The main applications of enzymes in different food sectors [6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18].
Abstract
Fungal enzymes that catalyze different types of biochemical reactions play a significant role in modern industry by improving existing processes. Also, the use of enzymes to replace some traditional toxic chemical or mechanical approaches helps decrease energy demand and environmental pollution. However, enzymes must be able to compete commercially with relatively low-priced traditional approaches. Meeting economical and commercial feasibility criteria depends on a number of enzymatic properties including the specificity to the substrate, stability in industrial enzymatic reaction conditions and catalytic efficiency. Fungi used as an enzyme manufacture host should be appropriate for industrial scale fermentation. Aspergillus species are being developed as one of the best enzyme manufacture factories due to their capability to secrete high quantities of enzymes suitable for industrial applications. The industrial importance of Aspergillus species also includes the progress and commercialization of new products derived from genetically engineered modified strains. Hence, the main aim of this chapter investigation is to analyze the secreted and cellular proteins from Aspergillus species and their application in industries.
Keywords
- filamentous fungi
- Aspergillus species
- fermentation
- enzymes
- intra- and extracellular secretion
1. Introduction
With the exponential increase in science and knowledge about biochemical processes; it would be fair to say that it is inconceivable to consider any biological process without an enzyme. They are biocatalysts that enhance the rate of reaction in numerous folds. Enzymes usually are reusable. In other words, they are not used up by the reaction and can be reused. Once an enzyme binds to a substrate and catalyzes the reaction, the enzyme is released, unchanged, and can be used for another reaction. This means that for each reaction, it is not necessary to have a ratio of 1:1 between enzymatic molecules and substrate molecules. Enzymes mostly are proteinaceous-based in nature (there are a few RNA-based enzymes) and necessary for all living organisms [1]. A significant number of them have been recognized as safe from a biotechnological perspective. Fungi, as one of the simplest organisms, are often used to produce enzymes. In addition, factors such as low energy, low cost, non-toxic and environmentally friendly nature make them popular in many industrial processes [2]. Also, the need for gentle temperature and pressure for enzymes to function enables them to become a viable alternative to hazardous chemical catalysts [3]. Enzymes are commonly used to make wine, beer, bread, cheese, vinegar, and leather and textiles. However, the pure and clean form of enzymes has found wide applications in industry only a few decades ago [4]. Enzymes produced by the fungal system are commonly used in various sectors including food, chemicals, medicine, agriculture and energy [5]. Today, due to multiple applications, the demand for different kind of enzymes in various food sectors has increased greatly [6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18], as shown in Table 1. Additionally, the manipulation of strains through recombinant DNA techniques and protein engineering technology has made it possible to meet the growing demand for enzymes [19]. Fungi are metabolically dynamic, simple to ferment and can work on an industrial scale, require simple nutrients and can be used throughout the year and are not subject to seasonal conditions [20]. The genus
Enzymes | Food sectors | Applications |
---|---|---|
Amylases | Brewing industry | Fermentation of alcohol by converting starch to sugars |
Baking industry | Breakdown of starch into simple sugars; thereby allowing the bread to rise and impart flavor | |
Dough conditioning | ||
Generates additional sugar in the bread, which improves the taste, crust color and toasting quality | ||
Anti-staling effect during bread making; improves the softness and shelf-life | ||
Cellulases | Fruit industry | Fruit and vegetable juice clarification |
Reducing the viscosity of nectars | ||
Alteration of fruit sensory properties | ||
Beverages industry | Concentrating purees | |
Health food industry | Carotenoids extraction | |
Edible oil extraction industry | Olive oil extraction | |
Baking industry | Improvement quality of bakery products | |
Chitosanases | Seafood industry | The degradation of crustacean chitinous waste |
Agriculture industry | Biological activities such as antifungal effect | |
Galactosidases | Dairy industry | Production of low lactose/milk free lactose |
Production of prebiotics | ||
Prevents crystallization of lactose Improves the scoop ability and creaminess of the product | ||
Production of ice creams, sweetened flavor and condensed milks | ||
Improves the scoop ability and creaminess of the product | ||
Invertases | Food sweetener market | Invert sugar production |
Confectionery food industry | Production of high fructose syrup | |
Manufacturing of soft-centered candies | ||
Manufacture of artificial honey | ||
Laccase | Wine industry | Removal of polyphenol, thereby providing stability to wines |
Preparation of cork stoppers of wine bottles | ||
Reduces cork taint generally imparted to aged wine bottles | ||
Brewing industry | Removal of oxygen at the end of beer fermentation process | |
Prevent the formation of off-flavors (trans 2-nonenal) | ||
Fruit industry | Juice clarification | |
Baking industry | Increase strength, stability and reduce stickiness | |
Increase volume, improved crumb structure and softness of the product | ||
Lipases | Fats and oils food industry | Production of mayonnaise and other emulsifiers, Triglycerides synthesis and trans-esterification of triglycerides in non-aqueous media; specially fat production |
Dairy industry | Development of flavoring agent in milk, cheese, and butter | |
Hydrolysis of milk, fat, cheese ripening, and modification of butter fats | ||
Meat industry | Degumming during the refining of vegetable oil | |
Flavor development, meat and fish product fat removal | ||
Baking industry | Flavor development, shelf-life prolongation | |
Naringinases | Fruit industry | Debittering of citrus fruit juices |
Wine industry | Enhances the aroma in the wine | |
Production of pruning, a flavonoid | ||
Pectinases | Fruit industry | Clarification of the fruit juices |
Enhanced levels of fruit juice volume when fruit pulps treated with pectinase | ||
Soften the peel of citrus fruits | ||
Enhances the citrus oil extraction such as lemon oil | ||
Beverages industry | Accelerates tea fermentation | |
Reduces foam forming property in instant tea powders | ||
Remove mucilaginous coat from coffee beans | ||
Wine industry | Imparts stability of red wine | |
Phytases | Baking industry | Reduction of phytate content in dough & fresh breads |
Shortening of formulation time without any change in pH | ||
Increase in bread volume and an improvement in crumb texture | ||
Softer bread crumbs were obtained | ||
Other texture parameters like gumminess and chewiness were also decreased | ||
Proteases | Dairy industry | Prevent coagulation of casein during cheese production |
Flavor development | ||
Meat industry | Meat tenderization | |
Baking industry | Assures dough uniformity | |
Improve dough consistency | ||
Gluten development | ||
Improve texture and flavor | ||
Reduce mixing time | ||
Tannase | Brewing industry | Removal of polyphenolic compounds |
Beverages industry | Manufacture of instant tea |
2. History and background
The use of various
3. Enzymes production process
A general overview of the enzyme production process has been shown in Figure 1. Fermentation has two parts, upstream processes (UsP) and downstream processes (DsP). The UsP for the enzyme manufacture include the selection of
3.1 Fermentation
Both submerged (SmF) and solid-state (SSF) fermentation are used for making different enzymes by fungi [35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99]. Due to easy measurement and of control fermentation parameters, reduction fermentation time and basic ways for harvesting and refining enzymatic products, more attention has been paid to SmF [62, 63, 64, 65]. In recent time, intensive investigate on SSF has been conducted and has gained reliability due to low water consumption, low energy necessities, less contamination and high manufacture yields [35, 52]. However,
Enzymes | Substrate | Type of fermentation | Fermentation conditions | Yield of enzymes | Reference | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pH | T (°C) | D | M (%) | ||||||
Amylase | Wheat bran | SSF | 4.5–9.0 | 22–40 | 4 | 43–81 | 74 U/mgds | [34] | |
SmF | — | 58.06 U/ml | |||||||
Pearl millet | SSF | 7.0 | 30 | 4 | 70 | 19.19 U/gds | [35] | ||
Maltose | SmF | 6.0 | 30 | 8–10 | — | 60–130 U/mgds | [36] | ||
Starch or maltose | SmF | 4.0–10.0 | 25–42 | 6 | — | ND | [37] | ||
Wheat bran | SSF | 6.0 | 28–30 | 7 | 50 | 14,249 U/gds | [38] | ||
Groundnut oil cake, coconut oil cake, sesame oil cake | SSF | 4.5 | 32.5 | 4–5 | 64 | 9868.12 U/gds | [39] | ||
Mandarin ( | SmF | 4.0–5.5 | 28–40 | 4–5 | — | 26.90 U/ml | [40] | ||
Rice flour | SmF | 6.5 | 30 | 2 | — | 0.18 U/ml | [41] | ||
0.08 U/ml | |||||||||
Wheat bran | SSF | 5.5 | 35 | 4 | 85 | 4528.4 ± 121 U/gds | [42] | ||
Ground millet, starch or carboxymethylcellulose | SmF | 5.6 | 28 | 4 | — | ND | [43] | ||
Cassava root fiber | SSF | 3.62 | ND | 2 | ND | 1.327 U/ml | [44] | ||
Cellulases | Agricultural and kitchen waste residues | SSF | 3.0–8.0 | 20–50 | 4 | 57–67 | 17–310 U/gds | [45] | |
Wheat straw | SmF | 5.0 | 30 | 5 | — | 3.2 U/ml | [46] | ||
Rice straw and wheat Bran | SSF | 5.0–6.0 | 40 | 4 | 75 | 0.68–42.7 U/gds | [47] | ||
Lantana leaves | SmF | 5.0 | 25 | 7 | — | 213.3 U/ ml | [48] | ||
Wheat bran, rice bran, rice husk, coir waste and saw dust | SSF | 6.0 | 30 | 4 | 50 | 29.11 U/gds | [49] | ||
SmF | 2.04 U/ml | ||||||||
Corn steep liquor | SSF | 7.0 | 30 | 5 | 70 | 3. 4 U/gds | [50] | ||
Chitosanases | Wheat bran | SSF | 6.6 | 28 | 5 | 65 | 41.33 U/gds | [51] | |
Yeast glucose | SmF | 4.0 | 30 | 1 | — | 85.816 U/ml | [52] | ||
Vogel’s medium | SmF | 6.0 | 37 | 1 | — | 8.80 U/mg | [53] | ||
Yeast-peptone glucose | SmF | 5.0 | 30 | 4 | — | 352 mg/l | [54] | ||
Galactosidases | Rice straw and wheat straw | SSF | 7.0 | 30 | 6 | 70 | 4681 U/mg | [55] | |
Red gram and waste-wheat bran | SSF | 5.5 | 35 | 6 | 50 | ND | [56] | ||
Lactose and wheat bran | SmF | 4.8 | 30 | 7 | — | ND | [57] | ||
Wheat bran and rice husk | SSF | 5.0 | 30 | 7 | 90 | 146.6–386.6 U/ml | [58] | ||
Invertases | Wheat bran | SSF | 4–6 | 30–40 | 3 | 70 | 117.4 U/gds | [59] | |
SmF | — | 19.1 U/ml | |||||||
Orange fruit peel | SSF | 5.0 | 30 | 4 | 80 | 43 U/ml | [60] | ||
Rye flour | SmF | 6.0 | 30 | 3 | — | 30–33.6 U/ml | [61] | ||
Laccase | Starch and yeast extract | SmF | 7.0 | 35 | 14 | — | 17.39 U/ml | [62] | |
Banana peel and peptone excelled | SmF | 5.2 | 31 | 7 | — | 15.1 and 2.60 g/l | [63] | ||
Glucose and straw | SmF | 5–7 | 28 | 2 | — | 0.052 and 0.0677 U/ml | [64] | ||
Lipases | Wheat bran + synthetic oil based | SSF | 5.5 | 30 | 6 | 40 | 630 U/gds | [65] | |
Sheanut cake | SSF | 7.0 | 30 | 7 | 60 | 49.37 U/gds | [66] | ||
Sorghum, wheat bran | SmF | 5.5 | 30 | 3 | — | 5.66 U/ml | [67] | ||
Bran-wood flour-olive oil, bran-soy bean | SSF | 5.0 | 28 | 3–4 | 50 | 37.4 U/gds | [68] | ||
Rice husk, cottonseed cake and red gram husk | SSF | 6.0 | 40 | 1 | 75 | 28.19 U/gds | [69] | ||
Naringinases | Citrus wastes | SmF | 3–5 | 26–30 | 6–8 | — | 426.4–545.2 U/gds | [70] | |
Orange and grapefruit rind | SSF | 5.4 | 35 | 8 | ND | 2.58 U/ml | [71] | ||
Yeast extract, naringin | SmF | 6.0 | 28 | 7 | — | 1.16 U/ml | [72] | ||
Orange peel | SmF | 5.0 | 45 | 4 | — | 2194.62 U/mgds | [73] | ||
Rice bran, wheat bran, sugar cane bagasse, citrus peel, and press mud | SSF | 4.0 | 27 | 4 | 50 | 58.1 U/gds | [74] | ||
Cassava waste | SSF | 5.0 | 27 | 5 | ND | 889.91 U/mg | [75] | ||
Mildew pomelo peel | SSF | 4.0 | 30 | 5 | ND | 808.85 U/mg | [76] | ||
Soybeans | SmF | 4.5 | 28 | 6 | — | 1.5 U/mgds | [77] | ||
Pectinases | Wheat bran | SSF | 4.0 | 30 | 3 | 63 | 68 U/gds | [78] | |
Orange peels and pulps | SmF | 5.0–5.5 | 30–55 | 5 | — | 40 U/ml | [79] | ||
Lemon peel | SmF | 4.2 | 37 | 6 | — | ND | [80] | ||
Wheat bran, banana peel, sugarcane bagasse, lemon peel, coffee pulp and orange peel | SSF | 6.0 | 30 | 4 | 70 | 101.05 U/ml | [81] | ||
Agroindustrial residues and polysaccharides | SmF | 3.5–9.0 | 37 | 5 | — | 1.35–7.89 U/ml | [82] | ||
Polygalacturonic acid, citrus pectins | SmF | 4.0–5.5 | 30 | ND | — | 805 and 839 U/mg | [83] | ||
Phytases | Wheat bran, rice bran, and groundnut cake | SSF | 2.0–7.5 | 30 | 8 | 10–80 | 60.6 U/gds | [84] | |
SmF | 10 | — | 9.6 U/mL | ||||||
SSF | 8 | 10–80 | 38 U/gds | ||||||
SmF | 10 | — | 8.2 U/mL | ||||||
Chickpea flour | SmF | 7.0 | 35 | 4 | — | 164 U/mL | [85] | ||
Potato waste | SSF | 6.1 | 27 | 6 | 79 | 12.93 U/gds | [86] | ||
Rice bran | SmF | 4.5 | 30 | 4 | — | ND | [87] | ||
Proteases | Wheat bran | SSF | 8.0 | 40 | 8 | 3.3 | 30.21 U/mg | [88] | |
Wheat bran | SSF | 5–5.5 | 23 | 3 | 50 | 3961.30 U/gds | [89] | ||
Vogel medium with glucose | SmF | 9.5 | 37 | 10 | — | 38 U/ml | [90] | ||
Wheat bran | SSF | 7.5–9.5 | 32 | 2 | 63 | 6.8 U/ml | [91] | ||
Tannase | Tannic acid, gallic acid and methyl gallate | SmF | 5.0 | 30 | 2 | — | 20.6 U/ml | [92] | |
Jamun ( | SSF | 5.5 | 30 | 4 | 50 | 69 U/gds | [93] | ||
Cashew testa | SSF | 3.0–8.0 | 32–35 | 3–5 | 60 | 97.32–301.7 U/gds | [94] | ||
Rosewood ( | SSF | 5.5 | 30 | 4 | 70 | 1.84 U/gds | [95] | ||
Khanna medium | SmF | 5.0 | 40 | 3 | — | 0.92 U/mgds | [96] | ||
Achachairu seed powder | SSF | 5.5 | 40 | 2 | 60 | 452.55 U/ml | [97] | ||
Wheat bran, rice bran, saw dust, rice straw dust, sugarcane pith | SSF | 5.0 | 30 | 3 | 80 | 1.32–3.95 U/gds | [98] |
3.2 Use of low-cost/economical substrates for enzyme cost-effective/commercial production
A large amount of agro-industrial waste like wheat straw, rice straw, rice husk, bagasse, potato waste, industrial effluents, citrus wastes, sludge, etc., are produced annually. They are rich sources of sugars, mineral elements, vitamins, fiber and different phenolic compounds, etc. Consequently, they can be used for the manufacture of commercially important products like enzyme, due to their nutritional potential (Table 2). Enzymes like amylases, celluloses, chitosanases, galactosidases, invertases, laccase, lipases, naringinases, pectinases, phytases, proteases, tannase, etc., have industrial significance and are broadly used in different industries such as pulp and paper, textile, wine and brewery, food processing, laundry and detergent, agricultural industries and bio-ethanol production [6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18]. The cost of these enzymes is a big subject faced by these industries, and efforts are going on to decrease the cost through strain improvement, better fermentation and recovery system and utilization of easily available low-cost substrates [60]. These agro-industrial wastes have exposed potential for the production of various kinds of enzymes using
3.3 Recovery purification and formulation
Enzymes are recovered from fermentation through chemical engineering operations that are broadly used to produce enzymes [101]. When the enzyme is intracellular, the cells must be broken down to release the enzyme. This can be done using mechanical methods (such as high-pressure press, grinding, or ultrasound) or non-mechanical methods (such as drying or lysis). In the case of extracellular enzymes, an early stage of isolation (centrifugation, filtration or both) is often used to eliminate residue of the cells [101]. Then the dissolved enzyme is concentrated by eliminating the water (cross-flow filtration or evaporation), resulting in an enzyme concentrate. Alternatively, a whole enzyme preparation containing inactivated cells or cell debris may be suitable where the resulting food undergoes further refinement, for example in potable alcohol production. In all cases, the prepared enzyme is free of viable fungi [101]. The concentrate is then formulated using the correct ingredients to stabilize and standardize the enzyme [101]. The raw materials used for recovery and formulation require to be of suitable purity for the future use and require to be used according to good manufacturing Practices, i.e., in the minimal quantities required to achieve the desired effect [101]. The utilize of potential allergens in the process of producing food enzymes must be addressed and, if necessary, included in the enzyme preparation. At the end of the manufacturing procedure, the last formulated enzyme generate is introduced in the market after testing to verify agreement with qualifications for contaminants (microbial and chemical) established for enzyme preparations by the Food Chemicals Codex and FAO/WHO’s JECFA. In other words, enzymes come in three diverse forms. Firstly, there is the enzymatic protein itself, which is a pure substance that is used in labs [102]. Secondly, enzymatic concentrates are products produced following fermentation or extraction [102]. They contain the enzyme produced in much smaller amounts from other substances obtained during the fermentation process, like other (secondary) enzymes or the remainder of the fermentation [102]. These enzymatic concentrates are evaluated for safety prior to being approved for marketing. Finally, there are enzymatic preparations, which are formulations containing one or more enzymatic concentrates with added stabilizers, preservatives, and diluents to stabilize enzymes and maintain activity. These formulas are sold commercially. In general, a proven quality feature of enzymes produced by microorganisms is the lack of viable cells. In addition, other specific features of microbial enzymes include their ability and significant activity under abnormal conditions, mostly temperature and pH. For example, some microbial enzymes are produced in thermophilous, acidophilic or alkalophilic forms.
4. Recombinant DNA (rDNA) technology
In industries, the rDNA technique will contribute to the manufacture of chemicals of commercial importance, to the advancement of existing fermentation processes and protein/enzyme production from waste materials. For this purpose, more effective strains of microorganisms can be developed. Thus, the technology of rDNA has many useful applications in crop betterment, medication and industry.
The rDNA in microorganisms occurs through three different parasexual processes namely conjugation, transduction, and transformation [103]. Internal genetic rearrangements can also occur via translocatable DNA segments (insertion sequences or transposons) [103]. Conjugation implies DNA transfer through cell-to-cell contact. Transduction occurs from the host cell to the recipient cell through bacteriophaging mediation. Transformation involves the absorption and expression of bare DNA by the appropriate cells. Competence occurs naturally but can also be induced by changes in the physical and chemical environment. In the laboratory, it can be induced by cold calcium chloride treatment, protoplasting, electroporation and heat shock [103]. After 1980, there was a heightened interest in the application of genetic recombination to the production of important microbial products such as antibiotics. The use of rDNA technology has made it possible to produce new enzymes appropriate for specific food-processing conditions [104]. Various substantial enzymes (lipases, pectinases, cellulases, amylases, etc.) are useable for the specific manufactures because of their exclusive roles and utilization in food and feed industries. Manufacture of microbial strains is another vast accomplishment that became feasible with the assist of rDNA technology. Various microbial strains have been expanded to manufacture superior enzymes by particular engineering. Specific strains of fungi have been modified in order that their capability of manufacturing toxic and hazardous materials could be decreased. Wide ranges of recombinant proteins/enzymes have been expressed in different species of fungi to be used as enzymes in industries [105].
Several
5. Enzymes production by Aspergillus species and their application
5.1 Amylases
The
5.2 Cellulases
Cellulases are groups of enzymes that are secreted using a wide range of
5.3 Chitosanases
Chitosanases can degrade chitin and it can generate using various
5.4 Galactosidases
Galactosidases can be generated by various
5.5 Invertase
Invertases are generated using plants, bees, and microorganisms [10], but the filamentous fungi belonging to the
5.6 Laccases
Fungi such as
5.7 Lipases
Lipases are one of the most important biocatalysts that perform different reactions in aqueous and non-aqueous media [11]. These enzymes usually catalyze the hydrolysis of long-chain triglycerides. They can operate on a diversity of substrates counting natural oils, artificial triglycerides, and esters of fatty acids. They are manufactured using animals, plants, and microorganisms. Presently, fungal lipases are achieving much consciousness with the rapid development of enzyme technology. Fungi-produced lipases have played an interesting role in industrial biotechnology because many of them are stable in a wide range of pH, high temperatures, and organic solvents. They are signifying one of the most important groups of biocatalysts for industrial applications.
5.8 Naringinases
Various microbial sources of naringinases have been reported worldwide by various investigators [12]. Production of naringinases has been very well studied in fungal sources. Among fungi,
5.9 Pectinases
Pectinases have the most important role in fruit and veggie juice marketing by breaking the pectin (polysaccharide) structure present in the cell wall of plants. They are mainly manufactured using microorganisms and plants. Among microorganisms, fungi (especially
5.10 Phytases
Phytases have a role in food and feed industry. They are synthesized using fungi, mainly from
5.11 Proteases
Proteases are produce in all organisms, such as plants, animals, and microbes [15]. The peptide bond present in the polypeptide chain is hydrolyzed by proteases. They are degradative enzymes and demonstrate specificity and selectivity in protein modification. They are one of the most important industrial enzymes and their international market is significantly growing annually. Of the 60% of enzymes marketed worldwide, proteases account for 20%. Proteases have been successfully produced by researchers from various microbial sources [15]. Reports suggest that two-thirds of the world’s commercial proteases are produced by microorganisms because of their greater yield, reduction in time consumption, reduction in space requirement, lofty genetic manipulation, and cost-effectiveness, which have made them suitable for biotechnological application in the market. Among microbes,
5.12 Tannase
Tannases are a group of enzymes that are employed in multitudinous industries such as food, brewing, and pharmaceutical [18]. They have an expansive range of scattering and are generated form animals, plants, and microbial sources. However, manufactured tannins of microbial origin are favored over other sources for industrial utilization. Fungi such as
6. Future perspectives and conclusions
At present, enzymes have become an important part of various industries [1]. The total enzymes market size in the worldwide is anticipated to reach over $13–14 billion by 2027. However, the manufacture of different enzymes has always been a challenge. They are produced from plants, animals and microorganisms [4]. Microbial enzyme production is generally accepted and occupies approximately 85–90% of the global enzyme market. In microbial enzyme manufacture, the localization of enzyme is a major aspect to be considered. If an enzyme is extracellular, the cost of downstream processing is reduced [100]. However, when it comes to intracellular enzymes, it becomes an expensive process to purify such enzymes. The degree of purification also varies according to the use of enzymes. Among microorganisms, fungi are especially used for the manufacture of various enzymes in a wide range [5]. Out of about 260 commercial enzymes, 60% are sourced from about 25 fungal genera [115]. Fungi can produce a number of industrial enzymes that are used in variety different industrial processes. Owing to their ability to use low-value substrates, their ability to handle and their ability to produce high enzymatic titres, fungi are the subject of extensive studies for industrial enzymes. Enzymes of fungal origin (especially from
Acknowledgments
Research reported in this publication was supported by Elite Researcher Grant Committee under award numbers [958634 and 963646] from the National Institute for Medical Research Development (NIMAD), Tehran, Iran to MRA.
References
- 1.
Patel AK, Singhania RR, Pandey A. Production, purification, and application of microbial enzymes. In: Brahmachari G, editor. Biotechnology of Microbial Enzymes. San Diego, CA: Elsevier; 2017. pp. 13-41. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-803725-6.00002-9 - 2.
Meyer V, Basenko EY, Benz JP, Braus GH, Caddick MX, Csukai M, et al. Growing a circular economy with fungal biotechnology: A white paper. Fungal Biology and Biotechnology. 2020; 7 :1-23. DOI: 10.1186/s40694-020-00095-z - 3.
Jun H, Kieselbach T, Jönsson LJ. Enzyme production by filamentous fungi: Analysis of the secretome of Trichoderma reesei grown on unconventional carbon source. Microbial Cell Factories. 2011;10 :68. DOI: 10.1186/1475-2859-10-68 - 4.
Singh R, Kumar M, Mittal A, Mehta PK. Microbial enzymes: Industrial progress in 21st century. 3 Biotech. 2016; 6 :174. DOI: 10.1007/s13205-016-0485-8 - 5.
Robinson PK. Enzymes: Principles and biotechnological applications. Essays in Biochemistry. 2015; 59 :1-41. DOI: 10.1042/bse0590001 - 6.
de Souza PM, de Oliveira Magalhães P. Application of microbial α-amylase in industry—A review. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. 2010; 41 (4):850-861. DOI: 10.1590/S1517-83822010000400004 - 7.
Jayasekara S, Ratnayake R. Microbial cellulases: An overview and applications. In: Pascual AR, Martín MEE, editors. Cellulose. London, England: IntechOpen; 2019. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.84531 - 8.
Muzaddadi AU, Devatkal S, Oberoi HS. Seafood enzymes and their application in food processing. In: Dhillon GS, Kaur S, editors. Agro-Industrial Wastes as Feedstock for Enzyme Production. San Diego, CA: Elsevier; 2016. pp. 201-232. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-802392-1.00009-5 - 9.
Xavier JR, Ramana KV, Sharma RK. β-Galactosidase: Biotechnological applications in food processing. Journal of Food Biochemistry. 2018; 42 :e12564. DOI: 10.1111/jfbc.12564 - 10.
Veana F, Flores-Gallegos AC, Gonzalez-Montemayor AM, Michel-Michel M, Lopez-Lopez L, Aguilar-Zarate P, et al. Invertase: An enzyme with importance in confectionery food industry. In: Kuddus M, editor. Enzymes in Food Technology. Singapore: Springer Singapore; 2018. pp. 187-212. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-1933-4_10 - 11.
Mehta A, Guleria S, Sharma R, Gupta R. The lipases and their applications with emphasis on food industry. In: Ray RC, editor. Microbial Biotechnology in Food and Health. San Diego, CA: Elsevier; 2021. pp. 143-164. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-819813-1.00006-2 - 12.
Yadav M. Naringinase: Microbial sources, production and applications in food processing industry. Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Food Sciences. 2018; 8 :717-720. DOI: 10.15414/jmbfs.2018.8.1.717-720 - 13.
Kubra KT, Ali S, Walait M, Sundus H. Potential applications of pectinases in food, agricultural and environmental sectors. Journal of Pharmaceutical, Chemical and Biological Sciences. 2018; 6 :23-34 - 14.
Dahiya S. Role of phytate and phytases in human nutrition. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition. 2016; 1 :39-42 - 15.
Razzaq A, Shamsi S, Ali A, Ali Q, Sajjad M, Malik A, et al. Microbial proteases applications. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2019; 7 :110. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00110 - 16.
Minussi RC, Pastore GM, Durán N. Potential applications of laccase in the food industry. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 2002; 13 :205-216. DOI: 10.1016/S0924-2244(02)00155-3 - 17.
Brijwani K, Rigdon A, Vadlani PV. Fungal laccases: Production, function, and applications in food processing. Enzyme Research. 2010; 2010 :149748. DOI: 10.4061/2010/149748 - 18.
Kumar SS, Sreekumar R, Sabu A. Tannase and its applications in food processing. In: Parameswaran B, Varjani S, Raveendran S, editors. Green Bio-Processes: Energy, Environment, and Sustainability. Singapore: Springer Singapore; 2019. pp. 357-381. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-3263-0_19 - 19.
Wang Q, Zhong C, Xiao H. Genetic engineering of filamentous fungi for efficient protein expression and secretion. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2020; 8 :293. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00293 - 20.
Hyde KD, Xu J, Rapior S, Jeewon R, Lumyong S, Niego AGT, et al. The amazing potential of fungi: 50 ways we can exploit fungi industrially. Fungal Diversity. 2019; 97 :1-136. DOI: 10.1007/s13225-019-00430-9 - 21.
Park HS, Jun SC, Han KH, Hong SB, Yu JH. Diversity, application, and synthetic biology of industrially important Aspergillus fungi. Advances in Applied Microbiology. 2017;100 :161-202. DOI: 10.1016/bs.aambs.2017.03.001 - 22.
El-Enshasy HA. Filamentous fungal cultures—Process characteristics, products, and applications. In: Yang ST, editor. Bioprocessing for Value-Added Products from Renewable Resources. B.V., The Netherlands: Elsevier; 2007. p. 225–261. Doi:10.1016/B978-044452114-9/50010-4 - 23.
Luis HSG, Patricia N d CS. Aspergillus biotechnology: An overview on the production of hydrolases and secondary metabolites. Current Biotechnology. 2017;6 :283-294. DOI: 10.2174/2211550105666160607071134 - 24.
Ward OP, Qin WM, Dhanjoon J, Ye J, Singh A. Physiology and biotechnology of Aspergillus . Advances in Applied Microbiology. 2005;58C :1-75. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2164(05)58001-8 - 25.
Max B, Salgado JM, Rodríguez N, Cortés S, Converti A, Domínguez JM. Biotechnological production of citric acid. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. 2010; 41 :862-875. DOI: 10.1590/S1517-83822010000400005 - 26.
Show PL, Oladele KO, Siew QY, Aziz Zakry FA, Lan JC-W, Ling TC. Overview of citric acid production from Aspergillus niger . Frontiers in Life Science. 2015;8 :271-283. DOI: 10.1080/21553769.2015.1033653 - 27.
Gomi K. Aspergillus: Aspergillus oryzae . In: Encyclopedia of Food Microbiology. 2nd ed. USA: Elsevier Academic Press; 2014. pp. 92-96. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-384730-0.00011-2 - 28.
Manzoni M, Rollini M. Biosynthesis and biotechnological production of statins by filamentous fungi and application of these cholesterol-lowering drugs. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2002; 58 :555-564. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-002-0932-9 - 29.
Kumar A. Aspergillus nidulans : A potential resource of the production of the native and heterologous enzymes for industrial applications. International Journal of Microbiology. 2020;2020 :8894215. DOI: 10.1155/2020/8894215 - 30.
Cairns TC, Nai C, Meyer V. How a fungus shapes biotechnology: 100 years of Aspergillus niger research. Fungal Biology and Biotechnology. 2018;5 :13. DOI: 10.1186/s40694-018-0054-5 - 31.
Arnau J, Yaver D, Hjort CM. Strategies and challenges for the development of industrial enzymes using fungal cell factories. In: Grand Challenges in Fungal Biotechnology. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020. pp. 179-210. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-29541-7_7 - 32.
Berenjian A, editor. Essentials in Fermentation Technology. 1st ed. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature; 2019. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-16230-6 - 33.
Tan CH, Show PL, Ooi CW, Ng EP, Lan JC, Ling TC. Novel lipase purification methods–a review of the latest developments. Biotechnology Journal. 2015; 10 :31-44 - 34.
Bhatia S. Introduction to Pharmaceutical Biotechnology. Volume 2: Enzymes, Proteins and Bioinformatics. London, England: Institute of Physics Publishing; 2018. pp. 2-42. DOI: 10.1088/978-0-7503-1302-5 - 35.
Varalakshmi KN, Kumudini BS, Nandini BN, Solomon J, Suhas R, Mahesh B, et al. Production and characterization of alpha-amylase from Aspergillus niger JGI 24 isolated in Bangalore. Polish Journal of Microbiology. 2009;58 :29-36 - 36.
Sethi BK, Jana A, Nanda PK, DasMohapatra PK, Sahoo SL, Patra JK. Production of α-amylase by Aspergillus terreus NCFT 4269.10 using pearl millet and its structural characterization. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2016;7 :639. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00639 - 37.
Goto CE, Barbosa EP, Kistner LCL, Moreira FG, Lenartovicz V, Peralta RM. Production of amylase by Aspergillus fumigatus utilizing α-methyl-D-glycoside, a synthetic analogue of maltose, as substrate. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 1998;167 (2):139-143. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1998.tb13219.x - 38.
Moreira FG, Lima FA de, Pedrinho SRF, Lenartovicz V, Souza CGM de, Peralta RM. Production of amylases by Aspergillus tamarii . Revista de Microbiologia 1999;30 :157–162. DOI:10.1590/S0001-37141999000200014 - 39.
Fattah Farid MA, Halim Shata HMA. Amylase production from Aspergillus oryzae LS1 by solid-state fermentation and its use for the hydrolysis of wheat flour. Iranian Journal of Biotechnology. 2011;9 :267-274 - 40.
Balakrishnan M, Jeevarathinam G, Kumar SKS, Muniraj I, Uthandi S. Optimization and scale-up of α-amylase production by Aspergillus oryzae using solid-state fermentation of edible oil cakes. BMC Biotechnology. 2021;21 :33. DOI: 10.1186/s12896-021-00686-7 - 41.
Ali EH, El-Nagdy MA, Al-Garni SM, Ahmed MS, Rawaa AM. Enhancement of alpha amylase production by Aspergillus flavus AUMC 11685 on mandarin (Citrus reticulata) peel using submerged fermentation. European Journal of Biological Research. 2017;7 :154-164. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.818271 - 42.
Pestana F, Castillo FJ. Glucoamylase production by Aspergillus awamori on rice flour medium and partial characterization of the enzyme. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 1985;1 :225-237. DOI: 10.1007/BF01742317 - 43.
Negi S, Banerjee R. Optimization of culture parameters to enhance production of amylase and protease from Aspergillus awamori in a single fermentation. African Journal of Biochemistry Research. 2010;4 :73-80. DOI: 10.5897/AJBR.9000178 - 44.
Shambe T, Ejembi O. Production of amylase and cellulase: Degradation of starch and carboxymethylcellulose by extracellular enzymes from four fungal species. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 1987; 9 :308-312. DOI: 10.1016/0141-0229(87)90010-X - 45.
Adegoke SA, Odibo FJC. Production, purification and characterization of α-amylase of Aspergillus sydowii IMI 502692. Plant Cell Biotechnology and Molecular Biology. 2019;20 :1050-1058 - 46.
Bansal N, Tewari R, Soni R, Soni SK. Production of cellulases from Aspergillus niger NS-2 in solid state fermentation on agricultural and kitchen waste residues. Waste Management. 2012;32 :1341-1346. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.03.006 - 47.
Singh A, Singh N, Bishnoi NR. Production of cellulases by Aspergillus heteromorphus from wheat straw under submerged fermentation. International Journal of Civil Engineering. 2009;1 :23-26 - 48.
Sherief AA, El-Tanash AB, Atia N. Cellulase production by Aspergillus fumigatus grown on mixed substrate of rice straw and wheat bran. Research Journal of Microbiology. 2010;5 :199-211. DOI: 10.3923/jm.2010.199.211 - 49.
Padmavathi T, Nandy V, Agarwal P. Optimization of the medium for the production of cellulases by Aspergillus terreus andMucor plumbeus . European Journal of Experimental Biology. 2012;2 :1161-1170 - 50.
Mrudula S, Murugammal R. Production of cellulase by Aspergillus niger under submerged and solid state fermentation using coir waste as a substrate. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. 2011;42 :1119-1127. DOI: 10.1590/S1517-838220110003000033 - 51.
Lee CK, Darah I, Ibrahim CO. Production and optimization of cellulase enzyme using Aspergillus niger USM AI 1 and comparison withTrichoderma reesei via solid state fermentation system. Biotechnology Research International. 2011;2011 :658493. DOI: 10.4061/2011/658493 - 52.
Xu X, Song Z, Yin Y, Zhong F, Song J, Huang J, et al. Solid-state fermentation production of chitosanase by Streptomyces with waste mycelia ofAspergillus niger . Advances in Enzyme Research. 2021;9 :10-18. DOI: 10.4236/aer.2021.91002 - 53.
Zhang H, Sang Q, Zhang W. Statistical optimization of chitosanase production by Aspergillus sp. QD-2 in submerged fermentation. Annales de Microbiologie. 2012;62 :193-201. DOI: 10.1007/s13213-011-0246-1 - 54.
Hirano K, Arayaveerasid S, Seki K, Adams DJ, Mitsutomi M. Characterization of a chitosanase from Aspergillus fumigatus ATCC13073. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry. 2012;76 :1523-1528. DOI: 10.1271/bbb.120248 - 55.
Jebur HA, Abdulateef AA, Thbit ZA. Chitosan production from Aspergillus oryzae SU-B2 by submerged fermentation and studying some of its physiochemical and antibacterial characteristics. Jordan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2019;11 :609-613 - 56.
Kazemi S, Khayati G, Faezi-Ghasemi M. Β-galactosidase production by Aspergillus niger ATCC 9142 using inexpensive substrates in solid-state fermentation: Optimization by orthogonal arrays design. Iranian Biomedical Journal. 2016;20 :287-294. DOI: 10.22045/ibj.2016.06 - 57.
Kapnoor S, Mulimani VH. Production of α-galactosidase by Aspergillus oryzae through solid-state fermentation and its application in soymilk Galactooligosaccharide hydrolysis. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology. 2010;53 :211-218. DOI: 10.1590/S1516-89132010000100026 - 58.
Bailey MJ, Linko M. Production of β-galactosidase by Aspergillus oryzae in submerged bioreactor cultivation. Journal of Biotechnology. 1990;16 :57-66. DOI: 10.1016/0168-1656(90)90065-J - 59.
Nizamuddin S, Sridevi A, Narasimha G. Production of β-galactosidase by Aspergillus oryzae in solid-state fermentation. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2008;7 :1096-10100. DOI: 10.5897/AJB07.325 - 60.
Alegre ACP, de Lourdes Teixeira de Moraes Polizeli M, Terenzi HF, Jorge JA, Guimarães LHS. Production of thermostable invertases by Aspergillus caespitosus under submerged or solid state fermentation using agroindustrial residues as carbon source. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. 2009;40 :612-622. DOI: 10.1590/S1517-838220090003000025 - 61.
Raju CHAI, Pulipati K, Jetti A. Production of invertase by Aspergillus niger under solid state fermentation using orange fruit peel as substrate. Advances in Crop Science and Technology. 2016;04 :1-4. DOI: 10.4172/2329-8863.1000247 - 62.
Alves JNO, Jorge JA, Guimarães LHS. Production of invertases by anamorphic ( Aspergillus nidulans ) and teleomorphic (emericela nidulans ) fungi under submerged fermentation using rye flour as carbon source. Advances in Microbiology. 2013;03 :421-429. DOI: 10.4236/aim.2013.35057 - 63.
Kumar R, Kaur J, Jain S, Kumar A. Optimization of laccase production from Aspergillus flavus by design of experiment technique: Partial purification and characterization. Journal, Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology. 2016;14 :125-131. DOI: 10.1016/j.jgeb.2016.05.006 - 64.
Abdallah YK, Estevez AT, Tantawy DEDM, Ibraheem AM, Khalil NM. Employing laccase-producing Aspergillus sydowii NYKA 510 as a cathodic biocatalyst in self-sufficient lighting microbial fuel cell. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2019;29 :1861-1872. DOI: 10.4014/jmb.1907.07031 - 65.
Fokina O, Fenchel A, Winandy L, Fischer R. Immobilization of LccC laccase from Aspergillus nidulans on hard surfaces via Fungal hydrophobins. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2016;82 (21):6395-3402. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01413-16 - 66.
Mahadik ND, Puntambekar US, Bastawde KB, Khire JM, Gokhale DV. Production of acidic lipase by Aspergillus niger in solid state fermentation. Process Biochemistry. 2002;38 :715-721. DOI: 10.1016/S0032-9592(02)00194-2 - 67.
Salihu A, Bala M, Alam MZ. Lipase production by Aspergillus niger using sheanut cake: An optimization study. Journal of Taibah University for Science. 2016;10 :850-859. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtusci.2015.02.011 - 68.
Ahmed A, Badar R, Khalique N. Screening and optimization of submerged fermentation of lipolytic Aspergillus oryzae . BioResources. 2019;14 :7664-7674. DOI: 10.15376/biores.14.4.7664-7674 - 69.
Kirsh D. Lipase Production by Penicillium oxalicum andAspergillus flavus . Botanical Gazette. 1935;97 :321-333. DOI: 10.1086/334555 - 70.
Nema A, Patnala SH, Mandari V, Kota S, Devarai SK. Production and optimization of lipase using Aspergillus niger MTCC 872 by solid-state fermentation. Bulletin of the National Research Centre. 2019;43 :1-8. DOI: 10.1186/s42269-019-0125-7 - 71.
Borkar V, Chakraborty S, Gokhale JS. Fermentative production of naringinase from Aspergillus niger van Tieghem MTCC 2425 using citrus wastes: Process optimization, partial purification, and characterization. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 2021;193 :1321-1337. DOI: 10.1007/s12010-020-03385-9 - 72.
Mendoza-Cal A, Cuevas-Glory L, Lizama-Uc G, Ortiz-Vázquez E. Naringinase production from filamentous fungi using grapefruit rind in solid state fermentation. African Journal of Microbiology Research. 2010; 4 :1964-1969 - 73.
Chen Y, Ni H, Chen F, Cai H, Li L, Su W. Purification and characterization of a naringinase from Aspergillus aculeatus JMUdb058. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2013;61 :931-938. DOI: 10.1021/jf303512q - 74.
Zhu Y, Jia H, Xi M, Li J, Yang L, Li X. Characterization of a naringinase from Aspergillus oryzae 11250 and its application in the debitterization of orange juice. Process Biochemistry. 2017;62 :114-121. DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2017.07.012 - 75.
Shanmugaprakash M, Vinoth Kumar V, Hemalatha M, Melbia V, Karthik P. Solid-state fermentation for the production of debittering enzyme naringinase using Aspergillus niger MTCC 1344. Engineering in Life Sciences. 2011;11 :322-325. DOI: 10.1002/elsc.201000128 - 76.
Shanmugaprakash M, Vinothkumar V, Ragupathy J, Reddy DA. Biochemical characterization of three phase partitioned naringinase from Aspergillus brasiliensis MTCC 1344. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2015;80 :418-423. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.06.057 - 77.
Xia X-K, Zhang Y-E, Lei S-J, Hu B, Fu C-X. Identification and iterative combinatorial mutagenesis of a new naringinase-producing strain, Aspergillus tubingensis MN589840. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 2021;72 :141-148. DOI: 10.1111/lam.13379 - 78.
Chang H-Y, Lee Y-B, Bae H-A, Huh J-Y, Nam S-H, Sohn H-S, et al. Purification and characterisation of Aspergillus sojae naringinase: The production of prunin exhibiting markedly enhanced solubility with in vitro inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase. Food Chemistry. 2011;124 :234-241. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.06.024 - 79.
Sandri I, Silveira M. Production and application of pectinases from Aspergillus niger obtained in solid state cultivation. Beverages. 2018;4 :48. DOI: 10.3390/beverages4030048 - 80.
El-Sheekh MM, Ismail A-MS, El-Abd MA, Hegazy EM, El-Diwany AI. Effective technological pectinases by Aspergillus carneus NRC1 utilizing the Egyptian orange juice industry scraps. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation. 2009;63 :12-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2008.06.002 - 81.
Wolf-Márquez VE, Martínez-Trujillo MA, Aguilar Osorio G, Patiño F, Álvarez MS, Rodríguez A, et al. Scaling-up and ionic liquid-based extraction of pectinases from Aspergillus flavipes cultures. Bioresource Technology. 2017;225 :326-335. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.11.067 - 82.
Shanmugavel M, Vasantharaj S, Yazhmozhi A, Bhavsar P, Aswin P, Felshia C, et al. A study on pectinases from Aspergillus tamarii : Toward greener approach for cotton bioscouring and phytopigments processing. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology. 2018;15 :295-303. DOI: 10.1016/j.bcab.2018.06.013 - 83.
Pradal-Velázquez M, Martínez-Trujillo MA, Aguilar-Osorio G. Xylanases and pectinases of Aspergillus flavus CECT-2687 on different carbon sources and initial ph values. Revista Mexicana de Ingenieria Quimica. 2018;17 :421-431. DOI: 10.24275/10.24275/uam/izt/dcbi/revmexingquim/2018v17n2/Pradal - 84.
Semenova MV. Isolation and properties of pectinases from the fungus Aspergillus japonicus . Biochemistry (Moscow). 2003;68 :559-569. DOI: 10.1023/A:1023959727067 - 85.
Shivanna GB, Venkateswaran G. Phytase production by Aspergillus niger CFR 335 andAspergillus ficuum SGA 01 through submerged and solid-state fermentation. Scientific World Journal. 2014;2014 :392615. DOI: 10.1155/2014/392615 - 86.
Shah PC, Kumar VR, Dastager SG, Khire JM. Phytase production by Aspergillus niger NCIM 563 for a novel application to degrade organophosphorus pesticides. AMB Express. 2017;7 :66. DOI: 10.1186/s13568-017-0370-9 - 87.
Tian M, Yuan Q. Optimization of phytase production from potato waste using Aspergillus ficuum . 3 Biotech. 2016;6 :256. DOI: 10.1007/s13205-016-0573-9 - 88.
Yamada K, Minoda Y, Yamamoto S. Phytase from Aspergillus terreus : Part I. Production, purification and some general properties of the enzyme. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry. 1968;32 :1275-1282. DOI: 10.1080/00021369.1968.10859223 - 89.
Ahmed ME. Extraction and purification of protease from Aspergillus niger isolation. Pharmacy & Pharmacology International Journal. 2018;6 :62-65. DOI: 10.15406/ppij.2018.06.00162 - 90.
de Castro RJS, Sato HH. Protease from Aspergillus oryzae : Biochemical characterization and application as a potential biocatalyst for production of protein hydrolysates with antioxidant activities. Journal of Food Processing. 2014;2014 :1-11. DOI: 10.1155/2014/372352 - 91.
Tremacoldi CR, Carmona EC. Production of extracellular alkaline proteases by Aspergillus clavatus . World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2005;21 :169-172. DOI: 10.1007/s11274-004-2724-0 - 92.
Malathi S, Chakraborty R. Production of alkaline protease by a new Aspergillus flavus isolate under solid-substrate fermentation conditions for use as a depilation agent. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1991;57 :712-716. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.57.3.712-716.1991 - 93.
Costa AM, Ribeiro WX, Kato E, Monteiro ARG, Peralta RM. Production of tannase by Aspergillus tamarii in submerged cultures. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology. 2008;51 :399-404. DOI: 10.1590/S1516-89132008000200021 - 94.
Kumar R, Sharma J, Singh R. Production of tannase from Aspergillus ruber under solid-state fermentation using jamun (Syzygium cumini ) leaves. Microbiological Research. 2007;162 :384-390. DOI: 10.1016/j.micres.2006.06.012 - 95.
Viswanath V, Leo VV, Prabha SS, Potty VP, Jisha MS. Optimized production of tannase from cashew testa using Aspergillus niger MTCC 5898. Food Biotechnology. 2016;30 :249-262. DOI: 10.1080/08905436.2016.1234392 - 96.
Beniwal V, Rajesh, Goel G, Kumar A, Chhokar V. Production of tannase through solid state fermentation using Indian rosewood ( Dalbergia sissoo ) sawdust—A timber industry waste. Annales de Microbiologie. 2013;63 :583-590. DOI: 10.1007/s13213-012-0508-6 - 97.
Gonçalves HB, Riul AJ, Quiapim AC, Jorge JA, Guimarães LHS. Characterization of a thermostable extracellular tannase produced under submerged fermentation by Aspergillus ochraceus . Electronic Journal of Biotechnology. 2012;15 :5. DOI: 10.2225/vol15-issue5-fulltext-5 - 98.
Liu TPSL, Brandão Costa RMP, de Vasconcelos Freitas DJ, Oliveira Nacimento C, de Souza Motta CM, Bezerra RP, et al. Tannase from Aspergillus melleus improves the antioxidant activity of green tea: Purification and biochemical characterisation. International Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2017;52 :652-661. DOI: 10.1111/ijfs.13318 - 99.
Banerjee D, Mondal K, Pati B. Tannase production by Aspergillus aculeatus DBF9 through solid-state fermentation. Acta Microbiologica et Immunologica Hungarica. 2007;54 :159-166. DOI: 10.1556/AMicr.54.2007.2.6 - 100.
Bajar S, Singh A, Bishnoi NR. Exploration of low-cost agro-industrial waste substrate for cellulase and xylanase production using Aspergillus heteromorphus . Applied Water Science. 2020;10 :153. DOI: 10.1007/s13201-020-01236-w - 101.
Sewalt V, Shanahan D, Gregg L, La Marta J, Carrillo R. The generally recognized as safe (GRAS) process for industrial microbial enzymes. Industrial Biotechnology. 2016; 12 :295-302. DOI: 10.1089/ind.2016.0011 - 102.
Deckers M, Deforce D, Fraiture MA, Roosens NH. Genetically modified micro-organisms for industrial food enzyme production: An overview. Food. 2020; 9 :326. DOI: 10.3390/foods9030326 - 103.
Adrio JL, Demain AL. Recombinant organisms for production of industrial products. Bioengineered Bugs. 2010; 1 :116-131 - 104.
Khan S, Ullah MW, Siddique R, Nabi G, Manan S, Yousaf M, et al. Role of recombinant DNA technology to improve life. International Journal of Genomics. 2016; 2016 :2405954. DOI: 10.1155/2016/2405954 - 105.
Archer DB. Enzyme production by recombinant Aspergillus . In: Yoshikatsu M, Tadayuki I, editors. Recombinant Microbes for Industrial and Agricultural Applications. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2020. pp. 373-393. DOI: 10.1201/9781003067191 - 106.
Meyer V, Punt PJ, Ram AFJ. Genetics, genetic manipulation, and approaches to strain improvement of filamentous fungi. In: Bull AT, Junker B, Katz L, Lynd LR, Masurekar P, Reeves CD, Zhao H, editors. Manual of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology. 3rd ed. USA: American Society of Microbiology; 2010. pp. 318-329. DOI: 10.1128/9781555816827.ch22 - 107.
Yu X-C, Ma S-L, Xu Y, Fu C-H, Jiang C-Y, Zhou C-Y. Construction and application of a novel genetically engineered Aspergillus oryzae for expressing proteases. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology. 2017;29 :32-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejbt.2017.07.004 - 108.
Prathumpai W, Flitter SJ, McIntyre M, Nielsen J. Lipase production by recombinant strains of Aspergillus niger expressing a lipase-encoding gene fromThermomyces lanuginosus . Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2004;65 :714-719. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-004-1699-y - 109.
Record E, Punt PJ, Chamkha M, Labat M, van Den Hondel CAMJJ, Asther M. Expression of the Pycnoporus cinnabarinus laccase gene in Aspergillus niger and characterization of the recombinant enzyme: P. cinnabarinuslaccase gene expression inA. niger . European Journal of Biochemistry. 2002;269 :602-609. DOI: 10.1046/j.0014-2956.2001.02690.x - 110.
Bohlin C, Jönsson LJ, Roth R, van Zyl WH. Heterologous expression of Trametes versicolor laccase inPichia pastoris andAspergillus niger . Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 2006;129-132 :195-214 - 111.
Dragosits M, Pflügl S, Kurz S, Razzazi-Fazeli E, Wilson IBH, Rendic D. Recombinant Aspergillus β-galactosidases as a robust glycomic and biotechnological tool. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2014;98 (8):3553-3567. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-013-5192-3 - 112.
Mojsov K. Microbial α-amylases and their industrial applications: A review. International Journal of Management in Education. 2012; 2 :583-609 - 113.
Lemnaru Popa G-M, Truşcă RD, Ilie C-I, Țiplea RE, Ficai D, Oprea O, et al. Antibacterial activity of bacterial cellulose loaded with bacitracin and amoxicillin: In vitro studies. Molecules. 2020; 25 :4069. DOI: 10.3390/molecules25184069 - 114.
Limón MC, Chacón MR, Mejías R, Delgado-Jarana J, Rincón AM, Codón AC, et al. Increased antifungal and chitinase specific activities of Trichoderma harzianum CECT 2413 by addition of a cellulose binding domain. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2004;64 :675-685. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-003-1538-6 - 115.
Kango N, Jana UK, Choukade R. Fungal enzymes: Sources and biotechnological applications. In: Satyanarayana T, Deshmukh S, Deshpande M, editors. Advancing Frontiers in Mycology & Mycotechnology. Singapore: Springer Singapore; 2019. pp. 515-538. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-9349-5_21