Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Carotenoids as Natural Colorful Additives for the Food Industry

Written By

Catarina Lourenço-Lopes, Anxo Carreira-Casais, Maria Fraga-Corral, Paula Garcia-Oliveira, Antón Soria, Amira Jarboui, Marta Barral, Paz Otero, Jesus Simal-Gandara and Miguel A. Prieto

Submitted: 29 March 2021 Reviewed: 13 October 2021 Published: 25 November 2021

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.101208

From the Edited Volume

Natural Food Additives

Edited by Miguel A. Prieto and Paz Otero

Chapter metrics overview

689 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

The application of natural colorants is increasing in the food industry because they are considered safer and healthier than some synthetic pigments. Natural colorants can improve the organoleptic properties of foodstuffs, provide additional benefits such as enhance their nutritional value and/or extend shelf-life. Plants, fungi, bacteria or algae naturally produce different natural colorants, including carotenoids. These compounds are classified into two main groups: pure hydrocarbon carotenes (α- and β-carotenes, lycopene) and oxygenated derivatives of xanthophylls (lutein, zeaxanthin, astaxanthin, fucoxanthin, cryptoxanthin, etc.). Carotenoids have been related with beneficial properties like antioxidant, antidiabetic, antitumor or antimicrobial, so they are a natural and healthy alternative to the use of synthetic colorants. Thus, it is critical to optimize their extraction, by utilizing novel and green techniques, and their stability through encapsulation processes. This chapter aims to review natural sources of carotenoids, strategies to efficiently extract and produce them and their potential application as food colorants.

Keywords

  • carotenoids
  • natural colorants
  • natural pigments
  • natural additives
  • antioxidant
  • green carotenoid extraction

1. Introduction

1.1 Carotenoids: natural pigments for coloring in food industry

Carotenoids are a class of natural pigments broadly distributed in nature and synthesized by plants, certain bacteria, fungi and algae. These molecules are classified in two main groups: carotenes, which are pure hydrocarbons (α−/β-carotenes and lycopene), and xanthophylls, which represent the oxygenated derivatives (lutein, zeaxanthin, astaxanthin, fucoxanthin and cryptoxanthin) [1]. These hydrocarbons are formed by eight five-carbon isoprenoid units with conjugated double bonds, responsible of multiple geometrical isomers (cis/trans), although carotenoids are mainly found in the most stable configuration, the all-trans one [2, 3]. These double bonds act as chromophores and are responsible for light absorption in the visual range of the spectrum [4], providing yellow, orange and red coloration [5]. Among the main biological properties described for carotenoids, they stand out for their antioxidant capacity and ability to quench singlet oxygen species [6]. Carotenoids have also been described to wield anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial and anti-hyperglycemic activities, to prevent cardiovascular and/or neurodegenerative diseases and to stimulate the immune system [7, 8]. These beneficial properties made them emerge as a promising alternative to synthetic additives, which have been related with negative side-effects. Besides, these pigments improve the nutritional value of foodstuff and can be used for food coloring. These reasons have boosted carotenoids’ market size, which is expected to reach $300 billion by 2024, due to the interest shown by food, animal feeding, pharmaceutical, nutraceutical and cosmetic industries [9].

1.2 Carotenes

1.2.1 Alpha and beta-carotene

Found primarily in microalgae species such as Dunaliella sp. or Arthrospira sp. and vegetables like carrots and pumpkins, β-carotene is an isomer form of α-carotene (Figure 1). The latter compound is also found in these vegetables and in cereals like corn and fruits like peaches and apples [10]. Since β-carotene bioconversion efficiencies surpass those of α-carotene, it is more abundantly distributed among the vegetal kingdom [11]. Carotenes have been approved as Group II food additives by the European Commission under the E160 number [12], being used as an orange-red pigment on non-alcoholic beverages, cheese, pastry and ice cream [13]. Moreover, both pigments are known for being vitamin A (retinal, retinol and retinoic acid) precursors [5]. Vitamin A intake has proven to prevent the development of ocular diseases associated with its deficiency [11, 14] and systemic affections involving an increase of the oxidative status as in immunological diseases or cancers [5]. Thus, their versatility and multiple benefits have made them emerge as high-valued food additives with large economic significance, catching the attention of food industry.

Figure 1.

Chemical structure of α-carotene and β-carotene.

1.2.2 Lycopene

Lycopene can be found in fruits and vegetables, especially in tomatoes (Figure 2), being the carotenoid with the highest antioxidant capacity. It has been seen that this pigment is involved in modulating many anti-inflammatory processes, and some authors have linked it with the prevention of bone diseases, such as osteoporosis [15]. Furthermore, lycopene also shown anticancer effects against several tumoral and normal cell lines, particularly prostate cancer cell lines (PrEC and PC-3), in in vitro and in vivo studies [16, 17]. For all these health benefits and for being easily obtainable, lycopene is widely used by the food industry as a colorant, being applied into many foodstuffs like cheese, sausages or dairy drinks, among many others [10]. However, the major drawback of lycopene is its bioavailability, which depends on several factors, including the food source, people’s metabolism and even the interaction with other food [18].

Figure 2.

Chemical structure of lycopene.

1.3 Xanthophylls

Xanthophylls comprise oxidized derivatives of carotenoids, being broadly available in nature. These pigments are characterized for having yellow, orange or red coloration. Some of the most common xanthophylls present in nature include lutein, zeaxanthin, astaxanthin, β-cryptoxanthin and fucoxanthin (Figure 3) [6]. These compounds are polar molecules and, unlike non-polar carotenes, they get accumulated, contributing to skin pigmentation [1]. Antioxidant, neuroprotective, antiplasmodial or anticancer are some of the biological activities that pointed xanthophylls as a promising nutraceutical. These beneficial bioactivities may have preventive effects in an extensive variety of diseases such as oral, allergic, neurologic, ophthalmologic and immune affections [6]. Moreover, beneficial properties may be transferred to food. Hence, these characteristics have prompted the incorporation of xanthophylls as natural additives to obtain products with a better appearance according to the consumers’ standards [1, 19].

Figure 3.

Chemical structure of a) lutein, b) zeaxanthin, c) astaxanthin, d) cryptoxanthin and e) fucoxanthin.

1.3.1 Lutein

Lutein is a dihydroxy derivative of β-carotene with hydroxyl groups at both sides of the molecule (Figure 3a), converting it in a dipolar xanthophyll. This chemical configuration confers hydrophilic characteristics and improves its capacity to scavenge free radicals [6, 20]. The most common chemical configuration of lutein is acylated with different fatty acids [1], such as lauric (C12:0) or palmitic acid (C16:0), becoming mono- and diacylated derivatives [21]. Leafy vegetables and plants, flower petals and yellow and orange fruits are the most important sources of lutein. Its extraction is mainly carried out with organic solvents from flower petals that have been previously fermented and/or dried [1].

1.3.2 Zeaxanthin

Zeaxanthin (Figure 3b) is a structural isomer of lutein with a darker yellow tone, closer to orange [20]. It is naturally found in leaves of green vegetables, flower petals, in some yellow and orange fruits, corn and even in microbial Flavobacterium sp. Also, it can be transferred into animal products such as egg yolks [6, 20, 22]. Zeaxanthin’s poor stability in presence of oxygen and light and its lipophilic nature limit its applications in food industry. Nanoencapsulation of the molecule seems to be a promising strategy to improve zeaxanthin stability in the final product [22]. Currently, in the food industry, zeaxanthin is used as colorant and feed additive in birds to color skin and egg’s yolk, and in swine and fish for skin pigmentation [20].

1.3.3 Astaxanthin

Astaxanthin (Figure 3c) is a lipophilic carotenoid with a reddish-orange color [23]. This pigment is found in high concentrations in microalgae like Haematococcus pluvialis, and Chlorella zofingiensis. Furthermore, it is also encountered in red yeast like Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous and some bacteria like Agrobacterium aurantiacum [24]. Ascending in the food chain, astaxanthin gets accumulated in crustaceans like krill, shrimps, lobsters or crabs, and fish flesh like in salmon [20, 25]. This xanthophyll is mainly used as a food additive in aquaculture for animal feeding, as well as in poultry, to provide the characteristic pigmentation [24]. However, astaxanthin presents several disadvantages such as undesirable sensory attributes, low solubility in water and is easily oxidated, problems that can be overcome by microencapsulation [26]. Moreover, this molecule exerts a powerful quenching of singlet oxygen activity and scavenging oxygen free radicals, translated into a high antioxidant activity. These qualities convert astaxanthin into a promising supplement with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties [24, 27].

1.3.4 Cryptoxanthin

β-cryptoxanthin is a naturally occurring pigment mainly found in tropical fruit like papaya, highlighting its accumulation in citrus fruit such as oranges and tangerines [28]. This xanthophyll is closely related to β-carotene since, aside from being a vitamin A precursor, their structures are very similar, varying by just the addition of a hydroxyl group in one of the β-ionone rings in β-cryptoxanthin’s structure (Figure 3d), resulting in a bipolar conformation. These conformation makes its bioaccumulation easier, facilitating food coloring as well as being more nutritionally valuable, contributing to vitamin A production [29]. Moreover, β-cryptoxanthin intake has been associated with a reduced risk of inflammatory diseases, like polyarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis, by suppressing bone resorption and stimulated bone formation [30].

1.3.5 Fucoxanthin

Fucoxanthin (Figure 3e) is mostly known for giving the characteristic brownish/olive-green color to brown algae (Phaeophyceae), as in species belonging to the genus Undaria, Sargassum and Laminaria, although some microalgae, mainly diatoms and Chrysophyta, can accumulate higher concentrations [31, 32]. This pigment has been related with antioxidant, anticancer, antihypertensive, anti-inflammatory, anti-diabetic, anti-obesity, neuroprotective, anti-angiogenic and photoprotective bioactivities [33], being considered as a non-toxic and safe bioactive ingredient for coloring and food supplementation purposes [34]. However, some limitations arise due to its low water-solubility, reduced bioavailability, and sensitivity to temperature, light and oxygen [35]. In addition, its synthesis is complex and expensive and extraction procedures from algae have not been standardized yet [36, 37]. Despite these drawbacks, some studies reported great fucoxanthin stability after encapsulation [38, 39].

Advertisement

2. Natural sources of carotenoids

Generally, natural sources of carotenoids are divided into: i) fruits, vegetables and flowers; ii) microorganisms (microalgae, cyanobacteria, fungi, bacterial and yeasts); and iii) by-products (peels, seeds and skin).

2.1 Fruits, vegetables and flowers

There is a wide variety of fruits and vegetables recognized as natural sources of carotenoids in human diet. Besides, flowers, recently introduced in gastronomy, appeared to be a suitable source of carotenoids (Table 1). In general terms, the most relevant carotenoid found among these groups is β-carotene, although lutein, β-cryptoxanthin, lycopene and zeaxanthin are also highlighted as major carotenoids. Reviewed literature showed very different ranges of carotenoid concentrations depending on the analyzed tissue, variety, ripening stage, geographical origin, etc. [46, 47]. Nevertheless, Table 1 points to fruit as the most relevant source of carotenoids.

SourceMain CarotenoidsCarotenoid Content (mg/g)Ref.
Fruits
ApricotPrunus armeniacaβ-car, β-crypt, Lut, Zea0.07–0.08 (DW)[40]
‘Gac’ oilMomordica cochinchinensisα−/β-Car, Lyc1.8–11 (FW)[41, 42]
GojiLycium barbarumβ-car, β-crypt, Zea0.04–0.51 (FW)[43]
KakiDiospyros kakiβ-car, β-crypt, Lut, Zea0.03–0.07 (DW)[40]
Banana and plantainMusa sp.α−/β-Car, Lut0.01–0.04 (DW)[44, 45]
Mandarin juiceCitrus reticulataζ−/ β-car, β-crypt0.01 (DW)[46]
MangoMangifera indicaα−/β-Car, β-crypt, Lut, Zea3–129 (FW)[47]
OrangeCitrus sinensisα−/ β−/ζ-car, β-crypt, Lut, Zea0.01–0.03
0.01–0.02 (DW)
[46, 48]
PapayaCarica papayaβ−/ζ-car, β-crypt, Lyc, Vio, Zea0.14–4.13 (FW)[49, 50]
PeachPrunus persicaβ-car, β-crypt, Lut, Zea0.04–0.09 (DW)[40]
Vegetables and cereals
BroccoliBrassica oleracea var. italiacaLut, Neo8.5–11.6 (DW)[51]
CarrotDaucus carotaα−/β-car, Lut, Lyc0.01–0.8 (DW)(TC’s)[52, 53]
KaleB. oleracea var. sabellicaZea1.6–2.5 (DW)[54]
β-car0.10 (DW)
Neo0.12 (DW)
LettuceLactuca sativaLut0.1–0.13 (DW)[55]
β-car2.2–2.9 (DW)
PeaPisum sativumLut0.01–0.02 (DW)[56]
β-car0.01–0.02 (DW)
PepperCapsicum annuumβ-car0.39–0.71 (DW)[57]
Zea0.31–0.73 (DW)
SpinachSpinacia oleraceaNeo0.1–0.2 (FW)[58]
Lut0.34–0.53 (FW)
β-car0.2–0.32 (FW)
Sweet cornZea maysLut0.02 (DW)[59]
β-car0.01 (DW)
TomatoLycopersicon esculentumβ-car0.01 (FW)[60]
Lyc0.05–0.08 (FW)
TCs0.04–0.2 (FW)
Flowers
Blue centaureaCentaurea cyanusβ-car, Lut0.06 (DW)[61]
Blue borageBorago officinalisβ-car, Lut1.8 (DW)
CameliaCamelia japonicaβ-car, Lut0.2 (DW)
CarnationDianthus caryophyllusXanthophylls0.001–0.003 (P) (DW) 0.04–0.07 (L) (DW)[62]
MarigoldTagetes sp.Lut0.0002–0.006 (DW)[63]
NasturtiumTropaeolum majusLut0.4–1.2 (DW)[64]
PansiesViola x wittrockianaβ-car, Lut, Zea0.2–1.1 (DW)[61, 65]
SnapdragonAntirrhinum majusβ-car, Lut, Zea0.03 (DW)[65]

Table 1.

Quantitative and qualitative analysis of carotenoids content in different species of fruits, vegetables, and flowers.

Abbreviations: DW: dry weight, FW: fresh weight, L: leaves, P: petals. Carotenoids: α−/β−/γ−/ζ-car: α−/β−/γ−/ζ-carotene, β-crypto: β-cryptoxanthin, lyc: lycopene, lut: lutein, neo: neoxanthin, TCs: total carotenoids content, vio: violaxanthin, zea: zeaxanthin.


Carotenoids extracted from fruits, vegetables and flowers become too expensive due to high production costs associated with large production areas required. Besides, the supply of carotenoids extracted from plants becomes unstable, since it is dependent on unpredictable climatologic conditions [66]. Therefore, more sustainable and green approaches have been explored for a more efficient carotenoids’ collection, including the use of microorganism or the reutilization of agricultural by-products

2.2 Microorganisms

Nowadays, the interest on microbial carotenoids has increased because of their low production area requirements when compared to plants. Besides, microbial cultures are nearly independent of climatic conditions, seasonality and soil composition. Current technological advances permit a tight control of culturing conditions, which improves the efficiency of microbial carotenoid production and reduces costs. Examples of efficient production of carotenoids using microalgae, bacteria, yeasts or fungi are displayed in Table 2, that demonstrates the huge variability of microorganisms capable of producing specific types of carotenoids being the most relevant β-carotene, lutein, astaxanthin, canthaxanthin and torulene (Table 2).

SpeciesMost abundant CarotenoidsContent (mg/g)Ref.
Microalgae
Dunaliella tertiolectaβ-car0.001–0.0045 (DW)[67]
Haematococcus pluvialisAst2–20 (DW)[68]
Haematococcus alpinusAst6–19 (DW)[69]
Nostoc communeCanthaxanthinN.D[70]
Scenedesmus almeriensisLut0.01 (DW)[71]
β-car1.50 (DW)
Bacteria
Arthrobacter sp. P40Decaprenoxanthin and derivatives mono−/diglucosides; Lyc0.3–0.4 (DW)[72]
Corynebacterium glutamicumβ-Car0.01–3.1 (CDW)[73]
Zea0.01–0.9 (CDW)
Cryobacterium sp. P19Carotenoids, glucoside derivatives0.4–0.5 (DW)[72]
Chryseobacterium sp. P36Zea; β-Crypto; β-Car; β-Zeacarotene0.5–0.6 (DW)
Flavobacterium sp.P33Zea; β-Crypto; β-Car; β-Zeacarotene0.7–0.8 (DW)
Planococcus sp. 48Carotenoids and glucoside derivatives0.7 (DW)[72]
Salinibacterium sp. P15Carotenoids and glucoside derivatives0.5 (DW)[72]
Yeasts and filamentous fungi
Blakeslea trisporaFungiβ-car30 (DW)[68]
Lyc>900 (DW)
Mucor circinelloidesβ-car0.275–0.698 (DW)[74]
Phycomyces blakesleeanusβ-car0.05–10 (DM)[68]
Phaffia rhodozymaYeastsAst0.000725–0.007642 (DW)[75, 76]
Rhodotorula minutaβ-car0.0172 (DW)[77]
Rhodotorula glutinisTorulene5–14 (DW)[78, 79]
Torularhodin32.2 (DW)
Rhodotorula graminisTorulene18.2 (DW)[79, 80]
Torularhodin9.3 (DW)
Sporobolomyces sp.Torulene0.0001 (DW)[79]
Torularhodin0.00001 (DW)
Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhousAst0.0026–0.001 (DW)[81]

Table 2.

Quantitative and qualitative analysis of carotenoids content in different species microorganisms such as microalgae, bacteria, yeasts, filamentous fungi and cyanobacteria.

Abbreviations: DW: dry weight; CDW: cold-water-dispersible; N.D: not determined. Carotenoids: ast: astaxanthin, β-car: β-carotene, β-crypto: β-cryptoxanthin, lut: lutein, lyc: lycopene, TCs: total carotenoids content; zea: zeaxanthin.


2.3 By-products

Food waste has been increased in the last years driven by an increasing population, expected to reach 10 billion people by 2050, and inefficient and unsustainable production systems [82]. These factors boosted waste production, which is usually composted or burnt, emitting high amounts of CO2 to the atmosphere. To counteract this situation, multiple strategies have been explored in the last decades, such as the revalorization of wastes as source of biomolecules. In fact, peels, seeds, husks, pomace or pulp are recognized as alternative sources of compounds with diverse biological properties [83].

Table 3 collects information about potential agricultural and food by-products as sustainable sources of carotenoids.

By-productMost abundant CarotenoidsContent (μg/g)Ref.
Tucumã peelsβ-car68–88 (FW)[84]
Peach palm peel71–75 (FW)
Mandarin epicarpβ-car1397–1417 (DW)[85]
Melon peelsβ-car67–915 (DW)[86]
β-crypto3–49 (DW)
Atlantic shrimp cooked shellAst57.3–284.5 (DW)[87]
Grape canesLut; β-car0.3–2.4 (DW)[88]
Peels and pulp of persimmonβ-crypto6500–167,000 (DW)[89]
β-car6900–45,000 (DW)
Pressed palm fibersα-car142–305 (DW)[90]
β-car317–713 (DW)
Mango peelα−/β-car; crypto5600 (β-car) (DW)[91]
Skin and seeds of tomatoesLyc3.8–166.4 (DW)[92]
β-car0.6–26.4 (DW)
Lut0.8–10.8 (DW)
Carrot by-productsβ-car230 (FW)[93]
Carrot juice processing wasteβ-car240 (DW)[94]
Tomato peels and seedsLyc410 (P);28 (S) (FW)[95]
β-car31 (P); 5.2 (S) (FW)

Table 3.

Quantitative and qualitative analysis of carotenoids content in different by-products derived from agricultural and food industries.

Abbreviations: P: peel; S: seeds. Carotenoids: ast: astaxanthin, α−/β-car: α−/β-carotene, β-crypto: β-cryptoxanthin, lut: lutein, lyc: lycopene. FW – Fresh weight, DW – Dry weight.


2.4 Macroalgae

In the last decades, macroalgae have been pointed out as a promising source of carotenoids. These photosynthetic organisms contain high amounts of pigments involved in light absorption for nourishment. However, they also have a secondary role related with damage protection from UV exposition. The main xanthophylls found in macroalgae include fucoxanthin, lutein, or zeaxanthin, being fucoxanthin the most abundant one, while β-carotene stands out from carotenes (Table 4). The main advantage of using macroalgae, is that invasive species can be used as an alternative source of carotenoids.

SpeciesMost abundant CarotenoidsContent (mg/g)Ref.
Cystoseira sp.Fuco2.0–3.5 (DW)[96]
Dictyota sp.Fuco0.4–6.4 (DW)[97]
Eisenia bicyclisFuco0.42 (DW)[98]
Fucus serratusFuco, Lut5.2 (DW)
0.3 (DW)
[99]
Laminaria digitata1.4 (DW)
0.1 (DW)
Himanthalia elongataFuco18.6 (DW)[100]
Hypnea musciformisβ-car, lut, zea0.0029 (TCs, FW)[101]
Monostroma nitidumLut0.3 (FW)[102]
Sargassum muticumFuco0.0084 (TCs, DW)[103]

Table 4.

Quantitative and qualitative analysis of carotenoids content in different macroalgae species.

Abbreviations: DW: dry weight, FW: fresh weight, β-car: β-carotene, fuco: fucoxanthin lut: lutein, TCs: total carotenoids content, zea: zeaxanthin.


Advertisement

3. Extraction and production techniques for carotenoids recovery

3.1 Conventional extraction

In the last century, pigment extraction has been performed using solid–liquid extraction with different organic solvents. Extracts were later purified via semipreparative high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [104] or clean up and separation columns using organic solvents such as hexane or dichloromethane [105]. The use of non-polar solvents for carotenoid extraction like petroleum ether or hexane has been linked with toxicity, having a negative impact in the environment in the long term. In addition, in the current legislation regarding the use of these solvents for the production of food ingredients is not allowed. For this reason, in the latest years, novel “greener” extraction processes have been developed for pigment recovery, including supercritical fluid extraction (SFE), pressurized liquid extraction (PLE), ultrasonic assisted extraction (UAE) and microwave assisted extraction (MAE) (Table 5). Implementing these techniques improved, among other things, extraction times, yields and solvent usage [114].

SourceCarotenoidsConditionsRecovery (μg/g)Ref.
SFE
Dunaliella salinaβ-carCO2, 60 °C, 300 bar15,000 (DW)[106]
Hachiyakaki sp. (Pe)α−/β-car, β-crypto, lyc, lut, zeaCO2 + EtOH, 30 MPa392 (TCs)[107]
Rosmarinus officinalis (L)CarotenoidsCO2 + EtOH, 25°C, 20 min, 20 MPa47,000–53,000[108]
Scenedesmus almeriensisLutCO2, 65°C, 55 MPa3000 (DW)[109]
Scenedesmus sp.Ast, β-car, lut, neo, zeaCO2 + 10% EtO, 25°C, 20 min, 20 Mpa73; 60, 436, 671, 90[110]
Tomato, apricot, peach, pumpkin (Fl, Pe), pepper (Fl, wastes)β-car, lut, lycCO2/EtOH, 59°C, 30 min, 350 bar88–100% β-car[111]
PLE
Carrot
by-products
β-carEtOH 99%, 60–180°C, 5 min, 50 bar, 1–5 cycles of 2 min120–230 (FW) (soft soggy carrots)
80–190 (FW) (orange carrots)
[93]
Diospyros kaki, P. armeniacaβ-crypto, β-car, lut, zeaMeOH: THF 2:8 (v:v), 40 °C, 5 min, 103 barKaki: β-crypto ≤29, lut ≤ 13, zea ≤ 18
Apricot: ≤48 (β-car)
[40]
Eisenia bicyclisFucoxanthin90% EtOH, 110°C, 5 min, 1500 psi420[98]
Porphyridium cruentumβ-car, zea125°C, 20 min, 10.5 MPaZea ≤14,000
β-car ≤8000
[112]
UAE
Dark red tomatoLycEtAc: tomato paste 8:1 (V/W), 86°C, 29 min89,000[113]
MAE
Carrot juice wastesβ-carFlaxseed oil: wastes 8:1 g/g, 165 W, 9.4 min775,000[94]

Table 5.

Novel extraction techniques to efficiently recover carotenoids from natural sources.

Abbreviations: DW: dry weight, EtOH: ethanol, EtAc: ethyl acetate, Fl: flesh, FW: fresh weight, L: leaves, MeOH: methanol, Pe: peels, THF: tetrahydrofuran. Carotenoids: ast: astaxanthin, α−/β-car: β-carotene, β-crypto: β-cryptoxanthin, lyc: lycopene, lut: lutein, neo: neoxanthin, TCs: total carotenoids, zea: zeaxanthin.


3.2 Novel techniques

Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) emerged in 80s decade as a promising alternative to conventional organic extractions [115]. This is a process where a compound is separated from its matrix making use of the unique properties of supercritical fluids as solvents, being CO2 the most commonly used. Supercritical fluid technology applies pressures and temperatures above the critical point of the extracting solvent, leading to a balanced state between liquid and gas phases. This balance confers low viscosity, high diffusivity, enhanced solubility and no surface tension, facilitating mass transfer [116]. However, this process involves a high cost, due to high temperatures and pressures requirements. Moreover, CO2 only dissolves non-polar molecules, although using a co solvent overcomes this issue, being ethanol the most employed [107, 108].

As well as in SFE, pressurized liquid extraction (PLE), also called accelerated solvent extraction (ASE), makes use of high temperature and pressure, although along with a liquid solvent to accelerate the extraction of specific analytes from solid matrices. In this system, pressure is high enough to keep the solvent liquid without hampering extraction performance. However, extraction time, temperature, solvent type and volume have influence on extraction performance, especially temperature and solvent type. Temperature range is mostly comprised from 40 to 180°C and it has been seen that the use of Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) solvents, like water, ethanol or its mixtures enhance extraction efficiencies [117]. Nevertheless, other more non-polar solvent mixtures like methanol: tetrahydrofuran can also be used [40].

Ultrasonic assisted extraction (UAE) also emerged as a novel technique, which employs using ultrasonic waves that propagate causing the implosion of bubbles, phenomenon known as cavitation. This perturbation leads to a diffusion of the solute from the porous matrix to the solvent. Nowadays, UAE is used for extracting various compounds including carotenoids from a wide diversity of matrices, such as macroalgae, microalgae and plants. This technique is environment-friendly, simple, cheap and efficient, reporting high yields when compared to conventional techniques, although the reproducibility of the samples is jeopardized by equipment’s aging [118].

Microwave assisted extraction (MAE) is a relatively new extraction technique that combines microwave and traditional solvent extraction. Since the late 1980s, MAE has become one of the most popular and cost-effective extraction methods [81]. This technique is based on the application of microwaves for heating both solvents and matrices, increasing the kinetic of the extraction. Compared to conventional and novel (SFE and PLE) techniques, MAE reduced extraction time and solvent usage, leading to higher extraction rates and reduced costs [94].

Advertisement

4. Carotenoids’ incorporation into food: reported and future applications

Color is an important sensory attribute associated with safety and nutritional values of food, reason why, in the last years, consumer awareness regarding the use of synthetic food coloring has been increased. In order to develop a more natural food industry, natural pigment demand has raised, as is the case for carotenoids. These pigments are used for their coloring properties as well as for their antioxidant potential and biological functions. Carotenoids can be either applied directly into food matrices like beverages or pasta, among others [119, 120], or indirectly, into animal feeding to improve pigmentation of final products as in eggs or fish flesh [1, 29, 121]. Moreover, carotenoids have pointed out as promising ingredients in active packaging films. Their inclusion in protective films can improve the storing properties of the package, extending the shelf-life of the product, as well as transferring carotenoids’ nutritional values [122, 123]. Several applications of carotenoids in the food industry have been collected in Table 6.

CarotenoidOriginApplicationPropertiesRef.
β-CaroteneFruits & vegetablesFree and encapsulatedYellow colorant and antioxidant[120]
Incorporated into polymer materialsAntioxidant, O2 and light barrier[123]
α-CaroteneFree and encapsulatedYellow colorant, anti-carcinogenic and antioxidant[120, 124]
α-TocopherolHigh fat vegetablesIncorporated into polymer materialsAntioxidant[123]
AstaxanthinMarigold flowerIncorporated into packaging materialFish feeding for antioxidation and flesh coloring[125]
BixinAnnatto seedsIncorporated into polymer materialsAntioxidant, O2 and light barrier[123]
CanthaxanthinMushroomsAlginate-pectin microencapsulationRed colorant and antioxidant[126]
CryptoxanthinMandarin, papaya, orangeFree and encapsulatedOrange colorant and antioxidant[120]
LuteinGreen vegetablesEncapsulation in foodEye protection against AMD development or cataracts. Anticancer[124]
LycopeneTomato, watermelon, pink grapefruit, guavaFree and encapsulatedRed colorant, eye UV-protection, antioxidant[120, 123, 124]
Incorporated into polymer materialsAntioxidant, O2 and light barrier
ZeaxanthinMandarin, papaya, orangeOrange colorantEye protection against macular degeneration and cataracts[120, 124]

Table 6.

Carotenoids applications in food industry.

Since the late 1980s, carotenoids implementation into food has significantly increased. Among all, β-carotene is the most applied one, being used for coloring oils and butters, providing a yellowish color. In addition, it has been also used to fortify different food matrices for its provitamin A activity [127]. Apart from β-carotene, other carotenoids have been incorporated as free molecules into food matrices (Table 6). However, the direct application of these natural pigments is limited by their low stability, so micro- and nanoencapsulation technologies have been applied. Multiple encapsulation technologies including spray or freeze drying, emulsion, spray chilling, extrusion coating, liposome entrapment, coacervation and ionic gelation [128] have been applied to improve solubility, chemical stability and bioavailability of pigments, as well as for masking unpleasant organoleptic properties [129]. Most of these technologies have been applied to encapsulate carotenoids, generally on a nanometric scale (≤100 nm). The type of encapsulation materials used for food applications have to be food-graded biopolymers such carbohydrates or gums (Persian gum), proteins (gelatin or whey), and animal or vegetal lipids [22, 26, 130]. Emulsion is also a prominent encapsulation processes, which results in an improved bio accessibility and bioavailability [131]. Lutein emulsions, β-carotene oil-in-water emulsions or microcapsules containing lycopene are just some examples of microencapsulation found in the food industry to improve the stability, bio accessibility and bioavailability of these pigments [129, 132, 133]. Similarly, multiple studies support carotenoids’ nanoencapsulation [134, 135].

A different way to incorporate natural pigments in human food is through animal feeding. By doing so, pigments get incorporated in foodstuff such as in fish flesh or eggs, giving a characteristic pigmentation and an increased nutritional value that will be further transferred to humans or animals [121, 136]. One of the main industries where carotenoids have been implemented is aquaculture. Fish factories have been making use of pigments such as β-carotene as an important source of provitamin A, which has been shown to improve the antioxidant capacity and immune system of fish, enhancing growth and preventing lipid peroxidation [137]. In fact, in aquaculture, different biological sources of xanthophylls such as green microalgae, yeast, krill, or crab waste have been utilized as feeding supplements. This complementary pigmentation enhances the nutritional value of fish products by providing strong antioxidant activity and higher amounts of provitamin A [1]. Other industry where pigments are widely use is poultry. EU approved egg yolk and poultry tissues pigmentations with yellow and red carotenoids, including lutein, zeaxanthin, β-cryptoxanthin, violaxanthin and capsanthin [136].

Natural pigments can also be incorporated into packaging materials to improve food preservation. Carotenoids such as lycopene or β-carotene prevent color alterations due to oxidation processes and UV-induced damage, providing stability to packaging polymers [123]. Besides, pigment migration from active packaging into food matrices has been reported, transferring the beneficial properties. As could be seen in Table 6, several carotenoids such have been included in active packaging, achieving promising results.

Advertisement

5. Conclusions

Synthetic pigments have been frequently used as food additives to improve food appearance since colorful products have been associated with healthy and high-quality properties by consumers. However, tendency has slowly shifted towards a stronger presence of natural ingredients due to a raising concern about the negative side effects associated with synthetic molecules. In this context, carotenoids have come up as an attractive replacement of synthetic pigments, being found in multiple sources, like plants, algae, fungi, microorganisms and by-products. Moreover, carotenoids have been linked with diverse beneficial properties, such as antioxidant, prevention of degenerative diseases, cancer and stimulation of the immune system. For all these reasons, carotenoids have caught the attention of many industries, including food, nutraceutical and cosmetic industries.

In order to extract these pigments, novel technologies emerged to improve the extraction rates of traditional techniques, mostly based on maceration. Among these new strategies, SFE and PLE highlight. Equipment may result into an initial economic expense, but they offer satisfactory extraction rates while minimizing solvent usage and experimental times.

Regarding food industry, carotenoids have been widely used for their application into food matrices or as part of packaging materials. Their inclusion as food additives or feed supplements for animals is the most extended and explored application, improving the organoleptic properties and nutritional values, aiming for a higher commercial acceptance. Besides, carotenoids have also been used as ingredients for active packaging films to extend products’ shelf-life. Regardless the matrix of inclusion, natural carotenoids have been incorporated as free molecules or encapsulated. This last strategy prolongs the stability and bio accessibility of carotenoids, protecting core ingredients from chemical degradation.

Furthermore, due to their extensive bioactivities, carotenoids are very useful to formulate new cosmetic ingredients. Besides, its antioxidant properties that can benefit the skin and promote skin regeneration and healthy aging, carotenoids also mitigate the harmful effects of UV radiation, which makes them excellent candidates for their application in cosmetic formulations as preservatives with photoprotective, antioxidant and anti-aging properties.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

The research leading to these results was funded by Xunta de Galicia supporting the Axudas Conecta Peme, the IN852A 2018/58 NeuroFood Project and the program EXCELENCIA-ED431F 2020/12; to Ibero-American Program on Science and Technology (CYTED—AQUA-CIBUS, P317RT0003) and to the Bio Based Industries Joint Undertaking (JU) under grant agreement No 888003 UP4HEALTH Project (H2020-BBI-JTI-2019). The JU receives support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program and the Bio Based Industries Consortium. The project SYSTEMIC Knowledge hub on Nutrition and Food Security, has received funding from national research funding parties in Belgium (FWO), France (INRA), Germany (BLE), Italy (MIPAAF), Latvia (IZM), Norway (RCN), Portugal (FCT), and Spain (AEI) in a joint action of JPI HDHL, JPI-OCEANS and FACCE-JPI launched in 2019 under the ERA-NET ERA-HDHL (n° 696295).

The research leading to these results was supported by MICINN supporting the Ramón y Cajal grant for M.A. Prieto (RYC-2017-22891) and the FPU grant for Anxo Carreira Casais (FPU2016/06135); by Xunta de Galicia for supporting the post-doctoral grant of M. Fraga-Corral (ED481B-2019/096), the pre-doctoral grants of P. García-Oliveira (ED481A-2019/295), and by UP4HEALTH Project that supports the work of P. Otero and C. Lourenço-Lopes.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1. Breithaupt DE. Modern application of xanthophylls in animal feeding - a review. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 2007;18:501-506
  2. 2. Domonkos I, Kis M, Gombos Z, Ughy B. Carotenoids, versatile components of oxygenic photosynthesis. Progress in Lipid Research. 2013;52:539-561
  3. 3. Rodriguez-Concepcion M, Avalos J, Bonet ML, Boronat A, Gomez-Gomez L, Hornero-Mendez D, et al. A global perspective on carotenoids: Metabolism, biotechnology, and benefits for nutrition and health. Progress in Lipid Research. 2018;70:62-93
  4. 4. Rodriguez DA. Guide to Carotenoid Analysis in Foods. Washington, D.C: ILSI Press; 2001 ISBN 1578810728
  5. 5. Nagarajan J, Ramanan RN, Raghunandan ME, Galanakis CM, Krishnamurthy NP. Carotenoids. In: Galanakis CM, editor. Nutraceutical and Functional Food Components: Effects of Innovative Processing Techniques. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Academic Press; 2017. pp. 259-296 ISBN 9780128052570
  6. 6. Aziz E, Batool R, Akhtar W, Rehman S, Shahzad T, Malik A, et al. Xanthophyll: Health benefits and therapeutic insights. Life Sciences. 2020;240:117104
  7. 7. Bhatt T, Patel K. Carotenoids: Potent to prevent diseases review. Natural Products and Bioprospecting. 2020;10:109-117
  8. 8. Maoka T. Carotenoids as natural functional pigments. Journal of Natural Medicines. 2020;74:1-16
  9. 9. Data, Reports and. 2019. “Carotenoids Market.” Reports and Data. 2016-2027
  10. 10. Jeevanandam J, Choudhary V, Selvam JD, Danquah MK. The Bioeconomy of Production of Microalgal Pigments. In: Jacob-Lopes E, Queiroz M, Zepka L, editors. Pigments from Microalgae Handbook. Cham: Springer; 2020. pp. 325-362 ISBN 9783030509705
  11. 11. Chiu HF, Shen YC, Venkatakrishnan K, Wang CK. Food for eye health: Carotenoids and omega-3 fatty acids. Encyclopedia of Food Chemistry. Elsevier. 2018:313-322. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-100596-5.21740-X
  12. 12. European Parliament and Council. Directive 94/36/EC of 30 June 1994 on Colours for Use in Foodstuffs. European Union: European Parliament, Council of the European Union; 1994. pp. 13-29
  13. 13. Mezzomo N, Ferreira SRS. Carotenoids functionality, sources, and processing by supercritical technology: A review. Journal of Chemistry. 2016;2016:3164312
  14. 14. Von Lintig J. Provitamin A metabolism and functions in mammalian biology. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2012;96:1234-1244
  15. 15. Domínguez R, Gullón P, Pateiro M, Munekata PES, Zhang W, Lorenzo JM. Tomato as potential source of natural additives for meat industry. A review. Antioxidants. 2020;9:73
  16. 16. Rafi MM, Kanakasabai S, Reyes MD, Bright JJ. Lycopene modulates growth and survival associated genes in prostate cancer. The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry. 2013;24:1724-1734
  17. 17. Mirahmadi M, Azimi-Hashemi S, Saburi E, Kamali H, Pishbin M, Hadizadeh F. Potential inhibitory effect of lycopene on prostate cancer. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. 2020;129:110459
  18. 18. Costa-Rodrigues J, Pinho O, Monteiro PRR. Can lycopene be considered an effective protection against cardiovascular disease? Food Chemistry. 2018;245:1148-1153
  19. 19. Baker R, Günther C. The role of carotenoids in consumer choice and the likely benefits from their inclusion into products for human consumption. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 2004;15:484-488
  20. 20. Mohd Hatta, F.A.; Othman, R. Carotenoids as potential biocolorants: A case study of astaxanthin recovered from shrimp waste. In Carotenoids: Properties, Processing and Applications; Galanakis, C.M., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2020; pp. 289-325 ISBN 9780128170670
  21. 21. Breithaupt DE, Wirt U, Bamedi A. Differentiation between lutein monoester regioisomers and detection of lutein diesters from marigold flowers (Tagetes erecta L.) and Several fruits by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2002;50:66-70
  22. 22. Zhang J, Jia G, Wanbin Z, Minghao J, Wei Y, Hao J, et al. Nanoencapsulation of zeaxanthin extracted from Lycium barbarum L. by complex coacervation with gelatin and CMC. Food Hydrocolloids. 2021;112:106280
  23. 23. Ambati RR, Moi PS, Ravi S, Aswathanarayana RG. Astaxanthin: Sources, extraction, stability, biological activities and its commercial applications - A review. Marine Drugs. 2014;12:128-152
  24. 24. Solymosi K, Latruffe N, Morant-Manceau A, Schoefs B. Food colour additives of natural origin. In: Scotter MJ, editor. Colour Additives for Foods and Beverages. Sawston, Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing; 2015. pp. 4-34 ISBN 9781782420200
  25. 25. Khanafari A, Saberi A, Azar M, Vosooghi G, Jamili S, Sabbaghzadeh B. Extraction of astaxanthin esters from shrimp waste by chemical and microbial methods. Journal of Environmental Health Science & Engineering. 2007;4:93-98
  26. 26. Bassijeh A, Ansari S, Hosseini SMH. Astaxanthin encapsulation in multilayer emulsions stabilized by complex coacervates of whey protein isolate and Persian gum and its use as a natural colorant in a model beverage. Food Research International. 2020;137:109689
  27. 27. Lorenz RT, Cysewski GR. Commercial potential for Haematococcus microalgae as a natural source of astaxanthin. Trends in Biotechnology. 2000;18:160-167
  28. 28. Tanumihardjo SA. Carotenoids: Health effects. In: Encyclopedia of Human Nutrition. Madison, WI, USA: Elsevier Inc.; 2012; Vol. 1-4. pp. 292-297 ISBN 9780123848857
  29. 29. Liu YQ, Davis CR, Schmaelzle ST, Rocheford T, Cook ME, Tanumihardjo SA. β-cryptoxanthin biofortified maize (Zea mays) increases β-cryptoxanthin concentration and enhances the color of chicken egg yolk. Poultry Science. 2012;91:432-438
  30. 30. Ozaki K, Okamoto M, Fukasawa K, Iezaki T, Onishi Y, Yoneda Y, et al. Daily intake of β-cryptoxanthin prevents bone loss by preferential disturbance of osteoclastic activation in ovariectomized mice. Journal of Pharmacological Sciences. 2015;129:72-77
  31. 31. Peng J, Yuan J-PP, Wu C-FF, Wang J-HH. Fucoxanthin, a marine carotenoid present in brown seaweeds and diatoms: Metabolism and bioactivities relevant to human health. Marine Drugs. 2011;9:1806-1828
  32. 32. Wang L-J, Fan Y, Parsons RL, Hu G-R, Zhang P-Y, Li F-L. A rapid method for the determination of fucoxanthin in diatom. Marine Drugs. 2018;16:33
  33. 33. Lourenço-Lopes C, Garcia-Oliveira P, Carpena M, Fraga-Corral M, Jimenez-Lopez C, Pereira AG, et al. Scientific approaches on extraction , purification and stability for the commercialization of fucoxanthin recovered from brown algae. Food. 2020;9:1113
  34. 34. Beppu F, Niwano Y, Tsukui T, Hosokawa M, Miyashita K. Single and repeated oral dose toxicity study of fucoxanthin (FX), a marine carotenoid, in mice. The Journal of Toxicological Sciences. 2009;34:501-510
  35. 35. Ma Z, Zhao Y, Khalid N, Shu G, Neves MA, Kobayashi I, et al. Comparative study of oil-in-water emulsions encapsulating fucoxanthin formulated by microchannel emulsification and high-pressure homogenization. Food Hydrocolloids. 2020;108:105977
  36. 36. Yamamoto K, Ishikawa C, Katano H, Yasumoto T, Mori N. Fucoxanthin and its deacetylated product, fucoxanthinol, induce apoptosis of primary effusion lymphomas. Cancer Letters. 2011;300:225-234
  37. 37. Kanda H, Kamo Y, Machmudah S, Wahyudiono; Goto, M. Extraction of fucoxanthin from raw macroalgae excluding drying and cell wall disruption by liquefied dimethyl ether. Marine Drugs. 2014;12:2383-2396
  38. 38. Oliyaei N, Moosavi-Nasab M, Tamaddon AM, Fazaeli M. Encapsulation of fucoxanthin in binary matrices of porous starch and halloysite. Food Hydrocolloids. 2020;100:105458
  39. 39. Wang C, Chen X, Nakamura Y, Yu C, Qi H. Fucoxanthin activities motivate its nano/micro-encapsulation for food or nutraceutical application: A review. Food & Function. 2020;11:9338-9358
  40. 40. Zaghdoudi K, Pontvianne S, Framboisier X, Achard M, Kudaibergenova R, Ayadi-Trabelsi M, et al. Accelerated solvent extraction of carotenoids from: Tunisian Kaki (Diospyros kaki L.), peach (Prunus persica L.) and apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.). Food Chemistry. 2015;184:131-139
  41. 41. Wimalasiri D, Brkljača R, Piva TJ, Urban S, Huynh T. Comparative analysis of carotenoid content in Momordica cochinchinensis (Cucurbitaceae) collected from Australia, Thailand and Vietnam. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2017;54:2814-2824
  42. 42. Müller-Maatsch J, Sprenger J, Hempel J, Kreiser F, Carle R, Schweiggert RM. Carotenoids from gac fruit aril (Momordica cochinchinensis [Lour.] Spreng.) are more bioaccessible than those from carrot root and tomato fruit. Food Research International. 2017;99:928-935
  43. 43. Liu Y, Zeng S, Sun W, Wu M, Hu W, Shen X, et al. Comparative analysis of carotenoid accumulation in two goji (Lycium barbarum L. and L. ruthenicum Murr.) fruits. BMC Plant Biology. 2014;14:269
  44. 44. Amah D, Alamu E, Adesokan M, van Biljon A, Maziya-dixon B, Swennen R, et al. Variability of carotenoids in a Musa germplasm collection and implications for provitamin A biofortification. Food Chemistry X. 2019;2:100024
  45. 45. Mbabazi R, Harding R, Khanna H, Namanya P, Arinaitwe G, Tushemereirwe W, et al. Pro-vitamin A carotenoids in East African highland banana and other Musa cultivars grown in Uganda. Food Science & Nutrition. 2020;8:311-321
  46. 46. Giuffrida D, Cacciola F, Mapelli-Brahm P, Stinco CM, Dugo P, Oteri M, et al. Free carotenoids and carotenoids esters composition in Spanish orange and mandarin juices from diverse varieties. Food Chemistry. 2019;300:125139
  47. 47. Maldonado-Celis ME, Yahia EM, Bedoya R, Landázuri P, Loango N, Aguillón J, et al. Chemical Composition of Mango (Mangifera indica L.) Fruit: Nutritional and Phytochemical Compounds. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2019;10:1073
  48. 48. Brasili E, Chaves DFS, Xavier AAO, Mercadante AZ, Hassimotto NMA, Lajolo FM. Effect of pasteurization on flavonoids and carotenoids in citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck cv. Cara Cara’ and Bahia’ Juices. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2017;65:1371-1377
  49. 49. Chan-León AC, Estrella-Maldonado H, Dubé P, Fuentes Ortiz G, Espadas-Gil F, Talavera May C, et al. The high content of β-carotene present in orange-pulp fruits of Carica papaya L. is not correlated with a high expression of the CpLCY-β2 gene. Food Research International. 2017;100:45-56
  50. 50. Farina V, Tinebra I, Perrone A, Sortino G, Palazzolo E, Mannino G, et al. Physicochemical, nutraceutical and sensory traits of six papaya (Carica papaya L.) cultivars grown in greenhouse conditions in the mediterranean climate. Agronomy. 2020;10:501
  51. 51. Moreira-Rodríguez M, Nair V, Benavides J, Cisneros-Zevallos L, Jacobo-Velázquez DA. UVA, UVB light, and methyl jasmonate, alone or combined, redirect the biosynthesis of glucosinolates, phenolics, carotenoids, and chlorophylls in broccoli sprouts. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2017;18:2330
  52. 52. Behsnilian D, Mayer-Miebach E. Impact of blanching, freezing and frozen storage on the carotenoid profile of carrot slices (Daucus carota L. cv. Nutri Red). Food Control. 2017;73:761-767
  53. 53. Fuentes P, Pizarro L, Moreno JC, Handford M, Rodriguez-Concepcion M, Stange C. Light-dependent changes in plastid differentiation influence carotenoid gene expression and accumulation in carrot roots. Plant Molecular Biology. 2012;79:47-59
  54. 54. Mageney V, Baldermann S, Albach DC. Intraspecific Variation in Carotenoids of Brassica oleracea var. sabellica. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2016;64:3251-3257
  55. 55. Kim HJ, Fonseca JM, Choi JH, Kubota C. Effect of methyl jasmonate on phenolic compounds and carotenoids of romaine lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2007;55:10366-10372
  56. 56. Edelenbos M, Christensen LP, Grevsen K. HPLC determination of chlorophyll and carotenoid pigments in processed green pea cultivars (Pisum sativum L.). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2001;49:4768-4774
  57. 57. Mínguez-Mosquera MI, Hornero-Méndez D. Comparative Study of the Effect of Paprika Processing on the Carotenoids in Peppers (Capsicum annuum) of the Bola and Agridulce Varieties. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 1994;42:1555-1560
  58. 58. Bunea A, Andjelkovic M, Socaciu C, Bobis O, Neacsu M, Verhé R, et al. Van Total and individual carotenoids and phenolic acids content in fresh, refrigerated and processed spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.). Food Chemistry. 2008;108:649-656
  59. 59. Žilić S, Serpen A, Akillioǧlu G, Gökmen V, Vančetović J. Phenolic compounds, carotenoids, anthocyanins, and antioxidant capacity of colored maize (Zea mays L.) kernels. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2012;60:1224-1231
  60. 60. Abushita AA, Daood HG, Biacs PA. Change in Carotenoids and Antioxidant Vitamins in Tomato as a Function of Varietal and Technological Factors. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2000;48:2075-2081
  61. 61. Fernandes L, Ramalhosa E, Pereira JA, Saraiva JA, Casal S. Borage, camellia, centaurea and pansies: Nutritional, fatty acids, free sugars, vitamin E, carotenoids and organic acids characterization. Food Research International. 2020;132:109070
  62. 62. Iijima L, Kishimoto S, Ohmiya A, Yagi M, Okamoto E, Miyahara T, et al. Esterified carotenoids are synthesized in petals of carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus) and accumulate in differentiated chromoplasts. Scientific Reports. 2020;10:1-12
  63. 63. Abdel-Aal ESM, Rabalski I. Composition of lutein ester regioisomers in marigold flower, dietary supplement, and herbal tea. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2015;63:9740-9746
  64. 64. Niizu PY, Rodriguez-Amaya DB. Flowers and leaves of Tropaeolum majus L. as rich sources of lutein. Journal of Food Science. 2005;70:605-609
  65. 65. González-Barrio R, Periago MJ, Luna-Recio C, Garcia-Alonso FJ, Navarro-González I. Chemical composition of the edible flowers, pansy (Viola wittrockiana) and snapdragon (Antirrhinum majus) as new sources of bioactive compounds. Food Chemistry. 2018;252:373-380
  66. 66. Foong LC, Loh CWL, Ng HS, Lan JCW. Recent development in the production strategies of microbial carotenoids. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2021;37:1-11
  67. 67. Fazeli MR, Tofighi H, Samadi N, Jamalifar H. Effects of salinity on β-carotene production by Dunaliella tertiolecta DCCBC26 isolated from the Urmia salt lake, north of Iran. Bioresource Technology. 2006;97:2453-2456
  68. 68. Britton G, Liaaen-Jensen S, Pfander H. Carotenoids. Volume 5: Nutirition and Health. Basel: Birkhäuser; 2009 ISBN 9783764375003
  69. 69. Mazumdar N, Gopalakrishnan KK, Visnovsky G, Novis PM. A novel alpine species of Haematococcus (Chlamydomonadales: Chlorophyta) from New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Botany. 2018;56:216-226
  70. 70. Valduga E, Tatsch PO, Tiggemann L, Treichel H, Toniazzo G, Zeni J, et al. Carotenoids production: Microorganisms as source of natural dyes. Quimica Nova. 2009;32:2429-2436
  71. 71. Macías-Sánchez MD, Fernandez-Sevilla JM, Fernández FGA, García MCC, Grima EM. Supercritical fluid extraction of carotenoids from Scenedesmus almeriensis. Food Chemistry. 2010;123:928-935
  72. 72. Vila E, Hornero-Méndez D, Azziz G, Lareo C, Saravia V. Carotenoids from heterotrophic bacteria isolated from Fildes Peninsula, King George Island, Antarctica. Biotechnology Reports. 2019;21:e00306
  73. 73. Heider SAE, Peters-Wendisch P, Netzer R, Stafnes M, Brautaset T, Wendisch VF. Production and glucosylation of C50 and C40 carotenoids by metabolically engineered Corynebacterium glutamicum. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2014;98:1223-1235
  74. 74. Naz T, Nosheen S, Li S, Nazir Y, Mustafa K, Liu Q, et al. Comparative analysis of β-carotene production by mucor circinelloides strains CBS 277.49 and WJ11 under light and dark conditions. Metabolites. 2020;10:38
  75. 75. Ramírez J, Gutierrez H, Gschaedler A. Optimization of astaxanthin production by Phaffia rhodozyma through factorial design and response surface methodology. Journal of Biotechnology. 2001;88:259-268
  76. 76. Liu YS, Wu JY, Ho KP. Characterization of oxygen transfer conditions and their effects on Phaffia rhodozyma growth and carotenoid production in shake-flask cultures. Biochemical Engineering Journal. 2006;27:331-335
  77. 77. da Silva SRS, Stamford TCM, Albuquerque WWC, Vidal EE, Stamford TLM. Reutilization of residual glycerin for the produce β-carotene by Rhodotorula minuta. Biotechnology Letters. 2020;42:437-443
  78. 78. Buzzini P, Martini A. Production of carotenoids by strains of Rhodotorula glutinis cultured in raw materials of agro-industrial origin. Bioresource Technology. 2000;71:41-44
  79. 79. Kot AM, Błazejak S, Gientka I, Kieliszek M, Bryś J. Torulene and torularhodin: “New” fungal carotenoids for industry? Microbial Cell Factories. 2018;17:1-14
  80. 80. Buzzini P, Martini A, Gaetani M, Turchetti B, Pagnoni UM, Davoli P. Optimization of carotenoid production by Rhodotorula graminis DBVPG 7021 as a function of trace element concentration by means of response surface analysis. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 2005;36:687-692
  81. 81. Delazar A, Nahar L, Hamedeyazdan S, Sarker SD. Microwave-assisted extraction in natural products isolation. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2012;864:89-115
  82. 82. García-Oliveira P, Fraga-Corral M, Pereira AG, Prieto MA, Simal-Gandara J. Solutions for the sustainability of the food production and consumption system. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. Bellwether Publishing, Ltd., 2020:1-17. DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2020.1847028
  83. 83. Jimenez-Lopez C, Fraga-Corral M, Carpena M, García-Oliveira P, Echave J, Pereira AG, et al. Agriculture waste valorisation as a source of antioxidant phenolic compounds within a circular and sustainable bioeconomy. Food & Function. 2020;11:48-53
  84. 84. Noronha Matos KA, Praia Lima D, Pereira Barbosa AP, Zerlotti Mercadante A, Campos Chisté R. Peels of tucumã (Astrocaryum vulgare) and peach palm (Bactris gasipaes) are by-products classified as very high carotenoid sources. Food Chemistry. 2019;272:216-221
  85. 85. Ordóñez-Santos LE, Esparza-Estrada J, Vanegas-Mahecha P. Ultrasound-assisted extraction of total carotenoids from mandarin epicarp and application as natural colorant in bakery products. LWT. 2021;139:110598
  86. 86. Gómez-García R, Campos DA, Oliveira A, Aguilar CN, Madureira AR, Pintado M. A chemical valorisation of melon peels towards functional food ingredients: Bioactives profile and antioxidant properties. Food Chemistry. 2021;335:127579
  87. 87. Dave D, Liu Y, Pohling J, Trenholm S, Murphy W. Astaxanthin recovery from Atlantic shrimp (Pandalus borealis) processing materials. Bioresource Technology Reports. 2020;11:100535
  88. 88. Ferreyra SG, Antoniolli A, Bottini R, Fontana A. Bioactive compounds and total antioxidant capacity of cane residues from different grape varieties. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2020;100:376-383
  89. 89. Gea-Botella S, Agulló L, Martí N, Martínez-Madrid MC, Lizama V, Martín-Bermudo F, et al. Carotenoids from persimmon juice processing. Food Research International. 2020;141:109882
  90. 90. Cardenas-Toro FP, Alcázar-Alay SC, Coutinho JP, Godoy HT, Forster-ized liquid extraction and low-pressure solvent extraction of carotenoids from pressed palm fiber: Experimental and economical evaluation. Food and Bioproducts Processing. 2015;94:90-100
  91. 91. Garcia-Mendoza MP, Paula JT, Paviani LC, Cabral FA, Martinez-Correa HA. Extracts from mango peel by-product obtained by supercritical CO2 and pressurized solvent processes. LWT- Food Science and Technology. 2015;62:131-137
  92. 92. Strati IF, Oreopoulou V. Recovery and isomerization of carotenoids from tomato processing by-products. Waste and Biomass Valorization. 2016;7:843-850
  93. 93. Mustafa A, Trevino LM, Turner C. Pressurized hot ethanol extraction of carotenoids from carrot by-products. Molecules. 2012;17:1809-1818
  94. 94. Elik A, Yanık DK, Göğüş F. Microwave-assisted extraction of carotenoids from carrot juice processing waste using flaxseed oil as a solvent. LWT. 2020;123:109100
  95. 95. Kehili M, Schmidt LM, Reynolds W, Zammel A, Zetzl C, Smirnova I, et al. Biorefinery cascade processing for creating added value on tomato industrial by-products from Tunisia. Biotechnology for Biofuels. 2016;9:1-12
  96. 96. Susanto E, Fahmi AS, Abe M, Hosokawa M, Miyashita K. Lipids, fatty acids, and fucoxanthin content from temperate and tropical brown seaweeds. Aquatic Procedia. 2016;7:66-75
  97. 97. Agatonovic-Kustrin S, Morton DW. High-performance thin-layer chromatography HPTLC-direct bioautography as a method of choice for alpha-amylase and antioxidant activity evaluation in marine algae. Journal of Chromatography. A. 2017;1530:197-203
  98. 98. Shang YF, Kim SM, Lee WJ, Um BH. Pressurized liquid method for fucoxanthin extraction from Eisenia bicyclis (Kjellman) Setchell. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering. 2011;111:237-241
  99. 99. Heffernan N, Smyth TJ, FitzGerald RJ, Vila-Soler A, Mendiola J, Ibáñez E, et al. Comparison of extraction methods for selected carotenoids from macroalgae and the assessment of their seasonal/spatial variation. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies. 2016;37:221-228
  100. 100. Rajauria G, Foley B, Abu-Ghannam N. Characterization of dietary fucoxanthin from Himanthalia elongata brown seaweed. Food Research International. 2017;99:995-1001
  101. 101. Schmidt ÉC, Pereira B, dos Santos RW, Gouveia C, Costa GB, Faria GSM, et al. Responses of the macroalgae Hypnea musciformis after in vitro exposure to UV-B. Aquatic Botany. 2012;100:8-17
  102. 102. Kanda H, Wahyudiono, Machmudah S, Goto M. Direct extraction of lutein from wet macroalgae by liquefied dimethyl ether without any pretreatment. ACS Omega. 2020;5:24005-24010
  103. 103. Vieira FA, Guilherme RJR, Neves MC, Rego A, Abreu MH, Coutinho JAP, et al. Recovery of carotenoids from brown seaweeds using aqueous solutions of surface-active ionic liquids and anionic surfactants. Separation and Purification Technology. 2018;196:300-308
  104. 104. Rauscher R, Edenharder R, Platt KL. In vitro antimutagenic and in vivo anticlastogenic effects of carotenoids and solvent extracts from fruits and vegetables rich in carotenoids. Mutation Research, Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis. 1998;413:129-142
  105. 105. Yokoyama A, Miki W, Izumida H, Shizuri Y. New trihydroxy-keto-carotenoids isolated from an astaxanthin-producing marine bacterium. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry. 1996;60:200-203
  106. 106. Macías-Sánchez MD, Mantell C, Rodríguez M, Martínez de la Ossa E, Lubián LM, Montero O. Comparison of supercritical fluid and ultrasound-assisted extraction of carotenoids and chlorophyll a from Dunaliella salina. Talanta. 2009;77:948-952
  107. 107. Takahashi M, Watanabe H, Kikkawa J, Masaki OTA, Watanabe M, Sato Y, et al. Carotenoids extraction from Japanese persimmon (Hachiyakaki) peels by supercritical CO2 with ethanol. Analytical Sciences. 2006;22:1441-1447
  108. 108. Lefebvre T, Destandau E, Lesellier E. Sequential extraction of carnosic acid, rosmarinic acid and pigments (carotenoids and chlorophylls) from Rosemary by online supercritical fluid extraction-supercritical fluid chromatography. Journal of Chromatography. A. 2020;1639:461709
  109. 109. Mehariya S, Iovine A, Di Sanzo G, Larocca V, Martino M, Leone GP, et al. Supercritical fluid extraction of lutein from Scenedesmus almeriensis. Molecules. 2019;24:1-15
  110. 110. Abrahamsson V, Rodriguez-Meizoso I, Turner C. Determination of carotenoids in microalgae using supercritical fluid extraction and chromatography. Journal of Chromatography. A. 2012;1250:63-68
  111. 111. de Andrade Lima M, Kestekoglou I, Charalampopoulos D, Chatzifragkou A. Supercritical fluid extraction of carotenoids from vegetable waste matrices. Molecules. 2019;24:446
  112. 112. Gallego R, Martínez M, Cifuentes A, Ibáñez E, Herrero M. Development of a green downstream process for the valorization of Porphyridium cruentum biomass. Molecules. 2019;24:15642
  113. 113. Lianfu Z, Zelong L. Optimization and comparison of ultrasound/microwave assisted extraction (UMAE) and ultrasonic assisted extraction (UAE) of lycopene from tomatoes. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry. 2008;15:731-737
  114. 114. Otero P, Quintana SE, Reglero G, Fornari T, García-Risco MR. Pressurized Liquid Extraction (PLE) as an innovative green technology for the effective enrichment of galician algae extracts with high quality fatty acids and antimicrobial and antioxidant properties. Marine Drugs. 2018;16:156
  115. 115. Abbas KA, Mohamed A, Abdulamir AS, Abas HA. A review on supercritical fluid extraction as new analytical method. American Journal of Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 2008;4:345-353
  116. 116. Jodhner JCF, Meireles MA d A. Construction of a supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) equipment: Validation using annatto and fennel and extract analysis by thin layer chromatography coupled to image. Food Science and Technology. 2016;36:210-247
  117. 117. Rudke AR, Mazzutti S, Andrade KS, Vitali L, Ferreira SRS. Optimization of green PLE method applied for the recovery of antioxidant compounds from buriti (Mauritia flexuosa L.) shell. Food Chemistry. 2019;298:125061
  118. 118. Roohinejad S, Nikmaram N, Brahim M, Koubaa M, Khelfa A, Greiner R. Potential of novel technologies for aqueous extraction of plant bioactives. In: Domínguez González H, González Muñoz MJ, editors. Water Extraction of Bioactive Compounds: From Plants to Drug Development. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2017. pp. 399-419 ISBN 9780128096154
  119. 119. Giuffrida D, Zoccali M, Mondello L. Recent developments in the carotenoid and carotenoid derivatives chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis in food matrices. TrAC, Trends in Analytical Chemistry. 2020;132:116047
  120. 120. Cheng S-H, Khoo HE, Kong KW, Prasad KN, Galanakis CM. Extraction of carotenoids and applications. In: Galanakis CM, editor. Carotenoids: Properties, Processing and Applications. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Academic Press; 2020. pp. 259-288 ISBN 9780128170670
  121. 121. Moreno JA, Díaz-Gómez J, Fuentes-Font L, Angulo E, Gosálvez LF, Sandmann G, et al. Poultry diets containing (keto)carotenoid-enriched maize improve egg yolk color and maintain quality. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2020;260:114334
  122. 122. Xu J, Wei R, Jia Z, Song R. Characteristics and bioactive functions of chitosan/gelatin-based film incorporated with ε-polylysine and astaxanthin extracts derived from by-products of shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). Food Hydrocolloids. 2020;100:105436
  123. 123. Stoll L, Rech R, Flôres SH, Nachtigall SMB, de Oliveira Rios A. Poly(acid lactic) films with carotenoids extracts: Release study and effect on sunflower oil preservation. Food Chemistry. 2019;281:213-221
  124. 124. Jaswir I, Noviendri D, Hasrini RF, Octavianti F. Carotenoids: Sources, medicinal properties and their application in food and nutraceutical industry. Journal of Medicinal Plant Research: Planta Medica. 2011;5:7119-7131
  125. 125. Cardoso LAC, Karp SG, Vendruscolo F, Kanno KYF, Zoz LIC, Carvalho JC. Biotechnological production of carotenoids and their applications in food and pharmaceutical products. In: Carotenoids. Rijeka: InTech; 2017
  126. 126. Arab M, Razavi SH, Hosseini SM, Nayebzadeh K, Meybodi NM, Khanniri E, et al. Production and characterization of functional flavored milk and flavored fermented milk using microencapsulated canthaxanthin. LWT. 2019;114:108373
  127. 127. Van Wayenbergh E, Struyf N, Rezaei MN, Sagalowicz L, Bel-Rhlid R, Moccand C, et al. Cereal bran protects vitamin A from degradation during simmering and storage. Food Chemistry. 2020;331:127292
  128. 128. Mart Ó, Calvo MM. Recent advances in astaxanthin micro / nanoencapsulation to improve its stability and functionality as a food ingredient. Marine Drugs. 2020;18:1-25
  129. 129. Liu W, Wang J, McClements DJ, Zou L. Encapsulation of β-carotene-loaded oil droplets in caseinate/alginate microparticles: Enhancement of carotenoid stability and bioaccessibility. Journal of Functional Foods. 2018;40:527-535
  130. 130. Gomez-Estaca J, Comunian TA, Montero P, Ferro-Furtado R, Favaro-Trindade CS. Encapsulation of an astaxanthin-containing lipid extract from shrimp waste by complex coacervation using a novel gelatin-cashew gum complex. Food Hydrocolloids. 2016;61:155-162
  131. 131. Zhang Z, Zhang R, McClements DJ. Encapsulation of β-carotene in alginate-based hydrogel beads: Impact on physicochemical stability and bioaccessibility. Food Hydrocolloids. 2016;61:1-10
  132. 132. Xavier AAO, Mercadante AZ. The bioaccessibility of carotenoids impacts the design of functional foods. Current Opinion in Food Science. 2019;26:1-8
  133. 133. Pal S, Bhattacharjee P. Spray dried powder of lutein-rich supercritical carbon dioxide extract of gamma-irradiated marigold flowers: Process optimization, characterization and food application. Powder Technology. 2018;327:512-523
  134. 134. Steiner BM, Shukla V, McClements DJ, Li YO, Sancho-Madriz M, Davidov-Pardo G. Encapsulation of Lutein in Nanoemulsions Stabilized by Resveratrol and Maillard Conjugates. Journal of Food Science. 2019;84:2421-2431
  135. 135. Medeiros AK de OC, Gomes C. de C, Amaral MLQ de A, Medeiros LDG de, Medeiros I, Porto DL, et al. Nanoencapsulation improved water solubility and color stability of carotenoids extracted from Cantaloupe melon (Cucumis melo L.). Food Chemistry. 2019;270: 562-572
  136. 136. Grashorn M. Feed additives for influencing chicken meat and egg yolk color. In: Carle R, Schweiggert RM, editors. Handbook on Natural Pigments in Food and Beverages: Industrial Applications for Improving Food Color. Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc.; 2016. pp. 283-302 ISBN 9780081003923
  137. 137. Hassaan MS, Mohammady EY, Soaudy MR, Sabae SA, Mahmoud AMA, El-Haroun ER. Comparative study on the effect of dietary β-carotene and phycocyanin extracted from Spirulina platensis on immune-oxidative stress biomarkers, genes expression and intestinal enzymes, serum biochemical in Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Fish & Shellfish Immunology. 2021;108:63-72

Written By

Catarina Lourenço-Lopes, Anxo Carreira-Casais, Maria Fraga-Corral, Paula Garcia-Oliveira, Antón Soria, Amira Jarboui, Marta Barral, Paz Otero, Jesus Simal-Gandara and Miguel A. Prieto

Submitted: 29 March 2021 Reviewed: 13 October 2021 Published: 25 November 2021