Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Perspective Chapter: Application of Nanotechnology Solutions in Plants Fertilization and Environmental Remediation

Written By

Lina M. Alnaddaf, Salim F. Bamsaoud and Mahroos Bahwirth

Submitted: 02 February 2023 Reviewed: 14 March 2023 Published: 19 May 2023

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.1001441

From the Edited Volume

Urban Horticulture - Sustainable Gardening in Cities

Ali Kuden and Burhanettin İmrak

Chapter metrics overview

171 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

The effects of nanoparticles that are used on plants, either as foliar sprays or as fertilizers, vary between promoting and inhibiting. This effect varies according to many different factors, such as the type of nanoparticles, the concentration, the shape, the size, the type of plant, the soil characteristics, and the soil microorganisms. The effect of iron, zinc oxide, graphene, copper oxide, silicon, titanium, and carbon nanotubes on soil fertility, plant growth and development, and crop yield was discussed in detail. The nanoparticles affect the seed’s water absorption, roots, germination, stem, photosynthesis rate, photosynthetic pigments, and enzymatic and non-enzymatic compounds. Moreover, it also highlights the role of these particles in the different stresses that can be exposed to the plant and the mechanisms of tolerance of these stresses. This chapter presents the ability of these particles to combat pollution in its various forms, including groundwater, heavy metals, and wastewater. In addition, these nanoparticles accumulate in the water, soil, and plants, and impact humans and the food chain. Finally, the future prospects for the use of nanotechnology to achieve the goals of sustainable development.

Keywords

  • nanotechnology
  • fertilization
  • environmental remediation
  • nanoparticles
  • plant

1. Introduction

Nanotechnology can change agricultural systems and methods used via nanofertilization. It contributes to reducing pollution and protecting the environment, as well as reducing the costs of using chemical fertilizers. Nanofertilizers provide soluble nutrients that are quickly absorbed and reduce their build-up in the soil. In addition, it increases plant growth and development and enhances plant resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses. Nanofertilizers’ effect on plants varies according to the plant type, method of application, and the size and concentration of different nanoparticles. Moreover, to the positive effects of nanofertilizers, it is necessary to highlight their adverse effects related to toxicity. In addition, we will discuss the future prospects for the use of nanofertilizers.

Advertisement

2. Mechanisms of nanofertilizer impacts on soil, plants, crops, and stress

2.1 Soil fertility

A fertile soil is one of the fundamentals (along with water, climate, and seeds) that are essential for the advancement of agriculture and enhancing agricultural output efficiency. Several groups of researchers each suggested a creative approach to soil remediation. Advances in nanotechnology over the last century have allowed for a variety of approaches to increasing soil fertility. Unpredictably, NPs in soil may either inhibit plant development or promote it, depending on many factors related to nanoparticles and plants [1]. Several techniques, including spraying, pouring down nanofluid, and combining nanoparticles with the soil, are used to amend the soil with nanoparticles in order to increase soil fertility. Brownian motion and gravitational force may both play a role in the transit of NPs in soil, hence increasing the likelihood of these particles interacting with soil constituents that subsequently reflected plants [2]. If NPs are tiny enough (5 to 20 nm), they may penetrate plant cells through sieve-like cell walls [3]. This has enhanced the need for employing the substance in nanoform to overcome the problems in soil fertility and plant fertilization.

Several soil-beneficial processes are attributed to the use of nanomaterials, including the nitrogen cycle, the enhancement of enzyme activity, and the induction of plant-beneficial microbes. Numerous inorganic, organic, and composite nanomaterials were examined in terms of the possible influence they might have on fertilizing soil and resolving issues connected to plant development and production. These studies were conducted both in the laboratory and in the field, and they were evaluated and summarized in order to be a useful resource for farmers and researchers to save time and money.

One of the ways that nanoparticles are employed in agriculture is by incorporating them (in either fluid or solid form) into the soil [4]. These nanoparticles have the potential to introduce either on their own or in combination with conventional fertilization ingredients. In each of the aforementioned methods, nanoparticles and nanotechnology, in general, have the potential to provide solutions to soil problems that have preoccupied farmers over the period of the last several years. Among these solutions was the application of silver nanoparticles on the soil. The combination of these nanoparticles caused a rise in the number of diazotrophic bacteria in the soil, which is thought to have been a contributing factor in the elevated amount of fertilization seen in the soil. Moreover, iron nanoparticles, which are a component of a new generation of environmental remediation technology, may provide a cost-effective solution to one of the most challenging difficulties in environmental cleanup. Soil contaminants such as chlorinated organic compounds, toxic metals, and inorganic compounds can all be converted into less toxic or inert compounds by interacting with nanoparticles zero-valent iron [5, 6, 7, 8, 9]. On the other hand, it is shown that soil amendments containing metallic Cu NPs up to 600 mg/kg considerably improved the development of lettuce seedlings by up to 91% without causing any harmful consequences [1]. Recent research has shown that adding zinc nanoparticles to the soil as a kind of fertilizer considerably increases the amount of zinc that is available in the soil, which in turn significantly increases the amount of zinc that is present in the plant’s shoots and grain. This is due to that the application of these fertilizers considerably accelerated the development of plant roots and exudates. These exudates have the potential to greatly boost both the availability of zinc and its absorption by plants [10, 11].

One of the most promising approaches that deliver the answer to reducing soil toxicity is the use of nanocomposites, which will eventually result in an improvement in plant growth and production [12]. The higher surface-to-volume ratio of graphene oxide (GO) nanoparticles has unique capabilities as an efficient water transporter in soil because of its sp2 and sp3 hybrid structure; these particles could contribute to solving drought problems and the lack of water [13]. CuO nanoparticles, on the other hand, promote the growth of plant growth-promoting microorganisms in the rhizosphere of Salvia miltiorrhiza (red sage) [14, 15]. The ameliorating potential of Si nanoparticles for soil is well known since these nanoparticles are often more effective than their bulk equivalents [12, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21]. Due to the stimulation of plant photosynthesis by SiO2 nanoparticles, silicon plays a critical role in improving the plant antioxidant system’s efficiency, promoting plant growth under salt stress, and increasing the plant’s tolerance to abiotic and biotic stressors. Therefore, SiO2 nanoparticles provide excellent solutions for enhancing the capabilities of the soil to support agricultural activities [12, 22]. TiO2 nanoparticles have several uses in agroecosystems due to their attractive physical and chemical characteristics, availability, cheap cost, and excellent stability. TiO2 NPs are used in nanofertilizers and nanopesticides to increase soil fertility and crop development as well as improved light retention [23, 24, 25]. Numerous studies show that TiO2 nanoparticles, at a specific concentration range in various plant species, may increase plants’ resistance to cold, heat, drought, NaCl, and ultraviolet light [26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31]. TiO2 NPs stimulate soil nutrients and microbial dynamics at low concentrations [32]. Nanoparticles of titanium dioxide make it easier for seeds to absorb water and, as a result, accelerate the germination process [12]. The radicle, plumule, root, and seed germination of canola seedlings is accelerated by the application of TiO2 NPs [33].

Carbon nanotubes are employed as fertilizer to enrich the soil, consequently encouraging the growth of many plants, including tomatoes, cucumbers, rice, maize, broccoli, and soybeans [3, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39]. Carbon nanoparticles have the ability to restrict the mobility of herbicides in agricultural applications. Furthermore, CNPs improve plant photosynthesis, crop development, water absorption, antioxidant levels, and the efficiency of nitrogen (N), P, and K use. CNPs have recently reported as part of a novel approach that also includes compost, mycorrhizal, and arbuscular fungi blended into the soil. This combination of CNPs has the ability to protect plants against drought stress. The innovative use of CNPs in agriculture might fulfill growing food demand while simultaneously protecting the environment [40]. The recent approach is a significant indicator that nanotechnology is a fertile field for agricultural research, and many more studies will be required to develop innovative agricultural solutions in the near future.

2.2 Plant growth and development

The use of nanotechnology in agricultural sciences, with the assistance of nanoscience, is now achieving a high level of success, resulting in the development of novel solutions in a wide range of agricultural domains. The consequences of all the novel approaches to enhance soil, irrigation water, and agricultural climate discovered via the usage of nanotechnology are indirectly improving plant components in order to produce agricultural items and boost yields. For example, the addition of iron nanoparticles to the soil reduces soil contaminants such as chlorinated organic compounds, toxic metals, and inorganic compounds that could harm plants. A wide variety of nanoscale materials were prepared and analyzed to provide a fresh strategy for addressing agriculture’s perennial challenges. These nanoparticles are often delivered directly to plants through the seeds, stems, or leaves in order to improve growth and agricultural productivity. In this section, all of the recent researches on how nanoparticles affect plant development are summarized.

Using carbon-based nanomaterials (CNTs) boosted seed water absorption by moving it from the seed coat to shoots and leaves [1]. This improved germination percentage and plant growth by maximizing water uptake and nutrient intake [41]. This technique has been used to improve seed germination, root and plant growth, and final growth in numerous crops, including hybrid Bt cotton, Phaseolus mungo L., Brassica juncea L., tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) and rice (Oryza sativa L.), resulting in an increase in biomass and seed germination [12]. CNTs have a crucial role in stimulating rice seedling growth, root elongation, and seed germination in zucchini species [42]. In addition, CNTs improved seed germination, vegetative biomass, and tomato growth [43], and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) influenced the fresh and dried mass of tomato roots as well as gene expression [44]. Research demonstrates that maize, tobacco, switchgrass, rice, tomato cell cultures, barley, wheat, and soybean seeds grew faster when treated with single-walled carbon nanohorns (SWCNHs) [12]. In fact, the effect on plant shape depends on the type of nanoparticles and its applied [45]. However, titanium dioxides (TiO2) NPs, such as Ag and graphene NPs, have shown to improve seed germination by increasing the ability of internal tissues to convey water and increasing the metabolism of seed stores [24]. They also improve water absorption, which accelerates seed germination [12]. Increased nitrate absorption and photosynthetic rate attributed to the augmentation of nitrogen metabolism caused by the introduction of TiO2 NPs in spinach, showing that these nanoparticles may really boost plant growth [44]. The application of TiO2 NPs to canola seedling plants increased the growth of the radicle and plumule, as well as root and seed germination [33].

Nanoscale zinc oxide (ZnO) is essential for plant growth at low concentrations and does not inhibit onion seedling growth or cell division [33]. ZnO NPs enhanced the germination of soybean, wheat, tomato, and onion seeds [46] and increased the germination of cucumber seeds by 10%. In addition, ZnO NPs with a particle size of 50 nm favorably influenced the roots of rapeseed [33]. In addition, ZnO NPs application on the coffee plants had a positive effect by increasing the fresh weight of roots (37%) [44]. Compared to the control, ZnO NPs at 10 mg/L accelerated seed germination (100%), root length (185 mm), and root width (0.5 mm) [47].

Similar to other nanomaterials, silver nanoparticles (SNPs) had beneficial impacts on vascular plants, including seed germination, root development, and plant biomass. These benefits correlated with the concentration and structure of SNPs [42]. Experiments conducted with varied concentrations of SNPs on Cucurbita Pepo revealed a notable change in seeding speed and duration due to the presence of the SNPs [48]. SNPs greatly improved wheat seeding rate, rootletlet and plumule length, and rootletlet and plumule wet and dry weight [49]. In fenugreek plants, low concentrations of SNPs (10–20 g/mL) increased seedling growth and seed germination [44]. A number of investigations on the impact of SNPs on two wheat and barley types found a rise in germination ratio stem, length, and a decrease in root length compared to the control [50].

Rice seed germination is stimulated by the addition of Silicon (Si) NPs. Si NPs increase maize seed germination by improving nutrient availability [41]. Si NPs enhanced all seedling parameters such as percent germination, germination rate, length, and fresh and dry mass of root and shoot in Changbai larch (Larix olgensis Henry) seedlings [51, 52]. Also, utilizing Si NPs for pre-chilling seeds in tall wheatgrass (Thinopyrum intermedium L.) breaks inertia, stimulates seed germination, and boosts the vigor index, mean germination time, and dry weight of seedling roots and shoots [50]. Soybean (Glycine max L.) germination and growth are boosted by boosting nitrate reductase activity and improving the seeds’ capacity to absorb and use water and nutrients [51, 52]. Seed germination, plant height, and root and shoot dry weights were all improved by using Si-NPs in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings [53]. In a similar manner, Se NPs stimulated organogenesis and accelerated root development in Nicotiana tabacum L. by up to 40%, compared to the effect of aqueous selenate [33]. Gold nanoparticles (NPs) at concentrations of 5–15 mg/L considerably enhanced the germination and physiology of older maize seeds without causing any harm [54].

Numerous researchers have used a wide number of techniques, including the biological approach, in order to fabricate NPs with a wide range of morphologies and sizes [48, 51, 52, 54, 55, 56, 57]. The biological approach is a synthetic technology that involves the extraction of plant components for use in the nanoparticle synthesis process. This technology has the potential to be an effective solution in agricultural applications since it is controllable, inexpensive, low-risk, and safe. Generally, nanotechnology has the potential to improve agriculture’s sustainability and benefits, but there are still many questions surrounding its use in this field.

2.3 The effect of nanofertilizer on crop yield

Numerous studies outline the nanotechnology mechanism for crop enhancement. In this part, these findings on the function of nanotechnology in crop improvement are discussed. Nanotechnologies have the potential to generate a substantial increase in agricultural productivity as well as enhancements to food production systems [58]. Nanotechnology is one example of a technology that may aid in agricultural production by reducing wasteful input consumption and increasing productivity. Nanotechnology is regarded as an effective tool for managing a wide range of environmental stresses by providing novel and practical solutions. Nano-fertilizers (NFs) considerably increase plant growth efficiency, soil quality, and crop yield of high-quality fruits and cereals [59], and also, may serve as a sustainable strategy to promote agricultural yield in (semi-) arid regions [60]. NFs have the potential to improve nutrient absorption and plant output by modulating fertilizer availability in the rhizosphere, prolong stress tolerance by enhancing nutritional capacity, and raise plant defense mechanisms. For sustainable agriculture, NFs might potentially take the place of synthetic fertilizers since they are better at stimulating plant growth [61]. The applications of nanoparticles and nanomaterials have a positive effect on crop productivity via different strategies. It is summarized by green synthesis of nanoparticles, plant-targeted protection via the application of nanoherbicides and nanofungicides, precise and constant supply of nutrients through nanofertilizers as well as tolerance to abiotic stress, by several mechanisms such as activation of the antioxidant enzyme system that alleviates oxidative stress [62]. In addition, the tolerance to abiotic stress by several mechanisms, such as activation of the antioxidant enzyme system that alleviates oxidative stress is one of the positive impacts of the applications of nanoparticles and nanomaterials in agriculture. All the mentioned positive effects could be due to their nano-size properties, their high nutrient use efficiency, their slow release of nutrients, and the controllable necessary dosage of nanomaterials used in fertilizer to get the desired results [63].

In the most recent decades, there have been reports that nanoscale zero-valent iron has the ability to increase plant development in the laboratory. Therefore, nanoprimed seeds demonstrated superior crop performance when compared to hydroprimed seeds in the conventional sense. As a result, nZVI is classified as a “pro-fertilizer,” and it is utilized commercially as a seed treatment agent capable of increasing plant development and yield while causing little disruption to the soil ecology [64].

Essential oil content was found to increase with the use of nano-iron fertilizer, fruit output and quality were both enhanced with the use of nano-zinc and boron fertilizers, and the use of nano-zeolite was shown to increase germination rates and prolong the life of soil nutrients. Increased growth from nanoparticles helps crops mature sooner and recover more quickly from environmental challenges. In addition to increasing the levels of photosynthetic pigments and osmolytes, the synthesized Fe2O3 NPs also increased the activities of the enzymes peroxidase (POD), polyphenol oxidase (PPO), catalase (CAT), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) in healthy as well as infected tomato plants when compared with the control. The optimum therapy for peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase activities was determined to be the administration of Fe2O3 NPs (10 g/mL) to stress plants, which enhanced the activities of POD by 34.4% and PPO by 31.24%. On the other hand, the best treatment for stressed plants was to apply Fe2O3 NPs (20 g/mL), which increased the activities of CAT by 30.9% and SOD by 31.33%) [65]. When compared to the control, the same treatment had significantly higher biological yield, grain yield, protein yield, and harvest index, with 14.792 Meg/ha, 7.100 Meg/ha, 890.34 kg/ha, and 40.00 percent, respectively [66]. Under normal circumstances, applying ZnO NPs led to considerable growth and biomass augmentation while preventing drought-induced decrease. ZnO NPs treatment increased photosynthetic pigments, photosynthesis, and PSII activity, with peak values at 100 mg/L [67]. Under both normal and drought circumstances, ZnO NPs caused an increase in the total amount of proline, glycine betaine, free amino acids, and carbohydrates. In addition, foliar application of ZnO NPs was shown to be effective in preventing the drought-induced decrease in the amount of phenol and mineral nutrients [67]. Stimulatory effects were seen on total chlorophyll (0.93 g/kg FW), shoot biomass (2168 kg/ha), and essential oil content (3.4 g/kg) and yield (7.4 kg/ha) as a result of sub-risky levels of Zn in nanoform absorption (amounted to an average of 152.6 mg Zn/kg after foliar application of 160 mg of zinc oxide nanoparticles) in comparison with ZnS treatment or control. Foliar application of 160 mg/L ZnO NPs is recommended for optimal micronutrient Zn biofortification, biomass production, and essential oil yield in dragonhead [60]. The researchers used many nanocomposites with different concentrations on different plant species to study their effect on their production and increase the yield [4].

Foliar application of nanoparticles enhanced the foliar nutrient status and crop growth and yield. The nano-enabled foliar application could be an ideal strategy for advancing agricultural productivity. Canola plants had an increase in their biomass after receiving a foliar spray of Ca-NPs at a concentration of 100 mg/L, which was deemed the best dosage. Canola plants had an increase in their biomass after receiving a foliar spray of calcium nanoparticles at a concentration of 100 mg/L, which was deemed the best dosage. Furthermore, Ca-NPs also induced a drought-tolerant response in Brassica napus plants, which correlated with an uptick in the expression of key antioxidative defense enzymes (APX, POD, SOD, CAT), secondary metabolites and non-enzymatic components (protease, lipoxygenase, proline, total soluble protein contents, endogenous hormonal biosynthesis) [68]. Grain yield components such as the number of pods per plant and 100-grain weight were also affected by seed priming with nano-Zn. Nano-Zn priming increased grain protein percentage by 21%. Therefore, to increase the yield of white beans, priming treatment with nano-Zn as well as foliar application of zinc + iron can be used [69].

The results demonstrated that nano-K2SO4 enhanced shoot dry weight, plant height, number of flowers, number of tillers, root length, root fresh weight, and root dry weight under both salt levels on two alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) genotypes [70].

Currently, the use of nanoparticles is having an impact on agricultural production. There is evidence that the results obtained indicated that the foliar application of CuNPs improved the physical and nutraceutical quality and the concentration of Cu in melon fruits. The highest weight and the best diameters of the fruit were obtained with copper nanoparticles have a strong impact on the growth and development of different crops. Biofortification specifically with Cu NPs improves the nutritional quality of food and its consumption has a positive influence on the health of humanity. The findings indicate that there is a statistically significant relationship between the copper nanoparticles and the phytochemical variables found in melon fruits. It was determined that the use of Cu NPs may be an option to enrich melon fruits, and it has the potential to alleviate the problem of copper insufficiency in the diet of the general population [71].

Nano-fertilizers suggest new crop management strategies. Although potassium (K) is difficult to incorporate into organic materials, it helps to increase rice crop quality [72]. Although the dosage of 200 ppm of K nanofertilizer resulted in a greater increase in yield, the dosage of 100 ppm produced greater accumulations of biomass, total chlorophyll content, SPAD values, photosynthetic activity, and nitrate reductase activity. Based on the findings obtained, it seems that the use of K nanofertilizers has a positive impact on the physiological growth of plants [73]. Drip irrigation with 75% nN and foliar treatment with 25% nN have a substantial effect on growth and biochemical parameters [74].

Plant species vary in the efficiency of nanoparticle absorption and the impact of nanoparticles on growth and metabolic processes. Nanoparticle concentration influences activities such as germination and plant growth and development [66].

Various kinds of nanomaterials have shown great promise in promoting sustainable agriculture as they help to improve agricultural production by increasing the efficiency of inputs and minimizing yield losses. Nanomaterials offer a wider specific surface area to fertilizers [75].

Our most significant findings are as follows: (1) Plants have the ability to take up nanomaterials via their roots and leaves, which will then subsequently be transformed by the plant. (2) Plant growth may be stimulated and stress alleviated with moderate applications, while high concentrations can be harmful. (3) It is impossible to ignore the impact that nanomaterials have on the rhizosphere [76].

Using nanofertilizers is a potential strategy that may boost the sustainability and efficiency of the agricultural output of farmed crops. This technology is also effective. This technology is also successful due to its nano-size features, high nutrient usage efficiency, gradual release of nutrients, and therefore low necessary applied dosage of fertilizer [77].

Smart fertilizer means using smart agro-technological and advanced tools for the control dose and time of applied fertilizers such as global positioning systems, and remote sensing. These tools are able to minimize agrochemical inputs and maximize crop yield [63].

Nano-fertilization is considered an emerging strategy for increasing plant production while avoiding agroecosystem contamination.

One way to boost agricultural efficiency is the use of nanotechnology. At present, numerous novel nanomaterials are commercially used in agriculture and developed to improve crop productivity and preserve food quality and safety [78].

2.4 The relationship between nanofertilizer and stresses

Many scientists have studied the effect of factors that threaten crop production, including water stress, salinity, and alkalinity, among others. Nanotechnology is a promising tool for increasing crop yields and improving plant stress tolerance. Many books and chapters talk about one or more types of stress. Among them, for example, is a book, Nanomaterial Interactions with Plant Cellular Mechanisms and Macromolecules and Agricultural Implications, and accordingly we tried to start from where the others ended, as we limited ourselves to presenting some research that was published in 2022 and beyond.

Table 1 shows the type of stresses as well as the impact of nanoparticles by different concentrations on the growth and development of various plants.

StressesPlantNanoparticlesConcentrationApplicationsReference
SalinityPea (Pisum sativum L.)Si and NSi3 mMEnhanced the following indications as vegetative growth, relative water content (RWC), plant height, fresh dry weight, total yield, antioxidant defense systems, and K+ content in roots and shoots[79]
Rice (Oryza sativa L.)ZnO-NPs50 mg/LRoot length, root fresh weight, root dry weight, root K+ content, and root antioxidant enzymatic activity were all enhanced by applying 50 mg/L ZnO-NPs often in salinity as well as improved the K+/Na+ ratio in the rice’s root system.[80]
Squash (Cucurbita pepo L.)Fertilizer (nano-K)0.50 g/L nano-KUsing nano-K to promote antioxidant and photo-synthetic machinery, minimize oxidative stress biomarkers and Na+ levels, boost tolerance to salt stress, and improve squash yield and yield quality under salt stress.[81]
Spearmint (Mentha spicata L.)Chitosan-melatonin nanoparticles (CTS-HPMC-Mel NPs)an chemical priming agentAdverse effects of salt stress were ameliorated with Mel and CTS-HPMC-Mel NP treatments by enhancing morphological traits, proline, antioxidant enzymatic activities, as well as the content of dominant constituents of essential oil profile. Engineered CTS-HPMC-Mel NPs could be applied as an innovative protective agent to mitigate the effects of salinity in crop plants.[82]
DroughtRice (Oryza sativa L.)ZnONPs25 ppmincrease both of plant height, total chlorophyll contents, plant fresh and dry weights as well as seed, straw yield and the 1000 paddy weight of rice plants[83]
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Iron nanoparticles 10 mg/L when combined with Glomus in- traradices10 mg/L when combined with Glo-musint-raradicesIron nanoparticles combined with Glomus intraradices promoted significantly the growth and drought-tolerant of wheat[84]
Corn (Zea mays L.)(CNPs)4.5, 10 nmIncrease in their anti-oxidant defense system.[40]
Peppermint (Mentha piperita L.)Myco-Root + TiO2 NPs100 mg/LThe maximum content of menthol, 1,8-cineole, and neo-menthol was obtained under mild drought stress (I40) fertilized with Myco-Root + TiO2 NPs.[85]
Potentially toxic elements (PTEs)Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)nano-Fe2O31% (w/w)Lower inhibitory effects on biometric parameters as well as lowering PTEs-induced oxidative damage and protect the growth of barley plants under contaminated soils.[86]
Cd stressalfalfa supplemented (Medicago sativa)nZnOSoil application of 90 mg/kg nZnO with BC (2%)Decreased Cd and increased Zn-bioaccumulation into roots and shoots as well as higher nZnO and BC levels efficiently alleviated the Cd-mediated reductions in alfalfa biomass, anti-oxidant enzymatic response, and gaseous exchange traits than control.[87]
Soils contaminated with rare earth elements (REEs)Duckweed (Lemna minor)nano terbium (Tb)less than 100 mg/LIncreased the contents of (N), (P), (K+), (Ca+2), (Mg+2), (Mn+2) and (Fe+2)[88]
CeO2Pakchoi (Brassica chinensis L.)CeO2 NPs0.7 mg/kgSub-stomatal CO2 was increased dramatically under low doses of CeO2 NPs[89]
Cu stressRape (Brassica napus L.)SNPs5 mg/LSNPs application enhanced the shoot height, root length, and dry weight of shoot and root by 34.6%, 282%, 41.7% and 37.1%, respectively, over Cu treatment alone SNPs application has the sustainable technology for increasing plant productivity and reducing the accumulation of toxic metals in heavy metal-polluted soils.[90]

Table 1.

The various impacts of different types of stresses with different concentrations on growth and development of plants.

Advertisement

3. The role of nanofertilizer in environmental protect

The essential key to agricultural sustainability is to perform all farming activities in a sustainable manner [91]. The agricultural sector is facing a series of biological and environmental challenges [92]. Therefore, it is essential to manage the available natural resources in a sustainable method [93]. This requires finding more creative and innovative solutions using modern technology such as nanotechnology that can provide society with the proper technologies used in environmental detection, sensing, and remediation [94]. Farmers face several challenges in traditional agriculture. There are no fertilizers can successfully provide optimal plant nutrients. In addition, chemical toxicity results from the high use of fungicides/pesticides/herbicides [95]. The chemical soluble fertilizers used not only have less utilization efficiency (less than 30%) but large amounts of these are also lost during the application causing environmental pollution [96].

The use of nanoparticles would decrease the consumption of agrochemicals due to the very high efficiency. The environmental benefit of using nanoparticles is more known when it starts to be used, for example, in plant protection products, chemical copper could be replaced with a suitable Cu-NP which is the least environmentally harmful [97]. Likewise, the seed soaking with nanoparticles solution has shown improvements toward increased and more stable production [98]. In order to use nanoparticles in a clear legislative framework, it is necessary to synthesize them with an innovative composition as well as similar in their properties as much as possible to natural substances [99]. In this context, nanofertilizers synthesized by the bio-method are promising substances for achieving sustainable growth of crop yields and securing food for the ever-increasing population [79].

The soil is a system full of life, particularly symbiotic associations with the roots of different plant species [99]. Plants exchange gas and fluid with the environment via their leaves and roots, where rhizosphere microorganisms (rhizobacteria and mycorrhizal fungi) solubilize minerals and then the plants absorb solubilize nutrients [100]. This can reflect on the germination of seeds, root and shoot development, biomass, and yield of the crops [101].

Nanofertilizers have some characteristics compared to conventional fertilizers [99]. These features help crops absorb nutrients slowly and sustainably due to a high surface-to-volume ratio and reduced loss of nutrients [102]. Also, it is having active sites for a more significant number of biological activities, which increases the efficiency of plant absorption of nanofertilizer [103]. Furthermore, soil fertility improvement as well as maintaining a suitable environment for the growth of microorganisms in the soil [104]. Thus, it is providing sustainable solutions to environmental pollution and climate change [105].

Methods for preparing nanoparticles vary to the available capabilities and the purpose of the application [106]. Many of the protocols relied on eco-friendly, less polluting, more sustainable approaches [107]. Also, it can use extraction and separation strategies away from pressures [108], high temperatures [109], acidifications [110], and toxic metals [111]. The most natural sources used to synthesize nanoparticles from plant extracts as well as microorganisms such as yeasts, fungi, bacteria, and algae. Biomolecules of cells microorganisms and plants such as enzymes, amines, proteins, phenolic, alkaloids, and pigments contribute to synthesizing NPs and capping of them [112].

Bioremediation provides based on nanomaterials many features compared to conventional treatments. It has exhibited a quantum effect with decreased activation energy as well as contact with a larger amount of it with the surrounding materials, and also, has a high competence level, selective to specific metals, and is more economically feasible [113].

Bioremediation processes were used in groundwater and wastewater management, uranium remediation, solid waste, soil remediation and remediation of heavy metal pollution as well as petroleum [114]. The ability of NMs to combat pollution is a revolutionary change in the ecological field. Furthermore, it can mention these changes via some examples such as the nanoscale zero-valent iron removing AS (III) in anoxic groundwater [115]. Eliminating hydrophobic contaminants was via using engineered polymeric NPs [116]. Formatting special structures of PAMAM dendrimers are used in water treatment [117]. Employment-engineered polymeric NPs are used for soil remediation [118].

On other hand, NPS have a great effect on biodegradation especially dye contaminants. These dyes have high chemical stability, and compositions complicated and long-distance stability in running water, which will lead to inhibited photosynthesis, the development of aquatic biota and less use of dissolved oxygen as well as decreased watercourse recovery rate Figure 1 [119].

Figure 1.

Graphic representation of the advantages of nanotechnology in bioremediation.

In addition, several studies showed the importance of zinc oxide (ZnO) and titanium dioxide (TiO2) in environmental remediation which were used in dye-sensitized solar cells as well as water photoelectrolysis [120].

NPs have the best-advanced strategies for the treatment of wastewater due to their properties such as high adsorption and reaction capacities as well as a suspension in aqueous solutions as colloids, less time-consuming, efficient cost-effective, eco-friendly and less waste compared with conventional methods [121].

Green nanomaterials have a wide effective of abilities to remove organic and inorganic solutes, toxic metal ions and pathogenic microorganisms from water by using various nanomaterials such as nanosorbents (carbon-based nanosorbents such as Captymer™), nanostructured catalytic membranes (cellulose acetate, polyvinylidene fluoride, chitosan and polysulfone), nanocatalysts (silver nanocatalysts), bioactiveNPs, molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) and biomimetic membranes [122, 123].

Advertisement

4. Nanofertilizer toxicity

NPs found naturally in soil via agricultural activities or rain as well as through anthropogenic production [124]. Also, it is more concentrated in soil compared to air and water. Plants absorb these NPs from the soil and move them to reach various parts of plants and finally, a human consumes this plant Figure 2 [125].

Figure 2.

Graphic representation of the environmental benefit for nanoparticles fertilizer.

The NPs’ increasing application in agriculture led to directly interacting with the environment as well as harmful effects on aquatic, terrestrial species and humans [105]. It is reflected in the accumulation of NPs in the soil, fertility and physicochemical characteristics of the soil [126].

The NPs’ harmful effects on plants include DNA damage, reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation, association with nuclear protein, chromosomal aberration, decreased DNA repair and genetic defects. NiO NPs access the DNA of tomato plants and produced irreversible cell damage [127, 128]. Application Co3O4 NPs in eggplants caused apoptosis in their cells [128]. In addition, using ZnO NPs led to adverse effects on membrane integrity, chromosomal damage and DNA strand breakage in Vicia faba L., Nicotiana tabacum L. and Allium cepa L. [129, 130].

The presence of silver NPs in the range of 0.1–0.5 mg kg − 1 in soil inhibits the growth of dehydrogenase activity of bacteria [131].

Likewise, CNTs, copper NPs, zinc NPs and iron NPs have several adverse effects on soil microflora and aquatic life, which include aquatic microbes, vertebrates and aquatic plants [132, 133]. It is reported [134] that graphene oxide NPs caused toxic effects on freshwater algae due to the generation of oxidative stress.

Advertisement

5. Conclusion and future perspective

Sustainable development to achieve the Zero Hunger SDG 2030 should be inclusive. This goal is achieved via the implementation of agricultural practices to ensure improved crop production, protecting the natural resources (water, land and forests) as well without adverse impacts on biota and human beings [105].

Nanotechnology can achieve these requirements by relying on vital nanomaterials in environmental remediation and other industries. It is cost effective and involves less toxic waste disposal. Also, it improves catalytic efficiency and selectivity.

Despite the fact that the reports that are readily available on the application of nanoparticles to the process of cultivating soil and plants are only for a small number of nanomaterial, the quantity of materials used in agriculture is significantly greater than what is currently available.

As a result of this, there is an urgent need to implement a bigger variety of nanomaterials, each of which must be manufactured using a new precursor and creative synthesized methods. In addition, using plant components in the manufacturing of nanoparticles during green synthesis may result in the development of nanoparticles that are well suited for performing effectively as nanofilters.

However, the growing application of NPs must be a concern on some points, their accumulation in the soil, their interaction with plants and microorganisms and the dose of application as well as toxicological aspects in ecotoxicological and food chains.

The potential impact of nanofertilizers on human health necessitates more investigation into their persistence in plant tissue that is consumed. While nanofertilizers have the potential to radically alter farming methods, it is essential to evaluate their effects on the environment as soon as possible.

Therefore, our insight will concern the development of green strategies for biogenic nanoparticle synthesis, examining plant/soil–NP interactions in the field in a way that enhances crop productivity and provides a suitable environment for the growth and development of all living organisms and feeding future generations with healthy food.

References

  1. 1. Omar RA, Afreen S, Talreja N, Chauhan D, Ashfaq MOMAR, Anand R, et al. Impact of nanomaterials in plant systems. In: Plant Nanobionics. Cham: Springer; 2019. pp. 117-140
  2. 2. Rajput VD, Minkina TM, Behal A, Sushkova SN, Mandzhieva S, Singh R, et al. Effects of zinc-oxide nanoparticles on soil, plants, animals and soil organisms: A review. Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring & Management. 2018;9:76-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.enmm.2017.12.006
  3. 3. Liu R, Lal R. Potentials of engineered nanoparticles as fertilizers for increasing agronomic productions. Science of the Total Environment. 2015;1(514):131-139. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.104 Epub 2015 Feb 5
  4. 4. Bahwirth MA, Bamsaoud SF, Alnaddaf LM. Nanomaterial impact on plant morphology, physiology and productivity. In: Al-Khayri JM, Alnaddaf LM, Jain SM, editors. Nanomaterial Interactions with Plant Cellular Mechanisms and Macromolecules and Agricultural Implications. Cham: Springer; 2023. pp. 319-340. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-20878-2_12
  5. 5. Ponder SM, Darab JG, Bucher J, Caulder D, Craig I, Davis L, et al. Surface chemistry and electrochemistry of supported zerovalent iron nanoparticles in the remediation of aqueous metal contaminants. Chemistry of Materials. 2001;13(2):479-486. DOI: 10.1021/cm000288r
  6. 6. Lowry GV, Johnson KM. Congener-specific dechlorination of dissolved PCBs by microscale and nanoscale zerovalent iron in a water/methanol solution. Environmental Science & Technology. 2004;38(19):5208-5216. DOI: 10.1021/es049835q
  7. 7. Liou YH, Lo SL, Lin CJ, Kuan WH, Weng SC, Liou YH, et al. Chemical reduction of an unbuffered nitrate solution using catalyzed and uncatalyzed nanoscale iron particles. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2005;127(1-3):102-110. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.06.029 Epub 2005 Aug 2. PMID: 16081210
  8. 8. Sohn K, Kang SW, Ahn S, Woo M, Yang SK. Fe(0) nanoparticles for nitrate reduction: Stability, reactivity, and transformation. Environmental Science & Technology. 2006;40(17):5514-5519. DOI: 10.1021/es0525758
  9. 9. Liu Y, Phenrat T, Lowry GV. Effect of TCE concentration and dissolved groundwater solutes on NZVI-promoted TCE dechlorination and H2 evolution. Environmental Science & Technology. 2007;41(22):7881-7887. DOI: 10.1021/es0711967 PMID: 18075103
  10. 10. Gupta N, Ram H, Kumar B. Mechanism of zinc absorption in plants: Uptake, transport, translocation and accumulation. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology. 2016;15(1):89-109. DOI: 10.1007/s11157-016-9390-1
  11. 11. Abbas HH, Noufal E, Farid I, Attia M, Ahmed R, Abbas M. Effect of traditional sources of Zn and ZnO-nano-particles foliar application on productivity and P-uptake of maize plants grown on sandy and clay loam soils. Environment, Biodiversity and Soil Security. 2021;5:59-72. DOI: 10.21608/jenvbs.2021.58802.1127
  12. 12. Ali NM, Altaey DK, Altaee NH. The impact of selenium, Nano (SiO2) and organic fertilization on growth and yield of potato Solanum tuberosum L. under salt stress conditions. In: IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. Vol. 735. IOP Publishing; 2021. p. 012042. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/735/1/012042
  13. 13. He Y, Hu R, Zhong Y, Zhao X, Chen Q, Zhu H. Graphene oxide as a water transporter promoting germination of plants in soil. Nano Research. 2018;11(4):1928-1937. DOI: 10.1007/s12274-017-1810-1
  14. 14. Shah V, Collins D, Walker VK, Shah S. The impact of engineered cobalt, iron, nickel and silver nanoparticles on soil bacterial diversity under field conditions. Environmental Research Letters. 2014;9(2):024001. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/9/2/024001
  15. 15. Wei X, Cao P, Wang G, Liu Y, Song J, CuO HJ. ZnO, and γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles modified the underground biomass and rhizosphere microbial community of salvia miltiorrhiza (Bge.) after 165-day exposure. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2021;1(217):112232. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112232 Epub 2021 Apr 14
  16. 16. Suriyaprabha R, Karunakaran G, Yuvakkumar R, Rajendran V, Kannan N. Silica nanoparticles for increased silica availability in maize (Zea mays. L) Seeds under hydroponic conditions. Current Nanoscience. 2012;8(6):902-908. DOI: 10.2174/157341312803989033
  17. 17. Karunakaran G, Suriyaprabha R, Manivasakan P, Yuvakkumar R, Rajendran V, Prabu P, et al. Effect of nanosilica and silicon sources on plant growth promoting rhizobacteria, soil nutrients and maize seed germination. IET Nanobiotechnology. 2013;7(3):70-77. DOI: 10.1049/iet-nbt.2012.0048
  18. 18. Liu J, Cai H, Mei C, Wang M. Effects of nano-silicon and common silicon on lead uptake and translocation in two rice cultivars. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering. 2015;9(5):905-911. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-015-0786-x
  19. 19. Tantawy AS, Salama YAM, El-Nemr MA, Abdel-Mawgoud AMR. Nano silicon application improves salinity tolerance of sweet pepper plants. International Journal of ChemTech Research. 2015;8(10):11-17
  20. 20. Tripathi DK, Singh S, Singh VP, Prasad SM, Chauhan DK, Dubey NK. Silicon nanoparticles more efficiently alleviate arsenate toxicity than silicon in maize cultiver and hybrid differing in arsenate tolerance. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2016;4:46. DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2016.00046
  21. 21. Soares C, Branco-Neves S, de Sousa A, Teixeira J, Pereira R, Fidalgo F. Can nano-SiO2 reduce the phytotoxicity of acetaminophen? - A physiological, biochemical and molecular approach. Environmental Pollution. 2018;241:900-911. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.06.037
  22. 22. Ayman M, Metwally S, Mancy M, Abd Alhafez A. Influence of nano–silica on wheat plants grown in salt–affected soil. Journal of Productivity and Development. 2020;25(3):279-296. DOI: 10.21608/JPD.2020.120786
  23. 23. Simonin M, Martins JM, Le Roux X, Uzu G, Calas A, Richaume A. Toxicity of TiO2 nanoparticles on soil nitrification at environmentally relevant concentrations: Lack of classical dose-response relationships. Nanotoxicology. 2017;11(2):247-255. DOI: 10.1080/17435390.2017.1290845
  24. 24. Juárez-Maldonado A, Ortega-Ortíz H, Morales-Díaz AB, et al. Nanoparticles and nanomaterials as plant biostimulants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019;20(1):162. DOI: 10.3390/ijms20010162
  25. 25. Thiagarajan V, Ramasubbu S. Fate and behaviour of TiO2 nanoparticles in the soil: Their impact on staple food crops. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution. 2021;232(7):1-18. DOI: 10.1007/s11270-021-05219-8
  26. 26. Mohammadi R, Maali-Amiri R, Mantri NL. Effect of TiO2 nanoparticles on oxidative damage and antioxidant defense systems in chickpea seedlings during cold stress. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology. 2014;61(6):768-775. DOI: 10.1134/S1021443714050124
  27. 27. Qi M, Liu Y, Li T. Nano-TiO2 improve the photosynthesis of tomato leaves under mild heat stress. Biological Trace Element Research. 2013;156(1-3):323-328. DOI: 10.1007/s12011-013-9833-2
  28. 28. Jaberzadeh A, Moaveni P, Moghadam HRT, Zahedi H. Influence of bulk and nanoparticles titanium foliar application on some agronomic traits, seed gluten and starch contents of wheat subjected to water deficit stress. Notulae botanicae horti agrobotanici cluj-napoca. 2013;41(1):201-207. DOI: 10.15835/nbha4119093
  29. 29. Mohammadi H, Esmailpour M, Gheranpaye A. Effects of TiO2 nanoparticles and water-deficit stress on morpho-physiological characteristics of dragonhead (Dracocephalum moldavica L.) plants. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica. 2016;107(2):385-396. DOI: 10.14720/aas.2016.107.2.11
  30. 30. Kiapour H, Moaveni P, Habibi D. Evaluation of the application of gibbrellic acid and titanium dioxide nanoparticles under drought stress on some traits of basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). IJAAR. 2015, 2015;6(4):138-150
  31. 31. Khan MN. Nano-titanium dioxide (nano-TiO2) mitigates NaCl stress by enhancing antioxidative enzymes and accumulation of compatible solutes in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum mill.). Journal of Plant Sciences. 2016;11(1/3):1-11. DOI: 10.3923/jps.2016.1.11
  32. 32. Kaur H, Kalia A, Sandhu JS, Dheri GS, KaurG, & Pathania S. Interaction of TiO2 nanoparticles with soil: Effect on microbiological and chemical traits. Chemosphere. 2022;301:134629
  33. 33. Khana MA, Khanb T, Mashwanic ZR, et al. Plant cell nanomaterials interaction: Growth, physiology and secondary metabolism. In: Comprehensive Analytical Chemistry. Vol. 84. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2019. pp. 32-54. DOI: 10.1016/bs.coac.2019.04.005
  34. 34. Cañas JE, Long M, Nations S, et al. Effects of functionalized and nonfunctionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes on root elongation of select crop species. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 2008;27(9):1922-1931. DOI: 10.1897/08-117.1
  35. 35. Lahiani MH, Dervishi E, Chen J, et al. Impact of carbon nanotube exposure to seeds of valuable crops. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2013;5(16):7965-7973. DOI: 10.1021/am402052x
  36. 36. Jiang Y, Hua Z, Zhao Y, Liu Q, Wang F, Zhang Q. The effect of carbon nanotubes on rice seed germination and root growth. In: Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Applied Biotechnology (ICAB 2012). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2014. pp. 1207-1212. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-37922-2_129
  37. 37. Martínez-Ballesta MC, Zapata L, Chalbi N, Carvajal M. Multiwalled carbon nanotubes enter broccoli cells enhancing growth and water uptake of plants exposed to salinity. Journal of Nanobiotechnology. 2016;14(1):42. DOI: 10.1186/s12951-016-0199-4
  38. 38. Zhao F, Xin X, Cao Y, et al. Use of carbon nanoparticles to improve soil fertility, crop growth and nutrient uptake by corn (Zea mays L.). Nanomaterials (Basel). 2021;11(10):2717. DOI: 10.3390/nano11102717
  39. 39. Xin X, Nepal J, Wright AL, Yang X, He Z. Carbon nanoparticles improve corn (Zea mays L.) growth and soil quality: Comparison of foliar spray and soil drench application. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2022;363:132630. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132630
  40. 40. Alsherif EA, Almaghrabi O, Elazzazy AM, Abdel-Mawgoud M, Beemster GTS, Abd EH. Carbon nanoparticles improve the effect of compost and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in drought-stressed corn cultivation. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2023;194:29-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2022.11.005 Epub 2022 Nov 10
  41. 41. Singh A, Singh NB, Hussain I, Singh H, Singh SC. Plant-nanoparticle interaction: An approach to improve agricultural practices and plant productivity. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Science Invention. 2015;4(8):25-40
  42. 42. Aslani F, Bagheri S, Muhd Julkapli N, Juraimi AS, Hashemi FS, Baghdadi A. Effects of engineered nanomaterials on plants growth: An overview. The Scientific World Journal. 2014;2014:641759. DOI: 10.1155/2014/641759
  43. 43. Remedios C, Rosario F, Bastos V. Environmental nanoparticles interactions with plants: Morphological, physiological, and genotoxic aspects. Journal of Botany. 2012;2012:1-8. DOI: 10.1155/2012/751686
  44. 44. Predoi D, Ghita RV, Iconaru SL, et al. Application of Nanotechnology Solutions in Plants Fertilization, Urban Horticulture - Necessity of the Future. London, UK, London: IntechOpen; 2020. pp. 51-74. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.91240
  45. 45. Hossain Z, Yasmeen F, Komatsu S. Nanoparticles: Synthesis, morphophysiological effects, and proteomic responses of crop plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020;21:3056-3064. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21093056
  46. 46. Velasco EAP, Galindo RB, Aguilar LAV, et al. Effects of the morphology, surface modification and application methods of ZNO-NPS on the growth and biomass of tomato plants. Molecules. 2020;25:1282. DOI: 10.3390/molecules25061282
  47. 47. Itroutwar PD, Govindaraju K, Tamilselvan S, et al. Seaweed-based biogenic zno nanoparticles for improving agro-morphological characteristics of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 2019;39:717-728. DOI: doi.org/10.1007/s00344-019-10012-3
  48. 48. Bamsaoud S, Bahwirth M. The effect of biologically synthesized silver nanoparticles on the germination and growth of Cucurbita pepo seedlings. Journal of the Arab American University. 2017;3:34-47
  49. 49. Bahwirth M, Bamsaoud S. The effect of silver nanoparticles on the germination and growth of two cultivars of wheat Triticum aestivum L. Alandalus Journal for Applied Sciences. 2020;7:9-25
  50. 50. Al-Hadede LT, Khaleel SA, Hasan SK. Some applications of nanotechnology in agriculture. Biochemical and Cellular Archives. 2020;20:1447-1454. DOI: 10.35124/bca.2020.20.1.1447
  51. 51. Bamsaoud S, Basuliman M, Bin-Hameed A, et al. The effect of volume and concentration of AgNO3 aqueous solutions on silver nanoparticles synthesized using Ziziphus Spina–Christi leaf extract and their antibacterial activity. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2021;1900(1):012005
  52. 52. Siddiqui H, Ahmed KBM, Sami F, Hayat S. Silicon nanoparticles and plants: Current knowledge and future perspectives. In: Hayat S et al., editors. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews. Vol. 41. Cham: Springer; 2020
  53. 53. Elshayb OM, Nada AM, Ibrahim HM, et al. Application of silica nanoparticles for improving growth, yield, and enzymatic antioxidant for the hybrid rice EHR1 growing under water regime conditions. Materials. 2021;14:1150-1169. DOI: 10.3390/ma14051150
  54. 54. Elemike EE, Uzoh IM, Onwudiwe DC, Babalola OO. The role of nanotechnology in the fortification of plant nutrients and improvement of crop production. Applied Sciences. 2019;9:499-532. DOI: 10.3390/app9030499
  55. 55. Guo Y, Khan RAA, Xiong Y, Fan Z. Enhanced suppression of soil-borne phytopathogenic bacteria Ralstonia solanacearum in soil and promotion of tomato plant growth by synergetic effect of green synthesized nanoparticles and plant extract. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2022;132(5):3694-3704
  56. 56. Azmat A, Tanveer Y, Yasmin H, Hassan MN, Shahzad A, Reddy M, et al. Coactive role of zinc oxide nanoparticles and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for mitigation of synchronized effects of heat and drought stress in wheat plants. Chemosphere. 2022;297:133982
  57. 57. Dappula SS, Kandrakonda YR, Shaik JB, Mothukuru SL, Lebaka VR, Mannarapu M, et al. Biosynthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles using aqueous extract of Andrographis alata: Characterization, optimization and assessment of their antibacterial, antioxidant, antidiabetic and anti-Alzheimer's properties. Journal of Molecular Structure. 2023;1273:134264
  58. 58. Wasilewska A, Klekotka U, Zambrzycka M, Zambrowski G, Święcicka I, Kalska-Szostko B. Physico-chemical properties and antimicrobial activity of silver nanoparticles fabricated by green synthesis. Food Chemistry. 2023;400:133960
  59. 59. Tiwari K, Kumar Y, Singh T, Nayak R. Nano technology based P fertilizers for higher efficiency and agriculture sustainability. Annals of Plant and Soil Research. 2022;24(2):198-207. DOI: 10.47815/apsr.2022.10149
  60. 60. Reddy SS, Chhabra V. Nanotechnology: Its scope in agriculture. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2022;2267:012112. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/2267/1/012112
  61. 61. Marjan N, Sina F, Ali A, Surki L, Raj P, Ali R. Improved efficacy of foliar application of zinc oxide nanoparticles on zinc biofortification, primary productivity and secondary metabolite production in dragonhead. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2022;379:379. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134803
  62. 62. Verma K, Song P, Joshi A, Tian D, Rajput D, Singh M, et al. Recent trends in Nano-Fertilizers for sustainable agriculture under climate change for global food security. Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland). 2022;12(1):173. DOI: 10.3390/nano12010173
  63. 63. Aguirre H, Feregrino A, Esquivel P, Vazquez C, Mariana A. Nanomaterials as an alternative to increase plant resistance to abiotic stresses. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2022;13:1023636. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1023636
  64. 64. Abdalla Z, El-Sawy S, El-Bassiony M, Jun H, Shedeed S, Okasha A, et al. Nano-fertilizers: A pictorial overview. Environment, biodiversity and soil. Security. 2022;6:191-204. DOI: 10.21608/jenvbs.2022.153990.1184
  65. 65. Guha T, Mukherjee A, Kundu R. Nano-scale zero Valent iron (nZVI) priming enhances yield, alters mineral distribution and grain nutrient content of Oryza sativa L. cv. Gobindobhog: A Field study. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 2022;41:710-733. DOI: 10.1007/s00344-021-10335-0
  66. 66. Beig B, Niazi K, Sher F, Bilal B, Muhammad N, Farooq S, et al. Nanotechnology-based controlled release of sustainable fertilizers A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters. 2022;20:2709-2726. DOI: 10.1007/s10311-022-01409-w
  67. 67. Hayyawi W, Al-Juthery A, Sana Y, Nabil L, Ali A, Sulaf T, et al. Response wheat to spray some of synthetic Nano Fertilizers. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2022;1060:012030. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/1060/1/012030
  68. 68. Ghani MI, Saleem S, Rather SA, Rehmani MS, Alamri S, Rajput VD, et al. Foliar application of zinc oxide nanoparticles: An effective strategy to mitigate drought stress in cucumber seedling by modulating antioxidant defense system and osmolytes accumulation. Chemosphere. 2022;289:133202. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133202
  69. 69. Ahsan A, Rouyi F, Junyi M, Fakhir H, Qian H, Habib A, et al. Calcium nanoparticles (Ca-NPs) improve drought stress tolerance in Brassica napus by modulating the photosystem II, nutrient acquisition and antioxidant performance. NanoImpact. 2022;28:100423. DOI: 10.1016/j.impact.2022.100423
  70. 70. Seyed A, Hamid E, Ahmad I, Naser A. Effect of gibberellin, nano-nutrition with titanium, zinc and iron on yield and some physiological and qualitative traits of white beans. Notulae botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca. 2022;50(1):1-16. DOI: 10.15835/nbha50112538
  71. 71. El-Shal M, El-Naggar H, El-Beshbeshy R, Mahmoud K, El-Kader A, Missaui M, et al. Effect of Nano-Fertilizers on alfalfa plants grown under different salt stresses in hydroponic system. Agriculture. 2022;12(8):1113. DOI: 10.3390/agriculture12081113
  72. 72. Fortis M, Ortiz J, Preciado P, Trejo R, Lagunes E, Andrade A, And Rueda O: Biofortification with copper nanoparticles (Nps Cu) and its effect on the physical and nutraceutical quality of hydroponic melon fruits. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca. 2022;50, 1:12568. DOI: 10.15835/nbha50112568
  73. 73. Pooja A, Vidyashree S, Shivashankar K, Kiran E, Ashwini R. Effects of nano potassium in rice: A review. Indian Journal of Natural Sciences. 2022;13(72):43202-43208. DOI: 10.35709/ory.2021.58.3.1
  74. 74. Ana K, Márquez-Prieto AP, Esteban S, Bertha C, Macias-López S, Octavio VC, et al. Impact of the foliar application of potassium nanofertilizer on biomass, yield, nitrogen assimilation and photosynthetic activity in green beans. Notulae botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca. 2022;50:1. DOI: 10.15835/nbha50112569
  75. 75. Sharaf-Eldin A, Elsawy B, Eisa Y, El-Ramady H, Usman M, Ziaur-Rehman M. Application of nano-nitrogen fertilizers to enhance nitrogen efficiency for lettuce growth under different irrigation regimes. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2022;59(3):367-379. DOI: 10.21162/PAKJAS/22.1044. Available from: http://www.pakjas.com.pk. ISSN (Online) 2076-09061
  76. 76. Abdul, Qayyum A, Faisal N, Yamin B, Raza U, Husnain R, Husnain JA. Role of Nanoparticles in Improving Stress Tolerance in Crop Plants. CABI Books. CABI International; 2022. DOI: 10.1079/9781789248098.0024
  77. 77. Lingrui L, Niana H, Tengxiang L. Plants and rhizospheric environment: Affected by zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs). A review. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2022;185:91-100. DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2022.05.032
  78. 78. Nongbet A, Mishra AK, Mohanta YK, Mahanta S, Ray MK, Khan M, et al. Nanofertilizers: A Smart and sustainable attribute to modern agriculture. Plants (Basel). 2022;11(19):2587. DOI: 10.3390/plants11192587
  79. 79. Nazari M, Mojtaba K, Akbar G, Jameel A, et al. Role of nanomaterials in improving the nutritional value of crops. In: Nanomaterial Interactions with Plant Cellular Mechanisms and Macromolecules and Agricultural Implications. Cham: Springer; 2023. pp. 399-422
  80. 80. Ismail LM, Soliman MI, Abd El-Aziz MH, Abdel-Aziz HMM. Impact of silica ions and Nano silica on growth and productivity of pea plants under salinity stress. Plants. 2022;11(4):494. DOI: 10.3390/plants11040494
  81. 81. Singh A, Sengar RS, Shahi UP, Rajput VD, Minkina T, Ghazaryan KA. Prominent effects of zinc oxide nanoparticles on roots of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) grown under salinity stress. Stress. 2023;3(1):33-46. DOI: 10.3390/stresses3010004
  82. 82. Rady MM, Mossa A-TH, Youssof AMA, Ashraf S, Osman SMA, Ahmed IAA. Mohamed: Exploring the reinforcing effect of nano-potassium on the antioxidant defense system reflecting the increased yield and quality of salt-stressed squash plants. Scientia Horticulturae. 2023;308:111609. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2022.111609
  83. 83. Gholamreza G, Habib F, Sima P, Elnaz Z, Parisa L, Hessam J, et al. Mitigation of salinity impact in spearmint plants through the application of engineered chitosan-melatonin nanoparticles. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2023;224:893-907. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.10.175
  84. 84. Waqas MM, Ishtiaq M, Hussain I, Parveen A, Hayat Bhatti K, Azeem M, et al. Seed nano-priming with zinc oxide nanoparticles in rice mitigates drought and enhances agronomic profile. PLoS One. 2022;17(3):e0264967. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264967
  85. 85. Naseer M, Zhu Y, Li FM, Yang YM, Wang S, Xiong YC. Nano-enabled improvements of growth and colonization rate in wheat inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Environmental Pollution. 2022 Feb 15;295:118724. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118724 Epub 2021 Dec 21
  86. 86. Ostadi A, Javanmard A, Amani Machiani M, Kakaei K. Optimizing antioxidant activity and phytochemical properties of peppermint (Mentha piperita L.) by integrative application of biofertilizer and stress-modulating nanoparticles under drought stress conditions. Plants. 2023;12(1):151. DOI: 10.3390/plants12010151
  87. 87. Rodríguez-Seijo A, Soares C, Ribeiro S, Amil BF, Patinha C, Cachada A, et al. Nano-Fe2O3 as a tool to restore plant growth in contaminated soils - assessment of potentially toxic elements (bio)availability and redox homeostasis in Hordeum vulgare L. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2022 Mar;5(425):127999. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127999 Epub 2021 Dec 6
  88. 88. Abdul Kareem H, Adeel M, Azeem M, Ahmad MA, Shakoor N, Hassan MU, et al. Antagonistic impact on cadmium stress in alfalfa supplemented with nano-zinc oxide and biochar via upregulating metal detoxification. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2023;443(Pt B):130309. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130309 Epub 2022 Nov 2
  89. 89. Alp FN, Arikan B, Ozfidan-Konakci C, Gulenturk C, Yildiztugay E, Turan M, et al. Hormetic activation of nano-sized rare earth element terbium on growth, PSII photochemistry, antioxidant status and phytohormone regulation in Lemna minor. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2023;194:361-373. DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2022.11.031 Epub 2022 Nov 28
  90. 90. Hong J, Jia S, Wang C, Li Y, He F, Gardea-Torresdey JL. Transcriptome reveals the exposure effects of CeO2 nanoparticles on pakchoi (Brassica chinensis L.) photosynthesis. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2023;444(Pt A):130427. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130427 Epub 2022 Nov 17
  91. 91. Yuan H, Liu Q, Fu J, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Sun Y, et al. Co-exposure of sulfur nanoparticles and Cu alleviate Cu stress and toxicity to oilseed rape Brassica napus L. Journal of Environmental Sciences (China). 2023;124:319-329. DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2021.09.040 Epub 2022 Feb 3
  92. 92. Ilmudeen S, Farween F, Mahaletchumi S, Kanchana DKDI. Advances of Nanofertilizers in modern agriculture. A review. The Journal of Research Technology and Engineering. 2022;3(2):19-29
  93. 93. Khan MR, Rizvi TF. Application of nanofertilizer and nanopesticides for improvements in crop production and protection in nanoscience and plant–soil systems. Springer Cham. 2017;48:405-427
  94. 94. Ghamry AE, Mosa AA, Alshaal T, Ramady HE. Nanofertilizers vs. biofertilizers: New insights. Environment, Biodiversity and Soil Security. 2018;2(2018):51-72
  95. 95. Sahu SK, Sk B, Acharya DK, Padhee RK. Development of nano bio fertilizer via chemical & biological synthesis. IRJMETS. 2022;4(7):1-17
  96. 96. Avila-Quezada GD, Ingle AP, Golińska P, Rai M. Strategic applications of nano-fertilizers for sustainable agriculture: Benefits and bottlenecks. De Gruyter Nanotechnology Reviews. 2022;11:2123-2140. DOI: 10.1515/ntrev-2022-0126
  97. 97. Zhang Q, Ying Y, Ping J. Recent advances in plant nanoscience. Advancement of Science. 2022;9:2103414. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202103414
  98. 98. Wohlmuth J, Tekielska D, Cechová J, Baránek M. Interaction of the nanoparticles and plants in selective growth stages—Usual effects and resulting impact on usage perspectives. Plants. 2022;11:2405. DOI: 10.3390/plants11182405
  99. 99. Alnaddaf LM, Almuhammady AK, Salem KFM, Alloosh MT, Saleh MM, Al-Khayri JM. Green synthesis of nanoparticles using different plant extracts and their characterizations. In: Al-Khayri JM, Ansari MI, Ak S, editors. Nanobiotechnology: Mitigation of Abiotic Stress in Plants. Cham: Springer; 2021. pp. 165-199. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-73606-4_8
  100. 100. Madrid-Delgado G, Orozco-Miranda M, Cruz-Osorio M, Hernández-Rodríguez OA, Rodríguez-Heredia R, RoaHuerta M, et al. Pathways of phosphorus absorption and early signaling between the mycorrhizal fungi and plants. Phyton-International Journal of Experimental Botany. 2021;90:1321-1338. DOI: 10.32604/phyton.2021.016174
  101. 101. Ranjan A, Rajput VD, Kumari A, Mandzhieva SS, Sushkova S, Prazdnova EV, et al. Nanobionics in crop production: An emerging approach to modulate plant functionalities. Plants. 2022;11:692. DOI: 10.3390/plants11050692
  102. 102. Tarafder C, Daizy M, Alam MM, Ali MR, Islam MJ, Islam R, et al. Formulation of a hybrid nanofertilizer for slow and sustainable release of micronutrients. ACS Omega. 2020;5:23960-23966. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c03233
  103. 103. Feregrino-Pérez AA, Magaña-López E, Guzmán C, Esquivel K. A general overview of the benefits and possible negative effects of the nanotechnology in horticulture. Scientia Horticulturae. 2018;238:126-137. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.03.060
  104. 104. Thavaseelan D, Priyadarshana G. Nanofertilizer use for sustainable agriculture. The Journal of Research Technology and Engineering. 2021;2(1):41-59
  105. 105. Solanki P, Bhargava A, Chhipa H, Jain N, Panwar J. Nanofertilizers and their smart delivery system. In: Rai M, Ribeiro C, Mattoso L, Duran N, editors. Nanotechnologies in Food and Agriculture. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2015. pp. 81-101. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-14024-7_4
  106. 106. Malini S, Raj K, Madhumathy S, El-Hady KM, Islam S, Dutta M, et al. Bioinspired advances in nanomaterials for sustainable agriculture. Journal of Nanomaterials. 2022;2022. DOI: 10.1155/2022/8926133
  107. 107. Almuhammady AK, Salem KFM, Alloosh MT, Saleh MM, Alnaddaf LM, Al-Khayri JM. Nanomaterials fundamentals: Classification, synthesis and characterization. In: Al-Khayri JM, Ansari MI, Ak S, editors. Nanobiotechnology: Mitigation of Abiotic Stress in Plants. Cham: Springer; 2021. pp. 77-99. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-73606-4_4
  108. 108. Santoro M, Gorelli FA, Bini R, Haines J, vander Lee A. High-pressure synthesis of a polyethylene/zeolite nanocomposite material. Nature Communications. 2013;4:1557. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2564
  109. 109. Sugai T, Yoshida H, Shimada T, Okazaki T, Shinohara H, Bandow S. New synthesis of high-quality doublewalled carbon nanotubes by high-temperature pulsed arc discharge. Nano Letters. 2003:769-773. DOI: 10.1021/nl034183+
  110. 110. Lou XW, Zeng HC. Hydrothermal synthesis of α-MoO3 nanorods via acidification of ammonium heptamolybdate tetrahydrate. Chemistry of Materials. 2002;14(11):4781-4789. DOI: 10.1021/cm0206237
  111. 111. Khan NA, Kang IJ, Seok HY, hung SHJ. Facile synthesis of nano-sized metal-organic frameworks, chromium benzenedicarboxylate, MIL-101. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2011:1152-1157. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2010.11.098
  112. 112. Jośko I, Oleszczuk P, Skwarek E. Toxicity of combined mixtures of nano particles to plants. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2017;331:200-209. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.02.028
  113. 113. Samuel MS, Ravikumar M, John JA, Selvarajan E, Patel H, Chander PS, et al. A review on green synthesis of nanoparticles and their diverse biomedical and environmental applications. Catalysts. 2022;12:459. DOI: 10.3390/catal12050459
  114. 114. El-Dafrawy SM, Fawzy S, Hassan SM. Preparation of modified nanoparticles of zinc oxide for removal of organic and inorganic pollutant. Trends in Applied Sciences Research. 2017;12:1-9
  115. 115. Kanel SR, Manning B, Charlet L, Choi H. Removal of arsenic (III) from groundwater by nanoscale zero-valent iron. Environmental Science & Technology. 2005;39(5):1291-1298. DOI: 10.1021/es048991u
  116. 116. Boulkhessaim S, Gacem A, Khan SH, Amari A, Yadav VK, Harharah HN, et al. Emerging trends in the remediation of persistent organic pollutants using nanomaterials and related processes: A review. Nanomaterials. 2022;12:2148. DOI: 10.3390/nano12132148
  117. 117. Bizzarri BM, Fanelli A, Botta L, Zippilli C, Cesarini S, Saladino R. Dendrimeric structures in the synthesis of fine chemicals. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(18):5318. DOI: 10.3390/ma14185318
  118. 118. Tungittiplakorn W, Lion LW, Cohen C, Kim JY. Engineered polymeric nanoparticles for soil remediation. Environmental Science & Technology. 2004;38(5):1605-1610. DOI: 10.1021/es0348997
  119. 119. Ledakowicz S, Paździor K. Recent achievements in dyes removal focused on advanced oxidation processes integrated with biological methods. Molecules. 2021;26(4):870. DOI: 10.3390/molecules26040870
  120. 120. Zhang Q, Hou S, Li C. Titanium dioxide-coated zinc oxide nanorods as an efficient photoelectrode in dye-sensitized solar cells. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2020;10(8):1598. DOI: 10.3390/nano10081598
  121. 121. Abigail MEA, Samuel SM, Ramalingam C. Addressing the environmental impacts of butachlor and the available remediation strategies: A systematic review. International journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2015;12:4025-4036. DOI: 10.1007/s13762-015-0866-2
  122. 122. Samuel MS, Bhattacharya J, Raj S, Santhanam N, Singh H, Singh NP. Efficient removal of chromium(VI) from aqueous solution using chitosan grafted graphene oxide (CS-GO) nanocomposite. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2019;121:285-292. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.09.170
  123. 123. Samuel MS, Subramaniyan V, Bhattacharya J, Parthiban C, Chand S, Singh NP. A GO-CS@MOF [Zn(BDC)(DMF)] material for the adsorption of chromium(VI) ions from aqueous solution. Composites Part B: Engineering. 2018;152:116-125. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.06.034
  124. 124. Aslam AA, Aslam AA, Aslam MS, Quazi S. An overview on green synthesis of nanomaterials and their advanced applications in sustainable agriculture. Preprint. 2022:2022020315. DOI: 10.20944/preprints202202.0315.v1
  125. 125. Kumar A, Gupta K, Dixit S, Mishra K, Srivastava S. A review on positive and negative impacts of nanotechnology in agriculture. International journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2019;16(4):2175-2184. DOI: 10.1007/s13762-018-2119-7
  126. 126. Rajput V, Minkina T, Sushkova S, Behal A, Maksimov A, Blicharska E, et al. ZnO and CuO nanoparticles: A threat to soil organisms, plants, and human health. Environmental Geochemistry and Health. 2020;42:147-158. DOI: 10.1007/s10653-019-00317-3
  127. 127. Verma KK, Song X-P, Joshi A, Rajput VD, Singh M, Sharma A, et al. Nanofertilizer possibilities for healthy soil, water, and food in future: An overview. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2022;13:865048. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.865048
  128. 128. Faisal M, Saquib Q, Alatar AA, Al-Khedhairy AA, Hegazy AK, Musarrat J. Phytotoxic hazards of NiO-nanoparticles in tomato: A study on mechanism of cell death. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2013;250:318-332. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.01.063
  129. 129. Faisal M, Saquib Q, Alatar AA, Al-Khedhairy AA, Ahmed M, Ansari SM, et al. Cobalt oxide nanoparticles aggravate DNA damage and cell death in eggplant via mitochondrial swelling and NO signaling pathway. Biological Research. 2016;49:1-13. DOI: 10.1186/s40659-016-0080-9
  130. 130. Bhardwaj AK, Arya G, Kumar R, Hamed L, Pirasteh-Anosheh H, Jasrotia P, et al. Switching to nanonutrients for sustaining agroecosystems and environment: The challenges and benefits in moving up from ionic to particle feeding. Journal of Nanobiotechnology. 2022;20:19. DOI: 10.1186/s12951-021-01177-9
  131. 131. Murata T, Kanao-Koshikawa M, Takamatsu T. Effects of Pb, Cu, Sb, In and Ag contamination on the proliferation of soil bacterial colonies, soil dehydrogenase activity, and phospholipid fatty acid profiles of soil microbial communities. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution. 2005;164:103-118. DOI: 10.1007/s11270005-2254-x
  132. 132. Otero-González L, Field JA, Sierra-Alvarez R. Fate and longterm inhibitory impact of ZnO nanoparticles during high-rate anaerobic wastewater treatment. Journal of Environmental Management. 2014;15(135):110-117. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.01.025
  133. 133. Punnoose A, Dodge K, Rasmussen JW, Chess J, Wingett D, Anders C. Cytotoxicity of ZnO nanoparticles can be tailored by modifying their surface structure: A green chemistry approach for safer nanomaterials. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. 2014;2:1666-1673
  134. 134. Zhao J, Wang Z, White JC, Xing B. Graphene in the aquatic environment: Adsorption, dispersion, toxicity and transformation. Environmental Science & Technology. 2014;48(17):9995-10009

Written By

Lina M. Alnaddaf, Salim F. Bamsaoud and Mahroos Bahwirth

Submitted: 02 February 2023 Reviewed: 14 March 2023 Published: 19 May 2023