Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Bioactive Peptides from Legumes and Their Bioavailability

Written By

Retno Indrati

Submitted: 23 May 2021 Reviewed: 18 August 2021 Published: 09 September 2021

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.99979

From the Edited Volume

Legumes Research - Volume 2

Edited by Jose C. Jimenez-Lopez and Alfonso Clemente

Chapter metrics overview

481 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Bioactive peptides (BPs) isolated from legumes have functional properties as healthy foods. These functional effects depend on their stability and bioavailability in the gastrointestinal tract before reaching the target organs. Therefore, it is necessary to disclose the factors that influence it and discuss the technical processing to develop its utilisation. This chapter discusses and summarises the bioactive activities of BPs from various legumes, factors and mechanisms related to the bio-assessability, stability, bio-availability and bioactivity of BPs. Furthermore, the development of BPs bioseparation was also discussed. The results show that the nature of BPs varies greatly depending on the legume source and the production method. Factors that influenced the bio-availability of BPs include molecular weight, charge, amino acid sequence, the presence of specific residues and hydrophobic amino acids, and resistance to the action of peptidase while in the digestive tract. However, some BPs showed increased bio-accessibility and bio-availability after being hydrolyzed by digestive enzymes. Processing technologies such as encapsulation allowing BPs to enter the body and undergo release and degradation by enzymes digestion. Further studies are required to understand the increase in the bioavailability of BPs, the safety of the food components produced, and their use in producing functional foods.

Keywords

  • Legumes
  • bioactive peptides
  • fermentation
  • germination
  • health benefits
  • bioavailability

1. Introduction

Legumes are a cheap and healthy source of nutrition because of their high protein content and complete constituent components, such as fats, essential amino acids, complex carbohydrates, vitamins, and minerals or dietary fibre. This high protein content plays an essential role in producing functional compounds such as bioactive peptides (BPs) that benefit the health and treatment of chronic diseases. For example, BP from legumes is used as an antioxidant compound to prevent degenerative diseases such as atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease, diabetes mellitus, and cancer [1, 2]. The number of deaths due to NCDs (non-communicable diseases), especially cardiovascular disease, cancer, chronic respiratory diseases, and diabetes, increases globally, both in low-income and rich countries. As a result, NCDs are still the cause of most global deaths each year [3]. One way to reduce the risk of NCD is controlling hypertension, regulating diet and obesity.

Protease enzymes have an essential role in producing BP as a result of protein hydrolysis. Food processing, microbial fermentation, germination, or other process involving protease enzymes are examples of proteolytic processes. The involvement of protease enzymes in producing BP is significant because BP is mainly composed of 2–20 amino acids [4]. Some countries have healthy food products from legumes. Examples of fermented foods such as natto [5], douchi [6], tempe [7], and others, have antihypertensive activity. Fermented foods represent, on average, one-third of total food consumption [8]. Fermented food has a delicious taste, easy to digest, nutritious and has beneficial properties. Such as antidiabetic, hypocholesterolemic, and anti-inflammatory activities [8, 9].

Many researchers have proven (both in vitro and in vivo using experimental animals) that BP from legumes has functional properties as a healthy food. However, this functional effect depends on the stability of BP to withstand the action of digestive enzymes while in the digestive tract on its way to reach the target organs [10]. In this target organ, BP will act to provide health effects for the body. One of the determining factors to be bioavailable is the number of amino acids, hydrophobic amino acid content, and resistance to digestive enzyme activity [11]. This chapter aims to describe the quality of various legumes, the BP of legumes and their effects on health. Also, an explanation of the factors that affect the stability, absorption, bio-availability and bio-activity of BP and food technology to develop functional food.

Advertisement

2. Legume, as a source of bioactive peptides

One of the excellent sources of essential amino acids and protein is legumes. As a source of bioactive peptides (BPs), an ingredient must have a high enough protein content. In addition, legumes also contain many components needed for body health, such as antioxidant compounds, resistant starch, dietary fibre and others [12]. However, it is a fact that the nutritional content and phytochemical composition among legumes vary widely, as shown in Table 1. The differences in their genetics, varieties, geographical location and climatic conditions may cause the nutritional content variation [18].

NoLegumes sourcesProteinAmino acid hydrophobic
(db, % w/w)Reference(% w/w protein)Reference
1Soybean, Glycine max35.35–39.80[13]37.70[14]
2Jack bean, white, Canavalia ensiformis L. DC22.80–35.30[14]8.60–43.50[14]
3Sword bean, red, Canavalia gladiata jacq. DC32.4–35.0[15]26.62–29.47[15]
4Cowpea, Vigna unguiculata L. Walp20.90–24.70[16]8.46[16]
5Bambara groundnut, Vigna subterranea L. Verde17.00–17.30[16]6.45[16]
6Velvet bean, White, Mucuna pruriens var. utilis28.82 ± 0.14[17]34.14[17]
7Velvet bean, Black, Mucuna pruriens var. utilis26.26 ± 0.07[17]32.79[17]
8Kidney beans, Phaseolus vulgaris L.21.80–29.20[18]7.96[16]
9Lima beans, brown, Phaseolus luna tus28.06[7]4.68[7]
10Mung bean, Phaseolus radiata26.80[19]39.75[20]
11Chick pea, Cicer Arieti num19.68–22.75[16]35.3[21]

Table 1.

Protein and hydrophobic amino acid content of several legumes.

The level of hydrophobic amino acids is the sum of the data available in the reference sources used.

In general, the protein content of legumes ranged from 17.0 to 39.8% (w/w). Soybean is the legumes that have the highest protein content. Soybean is also the most studied legume regarding its function on health. According to FAO [22] world soybean production in 2019 was 333,671,692 tonnes (the highest among the types of legumes produced), of which Brazil produced 34.25% as the world’s No. 1 producer country. Apart from soybean, some legumes also have a high protein content as a source of BPs, such as jack beans, velvet beans, lima beans, mung beans, and kidney beans (Table 1).

In addition to the protein content, it is also necessary to pay attention to the amino acid composition in choosing ingredients. Peptides with hydrophobic amino acids (Tyr, Phe, Trp, Ala, Ile, Val, and Met), positively charged amino acids (Arg and Lys), or contain Pro at the C end will have higher biological activity. For example, inhibition of ACE enzymes [23], Diabetes mellitus type 2 (T2DM) inhibitory activity [24], or other biological functions. Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor (ACEI), is a BP that affects lowering blood pressure. Meanwhile, DPP-IV inhibitors are compounds that can inhibit dipeptidyl peptidase-IV, an enzyme associated with T2DM disease [25]. So the presence of hydrophobic amino acids in short-chain peptides (between 2 and 20 amino acids in length) [4] is related to biological activities beneficial to health. Soybean, jack bean, velvet bean and mung bean are legumes that have high hydrophobic amino acid content (Table 1). Enzymatic breakdown through food processing produces short-chain peptides. For example, fermentation (to produce tempeh, soy sauce, natto, miso, douche, or other legume fermented products), germination (mung bean sprouts, soybean sprouts, or other sprouts), or other processes can break the polypeptide chain.

Apart from these benefits, legumes contain substances that are considered anti-nutritional compounds [26]. Despite having a high protein content, some toxic anti-nutritional substances limit the use of legumes. Food processing, such as soaking (hydration), cooking, autoclaving, germination, and combination, could reduce or eliminate anti-nutritional compounds [27, 28]; these processes can increase the digestibility value of protein ingredients. Table 2 shows some of the anti-nutritional compounds present in some legumes. Kalpanadevi and Mohan [26] said that the soaking process and continued germination was less effective in removing anti-nutrients. However, the process would be effective if the germination process was extended (96 hours) or continued with the heating process (or autoclaving process). With this combination process, the effect of anti-nutritional compounds can be eliminated, such as phenolics, tannins, hydrogen cyanide, phytic acid, trypsin inhibitors, oligosaccharides and Phyto-hemagglutination activity.

NoLegume sourcesAntinutritional compoundReferences
Phenol (%)Tannin (%)L-DOPA (%)Phytic acid (%)Trypsin inhibitor (TIU/mg protein)HCN (ppm)Oxalate (%)Total oligosaccharide (%)
1Cowpea, Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.1.210.382.460.426.482.2NANA[26]
2Velvet bean, Black, Mucuna pruriens var. utilis2.840.263.640.4543.13.1NANA[17]
3Velvet bean, White, Mucuna pruriens var. utilis3.130.343.240.4243.52.1NA4.49–6.08[17, 29]
4Sword Bean, red, Canavalia gladiate jacq DC.1.21–1.410.16–0.202.32–2.64NA30.43–34.34NANANA[16]
5Kidney bean, Phaseolus vulgaris L.NA0.54–2.88NA1.68–2.413.65NANA12.51[19, 30]
6Chick pea, Cicer arietinumNA0.01–0.05NANANA13.5–40.50.18–0.45NA[17]
7Jack Bean, white, Canavalia ensiformis L. DC.3, 830.0831.70.90NA59.95NA8.17[28, 31]
8Soybean, Glycine max1.40–3.621.11–1.88NA0.51–2.4523.67NANA8.30–10.11[27, 32]

Table 2.

Anti-nutritional compounds in legumes.

NA, data not available in the references used.

Data is prepared and recalculated so that it has the same units.

Other researchers stated that the fermentation process is also very effective for reducing/removing anti-nutritional compounds because the fermentation process is a combination of several processes, including soaking, heating, and proteolytic hydrolysis by starter microbes [31]. For example, the process of fermenting koro bean tempe (Canavalia ensiformis) for 48 hours can eliminate 100% of concanavalin-A (Con-A) and reduce almost 99% of its HCN content [31]. Moreover, the fermentation process causes the percentage of peptides with MW <1 kDa to increase to the highest [33]. Short-chain peptides (between 2 and 20 amino acids) are associated with biological activities beneficial to health [4]. As shown by peptides from Phaseolus lunatus and Mucuna pruriens, peptides with MW < 1 kDa have higher ACE inhibitory activity [7, 34].

Advertisement

3. Bioactive peptides

Bioactive peptides (BPs) are tiny fragments of dietary protein, consisting of 2–20 amino acids, have a molecular weight of less than three kDa, and promote health benefits. After entering the body, BPs can be absorbed in the intestine, carry out various metabolic pathways, and perform various physiological functions [4, 35, 36]. Several researchers have reported that legumes have various biological activities good for body health (Table 3).

LegumesAmino acid sequenceReference
a. Antidiabetic activity
Kidney bean, Phaseolus vulgaris (L), FermentedINEGSLLLPH[9]
Soybean, germinatedNNDDRDS, LSSTEAQQS, NAENNQRN, QQQQQGGSQSQ, EEPQQPQQ, IKSQSES[37]
Cowpea, Vigna unguiculata, germinated and enzymatic hydrolysisTTAGLLE[38]
Black bean, Phaseolus vulgaris, hydrolysateAKSPLF, ATNPLF, FEELN, LSVSVL[39]
b. Antihypertensive activity
Kidney bean, Phaseolus vulgaris (L), FermentedFVVAEQAGNEEGFE[9]
Mung Bean, Vigna radiata, HydrolysateKDYRL, VTPALR, KLPAGTLF[40]
Soybean, Glycine max, HydrolysisVLIVP, LAIPVNKP, LPHF, NVVGPLV, YLAGNQ, IPPGVPYWT, DQTPRVF, ASYDTKF, DTKF, PNNKPFQ, RPSYT[41, 42, 43, 44, 45]
Soybean protein, Glycine max, HydrolysisIVF, LLF, LNF, LSW, LEF[46]
Soybean germinatedRNLQGENEEEDSGA[37]
Fermented soybean, nattoVAHINVGK, YVWK[5]
Fermented soybean, soy sauceGY, SY[47]
Garden pea, Pisum sativum, in silicoLRW[48]
Pigeon pea, in silicoVVSLSIPR[49]
c. Hypocholestcrolcmic activity
Kidney bean, Phaseolus vulgaris L, FermentedSGGGGGGVAGAATASR[9]
Soybean, Glycine max, HydrolysateLPYP, IAVPGEVA, IAVPTGVA, YVVNPDNDEN, YVVNPDNNEN, LPYPR[50, 51, 52]
Soybean protein, Glycine max, in silicoSFGYVAE[53]
Black bean and cowpea, in silicoYAAAT[54]
d. Antioxidant activity
Soybean, Glycine max, HydrolysisLLPHHADADY, LLPHH, LVNPH, DHQN, TTYY, LQSGDALRVPSGTTYY[42]
Soybean, Glycine max, HydrolysisRPSYT[43]
e. Antimicrobial activity
Soybean, Glycine max, HydrolysisIIVVQGKGAIGF, ASRGIRVNGVAPGPVWTPIQPA, IIIAQGKGALGV,[42]
Soybean, Glycine maxIKAFKEATKVDKVVVLWTA, PGTAVFK[55]
f. Anti-inflammatory activity
Black bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L), hydrolysisIAISISGLL, CNKY, YETN, QAEEEF, MSAMSNAAA, DLPYSCR, ATL, NLG, EDAY, GYDHPMGGL, PVNF, EEAK, LGAL, DLK, LVVL, VPTK, TGVI, TTW, MEL, FNL, GFTPL, KYGDKSVY, IPVL, KTCENL, GGSSDKR[56]
Soybean (Glycine mox)Lunasin[57]
g. Anti-cancer activity
Soybean (Glycine max)Lunasin[58]
Common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris), Extra long Autumn Purple Bean cultivarANEIYFSFQRFNETNLILQR[59]
Chickpea (Cicer anetinum)ARQSHFANAQP[60]

Table 3.

The amino acid sequence of several bioactive peptides from legumes.

The hydrolysis of legumes protein can produce these BPs. The enzymatic hydrolysis process occurs in the food processing process, for example, in the fruit ripening process, the fermentation process (producing soy sauce, tempe, natto, and other fermented products), or the germination process (producing soybean sprouts, green bean sprouts, and sprouts products others). In addition, the protein breakdown process can also be carried out by in vitro enzymatic hydrolysis, for example, using the alcalase in legume protein. Some examples of enzymatic hydrolysis are soybean hydrolysis (Glycine max) or mung bean hydrolysis (Vigna radiata), which produces BP hydrolysate as an ACE inhibitor [40, 45]. The in vitro enzymatic hydrolysis process will produce peptides with enormous structural diversity. Bioinformatics techniques using in silico studies can help select suitable peptide sources. Simulations of biological processes, such as enzyme hydrolysis, can use these in silico studies and further characterise processes and products using software/computers [61].

BPs can perform their activities and roles based on their structural properties, composition and amino acid sequence [62]. Biologically, the active peptides have similar structural properties, including the length of the amino acids, containing hydrophobic amino acids, and resistance to proteolysis [11]. For example, BPs with antioxidant activity have a length of 5–16 amino acids [63]. The structure of ACE inhibiting BPs contains arginine or lysine residues at the C-terminal will affect their activity [11]. Therefore, selecting the protease enzyme to form BPs is essential to produce biologically active peptides. For example, the Carlsberg enzyme subtilysin will hydrolyse peptide bonds with broad specificity to produce peptides with C terminal in the form of hydrophobic amino acids such as Phe, Tyr, Trp, Leu, Ile, Val and Met [64]. In addition, because of their relatively small size and high specificity, BPs can inhibit protein–protein interactions [65]. Some examples of the functional properties possessed by BPs are anti-hypertensive [66], antioxidants [67], hypo-cholesterolemia [68], antimicrobials [69], anti-inflammatory [70, 71], anti-cancer [59], and other functional properties. One type of BPs can have more than one functional property [9, 65]. To date, researchers are still developing comprehensive studies and reviews to confirm the therapeutic effect of BPs. This chapter will discuss the BPs of legumes and their functions.

3.1 Antidiabetic

Increased blood sugar levels are signs of diabetes caused by decreased insulin secretion, impaired insulin function, or both. In patients with T2DM, the body does not respond adequately to insulin action and the blood glucose level increases, a condition known as hyperglycemia [72]. Changing diet is one way of treating diabetes, besides losing weight, exercising, or taking drugs to increase glucose homeostasis [25]. Side effects from synthetic antidiabetic drugs are gastrointestinal disorders [73]. Other side effects are hypoglycemia and weight gain [74].

Meanwhile, some patients are intolerant of the drug [75]. Therefore, research to find BPs from food as a safe antidiabetic has recently increased to overcome these side effects [76]. Measuring the inhibitory activity of DPP-IV is one way to determine whether BPs have an antidiabetic activity or not. The role of the DPP-IV enzyme is to inactivate incretins, especially GLP-1 and GIP. GLP-1 is a glucagon-like peptide, while GIP is a glucose-dependent autotrophic insulin peptide. Incretin is a hormone that vitalising insulin secretion. So the mechanism commonly used to control T2DM is to measure how much DPP-IV inhibition is [77].

Several low molecular weight BPs can induce insulin stimulation in blood intake, for example, the peptides present in fermented soybeans [78] or fermented kidney beans [9]. Some BPs that are isolated from black bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L) protein hydrolyzate effectively inhibits glucose transporter 2 (GLUT2) and glucose transporter, which depends on sodium 1 (SGLT1), which functions to lower blood glucose levels [39]. The BPs found in legumes (such as kidney beans, Phaseolus vulgaris L with ten amino acids) have antidiabetic properties [9] (Table 3). The table states that the process can produce antidiabetic peptides, including fermentation, germination, or enzymatic hydrolysis.

3.2 Anti-hypertensives

Controlling hypertension is essential to reduce the risk of cardiovascular complications such as coronary heart disease (which causes heart disease) and stroke, congestive heart failure, irregular heart rhythm, and renal failure [3, 79]. A healthy diet is a way to control hypertension. Eating foods high in BPs is very healthy. Several studies have shown that food ingredients derived from legumes have an anti-hypertensive function. The preparation of BPs uses three ways: fermentation of materials into fermented products, germination, and enzymatic hydrolysis. Table 3 shows some of the research results.

The anti-hypertensive activity was measured by measuring the inhibitory activity of the ACE (Angiotensin I-converting Enzyme). The ACE will cut angiotensin I to produce angiotensin II (vasoactive peptide). This angiotensin II compound will bind to receptors on the walls of blood vessels causing contraction of blood vessels so that blood pressure rises [80]. The presence of BPs will bind to the ACE enzyme, thus inhibiting the action of ACE, and as a result, blood pressure can drop. Some legumes that are recognised to contain BPs that lower blood pressure include garden beans (Pisum sativum) [48], green beans [20, 40], soy (Glycine max) glycinin [41], kidney bean [9], and pigeon pea [49]. Fermented products also have anti-hypertensive activity, such as douchi, a traditional Chinese food fermented soybean [8]. Other fermented products are Korean soybean paste fermented with mixed cultures of bacteria [81, 82], and many other products from legumes.

Research on anti-hypertensive BPs from food is still being studied [65]. Anti-hypertensive BPs (isolated from food) have a higher tissue binding affinity than synthetic drugs, resulting in slower tissue loss [83]. For vigorous anti-hypertensive activity, the position of specific amino acid residues is critical. For example, valine and isoleucine are essential for ACE inhibition [84]. Increased ACE inhibitory activity occurs when the C-terminal is Proline [84]. Therefore, the strategy to produce peptides with high anti-hypertensive activity is to hydrolyse protein to produce proline containing peptides.

3.3 Hypo-cholesterolemic

Many researchers have studied and reviewed the ability of BPs as cholesterol-lowering agents [65]. The human body needs healthy cholesterol levels to produce vitamin D and steroid hormones, and bile acids. However, arteriosclerosis can occur when cholesterol in the blood forms plaque in the arteries. As a result, it can reduce oxygen supply to the heart, which leads to cardiovascular disease. While chemicals that lower blood cholesterol can cause liver damage or failure, myopathy [85] and diabetes [86, 87], or some people are sensitive to statins (cholesterol-lowering drugs) [88]. Therefore, the research for BPs that can lower cholesterol has increased over the years [65]. Table 3 shows BPs in legumes (such as red beans and soybeans with 4–16 amino acids) with hypocholesterolemic activity.

Cholesterol reduction by peptides can occur due to inhibition of cholesterol micelle formation, inhibition of lipase activity and strong bile acid-binding [89]. Peptides from fermented soy milk show the ability to bind bile acids [90]. The solubility of cholesterol in lipid micelles will be reduced due to BPs [91], resulting in inhibition of cholesterol absorption in Caco-2 cells with one layer. For example, peptides from cowpeas can inhibit HMGCoA reductase and reduce the dissolution of cholesterol micelles in vitro [92]. A 36% reduction in plasma cholesterol levels could occur in the livers of rats consuming the a’-subunit. The tight binding of BPs with taurocholate, deoxytaurocholate, and glycodeoxycholate can also lead to decreased cholesterol absorption in the intestine [93]. Soybean peptides (LPYP, IAVPGEVA and IAVPTGVA) can activate the LDLR-SREBP 2 pathway to increase LDL uptake effectively. For moderate hypercholesterolemia, 30 g/ml lupine protein consumption effectively reduced the Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin type 9 enzyme (PCSK9). Inhibiting HMGCoA reductase activity on HepG2 cells may explain the hypocholesterolemic effect of lupine protein hydrolysate [94]. In addition, peptides cause the regulation of lipoprotein b-VLDL cholesterol receptors to increase in rat liver [95].

3.4 Antioxidants

The antioxidant properties of peptides have more to do with their composition, structure, and hydrophobicity [62]. The amino acid sequence of these peptides can determine different biological activities. Amino acids Tyr, Trp, Met, Lys, Cys, and His are examples of amino acids that cause antioxidant activity [96]. BPs from some legumes have antioxidant properties, for example, soy peptides with 4–16 amino acids [42, 43] (Table 3). This table also shows that BP of Leu-Leu-Pro-His-His from soybean β-conglycinin hydrolysate has antioxidant properties. The amino acid leucine or proline at the N-end can increase its antioxidative activity [35]. Amino acids with aromatic residues can donate protons to electron-deficient radicals. This property enhances the radical scavenging character of amino acid residues. Amino acids in the C-terminal region can increase the antioxidant activity higher than in the N-terminal region. This increase in antioxidative activity relates to the nature of the electronic, hydrophobic, steric, and hydrogen bonding amino acids in the area [39]. Soy milk has significant antimutagenic and antioxidant activity. So fermented soy milk probably can prevent mutagenic and oxidative damage [97]. Consumption of douchi (fermented soy food) extract will increase the activity of SOD (Superoxide dismutase) in the liver and kidneys of mice. This consumption also reduces the serum TBARS (Thio Barbituric Acid Reactive Substance), which will increase catalase activity (CAT). These results may indicate the involvement of BPs and free amino acid components from douchi extract as antioxidants [98].

3.5 Antimicrobial

The ability of BPs as antimicrobial peptides (AMP) has also been widely researched and studied [65]. For example, Pina-Pérez and Ferrús-Pérez [55] studied AMP from several legumes against bacterial pathogens that cause foodborne diseases. AMP is generally active against a broad spectrum of microorganisms, including bacteria (Gram+ and Gram-), fungi, and viruses [99]. Some AMPs also show additional activity, such as antioxidant activity [100], immunomodulation [101] and wound healing activity [102]. Therefore, this AMP may be a better choice of antibiotics for pathogenic bacteria resistant to conventional antibiotics.

AMP has various characteristics, including amino acid length (between 12 and 50), amino acid composition, charge and position of disulfide bonds [103]. AMP isolated from soybeans showed that long-chain peptides had higher AMP activity than short peptides [55]. AMP interacts with microbes due to positive charges or hydrophilic and hydrophobic (amphipathic) terminal amino acids, recognised as a prominent structural motif. The charge, hydrophobicity and length of cationic AMP are directly related to their potential as antimicrobials [103]. AMP will cause changes in permeability and osmotic disturbances in bacterial cell membranes [104]. AMP can directly kill bacteria by creating pores through the bacterial cell membrane [101] or interacting with macromolecules in microbial cells [105]. The structure and sequence of peptide amino acids are the main factors for whether or not it is effective as an antimicrobial [104]. Some AMPs are rich in positively charged amino acids (arginine and lysine). Such AMP can enter microbial cells by inducing energy-dependent endocytic pathways such as micropinocytosis [106]. Table 3 shows some of the AMP amino acid sequences from soybeans.

3.6 Anti-inflammatory

Inflammation is a natural immune system reaction to fight disease. Inflammation is generally associated with cancer because it involves the interaction of various immune cells that can lead to signals of proliferation, growth and invasion of tumour cells [107, 108]. There are two pathways of inflammatory-cancer interaction, namely the extrinsic pathway (inflammation facilitates cancer development) and the intrinsic pathway (genetic changes causing cancer to stimulate the inflammatory process to support tumour development) [109]. Bastiaannet and co-workers [110] and Crawford [111] reported that anti-inflammatory therapy could reduce or prevent cancer risk. This report shows the interaction between inflammatory-cancer. So far, lunasin, VPY and -glutamyl peptides have anti-inflammatory activity [70]. Lunasin exerts an anti-inflammatory effect by inhibiting the Akt-mediated NF-kB pathway [57]. BPs from legumes, particularly soybeans, can regulate several inflammatory markers, which include prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), nitric oxide (NO), induced nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2), cytokines, and chemokines [70]. BPs from Phaseolus vulgaris L (the result of hydrolysis of alcalase and digestive enzymes pepsin and pancreatin) also showed similar results, inhibiting important markers and mediators of the inflammatory process [71]. Therefore BPs from Phaseolus vulgaris L can assist in managing diseases associated with chronic inflammatory processes such as T2DM and cancer. Several peptides from Phaseolus vulgaris L with anti-inflammatory activity are low molecular weight (MW) and contain 3–11 amino acids (Table 3). A lunasin-like peptide with low MW (5 kDa) inhibited the most potent pro-inflammatory markers than peptides with MW 8 and 14 KDa [112]. Biopsy of the small intestine mucosa showed repair in intestinal inflammation after supplementation of tempe in the diet [8]. Tempe contains many easily digestible compounds such as peptides and free amino acids that are affecting intestinal growth.

3.7 Anti-cancer

Many researchers are experimenting with cancer therapy using BPs from various legumes. The results are more promising, cheaper, and safer than cancer treatment using surgery, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy, which have adverse side effects due to the emergence of drug resistance and radio-resistance [113]. Extensive exploration has shown that a high intake of legumes can significantly reduce the risk of colorectal adenoma [114, 115] BPs with anti-cancer activity have a relatively low molecular weight (Table 3), as isolated from black soybean by-products have the sequence Leu/Ile-Val-Pro-Lys [116]. In comparison, lunasin from soybeans contains 43 amino acids [58]. The hallmark of lunasin is the Arg-Gly-Asp sequence which functions for adhesion to the extracellular matrix, and the 8 Asp sequence to bind chromatin [117]. Kim and co-workers [118] said that hydrophobic BPs isolated from soybeans could act as anti-cancer. Some legumes also have higher hydrophobic amino acids that are similar in levels to soybeans, such as mung bean, chickpea, and velvet bean (Table 1), thus potentially producing anti-cancer peptides.

The mechanism of inhibition of tumour growth by BPs varies depending on the variety of legume sources, namely by induction of extrinsic apoptosis [119], induction of chromatin condensation [59] or inhibition of inflammatory processes [120]. BP isolated from chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) inhibits the proliferation of breast cancer cells effectively [60]; this BP has the sequence ARQSHFANAQP. Meanwhile, BP from Phaseolus vulgaris (cultivar extra-long autumn purple) can also inhibit the proliferation of human tumour cells by inducing apoptotic bodies and nitric oxide [59]. Apoptosis (programmed cell death) is a complex process coordinated by specific target proteins and, in many cases, possibly responsible for the potential anti-cancer effects [121]. Lunasin can reduce the incidence of skin tumours by 70% [58]. Also, it inhibits gastrointestinal cancer cells [122] and cardiovascular and immunological disorders [123]. The researcher reported that consumption of legumes could reduce the risk of 10 kinds of chronic diseases, including breast cancer, lung cancer and colon cancer [124]. Consumption of legumes in higher amounts will lead to a lower risk of death from cancer [125].

Advertisement

4. Bioacessability, stability, and bioavailability of bioactive peptides

Bioaccessibility, stability, and bioavailability are the main concerns in utilising bioactive peptides (BPs) from food ingredients to remain active in maintaining a healthy body. Bioaccessibility is the first step in the digestive system so that nutrients/BPs out of the food tissue and transported across the intestinal epithelial barrier into the blood circulation system. BP transport processes may involve passive transport (paracellular or passive diffusion) or active routes [126]. During the nutrient transport process, the stability of the material must be kept high, so the bioavailability of nutrients is maintained to be utilised by target cells or tissues. In the digestive tract, nutrients are released from the food matrix and converted into chemical forms that can bind to and enter intestinal cells or pass between them. Dietary factors can also affect the bioavailability of the BPs contained. Interactions between peptides and components of the food matrix can modulate their digestibility and alter the absorption route of the peptide [10]. The release of nutrients in the small intestine starts from chewing, which involves digestive enzymes in the mouth and then in the stomach mixed with acids and enzymes in gastric juices. This whole process is a process for making nutrients biologically accessible [127].

Although the number of active components in the food consumed is abundant, it cannot necessarily prevent disease because it depends on the amount available to function in target organs or tissues [128]. Bioavailability is the number of bioactive compounds that organisms can use effectively [129]. For example, when food contact with the mouth or gastrointestinal tract, various interactions can affect the bioavailability of food nutrients (e.g., the presence of fat can increase the bioavailability of quercetin in food) [130]. In studying the role of bioactive compounds in human health, several factors can inhibit the bioavailability of the active components for use in target organs or tissues [131]. For example, fruit antioxidants mixed with macromolecules form a food matrix such as carbohydrates, fats, and proteins [132].

From a nutritional point of view, bioavailability refers to several nutrient fractions or bioactive compounds that are ingested and can reach the systemic circulation and can finally be utilised [133]. Besides that, bioavailability is the fraction of a nutrient stored or available for a particular physiological function [134]. Another definition, bioavailability, is the amount of active metabolite from the oral dose fraction reaching systemic circulation [135]. The bioavailability of oral BPs is limited because their release from the plant matrix is affected by: solubility in GI fluids, permeability in intestinal epithelial cells, enzymatic and chemical reactions in the GI tract [136]. Four essential steps are required to absorb bioactive compounds effectively: (a) release from the food matrix; (b) incorporation into bile salt micelles; (c) absorption by epithelial cells; and finally; (d) incorporation into the cyclomicron secretion into the lymphatic system.

The biological effects of a BP depend on its capacity to survive until it reaches the target organ. Thus, the main requirement of a BP is its stability or resistance to gastrointestinal enzyme hydrolysis, brush border and serum peptidase. Experimental evidence shows that the length of the peptide chain determines the ability of BPs to pass through the intestinal epithelium in humans by different mechanisms. For small peptides, it is possible to transport through active basolateral, while for large peptides through a transport mechanism mediated by exocytotic-vesicles [137].

However, many peptides are biologically active but are unlikely to be absorbed in the gastrointestinal tract via local effects or receptors that release hormones and cell signalling in the gut. Such BPs affect gastric emptying, gastrointestinal transport, nutrient absorption (amino acids, glucose, lipids) and composition of the colon microflora. They may also regulate food intake [138].

In addition to the presence of specific residues, charge, and molecular weight, hydrogen bonding potential and amino acid hydrophobic tend to affect the bioavailability resistance of BPs to proteases and enzyme hydrolysing peptides [11, 139, 140]. Lunasin, a BP isolated from soybeans and cereal (wheat, barley and rice), has 43 amino acids (MW 5.4 kDa), displays a helical structure and contains nine aspartic acid residues in the C-terminal region. Lunasin is highly bioavailable, heat-stable (100°C, 10 min), and anti-cancer against carcinogenic chemicals. In vivo digestibility of lunasin-fortified soy protein was studied in mice fed for four weeks [141].

During transit in the central digestive tract, the structural properties of the peptide will influence the stability of BPs, including molecular weight, charge, amino acid sequence, and hydrophobicity [126]. Tests using Sprague Dawley rats showed that the highest absorption of ACE inhibitor BPs was in the jejunum [7]. The results showed that BPs with 2–6 amino acids were easy to absorb than proteins and free amino acids [142]. Small (di- and tripeptide) and large (10–51 amino acids) peptides can pass through the intestinal barrier and exhibit their biological function at the target tissue level. However, as the molecular weight of BPs increases, their chances of passing through the intestinal barrier decrease further [143]. The presence of proline and proline hydroxyl will result in resistance of BPs to digestive enzymes, especially a tripeptide with Pro-Pro at the C-terminal [144]. In another study, the number of peptides in human plasma increased depending on the dose of the BP administered. Thus, it concluded that the saturation of BP transporters could affect the number of peptides that can enter the peripheral blood [145].

Encryption of BPs in their natural protein structure may protect these BPs from gastric digestion. Another way to protect BPs is to modify structural proteins such as phosphorylation of serine, threonine, or tyrosine can prevent hydrolysis by digestive proteases. As a result, protein or peptides have a greater chance of being absorbed in target organs or tissues [146]. Stability also depends on the degree of hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity. The more hydrophobic the structure, the more difficult it is to attack by proteases [147].

Therefore, it explained that the difference in bioavailability of BPs between in vitro and in vivo tests (after oral consumption), which may be smaller or larger, occurs due to an increase or decrease in BPs after being catalysed by gastrointestinal proteases. A simulation test of the gastrointestinal digestion process of several tempe legumes (Phaseolus lunatus L, Canavalia ensiformis L, Mucuna pruriens) showed that the proteolysis process by the digestive enzyme pepsin-pancreatin increased ACE inhibitory activity [7, 31, 34]. Another example is that BPs’ antioxidant activity in vivo is more significant than in vitro [148]. The shape of the molecular structure also influences the stability of BPs. For example, a small BP (YPI) isolated from ovalbumin has additional stability when tested in GI digestive system simulation. BPs (YPI) and peptides containing P at the C end (RADHP and ADHP) are stable. If their structure is slightly modified by adding one or two amino acids to the C end (e.g. RADHPF, RADHPFL, FRADHPFL), they become unstable in simulated GI hydrolysis [149].

Finally, the use of BPs in nutraceutical and pharmacology for human health is still limited. For that, it is necessary to evaluate: (1) degradation of BPs by proteases in the digestive tract, which can affect bioaccessibility, stability, and bioavailability; (2) the existence of technology that allows modification of the structure of BPs such as (a) phosphorylation of amino acids in BPs to make them more resistant to hydrolysis by digestive enzymes; or (b) increase the amino acid hydrophobic at the N-terminal or C-terminal [150].

Advertisement

5. Technology for bioactive peptides

In general, protein-rich foods that undergo processing involving protease enzymes will produce peptides. However, not all peptides resulting from protein hydrolysis of foodstuffs will become bioactive peptides (BPs) beneficial to body health. The structural properties of BPs (composition, amino acid sequence, hydrophobic amino acid content, and resistance to digestive enzymes) will determine their beneficial functional properties [126], such as, example anti-diabetic, anti-hypertensive, cholesterol-lowering, antioxidant, and other functional properties.

Food processing processes related to conventional BPs production include cooking, ripening, fermentation and germination. In principle, the processing involves protease enzymes, e.g., chymotrypsin, trypsin, papain, thermolysin, and others) [151], either in the form of free or immobilised enzymes. For food processing by fermentation, protease enzymes derived from microbes are used in the process, while for germination, the enzymes are from growing seeds. Production of BPs increased by regulating the types of enzymes, microbes used, and germination time. Combining these processes (enzymatic process followed by fermentation, or vice versa) will increase the production of BPs so that it is more optimal [152]. The conventional production of the BPs product was a low amount and purity, making it less effective for the industrial scale [153]. So this conventional method for producing BPs does not necessarily involve a separation and purification process, but the production of functional foods containing healthy BPs in the form of fermented food products [153].

The process technology used to produce functional or nutraceutical food will affect the functional, nutritional and biological properties of the protein in the food. Therefore, several things to pay attention to, namely: (1) the effect of using a thermal (or non-thermal) process on the components of the food produced, including its effect on its functional properties and preservation capabilities; (2) available extraction processes and formulations and their optimization; (3) innovative and sustainable applications that can be developed [127]. In addition, consideration of the choice of processing technology must also be based on the desired nutritional function and appearance and sensory properties (such as colour, texture, and taste in the mouth) to be attractive to consumers [154]. Thermal processes can encourage non-enzymatic Maillard reactions between amino groups and reducing sugars [155]. This process will produce colour, sensory properties that affect consumer acceptance and reduce the activity of BPs [155, 156]. The use of thermal processes (e.g. boiling, cooking, blanching, frying, and sterilising) for softening cell walls and inactivate microorganisms and enzymes to make the shelf life longer [127]. The development of non-thermal processes has several weaknesses; for example, the use of nanofiltration membranes requires energy [157]. Freeze-drying, encapsulation, and solvent extraction techniques are costly. To overcome this limitation, food technology experts must develop new alternative technologies (technology that can maintain bio-accessibility, stability, bio-availability and bio-activity of active components). Including BPs, processed food ingredients and the form of pure isolates (capsules or nanocapsules).

The production of BPs has become more accessible, faster, and more effective with the development of science and technology. Production of BPs on an industrial scale usually uses an enzyme hydrolysis process. So the BPs production process uses computer equipment and database search algorithms to predict target peptides and their properties. By selecting the correct protease enzyme through the database, it is possible to select the protein-enzyme combination, in-silico hydrolysis, and the nature of the peptide to be produced [152, 153, 158]. This in-silico hydrolysis method is a functional and widely practised approach for producing legume BPs (Table 3).

The legume or various food peptides resulting from enzymatic hydrolysis was then fractionated and purified using a combination of various chromatographic techniques [158, 159, 160]. Isoelectric focusing and ultrafiltration are separate macromolecular compounds (such as protein and pectin). Meanwhile, extraction techniques use solvents or supercritical solutions to isolate small molecule bioactive compounds such as antioxidants [157, 161, 162]. This extraction technique, combined with thermal technology (e.g. pasteurisation or spray drying), has been applied to functional foods. This conventional food processing technology is well documented and well established, but its application for the isolation of BPs still needs development and improvement.

The weakness of current technology is that there is still a need for studies on product safety for health. For example, advanced technologies such as cold plasma, nanotechnology, ultrasound, and others, are thought to affect advanced lipid oxidation processes and cause cell tissue damage. For this reason, the effect of this advanced technology on the safety and health of the food components produced needs to be studied to obtain a complete understanding. In this case, it is necessary to adapt the product and technology to the desired functional properties of the active ingredient. For example, modification or interaction with other macronutrients (e.g. dietary fibre) can increase the bio-availability of bioactive compounds [163].

On the other hand, encapsulation technology using legume protein ingredients as a material is also a technique for providing chemical compounds found naturally in plants and other nutraceutical compounds (such as vitamins, minerals, BPs, or others). Thus this encapsulation allowing these compounds (including BPs) to enter the body and undergo release and degradation by enzymes digestion [164]. Other technologies used to protect the active ingredients or nutraceuticals (such as BPs and others) are encapsulation, edible films and coatings, and vacuum impregnation. One may be promising is nutrigenomics, where the active ingredients are given to individuals on a Taylor-made basis according to the genetic characteristics of each individual [165].

Although several researchers have evaluated and characterised BPs that BPs isolated from food have potential bioactive activity and therapeutic functions, and have high bio-availability (bio-accessibility) (due to the support of excellent and modern processing technology), however, all of them can only have a positive impact on human health when combined with healthy living habits [4].

Advertisement

6. Conclusions

Legumes have various biological activities that are good for body health, such as antihypertensive, anti-diabetic, anti-cancer, antioxidant, and others, but legumes also contain anti-nutritional compounds. Food processing is an effective process to remove anti-nutritional compounds and, at the same time, can produce BP compounds that are healthy for the body. Although the number of active components in food is abundant, it is not necessarily able to prevent disease because it is very dependent on the amount available to function in target organs or tissues. One of the contributing factors is the BPs enzyme in holding the action while in the digestive tract. Some legumes showed that hydrolysis by these enzymes increased their bio-accessibility and bio-availability in the digestive tract of rats (in antihypertensive testing). Due to the diverse nature of BP, it is necessary to develop technology that is following the desired functional properties of BP, for example, to protect it so that it is stable while passing through the digestive tract using microencapsulation, edible film and coating technology. Further research still needs to be developed related to the study of safety separation technology for the products produced. From the excellent stability and bioavailability of BPs from legumes, it is likely to be more promising to develop alternative healthy functional food products containing BPs and sensory properties that attract consumers.

References

  1. 1. Sulistiani HR, Handayani S, Pangastuti A. Characterization of isoflavone bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity test of ethanol extract of tempe made from Glycine soja, Lablab purpureus, and Phaseolus lunatus. Biofarmasi. 2014; 12:62-72. DOI: 10.13057/biofar/f120203 [Indonesian]
  2. 2. Li Y, Jiang B, Zhang T, Mu W, Liu J. Antioxidant and free radical-scavenging activities of chickpea protein hydrolysate (CPH). Food Chem. 2008; 106:444-450. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.04.067
  3. 3. WHO. World Health Statistics 2020: A visual summary. World Health Organization. Available from: https://www.who.int/data/gho/whs-2020-visual-summary. [Accessed: 2021-05-15]
  4. 4. Li Y, Yu J. Research progress in structure-activity relationship of bioactive peptides. J Med Food. 2015; 18:147-156. DOI: 10.1089/jmf.2014.0028
  5. 5. Hernandez-Ledesma B, Amigo L, Ramos M, Recio I. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitory activity in commercial fermented products. Formation of peptides under simulated gastrointestinal digestion. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004; 52:1504-1510. DOI: 10.1021/jf034997b
  6. 6. Zhang JH, Tatsumi E, Ding CH, Li LT. Angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitory peptides in douchi, a Chinese traditional fermented soybean product. Food Chem. 2006; 98:551-557. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.06.024
  7. 7. Pertiwi MGP, Marsono Y, Indrati R. In vitro gastrointestinal simulation of tempe prepared from koro kratok (Phaseolus lunatus L.) as an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. J Food Sci Technol. 2020; 57:1847-1855. DOI: 10.1007/s13197-019-04219-1
  8. 8. Nout MJR, Kiers JL. Tempe fermentation, innovation, and functionality: update into the third millennium. J Appl Microb. 2005; 96:789-805. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02471.x
  9. 9. Jakubczyk A, Karaś M, Złotek U, Szymanowska U. Identification of potential inhibitory peptides of enzymes involved in the metabolic syndrome obtained by simulated gastrointestinal digestion of fermented bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) seeds. Food Res Int’l, 2017; 100: 489-496. DOI:10.1016/j.foodres.2017.07.046
  10. 10. Amigo L, Hernández-Ledesma B. Current Evidence on the Bioavailability of Food Bioactive Peptides. Molecules. 2020; 25: 4479. DOI: 10.3390/molecules25194479
  11. 11. Carbonaro M, Maselli P, Nucara A. Structural aspects of legume proteins and nutraceutical properties. Food Res Int’l. 2015; 76: 19-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2014.11.007
  12. 12. Zhang B, Deng Z, Ramdath DD, Tang Y, Chen PX, et al. Phenolic profiles of 20 Canadian lentil cultivars and their contribution to antioxidant activity and inhibitory effects on α-glucosidase and pancreatic lipase. Food Chem. 2015; 172:862-872. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.09.144
  13. 13. Ciabotti S, Silva ACBB, Juhasz ACP, Mendonça CD, Tavano OL, et al. Chemical composition, protein profile, and isoflavones content in soybean genotypes with different seed coat colors. Int’l Food Res J. 2016; 23:621-629
  14. 14. Sridhar KR, Seena S. Nutritional and antinutritional significance of four unconventional legumes of the genus Canavalia - A comparative study. Food Chem. 2006; 99: 267-288. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.07.049
  15. 15. Vadivel V. The Nutritional and Antioxidant Contents of Wild Jack Bean (Canavalia ensiformis L. Dc.): An Under-Exploited Legume From South India. Int’l J Recent Sci Res. 2019; 10:35502-35508. DOI: 10.24327/ijrsr.2019.1010.4116
  16. 16. Baptista A, Pinho O, Pinto E, Casal S, Mota C, et al. Characterization of protein and fat composition of seeds from common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) and bambara groundnuts (Vigna subterranea L. Verdc) from Mozambique. J Food Measurement and Characterization. 2017; 11: 442-450. DOI: 10.1007/s11694-016-9412-2
  17. 17. Kalidass C, Mahapatra AK. Evaluation of the proximate and phytochemical compositions of an underexploited legume Mucuna pruriens var. utilis (Wall ex Wight) L.H.Bailey. Int’l Food Res J. 2014; 21: 303-308
  18. 18. Perazzini R, Leonardi D, Ruggeri S, Alesiani D, D’Arcangelo G, et al. Characterization of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Landraces cultivated in central Italy. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition (Dordrecht, Netherlands). 2008; 63:211-218. DOI: 10.1007/s11130-008-0095-7
  19. 19. Blessing IA, Gregory IO. Effect of processing on the proximate composition of the dehulled and undehulled mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) Flours. Pakistan J Nutr. 2010; 9:1006-1016. DOI: 10.3923/pjn.2010.1006.1016
  20. 20. Li GH, Le GW, Liu H, Shi YH. Mung-bean protein hydrolysates obtained with alcalase exhibit angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitory activity. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2005; 11:281-287. DOI: 10.1177/1082013205056781
  21. 21. El-Adawy TA. Nutritional composition and antinutritional factors of chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) undergoing different cooking methods and germination. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition. 2002; 57:83-97. DOI:10.1023/A:1013189620528
  22. 22. FAO. Food and Agriculture Organization of the united nations. 2021. Available from: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC. [Accessed: 2021-05-08]
  23. 23. Sanjukta S, Rai AK. Production of bioactive peptides during soybean fermentation and their potential health benefits. Trends in Food Science and Technology. Elsevier Ltd. 2016; p. 1-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2016.01.010
  24. 24. Yan J, Zhao J, Yang R, Zhao W. Bioactive peptidas with antidiabetic properties: a review. Int’l J Food Sci Technol. 2019; 54:1909-1919. DOI: 10.1111/ijfs.14090
  25. 25. Mojica L, Luna-Vital DA, de Mejia EG. Characterization of peptides from common bean protein isolates and their potential to inhibit markers of type-2 diabetes, hypertension and oxidative stress. J Sci Food Agric. 2017; 97:2401-2410. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.8053
  26. 26. Kalpanadevi V, Mohan VR. Effect of processing on antinutrients and in vitro protein digestibility of the underutilized Legume, Vigna Unguiculata (L.) Walp Subsp. Food Sci. Technol. 2013; 51:455-461. DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2012.09.030
  27. 27. Sharma S, Goyal R, Barwal S. Domestic processing effects on physicochemical, nutritional and anti-nutritional attributes in soybean (Glycine max L. Merill). Int’l Food Res J. 2013; 20: 3203-3209
  28. 28. Doss A, Pugalenthi M, Vadivel VG, Subhashini G, Subash AR. Effects of processing technique on the nutritional composition and antinutrients content of under –utilized food legume Canavalia ensiformis L. DC. Int’l Food Res J. 2011; 18: 965-970
  29. 29. Vadivel V, Pugelanthi M. Effect of various processing methods on the levels of antinutritional constituents and protein digestibility of Mucuna pruriens(l.) Dc. Var. utilis (wall. Ex wight) baker ex burck (velvet bean) seeds. J Food Biochem. 2008; 32:795-812. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-4514.2008.00199.x
  30. 30. Shimelis EA, Rakshit SK. Antinutritional factors and in vitro protein digestibility of improved haricot bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties grown in Ethiopia. Int’l J Food Sci Nutr. 2005; 56:377-387. DOI: 10.1080/09637480500512930
  31. 31. Puspitajati E, Cahyanto MN, Marsono Y, Indrati R. Jack bean as tempe ingredients: The safety study and fate of protein against gastrointestinal enzymes. IOP Conference Series: Earth Environ Sci. 2019; 346:012070. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/346/1/012070
  32. 32. Thorn KA, Tinsley AM, Weber CW, Berry JW. Antinutritional factors in legumes of the Sonoran Desert. Ecology Food Nut. 1983; 13:251-256. DOI: 10.1080/03670244.1983.9990757
  33. 33. Pebrianti SA, Cahyanto MN, Indrati R. Proteolysis and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitory activity of peptide fractions from pigeon pea tempe. Int’l J Sci Res. 2020; 9:306-311. DOI: 10.21275/SR20903093551
  34. 34. Rizkaprilisa W, Marsono Y, Indrati R. Bioactive peptide tempe made from Mucuna pruriens (L) DC as an inhibitor of angiotensin-I-converting enzyme (ACE) in a digestion simulation. Prev. Nutr. Food Sci. 2020; 25:93-97. DOI: 10.3746/pnf.2020.25.1.93
  35. 35. Sarmadi BH, Ismail A. Antioxidative peptides from food proteins: A review. Peptides. 2010; 31: 1949-1956. DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2010.06.020
  36. 36. Chalamaiah M, Keskin-Ulug S, Hong H, Wu J. Regulatory requirements of bioactive peptides (protein hydrolysates) from food proteins. J Funct Foods. 2019; 58:123-129. DOI: 10.1016/j.jff.2019.04.050
  37. 37. González-Montoya M, Hernández-Ledesma B, Mora-Escobedo R, Martínez-Villaluenga C. Bioactive peptides from germinated soybean with anti-diabetic potential by inhibition of dipeptidyl peptidase-IV, α-amylase, and α-glucosidase enzymes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018; 19: 2883. DOI: 10.3390/ijms19102883
  38. 38. Rocha TdS, Hernandez LMR, Chang YK, de Mejía EG. Impact of germination and enzymatic hydrolysis of cowpea bean (Vigna unguiculata) on the generation of peptides capable of inhibiting dipeptidyl peptidase IV. Food Res Int’l. 2014; 64:799-809. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2014.08.016
  39. 39. Mojica L, de Mejia EG, Granados-Silvestre MÁ, Menjivar M. Evaluation of the hypoglycemic potential of a black bean hydrolyzed protein isolate and its pure peptides using in silico, in vitro and in vivo approaches. J. Funct. Foods. 2017; 31:274-286 DOI: 10.1016/j.jff.2017.02.006
  40. 40. Li GH, Wan JZ, Le GW, Shi YH. Novel angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitory peptides isolated from alcalase hydrolysate of mung bean protein. J Peptide Sci. 2006; 12:509-514. DOI: 10.1002/psc.758
  41. 41. Gouda KGM, Gowda LR, Rao AGA, Prakash V. Angiotensin I-Converting Enzyme Inhibitory Peptide Derived from Glycinin, the 11S Globulin of Soybean (Glycine max). J Agric Food Chem. 2006; 54:4568-4573.DOI: 10.1021/jf060264q
  42. 42. Capriotti AL, Caruso G, Cavaliere C, Samperi R, Ventura S, et al. Identification of potential bioactive peptides generated by simulated gastrointestinal digestion of soybean seeds and soy milk proteins. J Food Composition Anal. 2015; 44:205-213. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2015.08.007
  43. 43. Puchalska P, García MC, Marina ML. Identification of native angiotensin-I converting enzyme inhibitory peptides in commercial soybean based infant formulas using HPLC-Q-ToF-MS. Food Chem. 2014; 157:62-69. DOI:10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.01.130
  44. 44. Kuba M, Tana C, Tawata S, Yasuda M. Production of angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitory peptides from soybean protein with Monascus purpureus acid proteinase. Process Biochem. 2005; 40: 2191-2196. DOI:10.1016/j.procbio.2004.08.010
  45. 45. Kodera T, Nio N. Identification of an angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitory peptides from protein hydrolysates by a soybean protease and the antihypertensive effects of hydrolysates in 4 spontaneously hypertensive model rats. J. Food Sci. 2006; 71:164-173. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2006.tb15612.x
  46. 46. Gu Y, Wu J. LC-MS/MS coupled with QSAR modeling in characterising of angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitory peptides from soybean proteins. Food Chem. 2013; 141:2682-2690. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.04.064
  47. 47. Nakahara T, Sugimoto K, Sano A, Yamaguchi H, Katayama H, et al. Antihypertensive mechanism of a peptide-enriched soy sauce-like seasoning: the active constituents and its suppressive effect on renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. J. Food Sci. 2011; 76:H201-H206. DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02362.x
  48. 48. Wu J, Yuan L, Aluko RE. Restriction of the in vitro formation of angiotensin II by leucinyl-arginyl-tryptophan, a novel peptide with potent angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitory activity. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2006; 70:1277-1280. DOI: 10.1271/bbb.70.1277
  49. 49. Nawaz KAA, David SM, Murugesh E, Thandeeswaran M, Gopikrishnan K, et al. Identifcation and in silico characterization of a novel peptide inhibitor of angiotensin converting enzyme from pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan). Phytomedicine. 2017; 36:1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.phymed.2017.09.013
  50. 50. Lammi C, Zanoni C, Arnoldi A. IAVPGEVA, IAVPTGVA, and LPYP, three peptides from soy glycinin, modulate cholesterol metabolism in HepG2 cells through the activation of the LDLR-SREBP2 pathway. J. Funct. Foods 2015; 14:469-478. DOI: 10.1016/j.jff.2015.02.021
  51. 51. Lammi C, Zanoni C, Arnoldi A, Vistoli G. Two peptides from soy beta-Conglycinin Induce a hypocholesterolemic effect in HepG2 Cells by a statin-like mechanism: Comparative in vitro and in silico modeling studies. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015; 63: 7945-7951. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b03497
  52. 52. Yoshikawa M, Fujita H, Matoba N, Takenaka Y, Yamamoto T, et al. Bioactive peptides derived from food proteins preventing lifestyle-related diseases. Bio Factors. 2000; 12:143-146. DOI: 10.1002/biof.5520120122
  53. 53. Pak VV, Koo M, Kwon DY, Yun L. Design of a highly potent inhibitory peptide acting as a competitive inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase. Amino Acids. 2012; 43:2015-2025. DOI:10.1007/s00726-012-1276-0
  54. 54. Hernandez LMR, de Mejia EG. Bean peptides have higher in silico binding affinities than Ezetimibe for the N-terminal domain of cholesterol receptor Niemann-Pick C1 Like-1. Peptides. 2017; 90:83-89. DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2017.02.011
  55. 55. Pina-Pérez MC, Ferrús-Pérez MA. Antimicrobial potential of legume extracts against foodborne pathogens: A review. Trends in Food Sci Technol. 2018; 72:114-124. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2017.12.007
  56. 56. López-Barrios L, Antunes-Ricardo M, Gutiérrez-Uribe JA. Changes in antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity of black bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) protein isolates due to germination and enzymatic digestion. Food Chem. 2016; 203:417-424. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.02.048
  57. 57. Cam A., de Mejia E.G. RGD-peptide lunasin inhibits Akt-mediated NF-κB activation in human macrophages through interaction with the αVβ3 integrin. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2012; 56:1569-1581. DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.201200301
  58. 58. Galvez AF, Chen N, Macasieb J, de Lumen BO. Chemopreventive property of a soybean peptide (Lunasin) that binds to deacetylated histones and inhibits acetylation. Cancer Res. 2001; 61: 7473-7478. PMID: 11606382
  59. 59. Fang EF, Lin P, Wong JH, Tsao SW, Ng TB. A lectin with anti-HIV-1 reverse transcriptase, antitumor, and nitric oxide inducing activities from seeds of Phaseolus vulgaris cv. Extralong Autumn Purple Bean. J Agric Food Chem. 2010; 58:2221-2229. DOI: 10.1021/jf903964u
  60. 60. Xue Z, Wen H, Zhai L, Yu Y, Li Y, et al. Antioxidant activity and anti-proliferative effect of a bioactive peptide from chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Food Res Int’l. 2015; 77: 75-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2015.09.027
  61. 61. Marshall T. Differences between in vitro, in vivo, and in silico studies. The Marshall Protocol Knowledge Base. 2018. Available from: https://mpkb.org/home/patients/assessing_literature/in_vitro_studies
  62. 62. Chen HM, Muramoto K, Yamauchi F, Fujimoto K, Nokihara K. Antioxidative properties of histidine-containing peptides designed from peptide fragments found in the digests of a soybean protein. J Agric Food Chem 1998; 46:49-53. DOI: 10.1021/jf970649w
  63. 63. Chen HM, Muramoto K, Yamauchi F, Nokihara K. Antioxidant activity of design peptides based on the antioxidative peptide isolated from digests of a soybean protein. J Agric Food Chem. 1996; 44:2619-2623. DOI: 10.1021/jf950833m
  64. 64. Markland FS, Smith EL. Subtilisins: primary structure, chemical and physical properties. In: Boyer PD. (ed.), The Enzyme. New York: Academic Press, 1971; p. 561-608
  65. 65. Daliri EBM., Oh DH., Lee BH. Bioactive Peptides. Foods. 2017; 6:32. DOI: 10.3390/foods6050032
  66. 66. Jia J, Maa H, Zhao W, Wang Z, Tian W, et al. The use of ultrasound for enzymatic preparation of ACE-inhibitory peptides from wheat germ protein. Food Chem. 2010; 119:336-342. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.06.036
  67. 67. Mendis E, Rajapakse N, Kim SK. Antioxidant properties of a radicals scavenging peptide purified from enzymatically prepared fish skin gelatin hydrolysate. J Agric Food Chem. 2005; 53:581-587. DOI: 10.1021/jf048877v
  68. 68. Zhong F, Liu J, Ma J, Shoemaker CF. Preparation of hypocholesterol peptides from soy protein and their hypocholesterolemic effect in mice. Food Res Int. 2007; 40: 661-667. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2006.11.011
  69. 69. McCann KB, Shiell BJ, Michalski WP, Lee A, Wan J, et al. Isolation and characterisation of a novel antibacterial peptide from bovine a S1-casein. Int Dairy J. 2006; 16:316-323. DOI: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2005.05.005
  70. 70. Reyes-Díaz A, Del-Toro-Sánchez CL, Rodríguez-Figueroa JC, Valdéz-Hurtado S, Wong-Corral FJ, et al. Legume Proteins as a Promising Source of Anti-Inflammatory Peptides. Curr Protein and Peptide Sci. 2019; 20:1204-1217 DOI: 10.2174/1389203720666190430110647
  71. 71. Oseguera-Toledo ME, de Mejıa EG, Dia VP, Amaya-Llano SL. Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) hydrolysates inhibit inflammation in LPS-induced macrophages through suppression of NF-jB pathways. Food Chem. 2011; 127:1175-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.01.121
  72. 72. Galicia-Garcia U, Benito-Vicente A, Jebari S, Larrea-Sebal A, Siddiqi H, et al. Pathophysiology of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21:6275. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21176275
  73. 73. Thong K, Gupta PS, Blann A, Ryder R. The influence of age and metformin treatment status on reported gastrointestinal side effects with liraglutide treatment in Type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2015; 109:124-129. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2015.04.009
  74. 74. Thulé PM, Umpierrez G. Sulfonylureas: A new look at old therapy. Curr. Diabetes Rep. 2014; 14:1-8. DOI: 10.1007/s11892-014-0473-5
  75. 75. Dujic T, Causevic A, Bego T, Malenica M, Velija-Asimi Z, et al. Organic cation transporter 1 variants and gastrointestinal side effects of metformin in patients with Type 2 diabetes. Diabet. Med. 2015; 4:511-514. DOI: 10.1111/dme.13040
  76. 76. Chakrabarti S, Jahandideh F, Wu J. Food-derived bioactive peptides on inflammation and oxidative stress. BioMed Res. Int. 2014; 608979. DOI: 10.1155/2014/608979
  77. 77. Oseguera-Toledo ME, de Mejıa EG, Reynoso-Camacho R, Cardador-Mart!ınez A, Amaya-Llano SL. Proteins and bioative peptides: Mechanisms of action on diabetes management. Nutrafoods. 2015; 13:147-157. DOI: 10.1007/s13749-014-0052-z
  78. 78. Kwon DY, Hong SM, Ahn IS, Kim MJ, Yang HJ, et al. Isoflavonoids and peptides from meju, long-term fermented soybeans, increase insulin sensitivity and exert insulinotropic effects in vitro. Nutrition. 2011; 27:244-252. DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2010.02.004
  79. 79. Fuchs FD, Whelton PK. High Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Disease. Hypertension. 2020; 75:285-292. DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.14240
  80. 80. García-Tejedor A, Sánchez-Rivera L, Castelló-Ruiz M, Recio I, Salom JB, et al. Novel antihypertensive lactoferrin-derived peptides produced by Kluyveromyces marxianus: Gastrointestinal stability profile and in vivo angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014; 62:1609-1616. DOI: 10.1021/jf4053868
  81. 81. Jung WY, Jung JY, Lee HJ, Jeon CO. Functional Characterization of Bacterial Communities Responsible for Fermentation of Doenjang: A Traditional Korean Fermented Soybean Paste. Front Microbiol. 2016; 7:827. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00827
  82. 82. Shin ZI, Yu R, Park SA, Chung DK, Ahn CW, et al. His-His-Leu, an angiotensin I converting enzyme inhibitory peptide derived from Korean soybean paste, exerts antihypertensive activity in vivo. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001; 49:3004-3009. DOI: 10.1021/jf001135r
  83. 83. Koyama M, Hattori S, Amano Y, Watanabe M, Nakamura K. Blood pressure-lowering peptides from neo-fermented buckwheat sprouts: A new approach to estimating ACE-inhibitory activity. PLoS ONE 2014; 9: e105802. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105802
  84. 84. Nakamura Y, Yamamoto N, Sakai K, Okubo A, Yamazaki S, et al. Purification and characterization of Angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitors from sour milk. J. Dairy Sci. 1995; 78:777-783. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(95)76689-9
  85. 85. Mancini GJ, Baker S, Bergeron J, Fitchett D, Frohlich J, et al. Diagnosis, prevention, and management of statin adverse effects and intolerance: Canadian consensus working group update. Can. J. Cardiol. 2016; 32:S35–S65. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2016.01.003
  86. 86. Carter AA, Gomes T, Camacho X, Juurlink DN, Shah BR, et al. Risk of incident diabetes among patients treated with statins: Population Based Study. BMJ 2013; 346: f2610. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f2610
  87. 87. Chogtu B, Magazine R, Bairy KL. Statin use and risk of diabetes mellitus. World J Diabetes. 2015; 6:352-357. DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v6.i2.352
  88. 88. Ahmad Z. Statin Intolerance. Am J Cardiology. 2014; 113:1765-1771. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.02.033
  89. 89. Siow HL, Choi SB, Gan CY. Structure-activity studies of protease activating, lipase inhibiting, bile acid binding and cholesterol-lowering effects of pre-screened Cumin seed bioactive peptides. J. Funct. Foods. 2016; 27:600-611. DOI: 10.1016/J.JFF.2016.10.013
  90. 90. Yusmarini, Indrati R, Utami T, Marsono Y. Ability of fermented soymilk by Lactobacillus plantarum-1 in bile acids binding. Majalah Farmasi Indonesia. 2010; 21:202-208. (in Indonesian)
  91. 91. Zhang H, Yokoyama WH, Zhang H. Concentration-dependent displacement of cholesterol in micelles by hydrophobic rice bran protein hydrolysates. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2012; 92:1395-1401. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.4713
  92. 92. Marques MR, Freitas RAMS, Carlos ACC, Siguemoto ÉS, Fontanari GG, et al. Peptides from cowpea present antioxidant activity, inhibit cholesterol synthesis and its solubilisation into micelles. Food Chem. 2015; 168:288-293. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.07.049
  93. 93. Lapphanichayakool P, Sutheerawattananonda M, Limpeanchob N. Hypocholesterolemic effect of sericin-derived oligopeptides in high-cholesterol fed rats. J. Nat. Med. 2017; 71: 208-215. DOI: 10.1007/s11418-016-1050-9
  94. 94. Lammi C, Zanoni C, Calabresi L, Arnoldi A. Lupin protein exerts cholesterol-lowering effects targeting PCSK9: From clinical evidences to elucidation of the in vitro molecular mechanism using HepG2 cells. J. Funct. Foods. 2016; 23:230-240. DOI: 10.1016/j.jff.2016.02.042
  95. 95. Duranti M, Lovati MR, Dani V, Barbiroli A, Scarafoni A, et al. The alpha’-subunit from soybean 7S globulin lowers plasma lipids and upregulates liver b-VLDL receptors in rats fed a hypercholesterolemic diet. J. Nutr. 2004; 134:1334-1339. DOI: 10.1093/jn/134.6.1334
  96. 96. Wang WY, de Mejia EG. A new frontier in soy bioactive peptides that may prevent age-related chronic diseases. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2005; 4:63-78. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-4337.2005.tb00075.x
  97. 97. Liu JR, Chen MJ, Lin CW. Antimutagenic and antioxidant properties of milk-kefir and soymilk-kefir. J Agric Food Chem. 2005; 53:2467-2474. DOI: 10.1021/jf048934k
  98. 98. Wang D, Wang LJ, Zhu FX, Zhu JY, Chen XD, et al. In vitro and in vivo studies on the antioxidant activities of the aqueous extracts of Douchi (a traditional Chinese salt-fermented soybean food). Food Chem 2008; 107:1421-1428
  99. 99. Barari L, Mosavi N, Asgharpour F, Asadi A, Moulana Z, et al. Antibacterial and antifungal effect of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) aqueous seed extract. World Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2015; 4:336-346
  100. 100. Yazdi MM, Asoodeh A, Chamani J. A novel antioxidant and antimicrobial peptide from hen egg white lysozyme hydrolysates. J. Funct. Foods. 2012; 4:278-286. DOI: 10.1016/j.jff.2011.12.004
  101. 101. Mansour SC, Pena OM, Hancock RE. Host defense peptides: Front-line immunomodulators. Trends Immunol. 2014; 35:443-450. DOI: 10.1016/j.it.2014.07.004
  102. 102. Tomioka H, Nakagami H, Tenma A, Saito Y, Kaga T, et al. Novel anti-microbial peptide SR-0379 accelerates wound healing via the PI3 Kinase/Akt/mTOR pathway. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9:e92597. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092597
  103. 103. Pane K, Durante L, Crescenzi O, Cafaro V, Pizzo E, et al. Antimicrobial potency of cationic antimicrobial peptides can be predicted from their amino acid composition: Application to the detection of “cryptic” antimicrobial peptides. J. Theor. Biol. 2017; 419:254-265. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.02.012
  104. 104. Li Y, Xiang Q, Zhang Q, Huang Y, Su Z. Overview on the recent study of antimicrobial peptides: Origins, functions, relative mechanisms and application. Peptides. 2012; 37: 207-215. DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2012.07.001
  105. 105. Shah P, Hsiao FSH, Ho YH, Chen CS. The proteome targets of intracellular targeting antimicrobial peptides. Proteomics. 2016; 16:1225-1237. DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201500380
  106. 106. Guterstam P, Madani F, Hirose H, Takeuchi T, Futaki S, et al. Elucidating cell-penetrating peptide mechanisms of action for membrane interaction, cellular uptake, and translocation utilizing the hydrophobic counter-anion pyrenebutyrate. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Biomembr. 2009; 1788:2509-2517. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2009.09.014
  107. 107. Aggarwal BB, Shishodia S, Sandur SK, Pandey MK, Sethi G. Inflammation and cancer: How hot is the link? Biochemical Pharmacology. 2006; 72:1605-1621. DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2006.06.029
  108. 108. Korniluk A, Koper O, Kemona H, Dymicka-Piekarska V. From inflammation to cancer. Irish J Med Sci. 2017; 186:57-62. DOI: 10.1007/s11845-016-1464-0
  109. 109. Vendramini-Costa DB, Carvalho JE. Molecular link mechanisms between inflammation and cancer Current Pharmaceutical Design. 2012; 18:3831-3852. DOI: 10.2174/138161212802083707
  110. 110. Bastiaannet E, Sampieri K, Dekkers OM, de Craen AJM, van Herk-Sukel MPP, et al. Use of aspirin postdiagnosis improves survival for colon cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2012; 106:1564-1570. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.101
  111. 111. Crawford S. Anti-inflammatory/antioxidant use in long-term maintenance cancer therapy: A new therapeutic approach to disease progression and recurrence. Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology. 2014; 6:52-68. DOI: 10.1177/1758834014521111
  112. 112. De Mejia EG, Dia VP. Lunasin and lunasin-like peptides inhibit inflammation through suppression of NFkB pathway in the macrophage. Peptides. 2009; 30:2388-2398. DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2009.08.005
  113. 113. Lei Y, Zhang D, Yu J, Dong H, Zhang J, et al. Targeting autophagy in cancer stem cells as an anticancer therapy. Cancer Lett. 2017; 393:33-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.02.012
  114. 114. Hartman TJ, Albert PS, Zhang Z, Bagshaw D, Kris-Etherton PM, et al. Consumption of a legume-enriched, low-glycemic index diet is associated with biomarkers of insulin resistance and inflammation among men at risk for colorectal cancer. J Nutr. 2010; 140:60-67. DOI: 10.3945/jn.109.114249
  115. 115. Wang Y, Wang Z, Fu L, Chen Y, Fang J. Legume consumption and colorectal adenoma risk: a meta-analysis of observational studies. PLoS One. 2013; 8:e67335. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067335
  116. 116. Chen Z, Li W, Santhanam RK, Wang C, Gao X, et al. Bioactive peptide with antioxidant and anticancer activities from black soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] byproduct: isolation, identification and molecular docking study. Eur Food Res Technol. 2019; 245:677-689. DOI: 10.1007/s00217-018-3190-5
  117. 117. Galvez AF, de Lumen BO. A soybean cDNA encoding a chromatin-binding peptide inhibits mitosis of mammalian cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 1999; 17:495-500. DOI: 10.1038/8676
  118. 118. Kim SE, Kim HH, Kim JY, Kang YI, Woo HJ, et al. Anticancer activity of hydrophobic peptides from soy proteins. Biofactors. 2000; 12:151-155. DOI: 10.1002/biof.5520120124
  119. 119. Lam SK, Ng TB. Apoptosis of human breast cancer cells induced by hemagglutinin from Phaseolus vulgaris cv. Legumi Secchi. Food Chem. 2011; 126:595-602. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.11.049
  120. 120. Ben-Neriah Y, Karin M. Inflammation meets cancer, with NF-κB as the matchmaker. Nat Immunol. 2011; 12:715-723. DOI: 10.1038/ni.2060
  121. 121. Walsh JG, Cullen SP, Sheridan C, Lüthi AU, Gerner C, et al. Executioner caspase-3 and caspase-7 are functionally distinct proteases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008; 105:12815-12819. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0707715105
  122. 122. Fernández-Tomé S, Sanchón J, Recio I, Hernández-Ledesma B. Transepithelial transport of lunasin and derived peptides: inhibitory effects on the gastrointestinal cancer cells viability. J Food Composition Anal. 2017; 68:101-110. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2017.01.011
  123. 123. Hsieh CC, Martínezvillaluenga C, de Lumen BO, Hernándezledesma B. Updating the research on the chemopreventive and therapeutic role of peptide lunasin. J Sci Food Agric. 2018; 98:2070-2079. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.8719
  124. 124. Kromhout D, Spaaij CJK, de Goede J, Weggemans RM, Brug J, et al. The 2015 Dutch food-based dietary guidelines. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2016; 70:869-878. DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2016.52
  125. 125. Papandreou C, Becerra-Tomás N, Bulló M, Martínez-González MA, Corella D, et al. Legume consumption and risk of all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality in the PREDIMED study. Clin Nutr. 2019; 38:348-356. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.12.019
  126. 126. Xu Q, Hong H, Wu J, Yan X. Bioavailability of bioactive peptides derived from food proteins across the intestinal epithelial membrane: A review. Trends in Food Sci Technol. 2019; 86:399-411. DOI:10.1016/j.tifs.2019
  127. 127. Galanakis C, editor. Nutraceutical and Functional Food Components. Effects of Innovative Processing Technique. Elsevier Inc. 2017. 382.p
  128. 128. Manach C, Williamson G, Morand C, Scalbert A, Remesy C. Bioavailability and bioefficacy of polyphenols in humans. I. Review of 97 bioavailability studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005; 81:230s-242s. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/81.1.230S
  129. 129. Blenford D. Bioavailability is key to nutrient effectiveness. Food Ingredients and Process Int’l. 1995; 17:28-30
  130. 130. Lesser S, Cermak R, Wolffram S. The fatty acid pattern of dietary fat influences the oral bioavailability of the flavonol quercetin in pigs. Br J Nutr. 2006; 96: 1047-1052. DOI: 10.1017/BJN20061953
  131. 131. Carbonell-Capella JM, Buniowska M, Barba FJ, Esteve MJ, Frigola A. Analytical methods for determining bioavailability and bioaccessibility of bioactive compounds from fruits and vegetables: A review. Comprehensive Rev Food Sci Food Safety, 2014; 13:155-171. DOI: 10.1111/1541-337.12049
  132. 132. Manach C, Scalbert A, Morand C, Remesy C, Jimenez L. Polyphenols: Food sources and bioavailability. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004; 79:727-747. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/79.5.727
  133. 133. Wood RJ. Bioavailability: Definition, general aspects and fortificants. In: Caballero B, Prentice A, Allen L, editors. Encyclopedia of Human Nutrition. 2nd ed. Academic Press. 2005. 2000 p
  134. 134. Fairweather-Tait SJ. Bioavailability of nutrients. In: Macrae R, Robinson RK, Sadler MJ, editors. Encyclopaedia of food science, food technology and nutrition. London: Academic Press; 1993. p. 384-388
  135. 135. Schumann K, Classen HG, Hages M, Prinz-Langenhol R, Pietrzik K, et al. Bioavailability of oral vitamins, minerals and trace elements in perspective. Drug Res, 1997; 47:369-380. PMID: 9150856
  136. 136. McClements DJ, Xiao H. Excipient foods: Designing food matrices that improve the oral bioavailability of pharmaceuticals and nutraceuticals. Food Funct. 2014; 5: 1320-1333. DOI: 10.1039/c4fo00100a
  137. 137. Segura-Campos M, Chel-Guerrero L, Betancur-Ancona D, Hernandez-Escalante VM. Bioavailability of bioactive peptides. Food Rev Int’l. 2011; 27:213-226. DOI: 10.1080/87559129.2011.563395
  138. 138. Jahan-Mihan A, Luhovyy BL, Khoury DEL, Anderson GH. Dietary proteins as determinants of metabolic and physiologic functions of the gastrointestinal tract. Nutrients. 2011; 3: 574-603. DOI: 10.3390/nu3050574
  139. 139. Carbonaro M, Grant G, Cappelloni M. Heat-induced denaturation impairs digestibility of legume (Phaseolus vulgaris L. and Vicia faba L.) 11S and 7S globulins in the small intestine of rat. J Sci Food Agric. 2005; 85:65-72. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.1940
  140. 140. Udenigwe CC, Aluko RE. Food protein-derived bioactive peptides: Production, processing, and potential health benefits. J Food Sci. 2012; 71:11-24. DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02455.x
  141. 141. Jeong HJ, Jeong JB, Kim DS, de Lumen BO. Inhibition of core histone acetylation by the cancer preventive peptide lunasin. J Agric Food Chem. 2007; 55: 632-637. DOI: 10.1021/jf062405u
  142. 142. Grimble GK. The significance of peptides in clinical nutrition. Annu Rev Nutr. 1994; 14:419-447. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.nu.14.070194.002223
  143. 143. Roberts PR, Burney JD, Black KW, Zaloga GP. Effect of chain length on absorption of biologically active peptides from the gastrointestinal tract. Digestion. 1999; 60:332-337. DOI: 10.1159/000007679
  144. 144. FitzGerald RJ, Meisel H. Milk protein-derived peptide inhibitors of angiotensin-I-converting enzyme. Br J Nutr. 2000; 84:S33–S37. DOI: 10.1017/s0007114500002221
  145. 145. Matsui T, Tamaya K, Seki E, Osajima K, Matsumoto K, et al. Val-Tyr as a natural antihypertensive dipeptide can be absorbed into the human circulatory blood system. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2002; 29:204-208. DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1681.2002.03628.x
  146. 146. Boutrou R, Jardin J, Blais A, Tomé D, Léonil J. Glycosylations of κ–caseinderived caseinomacropeptide reduce its accessibility to endo- but not exointestinal brush border membrane peptidases. J Agric Food Chem. 2008; 56: 8166-8173. DOI: 10.1021/jf801140d
  147. 147. [Hausch F, Shan L, Santiago NA, Gray GM, Khosla C. Intestinal digestive resistance of immunodominant gliadin peptides. Am J Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. 2002; 283:996-1003. DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00136.2002
  148. 148. Li GH, Le GW, Shi YH, Shrestha S. Angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitorypeptides derived from food proteins and their physiological and pharmacological effects. Nutr Res. 2004; 24:469-486. DOI: 10.1016/j.nutres.2003.10.014
  149. 149. Miguel M, Aleixandre A. Antihypertensive peptides derived from egg proteins. J Nutr. 2006; 136:1457-1460
  150. 150. Gianfranceschia GL, Gianfranceschia G, Quassintib L, Bramuccib M. Biochemical requirements of bioactive peptides for nutraceutical efficacy. J. Funct Foods. 2018; 47:252-263. DOI: 10.1016/j.jff.2018.05.034
  151. 151. Kim SK, Wijesekara I. Development and biological activities of marine-derived bioactive peptides: a review. J Funct Foods. 2010; 2:1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jff.2010.01.003
  152. 152. Agyei D, Danquah MK. Industrial-scale manufacturing of pharmaceutical-grade bioactive peptides. Biotechnology Advances. 2011; 29:272-277. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.01.001
  153. 153. Udenigwe CC. Bioinformatics approaches, prospects and challenges of food bioactive peptide research. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2014; 36:137-143. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2014.02.00
  154. 154. Day L, Seymour RB, Pitts KF, Konczak I, Lundin L. Incorporation of functional ingredients into foods. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2009; 20;388-395. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2008.05.002
  155. 155. Jiang Z, Wang L, Wu W, Wang Y. Biological activities and physicochemical properties of Maillard reaction products in sugar-bovine casein peptide model systems. Food Chem. 2013; 141:3837-3845. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.06.041
  156. 156. Zhao CJ, Hu Y, Schieber A, G€anzle M. Fate of ACE inhibitory peptides during the bread-making process: quantification of peptides in sourdough, bread crumb, steamed bread and soda crackers. J Cereal Sci. 2013; 57:514-519. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcs.2013.02.009
  157. 157. Galanakis CM. Recovery of high added-value components from food wastes: Conventional, emerging technologies and commercialized applications. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2012; 26:68-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2012.03.003
  158. 158. Tadesse S, Emire S. Production and processing of antioxidant bioactive peptides: A driving force for the functional food market. Heliyon. 2020; 6:e04765. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04765
  159. 159. Lemes AC, Sala L, Ores JDC, Braga ARC, Egea MB, et al. A review of the latest advances in encrypted bioactive peptides from protein-rich waste. Int J Mol Sci. 2016; 17:950. DOI: 10.3390/ijms17060950
  160. 160. Piovesana S, Capriotti AL, Cavaliere C, Barbera GL, Montone CM, et al. Recent trends and analytical challenges in plant bioactive peptide separation, identification and validation. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2018; 410:3425-3444. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-018-0852-x
  161. 161. Galanakis C.M. Emerging technologies for the production of nutraceuticals from agricultural b y-products: A viewpoint of opportunities and challenges. Food and Bioproducts Processing. 2013; 91:575-579. DOI: 10.1016/j.fbp.2013.01.004
  162. 162. Heng WW, Xiong LW, Ramanan RN, Hong TL, Kong KW, et al. Two level factorial design for the optimization of phenolics and flavonoids recovery from palm kernel by-product. Industrial Crops and Products. 2015; 63:238-248. DOI:10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.09.049
  163. 163. Dupas C, Baglieri AM, Ordonaud C, Tom D, Maillard MN. Chlorogenic acid is poorly absorbed, independently of the food matrix: A Caco-2 cells and rat chronic absorption study. Mol Nut Food Res. 2006; 50:1053-1060. DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.200600034
  164. 164. Maltais A, Remondetto GE, Subirade M. Soy protein cold-set hydrogels as controlled delivery devices for nutraceutical compounds. Food Hydrocolloids. 2009; 23:1647-1653. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2008.12.006
  165. 165. Betoret E, Betoret N, Vidal D, Fito P. Functional foods development: Trends and technologies. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2011; 22:498-508. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2011.05.004

Written By

Retno Indrati

Submitted: 23 May 2021 Reviewed: 18 August 2021 Published: 09 September 2021