Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Cytokine Profiling Plays a Crucial Role in Activating Immune System to Clear Infectious Pathogens

Written By

José Luis Muñoz-Carrillo, Juan Francisco Contreras-Cordero, Oscar Gutiérrez-Coronado, Paola Trinidad Villalobos-Gutiérrez, Luis Guillermo Ramos-Gracia and Viridiana Elizabeth Hernández-Reyes

Submitted: 10 April 2018 Reviewed: 10 August 2018 Published: 05 November 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.80843

From the Edited Volume

Immune Response Activation and Immunomodulation

Edited by Rajeev K. Tyagi and Prakash S. Bisen

Chapter metrics overview

4,487 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Pathogen infections are recognized by the immune system, which consists of two types of responses: an innate immune response that recognizes pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and an antigen-specific adaptive immune response. In both responses, there are several activated cells of the immune system, which play a key role in establishing the environment of cytokines, thus directing their differentiation either suppressing or promoting the immune response. This immune response is crucial against pathogen infections. In this chapter, we will describe the crucial role played by different families of cytokines during activation of the immune system to eliminate infectious pathogens.


  • cytokines
  • IL-1
  • TNF
  • IL-17
  • IL-6
  • IFN
  • bacteria
  • fungi
  • virus
  • parasites

1. Introduction

The innate and adaptive immune responses are key factors in the control of infections or chronic diseases. The balance between these two systems is mainly orchestrated by cytokines [1]. Cytokines are low-molecular-weight proteins that contribute to the chemical language that regulates the development and repair of tissues, hematopoiesis, inflammation, etc., through the transduction of signals mediated by binding to cellular receptors. Cytokines can act on their target cells in an autocrine, paracrine, and/or endocrine fashion to induce systemic and/or localized immune responses. In addition, cytokines have pleiotropic activity, that is, they act on different target cells, as well as affect the function of other cytokines in an additive, synergistic, or antagonistic manner [2, 3]. Cytokines can be secreted by immune cells, but they can also be produced by a wide variety of cells in response to infection or can be produced or released from cells in response to cellular damage when cellular integrity is compromised. Acting through a series of conserved signaling pathways that program transcriptional pathways by controlling many biological processes, such as cell growth, cell differentiation, apoptosis, development, and survival, can also reprogram cells in the local tissue environment to improve certain types of immune responses. Therefore, cytokines are critical mediators of communication for the immune system and are essential for host defense against pathogens [4].


2. Cytokines

The cytokine pattern that is released from the cell depends primarily on the nature of the antigenic stimulus and the type of cell being stimulated. Cytokines compromise leukocytes to respond to a microbial stimulus. Cytokines can be classified into six groups: (1) L1 superfamily, (2) TNF superfamily, (3) IL-17 family, (4) IL-6 superfamily, (5) type I superfamily, and (6) type II superfamily [5].

2.1 IL-1 superfamily

More than any other cytokine family, the interleukin (IL)-1 family of ligands and receptors is primarily associated with acute and chronic inflammation. The cytosolic segment of each IL-1 receptor family member contains the Toll/interleukin-1 receptor (TIR) domain. This domain is also present in each Toll-like receptor (TLR), which responds to microbial products and viruses [6]. Since TIR domains are functional for both receptor families, responses to the IL-1 family are fundamental to the innate immunity [7].

2.1.1 IL-1 family of cytokines and innate immune system

There are 11 members of IL-1 family of cytokines (IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-1Ra, IL-18, IL-33, IL-36α, IL-36β, IL-36γ, IL-36Ra IL-37, and IL-38) and 10 members of the IL-1 family of receptors (IL-1R1 to ILR10) [8, 9]. More than any other cytokine family, the IL-1 family members are closely linked to damaging inflammation; however, the same members also work to increase nonspecific resistance to infection and the development of an immune response to a foreign antigen [10].

The numerous biological properties of the IL-1 family are nonspecific. The importance of IL-1 family members to the innate response became evident upon the discovery that the cytoplasmic domain of the IL-1 receptor type 1 (IL-1R1) is also found in the Toll protein of the fruit fly. The functional domain of the cytoplasmic component of IL-1R1 is termed the TIR domain. Thus, fundamental inflammatory responses such as the induction of cyclooxygenase type 2 (COX-2), production of multiple cytokines and chemokines, increased the expression of adhesion molecules, or synthesis of nitric oxide (NO) are indistinguishable responses of both IL-1 and TLR ligands [11]. Both TLR and IL-1 families nonspecifically augment antigen recognition and activate lymphocyte function. The lymphocyte-activating function of IL-1 was first described in 1979 and is now considered a fundamental property of the acquired immune response. IL-1β is the most studied member of the IL-1 family due to its role in mediating auto-inflammatory diseases. Unquestionably, IL-1β evolved to assist host defense against infection, and this landmark study established how a low dose of recombinant IL-1β protects mice against lethal bacterial infection in the absence of neutrophils. Although we now accept the concept that cytokines like IL-1β served millions of years of evolution to protect the host, in the antibiotic and antiviral therapies era of today, we view cytokines as the cause of disease due to acute or chronic inflammation [12]. IL-1β has emerged as a therapeutic target for an expanding number of systemic and local inflammatory conditions called auto-inflammatory diseases. The neutralization of IL-1β results in a rapid and sustained reduction in disease severity. Treatment for autoimmune diseases often includes immunosuppressive drugs, whereas neutralization of IL-1β is mostly anti-inflammatory. The auto-inflammatory diseases are caused due to gain-of-function mutations for caspase-1 activity, and common ailments, such as gout, type 2 diabetes, heart failure, recurrent pericarditis, rheumatoid arthritis, and smoldering myeloma, respond to the IL-1β neutralization [7]. IL-1 family also includes member that suppress inflammation, specifically within the IL-1 family, such as the IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra), IL-36 receptor antagonist (IL-36Ra), and IL-37. In addition, the IL-1 family member IL-38, the last member of the IL-1 family of cytokines to be studied, nonspecifically suppresses inflammation and limits the innate immunity [12].

2.1.2 IL-1 receptor family

There are 10 members of the IL-1 family receptors. IL-1R1 binds IL-1α, IL-1β, and IL-1Ra and IL-R1 binds either IL-1β or IL-1α. IL-1R2 is a decoy receptor for IL-1β. IL-1R2 lacks a cytoplasmic domain and exists not only as an integral membrane protein but also in a soluble form. The term soluble is meant to denote the extracellular domain only. The soluble domain of IL-1R2 binds IL-1β in the extracellular space and neutralizes IL-1β. The neutralization of IL-1β by soluble IL-1R2 is greatly enhanced by forming a complex with IL-1R3. IL-1R3 is the co-receptor for IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-33, IL-36a, IL-36β, and IL-36γ. IL-1R3 exists as an integral membrane receptor or in a soluble receptor form. The inflammation and infection drive liver to increase the synthesis and levels of soluble IL-1R3 in the circulation [13].

2.2 TNF superfamily

Tumor necrosis factor superfamily (TNFSF) is a group of cytokines composed of 19 ligands and 29 receptors [14]. This family plays a pivotal role in immunity, inflammation and controlling cell cycle, proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis [15]. TNFSF receptors can be divided into two different groups depending on the presence or absence of the intracellular death domain (DD) [16]. Signaling via the death domain demands the involvement of adapter proteins Fas-associated death domain (FADD) and TNF receptor-associated proteins (TRADD), leading to the activation of caspases that result in apoptotic death of a cell. The second group of TNFSF receptor signals acts only via adapter proteins termed tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated proteins (TRAFs). The DD containing receptors may use the pathway [17]. The functional activity of TNFSF receptors depends on the cellular context and the balance between pro- and antiapoptotic factors inside the cell and in the environment. Mostly, the TNFSF members are revealed on the cells of immune system and play a notable function in maintaining the equilibrium of T-cell–mediated immune responses by arranging direct signals required for the full activation of effector pool and survival of memory T cells. The TNFSF members are necessary in the development of pathogenesis of many T-cell–mediated autoimmune diseases, such as asthma, diabetes, and arthritis [16].

2.2.1 TNF-α

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α is classified as homotrimeric transmembrane protein with a prominent role in systemic inflammation. Macrophages/monocytes are capable to produce TNF-α in the acute phase of inflammation, and this cytokine drives a wide range of signaling events within cells, leading to necrosis or apoptosis [17]. The TNF superfamily incorporates receptor activator of nuclear factor κB (RANK), cluster of differentiation (CD)-40, CD27, and FAS receptor. This protein was discovered in the circulation of animals subsequent to the stimulation of their reticuloendothelial system and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenge. This protein has been found to provoke a rapid necrotic regression of certain forms of tumors [16].

2.2.2 Biological roles of TNF-α

Several biological functions are ascribed to the TNF-α, and for this reason, the mechanism of action is somewhat complex. Because this protein confers resistance to certain types of infections and in parallel causes pathological complications, it carries out contradictory roles. This may be connected to the varied signaling pathways that are activated. TNF-α modulates several therapeutic roles within the body, such as immunostimulation, resistance to infection agents, resistance to tumors, sleep regulation, and embryonic development [17]. On the other hand, parasitic, bacterial, and viral infections become more pathogenic or fatal due to TNF circulation. The major role of TNF is explicated as mediator in resistance against infections. Moreover, it was postulated that TNF plays a pathological role in several autoimmune diseases such as graft versus host rejection or rheumatoid arthritis. In addition, TNF exhibits antimalignant cell cytotoxicity in association with interferon. High concentrations of TNF-α are toxic to the host. The enhancement in the therapeutic index by decreasing toxicity or by increasing effectiveness is indeed needed. This may be possible through the mutations that reduce systemic cytotoxicity and increase TNF’s effectiveness in selectively eliminating tumor cells. TNF-α is also implicated in physiological sleep regulation. TNF-related proteins such as receptor activator for nuclear factor κB ligand (RANKL) are required for osteoclast differentiation necessary for bone resorption [16].

2.3 IL-17 family

IL-17 is a pro-inflammatory cytokine. There are six family known members of IL-17. Also, we have just a little information of its biological functions, being the IL-17A and the IL-17F described recently [18]. IL-17–related cytokines play key roles in defense against extracellular pathogen, and their participation in the development of autoimmune diseases has drawn significant attention. Moreover, some of these molecules are involved in the amplification and perpetuation of pathological processes in many inflammatory diseases. However, the same cytokines can exert anti-inflammatory effects in specific settings, as well as play a key role in the control of immune homeostasis [19, 20].

2.4 IL-6 superfamily

IL-6 family is a group of cytokines and colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) that include IL-6, IL-27, IL-31, IL-35, ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF), leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), oncostatin M (OSM), cardiotrophin (CT)-1, and cardiotrophin-like cytokine (CLC), among others [16, 17]. This cytokine family binds to its receptor, allowing a binding with the gp130 subunit [21, 22]. This binding allows dimerization of the subunit homogeneously or heterogeneously (either with the same subunit or cytokine receptor), creating a receptor complex. This complex allows associated proteins phosphorylation, such as Janus kinases (JAK) type 1, 2, and tyrosine kinase (TYK) 2, among others, which triggers a signaling pathway through phosphorylation toward types of signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) 1–6, forming another dimerization, homogeneous or heterogeneous with other STATs, that gets into the nucleus, recognizing promoter regions and initiating the regulation of the expression of specific genes [22, 23].

In IL-6 family, there are soluble receptors that have different signaling pathways, which are mostly of inhibitory function. Although they bind to the same cytokine and to the same subunit, they transmit different signaling called trans-signaling. It is observed that these soluble receptors prolong its effect and have action on cells where cytokine emerges effect; namely, all cells reactive to IL-6 will have the soluble receptor of IL-6 (IL-6Rs) function [21, 24]. Main functions of this IL-6 family cytokines are inflammation proteins production in acute phase, B cell differentiation into antibody-forming plasma cell, T cell modulator, development of Th17, and hematopoiesis, among other functions [24, 25, 26].

2.5 Type I superfamily

Type I cytokine family, also known as hematopoietins, is made up of several types of cytokines, including IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-6, IL-7, IL-9, IL-12, IL-15, IL-21, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), among others. This group of cytokines has α, β, and γ chain in common. IL-2, -4, -7, -9, -13, -15, and -21 have in common the γ chain (also known as IL2Rγ or CD132) for activation of JAK1/JAK3 and downstream STAT 1–5. While IL-3, -5, and GM-CSF share the common β chain (CSF2RB/CD131) for activation of the JAK/STAT pathway through interactions with JAK2 [3, 27], α chains do not activate signaling pathways but increase the binding affinity between the cytokine and β and γ subunit [3, 28], helping receptor specificity for gene expression [27]. While the receptor is more complex, there is more affinity of the cytokines of the receptor, which increases the signaling [27, 29]. The specificity of the receptor is conferred by α and β subunit, that in combination with γ subunit provides different stimulations. This means that the same cytokines can have different effects on the cell, depending on the receptor complexity; for example, IL-2 binds to its γ chain receptor (CD132) and β chain (IL-2Rβ), forming an intermediate affinity dimer, or also the binding of α chain (IL-2Rα), generating a high affinity. Phosphorylating tyrosine residues in JAKs, which lead to signaling to STAT5, prolonging and increasing its effect unlike the intermediate affinity [30]. Among the main functions of this cytokine family are the growth and differentiation of precursor leukocytes, as well as being modulators and initiators of the inflammatory response [3, 27].

2.6 Type II superfamily

The type II superfamily is composed of the subfamilies of interferons (IFNs) and IL-10. IFN family has the characteristic of inducing antiviral response in both hematopoietic and structural cells, serving as an essential mediator of cross talk between the immune system and host physiology during viral infections [3, 29]. This family is divided into three types INFs families: types I, II, and III.

Type I IFNs family is mainly composed of IFN-α and -β. IFN-α is expressed in leukocytes and IFN-β in fibroblasts, dendritic, and plasmacytoid cells. These IFNs have signaling pathways through JAK1 and TYK2 to phosphorylate STAT1 and STAT2 [29, 31]. These IFNs have a powerful proinflammatory effect and an antiviral response in immune and nonhematopoietic cells, as well as they can synergize with type II interferon (i.e., IFNγ) to potentiate Th1 lineage commitment by T-helper cells and cytotoxic activity by CD8+ cells [3].

Type II IFNs family is composed only by IFN-γ, which is produced by active CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, NK cells, and macrophages by stimulation of IL-12, IL-18, and TNF-α [3, 29, 32]. IFN-γ has signaling pathways with STAT1 through JAK1 and JAK2 [29]. IFN-γ is mediator of interaction of innate and adaptive immune cells. IFN-γ promotes B-cell differentiation toward plasma cells immunoglobulin (Ig)-G-production. Also, IFN-γ induces phagocytosis through the antimicrobial potential activation on macrophages. IFN-γ increases the expression of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) I and II, molecules in antigen-presenting cells, promotes complement activation, and increases cytotoxic activity of T cells and differentiation Th1 cell differentiation for the clearance of infectious pathogens [3, 32].

Type III INFs family is composed by IFNλ-1 (IL-29), IFNλ-2 (IL-28A), and IFNλ-3 (IL-28B) [3, 29, 32]. IFNλ-1 and -2 regulate IFN expression [3], being structurally and functionally like them by sharing beta chain but with less intensity [32]. IFNλ-3 induces antiviral response in cells through STAT1 and STAT2 [3, 33].

IL-10 is a potent pro-inflammatory cytokine, which is produced by different cells such as monocytes, macrophages, Th2, and Treg cells. The IL-10 performs its functions through the activation of the STAT1, STAT3, PI3K, and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) pathways. Among its most important functions are the suppression of Th1 cytokines, the classically activated/M1 macrophage inflammatory gene expression, and the presentation of antigen [3].


3. Cytokine profile in bacterial infections

During a bacterial infection in the host, a nonspecific and immediate immune response is initiated to eliminate the pathogen, and this nonspecific response involves the recruitment of neutrophils, macrophages and dendritic cells, complement activation, and cytokine production [34]. This response can inhibit or limit microbial growth but also can cause host damage, and so it is necessary to keep this response under control; to achieve this, the host performs some strategies, including the production of cytokines. These molecules play an important role in intercellular communication and coordinate the innate and adaptive response [35].

In microbial infections, the pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs) recognize several PAMPs [36] such as DNA, double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), single-stranded RNA (ssRNA), and 5′-triphosphate RNA, as well as lipoproteins, surface glycoproteins, membrane components peptidoglycans, lipoteichoic acid (LTA), lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and glycosyl-phosphatidyl-inositol. The recognition of PAMPs by PRRs leads to the activation of NF-κB and/or MAPK [37] to produce several cytokines such as IL-1α, IL-1β, TNFα, IFN-γ, IL-12, and IL-18, being TNF-α and IL-1β the main inflammatory mediators, since they play an important role in mediating the local response through cellular activation. The inflammatory response that occurs in the presence of an infection consists of several protective effector mechanisms that promote the microbicidal functions and in turn stimulate adaptive immunity, which contributes to reduce the damage of the tissues [38] (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Cytokines profile in bacterial infections. In response to bacterial infection, the IL-1 family cytokines, such as IL-1β, potently induces the expression of adhesion molecules in the endothelial cells and promotes the recruitment of neutrophils to the site of inflammation. TNF-α plays an important role through the recruitment of neutrophils and macrophages, besides inducing the expression of proinflammatory mediators to the site of infection. Th17 cells produce IL-17A, which induces the production of inflammatory mediators such as IL-1β, IL-6, GM-CSF, G-CSF, and TNF-α, as well as adhesion molecules. IL-18 also promotes the secretion of other proinflammatory cytokines like TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-8, and GM-CSF and consequently enhancement, migration, and activation of neutrophils during infections.

IL-1β is a cytokine that is inducible through the activation of PRRs such as TLRs, by microbial products or damaged cell factors [39], once the recognition of the ligands through the receptors activates the downstream signaling pathways activating the NF-κB, activator protein (AP)-1, MAPK, and type I IFNs pathways, resulting in an upregulation of inflammatory mediators, as well as chemotactic factors [40]. IL-1β is synthesized as a precursor peptide (pro-IL-1β) that is cut to generate its mature form (mIL-1β); this process involves caspase 1, and the proenzyme (procaspase-1) requires it to be cut by the inflammasome, which is a multimeric cytosolic protein complex, composed of NLR family-pyrin domain containing 3 (NALP3) and the adapter protein containing CARD (ASC) and caspase-1; once IL-1β is cut by this complex, it binds to the IL-1R1 receptor, thus initiating the signaling that induces the expression of adhesion molecules in the endothelial cells and promotes the recruitment of neutrophils to the site of inflammation, as well as of the monocytes. It also has a potent stimulatory effect on phagocytosis, and it produces a chemotactic effect on leukocytes and induces the production of other inflammatory mediators of the lipid type, as well as other cytokines [41]. In vivo studies show that IL-1β is an important cytokine for the host defense against some microbial pathogens. During infection with Staphylococcus aureus, it was shown that the interaction of IL-1β with its receptor IL-1R plays an important role in the recruitment of neutrophils, suggesting that IL-1β is crucial for host defense against S. aureus and this can be transpolar to infections induced by other microorganisms [42].

Another cytokine that accompanies the IL-1β response is TNF-α, and this cytokine is produced initially during endotoxemia, as well as in response to some microbial products. TNF-α shares with IL-6 an important inflammatory property, that is, the induction of acute phase reactant protein by the liver [43]. In vivo studies show that TNF-α plays an important role in mediating clearance through the recruitment of neutrophils and macrophages to the site of infection after a bacterial intraperitoneal challenge [44], followed by an increase in the expression of COX-2, as well as inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), which leads to the production of prostaglandin (PG)-E2 and NO to eradicate the pathogen and recover homeostasis [45].

During bacterial infections, the IL-17 is another important cytokine produced. IL-17A plays an important role in the defense of the host against extracellular bacteria. The cells that are characterized mainly by producing IL-17 are a subpopulation of CD4+ T cells, and their differentiation and maturation are favored by a mixture of cytokines, including transforming growth factor (TGF)-β and IL-6, IL-21 and TGF-β, or IL-1, IL-6, and IL-23 [46, 47]. The protective capacity of IL-17A against infectious agents can be mediated through several mechanisms, among these is the ability of IL-17A in the barrier surfaces to induce the production of inflammatory mediators such as IL-1β, IL-6, GM-CSF, granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), and TNF-α, as well as adhesion molecules. IL-17A also induces the production of chemotactic factors, such as chemokine-(C-C motif)-ligand (CCL)-2, CCL7, CXCL1, CXCL2, CXCL5, and CXCL8, responsible for recruiting neutrophils and monocytes, as well as the CCL20 that is involved in the recruitment of dendritic cells, with the aim of eliminating the extracellular pathogen [48]. In vivo and in vitro studies show that signaling through TLR4 is the main mechanism by which IL-17 is induced in response to Klebsiella pneumoniae infection, which induces an upregulation of granulopoietic cytokines involved in the recruitment of neutrophils [49]. In mice lacking the IL-17 receptor, the recruitment of neutrophils decreased, the bacterial load increased, and survival was compromised. Whereas overexpression of IL-17 through an adenovirus, resulted in the production of cytokines mainly, macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-2, G-CSF, TNF-α, and IL-1β, increasing the recruitment of neutrophils, bacterial clearance and finally survival after infection with K. pneumoniae [50]. And finally, PGE2 increases the expansion of Th17 cells in an IL-1β dependent manner, thus favoring the recruitment of these cells to the site of damage. In vitro studies show that Th17 cells in the presence of PGE2 increase the production of CCL20, thus favoring the control of infection [51].

IL-18 also promotes the secretion of other proinflammatory cytokines like TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-8, and GM-CSF and consequently enhancement, migration, and activation of neutrophils during infections. IL-18 increases the cytotoxic activity and proliferation of CD8+ T and NK cells, as well as promotes the secretion of inflammatory mediators of the type TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-8, and GM-CSF, which will activate neutrophils, thus increasing their migration [38]. During a bacterial infection, IL-18 plays an important role, since it induces IFN-γ production of NK cells [52]. The IFN-γ that is produced activates macrophages and produces cytokines that induce antimicrobial pathways against intracellular and extracellular pathogens [53]. Infection with strains of lactobacillus nonpathogenic and with streptococcus pyogenes induces the expression of IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, IL-12, IL-18, and IFN-γ, suggesting that this type of bacterial strains induces Th1 type cytokines [54].


4. Cytokine profile in fungal infections

As well as the response to bacteria, the response against fungi also requires coordination of the innate and adaptive immune system. The innate immune system performs its effect through the cells that have the phagocytic and antigen presenting function. These cells include neutrophils, macrophages, and dendritic cells [55]. The recognition of pathogens by the immune system involves four class of PRRs: TLRs, C-type lectin receptors (CLRs), nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like (NOD-like) receptors (NLRs), and retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I) like receptors (RLRs) [56]. The CLRs, especially Dectin-1 and 2, play an important role in the pathogen recognition from Candida spp.; this is because the cell wall is made up of mannoproteins with O-glycosylated oligosaccharide and N-glycosylated polysaccharide moieties, with an inner layer of chitin and β (1, 3) and β (1, 6) glucans are recognized and initiate a downstream signaling through these receptors, which leads to activation of the transcription factor NF-κB and other signaling pathways that induce the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, IL-1β, and IL-23 that induce the Th17 cytokines [57] (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Cytokines profile in fungal infections. The PRRs recognize fungal PAMPs and initiate a downstream signaling, which leads to the activation of the NF-κB and other signaling pathways inducing the production of cytokines such as IL-6, IL-1β, IL-12, TNF-α, GM-CSF, IFN-γ, and IL-23. These cytokines induce the differentiation of Th1 and Th17 immune responses against fungi infection, stimulating the migration, adherence, and phagocytosis of neutrophils and macrophages.

The recognition of fungi by phagocytic cells occurs mainly through the detection of cell wall components such as mannan, β-glucan, phosphocholine, β-1,6 glucan, and even internal components such as DNA can be recognized [58, 59]. The recruitment and activation of phagocytic cells are mediated through the induction of proinflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and complement components. Fungi are killed by oxidative and nonoxidative mechanisms and antimicrobial peptides. These activities are influenced by the action of cytokines such as IFN-γ [59]. This cytokine produced mainly by T and NK cells stimulates the migration, adherence, and phagocytosis of neutrophils and macrophages and production of opsonizing antibodies and maintains a Th1 response as a protective response against fungi. It also induces a classical activation of macrophages that is important to stop the growth of intracellular fungal pathogens [60]. The Th1 response occurs through the release of proinflammatory cytokines IFN-γ, TNF-α, and GM-CSF, increasing the permeability in the tissue, as well as the phagocytic cells at the site of infection to efficiently clean the infection [61] (Figure 2).

Another important cytokine in immunity against fungi is IL-12, and this cytokine is considered the main cytokine that induces IFN-γ production. IL-12 is produced by monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells, in response to microbial products, and acts on NK and T cells to induce IFN-γ. On the other hand, the late secretion of IL-12 in the lymph nodes induces naive T cells to produce IFN-γ and therefore amounting a Th1 response is promoted [62]. The ability of IFN-γ to increase the production of IL-12 forms a positive feedback during the inflammatory process and the Th1 response, and this interferon in turn activates monocytes and macrophages to induce the production of IL-12 [63] (Figure 2). Studies in Il12p35−/− and IFN-γ−/− mice show an increase in susceptibility to infections with Candida albicans, and this suggests that IL-12 and the Th1 responses play an important role in controlling Candida infection [64]. On the other hand, neutrophils kill the extracellular and intracellular fungi through effector mechanism that includes the production of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, as well as the release of hydrolytic enzymes and their granules containing antimicrobial peptides [65].

IL-23 is a member of the IL-12 family and plays a central role in the expansion of Th17 cells as well as their function, composed of a p19 and p40 subunit that shares it with IL-12 [66, 67]. IL-23 is produced primarily by dendritic cells, the binding of β-glucan to Dectin-1 activates the syk-CARD-9 signaling pathway leading to the production of IL-23, which promotes the Th17 response, through the differentiation of naïve CD4+ T cells into Th17 cells and the release of IL-17A, IL-17F and IL-22 in response to infections caused by mucosal fungi [68]. These cytokines in conjunction with IL-23 have various functions in the body from a proinflammatory, anti-inflammatory, or regulatory activity, which depends on the type of microorganism, the site of infection, and the immunological status of the host (Figure 2). In vivo studies have shown that mice deficient of the IL-17 receptor (IL-17RA−/−) cannot limit systemic candidiasis, as well as oropharyngeal candidiasis, being more susceptible to developing mucocutaneous candidiasis, suggesting that the Th17 lineage strongly acts through IL-17, regulating the expansion, recruitment, and migration of neutrophils, as well as CXC-chemokines and antimicrobial proteins such as β-defensin 3 [66, 69].


5. Cytokine profile in viral infections

In viral infections, the cytokines are implicated to establish an antiviral state as the unspecific first line of defense and virus-specific response. This process initiates through recognition of viral molecules by PRRs, which can be found as transmembrane receptors or in different intracellular compartment. The receptor undergoes a structural change, activating a route of signalization in the cytoplasm that end with the activation of cytoplasmic transcription factors that translocate into the nuclei to promote the expression of different cytokines. Depending of the virus and the type of cell, the type of cytokine produced may vary [70, 71].

5.1 Pattern recognition receptors versus virus

Viruses can infect virtually all cells of an organism. Epithelial, endothelial, fibroblasts, neurons, as well as innate and adaptive immune cells can be infected. PRRs are present in both nonhematopoietic origin cell and immune cells. Some PRRs recognize viral proteins, but other can detect viral single or double RNA or DNA. In human, there are 10 TLRs distributed in plasmatic membrane and endosome membranes. Of them, TLR-2 and TLR-4 can detect viral surface glycoprotein before the viral penetration. Others like TLR-3, TLR-8, and TLR-9 sense different types of viral nucleic acids in endosomes during virus entering. TLR-8 senses genomic ssRNA, TLR-3 senses dsRNA, and TLR-9 detects nonmethylated CpG viral DNA [72, 73]. Another type of receptors that sense viral RNA are the RNA helicases receptors like RIG-I and melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5) [71, 74]. These receptors have been demonstrated to detect viral dsRNA. This dsRNA can be genomic or an intermediate form during replication, which is formed, virtually, for all virus of single or double RNA during viral replication. However, there is evidence that some dsRNA replicative intermediators can translocate to endosomes where TLR can sense and trigger the signalization way [75].

5.2 Cytokines produced in viral infections

There are many cytokines with distinct functions. All of them are molecules with less than 20 KDa and can be pleiotropic or redundant, and also, they can synergize or antagonize each other. However, all of them are produced to ensure the virus elimination through the regulation of the immune response against the virus [76]. The process includes detection of the pathogen, signal to neighbor cells, activation and differentiation of innate immune cells, production of adhesion molecules on endothelial cell for extravasation of immune circulating cell, chemotactic molecules to attract cell to the infection foci, increase of phagocytosis, and activation of adaptive cells to specifically eliminate infected cells and extracellular virus [77].

Cytokine network against viruses starts with some cytokines produced by virus-infected cells (Figure 3). Epithelial cell can produce IFN, IL-8, IL-6, IL-1, GM-CSF [78, 79], TNFα [80], IL-18 [81], IL-12 [82], IL-2 [83], and IL-23 [84, 85]. The role of these cytokines is varied, IFN induces an antiviral state, and IL-8 is a potent inflammatory attracting phagocyte cell to the site of infection. IL-1 can promote apoptosis, and it is proinflammatory and chemotactic to neutrophils. GM-CSF is a hematopoietic grow factor that recruits various immune cells to host defense [76, 86]. Moreover, in the infection course, varies cytokines are also produced by innate and adaptive cell that can also be infected or activated. In filovirus infection, IL-1β, IL-5, IL-8, and IL-18, as well as varies chemokines like MIP-1α and β, monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1), and IFN-γ–inducible protein 10 (IP10) among others are produced [77]. In influenza virus infection, TNF-α, IL-1 α and β, and IL-6 and IL-8 are produced [87], and hepatitis C virus can promote the expression of IL-6, IL-8, MIP-1α, and MIP-1β and IL-1 [88], while rotavirus can induce the production of IFN, IL-8, IL-6, IL-1 [89], TNF-α [80], IL-18 [81], IL-12 [82], IL-2 [83], and IL-23 [84, 85]. Thus, the infected cell can upregulate multiple cytokine genes involved in different process as activation of NK, macrophages, and dendritic cells. Increasing the production of cytokines that serve as bridge between innate and adaptive response. In the inflammation process, virus-infected cells produce and secrete proinflammatory cytokines like IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, TNF [70] and IFN. These cytokines can be involved in the early defense of the organism. They can activate cells present in the site of infection, and they can recruit leukocyte cells from circulating system through inflammation process (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Cytokines profile in viral infections. The immune response against viruses initiates through recognition of viral molecules by PRRs. These PRRs can activate a signal system culminating in the activation of transcription factors involved in the establishment of an antiviral state and an inflammation process. Cytokine network against viruses start with some cytokines produced by virus infected cells, such as IFNs, IL-8, IL-6, IL-1, GM-CSF, TNFα, IL-18, IL-12, IL-2 and IL-23, inducing a potent inflammatory response, attracting and activating phagocyte cells (e.g. neutrophils, macrophages, dendritic cells), mast cells and NK cells, to the site of infection. Furthermore, these cytokines are involved in the induction of an immune response type Th1/TCL with the purpose of eliminate infected cells and extracellular virus while cytokines such as IL-4, IL-10, IL-13, IL-37, and TGF-β modulate the immune response to a Th2 and Th17 phenotype, which produce immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory actions.

5.3 Cytokines’ role in viral infection

IFN is a pleiotropic cytokine produced by virus infection. Although there are three types of IFN called type I (α/β), type II (γ) and type III (λ). Type I IFN plays an important role in control early viral infections. The role of type I IFN is to interfere with viral replication through activating the expression of antiviral molecules. Once IFN is secreted, it can act in autocrine or paracrine (like other cytokines) way, interacting with interferon receptor to induce the production of an antiviral state in the infected and noninfected neighboring cells, inhibiting different step of viral replication [76]. Also, IFN promotes the production of cytokines like IL-12, IL-6, IFN-γ, and TNF-α in innate cells including NK cells and macrophages [90]. Another function of IFN is to enhance differentiation of dendritic cells [91] and promote the antigen presentation [90] to stimulate T and B cells [92], which is redundant with the function of the IL-12 and IL-18 [93, 94]. NK cells are activated by synergism between type 1 IFNs and IL-12. However, cytokines such as IL-10, IL-6, IL-4, IL-13, and TGF-β suppress the actions of IFN, and these cytokines are known for their immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory actions [95].

TNF-α is other pleiotropic cytokine produced by also nonhematopoietic infected cells and innate and adaptive immune cells, including macrophages, dendritic cells, natural killer, and T and B lymphocytes after being activated [96]. This cytokine can activate the production of adhesion molecules in endothelial cells and promote the extravasation of neutrophils, monocytes, and others immune cells to be attracted to infection foci. TNF also can participate in apoptosis through activating caspases. TNF-α, together with IFN-γ, acts on macrophages, inducing the production of superoxide anions and oxygen and nitrogen radicals [97]. Macrophages can also produce cytokines such as IL-1, IL-6, IL-23, IL-12, and more TNF-α [95].

IL-1 was the first interleukin to be identified and is a pleiotropic cytokine, and it acts synergically with IL-6 on the central nervous system, inducing fever by activation of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis [98]. This molecule also activates mast cells and induces histamine production, acting as a vasodilator, thus increases the permeability of the membrane [99]. Also, IL-1 is chemotactic factor that induces the passage of neutrophils to the site of infection. This chemotactic function is redundant with the action of IL-8, also known as chemokine CXCL8 [86] also produced by the infected cell. There are cytokines that antagonize these functions of IL-1 such as IL-10, IL-4, and IL-13 recognized for their anti-inflammatory actions [100].

Another pleiotropic cytokine is IL-18, first described as “interferon-γ-inducing factor” and member of IL-1 family. This interleukin and type I IFN are recognized by dendritic cells and trigger a signaling pathway through TRF6 and induce the expression of CD11b+ in the surface of the cell [94]. These activated cells can express cytokines like IL-12, IL-6, IFN-γ, TNFα, and IFN-α, which also participates in other hematopoietic cells [101, 102]. IL-18 also participates synergistically with interleukin 12 on the activation of NK cells [93], stimulating the expression of CD25 and CD69 molecules, promoting their proliferation and cytotoxic capacity, respectively. Once activated, NK cells can induce apoptosis in virus-infected cells and produce other cytokines such as IL-12, IL-6, IL-10, IFN-γ, and TNF-α. Within the cytokines that block these functions of IL-18 are IL-37, IL-10, and TGF-β [103].

IL-6 is a soluble mediator with a pleiotropic effect on inflammation, immune response, and hematopoiesis. IL-6 is an important mediator of fever and of the acute phase response, which is redundant with IL-1 and TFN-α and promotes the differentiation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes, which induce the death of infected cells by osmotic lysis [104]. IL-6 synergistically with IL-23 participates in the differentiation of Th17 [105], through the production of RORγt. Once activated, Th17 induces inflammatory response through the expression of cytokines as IL-17 and IL-22. IL-6 also promotes the proliferation of B cells by binding to a complex of receptors (gp80, CD126, and CD130) [106] and, like IL-21 [107], induces the differentiation of plasma cells stimulating the antibody production [108]. However, there exist antagonist cytokines like IL-10, IL-13, and TGF-β that inhibit all these functions of the IL-6 [103].

IL-12, also known as a T cell-stimulating factor, which together with IFN-γ, promotes differentiation of Th1 cells by activation of T-bet, and these cells can activate macrophages through expression of other cytokines like IFN and TNF, amplifying the produced immune response [109]. Although, there is evidence that viruses may selectively induce IFN production and Th1 differentiation even in the absence of IL-12 [110].

IL-2 participates in the differentiation and proliferation of Th2 (redundant with IL-4) and Treg cells by the expression of GATA-3 and FOXP3, respectively [111, 112]. Th2 cells can express IL-4, IL-5, IL-9, and IL-13, which also have pleiotropic effects in promoting type 2 effector mechanisms, such as B cells secretion of immunoglobulins, eosinophilia, mastocytosis, and M2 macrophage polarization [113]. Treg cells regulate the immune response, suppressing T-cell activation [114]. Treg and Th2 are known for their immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory actions [95]. Finally, GM-CSF stimulates the generation of dendritic cells and participates in polarization of macrophages M1 [115]. Moreover, GM-CSF has also been associated with Th2 immunity and therefore M2 polarization. GM-CSF is considered a pleiotropic cytokine with inflammatory and anti-inflammatory functions [116].


6. Cytokine profile in parasitic infections

In parasitic infections is difficult to generalize about the mechanisms of antiparasitic immunity because there is a great variety of different parasites that have different morphology and reside in different locations of tissues and hosts during their life cycles [117]. In this section of the chapter, we will talk about the immune response against protozoa and helminths, two of the main parasites of medical importance for human health.

6.1 Immune system activation by parasitic protozoan infections

Protozoan parasites are much larger and more complex pathogens than viruses or bacteria and have developed additional and sophisticated strategies to escape the immune attack of the host. Currently, 30% of humans suffer parasitic protozoan infections worldwide. Life cycles of protozoans generally involve several stages of specific antigenicity, which facilitates their survival and propagation within different cells, tissues, and hosts. Frequently, the host fails to eliminate protozoan infections, which often results in a chronic disease or inapparent infections, in which the host continues to act as a reservoir of parasites [118].

The immune defense mechanisms against protozoan parasites frequently involve several immune cells such as neutrophils, macrophages, and NK cells that mediate the innate response against extracellular protozoan parasites. NK cell and cytokine-activated macrophages are central to the innate response to intracellular parasites. Innate cytokine and dendritic cell responses also play a critical role in the induction of adaptive immunity [119].

During the initial stage of parasitic protozoan infections, intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) bind and recognize PAMPs through PRRs [120] such as TLR-2 and TLR-4 [121], which activates NF-κB and leads to the production of proinflammatory cytokines [122], including IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-12, IFN-γ, and TNF-α [123, 124], which induces the activation of a Th1 type response [125]. IFN-γ is involved in clearance of infection, through the activation of neutrophils and macrophages (Figure 4) [126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132]. It has been also shown that IFN-γ-producing CD4+ T cells are involved protection in vaccinated mice [133]. Several studies suggest a role for IFN-γ in the pathogenesis of parasitic protozoan infections. In both humans and animal models, the production of high levels of IFN-γ is associated with resistance to infection [134, 135, 136], while low levels of IFN-γ are associated with an increased susceptibility to infection. Therefore, it is considered highly probable that IFN-γ provides protection against infection by activation of neutrophils and/or macrophages [125]. The production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and NO through the complex of NADPH oxidase and iNOS, respectively, plays a critical role in the elimination of protozoan parasites [131, 132]. In experimental studies, infection protection was mediated by IFN-γ from NK T cells (NKT), while TNF-α is produced by increased tissue damage [137, 138], together with IL-1 and IL-8 [139] (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Cytokines profile in parasitic protozoan infections. The immune defense mechanisms against protozoan parasites involve several immune cells such as neutrophils, macrophages, NK cells, and CD4+ T cells. These cells are capable to produce proinflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-12, IFN-γ, and TNF-α, promoting type 1 immune response. Likewise, protozoan parasites activate a Th2-type immune response, producing anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-4, IL-10, IL-5, and IL-13, suppressing the production of Th1 cytokines.

On the other hand, the antigenic exposure of protozoan parasites activates a Th2-type immune response by the host, inducing the production of anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-4, IL-10 [125], IL-5 and IL-13, which try to attenuate the Th1 type response characterized also by the INF-γ production, leading to upregulation of Th2 cytokine responses (IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13) and Th17 (IL-17), suppressing the production of Th1 cytokines [140] (Figure 4). In addition, another cytokine of anti-inflammatory importance is TGF-β, which acts in a synergistic manner to counteract this Th1 type response, activating macrophages which produce NO, through iNOS, for the elimination of the parasite [138]. Therefore, Th1-type cytokine response is characterized mainly by the production of IFN-γ, whereas susceptibility to tissue damage by protozoan parasites is critically dependent on a Th2-type cytokine response mediated mainly by IL-4.

6.2 Immune system activation by parasitic helminth infection

More than two billion people around the world are infected with helminth parasites. Parasitic helminth infections are a major public health problem worldwide due to their ability to cause great morbidity and socioeconomic loss [141, 142].

The immune response against helminth parasites is characterized by the induction of an early Th1-type immune response, with the subsequent predominance of a Th2 type immune response, resulting in a mixture of both Th1/Th2 immune responses [143, 144], which depend on the CD4+ T cells [145]. The CD4+ T cells have a key role in the establishment of the cytokine environment during helminth parasite infection, thus directing their differentiation either by suppressing or favoring the inflammatory response at the intestinal level, which is crucial for the elimination of the parasite [146] (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

Cytokines profile in parasitic helminth infection. The immune response against helminth parasites is characterized by the induction of an early Th1 type immune response, which results in a significant increase of Th1 cytokines such as IL-12, INF-γ, IL-1β, and TNF-α. Then, there is a subsequent predominance of a Th2 type immune response characterized by the release of IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, and IL-13 favoring helminth parasites expulsion.

PAMPs derived from helminth parasites induce the activation and maturation of dendritic cells [147, 148], promoting the development of the Th1 immune response [149], which results in a significant increase of Th1 cytokines such as IL-12 [150, 151, 152], INF-γ [149, 150, 151, 152, 153], IL-1β [152, 154], and TNF-α [150, 151, 152, 155] (Figure 5). However, in recent years, several studies have shown that this immune response of Th1 type favors infection by helminth parasites. On the one hand, IL-12 and INF-γ are two important cytokines against infection by helminth parasites, since they participate in the polarization of the Th1 type immune response [149, 150, 151, 153]. However, exogenous IL-12 is capable of suppressing intestinal mastocytosis, delaying the parasite expulsion, and increasing the parasite burden at the muscular level [156]. INF-γ induces the expression of iNOS, activates transcription factors such as NF-κB [157], and regulates the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α [158]. Studies have shown that TNF-α is a cytokine that is produced during intestinal infection by helminth parasites [150, 151, 159], which is necessary in the protection against the parasite through the Th2 immune response [160]. However, several studies have associated the production of TNF-α with the development of intestinal pathology during infection by helminth parasites [155, 161, 162]. One of the effects of TNF-α is the iNOS expression and consequently the NO production [163, 164, 165]. Helminth parasite antigens are capable to induce the expression of iNOS, with the subsequent production of NO [166], which acts mainly as an effector molecule against both extracellular and intracellular parasites [167]. Studies in iNOS knockout mice infected with helminth parasites, showed a reduction in the expression of Th2 cytokines (IL-4, IL-5), a reduced humoral response (IgG and IgE), with a decrease in mastocytosis. However, no significant difference was observed in the helminth parasite expulsion, although iNOS knockout mice showed a decrease in intestinal pathology compared to wild-type animals. These results suggest that NO is not required for the helminth parasite expulsion, but its production is responsible for the intestinal pathology [155, 168]. With respect to IL-1β, it is well known that it participates in the intestinal inflammatory response in the helminth parasites infection, observing high levels during intestinal infection. However, until now, the role of IL-1β is not well understood [159].

With respect to the Th2 type immune response, in vitro studies have shown that helminth parasite antigens are capable of dendritic cells activating, inducing the synthesis of Th2 cytokines such as IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, and IL-13 [147, 149, 153, 169]. Likewise, studies in in vivo models have shown that helminth parasites infection is a significant increase in the synthesis of IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, and IL-13 [150, 151, 159, 170] (Figure 5). IL-10 may suppress antigen presentation by dendritic cells and inhibition of IL-12 secretion. In addition, helminth parasite antigens increased both IL-4 and IL-10 production derived from Th2 cells with a decrease in INF-γ production, polarizing the immune response to a strong Th2 cellular immune response, protective and responsible for the helminth parasite expulsion [143]. IL-10 is a Th2 cytokine, which is necessary for a successful intestinal immune response. This is because the absence or decrease of IL-10 causes a significant delay in the helminth parasite expulsion and an increase in the parasite burden [171]. IL-4 and IL-13 induce muscle cells hypercontractility of the jejunum and intestinal mastocytosis, promoting the helminth parasite expulsion [161, 172]. In IL-4/IL-13 mice deficient, a reduction in the helminth parasite expulsion, mastocytosis, and development of intestinal pathology was observed [161, 162, 173, 174]. Therefore, these studies suggest that IL-4 and IL-13 can regulate the induction of the protective Th2 immune response and intestinal inflammation, both associated with the helminth parasite expulsion [162]. During the Th2 immune response, the cytokines such as IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 stimulate IgE synthesis [175], inducing mast cell and eosinophil hyperplasia [176], triggering immediate hypersensitivity reactions, and promoting the helminth parasite expulsion from the intestine [177]. However, mast cells and eosinophils are involved in tissue damage, thus promoting the inflammatory response. It suggests that the protective role of the Th2 type immune response is not sufficient facing the challenge against helminth parasite infections, as it contributes to the development of immunopathology [178] (Figure 5).


7. Conclusion

Although cytokines are produced with the purpose of modulating the immune response against infections caused by microorganisms, such as bacteria, fungi, viruses, and parasites, there is evidence that these microorganisms can induce cytokine production with bad prognostic to host recovery. In this sense, overproduction of inflammatory cytokines may be responsible for the severe damage observed in many microorganism infections. For this reason, a better understanding over the cytokine balance related to diseases by microorganisms is required to avoid severe damage against the organism caused by overreaction of the immune system.



We thank the authors who collaborated in the writing of this chapter: Dr. José Luis Muñoz, Dr. Juan Francisco Contreras, Dr. Oscar Gutiérrez, Dra. Paola Trinidad Villalobos, Dra. Viridiana Elizabeth Hernández and Luis Guillermo; as well as the Universities involved: Cuauhtémoc University Aguascalientes, Autonomous University of Nuevo Leon, and University of Guadalajara. We also thank the financial support for chapter publication.


Conflict of interest

We have no conflict of interest related to this work.


  1. 1. Silva-Barrios S, Stäger S. Protozoan parasites and type I IFNs. Frontiers in Immunology. 2017;8:14. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00014
  2. 2. Grignani G, Maiolo A. Cytokines and hemostasis. Haematologica. 2000;85(9):967-972
  3. 3. Carson WF, Kunkel SL. Type I and II cytokine superfamilies in inflammatory responses. In: Cavaillon JM, Singer M, editors. Inflammation: From Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms to the Clinic. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA; 2017. pp. 587-618. DOI: 10.1002/9783527692156.ch24
  4. 4. O'Shea JJ, Gadina M, Siegel RM. Cytokines and cytokine receptors. In: Rich RR, Fleisher TA, Shearer WT, Schroeder HW, Frew AJ, Weyand CM, editors. Clinical Immunology. 5th ed. London: Content Repository Only; 2019. pp. 127-155.e1. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-7020-6896-6.00009-0
  5. 5. Muñoz Carrillo JL, Castro García FP, Gutiérrez Coronado O, Moreno García MA, Contreras Cordero JF. Physiology and pathology of innate immune response against pathogens. In: Rezaei N, editor. Physiology and Pathology of Immunology. London: InTech; 2017. pp. 99-134. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.70556
  6. 6. Dinarello CA. Biologic basis for interleukin-1 in disease. Blood. 1996;87(6):2095-2147
  7. 7. Dinarello CA. Immunological and inflammatory functions of the interleukin-1 family. Annual Review of Immunology. 2009;27:519-550. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132612
  8. 8. Sims JE, Smith DE. The IL-1 family: Regulators of immunity. Nature Reviews. Immunology. 2010;10(2):89-102. DOI: 10.1038/nri2691
  9. 9. Boraschi D, Tagliabue A. The interleukin-1 receptor family. Seminars in Immunology. 2013;25(6):394-407. DOI: 10.1016/j.smim.2013.10.023
  10. 10. Dinarello C. IL-1 superfamily and inflammasome. In: Cavaillon JM, Singer M, editors. Inflammation: From Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms to the Clinic. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA; 2017. pp. 477-528. DOI: 10.1002/9783527692156.ch20
  11. 11. Gay NJ, Keith FJ. Drosophila Toll and IL-1 receptor. Nature. 1991;351(6325):355-356. DOI: 10.1038/351355b0
  12. 12. Pappu BP, Borodovsky A, Zheng TS, Yang X, Wu P, Dong X, et al. TL1A–DR3 interaction regulates Th17 cell function and Th17-mediated autoimmune disease. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2008;205(5):1049-1062. DOI: 10.1084/jem.20071364
  13. 13. Garlanda C, Riva F, Bonavita E, Mantovani A. Negative regulatory receptors of the IL-1 family. Seminars in Immunology. 2013;25(6):408-415. DOI: 10.1016/j.smim.2013.10.019
  14. 14. Aggarwal BB, Gupta SC, Kim JH. Historical perspectives on tumor necrosis factor and its superfamily: 25 years later, a golden journey. Blood. 2012;119(3):651-665. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-04-325225
  15. 15. Cuzzocrea S. TNF Superfamily. In: Cavaillon JM, Singer M, editors. Inflammation: From Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms to the Clinic. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA; 2017. pp. 529-547. DOI: 10.1002/9783527692156.ch21
  16. 16. Croft M. The role of TNF superfamily members in T-cell function and diseases. Nature Reviews. Immunology. 2009;9(4):271-285. DOI: 10.1038/nri2526
  17. 17. Carswell EA, Old LJ, Kassel RL, Green S, Fiore N, Williamson B. An endotoxin-induced serum factor that causes necrosis of tumors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1975;72(9):3666-3670
  18. 18. Yao Z, Fanslow WC, Seldin MF, Rousseau AM, Painter SL, Comeau MR, et al. Herpesvirus saimiri encodes a new cytokine, IL-17, which binds to a novel cytokine receptor. Journal of Immunology. 2011;187(9):4392-4402
  19. 19. Korn T, Bettelli E, Oukka M, Kuchroo VK. IL-17 and Th17 cells. Annual Review of Immunology. 2009;27:485-517. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132710
  20. 20. Monteleone G, Marafini I. Troncone E interleukin-17 A-E. In: Cavaillon JM, Singer M, editors. Inflammation: From Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms to the Clinic. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA; 2017. pp. 549-572. DOI: 10.1002/9783527692156.ch22
  21. 21. Tanaka T, Narazaki M, Kishimoto T. IL-6 Superfamily. In: Cavaillon JM, Singer M, editors. Inflammation: From Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms to the Clinic. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA; 2017. pp. 573-589. DOI: 10.1002/9783527692156.ch23
  22. 22. Hibi M, Nakajima K, Hirano T. IL-6 cytokine family and signal transduction: A model of the cytokine system. Journal of Molecular Medicine. 1996;74:1-12. DOI: 10.1007/BF00202068
  23. 23. Hirano T, Ishihara K, Hibi M. Roles of STAT3 in mediating the cell growth, differentiation and survival signals relayed through the IL-6 family of cytokine receptors. Oncogene. 2009;19(21):2548-2556. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ocn.1203551
  24. 24. Rose-John S. Interleukin-6 family cytokines. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 2018;10(2):1-17. DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a028415
  25. 25. Tanaka T, Narazaki M, Kishimoto T. Therapeutic targeting of the interleukin-6 receptor. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology. 2012;52:199-219. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010611-134715
  26. 26. Tanaka T, Narazaki M, Kishimoto T. IL-6 in inflammation, immunity, and disease. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 2014;6(10):1-16. DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a016295
  27. 27. Owen J, Punt J, Stranford S, Jones P. Kuby Inmmunology. 7th ed. México: Editorial McGrawHill; 2014. pp. 116-123. ISBN: 978-607-15-1126-3
  28. 28. Smith KA. The structure of IL2 bound to the three chains of the IL2 receptor and how signaling occurs. Medical Immunology. 2006;5:3. DOI: 10.1186/1476-9433-5-3
  29. 29. Sinobiological. Cytokine Families [Internet]. 2017. Available form: [Accessed: May 29, 2018]
  30. 30. Sinobiological. Interleukin 2 & Receptor [Internet]. 2017. Available form: [Accessed: May 31, 2018]
  31. 31. Thermo Fisher Scientific. Interferon (IFN) Cell Signaling Pathway [Internet]. 2017. Available from: [Accessed: Jun 1, 2018]
  32. 32. Wolff K, Goldsmith L, Katz S, Gilchrest B, Paller A, Leffell D. Fitzpatrick Dermatologia en Medicina General. 7th ed. México: Editorial Editorial Medica Panamericana; 2009. pp. 124-125. ISBN: 978-950-06-1703-1
  33. 33. González M, Ordónez A. La Astenia Tumoral. 1st ed. Editorial Medica Panamericana. México, 2004. pp. 32-35. ISBN: 84-7903-962-0
  34. 34. Michael FT. Innate immune responses to infection. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2005;116(2):241-249. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.05.036
  35. 35. Dejan B, Vuk RV, Suzana P, Predrag D, Milan Z, Ivana N, et al. Cytokine profile in chronic hepatitis C: An observation. Cytokine. 2017;96:185-188. DOI: 10.1016/j.cyto.2017.04.008
  36. 36. Andrea JW, David MU. Peptidoglycan recognition by the innate immune system. Nature Reviews. Immunology. 2018;8(4):243-254. DOI: 10.1038/nri.2017.136
  37. 37. Kawai T, Akira S. The roles of TLRs, RLRs and NLRs in pathogen recognition. International Immunology. 2009;21(4):317-337. DOI: 10.1093/intimm/dxp017
  38. 38. Manoranjan S, Ivonne CO, Laura B, Fabio R. Role of the inflammasome, IL-1𝛽 and IL-18 in bacterial infections. The Scientific World Journal. 2011;11:2037-2050. DOI: 10.1100/2011/212680
  39. 39. Borthwick LA. The IL-1 cytokine family and its role in inflammation and fibrosis in the lung. Seminars in Immunopathology. 2016;38(4):517-534. DOI: 10.1007/s00281-016-0559-z
  40. 40. Broggi A, Granucci F. Microbe- and danger-induced inflammation. Molecular Immunology. 2015;63(2):127-133. DOI: 10.1016/j.molimm.2014.06.037
  41. 41. Biondo C, Mancuso G, Midiri A, Signorino G, Domina M, Lanza Cariccio V, et al. Essential role of interleukin-1 signaling in host defenses against group B streptococcus. MBio. 2014;5(5):e01428-e014214. DOI: 10.1128/mBio.01428-14
  42. 42. Miller LS, Pietras EM, Uricchio LH, Hirano K, Rao S, Lin H, et al. Inflammasome-mediated production of IL-1β is required for neutrophil recruitment against Staphylococcus aureus in vivo. Journal of Immunology. 2007;179(10):6933-6942. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.10.6933
  43. 43. Arango DG, Descoteaux A. Macrophage cytokines: Involvement in immunity and infectious diseases. Frontiers in Immunology. 2014;5:491-502. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00491
  44. 44. Malaviya R, Abraham SN. Role of mast cell leukotrienes in neutrophil recruitment and bacterial clearance in infectious peritonitis. Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 2000;67(6):841-846. DOI: 10.1002/jlb.67.6.841
  45. 45. Dinarello CA. Proinflammatory cytokines. Chest. 2000;118(2):503-508. DOI: 10.1378/chest.118.2.503
  46. 46. Harrington LE, Hatton RD, Mangan PR, Turner H, Murphy TL, Murphy KM, et al. Interleukin 17-producing CD4+ effector T cells develop via a lineage distinct from the T helper type 1 and 2 lineages. Nature Immunology. 2005;6(11):1123-1132. DOI: 10.1038/ni1254
  47. 47. Chizzolini C, Dufour AM, Brembilla NC. Is there a role for IL-17 in the pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis? Immunology Letters. 2018;195:61-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.imlet.2017.09.007
  48. 48. Kolls JK, McCray PB Jr, Chan YR. Cytokine-mediated regulation of antimicrobial proteins. Nature Reviews. Immunology. 2008;8(11):829-835. DOI: 10.1038/nri2433
  49. 49. Happel KI, Zheng M, Young E, Quinton LJ, Lockhart E, Ramsay AJ, et al. Cutting edge: Roles of toll-like receptor 4 and IL-23 in IL-17 expression in response to Klebsiella pneumoniae infection. Journal of Immunology. 2003;170(9):4432-4436. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.9.4432
  50. 50. Ye P, Garvey PB, Zhang P, Nelson S, Bagby G, Summer WR, et al. Interleukin-17 and lung host defense against Klebsiella pneumoniae infection. American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. 2001;25(3):335-340. DOI: 10.1165/ajrcmb.25.3.4424
  51. 51. Chizzolini C, Chicheportiche R, Alvarez M, de Rham C, Roux-Lombard P, Ferrari-Lacraz S, et al. Prostaglandin E2 synergistically with interleukin-23 favors human Th17 expansion. Blood. 2008;112(9):3696-3703. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2008-05-155408
  52. 52. Dinarello CA, Novick D, Kim S, Kaplanski G. Interleukin-18 and IL-18 binding protein. Frontiers in Immunology. 2013;4:289. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00289
  53. 53. Murray HW. Interferon-γ and host antimicrobial defense: Current and future clinical applications. The American Journal of Medicine. 1994;97(5):459-467. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(94)90326-3
  54. 54. Miettinen M, Matikainen S, Vuopio-Varkila J, Pirhonen J, Varkila K, Kurimoto M, et al. Lactobacilli and streptococci induced interleukin-12 (IL-12), IL-18, and gamma interferon production in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Infection and Immunity. 1998;66(12):6058-6062
  55. 55. Antachopoulos C, Roilides E. Cytokines and fungal infections. British Journal of Haematology. 2005;129(5):583-596. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05498.x
  56. 56. Hamad M. Innate and adaptive antifungal immune responses: Partners on an equal footing. Mycoses. 2012;55(3):205-217. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2011.02078.x
  57. 57. Mengesha BG, Conti HR. The role of IL-17 in protection against mucosal candida infections. Journal of Fungi. 2017;3(4):52-63. DOI: 10.3390/jof3040052
  58. 58. Salazar F, Brown GD. Antifungal innate immunity: A perspective from the last 10 years. Journal of Innate Immunity. 2018;16:1-25. DOI: 10.1159/000488539
  59. 59. Brown GD. Innate antifungal immunity: The key role of phagocytes. Annual Review of Immunology. 2011;29:1-21. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-030409-101229
  60. 60. Verma A, Wüthrich M, Deepe G, Klein B. Adaptive immunity to fungi. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine. 2014;5(3):a019612-a019636. DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a019612
  61. 61. Nadesalingam J, Dodds AW, Reid KB, Palaniyar N. Mannose-binding lectin recognizes peptidoglycan via the N-acetyl glucosamine moiety and inhibits ligand-induced proinflammatory effect and promotes chemokine production by macrophages. Journal of Immunology. 2005;175(3):1785-1794. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.3.1785
  62. 62. Gafa V, Lande R, Gagliardi MC, Severa M, Giacomini E, Remoli ME, et al. Human dendritic cells following Aspergillus fumigatus infection express the CCR7 receptor and a differential pattern of interleukin-12 (IL-12), IL-23, and IL-27 cytokines, which lead to a Th1 response. Infection and Immunity. 2006;74(3):1480-1489. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.74.3.1480-1489.2006
  63. 63. Thompson A, Orr SJ. Emerging IL-12 family cytokines in the fight against fungal infections. Cytokine. 2018;S1043-4666(18):30218-30227. DOI: 10.1016/j.cyto.2018.05.019
  64. 64. Balish E, Wagner RD, Vázquez-Torres A, Pierson C, Warner T. Candidiasis in interferon-gamma knockout (IFN-gamma−/−) mice. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 1998;178(2):478-487. DOI: 10.1086/515645
  65. 65. Hünniger K, Kurzai O. Phagocytes as central players in the defence against invasive fungal infection. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology. 2018;S1084-9521(17):30540-30552. DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2018.03.021
  66. 66. Conti HR, Shen F, Nayyar N, Stocum E, Sun JN, Lindemann MJ, et al. Th17 cells and IL-17 receptor signaling are essential for mucosal host defense against oral candidiasis. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2009;206(2):299-311. DOI: 10.1084/jem.20081463
  67. 67. Oppmann B, Lesley B, Blom JC, Timans Y, Xu B, Hunte F, et al. Kastelein. Novel p19 protein engages IL-12p40 to form a cytokine: IL-23, with biological activities similar as well as distinct from IL-12. Immunity. 2000;13(5):715-725. DOI: 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)00070-4
  68. 68. Mariangel A, Federica F, Daniela G, Silvia D, Silvio D. Can IL-23 be a good target for ulcerative colitis? Best Practice & Research. Clinical Gastroenterology. 2018;32-33:95-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2018.05.016
  69. 69. Huang W, Na L, Fidel PL, Schwarzenberger P. Requirement of interleukin-17A for systemic anti-Candida albicans host defense in mice. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2004;190(3):624-631. DOI: 10.1086/422329
  70. 70. Mogensen TH, Paludan SR. Molecular pathways in virus-induced cytokine production. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 2001;65(1):131-150. DOI: 10.1128/MMBR.65.1.131-150.2001
  71. 71. Takeuchi O, Akira S. MDA5/RIG-I and virus recognition. Current Opinion in Immunology. 2008;20(1):17-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.coi.2008.01.002
  72. 72. Barton GM. Viral recognition by Toll-like receptors. Seminars in Immunology. 2007;19(1):33-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.smim.2007.01.003
  73. 73. Perrot I, Deauvieau F, Massacrier C, Hughes N, Garrone P, Durand I, et al. TLR3 and Rig-like receptor on myeloid dendritic cells and Rig-like receptor on human NK cells are both mandatory for production of IFN-gamma in response to double-stranded RNA. Journal of Immunology. 2010;185(4):2080-2088. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1000532
  74. 74. Kawai T, Akira S. Innate immune recognition of viral infection. Nature Immunology. 2006;7(2):131-137. DOI: 10.1038/ni1303
  75. 75. Xagorari A, Chlichlia K. Toll-like receptors and viruses: Induction of innate antiviral immune responses. Open Microbiology Journal. 2008;2:49-59. DOI: 10.2174/1874285800802010049
  76. 76. López S, Sánchez-Tacuba L, Moreno J, Arias CF. Rotavirus strategies against the innate antiviral system. Annual Review of Virology. 2016;3(1):591-609. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-virology-110615-042152
  77. 77. Bixler SL, Goff AJ. The role of cytokines and chemokines in filovirus infection. Viruses. 2015;7(10):5489-5507. DOI: 10.3390/v7102892
  78. 78. Sennikov SV, Temchura VV, Trufakin VA, Kozlov VA. Effects of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor produced by intestinal epithelial cells on functional activity of hemopoietic stem cells. Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine. 2002;134(6):548-550. DOI: 10.1023/A:1022952810245
  79. 79. Chan MC, Cheung CY, Chui WH, Tsao SW, Nicholls JM, Chan YO, et al. Proinflammatory cytokine responses induced by influenza A (H5N1) viruses in primary human alveolar and bronchial epithelial cells. Respiratory Research. 2005;11(6):135. DOI: 10.1186/1465-9921-6-135
  80. 80. González-Amaro R, García-Monzón C, García-Buey L, Moreno-Otero R, Alonso JL, Yagüe E, et al. Induction of tumor necrosis factor alpha production by human hepatocytes in chronic viral hepatitis. Journal of Experimental Medicine. 1994;179(3):841-848
  81. 81. Burbach GJ, Naik SM, Harten JB, Liu L, Dithmar S, Grossniklaus H, et al. Interleukin-18 expression and modulation in human corneal epithelial cells. Current Eye Research. 2001;23(1):64-68. DOI: 10.1076/ceyr.
  82. 82. Walter MJ, Kajiwara N, Karanja P, Castro M, Holtzman MJ. Interleukin 12 p40 production by barrier epithelial cells during airway inflammation. Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2001;193(3):339-351
  83. 83. Aoki Y, Qiu D, Uyei A, Kao PN. Human airway epithelial cells express interleukin-2 in vitro. The American Journal of Physiology. 1997;272(2 Pt 1):L276-L286. DOI: 10.1152/ajplung.1997.272.2.L276
  84. 84. Piskin G, Sylva-Steenland RM, Bos JD, Teunissen MB. In vitro and in situ expression of IL-23 by keratinocytes in healthy skin and psoriasis lesions: Enhanced expression in psoriatic skin. Journal of Immunology. 2006;176(3):1908-1915. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.3.1908
  85. 85. Yannam GR, Gutti T, Poluektova LY. IL-23 in infections, inflammation, autoimmunity and cancer: Possible role in HIV-1 and AIDS. Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology. 2012;7(1):95-112. DOI: 10.1007/s11481-011-9315-2
  86. 86. Cotton JA, Platnich JM, Muruve DA, Jijon HB, Buret AG, Beck PL. Interleukin-8 in gastrointestinal inflammation and malignancy: Induction and clinical consequences. International Journal of Interferon and Cytokine Medical Research. 2016;8:13-34. DOI: 10.2147/IJICMR.S63682
  87. 87. Hofmann P, Sprenger H, Kaufmann A, Bender A, Hasse C, Nain M, et al. Susceptibility of mononuclear phagocytes to influenza A virus infection and possible role in the antiviral response. Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 1997;61(4):408-414. DOI: 10.1002/jlb.61.4.408
  88. 88. Nishitsuji H, Funami K, Shimizu Y, Ujino S, Sugiyama K, Seya T, et al. Hepatitis C virus infection induces inflammatory cytokines and chemokines mediated by the cross talk between hepatocytes and stellate cells. Journal of Virology. 2013;87(14):8169-8178. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00974-13
  89. 89. Jiang B, Snipes-Magaldi L, Dennehy P, Keyserling H, Holman RC, Bresee J, et al. Cytokines as mediators for or effectors against rotavirus disease in children. Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology. 2003;10(6):995-1001. DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.10.6.995-1001.2003
  90. 90. Hervas-Stubbs S, Perez-Gracia JL, Rouzaut A, Sanmamed MF, Le Bon A, Melero I. Direct effects of type I interferons on cells of the immune system. Clinical Cancer Research. 2011;17(9):2619-2627. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1114
  91. 91. Luft T, Pang KC, Thomas E, Hertzog P, Hart DN, Trapani J, et al. Type I IFNs enhance the terminal differentiation of dendritic cells. Journal of Immunology. 1998;161(4):1947-1953
  92. 92. Le Bon A, Durand V, Kamphuis E, Thompson C, Bulfone-Paus S, Rossmann C, et al. Direct stimulation of T cells by type I IFN enhances the CD8+ T cell response during cross-priming. Journal of Immunology. 2006;176(8):4682-4689. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.8.4682
  93. 93. Freeman BE, Raué HP, Hill AB, Slifka MK. Cytokine-mediated activation of NK cells during viral infection. Journal of Virology. 2015;89(15):7922-7931. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00199-15
  94. 94. Ito H, Esashi E, Akiyama T, Inoue J, Miyajima A. IL-18 produced by thymic epithelial cells induces development of dendritic cells with CD11b in the fetal thymus. International Immunology. 2006;18(8):1253-1263. DOI: 10.1093/intimm/dxl058
  95. 95. Striz I, Brabcova E, Kolesar L, Sekerkova A. Cytokine networking of innate immunity cells: A potential target of therapy. Clinical Science (London, England). 2014;126(9):593-612. DOI: 10.1042/CS20130497
  96. 96. Seo SH, Webster RG. Tumor necrosis factor alpha exerts powerful anti-influenza virus effects in lung epithelial cells. Journal of Virology. 2002;76(3):1071-1076. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.76.3.1071-1076.2002
  97. 97. Mosser DM, Edwards JP. Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation. Nature Reviews. Immunology. 2008;8(12):958-969. DOI: 10.1038/nri2448
  98. 98. Eskilsson A, Mirrasekhian E, Dufour S, Schwaninger M, Engblom D, Blomqvist A. Immune-induced fever is mediated by IL-6 receptors on brain endothelial cells coupled to STAT3-dependent induction of brain endothelial prostaglandin synthesis. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2014;34(48):15957-15961. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3520-14.2014
  99. 99. Di Paolo NC, Shayakhmetov DM. Interleukin 1α and the inflammatory process. Nature Immunology. 2016;17(8):906-913. DOI: 10.1038/ni.3503
  100. 100. Opal SM, DePalo VA. Anti-inflammatory cytokines. Chest. 2000;117(4):1162-1172. DOI: 10.1378/chest.117.4.1162
  101. 101. Reis C. Activation of dendritic cells: Translating innate into adaptive immunity. Current Opinion in Immunology. 2004;16(1):21-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.coi.2003.11.00
  102. 102. Kapsenberg ML. Dendritic-cell control of pathogen-driven T-cell polarization. Nature Reviews. Immunology. 2003;3(12):984-993. DOI: 10.1038/nri1246
  103. 103. Letterio JJ, Roberts AB. TGF-β: A critical modulator of immune cell function. Clinical Immunology and Immunopathology. 1997;84(3):244-250. DOI: 10.1006/clin.1997.4409
  104. 104. Tanaka T, Narazaki M, Kishimoto T. IL-6 in inflammation, immunity, and disease. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 2014;6(10):a016295. DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a016295
  105. 105. Acosta-Rodriguez EV, Napolitani G, Lanzavecchia A, Sallusto F. Interleukins 1beta and 6 but not transforming growth factor-beta are essential for the differentiation of interleukin 17-producing human T helper cells. Nature Immunology. 2007;8(9):942-949. DOI: 10.1038/ni1496
  106. 106. Friederichs K, Schmitz J, Weissenbach M, Heinrich PC, Schaper F. Interleukin-6-induced proliferation of pre-B cells mediated by receptor complexes lacking the SHP2/SOCS3 recruitment sites revisited. European Journal of Biochemistry. 2001;268(24):6401-6407. DOI: 10.1046/j.0014-2956.2001.02586.x
  107. 107. Ozaki K, Spolski R, Ettinger R, Kim HP, Wang G, Qi CF, et al. Regulation of B cell differentiation and plasma cell generation by IL-21, a novel inducer of Blimp-1 and Bcl-6. Journal of Immunology. 2004;173(9):5361-5371. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.9.5361
  108. 108. Hilbert DM, Cancro MP, Scherle PA, Nordan RP, Van Snick J, Gerhard W, et al. T cell derived IL-6 is differentially required for antigen-specific antibody secretion by primary and secondary B cells. Journal of Immunology. 1989;143(12):4019-4024
  109. 109. Placek K, Gasparian S, Coffre M, Maiella S, Sechet E, Bianchi E, et al. Integration of distinct intracellular signaling pathways at distal regulatory elements directs T-bet expression in human CD4+ T cells. Journal of Immunology. 2009;183(12):7743-7751. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0803812
  110. 110. Schijns VE, Haagmans BL, Wierda CM, Kruithof B, Heijnen IA, Alber G, et al. Mice lacking IL-12 develop polarized Th1 cells during viral infection. Journal of Immunology. 1998;160(8):3958-3964
  111. 111. Ansel KM, Djuretic I, Tanasa B, Rao A. Regulation of Th2 differentiation and Il4 locus accessibility. Annual Review of Immunology. 2006;24:607-656. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115821
  112. 112. Cote-Sierra J, Foucras G, Guo L, Chiodetti L, Young HA, Hu-Li J, et al. Interleukin 2 plays a central role in Th2 differentiation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2004;101(11):3880-3885. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0400339101
  113. 113. Walker JA, McKenzie ANJ. TH2 cell development and function. Nature Reviews. Immunology. 2018;18(2):121-133. DOI: 10.1038/nri.2017.118
  114. 114. Baecher-Allan C, Viglietta V, Hafler DA. Inhibition of human CD4(+)CD25(+high) regulatory T cell function. Journal of Immunology. 2002;169(11):6210-6217. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.11.6210
  115. 115. Krausgruber T, Blazek K, Smallie T, Alzabin S, Lockstone H, Sahgal N, et al. IRF5 promotes inflammatory macrophage polarization and TH1-TH17 responses. Nature Immunology. 2011;12(3):231. DOI: 10.1038/ni.1990
  116. 116. Willart MA, Deswarte K, Pouliot P, Braun H, Beyaert R, Lambrecht BN, et al. Interleukin-1α controls allergic sensitization to inhaled house dust mite via the epithelial release of GM-CSF and IL-33. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2012;209(8):1505-1517. DOI: 10.1084/jem.2011269
  117. 117. Murray PR, Rosenthal KS, Pfaller MA, editors. Medical Microbiology. 9th ed. Elsevier Inc., Philadelphia, PA. 2015. 89 p. ISBN: 9780323299565
  118. 118. Schnittger L, Florin-Christensen M. Introduction into parasitic protozoa. In: Florin-Christensen M, Schnittger L, editors. Parasitic Protozoa of Farm Animals and Pets. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2018. pp. 1-10 (Chapter 1). ISBN 978-3-319-70132-5
  119. 119. Melby PC, Stephens R, Dann SM. Host defenses to protozoa. In: Rich RR, Fleisher TA, Shearer WT, Schroeder HW, Frew AJ, Weyand CM, editors. Clinical Immunology. 5th ed. London: Elsevier; 2019. pp. 425-435.e1. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-7020-6896-6.00030-2
  120. 120. Kumar H, Kawai T, Akira S. Pathogen recognition by the innate immune system. International Reviews of Immunology. 2011;30(1):16-34. DOI: 10.3109/08830185.2010.529976
  121. 121. Li K, Qu S, Chen X, Wu Q, Shi M. Promising targets for cancer immunotherapy: TLRs, RLRs, and STING-mediated innate immune pathways. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2017;18(2):404. DOI: 10.3390/ijms18020404
  122. 122. Muñoz-Carrillo JL, Ortega-Martín Del Campo J, Gutiérrez-Coronado O, Villalobos-Gutiérrez PT, Contreras-Cordero JF, Ventura-Juárez J. Adipose tissue and inflammation. In: Szablewski L, editor. Adipose Tissue. London: InTech; 2018. pp. 93-121. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.74227
  123. 123. Bansal D, Ave P, Kerneis S, Frileux P, Boché O, Baglin AC, et al. An ex-vivo human intestinal model to study Entamoeba histolytica pathogenesis. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2009;3(11):e551. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000551
  124. 124. Galván-Moroyoqui JM, Del Carmen Domínguez-Robles M, Meza I. Pathogenic bacteria prime the induction of toll-like receptor signalling in human colonic cells by the Gal/GalNAc lectin carbohydrate recognition domain of Entamoeba histolytica. International Journal for Parasitology. 2011;41(10):1101-1112. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2011.06.003
  125. 125. Sierra-Puente RE, Campos-Rodríguez R, Jarillo-Luna RA, Muñoz-Fernández L, Rodríguez MG, Muñoz-Ortega MH, et al. Expression of immune modulator cytokines in human fulminant amoebic colitis. Parasite Immunology. 2009;31(7):384-391. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.2009.01118.x
  126. 126. Salata RA, Murray HW, Rubin BY, Ravdin JI. The role of gamma interferon in the generation of human macrophages cytotoxic for Entamoeba histolytica trophozoites. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 1987;37(1):72-78. DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.1987.37.72
  127. 127. Ghadirian E, Kongshavn PA. Activation of macrophages by Entamoeba histolytica extracts in mice. Microbial Pathogenesis. 1988;5(1):63-70. DOI: 10.1016/0882-4010(88)90082-4
  128. 128. Denis M, Chadee K. Human neutrophils activated by interferon-gamma and tumour necrosis factor-alpha kill Entamoeba histolytica trophozoites in vitro. Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 1989;46(3):270-274. DOI: 10.1002/jlb.46.3.270
  129. 129. Denis M, Chadee K. Cytokine activation of murine macrophages for in vitro killing of Entamoeba histolytica trophozoites. Infection and Immunity. 1989;57(6):1750-1756
  130. 130. Ghadirian E, Denis M. In vivo activation of macrophages by IFN-γ to kill Entamoeba histolytica trophozoites in vitro. Parasite Immunology. 1992;14(4):397-404. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.1992.tb00014.x
  131. 131. Lin JY, Chadee K. Macrophage cytotoxicity against Entamoeba histolytica trophozoites is mediated by nitric oxide from L-arginine. Journal of Immunology. 1992;148(12):3999-4005
  132. 132. Espinosa-Cantellano M, Martínez-Palomo A. Pathogenesis of intestinal amebiasis: From molecules to disease. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 2000;13(2):318-331. DOI: 10.1128/CMR.13.2.318-331.2000
  133. 133. Guo X, Barroso L, Becker SM, Lyerly DM, Vedvick TS, Reed SG, et al. Protection against intestinal amebiasis by a recombinant vaccine is transferable by T cells and mediated by gamma interferon. Infection and Immunity. 2009;77(9):3909-3918. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00487-09
  134. 134. Sánchez-Guillén Mdel C, Pérez-Fuentes R, Salgado-Rosas H, Ruiz-Argüelles A, Ackers J, Shire A, et al. Differentiation of Entamoeba histolytica/entamoeba dispar by PCR and their correlation with humoral and cellular immunity in individuals with clinical variants of amoebiasis. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2002;66(6):731-737
  135. 135. Bansal D, Sehgal R, Chawla Y, Malla N, Mahajan RC. Cytokine mRNA expressions in symptomatic vs. asymptomatic amoebiasis patients. Parasite Immunology. 2005;27(1-2):37-43. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.2005.00739.x
  136. 136. Seydel KB, Smith SJ, Stanley SL Jr. Innate immunity to amebic liver abscess is dependent on gamma interferon and nitric oxide in a murine model of disease. Infection and Immunity. 2000;68(1):400-402
  137. 137. Houpt ER, Glembocki DJ, Obrig TG, Moskaluk CA, Lockhart LA, Wright RL, et al. The mouse model of amebic colitis reveals mouse strain susceptibility to infection and exacerbation of disease by CD4+ T cells. Journal of Immunology. 2002;169(8):4496-4503. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.8.4496
  138. 138. Lin JY, Seguin R, Keller K, Chadee K. Transforming growth factor-beta 1 primes macrophages for enhanced expression of the nitric oxide synthase gene for nitric oxide-dependent cytotoxicity against Entamoeba histolytica. Immunology. 1995;85(3):400-407
  139. 139. Seydel KB, Li E, Swanson PE, Stanley SL Jr. Human intestinal epithelial cells produce proinflammatory cytokines in response to infection in a SCID mouse-human intestinal xenograft model of amebiasis. Infection and Immunity. 1997;65(5):1631-1639
  140. 140. Guo X, Stroup SE, Houpt E. Persistence of Entamoeba histolytica infection in CBA mice owes to intestinal IL-4 production and inhibition of protective IFN-gamma. Mucosal Immunology. 2008;1(2):139-146. DOI: 10.1038/mi.2007.1
  141. 141. Babu S, Nutman TB. Immune responses to helminth infection. In: Rich RR, Fleisher TA, Shearer WT, Schroeder HW, Frew AJ, Weyand CM, editors. Clinical Immunology. 5th ed. London: Elsevier; 2019. pp. 437-447.e1. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-7020-6896-6.00031-4
  142. 142. Maizels RM, Hewitson JP, Smith KA. Susceptibility and immunity to helminth parasites. Current Opinion in Immunology. 2012;24(4):459-466. DOI: 10.1016/j.coi.2012.06.003
  143. 143. Ilic N, Gruden-Movsesijan A, Sofronic-Milosavljevic L. Trichinella spiralis: Shaping the immune response. Immunologic Research. 2012;52(1-2):111-119. DOI: 10.1007/s12026-012-8287-5
  144. 144. Ashour DS. Trichinella spiralis immunomodulation: An interactive multifactorial process. Expert Review of Clinical Immunology. 2013;9(7):669-675. DOI: 10.1586/1744666X.2013.811187
  145. 145. Bruschi F, Chiumiento L. Immunomodulation in trichinellosis: Does Trichinella really escape the host immune system? Endocrine, Metabolic & Immune Disorders Drug Targets. 2012;12(1):4-15. DOI: 10.2174/187153012799279081
  146. 146. Cieza RJ, Cao AT, Cong Y, Torres AG. 2012. Immunomodulation for gastrointestinal infections. Expert Review of Anti-Infective Therapy. 2012;10(3):391-400. DOI: 10.1586/eri.11.176
  147. 147. Ilic N, Worthington JJ, Gruden-Movsesijan A, Travis MA, Sofronic-Milosavljevic L, Grencis RK. Trichinella spiralis antigens prime mixed Th1/Th2 response but do not induce de novo generation of Foxp3+ T cells in vitro. Parasite Immunology. 2011;33(10):572-582. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.2011.01322.x
  148. 148. Sofronic-Milosavljevic L, Ilic N, Pinelli E, Gruden-Movsesijan A. Secretory products of Trichinella spiralis muscle larvae and immunomodulation: Implication for autoimmune diseases, allergies, and malignancies. Journal of Immunology Research. 2015;2015:523875. DOI: 10.1155/2015/523875
  149. 149. Gruden-Movsesijan A, Ilic N, Colic M, Majstorovic I, Vasilev S, Radovic I, et al. The impact of Trichinella spiralis excretory-secretory products on dendritic cells. Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 2011;34(5):429-439. DOI: 10.1016/j.cimid.2011.08.004
  150. 150. Gentilini MV, Nuñez GG, Roux ME, Venturiello SM. Trichinella spiralis infection rapidly induces lung inflammatory response: The lung as the site of helminthocytotoxic activity. Immunobiology. 2011;216(9):1054-1063. DOI: 10.1016/j.imbio.2011.02.002
  151. 151. Yu YR, Deng MJ, Lu WW, Jia MZ, Wu W, Qi YF. Systemic cytokine profiles and splenic toll-like receptor expression during Trichinella spiralis infection. Experimental Parasitology. 2013;134(1):92-101. DOI: 10.1016/j.exppara.2013.02.014
  152. 152. Muñoz-Carrillo JL, Contreras-Cordero JF, Muñoz-López JL, Maldonado-Tapia CH, Muñoz-Escobedo JJ, Moreno-García MA. Resiniferatoxin modulates the Th1 immune response and protects the host during intestinal nematode infection. Parasite Immunology. 2017;39(9):1-16. DOI: 10.1111/pim.12448
  153. 153. Ilic N, Colic M, Gruden-Movsesijan A, Majstorovic I, Vasilev S, Sofronic-Milosavljevic LJ. Characterization of rat bone marrow dendritic cells initially primed by Trichinella spiralis antigens. Parasite Immunology. 2008;30(9):491-495. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.2008.01049.x
  154. 154. Ming L, Peng RY, Zhang L, Zhang CL, Lv P, Wang ZQ, et al. Invasion by Trichinella spiralis infective larvae affects the levels of inflammatory cytokines in intestinal epithelial cells in vitro. Experimental Parasitology. 2016;170:220-226. DOI: 10.1016/j.exppara.2016.10.003
  155. 155. Muñoz-Carrillo JL, Muñoz-Escobedo JJ, Maldonado-Tapia CH, Chávez-Ruvalcaba F, Moreno-García MA. Resiniferatoxin lowers TNF-α, NO and PGE2 in the intestinal phase and the parasite burden in the muscular phase of Trichinella spiralis infection. Parasite Immunology. 2017;39(1):1-14. DOI: 10.1111/pim.12393
  156. 156. Helmby H, Grencis RK. IFN-gamma-independent effects of IL-12 during intestinal nematode infection. Journal of Immunology. 2003;171(7):3691-3696. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.7.3691
  157. 157. Mühl H, Pfeilschifter J. Anti-inflammatory properties of pro-inflammatory interferon-gamma. International Immunopharmacology. 2003;3(9):1247-1255. DOI: 10.1016/S1567-5769(03)00131-0
  158. 158. Neumann B, Emmanuilidis K, Stadler M, Holzmann B. Distinct functions of interferon-gamma for chemokine expression in models of acute lung inflammation. Immunology. 1998;95(4):512-521. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2567.1998.00643.x
  159. 159. Roy A, Sawesi O, Pettersson U, Dagälv A, Kjellén L, Lundén A, et al. Serglycin proteoglycans limit enteropathy in Trichinella spiralis-infected mice. BMC Immunology. 2016;17(1):15. DOI: 10.1186/s12865-016-0155-y
  160. 160. Ierna MX, Scales HE, Müller C, Lawrence CE. 2009. Transmembrane tumor necrosis factor alpha is required for enteropathy and is sufficient to promote parasite expulsion in gastrointestinal helminth infection. Infection and Immunity. 2009;77(9):3879-3885. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.01461-08
  161. 161. Lawrence CE, Paterson J, Higgins LM, MacDonald TT, Kennedy MW, Garside P. IL-4-regulated enteropathy in an intestinal nematode infection. European Journal of Immunology. 1998;28(9):2672-2684. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199809)28:09<2672::AID-IMMU2672>3.0.CO;2-F
  162. 162. Ierna MX, Scales HE, Saunders KL, Lawrence CE. Mast cell production of IL-4 and TNF may be required for protective and pathological responses in gastrointestinal helminth infection. Mucosal Immunology. 2008;1(2):147-155. DOI: 10.1038/mi.2007.16
  163. 163. Bogdan C. Nitric oxide and the immune response. Nature Immunology. 2001;2(10):907-916. DOI: 10.1038/ni1001-907
  164. 164. Guzik TJ, Korbut R, Adamek-Guzik T. Nitric oxide and superoxide in inflammation and immune regulation. Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology. 2003;54(4):469-487
  165. 165. Wink DA, Hines HB, Cheng RYS, Switzer CH, Flores-Santana W, Vitek MP, et al. Nitric oxide and redox mechanisms in the immune response. Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 2011;89(6):873-891. DOI: 10.1189/jlb.1010550
  166. 166. Andrade MA, Siles-Lucas M, López-Abán J, Nogal-Ruiz JJ, Pérez-Arellano JL, Martínez-Fernández AR, et al. Trichinella: Differing effects of antigens from encapsulated and non-encapsulated species on in vitro nitric oxide production. Veterinary Parasitology. 2007;143(1):86-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.07.026
  167. 167. Moncada S, Erusalimsky JD. Does nitric oxide modulate mitochondrial energy generation and apoptosis? Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology. 2002;3(3):214-220. DOI: 10.1038/nrm762
  168. 168. Lawrence CE, Paterson JC, Wei XQ, Liew FY, Garside P, Kennedy MW. Nitric oxide mediates intestinal pathology but not immune expulsion during Trichinella spiralis infection in mice. Journal of Immunology. 2000;164(8):4229-4234. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.8.4229
  169. 169. Cvetkovic J, Sofronic-Milosavljevic L, Ilic N, Gnjatovic M, Nagano I, Gruden-Movsesijan A. Immunomodulatory potential of particular Trichinella spiralis muscle larvae excretory-secretory components. International Journal for Parasitology. 2016;46(13-14):833-842. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2016.07.008
  170. 170. Ding J, Bai X, Wang X, Shi H, Cai X, Luo X, et al. Immune cell responses and cytokine profile in intestines of mice infected with Trichinella spiralis. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2017;8:2069. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02069
  171. 171. Helmby H, Grencis RK. Contrasting roles for IL-10 in protective immunity to different life cycle stages of intestinal nematode parasites. European Journal of Immunology. 2003;33(9):2382-2390. DOI: 10.1002/eji.200324082
  172. 172. Urban JF, Schopf L, Morris SC, Orekhova T, Madden KB, Betts CJ, et al. Stat6 signaling promotes protective immunity against Trichinella spiralis through a mast cell-and T cell-dependent mechanism. Journal of Immunology. 2000;164(4):2046-2052. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.4.2046
  173. 173. Akiho H, Blennerhassett P, Deng Y, Collins SM. Role of IL-4, IL-13, and STAT6 in inflammation-induced hypercontractility of murine smooth muscle cells. American Journal of Physiology. Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. 2002;282(2):G226-G232. DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.2002.282.2.G226
  174. 174. Scales HE, Ierna MX, Lawrence CE. The role of IL-4, IL-13 and IL-4Ralpha in the development of protective and pathological responses to Trichinella spiralis. Parasite Immunology. 2007;29(2):81-91. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.2006.00920.x
  175. 175. Gurish MF, Bryce PJ, Tao H, Kisselgof AB, Thornton EM, Miller HR, et al. IgE enhances parasite clearance and regulates mast cell responses in mice infected with Trichinella spiralis. Journal of Immunology. 2004;172(2):1139-1145. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.2.1139
  176. 176. Yasuda K, Nakanishi K. Host responses to intestinal nematodes. International Immunology. 2018;30(3):93-102. DOI: 10.1093/intimm/dxy002
  177. 177. Wang LJ, Cao Y, Shi HN. Helminth infections and intestinal inflammation. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2008;14:5125-5132
  178. 178. Muñoz-Carrillo JL, Muñoz-López JL, Muñoz-Escobedo JJ, Maldonado-Tapia C, Gutiérrez-Coronado O, Contreras-Cordero JF, et al. Therapeutic effects of resiniferatoxin related with immunological responses for intestinal inflammation in trichinellosis. The Korean Journal of Parasitology. 2017;55(6):587-599. DOI: 10.3347/kjp.2017.55.6.587

Written By

José Luis Muñoz-Carrillo, Juan Francisco Contreras-Cordero, Oscar Gutiérrez-Coronado, Paola Trinidad Villalobos-Gutiérrez, Luis Guillermo Ramos-Gracia and Viridiana Elizabeth Hernández-Reyes

Submitted: 10 April 2018 Reviewed: 10 August 2018 Published: 05 November 2018