Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Exploration of Earthworms of India through Online Digital Library

Written By

Samrendra Singh Thakur and Shweta Yadav

Reviewed: 19 February 2018 Published: 27 June 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.75666

From the Edited Volume

Earthworms - The Ecological Engineers of Soil

Edited by Sajal Ray

Chapter metrics overview

1,313 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Online digital library (http://earthwormsofindia.com) for identification of earthworms of India has been developed for the first time. The database comprises digital keys for identification of earthworms of India, diagnostics, and mathematical parameters to provide a useful supplement for traditional morphological taxonomists and nonexperts in this area. This will scientifically broaden the taxonomic coverage of Indian earthworms. The genomic signatures with short sequences from standardized regions of the genome for 1192 specimens of earthworms were generated. Earlier, species identification of adult earthworms was possible only by dissection of the anterior end. However, this method is labor intensive, time-consuming, and very difficult for nonspecialists, particularly when dealing with field collections consisting of several different earthworm species. Furthermore, identification is limited to adult worms, as most life stages are unidentifiable and many morphological and anatomical characteristics of earthworms are variable, consequently, and the degree of variability can differ and features can overlap the taxa. The present work appears pioneer endeavor in this direction, as there appears no work available on the digitization of earthworms of India.

Keywords

  • identification key
  • earthworms of India
  • diagnostics of earthworms of India
  • computational key to identify earthworms
  • genomic signature
  • coi-1

1. Introduction

The scientific exploration of earthworm’s diversity in India dates back to the nineteenth century. The credit for naming the first earthworm species in the Indian subcontinent goes to Templeton [1], when he discovered Megascolex coeruleus from Sri Lanka. However, Perrier [2] was the first to describe earthworm species from the Indian mainland. The significant contributions on the taxonomy of Indian earthworm are of Bourne [3], Beddard [4], Michaelsen [5, 6], Stephenson [7, 8, 9, 10], Aiyer [11], Gates [12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20], Jamieson [21], Julka [22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27] and Julka and Paliwal [28, 29, 30] Paliwal and Julka [31], Verma et al., [32] have provided comprehensive checklists for earthworms of different regions of India. The earthworm fauna of India is well reported as compared to other Asian Countries (excluding Myanmar).

Advertisement

2. Database of earthworms of India

Presently, 451 valid species/subspecies of earthworms under 71 genera are known from the Indian territory, including the islands of Andaman, Nicobar and Lakshadweep which have reported 9 families described in Table 1 (as per Brinkhurst and Jamieson’s classification of Oligochaeta, and Gates [33] classification of Megascolecidae), Endemism, both at genera and species level, is very high; about 71% of genera and 89% of species are endemic. Some exotic peregrine species of earthworms are also found, and these are now widespread in disturbed habitats following deforestation and intensive cultivation practices.

Sl No.FamilyGenus (No)Species (No)*
1.Acanthodrilidae0343
2.Almidae025
3.Eudrilidae011
4.Lumbricidae0916
5.Megascolecidae14149
6.Moniligastridae0385
7.Ocnerodrilidae0817
8.Octochaetidae30134
9.Rhinodrilidae011
Total families: 971451

Table 1.

Families of earthworms of India with genera and number of species.

Species incertae sedis: 8.


Advertisement

3. Earthworm diversity in India

India is located 8.4–37.6°N latitude with covered area 3,287,797 km2 and is rich country as far as its biodiversity is concerned. Considering the past geological history of the Indian subcontinent excluding (Burma, Nepal, and Pakistan) has been divided into six well-defined physiographic regions depending upon topography, climate, and vegetation viz. Western Himalayas, Eastern Himalayas, and Northeast ranges, Indo-Gangetic Plains, Central high lands, Peninsular plateaus, and Western Ghats including Sahyadri and Nilgiri hills (Table 2).

FamilyGenusNumber of valid species
AcanthodrilidaeMicroscolex1
Plutellus41
Pontodrilus1
Total43
AlmidaeProgizzardus1
Glyphidrilus4
Total5
EudrilidaeEudrilus1
Total1
LumbricidaeAllolobophoridella1
Aporrectodea3
Bimastos1
Dendrobaena2
Dendrodrilus1
Eisenia2
Eiseniella1
Lumbricus3
Octolasion2
Total16
MegascolecidaeAmynthas13
Comarodrilus1
Kanchuria4
Lampito8
Megascolex33
Metaphire10
Nelloscolex2
Notoscolex10
Perionyx56
Pheretima1
Pithemera1
Polypheretima2
Tonoscolex7
Troyia1
Total149
MoniligastridaeDesmogaster1
Drawida73
Moniligaster11
Total85
OcnerodrilidaeCurgiona1
Deccania1
Eukerria1
Gordiodrilus2
Malabaria5
Nematogenia1
Ocnerodrilus1
Thatonia5
Total17
OctochaetidaeBahlia1
Barogaster3
Calebiella1
Celeriella7
Chaetocotoides1
Dashiella1
Dichogaster5
Eudichogaster6
Eutyphoeus23
Herbettodrilus1
Hoplochaetella19
Karmiella2
Konkadrilus6
Kotegeharia1
Lennogaster7
Mallehulla1
Octochaetoides1
Octochaetona15
Octonochaeta1
Parryodrilus1
Pellogaster3
Priodochaeta1
Priodoscolex1
Ramiella5
Rillogaster2
Scolioscolides1
Senapatiella3
Shimodrilus2
Travoscolides3
Wahoscolex10
Total134
RhinodrilidaePontoscolex1
Total1

Table 2.

Earthworms of India with valid number of species.

Advertisement

4. Diagnostics of families of earthworms of India

Earthworms of India belong to 9 families that may be identified with the following key:

1Inconspicuous male pores2
Conspicuous male pores3
2Clitellum flared into wings; zygolobic prostomium; setae in regular rows bodyAlmidae
Clitellum not flared; irregular arrangement of setae in caudal segmentsRhinodrilidae
3Male pores in front of segment 154
Male pores behind segment 155
4Male pores at segment 13 or 15Lumbricidae
Male pores at intersegment grove 10/11Moniligasteridae
5Without dorsal pores6
With dorsal pores7
6Thin whitish worms, female pore tiny close to mid-ventral lines or at b lines on segment 14Ocnerodrilidae
Robust, dark-colored, female pore large slits close to lateral margins of segment 14, Male Pore on 17Eudrilidae
7Prostate tubular, holonephricAcanthodrilidae
Prostate tubular, meronephricOctochaetidae
Prostate racemose, meronephricMegascolecidae

Advertisement

5. Databases and genus characteristics of earthworms of India

The characteristic features of each genus with available known species and their type locality are described in the library.

5.1. Family: Acanthodrilidae

5.1.1. Microscolex phosphorus (Duges, 1837)

  • Male pores minute between apertures of a and b follicles at eq/xvii.

  • Female pore at or slightly median to a, about halfway between xiii and xiv.

  • Lumbricine, widely paired setae.

  • Spermathecae one pair, diverticulate.

  • Size 10–35 mm.

  • Single species recorded in India.

  • Type locality is Montpellier, France.

5.1.2. Plutellus Perrier, 1873

  • Male pores in xviii, xix, or xx.

  • Three pairs of kidney-shaped extramural calciferous glands.

  • Dorsal pores present behind clitellum.

  • Intestinal origin xiv, xv, xvi, xvii, or xviii.

  • Spermathecae 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, or 7 pairs in some or all of vi–xii.

  • 41 species recorded from India.

5.1.3. Pontodrilus litoralis (Grube, 1855)

  • Male pores in xviii, biprostatic

  • Female pores in xiv.

  • Spermathecal pores at vii/viii/ix.

  • Genital markings oval unpaired, median usually in xi/xx, and sometimes in xii/xiii/xiv.

  • Prostate tubular.

  • Spermathecae paired in vii and ix with club-shaped diverticulum.

  • Without typhlosole, calciferous, and supra-intestinal gland.

  • Known to occur in mud with large content of organic matter and salt on seashores and margins of estuaries and brackish water lakes.

  • Single species recorded in India.

  • Type locality is French Riviera.

5.2. Family: Almidae

5.2.1. Glyphidrilus Horst, 1889

  • Male pore Inconspicuous (not clearly visible), difficult to recognize and intraclitellar behind segment xvi.

  • Lumbricine

  • Clitellum annular and laterally flared into wings.

  • Seminal vesicles in ix–xii.

  • Four species recorded in India.

5.2.2. Progizzardus varadiamensis (Nair, 2010)

  • Male pore in xiii segment.

  • Lumbricine

  • Four pair seminal vesicle.

  • Multiple Spermathecae (4-5) and adiverticulate.

  • Presence of genital markings in xxi–xxvi.

  • Single species recorded in India.

  • Type locality is Varadiam, Thrissur dist., Kerala, India.

5.3. Family: Eudrilidae

5.3.1. Eudrilus eugeniae (Kinberg, 1867)

  • Male pores minute paired on segment xvii, penes retractable copulatory chamber.

  • Female pores paired, large transverse slits, close to sides of the body on segment xiv.

  • Lumbricine closely paired.

  • Color reddish to purple or dark purplish.

  • Y-shaped gland present that opens through own porophore into the copulatory chamber.

  • Dorsal pores absent.

  • Only one species found in India.

  • Type locality is St. Helena Island, South Atlantic.

5.4. Family: Lumbricidae

5.4.1. Allolobophoridella eiseni (Levinsen, 1884)

  • Male pores in xv.

  • Male tumescences confined to median half of bc.

  • Female pores in xiv, slightly lateral to b.

  • Holandric, seminal vesicles in xi, xii.

  • Tubercula pubertatis and TP glands absent.

  • Single species recorded in India.

  • Type locality is Deer Garden, Copenhagen.

5.4.2. Aporrectodea (Orley, 1885)

  • Male pore inconspicuous and transverse slits on usually much elevated glandular area, which occupy xiv–xvi.

  • Prostomium epilobic.

  • Spermathecal pore at most three pairs or pairs of groups in cd.

  • Seminal vesicles four pairs in ix–xii.

  • Tubercula pubertatis absent.

  • Three species recorded in India.

5.4.3. Bimastos parvus (Eisen, 1874)

  • Color reddish.

  • Length 23–46 mm.

  • Lumbricine.

  • Clitellum saddle-shaped segments xxiv–xxx.

  • Tubercula pubertatis absent.

  • Male pores on segment xv.

  • Single species recorded in India.

  • Type locality is Mount Lebanon, New York-New England, USA.

5.4.4. Dendrobaena Eisen, 1874

  • Male pores at the bottom of equatorial clefts at or bear mbc. Male tumescences (swellings) large protuberant confined to xv and bc but often slightly dislocating xiv/xv and xv/xvi.

  • Female pores at xiv just lateral to b.

  • Tubercula pubertatis longitudinal bands of translucence slightly depressed just lateral to b in xxxi–xxxiii.

  • Spermathecal pores in cd.

  • Color dark red to slate.

  • Size 20–60 mm.

  • Two species recorded in India.

5.4.5. Dendrodrilus rubidus (Savigny, 1826)

  • Male pores in xv between bc.

  • Spermathecal pores ix/x/xi.

  • Clitellum covers six segments in xxvii–xxxi.

  • Tubercula pubertatis xxviii–xxx or only xxix–xxx.

  • Genital tumescence surrounds setae ab in xvi, ix, xvii, xxii–xxv, and xxx.

  • Dark red, pale ventrally.

  • Size 20–100 mm.

  • Single species recorded in India.

  • Type locality is Paris, France.

5.4.6. Eisenia Gates, 1968

  • Distinctive striped appearance because of alternating segmental bands of red and yellow color along the entire length of the body.

  • Male pore on segment xv.

  • Clitellum covering from segment xxvi to segment xxxii.

  • Tubercula pubertatis on segment xxviii–xxx.

  • Spermathecal pore two pairs, close to together on the upper side, in intersegment furrow ix/x, and x/xi.

  • Two species recorded in India.

5.4.7. Eiseniella tetraedra (Savigny, 1826)

  • Male pores in xv at or somewhat below c, each at the lateral end of a deep

  • transverse cleft.

  • Tubercula pubertatis longitudinally band like, uninterrupted by intersegment furrows.

  • Color reddish brown with golden tinge.

  • Single species recorded in India.

  • Type locality is Paris, France.

5.4.8. Lumbricus Beddard, 1895

  • Dark pigmented.

  • Male pore inconspicuous and without glandular area.

  • Spermathecal pore of two pairs in ix/x and x/xi in cd.

  • Seminal vesicles of three pairs in ix, xi, and xii.

  • Three species recorded in India.

5.4.9. Octolasion (Oerley, 1885)

  • Male pores with large glandular area which encroach xiv and xvi.

  • Female pore just lateral to b at eq/xiv.

  • Tubercula pubertatis fused to form wall.

  • Spermathecal pore two pairs in ix/x or x/xi in the region of cd.

  • Four pairs of seminal vesicles in ix–xii.

  • Two species recorded in India.

5.5. Family: Megascolecidae

5.5.1. Amynthas Kinberg, 1867

  • Male pore paired in xviii (rarely xix) discharging directly onto the surface.

  • Female pore single rarely paired on xiv.

  • Spermathecal pores paired (bithecal), occasionally numerous, or single between iv/v and viii/ix.

  • Prostate racemose.

  • Copulatory pouches absent.

  • Spermathecae usually paired, rarely multiple or single.

  • Thirteen species recorded in India.

5.5.2. Comarodrilus gravely Stephenson, 1915

  • Male pores on small conical papillae, which touch each other in the middle line.

  • Spermathecal pores unpaired and at the median in vii/viii and viii/ix.

  • Clitellum xiv–xvii (four segments).

  • Gizzard in v.

  • Prostate a compact glandular mass (racemose).

  • Penial setae absent.

  • Length 92 mm.

  • Color gray.

  • Single species recorded in India.

  • Type locality is Thrissur, Kerala, India.

5.5.3. Kanchuria Julka, 1988

  • Male pores paired in xviii.

  • Megameronephridia absent.

  • Four species recorded in India.

5.5.4. Lampito Michaelsen, 1909

  • Male pores in xviii (combined with prostatic pores).

  • Female pore in xiv.

  • Spermathecae bidiverticulate with two small digitiform diverticula arising from lateral and median faces of the duct.

  • Intestinal caeca and supra-intestinal glands absent.

  • Meronephric: one pair enteronephric meganephridia with preseptal funnels from the region of xx.

  • Eight species recorded in India.

5.5.5. Megascolex Beddard, 1895

  • Male pores in xviii.

  • Female pore in xiv.

  • Spermathecal pores 1–5 pairs between segments iv and ix, lateral to mid-ventral.

  • Penial setae present.

  • Thirty-three species recorded in India.

5.5.6. Metaphire Sims and Easton, 1972

  • Male pores (combined with prostatic pores paired) within copulatory pouches on xviii rarely on xix or xx.

  • Female pore single rarely paired in xiv.

  • Clitellum annular xiv–xvi.

  • Spermathecal pores usually large transverse slits, rarely small paired, occasionally single or multiple between iv/v and ix/x.

  • Meronephric, nephridia absent from the spermathecal ducts.

  • Prostate gland racemose.

  • Metaphire is different from Amynthas by the presence of copulatory pouches and differs from Pheretima by the absence of nephridia from the spermathecal ducts.

  • Ten species recorded in India.

5.5.7. Nelloscolex Gates, 1939

  • Male pores in seminal grooves confined to xvii.

  • Female pores anteromedian to a in xiii.

  • Calciferous glands unstalked and not constricted off from the esophagus.

  • Calciferous lamellae within lateral swellings of esophagus in viii–xii.

  • Dorsal pores present from region viii/ix–ix/x.

  • Pigment lacking.

  • Prostate strap-shaped.

  • Spermathecal pores paired lateral to mid-ventral.

  • Two species recorded in India.

5.5.8. Notoscolex Michaelsen, 1907

  • Male pores in xviii.

  • Spermathecal pores 1, 2, or 3 pairs, the last in viii/ix, lateral to mid-ventral.

  • Very close to Megascolex only difference is arrangement of setae.

  • Ten species recorded in India.

5.5.9. Perionyx Perrier, 1872

  • Male pores (combined with prostatic pores) paired on xviii.

  • Female pore intraclitellar and median.

  • Spermathecal pores paired, lateral to mid-ventral.

  • Dorsally pigmented reddish to blackish, ventrally nonpigmented.

  • Holonephric: nephridia with preseptal funnels and postseptal loops that open in their own segments to the exterior through epidermal apertures.

  • Typhlosole, intestinal and supra-intestinal glands absent.

  • Ovaries are fan-shaped with several egg strings.

  • Fifty-six species recorded in India.

5.5.10. Pheretima darnleiensis (Fletcher, 1886)

  • Male pores paired within copulatory pouches in xviii.

  • Gizzard present between vii/viii and ix/x.

  • Copulatory pouches present often with secretory diverticulate.

  • Meronephric, nephridia always present on spermathecal ducts.

  • Single species recorded in India.

  • Type locality is Darnley Island, Torres Strait, Australia

5.5.11. Pithemera bicincta (Perrier, 1875)

  • Male pores paired in xviii small on a porophore.

  • Preclitellar genital markings absent.

  • Postclitellar genital markings present or absent when present paired on xviii or xviii/xix.

  • Spermathecal pore five pairs in iv/v/vi/vii/viii/ix.

  • Spermathecae present or absent when present five pairs in vi–x with a duct as long as the ampulla, diverticulum usually shorter than duct, and ampulla combined.

  • Single species recorded in India.

5.5.12. Polypheretima Michaelsen, 1934

  • Male pores on circular porophores in xviii.

  • Perichaetine, setae never excessively crowded ventrally, creeping sole absent.

  • Crescentric genital markings absent.

  • First dorsal pore between iv/v and xii/xiii.

  • Two species recorded in India.

5.5.13. Tonoscolex Gates, 1933

  • Male pores in xvii and in seminal grooves that extend into another segment.

  • Quadrithecal pores at vi/vii–vii/viii.

  • Gizzzard in vi.

  • Discrete calciferous glands stalked in viii–xii, ix–xii, x–xii.

  • Intestinal caeca and supra-intestinal glands absent.

  • Meroic, V-shaped, exoic micronephridia on parietes from iv and especially numerous in clitella segments.

  • Prostate strap-shaped extending through several segments, duct short, soft, and joined entally by the sperm duct.

  • Spermathecae each with a diverticulum shorter than the main axis.

  • Seven species recorded in India.

5.5.14. Troyia gundarshola Jamieson, 1977

  • Male pores in ab near a of xviii relative to adjacent segments each with wide tumid lips, which constitute papillae.

  • Single pair of the tubular racemose prostate in xviii.

  • Three pairs extramural calciferous glands in xiii, xiv, and xv.

  • Intestine begins in xvi.

  • Meronephric, enteronephric tufts in v, caudally with numerous preseptal nephrostomal funnels on each side in each segment corresponding with post septal exonephric avesiculate micromeronephridia.

  • Megameronephridia absent.

  • Spermathecae one pair in viii with single elevate diverticulum.

  • Single species recorded in India.

  • Type locality is Gundar Shola, Palni Hills, Tamil Nadu, India.

5.6. Family: Moniligastridae

5.6.1. Desmogaster farina Gates, 1943

  • Two pairs of male pores xi/xii and xii/xiii.

  • Female pores at or just lateral to b and at or slightly behind xiii/xiv.

  • Spermathecae adiverticulate.

  • Single species recorded in India.

  • Type locality in Tingpai, Myitkyina district, Myanmar.

5.6.2. Drawida Michaelsen, 1900

  • Male pores at or near x/xi.

  • Female pores at or just behind xi/xii.

  • Spermathecal pores at vii/viii.

  • Spermathecae without a stalked glandular mass in the association.

  • Seventy-one species recorded in India.

5.6.3. Moniligaster Perrier, 1872

  • Male pores in x/xi.

  • Spermathecae with a bifid muscular atrial chamber, each horn of which bears a lobulated glandular mass.

  • 11 species recorded in India.

5.7. Family: Ocnerodrilidae

5.7.1. Curgiona narayani (Michaelsen, 1921)

  • Male pores in papillae just behind eq/xvii.

  • Copulatory chambers in xvii into which sperm duct open.

  • Gizzard in vii and ventromedian calciferous gland in ix and x.

  • Single species recorded in India.

  • Type locality is River Hatti at Madapur, Coorg, S. India, and is endemic.

5.7.2. Deccania alba Gates, 1949

  • Male pores paired minute in seminal grooves on xviii near a.

  • Prostatic pores paired, minute at the ends of seminal grooves on xvii and xix in

  • Spermathecal pores paired inconspicuous in vii/viii/ix at b.

  • Genital markings paired usually presetal on xx–xxi at ab sometimes on ix, x, xiv, and xv at bc or ab.

  • Clitellum saddle-shaped.

  • Length 47–66 mm.

  • Single species recorded in India.

  • Type locality is Baraila (near Jabalpur), MP, India, and is endemic.

5.7.3. Eukerria kukenthali (Michaelsen, 1908)

  • Male pores in xvii.

  • Quadrithecal pores at mAB, at vii/viii–viii/ix.

  • Calciferous glands one pair in ix with a small central lumen a triangular in section.

  • A solid “clear gland” with short stalk protrusible from each prostate-pore invagiation.

  • Single species recoded in India.

  • Type locality is Thomas Isl., West Indies.

5.7.4. Gordiodrilus Beddard, 1895

  • Male pores and prostatic pores approximated xvii/xviii.

  • Spermathecae without diverticulate on the duct, often with evaginations at the ectal end of the ampulla.

  • Two species recorded in India.

5.7.5. Malabaria Gates, 1942

  • Male and prostatic pores in xvii.

  • Holonephric, large nephridia.

  • Dorsal pores and pigment lacking.

  • Five species recorded in India.

5.7.6. Nematogenia panamaensis (Eisen, 1900)

  • Male pores in xvii.

  • Seminal vesicles in xii, large.

  • Paired calciferous glands in ix, each with the fairly thick wall (n large canal) and a central, vertically slit like lumen, a long and slender stalk bound in a U-loop against the esophagus.

  • Single species recorded in India.

  • Type locality is Panama.

5.7.7. Ocnerodrilus occidentalis Eisen, 1878

  • Male pores in xvii.

  • Prostomium epilobic, tongue usually open but may be closed, or even unrecognizable.

  • Single species recorded in India.

  • Type locality is Fresno, California, USA.

5.7.8. Thatonia Gates, 1942

  • Male pores in xviii.

  • Gizzard in vii, a dendritically branched system of spaces (opening into gut lumen) in the thickened ventral wall of esophagus in ix–x.

  • Holonephric, avesiculate, and ducts passing parietes to b.

  • Five species recorded in India.

5.8. Family: Octochaetidae

5.8.1. Bahlia albida Gates, 1945

  • Male and prostatic pores paired in seminal grooves on xvii.

  • Two pairs of discrete intramural calciferous glands in xi–xiii.

  • Genital markings unpaired and median with two central translucent areas, post setal on xviii–xix, sometimes on xvi, xx, and xxi at aa or bb.

  • Type locality is found in Allahabad, UP, India, and is endemic.

5.8.2. Barogaster Gates, 1939

  • Combined male and prostatic pores paired with xviii, seminal grooves absent.

  • Typhlosole lamelliform simple and “grid-like” thickening present at the posterior end of typhlosole.

  • Genital markings present.

  • Three species recorded in India.

5.8.3. Calebiella parva Gates, 1945

  • Male pores paired in seminal grooves on xviii.

  • Prostatic pores paired at the end of seminal grooves on xvii and xix.

  • Typhlosole lamelliform, bifid ventrally at the anterior portion.

  • Single species recorded from Partapgarh, UP, India, and is endemic.

5.8.4. Celeriella Gates, 1958

  • Combined male and prostatic pores paired, on xviii.

  • Intestinal caecae, supra-intestinal glands, and typhlosole absent.

  • Prostates paired in xviii, extending posteriorly through several segments, and vasa deferential on each side join the prostatic duct entally.

  • Seven species recorded from India.

5.8.5. Chaetocotoides montanus (Stephenson, 1920)

  • Male pores paired in seminal grooves on xviii, prostatic pores paired at the ends of seminal grooves on xvii, and xix.

  • One pair of discrete extramural calciferous gland present. Each gland bilobed, one lobe in xv and other in xvi, opening into gut in xv slightly anterior to septum xv/xvi.

  • Single species found in India.

  • Type locality is Panchgani, W. Ghats and Maharashtra, India, and is endemic.

5.8.6. Dashiella khandalaensis Julka, 1988

  • Combined male and prostatic pores paired on xvii; seminal grooves absent.

  • Genital markings are circular to oval, paired, and presetal on xvi and xvii at ab.

  • Spermathecal pores in paired batteries of 1-4 (polythecal) on vi/vii/viii

  • Single species found in India.

  • Type locality is Khandala, W Ghats, Maharashtra, India, and is endemic.

5.8.7. Dichogaster Beddard, 1888

  • Male pores paired in seminal grooves on xviii or xvii/xviii; prostatic pores two pairs at the ends of seminal grooves.

  • esophagus with two gizzards anterior to septum viii/ix.

  • Each calciferous gland trilobed, a vertically reniform lobe in each of segments xv–xvii with a common duct opening into gut in xvi.

  • Five species recorded in India.

5.8.8. Eudichogaster Michaelsen, 1902

  • Male pores paired in seminal grooves on xviii; prostatic pores paired at the end of seminal grooves on xvii and xix.

  • Two pairs of discrete extramural calciferous glands in xi–xii.

  • Six species recorded in India.

5.8.9. Eutyphoeus Michaelsen, 1900

  • Male pore paired just posterior to prostatic pores on xvii; seminal grooves absent.

  • Prostatic and male pore paired near the setal arc of xvii, discharging within vestibula or directly into the body surface.

  • Typhlosole lamelliform, ending posteriorly with a short series of supra-intestinal glands.

  • 23 species recorded in India.

5.8.10. Herbettodrilus bahli Julka, 2004

  • Male pores paired in seminal grooves on xviii.

  • Prostatic pores paired at ends of seminal grooves on xvii and xix.

  • One pair of discrete, extramural calciferous glands, each gland bilobed, one lobe in xv and the other in xvi, both discharging into gut through a common duct in xv close to attachment of septum xiv/xv.

  • Micromeronephridia astomate, enteronephric paired tufts in iii, few scattered on body wall in xiv and posteriad segments; paired, stomate, enteronephric megameronephridia in xv and posteriad segments, discharging into rectum through paired excretory canals.

  • Single species recorded in India.

  • Type locality is Herbettu, Shimoga dist., Karnataka, India, and is endemic.

5.8.11. Hoplochaetella Michaelsen, 1900

  • Combined male and prostatic pores two pairs on xvii or xvii/xviii and xix or xviii/xix, seminal grooves absent.

  • Genital markings present or absent when present with or without central apertures.

  • 19 species recorded in India.

5.8.12. Karmiella Julka, 1983

  • Male pores paired, in seminal grooves, on xviii; prostatic pores paired at the end of seminal grooves, on xvii and xix.

  • Stomate megameronephridia present at least in caudal segments; micromeronephridia astomate throughout the body.

  • Calciferous gland one pair, each gland bilobed one lobe in xv and the other in xvi.

  • Two species recorded in India.

5.8.13. Konkadrilus Julka, 1988

  • Male pores paired in seminal grooves on xviii; prostatic pores paired at the end of seminal grooves on xvii and xix.

  • Discrete calciferous glands, intestinal caeca, and supra-intestinal glands absent.

  • Spermathecae paired in viii and ix.

  • Six species recorded in India.

5.8.14. Kotegeharia gatesi Julka, 1988

  • Male pores paired, in seminal grooves on xviii; prostatic pores paired at the end of seminal grooves on xvii and xix.

  • Single species recorded in India.

  • Type locality is Kotegehar, Karnataka, India, and is endemic.

5.8.15. Lennogaster Gates, 1939

  • Male pores paired in seminal grooves on xviii or xvii/xviii; prostatic pores two pairs at the end of seminal grooves on xvii and xix or one pair in xvii.

  • Three pairs discrete extramural calciferous glands in x–xii.

  • Paired stomata mega-meronephridia in caudal segments.

  • Seven species recorded in India.

5.8.16. Mallehulla indica Julka and Rao, 1982

  • Male pores paired in seminal grooves on xviii; prostatic pores paired at the end of seminal grooves on xvii and xix.

  • Prostate paired in xvii and xix extending posteriorly to two segments.

  • Single species recorded in India.

  • Type locality is Moodabidri, Karnataka, India, and is endemic.

5.8.17. Octochaetoides aitkeni (Fedarb, 1898)

  • Male pores paired on xviii in seminal grooves, prostatic pores paired at the end of seminal grooves, on xvii and xix.

  • Spermathecal pores paired in viii and ix, each with a tubular diverticulum arising from about the middle of the duct.

  • Single species recorded in India.

  • Type locality is Travancore, Kerala, India, and is endemic.

5.8.18. Octochaetona Michaelsen, 1922

  • Male pores paired on xviii in seminal grooves, prostatic pores paired at the ends of seminal grooves on xvii and xix.

  • Esophagus with a single gizzard in vi or in a space between septa iv/v and vii/viii or viii/ix or ix/x.

  • One pair discrete extramural asymmetrical calciferous glands opening into gut close to the attachment of septum v/vi.

  • Prostate paired in xvii and xix extending posteriorly to a few segments.

  • Fifteen species recorded in India.

5.8.19. Octonochaeta rosea (Stephenson, 1926)

  • Male pores paired in seminal grooves on xviii, prostatic pores paired at the end of seminal grooves on xvii and xix.

  • Esophagus with a single gizzard in a space between septa iv/v and vii/viii and one pair of discrete extramural calciferous glands.

  • Single species recorded in India.

  • Type locality is Secunderabad, AP, India, and is endemic.

5.8.20. Octonochaeta rosea (Stephenson, 1926)

  • Male pores paired in seminal grooves on xviii, prostatic pores paired at the end of seminal grooves on xvii and xix.

  • Single species recorded in India.

  • Type locality is Secunderabad, AP, India, and is endemic.

5.8.21. Parryodrilus lavellei Julka, 1997

  • Male pores (combined male and prostatic pores) paired, large slits in line with b discharging directly on the body surface of xviii, at lateral ends of transverse furrow across a tumescent male field extending laterally to mid bc.

  • Single species recorded in India.

  • Type locality in Nilambur, Malappuram dist., Kerala, India, and endemic.

5.8.22. Pellogaster Gates, 1939

  • Male pores paired in seminal grooves on xviii, prostatic pores paired at the end of seminal grooves on xvii and xix.

  • Prostate two pairs in xvii and xix.

  • Three species recorded in India.

5.8.23. Priodochaeta pellucida (Bourne, 1894)

  • Combined male and prostatic pores on xviii.

  • Esophagus with single large gizzard in v.

  • Single species recorded in India.

  • Type locality is Coonoor, Nilgiri Hills, South India, and is endemic.

5.8.24. Priodoscolex montanus Gates, 1940

  • Combined male and prostatic pores on xviii.

  • Three pairs extramural calciferous glands in xiv–xvi.

  • Single species recorded in India.

  • Type locality is Coonoor, Nilgiri Hills, South India, and is endemic.

5.8.25. Ramiella Stepheson, 1921

  • Male pores paired in seminal grooves on xviii; prostatic pores paired at the end of seminal grooves on xvii and xix.

  • Esophagus with a single gizzard in v or vi and calciferous lamellae in viii–xi.

  • Discrete calciferous glands and supra-intestinal glands absent.

  • Genital markings usually present.

  • Five species recorded in India.

5.8.26. Rillogaster Gates, 1939

  • Combined male and prostatic pores paired on xix; Seminal grooves absent.

  • Esophagus with two gizzards in vi and vii.

  • Typhlosole in the form of low ridge.

  • Spermathecal pores paired in vii/viii.

  • Genital markings present.

  • Spermathecae paired diverticulate.

  • Two species recorded in India.

5.8.27. Scolioscolides bergtheili (Michaelsen, 1907)

  • Combined male and prostatic pores paired on xviii.

  • Esophagus with a single gizzard between septa v/vi and viii/ix.

  • One pair discrete intramural calciferous glands in xii.

  • Holandric, testes, and male funnels in x enclosed in U-shaped sacs.

  • Spermathecae one pair in viii, each with a median and a lateral bi or trilobed ental diverticula, duct shorter than ampulla.

  • Exonephric megameronephridia in each segment posterior to the supra-intestinal glands.

  • Single species recorded in India

  • Type locality is Sandakphu, Darjeeling dist., W Bengal, India, and is endemic.

5.8.28. Senapatiella Julka, 2004

  • Male pores paired in seminal grooves on xviii.

  • Prostatic pores paired at ends of seminal grooves on xvii and xix.

  • Single gizzard in vi.

  • One pair bilobed extramural calciferous gland is present. One lobe in xiv and other in xv.

  • Micromeronephridia astomate, exonephric.

  • Megameronephridia in caudal segments.

  • Prostomium tanylobic.

  • Three species recorded in India.

5.8.29. Shimodrilus Julka, 2004

  • Male pores paired in seminal grooves on xviii.

  • Prostatic pores paired at ends of seminal grooves on xvii and xix.

  • Prostomium prolobic to proepliobic.

  • Single gizzard in v.

  • Large extramural calciferous glands in xvi with calciferous ridges extending to xviii.

  • Intestinal caeca and supra-intestinal glands absent.

  • Typhlosole simple lamellicorn.

  • Penial setae present.

  • Micromeronephridia astomate, exonephric, small paired tufts on body wall in ii–iv on septa in v–xii, in clusters of iv–v in xiii, and posteriad segments.

  • Paired stomata exonephric megameronephridia lateral to micromeronephridia in xvii and posteriad segments.

  • Two species recorded in India.

5.8.30. Travoscolides Gates, 1940

  • Combined male and prostatic pores on xviii.

  • Esophagus with a single gizzard in v and four pairs of discrete calciferous glands in x–xiii.

  • Supra-intestinal glands absent.

  • Typhlosole simple lamelliform.

  • Megameronephridia absent.

  • Spermathecal pores paired in or close to vii/viii/ix.

  • Genital markings absent.

  • Holandric, seminal vesicles in xi and xii.

  • Prostate paired in xviii.

  • Penial setae present.

  • Spermathecae paired in viii and ix.

  • Three species recorded in India.

5.8.31. Wahoscolex (Julka, 1988)

  • Male pores paired in seminal grooves on xviii or xvii/xviii or on porophores on xvii; prostatic pores two pairs at the end of seminal grooves on xvii and xix or xvii and xviii or one pair on xvii.

  • Esophagus with a single gizzard in v and with calciferous lamellae in in xvi.

  • Discrete calciferous glands, caeca, and supra-intestinal gland absent.

  • Typhlosole simple lamelliform.

  • One or two pair stomate enteronephric megameronephridia in each segment from about middle of the body to posterior end.

  • Testes holandric.

  • Spermathecae paired or unpaired.

  • Ten species recorded in India.

5.9. Family: Rhinodrilidae

5.9.1. Pontoscolex corethrurus (Muller, 1856)

  • Male and spermathecal pores minute and inconspicuous.

  • Female pore small transverse slit at left side of mid-ventral line just in front of intersegment furrow xiv/xv.

  • Lumbricine in regular furrow, but enlarged and located in alternate positions on adjacent segments in tail region.

  • Clitellum saddle-shaped generally covering segments xv–xxii/xxiii.

  • Dorsal pores absent.

  • Calciferous glands visible through the body wall in live specimen.

  • Digestive system with paired “Panicled tubular” calciferous glands in vii–ix.

  • First Segment and snout (prostomium) often elongated as a long thin proboscis when the worm is exploring the area.

  • Body pale, light pink in head.

  • Single species found in India and is exotic in origin.

  • Type locality is found in Itajai, Brazil.

Advertisement

6. Conclusions

First systematic comprehensive earthworm database of India developed for identification of earthworms to provide a useful supplement for traditional morphological taxonomists and nonexperts in this area.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

Authors are thankful to Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of India, New Delhi for the financial support to carry out the study.

References

  1. 1. Templeton R. Description of Megascolex caeruleus. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London. 1844;12:89-91
  2. 2. Perrier E. Recherches pour Servir a1’ historie des Lombriciens terrestres. Nouvelles annales du Muséum d’histoire naturelle, Paris. 1872;8:5-198
  3. 3. Bourne AG. On certain earthworms from the western Himalayas and Dehradun. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal. 1889;58:110-117
  4. 4. Beddard FE. On two new earthworms of the family Megascolecidae. Annals and Maga-zine of Natural History. 1902;9:456-463
  5. 5. Michaelsen W. New Oligochaten von vorder Indian, Ceylon, Burma and the Andaman Islands. Memoirs of the Indian Museum. 1907;1:103-253
  6. 6. Michaelsen W. Die Oligochaten fauna der vorde indisch—ceylonischen region. Abhandlungen aus dem Gebiete der Naturwissenschaften, Herausgegeben von dem naturwissenschaftlichen Verein in Hamburg. 1910;19(5):1-108
  7. 7. Stephenson J. On a collection of Oligochaeta mainly from Northern India. Records of Indian Museum. 1914;10:321-365
  8. 8. Stephenson J. On some Oligochaeta, mainly from Southern Indian and Ceylon. Records of Indian Museum. 1915;6:35-108
  9. 9. Stephenson J. On a collection of Oligochaeta from various parts of India and further India. Records of Indian Museum. 1917;13:353-416
  10. 10. Stephenson J. Oligochaeta: The Fauna of British India, Including Ceylon and Burma. London: Taylor and Francis Limited; 1923
  11. 11. Aiyer KSP. An account of the Oligochaeta of Travancore. Records of Indian Museum. 1929;31:13-76
  12. 12. Gates GE. Indian earthworm : The genus Pheretima. Records of Indian Museum. 1937;39:175-212
  13. 13. Gates GE. Indian earthworms : The genus Eutyphoeus. Records of Indian Museum. 1938;40:39-119
  14. 14. Gates GE. Indian earthworms : Nelloscolex sp. Records of Indian Museum. 1939;41:37-44
  15. 15. Gates GE. Indian earthworms: Contributions to a revision of the genus Eudichogaster. Records of Indian Museum. 1939;41:151-218
  16. 16. Gates GE. Notes on various peregrine earthworms. Bulletin of the Museum of Com-parative Zoology, Harvard. 1942;89(3):61-144
  17. 17. Gates GE. Checklist and bibliography of North American earthworms. The American Midland Naturalist. 1942;27:86-108
  18. 18. Gates GE. On the Indian earthworms. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal. 1945;11:54-91
  19. 19. Gates GE. Earthworms of the Allahabad sector of the Gangetic plain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India. 1947;17:117-128
  20. 20. Gates GE. On some species of the oriental earthworm. Zoologische Mededelingen. 1961;37:293-312
  21. 21. Jamieson BGM. Preliminary descriptions of Indian earthworms (Megascolecidae: Oligochaeta) from the Palani Hills. Bulletin of the National Museum of Natural History. 1977;313:477-502
  22. 22. Julka JM. Studies on the earthworms collected during the Daphabum expedition in Arunachal Pradesh, India. Records of the Zoological Survey of India. 1976;69:229-239
  23. 23. Julka JM. Studies on the earthworm fauna of Orissa (India): Moniligastridae and Ocnerodrilidae. Mitteilungen aus dem Museum für Naturkunde in Berlin. 1976;52:321-329
  24. 24. Julka JM. Studies on the earthworm fauna of Orissa (India); Megascolecidae, Octo-chaetidae and Microchaetidae. Mitteilungen aus dem Museum für Naturkunde in Ber-lin. 1978;54:185-197
  25. 25. Julka JM. Taxonomic studies on the earthworms collected during the Subansiri expedition in Arunachal Pradesh, India. Records of the Zoological Survey of India. 1981;26:1-37
  26. 26. Julka JM. The Fauna of India and the Adjacent Countries. Megadrile: Octochaetidae (Earthworms) Haplotaxida, Lumbricina: Megascolecidae: Octochaetidae. Vol. XIV. Zoo-logical Survey of India; 1988. p. 400
  27. 27. Julka JM. A new genus and species of earthworm (Octochaetidae: Oligochaeta) from South India. Geobios New Reports. 1983;2:48-50
  28. 28. Julka JM, Paliwal R. Distribution of earthworms in different agro-climatic regions of India. In: Ramakrishnan, editor. Soil Biodiversity, Ecological Processes and Landscape Management. New Delhi, India: Oxford & IBH Publication; 2005. pp. 1-13
  29. 29. Julka JM, Paliwal R. Distribution Pattern in Indian Earthworms: Resources and Vermiculture. Solan: Zoological Survey of India; 1993. pp. 27-31
  30. 30. Julka JM, Paliwal R. On a new species of Plutellus Perrier (Acanthodrilidae: Oligochaeta) from northwest Himalayas. Research Bulletin of the Punjab University. 1994;44:217-220
  31. 31. Paliwal R, Julka JM. Checklist of earthworms of Western Himalaya, India. Zoo’s. 2005
  32. 32. Verma D, Bharti S, Yadav S. Earthworm resources in Gangetic plains of India. Inter-national Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation. 2010;2:134-139
  33. 33. Gates GE. Burmese earthworms: An introduction to the systematic and biology of Megadrile Oligochaetes with special reference to Southeast Asia. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society. 1972;62(7):1-326

Written By

Samrendra Singh Thakur and Shweta Yadav

Reviewed: 19 February 2018 Published: 27 June 2018