Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Carbon Dioxide Conversion to Methanol: Opportunities and Fundamental Challenges

Written By

Sajeda A. Al-Saydeh and Syed Javaid Zaidi

Submitted: 08 November 2017 Reviewed: 02 February 2018 Published: 16 August 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.74779

From the Edited Volume

Carbon Dioxide Chemistry, Capture and Oil Recovery

Edited by Iyad Karamé, Janah Shaya and Hassan Srour

Chapter metrics overview

6,508 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Greenhouse gases mitigation is one of most important challenges facing societies nowadays. Therefore, the way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions should be using carbon free sources that do not generate extra CO2 to the atmosphere. However, there is a great potential in energy carriers and other materials from CO2, with many challenges to overcome. It has been suggested that the reduction of CO2 and conversion to renewable fuels and valuable chemicals may be considered as a promising solution to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions. This chapter discusses the recent developments and remaining challenges of CO2 utilization for the efficient production of methanol. This includes novel technologies, approaches, and current barriers for the conversion of CO2 to methanol through heterogeneous catalysis, homogenous catalysis, electrochemical, photochemical, and photoelectrochemical conversion, which will contribute to the economic growth and mitigate the hazardous emissions for cleaner environment. A review of various state-of-the-art technologies for CO2 conversion to methanol was carried out aiming to establish the advances in this area and present an overview of the recent research trend for future development of new ideas for CO2 reduction into methanol in a large scale.


  • CO2 utilization
  • heterogeneous catalysis
  • homogeneous catalysis
  • electrochemical conversion
  • photochemical conversion
  • photoelectrochemical conversion

1. Introduction

Nowadays, the demand for energy is rapidly increasing because of the economic growth worldwide. In order to meet this growing demand, an abundant amount of fossil fuel (oil, coal, and natural gas) is needed [1]. Fossil fuel combustion is often considered as one of the main threats to the environment because of the CO2 release in the atmosphere. CO2, which is considered as a primary greenhouse-gas (GHG), is periodically exchanged within land surface, ocean, and atmosphere where a variety of creatures, including animals, plants, and microorganisms absorb and produce it daily. However, the process of releasing and consuming CO2 trends has to be balanced by nature. Since 1750, when the industrial revolution began, so did climate change following the activities related to industries. In order to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions, CO2 sequestration and storage (CSS) processes gained a widespread attention. However, it will increase the amount of available captured CO2 as feedstock of zero cost. Therefore, utilizing CO2 and converting it into fuels and chemicals, which is called carbon capture and recycling (CCR) process, is an active option used worldwide to convert usable products into valuable products, and it is used to mitigate CO2 emissions which is more preferable compared to CSS option [2, 3, 4, 5]. During the last years, conversion of CO2 into value-added chemicals (i.e., ethanol, methanol, and formic acid) using different ways has received a great attention from the researchers as it can be seen as a solution to reduce the global warming [6, 7, 8], energy crisis (i.e., fossil fuels depletion) [9, 10, 11], and the storage of energy [12] problems. Methanol is a renewable energy source that can be produced from any raw material containing carbon (mainly CO2), as well as it is a clean source of energy that can be used as transportation fuel. In general, for a fuel to satisfy the market demand, it must be sustainable material, clean, and able to be synthesized from available resources. Nowadays, as a matter of fact, most of the production companies around the world use methanol as a raw material to produce different products. Methanol is used in producing solvents like the acetic acid, which represents 10% of the global demand [13]. Methanol can also be used in direct methanol fuel cells (DMFC), which is used for the conversion of chemical energy in methanol directly to electrical power under ambient conditions [14]. Methanol is considered to be one of the most important organic feedstocks that can be used in the industries with an annual production of 65 million tons worldwide [15]. However, “Methanol Economy” term includes an anthropogenic carbon cycle for methanol production as shown in Figure 1, which can be used as a renewable fuel or to produce nearly all products that are derived from fossil fuels [16, 17]. Carbon Recycling International (CRI)’s George Olah plant is considered to be the world’s largest CO2 methanol plant. In 2015, Carbon Recycling International (CRI) scaled up the plant from a capacity of 1.3 million liters of methanol per year to more than 5 million liters a year. The plant now recycles 5.5 thousand tons of CO2 a year. All energy used in the plant comes from the Icelandic grid that is generated from geothermal and hydro energy [18]. As shown in Figure 2, the plant uses electricity to make H2 which reacts with CO2 in a catalytic reaction for methanol production. The various pathways and processes for CO2 conversion to methanol are described schematically in Figure 3. There are different CO2 conversion routes such as the catalytic method which comes in the form of conventional, electrocatalytic, photocatalytic, and photoelectrocatalytic conversion [19].

Figure 1.

Anthropogenic carbon cycle for methanol production [20].

Figure 2.

Green methanol production by Carbon Recycling International [18].

Figure 3.

Outline of chemical conversion processes of CO2.


2. Methods to convert CO2 into methanol

2.1. Chemical conversion

The catalytic hydrogenation of CO2 with H2 is considered to be the most straightforward way for methanol and DME production from CO2, as shown in Eq. (1). During the 1920s and 1930s, the earliest methanol production plants were operated in the USA, which were using CO2 and H2 to produce methanol. Both heterogeneous and homogeneous catalysts systems have been studied by many researchers for CO2 hydrogenation process. However, heterogeneous catalysts have many advantages in terms of separation, stability, handling, cost, and recycling of the catalyst. Heterogeneous and homogeneous catalysts systems are discussed in the following sections [21, 22, 23].


2.1.1. Heterogeneous catalytic conversion

Although homogeneous catalysis is also used for methanol production from CO2, heterogeneous catalysis is the preferred choice for chemical reaction engineers due to the advantages of heterogeneous catalysis. This includes easy separation of fluid from solid catalyst, convenient handling in different types of reactors (i.e., fixed-, fluidized- or moving-bed), and the used catalyst can be regenerated. Recently, a large number of experiments have been conducted for the development of stable and efficient heterogeneous catalysts for the reduction of CO2 to produce methanol. However, many studies proved that the Cu based catalysts with different additives such as ZrO2 and ZrO play an important role to improve the stability and activity of the heterogeneous catalyst (Figure 4). Therefore, some of the catalysts, that are shown in Figure 4, are already exist and used in demonstration and pilot plants. Some of the metals (i.e., Cu and Zn) and their oxides have been developed to be used as an efficient heterogeneous catalyst for the conversion of CO2 to methanol [24, 25]. This type of catalyst is similar to Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 based catalysts that are used to produce methanol in the industry. However, it has been proved that the commercial methanol catalyst such as the heterogeneous mixture of zinc oxide, alumina, and copper (30, 10, and 60%, respectively) produces very little amount of methanol [26]. Various reviews discussed the different factors that may affect the methanol production from syngas such as catalyst preparation, catalyst design, reaction kinetics, reactor design, and catalyst deactivation [22, 27, 28, 29, 30]. Therefore, the future research works should be focused on the methanol production from CO2 and H2 in which the amount of produced methanol by this way is higher compared to the syngas. In order to sustain high plant output, the catalyst should remain active to be used for several years. Moreover, improving the activity and stability of catalyst over time is very important in the economics of any methanol plant [31]. Recently, Lurgi, which is the leader in methanol synthesis process technology, has been collaborated with Süd-Chemie using a high activity catalyst (C79-05-GL, based on Cu/ZnO) to convert CO2 and H2 into methanol [24, 32]. The Lurgi methanol reactor is a tube-based converter which contains the catalysts in fixed tubes and uses a steam pressure control to achieve the controlled temperature reaction. This type of reactor is able to achieve low recycle ratios and high yield. Therefore, Lurgi has been developed to two-stage converter system which uses two combined Lurgi reactors for high methanol capacities. However, the space velocities and temperatures in the first converter will be higher than the single-stage converter in which it needs to achieve only partial conversion of synthesis gas to methanol. This makes the converter to be smaller and produces high-pressure steam due to the high temperatures which will help in saving the energy costs. The exit gas, from the first converter, contains methanol, and it will be directly sent to the second reaction stage that operates at a lower reaction rate [31]. Even if the operating temperature of the Lurgi system is around 260°C which is higher than that used for conventional catalysts to produce methanol, but the methanol selectivity of this system is excellent. However, the activity of this catalyst is decreased with the same rate as commercial catalyst’s activity, which is currently used in the industries to produce methanol. There are different companies commercializing high stable catalysts for methanol production such as Mitsubishi Gas Chemical, Sinetix, and Haldor Topsøe. Arena et al. [33] studied the solid-state interactions, functionality, and adsorption sites of Cu–ZnO/ZrO2 catalysts and its ability for the conversion of CO2 to methanol. Characterization data indicated that the strong Cu–ZnO interaction effectively promotes the dispersion and reactivity of metal copper to oxygen. The metal/oxide interface in Cu–ZnO/ZrO2 catalysts plays an important role in hydrogenation of CO2 to methanol. As shown in Figure 5, the dual-site nature of the reaction path explains the formal structure-insensitive character of CO2 conversion over Cu–ZnO/ZrO2 catalysts.

Figure 4.

Supports and additives used for Cu-based catalysts.

Figure 5.

Heterogeneous catalytic process for conversion of CO2 to methanol using Cu/ZrO2 and Cu-ZnO/ZrO2 [33].

2.1.2. Homogenous catalytic conversion Homogeneous catalysts for CO2 Hydrogenation to produce methanol

Although different heterogeneous catalysts were tested for the direct CO2 conversion to methanol, yet very limited homogeneous catalysts have been mentioned in the literature. Tominaga et al. [34] reported an example of direct CO2 conversion to methanol using homogeneous catalysts. They studied the ability of Ru3(CO)12 catalyst precursor in the presence of KI additive for the CO2 hydrogenation to form methane, methanol, and CO. Also, it was proved by the same authors that the performance of Ru3(CO)12–KI for CO2 conversion is much better than the other transition metal carbonyl catalysts such as W(CO)6,, Fe2(CO)9, Ir4(CO)12, Mo(CO)6, Co2(CO)8, and Rh4(CO)12 [35]. Recently, cascade process has been used to reduce CO2 to methanol instead of six electrons process [36]. Cascade process using homogeneous catalysts can be divided into three steps, which are hydrogenation of CO2 to formic acid; then, the formic acid will be esterified to generate formate esters; and finally, the formate ester will be hydrogenated to produce methanol (Figure 6) as mentioned by Huff and Sanford [36].

Figure 6.

CO2 hydrogenation to produce methanol via cascade system [36].

Different catalysts will be used in each step of this approach under specific reaction conditions which are high temperature (135°C) and pressure (40 bars). Wesselbaum et al. [37] reported the hydrogenation of CO2 with 60 bars of H2 and 20 bars of CO2 at 140°C in the presence of [(triphos)Ru-(TMM)] (TMM = trimethylenemethane, Triphos = 1,1,1-tris(diphenylphosphinomethyl) ethane) giving a maximum turnover number of 221. Therefore, it has been proved by the same authors that this catalyst can be used in the hydrogenation process to covert formate esters to methanol. In addition to the direct CO2 conversion to methanol, the conversion of CO2 derivatives by hydrogenation, such as polycarbonates, carbonates, formates, and carbamates, has gained a huge attention due to the small barriers of these reactions (Figure 7) [38, 39].

Figure 7.

Indirect hydrogenation of CO2 for methanol production [39]. Homogeneous chemical conversion of CO2 to methanol

Silanes and hydrides are the main reducing agents to be used in the homogeneous chemical reduction of CO2 to methanol in the presence of organocatalysts such as N-heterocyclic carbenes (NHC). Although the cost of the silanes is high, it was proved that the NHC-catalyst has the ability to reduce CO2 to methoxides under ambient conditions as mentioned by Zhang et al. [40]. As shown in Figure 8, the derivatives of silanol and methanol will be produced by the hydrolysis of methoxysilanes.

Figure 8.

NHC-catalyzed CO2 conversion and the subsequent methanol hydrolytic [40].

The application of frustrated Lewis pairs to reduce CO2 to methanol is considered to be another example of the metal-free catalysis (Figure 9) [41]. In the first step, the formatoborate derivative is produced via the reaction between CO2 and [TMPH] + [HB(C6F5)3]. The coordinatively unsaturated B(C6F5)3 attacks the nucleophile and formato-bridged intermediate forms.

Figure 9.

Lewis acid/Lewis base-catalyzed CO2 hydrogenation [44].

After that, the latter will react with [TMPH] + [HB(C6F5)3] to produce the formaldehyde acetal derivative. Schwartz’s reagent ((Cp)2Zr(H)(CI)) was used as a hydride source for the two-step reduction of CO2 to formaldehyde and methanol, respectively as shown in (Figure 10) [42, 43]. In the first step, the conversion of CO2 to formaldehyde produces some of the m-oxo complexes. Then, the deeper reduction of formaldehyde can be achieved by adding more Schwartz’s reagent which leads to form zirconium methoxide in the second step.

Figure 10.

Two-step CO2 reduction to methanol with Schwarz’s reagent [44].

2.2. Electrochemical reduction of CO2 to methanol

During the last decades, electrochemical CO2 conversion has been widely used on a laboratory scale, but it has not yet been successfully used in the industrial processes (large scale). The electrochemical reduction method is used for CO2 conversion to valuable chemicals and fuels such as methanol using electricity as the main source of energy [45, 46, 47]. Many experiments with different conditions and electrocatalysts have been conducted for CO2 reduction on metal electrodes [48]. Different reduced products can be formed electrochemically from CO2, and some of these products are presented in Table 1. The selection of catalyst and reaction conditions plays a significant role as compared to the potential in controlling between various reduced products. However, all the listed standard potentials in Table 1 are relatively close to the hydrogen evolution standard potential [49]. The hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) is very important during CO2 electrocatalyst reduction in which H2O is typically present as an electrolyte (and proton source). For this reason, the reported metals that can be used as an electrocatalyst for CO2 reduction have relatively high HER overpotentials. A huge effort must be conducted in order to find the optimum electrode for CO2 electrochemical reduction which will reduce the selectivity of CO2 at low overpotentials and high rates without reducing water simultaneously [44].

Half-cell reactionE° vs. SHE

Table 1.

Standard potentials for CO2 reduction [49].

There is a distinct advantage of directly converting the captured CO2 into methanol of producing a useful product that can be used in many energy-consuming devices. This process allows for recycling captured CO2 and produce methanol that could be used as a renewable energy instead of fossil fuel in energy-consuming devices. In other words, by electroreduction process, CO2 could be reduced directly in the electrolysis cell back to methanol in one step. Different electrodes can be used to achieve methanol directly from CO2 [44], as shown in Table 2. In 1983, Canfield and Frese [50] proved that some semiconductors such as n-GaAs, p-InP, and p-GaAs have the ability to produce methanol directly from CO2 although at extremely low current densities and faradaic efficiencies (FEs). Many other researchers did some efforts to increase both the current density as well as faradaic efficiency of the process. Seshadri et al. [51] found that the pyridinium ion is a novel homogeneous electrocatalyst for CO2 reduction to methanol at low overpotential. Recently, Pyridine has been widely explored in which it is used to act as co-catalyst to form the active pyridinium species in situ [52, 53, 54, 55, 56]. Generally, the one-electron reduction products of CO2 show lower current density than the two-electron reduction products such as CO. The direct electrochemical reduction of CO2 to methanol is a promising process to reduce the amount of captured CO2.

ElectrodeType of electrodeE vs. NHE (V)Current density (mA cm−2)Faradaic efficiency (%)ElectrolyteReference
p-InPSemiconductor− Na2SO4[50]
CuOMetal oxide−1.36.9280.5 M KHCO3[59]
RuO2/TiO2 Nanotubes−0.61600.5 M NaHCO3[58]
Pt–Ru/CAlloy− cell[60]
n-GaPHomogeneous catalyst−0.060.279010 mM pyridine at pH = 5.2[61]
Pd−0.510.04300.5 M NaClO4 with pyridine[51]

Table 2.

CO2 electrochemical reduction to methanol.

Popić et al. [57] proved that the Ru and Ru modified by Cd and Cu adatoms can be used as an electrode for CO2 reduction at relatively small overpotentials. The obtained results showed that on the surface of pure Ru, Ru modified by Cu and Cd adatoms, and RuOx+IrOx modified by Cu and Cd adatoms, the reduction of CO2 was achieved to produce methanol during 8 h of holding the potential at −0.8 V. Therefore, in case of CO2 reduction on Ru modified by Cu and Cd adatoms, the production of methanol was depended on the presence of adatoms at the surface of ruthenium. RuO2 is a promising material to be used as an electrode for CO2 reduction to methanol due to its high electrochemical stability and electrical conductivity. For that reason, Qu et al. [58] prepared RuO2/TiO2 nanoparticles (NPs) and nanotubes (NTs) composite electrodes by loading of RuO2 on TiO2 nanoparticles and nanotubes, respectively. The obtained results showed that the current efficiency of producing methanol from CO2 was up to 60.5% on the RuO2/TiO2 NTs modified Pt electrode. Therefore, RuO2 and RuO2/TiO2 NPs composite electrodes showed lower electrocatalytic activity than RuO2/TiO2 NTs composite modified Pt electrode for the electrochemical reduction of CO2 to methanol. In order to increase the selectivity and efficiency of CO2 electrochemical reduction process, nanotubes structure is suggested to be used as an electrode as the studies proved.

2.3. Photochemical reduction of CO2 to methanol

Typically, the photochemical (or photocatalytic) CO2 conversion method is used to convert captured CO2 to methanol and other valuable products by using solar energy such as light or laser [62, 63]. Even if the selectivity for methanol is relatively low, the direct conversion of CO2 to methanol using photocatalytic method has been studied [64]. However, recently, this method has received a great attention, and it is considered to be as the most attractive method for CO2 utilization. The photocatalytic CO2 conversion process is a complex combination of photophysical and photochemical processes together [62]. Therefore, this method has some similarities with electrocatalytic CO2 reduction in which the molecular catalysts are used in both cases. Sacrificial hydride source is considered to be the major limitation to reduce CO2 by photocatalytic method. Ascorbic acid, amine, and 1-benzyl-1,4-dihydronicotinamide are examples of sacrificial hydride source, which must be added to the solution to substitute for the anode, that would be used in electrocatalytic CO2 reduction process [65]. Several experiments have been conducted to test the ability of some semiconductors and metal oxides for CO2 conversion to methanol. This include silicon carbide [66], TiO2 [67, 68, 69, 70], WO3 [71], NiO [70], ZnO [70], and InTaO4 [72] either by themselves or they can be combined with different heterogeneous catalysts to achieve the same goal. The main challenge in methanol production on semiconductors by using solar energy is that the formation reaction is reversible. Thus, in order to mitigate the methanol oxidation, it is very essential to find new strategies to achieve a practical industrial process [66, 70].

Gondal et al. [66] proved that the granular silicon carbide is a promising photocatalyst for CO2 reduction to methanol. The granular silicon carbide (α6H-SiC) has been tested as a photocatalyst to reduce CO2 and convert it into methanol using a 355-nm laser. The reaction cell was filled with α6H-SiC granules, pressurized with CO2 gas at 50 psi and distilled water. Therefore, they mentioned that a pair of competitive reactions which are photo-oxidation and photo-reduction are existed in the photochemical process, as shown in Figure 11. When the reaction starts, the photooxidation rates (Ko) will be slower than the photoreduction rates (Kr) because of the low concentration of produced methanol. The obtained results showed that the maximum molar concentration of methanol and photonic efficiencies of CO2 conversion into methanol achieved was around 1.25 mmol/l and 1.95%, respectively.

Figure 11.

Schematic illustration of the photoreduction and photooxidation reactions in the photochemical process [67].

CdS/TiO2 and Bi2S3/TiO2 nanotube photocatalysts were tested by Li et al. [67], and their photocatalytic activities that reduce CO2 to methanol under visible light irradiation have been studied. The obtained results proved that the synthetical TNTs are almost a good material to be act as photoreduction to convert CO2 into methanol. The largest methanol production on TNTs–CdS and TNTs–Bi2S3 photocatalysts by using visible light irradiation for 5 h were 159.5 and 224.6 μmol/L, respectively. Luo et al. [68] studied the ability of Nd/TiO2, which is synthesized via the sol-gel method, to reduce CO2 into methanol in an aqueous solution under UV irradiation. The experiment showed that the maximum methanol yield under UV irradiation for 8 h was 184.8 μmol/g, proving that the Nd/TiO2 can increase the efficiency of CO2 photocatalytic reduction compared to pure titanium oxide.

2.4. Photoelectrochemical reduction of CO2 to methanol

The photoelectrocatalytic CO2 reduction process is a combination of the photocatalytic and electrocatalytic methods together. Many research works were focused to find the best semiconductor material that can be used as a photoelectrode to convert CO2 into methanol using any solar energy in PEC cell; however, no tested semiconductor met the desired stability and efficiency [73]. In fact, the photoelectrochemically reduction of CO2 need around 1.5 eV of thermodynamic energy input. Therefore, the PEC cell needs greater energy input to make up the losses that causes by band bending (which is needed for charge separation at the surface of semiconductor), overvoltage potentials, and resistance losses [61, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81]. The first important step for the reduction of CO2 to methanol by the photoelectrochemical (PEC) method is the hydrogen ions and electrons generation by the solar irradiance of semiconductor which is used as photocathode. The semiconductor (e.g., GaP, SiC) is illuminated by light as the source of energy that is higher than the semiconductor’s band gap. In that case, the electrons in semiconductor will be excited and transferred to conduction band from the valance band, and it will reach the cathode counter electrode through an external electrical wire. Furthermore, in order to produce the electrochemical reduction and oxidation reactions, the produced electron-hole pairs at or near the interface will be separated by the semiconductor and will be injected into the electrolyte [82, 83, 84]. A major problem in using the photoelectrochemical cells is the ability of n-type semiconductor materials to generate holes on the surface that can oxidize the semiconductor itself [85]. Recently, the hybrid system which consists of a semiconductor light harvester and a complex of metal co-catalyst has received a huge attention. In this system, the water is considered the main source of electron donors and protons for the reduction of CO2 at the surface of cathode. An example of hybrid system has been discussed by Zhao et al. [86]. They studied the full cell of photocathode with InP/Ru-complexes that was coupled with a TiO2/Pt based photoanode, as shown in Figure 12. In this full cell, in order to avoid the formate re-oxidation at the surface of photoanode, the proton exchange membrane was used as a separator. However, Arai et al. constructed a wireless full cell for photoelectrochemical CO2 reduction in which the system consists of the InP/Ru-complex as a hybrid photocathode and a photoanode of SrTiO3 (Figure 13). In this system, the redox reactions of CO2 and H2O will occur via sunlight irradiation without applying any bias. The obtained results showed that the conversion efficiency from solar to chemical energy in these two full cells was 0.03% and 0.14% for TiO2–InP/[RuCP] and SrTiO3–InP/[RuCP], respectively. Barton et al. [61] successfully reduced CO2 to methanol by using catalyzed p-GaP-based photoelectrochemical (PEC) cell in a process called chemical carbon mitigation. Chemical carbon mitigation term describes the photoinduced CO2 conversion to methanol without the use of additional CO2 generating power source. The obtained results showed that the methanol selectivity and CO2 conversion were found to be 100 and 95%, respectively.

Figure 12.

The two-compartment photoelectrochemical cell for CO2 reduction [87].

Figure 13.

The one-compartment photoelectrochemical cell for CO2 reduction [87].


3. Future prospective and conclusions

Carbon dioxide conversion is presenting both an opportunity and a challenge worldwide for the sustainability of environment and energy. The main strategies of CO2 reduction should focus on the utilization of CO2, the CO2 recycling combined with the renewable energy to save carbon sources, and the useful chemicals production from CO2. Therefore, the conversion of CO2 into energy product such as methanol will consume large amount of captured CO2 in which the market scale of methanol is potentially extensive. Furthermore, the generated methanol can be used instead of the fossil fuel, thus reducing the dependence on fossil fuel and contribute in the market growth of CO2 utilization. Herein, a complete literature of different methods for CO2 conversion into methanol is reported in this section. This include homogeneous/heterogeneous catalytic, electrochemical, photochemical, and photoelectrochemical reduction. However, the high performance in CO2 conversion process can be achieved by using an effective catalyst. In general, the development of required catalyst can be used as a solution if the catalyst is already used, but it is required high cost to be scaled up or it does not exist and await discovery thus the challenges in catalytic processes are huge indeed. The poor product selectivity and the low/high reaction temperatures are considered to be the main barriers in the heterogeneous CO2 reduction process. However, the above discussion shows that among various methods proposed for CO2 conversion to methanol or to any valuable chemical, the electrochemical cells are the preferable over other methods. Nevertheless, many barriers still exist in the CO2 electrochemical reduction in which the electrocatalyst is needed to be used at higher selectivity as well as lower over potentials. Various heterogeneous electrocatalysts are selective, fast and energy-efficient, but they are considered to be unstable catalysts. Therefore, in the future, the electricity needed for electrochemical CO2 reduction process on a large scale can come from different renewable energy sources such as hydro, wind, wave, geothermal, tides, and so on. In this sense, many research works should be focused on new electrocatalytic materials that can be used to allow working at higher current densities without loss of Faradaic efficiency. On the other hand, photochemical processes offer an attractive approach to reduce CO2 to methanol using solar energy. However, this method is not widely used due to its critical conditions to absorb the required amount of solar energy. Otherwise, the prospects to develop the successful technologies for the efficient CO2 conversion using solar energy are certainly long term (>5 years out). Nonetheless, photoelectrochemical reduction processes are discovered to be attractive approaches for the reduction of CO2 to methanol. At present, the applications of solar photoelectrochemical devices are very limited due to its high cost and several reasons, as discussed above. However, it is very important for research efforts to continue in these areas because this technology will be extremely needed for efficient reduction of CO2 in the coming years.



The authors would like to acknowledge the support of Center for Advanced Materials, Qatar University (QU) for this work. Ms. Sajeda Alsaydeh also acknowledges QU for Graduate Assistantship awarded to her.


  1. 1. Leung DYC, Caramanna G, Maroto-Valer MM. An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2014;39:426-443
  2. 2. Peters M, Mueller T, Leitner W. CO2: From waste to value. Chemical Engineer. 2009;(813):46-47
  3. 3. Aresta M. Carbon Dioxide as Chemical Feedstock. John Wiley & Sons; 2010
  4. 4. Aresta M, Dibenedetto A. Utilisation of CO2 as a chemical feedstock: Opportunities and challenges. Dalton Transactions. 2007;(28):2975-2992
  5. 5. Centi G, Perathoner S. Opportunities and prospects in the chemical recycling of carbon dioxide to fuels. Catalysis Today. 2009;148(3–4):191-205
  6. 6. Hicks JC, Drese JH, Fauth DJ, Gray ML, Qi G, Jones CW. Designing adsorbents for CO2 capture from flue gas-hyperbranched aminosilicas capable of capturing CO2 reversibly. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2008;130(10):2902-2903
  7. 7. Ritter SK. What can we do with CO? Chemical & Engineering News Archive. 2007;85(18):11-17
  8. 8. Robinson AB, Robinson NE, Soon W. Environmental Effects of increased atmospheric carbon dioxide. Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons. 2007;12:79-90
  9. 9. Dinger A et al. Batteries for electric cars: Challenges, opportunities, and the outlook to 2020. The Boston Consulting Group. 2010;7:2017
  10. 10. Moniz EJ. Nanotechnology for the Energy Challenge. John Wiley & Sons; 2010
  11. 11. Budzianowski WM. Negative carbon intensity of renewable energy technologies involving biomass or carbon dioxide as inputs. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2012;16(9):6507-6521
  12. 12. Centi G, Perathoner S. CO2-based energy vectors for the storage of solar energy. Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology. 2011;1(1):21-35
  13. 13. Global Demand of Methanol By Products, NGI, Natural Gas Inte. 2015. Available from: At 26th of Oct. 2015
  14. 14. McGrath KM, Prakash GKS, Olah GA. Direct methanol fuel cells. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. 2004;10(7):1063-1080
  15. 15. MI. Methanol Institute. 2013. Available from: The Methanol Industry,
  16. 16. Olah GA, Goeppert A, Prakash GKS. Beyond Oil and Gas: The Methanol Economy. John Wiley & Sons; 2011
  17. 17. Olah GA, Prakash GKS, Goeppert A. Anthropogenic chemical carbon cycle for a sustainable future. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2011;133(33):12881-12898
  18. 18. Carbon Recycling International (CRI), World's Largest CO2 Methanol Plant. 2016. Available from:
  19. 19. Kondratenko EV, Mul G, Baltrusaitis J, Larrazábal GO, Pérez-Ramírez J. Status and perspectives of CO2 conversion into fuels and chemicals by catalytic, photocatalytic and electrocatalytic processes. Energy & Environmental Science. 2013;6(11):3112-3135
  20. 20. Letcher T, Scott J, Patterson DA. Chemical processes for a sustainable future. Royal Society of Chemistry. 2014
  21. 21. Chorkendorff I, Niemantsverdriet JW. Concepts of Modern Catalysis and Kinetics. John Wiley & Sons; 2017
  22. 22. Cheng W-H. Methanol Production and Use. CRC Press; 1994
  23. 23. Paul JK editor. Methanol technology and Application in Motor Fuels. Park Ridge, NJ: Noyes Data Corporation; 1978. (Energy technology review; no. 31, Accessed from
  24. 24. Goehna H, Koenig P. Producing methanol from CO2. 1994
  25. 25. Saito M. R&D activities in Japan on methanol synthesis from CO2 and H2. Catalysis Surveys from Asia. 1998;2(2):175-184
  26. 26. Chinchen GC, Denny PJ, Parker DG, Spencer MS, Whan DA. Mechanism of methanol synthesis from CO2/CO/H2 mixtures over copper/zinc oxide/alumina catalysts: Use of 14 C-labelled reactants. Applied Catalysis. 1987;30(2):333-338
  27. 27. Bart JCJ, Sneeden RPA. Copper-zinc oxide-alumina methanol catalysts revisited. Catalysis Today. 1987;2(1):1-124
  28. 28. Waugh KC. Methanol synthesis. Catalysis Today. 1992;15(1):51-75
  29. 29. Chinchen GC, Denny PJ, Jennings JR, Spencer MS, Waugh KC. Synthesis of methanol: Part 1. Catalysts and kinetics. Applied Catalysis. 1988;36:1-65
  30. 30. Klier K. Methanol synthesis. Advances in Catalysis. 1982;31:243-313
  31. 31. Tijm PJA, Waller FJ, Brown DM. Methanol technology developments for the new millennium. Applied Catalysis A: General. 2001;221(1):275-282
  32. 32. Inui T, Anpo M, Izui K, Yanagida S, Yamaguchi T. Advances in Chemical Conversions for Mitigating Carbon Dioxide. Elsevier; 1998
  33. 33. Arena F et al. Solid-state interactions, adsorption sites and functionality of Cu-ZnO/ZrO2 catalysts in the CO2 hydrogenation to CH3OH. Applied Catalysis A: General. 2008;350(1):16-23
  34. 34. Tominaga K-i, Sasaki Y, Kawai M, Watanabe T, Saito M. Ruthenium complex catalysed hydrogenation of carbon dioxide to carbon monoxide, methanol and methane. Journal of the Chemical Society, Chemical Communications. 1993;(7):629-631
  35. 35. Tominaga K-i, Sasaki Y, Watanabe T, Saito M. Ethylene oxide-mediated reduction of CO2 to CO and ethylene glycol catalysed by ruthenium complexes. Journal of the Chemical Society, Chemical Communications. 1995;(15):1489-1490
  36. 36. Huff CA, Sanford MS. Cascade catalysis for the homogeneous hydrogenation of CO2 to methanol. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2011;133(45):18122-18125
  37. 37. Wesselbaum S, vom Stein T, Klankermayer J, Leitner W. Hydrogenation of carbon dioxide to methanol by using a homogeneous ruthenium–phosphine catalyst. Angewandte Chemie. 2012;124(30):7617-7620
  38. 38. Balaraman E, Gunanathan C, Zhang J, Shimon LJW, Milstein D. Efficient hydrogenation of organic carbonates, carbamates and formates indicates alternative routes to methanol based on CO2 and CO. Nature Chemistry. 2011;3(8):609-614
  39. 39. Choudhury J. New strategies for CO2-to-methanol conversion. ChemCatChem. 2012;4(5):609-611
  40. 40. Riduan SN, Zhang Y, Ying JY. Conversion of carbon dioxide into methanol with silanes over N-heterocyclic carbene catalysts. Angewandte Chemie. 2009;121(18):3372-3375
  41. 41. Ashley AE, Thompson AL, O'Hare D. Non-metal-mediated homogeneous hydrogenation of CO2 to CH3OH. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2009;48(52):9839-9843
  42. 42. Gambarotta S, Strologo S, Floriani C, Chiesi-Villa A, Guastini C. Stepwise reduction of carbon dioxide to formaldehyde and methanol: Reactions of carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide like molecules with hydridochlorobis (cyclopentadienyl) zirconium (IV). Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1985;107(22):6278-6282
  43. 43. Fachinetti G, Floriani C, Pucci S. Stoichiometric reduction of CO and CO2 to methanol: Evidence for carbon monoxide insertion into zirconium–hydrogen bond. Journal of the Chemical Society, Chemical Communications. 1978;(6):269-270
  44. 44. Goeppert A, Czaun M, Jones J-P, Prakash GKS, Olah GA. Recycling of carbon dioxide to methanol and derived products–closing the loop. Chemical Society Reviews. 2014;43(23):7995-8048
  45. 45. Jovanov ZP et al. Opportunities and challenges in the electrocatalysis of CO2 and CO reduction using bifunctional surfaces: A theoretical and experimental study of Au–Cd alloys. Journal of Catalysis. 2016
  46. 46. Kuhl KP, Hatsukade T, Cave ER, Abram DN, Kibsgaard J, Jaramillo TF. Electrocatalytic conversion of carbon dioxide to methane and methanol on transition metal surfaces. Journal of American Chemical Society. 2014;136(40):14107-14113
  47. 47. Ganesh I. Conversion of carbon dioxide into methanol – A potential liquid fuel: Fundamental challenges and opportunities (a review). Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2014;31(Supplement C):221-257
  48. 48. White RE, Vayenas CG, Gamboa-Aldeco ME. Modern Aspects of Electrochemistry No. 54. Springer; 2009
  49. 49. Pradier JP, Pradier C-M. Carbon Dioxide Chemistry: Environmental Issues. Elsevier; 2014
  50. 50. Canfield D, Frese KW Jr. Reduction of carbon dioxide to methanol on n-and p-GaAs and p-InP. Effect of crystal face, electrolyte and current density. Journal of the Electrochemical Society. 1983;130(8):1772-1773
  51. 51. Seshadri G, Lin C, Bocarsly AB. A new homogeneous electrocatalyst for the reduction of carbon dioxide to methanol at low overpotential. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry. 1994;372(1–2):145-150
  52. 52. Morris AJ, McGibbon RT, Bocarsly AB. Electrocatalytic carbon dioxide activation: The rate-determining step of Pyridinium-catalyzed CO2 reduction. ChemSusChem. 2011;4(2):191-196
  53. 53. Barton Cole E, Lakkaraju PS, Rampulla DM, Morris AJ, Abelev E, Bocarsly AB. Using a one-electron shuttle for the multielectron reduction of CO2 to methanol: Kinetic, mechanistic, and structural insights. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2010;132(33):11539-11551
  54. 54. Lim C-H, Holder AM, Musgrave CB. Mechanism of homogeneous reduction of CO2 by pyridine: Proton relay in aqueous solvent and aromatic stabilization. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2012;135(1):142-154
  55. 55. Keith JA, Carter EA. Theoretical insights into pyridinium-based photoelectrocatalytic reduction of CO2. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2012;134(18):7580-7583
  56. 56. Ertem MZ, Konezny SJ, Araujo CM, Batista VS. Functional role of pyridinium during aqueous electrochemical reduction of CO2 on Pt (111). The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. 2013;4(5):745-748
  57. 57. Popić JP, Avramov-Ivić ML, Vuković NB. Reduction of carbon dioxide on ruthenium oxide and modified ruthenium oxide electrodes in 0.5 M NaHCO3. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry. 1997;421(1):105-110
  58. 58. Qu J, Zhang X, Wang Y, Xie C. Electrochemical reduction of CO2 on RuO2/TiO2 nanotubes composite modified Pt electrode. Electrochimica Acta. 2005;50(16):3576-3580
  59. 59. Le M, Ren M, Zhang Z, Sprunger PT, Kurtz RL, Flake JC. Electrochemical reduction of CO2 to CH3OH at copper oxide surfaces. Journal of the Electrochemical Society. 2011;158(5):E45-E49
  60. 60. Shironita S, Karasuda K, Sato K, Umeda M. Methanol generation by CO2 reduction at a Pt–Ru/C electrocatalyst using a membrane electrode assembly. Journal of Power Sources. 2013;240:404-410
  61. 61. Barton EE, Rampulla DM, Bocarsly AB. Selective solar-driven reduction of CO2 to methanol using a catalyzed p-GaP based photoelectrochemical cell. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2008;130(20):6342-6344
  62. 62. Fan W, Zhang Q, Wang Y. Semiconductor-based nanocomposites for photocatalytic H2 production and CO2 conversion. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 2013;15(8):2632-2649
  63. 63. Hossain MA, Ngo HH, Guo WS, Nguyen TV. Removal of copper from water by adsorption onto banana peel as bioadsorbent. International Journal of Geomate. 2012;2(2):227-234
  64. 64. Doherty MD, Grills DC, Muckerman JT, Polyansky DE, Fujita E. Toward more efficient photochemical CO2 reduction: Use of scCO2 or photogenerated hydrides. Coordination Chemistry Reviews. 2010;254(21):2472-2482
  65. 65. Dibenedetto A et al. Hybrid technologies for an enhanced carbon recycling based on the enzymatic reduction of CO2 to methanol in water: Chemical and photochemical NADH regeneration. ChemSusChem. 2012;5(2):373-378
  66. 66. Gondal MA, Ali MA, Dastageer MA, Chang X. CO2 conversion into methanol using granular silicon carbide (α6H-SiC): A comparative evaluation of 355 nm laser and xenon mercury broad band radiation sources. Catalysis Letters. 2013;143(1):108-117
  67. 67. Li X et al. Adsorption of CO2 on heterostructure CdS (Bi2S3)/TiO2 nanotube photocatalysts and their photocatalytic activities in the reduction of CO2 to methanol under visible light irradiation. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2012;180:151-158
  68. 68. Luo D, Chen C, Zhang N, Hong S, Wu H, Liu Z. Characterization and DFT research of Nd/TiO2: Photocatalyst for synthesis of methanol from CO2 and H2O. Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie. 2009;223(12):1465-1476
  69. 69. Wu JCS, Lin H-M, Lai C-L. Photo reduction of CO2 to methanol using optical-fiber photoreactor. Applied Catalysis A: General. 2005;296(2):194-200
  70. 70. Yahaya AH, Gondal MA, Hameed A. Selective laser enhanced photocatalytic conversion of CO2 into methanol. Chemical Physics Letters. 2004;400(1):206-212
  71. 71. Chen X, Zhou Y, Liu Q, Li Z, Liu J, Zou Z. Ultrathin, single-crystal WO3 nanosheets by two-dimensional oriented attachment toward enhanced photocatalytic reduction of CO2 into hydrocarbon fuels under visible light. Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2012;4:3372-3377
  72. 72. Tsai C-W, Chen HM, Liu R-S, Asakura K, Chan T-S. Ni@ NiO core–shell structure-modified nitrogen-doped InTaO4 for solar-driven highly efficient CO2 reduction to methanol. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2011;115(20):10180-10186
  73. 73. Hennig H. Semiconductor Photocatalysis: Principles and Applications. In: Horst K, editor. Wiley Online Library; 2015
  74. 74. Spataru N, Tokuhiro K, Terashima C, Rao TN, Fujishima A. Electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide at ruthenium dioxide deposited on boron-doped diamond. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry. 2003;33(12):1205-1210
  75. 75. Ryu J, Andersen TN, Eyring H. Electrode reduction kinetics of carbon dioxide in aqueous solution. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. 1972;76:3278-3286
  76. 76. Ogura K, Salazar-Villalpando MD. CO2 electrochemical reduction via adsorbed halide anions. JOM–Journal of the Minerals, Metals and Materials Society. 2011;63(1):35-38
  77. 77. Bhardwaj R, Pan RL, Gross EL. Solar energy conversion by chloroplast photoelectrochemical cells. Nature. 1981;289(5796):396-398
  78. 78. Licht S. A description of energy conversion in photoelectrochemical solar cells. Nature. 1987;330(6144):148-151
  79. 79. Grätzel M. Photoelectrochemical cells. Nature. 2001;414(6861):338-344
  80. 80. Grätzel M, Kalyanasundaram K. Artificial photosynthesis: Efficient dye-sensitized photoelectrochemical cells for direct conversion of visible light to electricity. Current Science. 1994:706-714
  81. 81. Yae S et al. Solar to chemical conversion using metal nanoparticle modified microcrystalline silicon thin film photoelectrode. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells. 2007;91(4):224-229
  82. 82. Fujishima A, Honda K. Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature. 1972;238(5358):37-38
  83. 83. Fujishima A, Kohayakawa K, Honda K. Formation of hydrogen gas with an electrochemical photo-cell. Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan. 1975;48(3):1041-1042
  84. 84. Watanabe T, Fujishima A, Honda K. Photoelectrochemical Hydrogen Production. 1979. pp. 137-169
  85. 85. Ganesh I. Conversion of carbon dioxide to methanol using solar energy–A brief review. Materials Sciences and Applications. 2011;2(10):1407
  86. 86. Zhao J, Wang X, Xu Z, Loo JSC. Hybrid catalysts for photoelectrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide: A prospective review on semiconductor/metal complex co-catalyst systems. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 2014;2(37):15228-15233

Written By

Sajeda A. Al-Saydeh and Syed Javaid Zaidi

Submitted: 08 November 2017 Reviewed: 02 February 2018 Published: 16 August 2018