Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Understanding Interaction Capacity of CO2 with Organic Compounds at Molecular Level: A Theoretical Approach

Written By

Pham Ngoc Khanh and Nguyen Tien Trung

Submitted: 08 July 2017 Reviewed: 23 October 2017 Published: 16 August 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.71878

From the Edited Volume

Carbon Dioxide Chemistry, Capture and Oil Recovery

Edited by Iyad Karamé, Janah Shaya and Hassan Srour

Chapter metrics overview

1,421 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


In this chapter, interactions of CO2 with a number of organic compounds at molecular level are discussed in detail. The naked and substituted hydrocarbons along with compounds functionalized by hydroxyl, carbonyl, thiocarbonyl, carboxyl, sulfonyl, and amide groups have attracted much attention as CO2-philic agents. In general, interaction capacity between the functionalized organic compounds with CO2 is stronger than the hydrocarbon and its derivatives. An addition of more CO2 molecules into the interaction system formed by the functionalized organic compounds and CO2 leads to an increase in the stability of the complexes. The obtained results indicate that π…π linkages between CO2 and aromatic rings can significantly contribute to the interactions between CO2 and MOF/ZIF materials. Formic acid (HCOOH) is likely to be the most soluble compound as compared to the remaining host molecules (CH3OH, CH3NH2, HCHO, HCOOCH3, and CH3COCH3) when dissolved in CO2. The carbonyl (>C═O, >C═S) and sulfonyl (>S═O, >S═S) compounds have presented a higher stability, as compared to other functionalized groups, when they interact with CO2. Therefore, they can be valuable candidates in the design of CO2-philic materials and in the search of materials to adsorb CO2.


  • supercritical carbon dioxide
  • Lewis acid-base
  • hydrogen bond
  • weak interaction

1. Introduction

Carbon dioxide (CO2) causes negative effect on global climate due to its “greenhouse effect” property multiplying by its high level in the atmosphere. Currently, its concentration is increasing due to the fossil fuels combustion process by human activities [1]. Nevertheless, it is usually regarded as an environmentally benign solvent because of its less hazardous property. Furthermore, it is an attractive solvent owing to the ease of its removal capacity, abundance, inexpensive, and flexibility of the solvent parameters [2]. Consequently, supercritical CO2 (sc-CO2) is well known as an efficient solvent over conventional organic ones in many chemical processes, and is expected to be useful in many applications of green chemistry such as extraction, separation, chemical reaction, and material processes [3, 4, 5, 6]. Recently, sc-CO2 has been employed in direct sol-gel reactions for the synthesis of oxide nanomaterials, oligomers, and polymers, etc. [7, 8, 9, 10]. It is noteworthy that due to a lack of polarity, sc-CO2 is a very feeble solvent for most polar solutes [11]. Nevertheless, due to the possession of a substantial quadrupole moment and a polar C═O bond, the majority of materials attached by carbonyl functional or fluoride groups are soluble in sc-CO2. In the context, continuing efforts have been reported for the purpose of enhancement in applicability of sc-CO2 solvent through the use of “CO2-philes”, which makes insoluble or poorly soluble materials becoming more soluble in sc-CO2 at an acceptable level of low temperature and pressure conditions [3, 12]. Experimental works have aimed at better understanding of behavior of the sc-CO2 as solvent for organic compounds [13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18]. It might be assumed that CO2 is a green yet feeble solvent because its full potential could not be realized without a thorough understanding of its solvent behavior at molecular level. Accordingly, numerous results on the CO2-philes have been reported during the 1990s [19, 20]. These CO2-philes are less favorable and effective both economically and environmentally because most of them are fluorinated polymers. Thus, in attempts to avoid expensive cost and environmental impacts of the fluorous materials, during the last three decades, large-scale studies have focused on the design of nonfluorous CO2-philes, specifically hydrocarbon-based and oxygenated hydrocarbon-based polymers [21, 22]. In 1996, Kazarian et al. discovered the formation of Lewis acid-base (LA-LB) type of interaction between CO2 with the O atom of a number of carbonyl compounds (>C═O) for the first time [23]. Soon later, Beckman et al. successfully synthesized copolymer of nonfluorous-ete-carbonate in sc-CO2 at low pressure [21]. Interaction of CO2 with delocalized π aromatic systems in the gas phase have been theoretically studied for the purpose of ranking in a database of a large variety of organic ligands, which would be valuable candidates for designing new metal-organic framework materials with enhanced affinity for CO2 adsorption at low pressure. Accordingly, some extensive studies have been reported on the interactions of CO2 with π-systems at level of theory and experiment [24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29]. In recent years, interactions of simple functionalized organic molecules, including CH3OH, CH3CH2OH [30, 31, 32], CH3OCH3, CH3OCH2CH2OCH3 [33, 34, 35], HCHO, CH3CHO, CH3COOCH3, CH3COCH3, CH3COOH [36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41], and XCHZ (X = CH3, H, F, Cl, Br; Z = O, S) [42] CH3SZCH3 (Z = O, S) [43] with CO2 have been carried out using quantum chemical methods. Today, the interest in CO2 computational chemistry is the interaction capacity of a solute molecule surrounded by a number of CO2 molecules. Despite the fact that numerous studies have been performed, a full understanding of the CO2 characteristics as a solvent remains a challenging task [1]. It is therefore clear that we need more systematic studies to gain a better understanding on the nature of the interactions involved, rather than considering the origin for a few disparate systems. Furthermore, there is also a great interest in deep understanding of the origin of the interactions between different types of organic compounds with CO2 at molecular level for an effective use of CO2 in different states.

This chapter focuses on evaluating interaction capacity of CO2 with model organic compounds at level of molecule using theoretical approaches. Section 2 provides us with a brief summary of theoretical methods and computational techniques. Section 3 reviews the remarkable results of the investigation of interactions between CO2 with organic compounds and is divided into two parts: (3.1) interactions of CO2 with selected models of saturated and unsaturated hydrocarbons and their substituted derivatives, and modeled aromatic hydrocarbons; (3.2) interactions of CO2 and modeled organic compounds with different functional groups and their substituted derivatives. Obtained results presented in Section 4 support for the enhancement of sc-CO2 solvent used as a replacement for toxic classical organic solvents in industrial applications. In addition, the functional groups that present the more stable interaction with CO2 at molecular level are revealed, which could be attached on the surface of materials to absorb and store CO2 gas.


2. Computational details

Geometrical parameters of all the considered structures including monomers and complexes are optimized using suitable quantum-chemical methods such as the molecular orbital theory (MO) and density functional theory (DFT) and large basis sets, depending on investigated systems, such as 6-311++G(2d,2p), 6-311++G(3df,2pd), aug-cc-pVDZ, aug-cc-pVTZ, which have succeeded in investigating noncovalent interactions, especially hydrogen bonds [44, 45]. Harmonic vibrational frequencies are subsequently calculated at investigated level of theory to ensure that the optimized structures are local minima on the potential energy surfaces, and to estimate their zero-point energy (ZPE). The stabilization energy of each complex is calculated using the supermolecular method as the difference in total energies between that of each complex and the sum of the relevant monomers at the selected level of theory. The interaction energy is corrected by zero-point energy (ZPE) and basis set superposition errors (BSSE). The latter is computed using the function counterpoise procedure of Boys and Bernardi [46]. The “atoms-in-molecules” (AIM) [47] analyses are applied to identify critical points and to calculate their characteristics including electron density (ρ(r)), Laplacian, electron potential and kinetic energy density, and total energy density. The GenNBO 5.G program [48] is used to perform NBO calculations, which is extensively applied to investigate chemical essences of hydrogen bonds and other weak interaction, and can provide information about natural hybrid orbitals, natural bond orbitals, natural population, occupancies in NBOs, hyperconjugation energies, rehybridization, and repolarization.


3. Interaction capacity of CO2 with organic compounds

3.1. Interaction of CO2 with model hydrocarbons

3.1.1. Interaction of CO2 with saturated hydrocarbons and their substituted derivatives

Saturated hydrocarbons are a primary energy source for our civilization. Fluorocarbons have been currently used as CO2-philic functionalities in many potential applications of chemistry utilizing liquid and supercritical CO2 as a “green” alternative to conventional organic solvents for chemical processes [20, 49, 50, 51, 52]. The miscibility and dissolution of organic molecules in sc-CO2 generally increase when the hydrogen atoms in molecules are substituted by fluorine atoms [49, 53]. It is crucial, therefore, to investigate interaction of CO2 with saturated hydrocarbons and its substituted derivatives. A study [54] on density-dependent 1H and 19FNMR chemical shift of hydrocarbons and fluorocarbons in sc-CO2 pointed out that there is a distinct difference in the chemical shift changes, as a function of density, for the two nuclei. In addition, the authors suggested a specific interaction of type “solute-solvent” in the system formed by the fluorocarbons and CO2, and a site specificity for the 19F shifts due to the surface accessibility of the individual fluorine atoms. In 1996, interactions between CO2 with ethane (C2H6) and hexafluoroethane (C2F6), in particular the (CO2)n∙∙∙C2H6 and (CO2)n∙∙∙C2F6 interactions, with n = 1–4, were examined using restricted Hartree-Fock method [55]. The interaction energy for the CO2∙∙∙C2F6 complex was calculated to be −3.35 kJ.mol−1, while it was −1.26 kJ.mol−1 for the CO2∙∙∙C2H6 complex, indicating that the interaction of CO2 with C2F6 is stronger than that with C2H6. The obtained results showed key differences between the interaction of hydrocarbons and fluorocarbons with CO2. The interaction of the fluorocarbon with CO2 is predominantly electrostatic in nature. Thus, the positively charged carbon atom in CO2 has a strong attraction with the negatively charged fluorine atoms of the fluorocarbons, resulting in a favorable binding energy of 3.14–3.35 kJ.mol−1 for each CO2 molecule in the first solvent shell. The interaction of CO2 with hydrocarbons is quite weak due to the noble nature of the hydrocarbons molecule. Nevertheless, Han and Jeong [56] pointed out that the results in Ref. [55] were incorrect because the calculations for interaction energy of the complexes were not corrected by the basis set superposition error.

In 1998, interactions of CO2 with small hydrocarbons (CH4 and C2H6) and fluorocarbons (CF4 and C2F6) were reinvestigated using second-order many-body perturbation theory (MP2) methods by Diep et al. [57]. These authors surprisingly did not find any enhanced attraction between CO2 and perfluorocarbons relative to the analogous hydrocarbons as in the publication of Cece et al. [55]. On the contrary, interaction energies of the obtained complexes range from −3.31 to −4.90 kJ.mol−1, in which the interaction energies are slightly more negative for the CO2-hydrocarbon complexes than for the corresponding CO2-perfluorocarbon ones, suggesting that the interaction capacity of CO2 and hydrocarbons is stronger than that of fluorocarbons and CO2. Yonker and Palmer [58] studied the nuclear shielding of 1H and 19F nuclei in CH3F and CHF3 by NMR and molecular dynamics simulations. Obtained results showed that there is no distinct or specific interaction between fluoromethane and CO2. A various work by Yee et al. [59] reported that the polarizability of CF4 and C2F6, which is derived from dielectric constant measurement, is larger than that of CH4 and C2H6, and noted that this reason should result in a proportional difference in the magnitude of the interaction between the induced dipoles. Consequently, they suggested that the repulsion of CO2 is greater for CF4 than for CH4. However, Diep et al. [57] argued that only the electronic component of the total polarizability cited by Yee et al. [59] is the adequate reason for the induced dipole-induced dipole interactions between the molecules. They showed that the electronic polarizability is comparable between the perfluorocarbons and the alike hydrocarbons. The CO2-philicity of fluorinated compounds with varying numbers of fluorine atoms in the system was investigated by Wallen et al. [60]. By using correlated ab-initio calculations and studying effect of stepwise substitution of H atom of methane by fluorine, the authors explored origin of fluorocarbon and hydrocarbon interactions with CO2. The results suggested an optimum density of fluorine atoms that can be viewed as a maximum CO2-philicity, and CO2 molecule plays both weak Lewis acid and base in these systems. In this work, the authors suggested the fundamentally different nature of interaction between CO2-fluorocarbon and CO2-hydrocarbon, in spite of comparable interaction energy. For complexes formed by fluorocarbons and CO2, their stability is contributed by interaction of carbon in CO2 and fluorine in fluorocarbons, while the stability of complexes of hydrocarbons and CO2 is thanks to two oxygen of CO2. It should be noteworthy that the stability of complex is also contributed by the C─H∙∙∙O weak hydrogen. In summary, these molecular modeling computations have shed some light on the interaction of hydrocarbons and fluorocarbons with CO2, which may help to explain the difference in solubility of various saturated hydrocarbons and their substituted derivatives in sc-CO2.

3.1.2. Interaction of CO2 with unsaturated hydrocarbons and its substituted derivatives

Unsaturated hydrocarbons is one of the most important classes of materials for synthesizing polymers; and sc-CO2 has been seen as a good solvent for this kind of synthesis. In 2009, interaction between C2H2 with CO2 was investigated by Alkorta et al. [61] and interaction energy was evaluated to be ca. -4.70 kJ.mol−1 at M05-2x/6-311++G(d,p) and −5.99 kJ.mol−1 at MP2/aug-cc-pVTZ, implying that the complex C2H2∙∙∙CO2 is stable on the potential energy surface. The stability of complex is determined by weak C∙∙∙C interaction and is confirmed by AIM and NBO analyses. Indeed, AIM analysis shows the presence of this intermolecular contact owing to the values of electron density (ρ(r)) and Laplacian (∇2ρ(r)) at its BCP to be 0.0067 and 0.0246 au. Furthermore, the NBO analysis also indicates that upon complexation the electron-rich carbon atom of CO2 transfers electrons to the anti-bonding orbital of C2H2 having electron-poor carbon atoms. In order to understand deeply origin of interaction of unsaturated hydrocarbons with CO2, the complexes of C2H4 and CO2 were investigated by our group in 2016 [1]. It is remarkable that the interaction energies corrected by both ZPE and BSSE for the C2H4∙∙∙CO2 complexes are in the range from −1.1 to −4.9 kJ.mol−1. The most stable structure of C2H4∙∙∙CO2 is in line with the report by Miller et al. that CO2’s main axis parallels the plane of C2H4, but is not parallel to its C─C axis [62]. Obtained results showed that the p∙∙∙π* and π∙∙∙π* interactions play more important role than the C─H∙∙∙O hydrogen bond in stabilizing the C2H4∙∙∙CO2 complexes. Remarkably, contribution of the π∙∙∙π* interaction to stabilization of the complex formed by CO2-philic compounds and CO2 has been observed for the first time in this literature. The stability of complex C2H4∙∙∙CO2 (−4.9 kJ.mol−1) is more stable than the complexes of interaction between CO2 with hydrocarbons and fluorinated hydrocarbons such as CH4, C2H6, CF4, C2F6 (from −3.7 to −4.9 kJ.mol−1 at the MP2/aug-cc-pVDZ) [56, 57, 61]. This review indicates that interaction capacity of CO2 with unsaturated hydrocarbons is stronger than that of CO2 with saturated hydrocarbons.

Our group [1] continued to investigate the interactions of the 1,2-dihalogenated derivatives of ethylene (XCH═CHX) with CO2 in order to evaluate the substituent effects on the interactions. Six stable shapes of the optimized structures of XCH═CHX∙∙∙CO2 (X = F, Cl and Br) at the MP2/aug-cc-pVDZ level are showed in Figure 1, which are denoted hereafter by C1X, C2X and C3X for cis-XCH═CHX∙∙∙CO2 pairs, and T1X, T2X and T3X for trans-XCH═CHX∙∙∙CO2 pairs.

Figure 1.

The stable geometries of the complexes of CO2 and XCH═CHX derivatives (X = F, Cl, and Br). (a) cis-XCH═CHX···CO2 complexes, (b) trans-XCH═CHX···CO2 complexes.

The obtained results showed that stability of the complexes C1X and C3X is determined by the C─H∙∙∙O hydrogen bonded interaction, whereas the presence of both the C─H∙∙∙O hydrogen bond and C─X∙∙∙C Lewis acid-base interaction leads to stabilization of the complexes C2X, T1X and T2X. For T3X, their stability is induced by a p∙∙∙π* interaction from the lone pair n(O) to the π*(C═C) orbital and a π∙∙∙π* interaction from MO-π(C═O) to MO-π*(C═C) orbital. The two H atoms in C2H4 substituted by two alike halogen atoms X results in an additional presence of C─X∙∙∙C Lewis acid-base interaction, thus contributing supplementary to the stabilization of the investigated complexes. In general, the cis-XCH═CHX∙∙∙CO2 complexes are more stable than the trans counterparts. In addition, CH2CH2∙∙∙CO2 is less stable than both trans-XCH═CHX∙∙∙CO2 and cis-XCH═CHX∙∙∙CO2. Thus, the interaction energies with both ZPE and BSSE corrections are calculated to be from −1.7 to −7.5 kJ.mol−1 for cis-XCH═CHX∙∙∙CO2 and from −4.4 to −6.8 kJ.mol−1 for trans-XCH═CHX∙∙∙CO2. Hence replacement of the two H atoms in CH2═CH2 by the same halogen atoms actually increases the stability of complexes formed by interaction of XCH═CHX with CO2 and causes a decrease of the role of the π∙∙∙π* interaction in stabilization of the parent C2H4∙∙∙CO2 complex in comparison with the XCH═CHX∙∙∙CO2 ones.

3.1.3. Interaction of CO2 with some model aromatic hydrocarbons

Key aromatic hydrocarbons of commercial interests such as benzene, toluene, and xylene play a key role in the biochemistry of all living things. They are used to produce a range of important chemicals and polymers. In 2009, interactions between CO2 and a large number of functionalized aromatic molecules were investigated by means of using density functional theory by Torrisi et al. [24] with the aim of ranking a large variety of organic ligands in a database, which could be suitable candidates for designing new metal organic framework materials with enhanced CO2 adsorption capacity at ambient pressure. Two groups of substituted benzene derivatives including the electron-withdrawing halogen groups (tetrafluoro-, chloro-, bromo-, and dibromobenzene) and methyl electron donor (mono-, di-, and tetramethylbenzene) were considered since these substituents are very common components of aromatic ligands in MOFS. The results of interaction energy showed that halogen substitution causes relatively strong destabilization of complexes formed, which is increased with number of substituting groups, and thus reduces the magnitude of the aromatic ring adsorption toward CO2. Nevertheless, a decrease of electron density of the aromatic ring induces an increase in acidity for some of the aromatic hydrogen atoms, which helps weak hydrogen bond-like interactions of these hydrogen atoms with oxygen atom of CO2 formed. On the other hand, substitution of hydrogen atom in aromatic ring by methyl group clearly strengthens its interaction capacity with CO2, which is usually very accessible on the internal surface of a MOF cavity, and hence it can be seen as a promising way to enhance the CO2 affinity of the MOF, in which tetramethyl substitution manifests a maximum advantage of this particular class of ligand.

In 2013, Chen et al., by using high-level ab initio methods, suggested the π∙∙∙π interaction between CO2 and three aromatic molecules, namely benzene (C6H6), pyridine (C5H5N), and pyrrole (C4H5N), which serve as common functional groups in metal-organic/zeoliticimidazolate framework materials [63]. The interaction energies for the complexes of CO2 with aromatic hydrocarbons calculated at MP2/aug-cc-pVTZ are in the range from −11.9 to −15.4 kJ.mol−1, which are twice more negative than the most stable complex of the C2H4∙∙∙CO2 system (−4.9 kJ.mol−1 at CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVTZ//MP2/aug-cc-pVDZ level). This result implies that interaction capacity of CO2 with aromatic hydrocarbons is stronger than that of CO2 with unsaturated hydrocarbons. These authors also optimized the side-on structures of all possible complexes to compare the interaction strength of side-on configurations and π∙∙∙π top-on configurations. This work obtained the three most-stable side-on configurations, specifically S-C6H6∙∙∙CO2, S-C5H5N∙∙∙CO2, and S-C4H5N∙∙∙CO2, as illustrated in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Optimized structures of S-C6H6∙∙∙CO2, S-C5H5N∙∙∙CO2, and S-C4H5N∙∙∙CO2.

The side-on interaction is significantly weaker than the π∙∙∙π interaction in C6H6∙∙∙CO2 and C4H5N∙∙∙CO2 pairs. On the contrary, for the C5H5N∙∙∙CO2 pair the π∙∙∙π interaction [−11.6 kJ.mol−1 for T-C5H5N∙∙∙CO2(N) and −11.5 kJ.mol−1 for TC5H5N∙∙∙CO2(C)] is weaker than the side-on interaction (−18.0 kJ.mol−1). The obtained results showed that the EDA-type interactions are not available in real MOF/ZIF materials because the central cationic metal of MOF/ZIF materials is linked to the exposed aromatic N atom of the EDA-type interaction in S-C5H5N∙∙∙CO2. In short, the results indicate that π∙∙∙π interaction between CO2 and aromatic rings can significantly contribute to the interactions between CO2 and MOFs/ZIFs.

3.1.4. Concluding remarks on interaction of CO2 with model hydrocarbons

Interactions of CO2 with model hydrocarbons including saturated, unsaturated, aromatic hydrocarbons and theirs substituted derivatives were investigated using high-level ab initio methods. In general, the strength of the complexes increases in going from the interaction of the saturated hydrocarbons with carbon dioxide to unsaturated hydrocarbons with carbon dioxide and finally to the parent aromatic hydrocarbons with carbon dioxide. The stability of the obtained complexes is determined by the C─H∙∙∙O hydrogen bonded interaction, C─X∙∙∙C Lewis acid-base interaction, π∙∙∙π, p∙∙∙π* and π∙∙∙π* interactions. The contribution of the π∙∙∙π* interaction to the formation of the complexes between CO2-philic compounds and CO2 has been observed. The π∙∙∙π interactions were significantly stronger than the side-on hydrogen-bond interactions but weaker than EDA-type interaction. The π∙∙∙π interactions can significantly contribute to adsorption of CO2 in practical applications. Consequently, approach to the increase in the aromaticity of the linker should be an effective way with purpose of increasing the CO2 adsorption in MOF/ZIF materials.

3.2. Interaction of CO2 with model functionalized organic compounds and their substituted derivatives

3.2.1. Interaction of CO2 with model functionalized organic compounds

Up to now, a large number of complexes for interactions of CO2 with simple functionalized organic molecules have been studied using quantum chemical methods [33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43]. In more recent investigations, the Lewis acid-base interaction between CO2 and some carbonyl-functionalized compounds has been reported [34, 44, 64, 65, 66, 67]. The existence of the C─H∙∙∙O hydrogen bond in complexes was confirmed clearly by Wallen et al. [38, 39, 60]. However, it is necessary to perform systematic studies to elucidate the nature of the interactions formed in complexes, rather than considering the results obtained from few specific systems. We investigated complexes of CO2 and some typically functionalized organic molecules such as methanol (CH3OH), methylamine (CH3NH2), formaldehyde (HCHO), formic acid (HCOOH), dimethylether (CH3OCH3), acetone (CH3COCH3) and methyl formate (HCOOCH3) [40] Obtained results showed that the Lewis acid-base interaction such as C─N∙∙∙C(CO2), C═O∙∙∙C(CO2) plays a more dominant role compared to the C─H∙∙∙O blue-shifting hydrogen bond in stabilizing most of the complexes. However, the stability of the HCOOH∙∙∙CO2 pair is mainly determined by O─H∙∙∙O red-shifting hydrogen bond. All interaction energies are significantly negative, indicating that obtained complexes are quite stable. Particularly, the interaction energies with both ZPE and BSSE corrections are in the range from −3.3 to −14.2 kJ.mol−1, in which the HCOOH∙∙∙CO2 pair is the most stable, whereas the weakest one is the HCHO∙∙∙CO2 pair. As a consequence, solubility of HCOOH in sc-CO2 is likely to be the largest in all the considered compounds. The interaction energies of some considered complexes are more negative than the values reported in the previous works [35, 64]. Thus, for the pair (CH3OH, CO2), its interaction energy of −13.3 kJ.mol−1 with only ZPE correction, and −11.4 kJ.mol−1 with both ZPE and BSSE corrections is more negative than that of −11.3 kJ.mol−1 obtained with only BSSE correction at the MP2/aug-cc-pVTZ level [64]. Another example is that the BSSE corrected interaction energy of the CH3OCH3∙∙∙CO2 pair was computed to be −13.1 kJ.mol−1 at the MP2/6-311++G(2d,2p)//MP2/6-311++G(d,p) level [35] while it is −13.7 kJ.mol−1 with ZPE and BSSE corrections, and −16.3 kJ.mol−1 with only ZPE correction in the present work.

In 2011, our group investigated the interactions of CO2 with substituted derivatives of formaldehyde and thioformaldehyde [42]. The interaction energies (with ZPE and BSSE corrections) of −10.5 kJ.mol−1 for CH3CHO∙∙∙CO2 and −9.1 kJ.mol−1 for CH3CHS∙∙∙CO2 are more negative than for complexes of HCHO∙∙∙CO2 and HCHS∙∙∙CO2, respectively. The obtained results supported that both O and S atoms act as Lewis bases and the >C═X (X = O, S) groups should be considered as potential candidates for the design of CO2-philic materials. The interactions between carbonyl compounds and CO2 are stronger than those of fluorocarbons and fluoro-carbonyl compounds. Obtained results suggested that the Lewis acid-base and hydrogen bonded interactions should be the key factors in governing the solubility of isolated monomers in sc-CO2, in which the crucial role of the former is suggested. The function of these interactions in the solvation of >C═O and >C═S compounds in sc-CO2 may be important in terms of the specific solute-solvent.

In 2014, we investigated the interactions between some carbonyl compounds including acetone (CH3COCH3) with CO2 [41]. Interaction energies of obtained complexes which are denoted by H1, H2, H3, and H4 at the CCSD(T)/6-311++G(3df,2pd)//MP2/6-311++G(2d,2p) level are gathered in Table 1. The results indicate that the stability of studied complexes is contributed by both Lewis acid-base and hydrogen bonded interactions. As shown in Table 1, the interaction energy for H1 (−10.3 kJ.mol−1) is less negative than that reported in Ref. [40] (−11.1 kJ.mol−1) at CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVTZ but is more negative than that in Ref. [64] (−8.8 kJ.mol−1) at MP2/aug-cc-pVDZ. Notably, complex H3 is less stable than H1 in this work, which is different from the results reported by Ruiz-Lopez et al [68]. By using the levels of theory MP2/aug-cc-pVDZ and CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVDZ, the authors suggested that H1 is ca. 1.0 kJ.mol−1 higher in interaction energy than H3. These authors conclusively suggested that the >C═O group can be a valuable candidate in the design of CO2-philic and adsorbent materials.


Table 1.

Interaction energies (kJ.mol−1) corrected for only ZPE and for both ZPE and BSSE of the complexes.

Source: Dai et al. [41].

Further, interactions of CO2 with CH3SZCH3 (Z = O, S) were also investigated by our group [43]. Three stable shapes of the complexes at MP2/6-311++G(2d,2p) are presented in Figure 3, denoted hereafter by T1, T2 and T3. Interaction energies of complexes at two different levels of theory are also given in the Table 2.

Figure 3.

Stable shapes of complexes between CH3SZCH3 (Z = O, S) and CO2.

StructuresZ = OZ = S

Table 2.

Interaction energies corrected for ZPE (∆E0, in kJ.mol−1) and for ZPE and BSSE (∆E*, in kJ.mol−1) of obtained complexes.

Taken from MP2/aug-cc-pVTZ//MP2/6-311++G(2d,2p).

Taken from CCSD(T)/6-311++G(3df,2pd)//MP2/6-311++G(2d,2p).

Source: Phuong et al. [43].

The CH3SZCH3∙∙∙CO2 (Z = O, S) complexes are in general stabilized by the Lewis acid-base, chalcogen-chalcogen and hydrogen bonded interactions. However, the crucial role contributing to the overall stabilization energy should be the Lewis acid-base interaction. The obtained results pointed out a slight difference in the interaction energies between the two employed levels of theory. Thus, the interaction energies of the examined complexes range from −13.8 to −17.2 and −9.8 to −14.4 kJ.mol−1 (at MP2/aug-cc-pVTZ//MP2/6-311++G(2d,2p)), and −13.6 to −17.7 and -9.6 to −14.5 kJ.mol−1 (at CCSD(T)/6-311++G(3df,2pd)//MP2/6-311++G(2d,2p)) for only ZPE correction and for both ZPE and BSSE corrections, respectively (cf.Table 2). The results indicate that the formed complexes are significantly stable, and more stable than the complexes of the >C═O or >C═S functionalized compounds with CO2 reported in Refs. [38, 40, 42]. This implies a stronger interaction of CO2 with the >S═O and >S═S functional groups relative to the >C═O and >C═S counterparts. In addition, we also suggested a stronger interaction of CO2 with the >S═O moiety compared to the >S═S one, and they both should be candidates for designing CO2-philic materials, CO2 adsorption and storage materials in the future.

For the CH3SOCH3∙∙∙CO2 complexes, the strength of T3 is close to that of T1 reported by Wallen et al. [38]. Thus, the interaction energies of T1 in this work are −14.4 kJ.mol−1 at MP2/aug-cc-pVTZ//MP2/6-311++G(2d,2p) and −14.5 kJ.mol−1 at CCSD(T)/6-311++G(3df,2pd)//MP2/6-311++G(2d,2p), which are in consistent with the value of −14.3 kJ.mol−1 at MP2/aug-cc-pVDZ//MP2/6-31+G(d) reported in Ref. [38].

3.2.2. Effect of various substituted groups to strength the complexes formed by interaction of CO2 with model functionalized organic compounds

We now continue to discuss in some details the effects of substitution to the overall interaction energy in obtained complexes between CO2 with model functionalized organic compounds. The complexes of the interactions of CO2 with CH3SZCHX2 (X = H, CH3, F, Cl, Br; Z = O, S) were studied by our group and reported in Ref. [43]. In general, the CH3SOCHX2∙∙∙CO2 complexes are more stable than the CH3SSCHX2∙∙∙CO2 complexes. This firmly indicates that the >S═O, as compared to the >S═S, has a stronger interaction with CO2, which originates from a contribution of a larger attractive electrostatic interaction of the former than the latter in stabilizing the examined complexes. For the CH3SOCHX2∙∙∙CO2 complexes, the strength is enhanced by the X substitution in the order from H via F to Cl to Br and finally to CH3. Therefore, the substitution of two H atoms in a CH3 group of CH3SOCH3 by two alike X groups significantly influences the strength of CH3SOCHX2∙∙∙CO2 complexes relative to CH3SOCH3∙∙∙CO2 complexes. The replacement also leads to a slight enhancement of stability of the CH3SSCHX2∙∙∙CO2 complexes in the sequence from F, H, Cl, Br to CH3. In Ref. [41], we replaced two H atoms in a CH3 group of CH3COCH3 by two alike CH3, F, Cl and Br groups, and the results showed that interaction energies of complexes are in the range from −9.2 to −10.7 kJ.mol−1 with both ZPE and BSSE corrections, which are more negative than that of interactions of CO2 with hydrocarbons and fluorocarbons. Thus, the interaction energies range from −3.7 to −4.9 kJ.mol−1 for the complexes of CO2 with the hydrocarbons such as CH4, C2H6, CF4, C2F6; and from −2.4 to −7.8 kJ.mol−1 for the complexes of CO2 with CH4−nFn (n = 0 ÷ 4) [57, 60] at the MP2/aug-cc-pVDZ level. These results are in line with the suggestion on larger stability of carbonyl relative to fluorocarbons and other functionalized compounds in interacting with CO2. Generally, the strength of CH3COCHR2∙∙∙CO2 complexes is gently increased when R = CH3 as compared to CH3COCH3∙∙∙CO2, while it is slightly decreased with R = F, Cl and Br.

3.2.3. Interaction of nCO2 (n = 1:3) with model functionalized organic compounds

It is important to investigate the strength of interactions between CO2 and carbonyl-containing molecules, as well as the underlying their chemical nature. Due to a strong interest in CO2 as a solvent, it is imperative to consider aggregates in which a solute molecule is surrounded by a number of CO2 molecules, an unexplored area at present [69]. Expansion of the system by adding more CO2 molecules shows how the geometry and bonding in the heterodimer is affected by placement of the solute in an environment. This would make our simulation more akin to solvation phenomenon, and particularly the magnitude of cooperative effects. The complexes formed by H2CO, CH3CHO, and (CH3)2CO with two and three molecules of CO2 are studied using ab initio calculations by Scheniner et al. [69]. There are a host of different geometries adopted by the complexes of the carbonyl with two or three CO2 molecules, with small energy differences. The bonding features of the heterodimers are generally carried over to these larger heterotrimers and tetramers, although the linear C═O∙∙∙C arrangement of the binary complexes is largely absent. The O∙∙∙O chalcogen bonds, absent in the heterodimers, play a major role in many of the larger complexes. The degree of cooperativity in these oligomers is generally rather small, with a maximal positive cooperativity of only 1.1 kJ/mol. The binding energies of heterotetramers complexes range from −39.0 to −50.7 kJ.mol−1, which are more negative than heterodimers (−8.8 to −12.5 kJ.mol−1) and trimers complexes (−23.1 to −34.2 kJ.mol−1). These results suggest that the addition of more carbon dioxide molecules into systems leads to a larger increase in stability of complexes.

3.2.4. Concluding remarks on interaction capacity of CO2 with model functionalized organic compounds

The organic compounds functionalized by hydroxyl, carbonyl, thiocarbonyl, carboxyl and amide groups have been paid much attention as CO2-philic compounds. The carbonyl and thiocarbonyl compounds have presented a higher stability, as compared to other functionalized ones, when they interact with CO2. This durability has been assigned to a main contribution of the >C═Z∙∙∙C (Z = O, S) Lewis acid-base interaction and/or an additional cooperation of the C─H∙∙∙O hydrogen bonded interaction, except for the case of the HCOOH∙∙∙CO2 complex, where the role of the O─H∙∙∙O hydrogen bond was found to be more important than the >C═O∙∙∙C Lewis acid-base interaction. We have also found that there is a stronger interaction of CO2 with the >S═O and >S═S containing compounds relative to the >C═O and >C═S counterparts, and therefore it should be suggested that they would be potential groups attached on the surface of materials to adsorb CO2 and used to design CO2-philic materials.


4. Concluding remarks

From the contents mentioned above, we can draw some key conclusions for this chapter:

  1. Interaction capacity of CO2 with various organic compounds including hydrocarbons and functionalized organic compounds along with its derivatives were investigated by using ab initio calculations. The obtained results show that interaction capacity between functionalized organic compounds with CO2 is stronger than that of model hydrocarbons with CO2. For interactions of CO2 with model hydrocarbons, the larger stability of complexes is found for interaction of aromatic relative to saturated and unsaturated hydrocarbons with carbon dioxide. In the case of interactions between functionalized organic compounds with CO2, interaction capacity of the carbonyl and sulfonyl compounds with CO2 is stronger than that of other functionalized compounds. Obtained results on interaction of nCO2 (n = 1–3) with functionalized organic compounds indicate that the addition of more CO2 into systems leads to an increase in the stability of complexes formed.

  2. The stability of examined complexes is determined by weakly noncovalent interaction including C─H∙∙∙O, O─H∙∙∙O of hydrogen bonds, X∙∙∙C Lewis acid-base interaction, O∙∙∙O chalcogen-chalcogen, π∙∙∙π, p∙∙∙π*, and π∙∙∙π* interactions. Remarkably, contribution of the π∙∙∙π* interaction to the complex formed between CO2-philic compounds and CO2 has been revealed in our work. The π∙∙∙π interactions can significantly contribute to the adsorption of CO2 in MOF/ZIF materials. Obtained results show the strength of intermolecular interaction tends to decrease in going from >C═S∙∙∙C via > C═O∙∙∙C to >C═X∙∙∙C (X = F, Cl, Br). This observation points out enormous applicability of CO2-philic materials based on thiocarbonyls.

  3. It is found that the functional groups such as carbonyl and sulfonyl give a more stable interaction with CO2 than other functionalized groups, in which a stronger interaction of CO2 with the >S═O and >S═S counterparts relative to the >C═O and >C═S ones is revealed, and they should be valuable candidates for synthesizing CO2-philic materials and finding new materials to adsorb CO2.


  1. 1. Trung NT, Trang NTT, Ngan VT, Quang DT, Nguyen MT. Complexes of carbon dioxide with dihalogenated ethylenes: structure, stability and interaction. RSC Advances. 2016;6:31401-31409
  2. 2. Sun Y-P, Dekker M. Supercritical Fluid Technology in Materials Science and Engineering: Syntheses: Properties and Applications, ed. New York; 2002
  3. 3. Beckman EJ. Supercritical and near-critical CO2 in green chemical synthesis and processing. Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 2004;28:121-191
  4. 4. Kajimoto O. Homogeneous catalysis in supercritical fluids. Chemical Reviews. 1999;99:475-494
  5. 5. Eckert CA, Knutson BL, Debenedetii PG. Supercritical fluids as solvents for chemical and materials processing. Nature. 1996;383:313-318
  6. 6. Johnston KP, Shah PS. Making nanoscale materials with supercritical fluids. Science. 2004;303:482-483
  7. 7. Sui R, Lo JMH, Charpentier PA. Infrared and computational studies on interactions of carbon dioxide and titania nanoparticles with acetate groups. Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2009;113:21022-21028
  8. 8. Sui R, Rizkalla AS, Charpentier PA. Synthesis and formation of silica aerogel particles by a novel sol−gel route in supercritical carbon dioxide. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2004;108:11886-11892
  9. 9. Moner-Girona M, Roig A, Molins E. Sol-gel route to direct formation of silica aerogel microparticles using supercritical solvents. Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology. 2003;26:645-649
  10. 10. Wang Y, Hong L, Tapriyal D, Kim IC, Paik I-H, Crosthwaite JM, Hamilton AD, Thies MC, Beckman EJ, Enick RM, Johnson JK. Design and evaluation of nonfluorous CO2-soluble oligomers and polymers. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2009;113:14971-14980
  11. 11. McHugh MA, Krukonis VJ. In: Mark HF, Bikales M, Overberger CG, Menges G, Kroschwitz JI, Editors. Supercritical Fluids in Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Engineering. 2nd edn. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1989. 16
  12. 12. Beckman EJ. A challenge for green chemistry: Designing molecules that readily dissolve in carbon dioxide. Chemical Communications. 2004;17:1885-1888
  13. 13. Potluri VK, Xu J, Enick R, Beckman E, Hamilton AD. Peracetylated sugar derivatives show high solubility in liquid and supercritical carbon dioxide. Organic Letters. 2002;4:2333-2335
  14. 14. Chang F, Kim H, Joo B, Park K, Kim H. Novel CO2-soluble pyridine derivatives and the extraction of heavy metals into sc-CO2. Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 2008;45:43-50
  15. 15. Estorach CT, Giménez-Pedrós M, Masdeu-Bultó AM, Sayede AD, Monflier E. Hydroformylation of 1-octene in supercritical carbon dioxide with alkyl p-donor ligands on rhodium using a peracetylated β-cyclodextrin as a solubiliser. European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry. 2008;17:2659-2663
  16. 16. Dalvi VH, Srinivasan V, Rossky PJ. Understanding the effectiveness of fluorocarbon ligands in dispersing nanoparticles in supercritical carbon dioxide. Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2010;114:15553-15561
  17. 17. Dalvi VH, Srinivasan V, Rossky PJ. Understanding the relative effectiveness of alkanethiol ligands in dispersing nanoparticles in supercritical carbon dioxide and ethane. Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2010;114:15562-15573
  18. 18. Nunes AVM, Almeida APC, Marques SR, de Sousa ARS, Casimiro T, Duarte CMM. Processing triacetyl-β-cyclodextrin in the liquid phase using supercritical CO2. Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 2010;54:357-361
  19. 19. Desimond J, Guan Z, Elsbernd CS. Synthesis of fluoropolymers in supercritical carbon dioxide. Science. 1992;257:945-947
  20. 20. Johnston KP, Harrison KL, Clarke MJ, Howdle SM, Heitz MM, Bright FV, Carlier C, Randolph TW. Water-in-carbon dioxide microemulsions: An environment for hydrophiles including proteins. Science. 1996;271:624-626
  21. 21. Sarbu T, Styranec TJ, Beckman EJ. Non-fluorous polymers with very high solubility in supercritical CO2 down to low pressures. Nature. 2000;405:165-168
  22. 22. Sarbu T, Styranec TJ, Beckman EJ. Design and synthesis of low cost, sustainable CO2-philes. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research. 2000;39:4678-4683
  23. 23. Kazarian SG, Vincent MF, Bright FV, Liotta CL, Eckert CA. Specific intermolecular interaction of carbon dioxide with polymers. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1996;118:1729-1736
  24. 24. Torrisi A, Mellot-Draznieks C, Bell RG. Impact of ligands on CO2 adsorption in metal-organic frameworks: First principles study of the interaction of CO2 with functionalized benzenes. I. Inductive effects on the aromatic ring. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 2009;130:194703-194714
  25. 25. Besnard M, Cabaco MI, Danten Y. Transient complex formation in CO2−hexafluorobenzene mixtures: A combined raman and ab initio investigation. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 2009;113:184-192
  26. 26. Lauzin C, Didriche K, Lievin J, Herman M, Perrin A. Investigation of C2H2-CO2 the van der Waals complex in the overtone range using cw cavity ring-down spectroscopy. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 2009;130:204306-204313
  27. 27. Muenter JS. An intermolecular potential function model applied to acetylene dimer, carbon dioxide dimer, and carbon dioxide acetylene. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 1991;94:2781-2793
  28. 28. Torrisi A, Mellot-Draznieks C, Bell RG. Impact of ligands on CO2 adsorption in metal-organic frameworks: First principles study of the interaction of CO2 with functionalized benzenes. II. Effect of polar and acidic substituents. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 2010;132:044705
  29. 29. Shen JW, Domanski KB, Kitao O, Nakanishi K. Computer simulation on supercritical carbon dioxide fluid a potential model for the benzene-carbon dioxide system from ab initio calculations. Fluid Phase Equilibria. 1995;104:375-390
  30. 30. Stubbs JM, Siepmanna JI. Binary phase behavior and aggregation of dilute methanol in supercritical carbon dioxide: A Monte Carlo simulation study. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 2004;121:1525-1534
  31. 31. Dartois E, Demyk K, d’Hendecourt L, Ehrenfreund P. Carbon dioxide-methanol intermolecular complexes in interstellar grain mantles. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 1999;351:1066-1074
  32. 32. Lalanne P, Tassaing T, Danten Y, Cansell F, Tucker SC. CO2−ethanol interaction studied by vibrational spectroscopy in supercritical CO2. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 2004;108:2617-2624
  33. 33. Newby JJ, Peebles RA, Peebles SA. Structure of the dimethylether−CO2 van der Waals complex from microwave spectroscopy. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 2004;108:11234-11240
  34. 34. Kim KH, Kim Y. Theoretical studies for Lewis acid−base interactions and C−H∙∙∙O weak hydrogen bonding in various CO2 complexes. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 2008;112:1596-1603
  35. 35. Ginderen PV, Herrebout WA, van der Veken BJ. Van der Waals complex of dimethyl ether with carbon dioxide. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 2003;107:5391-5396
  36. 36. Rivelino R. Lewis acid−base interactions in weakly bound formaldehyde complexes with CO2, HCN, and FCN:  Considerations on the cooperative H-bonding effects. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 2008;112:161-165
  37. 37. Blatchford MA, Raveendran P, Wallen SL. Spectroscopic studies of model carbonyl compounds in CO2:  Evidence for cooperative C−H∙∙∙O interactions. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 2003;107:10311-10323
  38. 38. Raveendran P, Wallen SL. Cooperative C−H∙∙∙O hydrogen bonding in CO2-lewis base complexes: Implications for solvation in supercritical CO2. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2002;124:12590-12599
  39. 39. Raveendran P, Wallen SL. Sugar acetates as novel, renewable CO2-philes. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2002;124:7274-7275
  40. 40. Trung NT, Nguyen MT. Interactions of carbon dioxide with model organic molecules: A comparative theoretical study. Chemical Physics Letters. 2013;581:10-15
  41. 41. Dai HQ, Tri NN, Trang NTT, Trung NT. Remarkable effects of substitution on stability of complexes and origin of the C−H∙∙∙O(N) hydrogen bonds formed between acetone’s derivative and CO2, XCN (X = F, Cl, Br). RSC Advances. 2014;4:13901-13908
  42. 42. Trung NT, Hung NP, Hue TT, Nguyen MT. Existence of both blue-shifting hydrogen bond and Lewis acid–base interaction in the complexes of carbonyls and thiocarbonyls with carbon dioxide. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 2011;13:14033-14042
  43. 43. Phuong VT, Trang NTT, Vo V, Trung NT. A comparative study on interaction capacity of CO2 with the >S=O and >S=S groups in some doubly methylated and halogenated derivatives of CH3SOCH3 and CH3SSCH3. Chemical Phyics Letters. 2014;598:75-80
  44. 44. Joseph J, Jemmis ED. Red-, blue-, or no-shift in hydrogen bonds:  A unified explanation. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2007;129:4620-4632
  45. 45. Hobza P, Sponer J, Cubero E, Orozco M, Luque FJ. C−H∙∙∙O contacts in the adenine∙∙∙uracil Watson−Crick and uracil∙∙∙uracil nucleic acid base pairs:  nonempirical ab initio study with inclusion of electron correlation effects. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2000;104:6286-6292
  46. 46. Boys SF, Bernadi F. The calculation of small molecular interactions by the differences of separate total energies. Some procedures with reduced errors. Molecular Physics. 1970;19:553-566
  47. 47. Popelier P. Atoms in Molecules. Essex, UK: Pearson Education Ltd; 2000
  48. 48. Glendening ED, Baderhoop JK, Read AE, Carpenter JE, Bohmann JA, Weinhold F. GenNBO 5.G. WI: Theoretical Chemistry Institute, University of Wisconsin Madison; 1996-2001
  49. 49. Laintz KE, Wai CM, Yonker CR, Smith RD. Solubility of fluorinated metal diethyldithiocarbamates in Supercritical carbon dioxide. Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 1991;4:194-198
  50. 50. Wells SL, DeSimone JM. CO(2) technology platform: An important tool for environmental problem solving a list of abbreviations can be found at the end of the article. Angewandte Chemie, International Edition. 2001;40:518-527
  51. 51. Ji M, Chen X, Wai CM, Fulton JL. Synthesizing and dispersing silver nanoparticles in a water-in-supercritical carbon dioxide microemulsion. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1999;121:2631-2632
  52. 52. Consani KA, Smith RD. Observations on the solubility of surfactants and related molecules in carbon dioxide at 50°C. Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 1990;3:51-65
  53. 53. Laitinen A, Jauhiainen O, Aaltonen O. Solubility of fluorinated pharmaceuticals in dense carbon dioxide. Organic Process Research and Development. 2000;4:353-356
  54. 54. Dardin A, DeSimone JM, Samulski ET. Fluorocarbons dissolved in supercritical carbon dioxide. NMR evidence for specific solute−solvent interactions. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 1998;102:1775-1780
  55. 55. Cece A, Jureller SH, Kerschner JL, Moschner KF. Molecular modeling approach for contrasting the interaction of ethane and hexafluoroethane with carbon dioxide. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. 1996;100:7435-7439
  56. 56. Han Y-K, Jeong HY. Comment on “Molecular modeling approach for contrasting the interaction of ethane and hexafluoroethane with carbon dioxide”. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 1997;101:5604
  57. 57. Diep P, Jordan KD, Johnson JK, Beckman EJ. CO2−fluorocarbon and CO2−hydrocarbon interactions from first-principles calculations. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 1998;102:2231-2236
  58. 58. Yonker CR. Solution dynamics of perfluorobenzene, benzene, and perdeuteriobenzene in carbon dioxide as a function of pressure and temperature. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 2000;104:685-691
  59. 59. Yee GG, Fulton JL, Smith RD. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy of molecular interactions of heptafluoro-1-butanol or 1-butanol in supercritical carbon dioxide and supercritical ethane. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. 1996;96:6172-6182
  60. 60. Raveendran P, Wallen SL. Exploring CO2-philicity: Effects of stepwise fluorination. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2003;107:1473-1477
  61. 61. Alkorta I, Blanco F, Elguero J, Dobado JA, Ferrer SM, Vidal I. Carbon∙∙∙carbon weak interactions. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 2009;113:8387-8389
  62. 62. Bemish RJ, Block PA, Pedersen LG, Miller RE. The ethylene–carbon dioxide complex: A double internal rotor. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 1995;103:7788-7795
  63. 63. Cheng L, Cao F, Sun H. Ab initio study of the π–π interactions between CO2 and benzene, pyridine, and pyrrole. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry. 2013;113:2261-2266
  64. 64. Danten Y, Tassaing T, Besnard M. Vibrational spectra of CO2-electron donor−acceptor complexes from ab initio. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 2002;106:11831-11840
  65. 65. Wojtulewski S, Grabowski SJ. Blue-shifting C−H∙∙∙Y intramolecular hydrogen bonds – DFT and AIM analyses. Chemical Physics. 2005;309:183-188
  66. 66. Trung NT, Hue TT, Nguyen MT. Remarkable blue shifts of C−H and N−H stretching frequencies in the interaction of monosubstituted formaldehyde and thioformaldehyde with nitrosyl hydride. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 2009;113:3245-3253
  67. 67. Besnard M, Cabaco MI, Longelin S, Tassaing T, Danten Y. Raman investigation of the CO2 complex formation in CO2−acetone mixtures. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 2007;111:13371-13379
  68. 68. Altarsha M, Ingrosso F, Ruiz-Lopez MF. A new glimpse into the CO2-philicity of carbonyl compounds. Chemphyschem. 2012;13:3397-3403
  69. 69. Azofra LM, Scheiner S. Tetrel, chalcogen, and C−H∙∙∙O hydrogen bonds in complexes pairing carbonyl-containing molecules with 1, 2, and 3 molecules of CO2. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 2015;142:034307

Written By

Pham Ngoc Khanh and Nguyen Tien Trung

Submitted: 08 July 2017 Reviewed: 23 October 2017 Published: 16 August 2018