Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Viticulture in Warmer Climates: Mitigating Environmental Stress in Douro Region, Portugal

Written By

Manuel Oliveira

Submitted: 10 March 2017 Reviewed: 21 September 2017 Published: 20 December 2017

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.71155

Chapter metrics overview

2,596 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


There is evidence that temperatures all over the planet are increasing slowly but steadily. The projections for the Mediterranean basin indicate a strong warming and decreased precipitation, especially in summer, and they are not favorable for agriculture in general and, in particular, for viticulture, which is a very climate-sensitive system. The vineyards of Douro Demarcated Region, located in the northeastern Portugal, are grown in marginal conditions, and the expected daily higher temperatures and decreased rainfall are bound to affect the yield and wine quality. Touriga Nacional and Tinta Roriz are two of the most valuable varieties for high-end wines of Douro, and they were subjected to a number of experiments on mitigation techniques to counteract the worse effects of adverse weather conditions. Irrigation, canopy shading, water nebulization, and kaolin coating can mitigate the losses caused by increasing stressful conditions, but they have detrimental effects on some wine characteristics. They even might not be sufficient to protect the already producing vineyards from aggravated weather conditions.


  • viticulture
  • temperature stress
  • water stress
  • irrigation
  • canopy management
  • cooling techniques
  • climate change

1. Introduction

Today there is a large consensus that the earth’s average temperature has been increasing slowly but steadily. The planet’s average surface temperature has risen about 1.1°C since the late nineteenth century, and most of the warming occurred in the past 35 years; 2016 was the warmest year on record and every month from January through September, except for June, which was the warmest on record for those respective months [1]. Both projections from general circulation and regional climate models show that Southern Europe and the Mediterranean basin will experience strong warming and decreased precipitation, especially in summer, and more frequent and longer extreme climate events such as heat waves and prolonged drought [2, 3].

Such scenarios are not favorable for agriculture for an economic activity dependent upon and deeply connected to climate and weather. The cultivation of grapevines (Vitis vinifera), the fruit in Europe that is primarily used for winemaking and is a climate-sensitive agricultural system that has been used as an indicator of both historic and contemporary climate change [4]. Despite adaptation of Vitis vinifera to a wide range of climatic conditions, individual varieties, in particular premium wine grapes, have narrow climate ranges making the system very susceptible to minor changes in climate [5, 6]. Climate, especially air temperature, together with soil properties are considered the most important factors in defining the suitability of an area for wine production, affecting physiological behavior of the grapevine, the phenological phases of vine, the formation and maturity of the berry and its chemical changes, and finally, the characteristics of wines produced in a particular area [7, 8].

Portugal is expected to face aggravated weather conditions in coming years because the territory has suffered a pronounced decrease in precipitation in the spring, in particular in March, since the early 1950s [9] while a warming trend has been observed revealing a significant increase in extreme heat events for both spring and summer seasons, and a decrease in extreme cold events in winter [10]. All Portuguese wine regions are expected to experience an upper shift in temperature and lower precipitation. The Douro Demarcated Region (DDR), located in the northeastern Portugal, is classified as a Denomination of Controlled Origin (DOC), the highest Portuguese wine classification, given its distinctive climatic, topographic, and soil characteristics. It is of particular concern given its economic preeminence in Portuguese wine industry. Its strong Mediterranean climate influence shows the typical variability in precipitation along with high evapotranspiration during summer, the factors that limit grapevine development, yield, and quality components [11]. In these regions, meteorological averages from the period 1950–2000 show that during active vine development from April to September, rainfall varies from 190 to 326 mm but as low as 50 to 85 mm during the ripening stage (from July to September) coupled with high temperatures and intense solar radiation that give rise to very stressful conditions, particularly in the eastern end of the region (Alto Douro) [12] where grapevines can be subjected to a difference between evapotranspiration and precipitation as high as 730–750 mm from bud break to harvest [13]. Under these conditions, vineyards of DDR are, in general, grown in marginal conditions for agriculture production [14] that contribute to large fluctuations in interannual production and low yields averaging 30 hl ha−1 of wine well below the legal limit of 55 hl ha−1 permitted for DOC wine [12]. The expected higher daily temperatures and decreased rainfall [15] are bound to affect yield and wine quality.

Similar trends were observed in other wine regions worldwide where average temperatures have increased by 1.7°C during the growing seasons since 1950 and are expected to rise by an average of 2°C by 2050 leaving some regions at or near their optimum growing-season temperatures [16]. There are forecasts of further warming in Greek wine regions, pushing some of them past suitability for viticulture [17]. Three wine regions of the Northeastern Spain (Alt Penedès, Priorat, and Segrià) have experienced, from 1952 to 2006, overall growing-season warming of 1.0 to 2.2°C, while precipitation during the bud break to veraison period declined significantly, indicating more intense soil moisture stress during this critical growth stage [10].

Facing the most likely scenarios of climate change, wine farmers must adapt strategies to continue producing quality wines and to preserve their typicity from each growing location [18]. As a perennial crop, grapevines require a few years to reach maturity and can remain economically productive for several decades; thus, adaptation strategies must account for both short- and long-term impacts of a shifting environment. Perennial practices, such as choice of the planting site, choice of grapevine and rootstock variety, and vineyard layout, must be decided prior to planting. For those vineyards already under production, winegrowers will have to adapt using suitable short-term mitigation strategies [19], such as irrigation, canopy management, and cooling techniques.


2. Weather conditions in Alto Douro

Alto Douro has a total area of 120,000 ha with an average elevation of 420 m, but the best prized vintages are produced at lower elevations where records for the period 1950–2000 show an annual precipitation ranging from 600 to 800 mm, but only 200 to 300 mm occur during the growing season from April to October, while annual temperatures ranged between 14 and 16°C and growing season oscillated from 19 to over 21°C [20]. Located in Alto Douro, close to Douro river (41° 08′ North, 7° 08′ West), some mitigation techniques have been experimented to protect Vitis vinifera cv Touriga Nacional and cv Tinta Roriz (Syn. Aragonêz, Tempranillo) from intense abiotic stresses that might prove useful under more extreme conditions eventually brought about by climate change.

Touriga Nacional is one of the most valuable premium varieties of DDR. It is considered one of the best red varieties to produce quality wines with a unique aroma profile that can fetch high market prices [21]. It has good adaptation to environmental stresses, withstanding high light intensities that allow for better adjustment to warm conditions, provided an adequate water supply [22]. Tinta Roriz can be cultivated in a variety of soils and climatic conditions, because it resists well to moderate drought. It has a thick-skinned berry with a high anthocyanin concentration that makes for deep-colored wines with moderate tannins and moderate acidity. It provides some of the best red wines of Portugal and Spain [23, 24]. Despite Touriga Nacional and Tinta Roriz good adaptability, they can suffer serious yield losses under unfavorable weather conditions. An on-site automatic weather station provided records for the period 2004 to 2016 (Table 1). Average annual temperature was 16.1 and 21°C for the growing season, whereas total precipitation was 594 mm annually with 284 mm for the growing season. Calculated reference evapotranspiration (ET0) [25] averaged 1946.8 mm a year, mostly occurring during the growing season (1631.3 mm) creating an imbalance between ET0 and rainfall of 1349.3 and 1321.4 mm annually and for the growing season, respectively. Temperature was higher and rainfall was lower than the average values recorded for Alto Douro during the period 1950–2000. The average temperature for the growing season is already at the upper limit that is considered adequate for quality wine grape production [26].

2.1. Mitigation techniques in Alto Douro

2.1.1. Irrigation

Historically, vineyards of DDR in general and Alto Douro in particular are water stressed during the growing season, given the high atmospheric demand and the scarcity of rainfall that limits the soil water (SW) availability. SW has a complex relationship with air temperature that, when it rises, increases vapor pressure deficit, and more water is evapotranspirated from the soil; eventually, water availability becomes critical. In [27], SW will be the limiting resource in vineyards of Douro and it will become relatively more important than temperature for maintaining grapevine production. A model of SW annual distribution in Douro valley shows a sinusoidal pattern (Figure 1) that is consistent with temperature and rainfall distributions [28].

Figure 1.

Time frequency (Fourier series) generated data of soil water content (m3 m−3) based on 364 historical observations from 1991 to 1997 and annual occurrence of main phenological stages of the grapevines: bud breaking, flowering, veraison, and harvest. (Adapted from Oliveira [28]).

The time frequency generated data in Figure 1 shows that the minimum SW content is lower than the permanent wilting point (0.19), bringing the SW content of the important period from flowering to veraison to a critical level when irrigation will be most useful. As climate becomes warmer, grapevines in Douro show a clear tendency toward earlier phenological events [18, 29] a phenomenon also observed in Touriga Nacional and Tinta Roriz for the period 2004–2016, and in 2017, flowering occurred about 15–20 days earlier than usual across Alto Douro according to empirical observations. Earlier events could overlap with periods of higher SW content, but ripening might also occur in time of higher temperatures that are detrimental to quality [30, 31]. As rainfall is expected to diminish, SW will become scarcer and a short growing season might not bring any benefit. Under present conditions, rainfed vineyards in Alto Douro produce as little as 0.7 kg per plant and even less in drier years [32], not enough to cover production costs. Irrigation is then essential to ensure a stable production and minimize the risk of drought damage [33]. Experimental fields were set up in DDR to study the effects of irrigation in grapevines [32, 33, 34, 35]. The main experimental field was a 2.5-hectare commercial vineyard (Vitis vinifera cv. Tinta Roriz) where six treatments comprising three adjacent grapevine rows each, 120 plants per treatment, laid out in a random design pattern and trained to a vertical shoot position (VSP). Each grapevine row had its own drip irrigation line and they were nonirrigated, irrigated from flowering to veraison at rates of 4 (total of 160 mm) and 8 mm a day (total of 320 mm), irrigated from veraison to commercial maturation at rates of 4 (total of 225 mm) and 8 mm a day (total of 450 mm), and irrigated from flowering to commercial maturation at a rate of 8 mm a day (total of 720 mm). Water use efficiency (WUE) was calculated as the ratio between a given parameter (X) and crop evapotranspiration (Ec) [36].


Ec was determined by soil water balance [37, 38] using SW data measured with TDR probes.


where h is the soil water storage at measurement time i and at preceding measurement time i-1, P is precipitation, I is irrigation, Ec is the water used by plant transpiration plus evaporation from soil, R is the surface run-off, and D is the soil drainage below the root zone (all units in mm). R and D can be safely ignored because low SW content and sparse precipitation during growing season, conditions similar to those found by other authors [39, 40].

At commercial harvest, three samples were collected from every treatment for laboratory analysis; each sample was a composite of berries collected from 10 randomly chosen grapevines (18 analyses repeated over 3 years).

Irrigation caused a significant increase in yield (Table 2) due to larger berries, rather than to a greater number of clusters or berries per cluster, and simultaneously, the compounds related to must quality (color, aroma, and soluble solids) were either diluted or their amount significantly reduced compared with musts from rainfed plants. On the other hand, there were no significant differences in pH, free anthocyanins, and total flavonols.

Rad (Kw m−2)T (°C)R (mm)ET0 (mm)

Table 1.

Total solar radiation (rad), air temperature (T), precipitation (R), and reference evapotranspiration (ET0) averages for the period 2004–2016 at location in Alto Douro 41° 08′ North, 7° 08′ West (on-site meteorological station).

Irrigation (mm)Ec (mm)Y (g plant−1)TSS (°Brix)TA (g L−1)TAc (g L−1)MAc (g L−1)
0193721a (3.7a)30a (1.5a)*2.3a(1.2a)**6.6a(2.3a)**1.5a(0.8a)**
1603021002b (3.3b)28b (0.9b)*2.4b(0.8b)**6.5a(2.1b)**2.2c(0.7b)**
3205221003b (1.9c)26c (0.5c)*2.7c (0.5c)**6.5a(1.2c)**2.7e(0.5c)**
225308865c (2.8d)27c (0.9b)*2.4b(0.8b)**6.9b(2.2a)**2.3d(0.7b)**
450548889c (1.6e)25d (0.4d)*2.6c (0.5c)**7.0b(1.3 c)**2.2c(0.4c)**
7207441224d (1.6e)24e (0.3e)*3.0d(0.4d)**6.8b(0.9 d)**2.1b(0.3d)**

Table 2.

Effect of irrigation on crop evapotranspiration (Ec), yield (Y), total soluble solids (TSS), titrable acidity (TA), tartaric acid (TAc), malic acid (Mac), and respective water use efficiency of each parameter (in parenthesis).

WUE × 10.

WUE × 100.

Different superscript letters on same column indicate a significant difference at α ≤ 0.05 (Tukey’s HSD test). Vitis vinifera cv Tinta Roriz, Alto Douro (adapted from Refs. [32, 35]).

Titrable acidity increased with irrigation, but it is still too low for high-end wines with a preferred acidity of 6–7 mg L−1 that is equivalent of tartaric acid [41], which is a manifestation of the influence of high temperatures on degrading the main organic acids of the must, namely, malic and tartaric acids (Table 2).

Total soluble solids (TSS), polyphenol index (PI), total anthocyanins (TAn), and color index (CI) significantly decreased with irrigation (Table 3). TSS is very important for grape growers and winemakers because it determines how much sugar is available for conversion into alcohol. The relationship between irrigation and TSS is complex; more available water induces higher photosynthetic rate and accumulation of soluble solids but also augments yields and the berry size that can dilute the soluble solids, and in the end, their lower concentration produces a total volume of wine poorer in alcohol. PI is a phenolic parameter that measures the polyphenolic content of must and wine, and it relates to color stability of red wines as it ages; irrigated plants produced musts with lower phenolic potential that contribute for producing red wines with lower aging potential irrespective of the irrigation schedule. Accumulation of anthocyanins (glucosides and aglycones) in grape skin is responsible for the dark color of red grapes, and their concentration is related to the berry size that increases with irrigation, resulting in musts with lower concentration of anthocyanins as the amount of available water is higher, especially if irrigation occurs close to harvest date. CI is directly related to TAn, and its values in must of irrigated plants follow the pattern of TAn.

IrrigationTSS (°Brix)PITAn (mg berry−1)CI
030a (1.5a)*233a (13.4a)*13.8a (7.9a)**0.25a (12.0a)**
16028b (0.9b)*203b (7.2b)*11.9b (4.1b)**0.21b (6.9b)**
32026c (0.5c)*196b (3.9d)*12.3b (2.4c)**0.18c (3.5d)**
22527c (0.9b)*176c (6.1c)*10.6c (3.8b)**0.16d (5.3c)**
45025d (0.4c)*174c (3.2d)*9.2d (1.7d)**0.15d (2.8d)**
72024e (0.3d)*138d (1.8e)*9.1d (1.2d)**0.13e (1.5e)**

Table 3.

Effect of irrigation treatments on total soluble solids (TSS), polyphenol index (PI), total anthocyanins (TAn), color intensity (CI), and respective water use efficiency of each parameter (in parenthesis).

WUE × 10.

WUE × 100.

Different superscript letters on same column indicate a significant difference at α ≤ 0.05 (Tukey’s HSD test). Vitis vinifera cv Tinta Roriz, Alto Douro (adapted from Oliveira et al. [35]).

It is then clear that irrigation rate and its schedule had a significant influence on yield and berry quality. Irrigated grapevines had better yields but, in general, the must characteristics revealed lower quality. The must quality of grapevines receiving water before veraison was better than from those irrigated after veraison. Excessive water stress before veraison causes poor fruit setting and reduced metabolic functions; berry growth is stunted and essential metabolites, such as organic acids, do not accumulate. Irrigation starting after veraison cannot make up for the losses already sustained. If water stress before veraison is moderate, berries still can attain size and composition adequate for winemaking but increasing the SW content after veraison might dilute soluble solids, acids, anthocyanins, and phenols, turning the must inadequate to high-quality wine.

For grape growers, profits are made up of both yield and quality and very low yield, no matter how the quality is, which is not profitable. The best balance between quality and yield and still attaining acceptable water use efficiency was reached with irrigation from flowering to veraison amounting to about 50% of the reference evapotranspiration of that period. When irrigation is halted at veraison, SW content declines slowly until harvest and probably there is enough water to sustain the vine metabolic functions and yield at higher levels than rainfed grapevines [32, 35]. In addition, it also permits a larger foliar area providing additional shade to partially offset rising temperatures.

Tinta Roriz had lower water use efficiency as more water is added (Tables 2 and 3), an important consideration in scenarios of scarcer water resources and competing uses. In dry weather conditions and sparse soil cover as vineyards, direct evaporation from soil becomes an increasingly larger proportion of evapotranspiration, and when more water is available, it results in higher crop water use that is not directly proportional to plant yield and to its metabolic functions; thus, WUE lowers in irrigated plants. Again, a compromise between yield, quality, and WUE can be achieved with deficit irrigation before veraison. Deficit irrigation at critical moments contribute to moderate water stress during the entire growing season to produce quality musts, acceptable yields, and still keep a judicious use of water.

2.1.2. Canopy management

High solar radiation intensity and elevated temperatures damage the grape berries. The fruit shrivels and can desiccate completely (raisining), making it inappropriate for winemaking. This is a phenomenon very common in Douro, also in other wine regions [42], given the actual climate conditions (Table 1), and it is bound to increase in the future. A north-south row orientation allows the fruits, on both sides of the canopy, reach a balance in photosynthetic efficiency, and their exposure to radiation [43] and shade propitiated by a denser canopy can minimize the losses. However, slope might not permit a north-south orientation and additional shade provided by a denser canopy actually is not enough to prevent significant yield reductions. Shading the plants can reduce their exposure to radiation and heat but creates an imbalance in carbon budget, reducing vine biomass, and affects negatively the canopy photosynthesis [44]. To avoid these negative effects and still protect a rainfed commercial vineyard of Vitis vinifera cv Touriga Nacional in Alto Douro, planted in east-west oriented rows and VSP trained, had the lower third of their south-facing side (from ground to 20 cm above the insertion point of grape clusters) partially covered with a vertical double layer of white plastic netting attached to iron spikes driven into the ground at 3-m intervals [45]. At about 30 randomly laid out rows with 70 vines, each was divided into three groups with equal number of rows. One group was shaded after fruit setting, another after veraison, and the third was nonshaded (control). The net was removed just prior to harvest. The net reduced the total solar radiation by 23% and photosynthetic active radiation by 27%.

From the end of flowering to commercial harvest, every week on clear sky days at noon, two well lit, adult leaves of each five randomly chosen plants on each group were used to measure stomatal conductance (porometry) and leaf water potential (pressure chamber) (300 readings repeated over 3 years). On the same days and time but only after veraison, the temperature (infrared thermometry) of one cluster on 10 randomly chosen plants per treatment was measured (180 readings repeated over 3 years). At harvest, the same procedure described for irrigation section was used to sample berries for laboratory analysis (nine analyses repeated over 3 years).

Shading did not influence significatively either water status (leaf water potential) of the plants or their stomatal conductance; thus, it is reasonable to assume that they did not affect the net photosynthesis per unit of leaf area. Shaded vines consistently had significant higher yields (2100 g plant−1) than nonshaded vines (1500 g plant−1) because the percentage of shriveled berries per cluster was about 6.5% against 14%, respectively (Table 4). The number of clusters, weight, and size of the berries showed no significant differences. Shading does not totally prevent berry shriveling because the phenomenon is also caused by other factors like water stress [46].

ShadingYield (g plant−1)% Shriveled berries per clusterWeight 200 berries (g)Volume 200 berries (cm3)
Nonshaded1504a (6000)*14a270a136a
After fruit setting2172b (8690)*6b257a131a
After veraison2076b (8300)*7b256a131a

Table 4.

Effect of shading on yield, percentage of shriveled berries per cluster, weight, and volume of 200 berries for each shading treatment.

In parenthesis calculated yield kg ha−1.

Different superscript letters on same column indicate a significant difference at α ≤ 0.05 (Tukey’s HSD test). Vitis vinifera cv Touriga Nacional, Alto Douro (adapted from Oliveira et al. [45]).

Shading did not alter significatively the concentrations of total soluble solids (24.3 °Brix), tartaric acid (4.3 g L−1), malic acid (1.7 g L−1), glucose (118.2 g L−1), and fructose (110 g L−1) in the must. Must pH was higher (3.9) in nonshaded vines against shaded (3.8). These results suggest that photosynthetic carbon acquisition was not significantly different for all groups of plants, and they are consistent with values reported for the same region and they are typical for hot climate vineyards [47, 48]. The shaded berries were approximately 1°C cooler than nonshaded ones, a difference probably due to less radiation reaching the clusters [49]. There is evidence that berry temperature affects its composition, but only differences in 3°C or above are reported as causing changes [50, 51]. On the other hand, the biosynthesis of anthocyanins is sensitive to light environment and it decreases with lower light intensity [52, 53], and in fact, shaded berries from Touriga Nacional had lower concentration of total anthocyanins and extractable anthocyanins than nonshaded berries (Table 5).

ShadingTAn (mg L−1)EAn (mg L−1)
After fruit setting990b679b
After veraison1240b726b

Table 5.

Effect of shading on total anthocyanins (TAn) and extractable anthocyanins (EAn) for each shading treatment.

Different superscript letters on same column indicate a significant difference at α ≤ 0.05 (Tukey’s HSD test). Vitis vinifera cv Touriga Nacional, Alto Douro (adapted from Oliveira et al. [45]).

Lower concentrations of anthocyanins, responsible for the red color intensity of wines, can be detrimental to the must quality [54, 55] with loss in market value but that might be offset by an additional yield of 2300 kg ha−1 in favor of shaded grapevines.

According to the net maker, the net can last to 10–12 years. The grower did support the cost of the net, 3000 euros per hectare, plus an expense outlay of 150 euros per hectare for handling of the net. These added expenses look reasonable for vineyards already planted in an inconvenient layout that can sustain heavy losses under spells of extreme weather conditions.

2.1.3. Cooling techniques

The temperature of plant leaves are closely related to air temperature, and the rising temperatures reduce stomatal conductance [55], decrease photosynthesis rate significantly due to the increase in respiration [56], restrict carbon assimilation per unit leaf area, affecting negatively the vegetative growth and yield [57], and impair several physiological processes, notably sugar accumulation [58]. Berries after veraison are very sensitive to a combination of intense solar radiation and high temperature, reducing in size and in soluble solid concentration [59].

High temperatures and light intensity cause berries to ripe more slowly and contribute to berry sunburn and shriveling as cells of the mesocarp die [60]. The negative effects of high-temperature events on vine physiology are more severe in vines experiencing water stress [61].

Two mitigation techniques are actually being experimented in Alto Douro region with rainfed Touriga Nacional to reduce the effects of adverse temperature and radiation. Nontreated grapevines (control) are compared with plants treated from the end of flowering for 2 weeks before the forecast harvest date: (1): coated with a suspension of kaolin [Al4Si4O10(OH)8] at a rate of 12.5 kg ha−1 for every 20–25 days and (2): nebulized with water from misters located above the canopy for 30 seconds every 30 minutes as long as air temperature is higher than 32°C (The aperture of electro valves is automatically triggered by temperature records of the weather station.)

The sampling procedures described on above sections (irrigation, canopy management) were followed from the end of flowering to commercial harvest, to measure canopy temperature (average temperature of both sides of the canopy), cluster temperature, stomatal conductance, and berry sampling for laboratory analysis.

Infrared thermometry shows that nebulization keeps the canopies cooler at least 1°C than coated and control canopies (Table 6). Despite the reflective characteristics of kaolin, temperature of coated canopy is not significantly different from canopy temperature of control plants. Reduced stomatal opening, conducive to lower stomatal conductance, higher resistance of leaf boundary layer, and low photosynthetic photon flux density during part of the day are pointed out as explanations for these results [62, 63]. Stomatal conductance (gs, cm s−1) of nebulized plants (3.11) is significantly higher than of nontreated plants (2.14) (Table 6). Stomatal conductance is negatively correlated with leaf temperature [55], and as temperature raises, the plant reduces the opening of its stomata to conserve water and this mechanism reduces transpiration, a mechanism that rises the leaf temperature.

Temperature (°C)gs (cm s−1)
Kaolin coating30.1a31.5b2.09a

Table 6.

Effect of nebulization and kaolin coating on average canopy temperature and stomatal conductance (gs) from flowering to harvest and for cluster temperature from veraison to harvest.

Different superscript letters on same column indicate a significant difference at α ≤ 0.05 (Tukey’s HSD test). Vitis vinifera cv Touriga Nacional, Alto Douro.

Evaporative cooling and kaolin coating had the same effect on cluster temperature, measured after veraison (infrared thermometry). Clusters of treated plants show a reduced temperature in relation to control plants, which are at least 1.3°C warmer (Table 6). Here, the scattering of radiation caused by kaolin is not counter acted by reduced transpiration and cluster temperature was maintained lower than air temperature.

Excessive temperature and radiation that cause fruit sunburn, a major factor in loss of production in grapevines of Alto Douro region, were effectively avoided by nebulization and kaolin coating (Table 7). Treated plants have 5–7% of shriveled berries per cluster compared with 12–13% in control vines. Reduced berry loss contributed to higher yield per plant.

YieldSunburnt berriesTSS
g plant−1Kg ha−1%°Brix
Kaolin coating1012b40505b24.6a

Table 7.

Effect of nebulization and kaolin coating on yield, percentage of sunburnt berries, and total soluble solids (TSS).

Different superscript letters on same column indicate a significant difference at α ≤ 0.05 (Tukey’s HSD test). Vitis vinifera cv Touriga Nacional, Alto Douro.

Total soluble solids are 26.1°Brix for nebulized vines, and it is significantly higher than kaolin coated and control, 24.6 and 24.7°Brix, respectively (Table 7). Nebulized canopies show lower temperatures and, consequently, higher stomatal conductance (Table 6) that might permit an increased photosynthetic rate as observed by other authors [55, 56]. In turn, increased photosynthetic activity contributes to larger berry sugar content, evaluated as total soluble solids, as seen in Table 7 and corroborated in other works [58, 59].

However, other characteristics of the must (pH, titrable acidity, tartaric acid, malic acid, total tannins, total polyphenols, and total anthocianins) do not show significant differences among treated and control plants (data not shown).

The cost of installation (2500 euros ha−1) and running the water nebulization system (100 euros ha−1) might be impeditive of its adoption. Infection by fungus and insect repellency are factors associated to water spray and kaolin coating, respectively, that must be considered but they have not been assessed at the time of this report.


3. Conclusions

Meteorological records and grapevine phenological occurrences in DDR are in agreement with forecasts of higher temperatures, lower precipitations, and advances of phenological stages. The environment of Douro is expected to become more stressful in coming years, and adaptations are imperative to save the viticulture as an economic activity. For the vineyards already in commercial production, efficient irrigation associated with shading and cooling techniques can reduce significatively water and temperature stress on grapevines and they can maintain acceptable yields with marketable quality wine. However, these techniques have some drawbacks in must quality and might not suffice to a large shift in temperature and precipitation given the actual conditions already at the limit of tolerance of the best grape varieties.



Financial support was provided by Quinta do Vale Meão (Olazabal & Sons, LDA), COTESI: Companhia de Texteis, S.A., and UTAD. My special thanks go to Francisco Olazabal, Pedro Barbosa, André Guedes, and Frederico Lobão.


  1. 1. NASA. Global Climate Change. Vital Signs of the Planet [Internet]. 2017. Available from: [Accessed: May 8, 2017]
  2. 2. Lionello P, Abrantes F, Gacic M, Planton S, Trigo R, Ulbrich U. The climate of the Mediterranean region: Research progress and climate change impacts. Regional Environmental Change. 2014;14:1679-1684. DOI: 10.1007/s10113-014-0666-0
  3. 3. Alo CA, Anagnostou EN. A sensitivity study of the impact of dynamic vegetation on simulated future climate change over southern Europe and the Mediterranean. International Journal of Climatology. 2017;37:2037-2050. DOI: 10.1002/joc.4833
  4. 4. Mosedale JR, Abernethy KE, Smart RE, Wilson RJ, Maclean IMD. Climate change impacts and adaptive strategies: Lessons from the grapevine. Global Change Biology. 2016;22:3814-3828. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13406
  5. 5. Jones GV, Webb LB. Climate change, viticulture, and wine: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Wine Research. 2010;21:103-106. DOI: 10.1080/09571264.2010.530091
  6. 6. Hannah L, Roehrdanz P, Ikegami M, Shepard A, Shaw M, Tabo G, Zhi L, Marquet P, Hijmans R. Climate change, wine, and conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2013;110:6907-6912. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1210127110
  7. 7. Jackson R. Wine Science, Principles and Applications. London: Academic Press; 2014. p. 776. 9780123814685
  8. 8. Moral FJ, Rebollo FJ, Paniagua LL, García A, Salazar EM. Application of climatic indices to analyse viticultural suitability in Extremadura, south-western Spain. Theoretical and Applied Climatology. 2016;123:277-289. DOI: 10.1007/s00704-014-1363-0
  9. 9. Gallego MC, Trigo RM, Vaquero JM, Brunet M, García JA, Sigró J, Valente MA. Trends in frequency indices of daily precipitation over the Iberian Peninsula during the last century. Journal of Geophysical Research. 2011;116:D02109. DOI: 10.1029/ 2010JD014255
  10. 10. Ramos MC, Jones GV, Martínez-Casasnovas JA. Structure and trends in climate parameters affecting winegrape production in northeast Spain. Climate Research. 2008;38:1-15. DOI: org/10.3354/cr00759
  11. 11. Sotés V. Bases écophysiologiques et choix techniques dans la gestion de l’eau dans les vignobles méditerranéens: Expérience de l’Espagne. Le Progrès agricole et viticole. 2001;18:389-396 ISSN 0369-8173
  12. 12. Jones GV, Alves F. Impacts of climate change on wine production: A global overview and regional assessment in the Douro Valley of Portugal. International Journal of Global Warming. 2012;4:383-406. DOI: 10.1504/IJGW.2012.049448
  13. 13. Malheiro A, Ferreira T, Mathews R. Transpiration of vineyards of Douro Region. In: Proceedings of I Congreso Internacional sobre Clima y Viticultura (Conclivit II); 10-14 April 2007; Zaragoza. Zaragoza: Diputación General de Aragón; 2007. p. 400-406
  14. 14. Gouveia C, Liberato MLR, Da Camara CC, Trigo RM, Ramos AM. Modelling past and future wine production in the Portuguese Douro Valley. Climate Research. 2011;48:349-362. DOI: 10.3354/cr01006
  15. 15. Fraga H, Malheiro AC, Moutinho-Pereira J, Jones GV, Alves F, Pinto JG, Santos JÁ. Very high resolution bioclimatic zoning of Portuguese wine regions: present and future scenarios. Regional Environmental Change. 2014;14:295-306. DOI: 10.1007/s10113-013-0490-y
  16. 16. Jones GV, White MA, Cooper OR, Storchmann K. Climate change and global wine quality. Climatic Change. 2005;73:319-343. DOI: 10.1007/s10584-005-4704-2
  17. 17. Koufos G, Mavromatis T, Koundouras S, Fyllas NM, Jones GV. Viticulture–climate relationships in Greece: The impacts of recent climate trends on harvest date variation. International Journal of Climatology. 2014;34:1445-1459. DOI: 10.1002/joc.3775
  18. 18. van Leeuwen C, Darriet P. The impact of climate change on viticulture and wine quality. The Journal of Wine Economics 2016;11:150-167. DOI: 10.1017/jwe.2015.21
  19. 19. Marx W, Haunschild R, Bornmann L. Climate change and viticulture – A quantitative analysis of a highly dynamic research field. Vitis. 2017;56:35-43. DOI: 10.5073/vitis.2017.56.35-43
  20. 20. Jones GV. A Climate Assessment for the Douro Wine Region: An Examination of the Past, Present, and Future Climate Conditions for Wine Production [Internet]. 2012. Available from: [Accessed: Oct 15, 2016]
  21. 21. De Pinho PG, Falqué E, Castro M, Silva E, Machado B, Ferreira AC. Further insights into the floral character of Touriga Nacional wines. Journal of Food Science. 2007;72:S396-S401. DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00405.x
  22. 22. Zarrouk O, Garcia-Tejero I, Pinto C, Genebra T, Sabir F, Prista C, David TS, Loureiro-Dias MC, Chave MM. Aquaporins isoforms in cv. Touriga Nacional grapevine under water stress and recovery – Regulation of expression in leaves and roots. Agricultural Water Management. 2016;164:167-175. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2015.08.013
  23. 23. Borges PM. Estudo comparativo das castas tintas nobres do Dão: Touriga Nacional, Jaen, Tinta Roriz e Alfrocheiro [thesis]. Viseu: Instituto Politecnico de Viseu; 2012. Available from: Accessed: Feb 5, 2016]
  24. 24. Ramos MC, Jones GV, Yuste J. Phenology and grape ripening characteristics of cv Tempranillo within the Ribera del Duero designation of origin (Spain): Influence of soil and plot characteristics. European Journal of Agronomy. 2015;70:57-70. DOI: org/10.1016/j.eja.2015.07.009
  25. 25. Allen RG, Pereira L, Raes D, Smith M. Crop Evapotranspiration. Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage paper No. 56 [Internet]. 1998. Available from: [Accessed: Sep 18, 2015]
  26. 26. Jones GV. In: Macqueen RW, Meinert LD, editors. Climate and Terroir: Impacts of Climate Variability and Change on Wine. Fine Wine and Terroir – The Geoscience Perspective. St. John’s, Newfoundland: Geological Association of Canada; 2006. p. 203-216
  27. 27. Cunha M, Richter C. The impact of climate change on the winegrape vineyards of the Portuguese Douro region. Climatic Change. 2016;138:239-251. DOI: 10.1007/s10584-016-1719-9
  28. 28. Oliveira M. Modeling water content of a vineyard soil in the Douro region, Portugal. Plant and Soil. 2001;233:213-221. DOI: 10.1023/A:1010361420899
  29. 29. Real AC, Borges J, Cabral JS, Jones GV. Partitioning the grapevine growing season in the Douro Valley of Portugal: Accumulated heat better than calendar dates. International Journal of Biometeorology. 2015;59:1045-1059. DOI: 10.1007/s00484-014-0918-1
  30. 30. Webb L, Whetton P, Barlow EWR. Climate change and wine grape quality in Australia. Climate Research. 2008;36:99-111. DOI: 10.3354/cr00740
  31. 31. Santos JA, Grätsch SD, Karremann MK, Jones GV, Pinto JG. Ensemble projections for wine production in the Douro Valley of Portugal. Climatic Change. 2013;117:211-225. DOI: 10.1007/s10584-012-0538-x
  32. 32. Oliveira M, Sousa T. Organic acids and sugars in musts of irrigated grapevines in NortheastPortugal. Journal of Wine Research. 2009;20:1-13. DOI: 10.1080/09571260902978485
  33. 33. Resco P, Iglesias A, Bardají I, Sotés V. Exploring adaptation choices for grapevine regions in Spain. Regional Environmental Change. 2016;16:979-993. DOI: 10.1007/s10113-015-0811-4
  34. 34. Oliveira M. Effect of soil water availability upon the production of the variety Touriga Franca in the demarcated region of Douro (Cima-Corgo). Ciência e Técnica Vitivinícola. 1995;12:59-71
  35. 35. Oliveira M, de Freitas V, Sousa T. Water use efficiency and must quality of irrigated grapevines of north-eastern Portugal. Archiv für Acker- und Pflanzenbau und Bodenkunde 2012;58:871-886. DOI: 10.1080/03650340.2011.551875
  36. 36. Howell TA. Enhancing water use efficiency in irrigated agriculture. Agronomy Journal. 2001;93:281-289. DOI: 10.2134/agronj2001.932281x
  37. 37. Roygard JFK, Alley MM, Khosla R. No-till corn yields and water balance in the mid-Atlantic coastal plain. Agronomy Journal. 2002;94:612-623. DOI: 10.2134/agronj2002.6120
  38. 38. Lane PNJ, Morris J, Ningnan Z, Guangyi Z, Guoyi Z, Daping X. Water balance of tropical eucalypt plantations in south-eastern China. Agr Forest Meteorol. 2004;124:253-267. DOI: org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.01.015
  39. 39. Wythers KR, Lauenroth WK, Paruelo JM. Bare-soil evaporation under semiarid field conditions. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 1999;63:1341-1349. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1999.6351341x
  40. 40. Fares A, Alva AK. Soil water components based on capacitance probes in a sandy soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 2000;64:311-318. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2000.641311x
  41. 41. Esteban MA, Villanueva MJ, Lissarrague JR. Effect of irrigation on changes in berry composition of Tempranillo during maturation. Sugars, organic acids, and mineral elements. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture. 1999;50:418-434
  42. 42. Greer DH, Weedon MM. Interactions between light and growing season temperatures on, growth and development and gas exchange of Semillon (Vitis vinifera L.) vines grown in an irrigated vineyard. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2012;54:59-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.02.010
  43. 43. Cuevas E, Baeza P, Lissarrague JR. Variation in stomatal behaviour and gas exchange between midmorning and mid-afternoon of north–south oriented grapevines (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Tempranillo) at different levels of soil water availability. Scientia Horticulturae. 2006;108:173-180. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2006.01.027
  44. 44. Morandi B, Zibordi M, Losciale P, Manfrini L, Pierpaoli E, Grappadelli LC. Shading decreases the growth rate of young apple fruit by reducing their phloem import. Scientia Horticulturae. 2011;127:347-352. DOI: org/10.1016/j.scienta.2010.11.002
  45. 45. Oliveira M, Teles J, Barbosa P, Olazabal F, Queiroz J. Shading of the fruit zone to reduce grape yield and quality losses caused by sunburn. Journal International des Sciences de la Vigne et du Vin. 2014;48:1-9. DOI: 10.20870/oeno-one.2014.48.3.1579
  46. 46. Bondada B, Shutthanandan J. Understanding differential responses of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) leaf and fruit to water stress and recovery following re-watering. American Journal of Plant Sciences. 2012;3:1232-1240. DOI: 10.4236/ajps.2012.39149
  47. 47. López MI, Sánchez MT, Díaz A, Ramírez P, Morales J. Influence of a deficit irrigation regime during ripening on berry composition in grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.) grown in semi-arid areas. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition. 2007;58:491-507. DOI: 10.1080/09637480701311801
  48. 48. Guerra J, Abade E. Caracterização Enológica de Castas Autóctones da Região do Douro [Internet]. 2009. Available from: [Accessed: Jul 21, 2016]
  49. 49. Bergqvist J, Dokoozlian N, Ebisuda N. Sunlight exposure and temperature effects on berry growth and composition of cabernet sauvignon and Grenache in the Central San Joaquin Valley of California. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture. 2001;52:1-7. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-016-0850-0
  50. 50. Pieri P, Fermaud M. Effects of defoliation on temperature and wetness of grapevine berries. Acta Horticulturae (ISHS). 2005;689:109-116. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.689.9
  51. 51. Tarara JM, Lee J, Spayd SE, Scagel CF. Berry temperature and solar radiation alter acylation, proportion, and concentration of anthocyanin in merlot grapes. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture. 2008;59:235-247
  52. 52. Pollastrini M, Di Stefano V, Ferretti M, Agati G, Grifoni D, Zipoli G, Orlandini S, Bussotti F.Influence of different light intensity regimes on leaf features of Vitis vinifera L. in ultraviolet radiation filtered condition. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2011;73:108-115. DOI: org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2010.10.027
  53. 53. Koyama K, Ikeda H, Poudel PR, Goto-Yamamoto N. Light quality affects flavonoid biosynthesis in young berries of cabernet sauvignon grape. Phytochemistry. 2012;78:54-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2012.02.026
  54. 54. Bonfante A, Alfieri SM, Albrizio R, Basile A, De Mascellis R, Gambuti A, Giorio P, Langella G, Manna P, Monaco E, Moio L, Terribile F. Evaluation of the effects of future climate change on grape quality through a physically based model application: A case study for the Aglianico grapevine in Campania region, Italy. Agricultural Systems. 2017;152:100-109. DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.12.009
  55. 55. Gonzalez-Dugo V, Zarco-Tejada P, Berni JAJ, Suárez L, Goldhamer D, Fereres E.Almond tree canopy temperature reveals intra-crown variability that is water stress-dependent. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 2012;154-155:156-165. DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.11.004
  56. 56. Goldammer T. Grape grower's Handbook. A Guide to Viticulture for Wine Production. NY: Apex Publishers; 2015. p. 728 978-0-9675212-7-5
  57. 57. Zsófi ZS, Tóth E, Rusjan D, Bálo B. Terroir aspects of grape quality in a cool climate wine region: Relationship between water deficit, vegetative growth and berry sugar concentration. Scientia Horticulturae-Amsterdam. 2011;127:494-499. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2010.11.014
  58. 58. Greer DH, Weston C. Heat stress affects flowering, berry growth, sugar accumulation and photosynthesis of Vitis vinifera cv. Semillon grapevines grown in a controlled environment. Functional Plant Biology. 2010;37:206-214. DOI: 10.1071/FP09209
  59. 59. Hulands S, Greer DH, Harper JDI. The interactive effects of temperature and light intensity on Vitis vinifera cv: “Semillon” grapevines. I. Berry growth and development. European Journal of Horticultural Science. 2014;78:249-257. Available from: [Accessed: Apr 24, 2016]
  60. 60. Greer DH, Weedon MM. The impact of high temperatures on Vitis vinifera cv. Semillon grapevine performance and berry ripening. Frontiers. Plant Science. 2013;4:1-9. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00491
  61. 61. Edwards EJ, Smithson L, Graham DC, Clingeleffer PR. Grapevine canopy response to a high-temperature event during deficit irrigation. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research. 2011;17:153-161. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-0238.2011.00125.x
  62. 62. Cantore V, Pace B, Albrizio R. Kaolin-based particle film technology affects tomato physiology, yield and quality. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2009;66:279-288.DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.03.008
  63. 63. Brillante L, Belfiore N, Gaiotti F, Lovat L, Sansone L, Poni S, Tomasi D. Comparing kaolin and pinolene to improve sustainable grapevine production during drought. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0156631. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156631

Written By

Manuel Oliveira

Submitted: 10 March 2017 Reviewed: 21 September 2017 Published: 20 December 2017