Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Postharvest Handling of Indigenous and Underutilized Fruits in Trinidad and Tobago

Written By

Puran Bridgemohan and Wendy-Ann P. Isaac

Submitted: December 6th, 2016 Reviewed: July 18th, 2017 Published: September 13th, 2017

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.70424

Chapter metrics overview

1,580 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


This chapter briefly outlines the origin of some indigenous and underutilized fruit crops found throughout Trinidad and Tobago. It also examines the current situation, current practices, and maturity standards for postharvest handling of these commodities and examines the principle causes of postharvest losses and poor quality. Finally, the chapter includes some recommendations on the best postharvest practices for these indigenous and underutilized fruits, including field harvesting practices, storage and transportation, and cool storage.


  • indigenous
  • underutilized fruits
  • postharvest handling

1. Introduction

The present topic is characterized by a large natural population of indigenous and underutilized fruits which despite growing in popularity are on the verge of being extinct as they are not cultivated in large acreages. Several of these crops were consumed as the main fruits by earlier inhabitants in the Caribbean. However, most of them have lost their popularity due to changes in the taste patterns in favor of temperate fruits such as grapes, apples, pears, peaches, and plums. With the growing demand for some of these commodities and possible export potential, there are considerable market development opportunities within the Caribbean for these fruits. The low production of these fruits and the limited information on the postharvest physiology and disease characteristics of these fruits have made large-scale production and packing/processing difficult. The magnitude of postharvest losses of many of these fruits can exceed 50% depending on the commodity as many of them are highly perishable due to high moisture content under tropical conditions [1].

Many of these fruits are harvested, handled, and sometimes processed using local indigenous knowledge at the household level. The main ripe fruits that fall in this category are the edible fresh fruits and include pommerac (Syzygium malaccense), sapodilla (Manilkara zapota), balata (Manilkara bidentata), carambola (Averrhoa carambola), guinep (Melicoccus bijugatus), and cashew (Anacardium occidentale).The fruits that are harvested mature but do require to be ripened and need to be cooked include breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis)and chataigne (Artocarpus camansi)and also the palm fruit peewah (Bactris gasipaes).There are two edible fresh fruits that are made into frappes or sherbets and ice cream, sweet sop (Annona squamosa) and barbadine (Passiflora quadrangularis).There is also a very popular root tuber in the Caribbean Latin American countries called topi tamboor leren (Calathea allouia). Table 1 shows some of the most common indigenous and underutilized fruits in Trinidad and Tobago, their utilization, harvest and postharvest practices.

All these tropical fruits offer many diverse aromas, textures, tastes, and shapes and include many different bioactive compounds. These exotic indigenous tropical fruits and root vegetable products are seasonal crops to a great extent and form part of the diaspora niche markets in Europe and North America. However, because of the poor storage qualities and high rate of spoilage due to the poor postharvest handling, the export potential is not realized. There is a gap in the information for the minor exotic crops and fruits for export which have to be transported over a longer period than the local market.

The commercial success of these tropical fruits depends on the development of postharvest technologies and handling techniques both for marketing locally and export. There are many advances in techniques for harvesting, packing, selection and grading, quality evaluation, transportation, and refrigerated storage conditions and management of postharvest physiological symptoms, insect pest, and microbial decay which must be considered.

It has been reported that the major causes of postharvest losses in tropical fruits were due to fungal pathogens particularly Colletotrichumspp. [2].However, the etiology, biology, and environmental and horticultural factors that contribute to the high infection and development of decay are critical in improving fruit quality and must be clearly defined. It has been observed that although tropical fruit crops are cultivated under higher ambient temperatures, they usually have poor postharvest practices, which further affects their shelf life [3]. It was recommended that storage in different packaging materials, viz., micro-perforated polypropylene bags (MPB), micro-perforated polypropylene bags with ethylene absorbent (MPB+K), macro-perforated polypropylene bags coated with antimist coating (PP), fruit waxing, gibberellic acid (GA3), and indole butyric acid (IBA) applications [3].

Many scientific research have been focused on the crop production but little on postharvest issues. However, postharvest quality and shelf life of the fruit in part will depend on some postharvest handling practices and treatments carried out after harvest [4]. Handling practices like harvesting, pre-cooling, cleaning and disinfecting, sorting and grading, packaging, storing, and transportation all play an important role in maintaining quality and extending shelf life. The use of improved postharvest techniques such as refrigeration, heat treatment, modified atmosphere packaging (MAP), and 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) and calcium chloride (CaCl2) has been suggested [4].

This chapter will review and evaluate the applicability and appropriateness of some of these postharvest handling practices and treatment techniques in extending the shelf life and quality and reduction of the losses in some selected indigenous fruits of Trinidad and Tobago.


2. Harvest and postharvest practices and operations for indigenous fruits

Almost all minor tropical fruits are harvested manually, but this physical handling can have a drastic effect on the postharvest quality and shelf life. Most tree ripened fruits are susceptible to rough handling during and after harvesting due to mechanical injuries which reduces postharvest quality and shelf life [5]. The more common handling practices by small farmers include picking, pre-cooling and washing, sorting and grading, wrapping or packaging, transport, and storage.

Small-scale producers throughout the Caribbean usually harvest most of their fruits very early, when fruits are sometimes green to avoid the incidence of praedial larceny (farm theft) [6]. This often results in underripe fruits which have not yet developed their full flavor. Mechanical damage during harvest is therefore not often a serious problem.

The maturation of fruit ready for harvest varies depending on the fruit type which may be harvested in either the matured green, partially ripe, or ripe state [7]. The physiological stages of fruit maturity are the maturation, ripening, and senescence, and they influence the postharvest quality and shelf life. The climacteric fruits are usually harvested at the matured green and then placed in special conditions that ensure their continuation into ripening and senescence. There is little fruit loss during this phase except with physical damage or fruit-fly infested fruits.

The fully ripened fruits are more susceptible to mechanical injuries during harvesting and should be harvested during a cool period of the day to avoid excessive field heat accumulation. The use of sharp tools or containers with edges is discouraged as these bruise and puncture the fruits (Table 1).

Table 1.

Some of the most common indigenous and underutilized fruits in Trinidad and Tobago, their utilization, harvest, and postharvest practices.

Photo credits: Terry Sampson


3. Recommended best practice postharvest treatments

3.1. Pre-cooling and field heat reduction after harvest

There is usually a high build of field heat in the afternoon which is undesirable during the harvesting stage. This increases the metabolic activity that should be reduced immediately after harvest. Pre-cooling minimizes the effect of microbial activity, metabolic activity, respiration rate, and ethylene production [8, 9].

Pre-cooling treatments can reduce the ripening rate, water loss, and decay, thereby preserving quality and extending shelf life of most fruits. It is critical to determine the specific temperature range usually between 13 and 20°C for specific fruits. Pre-cooling can be done by hydro-cooling or dipping fruits in cold water with disinfectants such as thiabendazole and sodium hypochlorite to reduce microbial infections [10].

3.2. Sanitization

Proper hygiene can prevent postharvest diseases and transmission of food-borne pathogens such as Salmonella, Cryptosporidium, Cyclospora, and hepatitis A virus particularly where water is a constraint or likely to be contaminated. Care should be taken to ensure that harvested fruits do not come into contact with the ground to avoid any source of contamination. Disinfection or sanitization in conjunction with hydro-cooling is recommended using sodium hypochlorite solution to reduce the incidence of fungal infection before any postharvest process [11]. Thiabendazole [12] and anolyte water dips [13] have been shown to reduce the microbial infection and maintain superior fruit quality during storage.

3.3. Grading and sorting

Sorting and removal of damaged, infected, or diseased fruits can prevent the production of ethylene in substantial amounts which is capable of affecting the adjacent fruits. When sorting is followed immediately by grading and categorizing of fruits based on color, size, stage of maturity, or degree of ripening, cross contamination and the spread of infectious microbes from discarded fruits to healthy fruits during postharvest handling are reduced. Additionally, through removal, overripen fruits reduce ethylene production and reduce “forced” ripening of the other fruits.

3.4. Packaging

Packaging is done to improve handling, storage, and transport. It involves enclosing the product to protect it from mechanical injuries, tampering, and contamination from physical, chemical, and biological sources [14]. The materials used vary from wooden and plastic crates, cardboard and styrofoam boxes, woven palm baskets to nylon, jute sacks, and polythene bags. However, not all materials give full protection to the fruits [15].

Improper or inadequate aeration within the packaged commodity can result in a buildup of heat as a result of respiration. Similarly, crates or baskets with rough surfaces and edges can induce mechanical injuries which will increase ethylene production, thus reducing postharvest quality of the fruits [5].

3.5. Storage

Tropical fruits usually have a very high moisture content and are very difficult to store at ambient temperatures for extended periods without refrigeration. It is critical that storage is extended so that processing operations can provide continuity of product supply throughout the seasons.

Most fruits can be stored for short terms at ambient temperature (10–15°C) and relative humidity (85–95%) [16], provided that ventilation is adequate to prevent heat built from respiration and reduce poor ripening and chilling injuries. However, these conditions in tropical countries are difficult to achieve due to high day temperatures and high relative humidity [17]. On the contrary, very low storage temperature is also detrimental to the shelf life and quality of many tropical fruits and will reduce its flavor, total soluble solids (TSS), and pH of the fruit [18].

It is essential that the correct temperature management is predetermined during storage so as to extend the shelf life of the fruit while maintaining fruit qualities. Storage for short to intermediate time by using evaporative cooling system is recommended.

3.6. Transportation

Farms are usually located away from the marketing centers, processing plants, and inaccessible roads. The lack of proper transportation, like refrigerated vehicles, is a big challenge for both producers and distributors in Small Island Developing States (SIDS). This causes unnecessary delays in getting the produce to the pack houses or market, and such delays can result in losses up to about 20%. During transportation, the produce should be immobilized by proper packaging and stacking to avoid excessive movement or vibration or heat buildup, if transport is not refrigerated. Refrigerated trucks are not only convenient but also effective in preserving the quality of fruits. But it has a high initial investment which is usually unaffordable in SIDS.


4. Selected postharvest treatment techniques

After harvesting, fruits remain living, and all the metabolic process and functions of living tissue continue. However, the postharvest quality of the fruits at or after harvest cannot be enhanced by any postharvest technology, except fruit color, but can be maintained or prolonged.

4.1. Refrigeration storage

Refrigeration is one of the most common effective methods of preserving the quality of many fruits for several days. Low fruits placed at storage temperature can protect quality attributes like texture, nutrition, aroma, and flavor in many harvested fruits and extend shelf life. However, some fruits are sensitive to chilling injury when they are stored below their critical temperature (10°C) for even short durations and may result in pitting, uneven ripening, and fungal infestation of stored fruits.

The required optimum temperatures (10–15°C at 85–95% relative humidity) can be achieved by using less expensive methods of cooling such as an evaporative cooling system [19]. Where, air temperatures can be decreased (16°C, 91% relative humidity) without significant deterioration due physiological weight loss.

4.2. Postharvest heat treatment

Postharvest heat treatments using hot air and heated water have been reported to reduce chilling injuries in fruits like mangoes and oranges. Heat treating (37–42°C) prior to cold storage can slow down ripening while increasing pathogenic resistance enhanced or caused no change in some quality traits particularly in modified atmosphere storage system. Heat treatment before cold storage at 14°C can also increase TSS and titratable acids (TA) when fruits ripened as compared to the untreated fruits.

4.3. Modified atmosphere packaging (MAP)

Modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) is a packaging technique of using packaging materials with predetermined composition of gases (O2 and CO2) after which there is no active effort of modifying the storage space. The materials allow for diffusion of gases through them until a stable equilibrium is reached between the external gases and those inside the package.

MAP materials used include polyethylene terephthalate (PET), low-density polyethylene (LDP), high-density polyethylene (HDP), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polypropylene [20], and polystyrene [21, 22].

MAP provides a modified atmosphere to control ripening, reducing water loss in stored products reducing mechanical injuries, and reduces the spread of food-borne diseases [23]. The water loss and subsequent shriveling of fruits in tropical regions are two of the causes of their deterioration. However, maintaining excessively high levels of relative humidity inside the package can result in moisture condensation on the commodity, which will in turn create a conducive environment favorable for pathogenic activities, thus increasing the risk of fruit deterioration.

4.4. Methylcyclopropene (1-MCP)

Treatments of 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) can suppress the action of and reduce the rate of ethylene production in harvested climacteric fruit [24]. Fruits with high metabolic activities usually have a shorter shelf life, and any attempts to slow down the metabolism will increase the shelf life. The reduced metabolic activities are closely associated with the ripening process such as color change, cell wall breakdown, and respiration rates and are advantageous to extending storage life [24] and the prevention of abscission in fruits [25].

4.5. Calcium chloride (CaCl2) application

The pre- and postharvest treatment of calcium chloride (CaCl2) has been shown to improve shelf life and quality of many fruits [26] by delaying ripening and senescence, reducing respiration, maintaining firmness, and reducing physiological disorders [27, 28].

It has also been shown to reduce fungal and other microbial infections and maintain the structural integrity of cell walls, delaying softening and extending shelf life by 4–5 weeks [29]. It also aids in maintaining the quality of fruits by reducing the physiological disorders, increasing the fruit firmness, delaying ripening process, and prolonging the shelf life [30]. Fruit color loss is also delayed, and ethylene production is reduced by 92% [26] while maintaining higher firmness levels during storage. CaCl2 is a very cheap and cost-effective soluble salt which can be dissolved easily and used in the pre-cooling or cleaning of the fruits after harvesting.


  1. 1. Muhammad RH, Bamisheyi E, Olayemi FF. The effect of stage of ripening on the shelf life of tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum) stored in the evaporative cooling system (E.C.S). Journal of Dairying, Foods & Home Sciences. 2011;30(4):299-301
  2. 2. Yahia EM, De Jesus Ornelas-Paz J, Gonzalez-Aguilar GA. Nutritional and Health promoting Properties of Tropical and Subtropical Fruits. In: Postharvest Biology and Technology of Tropical and Subtropical Fruits. Edited by Yahia EM: Woodhead Publishing; 2011. pp. 21-78. ISBN 9781845697334.
  3. 3. Droby S, Wisniewski ME, Benkeblia N. Postharvest pathology of tropical and subtropical fruit and strategies for decay control. In: Yahia E, editor. Post-harvest Biology and Technology of Tropical and Sub-tropical Fruits. Vol. 1. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing Limited; 2011. pp. 194-223
  4. 4. Arah IK, Ahorbo GK, Anku EK, Kumh EK, Amaglo H. Postharvest Handling Practices and Treatment Methods for Tomato Handlers in Developing Countries: A Mini Review, Advances in Agriculture, vol. 2016, Article ID 6436945, 8 pages, 2016. DOI:10.1155/2016/6436945
  5. 5. Arah IK, Amaglo H, Kumah EK, Ofori H, Preharvest and Postharvest Factors Affecting the Quality and Shelf Life of Harvested Tomatoes: A Mini Review. International Journal of Agronomy, vol. 2015, Article ID 478041, 6 pages, 2015. DOI:10.1155/2015/478041
  6. 6. Isaac WAI, Ganpat W, Joseph M. Farm security for food security: Dealing with farm theft in the Caribbean Region. In: Ganpat W, Dyer R, Isaac Wendy-Ann P., editors. Agricultural Development and Food Security in Developing Nations. Pennsylvania USA: IGI Publications; 2017. (ISBN 978-152-250-942-4). pp. 300-319
  7. 7. Moneruzzaman KM, Hossain ABMS, Sani W, Saifuddin M, Alenazi M. Effect of harvesting and storage conditions on the postharvest quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentumMill) cv. Roma VF. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 2009;3(2):112-121
  8. 8. Akbudak B, Akbudak N, Seniz V, Eris A. Effect of pre-harvest harpin and modified atmosphere packaging on quality of cherry tomato cultivars “Alona” and “Cluster". British Food Journal. 2012;114(2):180-196.
  9. 9. Shahi NC, Lohani UC, Chand K, Singh A. Effect of pre-cooling treatments on shelf life of tomato in ambient condition. International Journal of Food, Agriculture and Veterinary Science. 2012;2(3):50-56
  10. 10. Ferreira MD, Brecht JK, Sargent SA, Aracena JJ. Physiological responses of strawberry to film wrapping and precooling methods. Proceedings of Florida State Horticulture Society. 1994;107:265-269
  11. 11. Genanew T. Effect of postharvest treatments on storage behaviour and quality of tomato fruits. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2013;9(1):29-37
  12. 12. Batu A, Thompson AK. Effects of modified atmosphere packaging on post harvest qualities of pink tomatoes. Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 1998;22:365-372
  13. 13. Arjenaki OO, Moghaddam PA, Motlagh AM. Online tomato sorting based on shape, maturity, size, and surface defects using machine vision. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 2013;37:62-68
  14. 14. Prasad P, Kochhar A. Active packaging in food industry: A review. IOSR Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology. 2014;8(5):01-07
  15. 15. Idah PA, Ajisegiri ESA, Yisa MG. An assessment of impact damage to fresh tomato fruits. Australian Journal of Technology. 2007;10(4):271-275
  16. 16. Žnidarčič D, Trdan S, Zlatič E. Impact of various growing methods on tomato (Lycopersicon esculentumMill.) yield and sensory quality. Research Reports Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Agriculture. 2003;81(2):341-348
  17. 17. Parker R, Maalekuu BK. The effect of harvesting stage on fruit quality and shelf-life of four cultivars (Lycopersicon esculentumMill). Agriculture and Biological Journal of North America. 2013;4(3):252-259
  18. 18. Moretti CL, Sargent SA, Huber DJ, Calbo AG, Puschmann R. Chemical composition and physical properties of pericarp, locule and placental tissue of tomatoes with internal bruising. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 1998;123(4):656-660
  19. 19. Workneh TS, Woldetsadik K. Forced ventilation evaporative cooling: A case study on banana, papaya, orange, mandarin, and lemon. Tropical Agriculture. 2004;81(1):1-6
  20. 20. de Wild HPJ, Otma EC, Peppelenbos HW. Carbon dioxide action on ethylene biosynthesis of preclimacteric and climacteric pear fruit. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2003;54:1537-1544
  21. 21. Artés F, Gómez P, Artés-Hernández F. Modified atmosphere packaging of fruits and vegetables. Stewart Postharvest Review. 2006;5:1-13
  22. 22. Sandhya. Modified atmosphere packaging of fresh produce: Current status and future needs. LTW-Food Science and Technology. 2010;43:381-392
  23. 23. Kader AA, Watkins CB. Modified atmosphere packaging – Towards 2000 and beyond. Hort Technology. 2000;10(3):483-486
  24. 24. Watkins CB. Overview of 1-methylcyclopropene trials and uses for edible horticultural crops. HortScience. 2008;43:86-94
  25. 25. Passam HC, Karapanos IC, Bebeli PJ, Savvas D. A review of recent research on tomato nutrition, breeding and post-harvest technology with reference to fruit quality. The European Journal of Plant Science and Biotechnology. 2007;1:1-21
  26. 26. Senevirathna PAWANK, Daundasekera WAM. Effect of post-harvest calcium chloride vacuum infiltration on the shelf life and quality of tomato (cv. ‘Thilina’). Ceylon Journal of Science (Biological Sciences). 2010;39(1):35-44
  27. 27. Hong MN, Lee BC, Mendonca S, Grossmann MVE, Verhe R. Effect of infiltrated calcium on ripening of tomato fruits. LWT Journal of Food Science. 1999;33:2-8
  28. 28. Akhtar A, Abbasi AA, Hussain A. Effect of calcium chloride treatments on quality characteristics of loquat fruit during storage. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 2010;42(1):181-188
  29. 29. Lara I, García P, Vendrell M. Modifications in cell wall composition after cold storage of calcium-treated strawberry (Fragaria×ananassa Duch.) fruit. Postharvest Biology and Technology. 2004;34:331-339
  30. 30. Abbasi AA, Zafar L, Khan HA, Qureshi AA. Effects of naphthalene acetic acid and calcium chloride application on nutrient uptake, growth, yield and postharvest performance of tomato fruit. Pakistani Journal of Botany. 2013;45(5):1581-1587

Written By

Puran Bridgemohan and Wendy-Ann P. Isaac

Submitted: December 6th, 2016 Reviewed: July 18th, 2017 Published: September 13th, 2017