Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Free-Living Amoeba Acanthamoeba Triggers Allergic Inflammation of Airways

Written By

Hak Sun Yu

Submitted: May 12th, 2014Reviewed: September 11th, 2014Published: April 22nd, 2015

DOI: 10.5772/59190

Chapter metrics overview

1,659 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

An estimated 300 million people worldwide have asthma, and 250,000 deaths are attributed annually to the disease. From 2001 to 2009, the number of people diagnosed with asthma grew by 4.3 million. Allergic airway inflammation is closely related to airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), the production of mucus, and airway remodeling. This inflammation is mediated by the T helper type 2 (Th2)-cell response, the upregulation of interleukins (IL)-4, 5, and 13, which are produced by activated CD4+ T cells, and by elevated immunoglobulin E (IgE) production. Asthma has long been associated with atopy, a predilection for producing antigen-specific IgE antibodies against environmental allergens capable of mediating hypersensitivity reactions, particularly immediate skin reactions [1, 2]. Many environmental proteases are believed to be allergens that elicit allergic airway inflammation. Allergens from house dust mites [3], cockroaches [4], fungi [3], and pollens have been reported to contain cysteine, serine, and aspartic proteases [5].

Recently, asthma patients with high serum IgE levels, but who do not react to known allergens in skin prick tests, have been identified, suggesting the presence of unknown environmental allergens [6]. We hypothesize that free living amoeba (FLA) are undiscovered aeroallergens. One of the FLA, Acanthamoeba, is an opportunistic protozoan broadly detected throughout the environment. The amoeba can cause severe human diseases, including amoebic keratitis (it can lead to blindness) in health person and fatal encephalitis in AIDS patients [7]. Acanthamoebaspecies have been isolated from swimming pools, public sewage, water supplies, air-conditioning units, sediments, air, compost, soils, contact lenses and their storage cases [8]. In addition, Acanthamoebahave been isolated from human bodies especially nasal cavities, pharyngeal swabs, lung tissues, and skin [8-10]. Perhaps it is not unsurprisingly that we have been found anti-Acanthamoebaantibodies from many of healthy individuals tested, this indicated that exposure to the amoeba is common [11]. Acanthamoebaexist as trophozoites or cysts. Trophozoites are the metabolically active form, consuming nutrients via phagocytosis, while unfavorable environmental conditions lead to the formation of cysts. In addition, a lot of proteases, including cysteine and serine proteases, have been detected from Acanthamoebaexcreted/secreted (ES) proteins.These proteases are significant determinants of protozoan pathogenicity and host cell invasion.It has been proposed that proteases play a central role in various processes, such as host cell invasion and way out, cyto-adherence, morphological differentiation, digestion of host proteins, stimulation immune response, and escape from host immune responses [12-16]. However, in spite of their ubiquitous existence in the environment and expression of a lot of proteases capable of eliciting allergic airway inflammation, no report exploring this connection has been published to date.


2. Acanthamoebatrophozoites elicited a strong allergic airway inflammation response

Airway allergens are experimentally confirmed by the ability to elicit allergic airway inflammation when it was inhaled. Ovalbumin (OVA) is one of commonly used the experimental allergens, but is unable to elicit allergic airway inflammation if directly administered by inhalation without any allergens. By contrast, pollens and fungal-derived allergens can easily elicit allergic responses when inhaled through the airway tract [17-19]. Therefore, if repeated administration of Acanthamoebainto the airway tract, allergic response can be occurred in the airway. Park et al. reported that repeated inoculation of Acanthamoebatrophozoites to a mouse model elicited allergic airway inflammation [20]. In order to test the ability of Acanthamoebato trigger allergic inflammation, they administrated trophozoites form of Acanthamoeba(5 × 104) into the nose of mice and evaluated immunological and pathological responses (Fig. 1A). In the mice inoculated with Acanthamoebatrophozoites, a dose-dependent increase in AHR to methacholine was observed (Fig. 1B). These mice also presented inflammatory cell infiltrations, and the numbers of neutrophils, eosinophils, (Fig. 1C) and lymphocytes were increased in the broncho-alveolar lavage fluid (BALF) (Fig. 1C). They also suggested that enormous inflammatory cell infiltration, hyperplasia of goblet cell and epithelial cell was found in the lung of Acanthamoebanasally administrated mice [20]. Also, It were increased that the levels of Th2 cytokines (IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13) in the BALF and in the supernatant of culture medium of T cells in lung draining lymph node (LLN), in the Acanthamoebaadministrated mice, compared with those of the controls. However, IFN-γ levels and IL-17 cytokine levels were unchanged in LLN and BALF by Acanthamoebainfection. The immunoglobulin (Ig) E level and Acanthamoeba-specific IgE level were significantly increases in total serum of Acanthamoebainfected mice (Fig. 1D).

It is possible for a person to come into contact with as many as 100 trophozoites at a time from Acanthamoebacontained tap water [21]. In order to evaluate whether such a dose of Acanthamoebacould elicit airway allergic inflammation, they introduced one hundred trophozoites of A. lugdunensisintranasally (Fig. 1E). Histology revealed some infiltrated of inflammatory cells, and mild hyperplasia of epithelial cells in the lung after administration and mucin expression in administrated mice was also higher than in control. A few Acanthamoebawere detected in alveoli, and quite a few eosinophils were observed around Acanthamoeba(Fig. 1F). Although, IL-5 levels in the LLNs and BALF were elevated following Acanthamoebanasally treatment (Fig. 1G), but IL-13 and IL-4 levels were unchanged. Total levels of IgE in the serum and anti-AcanthamoebaIgE were unchanged by low dose Acanthamoebatreatment.

Figure 1.

Acanthamoebaelicit airway allergic inflammation in mice [20]. Allergic airway inflammation was induced by inoculating mice with high (A–D) or low (E–G) doses ofAcanthamoeba. (A) Intranasal inoculation schedule for the high-dose (4 × 105Acanthamoebatrophozoites) model. (B) Airway resistance values in response to methacholine (0 - 50 mg/mL). (C) Differential cell count in 800 µL bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) after Diff-Quik staining. (D) Total andAcanthamoeba-specific IgE levels were measured in serum by ELISA. (E) Intranasal inoculation schedule for the low-dose (100Acanthamoebatrophozoites) model. (F) Tissue inflammation observed in stained lung sections (a and c, PBS-treated; b and d,Acanthamoeba-infected; a and b, H&E stained; c and d, PAS-stained; red arrows,Acanthamoebatrophozoites; white arrows, eosinophils). (G) Cytokine concentrations in BAL fluids (BALF) and in the culture medium of CD3-stimulated lymphocytes isolated from lung draining lymph nodes. (*,p< 0.05; **,p< 0.01; ***,p< 0.001; n=7, three independent experiments).


3. Acanthamoebaproduced strong ES proteases that could induce severe allergic inflammation in airway through Protease Activated Receptor 2 (PAR2)

Proteases of Acanthamoebaare required for the their life cycle maintenance [7, 14]. It is well known that Acanthamoebaexcretory and secretory (ES) protein contained abundant serine protease. Serine protease is necessary for the encystation and excystation of Acanthamoeba[22]. Serrano-Luna et al. identified 17 proteins with proteolytic activity in Acanthamoeba[14]. They demonstrated that proteolytic activity of ES proteins attributed primarily to the serine proteases and secondly to cysteine proteases, using protease inhibitors [14]. Subtilisin, one of the serine proteases, have been detected from ES proteins of Acanthamoeba, and also it was known as an inducer of asthma, [22, 23]. In addition, subtilisin has been detected from various organisms, and it can stimulate specific antibodies production in mice, and elicit various allergic response [24, 25].

Park et al., introduced protease-containing ES protein samples of Acanthamoebainto the nasal of mice six times, and observed the functional and immunological changes to the respiratory system. Lungs of ES protein-administered mice showed abundant infiltration of immune cell around the airway tracts, elevated mucin expression, and hyperplasia of goblet cells [20]. Levels of Th2 cytokines (IL-5, IL-4 and IL-13) were higher in the LLNs and BALF from the ES protein administrated group than those of control groups. Protease activity from the ES protein preparation was able to digest gelatin (Fig. 2A). This activity was abolished by introduction of PMSF (serine protease inhibitor), but not affected by cysteine protease inhibitor E-64, but some protein bands that had weaker protease activity were inhibited. The metallo protease inhibitor, matrix metallopeptidase (MMP)-9, did not inhibit the activity of most proteases (Fig. 2A). AcanthamoebaES proteins treatment increased the critical factors (TARC, TSLP, MDC, IL-25,eotaxingene expression) for Th2 response initiation and development in lung epithelial cells, and also led to increased levels of PARs in MLE12 cells (Fig. 2B & 2C) [20].

Figure 2.

Excreted/secreted (ES) proteins elicit T helper type 2 related chemokine and cytokine production [20].(A) ES proteins were treated with various protease inhibitors. Samples were incubated for 2 h and assayed by zymography on 0.1% gelatin SDS-PAGE gels (lane 1, 10 μg ES proteins; lane 2, with 1 mM PMSF; lane 3, with 5 mM PMSF; lane 4, with 10 μM E-64; lane 5, with 50 μM E-64; lane 6, with 10 μM MMP-9 inhibitor; lane 7, with 50 μM MMP-9 inhibitor; arrowhead, protease activity from ES proteins; arrow, protease activity inhibited by E64). (B) Th2-related chemokine gene expression (TSLP,TARC,MDC, eotaxin, andIL-25) was measured in MLE12 cells after incubation with 1 μg/mL of ES proteins (ES) for 2 h, or pre-treatment with 0.1 mM PMSF and 10 μg/mL polymyxin B (polymyxin) for 2 h. (C) The fold-change in PAR mRNA levels in MLE12 cells treated with ES proteins relative to those treated with medium, detected by real-time RT-PCR.

Recently PARs is known as belong to seven-transmembrane domain G protein coupled receptors [26]. They are activated through proteolytic cleavage of their N-terminal “tethered ligand” domains [27]. PAR1, 2, 3 and PAR4 have been cloned. They can be activated by thrombin (PAR1, PAR3, and PAR4), also can be activated by neutrophil protease 3, mast cell tryptase, trypsin, and several serine proteases (PAR2) [28]. Park et al. treated ES proteins with serine protease inhibitor (PMSF) and evaluated airway inflammation. The results showed that Pre-treatment with PMSF lead to a significant decrease in most values of the inflammation index, relative to administration of untreated ES proteins. The airway hyperresistant response (AHR) to methacholine following ES protein administration was likewise decreased by PMSF pre-treatment [20]. In addition, the infiltration of immune cells was lower in the PMSF-treated group, compared with ES protein-treatment alone; most notably, the number of eosinophils significantly decreased. In evaluation of the airway allergic inflammation induced by Acanthamoebaon PAR2 deficient (KO) mice, infiltration of immune cell around the airway tracts, elevated mucin expression, and hyperplasia of lung goblet cells were observed in PAR2 KO mice like as WT mice. However, Th2 cytokine level in the LLNs and BALF were lower in PAR2 KO mice treated with ES proteins than those of WT mice [20].


4. ES proteins activate dendritic cells (DCs) and the differentiation of Th2 cells

PARK et al., suggested that AcanthamoebaES proteins strongly stimulated DCs and enhanced the expression of CD80, CD86, CD40, and MHC II. (Fig. 3). Once ES protein stimulated DCs were co-incubated with CD4+CD25CD62L+T cells (naïve T cells), the number of CD4+ Th2 cells (IL-4-secreting CD4+ T cell) increased after co-incubation the DCs and naïve T cells (Fig. 4A). In addition, Th2 cytokines (IL-5, IL-4, and IL-13) production by CD4+ T cells increased in culture supernatants of co-incubated with ES protein stimulated DCs (Fig. 4B). In addition, naïve T cells co-incubated with AcanthamoebaES protein stimulated DCs had high levels of, transcription factor, GATA-3 gene expression (Fig. 4C).

Figure 3.

Acanthamoeba ES proteins activate BMDCs [20].Expression of cell surface markers (CD40, CD80 CD86, and MHCII,) on mouse BMDCs pulsed with ES proteins or LPS for 48 h, compared with untreated cells.

Figure 4.

Differentiation of T helper type 2 (Th2) cells from naïve T cells after co-cultivation with ES protein-activated BMDCs [20]. (A) Naïve T cells were cultured with BMDCs stimulated by ES proteins or LPS, or non-stimulated BMDCs for 3 d in the presence of anti-CD3 antibodies. After gating with CD4+ T cells, IL-4-producing T cells were counted. (Medium, naïve T cells with non-stimulated BMDCs; ES, naïve T cells with ES protein-stimulated BMDCs; LPS, naïve T cells with LPS-stimulated BMDCs). (B) Cytokine levels in the supernatants from co-cultures of naïve T cells and BMDC, measured by ELISA. (C) Gene levels were evaluated by real time-RT PCR from naïve T cell/BMDC co-cultures.

Enhancement of IL-5, IL-4, IL-13, and CXCL1 (eotaxin) are critical for the induction of allergic asthma by Th2 cells [29, 30]. Furthermore, CCR3, CCR4, and CCR8 was expressed on Th2 cells. Imai et al., suggested that TARC, MDC, and high-affinity CCR4 ligands can induce Th2 cells migration to the selective sites [31]. Therefore, production of serine protease activity contained AcanthamoebaES proteins might stimulate DCs, and promoting the differentiation of CD4+CD25CD62L+T (naive T) cells to Th2 cells.


5. Acanthamoebaantigens are detected in house dust, and significantly high level of anti AcanthamoebaIgE in asthma patients

Park et al., demonstrated that after samples of house dust were reacted with total serum from Acanthamoebainfected or uninfected mice, and the total dust reacted IgG1 levels in serum of infected mice were higher than those of control mice [20]. These results indicate that Acanthamoebacan be contaminated from domestic environments, like as house dust mite DerP1 allergen. Therefore, it is no wonder that almost all healthy persons have anti-AcanthamoebaIgG [10, 11]. They also screened Acanthamoeba-specific IgE levels in patients with asthma in order to know whether Acanthamoebacan be related with asthma in humans. The asthma patients have significantly higher IgE levels (p= 0.028) than those of healthy persons [20]. According to all of results proposed that Acanthamoebacould be a novel human airway allergen.


6. Conclusion

Acanthamoebatrophozoites and ES proteins stimulated allergic airway inflammation, and extended Th2 responses via PAR2 signaling and DC activation in a mouse asthma model. Furthermore, patients with asthma had higher anti-Acanthamoeba IgE titers than those of healthy persons. In order to aid the diagnosis, we needed further studies to identify the specific ES allergens from Acanthamoeba.



This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2012R1A1A2042979).


  1. 1.Burrows B, Martinez FD, Halonen M, Barbee RA, Cline MG: Association of asthma with serum IgE levels and skin-test reactivity to allergens. N Engl J Med 1989; 320 271-277.
  2. 2.Senti G, von Moos S, Tay F, Graf N, Sonderegger T, Johansen P, Kundig TM: Epicutaneous allergen-specific immunotherapy ameliorates grass pollen-induced rhinoconjunctivitis: A double-blind, placebo-controlled dose escalation study. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2012; 129 128-135.
  3. 3.Goplen N, Karim MZ, Liang Q, Gorska MM, Rozario S, Guo L, Alam R: Combined sensitization of mice to extracts of dust mite, ragweed, and Aspergillus species breaks through tolerance and establishes chronic features of asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2009; 123 925-932 e911.
  4. 4.Arruda LK, Vailes LD, Ferriani VP, Santos AB, Pomes A, Chapman MD: Cockroach allergens and asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2001; 107 419-428.
  5. 5.Vinhas R, Cortes L, Cardoso I, Mendes VM, Manadas B, Todo-Bom A, Pires E, Verissimo P: Pollen proteases compromise the airway epithelial barrier through degradation of transmembrane adhesion proteins and lung bioactive peptides. Allergy 2011; 66 1088-1098.
  6. 6.Johnson CC, Ownby DR, Zoratti EM, Alford SH, Williams LK, Joseph CL: Environmental epidemiology of pediatric asthma and allergy. Epidemiol Rev 2002; 24 154-175.
  7. 7.Khan NA: Pathogenesis of Acanthamoeba infections. Microb Pathog 2003; 34 277-285.
  8. 8.Khan NA: Acanthamoeba: biology and increasing importance in human health. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2006; 30 564-595.
  9. 9.Marciano-Cabral F, Cabral G: Acanthamoeba spp. as agents of disease in humans. Clin Microbiol Rev 2003; 16 273-307.
  10. 10.Schuster FL, Visvesvara GS: Free-living amoebae as opportunistic and non-opportunistic pathogens of humans and animals. Int J Parasitol 2004; 34 1001-1027.
  11. 11.Cursons RT, Brown TJ, Keys EA, Moriarty KM, Till D: Immunity to pathogenic free-living amoebae: role of humoral antibody. Infect Immun 1980; 29 401-407.
  12. 12.Singh B, Fleury C, Jalalvand F, Riesbeck K: Human pathogens utilize host extracellular matrix proteins laminin and collagen for adhesion and invasion of the host. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2012.
  13. 13.Moon EK, Chung DI, Hong YC, Kong HH: Differentially expressed genes of Acanthamoeba castellanii during encystation. Korean J Parasitol 2007; 45 283-285.
  14. 14.Serrano-Luna Jde J, Cervantes-Sandoval I, Calderon J, Navarro-Garcia F, Tsutsumi V, Shibayama M: Protease activities of Acanthamoeba polyphaga and Acanthamoeba castellanii. Can J Microbiol 2006; 52 16-23.
  15. 15.Dudley R, Alsam S, Khan NA: The role of proteases in the differentiation of Acanthamoeba castellanii. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2008; 286 9-15.
  16. 16.Cho JH, Na BK, Kim TS, Song CY: Purification and characterization of an extracellular serine proteinase from Acanthamoeba castellanii. IUBMB Life 2000; 50 209-214.
  17. 17.Kouzaki H, O'Grady SM, Lawrence CB, Kita H: Proteases induce production of thymic stromal lymphopoietin by airway epithelial cells through protease-activated receptor-2. J Immunol 2009; 183 1427-1434.
  18. 18.Chou H, Tam MF, Lee LH, Chiang CH, Tai HY, Panzani RC, Shen HD: Vacuolar serine protease is a major allergen of Cladosporium cladosporioides. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2008; 146 277-286.
  19. 19.Kiss A, Montes M, Susarla S, Jaensson EA, Drouin SM, Wetsel RA, Yao Z, Martin R, Hamzeh N, Adelagun R, et al: A new mechanism regulating the initiation of allergic airway inflammation. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2007; 120 334-342.
  20. 20.Park MK, Cho MK, Kang SA, Park HK, Kim DH, Yu HS: Acanthamoeba protease activity promotes allergic airway inflammation via protease-activated receptor 2. PLoS One 2014; 9 e92726.
  21. 21.Jeong HJ, Lee SJ, Kim JH, Xuan YH, Lee KH, Park SK, Choi SH, Chung DI, Kong HH, Ock MS, Yu HS: Acanthamoeba: keratopathogenicity of isolates from domestic tap water in Korea. Exp Parasitol 2007; 117 357-367.
  22. 22.Ferreira GA, Magliano AC, Pral EM, Alfieri SC: Elastase secretion in Acanthamoeba polyphaga. Acta Trop 2009; 112 156-163.
  23. 23.Kim WT, Kong HH, Ha YR, Hong YC, Jeong HJ, Yu HS, Chung DI: Comparison of specific activity and cytopathic effects of purified 33 kDa serine proteinase from Acanthamoeba strains with different degree of virulence. Korean J Parasitol 2006; 44 321-330.
  24. 24.Thorne PS, Hillebrand J, Magreni C, Riley EJ, Karol MH: Experimental sensitization to subtilisin. I. Production of immediate- and late-onset pulmonary reactions. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1986; 86 112-123.
  25. 25.Tripathi P, Nair S, Singh BP, Arora N: Molecular and immunological characterization of subtilisin like serine protease, a major allergen of Curvularia lunata. Immunobiology 2011; 216 402-408.
  26. 26.Traynelis SF, Trejo J: Protease-activated receptor signaling: new roles and regulatory mechanisms. Curr Opin Hematol 2007; 14 230-235.
  27. 27.Ossovskaya VS, Bunnett NW: Protease-activated receptors: contribution to physiology and disease. Physiol Rev 2004; 84 579-621.
  28. 28.Holzhausen M, Spolidorio LC, Vergnolle N: Role of protease-activated receptor-2 in inflammation, and its possible implications as a putative mediator of periodontitis. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2005; 100 Suppl 1 177-180.
  29. 29.Kim HY, DeKruyff RH, Umetsu DT: The many paths to asthma: phenotype shaped by innate and adaptive immunity. Nat Immunol 2010; 11 577-584.
  30. 30.Puxeddu I, Bader R, Piliponsky AM, Reich R, Levi-Schaffer F, Berkman N: The CC chemokine eotaxin/CCL11 has a selective profibrogenic effect on human lung fibroblasts. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006; 117 103-110.
  31. 31.Imai T, Nagira M, Takagi S, Kakizaki M, Nishimura M, Wang J, Gray PW, Matsushima K, Yoshie O: Selective recruitment of CCR4-bearing Th2 cells toward antigen-presenting cells by the CC chemokines thymus and activation-regulated chemokine and macrophage-derived chemokine. Int Immunol 1999; 11 81-88.

Written By

Hak Sun Yu

Submitted: May 12th, 2014Reviewed: September 11th, 2014Published: April 22nd, 2015