Open access

Study of Helminth Parasites of Amphibians by Scanning Electron Microscopy

Written By

Cynthya Elizabeth González, Monika Inés Hamann and Cristina Salgad

Submitted: 11 May 2011 Published: 09 March 2012

DOI: 10.5772/35371

From the Edited Volume

Scanning Electron Microscopy

Edited by Viacheslav Kazmiruk

Chapter metrics overview

6,305 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

Amphibians, like all other animals, are subject to a variety of parasites and diseases, including viral, bacterial and fungal infections as well as some forms of cancer and tuberculosis (Hoff et al., 1984). Various viruses and bacteria such as Pseudomonas or Salmonella, and fungi such as Candida, are recorded as common infectious agents in amphibians, but currently the focus of studies are the fungi of genus Batrachochytrium, agents of the disease known as chytridiomycosis, which is considered as one of the factors responsible for the decline of amphibian populations in many parts of the world (Berger and Speare, 1998). In addition, protozoans of the genera Opalina and Entamoeba in the digestive tract, and trypanosomes in the circulatory system, as well as coccidian protozoa have been recorded in amphibians (Duellman and Trueb, 1986; Duszynski et al., 2007).

However, helminths are the most common invertebrate parasites of amphibians. One well known example among trematodes is the monogenean genus Polystoma, which infects the urinary bladder of adult amphibians around the world. Parasitic digenean trematodes include both larval stages (metacercariae) and adults. Cestodes are not common parasites in the gastrointestinal tract of amphibians, but when present may persist for a long time. Adult acanthocephalans adhere to the mucosa of the stomach or intestine. Finally, nematodes are particularly abundant in the digestive tract, lungs and blood vessels of these vertebrates (Pough et al., 2001). Amphibians are also hosts to other groups of less common parasitic invertebrates, such as annelids, pentastomids and arthropods (copepods, ticks, insects) (Tinsley, 1995).

Of these, analyses using scanning electron microscopy techniques have been mainly applied to digenean trematodes (flatworms), nematodes (roundworms) and acanthocephalans (thorny or spiny headed), particularly to their adult stages (Fig. 1. 1-3).

The study of parasitic nematodes and trematodes by scanning electron microscopy began in the 1970s and involved mainly those organisms that produced diseases in humans and livestock, as well as parasites of crops (Halton, 2004). In particular, studies in amphibian hosts were first made by Nollen and Nadakavukaren (1974) and Nadakavukaren and Nollen (1975) who provided details of the tegument of the trematodes Megalodiscus temperatus (Paramphistomatidae) and Gorgoderina attenuata (Gorgoderidae) from Rana pipiens. Regarding nematodes, Navarro et al. (1988) provided details of the cuticle of the species Cosmocerca ornata, Oxysomatium brevicaudatum (Cosmocercidae) and Seuratascaris numidica (Ascarididae) collected in ranid hosts from different geographical areas of the Iberian Peninsula.

Figure 1.

Helminth parasites found in amphibian hosts. 1. Flatworms (Trematoda), general view. 2. Roundworms (Nematoda) male and female mating. 3. Thorny or spine headed (Acanthocephala), general view.

This chapter presents scanning electron micrographs taken during diverse studies undertaken to determine the helminth fauna of Argentinean anurans, especially those living in Northeastern Argentina. The survey includes the classes Trematoda (specifically subclass Digenea) and Nematoda (specifically subclass Secernentea) and the phyllum Acanthocephala. A total of five families of amphibians (Bufonidae, Cycloramphidae, Hylidae, Leptodactylidae, Leiuperidae) were analyzed, both at larval (tadpole) and adult stages, to study their helminth parasites. At the end of the chapter we present a summary of the present-day advances in this topic, including new contributions presented in this work; finally, we discuss possible future lines of research in this field of Parasitology.

The classification of helminths follows Anderson et al. (2009) and Gibbons (2010) for class Nematoda; Gibson et al. (2002) and Jones et al. (2005) for class Trematoda and Amin (1985) for Acanthocephala.


2. Preparation of helminth parasites of amphibians for observation by scanning electron microscopy

2.1. Collection of hosts and obtaining of helminth parasites

Adult frogs were hand captured, mainly at night, using the sampling technique defined as visual encounter survey (Crump and Scott, 1994). The individuals were transported live to the laboratory and killed in a chloroform solution (CHCl3). The abdominal cavity of each frog was opened and the oesophagus, stomach, gut, lungs, liver, urinary bladder, kidneys, body cavity, musculature, integument and brain examined for parasites under a dissecting microscope (Fig. 2). Tadpoles were captured with a 45-cm-diameter dip net and kept alive in the laboratory until their dissection. They were killed using a chloroform solution, and subsequently all organs, musculature and body cavity were examined for parasites.

Figure 2.

Ventral view of adult amphibian showing all organ systems.

The analized amphibian species were: Rhinella bergi, R. fernandezae, R. granulosa, R. schneideri (Bufonidae), Odontophrynus americanus (Cycloramphidae), Dendropsophus nanus, D. sanborni, Hypsiboas raniceps, Pseudis limellum, Phyllomedusa hypochondrialis, Scinax acuminatus, S. nasicus, Trachycephalus venulosus, Pseudis paradoxa (Hylidae), Physalaemus albonotatus, P. santafecinus, Pseudopaludicola boliviana, P. falcipes (Leiuperidae), Leptodactylus bufonius, L. chaquensis, L. elenae, L. latinasus, L. latrans, L. podicipinus (Leptodactylidae), Lepidobatrachus laevis (Ceratophryidae). Anurans were identified using different guides and keys (Faivovich et al., 2005; Frost et al., 2004).

2.2. Procedure applied to helminth. Complications

In 1972, Allison et al. proposed a simplified four-step procedure that resulted in excellent preservation, support in the high vacuum and dissipation of surface charging of nematodes. The procedure involved: fixation, dehydration, treatment with an antistatic agent and gold-palladium coating. These authors obtained best results using fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde (phosphate-buffered) and AFA (acetic acid-formalin-alcohol); specimens were dehydrated in an ascending series of ethanol solutions to 70%, then transferred to 5% glycerine-95% ethanol from which the alcohol was allowed to evaporate, and cleared in 96.6% glycerol-0.05% potassium chloride-3.35% distilled water, 24 to 48 hours prior to examination. Subsequently, specimens were mounted on metal specimen stubs with Duco cement, outgassed in a vacuum evaporator for 1 hour or more and rotary-coated with gold-palladium.

In this study we basically followed the aforementioned procedure, with some modifications. Helminths were observed in vivo, counted, fixed and stored. Adult nematodes and trematodes were fixed in hot 4% formaldehyde; larval nematodes and trematodes were removed from cysts with the aid of preparation needlees and fixed in hot 4% formaldehyde; acanthocephalan larvae were placed in distilled water for 24 hours at 4°C for the proboscis to evert, and then fixed in hot 4% formaldehyde.

Another technique used for the study of nematodes and acanthocephalans by SEM consists of transferring specimens for 2 hours into 1% osmium tetroxide and dehydrate them in an ethanol series for 2 hours in each bath (Mafra and Lanfredi, 1998). In the case of trematodes, fixation can be made with paraformaldehyde, glutaraldehyde or a formaldehyde-glutaraldehyde mix such as Karnovsky's fixative in phosphate or cacodylate buffer. Postfixation is usually done for 2 to 3 hours at 4°C with cacodylate– or phosphate- buffered 1% osmium tetroxide (Karnovsky, 1965).

For processing of helminths, it should be taken into account that a hypertonic solution will cause shrinkage and almost complete disappearance of inflation in specimens, whereas a hypotonic solution may produce artificial inflations. In some cases, in spite of careful processing of samples for SEM study, good results are not achieved. Very frequently, the samples contain bacteria or debris, or tears of the cuticle of nematodes or tegument of trematodes (Fig. 3. 5-9).

Figure 3.

Some complications in samples for SEM studies. 5. 6. Bacteria in posterior end of Skrjabinodon sp. (5) and in ventral surface of Cosmocerca parva (6). 7. Broken cuticle in posterior end of female of Aplectana sp. 8. 9. Debris in spicules and adanal papillae of Cosmocerca podicipinus (8) and in posterior end of Falcaustra sp. (9).

2.3. Characteristic of the scanning electron microscope used for this study

The Microscopy department at Universidad Nacional del Nordeste possesses a Jeol 5800LV scanning electron microscopy. Specimens are critical-point dried using a Denton Vacuum DCP-1 critical point drying apparatus, and sputter-coating is made using a Denton Vacuum Desk II sputter-coating unit.

For examination by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), specimens were dehydrated through an alcohol 70 and acetone series (70%, 85% and 100%; 15 minutes in each solution) and then subjected to critical point drying using CO2; in the case of larval digenean trematodes, critical point drying time is shortened because these individuals are more fragile than adults. Samples were mounted on a metal sheet of copper or aluminum using double-sided tape. Then the specimens were sputter-coated with gold or gold-palladium for three minutes. Helminth parasites were observed in high vacuum in all cases.

Adequate fixation contributes to specimen preservation and stability within the microscope; dehydration allows outgassing and drying of specimens in the vaccum evaporator prior to coating without subsequent "bubbling" or shrinkage artifacts; glyceration provides an antistatic surface coating over all surface irregularities, even those which might not be adequately coated with 200 a of gold-palladium. The thin metal coating does not obscure fine structural detail but, in combination with the glycerol-KCl coating, ensures that the specimen can be exposed for extended periods of time to the electron beam without surface changes (Allison et al., 1972).


3. What can SEM studies tell us about helminth parasites of amphibians?

3.1. Nematoda

The body surface of nematodes is covered by a truly inert cuticle of extracellular material in the form of cross-linked collagens and insoluble proteins that are synthesised and secreted by the underlying epidermis (= hypodermis). In addition to proteins and collagen, the cuticle possesses glycoproteins, fibrin and keratin. It consists of three main layers and the epicuticle. The external layer is divided into internal and external cortex; the middle layer varies from having a granular uniform structure to presenting skeletal rods, fibers or channels; the internal basal layer can be laminated or grooved. The thin epicuticle may have a coating of quinone (Lee, 2002).

The above discussion refers specifically to the cuticle of the external body surface. In other body parts, such as the buccal cavity, excretory pore, vagina, cloaca and rectum, as well as the eggs and spicules in males, the cuticle is of a different nature.

The particular composition of the cuticle along the whole body of nematodes, and especially the ornamentations that they present in the anterior and posterior extremity, are the focus of primary study of these helminths by scanning electron microscopy.

The nomenclature for the structures detailed here is based on Chitwood and Chitwood (1975), Gibbons (1986) and Willmott (2009). We describe the modifications of the cuticle along the body surface, at the anterior and posterior body ends, and finally the cuticle of the eggs, vulva and spicules of these helminths.

3.1.1. Cuticle of body

The features analyzed along the body surface are the morphology and disposition of somatic papillae as well as the striation of the cuticle -longitudinal, transverse or oblique-, and the presence of annulations, punctuations, longitudinal ridges, alae -lateral, cervical or caudal-, inflation and spination.

There are several types of gross cuticular markings, namely, transverse, longitudinal and oblique markings. Of these, transverse and longitudinal markings are very common in nematode parasites of amphibians.

Tranverse markings: the superficial markings are grooves or ridges. Striations are defined as fine transverse grooves occurring at regular intervals; the distance between two striae is the intestrial region (Aplectana hylambatis, Cosmocerca spp.) (Fig. 4. 10, 11). Deep striae are very commonly and are known as annulations; the distances between them are termed annules (Aplectana delirae, Falcaustra sp.) (Fig. 4. 12, 13). In nematode parasites of the family Pharyngodonidae, annulations are much broader and more prominent (Fig. 4. 14, 15; Fig. 9. 34).

Figure 4.

Transverse marking in cuticle of nematode parasites of amphibians. 10. 11. Striations (Aplectana hylambatis, Cosmocerca podicipinus, respectively). 12. 13. Striations and annules (A. delirae, Falcaustra sp., respectively). 14. 15. Annulations (Skrjabinodon sp.).

Striations can be distributed uniformly along the whole body of the parasite (Cosmocerca spp.), or they may become less evident (A. delirae) or wider (A. hylambatis) at the body ends, or more marked, as for example, in the posterior body (Skrjabinodon) (Fig. 4. 10-15).

Longitudinal markings: these may take the form of ridges or alae, or they may be merely the result of gaps in transverse markings.

Figure 5.

Longitudinal markings in nematode parasites of amphibians. 16. 17. Lateral alae in anterior end of body in Paraoxyascaris sp. (16) and in Porrocaecum sp. (larvae) (17). 18. 19. Lateral alae in posterior end of body in Cosmocerca spp. 20. Cephalic cuticular vesicle in Oswaldocruzia sp. 21. Longitudinal ridges in Oswaldocruzia sp. la: lateral alae; lr: longitudinal ridges.

Alae: these are usually lateral or sublateral cuticular thickenings or projections. There are three types of alae: longitudinal, cervical and caudal.

Longitudinal alae: these are usually lateral or sublateral and occur in both sexes; extending along the length of the body. They occur in the families Cosmocercidae (Aplectana, Cosmocerca, Cosmocercella, Paraoxyascaris) (Fig. 5. 16, 18, 19), Ascarididae (Ortleppascaris, Porrocaecum) (Fig. 5. 17); in Gyrinicola sp. (Family Pharyngodonidae) lateral alae are present in males only.

Cervical alae: these structures are confined to the anterior part of the body. This modification of the cuticle does not occur in nematode species that parasitize amphibians.

In some parasitic nematodes, the cervical alae is modified as a cephalic cuticular vesicle as in the genus Oswaldocruzia; in some cases this cuticular vesicle is divided into a larger anterior part and a smaller posterior part (Fig. 6. 20).

Caudal alae: these alae are confined to the caudal region of the body and limited to the males only; apparently they serve as clasping organs during copulation. Among nematodes that parasitize amphibians, they occur in the family Pharyngodonidae (Parapharyngodon). On the other hand, modified caudal alae occur in the males of some families such as the Molineidae, where they are called bursa copulatrix or copulatory bursa (see below).

Longitudinal ridges: these are raised areas that extend along the length of the body and are present on the submedian as well as on the lateral surfaces. Oswaldocruzia (Family: Molineidae) has longitudinal ridges throughout the body length that can disappear or appear along its body (Fig. 5. 21). The system of longitudinal cuticular ridges or synlophe in this genus is very important as a taxonomic character.

Inflation: when the cuticle is swollen in a blister-like manner, this condition may be termed inflation (eg. Rhabdias; Fig. 6. 22-24). Besides being inflated, the cuticle can be also striated. Inflation of the cuticle may be generalized over the whole body surface instead of restricted to certain areas.

Figure 6.

Inflation in the cuticle of nematode parasites of genus Rhabdias. 22. Cephalic end. 23. Vulvar region. 24. Anterior end of body.

Papillae: these structures are nerve endings, some of which have a tactile function and others are chemoreceptors; they appear as cuticular elevations of different shapes and sizes (Fig. 7. 25-27). According to their position, they are divided into labial, cephalic, cervical and genital papillae. In this section, we deal with the distribution and structure of somatic papillae, i.e. those that are distributed throughout the body of the nematode. These papillae are generally arranged in two subdorsal and two subventral rows along the body of the nematode.

Finally, in some genera of nematode parasites of amphibians, the excretory pore has conspicuous cuticularized walls, surrounded by a rough cuticular area (Pharyngodonidae); in others, the excretory pore is located in a depression of the cuticula (Falcaustra) (Fig. 8. 28, 29).

Figure 7.

Somatic papillae in nematode parasites of amphibians. 25. Aplectana hylambatis. 26. Aplectana delirae. 27. Cosmocerca podicipinus. sp: somatic papillae.

Figure 8.

Excretory pore in nematode parasites of amphibian. 28. Falcaustra sp. 29. Skrjabinodon sp.

Punctuations: this type of marking is frequent and appears as minute round areas of the cuticle which are arranged in definite patterns for each species. In nematode parasites of amphibians, this type of marking appears in males of the family Cosmocercidae, specifically in the genus Cosmocerca as part of the rosette papillae (see below; Fig. 10; Fig 11. 39-44) and in the genus Cosmocercella (Fig. 12. 46, 48).

3.1.2. Cuticle of anterior end of body

The cuticular modifications that occur in the anterior end of the body of nematode parasites of amphibians are: head papillae - cephalic papillae, externo-labial papillae, interno-labial papillae-, interlabia, deirids and amphids. These two latter structures are not modifications of the cuticle itself, but their opening in the cuticle can present diverse shape and structure.

Head papillae: these are tactile sensory organs usually located on the lips or labial region, including two circles of six labial papillae and one circle of four cephalic papillae. This arrangement has been proposed for ancestral nematodes considering a radial type of symmetry (De Coninck, 1965). The head papillae are divided into: cephalic papillae: outer circle of four head papillae (or latero-ventral and latero-dorsal papillae); externo-labial papillae: median circle of six head papillae, and interno-labial papillae: inner circle of six head papillae.

The basic structure proposed by De Coninck (1965) shows modifications in the nematodes that parasitize amphibians. For example, cosmocercid nematodes present three lips. The genus Aplectana has a circle of four internal labial papillae, 1 on each subventral lip and 2 on the dorsal lip, and a circle of six external labial papillae; the amphids are large, one on each subventral lip. The anterior end of the oesophagus presents three tooth-like projections covered with a thick cuticle, also called cuticular flap (Fig. 9. 30). The genus Cosmocerca presents the same arrangement in the internal and external labial papillae and, as in the previous genus, the anterior end of the oesophagus bears three tooth-like projections (cuticular flap); the amphids are very prominent in some cases (Fig. 9. 31). In the nematodes of family Atractidae, specifically in the genus Schrankiana, each lip has a cuticular flange overhanging the mouth opening (Fig. 9. 32).

Figure 9.

Modifications of the cuticle in the anterior end of body. 30. Aplectana sp. 31. Cosmocerca sp. 32. Schrankiana sp. 33. Rhabdias sp. 34. Pharyngodon sp. 35. Falcaustra sp. 36. Porrocaecum sp. (larvae). 37. Brevimulticaecum sp. (larvae). am: amphids; cf: cuticular flap; lp: labial papillae; one asterisk: external labial papillae; two asterisk: internal labial papillae.

In the lung nematodes of genus Rhabdias, which have an inflated cuticle, the cephalic structures are in most cases very difficult to observe (Fig. 9. 33). In oxyurid nematodes, eg. Parapharyngodon, there are three lips, each one bilobed with one small papillae (Fig. 9. 34). In genus Falcaustra the mouth is surrounded by 3 large lips, each with 2 forked papillae, and one amphid on each ventrolateral lip (Fig. 9. 35)

On the other hand, in nematode parasites found in larval stage, the cephalic structures of adult forms are generally not present. For example, Porrocaecum, a genus found in the liver of the host, has a very little developed lip anlagen (Fig. 9. 36); Brevimulticaecum, found encapsulated in various organs of the hosts, presents two toothlike prominences, 1 dorsal and 1 ventral (Fig. 9. 37).

Interlabia: these are cuticular outgrowths (neoformations) originating at the base of the lips or pseudolabia and extending between them, occurring in some ascarids and spirurids. These modifications of the cuticle are present in the larval stage of genus Physaloptera; this genus is characterized by the presence of four teeth on the internolateral face of each pseudolabium, an internal group of three teeth, two sublateral and one lateral, and a single externolateral tooth.

Deirids: a pair of sensory organs found laterally in the cervical region and usually protruding above the surface of the cuticle. That may be simple or claw-like and forked, and are situated laterally in the vicinity of the nerve ring in most species (Rhabdochonidae).

Amphids: a pair of glandular sensory organs situated laterally in the cephalic region and opening through the cuticle; according to some authors, they are chemoreceptors. They have various shapes and sizes but usually occur as two lateral pores (Fig. 9. 30, 31).

3.1.3. Cuticle of posterior end of body

In the case of nematode parasites of amphibians, the special modifications of the cuticle in the posterior end of males, which are generally associated with the copula, are particularly important. These comprise: plectanes, rosettes papillae, vesiculated rosette, papillae, bursa, phasmids, spines suckers and caudal lateral alae. Phasmids are not modifications of the cuticle such as the deirids and the amphids, but their opening onto the cuticle can present different shapes and structures.

Plectanes: these are cross striated cuticular plates functioning as supports for the genital papillae in some males (Fig. 10.). This structure is very common in the genus Cosmocerca, which is widely distributed in amphibians. In some species, these supports are very marked, as in C. podicipinus, in this case, the plectanes of each row are even fused to each other (Fig. 11. 39). In other species, this support is not so developed (eg. C. parva); on the other hand, the same species in different hosts can present different degree of development of these structures (Fig. 11. 40-43); indeed, in some immature specimens, the plectanes are imperceptible (Fig. 9. 44).

These structures are arranged in two longitudinal rows on the ventral surface of the males; the number of pairs of plectanes varies among species (C. podicipinus, C. cruzi, C. travassossi: 5 pairs; C. chilensis and C. rara: 6 pairs; C. longispicula, C. uruguayensis, C. vrcibradici: 7 pairs). Furthermore, some species show wide intraspecific variation regarding the number of pairs of plectanes, even in the same host species (C. parva: 5-7 pairs; C. brasiliensis: 8-11 pairs; C. paraguayensis: 4-5 pairs) (Fig. 5. 18, 19) (González and Hamann, 2010b).

Table 1 shows characteristics of the posterior end of males for species of Cosmocerca that parasitize amphibians, observed under SEM.

Cosmocerca spp.Plectanes + rosette papillaeAdanal
Puncatations of rosette papillae References
C. ornata5 pairsNot stablishedNot stablishedNot stablishedNavarro et al. (1988)
C. ornata5 pairsNot stablishedNot stablished6-7 pad-like protuberances around the posterior border onlyGrabda-Kazubska and Tenora (1991)
C. commutata7 pairs Not stablishedSeveral pairsInterior and exterior rosette: 15Grabda-Kazubska and Tenora (1991)
C. parva 5-7 pairs + 1 unpaired1 + 2-43 pairsInterior and exterior rosette: 12-16Mordeglia and Digiani (1998)
C. podicipinus5 pairs3 pairsNot stablishedInterior rosette: 11-12; exterior rosette: 12-15 González and Hamann (2010b)
C. parva5-7 pairs1 + 3 pairsNot stablishedInterior rosette: 10-11; exterior rosette: 12-14 González and Hamann (2010b)
C. parva4-5 pairs1 + 3 pairsNot stablishedInterior
rosette: 12-15; exterior
rosette: 12-15
González and Hamann (2008)

Table 1.

Characteristics of the caudal region of males of Cosmocerca spp. that parasitize amphibian hosts, studied under SEM. *Arrangement of adanal papillae: unpaired papillae anterior to anus + pairs of adanal papillae.

Figure 10.

Plectanes and rosette papillae in nematode parasites of genus Cosmocerca. pl: plectanes; ip: internal circle of punctations; ep: external circle of punctations.

Rosette papillae: these structures consist of papillae surrounded by punctuations. This modification is present in the genus Cosmocerca. In this genus, the plectanes are located outside the rosette papillae and are directed toward the anterior and posterior end (Fig. 10).

These rosette papillae are formed by two circles of punctuations, one internal and one external. The number of punctuations in each circle varies among species and within the same species for individuals collected from different hosts (González and Hamann, 2008; 2010b) (Fig. 10.; Fig. 11. 44). In the genus Cosmocercoides, the caudal rosette papillae are not raised above the cuticular surface.

Figure 11.

Plectanes and rosette papillae in nematode parasites of genus Cosmocerca. 39. Cosmocerca podicipinus collected in Pseudopaludicola falcipes with fused plectanes. 40. Cosmocerca parva collected in Rhinella granulosa with very marked plectanes. 41. 42. Cosmocerca parva collected in Rhinella schneideri. 43. Cosmocerca parva collected in Leptodactylus bufonius. 44. Cosmocerca parva, immature specimen, collected in Rhinella fernandezae with imperceptible plectanes. sp: somatic papillae; pl: plectanes; rs: rosette papillae; ip: internal circle of punctations; ep: external circle of punctations.

Figure 12.

Modifications of the cuticle in the posterior end of males of the genus Cosmocercella. 45. Vesiculated rosette in C. minor. 46. Combination of different structures in C. phyllomedusae. 47. Detail of small rosette papillae. 48. Detail of rosette papillae surrounded by wide areas of cuticular punctations. vr: vesiculated rosette; rp: rosette papillae; cp: cuticular punctation; rp+cp: rosette papillae surrounded by areas of cuticular punctations.

Vesiculated rosette: caudal rosette papillae raised on the surface of a clear vesicle. These modifications are present in the genus Cosmocercella. In C. minor, for example, there are 4 pairs of vesiculated papillae (Fig. 12. 45) and in C. phyllomedusae there is a combination of different structures; this species has small rosette papillae in the preanal subventral surface (Fig. 12. 46, 47), rosette papillae surrounded by wide areas of cuticular punctuations (Fig. 12. 46, 48), and large unpaired vesiculated papillae extending almost to the level of the oesophagus.

Papillae: some genera of nematode parasites, such as Aplectana, Raillietnema, Falcaustra or Paraoxyascaris do not possess conspicuous structures in the posterior end such as plectanes, rosette papillae or vesiculated papillae; these genera have simple papillae with variable number and arrangement (Fig. 13. 49-56). These structures can be divided into caudal papillae (located in the tail, posteriorly to the anus) and cloacal papillae (surrounding the cloaca; these can be precloacal, postcloacal and adcloacal). These papillae may be sessile (Aplectana, Schrankiana, Falcaustra) (Fig. 13. 49-52, 54-56) or pedunculate (Parapharyngodon) (Fig. 13. 53). On the other hand, other genera such as Cosmocercella and Cosmocerca have this type of papillae in addition to plectanes, rosettes and vesiculated rosette. These papillae are commonly surrounded by one or two small rosettes of punctuations (Fig. 13. 51). In some cases they protrude above the surface of the cuticle (Fig. 13. 52).

Figure 13.

Papillae in the posterior end of body of males nematode parasites of amphibians. 49. 50. Arrangement of caudal papillae in Aplectana hylambatis. 51. Arrangement of precloacal, adcloacal and postcloacal papillae in genus Cosmocerca. 52. Detail of precloacal, adcloacal and postcloacal papillae in Cosmocerca. 53. Pedunculate papillae in tail of Parapharyngodon. 54-56. Sessile papillae in Schrankiana (54), Falcaustra (55) and Cosmocerca (56). sp: somatic papillae; pl: plectane; pap: preanal papillae; ap: adanal papillae; cp: caudal papillae.

Bursa: this structure is present in nematodes of the genus Oswaldocruzia. This structure may be circular or oval, often divided into two symmetrical or asymmetrical lateral lobes, separated by a dorsal lobe and supported by rays or papillae. The rays of the bursa are visualized well under light microscope because they are not a part of the cuticle but embedded in the lobes.

Caudal lateral alae: these are sublateral or lateral longitudinal wings of the cuticle that occur on the male tail. Among nematode parasites of amphibians, they occur in the genus Physaloptera; however, these caudal alae develop in the adult stage, while it is typically the larval stage of Physaloptera that occurs as a parasite of amphibians.

Spines: some male and female nematode parasites, such as those of the genus Skrjabinodon, have cuticular spines on the tail filament (Fig. 14. 57).

Suckers: this is a sucker-like pre-cloacal structure. A series of stages in sucker development occurs in some kathlaniids, indicating that there is first a concentration of copulatory muscles in this area which later becomes a sucker through modification of the cuticle. This modification of the cuticle is found in some species of genus Falcaustra.

Phasmids: these are paired glandular sensory organs situated laterally in the caudal region and opening to the surface by a slit or pore (Fig. 14. 58).

As in the previous case, the structures and modifications of the cuticle that are observed in the posterior body end of adult specimens do not occur in larvae (Fig. 14. 59).

Figure 14.

Modifications of the cuticle in posterior end of body of nematode parasites. 57. Spines in the tail of Skrjabinodon sp. 58. Phasmid in Rhabdias sp. 59. Posterior end of Physaloptera sp. spi: spines; ph: phasmid.

3.1.4. Eggs

The eggs are variable in size, shape and structure; they usually have a many-layered shell with either smooth or rough, sometimes sculptured, external surface, and their poles may bear a characteristic operculum or plug. Among the nematode parasites of amphibians, eggs may present punctuations (Pharyngodonidae) (Fig. 15. 60, 61), an operculum (Gyrinicola) or a thin membrane that has no special features, as in the Cosmocercidae.

Figure 15.

Egg cuticle of nematode parasites of amphibians. 60. General view. 61. Detail of punctations.

3.1.5. Vulva

The area of the body inmediately anterior and posterior to the vulvar opening is called vulvar region. In most females of nematode parasites of amphibians, this may be simply an opening transversal to the longitudinal body axis without any special striation, as in the genus Rhabdias (Fig. 16. 62), or with a striation that differs slightly from that of the rest of the body as in the genus Cosmocercella (Fig. 16. 63); or it may present more complex structures as in Aplectana (Fig. 16. 64); in this latter case, the cuticle forms an extension in the anterior side of the vulvar opening that can be observed as a vulvar flap (Gibbons, 1986).

Figure 16.

Vulvar cuticle in nematode parasites of amphibians. 62. Rhabdias sp. 63. Cosmocercella sp. 64. Aplectana sp.

3.1.6. Spicules

Nematodes usually have two spicules; each one is essentially a tube covered by a sclerotized cuticle and containing a central protoplasmic core. In terms of the taxonomy of nematode parasites of amphibians, the importance of the spicules lies in their morphology and size, and not in the presence of ornamentation on the cuticle of these structures. In this case the spicules can be studied with SEM only when they are outside the individual, i.e., when protruding from the cloaca (Figs. 17. 65-67).

Figure 17.

Spicules in nematode parasites of amphibians. 65. Aplectana hylambatis. 66.Cosmocerca sp. 67. Falcaustra sp.


The tegument of trematodes is syncytial and consists of a tegumental outer membrane (trilaminate), a matrix (with discoid bodies, membranous bodies and usually mitochondria) and a basal tegumental membrane. The tegument is variously interrupted by cytoplasmatic projections of gland cells and by openings of excretory pores. The tegumental surface often contains ornamentations such as spines between the outer and basal membranes; these are often present in different areas of the body; there are also numerous sensory papillae, pits and ridges of various configurations (Fried, 1997; Schmidt and Roberts, 2000). The surface topography of the cirrus of digenetic trematodes also shows spine-shape protrusions and papillae (Bušta and Našincová, 1987).

3.2.1. Tegument of suckers

The rim of the oral and ventral suckers in some species of digenean parasites of amphibians (both larval and adult) shows sensory papillae with variable morphology and distribution. Thus, papillae may appear as button-like structures and can be distributed as single and double papillae on the oral and ventral surfaces of the sucker (Hamann and González, 2009; Mata-López, 2006; Nadakavukaren and Nollen, 1975). In other digeneans, the oral sucker has a spongy surface with numerous pores (Whitehouse, 2002). Figure 17 (68-70) show some characteristics of the tegument of the oral and ventral suckers of digenean trematodes found in Argentinean amphibians.

Figure 18.

Tegument of suckers of digenean parasites of amphibians. 68. Papillae on oral sucker of Macroderoididae. 69. Detail of papillae on oral sucker. 70. Detail of papillae on ventral sucker of Paramphistomatidae.

3.2.2. Tegument of the ventral surface

The tegument of digenean trematodes (larval and adults) that occur in amphibian hosts shows spines with varied morphology (e.g. scale-like spines) and variable distribution; they generally extend from the anterior end to variable levels of the posterior region (Hamann and González, 2009; Razo-Mendivil et al., 2006). In other digeneans, the surface of the tegument possesses regular ridges and interspersed protuberances (Nadakavukaren and Nollen, 1975). Figure 19. (71-72) show the shape and distribution of spines found in the tegument of some digenean parasites of Argentinean amphibian.

Figure 19.

Tegument of the ventral surface of Macroderoididae. 71. Spines of the anterior third of the body. 72. Spines of the posterior third of body.

3.3. Acanthocephalan

The body surface of acanthocephalans has 5 layers. The outermost layer is the epicuticle, followed by the cuticle which is composed mainly of lipoproteins; the third layer has a homogeneous nature; the fourth layer possesses fibrous bands besides mitochondria, bladders and lacunar channels, and the fifth layer contains scarce fibres but larger and more abundant lacunar channels than in the previous layer (Olsen, 1974).

Regarding this group of helminth parasites, most SEM studies are focused on the hooks that they possess in the proboscis, as well as their body spines. Likewise, they present sensory structures with diverse ornamentations in the posterior part of the bursa.

Figure 20.

Acanthocephalan parasites of amphibians. Centrorhynchus sp. 73. General view. 74. Detail of hooks of the proboscis. 75. Detail of spines of the proboscis.

In our study we found larval stages belonging to the genus Centrorhynchus. This genus is characterized for possessing an unarmed trunk, the proboscis divided into two regions (an anterior portion with hooks and a posterior portion with spines), and for having subterminal genital pores. Because the genital complex was not fully developed, specific determination was not possible. The proboscis presented 28 to 30 longitudinal rows of 20 to 23 hooks, 8 to 11 rooted hooks and 10 to 13 rootless spines (Fig. 20. 73-75).


4. Helminth parasites of Argentinean amphibian studied with SEM: Synthesis and new contributions. Research perspectives

Up to the present, studies performed with scanning electron microscopy techniques on helminth parasites of Argentinean amphibians have included three families of nematodes: Rhabdiasidae, Rhabdias füelleborni (González and Hamann, 2008), Cosmocercidae, Cosmocerca parva, C. podicipinus, Aplectana hylambatis, A. adaechevarriae (González and Hamann, 2010b; Mordeglia and Digiani, 1998; Ramallo et al., 2008) and Physalopteridae, Physaloptera sp. (González and Hamann, 2010b), and one family of trematodes: Diplostomidae, Lophosicyadiplostomum aff. nephrocystis and Bursotrema tetracotyloides (Hamann and González, 2009).

New contributions presented in this work include, for the Class Nematoda, the families Molineoidae (Oswaldocruzia spp.), Pharyngodonidae (Parapharyngodon, Pharyngodon, Skrjabinodon), Cosmocercidae (Aplectana spp., Cosmocerca spp., Cosmocercella spp., Paraoxyascaris sp.), Kathlaniidae (Falcaustra sp.), Atractidae (Schkrankiana sp.) and Ascarididae (Porrocaecum sp., Brevimulticaecum sp.), and for the Phyllum Acanthocephala, family Centrorhynchidae (Centrorhynchus sp.).

Future research in this topic should focus on extending the geographical areas studied while at the same time, expanding the examination to other possible amphibian hosts.

Reports about helminth parasites of Argentinean amphibians studied under SEM refer mainly to specimens collected in host from the Northeast region, specifically Corrientes province, and the Northwest region, with only one record for Salta province so; thus, there is still a vast portion of the Argentinean territory that has not yet been studied (Fig. 21.).

Figure 21.

Reports of helminth parasites of amphibians studied using SEM in Argentina. : González and Hamann (2008); *: González and Hamann (2010b); +: Hamann and González (2009); £: Mordeglia and Digiani (1998); §: Ramallo et al. (2008).

Lavilla et al. (2000) reported a total of 271 amphibian species for Argentina (167 anurans and 4 gymnophions); of these, only 32 (11.8%) have been cited as hosts for helminth parasites (González and Hamann, 2004, 2005, 2006a, 2006b, 2007a, 2007b, 2008, 2009, 2010a, 2010b, 2011; Hamann and Pérez, 1999; Hamann and González, 2009; Hamann et al., 2006a, 2006b, 2009a, 2009b, 2010; Lajmanovich and Martinez de Ferrato, 1995; Lunaschi and Drago, 2007; Ramallo et al., 2007a, 2007b, 2008). Of all the anuran families, the most studied for helminth parasites are Hylidae, Bufonidae, Leiuperidae and Leptodactylidae. Nine species of hylids have been studied for helminth parasites, but only one of these studies included SEM: Scinax nasicus (González and Hamann, 2008; Hamann and González, 2009); similarly, seven species of bufonids have been studied for helminth parasites, but SEM was employed in only two cases: Rhinella schneideri and R. granulosa (González and Hamann, 2008; Mordeglia and Digiani, 1998; Ramallo et al., 2008), finally, six species of leiuperids and leptodactylids have been studied for helminth parasites, but only one of them was analyzed with SEM, the leiuperid Physalaemus santafecinus (González and Hamann, 2010b).

The SEM study of the tegument of helminth species (e.g. morphology of spines) collected in different localities could detect possible intraspecific variation related to geographical location; this phenomenon has been highly documented in both trematode (Grabda-Kazubska and Combes, 1981; Kennedy 1980a) and nematode (Chitwood, 1957) parasites of amphibians. Similarly, variations related to occurrence in a wide range of phylogenetically unrelated hosts, i.e. the cases of generalist helminths could detect possible intraspecific variation related with the host age or diet, previous exposure to the parasite, presence of another parasite and number of specimens present (Chitwood, 1957; Haley, 1962; Kennedy, 1980b; Watertor, 1967).


5. Importance of the use of scanning electron microscope for the study of helminth parasites of amphibians

In helminth parasites, all morphological aspects must be studied under light microscope, because these structures are very important in the context of their systematic classification. Some examples of these traits include, in the case of parasitic nematodes, the type of esophagus (oxyuroid, rhabditoid, strongyloid), presence of ventriculus and its shape, and the caecum and its shape; in the females, the arrangement of ovaries (prodelphic, amphidelphic or opisthodelphic), number of uteri (monodelphic or didelphic), structure of the ovoyector and the vagina and, in the males, the structure and measurements of the gubernaculum. In the case of trematodes, the distribution of vitelline follicles, the position of the testes and ovary, size of the eggs, position of oral and ventral suckers, reproductive structures, among others, are characteristics of taxonomic importance. Finally, regarding the internal anatomy of acanthocephalans, some particularly relevant structures are the proboscis receptacle, lemnisci, retractor muscle, testis, seminal vesicle, cement gland, Saefftigen's pouch, etc. Thus, the scanning electron microscope represents an additional tool for the study of this group of organisms. The importance of SEM lies in its ability to provide three-dimensional images with high magnification that allow understanding the spatial relationships among surface structures. It could be used to separate species that appear morphologically identical when examined under light microscope, validate species and demonstrate differences between populations or races (Gibbons, 1986; Hirschmann, 1983).



We thank Secretaría General de Ciencia y Técnica of Universidad Nacional del Nordeste, Corrientes, Argentina, for supporting partially this work.

We are grateful Dr. Graciela T. Navone, Dr. Julia I. Díaz, Dr. María del Rosario Robles at the Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores, La Plata, Argentina, Licentiate Rodrigo Cajade at Centro de Ecología Aplicada del Litoral, Corrientes, Argentina, Dr. Lorena Sereno at Centro de Energia Nuclear na Agricultura, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil, Dr. Viviane Gularte Tavares dos Santos at Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, for helping with literature search.

We are grateful Dr. Marta I. Duré and Dr. Eduardo F. Schaefer at Centro de Ecología Aplicada del Litoral for the photographs of the host and for helping with the edition of the map.

We thank to Graphic Designer Cecilia Rios Encina for help in photograph edition.


  1. 1. AndersonR.ChabaudA.WillmontS. 2009 Keys to the Nematode Parasites of Vertebrates. Archival Volumen. CAB International, 978-1-84593-572-6 Wallingford, United Kingdom.
  2. 2. AllisonV.UbelakerJ.Webster JrR.RiddleJ. 1972 Preparations of Helminths for Scanning Electron Microscopy. Journal of Parasitology, 58 2 (April 1972), 414416 , 0022-3395
  3. 3. AminO. 1985 Classification, In: Biology of the Acanthocephala, D. Crompton and B. Nickol (Ed.), 2772 , Cambridge University Press, 0-52124-674-1 United Kingdom.
  4. 4. BergerL.SpeareR. 1998 Chytridiomycosis: a New Disease of Wild and Captive Amphibians. Australian & New Zealand Council for the Care of Animal in Research and Teaching. Newsletter, 11 (4), (December 1998), 13 .
  5. 5. BuštaJ.NašincováV. 1987 Ultrastructure of the Surface of External Genitals of six Species of Digenetic Trematodes Studied by Scanning Electron Microscopy. Folia Parasitologica, 34 2 137143 , 0015-5683
  6. 6. ChitwoodM. 1957 Intraespecific Variation in Parasitic Nematodes. Systematic Zoology, 6 1 (March 1957), 1923 , 0039-7989
  7. 7. ChitwoodB.ChitwoodM. 1975 Introduction to Nematology (Second Revised Edition). University Park Press, 0-83910-697-1 United State of America.
  8. 8. CrumpM.Scott JrN. 1994 Visual Encounters Surveys. In: Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity- standard methods for amphibians, W. Heyer, M. Donnelly, R. McDiarmid, L. Hayek and M. Foster (Ed.), 8491 , Smithsonian Institution Press, 101560982845 United State of America.
  9. 9. De ConinckL. 1965 Classe de Nématodes. In: Traité de Zoologie. Anatomie, Systématique, Biologie, P. Grassé (Ed.), 1217 , 4 2 Némathelminthes, pp. 1-217. Masson et Cie, 978-2-22558-510-4 Paris, France.
  10. 10. DuellmanW.TruebL. 1986 Biology of Amphibians. The Johns Hopkins University Press, 080184780 London, United Kingdom.
  11. 11. DuszynskiD.BolekM.UptonS. 2007 Coccidia (Apicomplexa: Eimeriidae) of Amphibians of the World. Zootaxa, 1667 (December 2007), 177 , 978-1-86977-183-6
  12. 12. FaivovichJ.HaddadC.GarcíaP.FrostD.CampbellJ.WheelerW. 2005 Systematic Review of the Frog Family Hylidae, with Special Reference to Hylinae: Phylogenetic Analysis and Taxonomic Revision. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 294 (June 2005), 1240 , 0003-0090
  13. 13. FriedB. 1997 An Overview of the Biology of Trematodes. In: Advances in Trematode Biology. Fried, B. and Graczyk T. (Ed.). CRC Press, 0-84932-645-1 York, United State of America.
  14. 14. FrostD.GrantT.FaivovichJ.BainR.HaasA.HaddadC.De SáR.ChanningA.WilkinsonM.DonnellanS.RaxworthyC.CampbellJ.BlottoB.MolerP.DrewesR.NussbaumR.LynchJ.GreenD.WheelerW. 2004 The Amphibian Tree of Life. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 297 1370 , 0003-0090
  15. 15. GibbonsL. 1986 SEM Guide to the Morphology of Nematode Parasites of Vertebrates. CAB International, 0-85198-569-6 United Kingdom.
  16. 16. GibbonsL. 2010 Keys to the Nematode Parasites of Vertebrates. Supplementary Volume. CAB International/The Natural History Museum, 978-1-84593-571-9 Wallingford, United Kingdom.
  17. 17. GibsonD.JonesA.BrayR. 2002 Keys to the Trematoda1 CAB International/The Natural History Museum, 0-85199-547-0 United Kingdom.
  18. 18. GonzálezC.HamannM. 2004 Primer Registro de Cosmocerca podicipinus Baker y Vaucher, 1984 (Nematoda, Cosmocercidae) en Pseudopaludicola falcipes (Hensel, 1867) (Amphibia, Leptodactylidae) en Argentina. FACENA, 20 (December 2004), 6572 , 0325-4216
  19. 19. GonzálezC.Hamann 2005 2005. Gyrinicola chabaudi Araujo & Artigas, 1982 (Nematoda: Pharyngodonidae) in Tadpoles of Scinax nasicus (Cope, 1862) (Anura: Hylidae) from Corrientes, Argentina. FACENA, 21 (December 2005), 145148 , 0325-4216
  20. 20. GonzálezC.HamannM. 2006a Nematodes Parásitos de Chaunus granulosus major (Müller & Hellmich, 1936) (Anura: Bufonidae) en Corrientes, Argentina. Cuadernos de Herpetología, 20 1 (September 2006), 4349 , 0032-6551X.
  21. 21. GonzálezC.HamannM. 2006b Helmintos Parásitos de Leptodactylus bufonius Boulenger, 1894 (Anura: Leptodactylidae) de Corrientes, Argentina. Revista Española de Herpetología, 20 3946 , 0213-6686
  22. 22. GonzálezC.HamannM. 2007a Nematode Parasites of two Species of Chaunus (Anura: Bufonidae) from Corrientes, Argentina. Zootaxa, 1393 (January 2007), 2734 , 1175-5326
  23. 23. GonzálezC.HamannM. 2007b The First Record of Amphibians as Paratenic Host of Serpinema larvae (Nematoda: Camallanidae). Brazilian Journal of Biology, 67 3 (August 2007), 579580 , 1519-6984
  24. 24. GonzálezC.HamannM. 2008 Nematode Parasites of two Anurans Species, Rhinella schneideri (Bufonidae) and Scinax acuminatus (Hylidae), from Corrientes, Argentina. Revista de Biología Tropical, 56 4 (December 2008), 21472161 , 0034-7744
  25. 25. GonzálezC.HamannM. 2009 First Report of Nematodes in the Common Lesser Escuerzo Odontophrynus americanus (Duméril and Bibron, 1841) (Amphibia: Cycloramphidae) from Corrientes, Argentina. Comparative Parasitology, 76 1 (January 2009), 122126 , 1525-2647
  26. 26. GonzálezC.HamannM. 2010a Larval Nematodes Found in Amphibians from Northeastern Argentina. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 70 4 (November 2010), 10891092 , 1519-6984
  27. 27. GonzálezC.HamannM. 2010b First Report of Nematode Parasites of Physalaemus santafecinus (Anura: Leiuperidae) from Corrientes, Argentina. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, 81 3 (December 2010), 677687 , 1870-3453
  28. 28. GonzálezC.HamannM. 2011 Cosmocercid Nematodes of Three Species of Frogs (Anura: Hylidae) from Corrientes, Argentina. Comparative Parasitology, 78 1 (January 2011), 212216 , 1525-2647
  29. 29. Grabda-KazubskaB.CombesC. 1981 Morphological Variabily of Haplometra cylindracea (Zeder, 1800) (Trematoda, Plagiorchiidae) in Populational and Geografic Aspects. Acta Parasitologica Polonica, 28 5 3965 , 0000-1230- 2821.
  30. 30. Grabda-KazubskaB.TenoraF. 1991 SEM Study on Cosmocerca ornata (Dujardin, 1845) and C. commutata (Diesing, 1851) (Nematoda, Cosmocercidae. Acta Parasitologica Polonica, 36 1 4550 , 0065-1478
  31. 31. HaleyA. 1962 Role of Host Relationship in the Systematics of Helminth Parasites. Journal of Parasitology, 48 5 (October 1962), 671678 , 0022-3395
  32. 32. HaltonD. 2004 Microscopy and the Helminth Parasite. Micron, 35 5 (July 2004), 361390 , 0968-4328
  33. 33. HamannM.GonzálezC. 2009 Larval Digenetic Trematodes in Tadpoles of six Amphibian Species from Northeastern Argentina. Journal of Parasitology, 95 3 (June 2009), 623628 , 0022-3395
  34. 34. HamannM.PérezV. 1999 Presencia de Haematoloechus longiplexus Stafford, 1902 (Trematoda, Haematoloechidae) en Anfibios de Argentina. FACENA, 15 No. (December 1999), 157162 , 0325-4216
  35. 35. HamannM.GonzálezC.KehrA. 2006a Helminth Community Structure of the Oven Frog Leptodactylus latinasus (Anura, Leptodactylidae) from Corrientes, Argentina. Acta Parasitologica, 51 4 (December 2006), 294299 , 1230-2821
  36. 36. HamannM.KehrA.GonzálezC. 2006b Species Affinity and Infracommunity Ordination of Helminths of Leptodactylus chaquensis (Anura: Leptodactylidae) in two Contrasting Environments from Northeastern Argentina. Journal of Parasitology, 92 6 (April 2006), 11711179 , 0022-3395
  37. 37. HamannM.KehrA.GonzálezC.DuréM.SchaeferE. 2009a Parasite and Reproductive Features of Scinax nasicus (Anura: Hylidae) from a South American Subtropical Area. Interciencia, 34 3 (March 2009), 214218 , 0378-1844
  38. 38. HamannM.KehrA.GonzálezC. 2009b Niche Specificity of two Glypthelmins (Trematoda) Congeners Infecting Leptodactylus chaquensis (Anura: Leptodactylidae) from Argentina. Journal of Parasitology, 95 4 (August 2009), 817822 , 0022-3395
  39. 39. HamannM.KehrA.GonzálezC. 2010 Helminth Community Structure of Scinax nasicus (Anura: Hylidae) from a South American Subtropical Area. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms, 93 1 (December 2010), 7182 , 0177-5103
  40. 40. HirschmannH. 1983 Scanning Electron Microscopy as a Tool in Nematode Taxonomy, In: Concepts in Nematode Systematics, A. Stone, H. Platt and L. Khalil (Ed.), 95111 , Academic Press, New York, United State of America and London, United Kingdom.
  41. 41. HoffG.FryeF.JacobsonE. 1984 Diseases of Amphibians and Reptiles. Plenum Press, 978-0-30641-711-5 New York, United State of America.
  42. 42. JonesA.BrayR.GibsonD. 2005 Keys to the Trematoda2 CAB International/The Natural History Museum, 0-85199-547-0 United Kingdom.
  43. 43. KarnovskyM. 1965 A Formaldehyde-glutaraldehyde Fixative of High Osmolality for use in Electron Microscopy. The Journal of Cell Biology, 27 137A138A (Abstr.), 0021-9525
  44. 44. KennedyJ. 1980a Geographical Variation in Some Representatives of Haematoloechus Looss, 1899 (Trematoda: Haematoloechidae) from Canada and the United State. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 58 6 (June 1980), 11511167 , 0008-4301
  45. 45. KennedyJ. 1980b Host-induced Variations en Haematoloechus buttensis (Trematoda: Haematoloechidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 58 3 (March 1980), 427442 , 0008-4301
  46. 46. LajmanovichR.Martinez deFerrato. A. 1995 Acanthocephalus lutzi (Hamman 1891) Parasite de Bufo arenarum en el Río Paraná, Argentina. Revista de la Asociación de Ciencias Naturales del Litoral, 26 1 1923 , 0325-2809
  47. 47. LavillaE.RichardE.ScrocchiG. 2000 Categorización de los Anfibios y Reptiles de la República Argentina. Edición Especial Asociación Herpetológica Argentina. Argentina: 197 , 9-87983-310-4
  48. 48. LeeD. 2002 Cuticle, moulting and exsheathment. In: The Biology of Nematodes, D.L. Lee, (Ed.), 171209 , Taylor and Francis, 0-41527-211-4 United Kingdom.
  49. 49. LunaschiL.DragoF. 2007 Checklist of Digenean Parasites of Amphibians and Reptiles from Argentina. Zootaxa, 1476 (May 2007), 5168 , 1175-5326
  50. 50. MafraA.LanfrediR. 1998 Reevaluation of Physaloptera bispiculata (Nematoda: Spiruroidea) by Light and Scanning Electron Microscopy. Journal of Parasitology, 84 3 (June 1998), 582588 , 0022-3395
  51. 51. Mata-LópezR. 2006 A New Gorgoderid Species of the Urinary Bladder of Rana zweifeli from Michoacán, Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, 77 2 (December 2006), 191198 , 1870-3453
  52. 52. MordegliaC.DigianiM. 1998 Cosmocerca parva Travassos, 1925 (Nematoda: Cosmocercidae) in Toads from Argentina. Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 93 6 (November/December 1998), 737738 , 0074-0276
  53. 53. NadakavukarenM.NollenM. 1975 A Scanning Electron Microscopic Investigation of the Outer Surfaces of Gorgoderina attenuata. International Journal for Parasitology, 5 6 (December 1975), 591595 , 0020-7519
  54. 54. NavarroP.IzquierdoS.Pérez-SolerP.HorneroM.LluchJ. 1988 Contribución al Conocimiento de la Helmintofauna de los Herpetos Ibéricos. VIII. Nematoda Ascaridida Skrjabin et Schultz, 1940 de Rana spp. Revista Ibérica de Parasitología, 48 2 (April, May, June 1988), 167173 , 0034-9623
  55. 55. NollenM.NadakavukarenM. 1974 Megalodiscus temperatus: Scanning Electron Microscopy of the Tegumental Surfaces. Experimental Parasitology, 36 1 (August 1974), 123130 , 0014-4894
  56. 56. OlsenO. 1974 Animal parasites, their life cycles and ecology, Dover Publications, Inc., 0-83910-643-2 York, United State of America.
  57. 57. PoughF.AndrewsR.CadleJ.CrumpM.SavitzkyA.WellsK. 2001 Herpetology (Second Edition), Prentice Hall, 0-13030-795-5 Jersey, United State of America.
  58. 58. RamalloG.BurseyC.GoldbergS. 2007a Two New Species of Cosmocercids (Ascaridida) in the Toad Chaunus arenarum (Anura: Bufonidae) from Argentina. Journal of Parasitology, 93 4 (August 2007), 910916 , 0022-3395
  59. 59. RamalloG.BurseyC.GoldbergS. 2007b Primer Registro de Oswaldocruzia proencai (Nematoda: Molineoidae), Parásito de Rhinella schneideri (Anura: Bufonidae) en Salta, Argentina. Acta Zoológica Lilloana, 51 1 9192 , 0065-1729
  60. 60. RamalloG.BurseyC.GoldbergS. 2008 New Species of Aplectana (Ascaridida: Cosmocercidae) in the Toads, Rhinella granulosa and Rhinella schneideri (Anura: Bufonidae) from Northern Argentina. Journal of Parasitology, 94 6 (December 2008), 13571360 , 0022-3395
  61. 61. Razo-MendivilU.León-RègagnonV.Pérez-Ponce deLeón. G. 2006 Monophyly and Systematic Position of Glypthelmins (Digenea), Based on Partial lsrDNA Sequences and Morphological Evidence. Organisms, Diversity & Evolution, 6 4 (November 2006), 308320 , 1439-6092
  62. 62. SchmidtG.RobertsL. 2000 Foundations of Parasitology (Sixth Edition), Mcraw-Hill, 0-07116-896-6 York, United State of America.
  63. 63. TinsleyR. 1995 Parasitic Diseasse in Amphibians: Control by the Regulation of Worm Burdens. Parasitology, 111 No. Suplement 1, (January 1995): 153178 , 0031-1820
  64. 64. WatertorJ. 1967 Intraespecific Variation of Adult Telorchis bonnerensis (Trematoda: Telorchiidae) in Amphibian and Reptilian Hosts. Journal of Parasitology, 53 5 (October 1967), 962968 , 0022-3395
  65. 65. WhitehouseC. 2002 A Study of the Frog Lung Fluke Haematoloechus (Trematoda: Haematoloechidae) Collected from Areas of Kentucky and Indiana. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science, 1 1 6776 , 0073-6767
  66. 66. WillmottS. 2009 Glossary and Keys to Subclasse, In: Keys to the Nematode Parasites of Vertebrates. Archival Volume, R. Anderson, A. Chabaud and S. Willmott (Ed.), 117 . CAB International, 978-1-84593-572-6 Wallingford, United Kingdom.

Written By

Cynthya Elizabeth González, Monika Inés Hamann and Cristina Salgad

Submitted: 11 May 2011 Published: 09 March 2012