Open access

Effect of Environmental Stresses on S-Layer Production in Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356

Written By

Moj Khaleghi and Rouha Kasra Kermanshahi

Submitted: February 26th, 2011 Published: January 20th, 2012

DOI: 10.5772/28334

Chapter metrics overview

3,046 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

The gastrointestinal tract (GTI) is the organ with the largest surface area in the human body, having in an adult between 150 and 200 m2 (Holzapfel et al., 1998). Interesting in this context is the fact that a huge number of microorganisms live and interact with the host in the stomach and gut. The GIT of an adult human is estimated to harbour about 1013–1014 viable bacteria, i.e. 10 times the total number of eukaryotic cells in all tissues of man's body (Holzapfel et al., 1998; Velez et al., 2007). In the gastrointestinal tract, the bacteria are affected both by the physiological conditions (such as low pH, bile salt and enzymes) and by other microorganisms which exist in the GIT. Because of the presence of enzymes, salts and acids in the gastric juice, the environmental conditions in the stomach are destructive to a number of microorganisms (Holzapfel et al., 1998). The microbial community in the gastrointestinal tract is complex and consists of several hundred species, of which lactic acid bacteria constitute a minor proportion. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are Gram-positive bacteria which excrete lactic acid as a main fermentation product into the medium. This biochemical definition associates lactic acid bacteria of different phylogenetic branches of bacterial evolution: the “low GC” taxa, e.g. Enterococcus, Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, Leuconostoc, Pediococcus and Streptococcus, and the “high GC” genus Bifidobacterium. Species of these genera can be found in gastrointestinal tract of man and animal (Klaenhammer et al., 2005; Klein et al., 1998; Mathur & Singh, 2005). They have also been involved since time immemorial in food processing and food preservation, and are applied in particular for the manufacturing of dairy products, fermented meat, vegetables, bread and ensilage (Pouwels et al., 1998). Several lactic acid bacteria have the potential to promote the health of the host or to prevent and treat diseases. Such bacteria are referred to as probiotic, meaning ‘for life’ (Latin pro=for and biotic=life) (Herich & Levkut, 2002; Marteau & Rambaud, 2002; Mercenier et al., 2002; Ouwehand et al., 2003). The strains of LAB used as probiotics usually belong to species of the genera Lactobacillus, Enterococcus, and Bifidobacterium (Klein et al., 1998). The effects of probiotic microorganisms on the host have been discussed extensively in the literature. It has been proposed that probiotics possess several advantageous properties, such as antagonistic actions, production of antimicrobial substances, modulation of immune responses, and impact on the metabolic activities of the gut (Marteau & Rambaud, 2002; O'Toole & Cooney, 2008; Sanders & Klaenhammer, 2001). In vitro and animal studies have further shown inhibitory effects of probiotic bacteria to be mediated by their interference with the adhesion of gastrointestinal pathogens or with toxins produced by the pathogenic microorganisms (O'Toole & Cooney, 2008; Sullivan & Nord, 2002). However, beneficial influence of probiotics has been demonstrated in clinical studies (De Roos & Katan, 2000; Kos et al., 2008; Mishra et al., 2008; O'Toole & Cooney, 2008; Park et al., 2008; Resta-Lenert & Barrett, 2003; Sanders & Klaenhammer, 2001). Some possible health effects include immune system stimulation, cholesterol lowering, prevention and treatment of diarrhea, prevention of cancer recurrence, improvement in lactose intolerance, and reduction of allergy (De Roos & Katan, 2000; Mercenier et al., 2002; Reid, 1999; Sanders & Klaenhammer, 2001). The most common probiotic strains belong to two genera, Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium (Sanders & Klaenhammer, 2001; Sullivan & Nord, 2002). Some strains of Lactobacillus are found as natural commensals of the GIT, the oral cavity and the female uro-genital tract of animals and humans (Pouwels et al., 1998). Also, Lactobacilli are of considerable technological and commercial importance because of their role in the manufacturing and preservation of many fermented food products (Schar-Zammaretti et al., 2005). Lactobacillus acidophilus is one of the major species of the genus Lactobacillus found in human and animal intestines (Frece et al., 2005). Nowadays, Lactobacillus acidophilus strains are commonly used as probiotic (Sanders & Klaenhammer, 2001), and marketed as capsules, powders, enriched yogurts, yogurt-like products, and milk (De Roos & Katan, 2000). Adhesion to intestinal epithelial cells is an important prerequisite for colonization of probiotic strains in the gastrointestinal tract (Altermann et al., 2004; Kos et al., 2003). This is mediated either non-specifically by physico-chemical factors (such as hydrophobicity) or, specifically, by adhesive bacterial surface molecules and epithelial receptor molecules (such as S-layer, fibronectin and mucin-binding proteins) (Holzapfel et al., 1998).

Advertisement

2. Probiotics and stress

In the intestinal tracts of mammals and avians, species of the genera Lactobacillus, Enterococcus, Streptococcus and Bifidobacterium are the dominant indigenous lactic micro-biota. Commonly recovered Lactobacillus isolates from the human gastrointestinal tract include L. acidophilus, L. salivarius, L. casei, L. plantarum, L. fermentum, L. brevis and L. reuteri. The findings that colonization by lactobacilli and other lactic acid bacteria improves infection resistance of the host have led to the production and consumption of probiotics (Kosin & Rakshit, 2006). The probiotics must resist multiple stresses including the GIT conditions and food processing. An important attribute for certain probiotic bacteria functions are survival and growth in the intestinal tract (Sanders & Klaenhammer, 2001). The gastric juice contains hydrochloric acid, which induces an extremely low pH. The fasting pH in the stomach is approximately 1.5, while the pH increases to between 3.0 and 5.0 when food is eaten (Cotter & Hill, 2003). In the intestine, the conditions are less extreme because of in the intestine pH is higher than the stomach, but the bacteria still have to endure bile and pancreatic juices (intestinal fluids). Other factors affecting microbial life in this environment are immunoglobulins, defensins, a continuously regenerating epithelium, peristaltic movement of intestinal content, and a viscous mucus layer (Dunne et al., 2001; Tannock et al., 1999). Moreover, probiotics used in food technology are exposed to various adverse conditions during processing, such as temperature changes, acidity, osmotic and oxidative stress (Kosin & Rakshit, 2006). Such stresses may reduce the physiological activity of the cells and readily kill the cells. Once the cells have survived the stresses, they can colonize and grow to adequate numbers to provide the beneficial effect to the host. Survival mechanisms exhibited by bacteria when confronted with stress are generally referred to as the stress response (De Angelis & Gobbetti, 2004; Jan et al., 2001; Kim et al., 2001). However, the ability to survive passage through the intestinal tract and potentially establish residence there is considered as an important feature. The degree of retention is likely dependent on the ability of the bacteria to interact with eukaryotic cell surfaces or with the mucosal layer surrounding these cells (Altermann et al., 2004). Several factors contribute to the interaction of Lactobacilli with the host tissues, such as cell surface hydrophobicity (Vadillo-Rodriguez et al., 2005; Van der Mei et al., 2003), autoaggregation (Kos et al., 2003), lipoteichoic acids (Granato et al., 1999) and external surface proteins (such as S-layer, fibronectin and mucin-binding proteins) (Altermann et al., 2004; Avall-Jaaskelainen & Palva, 2005; Frece et al., 2005; Kos et al., 2003; Kosin & Rakshit, 2006; Pouwels et al., 1998; Velez et al., 2007; Ventura et al., 2002). Surface layer (S-layer) has been identified as the outermost structure of cell envelope in numerous organisms from the domains Bacteria (in both Gram-positive and Gram-negative Eubacteria) and Archaea (Debabov, 2004; Sara & Sleytr, 2000). S-layer proteins are non-covalently bound to the cell wall and assemble into surface layers with high degrees of positional order often completely covering the cell wall, and can be disintegrated into monomers by denaturing agents such as urea or guanidine hydrochloride (Avall-Jaaskelainen & Palva, 2005; Engelhardt & Peters, 1998; Lortal et al., 1992; Sleytr et al., 2001). The S-layer has been detected in a few species of the genus Lactobacillus (Avall-Jaaskelainen & Palva, 2005). Lactobacilli surface layer proteins (S-layers) are generally monomolecular crystalline arrays exhibiting a morphologically similar, oblique lattice structure and representing 10-15% of the total protein content of the bacterial cell wall (Avall-Jaaskelainen & Palva, 2005; Jakava-Viljanen et al., 2002). Several reports have appeared in which functions of S-layer are described or assumed (Boot et al., 1993; Jakava-Viljanen et al., 2002; Sara & Sleytr, 2000). However, no general function has been identified for S-layer proteins, but several lactobacillar S-layers have been identified as putative adhesions with affinity for intestinal epithelial cells, extracellular matrices and/ or to lipoteichoic acid (LTA) of other bacterial species (Avall-Jaaskelainen & Palva, 2005; Buck et al., 2005; Frece et al., 2005; Garrote et al., 2004; Hynonen et al., 2002; Kos et al., 2003; Velez et al., 2007; Vidgren et al., 1992). Of the various roles proposed for the bacterial S-layer, it is a protective sheath against hostile environment (Avall-Jaaskelainen & Palva, 2005; Frece et al., 2005; Khaleghi et al., 2010, 2011; Kos et al., 2003; Schar-Zammaretti et al., 2005). Adhesive S-layers have a role in inhibition of adhesiveness of pathogenic bacteria and thus can contribute to probiotic effects of lactobacilli. To date, several lactobacilli S-layer protein-encoding genes have been cloned, sequenced and deposited in GenBank (Avall-Jaaskelainen & Palva, 2005; Velez et al., 2007). The presence of multiple S-layer protein genes seems to be quite common for bacteria (Avall-Jaaskelainen & Palva, 2005; Ben-Jacob et al., 2000; Boot & Pouwels, 1996; Jakava-Viljanen et al., 2002). Multiple S-layer genes have been identified in the genomes of L. acidophilus, L. amylovorus, L. gallinarum, L. crispatus, L. brevis, L. gasseri and L. johnsonii (Avall-Jaaskelainen & Palva, 2005; Boot & Pouwels, 1996; Jakava-Viljanen et al., 2002; Ventura et al., 2002). There is also increasing evidence that S-layer-carrying bacteria may use S-layer variation, by expressing alternative S-layer protein genes, for adaptation to different stress factors such as the immune response of the host for pathogens and drastic changes in the environmental conditions for nonpathogens (Boot & Pouwels, 1996; Frece et al., 2005; Jakava-Viljanen et al., 2002; Pouwels et al., 1998; Sara & Sleytr, 2000). According to Pouwels’ study (1998), phase variation or antigenic variation, as a result of inversion of the slp segment, might enable Lactobacillus acidophilus bacteria to better adhere to specific regions of the mucosa. Variation in S-layer gene expression as a response to environmental changes has also been described in Geobacillus stearothermophilus, Bacillus anthracis, and Campylobacter fetus (Boot & Pouwels, 1996; Mignot et al., 2002).

There is some evidence that the surface properties of microorganisms are dependent on the growth conditions and the composition of the fermentation medium (Schar-Zammaretti et al., 2005; Waar et al., 2002; Dufrene & Rouxhet, 1996; Millsap et al., 1997). Schar-Zammaretti (2005) suggested that S-layer protein is preferentially expressed under different fermentation media. Furthermore, it has been shown that the S-layer production is changed with the change in medium (such as bile salt, penicillin G) (Khaleghi et al., 2010, 2011).

The aim of this study was to gain more knowledge about S-layer production and slpA gene expression in different growth conditions (pH and temperature) in Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356. Moreover, the reassembly of S-layer subunits was studied under these stresses.

2.1. S-layer protein, slpA expression and stresses

The S-layer proteins of Lactobacilli are relatively small, 25 kDa to 71 kDa in size (Avall-Jaaskelainen & Palva, 2005), whereas the molecular masses of S-layers in other bacterial species range up to 200 kDa (Sara & Sleytr, 2000). The Lactobacillar S-layers are highly basic proteins with calculated isoelectric point values ranging from 9.35 to 10.4. Yet, all the other S-layer proteins characterized are weakly acidic (Avall-Jaaskelainen & Palva, 2005). Evidence shows that the S-layer protein is important for Lactobacillus acidophilus (Frece et al., 2005; Khaleghi et al., 2010, 2011; Kim et al., 2001; Toba et al., 1995).

Lactobacillus acidophilus strains isolated from humans and animals, which belong to DNA homology groups A, are reported to possess a slpA gene, while the strains which belong to the DNA homology groups B appear not to have an slpA gene (Boot et al., 1993). According to Boots' study (1995, 1996, 1996c), there are two S-layer protein encoding genes, slpA and slpB, in Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356; of the two, slpA is active and slpB is silent in normal growth conditions. The two S-protein genes are located 6-kb apart on the chromosome, in a reverse orientation relative to each other. The slpA gene is interchanged with the slpB gene through inversion of a chromosomal fragment in a fraction of a culture (0.3% of the cell growth under laboratory conditions). Thus, it seems that S-layer variation of non-pathogenic lactobacilli has the same function as S-layer variation for pathogenic organisms such as Campylobacter fetus, namely to circumvent an immune response of the infected host (Boot & Pouwels, 1996; Boot et al., 1995, 1996b, 1996c).

Therefore, the present study investigated the effects of some stresses on the S-layer production, reassembly of S-layer subunits, and slpA gene expression.

2.1.1. Materials and methods

2.1.1.1. Stress conditions

To study the effect of heat and pH stresses on S-layer production and slpA gene expression, the Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356 was cultivated in MRS broth (Merck) for heat stress (30, 45, 50 and 55 oC) (Kim et al., 2001); for pH stress, MRS broth was adjusted to pH 3-7 (adjusted with HCl and NaOH) (Jan et al., 2001; Lorca et al., 1998). The pH and temperature of the control culture (MRS broth) were 6.5 and 37 oC, respectively, according to manufacturer's recommendation and as described previously (Boot et al., 1993; Silva et al., 2005; Smit et al., 2001).

2.1.1.2. Isolation of S-layer

Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356 was obtained from the Germany Type Culture Collection and was cultivated anaerobically (in jar with Anaerocult A-strip, Merck) in MRS broth (Merck) at 37 oC (Boot et al., 1993; Smit et al., 2001). Lactobacillus casei ATCC 393 was used as negative control for isolation of S-layer.

For isolation of S-layer and total RNA, the recommended optical density is 0.7 at 695 nm (the end of log phase) (Boot et al., 1993; Smit et al., 2001) and 0.2-0.4 at 600 nm (mid-log phase), respectively (Boot et al., 1995). But in this study, we compared slpA gene expression and S-layer production at the same time. In addition, the S-layer production was compared in OD600= 0.4 and OD600= 0.7. Therefore, S-layer protein and total RNA were isolated in exponentially growing cells (OD600 ≈ 0.4). Also, S-layer protein was extracted at OD600= 0.7. For extraction of S-layer, Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356 was cultivated anaerobically in MRS broth at 37 oC. In general, 100 ml of pre-warmed MRS medium (under stress conditions and control) was inoculated 1: 100 (v/v) with an overnight culture and cultivated until the optical density at 600 nm reached 0.4 and 0.7. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 15000 ×g for 15 min at 4 oC. The cells were washed twice with 100 ml of ice-cold water. The cell pellet was extracted with 0.1 volume of 4 M guanidine hydrochloride (pH 7) for one hour at 37 oC and centrifuged at 18000 ×g for 15 min. The supernatant, containing S-layer protein monomers, was dialyzed against water at 4 oC for 16-24 h (Boot et al., 1993). The dialyzed extracts were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (Smit et al., 2001). SDS-PAGE of protein samples was carried out using Precision Plus Protein Standard [low molecular weight marker (10-250 kDa) - Biorad]. The samples were run on 12% polyacrylamide gel at 100 V. Protein bands were visualized by Coomassie blue staining. Protein concentration was determined according to Bradford's method (Bradford, 1976). For normalization of the measured absorption values, BSA (Merck) was used.

2.1.1.3. Reassembly of S-layer monomers and transmission electron microscopy (TEM)

S-layer self-assembly subunits were studied by the negative staining technique. To prepare the TEM samples, several droplets of the dialyzed protein were pipetted onto the carbon-coated grids and left for 1-16 h to immobilize the proteinaceous structures. Samples were washed once with distilled water and then stained with 2% uranyl acetate for two minutes (Avall-Jaaskelainen et al., 2002; Smit et al., 2001). The grids were dried by nitrogen flow and studied by Zeiss/CEM 902 a transmission electron microscopy (TEM) at 60 kV.

2.1.1.4. Isolation of total RNA

For isolation of total RNA, L. acidophilus ATCC 4356 cells were grown in MRS broth (under stress conditions and control) until they reached an optical density of approximately OD600=0.4. The cells were subsequently harvested by centrifugation (5000 ×g for 10 min at 4 C) and washed with an ice-cold TE buffer (Boot et al., 1995). The total RNA was isolated using a protective RNeasy Minikit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations, and then treated with deoxyribonuclease I (DNase I, RNase-free; Fermentas) at 37 C for 30 min according to manufacturer’s recommendations.

2.1.1.5. RT-PCR

The reverse transcription (RT) of the RNA samples was performed with 150 ng of total RNA and 0.5 µg of Oligo dT primer using a First Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (Fermentas) at 42 C for 60 min, as recommended by the manufacturer. Forward and reverse primers were designed for the slpA gene of Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356 as follows: slpA forward (5'-TGG CCG TTC TTG AAT GTG TA-3') and slpA reverse (5'-ACA TCA ACG CTG CAA ACA TC-3'). These primers generated a 154 bp PCR product in the PCR reaction.

16S rRNA was used as the internal control gene based on previously reported primers (Trotha et al., 2001) that generate a 370 bp PCR product.

The final volume of the PCR reaction was 25 µl with the following components: 1 µl cDNA (≈ 7.5 ng), 1 µl (100 pmol/µl) from each primer, 0.5 µl dNTPs mix, 0.5 µl MgCl2, and 0.25 µl (5 U/µl) Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas). The Mastercycler (Eppendorf) was programmed as follows: initial denaturation for 5 min at 94 C; 30 cycles at 94 C for 45 sec, 54 C for 30 sec, 72 C for 30 sec, and a final extension at 72 C for 8 min. The PCR products (and 50 bp DNA ladder, Fermentas) were separated on a 1% agarose gel and visualized by ethidium bromide staining.

2.1.1.6. Statistical assessment

All the experiments and measurements were repeated at least three times. All the statistical analyses were performed using SPSS and Excel 2003 software. All the experimental results were analyzed using mean descriptive statistics, the correlation coefficient, and a single-factorial analysis of variance. A value of P<0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.

2.1.2. Results

The growth curve of Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356 showed that it took approximately 8 h to reach OD600= 0.4 and approximately 14 h to reach OD600= 0.7 (Data not shown). It is important to know that Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356 was live and grew after 14 h under stress conditions. However, the results indicated that Lactobacillus acidophilus was not live in 50 oC, 55 oC, pH 3 and 4 after 14 h (Table 1). In this study, pH 5, 6, and 7, as well as temperatures 30 oC and 45 oC were chosen as the stress conditions.

Culture condition Cell count (CFU/ml)
Control* 9.6 × 109
pH 3 No growth
pH 4 No growth
pH 5 8.38 × 106
pH 6 7.24 × 108
pH 7 9.03 × 109
30 oC 8.98 × 108
45 oC 3.63 × 107
50 oC No growth
55 oC No growth
* pH 6.5 & 37 oC.

Table 1.

Viable cell counts of Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356 under stress conditions and the control after 14 h of inoculation.

The surface proteins of Lactobacills acidophilus ATCC 4356 were extracted by treatment of whole cells with 4M guanidine hydrochloride, and analyzed by SDS-PAGE. One dominant band of 43-46 kDa, which is known as the S-protein (Boot et al., 1993; Smit et al., 2001) and a few faint bands were visible on gel (Fig. 1b). In the mid-log-phase (OD600=0.4), S-protein production was low in control group, so the 43-46 kDa band was not seen on gel clearly (Fig. 1a, c; lane 1). However, in the control group with OD600=0.7, a 43-46 kDa band was visible on SDS-PAGE gel (Fig. 1b, d; lane 1).

Under stress conditions (OD600=0.4 & 0.7), S-protein band was visible and the band became sharper in pH 5 and 45 oC (Fig. 1). It seemed that S-protein bands were not different in pH 6, 7 and the control (Fig. 1b).

No protein bands (43-46 kDa) were visible on SDS-PAGE gel from isolated protein of Lactobacillus casei ATCC 393.

To determine the total proteins, the Bradford method was used. The total proteins were compared between the control and the group under stress conditions. In the case of pH 5 and 45 oC, total protein content was higher than others (Fig. 2). Moreover, the total protein production level was lowest at 30 oC (p< 0.001). In pH 6, 7 and control, the protein content was almost similar. After comparing the results of total protein analysis under stress and control conditions, the range of difference in protein content was similar in OD600 = 0.4 and 0.7.

Figure 1.

SDS-PAGE gel (12% polyacrylamide) analysis of isolated surface proteins of Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356 at: a) mid-log phase (OD600= 0.4) and b) exponential growth phase (OD600= 0.7) under pH stress (lane 1, control; lane 2, pH 5; lane 3, pH 6; lane 4, pH 7). c) mid-log phase (OD600= 0.4) and d) exponential growth phase (OD600= 0.7) under heat stress (lane 1, control; lane 2, 30 ºc; lane 3, 45 ºc). M, Protein marker.

Figure 2.

Extracted surface proteins (extracted in mid-log phase) were compared in control and the group under stress conditions by Bradford method. (a) Control (pH 6.5 & 37 oC); (b) pH 5; (c) pH 6; (d) pH 7; (e) 30 oC; (f) 45 oC. Error bars represent standard deviations of the mean values of results from three independent experiments.

To assess the change in S-layer protein content of the cell wall under stress conditions by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), we chose 45 oC in which S-layer production was highest (Fig. 2). In the electron microscopy study, the presence of the S-layer on the outer surface of Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356 was clearly demonstrated (Fig. 3). In particular, the bacterial surface was completely covered with an S-layer in the control (Fig. 3a, b), but an excess of S-layer protein was found at the both ends of the bacterial cell under stress condition (Fig. 3c, d).

Figure 3.

Electron microscopic images of Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356. a, b: Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356 was completely covered by the S-layer in the control. c, d: an excess of S-layer was found at the both ends of the bacterial cell at 45ºc. S-layer protein was indicated by black arrow (scale bar (a, c) = 2.5 μm and scale bar (b, d) = 0.6 μm).

The crystallization of S-layer was investigated by TEM. S-protein, which was isolated by guanidine hydrochloride, aggregated readily upon removal of the salt by dialysis, and formed a white precipitate. Analysis of these precipitates by TEM showed that they were composed exclusively of crystalline lattice (Fig. 4). It seems that the reassembly of S-layer subunits was similar in the group under stress condition (45ºc) and control. The results indicated that S-layer has two-fold (p2) symmetry with a periodicity of 11.3 and 5.5 nm in the control. After comparing the lattice parameters, we found that they were similar (under stress condition and control).

Figure 4.

Negatively stained TEM image of isolated S-layer from Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356. a) The control (37 ºc); b) 45 ºc (scale bar = 100nm).

The results indicated that the stress influenced slpA gene expression. Interestingly, the slpA gene expression increased in pH 5 and 45 oC. Under pH stress, comparison of the slpA gene expression showed that in the pH 6 and 7, the slpA gene expression was lower than that in the control (Fig. 5a) (p< 0.001). In addition, the slpA gene expression decreased at 30 oC, and the slpA gene expression was highest at 45 oC (Fig. 5b) (p< 0.001). However, major differences in the slpA gene expression were observed between the control and the group under stress conditions (Fig. 5).

Figure 5.

Comparison of slpA gene expression under control and stress conditions (a: pH stress; b: heat stress) as compared to expression of housekeeping gene (16S RNA) in the same reaction to normalize the data. Error bars represent standard deviations of the mean values of results from three independent experiments.

Advertisement

3. Discussion

To investigate the effects of pH and heat stresses on S-layer production and slpA gene expression (OD600 = 0.4 and 0.7) in Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356, we studied the survival of bacteria under stress conditions for 14 h. It was found that in pH 3, 4 and the temperatures 50-55 oC, Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356 could not survive. Then, pH 5, 6, and 7, as well as temperatures 30 oC and 45 oC were chosen as the stress conditions. SDS-PAGE gel (12% polyacrylamide) of S-layer protein showed that a single dominant band (43-46 kDa) was visible (Fig. 1). According to the previous studies, Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356 has S-layer protein with 43 kDa molecular weight (Boot et al., 1993; Smit et al., 2001). Also, Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356 has been used as positive control for S-layer protein in other studies (Fitzsimons et al., 2003; Frece et al., 2005). In our study, S-layer extraction was carried out according to Boot's method (Boot et al., 1993) in Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356 and Lactobacillus casei ATCC 393 (as negative control), and the results were compared together. As S-layer is the outermost structure of cell envelope in Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356, the extracted protein was only from cell wall without lysis of bacterial cells. In SDS-PAGE gel, there was one dominant band of 43-46 kDa and a few faint bands which were not 43 kDa. But there was no protein band in negative control. Therefore, we confirmed that these proteins are S-layer proteins. The S-layer protein was isolated with 4 M guanidine hydrochloride. During the mid-log phase (OD600 = 0.4), the S-layer protein production was low in the control group, but it was clearly visible in OD600 = 0.7 (Fig. 1, lane 1). Under stress conditions, the production of S-layer protein increased at pH 5 and 45oC. However, the increase in S-protein production was found in OD600 = 0.4 and 0.7 (Fig. 1, 2). Evidence showed that S-layer production was increased under stress conditions (Khaleghi et al., 2010, 2011) and medium components (Schar-Zammaretti et al., 2005). It was found that S-layer proteins were present during all growth phases of Lactobacillus acidophilus M92 under heat stress (Frece et al., 2005). This suggested that the S-layer protein is preferentially expressed under conditions which are not optimal for bacterial growth. It has been proposed that S-layer plays a role as a protective sheath in Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356. In addition, some studies identified that the S-layer proteins of Lactobacilli were important for hydrophobicity, autoaggregation and adherence of this bacteria to different host surfaces (Frece et al., 2005; Greene & Klaenhammer, 1994; Hynonen et al., 2002; Kos et al., 2003; Pelletier et al., 1997; Sillanpaa et al., 2000; Toba et al., 1995; Vadillo-Rodriguez et al., 2004, 2005; Van der Mei et al., 2003).

Transmission electron microscopic analysis showed that Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356 was completely covered by S-layer at 37 oC. Also, S-layer covered the bacterial cells at 45 oC, but an excess of S-protein was found at the both ends of the bacterial cell (Fig. 3). It seems that the S-layer protein has a protective role for Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356. Previously, the excess of S-layer was found at the site of separation of the two daughter cells in Clostridium thermosaccharolyticum, which prevented the exposure of the newly synthesized parts of the cell wall to the environment. It has been proposed that several bacteria produce an excess of S-protein to ensure complete coverage of the cell wall during cell division, and either store excess S-layer protein in the peptidoglycan layer or secrete it into the environment (Boot & Pouwels, 1996).

Because of the adhesion role of S-layer to the epithelial cells in Lactobacilli, it is important to investigate of the self-assembly ability of S-protein monomers under stress conditions. One of these stresses is heat stress that Lactobacillus is encountered it during food processing. According to the investigation, the TEM images showed that dialyzed S-protein monomers were able to recrystalized at 45 oC as same as 37 oC. The S-layer structure was an oblique lattice with p2 symmetry, and its parameters were respectively 11.3 and 5.5 nm. This finding was corresponded to the lattice parameters in Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356 (Smit et al., 2001), Lactobacillus helveticus ATCC 12046 (Lortal et al., 1992) and Lactobacillus brevis ATCC 14869 (Jakava-Viljanen et al., 2002).

According to the investigation of slpA gene expression, it was found that the slpA gene expression increased at 45 oC and pH 5. It proves that S-layer is very important for Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356, and is a protective sheath for the bacteria. In the pH 6, 7 and 37 oC, the slpA gene expression was lower than that in the control. It is not known why the slpA gene expression was different from the S-protein production in pH 6 and 7. It has been suggested that, either a little inversion has happened on slpA and slpB in unfavorable growth conditions or the presence of HCl and NaOH, used for adjusting of pH, can influence or block slpA gene expression. Another explanation could be that the S-layer mRNA has a relatively long half-life of 15 min and it can be repeatedly translated. As S-layer proteins represent 10-15% of the total amount of proteins in Lactobacillus cells, their transcription and secretion mechanisms must be efficient and tightly regulated. Multiple promoters precede several S-layer genes (Boot & Pouwels, 1996) including S-layer genes of Lactobacillus acidophilus (Boot et al., 1996a) and Lactobacillus brevis (Vidgren et al., 1992) and are likely to ensure efficient transcription of these genes. Also, the half-lives of mRNA-encoding lactobacillar S-layer proteins are relatively high, approximately 15 min, which enables efficient protein translation (Boot et al., 1996a). In addition to the actively transcribed S-layer protein gene (slpA), Lactobacillus acidophilus has also the silent slpB gene. The inversion of the slp segment causes an interchange of the active and the silent S-layer genes, which resembles a mechanism of phase variation in expression of bacterial surface antigen (Avall-Jaaskelainen & Palva, 2005; Boot & Pouwels, 1996; Boot et al., 1996b; Pouwels et al., 1998). It was found that the frequency of inversion was high (1/300), yet all attempts to demonstrate expression of the slpB gene have so far been unsuccessful (Boot et al., 1996b; Pouwels et al., 1998). Phase variation or antigenic variation, as a result of inversion of the slp segment, might enable Lactobacillus acidophilus bacteria to better adhere to specific regions of mucosa (Pouwels et al., 1998).

Advertisement

4. Conclusion

In conclusion, we found that environmental conditions influenced the S-layer protein and slpA gene expression. Nevertheless, it seems that high temperature (45 oC) did not influence the self-assembly of S-layer monomers.

For future investigations, the slpB gene expression and adhesion of Lactobacillus acidophilus to the epithelial cells should be studied under stress and control conditions.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Graduate Studies Office and Research Office of the University of Isfahan and International Center for Science, High Technology and Environmental Sciences.

References

  1. 1. Altermann E. Buck B. L. Cano R. Klaenhammer T. R. 2004 Identification and phenotypic characterization of the cell-division protein CdpA. Gene,342 1 (September 2004), 189 197 , 0378-1119
  2. 2. Avall-Jaaskelainen S. Kyla-Nikkila K. Kahala M. Miikkulainen-Lahti T. Palva A. 2002 Surface display of foreign epitoes on the Lactobacillus brevis S-layer. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68 12 (December 2002), 5943 5951 , 0099-2240
  3. 3. Avall-Jaaskelainen S. Palva A. 2005 Lactobacillus surface layers and their applications. FEMS Microbiology Review, 29 3 (August 2005), 511 529 , 0168-6445
  4. 4. Ben-Jacob E. Cohen I. Golding I. Gutnick D. L. Tcherpakov M. Helbing D. Ron I. G. 2000 Bacterial cooperative organization under antibiotic stress. Physica A, 282 1-2 , (February 2000), 247 282 , 0378-4371
  5. 5. Boot H. J. Kolen C. P. A. M. van Noort J. M. Pouwels P. H. 1993 S-Layer Protein of Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356: purification, expression in Escherichia coli, and nucleotide sequence of the corresponding genet. The Journal of Bacteriology, 175 19 (October 1993), 6089 6096 , 0021-9193
  6. 6. Boot H. J. Kolen C. P. A. M. Pouwels P. H. 1995 Identification, cloning, and nucleotide sequence of a silent S-layer protein gene of Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356 which as extensive similarity with the S-layer protein gene of this species. The Journal of Bacteriology, 177 24 (December 1995), 7222 7230 , 0021-9193
  7. 7. Boot H. J. Pouwels P. H. 1996 Expression, secretion and antigenic variation of bacterial S-layer proteins. Molecular Micribiology, 21 6 (September 1996), 1117 1123 , 0950-382X
  8. 8. Boot H. J. Kolen C. P. A. M. Andreadaki F. J. Leer R. J. Pouwels P. H. 1996a The Lactobacillus acidophilus S-Layer protein gene expression site comprises two consensus promoter sequences, one of which directs transcription of stable mRNA. The Journal of Bacteriology, 178 18 (September 1996), 5388 5394 , 0021-9193
  9. 9. Boot H. J. Kolen C. P. A. M. Pouwels P. H. 1996b Interchange of the active and silent S-layer protein genes of Lactobacillus acidophilus by inversion of the chromosomal slp segment. Molecular Micribiology, 21 4 (August 1996), 799 809 , 0950-382X
  10. 10. Boot H. J. Kolen C. P. A. M. Pot B. Kersters K. Pouwels P. H. 1996c The presence of two S-layer protein-encoding genes is conserved among species related to Lactobacillus acidophilus. Microbiology, 142 9 (September 1996), 2375 2384 , 0302-8933
  11. 11. Bradford M. M. 1976 A rapid & sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of dye-binding. Analytical Biochemistry, 72 1-2 , (January 1976), 248 254 , 0003-2697
  12. 12. Buck B. L. Altermann E. Svingerud T. Klaenhammer T. 2005 Functional analysis of putative adhesion factors in Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 71 12 (December 2005), 8344 8351 , 0099-2240
  13. 13. Cotter P. D. Hill C. 2003 Surviving the Acid Test: Responses of Gram- Positive Bacteria to Low pH. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 67 3 (September 2003), 429 453 , 1092-2172
  14. 14. De Angelis M. Gobbetti M. 2004 Environmental stress responses in Lactobacillus: A review. Proteomics, 4 1 (January 2004), 106 122, 1615-9853
  15. 15. De Roos N. M. Katan M. B. 2000 Effects of probiotic bacteria on diarrhea, lipid metabolism, and carcinogenesis: a review of papers published between 1988 and 1998. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrrition, 71 2 (February 2000), 405 411 , 0002-9165
  16. 16. Debabov V. G. 2004 Bacterial and archaeal S-layers as a subject of nanobiotechnology. Journal of Molecular Biology, 38 4 (January 2004), 482 493 , 0026-8933
  17. 17. Dufrene Y. F. Rouxhet P. G. 1996 Surface composition, surface properties, and adhesiveness of Azospirillum brasilense-variation during growth. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 42 6 (June 1996), 548 556 , 0008-4166
  18. 18. Dunne C. O’Mahony L. Murphy L. Thornton G. et al. 2001 In vitro selection criteria for probiotic bacteria of human origin: correlation with in vivo findings 1-4. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrrition, 73 2 (February 2001), 386s 392s , 0002-9165
  19. 19. Engelhardt H. . Peters J. 1998 Structural research on surface layers: a focus on stability, surface layer homology domains, and surface layer-cell wall interactions. Journal of Structural Biology, 124 2-3 , (December 1998), 276 302 , 1047-8477
  20. 20. Fitzsimons N. A. Akermans A. D. L. de Vos W. M. Vaughan E. E. 2003 Bacterial gene expression detected in human faeces by reverse transcription-PCR. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 55 1 (April 2003), 133 140 , 0167-7012
  21. 21. Frece J. Kos B. Svetec I. K. Zgaga Z. Mrsa V. Suskovic J. 2005 Importance of S-layer proteins in probiotc activity of Lactobacillus acidophilus M92. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 98 2 (February 2005), 285 292 , 1364-5072
  22. 22. Garrote G. L. Delfederico L. Bibiloni R. Abraham A. G. et al. 2004 Lactobacilli isolated from kefir grains: evidence of the presence of S-layer proteins. Journal of Dairy Research, 71 2 (March 2004), 222 230 , 0022-0299
  23. 23. Granato D. Perotti F. Masserey I. Rouvet M. Golliard M. et al. 1999 Cell surface-associated lipoteichoic acid acts as an adhesion factor for attachment of Lactobacillus johnsonii La1 to human enterocyte-like Caco-2 cells. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 65 3 (March 1999), 1071 1077 , 0099-2240
  24. 24. Greene J. D. Klaenhammer T. R. 1994 Factors involved in adherence of lactobacilli to human Caco-2 cells. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 60 12 (December 1994), 4487 4494 , 0099-2240
  25. 25. Herich R. . Levkut M. 2002 Lactic acid bacteria, probiotics and immune system. Veterinarni Medmedicina-Czech, 47 6 (June 2002), 169 180 , 0375-8427
  26. 26. Holzapfel W. H. Haberer P. Snel J. Schillinger U. Huis in’t Veld J. H. J. 1998 Overview of gut flora and probiotics. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 41 2 (May 1998), 85 101 , 0168-1605
  27. 27. Hynonen U. Weterlund-Wikstrom B. Palva A. Korhonen T. K. 2002 Identification by flagellum display of an epithelial cell- and fibronectin-binding function in the SlpA surface protein of Lactobacillus brevis. The Journal of Bacteriology, 184 12 (June 2002), 3360 3367 , 0021-9193
  28. 28. Jakava-Viljanen M. Avall-Jaaskelainen S. Messner P. Sleytr U. B. Palval A. 2002 Isolation of three new surface layer protein genes (slp) from Lactobacillus brevis ATCC 14869 and characterization of the change in their expression under aerated and anaerobic conditions. The Journal of Bacteriology, 184 24 (December 2002), 6786 6795 , 0021-9193
  29. 29. Jan G. Leverrier P. Pichereau V. Boyaval P. 2001 Changes in protein synthesis and morphology during acid adaptation of Propionibacterium freudenreichii. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 67 5 (May 2001), 2029 2036 , 0099-2240
  30. 30. Khaleghi M. Kasra Kermanshahi R. Yaghoobi M. M. Zarkesh-Esfahani S. H. Baghizadeh A. 2010 Assessment of bile salt effects on S-Layer production, slp gene expression and some physicochemical properties of Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 20 4 (April 2010), 749 756 , 1017-7825
  31. 31. Khaleghi M. Kasra Kermanshahi R. Zarkesh-Esfahani S. H. 2011 Effects of penicillin G on morphology and some physiological parameters of Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 21 8 (August 2011), 822 829 , 1017-7825
  32. 32. Kim W. S. Perl L. Park J. H. Tandianus J. E. Dunn N. W. 2001 Assessment of stress response of the probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus. Current Microbiology, 43 5 (April 2001), 346 350 , 0343-8651
  33. 33. Klaenhammer T. R. Barrangou R. Buck B. L. Azcarate-Peril M. A. Altermann E. 2005 Genomic features of lactic acid bacteria effecting bioprocessing and health. FEMS Microbiology Review, 29 3 (August 2005), 393 409 , 0168-6445
  34. 34. Klein G. Pack A. Bonaparte C. Reuter G. 1998 Taxonomy and physiology of probiotic lactic acid bacteria. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 41 2 (March 1998), 103 125 , 0168-1605
  35. 35. Kos B. Suskovic J. Vukovic S. Simpraga M. Frece J. Matosic S. 2003 Adhesion and aggregation ability of probitic strain Lactobacillus acidophilus M92. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 94 6 (January 2003), 981 987 , 1364-5072
  36. 36. Kos B. Suskovic J. Beganovic J. Gjuracic K. Frece J. Iannaccone C. Caganella F. 2008 Characterization of the three selected probiotic strains for the application in food industry. World Journal of Microbiology Biotechnology, 24 5 (May 2008), 699 707 , 1573-0972
  37. 37. Kosin B. Rakshit S. K. 2006 Microbial and processing criteria for production of probiotics: A Review. Food Technology and Biotechnology, 44 3 (March 2006), 371 379 , 1330-9862
  38. 38. Lorca G. L. Raya R. R. Taranto M. P. de Valdez G. F. 1998 Adaptive acid tolerance response in Lactobacillus acidophilus. Biotecholoyg Letters, 20 3 (March 1998), 239 241 , 0141-5492
  39. 39. Lortal S. van Heijenoort J. Gruber K. Sleytr U. B. 1992 S-layer of Lactobacillus helveticus ATCC 12046: isolation, chemical, characterization and re-formation after extraction with lithium chloride. Microbiology, 138 3 (March 1992), 611 618 , 0022-1287
  40. 40. Marteau P. Rambaud J. C. 2002 Probiotics and health: new facts and ideas. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 13 5 (October 2002), 486 489 , 0958-1669
  41. 41. Mathur S. Singh R. 2005 Antibiotic resistance in food lactic acid bacteria- a review. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 105 3 (December 2005), 281 295 , 0168-1605
  42. 42. Mercenier A. Pavan S. Pot B. 2003 Probiotics as biotherapeutic agents: present knowledge and future prospects. Current Pharmaceutical Design, 8 2 (February 2003), 99 110 , 1381-6128
  43. 43. Mignot T. Mesnage S. Couture-Tosi E. Mock M. Fouet A. 2002 Developmental switch of S-layer protein synthesis in Bacillus anthracis. Molecular Microbiology, 43 N0. 6 (December, 2001), 1615 1627, 0950-382X
  44. 44. Millsap K. W. Reid G. H. Van der Mei C. Busscher H. J. 1997 Cluster analysis of genotypically characterized Lactobacillus species based on physicochemical cell surface properties and their relationship with adhesion to hexadecane. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 43 3 (March 1997), 284 291 , 0008-4166
  45. 45. Mishra V. K. Mohammad G. Jha A. 2008 Immunomodulation and anticancer potentials of yogurt probiotic. EXCLI Journal, 7 1 (October 2008), 177 184 , 1611-2156
  46. 46. O’Toole P. W. Cooney J. C. 2008 Probiotic bacteria influence the composition and function of the intestinal microbiota. Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases, Article ID. 175285, (September 2008), 1 6 , 1687-7098
  47. 47. Ouwehand A. C. Batsman A. Salminen S. 2003 Probiotics for the skin: a new area of potential application. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 36 5 (May 2003), 327 331 , 0266-8254
  48. 48. Park Y. H. Kim J. G. Shin Y. W. Kim H. S. et al. 2008 Effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus 43121 and a mixture of Lactobacillus casei and Bifidobacterium longum on the serum cholesterol level and fecal sterol excretion in hypercholesteroemia-induced pigs. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry, 72 2 (February 2008), 595 600 , 0916-8451
  49. 49. Pelletier C. Bouley C. Cayuela C. Bouttier S. Bourlioux P. Bellon-Fontaine M. N. 1997 Cell surface characteristics of Lactobacillus casei subsp. casei, Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei, and Lactobacillus rhamnosus srtains. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 63 5 (May 1997), 1725 1731 , 0099-2240
  50. 50. Pouwels P. H. Leer R. J. Shaw M. den Bak-Glashouwer M-J. H. et al. 1998 Lacic acid bacteria as antigen delivery vehicles for oral immunization purposes. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 41 2 (March 1998), 155 167 , 0168-1605
  51. 51. Reid G. 1999 The scientific basis for probiotic strains of Lactobacillus. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 65 9 (September 1999), 3763 3766 , 0099-2240
  52. 52. Resta-Lenert S. Barrett K. E. 2003 Live probiotics protect intestinal epithelial cells from the effects of infection with enteroinvasive Escherichia coli (EIEC). Gut, 52 7 (July 2003), 988 997 , 0017-5749
  53. 53. Sanders M. E. Klaenhammer T. R. 2001 Invited Review: The scientific basis of Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM functionality as a probiotic. Journal of Dairy Science, 84 2 (February 2001), 319 331 , 0022-0302
  54. 54. Sara M. Sleytr U. B. 2000 S-layer proteins. The Journal of Bacteriology, 182 4 (February 2000), 859 868 , 0021-9193
  55. 55. Schar-Zammaretti P. Dillmann M-L. D’Amico N. Affolter M. Ubbink J. 2005 Influence of fermentation medium composition on physicochemical surface properties of Lactobacillus acidophilus. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 71 12 (December 2005), 8165 8173, 0099-2240
  56. 56. Sillanpaa J. Martinez B. Antikainen J. Toba T. Kalkkinen N. Tankka S. et al. 2000 Characterization of the collagen-binding S-layer protein CbsA of Lactobacillus crispatus. The Journal of Bacteriology, 182 22 (November 2000), 6440 6450 , 0021-9193
  57. 57. Silva J. Carvalho A. S. Ferreira R. Vitorino R. Amado F. Domingues P. Teixeira P. Gibbs P. A. 2005 Effect of the pH of growth on the survival of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus to stress conditions during spray-drying. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 98 3 (March 2005), 775 782 , 1364-5072
  58. 58. Sleytr U. B. Sara M. Pum D. Schuster B. 2001 Caracterization and use of crystalline bacterial cell surface layers. Progress in Surface Science, 68 7-8 , (October 2001), 231 278 , 0079-6816
  59. 59. Smit E. Oling F. Demel R. Martiez B. Pouwels P. H. 2001 The S-layer protein of Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356: Identification and characterization of domains responsible for S-protein assembly and cell wall binding. Journal of Molecular Biology, 305 2 (January 2001), 245 257 , 0022-2836
  60. 60. Sullivan A. Nord C. E. 2002 Probiotics in human infections. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 50 5 (October 2002), 625 627 , 0305-7453
  61. 61. Tannock G. W. Tilsala-Timisjarvi A. Rodtong S. Ng J. Munro K. Alatossava T. 1999 Identification of Lactobacillus isolates from the gastrointestinal tract, silage, and yoghort by 16S-23S rRNA gene intergenic spacer region sequence comparisons. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 65 9 (September 1999), 4264 4267 , 0099-2240
  62. 62. Toba T. Virkola R. Westerlund B. Bjorkman Y. Sillanpaa J. Vartio T. Kalkkinen N. Korhonen T. K. 1995 A collagen-binding S-layer protein in Lactobacillus crispatus. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 61 7 (July 1995), 2467 2471 , 0099-2240
  63. 63. Trotha R. Konig T. H. W. Konig B. 2001 Rapid ribosequencing-an effective diagnostic tool for detecting microbial infection. Infection, 29 1 (January-February 2001), 12 16 , 0019-9567
  64. 64. Vadillo-Rodriguez V. Busscher H. J. Norde W. De Vries J. van der Mei H. C. 2004 Dynamic cell surface hydrophobicity of Lactobacillus strains with and without surface layer proteins. The Journal of Bacteriology, 186 19 (July 2004), 6647 6650 , 0021-9193
  65. 65. Vadillo-Rodriguez V. Busscher H. J. van der Mei H. C. De Vries J. Norde W. 2005 Role of Lactobacillus cell surface hydrophobicity as probed by AFM in adhesion to surfaces at low and high ionic strength. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 41 1 (March 2005), 33 41 , 0144-8617
  66. 66. Van der Mei H. C. Van der Belt-Gritter B. Pouwels P. H. Martinez B. Busscher H. J. 2003 Cell surface hydrophobicity is conveyed by S-layer proteins- a study in recombinant lactobacilli. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 28 2-3 , (April 2003), 127 134 , 0144-8617
  67. 67. Velez M. P. De Keersmaecker S. C. J. Vanderleyden J. 2007 Adherence factors of Lactobacillus in the human gastrointestinal tract. FEMS. Microbiology Letters, 276 2 (September 2007), 140 148 , 1574-6968
  68. 68. Ventura M. Jankovic I. Walker D. C. Pridmore R. D. Zink R. 2002 Identification and characterization of novel surface proteins in Lactobacillus johnsonii and Lactobacillus gasseri. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68 12 (December 2002), 6172 6181 , 0099-2240
  69. 69. Vidgren G. Palva I. Pakkanen R. Lounatmaa K. Palva A. 1992 S-layer protein gene of Lactobacillus brevis: cloning by polymerase chain reaction and determination of the nucleotide sequence. The Journal of Bacteriology, 174 22 (November 1992), 7419 7427 , 0021-9193
  70. 70. Waar K. van der Mei H. C. Harmsen H. J. M. Degener J. E. Busscher H. J. 2002 Adhesion to bile drain materials and physicochemical surface propertise of Enterococcus faecalis strains growth in the presence of bile. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68 8 (August 2002), 3855 3858 , 0099-2240

Written By

Moj Khaleghi and Rouha Kasra Kermanshahi

Submitted: February 26th, 2011 Published: January 20th, 2012