Open access peer-reviewed chapter

The Link between Adenoids and Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Written By

Du-Bois Asante, Patrick Kafui Akakpo and Gideon Akuamoah Wiafe

Submitted: 14 February 2023 Reviewed: 23 February 2023 Published: 28 March 2023

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.1001347

From the Edited Volume

Tonsils and Adenoids

Balwant Singh Gendeh

Chapter metrics overview

52 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Adenoids, play a significant role in inflammatory response, especially in children. Together with other tissues of the lymphatic system, it fights off infections. In most cases of nasopharyngeal cancer, though rare, other histopathological variants of adenoids are seen. Adenoid hypertrophy is mostly observed, which causes obstruction of the nasopharynx and dysfunction of the Eustachian tube because of the formation of an abnormal tissue mass. Different viral and bacterial pathogens are associated with adenoid hypertrophy, including Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), coronavirus, parainfluenza virus, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Among these, EBV is associated with both adenoid hypertrophy and nasopharyngeal cancer, indicating the effect of EBV on both nasopharyngeal cancer and adenoids. We critically appraise the current evidence and discuss potential link between adenoids and nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Keywords

  • adenoids
  • nasopharyngeal carcinoma
  • Epstein-Barr virus
  • adenoid hypertrophy
  • nasopharynx
  • lymphoid tissue

1. Introduction

Adenoids also known as nasopharyngeal tonsils, is a collection of lymphoid tissue found on the level of the soft palate, at the posterior wall of the nasopharynx. At this site, the introduction of antigens through the nasal and oral cavities, are detected by the lymphocytes in the Waldeyer’s ring [1].

This results in the priming of the infant’s immune system, ultimately contributing further towards immunologic memory and production of antibodies in children. Adenoids are present at birth and enlarge to a maximum size usually in children, after which adenoidal tissue atrophy occurs. They are nearly absent during adulthood. Thus, adenoiditis is commonly a disease diagnosed during childhood and adolescence. Adenoiditis or hypertrophic adenoids occurs when there is inflammation of the adenoid tissue resulting from infection, allergies, or irritation from acid chyme reflux. In adults, they may be as a result of compromised immunity. Persistence of the etiological agents may lead to adenoid hypertrophy, which is responsible for many of the complications of adenoid disease, including Eustachian tube dysfunction and recurrent acute otitis media [2]. Malignant forms of adenoids are called adenoid cyst carcinoma, and though rare (about 1% of all carcinomas of the head and neck), they are locally aggressive and show perineural invasion [3].

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) on the other hand, is classified as a malignant neoplasm, arising from the mucosal epithelium of the nasopharynx, most often within the lateral nasopharyngeal recess or fossa of Rosenmüller [4]. Unlike other cancer types that are primarily linked with the aged, NPC can also be seen in children [5] and young patients [6]. In South China (where NPC is an epidemic disease), hypertrophic adenoids and NPC are commonly diagnosed together, mainly in young individuals [7].

Similarly, EBV as an aetiological agent, is a commoner of both adenoids [8, 9] and NPCs [10]. Hence, due to their anatomical location, a common aetiological agent, these two lesions, in some cases are commonly diagnosed together in the ear, nose and throat (ENT) departments of hospitals and also coexist in young individuals. Differentiating these two from each other during treatment could prevent overdosage and measurement of potentially false tumour size. And this is crucial, as response to therapy by these two lesions are different [11].

In recent years, multiple studies have been carried out on adenoids and NPC separately, but few have looked at their coexistence in a patient. Thus, we carried out a literature search in NCBI PubMed using ‘Adenoids’ together with ‘Nasopharyngeal carcinoma’ as single entities or together.

We summarized the findings of these studies and discuss potential link between adenoids and nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Advertisement

2. Adenoids

Adenoids develop from week 6 of gestation [12], and are described as lymphatic tissue mass lining the roof and posterior superior wall of the nasopharynx [12, 13]. Adenoids form a larger part of the lymphatic tissue of the Waldeyer’s ring comprising palatine, pharyngeal and lingual tonsils. These tonsils constitute the mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) [1, 13, 14] and specifically function as an important part of the immune system early in human life. The Waldeyer’s ring is named after a twentieth-century German anatomist, Heinrich Wilhelm Gottfried von Waldeyer-Hartz. Blood supply to the adenoids is by the ascending pharyngeal artery, ascending palatine artery, the tonsillar branch of the facial artery, the pharyngeal branch of the maxillary artery, artery of the pterygoid and the basisphenoid artery. Venous drainage is via the pharyngeal venous plexuses through the paratonsillar veins to the facial and internal jugular veins. The lymphatic drainage of the adenoids is directed via the retropharyngeal and pharyngomaxillary lymph nodes [15]. Adenoids act as the first site of defense against infectious agents and inhaled allergens in the nasopharynx. With their ciliated epithelial lining, they sample pathogens and generate immune responses against them. This sometimes leads to the development of immunologic memory which persists throughout childhood.

Adenoids are relatively small at birth, grow and peak in size around age 10. They gradually atrophy in adolescents to late adulthood [16, 17]. The hypertrophy of adenoids observed in children around age 6–10 is physiologically normal. However, these hypertrophied adenoids in children and adults are commonly linked to chronic infections, and sometimes allergies [18]. Since adenoids are largely seen in children, adenoid hypertrophy (AH) is more present in children than in adults, with 34.46% prevalence in children and adolescents [19]. AH causes a blockage in the airflow through the nasopharynx forcing affected individuals to breathe through the mouth. This results in difficulties in feeding, sleeping and speech [20, 21]. Otitis media (resulting from the obstruction of the orifice of the eustachian tube), cranial facies, chronic rhinosinusitis, snoring, cough, restlessness and attention deficits are among the observed symptoms that result from AH. Hypoxia and hypercarbia are also seen in extreme cases [18, 22, 23, 24]. Persistent untreated hypertrophy of adenoids exacerbates infections and reduces immunity which may lead to the development of other infection induced complications [25]. Overall, its anatomical position in the region of the nasopharynx exposes it to many and variety of microorganisms and allergens, making it an ever-active first line immunological ground.

Advertisement

3. Nasopharyngeal cancer

NPC is a malignant squamous cell carcinoma that originates in the nasopharynx (specifically the pharyngeal recess, thus the fossa of Rosenmüller). Though uncommon in most part of the world, it is geographically endemic in populations of Southern China, Southeast Asia, the Artic, some parts of North Africa and the Middle-East [26, 27, 28, 29]. Out of the 129,079 cases of NPC reported globally in 2018 by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Asia recorded over 85% of the reported cases. Over 72,000 mortality cases were recorded with only China accounting for 40.14% [26, 30, 31, 32]. Reports indicate that NPC disproportionately affects males than females [26, 29, 33, 34]. Studies conducted in North America revealed a higher incidence of NPC among migrated Asian population as compared to resident Caucasians, suggesting a genetic predisposition to the occurrence of the carcinoma [35, 36, 37].

Histologically, the World Health Organization (WHO) classifies NPC into three major forms: type I-keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), type II-non-keratinizing differentiated squamous cell carcinoma and type III-non-keratinizing undifferentiated squamous cell carcinoma. A rare variant, basaloid SCC has also been identified [26, 28, 37]. Type I is more common in other parts of the world whereas Type II and III are mostly seen in NPC cases from endemic areas [38].

Advertisement

4. Anatomical and pathological relationship between adenoids and nasopharyngeal cancer

Due to their location, both AH and NPC have the potential to cause obstruction of the orifice of the Eustachian tubes leading to serous otitis media and middle ear infections [39, 40]. This can potentially progress [41, 42] leading to hearing loss and speech problems. AH has the ability to expand into the posterior choanae and cover significant sections of the nasopharynx, obstructing airflow and causing mouth breathing [43]. In 2014, a retrospective study conducted by Berkiten et al. reported that 82.95% of (over 1600 individuals) patients had undifferentiated NPC with nasal obstruction as the common symptom. Interestingly, the study also concluded that hypertrophic adenoids are the major cause of nasal obstruction observed in these adult patients [44]. And this aforementioned condition is also common in children [45]. The abnormal inflammation of the adenoid presents an environment for the potential development of NPC since unresolved proliferation of the adenoidal lymphoid tissue reduces immunity at the nasopharyngeal region, allowing for recurrent infections as seen in EBV reported cases.

Similarly, unlike other cancer types that are primarily associated with the aged, NPC can also be seen in children [5, 46] and young patients [6], depicting that AH and NPC can affect both children and adults (Table 1). For instance, in South China (where NPC is an epidemic disease), hypertrophic adenoids and NPC are commonly diagnosed together, mainly in young individuals [7].

No.Condition (NPC/Adenoid)Causative agent(s) identifiedHistotype presentObserved symptomsTechnique usedTreatment optionAge range (years)References
1AHNRNRNRLateral neck X-rayNR5–14Moideen et al. [23]
2AHHuman herpesviruses 6, cytomegalovirus, EBVNRNRQuantitative real-time PCRNR2–11Lomaeva et al. [47]
3AHNRNRNRLateral cephalogramNR6–11Zhao et al. [24]
4AHNRNRNRLateral soft tissue neck X-rayAdenoidectomy2–16Shuaibu et al. [48]
5AHNRNRNRMRINR0–82Surov et al. [49]
6AHNRNRNRFlexible fibreoptic endoscopyNasal irrigations with isotonic solution and antihistamine medications2–14Cassano et al. [50]
7AHNasal allergy, S. pneumoniaeNRMouth breathing, bilateral nasal obstruction, snoring, headache, nasal allergy, earache, hearing lossFlexible fibreoptic endoscopy, radiologyNR3–14Maheswaran et al. [51]
8AHNRNRSnoring, mouth breathing and sleep discomfortLateral neck radiography, nasal endoscopyMontelukast chewable tablets4–12Shokouhi et al. [52]
9AHNRNRNRPowered-shaver adenoidectomyNR10–14Havas and Lowinger [43]
10AHNRNRSnoring, mouth breathing and sleep apnoea, otitis media, recurrent pharyngitisLateral nasopharyngeal X-rayNR0–15Dixit and Tripathi [53]
11AHNRNRNRFlexible fibreoptic nasopharynx endoscopy (FNE)Adenoidectomy (Backmann adenotome)3–9Zwierz et al. [54]
12AHNRNRSnoring, sleep apnoea, mouth breathing, and otitis mediaLateral neck radiography, fibre-optic rhinoscopyNRNRMlynarek et al. [55]
13AHNRNRSnoring, mouth breathing, daytime noisy breathing, sleep apnoeaFlexible fibreoptic endoscopyNR2–12Kindermann et al. [56]
14AHEBVNRNREBV DNA by real-time quantitative PCRNR2–14Zhang et al. [57]
15AHAdenovirusNRRhinorrhoea, otitis mediaPhysical examination, direct nasal endoscopy, MRI, PETRadiotherapy10Nicodemo et al. [19]
16NPCNRSquamous cell carcinoma, non-Hodgkins lymphoma, plasmacytoma, rhabdomyosarcomaNRNRChemotherapy, radiotherapy14–60Iseh et al. [33]
17NPCEBVLympho-epitheliomaNRImmunological assessment for EBV, radiology, biopsiesRadio-chemotherapy9–80Bofares [58]
18NPCNRNon-keratinized undifferentiated SCCNR18F-FDG PET/MRINRNRFeng et al. [59]
19NPCNRDifferentiated SCC, undifferentiated SCCNRComputed tomography (CT)NR40–75Raica et al. [60]
20NPCEBVNRNREndoscopy and MRINR30–70Liu et al. [61]
21NPCNRNRNREndoscopy and MRINR17–86Shayah et al. [62]
22NPCEBVNRNRSerum analysis for EBV antibodiesNR30–59Ji et al. [63]
23NPCNRNPC type I, II and IIIOtitis media, hearing loss, obstruction, epistaxis, headache, neuropathy, neck massEndoscopy and MRINRNRWang et al. [64]
24NPCEBVDiffused symmetrical and asymmetrical hyperplasia, mucosal lesionNREndoscopy and MRINR40–62King et al. [65]
25NPCNRNRNREndoscopy, endoscopic biopsy and MRINR17–85King et al. [66]
26NPCNRLymphoid hyperplasiaNRBiopsy, MRINR21–94King et al. [67]
27NPCNRNRNasal obstruction, epistaxis and hearing lossEndoscopic biopsy, sonography and MRINR21–68Gao et al. [68]
28NPCEBVNRNRSerum EBV capsid antigen IgANRNRChen et al. [69]
29NPCNRNon-keratinized undifferentiated SCCNRPET/MRI and PET/CTNR24–77Cheng et al. [70]
30NPCNRNRNRWhole-body 18F-FDG PET/MRI, 18F-FDG-PET/CTRadiation therapy, chemoradiotherapy, platinum-based chemotherapyNRChan et al. [71]
31NPCNRNon-keratinized carcinomaNRSerological testing for VCA/IgA, EA/IgA, Rta/IgG and EBNA1/IgA antibodies for EBVNR30–70Cai et al. [72]
32NPCNRUndifferentiated NPCNasal obstruction and bleedingFNE, lateral radiography, MRI, FDG-PETRadiotherapy and chemotherapy7Cengiz et al. [73]

Table 1.

List of NPC and adenoid hypertrophy cases.

Overall, since both lesions arise in the nasopharynx, the co-occurrence of the two in a patient will be very crucial during diagnosis and treatment regimes. Thus, effective diagnosis of these lesions in cases where they coexist is very important.

Advertisement

5. Aetiological agents for AH and NPC

Myriad causative agents have been identified to contribute to the development of AH and NPC, ranging from infectious to non-infectious agents and genetic predisposition. For AH, recurrent viral and bacterial infections in the upper respiratory tract is known to be the major cause. Reported viral pathogens include adenovirus, rhinovirus, cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex virus, EBV, coronavirus, parainfluenza virus and coxsackievirus [47, 74, 75]. France et al. [76] reported the incidence of AH in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) patients which confirmed the findings of Olsen et al. [77]. Rout et al. also suggested that the immunity of HIV patients are compromised and further reported that adults receiving organ transplants might be prone to developing AH [78]. Aerobic and non-aerobic bacterial pathogens associated with AH include Streptococcus pneumoniae, Peptostreptococcus, Enterococcus species, Bacteroides, Streptococcus viridans, Streptococcus pyrogens, Prevotella species, Moraxella catarrhalis, Klebsiella, Fusobacterium, Staphylococcus epididermis, Escherichia coli and Haemophilus influenzae [74, 79]. Allergies, smoking, gastroesophageal reflux and air pollution are some of the non-infectious agents that cause AH. Other factors such as sinonasal malignancy and lymphoma are also associated with AH [74, 80]. Recently, Gao et al. discovered that extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 activation by cysteinyl leukotriene receptor 1 may contribute to the development of AH [81]. Similarly, NACHT LRR and PYD domains-containing protein 3 (NLRP3)-mediated pyroptosis has been shown to be a mechanism through which IL-32 influences the progression of AH [82]. Additionally, a higher chance of developing AH has also been linked to several genetic predisposing factors [83, 84, 85, 86]. However, in a recent study conducted in Moscow, Lomaeva et al. suggested that children aged 2–11 years with the IL-10G-1082A genotype GG might be resistant to the development of AH [47].

Although the primary aetiology of NPC remains indefinite, EBV has strongly been associated with developing NPC and is mostly seen in the endemic areas, mostly associated with the type III [26, 28, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92]. Other infections such as human papillomavirus (HPV) has also been identified in NPC cases and found to be an aetiological agent for the development of NPC [37]. However, Bossi et al. recently reported that though HPV is highly seen in type I NPC, limited data is available on its association with NPC prognosis [93]. Among the HPV-positive/EBV-negative cases identified mostly in the non-endemic regions, worse patient outcomes have been observed than in EBV-positive cases [94].

A review by Chua et al. in 2016 indicated that persons with non-viral aetiologies of NPCs had lower survival rates and a worse phenotypic expression of the disease as compared to viral-associated causes [38]. This shows that the non-viral oncogenic variants have serious implications and yet their mechanistic mode of action remain undetermined. Reported non-viral aetiologies of NPCs include tobacco and smoking [87]. Risk of developing NPC have also been associated with alcohol intake, passive, intensity and frequency of smoking [95]. Though diet play a lesser role in the development of NPC currently [26], nitrosamines found in Chinese-styled salted fish and other preserved foods pose a high risk for the development of NPC [37]. These are associated with the non-keratinizing SCC of NPCs in the endemic regions while smoking and alcohol intake have been reported to cause type I NPCs mostly found in the non-endemic regions [37, 38]. Green-leafy vegetable diets seems to have a lower NPC risk as compared to animal based diets which has a twofold increased risk [96]. Additionally, frequent exposure to formaldehyde and wood dust are known causes of NPC [26]. However, other studies reported elsewhere found no excess risk in the development of NPC [97, 98, 99, 100]. High risk genetic vulnerability have also been implicated in individuals with susceptibility loci on class I and II human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecules in genome wide studies [29, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106]. Other reported genes of influence include cell cycle genes MDM2 and TP53, cell movement/adhesion gene MMP2 and DNA repair gene RAD51L1 [107].

Among the reported causative agents for AH and NPC, EBV and other lifestyle activities such as smoking and air pollution are common among the two, indicating the potential effect these agents have on adenoids and the nasopharynx.

Advertisement

6. Techniques for diagnosis

6.1 Adenoid hypertrophy

A major issue affecting the paediatric population is diseases of ENT of which AH is no exception. Early diagnosis is therefore necessary to control symptoms and enhance treatment modalities. Zwierz et al. grouped the various diagnostic methods into two categories: namely, invasive and imaging [54]. They further grouped techniques such as rigid or flexible fibreoptic nasopharynx endoscopy (FFNE), video fluoroscopy, acoustic rhinomanometry, physical examination by the finger or a mirror through the mouth as invasive. Lateral nasopharyngeal X-ray, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the nasopharynx are grouped as imaging techniques. Other imaging techniques such as computed tomography (CT) and cone beam tomography have also been reported [108]. These procedures come with high costs, the need for ENT specialists and cutting-edge expensive equipments. Though Zwierz et al. [54] reported that FFNE is invasive, Baldassari and Choi [109] highlighted that FFNE is minimally invasive and reliable among the paediatric population due to its effective and dynamic approach. Several other studies have also reported that FFNE is the gold standard for examining the nasopharynx which is less expensive as compared to the image techniques [50, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116]. FFNE is also the preferred choice of diagnostic procedure because it does not expose patients to unnecessary radiation as the imaging techniques do. In a recent retrospective study by Narang et al., 86% of children aged 3–10 years responded to the technique with no signs of discomfort, and symptoms of AH such as snoring, mouth-breathing and apnoeic episodes positively correlated with adenoid size [117].

Diagnosis of adenoid size in children with AH using video fluoroscopy yielded a 100% sensitivity and 90% specificity as compared to lateral skull films which showed 70% sensitivity and 55% specificity. This study concluded that video fluoroscopy is also a less invasive and reliable technique for the diagnosis of AH in the paediatric population [115]. On a lateral cephalogram ENT surgeons use methods such as that proposed by Handelman and Osborne which uses a trapezoid analysis to evaluate the adenoid-airway area [118]. Other methods have been formulated in recent years [119, 120, 121]. Among these, Choudhari and Shrivastav in a recent study, found the methods proposed by Holmberg and Linder-Aronson and Maw et al. to have better diagnostic accuracy due to their high sensitivity and specificity [108]. Adenoid-nasopharyngeal (A/N) ratio has also been used to assess adenoid size in several AH studies [23, 53, 122, 123, 124, 125], proposed earlier by Fujioka et al. [126]. These studies used lateral X-rays/cephalograms and found a positive correlation between adenoid size and severity of AH symptoms. Consequently, they concluded that lateral X-rays can also be used in the diagnosis of adenoid hypertrophies. Contrastingly, Mlynarek et al. concluded in their study that video rhinoscopy better correlated with adenoid size than lateral neck radioscopy [55]. However, Moideen et al. suggested that when images are not clear, FFNE should be used to give a definite diagnostic evaluation of hypertrophied adenoids [23]. In a systematic review by Major et al. which focused on comparing nasoendoscopy with other various diagnostic procedures for evaluating AH by dentists, lateral cephalogram was found to be a better option when used in combination with in-depth patient medical history [127]. Intra-operative mirror exam have also been used to assess adenoid size using the A/N ratio in comparison with FFNE findings [125, 128].

6.2 Nasopharyngeal cancer

Tissue biopsy is the gold standard for definite diagnosis of NPC though it is invasive [66].

Since EBV is highly associated with the occurrence of NPC [129], circulating free plasma EBV DNA has been used as a non-invasive biomarker to screen the disease, suggest treatment options and monitor the disease prognosis and recurrence [130, 131]. This technique produced an outstanding specificity (97.1%) and sensitivity (98.6%) in a prospective study where screening was done in a large sample of Chinese asymptomatic males aged between 40 and 69 years. The study concluded that this technique is reliable in detecting early stages of NPC which is advantageous in monitoring effective treatment and preventing worse disease outcomes [130]. In a more recent meta-analysis, EBV DNA gave a higher diagnostic accuracy than its related antibodies (VC-IgA, EBNA1-IgA and Rta-IgG) [132]. Early stages of NPC which sometimes presents with asymptomatic patients can be detected with immunoglobulin A (IgA) antibodies against EBV using various enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and chemiluminescent immunoassays kits [63, 69, 133, 134]. Similarly, a meta-analysis of 21 studies by Li et al. also showed that the presence of VC/IgA in NPC-positive serum is suggestive of the presence of the disease [135]. However, a combined detection of EBV capsid antigen-IgA (VC-IgA) and early lytic gene (BRLF1) transcription activator (Rta)-IgG have been reported to give better serodiagnosis of NPC than VC/IgA alone in a Southern Chinee population [72]. In 130 EBV-positive individuals who were NPC asymptomatic, 7 cases of NPC were identified when fibreoptic endoscopy was combined with biopsy in the evaluation of some sites of the nasopharynx [136].

A combined imaging technique using positron emission tomography (PET) and MRI (PET/MRI) have shown better diagnostic images than PET/CT technique [70]. A similar observation was reported [71] where images from PET/MRI were more detailed and succinct than those of PET/CT. PET/MRI therefore produced definite images that enhanced staging procedures in NPC. In a radiomic study, Feng et al. also developed a combined radiomic model based on fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose (fFE)-PET/MRI and PET semiquantitative parameters (metabolic tumour volume, total lesion glycolysis and standardized uptake value). They concluded that this model was also reliable in the staging of NPC [59]. The use of MRI in the early stages of NPC is however not highly recommended because of its diminished sensitivity in detecting small mucosal lesions. Contrastingly, because of its remarkable sensitivity, nasopharynx MRI with gadolinium enhancement is encouraged for use in localized staging of NPC [137]. In a population study, Liu et al. compared MRI with conventional endoscopy in the detection of NPC and concluded that MRI has a better sensitivity than endoscopy [61]. Raica et al. reported that neither clinical or endoscopic examination is a clear-cut technique in detecting the extent of tumour metastasis observed in NPC. This may be because the tumours are tiny during the initial endoscopic examination [137], located in the submucosal layer [136], or present in conjunction with hyperplasia [138]. Additionally, the lateral pharyngeal recess may be structurally difficult to find due to its location which hinders a clinician’s ability to identify an occult NPC [64, 139]. Raica et al. however stated in their study of 16 patients with different histologic forms of SCC which implored the use of CT and concluded that CT scan is able to predict the staging of NPC [60]. Sonography has been compared with MRI in the diagnosis of NPC among endemic population. Similar detection of cancer was observed between the two techniques in terms of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy [68]. In a parallel study where the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography was compared with endoscopy, similar observations were recorded in the detection of NPC [140].

In cases of NPC where AH is concurrently diagnosed, MRI is the best option to distinguish the two lesions [141, 142]. In a case report of a 7-year-old boy who presented with nasal congestion and obstruction, AH was suspected. However, further diagnosis using immunohistochemistry revealed that the histology of the tissue mass was undifferentiated NPC [73]. Thus, tissue specific antibodies can be used alongside to aid validate the initial diagnosis to prevent false results. A summary of the techniques used in the diagnosis of AH and NPC is presented in Table 1. Although similar diagnostic techniques have been reported for NPC and AH with promising results, it is recommended that well defined standards be established to help in the prompt diagnosis of the lesions in both endemic and non-endemic regions. This will enhance effective differential diagnosis, better prognostic measures, treatment modalities and increase survival rates among patients.

Advertisement

7. Treatment and future perspectives

NPC have mostly been treated using platinum based chemotherapy, radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy [33, 71]. In the more advanced stages such as stage IVB, other options include the use of immunotherapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy [143]. Also, chemotherapy plus targeted therapy (Cetuximab) or immunotherapy may be other options used in this more advanced stage [144]. In recurrent NPC, endoscopic surgery is also done to reduce tumour load before radiotherapy. Other options include chemotherapy or immunotherapy (or both). The targeted drug cetuximab may be given along with chemotherapy. Hence, immunotherapy and targeted therapy might be the last treatment option for advanced stage or recurrent NPC. The two treatment regimens (targeted therapy and immunotherapy) have shown preliminary antitumour effects, and have acceptable adverse effects [143].

For adenoids, they are treated primarily by adenoidectomy [48, 54]. Other treatment modalities for adenoids include nasal irrigations with an isotonic solution and antihistamine medications [50] and chewing Montelukast tablets [52].

However, there are unique cases where there is co-existence of benign or hypertrophic adenoids with NPC. In such instances, these non-malignant tissues should technically not be considered as gross tumour volume (GTV) during radiotherapy. This is because, distinction of adjacent non-malignant adenoidal tissues will allow for precise measurement of GTV to avoid overdosed radiation and guide delivery of radiation to reduce non-specific toxicity in normal tissue. Furthermore, the adenoids and NPC may have different responses to chemoradiotherapy and radiotherapy [11, 142].

Lastly, the advent of liquid biopsy analysis such as circulating tumour cells (CTCs), circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA), extracellular vesicles and micro-RNAs (miRNAs) in recent years, have demonstrated the feasibility of applying these biomarkers as a prognostic and/or predictive tool in patients with NPC [145]. These methods not only determine the heterogeneity of the tumour, but can also detect mutations or markers that are potentially druggable, hence enhancing the delivery of targeted therapy for effective treatment of the disease [144, 146].

Advertisement

8. Conclusion

From this review, enough evidence points to the fact that both AH and NPC have a common link based on the anatomical location and pathologies. More specifically, similar symptoms and common aetiological agents are observed in both disease conditions, and prevalent in both children and adults.

References

  1. 1. Hellings P, Jorissen M, Ceuppens JL. The Waldeyer’s ring. Acta Oto-Rhino-Laryngologica Belgica. 2000;54:237-241
  2. 2. Schupper AJ, Nation J, Pransky S. Adenoidectomy in children: What is the evidence and what is its role? Current Otorhinolaryngology Reports. 2018;6:64-73. DOI: 10.1007/s40136-018-0190-8
  3. 3. Barrett AW, Speight PM. Perineural invasion in adenoid cystic carcinoma of the salivary glands: A valid prognostic indicator? Oral Oncology. 2009;45:936-940. DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2009.07.001
  4. 4. Larem A, Al Duhirat E, Omer H. Nasopharyngeal cancer. In: Al-Qahtani A, Haidar H, Larem A, editors. Textb. Clin. Otolaryngol. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021. pp. 479-485. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-54088-3_41
  5. 5. Kao W-C, Chen J-S, Yen C-J. Advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma in children. Journal of Cancer Research and Practice. 2016;3:84-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrpr.2016.05.007
  6. 6. Zhu Y, Song X, Li R, Quan H, Yan L. Assessment of nasopharyngeal cancer in young patients aged ≤ 30 years. Frontiers in Oncology. 2019;9:1-8. Available from: https://www.frontiersin. org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2019.01179. [Accessed: February 11, 2023]
  7. 7. Wei K-R, Zheng R-S, Zhang S-W, Liang Z-H, Ou Z-X, Chen W-Q. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma incidence and mortality in China in 2010. Chinese Journal of Cancer. 2014;33:381-387. DOI: 10.5732/cjc.014.10086
  8. 8. Al-Salam S, Dhaheri SA, Awwad A, Daoud S, Shams A, Ashari MA. Prevalence of Epstein–Barr virus in tonsils and adenoids of United Arab Emirates nationals. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 2011;75:1160-1166. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.06.012
  9. 9. Seishima N, Kondo S, Wakisaka N, Kobayashi E, Imoto T, Moriyama-Kita M, et al. EBV infection is prevalent in the adenoid and palatine tonsils in adults. Journal of Medical Virology. 2017;89:1088-1095. DOI: 10.1002/jmv.24737
  10. 10. Hau PM, Lung HL, Wu M, Tsang CM, Wong KL, Mak NK et al. Targeting Epstein-Barr virus in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Frontiers in Oncology. 2020;10:1-18. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/ articles/10.3389/fonc.2020.00600. [Accessed: February 11, 2023]
  11. 11. Ng WT, Chow JCH, Beitler JJ, Corry J, Mendenhall W, Lee AWM, et al. Current radiotherapy considerations for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancers. 2022;14:5773. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14235773
  12. 12. Miller BJ, Gupta G. Adenoidectomy. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2022. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ books/NBK535352/. [Accessed: January 16, 2023]
  13. 13. Arambula A, Brown JR, Neff L. Anatomy and physiology of the palatine tonsils, adenoids, and lingual tonsils. The World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery. 2021;7:155-160. DOI: 10.1016/j.wjorl.2021.04.003
  14. 14. Golla S. Chapter 5—Adenoidectomy. In: Myers EN, Carrau RL, Eibling DE, Ferguson BJ, Ferris RL, Gillman GS, Golla S, Grandis JR, Hirsch BE, Johnson JT, Raz Y, Rosen CA, Schaitkin BM, Snyderman CH, Toh EH, editors. Oper. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. Second ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 2008. pp. 33-37. DOI: 10.1016/B978-1-4160-2445-3.50009-1
  15. 15. Mnatsakanian A, Heil JR, Sharma S. Anatomy, head and neck, adenoids. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2022. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK538137/. [Accessed: January 18, 2023]
  16. 16. Jaw TS, Sheu RS, Liu GC, Lin WC. Development of adenoids: A study by measurement with MR images. The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences. 1999;15:12-18
  17. 17. Vogler RC, Ii FJ, Pilgram TK. Age-specific size of the normal adenoid pad on magnetic resonance imaging. Clinical Otolaryngology and Allied Sciences. 2000;25:392-395. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.2000.00381.x
  18. 18. Zitelli BJ, McIntire SC, Nowalk AJ, Garrison J. Otolaryngology. In: Zitelli and Davis' Atlas of Pediatric Physical Diagnosis. E-Book. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Inc.; 2021. Available from: https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/book/3-s2.0-B9780323393034000244 [Accessed: January 18, 2023]
  19. 19. Nicodemo J, Hamersley E, Baker P, Reed S. Benign adenoidal hypertrophy caused by adenovirus presenting as a nasopharyngeal mass concerning for malignancy. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 2020;138:110300. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110300
  20. 20. Li H, Wang H, Hao H, An H, Geng H. Influences of airway obstruction caused by adenoid hypertrophy on growth and development of craniomaxillofacial structure and respiratory function in children. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine. 2022;2022:5096406. DOI: 10.1155/2022/5096406
  21. 21. Marieb EN, Hoehn K. Human Anatomy & Physiology. 9th ed. Boston: Pearson; 2013
  22. 22. Chan KH, Abzug MJ, Liu AH. 26—Sinusitis. In: Leung DYM, Szefler SJ, Bonilla FA, Akdis CA, Sampson HA, editors. Pediatr. Allergy Princ. Pract. Third ed. London: Elsevier; 2016. pp. 228-237.e3. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-323-29875-9.00026-4
  23. 23. Moideen SP, Mytheenkunju R, Govindan Nair A, Mogarnad M, Afroze MKH. Role of adenoid-nasopharyngeal ratio in assessing adenoid hypertrophy. Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery. 2019;71:469-473. DOI: 10.1007/s12070-018-1359-7
  24. 24. Zhao T, Zhou J, Yan J, Cao L, Cao Y, Hua F, et al. Automated adenoid hypertrophy assessment with lateral cephalometry in children based on artificial intelligence. Diagnostics. 2021;11:1386. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11081386
  25. 25. Onal M, Onal O, Turan A. Can secondary lymphoid organs exert a favorable effect on the mild course of COVID-19 in children? Acta Oto-Laryngologica, Stockholm. 2020:1-2. DOI: 10.1080/00016489.2020.1814965
  26. 26. Chang ET, Ye W, Zeng Y-X, Adami H-O. The evolving epidemiology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention. 2021;30:1035-1047. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-1702
  27. 27. McDermott AL, Dutt SN, Watkinson JC. The aetiology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Clinical Otolaryngology and Allied Sciences. 2001;26:82-92. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.2001.00449.x
  28. 28. Sinha S, Gajra A. Nasopharyngeal cancer. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2022. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459256/. [Accessed: January 19, 2023]
  29. 29. Tang L, Chen Y, Chen C, Chen M, Chen N, Chen X, et al. The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer Communications. 2021;41:1195-1227. DOI: 10.1002/cac2.12218
  30. 30. Guo R, Mao Y-P, Tang L-L, Chen L, Sun Y, Ma J. The evolution of nasopharyngeal carcinoma staging. The British Journal of Radiology. 2019;92:20190244. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190244
  31. 31. Zhang Q , Wang Y, Yang S, Wu Q , Qiang W. What is the appropriate skin cleaning method for nasopharyngeal cancer radiotherapy patients? A randomized controlled trial. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2022;30:3875-3883. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-06835-8
  32. 32. Lee HM, Okuda KS, González FE, Patel V. Current perspectives on nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2019;1164:11-34. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-22254-3_2
  33. 33. Iseh K, Abdullahi A, Malami S. Clinical and histological characteristics of nasopharyngeal cancer in Sokoto, North Western, Nigeria. West African Journal of Medicine. 2009;28:151-155. DOI: 10.4314/wajm.v28i3.48438
  34. 34. Xie S-H, Yu IT-S, Tse L-A, Mang OW, Yue L. Sex difference in the incidence of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Hong Kong 1983-2008: Suggestion of a potential protective role of oestrogen. European Journal of Cancer. 2013;1990(49):150-155. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.07.004
  35. 35. Flores AD, Dickson RI, Riding K, Coy P. Cancer of the nasopharynx in British Columbia. American Journal of Clinical Oncology. 1986;9:281-291. DOI: 10.1097/00000421-198608000-00002
  36. 36. Hamilton SN, Ho C, Laskin J, Zhai Y, Mak P, Wu J. Asian versus non-Asian outcomes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A north American population-based analysis. American Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2016;39:575-580. DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000091
  37. 37. Petersson F. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A review. Seminars in Diagnostic Pathology. 2015;32:54-73. DOI: 10.1053/j.semdp.2015.02.021
  38. 38. Chua MLK, Wee JTS, Hui EP, Chan ATC. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The Lancet. 2016;387:1012-1024. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00055-0
  39. 39. Buzatto GP, Tamashiro E, Proenca-Modena JL, Saturno TH, Prates MC, Gagliardi TB, et al. The pathogens profile in children with otitis media with effusion and adenoid hypertrophy. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0171049. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171049
  40. 40. Chang K-H, Jun B-C, Jeon E-J, Park Y-S. Functional evaluation of paratubal muscles using electromyography in patients with chronic unilateral tubal dysfunction. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2013;270:1217-1221. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-012-2091-7
  41. 41. Bhat V, Mani IP, Aroor R, Saldanha M, Goutham MK, Pratap D. Association of asymptomatic otitis media with effusion in patients with adenoid hypertrophy. Journal of Otology. 2019;14:106-110. DOI: 10.1016/j.joto.2018.12.001
  42. 42. Sogebi OA, Oyewole EA, Ogunbanwo O. Asymptomatic otitis media with effusion in children with adenoid enlargement. Journal of the National Medical Association. 2021;113:158-164. DOI: 10.1016/j.jnma.2020.08.005
  43. 43. Havas T, Lowinger D. Obstructive adenoid tissue: An indication for powered-shaver adenoidectomy. Archives of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery. 2002;128:789-791. DOI: 10.1001/archotol.128.7.789
  44. 44. Berkiten G, Kumral TL, Yildirim G, Uyar Y, Atar Y, Salturk Z. Eight years of clinical findings and biopsy results of nasopharyngeal pathologies in 1647 adult patients: A retrospective study. B-ENT. 2014;10:279-284
  45. 45. Mankowski NL, Bordoni B. Anatomy, head and neck, nasopharynx. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2022. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557635/. [Accessed: February 14, 2023]
  46. 46. Stambuk HE, Patel SG, Mosier KM, Wolden SL, Holodny AI. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Recognizing the radiographic features in children. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2005;26:1575-1579
  47. 47. Lomaeva I, Aghajanyan A, Dzhaparidze L, Gigani OB, Tskhovrebova LV, Gigani OO, et al. Adenoid hypertrophy risk in children carriers of G-1082A polymorphism of IL-10 infected with human herpes virus (HHV6, EBV, CMV). Life. 2022;12:266. DOI: 10.3390/life12020266
  48. 48. Shuaibu I, Usman M, Ajiya A, Chitumu D, Mohammed I, Abdullahi H, et al. Adenoid and tonsil hypertrophy in Zaria, North Western Nigeria: Review of clinical presentation and surgical outcome. Journal of the West African College of Surgeons. 2022;12:23. DOI: 10.4103/jwas.jwas_71_22
  49. 49. Surov A, Ryl I, Bartel-Friedrich S, Wienke A, Kösling S. MRI of nasopharyngeal adenoid hypertrophy. The Neuroradiology Journal. 2016;29:408-412. DOI: 10.1177/1971400916665386
  50. 50. Cassano M, De Corso E, Fiore V, Giancaspro R, Moffa A, Casale M, et al. Update of endoscopic classification system of adenoid hypertrophy based on clinical experience on 7621 children. Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica. 2022;42:257-264. DOI: 10.14639/0392-100X-N1832
  51. 51. Maheswaran S, Rupa V, Ebenezer J, Manoharan A, Irodi A. Relative etiological importance of adenoid hypertrophy versus sinusitis in children with persistent rhinorrhoea. Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery. 2015;67:34-38. DOI: 10.1007/s12070-014-0743-1
  52. 52. Shokouhi F, Jahromi AM, Majidi MR, Salehi M. Montelukast in adenoid hypertrophy: Its effect on size and symptoms. Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology. 2015;27:443
  53. 53. Dixit Y, Tripathi PS. Community level evaluation of adenoid hypertrophy on the basis of symptom scoring and its X-ray correlation. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care. 2016;5:789
  54. 54. Zwierz A, Domagalski K, Masna K, Burduk P. Effectiveness of evaluation of adenoid hypertrophy in children by flexible nasopharyngoscopy examination (FNE), proposed schema of frequency of examination: Cohort study. Diagnostics. 2022;12:1734. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12071734
  55. 55. Mlynarek A, Tewfik MA, Hagr A, Manoukian JJ, Schloss MD, Tewfik TL, et al. Lateral neck radiography versus direct video rhinoscopy in assessing adenoid size. The Journal of Otolaryngology. 2004;33:360-365. DOI: 10.2310/7070.2004.03074
  56. 56. Kindermann CA, Roithmann R, Lubianca Neto JF. Sensitivity and specificity of nasal flexible fiberoptic endoscopy in the diagnosis of adenoid hypertrophy in children. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 2008;72:63-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2007.09.013
  57. 57. Zhang X, Li H, Liu X, Zhang Q , Liu H, Wang X, et al. [Study and analysis on the quantitative detection of EBV-DNA in adenoidal hypertrophic and tonsillitis tissues of children], Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. 2009;23:1108-1111
  58. 58. Bofares KM. Epstein-Barr virus infection as significant predisposing factor and post-radiotherapy prognostic indicator among Libyan patients with nasopharyngeal cancer. Journal of Biomedical Research & Environmental Sciences. 2022;3:1020-1026. DOI: 10.37871/jbres1548
  59. 59. Feng Q , Liang J, Wang L, Ge X, Ding Z, Wu H. A diagnosis model in nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on PET/MRI radiomics and semiquantitative parameters. BMC Medical Imaging. 2022;22:150. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-022-00883-6
  60. 60. Raica V, Bratu A, Zaharia C, Salcianu I. CT evaluation of squamous cell carcinoma of the nasopharynx. Current Health Sciences Journal. 2019;45:79-86. DOI: 10.12865/CHSJ.45.01.11
  61. 61. Liu Z, Li H, Yu KJ, Xie S-H, King AD, Ai Q-YH, et al. Comparison of new magnetic resonance imaging grading system with conventional endoscopy for the early detection of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer. 2021;127:3403-3412. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33552
  62. 62. Shayah A, Wickstone L, Kershaw E, Agada F. The role of cross-sectional imaging in suspected nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. 2019;101:325-327. DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2019.0025
  63. 63. Ji MF, Sheng W, Cheng WM, Ng MH, Wu BH, Yu X, et al. Incidence and mortality of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Interim analysis of a cluster randomized controlled screening trial (PRO-NPC-001) in southern China. Annals of Oncology. 2019;30:1630-1637. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz231
  64. 64. Wang KH, Austin SA, Chen SH, Sonne DC, Gurushanthaiah D. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma diagnostic challenge in a nonendemic setting: Our experience with 101 patients. The Permanente Journal. 2017;21:16-180. DOI: 10.7812/TPP/16-180
  65. 65. King AD, Woo JKS, Ai QY, Chan JSM, Lam WKJ, Tse IOL, et al. Complementary roles of MRI and endoscopic examination in the early detection of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Annals of Oncology. 2019;30:977-982. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz106
  66. 66. King AD, Vlantis AC, Bhatia KSS, Zee BCY, Woo JKS, Tse GMK, et al. Primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Diagnostic accuracy of MR imaging versus that of endoscopy and endoscopic biopsy. Radiology. 2011;258:531-537. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10101241
  67. 67. King AD, Vlantis AC, Tsang RKY, Gary TMK, Au AKY, Chan CY, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2006;27:1288-1291
  68. 68. Gao Y, Zhu S-Y, Dai Y, Lu B-F, Lu L. Diagnostic accuracy of sonography versus magnetic resonance imaging for primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2014;33:827-834. DOI: 10.7863/ultra.33.5.827
  69. 69. Chen Y, Xin X, Cui Z, Zheng Y, Guo J, Chen Y, et al. Diagnostic value of serum Epstein-Barr virus capsid antigen-IgA for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A meta-analysis based on 21 studies. Clinical Laboratory. 2016;62:1155-1166. DOI: 10.7754/clin.lab.2015.151122
  70. 70. Cheng Y, Bai L, Shang J, Tang Y, Ling X, Guo B, et al. Preliminary clinical results for PET/MR compared with PET/CT in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Oncology Reports. 2020;43:177-187. DOI: 10.3892/or.2019.7392
  71. 71. Chan S-C, Yeh C-H, Yen T-C, Ng S-H, Chang JT-C, Lin C-Y, et al. Clinical utility of simultaneous whole-body 18F-FDG PET/MRI as a single-step imaging modality in the staging of primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2018;45:1297-1308. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-018-3986-3
  72. 72. Cai Y-L, Li J, Lu A-Y, Zheng Y-M, Zhong W-M, Wang W, et al. Diagnostic significance of combined detection of Epstein-Barr virus antibodies, VCA/IgA, EA/IgA, Rta/IgG and EBNA1/IgA for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention. 2014;15:2001-2006. DOI: 10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.5.2001
  73. 73. Cengiz K, Kumral TL, Yıldırım G. Diagnosis of pediatric nasopharynx carcinoma after recurrent adenoidectomy. Case Reports in Otolaryngology. 2013;2013:653963. DOI: 10.1155/2013/653963
  74. 74. Geiger Z, Gupta N. Adenoid hypertrophy. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2022. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK536984/. [Accessed: January 20, 2023]
  75. 75. Sorin C, Min S, Carino G. Patient with prior COVID-19 infection presenting with acute upper airway obstruction: A case report. Cureus. 2022;14:1-5. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.23214
  76. 76. France AJ, Kean DM, Douglas RH, Chiswick OM, St Clair D, Best JJ, et al. Adenoidal hypertrophy in HIV-infected patients. The Lancet (London, Englera). 1988;2:1076. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)90092-x
  77. 77. Olsen WL, Jeffrey RB, Sooy CD, Lynch MA, Dillon WP. Lesions of the head and neck in patients with AIDS: CT and MR findings. American Journal of Roentgenology. 1988;151:785-790. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.151.4.785
  78. 78. Rout MR, Mohanty D, Vijaylaxmi Y, Bobba K, Metta C. Adenoid hypertrophy in adults: A case series. Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery. 2013;65:269-274. DOI: 10.1007/s12070-012-0549-y
  79. 79. Rajeshwary A, Rai S, Somayaji G, Pai V. Bacteriology of symptomatic adenoids in children, north. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences. 2013;5:113-118. DOI: 10.4103/1947-2714.107529
  80. 80. Boll DT, Haaga JR. CT and MRI of the Whole Body. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2017
  81. 81. Gao W, Li J, Li Q , An S. CYSLTR1 promotes adenoid hypertrophy by activating ERK1/2. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine. 2018;16:966-970. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2018.6282
  82. 82. Zhang J, Sun X, Zhong L, Shen B. IL-32 exacerbates adenoid hypertrophy via activating NLRP3-mediated cell pyroptosis, which promotes inflammation. Molecular Medicine Reports. 2021;23:226. DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2021.11865
  83. 83. Atilla MH, Özdaş S, Özdaş T, Baştimur S, Muz SE, Öz I, et al. Association of Ugrp2 gene polymorphisms with adenoid hypertrophy in the pediatric population. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology. 2018;84:599-607
  84. 84. Babademez MA, Özdaş T, Özdaş S. The common genetic variants of toll-like receptor and susceptibility to adenoid hypertrophy: A hospital-based cohort study. The Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences. 2016;46:1449-1458
  85. 85. Saedi B, Sadeghi M, Mojtahed M, Mahboubi H. Diagnostic efficacy of different methods in the assessment of adenoid hypertrophy. American Journal of Otolaryngology. 2011;32:147-151
  86. 86. Shabaldina EV, Shabaldin AV, Riazantsev SV, Simbirtsev SV. The role of cytokine gene polymorphisms in the development of hypertrophy of the tonsils of the lymphoid pharyngeal ring and atopic march in the children. Vestnik Otorinolaringologica. 2013;6:18-23
  87. 87. Centre international de recherche sur le cancer, editor. A review of human carcinogens. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2012
  88. 88. Chan JK. Virus-associated neoplasms of the nasopharynx and sinonasal tract: Diagnostic problems. Modern Pathology. 2017;30:S68-S83. DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2016.189
  89. 89. Lo KW, To KF, Huang DP. Focus on nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer Cell. 2004;5:423-428
  90. 90. Pathmanathan R, Prasad U, Sadler R, Flynn K, Raab-Traub N. Clonal proliferations of cells infected with Epstein–Barr virus in preinvasive lesions related to nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1995;333:693-698
  91. 91. Svajdler M, Kaspirkova J, Mezencev R, Laco J, Torday T, Dubinsky P, et al. Human papillomavirus and Epstein-Barr virus in nasopharyngeal carcinoma in a non-endemic eastern European population. Neoplasma. 2016;63:107-114. DOI: 10.4149/neo_2016_013
  92. 92. Yeung WM, Zong YS, Chiu CT, Chan KH, Sham JS, Choy DT, et al. Epstein-Barr virus carriage by nasopharyngeal carcinoma in situ. International Journal of Cancer. 1993;53:746-750
  93. 93. Bossi P, Chan AT, Licitra L, Trama A, Orlandi E, Hui EP, et al. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: ESMO-EURACAN clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Annals of Oncology. 2021;32:452-465. DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.12.007
  94. 94. Stenmark MH, McHugh JB, Schipper M, Walline HM, Komarck C, Feng FY, et al. Nonendemic HPV-positive nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Association with poor prognosis. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. 2014;88:580-588. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.11.246
  95. 95. Chang ET, Liu Z, Hildesheim A, Liu Q , Cai Y, Zhang Z, et al. Active and passive smoking and risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A population-based case-control study in southern China. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2017;185:1272-1280. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwx018
  96. 96. Turati F, Bravi F, Polesel J, Bosetti C, Negri E, Garavello W, et al. Adherence to the Mediterranean diet and nasopharyngeal cancer risk in Italy. Cancer Causes & Control. 2017;28:89-95. DOI: 10.1007/s10552-017-0850-x
  97. 97. Sernia S, Di Folco F, Altrudo P, Sbriccoli B, Sestili C, Colamesta V, et al. Risk of nasopharyngeal cancer, leukemia and other tumors in a cohort of employees and students potentially exposed to (FA) formaldehyde in university laboratories. La Clinica Terapeutica. 2016;167:43-47
  98. 98. Siew SS, Kauppinen T, Kyyrönen P, Heikkilä P, Pukkala E. Occupational exposure to wood dust and formaldehyde and risk of nasal, nasopharyngeal, and lung cancer among Finnish men. Cancer Management and Research. 2012;4:223-232. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S30684
  99. 99. Siew SS, Martinsen JI, Kjaerheim K, Sparén P, Tryggvadottir L, Weiderpass E, et al. Occupational exposure to wood dust and risk of nasal and nasopharyngeal cancer: A case-control study among men in four nordic countries—With an emphasis on nasal adenocarcinoma. International Journal of Cancer. 2017;141:2430-2436
  100. 100. Xie S-H, Yu IT, Tse LA, Au JSK, Lau JSM. Occupational risk factors for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Hong Kong Chinese: A case-referent study. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health. 2017;90:443-449
  101. 101. Bei J-X, Li Y, Jia W-H, Feng B-J, Zhou G, Chen L-Z, et al. A genome-wide association study of nasopharyngeal carcinoma identifies three new susceptibility loci. Nature Genetics. 2010;42:599-603
  102. 102. Chin Y-M, Mushiroda T, Takahashi A, Kubo M, Krishnan G, Yap L-F, et al. HLA-A SNPs and amino acid variants are associated with nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Malaysian Chinese. International Journal of Cancer. 2015;136:678-687
  103. 103. Cui Q , Feng Q-S, Mo H-Y, Sun J, Xia Y-F, Zhang H, et al. An extended genome-wide association study identifies novel susceptibility loci for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Human Molecular Genetics. 2016;25:3626-3634
  104. 104. Ng CC, Yew PY, Puah SM, Krishnan G, Yap LF, Teo SH, et al. A genome-wide association study identifies ITGA9 conferring risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Journal of Human Genetics. 2009;54:392-397
  105. 105. Tsao SW, Yip YL, Tsang CM, Pang PS, Lau VMY, Zhang G, et al. Etiological factors of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Oral Oncology. 2014;50:330-338. DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2014.02.006
  106. 106. Tse K-P, Su W-H, Chang K-P, Tsang N-M, Yu C-J, Tang P, et al. Genome-wide association study reveals multiple nasopharyngeal carcinoma-associated loci within the HLA region at chromosome 6p21. 3. American Journal of Human Genetics. 2009;85:194-203
  107. 107. Hildesheim A, Wang C-P. Genetic predisposition factors and nasopharyngeal carcinoma risk: A review of epidemiological association studies, 2000-2011: Rosetta stone for NPC: Genetics, viral infection, and other environmental factors. Seminars in Cancer Biology. 2012;22:107-116. DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2012.01.007
  108. 108. Choudhari SM, Shrivastav S. Comparative evaluation of adenoids and airway space in 12 to 14-year-old children with different growth patterns using cephalometric methods commonly used by ENT specialists. The Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society. 2022;56:23-28. DOI: 10.1177/0301574220966875
  109. 109. Baldassari CM, Choi S. Assessing adenoid hypertrophy in children: X-ray or nasal endoscopy? The Laryngoscope. 2014;124:1509-1510. DOI: 10.1002/lary.24366
  110. 110. Cassano P, Gelardi M, Cassano M, Fiorella ML, Fiorella R. Adenoid tissue rhinopharyngeal obstruction grading based on fiber endoscopic findings: A novel approach to therapeutic management. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 2003;67:1303-1309. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2003.07.018
  111. 111. Chien C-Y, Chen A-M, Hwang C-F, Su C-Y. The clinical significance of adenoid-choanae area ratio in children with adenoid hypertrophy. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 2005;69:235-239. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2004.09.007
  112. 112. Kubba H, Bingham BJ. Endoscopy in the assessment of children with nasal obstruction. The Journal of Laryngology and Otology. 2001;115:380-384. DOI: 10.1258/0022215011907929
  113. 113. Parikh SR, Coronel M, Lee JJ, Brown SM. Validation of a new grading system for endoscopic examination of adenoid hypertrophy. Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery. 2006;135:684-687. DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.05.003
  114. 114. Wang DY, Clement PA, Kaufman L, Derde MP. Chronic nasal obstruction in children. A fiberscopic study. Rhinology. 1995;33:4-6
  115. 115. Ysunza A, Pamplona MC, Ortega JM, Prado H. Video fluoroscopy for evaluating adenoid hypertrophy in children. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 2008;72:1159-1165. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2008.03.022
  116. 116. Zicari AM, Rugiano A, Ragusa G, Savastano V, Bertin S, Vittori T, et al. The evaluation of adenoid hypertrophy and obstruction grading based on rhinomanometry after nasal decongestant test in children. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences. 2013;17:2962-2967
  117. 117. Narang VP, Loroch A, Sambiagio G. Versatility and benefits of 4.0mm flexible nasal endoscopy in 118 children up to 10 years of age. Cureus. 2022;14:e22656. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.22656
  118. 118. Handelman CS, Osborne G. Growth of the nasopharynx and adenoid development from one to eighteeen years. The Angle Orthodontist. 1976;46:243-259
  119. 119. Holmberg H, Linder-Aronson S. Cephalometric radiographs as a means of evaluating the capacity of the nasal and nasopharyngeal airway. American Journal of Orthodontics. 1979;76:479-490
  120. 120. Maw AR, Jeans WD, Fernando DCJ. Inter-observer variability in the clinical and radiological assessment of adenoid size, and the correlation with adenoid volume. Clinical Otolaryngology and Allied Sciences. 1981;6:317-322
  121. 121. McNamara JA. A method of cephalometric evaluation. American Journal of Orthodontics. 1984;86(6):449-469
  122. 122. Caylakli F, Hizal E, Yilmaz I, Yilmazer C. Correlation between adenoid-nasopharynx ratio and endoscopic examination of adenoid hypertrophy: A blind, prospective clinical study. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 2009;73:1532-1535. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.07.018
  123. 123. Elwany S. The adenoidal-nasopharyngeal ratio (A-N ratio)—Its validity in selecting children for adenoidectomy. The Journal of Laryngology and Otology. 1987;101:569-573
  124. 124. Kurien M, Lepcha A, Mathew J, Ali A, Jeyaseelan L. X-rays in the evaluation of adenoid hypertrophy: It’s role in the endoscopic ERA. Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery. 2005;57:45-47. DOI: 10.1007/BF02907627
  125. 125. Lertsburapa K, Schroeder JW, Sullivan C. Assessment of adenoid size: A comparison of lateral radiographic measurements, radiologist assessment, and nasal endoscopy. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 2010;74:1281-1285. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.08.005
  126. 126. Fujioka M, Young LW, Girdany BR. Radiographic evaluation of adenoidal size in children: Adenoidal-nasopharyngeal ratio. American Journal of Roentgenology. 1979;133:401-404
  127. 127. Major MP, Saltaji H, El-Hakim H, Witmans M, Major P, Flores-Mir C. The accuracy of diagnostic tests for adenoid hypertrophy. Journal of the American Dental Association (1939). 2014;145:247-254. DOI: 10.14219/jada.2013.31
  128. 128. Patel A, Brook CD, Levi JR. Comparison of adenoid assessment by flexible endoscopy and mirror exam. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 2020;134:110073. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110073
  129. 129. Asante D-B, Asmah RH, Adjei AA, Kyei F, Simpong DL, Brown CA, et al. Detection of human papillomavirus genotypes and Epstein-Barr virus in nasopharyngeal carcinomas at the Korle-Bu teaching hospital, Ghana. Scientific World Journal. 2017;2017:e2721367. DOI: 10.1155/2017/2721367
  130. 130. Chan KCA, Woo JKS, King A, Zee BCY, Lam WKJ, Chan SL, et al. Analysis of plasma Epstein–Barr virus DNA to screen for nasopharyngeal cancer. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2017;377:513-522. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1701717
  131. 131. Li H-P, Hsu C-L, Chang Y-S. Screening of nasopharyngeal carcinoma using plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA for at-risk population. Annals of Nasopharynx Cancer. 2018;2:1-3. DOI: 10.21037/anpc.2018.03.01
  132. 132. Liu W, Chen G, Gong X, Wang Y, Zheng Y, Liao X, et al. The diagnostic value of EBV-DNA and EBV-related antibodies detection for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A meta-analysis. Cancer Cell International. 2021;21:164. DOI: 10.1186/s12935-021-01862-7
  133. 133. Chen H, Chi P, Wang W, Li L, Luo Y, Fu J, et al. Evaluation of a semi-quantitative ELISA for IgA antibody against Epstein-Barr virus capsid antigen in the serological diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2014;25:110-115. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2014.03.1373
  134. 134. Chen H, Zhong Q , Wu X, Ding Y, Chen Q , Xue N, et al. Preliminary evaluation of a candidate international reference for Epstein–Barr virus capsid antigen immunoglobulin a in China. Infectious Agents and Cancer. 2020;15:25. DOI: 10.1186/s13027-020-00294-8
  135. 135. Li S, Deng Y, Li X, Chen Q , Liao X, Qin X. Diagnostic value of Epstein-Barr virus capsid antigen-IgA in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A meta-analysis. Chinese Medical Journal. 2010;123:1201-1205
  136. 136. Sham JS, Wei WI, Zong YS, Choy D, Guo YQ , Luo Y, et al. Detection of subclinical nasopharyngeal carcinoma by fibreoptic endoscopy and multiple biopsy. Lancet (London, England). 1990;335:371-374. DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)90206-k
  137. 137. Gorolay VV, Niles NN, Huo YR, Ahmadi N, Hanneman K, Thompson E, et al. MRI detection of suspected nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroradiology. 2022;64:1471-1481. DOI: 10.1007/s00234-022-02941-w
  138. 138. King AD. MR imaging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America. 2022;30:19-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2021.06.015
  139. 139. Loh LE, Chee TS, John AB. The anatomy of the fossa of Rosenmuller—Its possible influence on the detection of occult nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Singapore Medical Journal. 1991;32:154-155
  140. 140. Gao Y, Liu J-J, Zhu S-Y, Yi X. The diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography versus endoscopy for primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma. PLoS One. 2014;9:e90412. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090412
  141. 141. Aktas E, Sahin B, Ciledag N, Arda KN, Caglar E, Ilhan IE. Magnetic resonance imaging findings in childhood period nasopharynx cancer. Polish Journal of Radiology. 2015;80:555-560. DOI: 10.12659/PJR.895315
  142. 142. Wu Y-P, Cai P-Q , Tian L, Xu J-H, Mitteer RA, Fan Y, et al. Hypertrophic adenoids in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Appearance at magnetic resonance imaging before and after treatment. Chinese Journal of Cancer. 2015;34:130-136. DOI: 10.1186/s40880-015-0005-y
  143. 143. Liu Z, Chen Y, Su Y, Hu X, Peng X. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Clinical achievements and considerations among treatment options. Frontiers in Oncology. 2021;11:1-11. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2021.635737; [Accessed: February 11, 2023]
  144. 144. Jiromaru R, Nakagawa T, Yasumatsu R. Advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Current and emerging treatment options. Cancer Management and Research. 2022;14:2681-2689. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S341472
  145. 145. Cabezas-Camarero S, Pérez-Segura P. Liquid biopsy in head and neck cancer: Current evidence and future perspective on squamous cell, salivary gland, paranasal sinus and nasopharyngeal cancers. Cancers. 2022;14:2858. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14122858
  146. 146. Asante D-B, Calapre L, Ziman M, Meniawy TM, Gray ES. Liquid biopsy in ovarian cancer using circulating tumor DNA and cells: Ready for prime time? Cancer Letters. 2020;468:59-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2019.10.014

Written By

Du-Bois Asante, Patrick Kafui Akakpo and Gideon Akuamoah Wiafe

Submitted: 14 February 2023 Reviewed: 23 February 2023 Published: 28 March 2023