Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Application of Biotechnology and Husbandry Practices for the Conservation, Characterization and Enhancement of Production Potential of Available Goat Genetic Resource in Bangladesh

Written By

Auvijit Saha Apu, Md. Younus Ali, Mohammad Mahbubul, Tasmina Akter and M.A.M. Yahia Khandoker

Submitted: 17 January 2023 Reviewed: 17 January 2023 Published: 27 April 2023

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.1001142

From the Edited Volume

Goat Science - From Keeping to Precision Production

Sándor Kukovics

Chapter metrics overview

115 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

A goat is a small ruminant found across the globe. However, each and every type of goat has some unique characteristics and is popular for specific reasons in a specific area. The Black Bengal goat is the only recognized goat breed in Bangladesh and is famous for its high fertility, prolificacy, superior skin and meat quality, early sexual maturity, disease resistance and short kidding interval. In this chapter, we focused on available goat genetic resources in Bangladesh, breed characteristics, morphometric characterization, husbandry practices, feed and nutrition used for goat production, productive and reproductive performances under subsistence farming system, disease and health management, biotechnological approach for conservation like estrus synchronization, semen quality analysis, cryopreservation of semen, Artificial insemination, in vitro embryo production of embryos and multiple ovulation and embryo transfer. Moreover, the contribution of goat production in poverty alleviation and women empowerment in Bangladesh was also highlighted. Thereafter, constraints on goat production and future recommendations for sustainable goat production in Bangladesh were given.

Keywords

  • goat conservation
  • biotechnological and husbandry practices
  • Black Bengal goat
  • cryopreservation
  • MOET

1. Introduction

Goats are economically very important and promising animal genetic resources in developing countries, especially in Asia and Africa [1]. Goats are preferred for rearing especially in small holding farming systems due to its unique ability to adapt and maintain them in harsh environments [2]. They are also known as the “poor man’s cow” for their significant contribution to the poor man’s economy [3]. Archeological evidence indicates that the goat was one of the first animals to be domesticated by humans around 10,000 years ago at the dawn of the Neolithic period in the Fertile Crescent [4, 5]. The tropical and subtropical climate in association with topography provides a unique habitat for goats [6]. There are about 300 breeds and varieties of goats domesticated in the Indian subcontinent [2]. Like other domestic goat breeds in South Asia, the Bengal goat is believed to be derived from the wild bezoar of Pasang (Capra aegagrus) with infiltrated blood from markhor (Capra falconeri) [7].

Black Bengal, the only recognized goat breed of Bangladesh, is known for its excellence in reproductive capabilities and production of quality meat [8]. It is one of the most compliant, all-around adjusted, early maturing, prolific, productive, and tropical disease—resistant goat types of the world [9]. Goat meat is more expensive as compared to other livestock and poultry meats [8]. They also contributed to the GDP of Bangladesh by producing quality meat and elegant leather that earns a lot of foreign currency; income generation and poverty alleviation, creating employment opportunities in rural areas as well as cash income for empowering the poor and destitute women [10]. For rearing goats, a minimum investment of money is required, even without specific arrangement of housing, grazing on barren and road-side grassland and least homemade supplied feed (rice gruel, boiled rice, skins of vegetables etc.) in the Indian subcontinent. In addition, goats are fed on the leaves of jackfruits, which are available in most of the rearing areas in Bangladesh [11]. Since goats (Capra hircus) can utilize fibrous plant materials to produce meat, which offers a reliable source of animal protein in developing countries, their abundance may have led to an increasing preference for goat meat in developed countries [12, 13].

Advertisement

2. Methodology

Bangladesh is a hot humid country which lies between 88°01′ to 92°41′ east longitude and 20°34′ to 26°38′ north latitude. Average temperatures in winter raged from 11°C (Min.) to 29°C (Max.) whereas average summer temperatures are 21°C (Min.) and 34°C (Max.). Annual rainfall ranges from 1194 to 3454 mm. The highest humidity is 80–100% in August–September and the lowest is 36% (February–March) [14].

Goat keepers usually reared the goats under a semi-intensive management system in traditional houses. Bucks and does were kept separated tethered by rope and allowed to graze in roadside grass and available pasture land near the farmer’s house. Vegetable kitchen wastes, leftovers from family meals and tree leaves were also fed to the goats. Traditionally concentrate feeds @ 200 g/day were fed only to pregnant and lactating does [15]. Availability of drinking water was ensured all the time.

Measurements of the morphometric characteristics were taken according to [15]. Body weights at birth, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months of age were measured using the weighing balance based on different factors (sex of kid, type of birth, parity of dam, season of the year). The year was divided into three seasons namely winter (November–February), summer (March–June) and rainy (July–October) [16].

Among the reproductive parameters, age at first heat, age at first kidding, service per conception, gestation length, litter size, post-partum heat period and kidding interval were measured according to [1].

Semen collection was done with an artificial vagina (AV) maintaining an optimum temperature of about 41–43°C. Each ejaculate was evaluated for sperm motility, concentration, viability and morphology immediately [17]. After evaluation, semen aliquots were diluted by Triladyl, Andromed and Tris-based diluter separately to obtain a final concentration of 100 million spermatozoa per dose and then filled manually into 0.50-ml straws. One part of the evaluated extended semen was used for AI as fresh semen and another part was used for cryopreservation in liquid nitrogen using the standard protocol [18, 19]. The motility, morphology, viability and membrane integrity of fresh diluted and fresh-thawed semen were evaluated critically. Artificial insemination was done 24 hours [20] after the visible sign of natural or synchronized estrus. It is noteworthy to mention that successful synchronization of estrus was performed by using intramuscular injection of either progesterone or synthetic PGF2α analogue (Dinoprost®) in Black Bengal does [21, 22]. Does were closely monitored for up to 48 hours to record the signs of synchronized estrus behavior. Fertility after AI was calculated as the percentage of inseminated females actually kidding [18]. On the other hand, for multiple ovulation and embryo transfer (MOET), Black Bengal goats (BBGs) were synchronized with Gabbrostim® (Alfaprostol, VETEM, Italy @ 2-mg equivalent to 1 ml/goat), superovulation with PMSG (Folligon®, Intervet International B.V, Holland @ 900 IU, 800 IU and 700 IU, respectively) and test the efficacy of the dose. A surgical procedure was used to flush the embryos [23].

For In vitro production of embryos, goat ovaries were collected from a local slaughterhouse, processed and COCs were collected in three techniques (puncture, slicing and aspiration) and each graded into four grades as described [24]. Normal COCs (A and B grade) were transferred into the maturation medium and kept in a CO2 incubator at 38.5°C with 5% carbon dioxide for 22 hours. About 15–20 matured oocytes were transferred to each of the sperm drops (sperm concentration 12.5 × 106 per ml) and incubated for 5 hours. Thereafter, the fertilized oocytes were transferred to another culture drop (600 μl) of TCM-199 with 5% FCS and kept in CO2 incubator. The development was checked in every 48 hrs and the culture was continued up to 6–7 days [25].

In statistical analyses of the data, analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed using a completely randomized design (CRD) [26] by the Statistical Analysis System (SAS, 1998) package program. Significant differences between the mean values were separated by Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (DMRT) [27].

Advertisement

3. Results and discussion

3.1 Available goat genetic resources

BBG is the most well-known perceived goat breed speaking to over 90% of the all-out goats of the nation [28]. Although various types of goats are available in Bangladesh, BBGs are the most popular and dominantly (almost 90%) distributed throughout the country. Jamunapari goats concentrated in the northern and northeastern parts, Beetal, Sirohi and their crosses in the western part of Bangladesh [29, 30].

3.2 Breed characteristics

BBG is a dwarf goat breed and known to be famous for its high adaptability, fertility, prolificacy, delicious meat and superior skin [12, 31]. BBG is also reputed for its early sexual maturity, better resistance against common diseases, low kidding interval. In spite of having the above qualities, they are inferior in some economic traits such as birth weight, growth rates, milk yield, and kid survivability [9].

3.3 Morphometric characterization of Black Bengal Goat

Morphometric measurement is conducted for the characterization of the breeds of animals as well as the assessment of carcass quantity. Morphometric characterization contributes to the improvement of animal genetic resources in the context of country-level implementation [32]. Morphometric measurement of adult BBG is shown in Table 1.

TraitsMeasurements
Body weight14.05 ± 0.14 to 15.37 ± 0.23 kg [15]
16.56 ± 0.57 kg [33]
Body length47.83 ± 0.75 cm [33]
46.50 ± 0.77 cm [34]
Height at wither48.50 ± 0.42 cm [35]
47.92 ± 0.76 cm [33]
Heart girth59.08 ± 0.87 cm [33]
55.70 ± 0.20 cm [34]
Ear length14.21 ± 0.09 to 15.02 ± 0.16 cm [15]
12.69 ± 0.27 cm [33]
Ear breadth6.02 ± 0.04 to 6.20 ± 0.04 cm [15]
5.70 ± 0.20 cm [34]
Head length16.67 ± 0.26 cm [33]
15.10 ± 0.56 cm [34]
Head breath10.51 ± 0.06 to 11.56 ± 0.07 cm [15]
12.33 ± 0.34 cm at 12 month [33]
Tail length10.25 ± 0.31 cm [33]
9.80 ± 0.20 cm [34]
Scrotal circumference19.72 ± 0.33 cm [33]
19.60 ± 0.24 cm [34]
Testicular length9.80 ± 0.37 cm [34]

Table 1.

Morphometric measurement of Black Bengal Goats in Bangladesh.

3.4 Husbandry practices

Due to the hardy nature; resistance to diseases and better adaptability BBGs can reproduce and thereby thrive well under various types of climatic conditions [23]. The poor farmers mainly keep goats in a semi-intensive production system without any supplementation [6]. The majority of landless farmers opted to construct their farm sheds using natural materials such as bamboo, wood or occasionally coconut and straw for the roof. Some of the sheds were constructed of mud and earth. Some farmers put their goats under their beds in the same rooms where they slept [3].

The production system of BBGs in Bangladesh is generally characterized by poor feeding, housing, breeding and health management and consequently low return from sale.

3.4.1 Feed and nutrition used for goat production

Goats are excellent in utilizing tree leaves if provided properly. In terms of the availability of grazing land to the ruminant livestock, the stocking rate is high and supplementation of cereal grain and by-products is a costly proposition to goats for achieving higher productivity [36]. Availability of forages is not constant throughout the year and varies with season particularly, during the cropping seasons when more land is bought under cultivation.

Green grass does not fulfill the appetite and nutrient requirements as a sole feed [37]. Most of the farmers (82%) supplied concentrate feed with the green grass for their goats while very few farmers supplied green grass alone to their goats [38]. Some goat farmers gathered various feed items (wheat bran, broken rice, rice polish, oil cake, and so on) and blended a balanced diet on their farm premises [3]. Most of the farmers used concentrate feed once in a day with green grass and supplied water. Major sources of drinking water for goats were tube well and most of the farmers grazed their goats [39]. The majority of farmers preferred roadside grazing (86.7%) due to enough natural grass around their garden whereas only 8.3% cultivated high-yielding fodder on their own land [3] for feeding the goats. Farmers supplied 2.63 ± 0.05 kg/day of green grass, 60.00 ± 5.86 g/day concentrate and 0.62 ± 0.03 kg/day of tree leaves per animal during the lactation stage [38]. Concentrate supplementation is undoubtedly important to meet up the nutrient requirements, and to get the best result it can be supplemented up to 30% of the required DM. Under the stall feeding system, a concentrate supplementation with 15.60% CP is recommended for improving the growth performance of BBGs in Bangladesh [37].

3.4.2 Disease and health management

Hot and humid conditions in Bangladesh favor various diseases [40, 41]. The disease impairs the productivity of animals and incurs huge veterinary costs. The productivity of densely populated goats is poor due to the incidence of disease [42]. The common causes for goat morbidity and mortality in rural areas were: (a) viral diseases such as PPR, contagious ecthyma, goat pox and viral pneumonia; (b) bacterial diseases like brucellosis, tetanus, enterotoxaemia, mastitis and metritis; (c) fungal diseases such as ringworm infection and (d) rickettsial infections like conjunctivitis [43].

Among these infectious diseases, Peste des petitis ruminants (PPR) has become an important disease due to its effect on direct economic losses. PPR is an acute and extremely infectious viral disease that severely affects goats. The common symptoms were high fever, mucopurulent nasal and ocular discharge, pneumonia, necrosis, erosive stomatitis, ulceration of mucous membranes and inflammation of GI tract resulting in severe diarrhea. Age categories of goats, sex, breed and seasonal influence were found to be significantly associated (p < 0.01) with the prevalence of PPR. The susceptibility of BBGs to PPR was higher than other breeds [44].

Among the seasons of the year, the occurrence of various infectious diseases was higher in the rainy season (36.43%) followed by the winter season (34.94%) and summer season (28.62%). In respect of sex, the female goat was found to be more susceptible (64.22%) than the male (35.77%) [45].

The highest incidence of gastro-intestinal infection was diarrhea (31.1%) and the second highest incidence was pneumonia (27.4%). Several other diseases like lameness (9.0%), mange (6.2%), contagious ecthyma (4.4%), malnutrition (3.2%), fever (2.7%), conjunctivitis (2.6%), bloat (2.1%), abortion (1.7%), mastitis (1.7%), tympany (1.5%), abscess (1.1%), actinomycosis (1.1%), poisoning (0.8%), retained placenta (0.6%) and urolithiasis (0.4%) [46]. Large flock size was more infected to parasitic infestation (both by ecto- and endoparasites) than the smaller ones and this is due to direct contact, overcrowding and unhygienic condition of the goat farm. Usually, goats are maintained on the muddy floor in rural areas. Goats maintained on the muddy floor were infected more with parasitic infestation than the slatted floor and this may be explained as due to low level of hygiene and favored reinfestation [46]. Goats often suffer from a wide variety of surgical affections; e.g., gid disease, wound, urolithiasis, lymphadenitis, subcutaneous cyst, fracture, myiasis, bloat and so on and all these are curable if surgical intervention is performed at an appropriate time [47, 48].

Kid mortality was found 15.0 ± 0.50% in semi-intensive conditions and 10.07 ± 0.32% in extensive conditions [49] and the average kid mortality rate was 12.88% at farmers’ houses [50]. Kid’s mortality was due to infectious disease (63%), predators (10%), mechanical (4%) and congenital (1%). Among the infectious diseases, kid’s mortality was recorded as 30, 27, 23, 17 and 2% by diarrhea, pneumonia, bloat, enterotoxaemia and ecthyma, respectively [51]. Overall adult mortality was 12.69% [51]. Better housing, management, routine vaccination and timely deworming can reduce mortality as well as ensure better health management and higher productivity.

3.5 Productive performance

Adult body weight is an important economic factor that influences the growth and production pattern of any goat enterprise and has more influence mainly on the growth behavior of kids [52]. Average daily gain (g/d) was 43.29 ± 1.82 at birth to 3 months, 39.50 ± 1.91 at 3–6 months, 26.48 ± 1.99 at 6–9 months and 23.04 ± 1.30 at 9–12 months in the semi-intensive system of rearing in rural areas [53]. On the other hand, in the fully intensive management system body weight gain were 66.34 ± 1.69, 41.54 ± 2.02, 49.97 ± 3.10 and 39.28 ± 4.35 g/d, respectively. Average daily milk yield, lactation length and total milk per lactation were 287.7 ml/d, 61.5 days and 19129.40 ml, respectively [54]. Body weight differed in respect of sex, type of birth, parity and season of birth which is illustrated in Table 2.

FactorsBody wt. (kg)
Birth3-month6-month9-month12-month
Sex of kid
Male1.3 ± 0.10 [16]
1.16 ± 0.07 [55]
5.20 ± 0.6 [16]
5.70 ± 0.21 [55]
8. 90 ± 0.8 [16]
8.65 ± 0.11 [55]
13.20 ± 0.60 [16]
11.55 ± 0.33 [55]
17.9 ± 0.70 [16]
Female1.2 ± 0.1 [16]
1.07 ± 0.07 [55]
4.50 ± 0.6 [15]
5.01 ± 0.17 [55]
8.10 ± 0.8 [16]
7.40 ± 0.21 [55]
10.10 ± 0.5 [16]
9.93 ± 0.30 [55]
12.10 ± 0.5 [16]
Type of birth
Single1.40 ± 0.1 [16]
1.11 ± 0.01 [55]
5.50 ± 0.5 [16]
5.48 ± 0.19 [55]
8.60 ± 0.5 [16]
8.58 ± 0.13 [55]
12.70 ± 0.7 [16]
11.66 ± 0.31 [55]
16.50 ± 0.5 [16]
Twin1.30 ± 0.1 [16]
1.09 ± 0.01 [55]
5.3 ± 0.4 [16]
5.23 ± 0.16 [55]
7.70 ± 0.4 [16]
7.76 ± 0.16 [55]
11.10 ± 0.1 [16]
11.56 ± 0.28 [55]
13.30 ± 0.70 [16]
Triplets1.10 ± 0.1 [16]
0.86 ± 0.01 [55]
4.6 ± 1.5 [16]
4.78 ± 0.11 [55]
7.60 ± 1.1 [16]
5.57 ± 0.16 [55]
9.90 ± 1.3 [16]
10.72 ± 0.24 [55]
12.1 ± 1.30 [16]
Parity of dam
First1.10 ± 0.1 [16]
1.03 ± 0.10 [55]
4.40 ± 0.5 [16]
4.70 ± 0.11 [55]
7.70 ± 0.7 [16]
7.76 ± 0.16 [55]
11.50 ± 0.6 [16]
11.06 ± 0.23 [55]
14.80 ± 1.5 [16]
Second1.10 ± 0.10 [16]
1.17 ± 0.17 [55]
5.60 ± 0.60 [16]
5.62 ± 0.18 [55]
8.50 ± 0.90 [16]
8.51 ± 0.13 [55]
11.20 ± 1.20 [16]
11.01 ± 0.22 [55]
13.60 ± 1.0 [16]
Third1.30 ± 0.10 [16]
1.24 ± 0.10 [55]
5.70 ± 0.7 [16]
5.70 ± 0.17 [55]
8.10 ± 1.0 [16]
8.33 ± 0.13 [55]
10.60 ± 1.30 [16]
10.63 ± 0.18 [55]
12.10 ± 1.50 [16]
Fourth1.50 ± 0.10000 [16]6.90 ± 0.2 [16]8.50 ± 0.2 [16]10.8 ± 1.8 [16]12.62 ± 1.93 [16]
Season of birth
Winter1.30 ± 0.10 [16]5.44 ± 0.62 [16]8.50 ± 0.7 [16]12.70 ± 0.6 [16]15.49 ± 0.70 [16]
Summer1.30 ± 0.1 [16]5.32 ± 0.63 [16]8.10 ± 0.8 [16]10.10 ± 0.5 [16]12.3 ± 0.60 [16]
Rainy1.22 ± 0.06 [16]3.64 ± 0.94 [16]5.70 ± 1.24 [16]9.69 ± 0.32 [16]14.49 ± 0.31 [16]

Table 2.

Body weight at different ages of Black Bengal goat in respect of sex, type of birth, parity, and season of birth.

3.6 Reproductive performance

Reproductive efficiency is always considered to be the most vital factor ensuring the increase in productivity to a certain environmental condition [56]. One of the most favorable attributes of the BBG is its year-round breeding, high rate of reproduction and prolificacy. It reaches puberty earlier by 6 months and gives birth 2–3 kids at a time. The overall reproductive performance of the BBG is shown in Table 3.

ParameterPerformance
Age at puberty (days)182.7 ± 7.25 [54]
209.00 ± 32.25 [56]
Age at first service (days)187.56 ± 8.33 [54]
Service per conception (No.)1.46 ± 0.53 [57]
1.37 ± 0.03 [54]
Age at first kidding (month)13.85 ± 0.41 [57]
401.50 ± 32.08 days [56]
Gestation length (days)146.00 ± 2.15 [57]
142.45 ± 0.31 [54]
Litter size (No.)1.92 ± 0.90 [57]
1.75 ± 0.03 [54]
Kidding interval (days)177.00 ± 7.44 [57]
188.01 ± 2.14 [54]
Post partum heat period (days)33.39 ± 1.82 [54]
47.50 ± 0.87 days [1]

Table 3.

Reproductive performance of Black Bengal Goat.

3.6.1 Seminal attributes of Black Bengal buck

Male fertility is an important issue in caprine reproduction. As a result, determining male fertility before breeding is critical for breeding success. The most efficient parameter for selecting breeding buck is the semen quality. The evaluation of sperm motility and morphology is an essential parameter in the examination of sperm quality and the establishment of a correlation between semen quality and fertility [58]. Fertilizing capacity of semen has always been regarded as one of the key factors in running an AI program [59]. Semen quality and attributes were influenced by body weight, body condition score, age, scrotal circumference, testicular circumference, breed, management, climatic, nutrition, technique for semen assortment and level of sexual incitement [60, 61, 62, 63]. Like rams, buck ejaculates are small in volume with a high concentration of spermatozoa [64]. The characteristics of Black Bengal buck semen are shown in Table 4. Sperm motility accounts for around 10–15% of the total variation in male fertility measured by the non-return rate (NRR) [70].

ParametersMean ± SE
Ejaculate volume (ml)0.58 ± 0.17 to 1.04 ± 1.1 [65]
0.37 ± 0.02 to 0.53 ± 0.03 [66]
0.46 ± 0.08 to 0.71 ± 0.06 [67]
Concentration (109/ml)2.11 ± 0.09 to 2.69 ± 0.08 [66]
2.4 to 2.7 [67]
Fresh semen motility (%)80.83 ± 3.5 [68]
75.00 ± 5.3 [69]
72.65 ± 0.56 [59]
Live spermatozoa (%)87.58 ± 0.96 to 92.95 ± 0.74 [65]
86.16 ± 1.54 to 89.22 ± 0.79 [67]
Normal spermatozoa (%)91.39 ± 0.24% [59]
87.17 ± 2.40 to 91.85 ± 1.38% [65]
90.44 ± 0.27 to 91.41 ± 0.32 [67]
Head abnormalities (%)2.50 ± 1.70 [68]
1.40 ± 1.30 [69]
Mid piece abnormalities (%)6.90 ± 2.50 [68]
Tail abnormalities (%)7.10 ± 2.60 [68]

Table 4.

Characteristics of Black Bengal Goat semen.

3.7 Application of biotechnological tools

3.7.1 Estrus synchronization

Estrus synchronization is an essential element for the improvement of reproductive efficiencies through implementing fixed-time artificial insemination (AI), MOET, laparoscopic ovum pick up (LOPU), etc. As the duration of the estrous cycle and estrus period is variable, therefore, estrus synchronization is an important tool to increase reproductive efficiency [71]. Approaches toward synchronizing estrus are done by the manipulation of either the luteal or the follicular phase of the estrous cycle. Strategies can be employed to extend the luteal phase by supplying exogenous progesterone analogs in conjunction with or without gonadotropins or to shorten this phase by prematurely regressing existing corpora luteal through using prostaglandin (PGF2α) or by the combination of both techniques. Exogenous hormones are used to modify the physiological chain of events involved in the sexual cycle, while the non-hormonal methods of oestrus synchronization involve the use of light control or exposure to a male [72].

Worldwide, progestogen or progesterone treatment in the form of vaginal devices (Sponges/CIDR) or ear implants is usually used. In Bangladesh, two synchronization methods for goats have been evaluated under research conditions and concluded that 12.5 and 15.0 mg progesterone could be used as an effective way for estrus synchronization in Black Bengal does [21]. Another report showed that synchronization of estrus with dinoprost®, a synthetic analog of 1 ml/does PGF2α may be suitable for estrus synchronization of BBG [22]. Besides these, synchronization of BBG was also done successfully with Alfaprostol (Gabbrostim®, VETEM, Italy) and luprostiol (Prosolvin®, Intervet International, Netherlands) at the dose rate of 2 and 7.5 mg, equivalent to 1 ml/goat, respectively [73].

3.7.2 Cryopreservation of semen

Cryopreservation is the method that preserves structurally intact living cells at very low temperatures and during this process, all metabolic activities are minimized due to the freezing and the low temperature of storage [74, 75]. This technique is important for the breed conservation process. Furthermore, this technology can contribute to the extension of artificial insemination, which is a landmark technology in the modern livestock industry [76]. The success of semen preservation is markedly dependent on the semen quality and the major parameters include sperm morphology, sperm concentration and sperm motility [77].

A standardized freezing procedure for goat sperm includes semen samples collection, assessment of semen samples, semen extension and packaging into plastic straws, cooling and freezing of semen. But, several limiting factors such as: semen concentration, storage temperature (optimum freezing and thawing rates), the composition of extension media and cryoprotectants used during the freezing process are responsible for the low quality of goat cryopreserved semen. For cryopreservation of goat semen, different extenders and freezing procedures have been used [78, 79, 80, 81]. It was revealed that motility of the frozen semen differed according to the kinds of diluter (Triladyl: before dilution 81.7 ± 1.05% and post thawed 42.50 ± 1.71%, Andromed 83.3 ± 0.589% and 34.67 ± 1.67% and Tris diluter 80.1 ± 0.825% and 28.71 ± 1.55%, respectively) [82]. A comparative study on fresh and frozen–thawed semen quality revealed that sperm motility ranged from 70.83 ± 1.54 to 74.23 ± 1.59% vs. 44.17 ± 2.39 to 52.31 ± 1.08% in fresh and frozen–thawed semen of BBG. On the other hand, sperm abnormalities were found 8.82 ± 0.24 to 9.71 ± 0.52% in fresh and 11.18 ± 0.42 to 16.55 ± 0.09% in frozen–thawed semen, respectively [18]. In case of membrane integrity, a significant difference was also observed between fresh and frozen–thawed semen. An experiment result showed that the mean membrane integrity of fresh semen was 71.9% which declined to 62% after dilution which further reduced to 58.4% in case of post-thawed semen of BBG [19]. Semen cryopreservation exhibited detrimental effects on post-thaw semen motility, plasma membrane, acrosomal status and DNA integrity which ultimately affect the fertility outcome [83].

3.7.3 Artificial insemination

Artificial insemination (AI) is the most commonly applied means of assisted reproduction in domestic species. AI remained the main vehicle that offers a relatively simple and easy method for the dissemination of valuable genes rapidly to improve production traits. Furthermore, it avoids dissemination of various infectious and venereal diseases. The efficiency of AI is counterbalanced by two limitations resulting from the less number of breeding males used, which decreased the genetic variation, genetic defects or uncontrolled (or unknown) diseases could spread, and the inbreeding coefficient might be increased that affecting maternal traits [84].

For the implementation of AI, the collection of semen from male goats requires a teaser and an artificial vagina and it is a fully established technique [85]. Three methods of semen preservation (fresh, refrigerated and frozen) and three techniques of insemination (vaginal, cervical and intrauterine) are used worldwide in goats [85, 86, 87]. The use of two different forms like fresh and frozen–thawed semen influenced the fertility rate of goats. When artificial insemination was performed with fresh semen, the kidding rate was found higher than AI with Frozen–thawed semen [18]. The overall kidding rate of BBG achieved with fresh semen was 59.8%, using frozen–thawed semen it was found 43.9% [18]. On the other hand, when the conception rate was compared between the two kinds of frozen semen (diluted with Egg YC and Tris) it was revealed that the kind of semen had no significant effect (p > 0.05) on conception rate [88]. Similarly, the pregnancy rate did not differ when AI was done with the semen processed with different concentrations of egg yolk [89]. On the other hand, on the basis of the liquid preservation periods at 4°C, a kidding percentage was 69% (53 of 77), 68% (17 of 25) and 56% (14 of 25) after insemination with day 1, day 2 and day 3 semen, respectively [90].

It is a bitter truth that though AI has gained widespread acceptance in the cattle industries of most developed countries, it has not yet received such acceptance in the goat industries of Bangladesh [91]. With the exception of one region (Mymensingh), where 12% of farmers relied on artificial insemination in goats whereas almost all farmers (100%) of the country had to rely on natural mating to serve their does [92].

3.7.4 Multiple ovulation and embryo transfer (MOET)

In cross-breeding program, male germplasm through artificial insemination program has made tremendous progress in domestic species whereas MOET is considered as an effective means of increasing the contribution of superior females to breeding programs and it is also an essential procedure of embryo biotechnology [93]. MOET protocols have resulted in significant improvements in domestic animals over the last two decades; however, unlike cattle, goat MOET is underdeveloped, as collection and transfer of embryos via surgical procedures have limited advantages in small ruminants like a goat. In larger domesticated animals such as the cow and horse, manipulation of the genital tract per rectum facilitates the collection and transfer of embryos through the cervical canal and into the uterine horn ipsilateral to the ovulating ovary, whereas, the application of successful MOET in small ruminants has been constrained by the tightly folded form of the cervix, the variable ovarian response to various super ovulatory treatments, and the need for labor to handle animals, especially during large-scale production [94, 95].

MOET aims to fertilize multiple oocytes in a shorter time to produce a large number of viable embryos, that are transferred into the recipient animal which leads to a higher birth rate [96, 97]. The basis of this technology is to synchronize estrus, hormonal stimulation and AI of donors, thereafter collect the viable embryos and transfer them in the recipient animal by surgical procedure [98, 99]. Focusing on its beneficial effects, a series of works in goat MOET has been done around the world. But very few published work has been reported on multiple ovulation and embryo transfer in BBG in Bangladesh where they determine the responses of BBG following synchronization with Gabbrostim® (Alfaprostol, VETEM, Italy @ 2-mg equivalent to 1 ml/goat), superovulation with PMSG (Folligon®, Intervet International B.V, Holland at the dose rate of 900, 800 and 700 IU, respectively) and embryo collection with the surgical procedure was used to flush the embryos. The results of the experiment found that better super ovulatory response with 900 IU (13.6 ± 3.6) PMSG and the recovered embryos were 100% fertile [89]. However, MOET has not yet become a widespread tool for genetic improvement for a variety of reasons including its costs, technical demands and variable and unpredictable efficiency [100].

3.7.5 In vitro embryo production (IVP)

IVP is a very promising technique that offers an alternative to superovulation as an excellent source of low-cost embryos for transfer and manipulation purposes. It is a multistep methodology comprising the following procedures: [1] retrieval of oocytes from the ovary [2] in vitro maturation (IVM) of oocytes, [3] in vitro fertilization (IVF) with capacitated sperm and [4] in vitro culture (IVC) of zygotes to the blastocyst stage after that this could be directly transferred to the recipient animal or preserved in liquid nitrogen for long term use [101]. Moreover, IVEP from slaughterhouse oocytes represents the most convenient and cheapest source to develop basic research on oocyte maturation and cell cycle regulation, gametes recognition and fusion and regulation of early embryo development.

In Bangladesh, IVP technology in goats is new and very few research work done regarding goat IVEP including evaluation and grading of ovaries, oocyte retrieval, grading of oocytes IVM and IVF are lacking in BBGs in Bangladesh. Qualitative and quantitative assessment of ovaries from BBGs was conducted in view of IVP [102]. The average number of good quality oocytes recovered from ovaries without corpora lutea was more as compared to the ovaries with corpora lutea (CL). The number of follicles measuring 2–6 mm in diameter was found to be higher in ovaries without CL than in ovaries with functional and regressed CL [103]. Besides this, quality cumulus oocyte complexes (COCs) with a homogenous evenly granulated cytoplasm possessing multi-layers of compact cumulus cells are also important criteria for the production of goat embryos in IVP [25].

Results of investigation on the effect of collection techniques on COCs recovery indicated that aspiration of 2–6 mm diameter follicles is the most effective technique for oocyte recovery among the three techniques (puncture, slicing and aspiration) from slaughterhouse goat ovaries, however, there was no significant (p > 0.05) effect of COCs collection techniques on IVM and fertilization in goats [104]. Whereas other reports [105] suggested that the slashing technique is more suitable for harvesting a greater number and superior quality of COCs. The efficiency of fertilization and post-fertilization development is influenced markedly by IVM conditions [106]. Goat follicular fluid is one of the alternatives of macromolecules that can be used as supplementation in the maturation media because it is easy to get and also cheap [107]. Moreover, it is reported that goat follicular factor (gFF) has a positive effect on in vitro production of embryos in BBGs, and a 10% level of gFF is recommended based on the improvements observed and the associated economic benefits [108].

Besides this, it has been reported that supplementation of a protein source named bovine serum albumin (BSA) in basic medium improves maturation, fertilization, blastocyst formation and hatching rates in vitro embryo to the presence of a relatively high molecular weight protein which contributes to the maturation of oocytes [109, 110, 111, 112]. Bovine serum albumin at 5% level has been recommended as a supplement for the maturation and fertilization of goat oocytes in the TCM-199 medium [113]. The efficiency of in vitro fertilization and subsequent development of goat embryos using fresh and frozen semen for IVF was examined and found that both fresh and frozen semen can be used for IVF and subsequent development of goat embryos [114].

3.8 Contribution of goat production in poverty alleviation and women’s empowerment

Goats are highly valued for their diverse production profiles and important contributions, including their meat, milk and industrial raw materials including skin, fiber and dung. Goats play a significant role in enhancing household nutrition as well as producing employment, income and capital storage [115, 116]. The raising of goats by struggling women and poor farmers requires little financial commitment in Bangladeshi culture, according to [117] and goats are now highly regarded in Bangladesh because of their role in reducing rural poverty. Bangladesh Government has also given special emphasis and adopted a national program on BBGs for poor farmers to reduce poverty for the achievement of Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) since 2003 [118]. Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute (BLRI) developed a technology package namely “Goat rearing model for landless and small farmers”, which showed that one female goat keeper could earn an annual additional income of about BDT 1455. Besides these, they also recommended that it would possible to earn around BDT 7000–12,000 per year (from the second year) from goat farms starting with five does [119]. Findings from the project “National program on poverty reduction through goat production” showed that goat rearing improved livelihood dramatically; food purchasing capacity increased from 20 to 28% per annum and uplifted the farmer’s social status. Moreover, health facilities, festivals and educational status acceptance were increased by 28, 26 and 19%, respectively by goat rearing [119].

Women’s empowerment, particularly at the individual level, aids in creating a foundation for social change and is a crucial prerequisite for the eradication of global poverty and the protection of human rights [120]. Compared to women in other nations, Bangladeshi women are less advantaged economically and socially. In Bangladesh, women make up roughly 50% of the population and 80% of them live in rural areas. Previously in Bangladesh, rural women were restricted to homestead production and post-harvest operations; but nowadays they are involved in a variety of agricultural sub-sectors such as livestock, poultry and fishing in addition to caring for children and preparing and serving meals for the family. Employment opportunities in these subsectors are growing now. Goat rearing in Bangladesh enhanced employment for men, employment for women, social dignity, and social acceptance at rates of 35, 24, 58, 26 and 23%, respectively [121]. Moreover, one recent study conducted on entrepreneurship development among women through community-based goat rearing in char areas of Bangladesh (Figure 1a, b) found that community-based goat rearing helped to develop entrepreneurship among women and 70% of women in char areas opined that their overall livelihoods have been improved. The majority of the women entrepreneurs (71.61%) received benefits from BDT 10,000 to more than BDT 20,000 which facilitated them to help their husbands during a crisis moment, can give money to their children for education, buy personal commodities [122].

Figure 1.

(a, b): Entrepreneurship development among women through goat rearing (Photo credit: Prof. Dr. Auvijit Saha Apu).

Advertisement

4. Constraints

One of the main livestock species ensuring Bangladeshi farmers’ stability of livelihood is the goat. Goats are crucial as “mobile” food assets in emergency situations [123]. During religious festivals and ceremonial gatherings, goats are frequently used as a “sacrificial” animals. The Sustainable Development Goals can be achieved in large part through goat farming. However, goat farmers face a number of challenges in Bangladesh include a lack of education, inadequate veterinary services, a lack of feed, and a lack of fodders [124]. Another problem is the prevalence of PPR and skin disease in BBGs because the farmers have little or no knowledge about the causes of these diseases [121]. Aside from these, there are some other major constraints that affect sustainable and commercial goat farming in Bangladesh, such as farmers’ lack of knowledge on improved production management of goat rearing and proper feed preparation, a lack of low-cost complete feed, an acute shortage of good quality Black Bengal breeding bucks or AI facilities so that a large number of heated does remain unserved. In Bangladesh, unfortunately, the number of breeding bucks is decreasing day by day because the majority of goat farmers castrate almost all of the male calves at a young age for social and economic reasons [125]. Additionally, the use of the same buck from generation to generation has increased the likelihood of inbreeding, which lowers reproductive performance and facilitates the spread of infectious and venereal diseases [126]. Moreover, the lack of linkage between the wholesale market and farmers also affects the profitability in case of commercial farming.

Advertisement

5. Conclusion

Black Bengal goat (BBG) is the heritage and pride of Bangladesh. It is a dwarf breed found almost in all villages in Bangladesh. The higher demand of meat and skin in the local as well as foreign markets, focused goat enterprise as extremely important to the vulnerable group of people in the existing socio-economic conditions of the country. Due to several reasons, this breed is haphazardly crossed with an exotic breed and loses its purity. Therefore, the application of biotechnologies and modern husbandry practices should be implemented for the conservation, characterization and enhancement of the production potential of BBGs in Bangladesh.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the contribution of Professor Dr. Syed Sakhawat Husain, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh for his enormous support and time-to-time advice to improve the manuscript.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1. Solaiman M, Apu A, Ali M, Fakruzzaman M, Faruque M. Impact of community based breeding program on breeding buck availability, growth and reproductive performance of Black Bengal goat. Bangladesh Journal of Animal Science. 2020;49(1):13-21
  2. 2. Miah G, Das A, Bilkis T, Momin MM, Uddin MA, Alim MA, et al. Comparative study on productive and reproductive traits of Black Bengal and Jamnapari goats under semi-intensive condition. Scientific Research Journal. 2016;4(2):1-7
  3. 3. Naim N, Ahmed ST. Profitability and socio-economic upliftment of small-scale goat farmers in Mymensingh District of Bangladesh. International Journal of Innovative Research. 2021;6(3):28-35
  4. 4. Pringle H. Reading the signs of ancient animal domestication. Science. 1998;282(5395):1448
  5. 5. Porter V. Goats of the World. Ipswich, UK: Farming Press; 1996
  6. 6. Islam M, Amin M, Kabir A, Ahmed M. Comparative study between semi-intensive and scavenging production system on the performances of Black Bengal goat. Journal of the Bangladesh Agricultural University. 2009;7:79-86 (452-2016-35476)
  7. 7. Rahman M, Rahman S, Jalil M, Nasiruddin S, Rahman M. Molecular characterization of Black Bengal and Jamunapari goat breeds by RAPD markers. American Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences. 2006;1(2):17-22
  8. 8. Amin M, Husain S, Islam A. Evaluation of Black Bengal goats and their cross with the Jamunapari breed for carcass characteristics. Small Ruminant Research. 2000;38(3):211-215
  9. 9. Hossain ME. Performance of Black Bengal goat: A 50-year review. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 2021;53:1-15
  10. 10. Moni M, Samad M. Evaluation of productive and reproductive performances of Black Bengal goats in Rajshahi government goat development farm in Bangladesh. Journal of Veterinary Medical and One Health Research. 2019;1:201-210
  11. 11. Hassan M, Hoque M, Islam S, Khan S, Roy K, Banu Q. A prevalence of parasites in black bengal goats in Chittagong, Bangladesh. International Journal of Livestock Production. 2011;2(4):40-44
  12. 12. Devendra C. Concluding synthesis and the future for sustainable goat production. Small Ruminant Research. 2010;89(2-3):125-130
  13. 13. Webb E, Casey N, Simela L. Goat meat quality. Small Ruminant Research. 2005;60(1-2):153-166
  14. 14. Banglapedia. National Encyclopedia of Bangladesh. Chapter: Bangladesh. 2021. Available from: https://en.banglapedia.org/index.php/Bangladesh
  15. 15. Akhtar A, Hoque MA, Bhuiyan AKFH, Amin MR, Habib MA. A study on morphological characterization of black bengal goat at three villages under Bhaluka upazila in Mymensingh district of Bangladesh. International Journal of Livestock Research. 2021;12:86-97
  16. 16. Mahal Z, Khandoker M, Haque M. Effect of non genetic factors on productive traits of Black Bengal goats. Journal of the Bangladesh Agricultural University. 2013;11(1):79-86
  17. 17. Herman HA, Madden FW. The Artificial Insemination of Dairy and Beef Cattle: A Handbook and Laboratory Manual. Columbia, Missouri, USA: Locas brothers; 1963
  18. 18. Apu AS, Khandoker MAMY, Hussain SS, Fakruzzaman M, Notter DR. A comparative study of fresh and frozen-thawed semen quality in relation to fertility of Black Bengal goats semen from six adult male Black Bengal goats. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science. 2012;2:157-161
  19. 19. Moushi ZT. Effect of Three Extenders on Membrane Integrity of Post-thawed Spermatozoa of Black Bengal Goat Semen. Mymensingh: Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics. Bangladesh Agricultural University; 2022
  20. 20. Rao VH, Bhattacharyya NK. Ovulation in Black Bengal nanny goats. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. 1980;58(1):67-69
  21. 21. Khatun AHS, Ali MY, Khandoker MAMY. Estrus synchronization in Black Bengal goat using synthetic progesterone. Journal of Agriculture, Food and Environment (JAFE). 2022;3(1):33-38
  22. 22. Khandoker M, Sultana A, Akter Q , Tareq K, Mia M, Husain S, et al. Synchronization of estrus in Black Bengal does. Bangladesh Journal of Animal Science. 2009;38(1-2):7-14
  23. 23. Banerjee G. A Textbook of Animal Husbandry. 8th ed. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd; 2004. pp. 933-961
  24. 24. Khandoker MA, Imai K, Takahashi T, Hashizume K. Role of gelatinase on follicular atresia in the bovine ovary. Biology of Reproduction. 2001;65:726-732
  25. 25. Mondal A, Khandoker M, Mondal M, Rahman A, Apu A, Pervage S. In vitro production of goat embryos in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Animal Science. 2008;37(1):1-9
  26. 26. Steel RGD, Torrie JH. Principles and Procedures of Statistics, A Biometrical Approach. 2nd ed. New York, USA: McGraw Hill Company. INC; 1980. pp. 20-90
  27. 27. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. Statistical Methods. 7th ed. AMES. USA: The Iowa State University Press; 1980
  28. 28. Siddiky MNA. Dairying in South Asian region: Opportunities, challenges and way forward. SAARC Journal of Agriculture. 2017;15:173-187
  29. 29. Institute BLR. Farm Animal Genetic Resource in Bangladesh. Savar, Dhaka, Bangladesh: Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute; 2015
  30. 30. Ahmed EM, Amin R, Basrin R, Bhuiyan MSA. Phenotypic characterization and production potentials of exotic goat breeds and their crosses in Rajshahi metropolitan area of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Animal Science. 2020;49(2):100-107
  31. 31. Husain SS, Amin MR, Islam ABMM. Goat production and its breeding strategy in Bangladesh. In: First national Workshop on Animal Breeding. Mymensingh: Bangladesh Agricultural University; 1998. pp. 17-36
  32. 32. FAO. Phenotypic Characterization of Animal Genetic Resources. FAO Animal Production and Health Guidelines No. 11. Rome, Italy: FAO; 2012
  33. 33. Rahman AS, Khandoker M, Husain S, Apu A, Mondal A, Notter D. Morphometric characterization and relationship of body weight with linear body measurements in Black Bengal buck. Bangladesh Journal of Animal Science. 2008;37(2):8-16
  34. 34. Paul S, Khandoker MAMY, Moinuddin MA, Paul RC. Characterization of Black Bengal goat. Journal of Bangladesh Agricultural University. 2011;9:61-66
  35. 35. Hasanat MT, Husain SS, Amin MR, Miah G. Characterization of Black Bengal goats for some qualitative and quantitative traits. Bangladesh Journal of Animal Science. 2003;32:109-120
  36. 36. Alam M. Studies on feeding systems for the development of production strategies for goats in Bangladesh. In: Feeding Strategies for Improving Ruminant Productivity in Areas of Fluctuating Nutrient Supply International Atomic Energy Agency. Vol. 691. Vienna: IAEA–TECDOC; 1993. pp. 135-143
  37. 37. Ferdous M, Khan M, Rashid M, Kamruzzaman M. Effect of different levels of concentrate supplementation on the performance of Black Bengal goat. Bangladesh Journal of Animal Science. 2011;40(1-2):40-45
  38. 38. Shoshe NZ, Islam MT, Al Mahmud MA. Socio economic condition of Black Bengal goat farmers and their goat management in rural areas of North Bengal region, Bangladesh. Research in Agriculture Livestock and Fisheries. 2019;6(1):111-118
  39. 39. Islam F, Hossain M, Sarker S, Choudhury M, Majumder A. Black Bengal goat keeping at Mymensingh sadar upazila in Bangladesh. Journal of Bioscience and Agriculture Research. 2016;6(02):541-546
  40. 40. Munsi MN, Ershaduzzaman M, Akther S, Rahman MM, Rahman MH, Rahman MM. Incidence of clinical diseases and disorders in goats at Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute. Asian Journal of Medical and Biological Research. 2018;4(4):351-361
  41. 41. Ali MZ, Islam E, Giasuddin M. Outbreak investigation, molecular detection, and characterization of foot and mouth disease virus in the Southern part of Bangladesh. Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research. 2019;6(3):346
  42. 42. Tsegaye D, Belay B, Haile A. Prevalence of major goat diseases and mortality of goat in Daro-Labu district of West Hararghe, Eastern Ethiopia. Journal of Scientific and Innovative Research. 2013;2(3):665-672
  43. 43. Kashem M, Hossain M, Ahmed SU, Halim M. Prevalence of diseases, morbidity and mortality of Black Bengal Goats under different management systems in Bangladesh. University Journal of Zoology, Rajshahi University. 2011;30:01-04
  44. 44. Sarker S, Islam H. Prevalence and risk factor assessment of Peste des petits ruminants in Goats in Rajshahi, Bangladesh. The Veterinarian. 2011;40(2):546-549
  45. 45. Nath TC, Bhuiyan MJU, Mamun M, Datta R, Chowdhury S, Hossain M, et al. Common infectious diseases of goats in Chittagong district of Bangladesh. International Journal of Scientific Research in Agricultural Sciences. 2014;1(3):43-49
  46. 46. Rahman M, Akther S, Ali M, Hassan M. Incidence of diseases in goats in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Veterinarian. 2020;37(1-2):14-20
  47. 47. Alam M, Hossain M, Mohammed Y. Effects of plasma with minerals and vitamin on various haematobiochemical parameters of calves. Bangladesh Veterinary Journal. 2005;38:15-24
  48. 48. Miah MAH, Hasan M, Sarker YA, Alam MM, Juyena NS. Clinical evaluation of ethanolic extract of curcumin (Curcuma longa) on wound healing in Black Bengal goats. Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research. 2017;4(2):181-186
  49. 49. Hasan MJ, Ahmed JU, Alam MM. Reproductive performances of Black Bengal goat under semi-intensive and extensive conditions at rural areas in Bangladesh. Journal of Advanced Veterianry and Animal Research. 2014;11:196-200
  50. 50. Islam AFMF, Nahar S, Tanni TSJ, Hoque MA, Bhuiyan AKFH. Breeding and production performance profile of Black Bengal goats in rural areas of Mymensingh in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Animal Science. 2016;45:46-51
  51. 51. Ershaduzzaman M, Rahman M, Roy B, Chowdhury S. Studies on the diseases and mortality pattern of goats under farm conditions and some factors affecting mortality and survival rates in Black Bengal kids. Bangladesh Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 2007;5(1&2):71-76
  52. 52. McGregor BA. Growth, development and carcass composition of goats: A review. In: Goat Production and Research in the Tropics: Proceedings of a Workshop Held at the University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, 6-8 February 1984. Canberra, A. C. T.: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research; 1984. pp. 82-90
  53. 53. Husain S, Horst P, Islam A. Growth performance of Black Bengal goats in different regions of Bangladesh. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 1997;10(5):491-494
  54. 54. Jalil A, Kabir M, Chudhury P, Habib A. Productive and reproductive performance of Black Bengal goat under farming condition in Bangladesh. Asian Journal of Medical and Biological Research. 2016;1(2):235-245
  55. 55. Alam MM, Alam MJ, Kabir ME, Jalil MA, Dey MC, Begum M. Growth performance of Black Bengal goats at rural areas of Gaibandha district in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences. 2021;9(1):10-16
  56. 56. Hossain SMJ, Sultana N, Alam MR, Hasnath MR. Reproductive and productive performance of Black Bengal goat under semi-intensive management. Journal of Biological Sciences. 2004;4:537-541
  57. 57. Chanda T, Paul SR, Fakruzzaman M, Sultana M, Debnath GK. Productive and reproductive performance of goat breeds under semi-intensive system in Bangladesh. Indian Journal of Small Ruminants. 2020;26(2):253-255
  58. 58. Sekoni VO, Gustafsson BK. Seasonal variation in the incidence of sperm morphological abnormalities in dairy bull regularly used for artificial insemination. British Veterinary Journal. 1987;143:312-317
  59. 59. Apu AS, Husain SS, Khandoker MAMY, Rahman AHMS, Notter DR. Investigation on seminal attributes and fertility of Black Bengal goat. Bangladesh Journal of Animal Science. 2008;37:17-24
  60. 60. Furstoss V, David I, Leboeuf B, Guillouet P, Boué P, Bodin L. Genetic and non-genetic parameters of several characteristics of production and semen quality in young bucks. Animal Reproduction Science. 2009;110:25-36
  61. 61. Kumar R, Kumar PR, Kumar R, Negi M, Singh SP, Singh R, et al. Testicular biometry and seasonal variations in semen parameters of Black Bengal goats. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences. 2014;84:635-639
  62. 62. Agossou DJ, Koluman N. An objective analysis of factors affecting buck semen quality attributes during cryopreservation. A mini review. Annual Research & Review in Biology. 2018;27:1-7
  63. 63. Gofur MR. Effect of testosterone on penile and urethral development in Black Bengal goat. Bangladesh Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 2019;17:133-139
  64. 64. Memon MA, Bretzlaff KN, Ott RS. Comparison of semen collection techniques in goats. Theriogenology. 1986;26:823-827
  65. 65. Sultana F, Husain SS, Khatun A, Apu AS, Khandoker MAMY. Study on buck evaluation based on semen quality and fertility. Bangladesh Journal of Animal Science. 2013;42:101-108
  66. 66. Afrin S, Debnath S, Rahman ANMI, Paul RC, Khandoker MAMY. Selection of Black Bengal buck based on fertility and field progeny performance. Bangladesh Journal of Animal Science. 2014;43:11-20
  67. 67. Ahmed I. Evaluation of plasma membrane integrity of sperm and fertility of post-thawed frozen semen of Black Bengal Goat. [MS thesis]. Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh. 2022
  68. 68. Siddiqua A, Islam MN, Rahman MM, Khandoker MAMY, Bari ASM. Evaluation of semen quality of Black Bengal goat in Bangladesh. International Journal of Natural and Social Sciences. 2016;3:5-9
  69. 69. Dhar AC, Talukder AK, Rahman MB, Al-Mamun A, Shamsuddin M. Semen quality of the Black Bengal bucks used at commercial artificial insemination. Journal of Embryo Transfer. 2010;25:237-245
  70. 70. Christensen P, Brockhoff PB, Lehn-Jensen H. The relationship between semen quality and the nonreturn rate of bulls. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 1999;34:503-507
  71. 71. Rahman ANMA, Abdullah R, Wan-Khadijah WE. Oestrus synchronisation annd superovulation in goats: A review. Journal of Biological Sciences. 2008;8:1129-1137
  72. 72. Omontese BO, Rekwot PI, Ate IU, Ayo JO, Kawu MU, Rwuaan JS, et al. An update on oestrus synchronisation of goats in Nigeria. Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction. 2016;5:96-101
  73. 73. Faruk MI, Fatema BZ, Bari FY, Alam MGS. Effects of alfaprostol and luprostiol on the embryo production within MOET technique in Black Bengal goats. Bangladesh Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 2004;2:147-150
  74. 74. Pegg DE. Methods in molecular biology: Cryopreservation and freeze-drying protocols. In: Principles of Cryopreservation. 2nd ed. Totowa, NJ, USA: Humana Press Inc.; 2007. pp. 39-57
  75. 75. Sikarwar A, Ramachandran N, Ranjan R, Gangwar C, Agrawal JK. Effect of different levels of glycerol and DMSO on freezability of buck semen. Livestock Research International. 2015;3(3):71-73
  76. 76. Lv C, Wu G, Hong Q , Quan G. Spermatozoa cryopreservation: State of art and future in small ruminants. Biopreservation and Biobanking. 2019;17(2):171-182
  77. 77. Swarna M, Saha NG, Biswas S, Paul AK. Collection and evaluation of indigenous buck semen at the coastal region of Bangladesh. Insights in Veterinary Sciences. 2022;6:1-4
  78. 78. Jiménez-Rabadán P, Ramón M, García-Álvarez O, Maroto-Morales A, Álvaro-García PJ, Del Olmo E, et al. Improved cryopreservation protocol for Blanca-Celtibérica buck semen collected by electroejaculation. Cryobiology. 2013;67(3):251-257
  79. 79. Konyali C, Tomás C, Blanch E, Gómez EA, Graham JK, Mocé E. Optimizing conditions for treating goat semen with cholesterol-loaded cyclodextrins prior to freezing to improve cryosurvival. Cryobiology. 2013;67(2):124-131
  80. 80. Sharma A. Investigations on follicular dynamics and semen cryopreservation in goats: [PhD thesis] CSKHPKV Palampur, Himachal Pradesh, India; 2018
  81. 81. Sharma A, Sood P, Chaudhary J. Correlation of climatic conditions with seminal quality parameters in Gaddi and Chegu buck semen. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances. 2020;15:32-37
  82. 82. Rimi A. Screening of diluters for frozen semen production of black bengal goat. [MS thesis], Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh. 2022
  83. 83. Ranjan R, Kumar M, Gangwar C, Kharche S. Developments in goat semen cryopreservation. Animal Reproduction Update. 2021;1(1):41-45
  84. 84. Faigl V, Vass N, Jávor A, Kulcsár M, Solti L, Amiridis G, et al. Artificial insemination of small ruminants—A review. Acta Veterinaria Hungarica. 2012;60(1):115-129
  85. 85. Evans G, Maxwell WMC. Salamons' artificial insemination of sheep and goats. 2nd ed. Sydney, Australia: Butterworths; 1987
  86. 86. Chemineau P, Guérin Y, Orgeur P, Vallet J. Training Manual on Artificial Insemination in Sheep and Goats. Rome, Italy: FAO; 1991
  87. 87. Leboeuf B, Restall B, Salamon S. Production and storage of goat semen for artificial insemination. Animal Reproduction Science. 2000;62(1-3):113-141
  88. 88. Karim MF, Khandoker MAMY, Husain SS. Fact findings about the frozen buck semen characters freezing with EYC and Tris extender and productivity of Black Bengal does as the potential genetic resource in Bangladesh. Research in Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries. 2018;5(3):341-350
  89. 89. Faruk M, Bari F, Shamsuddin M, Alam M, Islam M. Responses of the Black Bengal goat (Capra hircus) to PMSG and surgical embryo recovery within MOET technique. Bangladesh Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 2006;4(2):107-115
  90. 90. Shamsuddin M, Amiri Y, Bhuiyan MMU. Characteristics of buck semen with regard to ejaculate numbers, collection intervals, dilution and preservation periods. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 2000;35:53-57
  91. 91. Apu AS. Frozen and liquid semen production and assessment of conception rate in Black Bengal goat [MS thesis]. Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Bangadesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh. 2007. pp. 40-52
  92. 92. Khandoker MAMY, Apu AS, Husain SS, Notter DR. A baseline survey on the availability of Black Bengal breeding bucks in different districts of Bangladesh. Journal of Bangladesh Agricultural University. 2011;9:91-96
  93. 93. Chang Z, Fan X, Luo M, Wu Z, Tan J. Factors affecting superovulation and embryo transfer in Boer goats. Asian-australasian journal of animal sciences. 2006;19(3):341-346
  94. 94. Ishwar A, Memon M. Embryo transfer in sheep and goats: A review. Small Ruminant Research. 1996;19(1):35-43
  95. 95. Khan SU, Jamal MA, Su Y, Wei H-J, Qing Y, Cheng W. Towards improving the outcomes of multiple ovulation and embryo transfer in sheep, with particular focus on donor superovulation. Veterinary Sciences. 2022;9(3):117
  96. 96. Maciel GS, Rodriguez MGK, da Silva PDA, Nociti RP, Uscategui RAR, Santos VJC, et al. Ovarian superstimulation treatment for multiple ovulation and embryo transfer programs in sheep. Investigação. 2017;16(8):30-36
  97. 97. Ramos AF, Silva BDM. Hormonal protocols in small ruminants. In: Chapter 05. Reproductive Biotechnology in Farm Animals. Avid Science; 2018. pp. 2-18
  98. 98. Batt P, Killeen I, Cameron A. Use of single or multiple injections of FSH in embryo collection programmes in goats. Reproduction, Fertility and Development. 1993;5(1):49-56
  99. 99. Brasil O, Moreira N, Júnior GS, Silva B, Mariante A, Ramos A. Superovulatory and embryo yielding in sheep using increased exposure time to progesterone associated with a GnRH agonist. Small Ruminant Research. 2016;136:54-58
  100. 100. Baldassarre H, Karatzas C. Advanced assisted reproduction technologies (ART) in goats. Animal Reproduction Science. 2004;82:255-266
  101. 101. Paramio M-T, Izquierdo D. Recent advances in in vitro embryo production in small ruminants. Theriogenology. 2016;86(1):152-159
  102. 102. Islam M, Khandoker M, Afroz S, Rahman M, Khan R. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of goat ovaries, follicles and oocytes in view of in vitro production of embryos. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B. 2007;8(7):465-469
  103. 103. Ferdous J. Collection, grading and evaluation of goat cumulus-oocyte-complexes (COCs) in view of in vitro maturation, fertilization and culture. [MS thesis], Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh. 2006
  104. 104. Hoque SAM, Kabiraj SK, Khandoker MAMY, Mondal A, Tareq KMA. Effect of collection techniques on cumulus oocyte complexes (COCs) recovery, in vitro maturation and fertilization of goat oocytes. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2011;10:9177-9181
  105. 105. Akter T, Hossain MM, Khandoker MY. Comparison of oocyte collection methods using caprine ovaries and in vitro embryo culture. Applied Animal Science. 2022;38(5):466-473
  106. 106. Fukui Y, Ono H. Effects of sera, hormones and granulosa cells added to culture medium for in-vitro maturation, fertilization, cleavage and development of bovine oocytes. Reproduction. 1989;86(2):501-506
  107. 107. Asad L, Khandoker MAMY, Hoque SAM, Saha S. Effect of follicular fluid on in vitro maturation, fertilization and development of goat embryos using fresh semen. International Journal of Agriculture Innovations and Research. 2018;6(6):349-354
  108. 108. Haque A, Bhuiyan MMU, Khatun M, Shamsuddin M. Parthenogenetic activation of Black Bengal goat oocytes. Journal of Embryo Transfer. 2011;26(2):123-128
  109. 109. Visconti PE, Bailey JL, Moore GD, Pan D, Olds-Clarke P, Kopf GS. Capacitation of mouse spermatozoa. I. Correlation between the capacitation state and protein tyrosine phosphorylation. Development. 1995;121(4):1129-1137
  110. 110. Bhattacharyya A. Albumin is required for the guinea pig sperm capacitation but is not essential for acrosome reaction and fusion with eggs. Archives of Andrology. 1992;28(3):235-239
  111. 111. Kane M, Headon D. The role of commercial bovine serum albumin preparations in the culture of one-cell rabbit embryos to blastocysts. Reproduction. 1980;60(2):469-475
  112. 112. Kane M. A low molecular weight extract of bovine serum albumin stimulates rabbit blastocyst cell division and expansion in vitro. Reproduction. 1985;73(1):147-150
  113. 113. Shuvashis K, Apu AS, Hoque SM, Khandoker MY. Effect of supplementation of BSA on in vitro maturation and fertilization of Black Bengal goat oocytes. Fundamental and Applied Agriculture. 2020;5(2):216-223
  114. 114. Saha S, Khandoker M, Asad L, Reza A, Hoque A. Effect of fresh and frozen semen on in vitro fertilization and subsequent development of goat embryos. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science. 2014;4(2):325-330
  115. 115. Devendra C. Studies in the nutrition of the indigenous goat at Malaya and requirement of liveweight gain. Malaysian Agricultural Journal. 1992;46:98-118
  116. 116. Husain S. Sustainable genetic improvement of economic traits of Black Bengal goats through selective and cross breeding. Bangladesh Agricultural University Research Progress. 1999;10:72-80
  117. 117. FAO. Asian livestock monthly technical magazine of the FAO animal production and health commission for Asia and the Pacific (APHCA). 1991:85-87
  118. 118. Kader MF. Microfinance provider organization: Institutional capital for poverty alleviation. The Daily Prothom Alo. 5 February 2006
  119. 119. Rahman MM, Hossain MM, Miah MM. Poverty reduction and livelihood improvement of women through goat rearing. Asian Journal for Poverty Studies (AJPS). 2017;3(1):59-66
  120. 120. DFID U. Halving World Poverty by 2015: Economic Growth, Equity and Security. London: Department for International Development; Sept. 2000
  121. 121. Hossain MM, Alam MK, Haque M. Livelihood improvement of poor farmers hrough goat rearing in Mymensingh district of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Animal Science. 2017;46(1):29-34
  122. 122. Apu AS. Entrepreneurship Development among Women through Community Based Goat Rearing in Char Areas of Bangladesh. Project report submitted to the Social Science Research Council, Ministry of Planning, Bangladesh. 2022. pp. 18-25
  123. 123. Dubeuf JP, Miller BA, Bhandari D, Capote J, Luginbuhl JM. Scaling-Up Successful Practices on Sustainable pro-poor Small Ruminant Development. Little Rock, Arkansas, USA: International Goat Association; 2014. p. 436
  124. 124. Paul AK, Sultana MJ, Nasrin F. Management practices, reproductive performance and constraints of goat rearing in Bangladesh. Indian Journal of Small Ruminants. 2020;26(1):138-141
  125. 125. Khandoker MAMY, Apu AS, Husain SS, Notter DR. Conservation of Black Bengal goat as the potential genetic resource in Bangladesh. Annual Research Report (2006-2007) USDA-Bangladesh Collaborative Research Project. 2007
  126. 126. Husain SS. Preservation of buck semen and their use in Artificial insemination for rapid genetic improvement of rural goat population. Annual Report, Bangladesh Agricultural University Research System. 2007

Written By

Auvijit Saha Apu, Md. Younus Ali, Mohammad Mahbubul, Tasmina Akter and M.A.M. Yahia Khandoker

Submitted: 17 January 2023 Reviewed: 17 January 2023 Published: 27 April 2023