IntechOpen

Home > Books > Nanowires - Recent Progress

Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Recent Progress in Gallium Nitride for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting

Written By

Fangliang Gao, Qing Liu, Jiang Shi and Shuti Li

Submitted: 10 February 2020 Reviewed: 17 May 2020 Published: 24 June 2020

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.92848

Nanowires IntechOpen
Nanowires Recent Progress Edited by Xihong Peng

From the Edited Volume

Nanowires - Recent Progress

Edited by Xihong Peng

Book Details Order Print

Chapter metrics overview

1,085 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics
Advertisement

Abstract

With the constant consumption of traditional energy sources, it is urgent to explore and develop new energy sources. Photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting is a method of preparing energy that can continuously generate hydrogen fuel without pollution to the environment. As an important part of the PEC water splitting system, the choice of semiconductor photoelectrode is crucial. Among these materials, gallium nitride (GaN) has attracted considerable attention due to its tunable band gap, favorable band edge positions, wide band gap, and good stability. In the past years, many reports have been obtained in GaN for PEC water splitting. This review summarizes the GaN as photoelectrodes for PEC water splitting, and methods to improve the efficiency of GaN for PEC water splitting also will be summarized from change morphology, doping, surface modification, and composition of solid solution or multiple-metal incorporation. Eventually, the future research directions and challenges of GaN for PEC water splitting are also discussed.

Keywords

  • photoelectrochemical water splitting
  • GaN
  • semiconductor

1. Introduction

Rising energy demand due to population growth has led to the rapid consumption of fossil fuels and serious environmental problems [1]. Currently, most of the world’s energy comes from fossil fuels, which will eventually lead to its predictable depletion. The decline of fossil energy reserves and the urgency to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to alleviate climate warming is forcing us to seek a cleaner, more renewable, and sustainable alternative energy source [2, 3]. Hydrogen is considered as a future ideal energy carrier to replace fossil fuels due to its high gravimetric energy density and zero carbon emissions [4, 5, 6]. But the achievement of this clean energy scheme largely depends on economically efficient hydrogen production technologies. At present, the industrial production of hydrogen is mainly realized by the reforming of hydrocarbon steam in fossil energy or coal through reaction to fossil fuels under the control of steam, which is not only expensive but also causes large emissions [7, 8]. Therefore, the use of renewable energy to produce hydrogen is considered, despite challenges stand in the way [7, 9].

In recent years, solar energy has attracted much attention as the largest renewable energy source on the planet. If solar energy can be effectively used, it will provide a continuous supply of energy for future energy [10, 11]. However, the vision of solar power to provide a significant portion of the global infrastructure is far from being realized. The main challenge comes from not having a cost-effective way to store solar energy. Solar water splitting is a prospective, environmentally friendly, and sustainable method to achieve this beautiful vision [10, 12, 13]. There are three types of solar water decomposition systems, photovoltaic electrolysis (PV-E), photochemical (PC) systems, and photoelectrochemical (PEC) cells, as shown in Figure 1. PV-E is achieved by connecting the photovoltaic cell and water electrolyzer. The advantage of this strategy is its solar-hydrogen conversion efficiency of more than 10%, but it is still too expensive compared to traditional hydrogen production methods [14, 15, 16, 17, 18]. The maturity of PV-E technology also determines that it is difficult to improve efficiency, so it is particularly important to find economical and suitable solar-hydrogen conversion methods. PC is a simple and cost-effective solar-hydrogen conversion method, but its conversion efficiency is less than 1%. In addition, the potentially explosive hydrogen-oxygen mixture produced requires expensive equipment for separation to avoid reaction, which greatly increases production costs [19]. In this case, PEC provides considerable conversion efficiency at an affordable cost [20, 21]. PEC integrates the light absorption and electrochemical processes of PV-E into a single unit. Two gases generated separately at the anode and cathode avoid further separation, which is helpful for reducing costs. If the conversion efficiency can reach 10% and the life span reaches 5 years, PEC is expected to be a replacement for traditional hydrogen production methods [22, 23, 24].

Figure 1.

Schematic of three types of solar water splitting system: PV-E, PC system, and PEC cell.

Basically, solar energy is converted into chemical energy stored in the form of hydrogen molecules by PEC devices [25, 26]. And a PEC device usually includes a metal electrode and a semiconductor photoelectrode. Ideally, semiconductors need to have a proper band gap and band structure to provide sufficient reaction potential and cover the solar spectrum as much as possible. In addition, excellent carrier transport performance and good physicochemical stability are also essential. Although a large number of semiconductor materials such as ZnO [27, 28], TiO2 [29, 30], WO3 [31, 32], and BiVO4 [33, 34] have been studied for photohydrolysis experiments, no dependent material meets all the critical conditions described above. Usually, overall water splitting consists of two half-reactions: oxidation of water and reduction of protons.

2H2O+4h+→4H++O2Eox=+1.23VE1
4H++4e−→2H2Ered=0VE2

It can be seen from the equation that the minimum voltage for water splitting is 1.23 V, which requires that the energy absorbed by exciting an electron is not less than 1.23 eV. In order to meet this requirement, the photon energy absorbed by the photoelectrode must also be at least 1.23 eV. But in fact, the energy required due to the energy loss caused by the failure to reach the ideal structure is far more than 1.23 eV [35, 36].

In general, PEC water splitting includes the following processes:

  1. Under light irradiation, carriers are generated in the semiconductor with a suitable band gap.

  2. Photogenerated carriers separate and migrate to the surface of the semiconductor.

  3. Redox reactions are induced by photogenerated carriers on semiconductor surfaces (Figure 2) [37, 38].

Figure 2.

Schematic illustration of typical PEC water splitting.

The number of photogenerated carriers is determined by the absorption efficiency of the semiconductor, which also reflects the utilization of sunlight. The separation and migration processes of carriers are related to how many can reach the semiconductor surface. Unfortunately, some carriers are lost resulting from recombining on their way to the surface. And the carriers that reach the surface of the semiconductor want to trigger an efficient water splitting reaction, which must meet the following requirements. First, the conduction band edge potential of the semiconductor material should be lower than H2 evolution potential, while the valence band edge potential should be higher than O2 evolution potential [39]. This means that the band gap of the semiconductor should be greater than 1.23 eV. Semiconductor materials need to have stronger absorption in the solar spectrum to generate more photogenerated carriers. Although wide band gap semiconductor materials are likely to meet matching at the band edge positions, the absorption of sunlight is very limited [7, 9, 40]. Second, carriers need to be separated and transmitted quickly to reduce recombination, thereby improving the utilization efficiency of photogenerated carriers for PEC water splitting. Finally, materials used for PEC water splitting should be cost-effective and have good stability in the catalytic process [41].

Among semiconductor materials commonly used in PEC water splitting, gallium nitride (GaN) has been regarded as a promising candidate [42, 43]. GaN is likely to achieve self-driven overall water splitting because its band gap has good energy alignment with the water redox potential [43, 44]. In addition, GaN is inherently chemically inert even in a harsh environment, which guarantees the stability of the device [45, 46]. Furthermore, the band gap of GaN and its alloys can be tuned by alloying with Indium (In) to span nearly the entire solar spectrum [47, 48]. However, to achieve practical hydrogen production, GaN is still facing many challenges as an excellent photoelectrode material, including how to get a larger reaction area, how to enhance the absorption of light, and how to separate and transport photogenerated carriers more quickly and effectively [49, 50]. Correspondingly, many strategies have been proposed to address the mentioned drawbacks of GaN photoelectrode. Compared with thin-film and bulk counterpart, nanostructures have a smaller size and a larger surface area, which is helpful for shortening the transmission distance and promotes the separation of carriers. Thus the efficiency of carrier collection and utilization will be higher [51, 52, 53]. Doping is also one of the commonly used approaches to effectively improve the electrical and optical properties of GaN, which can directly tune the energy band structure and carrier transmission [54, 55]. Moreover, PEC water splitting kinetics can be promoted through the surface decoration of co-catalysts, which can enhance the transmission of carriers for water redox reaction [56, 57].

In this review, we summarize the recent progress of using GaN as photoelectrode for PEC water splitting and enumerate some commonly used strategies to improve the performance of photoelectrode. In the end, we also have a brief outlook of GaN for PEC water splitting.

Advertisement

2. Basic principles of solar water splitting

2.1 PEC cell configurations

In the introduction section, we briefly introduced the three types of solar water splitting. In this section, we will focus on the different structures of the PEC cell, which can be achieved by an n-type semiconductor as photoanode (or p-type semiconductor as photocathode) or connecting two different semiconductors.

For a semiconductor PEC cell with a half-reaction to occur on working electrode, a counter electrode is required to complete the other half-reaction circuit. Generally, a reference electrode is connected to the working electrode to characterize an externally applied voltage. If necessary, there are two compartments or ion exchange membranes between the working and counter electrodes to avoid product crossover. To overcome the thermodynamic obstacles of water splitting and the potential losses caused by the recombination process, the band gap of the working electrode is at least 1.6 eV [58, 59, 60]. However, the visible light absorption efficiency will be attenuated if the band gap is too wide. To solve this problem, that is, potential loss mechanisms that include reverse contact and overpotential caused by poor catalytic activity, the semiconductor material should be deposited on a highly conductive substrate to form a good ohmic contact, which allows most carriers to be quickly injected from the working electrode into the counter electrode [61, 62].

Obtaining enough photovoltage from a single photoelectrode to achieve solar water splitting is a challenge. It will be more favorable that combinates with dual semiconductors, because the second photoelectrode can replace the opposite electrode where the other half-reaction occurs and compensate for the lack of photovoltage [7]. To increase the light utilization, lighting should be irradiated from a larger band gap photoelectrode (transparent substrate) to a smaller band gap photoelectrode. In addition, these two semiconductors can form wireless back-to-back ohmic contacts, sharing a transparent conductive substrate [63]. By doing so, the potential loss in the electrolyte and the pH gradient between the two photoelectrodes can be reduced. Similarly, lighting should pass from a larger band gap material to a smaller band gap material. This series of battery structure is a relatively effective device [64].

2.2 Calculation of efficiencies

Comparing onset potentials and photocurrent density (normalized to the projected surface area of the photoelectrode) at 1.23 V versus RHE (photoanode) and 0 V versus RHE (photocathode) is a well-known method to evaluate the performance of water splitting. Since the product of water splitting is hydrogen, solar-to-hydrogen (STH) is the most critical parameter of merit to evaluate the performance and the efficiency of PEC water splitting on the device. It is defined as the following equation: [65].

ηSTH=ΦH2mols−1m−2×Gf,H20kJmol−1PlightWm−2AM1.5GE3

where ΦH2 is the hydrogen gas production rate, Gf,H20 is the Gibbs free energy of hydrogen gas (237 kJ mol−1 at 25°C), and Plight is the total solar irradiation input. The light source should match the solar spectrum of air mass 1.5 global (AM1.5 G). Since the redox reaction needs to consider the current loss, the Faraday efficiency needs to be considered. So, the STH formula is expressed as:

ηSTH=JSCmAcm−2×1.23V×ηFPlightmWm−2AM1.5GE4

In general, JSC can use current density instead of under zero bias and stable-state conditions. Applied bias photon to current conversion efficiency (ABPE) is also an important parameter for PEC water splitting systems, which is often used to evaluate the performance of a single photoelectrode independently. It can be written as: [65].

ABPE=JSCmAcm−2×1.23V−Vapp×ηFPlightmWm−2AM1.5GE5

where Vapp is the applied potential between photoelectrode and the counter electrode.

It is important to understand the efficiency of photons to convert electrons/holes at certain wavelengths of PEC water splitting. Therefore, the incident photon-to-current conversion efficiency (IPCE) or external quantum efficiency (EQE) is proposed and expressed as: [65].

IPCEλ=EQEλ=electronfluxmols−1photonfluxmols−1=│jphmAcm−2│×hcVmPλmWcm−2×λnmE6

where λ is the wavelength, Pλ is the incident light power, h is Planck’s constant, c is the speed of light, and jph is the photocurrent density. Besides, integrating the IPCE value with the standard AM1.5G solar spectrum can estimate the total photocurrent density under solar light illumination. Its formula is defined as: [65].

JAM1.5=∫IPCEλ×Φλ×edλE7

where e is the elementary electron and Φλ is photon flux of irradiation.

Advertisement

3. Approaches to increase GaN-based PEC water splitting efficiency

3.1 Surface decoration

Up to now, considerable efforts have been investigated on surface decoration to enhance PEC water splitting performance [66]. In this regard, various co-catalysts were studied by depositing on the surface of GaN to improve the efficiency of PEC water splitting. For instance, the quantum efficiency of the solid solution of GaN and ZnO for overall water splitting in the visible light region achieves the highest value of 2–3% after modified with a mixed oxide of Rh and Cr nanoparticles [67]. A Co-Pi catalyst photoelectron deposited on GaN thin-film photoelectrodes eliminated the anomalous two-plateau behavior and current spikes, which revealed that the Co-Pi catalyst is helpful for suppressing surface recombination and increases the photocurrent [47]. A similar but deeper achievement was carried out by Tricoli et al. for hybridizing highly transparent Co3O4 nano-island catalysts on GaN nanowire to enhance the water oxidation activity. The result shows that the per-metal turnover frequencies in 1 M NaOH aqueous solution are 0.34–0.65 s−1 at an overpotential of 400 mV, which is the best result of Co-based electrocatalysts until this report. This was attributed to Co3O4 that can play a role as hole scavenger, collecting photogenerated holes rapidly and suppressing carrier recombination [68]. Additionally, a size-controlled effect of poly-protected Rh nanoparticles on the photocatalytic activity of (Ga1 − xZnx)(N1 − xOx) was studied by Teranishi et al. for the first time. Their results show that the activity of smaller Rh cores is higher than the larger ones, which benefits from its increased surface area and improves charge separation efficiency [69]. This study was inconsistent with the previous report by Kamat et al. The greater the shift in the Fermi level observed in smaller gold nanoparticles, which is reflected in the higher photocatalytic reduction efficiency, the stronger the photocurrent [70].

Apart from nanoparticles, core-shell heterostructure is another important approach for surface decoration. GaN-InGaN core-shell rod arrays as photoanode for visible light-driven water splitting were studied by Waag et al. The core-shell structure extends the use of sunlight to the visible light region, thereby greatly improving the efficiency of water splitting. The photocurrent density of (0.3 mA/cm2 at 1.35 V) GaN-InGaN was 10-fold higher than that of GaN (0.03 mA/cm2 at 1.35 V), as shown in Figure 3 [71]. Mi et al. employed GaN-InGaN core-shell nanowire for PEC water splitting, and the high incident photon-to-current conversion efficiency of up to ∼27% is obtained [72]. It is expected to achieve higher PEC activity by surface treatment of GaN. And as far as the current development is concerned, it is foreseeable that surface modification is still a good strategy to achieve efficient water splitting.

Figure 3.

(a) Current density of 3D GaN-InGaN core-shell rod array (red) and 3D GaN rod array (blue) in 0.01 M H2SO4 solution under 100 mW/cm2 illumination using AM 1.5 filter [71]. (b) Plasmon energy map in the highlighted region showing the indium incorporation in the InGaN shell [71]. (a and b) Reproduced from Ref. [71] with permission from the American Chemical Society.

3.2 GaN material having different morphologies

As an important part of the PEC water splitting system, the morphology of semiconductor materials is very important. Different morphologies have a great influence on the efficiency of PEC water splitting. Many different morphologies of GaN for PEC water splitting have been proposed. Xi and co-workers used metal–organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) to fabricate GaN nanowires, and it has obtained high photocurrent density value at an applied bias voltage from −1 to 1 V [73]. Its morphology was shown in Figure 4a. It can be found from Figure 4b that compared to the planar structure and other diameters, 300 nm has a stronger current density due to a larger body-to-surface ratio, thereby increasing the efficiency of PEC water splitting. GaN microwires still have problems such as low crystal quality and light absorption. To further improve the efficiency of PEC water splitting, Park et al. used the plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy (PAMBE) technique to grow InGaN/GaN multiple quantum wells (MQWs) grown on hollow n-GaN nanowires (Figure 4c) [74]. The hollow and InGaN/GaN multiple quantum well structures of the nanowires allow the incident light to be refracted multiple times, increasing the absorption of light. Figure 4d shows the incident photon-to-current conversion efficiency value of the device, which can be found that the highest IPCE value of the device is as high as 33.3% and 415 μmol of hydrogen gas was generated within 1 hour.

Figure 4.

(a) SEM images of GaN nanowires, (b) linear sweep voltammetry of GaN nanowires with diameters of 60, 100, and 300 nm and planar GaN [73]. (c) Structure schematic of InGaN/GaN MQW on n-GaN hollow NWs, (d) comparison of IPCE values for InGaN/GaN MQWs grown on solid and hollow n-GaN nanowires [74]. (a and b) Reproduced from Ref. [73] with permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry. (c and d) Reproduced from Ref. [74] with permission from Springer Nature.

Nanopores, nanocones, and honeycombs are other nanostructures of GaN. Figure 5a shows the GaN nanopore structure [43], nanopore structure used electrochemical lateral etching and ICP etching to prepare laterally porous, vertically holes well-ordered GaN. This structure reduces the UV reflectivity. The ordered vertical holes not only help open the embedded channels to the electrolyte on both sides and reduce the migration distance of bubbles in the water splitting reaction but also help to modulate the light field. Incident light can be modulated and captured into the nanopore to enhance the absorption of light, so the saturation photocurrent was 4.5 times that of the planar structure, as shown in Figure 5d. Moreover, GaN with aligned nanopore structure had been fabricated by combining MOCVD using a lateral anodic etching, as shown in Figure 5b [75]. Laterally porous 3D hierarchical nanostructures not only provided a large contact area between the electrode and the electrolyte but also increased the absorption of light and provided a channel for the transmission of light and electrons. The device also achieved high values of photocurrent of 0.32 mA/cm2 by using etching voltages at 10 V (Figure 5e). Kim et al. had prepared GaN truncated nanocones [76], which was shown in Figure 5c. GaN truncated nanocones have concentrated incident light inside the nanostructure and enhanced the light trapping with reduced light losses from surface reflection. The relationship between current density and potential was shown in Figure 5f, which indicated that the photocurrent of GaN truncated nanocones was three times higher than the planar structure.

Figure 5.

(a) [43], (b) [75], and (c) [76] are the structure schematics of the composite porous GaN, laterally porous GaN, and photoelectrochemical cell, respectively. (d) Relation curves between photocurrent density and voltage of the above three GaN photoelectrodes [43]. (e) The photocurrent and applied current curves under different GaN etching voltages [75]. (f) Dark (segment) and illumination (straight) conditions for photocurrent density in linear scanning voltammetry [76]. (a and d), (b and e), and (c and f) reproduced from Ref. [43, 75, 76], respectively, with permission from the American Chemical Society.

The above structures are expected, and GaN can also have nanorods [77], nanocolumns [78], nano-pyramids [79], and so on. It can be known from the above results that changing the morphology of GaN influences the efficiency of PEC water splitting, which mainly affects the light absorption efficiency of GaN and reduces light reflection and loss. Therefore, it is very important to choose the appropriate semiconductor morphology for PEC water splitting system.

3.3 GaN material having different doping

Doping is a commonly used and effective method to improve the performance of materials. It mainly adjusts the energy band of the material, so that the photogenerated electrons and holes are better transported and high efficiency of PEC water splitting is obtained. Zhou and co-workers doped ZnO-GaN (GZNO) solid solution with La, as shown in Figure 6a [80]. La-dopant incorporation is optimized to adjust the bending of the band gap, which increases the thickness of the space charge region, thereby improving the separation of photogenerated carriers. Figure 6c shows the photocatalytic performance of GZNO and 3% La GZNO. It can be clearly seen that the photocatalyst doped with La produces more hydrogen and oxygen under the same conditions, which indicates that the performance of the photocatalyst is significantly improved after doping. Figure 6b shows the schematic of Ni-doped AlN and two-dimensional GaN monolayers [81]. By controlling the doping content of Ni, it can adjust the band bending of GaN. Figure 6d displays the binding strength of GaN and AlN composites with different transition metals doped. It can be found that Ni doping is the best for OER because they have small OER overpotentials.

Figure 6.

(a) TEM images of 3% La GZNO [80]. (b) Schematic diagram of Ni-doped structure [81]. (c) The amount of H2 and O2 produced by overall water splitting after 8 hours of GZNO and 3% La GZNO [80]. (d) Binding strength of OH or O of different transition metal-doped GaN and AlN composites [81]. (a and c) Reproduced from Ref. [73] with permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry. (b and d) Reproduced from Ref. [74] with permission from the American Chemical Society.

GaN doped with Mn [82], Mg [83], or CrO are also reported [84]. Doping is also a good method to improve the efficiency of PEC water splitting. It mainly adjusts the energy band of GaN through doping, thereby promoting the separation of photogenerated electrons and holes and effectively preventing the recombination of carriers. However, excessive doping will deteriorate the crystal quality of the material. So, it is important to choose the doping material and control dopant incorporation.

3.4 Composition of solid solution

The solid solution is a wurtzite structure composite material composed of GaN and ZnO mixed in a certain proportion. It adjusts the doping content of ZnO to change the band gap of the solid solution and realizes PEC of water splitting under the visible light. This concept was first proposed by Maeda and co-workers [85]. And then, Ohno et al. used Rh2 − yCryO3 nanoparticles to modify the solid solution, and the device shows outstanding stability; it has been working continuously for half a year under light irradiation, as shown in Figure 7a [86]. The co-catalyst is beneficial to suppress the oxidative decomposition of the solid solution, thereby making the device more stable. NiCoFeP and flux-assisted method can also be used to modify the solid solution to improve the efficiency of PEC water splitting [87, 88]. The conversion efficiency of solar energy using NiCoFeP-modified solid solution exceeds 1% at 1.23 V vs. RHE. To further improve the efficiency of PEC water splitting, solid solution nanosheets modified with Rh nanoparticles have been proposed, as shown in Figure 7d [89]. This shows 0.7 μmol h−1 g−1 of hydrogen production in an aqueous H2SO4 solution. The nitridation process was used to change the morphology from hexagonal 2D ZnGa2O4 nanosheets to 2D (GaN)1 − x(ZnO)x nanosheets, reducing the path of carrier transportation and decreasing the recombination of electrons and holes. So, the composition of a solid solution or multiple-metal incorporation can expand the light absorption range of the device, improving the absorption of light and increasing the efficiency of PEC water splitting.

Figure 7.

(a) Curve of total hydrogen production over time [86]. (b) The relationship between photocurrent and voltage for GaN-ZnO in different ways of treatment [87]. (c) Variation curve of the amount of hydrogen and oxygen produced with time of (GaN)1 − x(ZnO)x solid solutions from Zn2Ga-LDH modified with Rh2 − yCryO3 nanoparticles [88]. (d) Structure conversion flowchart from 2D ZnGa2O4 to 2D (GaN)1 − x(ZnO)x [89]. (a–d) Reproduced from Ref. 86, 87, 88, 89 with permission from the American Chemical Society.

3.5 The multiple-metal incorporation

The method of forming multiple-metal incorporation is similar to that of a solid solution. Different In content incorporation can change the band gap of GaN to widen the absorption spectrum range. Many different multiple-metal incorporations have been proposed [90, 91, 92, 93, 94]. AlOtaibi et al. grown InGaN/GaN core-shell nanowire arrays on Si substrate by catalyst-free MBE, as shown in Figure 8a [72]. It has a photoelectric conversion efficiency of up to 27% under ultraviolet and visible light irradiation. The photoelectrode continued to work for 10 hours, and the hydrogen production was consistent with the theoretical value (Figure 8d), which indicates that the photoelectrode has good stability and hydrogen production ability. And the quadruple-band InGaN nanowire arrays were integrated on a nonpolar substrate, which includes In0.35Ga0.65N, In0.27Ga0.73N, In0.20Ga0.80N, and GaN and exhibits a solar-to-hydrogen efficiency of ∼5.2% in a relatively stable state (Figure 8b) [95]. Multiband nanowire arrays enhance light absorption to improve the performance of PEC water splitting. Moreover, the multiband nanowire array photoelectrode has good stability and high photocatalyst efficiency for overall water splitting, as shown in Figure 8e. To improve the efficiency of the photolysis of water, InGaN heterostructures have been proposed. Kibria and co-workers have fabricated InGaN/GaN nanowire heterostructures, in which the internal quantum efficiency is about 13% [48]. The nanowire heterostructure is shown in Figure 8c. The combination of GaN and InGaN expands the light absorption range of GaN from ultraviolet light to visible light, which greatly improves the light absorption range and improves the efficiency of photolysis. The InGaN/GaN nanowire heterostructure photoelectrode also exhibits extremely high stability and high hydrogen production capabilities, as shown in Figure 8f. Moreover, nanowire arrays [96], tunnel junction nanowire [97], have also been reported.

Figure 8.

(a) Schematic of the InGaN/GaN core-shell structure [72]. (b) Schematic diagram of ideal light absorption structure of a multiband InGaN stack with different indium compositions [95]. (c) Schematic diagram of photocatalytic overall water splitting reaction mechanism [48]. (d) Hydrogen production in 1 mol/L HBr at 0.2 V vs. the counter electrode [72]. (e) Hydrogen and oxygen produced as a function of time under multiple experiment cycles [95]. (f) Hydrogen and oxygen evolution as a function of irradiation time under full arc (>300 nm) 300 W xenon lamp irradiation [48]. (a and d) and (c and e) Reproduced from Ref. [48, 72] with permission from the American Chemical Society. (b and f) Reproduced from Ref. [95] with permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry.

In summary, the multiple-metal incorporation can greatly improve the efficiency of PEC water splitting of GaN. The structures and In content will greatly affect the efficiency of PEC water splitting. So, it is important to choose a suitable structure and the In content while preparing the GaN-based photoelectrode.

Advertisement

4. Conclusion

This review mainly introduces the application of GaN in the PEC water splitting system and summarizes the methods to improve the efficiency of PEC water splitting. The methods to enhance efficiency are mainly carried out in the following four aspects, such as morphology, doping, surface modification, and composition of solid solution or multiple-metal incorporation. Up to now, GaN has made great progress in the application of PEC water splitting; the solar-to-hydrogen efficiency of 12.6% has already been obtained without any external bias [98], better than CoP catalyst electrodes (6.7%) reported recently [99], but it still not as excellent as TiO2 (18.5%) [100]. And its properties need to be further optimized to improve the absorption efficiency of visible light, increase the carrier migration speed, and facilitate carrier transport. The follow-up works are suggested from the following aspects:

  1. At present, most water splitting processes are carried out in alkaline or acidic solutions. It should be considered how to ensure the stability and catalytic activity of metal nitrides for a long time.

  2. Although the theory of water splitting is simple, the reaction process is still not clear, and in-depth study of the mechanism is helpful for the design of the catalyst.

  3. Reasonable design of the composition and structure of the catalyst to adjust its electronic structure, band gap, band edge potential, and microstructure help to improve the catalytic performance. We believe that with the deepening of research, the efficiency of GaN for water splitting can be further promoted.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1. Lee R. The outlook for population growth. Science. 2011;333(6042):569-573. DOI: 10.1126/science.1208859
  2. 2. Di Primio R, Horsfield B, Guzman-Vega MA. Determining the temperature of petroleum formation from the kinetic properties of petroleum asphaltenes. Nature. 2000;406(6792):173-176. DOI: 10.1038/35018046
  3. 3. Christopher K, Dimitrios R. A review on exergy comparison of hydrogen production methods from renewable energy sources. Energy & Environmental Science. 2012;5(5):6640-6651. DOI: 10.1039/c2ee01098d
  4. 4. Wang W, Xu X, Zhou W, et al. Recent progress in metal-organic frameworks for applications in electrocatalytic and photocatalytic water splitting. Advanced Science. 2017;4(4):1600371. DOI: 10.1002/advs.201600371
  5. 5. Tamirat AG, Rick J, Dubale AA, et al. Using hematite for photoelectrochemical water splitting: A review of current progress and challenges. Nanoscale Horizons. 2016;1(4):243-267. DOI: 10.1039/C5NH00098J
  6. 6. Linic S, Christopher P, Ingram DB. Plasmonic-metal nanostructures for efficient conversion of solar to chemical energy. Nature Materials. 2011;10(12):911-921. DOI: 10.1038/nmat3151
  7. 7. Tee SY, Win KY, Teo WS, et al. Recent progress in energy-driven water splitting. Advanced Science. 2017;4(5):1600337. DOI: 10.1002/advs.201600337
  8. 8. Chiarello GL, Aguirre MH, Selli E. Hydrogen production by photocatalytic steam reforming of methanol on noble metal-modified TiO2. Journal of Catalysis. 2010;273(2):182-190. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2010.05.012
  9. 9. Jafari T, Moharreri E, Amin AS, et al. Photocatalytic water splitting—The untamed dream: A review of recent advances. Molecules. 2016;21(7):900. DOI: 10.3390/molecules21070900
  10. 10. Tachibana Y, Vayssieres L, Durrant JR. Artificial photosynthesis for solar water-splitting. Nature Photonics. 2012;6(8):511. DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2012.175
  11. 11. Joy J, Mathew J, George SC. Nanomaterials for photoelectrochemical water splitting—Review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2018;43(10):4804-4817. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.01.099
  12. 12. Chen X, Shen S, Guo L, et al. Semiconductor-based photocatalytic hydrogen generation. Chemical Reviews. 2010;110(11):6503-6570. DOI: 10.1021/cr1001645
  13. 13. Mao SS, Shen S. Catalysing artificial photosynthesis. Nature Photonics. 2013;7(12):944-946. DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2013.326
  14. 14. Luo J, Im JH, Mayer MT, et al. Water photolysis at 12.3% efficiency via perovskite photovoltaics and earth-abundant catalysts. Science. 2014;345(6204):1593-1596. DOI: 10.1126/science.1258307
  15. 15. Jia J, Seitz LC, Benck JD, et al. Solar water splitting by photovoltaic-electrolysis with a solar-to-hydrogen efficiency over 30%. Nature Communications. 2016;7(1):1-6. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13237
  16. 16. Cox CR, Lee JZ, Nocera DG, et al. Ten-percent solar-to-fuel conversion with nonprecious materials. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2014;111(39):14057-14061. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1414290111
  17. 17. Peharz G, Dimroth F, Wittstadt U. Solar hydrogen production by water splitting with a conversion efficiency of 18%. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2007;32(15):3248-3252. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.04.036
  18. 18. Khaselev O, Bansal A, Turner JA. High-efficiency integrated multijunction photovoltaic/electrolysis systems for hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2001;26(2):127-132. DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3199(00)00039-2
  19. 19. Fabian DM, Hu S, Singh N, et al. Particle suspension reactors and materials for solar-driven water splitting. Energy & Environmental Science. 2015;8(10):2825-2850. DOI: 10.1039/c5ee01434d
  20. 20. Ager JW, Shaner MR, Walczak KA, et al. Experimental demonstrations of spontaneous, solar-driven photoelectrochemical water splitting. Energy & Environmental Science. 2015;8(10):2811-2824. DOI: 10.1039/c5ee00457h
  21. 21. McKone JR, Lewis NS, Gray HB. Will solar-driven water-splitting devices see the light of day? Chemistry of Materials. 2014;26(1):407-414. DOI: 10.1021/cm4021518
  22. 22. Sathre R, Scown CD, Morrow WR, et al. Life-cycle net energy assessment of large-scale hydrogen production via photoelectrochemical water splitting. Energy & Environmental Science. 2014;7(10):3264-3278. DOI: 10.1039/c4ee01019a
  23. 23. Kment S, Schmuki P, Hubicka Z, et al. Photoanodes with fully controllable texture: The enhanced water splitting efficiency of thin hematite films exhibiting solely (110) crystal orientation. ACS Nano. 2015;9(7):7113-7123. DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.5b01740
  24. 24. Ding C, Shi J, Wang Z, et al. Photoelectrocatalytic water splitting: Significance of cocatalysts, electrolyte, and interfaces. ACS Catalysis. 2017;7(1):675-688. DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.6b03107
  25. 25. Hensel J, Wang G, Li Y, et al. Synergistic effect of CdSe quantum dot sensitization and nitrogen doping of TiO2 nanostructures for photoelectrochemical solar hydrogen generation. Nano Letters. 2010;10(2):478-483. DOI: 10.1021/nl903217w
  26. 26. Li W, Li J, Wang X, et al. Photoelectrochemical and physical properties of WO3 films obtained by the polymeric precursor method. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2010;35(24):13137-13145. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.09.011
  27. 27. Sun Y, Xu B, Shen Q, et al. Rapid and efficient self-assembly of Au@ ZnO core-shell nanoparticle arrays with an enhanced and tunable plasmonic absorption for photoelectrochemical hydrogen generation. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2017;9(37):31897-31906. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b09325
  28. 28. Wu M, Chen WJ, Shen YH, et al. In situ growth of matchlike ZnO/Au plasmonic heterostructure for enhanced photoelectrochemical water splitting. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2014;6(17):15052-15060. DOI: 10.1021/am503044f
  29. 29. Cho IS, Logar M, Lee CH, et al. Rapid and controllable flame reduction of TiO2 nanowires for enhanced solar water-splitting. Nano Letters. 2014;14(1):24-31. DOI: 10.1021/nl4026902
  30. 30. Yang JS, Wu JJ. Toward eco-friendly and highly efficient solar water splitting using In2S3/anatase/rutile TiO2 dual-staggered-heterojunction nanodendrite array photoanode. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2018;10(4):3714-3722. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b19139
  31. 31. Feng X, Chen Y, Qin Z, et al. Facile fabrication of sandwich structured WO3 nanoplate arrays for efficient photoelectrochemical water splitting. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2016;8(28):18089-18096. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b04887
  32. 32. Zheng G, Wang J, Zu G, et al. Sandwich structured WO3 nanoplatelets for highly efficient photoelectrochemical water splitting. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 2019;7(45):26077-26088. DOI: 10.1039/c9ta09188b
  33. 33. Xue D, Kan M, Qian X, et al. A tandem water splitting cell based on nanoporous BiVO4 photoanode cocatalyzed by ultrasmall cobalt borate sandwiched with conformal TiO2 layers. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. 2018;6(12):16228-16234. DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b03078
  34. 34. Kim JH, Jo Y, Kim JH, et al. Wireless solar water splitting device with robust cobalt-catalyzed, dual-doped BiVO4 photoanode and perovskite solar cell in tandem: A dual absorber artificial leaf. ACS Nano. 2015;9(12):11820-11829. DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.5b03859
  35. 35. Bak T, Nowotny J, Rekas M, et al. Photo-electrochemical hydrogen generation from water using solar energy. Materials-related aspects. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2002;27(10):991-1022. DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3199(02)00022-8
  36. 36. Werner JH, Kolodinski S, Queisser HJ. Novel optimization principles and efficiency limits for semiconductor solar cells. Physical Review Letters. 1994;72(24):3851. DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.72.3851
  37. 37. Wang D, Pierre A, Kibria MG, et al. Wafer-level photocatalytic water splitting on GaN nanowire arrays grown by molecular beam epitaxy. Nano Letters. 2011;11(6):2353-2357. DOI: 10.1021/nl2006802
  38. 38. Kudo A, Miseki Y. Heterogeneous photocatalyst materials for water splitting. Chemical Society Reviews. 2009;38(1):253-278. DOI: 10.1039/b800489g
  39. 39. Abe R. Recent progress on photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical water splitting under visible light irradiation. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews. 2010;11(4):179-209. DOI: 10.1039/c3cs60378d
  40. 40. Turner JA. A realizable renewable energy future. Science. 1999;285(5428):687-689. DOI: 10.1126/science.285.5428.687
  41. 41. Li Y, Zhang JZ. Hydrogen generation from photoelectrochemical water splitting based on nanomaterials. Laser & Photonics Reviews. 2010;4(4):517-528. DOI: 10.1002/lpor.200910025
  42. 42. Zhang Z, Qian Q, Li B, et al. Interface engineering of monolayer MoS2/GaN hybrid heterostructure: Modified band alignment for photocatalytic water splitting application by nitridation treatment. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2018;10(20):17419-17426. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b01286
  43. 43. Yang C, Xi X, Yu Z, et al. Light modulation and water splitting enhancement using a composite porous GaN structure. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2018;10(6):5492-5497. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b15344
  44. 44. Tseng WJ, van Dorp DH, Lieten RR, et al. Anodic etching of n-GaN epilayer into porous GaN and its photoelectrochemical properties. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2014;118(51):29492-29498. DOI: 10.1021/jp508314q
  45. 45. Neumayer DA, Ekerdt JG. Growth of group III nitrides. A review of precursors and techniques. Chemistry of Materials. 1996;8(1):9-25. DOI: 10.1021/cm950108r
  46. 46. Benton J, Bai J, Wang T. Utilisation of GaN and InGaN/GaN with nanoporous structures for water splitting. Applied Physics Letters. 2014;105(22):223902. DOI: 10.1063/1.4903246
  47. 47. Kamimura J, Bogdanoff P, Abdi FF, et al. Photoelectrochemical properties of GaN photoanodes with cobalt phosphate catalyst for solar water splitting in neutral electrolyte. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2017;121(23):12540-12545. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b02253
  48. 48. Kibria MG, Nguyen HPT, Cui K, et al. One-step overall water splitting under visible light using multiband InGaN/GaN nanowire heterostructures. ACS Nano. 2013;7(9):7886-7893. DOI: 10.1021/nn4028823
  49. 49. Varadhan P, Fu HC, Priante D, et al. Surface passivation of GaN nanowires for enhanced photoelectrochemical water-splitting. Nano Letters. 2017;17(3):1520-1528. DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04559
  50. 50. Walsh A, Yan Y, Huda MN, et al. Band edge electronic structure of BiVO4: Elucidating the role of the Bi s and V d orbitals. Chemistry of Materials. 2009;21(3):547-551. DOI: 10.1021/cm802894z
  51. 51. Tian J, Zhao Z, Kumar A, et al. Recent progress in design, synthesis, and applications of one-dimensional TiO2 nanostructured surface heterostructures: A review. Chemical Society Reviews. 2014;43(20):6920-6937. DOI: 10.1039/c4cs00180j
  52. 52. Kang Q, Cao J, Zhang Y, et al. Reduced TiO2 nanotube arrays for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 2013;1(18):5766-5774. DOI: 10.1039/c3ta10689f
  53. 53. Wang H, Wang X, Luo X, et al. Optimization of all figure-of-merits in well-aligned GaN microwire array based Schottky UV photodetectors by Si doping. ACS Photonics. 2019;6(8):1972-1980. DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.9b00363
  54. 54. Tang YB, Bo XH, Xu J, et al. Tunable p-type conductivity and transport properties of AlN nanowires via Mg doping. ACS Nano. 2011;5(5):3591-3598. DOI: 10.1021/nn200963k
  55. 55. Mitrofanov O, Manfra M, Weimann N. Impact of Si doping on radio frequency dispersion in unpassivated GaN/AlGaN/GaN high-electron-mobility transistors grown by plasma-assisted molecular-beam epitaxy. Applied Physics Letters. 2003;82(24):4361-4363. DOI: 10.1063/1.1582373
  56. 56. Zhong DK, Choi S, Gamelin DR. Near-complete suppression of surface recombination in solar photoelectrolysis by “Co-Pi” catalyst-modified W:BiVO4. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2011;133(45):18370-18377. DOI: 10.1021/ja207348x
  57. 57. Hisatomi T, Maeda K, Takanabe K, et al. Aspects of the water splitting mechanism on (Ga1−xZnx)(N1−xOx) photocatalyst modified with Rh2−yCryO3 cocatalyst. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2009;113(51):21458-21466. DOI: 10.1021/jp9079662
  58. 58. Walter MG, Warren EL, McKone JR, et al. Solar water splitting cells. Chemical Reviews. 2010;110(11):6446-6473. DOI: 10.1021/cr1002326
  59. 59. Pinaud BA, Benck JD, Seitz LC, et al. Technical and economic feasibility of centralized facilities for solar hydrogen production via photocatalysis and photoelectrochemistry. Energy & Environmental Science. 2013;6(7):1983-2002. DOI: 10.1039/c3ee40831k
  60. 60. Weber MF, Dignam MJ. Efficiency of splitting water with semiconducting photoelectrodes. Journal of the Electrochemical Society. 1984;131(6):1258-1265. DOI: 10.1149/1.2115797
  61. 61. Takanabe K. Photocatalytic water splitting: Quantitative approaches toward photocatalyst by design. ACS Catalysis. 2017;7(11):8006-8022. DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.7b02662
  62. 62. Stolarczyk JK, Bhattacharyya S, Polavarapu L, et al. Challenges and prospects in solar water splitting and CO2 reduction with inorganic and hybrid nanostructures. ACS Catalysis. 2018;8(4):3602-3635. DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.8b00791
  63. 63. Nozik AJ. Photochemical diodes. Applied Physics Letters. 1977;30(11):567-569. DOI: 10.1063/1.89262
  64. 64. Sivula K, Van De Krol R. Semiconducting materials for photoelectrochemical energy conversion. Nature Reviews Materials. 2016;1(2):15010. DOI: 10.1038/natrevmats.2015.10
  65. 65. Chu S, Li W, Yan Y, et al. Roadmap on solar water splitting: Current status and future prospects. Nano Futures. 2017;1(2):022001. DOI: 10.1088/2399-1984/aa88a1
  66. 66. Sivula K, Le Formal F, Grätzel M. Solar water splitting: Progress using hematite (α-Fe2O3) photoelectrodes. ChemSusChem. 2011;4(4):432-449. DOI: 10.1002/cssc.201000416
  67. 67. Maeda K, Teramura K, Saito N, et al. Overall water splitting using (oxy) nitride photocatalysts. Pure and Applied Chemistry. 2006;78(12):2267-2276. DOI: 10.1351/pac200678122267
  68. 68. Liu G, Karuturi SK, Simonov AN, et al. Robust sub-monolayers of Co3O4 nano-islands: A highly transparent morphology for efficient water oxidation catalysis. Advanced Energy Materials. 2016;6(15):1600697. DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201600697
  69. 69. Ikeda T, Xiong A, Yoshinaga T, et al. Polyol synthesis of size-controlled Rh nanoparticles and their application to photocatalytic overall water splitting under visible light. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2013;117(6):2467-2473. DOI: 10.1021/jp305968u
  70. 70. Subramanian V, Wolf EE, Kamat PV. Catalysis with TiO2/gold nanocomposites. Effect of metal particle size on the Fermi level equilibration. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2004;126(15):4943-4950. DOI: 10.1021/ja0315199
  71. 71. Caccamo L et al. Band engineered epitaxial 3D GaN-InGaN core-shell rod arrays as an advanced photoanode for visible-light-driven water splitting. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2014;6(4):2235-2240. DOI: 10.1021/am4058937
  72. 72. AlOtaibi B, Nguyen HPT, Zhao S, et al. Highly stable photoelectrochemical water splitting and hydrogen generation using a double-band InGaN/GaN core/shell nanowire photoanode. Nano Letters. 2013;13(9):4356-4361. DOI: 10.1021/nl402156e
  73. 73. Xi X, Li J, Ma Z, et al. Enhanced water splitting performance of GaN nanowires fabricated using anode aluminum oxide templates. RSC Advances. 2019;9(26):14937-14943. DOI: 10.1039/c9ra01188a
  74. 74. Park JH, Mandal A, Kang S, et al. Hydrogen generation using non-polar coaxial InGaN/GaN multiple quantum well structure formed on hollow n-GaN nanowires. Scientific Reports. 2016;6(1):1-10. DOI: 10.1038/srep31996
  75. 75. Yang C, Liu L, Zhu S, et al. GaN with laterally aligned nanopores to enhance the water splitting. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2017;121(13):7331-7336
  76. 76. Kim YJ, Lee GJ, Kim S, et al. Efficient light absorption by GaN truncated nanocones for high performance water splitting applications. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2018;10(34):28672-28678. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b09084
  77. 77. Tyagi P, Ramesh C, Kaswan J, et al. Direct growth of self-aligned single-crystalline GaN nanorod array on flexible Ta foil for photocatalytic solar water-splitting. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2019;805:97-103. DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.07.071
  78. 78. Xi X, Yang C, Cao H, et al. GaN nanocolumns fabricated by self-assembly Ni mask and its enhanced photocatalytic performance in water splitting. Applied Surface Science. 2018;462:310-315. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.08.113
  79. 79. Hou Y, Yu X, Syed ZA, et al. GaN nano-pyramid arrays as an efficient photoelectrode for solar water splitting. Nanotechnology. 2016;27(45):455401. DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/27/45/455401
  80. 80. Zhou Y, Chen G, Yu Y, et al. Effects of La-doping on charge separation behavior of ZnO:GaN for its enhanced photocatalytic performance. Catalysis Science & Technology. 2016;6(4):1033-1041. DOI: 10.1039/c5cy01193k
  81. 81. Liang Q, Brocks G, Zhang X, et al. Monolayer nitrides doped with transition metals as efficient catalysts for water oxidation: The singular role of nickel. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2019;123(43):26289-26298. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b06704
  82. 82. Liu SY, Sheu JK, Lin YC, et al. Mn-doped GaN as photoelectrodes for the photoelectrolysis of water under visible light. Optics Express. 2012;20(105):A678-A683. DOI: 10.1364/oe.20.00a678
  83. 83. Kibria MG, Qiao R, Yang W, et al. Atomic-scale origin of long-term stability and high performance of p-GaN nanowire arrays for photocatalytic overall pure water splitting. Advanced Materials. 2016;28(38):8388-8397. DOI: 10.1002/adma.201602274
  84. 84. Pan H, Gu B, Eres G, et al. Ab initio study on noncompensated CrO codoping of GaN for enhanced solar energy conversion. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 2010;132(10):104501. DOI: 10.1063/1.3337919
  85. 85. Maeda K, Takata T, Hara M, et al. GaN:ZnO solid solution as a photocatalyst for visible-light-driven overall water splitting. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2005;127(23):8286-8287. DOI: 10.1021/ja0518777
  86. 86. Ohno T, Bai L, Hisatomi T, et al. Photocatalytic water splitting using modified GaN:ZnO solid solution under visible light: Long-time operation and regeneration of activity. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2012;134(19):8254-8259. DOI: 10.1021/ja302479f
  87. 87. Wang Z, Zong X, Gao Y, et al. Promoting charge separation and injection by optimizing the interfaces of GaN:ZnO photoanode for efficient solar water oxidation. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2017;9(36):30696-30702. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b09021
  88. 88. Yang JH, Pei YR, Kim SJ, et al. Highly enhanced photocatalytic water-splitting activity of gallium zinc oxynitride derived from flux-assisted Zn/Ga layered double hydroxides. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2018;57(48):16264-16271
  89. 89. Li J, Yang W, Wu A, et al. Band-gap tunable 2D hexagonal (GaN)1-x(ZnO)x solid solution nanosheets for photocatalytic water-splitting. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2020;12(7):8583-8591. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b21793
  90. 90. Xu Z, Zhang S, Gao F, et al. Correlations among morphology, composition, and photoelectrochemical water splitting properties of InGaN nanorods grown by molecular beam epitaxy. Nanotechnology. 2018;29(47):475603. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6528/aae0d4
  91. 91. Xu Z, Zhang S, Gao F, et al. Enhanced charge separation and interfacial charge transfer of InGaN nanorods/C3N4 heterojunction photoanode. Electrochimica Acta. 2019;324:134844. DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.134844
  92. 92. Xu Z, Zhang S, Liang J, et al. Surface passivation of InGaN nanorods using H3PO4 treatment for enhanced photoelectrochemical performance. Journal of Power Sources. 2019;419:65-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.02.050
  93. 93. Lin J, Yu Y, Xu Z, et al. Electronic engineering of transition metal Zn-doped InGaN nanorods arrays for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Journal of Power Sources. 2020;450:227578. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227578
  94. 94. Lin J, Yu Y, Zhang Z, et al. A novel approach for achieving high-efficiency photoelectrochemical water oxidation in InGaN nanorods grown on Si system: MXene nanosheets as multifunctional interfacial modifier. Advanced Functional Materials. 2020;30:1910479. DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201910479
  95. 95. Wang Y, Wu Y, Sun K, et al. A quadruple-band metal-nitride nanowire artificial photosynthesis system for high efficiency photocatalytic overall solar water splitting. Materials Horizons. 2019;6(7):1454-1462. DOI: 10.1039/c9mh00257j
  96. 96. Alotaibi B, Fan S, Nguyen HPT, et al. Photoelectrochemical water splitting and hydrogen generation using InGaN/GaN nanowire arrays. In: 2014 IEEE Photonics Society Summer Topical Meeting Series. IEEE; 2014. pp. 206-207. DOI: 10.1109/sum.2014.112
  97. 97. Wang Y, Vanka S, Gim J, et al. An In0.42Ga0.58N tunnel junction nanowire photocathode monolithically integrated on a nonplanar Si wafer. Nano Energy. 2019;57:405-413. DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.12.067
  98. 98. Wang Y, Schwartz J, Gim J, et al. Stable unassisted solar water splitting on semiconductor photocathodes protected by multifunctional GaN nanostructures. ACS Energy Letters. 2019;4(7):1541-1548. DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b00549
  99. 99. Liang J, Han X, Qiu Y, et al. A low-cost and high-efficiency integrated device toward solar-driven water splitting. ACS Nano. 2020;14(5):5426-5434. DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.9b09053
  100. 100. Cheng W-H, Richter MH, May MM, et al. Monolithic photoelectrochemical device for direct water splitting with 19% efficiency. ACS Energy Letters. 2018;3(8):1795-1800. DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b00920

Written By

Fangliang Gao, Qing Liu, Jiang Shi and Shuti Li

Submitted: 10 February 2020 Reviewed: 17 May 2020 Published: 24 June 2020

© 2020 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Continue reading from the same book

View All
Chapter 5 III-Nitride Nanowires: Future Prospective for Phot...

By Soumyaranjan Routray and Trupti Lenka

524 downloads

Chapter 6 In Situ TEM Studies of III-V Nanowire Growth Mecha...

By Carina B. Maliakkal

524 downloads

Chapter 7 Indium (In)-Catalyzed Silicon Nanowires (Si NWs) G...

By M. Ajmal Khan and Yasuaki Ishikawa

375 downloads