Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Is Micro and Nanotechnology Helping Us Fight Histoplasmosis?

Written By

Filipa Sousa, Domingos Ferreira, Salette Reis and Paulo Costa

Submitted: 01 February 2023 Reviewed: 15 February 2023 Published: 21 March 2023

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.110544

From the Edited Volume

Histoplasmosis - A Comprehensive Study of Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment

Edited by Elena Dantes and Elena Dumea

Chapter metrics overview

69 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Histoplasmosis is an airborne systemic infection, with varied clinical manifestations, from asymptomatic infection to disseminated disease with a deadly outcome. Due to a growing number of immunosuppressed people, this mycosis has become more prevalent and thus, a cause for concern within the medical community. In fact, this fungal infection can be quite serious for children, elderly, people who have had an organ transplant, HIV-positive or people taking immunosuppressants. There has been a limited number of research articles suggesting polymeric, metallic, or lipid micro and nanotechnology-based approaches as a potential way to carry antifungal drugs to treat histoplasmosis. These new drug delivery systems present a variety of means of administration, thereby allowing a more targeted treatment to the lungs, skin, or eyes, according to the infection site. In this review, the aim was to explore these new therapies that have been emerging which hold great potential in comparison to regular antifungal treatments, not only due to their safety but also due to their drug release profile.

Keywords

  • nanotechnology
  • histoplasmosis
  • drug delivery
  • antifungal
  • spions
  • liposomes
  • polymeric nanoparticles

1. Introduction

Histoplasmosis is the most common respiratory fungal disease and displays the highest endemicity in North and South America [1, 2]. Nonetheless, tourism and migration have stimulated the worldwide growth of histoplasmosis in nonendemic areas, for instance, China, South Africa, India, and Southeast Asia [3, 4]. This disease triggers symptoms and signs, such as fever, weight loss, headache, abdominal pain, chills, fatigue, chest discomfort, diarrhea, and dry cough [5, 6, 7].

The infection is caused by inhaling aerosols that contain the infecting particles of the dimorphic fungus, Histoplasma capsulatum and it affects most frequently the lung [8]. Nevertheless, it can also affect the skin [9, 10, 11], and the central nervous system (CNS) causing meningitis [12] or even evolve into a progressive disseminated infection that may trigger an inflammatory response and bring rheumatological and heart complications (pericarditis), with high morbidity rates [13, 14].

Upon spores’ inhalation, the mycelial form goes through a dimorphic transition to yeast to infiltrate the host macrophages in almost any organ, granting its intracellular replication and survival [15, 16, 17]. Researchers have proved that the H. capsulatumyeasts facility on colonizing and adhering to different organ cryosections (lung, spleen, liver, gut, and trachea) is due to a well-known survival strategy of microorganisms: biofilm formation [18, 19, 20].

The at-risk population includes immunocompromised patients or those under immunosuppressive or biological regimens, as well as workers with occupational exposure to spore-laden soil [21].

The disease severity spectrum ranges from asymptomatic or mild lung disease to severe pneumonitis with respiratory compromise, depending on inoculum amount, exposure intensity, and host’s immunity [9, 14, 15].

Acute or chronic systemic disease may occur and is associated with immunodepression, particularly acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) [3]. In fact, disseminated histoplasmosis among AIDS patients is a rapidly progressing, life-threatening illness that requires prompt treatment with antifungal medication [6]. In Latin America, histoplasmosis is often listed as the number one death cause in patients with advanced AIDS [15].

Infectious diseases caused by intracellular microorganisms, such as histoplasmosis, are described as capable of altering host defense mechanisms and hence allowing these microorganisms to survive inside mononuclear phagocytes, such as macrophages and dendritic cells [22]. These kinds of diseases are regarded as medical challenges due to drug–drug interactions during coinfections and resistance emergencies, which evidently narrows available therapies [23].

Currently, the gold standard treatment for moderate-to-severe disseminated histoplasmosis is liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) [1, 6]. The liposomal formulation is preferred to the conventional deoxycholate one, due to decreased nephrotoxicity, lower mortality rates in HIV patients, and overall improved clinical success [3, 24].

On the other hand, for mild and moderate forms of infection, the most appropriate choice is itraconazole. Alternatives to itraconazole include posaconazole, fluconazole, ketoconazole, and voriconazole [1, 13].

Considering the hepatoxicity, limited efficacy due to deficient absorption, low bioavailability, drug degradation, long treatment duration, and frequent drug interactions of the traditional antifungal drugs, it is imperative to develop more efficient strategies for this disease, which would be able to overcome these hurdles [8].

The functionalization of nanocarriers for drug delivery has been ceaselessly disclosing its potential as an alternative and versatile technological platform for the management and treatment of intracellular infections caused by fungi from the H. capsulatum species [23, 25]. Indeed, the encapsulation of antifungal agents into nanoparticles to selectively target pathogens has shed light on improving treatment’s efficacy and efficiency [8]. Some of these novel drug delivery approaches, such as AmBisome® and Visudyne®, are already commercialized and now serve as benchmark treatments and proof-of-concept of the usefulness of nanotechnology in antifungal drug delivery [26, 27, 28].

However, between clear written clinical guidelines and actual clinical practice, there is sometimes a huge gap. In Latin America, for instance, the frequent lack of physician awareness about histoplasmosis and the shortage of accessible diagnostic methods translates into thousands of annual deaths amid advanced-HIV patients, which could have been prevented. It is likewise important to stress that the feasibility of implementing some of these novel treatment options, along with the therapeutic drug monitoring that they require, greatly depends on resource availability, which tends to be scarce in impoverished settings [5, 6].

Advertisement

2. Lipid formulations of Amphotericin B

The burden of invasive fungal infections has grown in the last years, leading to higher morbidity and mortality, especially among immunosuppressed individuals. Amphotericin B deoxycholate (AmBD) (Figure 1) is still regarded as one of the most important antifungals of the last 60 years and has been the foundation to treat these infections, showing efficient fungicidal activity against candidiasis, cryptococcosis, aspergillosis, histoplasmosis, blastomycosis, coccidioidomycosis, zygomycosis, sporotrichosis, fusariosis, and phaeohyphomycosis [29, 30].

Figure 1.

Chemical structure of amphotericin B (C71H112NNaO21). Drawn using ChemDraw Professional 22.0 from PerkinElmer Informatics, Inc.

Nonetheless, given the adverse effects in 50–90% of cases, efforts were made to reformulate the first amphotericin B formulation (Fungizone®) with equivalent efficacy yet reduced toxicity.

The commercially available formulations for this effect are Albelcet® (lipid complex), Amphotec® / Amphocil® (colloidal dispersion), and AmBisome® (liposomal formulation) [27, 29]. On account of their superior safety profiles and higher drug therapeutic index, these lipid-based preparations can nowadays be regarded as worthy substitutes for AmBD. Currently, they are first-line therapy for numerous invasive fungal infections in routine medical practice and clinical investigation, for instance, for disseminated histoplasmosis and AIDS, Candida meningitis, or endophthalmitis [27, 31, 32, 33].

Even in pregnancy, the lipid formulations of AmB are the cornerstone treatment of any invasive fungal infection and deemed as safe. On the contrary, azoles present complications in view of their teratogenicity, embryotoxicity, and of transplacental infection transmission to the fetus, consequently being contraindicated in this group. Their use during pregnancy should be restricted to superficial infections [14, 34].

Currently, only AmBisome® has been evaluated in the treatment of disseminated histoplasmosis [2, 31]. Besides, some case reports have also stressed its clinical efficacy in the rare primary cutaneous form of the disease in immunocompetent patients [9, 10, 11].

AmBisome® received its FDA approval in 1997 and is formed of small spherical unilamellar liposomes with a size inferior to 100 nm, where AmB is encapsulated. L-Amb is represented in Figure 2. Hydrogenated soy phosphatidylcholine, cholesterol, and phosphatidylglycerol are composition elements of these liposomes [30].

Figure 2.

Schematic representation of liposomal amphotericin B. Parts of the figure were drawn by using pictures from Servier Medical Art. Servier Medical Art by Servier is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).

In a 2002 multicenter randomized, double-blind, prospective clinical trial, with 81 participants, intravenous infusion doses of 3.0 mg/kg of body weight liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) and 0.7 mg/kg of AmBD were compared. The purpose was to evaluate both their safety and efficacy for induction therapy of moderate to severe disseminated Histoplasmosis in patients with AIDS [24]. A higher treatment response of 88% was achieved for L-AmB counter to 64% for AmBD, as well as lower mortality rates (2% vs. 13%). Furthermore, nephrotoxicity (assessed through an increase in serum creatinine level) was reported for 9% of patients treated with L-AmB, in opposition to 37% for AmBD, along with fewer infusion-related side effects (25% vs. 63%). Taking all these trial findings into account, L-AmB has clearly revealed to be an upgraded choice to the first standardized treatment AmBD, therefore modifications on therapy recommendations were undertaken after this study. Despite being more costly, L-AmB’s attractiveness lies in its less toxic profile, superior efficacy, and improved survival rates for moderate-to-severe invasive histoplasmosis [24, 31].

Nevertheless, clearance rates of fungemia and H. capsulatum antigen from serum and urine were alike with the two treatments. For this reason, 2 weeks after the beginning, induction therapy was replaced by itraconazole, for another 10 weeks of consolidation therapy [24, 35].

With the goal of clearly proving the benefits of L-AmB as the initial treatment of moderate-to-severe histoplasmosis, another study was carried out. It comprised two separate closed clinical trials and aimed to compare the clearance of fungal burden (correlated with survival) in patients with disseminated histoplasmosis treated with L-AmB (n = 51) versus itraconazole (n = 59). The clinical response rates were similar: 86% for L-AmB and 85% for itraconazole group. However, after 2 weeks of treatment, fungemia, antigenemia, and antigenuria cleared more rapidly with L-AmB than with itraconazole. This quicker fungemia clearance justifies the use of L-AmB, in opposition to itraconazole, as the initial treatment of moderate-to-severe histoplasmosis [35].

To address the issue of continuously high morbidity and mortality rates brought about by fungal infections, a preclinical study comparing different prophylactic agents was conducted (AmBisome® and Fungizone®). A single high dose of AmBisome® was able to deliver sufficient concentrations of AmB in tissue in immunocompetent and immunosuppressed murine while keeping a safety standard. It effectively inhibited the growth of Candida albicans in the kidneys and prevented the growth of H. capsulatum in the spleen of mice [36].

Advertisement

3. Drug delivery systems loaded with itraconazole

Itraconazole (Figure 3) is an antifungal drug from the azole group, widely used in the treatment of aspergillosis, cryptococcosis, candidiasis, blastomycosis, and mild histoplasmosis. Its action mechanism encompasses the disruption of ergosterol synthesis to avoid the formation of the fungal cell membrane [37, 38].

Figure 3.

Chemical structure of itraconazole (C35H38CI2N8O4). Drawn using ChemDraw Professional 22.0 from PerkinElmer Informatics, Inc.

3.1 Polymeric nanoparticles of itraconazole

Polymeric nanoparticles are capable of not only safely carrying drugs for specific target organs but also of effectively permeating cellular membranes [39].

A striking example of a novel nano-based delivery system is the encapsulation of itraconazole in nanosphere polymeric nanoparticles (NP) based on poly-(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) and functionalized with F4/80 antibodies and mannose. The optimized NP was made up of PLGA 75:25 and a mix of surfactants (Kolliphor P188 and vitamin E-TPGS) at pH 5. It showed optimal drug-loading capacity (6.6%), high encapsulation efficiency (80%), and fitted well with the Fickian diffusion model [23]. A schematic representation of this system is outlined in Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Schematic representation of the functionalized PLGA NPs loaded with itraconazole and their interaction with F4/80 antibodies receptor in macrophages. Created with BioRender.com.

This study has demonstrated increased J774 macrophage uptake in vitro and more efficacy in eliminating the H. capsulatum on murine macrophages compared with bare NP. Moreover, these NP did not affect the viability in macrophages at different concentrations, which proves they are not cytotoxic. A successful antibody-NP surface binding was achieved while keeping its stability and avoiding aggregation. The 200 nm size is adequate to prevent rapid elimination by the endothelial reticulum system. H. capsulatum induces IFN-γ expression in the macrophages and the functionalized NPs developed were able to reduce the expression of this cytokine, emphasizing the role of this antibody as a binding molecule with immunomodulatory properties. In addition, the treatment with these nano-formulations also significantly reduced IL-6 and IL-10 expression compared to free itraconazole. All in all, this research supports the idea that the encapsulation of itraconazole into NP allows a controlled and targeted drug release into macrophages, along with enhanced efficacy and efficiency in battling the fungal intracellular infection [8, 23, 25, 40].

In line with this research was the report of a new polymeric drug delivery system for targeted brain delivery. The authors achieved a stable linkage between RVG29 peptide (a brain-targeting ligand) and itraconazole-loaded albumin nanoparticles by means of the biotin-binding crosslinker streptavidin. This conjugation simplified the intracellular delivery of NPs and enhanced drug distribution in mice brain [41]. Albeit the non-specificity to H. capsulatum of either in vitro or in vivo conducted studies, there is undeniable potential to be exploited herein. In fact, CNS histoplasmosis, despite being rare, is of difficult diagnosis and quickly escalates to disseminated infection with a lower chance of recovery [12].

3.2 Lipid nanoparticles of itraconazole

Nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) are attractive drug carriers thanks to their unstructured matrix, which grants enhanced drug loading capacity and long-term drug stability, thereby constituting an upgrade of solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) [38, 42].

Itraconazole-NLCs were successfully formulated for brain-targeted delivery. The formulation included Precirol® ATO 5 and Transcutol® HP as lipid phase and Tween 80 and Solutol® HS15 as surfactants. A sustained release was achieved along with an almost double increase in the drug’s concentration in the brain, compared to pure itraconazole alone, which in turn showed much lower permeability across the blood–brain barrier [38]. Even though the conducted in vitro cellular studies have not targeted Histoplasma strains, these itraconazole-NLCs can be further exploited as nanocarriers for brain delivery in SNC histoplasmosis.

Advertisement

4. Drug delivery systems loaded with verteporfin

Verteporfin (Figure 5) is a lipophilic benzoporphyrin derivative synthesized from protoporphyrin IX dimethyl ester. It shares several beneficial properties of a photosensitizer: chemical stability, efficient generation of singlet oxygen species, strong absorption of red light at 692 nm, and diminished skin photosensitivity, due to faster body extravasation [43].

Figure 5.

Chemical structure of verteporfin (C41H42N4O8). Drawn using ChemDraw Professional 22.0 from PerkinElmer Informatics, Inc.

4.1 Liposomal formulation of verteporfin

In 2000, both Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) have approved a liposomal formulation of verteporfin [44]. In fact, encapsulating drugs in liposomes shield drugs from degradation by metabolic enzymes on conjunctiva, cornea, and in tear fluids. Furthermore, liposomes can enhance intraocular penetration and retard the drug’s clearance, leading to a higher concentration in the vitreous humor and an increment in the drug’s half-life [33].

Since verteporfin is a highly hydrophobic drug, encapsulation in liposomes can control its drug release and enhance its in vivo distribution upon intravenous injection [45].

The liposomal formulation was developed by Bausch & Lomb® and is currently marketed by the commercial name Visudyne®. Ophthalmologists consider this formulation a remarkable advance in vision sciences in view of its capability of reducing the magnitude of vision loss for at least 1 year, thus boosting the life quality of these patients [28].

Visudyne® is a light-activated nanomedicine and the first and only clinically approved photosensitizer, being applied in photodynamic therapy (PDT) to eliminate abnormal blood vessels in the eye’s retina and choroid (Figure 6) [43, 45, 46]. Briefly, it accumulates in these vessels and, when exposed to red light in the presence of oxygen, produces highly reactive free oxygen radicals, which impose local damage to the endothelium and vessel blockage [45, 47, 48]. It has become a milestone in the ophthalmology field for the treatment of patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization derived either from age-related macular degeneration, secondary to pathological myopia or from ocular histoplasmosis syndrome [44, 45, 48].

Figure 6.

Comparison between a healthy eye and an eye with choroidal neovascularization, a condition observed in ocular histoplasmosis with the formation of abnormal blood vessels in retina and choroid. Created with BioRender.com.

The lipid bilayer of Visudyne® liposomal formulation is made of a synthetic saturated phospholipid DMPC (dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine) and egg yolk phosphatidylglycerol EGPC (comprised of unsaturated multiple species) in the 5:3 ratio [4749]. The encapsulation of verteporfin in liposomes was a resourceful way to deliver the drug intravenously, thereby evading the natural predisposition of hydrophobic molecules to self-aggregate in aqueous media [43].

4.2 A theranostic liposome of verteporfin

More recently, in 2020, a group of Brazilian researchers designed a smart theranostic verteporfin-loaded lipid-polymer liposome for PTD. This study proposes the loading of the aforementioned verteporfin liposomes in a theranostic system. Shortly, it consists of lipid-polymer liposomes obtained from DPPC (1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine) coated with triblock copolymer Pluronic® F127 covalently functionalized with 5 [6]-carboxyfluorescein fluorescent probe. An illustration of this delivery system is depicted in Figure 7. This innovative formulation yielded 100 nm vesicles, 0.15 polydispersity index, outstanding stability, and encapsulation efficiency higher than 90%. Despite these encouraging results, the designed system’s efficiency was only proven in a glioblastoma cancer cell line, leaving its efficiency in ophthalmic diseases open for further future investigation [49].

Figure 7.

Schematic representation of a theranostic system to load verteporfin liposomes. Created with BioRender.com.

Advertisement

5. Magnetic nanoparticles

The insurgence of antimicrobial resistance is the greatest promoter of the fabrication of cutting-edge drug delivery systems. Iron oxide nanoparticles have always merited an outstanding place in drug delivery, thanks to their recognized biomedical importance, precise targeting, and biocompatibility [50].

Bearing this in mind, groups of investigators have recently published promising studies endorsing the development of superparamagnetic, fluorescent, noncytotoxic nano systems with antifungal activity against some fungal strains, namely H. capsulatum. In a summarized manner, iron oxide nanoparticles (IONPs) were synthesized using macromolecular stabilizing starch, noteworthy for their biocompatibility and agglomeration prevention. Upon encapsulation with starch, a shift in magnetic behavior takes place, converting the once weakly ferromagnetic IONPs into superparamagnetic (SPIONs) [50, 51]. The SPIONs were successfully incorporated in a fluorescently modified carrier system, enabling not only an easy identification of the system in a living body but also the application of this system in photodynamic therapy. An alarming discovery of this research is that H. capsulatum was found to be highly susceptible to the designed nano system in PTD studies, whereas it was resistant to the antifungal griseofulvin [51].

Specific drug targeting to the choroid has lately aroused special interest, on behalf of the rising blindness figures in the aged population and the choroid’s unique architecture as one of the most vascularized tissues in the human body.

Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles stabilized with carboxylic acid, have been covalently functionalized with a recombinant VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) permitting the preferential release of the drug into the choroid layer [52]. Albeit the study’s core focus was angiogenesis and so they evaluated a monoclonal antibody (bevacizumab), the information conveyed is transposable to histoplasmosis infection. As a matter of fact, and as previously stated, ocular histoplasmosis instigates neovascularization of choroidal vessels, as can be noticed in Figure 6.

All in all, magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles can be a powerful strategy for cell-specific eye targeting. Their potential against Candida sp. has already been proven and amphotericin B has also been encapsulated in this nano system with enhanced fungicidal activity and reduced side effects [53]. In addition, these systems are biodegradable, intrinsically safe, exhibit increased half-life and their release localization can be controlled [52].

Advertisement

6. Vaccines for histoplasmosis

The creation of vaccination strategies for clinically relevant fungi has been a long-sought ambition for investigators, even with the difficulties assigned to these organisms’ complex eukaryotic cells and their similarity to human proteins. Preventing or diminishing the severity of histoplasmosis through targeted vaccine development is then deemed to be an important scientific breakthrough [54, 55].

Glucan particles (GPs) are hollow, porous microspheres with an average diameter of 2–4 μm, derived from baker’s yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) purified cell walls and composed of 1,3-D-glucan and trace sums of chitin [56]. They are considered innovative and promising vaccine delivery systems, due to the possibility of encapsulating, transporting, delivering, and releasing protein antigens in their inner void cavity. In addition, the GPs delivery system retains the intrinsic immunostimulatory properties of 1,3-D-glucan on the surface. This polysaccharide functions as a ligand for receptor-mediated cell uptake by phagocytic cells bearing β-glucan receptors, for example, macrophages and dendritic cells in the immune system. Hence, GPs act as antigen-presenting phagocytic cells-selective-targeted delivery systems with adjuvant properties [55, 56].

A recent preclinical study was able to produce an extract from H. capsulatum yeast cells with the ability to convene protective immunity when encapsulated in GPs [21]. Succinctly, the GP vaccine consisted of Histoplasma alkaline extract, mouse serum albumin, and yeast RNA complexed with the glucan cells. Overall, the developed alkaline extract packaged in GP conferred vaccine-induced immunity, along with a reduced fungal burden by roughly 80% and improved survival in mice [56].

These data overlooks GP as useful vaccine delivery vehicles and may serve as a platform for the identification of proteins to include in GPs that both enhance protective immunity and modify immune responses to the agent [21]. On the other hand, this opens doors to the development of new GP nanoparticle-loaded formulations, which take advantage not only from the drug encapsulation assets of NPs but also from the macrophage-targeting properties of GPs [56].

Another ground-breaking study combining immunoproteomic and immunopeptidomic methods was able to map H. capsulatum peptide epitopes for the first time using murine dendritic cells and macrophages. After selecting and synthesizing the four most promising peptides, the incorporation into GPs took place. Efficient induction of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes was observed, as well as a production stimulation of IFN-γ, IL-17, and IL-2. The selected epitopes are derived from enolase (a heat shock protein 60) and the ATP-dependent molecular chaperone HSC82, which share a great degree of similarity with proteins expressed by other clinically relevant pathogenic fungi. Ergo, the authors preconize these promiscuous epitopes as the steppingstone for the creation of a multi-epitope peptide vaccine against histoplasmosis and other fungi [54].

Advertisement

7. Conclusion

Nanotechnology is still an emerging field in fungal vaccinology and pharmacology, yet there are many studies underlining its improved safety and tolerability. In fact, these innovative approaches have already replaced the original gold standard treatments for several forms of histoplasmosis disease, as outlined in this chapter.

Notwithstanding that, there are still a few therapeutic options to prevent and fight this neglected and potentially fatal disease. Therefore, the development of new drug delivery systems for the treatment and management of histoplasmosis is of utmost importance, particularly for AIDS patients.

Current investigation in antifungal drug delivery needs to put special emphasis on overcoming the challenges that deter the translation of nanoparticle-based systems into clinical practice.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Foundation for Science and Technology, I.P. (FCT), Portugal, through grant reference 2020.05884.BD, and by the Applied Molecular Biosciences Unit – UCIBIO, which receives financial support from Portuguese national funds (FCT/MCTES, Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia and Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior) through grant UIDB/04378/2020.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1. Azar MM, Loyd JL, Relich RF, Wheat LJ, Hage CA. Current concepts in the epidemiology, diagnosis, and Management of Histoplasmosis Syndromes. Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2020;41(1):13-30
  2. 2. Kischkel B, Rossi SA, Santos SR, Nosanchuk JD, Travassos LR, Taborda CP. Therapies and vaccines based on nanoparticles for the treatment of systemic fungal infections. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. 2020;10:463
  3. 3. Arauz AB, Papineni P. Histoplasmosis. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America. 2021;35(2):471-491
  4. 4. Ashraf N, Kubat RC, Poplin V, Adenis AA, Denning DW, Wright L, et al. Re-drawing the maps for endemic mycoses. Mycopathologia. 2020;185(5):843-865
  5. 5. Nacher M, Valdes A, Adenis A, Blaizot R, Abboud P, Demar M, et al. Disseminated histoplasmosis in HIV-infected patients: A description of 34 years of clinical and therapeutic practice. Journal of Fungi (Basel). 2020;6(3):164
  6. 6. Guidelines for diagnosing and managing disseminated histoplasmosis among people living with HIV. 2020
  7. 7. Purghè B, Manfredi M, Ragnoli B, Baldanzi G, Malerba M. Exosomes in chronic respiratory diseases. Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy. 2021;144:112270
  8. 8. Mejia SP, Lopez D, Cano LE, Naranjo TW, Orozco J. Antifungal encapsulated into ligand-functionalized nanoparticles with high specificity for macrophages. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14(9):1932
  9. 9. Batista JM, Martins MAP, Bertollo CM. Primary cutaneous histoplasmosis difficult to treat in immunocompetent patient: Case report and literature review. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2021;19:eRC5488
  10. 10. Raina RK, Mahajan V, Sood A, Saurabh S. Primary cutaneous histoplasmosis in an immunocompetent host from a nonendemic area. Indian Journal of Dermatology. 2016;61(4):467
  11. 11. Patra S, Nimitha P, Kaul S, Valakkada J, Verma K, Ramam M, et al. Primary cutaneous histoplasmosis in an immunocompetent patient presenting with severe pruritus. Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology. 2018;2018:84
  12. 12. Hariri OR, Minasian T, Quadri SA, Dyurgerova A, Farr S, Miulli DE, et al. Histoplasmosis with deep CNS involvement: Case presentation with discussion and literature review. Journal of Neurological Surgery Report. 2015;76(1):e167-e172
  13. 13. Wheat J, Sarosi G, McKinsey D, Hamill R, Bradsher R, Johnson P, et al. Practice guidelines for the Management of Patients with histoplasmosis. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2000;30(4):688-695
  14. 14. Wheat LJ, Freifeld AG, Kleiman MB, Baddley JW, McKinsey DS, Loyd JE, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the Management of Patients with histoplasmosis: 2007 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2007;45(7):807-825
  15. 15. Drak Alsibai K, Aissaoui H, Adenis A, Bourne-Watrin M, Djossou F, Epelboin L, et al. Cytological Spectrum of pulmonary histoplasmosis diagnosed by bronchoalveolar lavage: 12 years of experience in French Guiana. Journal of Fungi (Basel). 2021;7(7):576
  16. 16. Horwath MC, Fecher RA, Deepe GS Jr. Histoplasma capsulatum, lung infection and immunity. Future Microbiology. 2015;10(6):967-975
  17. 17. Lamprecht A. Nanomedicines in gastroenterology and hepatology. Nature Reviews. Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2015;12(4):195-204
  18. 18. Dos Santos Ramos MA, Da Silva PB, Spósito L, De Toledo LG, Bonifácio BV, Rodero CF, et al. Nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems for control of microbial biofilms: A review. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2018;13:1179-1213
  19. 19. Pitangui NS, Sardi JC, Silva JF, Benaducci T, Moraes da Silva RA, Rodríguez-Arellanes G, et al. Adhesion of histoplasma capsulatum to pneumocytes and biofilm formation on an abiotic surface. Biofouling. 2012;28(7):711-718
  20. 20. Suárez-Alvarez RO, Pérez-Torres A, Taylor ML. Adherence patterns of histoplasma capsulatum yeasts to bat tissue sections. Mycopathologia. 2010;170(2):79-87
  21. 21. Deepe GS Jr, Buesing WR, Ostroff GR, Abraham A, Specht CA, Huang H, et al. Vaccination with an alkaline extract of histoplasma capsulatum packaged in glucan particles confers protective immunity in mice. Vaccine. 2018;36(23):3359-3367
  22. 22. Sánchez A, Mejía SP, Orozco J. Recent advances in polymeric nanoparticle-encapsulated drugs against intracellular infections. Molecules. 2020;25(16):3670
  23. 23. Mejia SP, Sanchez A, Vasquez V, Orozco J. Functional nanocarriers for delivering itraconazole against fungal intracellular infections. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2021;12:685391
  24. 24. Johnson PC, Wheat LJ, Cloud GA, Goldman M, Lancaster D, Bamberger DM, et al. Safety and efficacy of liposomal amphotericin B compared with conventional amphotericin B for induction therapy of histoplasmosis in patients with AIDS. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2002;137(2):105-109
  25. 25. Fernández M, Orozco J. Advances in functionalized photosensitive polymeric nanocarriers. Polymers. 2021;13(15):2464
  26. 26. Hay RJ. Liposomal amphotericin B, AmBisome. The Journal of infection. 1994;28(Suppl. 1):35-43
  27. 27. Andrade F, Rafael D, Videira M, Ferreira D, Sosnik A, Sarmento B. Nanotechnology and pulmonary delivery to overcome resistance in infectious diseases. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2013;65(13-14):1816-1827
  28. 28. Bressler NM, Bressler SB. Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin (Visudyne): Impact on ophthalmology and visual sciences. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2000;41(3):624-628
  29. 29. Mônica Pereira Garcia MFMAS, Saldanha CA, RBA DCI. Amphotericin B: An antifungal drug in nanoformulations for the treatment of paracoccidioidomycosis. Revista de la Universidad Industrial de Santander Salud. 2013;45(3):45-53
  30. 30. Cavassin FB, Baú-Carneiro JL, Vilas-Boas RR, Queiroz-Telles F. Sixty years of amphotericin B: An overview of the Main antifungal agent used to treat invasive fungal infections. Infectious Diseases and Therapy. 2021;10(1):115-147
  31. 31. Saravolatz LD, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Marr KA, Rex JH, Cohen SH. Amphotericin B: Time for a new “gold standard”. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2003;37(3):415-425
  32. 32. LeMonte AM, Washum KE, Smedema ML, Schnizlein-Bick C, Kohler SM, Wheat LJ. Amphotericin B combined with itraconazole or fluconazole for treatment of histoplasmosis. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2000;182(2):545-550
  33. 33. Nagasa GD, Belete A. Review on nanomaterials and Nano-scaled Systems for Topical and Systemic Delivery of antifungal drugs. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare. 2022;15:1819-1840
  34. 34. Pilmis B, Jullien V, Sobel J, Lecuit M, Lortholary O, Charlier C. Antifungal drugs during pregnancy: An updated review. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2014;70(1):14-22
  35. 35. Wheat LJ, Cloud G, Johnson PC, Connolly P, Goldman M, Le Monte A, et al. Clearance of fungal burden during treatment of disseminated histoplasmosis with liposomal amphotericin B versus itraconazole. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2001;45(8):2354-2357
  36. 36. Garcia A, Adler-Moore JP, Proffitt RT. Single-dose AmBisome (Liposomal amphotericin B) as prophylaxis for murine systemic candidiasis and histoplasmosis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2000;44(9):2327-2332
  37. 37. Santos G, Vasconcelos C, Lopes AJ, Cartágenes M, Barros Filho AK, Nascimento F, et al. Candida infections and therapeutic strategies: Mechanisms of action for traditional and alternative agents. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2018;9:1351
  38. 38. Lim WM, Rajinikanth PS, Mallikarjun C, Kang YB. Formulation and delivery of itraconazole to the brain using a nanolipid carrier system. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2014;9:2117-2126
  39. 39. Sousa F, Ferreira D, Reis S, Costa P. Current insights on antifungal therapy: Novel nanotechnology approaches for drug delivery systems and new drugs from natural sources. Pharmaceuticals. 2020;13(9):248
  40. 40. Mena-Giraldo P, Orozco J. Polymeric micro/nanocarriers and motors for cargo transport and phototriggered delivery. Polymers (Basel). 2021;13(22):3920
  41. 41. Chen W, Zhan C, Gu B, Meng Q , Wang H, Lu W, et al. Targeted brain delivery of itraconazole via RVG29 anchored nanoparticles. Journal of Drug Targeting. 2011;19(3):228-234
  42. 42. Beloqui A, Solinis MA, Rodriguez-Gascon A, Almeida AJ, Preat V. Nanostructured lipid carriers: Promising drug delivery systems for future clinics. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology, and Medicine. 2016;12(1):143-161
  43. 43. Ghosh S, Carter KA, Lovell JF. Liposomal formulations of photosensitizers. Biomaterials. 2019;218:119341
  44. 44. Anselmo AC, Mitragotri S. Nanoparticles in the clinic: An update post COVID-19 vaccines. Bioengineering Translational Medicine. 2021;6(3):e10246
  45. 45. Greco A, Garoffolo G, Chiesa E, Riva F, Dorati R, Modena T, et al. Nanotechnology, a booster for the multitarget drug verteporfin. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology. 2021;64:102562
  46. 46. Afarid M, Mahmoodi S, Baghban R. Recent achievements in nano-based technologies for ocular disease diagnosis and treatment, review and update. Journal of Nanobiotechnology. 2022;20(1):361
  47. 47. Ansar SM, Jiang W, Mudalige T. Analysis of verteporfin liposomal formulations for phospholipids and phospholipid degradation products by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 2022;208:114473
  48. 48. Visudyne (verteporfin) [Summary of Product Characteristics]. European Medicines Agency, (Last update in September 2020). 2020
  49. 49. de Oliveira DCS, de Freitas CF, Calori IR, Goncalves RS, Cardinali C, Malacarne LC, et al. Theranostic verteporfin- loaded lipid-polymer liposome for photodynamic applications. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology. B. 2020;212:112039
  50. 50. Philip S, Kuriakose S. Synthesis, characterization and antimicrobial properties of superparamagnetic α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles stabilized by biocompatible starch. Journal of Cluster Science. 2021;32:1-11
  51. 51. Philip S, Kuriakose S. Photodynamic antifungal activity of a superparamagnetic and fluorescent drug carrier system against antibiotic-resistant fungal strains. Cellulose (Lond). 2021;28(14):9091-9102
  52. 52. Giannaccini M, Pedicini L, De Matienzo G, Chiellini F, Dente L, Raffa V. Magnetic nanoparticles: A strategy to target the choroidal layer in the posterior segment of the eye. Scientific Reports. 2017;7:43092
  53. 53. Niemirowicz K, Durnaś B, Tokajuk G, Głuszek K, Wilczewska AZ, Misztalewska I, et al. Magnetic nanoparticles as a drug delivery system that enhance fungicidal activity of polyene antibiotics. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine. 2016;12(8):2395-2404
  54. 54. Kischkel B, Boniche-Alfaro C, Menezes IG, Rossi SA, Angeli CB, de Almeida SR, et al. Immunoproteomic and Immunopeptidomic analyses of histoplasma capsulatum reveal promiscuous and conserved epitopes among Fungi with vaccine potential. Frontiers in Immunology. 2021;12:764501
  55. 55. Mirza Z, Soto ER, Dikengil F, Levitz SM, Ostroff GR. Beta-Glucan Particles as Vaccine Adjuvant Carriers. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2017;1625:143-157
  56. 56. Soto ER, Caras AC, Kut LC, Castle MK, Ostroff GR. Glucan particles for macrophage targeted delivery of nanoparticles. Journal of Drug Delivery. 2012;2012:143524

Written By

Filipa Sousa, Domingos Ferreira, Salette Reis and Paulo Costa

Submitted: 01 February 2023 Reviewed: 15 February 2023 Published: 21 March 2023