Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Co-Crystallization of Plant-Derived Antimalarial Drugs: An Alternate Technique for Improved Physicochemical Qualities and Antimalarial Drug Synergy

Written By

Zakio Makuvara

Submitted: 09 April 2022 Reviewed: 30 June 2022 Published: 13 October 2022

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.106200

From the Edited Volume

Drug Formulation Design

Edited by Rahul Shukla, Aleksey Kuznetsov and Akbar Ali

Chapter metrics overview

141 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Malaria is a complex disease associated with a variety of epidemiology and clinical symptoms worldwide. Despite the availability of a variety of antimalarial medications, national policies of many countries advocate for a single-medication first-line therapy for the majority of clinical malaria symptoms. However, the studies revealed that using multiple first-line medicines against malaria works more effectively. In this scenario, single-target monotherapy approaches have difficulties since malaria symptoms are seldom caused by single molecular entities. The current work is based on the critical literature review and primary sources as well as secondary databases. The chapter outline is as follows: (1) main antimalarial plant-derived active pharmaceutical ingredients (APD-APIs), (2) limitations of single APD-APIs and shift to multiple first-line therapies in malaria treatment, (3) techniques in the development and properties of APD-APIs co-crystals. The search for novel plant-derived antimalarial medicines and the development of antimalarial co-crystals are essential in the fight against antimalarial drug resistance.

Keywords

  • antimalarial drugs
  • mono-therapy
  • multiple first-line treatments
  • co-crystallization
  • plant-derived antimalarial drugs

1. Introduction

Malaria deaths and cases have decreased dramatically in the last 15 years, yet it remains one of the leading tropical diseases in terms of reported deaths [1]. Accordingly, the World Health Organization (WHO) recorded up to 216 million cases of malaria and about 445,000 deaths in 2016 only [1]. Development of antimalarial medicine resistance, as well as dramatically diminished sensitivity to artemisinin combination therapy (ACT), is the primary cause of this trend [2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. Apart from that, the chemotherapeutic choices for treating and preventing malaria are limited [4]. In light of these circumstances, novel antimalarial drug discovery, particularly medicines associated with multiple mode of action and versatility in terms of efficacy against resistant Plasmodia spp., is critical. Surprisingly, due to poor physicochemical characteristics and pharmacokinetic profiles, many novel prospective antimalarial medicines are overlooked [7, 8]. In accordance with this, novel studies are being performed on the prospect of producing antimalarial salts and co-crystals [4]. The fundamental goal of these investigations is to enhance the physiochemical characteristics of antimalarial medicines without interfering with their bioactivity [9, 10, 11].

The search for APD-APIs is motivated by previous studies, which have revealed the existence of two important plant-based antimalarial drugs (1) quinine and (2) artemisinin from Cinchona spp. stem bark and Artemisia annua, respectively [12, 13, 14]. It is envisaged that bioprospecting of existing enormous plant biodiversity can come up with novel antimalarial drugs. More importantly, the quest for novel plant-based antimalarial drugs is based on ethnopharmacological studies, which are critical in drug development and discovery [15]. The basic idea in an ethnopharmacological study in this case is to come up with inexpensive and easily used antimalarial therapies, which subsequently limit the cost of drug discovery and development research [16, 17, 18]. However, only approximate of 6 and 15% of all land plants have been analyzed for pharmacological activity and have an elucidated phytochemistry, respectively [17]. The main reasons for considering APD-APIs in malaria treatment include low cost, effectiveness, easy availability, safety, and cultural preferences [19].

Interestingly, plants are important sources of APIs, which can be utilized in treatment and prevention many human health problems including malaria [17]. Generally, up to 25% of known plant species are exploited in medicine production worldwide and approximately 65% of the global population count on plants for their basic health care [20, 21]. These plants have been identified as rich sources of template compounds for synthesis of other important drugs and in the prevention as well as fight against many infectious diseases including malaria. In the case of malaria, two lead antimalarial drugs, quinine and artemisinin, have been utilized as derivatives of chloroquine and artemether, respectively. Additionally, antimalarial drugs such as primaquine, amodiaquine, and mefloquine are synthesized based on quinine and in antimalarial drugs including arteether, and sodium artesunate, where artemisinin is the lead compound [7, 22]. Plants are associated with potential antimalarial APIs classified into major groups including flavonoids, alkaloids, glycosides, terpenoids, and phenolic acids [23].

Co-crystals are solid compounds that show promise in drug development, particularly in terms of improving physicochemical properties such as drug solubility. Generally, co-crystals are formed due to the interactions between (1) active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) and (2) co-crystals forming agents (normally solid under ambient conditions) [24, 25]. Normally, H-bond holds the two components of co-crystals, and this is facilitated by functional groups of APIs, e.g., carboxylic acid functional group. Moreover, APIs are associated with other function groups such as amine and amide groups [26]. Co-crystallization is performed under relatively mild reaction conditions. The techniques for preparing co-crystals are classified into (1) solid-state and (2) solution-based [27, 28, 29, 30].

Despite the various studies that have been conducted on a wide range of pharmacological molecules, plant-derived antimalarial drug molecules appear to have been neglected [10]. Many current antimalarial drugs are becoming ineffective owing to the drug resistance. For instance, Plasmodium spp. and Plasmodium falciparum have shown resistance to the antimalarial quinine derivatives such as chloroquine and an increase in resistance to the artemisinin-based therapies, respectively [2, 3]. The aim of this chapter is to explore multicomponent crystal structures utilization in antimalarial treatment and review the literature that addresses the feasibility of this therapeutic option. Up to date, there is no structured literature that relates to the co-crystallization of APD-APIs. Therefore, this chapter identifies the research gaps and outlines (1) APD-APIs, (2) limitations of single APD-APIs in the treatment of malaria, (3) techniques in the development and properties of APD-APIs co-crystals.

Advertisement

2. Summary of main APD-APIs

According to Ungogo [31], statistics for pharmaceuticals authorized by the U.S Food and Drug Administration (1981–2010) suggested that around 35% of approved new medicines were derived from natural sources, with plants-derived drugs contributing 25%. Phenolics, quinones, alkaloids, saponins, terpenes, and their derivatives are examples of APD-APIs. Notably, these APD-APIs can be utilized as both crude phytomedicines and pure pharmaceuticals. They can, nevertheless, serve as basis for the production of synthetic pharmacologically complex active compounds, models for designing lead molecules, and taxonomic markers for the discovery of novel drugs [31].

2.1 Alkaloids

Alkaloids are a group of diverse plant secondary metabolites characterized by a basic nitrogen associated with a carbon ring [32]. The classification of these APD-APIs is on the basis of the principal C-N skeleton, and in certain instances, classification is according to biological origin. Using the first classification system, alkaloids are classified into 13 classes: pyrroles, pyrrolines, pyrrolidines, pyrrolizidines, indoles, pyridines, pyrimidines, piperidines, quinolones, isoquinolines, quinolizidines, tropanes, and imidazoles [31]. Antimalarial alkaloids have been reported in several studies, for instance, Iwu and keayman [33] isolated alkaloids (which are antimalarial) from Picralima nitida fruits. The authors reported IC50 values in the range 1.6–2.4 μg/ml when crude dichloromethane extracts were tested for antiplasmodial action. Additionally, indole alkaloids including akuammicine and alstonine were isolated with aid of chromatographic technique, and these alkaloids were inhibitory against P. falciparum strains (1) D6 and (2) W2 as indicated by IC50 values ranging from 0.01 to 0.9 μg/ml [5]. More recently, Holarrhena africana bark and leaves’ alkaloid fractions showed antiplasmodial activity (Figure 1) [34].

Figure 1.

Some examples of the antimalarial alkaloids.

2.2 Terpenoids

Terpenoids are compounds of plant essential oils and terpene hydrocarbons derivatives, and according to [35], these APD-APIs are classified into eight categories: monoterpenoids, diterpenoids, triterpenoids, tetraterpenoids, hemiterpenoids, sesquiterpenoids, sesterterpenoids, and polyterpenoids. Notably, in several studies, terpenoids were identified in antimalarial plant essential oils [35, 36, 37, 38], and most of the plants from which essential oils are extracted have been exploited as traditional antimalarial and antipyretic medicines [39]. One of the most common antimalarial terpenoids is artemisinin, which is classified as sesquiterpenoid. This sesquiterpenoid (artemisinin) as well as bioactive compounds derived from this antimalarial is highly antimalarial especially against P. falciparum that is chloroquine-resistant. A study by [40] identified several diterpenoids, for example, (13S)-ent-7β-hydroxy3-cleroden-15-oic acid and (13S)-ent-18-(E)-coumaroyloxy-8(17)-labden-15-oic acid from a plant, Nuxia sphaerocephala in Madagascar. The identified diterpenoids were antiplasmodial as indicated by IC50 values ranging from 4.3 to 21.0 μgml−1 against FcB1 P. falciparum. Several studies have identified different classes of plant derived terpenoids and their antimalarial activities (Figure 2) [40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45].

Figure 2.

Some examples of the antimalarial terpenoids.

2.3 Quinones

Quinones are normally classed on the basis of their molecular structure, and accordingly, they are classified into three major groups: anthraquinones, benzoquinones, naphthoquinones. The three classes of quinones are aromatic ring based where anthraquinones, benzoquinones, and naphthoquinones have linear/angular anthracene ring, benzene ring, and naphthalenic ring, respectively [46]. Benzoquinones were isolated and had a substantial in vitro antimalarial action especially against strains of P. falciparum in a number of studies [47, 48, 49]. Recent studies on antimicrobial activity of quinones-rich Aspidosperma nitidum indicated strong in vitro antimalarial efficacy against W2 strain of P. falciparum and P. berghei in vivo respectively [50]. Naphthoquinones such as atovaquone were identified and have shown antimalarial activity due to their quinonic nature [51, 52]. Plant-based quinones including 2-acetylnaphtho-[2,3b]-furan-4,9-dione and plumbagin high activity against P. berghei (IC50 = 0.002 μgml−1) and P. falciparum (IC50 = 0.05 μgml−1) respectively (Figure 3) [50, 53, 54].

Figure 3.

Some examples of the antimalarial quinones.

2.4 Phenolics

Phenolic compounds are considered highly abundant group of plant metabolites. These metabolites are classified into three major groups: flavonoids (polyphenolic compounds, which exist as aglycones, methylated derivatives, and glucosides in plants), phenolic acids (e.g., hydroxybenzoic and hydroxycinnamic acids), and polyphenols [55, 56]. Additionally, these APD-APIs are characterized by a hydroxyl group bonded to an aromatic hydrocarbon group, with the most basic being a phenol (C6H5OH). Phenolics include lignins and tannins (polyphenolic compounds with high molecular weight) such as hydrolyzable and condensed tannins. Classification of phenolics is normally based on three methods: (1) number of hydroxylic groups, (2) chemical composition, and (3) number of aromatic rings as well as number of carbon atoms in the side chain [56]. Generally, phenolic compounds are rarely in a free form in plants, and therefore, they exist as glycosylates and polyphenols [55, 56, 57]. Phenolic compounds such as ellagic acid have shown significant degree of activity against malaria parasites, for example, [58] reported antimalarial activity of ellagic acid against Plasmodium vinckei. The presence of the phenolics in plants used traditionally against malaria has been noted in several of experimental reports [59, 60, 61]. The Artocarpus styracifolius (Moraceae) ethyl acetate extract (10 μg/ml) containing flavonoids (polyphenol) inactivated FcB1 P. falciparum significantly [62, 63]. According to [62], prenylated flavonoids including artoheterophyllin displayed high activity against P. falciparum strain FcB1 (IC50 = 4.797 μM) (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Structural summary of some of the antimalarial phenolics.

Advertisement

3. Limitations of single APD-APIs and shift to multiple first-line therapies in the treatment of malaria

3.1 Limitations of single APD-APIs in malaria treatment

The treatment of malaria is basically based on natural products, for example, APD-APIs, semisynthetic and synthetic compounds. Effective and safe antimalarial drugs are broadly classified into three main categories: (1) quinoline derivatives, (2) antifolates, and (3) artemisinin derivatives [64]. The first identified and widely used APD-APIs was quinine, an alkaloid. Notably, quinine was extracted from the Cinchona calisaya bark [65] and was used as first-line monotherapy. However, this antimalarial drug was exploited in the synthesis of a number of derivatives including 8-aminoquinoline (primaquine) and 4-aminoquinoline (chloroquine) [65, 66]. These derivatives of quinine were shown to eliminate malaria parasites through preventing biotransformation of heme, into nontoxic pigment granules, and therefore allowing heme to accumulate and promote cell lysis as well as Plasmodia auto-digestion [66]. Though quinine was an effective APD-API, development of resistance among P. falciparum strains and high toxicity has significantly contributed to its limited use. Additionally, this alkaloid (quinine) has a fairly short pharmacological half-life [6667]. However, use of quinine combined with other antimalarial drugs (in order to improve therapeutic efficacy) against malaria has been reported [12, 64].

The derivative of quinine, 8-aminoquinoline (primaquine), was utilized as a monotherapy against malaria during the first part of the twentieth century. However, it was disregarded due to abnormally elevated toxicity associated with highly reduced activity [64]. The other antimalarial drugs, which were widely exploited as first-monotherapy after abandonment of primaquine, include quinacrine, a derivative of acridine. Another derivative of quinine, a 4-aminoquinoline, chloroquine was later used as a first-line monotherapy against malaria for several years due to its efficacy, low as well as manageable side effects, and low cost [68]. Being the first-line monotherapy for a long period of time, chloroquine has led to P. falciparum strains, which are chloroquine-resistant [36]. Other quinine derivatives used as first-line monotherapies and are linked to several adverse effects and emergence of resistance include pyronaridine and mefloquine [69]. Although chloroquine significantly reduced malaria-related mortality and morbidity, its prolonged use has resulted in spread of resistance. For instance, cases of chloroquine resistance were reported in countries including Brazil, Thailand, and Vietnam by 1964 [70, 71]. Furthermore, according WHO reports of 1979 and 1981, chloroquine resistance was reported to have covered most parts of North-East India, South America, and Southeast Asia by 1980 [71].

Though not plant-derived, pyrimethamine was widely utilized as an antimalarial monotherapy in early 1950 and late 1960 as a prophylactic and treatment drug. Due to resistance of malarial parasite against pyrimethamine, pyrimethamine was combined with sulfadoxine to produce a more efficient antimalarial drug, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) [71]. This antimalarial drug was recommended as a first-line drug in many countries associated with chloroquine inactivity [72, 73]. Although for some time, resistance to pyrimethamine was inhibited by sulfadoxine, inactivity of sulfadoxine to malaria parasites was finally reported in African and Asian countries [71, 72, 73]. This prompted the use of artemisinin, an antimalarial drug, which was discovered from an important plant, Artemisia annua in the year 1972 [74]. Artemisinin is an APD-API classified under terpenoids and is specifically a sesquiterpene lactone [75]. This APD-API has been identified to be effective against blood as well as P. falciparum gametocyte stages [76].

The use of artemisinin as monotherapy has been noted in many regions including western part of Cambodia, and clinical studies in these regions have shown emerging P. falciparum strains, which are resistant to artemisinin [77]. Apart from reports of resistance of P. falciparum strains to artemisinin, artemisinin is inherently linked to solubility and bioavailability challenges [78, 79]. This, therefore, has resulted in the synthesis of quite a number of artemisinin derivatives with varying degrees of solubilities in oil and water [78, 79, 80]. The most common synthetic artemisinin derivatives include artemether, dihydroartemisinin, artesunate, and arteether. Based on their solubilities in water and oil, they are administered into the patient using different routes, for instance, artemether and dihydroartemisinin, which are oil- and water-soluble, are intramuscularly and administered orally administered, respectively [78]. In the face of this improvement, artemisinin derivatives are quickly absorbed, distributed, and metabolized.

Artemisinin and its derivatives including artesunate are characterized by being quick-acting and rapid blood parasite reduction. However, this effectiveness is hampered by a rise of artemisinin-resistant P. falciparum as described in nations including western Cambodia, Myanmar, Viet Nam, and Thailand [5, 78, 81]. Additionally, reports of decreased sensitivity to artemisinin of P. falciparum isolates have been made in Nigeria and Madagascar [82]. A number of malaria patients from countries such as Sierra Leone, India, and western Thailand took time to respond to artemisinin derivatives including artesunate and artemether [78, 83, 84]. Furthermore, the use of these antimalarial drugs as first-line monotherapy is associated with maintenance of an effective drug concentration for a short period after drug administration. In addition to this, short oral treatment courses have contributed to increased rates of recrudescence [66, 71, 85]. An increase in the number days of days of treatment to 7 has significantly reduced recurrent parasitemia, when artemisinin or its derivatives are utilized as monotherapy [74, 77, 85]. Generally, insensitivity to conventional antimalarial monotherapy including artemisinin as well as artemisinin-derived drugs has contributed significantly to antimalarial monotherapies being overlooked and disregarded [86]. Thus, a number of techniques are being explored globally to enhance potency of antimalarial drugs especially plant-derived ones and significantly interrupt parasite resistance to these drugs.

3.2 Shift to multiple first-line therapies in malaria treatment

Shift from monotherapy to multiple first-line therapies in malaria treatment, e.g., use of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACTs) has been exploited as an intervention to alleviate resistance to several antimalarial monotherapies [87], and according to [88], the adoption of ACTs was as a result of occurrence of resistance to oral artemisinin monotherapies. ACTs are produced by combining artemisinin derivatives with complimentary partner drugs, and the net effects of combining these drugs are: (1) rapid action and short period of treatment due to artemisinin derivatives and (2) prevention of recrudescence due to the partner drug [71, 89, 90]. It is against this background that WHO recommended the use of ACTs in the early 2000s in countries that had prevalence of Plasmodium falciparum strains that were highly resistant to the conventional available antimalarials [85, 91]. To date, ACTs continue to be among the most effective globally and remain a highly acclaimed first-line treatment for all cases of basic malaria [92]. The recommended ACTs include artemether/lumefantrine and dihydroartemisinin/piperaquine [93]. The efficacy of the artemisinins has been reported to be based on their activity, which have been improved by utilized synthetic artemisinin dimers, trimers, as well as tetramers without interfering with the peroxide bridge [94]. Generally, improving ACTs activity improves efficacy and postpone the development of resistance to malarial parasites. Although ACTs have been characterized with high curative activity, reports of P. falciparum strains with elevated resistance to ACTs have been presented in the Greater Mekong Region [95]. Faced with resistance against ACTs, some regions have adopted triple artemisinin-based combination therapy (TACT against multidrug resistant P. falciparum while awaiting registration of novel antimalarial drugs [96]. The efficacy of TACT is based on molecular antimalarial resistance mechanisms, which indicate counter-selection of antimalarial resistance by frequently utilized drugs, (1) piperaquine and (2) mefloquine [93].

Advertisement

4. Techniques in the development and properties of APD-APIs co-crystals

4.1 Techniques for development of co-crystals

Despite the fact that there are several APD-APIs, they lack key pharmacological activities due to poor physicochemical qualities such as low bioavailability, stability, and solubility [97]. Nanoparticles, co-crystallization, liposomal formulations, chemical changes, and changing ADP-APIs into solids such as polymorphs, salts, and hydrates are just a few of the strategies that may be employed to improve physical characteristics of ADP-APIs [98]. Co-crystallization has been praised for its effectiveness in increasing the pharmacological characteristics of APD-APIs. The use of co-crystallization to adjust the physical features of APD-APIs is excellent since co-crystals are not considered as new medications by the US Food and Drug Administration, but rather pro-drugs [99]. Although co-crystallization of APD-APIs improves their biopharmaceutical and physicochemical traits, there is need to screen APD-APIs based co-crystals. The screening of co-crystals efficiency is basically based on emerging techniques including quantitative structure-activity, Hansen solubility parameters calculation, and pKa rule [100, 101].

Co-crystallization involves dissolving APIs and respective coformers in an appropriate solvent at a predetermined stoichiometric ratio and the solvent is then removed to saturate of solutes for co-crystal production [25, 26]. This therefore implies that co-crystallization is based on slow solvent evaporation as well as reaction co-crystallization and slurry and antisolvent diffusion [12, 28]. Basically, co-crystallization is dependent on strong H-bonds between APIs and their respective coformers, thereby facilitating co-crystal formation [27, 29]. Notably, co-crystallization under the solution-based technique can be effectively achieved if the least soluble component is prevented from sole precipitation, and co-crystals’ purity can be improved by selecting APIs and coformers with congruent solubilities [28, 29, 30]. In addition to this, other factors such as solvent systems, stoichiometric ratio, and crystallization temperature influence co-crystallization process [29]. Costa et al. [102] reported that co-crystal structures from APIs and coformers with similar shapes and polarities co-crystallize easily with each other.

In addition to solution-based technique, solid-state grinding can be applied, and this involves homogenizing APIs and coformers in mortar to prepare co-crystals using mechanical techniques [29, 102]. Solid-state grinding techniques (SSGTs) are based on and depend on molecular mobility and existence complementarity between APIs and coformers [26, 27, 28, 29, 30]. Preparation of co-crystals may involve addition of small quantities of solvents before grinding of APIs and coformers, where the solvent facilitates co-crystal formation. This technique is called liquid-assisted method and is highly efficient in the formation of co-crystals [26, 27, 28, 29, 30]. APIs (bioactive compounds) generated from antimalarial plants are essential and have received attention in drug discovery and development. However, due to their poor physicochemical and biological qualities, such as solubility, stability, and dissolution performance, the large proportion of antimalarial plant-derived APIs (APD-APIs), such as alkaloids, flavonoids, phenolic acids, and terpenoids, are disregarded [19, 21, 23]. These PDADs-APIs supply a lot of hydrogen bond donors and acceptors for co-crystal formation, which makes it possible for APD-APIs and coformers to interact [29, 102]. Co-crystallization of these APD-APIs with coformers provides distinct advantages in terms of modulating physicochemical features of these compounds while avoiding covalent interactions that might compromise their therapeutic potential [27, 28, 29]. These PDADs-APIs supply a lot of hydrogen bond donors and acceptors for co-crystal formation, which makes it possible for APD-APIs and coformers to interact [102].

Co-crystallization can be applied to the production of multicomponent solids with more than two APIs. This combination of APIs has recently improved physical properties of individual APIs and reduced the number of doses given to a patient [103, 104]. It has, however, noted that formulation of APIs-APIs combinations is associated with inherent challenges including chemical interactions, instability, and variations in solubility of different APIs [105]. Though APIs-APIs combinations could potentially address the issues around antimalarial resistance, there is dearth of published information on APIs-APIs co-crystals. As indicated for other APIs-APIs co-crystals, APD-APIs- APD-APIs combinations are presumed to have synergistic as well as additive effects and enhanced bioavailability, among other advantages of biopharmaceuticals (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

Theoretical outline of the formation of APD-APIs co-crystals.

4.2 Properties of APD-APIs co-crystals

APD-APIs have poor physicochemical qualities, and their combination with coformers to produce co-crystals considerably improves a variety of attributes including thermal stability, solubility, and hygroscopicity [106]. The alteration of these APD-APIs affects therapeutic action while retaining pharmacological properties [97]. An overview of the key attributes of both APD-APIs and APD-APIs co-crystals is outlined in this section.

4.2.1 Thermal stability

Thermal stability is a critical feature for any APD-API or APD-API co-crystal. However, most APD-APIs have low thermal stability, and modifying these APD-APIs into APD-API co-crystals has demonstrated to enhance overall stability [107]. Notably, APD-APIs that easily sublime at room temperature inevitably result in drug loss during manufacture and storage. According to Lu et al. [108], the conversion of APD-APIs into APD-API co-crystals such as 2,6-dihydroxybenzoic acid has greatly increased thermal stability, as evidenced by results of study using differential scanning calorimetry and the thermogravimetric analysis method. When compared with APD-API, dihydroartemisinin, which sublimes at a relatively low temperature, co-crystals such as 2,6-dihydroxybenzoic acid have a higher sublimation temperature above 100°C, indicating a better degree of thermal stability [108].

4.2.2 Solubility

APD-APIs are often either slightly soluble or insoluble, which limits their application as biopharmaceuticals. The modification of these APD-APIs into co-crystals may be crucial, as several studies have shown that co-crystals can maintain stability while also enhancing solubility [109]. In most circumstances, it has been noted that selecting highly soluble coformers can increase co-crystal solubility. For example, in the production of certain APD-APIs co-crystals, extremely soluble coformers such as succinic acid and benzoic acid have been used [110].

4.2.3 Hygroscopicity

Because of the presence of free functional groups such as hydroxyl groups, most APD-APIs, including phenols, are very unstable at high relative humidity (have high hygroscopicity) [111]. Wong et al. [112], on the other hand, claim that the interaction between APD-API and their respective coformers during crystallization processes increases stability at high relative humidity. Curcumin-resorcinol co-crystals, for example, have been demonstrated to be very stable at high (95%) relative humidity as compared with curcumin, which quickly absorbs moisture at 75% relative humidity [113]. The interaction between the APD-API functional groups and those of the coformers, resulting in intermolecular interactions, is correlated to the stability of APD-API co-crystals at high (95%) relative humidity (low hygroscopicity) [114]. The presence of these intermolecular connections in APD-API co-crystals inhibits the interaction between moisture and APD-API functional groups [111]. This basically means that when the interactions between coformers and APD-APIs increase, the barrier to moisture absorption of APD-API co-crystals falls dramatically.

NB the other important properties of APD-APIs, which are modified in order to improve their efficacy through co-crystallization production, include bioavailability, dissolution, and tabletability [112].

Advertisement

5. Challenges and opportunities associated with development of co-crystallized antimalarial drugs from APD-APIs

Notably, APD-APIs are divided into two categories: (1) potential compounds for natural medicine production and (2) templates for artificially synthesized pharmaceuticals [115]. The quest for novel plant-derived antimalarial drugs, as well as the development of phytomedicines in general, is, however, inherently associated with two major obstacles, (1) existence of extremely active plant compounds with complicated molecular structures, where no feasible industrial production is envisaged, and (2) presence of APD-APIs with relatively reduced activity yet with relatively simple molecular structures, for which artificial production could be conducted [115, 116]. With notable examples of naturally occurring ADP-APIs, the development of novel antimalarial drugs is without. Although various powerful plant-derived antiplasmodial compounds have been documented, the majority of them have only been assessed in vitro, with few being evaluated for toxicity and even fewer being evaluated in vivo [117, 118]. Furthermore, most of them seem to be present in low quantities in plants and are frequently found as part of complicated composites, making separation and processing extremely costly. Among other factors, scientific evaluation of traditional ADP-APIs is limited by paucity of ethnobotany information [115, 117].

Advertisement

6. Conclusion and outlook

Though co-crystallization is a critical technique of improving therapeutic potential of pharmaceutically poor APD-APIs, there are several changes associated with APD-APIs co-crystal production including identification of suitable coformers and appropriate methods of production. However, like any other co-crystals, APD-APIs co-crystals are presumed to improve physical and pharmaceutical properties of ADP-APIs. APD-APIs such as phenolic acids and terpenoids have been shown to provide important functional groups, which allows for the formation of non-covalent intermolecular associations with a number of coformers during co-crystallization processes. In this chapter, information on pharmaceutical applications of APD-APIs co-crystals is summarized. With more research and clinical studies, co-crystallization of APD-APIs into single and multi-component molecules could provide the basis for malaria treatment.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1. WHO, World Malaria Report 2020: 20 Years of Global Progress and Challenges. WHO. 2020.
  2. 2. Arya A et al. Artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) and drug resistance molecular markers: A systematic review of clinical studies from two malaria endemic regions–India and sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal for Parasitology: Drugs and Drug Resistance. 2021;15:43-56
  3. 3. Erhunse N, Sahal D. Protecting future antimalarials from the trap of resistance: Lessons from artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) failures. Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2021;11(5):541-554
  4. 4. Nordmann T, Borrmann S, Ramharter M. Drug-induced hypersensitivity to artemisinin-based therapies for malaria. Trends in Parasitology. 2021;38(2):136-146
  5. 5. Ouji M et al. Plasmodium falciparum resistance to artemisinin-based combination therapies: A sword of Damocles in the path toward malaria elimination. Parasite. 2018;25:24. DOI: 10.1051/parasite/2018021
  6. 6. Ross LS, Fidock DA. Elucidating mechanisms of drug-resistant plasmodium falciparum. Cell Host & Microbe. 2019;26(1):35-47
  7. 7. Edwin GT, Korsik M, Todd MH. The past, present and future of anti-malarial medicines. Malaria Journal. 2019;18(1):1-21
  8. 8. Katsuno K et al. Hit and lead criteria in drug discovery for infectious diseases of the developing world. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 2015;14(11):751-758
  9. 9. Bilia AR et al. Vesicles and micelles: Two versatile vectors for the delivery of natural products. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology. 2016;32:241-255
  10. 10. Kazi M et al. Enhancing oral bioavailability of apigenin using a bioactive self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery system (bio-SNEDDS): In vitro, in vivo and stability evaluations. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12(8):749
  11. 11. Noonan TJ et al. A preformulation co-crystal screening case study: Polymorphic co-crystals of an imidazopyridazine antimalarial drug lead with the coformer succinic acid. Journal of Molecular Structure. 2020;1204:127561
  12. 12. Achan J et al. Quinine, an old anti-malarial drug in a modern world: Role in the treatment of malaria. Malaria Journal. 2011;10(1):1-12
  13. 13. Ceravolo IP et al. Studies on activities and chemical characterization of medicinal plants in search for new antimalarials: A ten year review on ethnopharmacology. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2021;12:734263. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.734263
  14. 14. Krettli AU et al. The search for new antimalarial drugs from plants used to treat fever and malaria or plants ramdomly selected: A review. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. 2001;96(8):1033-1042
  15. 15. Brusotti G et al. Isolation and characterization of bioactive compounds from plant resources: The role of analysis in the ethnopharmacological approach. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 2014;87:218-228
  16. 16. Ashraf MA. Phytochemicals as potential anticancer drugs: Time to ponder nature’s bounty. BioMed Research International. 2020;2020:8602879. DOI: 10.1155/2020/8602879
  17. 17. Atanasov AG et al. Discovery and resupply of pharmacologically active plant-derived natural products: A review. Biotechnology Advances. 2015;33(8):1582-1614
  18. 18. Leonti M. The future is written: Impact of scripts on the cognition, selection, knowledge and transmission of medicinal plant use and its implications for ethnobotany and ethnopharmacology. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2011;134(3):542-555
  19. 19. Noronha M et al. A literature review on traditional herbal medicines for malaria. South African Journal of Botany. 2020;128:292-303
  20. 20. Anyinam C. Ecology and ethnomedicine: Exploring links between current environmental crisis and indigenous medical practices. Social Science & Medicine. 1995;40(3):321-329
  21. 21. Mazid M, Khan TA, Mohammad F. Medicinal plants of rural India: A review of use by Indian folks. Indo Global Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2012;2(3):286-304
  22. 22. Kumari A et al. Current scenario of artemisinin and its analogues for antimalarial activity. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2019;163:804-829
  23. 23. Nwodo JN et al. Exploring cancer therapeutics with natural products from African medicinal plants, part II: Alkaloids, terpenoids and flavonoids. Anti-Cancer Agents in Medicinal Chemistry (Formerly Current Medicinal Chemistry-Anti-Cancer Agents). 2016;16(1):108-127
  24. 24. Ancheria RK et al. An overview of pharmaceutical co-crystal. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Development. 2019;7(2):39-46
  25. 25. Conceicao J et al. Cyclodextrins as drug carriers in pharmaceutical technology: The state of the art. Current Pharmaceutical Design. 2018;24(13):1405-1433
  26. 26. Kavanagh ON, Walker G, Lusi M. Graph-set analysis helps to understand charge transfer in a novel ionic cocrystal when the Δp K a rule fails. Crystal Growth & Design. 2019;19(9):5308-5313
  27. 27. Blagden N, Coles S Berry D. Pharmaceutical co-crystals–are we there yet? CrystEngComm. 2014;16(26):5753-5761
  28. 28. Dalpiaz A, Pavan B, Ferretti V. Can pharmaceutical co-crystals provide an opportunity to modify the biological properties of drugs? Drug Discovery Today. 2017;22(8):1134-1138
  29. 29. Duggirala NK et al. Pharmaceutical cocrystals: Along the path to improved medicines. Chemical Communications. 2016;52(4):640-655
  30. 30. Huang S et al. Simultaneously improving the physicochemical properties, dissolution performance, and bioavailability of apigenin and daidzein by co-crystallization with theophylline. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2019;108(9):2982-2993
  31. 31. Ungogo MA et al. A review of the antimalarial, antitrypanosomal, and antileishmanial activities of natural compounds isolated from Nigerian flora. Frontiers in Chemistry. 2020;8(617448):1221
  32. 32. Kurek J editor. Alkaloids: Their Importance in Nature and Human Life. Intechopen; 2019. p.1-8
  33. 33. Iwu MM, Kiayman DL. Evaluation of the in vitro antimalarial activity of Picralima nitida extracts. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 1992;36(2):133-135
  34. 34. Nnadi CO et al. Potent antitrypanosomal activities of 3-aminosteroids against African trypanosomes: Investigation of cellular effects and of cross-resistance with existing drugs. Molecules. 2019;24(2):268
  35. 35. Chaturvedi D. Sesquiterpene Lactones: Structural Diversity and Their Biological Activities, In-Opportunity, Challanges and Scope of Natural Products in Medicinal Chemistry. ISBN: 978-81-308-0448-4. Trivandrum: Research Signpost; 2011. pp. 313-334
  36. 36. Kaur K et al. Quinolines and structurally related heterocycles as antimalarials. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2010;45(8):3245-3264
  37. 37. Khamsan S et al. A new isoflavonc from Jacaranda obtusifolia HBK ssp. rhombifolia (GFW Meijer) gentry. Acta Pharmaceutica Sciencia. 2011;53(2):181-188
  38. 38. Nogueira CR, Lopes LM.Antiplasmodial natural products. Molecules. 2011;16(3):2146-2190
  39. 39. Titanji VP, Zofou D, Ngemenya MN. The antimalarial potential of medicinal plants used for the treatment of malaria in Cameroonian folk medicine. African Journal of Traditional, Complementary, and Alternative Medicines. 2008;5(3):302
  40. 40. Mahmout Y et al. 15ème colloque sur la Pharmacopée et la Médecine Traditionnelles Africaines. Conseil Africain et Malgache pour l’Enseignement Supérieur (CAMES). 2008:1
  41. 41. Ajaiyeoba E et al. Antiplasmodial compounds from Cassia siamea stem bark extract. Phytotherapy Research: An International Journal Devoted to Pharmacological and Toxicological Evaluation of Natural Product Derivatives. 2008;22(2):254-255
  42. 42. Mbah J et al. Antiplasmodial triterpenes from the stem bark of Baillonella toxisperma. ISESCO Journal of Science and Technology. 2011;7(12):84-87
  43. 43. Talontsi FM et al. Antibacterial and antiplasmodial constituents of Beilschmiedia cryptocaryoides. Journal of Natural Products. 2013;76(1):97-102
  44. 44. Zofou D et al. Hypericum lanceolatum (Hypericaceae) as a potential source of new anti-malarial agents: A bioassay-guided fractionation of the stem bark. Malaria Journal. 2011;10(1):1-7
  45. 45. Zofou D et al. Antimalarial drug interactions of compounds isolated from Kigelia africana (Bignoniaceae) and their synergism with artemether, against the multidrug-resistant W2mef plasmodium falciparum strain. Parasitology Research. 2012;110(2):539-544
  46. 46. Santos AG et al. A simple, comprehensive, and miniaturized solvent extraction method for determination of particulate-phase polycyclic aromatic compounds in air. Journal of Chromatography A. 2016;1435:6-17
  47. 47. Ichino T et al. Nonadiabatic effects in the photoelectron spectrum of the pyrazolide-d 3 anion: Three-state interactions in the pyrazolyl-d 3 radical. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 2006;125(8):084312
  48. 48. Radwan MM et al. Non-cannabinoid constituents from a high potency Cannabis sativa variety. Phytochemistry. 2008;69(14):2627-2633
  49. 49. Tasdemir D et al. Antitrypanosomal and antileishmanial activities of flavonoids and their analogues: in vitro, in vivo, structure-activity relationship, and quantitative structure-activity relationship studies. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2006;50(4):1352-1364
  50. 50. do Nascimento Brandão DL et al. Estudo in silico de diterpenos isolados de Portulaca pilosa L e sua correlação com estudos etnobotânicos. Research, Society and Development. 2020;9(11):e99491110635-e99491110635
  51. 51. Vale VV et al. Naphthoquinones isolated from Eleutherine plicata herb: In vitro antimalarial activity and molecular modeling to investigate their binding modes. Medicinal Chemistry Research. 2020;29(3):487-494
  52. 52. Waller RF, McFadden GI. The apicoplast: A review of the derived plastid of apicomplexan parasites. Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2005;7(1):57-80
  53. 53. Gómez-Estrada H et al. In vitro antimalarial activity of fractions and constituents isolated from Tabebuia billbergii. Revista Cubana de Plantas Medicinales. 2012;17(2):172-180
  54. 54. Moreira CM et al. A systematic review of sub-microscopic plasmodium vivax infection. Malaria Journal. 2015;14(1):1-10
  55. 55. Mamede L et al. Natural phenolic compounds and derivatives as potential antimalarial agents. Planta Medica. 2020;86(09):585-618
  56. 56. Saxena M et al. Phytochemistry of medicinal plants. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2013;1(6):168-182
  57. 57. Bekono BD et al. The potential of anti-malarial compounds derived from African medicinal plants: A review of pharmacological evaluations from 2013 to 2019. Malaria Journal. 2020;19(1):1-35
  58. 58. Soh PN et al. In vitro and in vivo properties of ellagic acid in malaria treatment. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2009;53(3):1100-1106
  59. 59. Aldulaimi O et al. A characterization of the antimalarial activity of the bark of Cylicodiscus gabunensis harms. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2017;198:221-225
  60. 60. Banzouzi J-T et al. In vitro antiplasmodial activity of extracts of Alchornea cordifolia and identification of an active constituent: Ellagic acid. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2002;81(3):399-401
  61. 61. Reddy MK et al. Antioxidant, antimalarial and antimicrobial activities of tannin-rich fractions, ellagitannins and phenolic acids from Punica granatum L. Planta Medica. 2007;53(05):461-467
  62. 62. Davis RA et al. Antimalarial activity of pyrroloiminoquinones from the Australian marine sponge Zyzzya sp. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2012;55(12):5851-5858
  63. 63. Tajuddeen N, Van Heerden FR. Antiplasmodial natural products: An update. Malaria Journal. 2019;18(1):1-62
  64. 64. Pinheiro L et al. Current antimalarial therapies and advances in the development of semi-synthetic artemisinin derivatives. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências. 2018;90:1251-1271
  65. 65. Lee M. Plants against malaria. Part 1: Cinchona or the Peruvian bark. The Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh. 2002;32(3):189-196
  66. 66. Karunamoorthi K et al. Role of traditional antimalarial plants in the battle against the global malaria burden. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases. 2013;13(8):521-544
  67. 67. Muregi FW, Ishih A. Next-generation antimalarial drugs: Hybrid molecules as a new strategy in drug design. Drug Development Research. 2010;71(1):20-32
  68. 68. Teixeira C et al. “Recycling” classical drugs for malaria. Chemical Reviews. 2014;114(22):11164-11220
  69. 69. Nosten F, Phillips-Howard PA, Kuile FOT. Other 4-methanolquinolines, amyl alcohols and phentathrenes: Mefloquine, lumefantrine and halofantrine. In: Staines HM, Sanjeev KS, editors. Treatment and Prevention of Malaria. Springer Nature; 2011. pp. 95-111
  70. 70. Moore DV, Lanier JE. Observations on two plasmodium falciparum infections with an abnormal response to chloroquine. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 1961;10(1):5-9
  71. 71. Rasmussen C, Alonso P, Ringwald P. Current and emerging strategies to combat antimalarial resistance. Expert Review of Anti-Infective Therapy. 2022;20(3):353-372
  72. 72. Roper C et al. Intercontinental spread of pyrimethamine-resistant malaria. Science. 2004;305(5687):1124-1124
  73. 73. Vinayak S et al. Origin and evolution of sulfadoxine resistant plasmodium falciparum. PLoS Pathogens. 2010;6(3):e1000830
  74. 74. Tu Y et al. Studies on the constituents of Artemisia annua L. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica. 2015;57(1):366-370
  75. 75. Mohammadi S et al. Medicinal plants used in the treatment of malaria: A key emphasis to Artemisia, Cinchona, Cryptolepis, and Tabebuia genera. Phytotherapy Research. 2020;34(7):1556-1569
  76. 76. Duffy S, Avery VM. Identification of inhibitors of plasmodium falciparum gametocyte development. Malaria Journal. 2013;12(1):1-15
  77. 77. White NJ. Qinghaosu (artemisinin): The price of success. Science. 2008
  78. 78. Adebayo J et al. Enhancing the antimalarial activity of artesunate. Parasitology Research. 2020;119(9):2749-2764
  79. 79. Memvanga PB, Préat V. Formulation design and in vivo antimalarial evaluation of lipid-based drug delivery systems for oral delivery of β-arteether. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. 2012;82(1):112-119
  80. 80. de Carvalho LP, Kreidenweiss A, Held J. The preclinical discovery and development of rectal artesunate for the treatment of malaria in young children: A review of the evidence. Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery. 2021;16(1):13-22
  81. 81. Thu AM et al. Combating multidrug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria. The FEBS Journal. 2017;284(16):2569-2578
  82. 82. Randrianarivelojosia M et al. Madagascan isolates of plasmodium falciparum showing low sensitivity to artemether in vitro. Annals of Tropical Medicine & Parasitology. 2001;95(3):237-243
  83. 83. Gogtay N et al. Probable resistance to parenteral artemether in plasmodium falciparum: Case reports from Mumbai (Bombay), India. Annals of Tropical Medicine & Parasitology. 2000;94(5):519-520
  84. 84. Sahr F et al. Apparent drug failure following artesunate treatment of plasmodium falciparum malaria in Freetown, Sierra Leone: Four case reports. Annals of Tropical Medicine & Parasitology. 2001;95(5):445-449
  85. 85. Group, I.A.S. Artesunate combinations for treatment of malaria: meta-analysis. The Lancet. 2004;363(9402):9-17
  86. 86. Newton PN et al. Poor quality vital anti-malarials in Africa-an urgent neglected public health priority. Malaria Journal. 2011;10(1):1-22
  87. 87. Kavishe RA, Koenderink JB, Alifrangis M. Oxidative stress in malaria and artemisinin combination therapy: Pros and cons. The FEBS Journal. 2017;284(16):2579-2591
  88. 88. Bosman A, Mendis KN. A major transition in malaria treatment: the adoption and deployment of artemisinin-based combination therapies. In: Defining and Defeating the Intolerable Burden of Malaria III: Progress and Perspectives: Supplement to Volume 77 (6) of American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2007. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1715/
  89. 89. Jiang J-B et al. Antimalarial activity of mefloquine and qinghaosu. The Lancet. 1982;320(8293):285-288
  90. 90. Nigam M et al. Bioactive compounds and health benefits of Artemisia species. Natural Product Communications. 2019;14(7):1934578X19850354
  91. 91. WHO. Monitoring antimalarial drug resistance: Report of a WHO consultation, Geneva, Switzerland, 3-5 December 2001. World Health Organization; 2002
  92. 92. Khan AQ et al. Surveillance of genetic markers associated with plasmodium falciparum resistance to artemisinin-based combination therapy in Pakistan, 2018-2019. Malaria Journal. 2020;19(1):1-9
  93. 93. Bassat Q et al. Challenges in the clinical development pathway for triple and multiple drug combinations in the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Malaria Journal. 2022;21(1):1-8
  94. 94. Fröhlich T et al. Synthesis of artemisinin-derived dimers, trimers and dendrimers: Investigation of their antimalarial and antiviral activities including putative mechanisms of action. Chemistry–A European Journal. 2018;24(32):8103-8113
  95. 95. Leang R et al. Evidence of plasmodium falciparum malaria multidrug resistance to artemisinin and piperaquine in western Cambodia: Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine open-label multicenter clinical assessment. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2015;59(8):4719-4726
  96. 96. van der Pluijm RW et al. Triple artemisinin-based combination therapies for malaria—A new paradigm? Trends in Parasitology. 2021;37(1):15-24
  97. 97. Gupta D et al. Salts of therapeutic agents: Chemical, physicochemical, and biological considerations. Molecules. 2018;23(7):1719
  98. 98. Kalepu S, Nekkanti V. Insoluble drug delivery strategies: Review of recent advances and business prospects. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B. 2015;5(5):442-453
  99. 99. Thayyil AR et al. Pharmaceutical co-crystallization: Regulatory aspects, design, characterization, and applications. Advanced Pharmaceutical Bulletin. 2020;10(2):203
  100. 100. Gadade DD, Pekamwar SS. Pharmaceutical cocrystals: Regulatory and strategic aspects, design and development. Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin. 2016;6(4):479
  101. 101. Mswahili ME et al. Cocrystal prediction using machine learning models and descriptors. Applied Sciences. 2021;11(3):1323
  102. 102. Costa RN et al. Optimization and comparison of statistical tools for the prediction of multicomponent forms of a molecule: The antiretroviral nevirapine as a case study. CrystEngComm. 2020;22(43):7460-7474
  103. 103. Ngilirabanga JB, Samsodien H. Pharmaceutical co-crystal: An alternative strategy for enhanced physicochemical properties and drug synergy. Nano Select. 2021;2(3):512-526
  104. 104. Patole T, Deshpande A. Co-crystallization-a technique for solubility enhancement. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. 2014;5(9):3566
  105. 105. Thipparaboina R et al. Multidrug co-crystals: Towards the development of effective therapeutic hybrids. Drug Discovery Today. 2016;21(3):481-490
  106. 106. Karagianni A, Malamatari M, Kachrimanis K. Pharmaceutical cocrystals: New solid phase modification approaches for the formulation of APIs. Pharmaceutics. 2018;10(1):18
  107. 107. Bandaru RK et al. Recent advances in pharmaceutical cocrystals: From bench to market. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2021;12:780582. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.780582
  108. 108. Lu J et al. Characterization and pseudopolymorphism of L-phenylalanine anhydrous and monohydrate forms. African Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 2012;6(4):269-277
  109. 109. Kesisoglou F, Wu Y. Understanding the effect of API properties on bioavailability through absorption modeling. The AAPS Journal. 2008;10(4):516-525
  110. 110. Kuminek G et al. Cocrystals to facilitate delivery of poorly soluble compounds beyond-rule-of-5. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2016;101:143-166
  111. 111. Han S et al. Hygroscopicity of organic compounds as a function of organic functionality, water solubility, molecular weight, and oxidation level. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 2022;22(6):3985-4004
  112. 112. Wong SN et al. Cocrystallization of curcumin with benzenediols and benzenetriols via rapid solvent removal. Crystal Growth & Design. 2018;18(9):5534-5546
  113. 113. Vemuri VD, Lankalapalli S. Insight into concept and progress on pharmaceutical co-crystals: An overview. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Research. 2019;53:522-538
  114. 114. Sanphui P et al. Fast dissolving curcumin cocrystals. Crystal Growth & Design. 2011;11(9):4135-4145
  115. 115. Bero J, Frédérich M, Quetin-Leclercq J. Antimalarial compounds isolated from plants used in traditional medicine. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 2009;61(11):1401-1433
  116. 116. Lahlou M. The success of natural products in drug discovery. Pharmacology & Pharmacy. 2013;4(3A):5
  117. 117. Laryea MK, Borquaye LS. Antimalarial efficacy and toxicological assessment of extracts of some Ghanaian medicinal plants. Journal of Parasitology Research. 2019;2019:1630405. DOI: 10.1155/2019/1630405
  118. 118. Oliveira AB et al. Plant-derived antimalarial agents: New leads and efficient phythomedicines. Part I. alkaloids. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias. 2009;81(4):715-740

Written By

Zakio Makuvara

Submitted: 09 April 2022 Reviewed: 30 June 2022 Published: 13 October 2022