Open access peer-reviewed chapter - ONLINE FIRST

Epoxy Composites for Radiation Shielding

Written By

Hayriye Hale Aygün

Reviewed: March 2nd, 2022 Published: April 21st, 2022

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.104117

Epoxy-Based Composites Edited by Samson Jerold Samuel Chelladurai

From the Edited Volume

Epoxy-Based Composites [Working Title]

Dr. Samson Jerold Samuel Chelladurai, Dr. Ramesh Arthanari and Dr. Meera M.R

Chapter metrics overview

17 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Due to the increase in use of radiation energy in many industrial applications, radiation shielding has become a crucial topic in order to diminish its hazardous effects. Radiation shields can be of various weights depending on the materials from which they are produced and the area in which they are used. In this sense, polymer composites have taken attention by researchers because it is aimed to obtain shields with good processability, sufficient flexibility, low weight, and subsequent performance properties. Epoxy resin is one of the mostly used synthetic polymers as a matrix element in composite material production due to its improving characteristics by means of electrical insulation, chemical resistance, service life, bonding characteristic, and mechanical properties. Besides, epoxies have intermediate radiation shielding characteristics as well. By loading epoxy matrix with fibers and/or fillers having different radiation absorption rates or mechanical resistance properties, multifunctional shields can be produced to serve in numerous applications. This chapter focuses on radiation shielding efficiency of fiber-reinforced epoxy composites and the role of fillers and fiber-based materials on manufacturing of functional radiation shields.


  • composite
  • epoxy resin
  • fiber
  • filler
  • radiation
  • shielding

1. Introduction

For protecting humans and the environment from the hazardous effects of radiation, various forms of shields have been used in different fields in which radiation has been utilized. Shielding materials manufactured from lead, stainless steel, and concrete are heavy and rigid structures and also not resistant to corrosion. These structures have been generally used as blocks for shielding against radiation and have not sufficient flexibility and comfort properties in order to be used in shielding garments (Figure 1). Therefore, researchers have been focused on the manufacturing of advanced materials with good shielding capability, lightweight, high modulus, and mechanical properties. At this point, composite materials have taken the attention of researchers due to manufacturing of a unique material from different materials with dissimilar characteristics.

Figure 1.

Types and penetration depths of radiation.

Epoxy polymer is one of the most important thermoset polymers used in composite manufacturing due to its good wetting ability, low cure shrinkage, excellent chemical corrosion resistance, good dimensional stability, high tensile, fatigue, and compression strength. By courtesy of its use in composites, it contributes to the properties of the whole composite by means of good mechanical strength, high stiffness, excellent chemical resistance, flame retardancy, and high electrical strength [1, 2]. Solid epoxy polymer is the output material obtained by reaction of curing agent and liquid resin. There are various types of epoxy-based liquid resin because the numbers of epoxide groups on its starting material can be variable. Diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A (DGEBA) has two epoxide groups in its structure, which is the most common starting material used in the manufacturing of epoxy-based liquid resin. For solidification, liquid resin is treated with small amounts of reactive curing agent and then a tridimensional network occurs as a result of crosslinking. The use of different types of starting materials and reactive curing agents results in various types of solid epoxy polymers with different characteristics. Thereby, the properties of epoxy resin are given a range of values as it is seen in Table 1. In case of being cured, the system exhibits brittle characteristic due to crosslinking mentioned above, and this case causes incomparable decreases in their relevant mechanical properties, especially in impact strength [3]. In addition to crosslinking occurred by reaction between the curing agent and epoxy resin, some additional structural changes are observed in case of irradiation of epoxy-based system. The color of epoxy resin alters from transparent to yellow and resin can be even degraded depending on exposing dose and starting material used for manufacturing epoxy resin. Even so, epoxies are addressed as assuring matrix elements with high radiation stability for composite manufacturing [4]. In order to limit brittle characteristics and develop mechanical performance of epoxy-based systems, epoxy resins should be reinforced with flexible materials.

Density (gcm−3)1.2−1.3
Tensile strength (MPa)55−130
Tensile modulus (GPa)2.75−4.10
Poisson’s ratio0.2−0.33
Thermal expansion coefficient50−80
Cure shrinkage (%)1−5

Table 1.

Typical properties of epoxy resin at room temperature.

High strength-to-weight ratio is one of the advantages of fiber-reinforced composites. By increasing interactions between fiber and epoxy matrix, the resistance of the whole composite to many destructive forces is improved. The improvement can be successfully achieved by the incorporation of elastomeric/thermoplastic phases or by adding organic/inorganic particles into epoxy resins [5, 6, 7]. Gojny et al. dispersed carbon-based nanoparticles in epoxy resins and reported that fracture toughness of produced composites effectively improved at low nanoparticle concentration as well as stiffness [8]. In another study, carbon-based nanoparticles lead to the development of flexural strength and modulus of the epoxy composite [9]. There are numerous researches about the use of inorganic and organic particles in reinforcement of epoxies and improvement of composite properties in different ways [10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20].


2. Polymers and fillers used for radiation shielding

Polymers have been intensively used for fabricating radiation shields due to their lightness, low cost, and elasticity [21, 22]. However, polymers behave differently when they are irradiated. Under different radiation sources with variable frequency rays, crosslinking, chain scission or degradation may be observed in a polymer chain [23]. The behaviors of some irradiated polymers and classifications according to their radiation resistance are given in Table 2.

PolymerReaction when irradiatedExposure dose
Neutron (neutron/cm2)Gamma
Polymers with very low radiation resistancePTFEChain scission1013105−106
PMMAChain scission1014106
Butyl rubberChain scission106
Polymers with
low radiation resistance
PVCChain scission or crosslinking and degradation10145*107−108
Cellulose acetateChain scission1014 −10155*106 − 4*107
Phenol formaldehyde resins7*1014107
Butadiene styrene rubberCrosslinking1015−1016107
Polymers with medium radiation resistancePECrosslinking1017108
PETChain scission or crosslinking and degradation1017−1018108−2*108
Polymers with high radiation resistancePolystyreneCrosslinking1018−10195*109

Table 2.

Reactions and resistance of polymers against radiation [23, 24].

In order to delay the degradation of polymeric structures and diminish the hazardous effect of radiation on polymers, fillers are added to the structure during manufacturing process. The radiation shielding efficiency of a filler depends on its atomic number and the atomic structure of filler is a crucial factor in order to fabricate functional structures from polymer and filler for intended end-use. Fillers with high atomic number are generally used for gamma radiation shielding (Table 3). However, the use of fillers with low atomic number is preferable for neutron radiation shielding. When considering that there are generally low atomic number elements in a polymer chain, compatibility of polymer/filler combination has a significant effect on radiation shielding efficiency of fabricated composite material [25]. Many researches have been performed on the use of polymers [26, 27, 28, 29, 30] and fillers [31, 32, 33] for the manufacturing of radiation shields.

ElementAtomic numberDensity
Absorption edge (keV)
Cadmium (Cd)488.6526.7
Tin (Sn)507.3029.2
Antimony (Sb)516.6930.5
Cesium (Cs)551.8726.0
Barium (Ba)563.5037.4
Gadolinium (Gd)647.9050.2
Tungsten (W)7419.3069.5
Lead (Pb)8211.3688.0
Bismuth (Bi)839.7590.5

Table 3.

Comparison of some elements used in radiation shielding [34].


3. Filler loaded epoxy composites for radiation shielding

There are many attempts for improving the shielding characteristics of epoxy or other polymer matrix with elemental particles. The researchers observed effects of particle loading via numerous trials by means of minimizing particle size, doping matrix with different particle concentration in weight, exposing composite specimens to different radiation sources, analyzing microstructural changes under different radiation doses, and testing failure mechanism of composites. Radiation shielding properties of epoxy-based composite panels were tested by Al-Sarray et al. Epoxy resin was loaded with different barite concentrations of 0−50 wt %, and the linear attenuation coefficient of fabricated composites was tested by Co60 and Cs137 radioactive sources. Radiation shielding efficiency improved with the increase in barite concentration [35]. Ergin et al. compared the effects of lead oxide and barium oxide on the radiation shielding performance of epoxy composites. They reported that gamma radiation performance handled by lead oxide/epoxy composites could be obtained by the addition of barium oxide but the weight percentage of barium oxide must be two times more than lead oxide addition. Besides, addition of barium oxide at 40 wt % in epoxy resin exhibited better radiation shielding performance than gadolinium oxide/epoxy composites, concrete, and steel [36]. Li et al. dispersed micro- and nano-gadolinium oxide particles into epoxy matrix and evaluated both mechanical properties and radiation shielding characteristics of fabricated composites. Gadolinium oxide addition enhanced shielding characteristics due to dominating photoelectric effect of the gadolinium element. Nano-gadolinium oxide/epoxy composites exhibited better X-ray and gamma shielding characteristics and had similar flexural strength but higher flexural modulus with those of micro-gadolinium oxide/epoxy composites [37]. More et al. determined radiation shielding parameters of metal chloride/epoxy composites. Doping epoxy resin with higher weight ratios of metal chloride lead to increase in attenuation parameters of epoxy composite and test results were comparable with those of pure lead metal [38].

Mechanical properties, structural characteristics, and gamma shielding efficiency of epoxy composites were reported by Alavian et al. Epoxy resin was doped with inorganic nanoparticles such as lead, zinc, zinc oxide, titanium, and titanium oxide. Increasing nanoparticle loading enhanced shielding efficiency. 25 wt% Pb/epoxy nanocomposites showed better shielding properties but low mechanical strength than those of their counterparts [39]. Degradation of epoxy composite by high-frequency rays was investigated by Saiyad et al. They fabricated three different composite materials by loading graphite, boron nitride, and lead into epoxy resin. They irradiated epoxy composites by Am-Be neutron sources. They reported that linear absorption coefficients of composites were strictly dependent on the dispersion of filler and the highest shielding performance was observed in graphite/epoxy composites [40]. Aldhuhaibat et al. examined gamma radiation shielding performance of pure epoxy resin and epoxy-based nanocomposites with aluminum oxide or ferrium oxide nanopowder at different concentrations of 10−15 wt %. Specimens were irradiated by Cs137(1.05 kBq with single gamma-ray emission energy of 0.662 MeV) and Co60 (74 kBq with two gamma-ray emission energies of 1.173 and 1.333 MeV) radioactive sources and linear attenuation coefficients of specimens were measured by NaI detector. They claimed that epoxy nanocomposites were potential gamma radiation shields with improved characteristics [41]. Another study was performed by Azman et al. Nano-sized tungsten oxide/epoxy composites had higher attenuation properties at 22–35 kV X-ray tube voltages used in mammography and radiography units. The particle size of tungsten was found as negligible by means of transmitted beam intensity at 40−120 kV tube voltages [42]. Cheng et al. studied the radiation degradation mechanism of tungsten/epoxy composites. They tested composites specimens under different activities of Co60 sources. Loading with tungsten improved shielding characteristic of composites. However, measurements showed that an increase in radiation dose caused a decrease, then a slight increase and a sharp decrease in thermal and mechanical properties of composites [43].


4. Modification of epoxy resin with fibers/fillers for radiation shielding

In recent years, studies performed on radiation shields have focused on developing failure mechanisms and decreasing the weight of shield for supplying personal comfort. For this goal, researchers offered dissimilar alternative shields by studying various polymeric matrices with different fillers. Kim observed the effect of particle size and dispersibility of tungsten particles on radiation shielding performance of samples. For this aim, three types of tungsten-loaded HDPE shields were manufactured with identical thickness and sizes by doping nanoparticles, microparticles, and their mixture. It was claimed that sufficient protection was handled against low dose exposure notwithstanding particle size. But nanoparticle loaded HDPE sheets were more resistant to high-energy radiation. The shielding sheets produced with a mixture of different particle sizes of tungsten showed similar shielding performance as microparticle tungsten-loaded sheets [44]. Manufacturing and radiation shielding properties of nano gadolinium oxide/PMMA composites were searched by Shreef and Abdulzahara. Composite shields were fabricated with varying concentrations of gadolinium oxide (10−40 wt %). The thickness of composites was measured and shielding performance was tested with Co60 and Cs137 radiation sources. Test results showed that increasing nanoparticle concentration lead to an increase in thickness and improvement in attenuation coefficient but a decrease in half-value layer values of epoxy composites [45]. Zheng et al. fabricated S-glass fabric/epoxy composites with a ratio of 1:1. Composites were irradiated by Co60 source and the effects of irradiation on properties of composites were compared. They claimed that gamma-ray irradiation caused negligible damage on S-glass fiber and possible degradation on epoxy resin. By increasing the exposing dose of gamma radiation, the color of composite altered from yellow to brown and tensile strength of composite reduced gradually. However, composite preserved its thermal and dimensional stability and exhibited excellent thermal conductivity after irradiation [46]. Li et al. tried to produce a novel radiation shielding composite with high mechanical strength. For this aim, they fabricated erbium oxide-loaded basalt fiber/epoxy composites by prepreg autoclave process and test shielding performance of composites by exposing them to X and gamma rays. They claimed that basalt fiber/erbium oxide/epoxy composites had high mass attenuation coefficient than aluminum at low photon energies ranging from 31 keV to 80 keV [47]. The fracture toughness of carbon fabric/epoxy composites was investigated by Phong et al. They produced micro/nano-sized bamboo fibrils and dispersed these fibrils into epoxy matrix. They reported that matrix cracking was delayed, crack growing was reduced, and fracture toughness of composites was improved [48]. Haque et al. reinforced epoxy matrix with layered nano silicate particles at very low concentrations (1 wt %) and claimed that flexural strength, toughness, decomposition temperature, and interlaminar shear strength of S2-glass/epoxy composites were improved due to enhanced fiber/matrix adhesion and reduced residual stresses [49]. Recycled PET fibers were used to mimic marble material. Nguyen et al. modified calcium carbonate particles with stearic acid in order to enhance compatibility between epoxy resin and calcium carbonate. They fabricated composites by positioning a single layer of recycled PET fiber mat in the core and by coating the front and backside of PET mat with epoxy/calcium carbonate mixture. They concluded that flexural properties, impact resistance, and thermal stability of epoxy composites were improved [50]. Saleem et al. presented an empirical approach and compared radiation shielding of lead nanoparticles loaded epoxy composites with glass or carbon fiber. The results showed that lead nanoparticles improved shielding characteristics and lead to an increase in mass attenuation coefficients of composites. Mass attenuation coefficients were 0.2145 cm2/g and 0.2152 cm2/g for carbon and glass fiber reinforced epoxy composites at lead nanoparticle concentration of 50 wt%. But half-value length of epoxy composite with glass fiber was reported as 1.431 cm, which was lower than epoxy composites with carbon fiber (1.756 cm) [51].

Effects of radiation on neat epoxy resin and carbon fiber/epoxy composites were studied by Hoffman and Skidmore (2009). Front and back surfaces of plain woven carbon fabrics were treated with epoxy/hardener mixture (2:1). Prepared composites were exposed to mechanical and thermal testing and also analyzed by means of microstructural properties and radiation characteristics. After being irradiated, there were no remarkable changes in mechanical resistance of composites but significant variations were observed in thermal properties, spectroscopic analysis, and hardness value of neat epoxy samples as a result of gamma radiation [52]. Zhong et al. examined the cosmic radiation shielding properties of hot-pressed UHMWPE/nano-epoxy composites and they concluded that epoxy composites with the combination of continuous fibers such as UHMWPE and/or graphite nanofibers found as multifunctional hybrid systems by means of good structural properties, cost-effectiveness, and high radiation shielding performance [53]. In another study, UHMWPE/epoxy composites were fabricated by Mani et al. and test results showed that composites containing gadolinium and boron nanoparticles had good neutron shielding performance [54]. Condruz et al. suggested coating carbon/epoxy composites with different types of functional materials such as tantalum foil, babbitt and Monel for protecting hazardous effects of proton radiation. They impregnated 2 × 2 twill woven carbon fabric into epoxy resin and then coated polymeric substrates with zinc, Babbitt or zinc/Monel particles by thermal spray technique. They concluded that the coating process reduced penetration depth of ion beam and produced composites were lightweight shields for proton radiation [55]. The effects of hybridization on mechanical, thermal and radiation shielding efficiency of composites were also examined and reported by Zagaoui et al. They blended epoxy resin (90 wt%) with benzoxazine resin (10 wt%) and reinforced bicomponent matrix with silane-treated glass and basalt fibers. Hybridization of different types of resins developed mechanical and thermal properties and excellent shielding characteristic was gained by integrating hybrid fibers into bicomponent matrix system [56].


5. Conclusion

Heavy concretes, lead plates, and stainless steel blocks or plaques are known as conventional radiation shielding materials but they are heavy and not suitable for individual protective equipment. Polymers are functional lightweight materials but do not supply adequate protection on their own. Thereby advanced radiation shields should be fabricated by the composition of polymer-based materials and substances with high radiation shielding activity. At this point, material selection has crucial importance on the efficiency of protection by which radiation source it is irradiated.

The destructive effect of radiation on the material is related to the type of radiation source, exposing dose rate, exposure period, radiation absorption rate of material and strength of interbonding forces between components if a composite material is used. By taking into consideration the advantages introduced with composite manufacturing, the destructive effect of radiation can be limited by a combination of materials with high attenuation rates. At this point, the shielding efficiency of composite material depends on how components in a composite behave in case of irradiation. Epoxies, the mostly used matrix elements in composite manufacturing, exhibit physical changes such as color transition and low shrinkage percentage and mechanical changes such as a decrease in flexural and impact strength due to crosslinking when they are irradiated. Despite these changes, they are known as reliable materials for being used as matrix elements in radiation shielding. Undesired physical and mechanical changes observed in irradiated epoxies tried to be eliminated by fiber and/or filler loading for handling effective radiation shields with long life. Fiber addition into epoxy matrix causes an increase in hardness, fracture toughness, impact resistance, flexural strength and modulus, and also consistency in dimensional stability and thermal properties with respect to neat epoxy. However, loading fillers into epoxy matrix outputs composite material with inconsistent mechanical and thermal properties, especially in heterogenic filler dispersion and inappropriate particle size. Modification of epoxy with fillers having high radiation absorption rate develops radiation shielding efficiency of the whole composite but not mechanical or thermal characteristics for long-term use of composite. Thereby epoxy-based composites, which are designed to be used for radiation shields, should contain both fillers and fibers. Epoxy-based radiation shields serve as effective protectors in the case of reinforcing with fiber-based structures and fillers having high radiation absorption rate and photoelectric properties.

Fiber and filler reinforced epoxy composites are functional engineering materials and compete with some conventional radiation shields by means of strength and modulus properties per unit weight. The functionality is improved by proper fiber/matrix combination, high interfacial bonding between these constituents, functional additive/filler loading, modification of fiber surface with an appropriate sizing agent, well-dispersed nano-sized filler addition, and suitable manufacturing technique. In this way, epoxy composite serves as a unique shielding material for which goal it is fabricated and in which field it is intended to be used. Moreover, there is a need to figure out the best alternative to be used in medical diagnostics and nuclear industry.


  1. 1. Ratna D. Handbook of Thermoset Resins. UK: iSmithers; 2009. p. 410
  2. 2. Aygün B. Epoxy based metal and metal oxide doped new composite neutron and gamma radiation moderator material. Erzincan University Journal of Science and Technology. 2019;12(3):1442-1453
  3. 3. Mallick PK. Fiber Reinforced Composites: Materials, Manufacturing and Design. New York: CRC Press; 2007. p. 638
  4. 4. Akbari R, Beheshty MH, Shervin M. Toughening of dicyandiamide-cured DGEBA based epoxy resins by CTBN liquid rubber. Iranian Polymer Journal. 2013;22:313-324
  5. 5. Özdemir T, Usanmaz A. Degradation of poly(bisphenol- a-epichlorohydrin) by gamma irradiation. Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 2008;77:799-805
  6. 6. Njuguna J, Pielichowski K, Alcock JR. Epoxy-based fibre reinforced nanocomposites. Advanced Engineering Materials. 2007;9(10):835-847
  7. 7. Dodiuk H, Kenig S, Blinsky I, Dotan A, Buchman A. Nanotailoring of epoxy adhesives by polyhedral-oligomeric-sil-sesquioxanes (POOS). International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives. 2005;25:211-218
  8. 8. Gojny FH, Wichmann MHG, Köpke U, Fiedler B, Schulte K. Carbon nanotube reinforced epoxy composites: Enhanced stiffness and fracture toughness at low nanotube content. Composites Science and Technology. 2004;64:2363-2371
  9. 9. Kong J, Ning R, Tang Y. Study on modification of epoxy resins with acrylate liquid rubber containing pendant epoxy groups. Journal of Materials Science. 2006;41:1639-1641
  10. 10. Zhao DL, Qiao RH, Wang CZ, Shen ZM. Microstructure and mechanical property of carbon nanotube and continuous carbon fiber reinforced epoxy resin matrix composites. Advanced Materials Research. 2006;11:517-520
  11. 11. Chisholm N, Mahfuz H, Rangari VK, Ashfaq A, Jeelani S. Fabrication and mechanical characterization of carbon/SiC-epoxy nanocomposites. Composite Structures. 2005;67(1):115-124
  12. 12. Schmidt H. New type of non-crystalline solids between inorganic and organic materials. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 1985;73:681-691
  13. 13. Wang K, Chen L, Wu J, Toh ML, He C, Yee AF. Epoxy nanocomposites with highly exfoliated clay: Mechanical properties and fracture mechanisms. Macromolecules. 2005;38(3):788-800
  14. 14. Mark JE. Ceramic reinforced polymers and polymer modified ceramics. Polymer Engineering and Science. 1996;36(24):2905-2920
  15. 15. Gilbert EN, Hayes BS, Seferis JC. Variable density composite systems constructed by metal particle modified prepregs. Journal of Composite Materials. 2002;36(17):2045-2060
  16. 16. Timmerman JF, Hayes BS, Seferis JC. Nanoclay reinforced effects on the cryogenic microcracking of carbon fiber/epoxy composites. Composites Science and Technology. 2002;62(9):1249-1258
  17. 17. Brunner AJ, Necola A, Rees M, Gasser P, Kornmann X, Thomann R, et al. The influence of silicate-based nano-filler on the fracture toughness of epoxy resin. Engineering Fracture Mechanics. 2006;73(16):2336-2345
  18. 18. Mohan RV, Kelkar AD, Akinyede O. Vartm processing and characterization of composite laminates from epoxy resins dispersed with alumina particles. In: Proceedings of 50th International SAMPE Symposium and Exhibition; 1-5 May 2005; USA. Long Beach: SAMPE; 2005. pp. 2425-2431
  19. 19. Kornmann X, Rees M, Thomann Y, Necola A, Barbezat M, Thomann R. Epoxy-layered silicate nanocomposites as matrix in glass fibre-reinforced composites. Composites Science and Technology. 2005;65(14):2259-2268
  20. 20. Ragosta G, Abbate M, Musto P, Scarinzi G, Mascia L. Epoxy-silica particulate nanocomposites: Chamical interactions, reinforcement and fracture toughness. Polymer. 2005;46(23):10506-10516
  21. 21. Kaphle A, Umapathi NPNA, Daima H. Nanomaterials for agriculture, food and environment: Applications, toxicitysss and regulation. Environmental Chemistry Letters. 2018;16:43-58
  22. 22. More CV, Alsayed Z, Badaw MS, Thabet AA, Pawar PP. Polymeric composite materials for radiation shielding: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters. 2021;19:2057-2090
  23. 23. Ivanov VS. Radiation Chemistry of Polymers. Wakefield: VSP Publishing; 1992. p. 321
  24. 24. Aygün HH. Production and Characterization of Shielding Surfaces with Bismuth Containing Polymeric Materials against X-Ray Radiation [PhD Thesis]. Kahramanmaras: University of Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam; 2018
  25. 25. Kaçal M, Akman F, Sayyed M. Evaluation of gamma-ray and neutron attenuation properties of some polymers. Nuclear Engineering and Technology. 2019;51(3):818-824
  26. 26. Kilicoglu O, Kara U, Inanc I. The impact of polymer additive for N95 masks on gamma-ray attenuation properties. Materials Chemistry and Physics. 2021;260(16):124093
  27. 27. Mirji R, Lobo B. Computation of the mass attenuation coeffcient of polymeric materials at specifc gamma photon energies. Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 2017;135:32-44
  28. 28. Sayyed MI. Investigation of shielding parameters for smart polymers. Chinese Journal of Physics. 2016;54(3):408-415
  29. 29. Bhosale RR, More CV, Gaikwad DK, Pawar PP, Rode MN. Radiation shielding and gamma ray attenuation properties of some polymers. Nuclear Technology and Radiation Protection. 2017;32(3):288-293
  30. 30. Mann K, Rani A, Heer M. Shielding behaviors of some polymer and plastic materials for gamma-rays. Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 2015;106:247-254
  31. 31. Kaçal MR, Dilsiz K, Akman F, Polat H. Analysis of radiation attenuation properties for polyester/Li2WO4 composites. Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 2021;179:109257
  32. 32. Lanina S, Kaminskaya N, Benyaev N, Suslova V, Grigorevskaya M. On possible use of inorganic fillers and matrix polymers in radiation shielding materials. Biomedical Engineering. 2013;46(6):228-231
  33. 33. Engelmann HJ. Material for shielding from radiation; 2009. WO2009097833A1
  34. 34. McCaffrey JP, Shen H, Downtown B, Mainegra-Hing E. Radiation attenuation by lead and nonlead materials used in radiation shielding garments. Medical Physics. 2007;34(2):530-537
  35. 35. Al-Sarray E, Günoğlu K, Evcin A, Bezir NÇ. Radiation shielding properties of some composite panel. Acta Physica Polonica A. 2017;132:490-492
  36. 36. Ergin Y, Karabul Y, Guven Ozdemir Z, Kılıç M. Experimental comparison of PbO and BaO addition effect on gamma ray shielding performance of epoxy polymer. European Journal of Science and Technology. 2019;16:256-266
  37. 37. Li R, Gu Y, Wang Y, Yang Z, Li M, Zhang Z. Effect of particle size on gamma radiation shielding property of gadolinium oxide dispersed epoxy resin matrix composite. Materials Research Express. 2017;4(3):035035
  38. 38. More CV, Pawar PP, Badawi MS, Thabet AA. Extensive theoretical study of gamma-ray shielding parameters using epoxy resin-metal chloride mixtures. Nuclear Technology and Radiation Protection. 2020;35(2):138-149
  39. 39. Alavian H, Samie A, Tavakoli-Anbaran H. Experimental and Monte Carlo investigations of gamma ray transmission and buildup factors for inorganic nanoparticle/epoxy composites. Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 2020;174:108960
  40. 40. Saiyad DM, Devashrayee N, Mewada R. Study the efect of dispersion of filler in polymer composite for radiation shielding. Polymer Composites. 2014;35(7):1263-1266
  41. 41. Al-Dhuhaibat M, Salman M, Jubier N, Salim A. Improved gamma radiation shielding traits of epoxy composites: Evaluation of mass attenuation coefficient, effective atomic and electron number. Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 2020;179:109183
  42. 42. Azman NN, Siddiqui S, Hart R, Low IM. Effect of particle size, filler loadings and X-ray tube voltage on the transmitted X-ray transmission in tungsten oxide-epoxy composites. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 2013;71(1):62-67
  43. 43. Chang L, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Fang J, Luan W, Yang X, et al. Preparation and characterization of tungsten/epoxy composites for γ-rays radiation shielding. Nuclear Instruments and Methods Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 2015;356-357:88-93
  44. 44. Kim SC. Analysis of shielding performance of radiation shielding materials according to particle size and clustering effects. Applied Sciences. 2021;11:4010
  45. 45. Sheerif AM, Abdulzahara NA. Manufacture of shielding for attenuation ionization ray by preparation of nano-gadolinium oxide with PMMA. Neuroquantology: An Interdiciplineray Journal of Neuroscience and Quantum Physics. 2021;19(8):66-78
  46. 46. Zheng LF, Wang LN, Wang ZZ, Wang L. Effects of γ-ray irradiation on the fatigue strength, thermal conductivities and thermal stabilities of the glass fibres/epoxy resins composites. Acta Metallurgica Sinica. 2018;1(31):105-112
  47. 47. Li R, Gu Y, Zhang G, Yang Z, Li M, Zang Z. Radiation shielding property of structural polymer composite: Continuous basalt fiber reinforced epoxy matrix composite containing erbium oxide. Composites Science and Technology. 2017;143:67-74
  48. 48. Phong NT, Gabr MH, Okubo K, Chuong B, Fujii T. Enhancement of mechanical properties of carbon fabric/epoxy composites using micro/nano-sized bamboo fibrils. Materials and Design. 2013;47:624-632
  49. 49. Haque A, Shamsuzzoha M, Hussain F, Dean D. S2-glass/epoxy polymer nanocomposites: Manufacturing, structures, thermal and mechanical properties. Journal of Composite Materials. 2003;37(20):1821-1837
  50. 50. Nguyen M, Vu T, Nguyen T, Nguyen T, Ha Thuc N, Bui QB, et al. Synergistic infuences of stearic acid coating and recycled PET microfbers on the enhanced properties of composite materials. Materials. 2020;13(6):1461
  51. 51. Saleem RAA, Abdelal N, Alsabbagh A, Al-Jarrah M, Al-Jawarneh F. Radiation shielding of fiber reinforced polymer composites incorporating lead nanoparticles: An empirical approach. Polymers. 2021;13(21):3699
  52. 52. Hoffman AN, Skidmore TE. Radiation effects on epoxy carbon fiber composite. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2009;392(2):371-378
  53. 53. Zhong W, Sui G, Jana S, Miller J. Cosmic radiation shielding tests for UHMWPE fiber/nano-epoxy composites. Composites Science and Technology. 2009;69(13):2093-2097
  54. 54. Mani V, Prasad N, Kelkar A. Ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) fiber epoxy composite hybridized with nanoparticles of gadolinium and boron for radiation shielding. In: Proceedings of SPIE Planetary Defense and Space Environment Applications; 22 September 2016; USA. California: SPIE; 2016. pp. 1-10
  55. 55. Condruz MR, Puscasu C, Voicu LR, Vintila IS, Paraschiv A, Mirea DA. Fiber reinforced composite materials for proton radiation shielding. Materiale Plastic. 2018;55(1):5-8
  56. 56. Zegaoui A, Derradji M, Medjahed A, Ghouti HA, Cai W, Liu WB, et al. Exploring the hybrid effects of short glass/basalt fibers on the mechanical, thermal and gamma radiation shielding properties of DCBA/BA-a resin composites. Polymer Plastics Technology and Materials. 2020;59(3):311-322

Written By

Hayriye Hale Aygün

Reviewed: March 2nd, 2022 Published: April 21st, 2022