Open access peer-reviewed chapter - ONLINE FIRST

Central Control of the Larynx in Mammals

Written By

Manuel Víctor López-González, Marta González-García, Laura Carrillo-Franco, Amelia Díaz-Casares and Marc Stefan Dawid-Milner

Submitted: December 9th, 2021 Reviewed: December 13th, 2021 Published: February 9th, 2022

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.102009

Autonomic Nervous System - Special Interest Topics Edited by Theodoros Aslanidis

From the Edited Volume

Autonomic Nervous System - Special Interest Topics [Working Title]

Dr. Theodoros Aslanidis and M.Sc. Christos Nouris

Chapter metrics overview

37 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Speech is a complex process that requires the coordination of multiple structures of the phonatory system regulated by the central nervous system. Specifically, the larynx is the key point necessary for the vocal folds to come into contact to convert the air that comes out of our lungs into sound. Vocal emission involves the genesis of a precise and prolonged expiration that provides an adequate pressure/air flow component to generate a subglottic pressure compatible with vocalization. The starting point for voluntary vocal production is the laryngeal motor cortex (LMC), a common structure in mammals, although the specific location within the cortex differs in humans. LCM projects to the periaqueductal gray matter (PGM), which leads to pontomedullary structures to locate the generators of laryngeal-respiratory motor patterns, necessary for vocal emission. All these regions present a high expression of FOXP2 transcription factor, necessary for brain and lung development that is closely related to vocalization. These central structures have in common that not only convey cardiorespiratory responses to environmental stress but also support vocalization. At clinical level, recent studies show that central circuits responsible for vocalization present an overactivity in certain speech disorders such as spasmodic dysphonia due to laryngeal dystonia.


  • central nervous system
  • laryngeal motor cortex
  • laryngeal motoneurons
  • periacueductal gray matter
  • FOXP2
  • vocal emission
  • speech
  • laryngeal dystonia

1. Introduction

Central control of vocalization involves the activation of different interrelated brain structures in complex networks. Vocalization in mammals depends on a network originating in the laryngeal motor cortex, which projects to the mesencephalic Periaqueductal Gray Matter (PAG). The PAG modifies the activity of all pontomedullary structures responsible of generating all the laryngeal-respiratory motor patterns, necessary for vocal emission. These pontomedullary generators control the pattern and intensity of activation of respiratory, laryngeal, oropharyngeal, and craniofacial motor neurons [1].

Vocal emission involves the genesis of a precise and prolonged expiration that provides an adequate pressure/air flow component to generate a subglottic pressure compatible with vocalization. The nucleus ambiguus (nA), where laryngeal motor neurons are concentrated, is mainly responsible for this. All these regions present a high expression of the FOXP2 factor. FOXP2 is a transcription factor necessary for brain and lung development that is closely related to vocalization. Throughout the evolution of the human species, synaptic connectivity and plasticity in the circuits of the basal ganglia were increased, improving motor control and human cognitive and linguistic abilities [2].

Vocal fold abduction and adduction are known to be accomplished by two distinct populations of motor neurons located within the caudal third of the nA. It can be divided into three main parts: the compact formation (with motor neurons that innervate the esophagus), the semi-compact formation (with motor neurons that innervate the pharynx and the cricothyroid muscle of the larynx innervated by the superior laryngeal nerve) and the sparse formation (with motor neurons that innervate the laryngeal muscles except the cricothyroid) [3].

In previous work by our research group, the activity of the laryngeal motor neurons of nA and the reflex mechanisms involved in respiratory laryngeal responses have been characterized, suggesting that the parabrachial complex (PBc) and the A5 region (A5) have a role in modifying the activity of laryngeal motoneurones localized in the nA and accordingly the striated laryngeal muscles of the upper airway [4, 5] (Figure 1). Pontomedullary respiratory nuclei: PBc, A5, the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS), nA and retroambiguous nuclei (nRA), paraambiguous (nPA) and retrofacial (nRF) integrate inputs from central and peripheral receptors and from superior structures to produce changes in the basic respiratory rhythm (eupnea). These changes are a prerequisite for survival (for example, tachypnea associated with the defense reaction, which increases the supply of oxygen preparing to fight or defend, or the response of gasping reset in the event of intense anxiety with respiratory alkalosis). But these changes in respiration are also necessary to maintain a constant expiratory flow that allows vocalization. It is known that Periaqueductal Gray Matter (PAG) is a key point in coordinating the efferent activity from limbic, cortico-prefrontal and cingulate afferents, modifying the activity of all these mesencephalic-pontomedullary nuclei [2].

Figure 1.

Laryngeal and respiratory responses to electrical stimulation in the medial (a) and lateral (b) parabrachial nucleus and (c) to glutamate microinjection in the A5 region. Phrenic nerve discharge, respiratory airflow, pleural pressure, subglottic pressure and integrated phrenic nerve discharge showing an expiratory facilitatory response with an increase of subglottic pressure during electrical stimulation (20 mA, 0.4-ms pulses, 50 Hz for 5 s) in the medial parabrachial nucleus, an inspiratory facilitatory response with the decrease of subglottic pressure during electrical stimulation (10 mA, 0.4-ms pulses, 50 Hz for 5 s) in the lateral parabrachial nucleus and an expiratory facilitatory response with an increase of subglottic pressure during a glutamate injection (10 nl over 5 s) in the A5 region. The arrow shows the onset of injection.


2. PAG as a key point in vocalization

The PAG presents a large number of afferences. The most important have their origin from the prefrontal cortex, amygdala and hypothalamus. Its efferent projections to different pontine nuclei allow it to coordinate different patterns of cardiorespiratory and motor responses depending on the type of stimulus. Other functions of PAG include thermoregulation, participation in wakefulness and sleep mechanisms, or modulation of neuropathic pain or urination. At the clinical level, we know that its activity is modified in different neurodegenerative processes such as Alzheimer’s and multisystemic atrophy [6, 7, 8, 9].

All these higher structures that project to the PAG integrate visual, auditory and somatosensory information in the context of basic mechanisms for survival, maintaining an efferent tone on the PAG which, in turn, projects on the pontomedullary respiratory nuclei involved in respiratory rhythmogenesis to change from eupnea to a rhythm adapted to vocalization or growling. Specifically, the nRA is the perfect target to convert passive breathing into active breathing to generate motor activities that produce changes in abdominal pressure, in addition to modifying the activity of the motor neurons that are located in the nA and that control the caliber of the pharynx and larynx [10, 11]. Stimulation of PAG and nRA is known to produce vocalization [12] and lesions in PAG cause mutism in animals and humans [13, 14] and vocalization and problems in the production of voice when lesions occur in nRA [15]. However, the electrophysiological influence of PAG on these pontomedullary nuclei has not yet been described.


3. Vocalization in apes: PAG-laryngeal motor cortex connectivity

Regarding the studies of the pathways that participate in voluntary and involuntary vocalizations, there is a model that explains vocal control that includes two hierarchically organized pathways. Involuntary vocalizations are innate and require a different control mechanism than that which dominates voluntary vocalizations or speech [16, 17]. These emotional expressions, such as crying or laughing, are directed by the emotional system, made up of specific pathways that target the brain stem and spinal cord [18, 19]. Specifically, research carried out with the squirrel monkey has determined that the system includes: the cingulate gyrus, the PAG, and various pontine and medullary nuclei [20, 21, 22, 23, 24].

The PAG receives projections from the upper limbic regions and from cortical areas such as the anterior cingulate gyrus, insula, and orbitofrontal cortex. In addition, it maintains connections with the caudal part of the nRA. The nRA has direct access to the motor neurons involved in vocalization, that is, it controls the motor neuron groups that innervate the soft palate, pharynx, and larynx, as well as the diaphragm, intercostal, abdominal, and pelvic muscles. Its final objective is to control/modify the intra-abdominal, intrathoracic and subglottic pressure, the control of which is essential to generate vocalization.

In primates, vocalizations, in addition to activation of the PAG, can be produced by electrical stimulation of the hypothalamus [20, 25, 26], amygdala [20], bed nucleus of the stria terminalis [22], orbitofrontal cortex [27] and anterior cingulate gyrus [28], since all these regions have a strong connection with the PAG [29, 30, 31, 32, 33]. The only necessary condition is that the PAG was intact [13, 34, 35].

On the contrary, if areas that are not connected with the PAG, such as the motor or premotor cortex, are stimulated, no vocalizations are produced [36, 37]. These results emphasize the essential role of the PAG in the production of vocalization in primates as well as in humans. This coordinating role in the generation of vocalization is also demonstrated by the fact that the activation of the caudal levels of the PAG can generate partial vocalizations through its connection with the nRA [10, 38, 39].

In summary, the input of the stimulus occurs in the primary integrating center of vocalizations (VOC). Next, the superior temporal gyrus, the supplementary motor area and the insula, will be in charge of modulating the stimulus. Once the output from the VOC is produced, the stimulus can be directed to the corticobulbar pathway and cerebellum directly or, on the contrary, it can go from the cingulate gyrus, the PAG, the pons, until reaching the reticular area of the medulla; which has access to the nA ipsilaterally and contralaterally [40]. On the other hand, the voluntary production of voice in human beings consists of a sound modulation of sound. This production depends directly on the laryngeal motor cortex, that is, the production of voluntary vocal emissions in humans, requires the activation of this cortex, located in the dorsal portion of the ventral zone of the primary motor cortex, and its direct connection with the laryngeal motor neurons of the nA, which are in charge of controlling the laryngeal muscles for the emission of learned vocal patterns [41].

However, it has been shown that during speech emissions there is a joint activation of the voluntary and involuntary system [19]. An involuntary activation of the path takes place automatically to give the vocal emissions the appropriate emotional character. Therefore, stimulation of the pathway that originates in the primary motor cortex and runs through the PAG and nRA is required; in addition to the activation of the pathway that goes from the laryngeal motor cortex directly to the corticomedullary fibers, which will activate the motor neurons of the face, mouth, tongue, larynx and pharynx, to control the production of words and phrases.

Finally, vocal control will depend on the primary motor area, a bilateral structure that is responsible for laryngeal control and orofacial musculature [42], in addition to the activation of the superior temporal gyrus to compensate for alterations in the auditory feedback of the tone used during phonation. Likewise, two feedback loops are put into operation that provide the motor cortex with the information necessary to carry out motor commands for phonation. One of these loops includes the basal ganglia, while the other involves the cerebellum. However, these structures seem unnecessary for the production of innate vocal patterns [43, 44].

Therefore, we see that emotional emissions in humans require bilateral activation of the laryngeal motor cortex (Figure 2) [45]. Furthermore, the system for the production of speech involves a predominant activation of the left hemisphere, including the superior temporal gyrus, the anterior insula, the basal ganglia, and the cerebellum. For this production, the activity of the cingulate gyrus and the PAG is also necessary, in variable degrees, to associate the emotional character with the vocal production.

Figure 2.

Scheme of squirrel monkey brain coronal section showing the voluntary and involuntary pathways controlling the larynx.


4. Other structures functionally related to the PAG

Other intermediate structures project both to the laryngeal motor cortex and the nA. One of these structures is PBc, cited above [46]. Neuronal unit recording experiments demonstrate the presence of neuronal activity during vocalization [47], suggesting that this nucleus is involved in laryngeal motor coordination as an intermediate nucleus of proprioceptive information between the cortex and the nA. In addition, recent work has shown that both cPB and PAG have high immunoreactivity to the expression of the FOXP2 gene, demonstrating that both regions are primarily involved in modulating the expiratory flow necessary for the production of the sound and voice [2].

In one of the latest works carried out by our research group, we have demonstrated that the column corresponding to the dorsolateral PAG is involved in the control of defense response [48, 49], which is associated with tachycardia, hypertension and redistribution of blood flow. This sympathetic response is mediated by the rostro-ventrolateral medulla (RVLM), which, in turn, activates sympathetic preganglionic neurons present in the intermediolateral column of the spinal cord. These projections are ultimately responsible for the sudden increase in blood pressure. It is also known that the increase in blood pressure is produced by indirect activation of the RVLM by other less studied pathways [50, 51, 52].

The dorsolateral PAG does not have direct connections with the RVLM but has very dense connections (afferents and efferents), with the hypothalamic area responsible for the activation of the RVLM during the defense response. We know that the cardiorespiratory activity of dorsolateral PAG neurons depends on the activity of these hypothalamic neurons [52, 53]. Likewise, our group has shown that there are functional connections from this hypothalamic area and other pons structures such as the parabrachial complex (cPB) [54, 55] and A5 area [56, 57]. Both regions are rich in FOXP2 expression. Our research group has shown the importance of the interrelation between some of these hypothalamic-midbrain and pontomedullary structures involved in cardiorespiratory control. More specifically, we have focused on the analysis of these interactions by analyzing the defense response evoked from specific areas of the hypothalamus (dorsomedial hypothalamic area and perifornical area (DMH-PeF)) [54, 55, 56, 57] and midbrain (PAG) (Figures 3 and 4) [48, 49].

Figure 3.

Extracellular recordings of two putative cells were recorded from the A5 region. (A) Silent neuron (upper trace, 4 superimposed sweeps) with constant-latency responses to HDA stimulation (lower trace). The cell was demonstrated to be orthodromically activated from the HDA. (B) Silent neuron (upper trace, 4 superimposed sweeps). The lower trace shows constant latency responses (4 superimposed sweeps) to the dlPAG stimulation.

Figure 4.

Instantaneous respiratory rate (upper trace), respiratory flow, pleural pressure, instantaneous heart rate and blood pressure in a spontaneously breathing rat, showing the cardiorespiratory response evoked on PAG (upper figures) or HDA (lower figures) stimulation before [A, a] and after [B, b] the microinjection of muscimol (50 nl over 5 s) in the A5 region. The arrows indicate show the onset of the HDA/PAG electrical stimulation.

Originally, the stimulation of these areas evokes a series of cardiorespiratory and autonomic changes that characterize the defense response [58]. The defense response prepares the animal for situations environmental stresses that require a rapid locomotor response characterized hemodynamically by hypertension, tachycardia and redistribution of blood flow from abdominal and visceral areas to the skeletal muscles of the extremities. Additionally, this response is accompanied by mydriasis, increases in respiratory rate and tidal volume and vocalization [56].

Recent publications propose DMH-PeF as one of the main areas of the hypothalamus that generate the defense response carried by the PAG [59]. Disinhibition of DMH-PeF after microinjection of bicuculin (GABA receptor antagonist) produces an increase in renal sympathetic activity and blood pressure that has been attributed to the activation of neurons in RVLM [60, 61]. The administration of bicuculin also produces an increase in heart rate, which decreases between 30 and 50% due to the inhibition of Rafe Pallidus with muscimol [62, 63, 64]. In addition, there is morphological evidence of projections from the DMH to the Rafe Pallidus [65]. The results seem to show that the pressor and tachycardia cardiovascular responses, typical of stress, evoked from this region, including in the DMH-PeF, would present two descending routes, one responsible for the increase in blood pressure, via RVLM, and the other responsible for the increase in heart rate, via Pale Rallidus. Both responses use the PAG as an intermediate station [60].


5. Preliminary results

In previous studies, we have characterized the activity of laryngeal nA motor neurons and the reflex mechanisms involved in respiratory laryngeal responses. We have also described the existence of a network of hypothalamic-midbrain-pontomedullary nuclei that modulate the cardiorespiratory responses produced to certain types of stress. Bearing this in mind and knowing that many of these structures express FOXP2 and participate in vocalization processes, the limited number of existing publications that study the electrophysiological relationships between the neural circuits involved in the control of laryngeal activity is striking.

Recently, we have been able to carry out a series of preliminary experiments with the techniques that we had been using for years and that we are taking up again. The results of this previous approach include the “in vivo” recording of laryngeal motor neurons and the recording of subglottic pressure and laryngeal resistance using the technique of “isolated glottis in situ” and the analysis of the changes that occur in these parameters. During electrical stimulation of the study areas. These works have led to two publications in international congress proceedings; [66] in Proc Physiol Soc 43, PC208 and [67] in J Physiol Biochem, 74 (Suppl 1) and two communications presented at the SENC Congress in Santiago de Compostela (2019), concluding that not also PAG but CnF seem to modify the activity of laryngeal motoneurons.


6. Clinical implications

Therefore, all these central structures described have in common the fact that they convey cardiorespiratory responses to environmental stress and support vocalization. Recent studies show that the laryngeal microstructure and its innervation undergo the same changes during development in rodents and humans [68] and that the central circuits responsible for vocalization present an overactivity in certain speech disorders of central origin such as spasmodic dysphonia due to laryngeal dystonia [69].

Laryngeal respiratory apnea is frequently a particularly serious clinical manifestation, as occurs in newborn apnea or central sleep apneas, caused by immaturity or abnormalities of central respiratory control in these individuals, causing an exaggerated response of the respiratory system, the laryngeal adduction reflex [70].

Furthermore, it is also known that spasmodic dysphonia, a focal form of dystonia, is a neurological alteration of the voice that manifests with involuntary “spasms” of the vocal cords, which result in speech interruptions and affect the quality of the voice. The two recognized types of spasmodic dysphonia are adductor spasmodic dysphonia (intermittent excessive closure of the vocal cords) and abductor spasmodic dysphonia (prolonged opening of the vocal cords). The cause of spasmodic dysphonia is unknown, although there is some consensus that behind it there is an alteration of the central nervous system, especially at the level of motor control. Specifically, alterations have been described in the circuit of the ganglia of the base, cerebellum and sensorimotor cortex, and structural alterations in the corticobulbar and corticospinal tracts, which are the nerve tracts that come into contact with the bulbar neurons responsible for phonation [69]. A better description and knowledge of the individual contribution of each of the nuclei that make up this hypothalamic-midbrain network on the central control of laryngeal motor neurons, would allow a better understanding not only of normal phonatory control, but would also contribute to a better understanding of the central alterations produced in this type of dystonia as well as in other disorders at the vocal level.

Paradoxical laryngeal adduction movements are characterized by adduction or approximation of the vocal cords during the respiratory cycle (especially during the inspiratory phase), which causes airway obstruction at the laryngeal level. The resulting dyspnoea and stridor are frequently confused with asthma, but do not respond to treatment with steroids and bronchodilators, since the glottic narrowing is independent of the caliber of the bronchial lumen. The origin of this intermittent interruption of transglottic airflow due to paradoxical laryngeal adduction remains to be elucidated. It has been linked to laryngeal irritation from agents such as gastroesophageal reflux or acute severe stress [71].

On the other hand, the pressor response and tachycardia associated with the stimulation of the DMH-PeF and PAG, mediated by the cPB nuclei and A5 Area, are of immediate interest for the knowledge of certain types of hypertensions classified clinically as “essential”. We believe that knowledge of the mechanisms involved in the inhibition of the baroreceptor reflex, which could mediate this type of hypertension, will allow us to provide new data that will contribute to better explaining the mechanisms of neuronal interactions between the hypothalamic-midbrain regions and the pontomedullary cardiorespiratory and laryngeal control centers implicated in this type of pathology.


7. Summary and perspectives

During the last two decades, Health Sciences research has evolved from a purely biological perspective towards a biopsychosocial model of health and disease. As a result, it has been found that there is a relationship between voice disorders and neuro-vegetative responses associated with emotional responses, mainly those related to anxiety and stress. These responses are generated by the activation of the hypothalamic defense areas and are carried by the PAG and pontomedullary structures such as the PBc and A5. The emotional response intervenes, along with other psychological factors, on the tone of the laryngeal muscles causing spasmodic dysphonia or laryngeal dysphonia. This occurs because the laryngeal muscles appear to be extremely sensitive to emotional stress generated by anxiety, anger, irritability, impatience, frustration, and depression, which can lead to spasmodic dysphonia or laryngeal dystonia [69]. Along these lines, Demmink-Geertman et al. [72] confirmed that, due to the characteristics of the higher pitch of the female voice, this effect is greater in women of all ages and that, above all, it affects professionals who use the voice as a means of work. This fundamentally affects women involved in teaching tasks. Only in Andalusia, the number of teachers is 132,985, and in Spain, they exceed 750,000, of which 71.9% are women. The percentage is particularly relevant in early childhood (97.6%), special (81.7%) and primary (81.4%) education. At least 21% have vocal involvement and 15.8% of sick leave is due to voice problems (FETE-UGT 2019 teaching report). Knowing the pathophysiology of the mechanisms by which stress produces alterations in the functionality of the vocal cords would allow the development of adequate treatments for these pathological processes.

Therefore, new contributions are needed to add new perspectives to a series of pathologies that are related to mechanisms that have their origin in these hypothalamic-midbrain regions, such as the so-called central apneas associated with hypertension [70], apneas associated with sudden death infantile syndrome [73], paradoxical laryngeal adduction movements [71] and muscular tension dysphonia secondary to stress [74].



The study was supported by a program grant Junta de Andalucía, Group n° CTS-156, Spain.


Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1. Ludlow CL. Central nervous system control of interactions between vocalization and respiration in mammals. Head Neck. 2011;33Suppl 1:S21-5. DOI: 10.1002/hed.21904
  2. 2. Stanic D, Dhingra R, Dutchmann M. Expression of the transcription factor FOXP2 in brainstem respiratory circuits of adult rat is restricted to upper airway premotor areas. Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology. 2018;250:14-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.resp.2018.01.014
  3. 3. Pascual-Font A, Hernández-Morato I, McHanwell S, Vázquez T, Maranillo E, Sañudo J, et al. The central projections of the laryngeal nerves in the rat. Journal of Anatomy. 2011;219(2):217-228. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2011.01390.x
  4. 4. Dawid-Milner MS, Lara JP, Milán A, González-Varón S. Activity of inspiratory neurones of the ambiguus complex during cough in the spontaneously breathing decerebrate cat. Experimental Physiology. 1993;78(6):835-838. DOI: 10.1113/expphysiol.1993.sp003730
  5. 5. Lara JP, Dawid-Milner MS, Lopez MV, Montes C, Spyer KM, Gonzalez-Baron S. Laryngeal effects of stimulation of rostral and ventral pons in the anaesthetized rat. Brain Research. 2002;934(2):97-106. DOI: 10.1016/s0006-8993(02)02364-8
  6. 6. Behbehani MM. Functional characteristics of the midbrain periaqueductal gray. Progress in Neurobiology. 1995;46:575-605. DOI: 10.1016/0301-0082(95)00009-k
  7. 7. Carrive P. The periaqueductal gray and defensive behavior: Functional representation and neuronal organization. Behavioural Brain Research. 1993;58:27-47. DOI: 10.1016/0166-4328(93)90088-8
  8. 8. Heinricher MM, Tavares I, Leith JL, Lumb BM. Descending control of nociception: Specificity, recruitment and plasticity. Brain Research Reviews. 2009;60:214-225. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2008.12.009
  9. 9. Zhang W, Hayward LF, Davenport PW. Respiratory responses elicited by rostral versus caudal dorsal periaqueductal gray stimulation in rats. Autonomic Neuroscience: Basic and Clinical. 2007;134:45-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.autneu.2007.02.003
  10. 10. Subramanian HH, Holstege G. The nucleus retroambiguus control of respiration. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2009;29:3824-3832. DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.0607-09.2009
  11. 11. Boers J, Klop EM, Hulsshoff AC, De Weerd H, Holstege G. Direct projections from the nucleus retroambiguus to cricothyroid motoneurons in the cat. Neuroscience Letters. 2002;319:5-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3940(01)02395-3
  12. 12. Holstege G, Kerstens L, Moes MC, Vanderhorst VG. Evidence for a periaqueductal gray-nucleus retroambiguus-spinal cord pathway in the rat. Neuroscience. 1997;80:587-598. DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4522(97)00061-4
  13. 13. Jürgens U, Pratt R. Role of the periaqueductal grey in vocal expression of emotion. Brain Research. 1979;167:367-378. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(79)90830-8
  14. 14. Esposito A, Demeurisse G, Alberti B, Fabbro F. Complete mutism after midbrain periaqueductal gray lesion. Neuroreport. 1999;10:681-685. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199903170-00004
  15. 15. Shibba K, Umezaki T, Zheng Y, Miller AD. The nucleus retroambigualis controls laryngeal muscle activity during vocalization in the cat. Experimental Brain Research. 1997;115:513-519. DOI: 10.1007/pl00005721
  16. 16. Jürgens U. Neural pathways underlying vocal control. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 2002;26:235-258. DOI: 10.1016/s0149-7634(01)00068-9
  17. 17. Jurgens U. The neural control of vocalization in mammals: A review. Journal of Voice. 2009;23:1-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2007.07.005
  18. 18. Holstege G. The emotional motor system. European Journal of Morphology. 1992;30:67-79
  19. 19. Holstege G, Bandler R, Saper CB. The emotional motor system. Progress in Brain Research. 1996;107:3-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0079-6123(08)61855-5
  20. 20. Jürgens U, Maurus M, Ploog D, Winter P. Vocalization in the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus) elicited by brain stimulation. Experimental Brain Research. 1977;4:114-117. DOI: 10.1007/BF00240356
  21. 21. Jürgens U, Ploog D. Cerebral representation of vocalization in the squirrel monkey. Experimental Brain Research. 1970;10:532-554. DOI: 10.1007/BF00234269
  22. 22. Jürgens U. Projections from the cortical larynx area in the squirrel monkey. Experimental Brain Research. 1976;25:401-411. DOI: 10.1007/BF00241730
  23. 23. Muller-Preuss P, Jürgens U. Projections from the ‘cingular’ vocalization area in the squirrel monkey. Brain Research. 1976;103:29-43. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(76)90684-3
  24. 24. Hage SR, Jurgens U. Telemetric recording of neuronal activity. Methods. 2006;38(3):195-201. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2005.08.005
  25. 25. Baxter BL. Comparison of the behavioral effects of electrical or chemical stimulation applied at the same brain loci. Experimental Neurology. 1967;19:412-432. DOI: 10.1016/0014-4886(67)90162-8
  26. 26. Altafullah I, Shipley C, Buchwald JS. Voiced calls evoked by hypothalamic stimulation in the cat. Experimental Brain Research. 1988;71:21-32. DOI: 10.1007/BF00247519
  27. 27. Myers RE. Comparative neurology of vocalization and speech: Proof of a dichotomy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1976;280:745-760. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1976.tb25537.x
  28. 28. Hunsperger RW, Bucher VM. Affective behaviour by electrical stimulation in the forebain and brain stem of the cat. Progress in Brain Research. 1967;27:103-127. DOI: 10.1016/s0079-6123(08)63095-2
  29. 29. Hopkins DA, Holstege G. Amygdaloid projections to themes encephalon, pons and medulla oblongata in the cat. Experimental Brain Research. 1978;32:529-547. DOI: 10.1007/BF00239551
  30. 30. Holstege G, Meiners L, Tan K. Projections of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis to the mesencephalon, pons, and medulla oblongata in the cat. Experimental Brain Research. 1985;58:379-391. DOI: 10.1007/BF00235319
  31. 31. Holstege G. Anatomical evidence for an ipsilateral rubrospinal pathway and for direct rubrospinal projections to motoneurons in the cat. Neuroscience Letters. 1987a;74:269-274. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3940(87)90308-9
  32. 32. Holstege G. Descending motor pathways and the spinal motor system: Limbic and non-limbic components. Progress in Brain Research. 1991;87:307-421. DOI: 10.1016/s0079-6123(08)63057-5
  33. 33. Kuipers R, Mensinga GM, Boers J, Klop EM, Holstege G. Infralimbic cortex projects to all parts of the pontine and medullary lateral tegmental field in cat. The European Journal of Neuroscience. 2006;23:3014-3024. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04843.x
  34. 34. Adametz J, O’Leary JL. Experimental mutism resulting from periaqueductal lesions in cats. Neurology. 1959;9:636-642. DOI: 10.1212/wnl.9.10.636
  35. 35. Skultety FM. Experimental mutism in dogs. Archives of Neurology. 1962;6:235-241. DOI: 10.1001/archneur.1962.00450210063007
  36. 36. Jürgens U. On the elicitability of vocalization from the cortical larynx area. Brain Research. 1974;8:564-566. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(74)90853-1
  37. 37. Kirzinger A, Jürgens U. Cortical lesion effects and vocalization in the squirrel monkey. Brain Research. 1982;233:299-315. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(82)91204-5
  38. 38. Schadt CR, Cox KL, Tramontana MG, Byrne DW, Davis TL, Fang JY, et al. Depression and intelligence in patients with Parkinson’s disease and deep brain stimulation. Journal of the National Medical Association. 2006;98:1121-1125
  39. 39. Subramanian HH, Arun M, Silburn PA, Holstege G. Motor organization of positive and negative emotional vocalization in the cat midbrain periaqueductal gray. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 2015;524(8):1540-1557. DOI: 10.1002/cne.23869
  40. 40. Ludlow CL. Central nervous system control of voice and swallowing. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2015;32(4):294-303. DOI: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000186
  41. 41. Simonyan K. The laryngeal motor cortex: Its organization and connectivity. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 2014;28:15-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2014.05.006
  42. 42. Brown S, Ngan E, Liotti M. A larynx area in the human motor cortex. Cerebral Cortex. 2008;18:837-845. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhm131
  43. 43. Larson CR, Burnett TA, Kiran S, Hain TC. Effects of pitch-shift velocity on voice Fo responses. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2000;107:559-564. DOI: 10.1121/1.428323
  44. 44. Loucks TM, Poletto CJ, Simonyan K, Reynolds CL, Ludlow CL. Human brain activation during phonation and exhalation: Common volitional control for two upper airway functions. NeuroImage. 2007;36:131-143. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.01.049
  45. 45. Penfield W, Roberts L. Speech and Brain Mechanisms. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press; 1959
  46. 46. Geerling J, Yokota S, Rukhadze I, Roe D, Chamberlin N. Kölliker–Fuse GABAergic and glutamatergic neurons project to distinct targets. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 2017;525:1844-1860. DOI: 10.1002/cne.24164
  47. 47. Farley GR, Barlow SM, Netsell R. Factors influencing neural activity in parabrachial regions during cat vocalizations. Experimental Brain Research. 1992;89(2):341-351. DOI: 10.1007/BF00228250
  48. 48. Peinado-Aragonés CA. Interrelaciones de la sustancia gris periacueductal dorsolateral y la región protuberancial a5 en el control central cardiorrespiratorio (tesis doctoral). Málaga: Universidad de Málaga; 2016
  49. 49. López-González MV, González-García M, Peinado-Aragonés CA, Barbancho MA, Díaz-Casares A, Dawid-Milner MS. Pontine A5 region modulation of the cardiorespiratory response evoked from the midbrain dorsolateral periaqueductal grey. Journal of Physiology and Biochemistry. 2020;76(4):561-572. DOI: 10.1007/s13105-020-00761-1
  50. 50. Keay KA, Bandler R. Parallel circuits mediating distinct emotional coping reactions to different types of stress. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 2001;25:669-678. DOI: 10.1016/s0149-7634(01)00049-5
  51. 51. Hayward LF. Midbrain modulation of the cardiac baroreflex involves excitation of lateral parabrachial neurons in the rat. Brain Research. 2007;1145:117-127. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.01.140
  52. 52. De Menezes RC, Zaretsky DV, Fontes MAP, DiMicco JA. Cardiovascular and thermal responses evoked from the periaqueductal grey require neuronal activity in the hypothalamus. The Journal of Physiology. 2009;587:1201-1215. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2008.161463
  53. 53. Horiuchi J, McDowall LM, Dampney RA. Vasomotor and respiratory responses evoked from the dorsolateral periaqueductal grey are mediated by the dorsomedial hypothalamus. The Journal of Physiology. 2009;587:5149-5162. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.179739
  54. 54. Díaz-Casares A, López-González MV, Peinado-Aragonés CA, Lara JP, González-Barón S, Dawid-Milner MS. Role of the parabrachial complex in the cardiorespiratory response evoked from hypothalamic defense area stimulation in the anesthetized rat. Brain Research. 2009;1279:58-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.02.085
  55. 55. Díaz-Casares A, López-González MV, Peinado-Aragonés C, González-Barón S, Dawid-Milner MS. Parabrachial complex glutamate receptors modulate the cardiorespiratory response evoked from hypothalamic defense area. Autonomic Neuroscience. 2012;169(2):124-134. DOI: 10.1016/j.autneu.2012.06.001
  56. 56. López-González MV, Díaz-Casares A, Peinado-Aragonés CA, Lara JP, Barbancho MA, Dawid-Milner MS. Neurons of the A5 region are required for the tachycardia evoked by electrical stimulation of the hypothalamic defence area in anaesthetized rats. Experimental Physiology. 2013;98:1279-1294. DOI: 10.1113/expphysiol.2013.072538
  57. 57. López-González MV, Díaz-Casares A, González-García M, Peinado-Aragonés CA, Barbancho MA, Carrillo de Albornoz M, et al. Glutamate receptors of the A5 region modulate cardiovascular responses evoked from the dorsomedial hypothalamic nucleus and perifornical area. Journal of Physiology and Biochemistry. 2018;74(2):325-334. DOI: 10.1007/s13105-018-0623-3
  58. 58. Mancia G, Zancchetti A. Hypothalamic control of autonomic functions. In: Morgane PJ, Panksepp J, editors. Handbook of the Hypothalamus. Behavioral Studies of the Hypothalamus. New York: Dekker; 1981. pp. 147-201
  59. 59. Dampney RAL. Central neural control of the cardiovascular system: Current perspectives. Advances in Physiology Education. 2016;40(3):283-296. DOI: 10.1152/advan.00027.2016
  60. 60. Fontes MAP, Tagawa T, Polson JW, Cavanagh SJ, Dampney RAL. Descending pathways mediating cardiovascular response from dorsomedial hypothalamic nucleus. The American Journal of Physiology. 2001;280:H2891-H2901. DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.2001.280.6.H2891
  61. 61. Cao WH, Fan W, Morrison SF. Medullary pathways mediating specific sympathetic responses to activation of dorsomedial hypothalamus. Neuroscience. 2004;126:220-240. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.03.013
  62. 62. Samuels BC, Zaretsky DV, DiMicco JA. Tachycardia evoked by disinhibition of the dorsomedial hypothalamus is mediated through medullary raphe. The Journal of Physiology. 2002;538:941-946. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2001.013302
  63. 63. Zaretsky DV, Zaretskaia MV, DiMicco JA. Stimulation and blockade of GABA(A) receptors in the raphe pallidus: Effects on body temperatura, heart rate, and blood pressure in conscious rats. American Journal of Physiology. Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 2003;285(1):R110-R116. DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00016.2003
  64. 64. Horiuchi J, McAllen RM, Allen AM, Killinger S, Fontes MA, Dampney RA. Descending vasomotor pathways from the dorsomedial hypothalamic nucleus: Role of medullary raphe and RVLM. American Journal of Physiology. Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 2004;287:R824-R832. DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00221.2004
  65. 65. Samuels BC, Zaretsky DV, DiMicco JA. Dorsomedial hypothalamic sites where disinhibition evokes tachycardia correlate with location of raphe-projecting neurons in rats. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 2004;287:R472-R478. DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00667.2003
  66. 66. González-García M, López-González MV, Carrillo-Franco L, Carrillo-Franco C, Dawid-Milner MS. Hypothalamic and mesencephalic regions involved in the control of laryngeal activity and subglottic pressure in spontaneously breathing anaesthetized rats. Proceedings of the Physiological Society. 2019;43:PC208
  67. 67. González-García M, López- González MV, Díaz-Casares A, Peinado-Aragonés CA, Barbancho MA, Dawid-Milner MS. Does the midbrain dorsolateral periaqueductal grey have direct connections with the pontine a5 region? A neuropharmacologic and electrophysiological study. FENS Abstr. 2018;9:E004
  68. 68. Peterson JR, Watts CR, Morris JA, Shelton JM, Cooper BG. Laryngeal aging and acoustic changes in male rat ultrasonic vocalizations. Developmental Psychobiology. 2013;55(8):818-828. DOI: 10.1002/dev.21072
  69. 69. Mor N, Simonyan K, Blitzer A. Central voice production and pathophysiology of spasmodic dysphonia. The Laryngoscope. 2018;128:177-183. DOI: 10.1002/lary.26655
  70. 70. Drager LF, Genta PR, Pedrosa RP, Nerbass FB, Gonzaga CC, Krieger EM. Characteristics and predictors of obstructive sleep apnea in patients with systemic hypertension. The American Journal of Cardiology. 2010;105(8):1135-1139. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.12.017
  71. 71. Christopher KL, Morris MJ. Vocal cord dysfunction, paradoxic vocal fold motion, or laryngomalacia? Our understanding requires an interdisciplinary approach. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America. 2010;43(1):43-66, viii. DOI: 10.1016/j.otc.2009.12.002
  72. 72. Demmink-Geertman L, Dejonckere PH. Differential effects of voice therapies on neurovegetative symptoms and complaints. Journal of Voice. 2010;24(5):585-591. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.12.013
  73. 73. Wang X, Guo R, Zhao W, Pilowsky P. Medullary mediation of the laryngeal adductor réflex: A posible role in sudden infant síndrome. Respiratory Physiology and Neurobiology. 2016;226:121-127. DOI: 10.1016/j.resp.2016.01.002
  74. 74. Van Houtte E, Van Lierde K, Claeys S. Pathophysiology and treatment of muscle tension dysphonia: A review of the current knowledge. Journal of Voice. 2011;25:2. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.10.009

Written By

Manuel Víctor López-González, Marta González-García, Laura Carrillo-Franco, Amelia Díaz-Casares and Marc Stefan Dawid-Milner

Submitted: December 9th, 2021 Reviewed: December 13th, 2021 Published: February 9th, 2022