Open access peer-reviewed chapter - ONLINE FIRST

Using Biostimulants Containing Phytohormones to Recover Hail-Damaged Essential Oil Plants

Written By

Zenzile Peter Khetsha, Moosa Mahmood Sedibe, Rudolph Johannes Pretorius, Phoka Caiphus Rathebe and Karabelo Moloantoa

Submitted: December 20th, 2021 Reviewed: December 24th, 2021 Published: February 4th, 2022

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.102398

IntechOpen
Revisiting Plant Biostimulants Edited by Vijay Meena

From the Edited Volume

Revisiting Plant Biostimulants [Working Title]

Dr. Vijay Singh Meena, Dr. Hanuman Prasad Parewa and Dr. Sunita Kumari Meena

Chapter metrics overview

52 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Hail can cause significant damage to aromatic and medicinal plants; however, this has never been investigated scientifically on most of aromatic and medicinal plants. Globally, essential oil crop producers primarily make use of agricultural crop insurance and costly mitigation strategies to recover lost production costs and alleviate hail-damaged plants. However, most aromatic and medicinal plants are not covered under agricultural crop insurance, and many commercial farmers are not able to regularly employ expensive alternative strategies. Therefore, hail damage may present a challenge to essential oil growers. The use of natural and synthetic phytohormones in a form of biostimulants, as an alternative biological mitigation strategy against hail damage in essential oil crops, has not received much attention, and there is no information on this topic. Exogenous applications of natural and synthetic biostimulants have consistently demonstrated growth enhancement, nutrient acquisition, yield and quality optimization, as well as physiological efficiency in plants. Biostimulants in a form of phytohormones are involved in diverse plant physiological processes, including the regulation of gene expression for adaptive responses to biotic and abiotic stresses. Using biostimulants, this chapter will detail the potential recovery response of aromatic and medicinal plants to hail damage, and the response of plants treated with biostimulants.

Keywords

  • biostimulants
  • phytohormones
  • post hail damage
  • recovery
  • secondary metabolites

1. Introduction

Prolonged droughts, increased floods and frequent extreme weather events are evidence of climate change, as a consequence of global warming [1]. Agriculture is adapting to the variability in global climatic conditions, with farmers continually developing strategies to respond to changing weather patterns [2]. Aromatic and medicinal plants are among those plants which are negatively affected by climate change [3]. In addition, there is a concern over climate change affecting the secondary metabolites of many medicinal and aromatic plants [4]. Hailstorms are one of the most common global natural disasters [5], and temperate zones seem especially prone to hailstorm events [6]. To date, there is no recorded data for the impact of hail damage on essential oil plants; however, it was reported that hail causes substantial damage to aromatic plants [7, 8].

Changes in the secondary metabolites of essential oil plants vary depending on the type of damage incurred by the plant [9]. Hail wounding on these plants affect specific aromatic and therapeutic attributes that make these plants economically important [10]. It has also been shown that hail damage, mechanical damage, and insect herbivory cause essential oil compound changes [10]. For example, hail damage simulation through leaf puncturing resulted in reduced menthone levels and increased pulegone concentrations in muña (Minthostachys mollis[Kunth] Griseb.). This subsequently altered the composition of the volatiles released from the damaged leaves [9].

A common mitigation strategy for the loss in yield caused by hail damage is crop insurance [11]. Globally, crop insurance against hail damage can be purchased for most commercial plants, but not for essential oil crops [12]. Other alternative strategies include the construction of hail nets as a preventative measure against hail damage. However, this strategy is often unfeasible as the high construction and maintenance costs require more herbage material to produce sufficient essential oil to recover these costs. This, in turn, requires more land for production. Some farmers increase the application of nitrogen after hail to facilitate the formation of new leaves and buds [13]. It has been reported that increased nitrogen fertilization increases rose geranium herbage material [14]; however, the essential oil quality is reduced (based on the ISO standard) [15]. In temperate regions where hail frequencies are high, agro-meteorologists implement strategies, such as hail forecasting and cloud seeding, to reduce the extent of hail damage [11].

Hail is a natural hazard that can cause significant loss to crop yields [16]. Hailstones larger than 8.4 mm in diameter can result in defoliation, which, in turn, initiates cell division and the synthesis of cellular components [6]. Such wounding can also lead to stress that affects plant growth and metabolic activities [10]. To produce a stress-response and recover metabolic functions, plants rely on the crosstalk between phytohormones [9]. Biostimulants are also used in the agricultural industry to mitigate against these types of biotic and abiotic stresses [17].

Plants perform unique functions in plant development and stress repair, as well as improving the primary and secondary metabolite content of plants, which directly affects the essential oil biosynthesis and quality [18]. Exogenous applications of natural and synthetic biostimulants have consistently demonstrated growth enhancement, yield and quality optimization, as well as physiological efficiency in plants [19, 20]. Phytohormones are involved in diverse plant physiological processes, including the regulation of gene expression for adaptive responses to biotic and abiotic stresses [21]. Primary biostimulants include auxins, abscisic acid (ABA), cytokinins (CKs), gibberellic acids (GAs) and ethylene [22]. Secondary biostimulants include jasmonates and its analogues (methyl jasmonate, MeJA), brassinosteroids (BRs), salicylic acid, polyamines, sterols, and dehydrodiconiferyl alcohol glucosides [22]. There is currently no specific hail-mitigation strategy for most medicinal and aromatic crops, and the effects of potential hailstorm damage on essential oil and aromatic plants, as well as mitigation and control mechanisms, require further investigation by researchers.

Advertisement

2. Extent of defoliation, and hail damage on plants

Extreme climatic conditions can lead to significant losses in the agricultural sector [2]. These losses have drastically increased, by at least 400% from 1960 to 2005 [5, 23, 24]. Hailstorms are one of the most common global natural disasters [5], and temperate zones seem especially prone to hailstorm events [6]. The following review focusses on hailstorm as one of the natural disasters responsible for crop loss and damage.

Hail is defined as precipitation in the form of small pellets, or pieces of ice, which vary in size from 0.5 mm to 100 mm [25]. Hail can cause extensive damage to growing crops and other vegetation [26]. Hail formation takes place in elongated convective cumulonimbus clouds, which are often associated with thunderstorms [6]. Severe hail-related losses result from hailstones above H2 size [27]. Hailstones above H2 cause defoliation, tearing, bruising, breaking, and the loss of stems and flowers [26]. Such wounding can also lead to plant stress, which affects growth and metabolic activities [28]. This can further predispose plants to disease outbreaks since wounds provide an entry point for plant pathogens [28].

The extent of hail damage depends on several factors, such as the number of hailstones per unit area, wind velocity [6], and hailstone size [29]. Changnon [29] and Fernandes et al. [24], reported that hail damage differs extensively among plant species, and is influenced by several factors, such as plant height, and leaf and stem morphology. Certain plant species, e.g. soybean (Glycine max[L.] Merr.], tea (Camellia sinensis[L.] Kuntze), and tobacco (Nicotiana tabacumL.), are susceptible to damage by hailstones of any size (>H0), due to their leaf and stem morphology [29, 30]. In contrast, crops such as maize and wheat are mostly damaged by larger, windblown hailstones (>H3) because of their height, and differences in leaf area, the stem sizes and morphology [29, 30].

Plants also respond differently to wounding stress following hail damage. Physical wounding of plant tissue resulting from hail damage and defoliation initiates a cascade of biochemical or physiological processes, which results in the repair of damaged tissue and resistance to opportunistic pests and pathogens [31]. Such alterations occur both in the tissue immediately surrounding the wound, and in distal tissue not directly in contact with the damaged tissue [31]. At the wound site, cell division and the synthesis of cellular components that are required to isolate the damaged tissue, reduce water loss, and restore tissue integrity, is initiated [31]. In leaves, wounding also induces the synthesis and accumulation of anti-microbial compounds, and in the specific case of damage caused by herbivory, volatile metabolites are released to deter pests and attract their predators and parasitoids [31].

Hail damage hinders plant growth, and affects the yield and quality by changing the cellular metabolic processes [4]. Defoliation and wounding stress in plants results in a knock-back effect that reduces the assimilation of carbon, ultimately affecting the rate of photosynthesis [4]. This stress stimulates the production of bio-inhibitors, reactive oxygen species levels, transient Ca2+ influxes into the cytoplasm, and protein phosphorylation. It also causes irreversible injury to cells and tissue that eventually slows growth [32]. This has been reported in potato plants (Solanum tuberosumL.), where ribonucleic acid (RNA) homology changed as a result of wounding [33]. Christopher et al. [34] identified a suite of wound-regulated genes, indicating the diversity and multiplicity of the induced defense response in systemically wounded leaves of hybrid poplars (Populus trichocarpa× P. deltoides). In lettuce (Lactuca sativaL.), plant wounding induced the synthesis of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase compounds [35].

The local and systemic plant responses activate and regulate defense mechanisms for localized tissue damage, such as those resulting from hail damage [36]. Plants can also positively adapt with altered growth habits to contradict the damaging effects of hail [4]. Thus, the responses are both reversible and irreversible modifications, such as cell division, alterations of membrane channels, and a change in the structure of the cell wall [4]. This has been demonstrated with muña (Minthostachys mollis[Kunth] Griseb.), where leaf puncturing resulted in reduced menthone levels, while the pulegone concentration increased during the first 48 h of the experiment [9]. Furthermore, an increased pulegone level and diminishing menthone emissions also altered the composition of volatiles released from damaged leaves. Depending on the phytohormonal crosstalk and proteins released, wound-inducible genes may either repair damaged plant tissue or produce inhibitory system [36].

Advertisement

3. Biostimulants as a mitigating strategy for hail damaged essential oil plants

Phytohormones are molecules that influence the growth and development of plants, even at low concentrations. There are phytohormones which are produced naturally by plants, as well as synthetic regulators, which are have been produced in biotechnology research as biostimulants [9]. Biostimulants are used in global crop production to improve field competitiveness, nutrient use efficiency, and stress resistance in plants [37]. Most biostimulants and their products are extracted from algae, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, chitin and chitosan derivatives, fulvic and humic acids, synthetic phytohormones, natural plant extracts and the magnetic field as a growth stimulant for plant species [37, 38]. Exogenous applications of natural and synthetic biostimulants enhance growth, increase oil yield and quality, as well as improving physiological efficiency in plants [37]. This section focuses on the use of biostimulants to recover defoliated, wounded, and hail-damaged plants.

Plant metabolic activities are regulated by phytohormones [39]. Phytohormones are produced naturally by plants and are small organic molecules which, at low endogenous concentrations (10−6 M to 10−9 M), induce metabolic activities within plant cells to modify growth and development [22]. However, synthetic chemicals, with the same properties and effects as natural phytohormones, can be produced [9]. A key research objective in plant biotechnology is to recognize the mechanism used by plants to respond to and overcome different environmental stressors [4]. Phytohormones are classified as either plant growth regulators (CK, GA, BRs, and auxins) or as bio-inhibitors (ABA, jasmonates, and salicylic acid) [20]. Phytohormones are involved in a number of diverse plant physiological processes, including the regulation of gene expression for adaptive responses to biotic and abiotic stress [21] and in wound healing [4, 17].

Primary phytohormones include auxins, ABA, CK, GA, and ethylene [40]. Other naturally occurring phytohormonal-like molecules include jasmonates, BRs, salicylic acid, polyamines, sterols, and dehydrodiconiferyl alcohol glucosides [40]. Phytohormones alter metabolic activities associated with cell division, cell enlargement, flowering, fruiting, and seed formation. Nemhauser et al. [19] found that exogenous applications of phytohormones regulate plant growth, and greatly influence plant stature and organ size. Bio-inhibitors are involved in the alleviation of biotic and abiotic stress that results from wounding, moisture stress, and temperature stress [20].

3.1 Effects of phytohormones, biostimulants and magnetic field on plant growth and development, refoliation and wounding

Phytohormones promote growth and development, the production of secondary metabolites, as well as bio-inhibition, due to the extensive crosstalk and signal integration which affects the plants physio-morphological chemistry [9]. The recovery mechanism of defoliated, wounded, and hail-damaged plants has provided the rationale for investigating the potential of phytohormone application in this chapter. The following section examines the effects of natural and synthetic ABA, jasmonates, BRs, CK and GA on plant growth and development, and changes in primary and secondary metabolite biosynthesis of essential oil plants.

3.1.1 Abscisic acid as a potential growth stimulant for refoliation and wounding recovery

Abscisic acid is a stress-signaling molecule, found to occur in all kingdoms, except Archea. The effect of foliar applications of ABA on plant growth is dependent on the plant species [41]. It is a crucial regulator of important plant processes, including resilience to abiotic stressors, such as wounding, moisture, light, drought, and temperature [42]. Abscisic acid is also involved in primary plant growth development. This includes buffering the day-night alterations of leaf growth rate, and regulating stomatal movement and transpiration rate [43]. It also improves leaf growth by increasing tissue and whole-plant hydraulic conductivity [44]. Dammann et al. [45] found that hail damage, and defoliation causes increased levels of ABA in plants, which in turn activates the biosynthesis of jasmonates.

Abscisic acid is a C15 sesquiterpenoid, formed by the joining of three isoprenoid units [4, 41]. Abscisic acid occurs naturally as (S)-(+)-ABA, which is often called a cis isomer; a combination of 1:1 cisand transabscisic acids, classed as isoprenoids [44]. The ABA biosynthetic pathway starts from oxidative cleavage of epoxy-carotenoids and 9-cis violaxanthin, where xanthoxin is converted to abscisic acid [4, 41]. The early C5 precursor of ABA, isopentenyl pyrophosphate, is produced primarily in plastids, via 1-deoxy-d-xylulose-5-phosphate from pyruvate and glyceraldehydes-3-phosphate. This is then processed to farnesyl pyrophosphate, geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate, phytoene, carotene, and lycopene [4, 41]. Subsequently, xanthoxin migrates from the plastid to the cytosol, where it is converted to ABA by abscisic aldehyde, xanthosis acid, or abscisic alcohol; clearly, abscisic aldehyde is an intermediary in the conversion of xanthoxin to abscisic acid [4, 41].

Transportation of ABA primarily occurs through the vascular tissues of plants [46]. However, ABA responds to abiotic stress through the cells [41]; this requires translocation from ABA-producing cells, via intercellular transport, to allow rapid distribution to other plant tissue [41]. Abscisic acid is ubiquitous in plants; the endogenous levels in plant cells determine its homeostasis [4]. However, developmental and environmental factors such as light, wounding, salinity, and water stress affect ABA concentration levels [4].

Abscisic acid is sensitive to direct sunlight and high temperatures, and rapidly deteriorates under these conditions [47]. Kong and Zhao [48] found that foliar-applied ABA elevates the aroma content of aromatic rice (Oryza sativaL). Foliar application of ABA on yeba mate (Ilex paraguariesnsisA.St.-Hil.) increases plant growth, by reducing water stress through stomatal closure [49]. It has also been reported that the exogenous application of ABA improves wounding tolerance in tomatoes and potatoes, and induces jasmonate gene expression in the leaves and roots of potatoes [49]. The exogenous application of ABA should preferably be conducted during cool mornings, before sunrise and increasing temperatures.

As well as direct involvement in plant growth and development, ABA has a significant role in the regulation of environmental stress. [50] reported that there are two distinct pathways responsible for the developmental and environmental stress regulatory processes. Responses to plant wounding includes the local response at the site of the wound, and the systemic response, which occurs throughout the whole plant [36]. The foliar concentrations of ABA applied to wounded plants varies from 0.001 mM to 1.5 mM solution per plant, with the optimal application rate and concentration differing between different crop species [48, 49, 51, 52].

3.1.2 Jasmonates as a potential growth stimulant for refoliation and wounding recovery

Jasmonates and their methyl ester, MeJA, are natural-occurring growth regulators found in higher plants [53]. Jasmonates were first discovered and isolated from a culture of the fungus Lasiodiplodia theobromae(Pat.), while MeJA is a component of the essential oils of Jasminum grandiforum(L.) and Rosmanus officinalis(L.) [53]. Cyclopentanone-derived jasmonates are widespread in plants [54], while MeJA, and jasmonic acid and its hydroxylated derivatives are commonly used jasmonates for agricuclural purposes. In plants, cis-jasmone, jasmonyl-1-aminocyclopropane-1 carboxylic acid, and jasmonoyl isoleucine are also known to act as analogues of jasmonates [54].

Jasmonates are present throughout the plant body, with the highest concentration in growing tissues such as shoot tips, root tips, immature fruits, and young leaves [54]. Jasmonate biosynthesis in plants ranges from 0.01 μg/g to 3 μg/g in fresh mass [54]; however, it has been found to be as high as 95 μg/g in fresh mass of sagebrush (Artemisia tridentate[Nutt.]) [53]. Jasmonates are derived from the fatty acid metabolism pathway and are harvested directly from jasmine (Jasminum grandiflorumL.) [53]. Huang et al. [55] reported that biosynthesis of jasmonates takes place in three different cell membranes, and is activated by 13-lipoxygenase to form hydroperoxyoctadecatrienoic acid.

Jasmonates, along with their derivatives, control various aspects of plant growth and development, such as stamen development, root development, flowering, and leaf senescence [55]. Jasmonates also induce a variety of physiological processes, such as seed germination, pollen development, ethylene synthesis, tuber formation, fruit ripening, and tendril coiling [56]. However, when applied exogenously, jasmonates can modulate stress by either enhancing or suppressing plant development [57].

Jasmonates also activate a signal transduction pathway in response to different kinds of stress [57]. Plant responses to abiotic stresses, such as wounding, are coordinated both locally and systemically by jasmonate signaling molecules [56]. In addition, there is a causal link between wounding and jasmonates; wounding causes the release of linoleic acid, a jasmonate precursor, from the membrane lipids, in turn forming jasmonate [56]. Thus, the jasmonate signaling pathway involves signal transduction events that are regulated by wounding shock, especially in relation to leaf defoliation [56].

The molecular mechanism of crosstalk between growth and immune-signaling networks are regulated and mediated through biosynthetic pathways of phenylpropanoids, polyketides, terpenoids, and N-containing compounds, which are directly associated with jasmonates [58]. The effects of exogenously applied jasmonic acid on growth, changes in essential oil biosynthesis, and plants subjected to biotic and abiotic stresses has been tested [59, 60]. In a study conducted by [61], a high concentration of MeJA (1 mM) inhibited primary root growth of soybeans, while a low application concentration (0.01 μM) slightly stimulated root growth. Anderson [62] also reported that low levels (1 μM–10 μM) of MeJA alters protein and mRNA populations, without inducing senescence in cell culture, while a high concentration of jasmonic acid or MeJA (50 μM) induces senescence in cell culture, and slows the primary root growth of soybeans [61].

Methyl jasmonate applied at 0.5 mM increases the content of eugenol and linalool in basil plants compared to the control [63]. In another study, MeJA applied to bigleaf marsh-elder (Iva frutescensL.) resulted in an increase in volatile compounds (α-pinene, sabinene, and limonene emissions) [64]. The increase in volatile emissions following MeJA treatment was ascribed to terpene synthase activation and de novo synthesis. In these studies, foliar application of MeJA varied between 0.01 mM and 0.5 mM solution, per plant, with the application rate and concentration differing between different crop species, under normal growing conditions [65, 66, 67, 68].

3.1.3 Combined cytokinin and gibberellin, and the brassinosteroids as potential growth stimulants for recovery of defoliated and hail-damaged essential oil plants

The effects of phytohomones are based on the synergism to improve the growth and development, as well as the recovery, resistance and survival of stressed plants [60, 69]. Phytohormones rarely function independently; they depend on a crosstalk network between their synergic and antagonistic metabolic processes [40]. Gibberellins primarily controls cell growth and division by stimulating the elongation of internodes [70]. In a study by [71], longer internodes and delayed flowering were observed in tomatoes treated with GA (5 mg/L), while plants treated with only CK (5 mg/L) formed no axillary buds. However, when GA and CK were combined, there was an increase in fresh matter [71]. This demonstrates that there is a possible interaction between the major biostimulants, with antagonistic relations, which improves plant growth and development. The crosstalk between GA and CK involves components from the GA biosynthesis pathways, which plays a central role in the regulation of plant growth and development [72]. Gibberellins and CKs are commonly used in agriculture, viticulture, gardens, and horticulture [73].

Cytokinin was first discovered in the early 1940s when coconut milk was added to aid cell division in tobacco plants [74]. All CKs are adenine derivatives and mostly occur as either free compounds, glucosides, or ribosides in the plant root system, particularly the root apex [44, 75]. According to [44], CK biosynthesis occurs through biochemical modification of dimethylallyl diphosphate, which is initiated through the transference of the isopentenyl moiety from dimethylallyl diphosphate to the N6 position of adenosine triphosphate, catalyzed by isopentenyl transferases. These form the isopentenyl transferases and the isoprene side chain, which is subsequently trans-hydroxylated by cytochrome P450 (CYP450) to yield zeatin ribosides [44]. The metabolic storage and transport of CK is not yet fully understood, however, it is hypothesized that transport takes place via the vascular tissue (particularly the xylem), from the roots to the shoots of the plant [76].

Commonly-used CKs for agricultural purposes include zeatin, kinetin, 6-Benzylaminopurine (BA and BAP), 2-isopentenyl adenine, zeatin riboside, and dihydro-zeatin [40, 77]. The main functional properties of CKs for agricultural use are the stimulation of cell division, release of lateral bud dormancy, the induction of adventitious bud formation, retarded leaf senescence, and the promotion of chlorophyll synthesis [78]. Exogenous application of CKs is currently used to optimize the internal concentrations of CKs for growth and development, organ regeneration after wounding damage, and changing the chemical compositions of essential oils [78].

Gibberellins were first isolated from the fungus, Fusarium moniliformaeSheldon (Gibberella fujiskuroi[Swada] Wollenweber), and named gibberellic acid (GA3) [79]. To date, ca. 126 naturally-occurring GAs have been discovered [73], with each plant species containing at least six to ten GAs [80]. A wise decision was made early in GA research to number the various GAs, rather than naming them separately, as was done with chemical-related sterols. Therefore, GAs are known as GA1, GA2, and GA3, etc. up to more than GA126 [81].

Gibberellins are a large group of essential diterpenoid acids [73]. They are biosynthesized in shoot apices, young leaves, and flowers of plants, via the terpenoid pathway [81]. Biosynthesis of GA requires three enzymes viz., terpene synthase, CYP450s, and 2-oxoglutarate [81]. Gibberellins are transported through plants by means of the vascular tissues, xylem, and phloem [81].

The most common molecular mechanisms of GA signaling in plants is through the GA receptor, Gibberellin Insensitive Dwarf 1 (GID1) [44, 82]. Upon binding, the receptors undergo conformation changes that favor the binding of DELLAproteins, a group of nuclear transcriptional regulators that repress GA signaling and plant growth [44, 82]. Homeostasis and regulation of the GA biosynthetic pathway depends on the developmental and environmental signals, specifically the genes GA20-oxidases, GA3-oxidase, and GA2-oxidases [44].

Gibberellins are endogenous hormones functioning as biostimulants that influence a wide range of developmental processes in higher plants [72]. This includes plant growth and development through promoting leaf development, stem elongation, induction of seed germination, promotion of hypocotyls and stem elongation, regulation of pollen development, and flower initiation [81]. Some GA-deficient mutants can cause dwarfism [82]. Different types of GAs are used to achieve specific agronomic objectives, for example, anti-flowering GA7 and GA3 are commonly used for promoting germination, seed development, leaf development, and stem elongation [81].

Several studies have revealed a reciprocal developmental dependence between the two hormones, where the ratio between GA and CK affects the developmental processes of the plant [72]. Cato et al. [71] observed positive synergic crosstalk between GA and CK in tomatoes, and [75] reported that a combination of BA and GA induced longer tomato shoots, under different abiotic stress conditions. High CK and low GA signals are required for normal shoot apical meristem functioning [82]. In contrast to these findings, joint applications of GAs and CKs have been shown to exert antagonistic effects on numerous developmental processes, including shoot and root elongation, cell differentiation, shoot regeneration in culture, and meristem activity [83, 84]. Moreover, GA tends to inhibit CK-induced cell differentiation in plants [72]. This inhibition is attributed to the loss of the SPINDLYprotein function, which results from CK resistance.

Cytokinin activity is highest during early shoot initiation (controlling meristem activity) [85]; in contrast, GAs act at a later stage to regulate plant cell division and shoot elongation [84]. The GA biosynthetic pathway from trans-geranylgeranyl diphosphate to GA12-aldehyde, leads to the identification of positive and negative signaling components [72]. In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thalianaL.), GA and CK signaling regulated the expression of ARR1 through repression of GA, via degradation of the DELLAprotein RGA [86]. This indicates that reducing the GA concentration, 5 days after foliar application, releases ARR1from repression, which in turn upregulates SHY2. This leads to an increase in cell differentiation, which balances with cell division to control plant growth. In addition, the regulation of SHY2by ARR1also represents a point of crosstalk with auxin, thus connecting three hormones in a single network [86]. The homeostatic balance of GA and CK in plants may vary between species, and the response of plants to foliar treatments may differ as a result of external factors, such as change in environmental conditions, and stage of development [87].

Changes in the ratios of GAs and CKs to both each other, and to other hormones, often results in distinct and divergent morphological features, such as dwarfism, contorted or twisted growth, weeping forms, or fastigiated and columnar forms [89]. In addition, the ratios may cause extra-large leaves or elongated stems, and extensive shoot proliferation, especially under less favorable environmental conditions. Weeping forms have been observed in spruce (Picea abiesMill.), pine (Pinus densifloraL.), and sweet viburnum (Viburnum odoratissimumKer Gawl.) treated with combined GA and CK [88, 89]. Therefore, it is evident that under abiotic stress conditions, plants can be treated with combined GA and CK to induce foliage material development. However, it is crucial to plan the application scheduling and ratios for each of these hormones, as shown in studies by [83, 84].

Brassinosteroids were named after the genus Brassicaduring the late 1970s [90], and they were initially extracted from maize pollen [90, 91]: to date, there are more than 70 free BRs and conjugates, described from various plant species [91]. Trace amounts of BR’s in a complex plant matrix are classed as polyhydroxylated steroid plant hormones and are widespread among plants [91]. In addition, BRs are structurally classed as C27, C28, or C29 based on the different alkyl-substitution patterns of the side chains [92]. All the BRs isolated from plants are produced through campesterol biosynthesis and belong to the C28-BRs, with a 24α-methyl group [80].

The most effective BRs, which have been extracted from plants for agricultural use are brassinolide, castasterone, testosterone, and 6-deoxy castasterone [80]. Of all the BRs, brassinolide is biologically the most active [92]; it is ubiquitous in plants and is produced in almost all plant parts, where it controls growth and developmental processes [93]. Plants synthesize excess brassinolide to meet the continuous need for growth and development, while inactive brassinolide is converted into active forms to maintain BRs homeostasis [92].

Brassinosteroids are found in various plant species, including monoplast freshwater algae and brown algae, suggesting that they are ancient ubiquitous plant hormones [92]. Brassinosteroids are also found in pollen, immature seeds, roots, and flowers [91, 92]. They range from 1 to 100 ng/g fresh weight in flowers, while shoots and leaves have lower amounts of 0.01–0.1 ng/g fresh mass [91, 92]. Brassinosteroids are not mobile within plants, they function by paracrine or autocrine signaling; however, long-distance transport of exogenously-applied BRs does occur in plants, particularly from the roots to shoots, but foliar-applied BRs (24-epibrassinolde) are fixed in the leaves [92]. In addition, [94] reported high mobility of BRs in a plant system.

Brassinosteroids are involved in a wide variety of plant physiological activities. They regulate plant growth, at nanomolar to micromolar concentrations, for multiple developmental processes, including cell division, cell elongation, vascular differentiation, reproductive development, and modulation of gene expression [54]. High metabolic activity, associated with growth, has been observed in rape (Brassica napusL.) treated with BRs [90]. BRs are also involved in microbial infection recovery, hypocotyl growth, increased leaf lamina growth, increased shoot apex fresh weight, pollen tube growth, and stress tolerance [80].

The application of BRs enhances plant biomass, secondary metabolites, antioxidant defense activities, and the accumulation of osmoprotectants under biotic and abiotic stress [93]. This has been demonstrated in soybean, where the application of 1 μmol/L BRs led to hypocotyl and epicotyl elongation. However, epicotyl elongation was affected by photoperiod, with no increase in length under dark conditions [95]. Therefore, BRs applied at higher concentrations (≥1 μmol/L) in dark-grown plants suppress shoot and root development [95]. Mung beans treated with the BR, 28-homobrasinolide, at 10−8 M, had increased leaf area, and plant height, as well as fresh and dry mass of shoots and roots over a 21-day growth period. This treatment also increased proline content [96]. The foliar fresh matter of corn mint (Mentha arvensisL.f. Piperascens Malinv. Ex Holmes) and its menthol content increased when treated with lactonic spirostane-SABS (0.5 ng/L) and ketonic-SABS (0.5 ng/L) [97]. BRs induce chlorophyll synthesis, through the activation of enzyme proteins [98]. [99] demonstrated this, with a foliar application of 0.5 ppm BRs increasing the chlorophyll content of soybean.

In light of these studies, it is evident that BRs can have a significant impact on plant growth and development, and therefore on recovering the yield and essential oil quality parameters of defoliated, wounded, or hail-damaged plants. The role of BRs in the alleviation of various abiotic and biotic stressors, such as temperature, salinity, moisture, and heavy metal exposure has been reported [100].

3.1.4 Natural biostimulants-containing phytohormones as a recovery mechanism for wounded, defoliated and hail-damaged plants

Exogenous applications of synthetic biostimulants have been shown to consistently enhance growth, yield optimization and oil quality [60], as well as physiological efficiency in plants [19]. However, the production and availability of some synthetic phytohormones are expensive and not readily available. In addition, the practical use of these phytohormones is dependent on various environmental factors, such as temperature and light [101]. The use of synthetic biostimulants is a potential ecological hazard as they could pose a threat to the health of non-target organisms, especially when improperly used [90]. As such, the use of less harmful and cheaper bioactive stimulants are preferred over conventional synthetic phytohormones [80].

There are numerous commercially available bio-fertilizers, plant conditioners, allelopathic preparations, biogenic stimulators, elicitors, plant strengtheners, and biostimulants (Table 1). Most of these products are considered as biostimulants, containing biostimulants. However, [102] found that some biostimulants contain traces of natural phytohormones, but their biological action should not be attributed to them, unless registered as biostimulants.

ProductCompositionCitation
Lucky Plant®Gibberellic acid, BRs and traces of CKsAgraforum, Germany
ComCat®Brassinosteroids (2,4-epibrassinolide)Agraforum, Germany
SilCat™Brassinosteroids (2,4-epibrassinolide)Agraforum, Germany
AnnGro® EWEthyl esters of fatty acidsAgraforum, Germany
Stimplex®Cytokinin (Kinetin 0.01%)[102]
FungicidalSalicylic acidPan African Farms
PanAf®Salicylic acidPan African Farms
Megafol®Amino acids, betaines, proteins, vitamins, auxin, GA, and cytokinins[69]
Biozyme®Algae extract, GAs, auxin and zeatin, and chelated micronutrients[69]
SlavolN-fixing, and phosphate-mineralizing bacteria, and auxins[69]
Algreen, Leili®Seaweed extract, plant growth regulator, vitamins, free amino acids, and alginic acid[69]
Agrispon®Natural plant extract with traces of phytohormones[103]
Kelpak®Seaweed extract and traces of plant growth regulators[103]
StifunComplex biologically active substances of natural origin[104]
Auxym®Auxins and CK, amino acids, peptides, vitamins, and essential micronutrients[105]

Table 1.

Examples of commercial biostimulants containing phytohormones as declared on the labels.

Biostimulants products are developed based on the synergism between natural phytohormones [86, 87]. However, there are only a few published scientific reports on these products, since most industrial companies withhold information for market confidentiality purposes (examples in Table 1). Below are a few of the published reports to highlight the effects of registered biostimulants (containing traces of phytohormones) on plant growth, recovery, and resistance against stressors.

Application of biostimulants (undisclosed brand-name) containing GA (50 mg/L) and CK (90 mg/L) increased the number of leaves, flower heads and the total flavonoid content of marigold plants inflorescences [106]. Peppers (Capsicum annuumL.) treated with Megafol® (0.2% 40 mL; GA & CK content) had increased Ca uptake in the foliage material and fruits. Megafol® also increased the fruiting yield and the level of antioxidants in the same species [69]. Hüster [90] studied the stimulatory effects of ComCat® on wheat, maize, cabbage (Brassica oleraceaL.), carrots (Daucus carota[Hoffm.] Schübl.), onions (Allium cepaL.), lettuce, beetroot (Beta vulgarisL.), and peas (Pisum sativumL.). They demonstrated that an optimum foliar application of 5 mg/L, significantly increased the foliar biomass of these crops. Marjoram (Majorana hortensisMoench.) treated with BRs (25 mg/L) was rich in cis-sabinene hydrate content [107]. Foliar application of the tropical plant extract, Auxym® (2 ml/L), improved the yield of jute (Corchorus olitoriussp.) [105]. Auxym® also increased the chlorophyll content, enhanced the adaptation of jute plants to fluctuating light levels, and positively increased the starch, soluble proteins, and amino acids content when the plants received the full strength of nutrient solution [105]. From these studies, it is evident that phytohormones and biostimulants containing natural phytohormones can increase crop yield, enhance plant phytochemistry and secondary metabolites biosynthesis, and improve the recovery response mechanism of plants following biotic and abiotic stresses.

3.1.5 Magnetic field as a potential growth stimulant

The emission of magnetic fields (MFs) in the ecosystem due to ever changing and advancing technology has brought significant changes in the human and ecological environment [108]. In the modern days, the use of MFs as a stimulant for plant performance and capability has been far an interesting alternative method to chemical stimulants [109]. Magnetic fields have positively influenced the morphogenesis, showing great modification of seed germination, seedling growth and development in various plants such as cereals, grasses, medicinal plants, horticultural crops and herbs [38]. It is worth noting that MFs constitute non-toxic stimulus resulting in increased food and environmental safety. Application of MFs on crops has been seen to reduce the attack of pathogenic diseases [110]. Many studies have tried to understand the actual mechanism involved on how seeds germinate when exposed to MFs. Vashisth and Joshi [111] exposed seeds of maize to static-MFs for 4 h on strengths ranging from 50, 100, 150, 200 and 250 milliTesla (mT). The results suggested that MFs application enhance the seed percentage-germination, seedling length, dry weight and speed of germination when compared to the referent group. Furthermore, exposure to MFs reduced cellular leakage, improved water absorption and functional root parameters. Kirdan et al. [112] performed an interesting experiment by treating Pinus PineaL. seeds with a MF of 9.42 mT for a different period of time; 0 min (used as a reference), 15, 30, and 40 min. Seeds exposed for 30 and 45 min showed a higher germination energy. There was also an increased root collar diameter, shoot height and tap root length.

Plants are outstanding experimental models compared to animals when conducting MFs exposure and response growth relationship studies. According to Vian et al. [113], they efficiently intercept with electromagnetic fields (EMFs) because of immobility and constant orientation. The benefit of magnetic seed germination has been seen in various biochemical events such as enzymatic stimulation, bioenergetic excitements and protein synthesis [110, 114]. Electrons in various molecules absorbs MF energy and utilize it for accelerating seed metabolism that triggers biochemical and enzyme reactions in the early stages of seed germination [115]. Afzal et al. [110] applied magnetic field strengths of 50, 100 and 150 mT for 5, 10 and 15 min on sunflower seed, and observed an increased α-amylase activity, with reduced sugar in high strength magnetically treated seeds. This confirms that magnetic treatment stimulates the protein synthesis of existing enzymes by producing germination metabolites at required amounts. Vashisth et al. [116] studied the effects of 200 mT for 2 h on crop growth and the yield of sunflower crops raised from magnetically treated seeds sown under different moisture stress conditions. The experimental results showed that plants from magnetically treated seeds had a higher leaf index area, chlorophyll content, 1000-seed mass, shoot length and biomass compared to untreated seeds. Magnetic field exposures in plants act as a stimulant in improving crop growth and yield under different ecological stress conditions.

3.2 Biostimulants, defoliation and hail damage on the development of leaf trichomes

The production and accumulation of essential oils is restricted to specialized structures (e.g. glandular trichomes, secretory cavities, and idioblasts) since they are toxic to healthy plant cells [9, 60]. The production of these essential oils takes place in closely connected secretory structure formations. It has been shown that biotic and abiotic stress factors affect essential oil production [9, 60]. In addition, plants produce some essential oil compounds in response to physiological stress, pathogen attack, and other ecological factors [60]. Therefore, it has a direct effect on the stimulation of the essential oil biosynthesis, which directly benefits essential oil yield and quality.

The recovery response mechanism of plants to hail damage, defoliation, wounding or grafting is complex, starting from upregulation of plant-stress hormones at the wound site, and later plant growth regulators to recover the lost organs [117, 118]. Therefore, the recovery of leaves following hail damage stress or related climate change affect the essential oil biosynthesis through the specialized structures called glandular trichomes, located on both surfaces of the leaf, and on tender stems and buds [52]. Moreover, [119] claimed that the densification of trichomes occurs as early as during leaf differentiation and continues throughout leaf development of P. scabrum.

Trichomes play different roles in plant physiology and ecology, especially with regards to morphological, mechanical and phytochemical characteristics [120]. Trichome density may vary with changes in environmental conditions [120]. These variations may indicate trade-offs between the trichomes, subsequently increasing resistance against trichome production. In defoliated plants, the rate of leaf regeneration is slow, possibly due to the endogenous ratio between CK and GA, and regulated plant bio-inhibitors [45, 121]. In the study conducted by [122], increasing the level of combined CK and GA decreased the density of the non-glandular trichomes on rose geranium, particularly on the adaxial leaf surface. In addition, [119] reported that non-glandular trichomes develop before glandular trichomes in the leaf primordial of Pelargonium, and cease development as the leaf expands. Therefore, this process could be ascribed to CK stimulation of the cell division, further regulating the leaf primordia by negatively affecting GA signaling through IPT7and GA20 oxidases, at an early stage of leaf primordia [123]. Zhou et al. [124] demonstrated this on Arabidopsis, where the C2H2 transcriptional factors regulated trichome cell differentiation through CK and GA pathways, suggesting that excess endogenous levels of these biostimulants could be toxic for trichome development. In another study, Zhou et al. [125] further reported that the ZFP5transcription factor of GA regulates trichome developmental actions, mainly through cell differentiation. In addition, GA is biosynthesized in young leaves and can translocate freely by diffusing through the plant cell protoplast when applied foliarly.

A combination of endogenous development and external signals regulate the developmental distribution of trichomes on plant leaves [126]. Therefore, under extreme external stimuli, such as complete defoliation, endogenous phytohormones are only synchronized to regenerate lost material. This directly affects leaf expansion and trichome developmental rate. In the study conducted by [122], the development and densities of the asciiform trichome following simulated hail damage was due to high concentration of GA (300 mg/L), applied at a later stage, in contrast to CK (0.64 mg/L) which was used earlier. Zhou et al. [124, 125] reported similar findings in Arabidopsis, where GA and CK, at concentrations as low as 100 μM, increased the density of glandular trichomes. According to the author, this was ascribed to GA and CK molecules, which regulated the development of glandular trichome through the combined action of ZFP5and ZFP6transcription factors [125]. Thus, in combination, these transcription factors regulate trichome cell differentiation, an important metabolic mechanism associated with trichome development.

Xue et al. [126] also demonstrated that the development of trichomes, and the biosynthesis of essential oil could be influenced by exogenous applications of BRs and jasmonic acid. According to [127], the dpymutant (BR-deficient) is the one which enhances pubescence, while the jasmonic acid jai1-1 mutant produces the opposite phenotypic effect [127, 128]. The Arabidopsis bls1mutant, which is impaired in the BR response, developed fewer trichomes on both the abaxial and adaxial leaf surfaces, indicating the possible involvement of BR in trichome development [129].

Defoliated plants deploy stored resources to rebuild photosynthetic material and regenerate new organs or tissues following defoliation and wounding [118, 130]. During the refoliation, it is possible that the endogenous CK content in defoliated plants is already too high; then GA accumulation occurred at the later stage to regulate growth. According to [89], the amalgamation of CK and GA following hail damage may cause alterations in morphological features, such as increased trichome density. Other than GA and CK, BRs and jasmonic acid directly affect trichome formation through the accumulation of zgband PI-I transcripts, indicating the importance of BRs in leaf recovery following defoliation or wounding [127].

3.3 Biostimulants, defoliation and hail damage on the production of primary and secondary metabolites

Plant chemistry (e.g. the essential oil and phytohormone content) is altered following mechanical damage, as caused by hail and/or animal herbivory [9]. Endogenous phytohormones are the primary inducible defense response for this class of volatiles, signaling to the transduction pathway between wounding stress perception and induction [36, 131]. These physiological response mechanisms occur within matter of minutes to several hours, resulting in the activation of wound-related defense genes [36].

According to [132], increased biomass and essential oil yield was recorded in rose geranium plants when biostimulants such as IAA, IBA, cycocel, cytozyne, biomyze, thephon, mepiquat chloride, triacontanol, and mixtalol were applied. However, the use of most of these natural or synthetic biostimulants as a recovery method for hail-damaged plants has not been tested. In addition, changes in the essential oil yield and quality have been found in most essential oil and medicinal plants, as a result of the exogenous application and endogenous triggering of biostimulants [60]. At least 60 essential oil constituents were identified in elderberry (Sambucus ebulusL.), with some of the components significantly increasing in content under different exogenous application of auxin (IAA and NAA) [133]. Treatment with CK increased the total oil yield of peppermint plants by 40% [77].

Jasmonates are directly involved in the mevalonic acid pathway, through the enzyme mevalonate-5-diphosphate carboxylase, which directly affects the biosynthesis of linalool [134]. Linalool levels decreases with increases in excess endogenous MeJA, which mostly accumulated following simulated hail damage [122]. In other studies, [135, 136] demonstrated that applications over 18 μM (MeJA) may significantly affect the accumulation of linalool content.

Biosynthesis of isomenthone occurs late in leaf development, when mature oil gland cells are in the post-secretory phase [137]. At this late stage of leaf development, ABA is abundant in the epidermal cells, where it is involved in the abscission process [138]. In the study conducted by [122], the daily application of ABA led to an excess of endogenous ABA content, causing toxicity affecting the biosynthesis of isomenthone. Similarly, [60] stated that the chemical composition of essential oil plants could be influenced by exogenous applications of ABA and methyl jasmonate.

In plants, geraniol and ABA biosynthesis share a similar pathway [41]: the ABA biosynthetic pathway starts from oxidative cleavage of the epoxy-carotenoids and 9-cisviolaxanthin, where xanthoxin is converted to abscisic acid. The process is then followed by sequential production of farnesyl pyrophosphate, phytoene, carotene, lycopene, and geranyl pyrophosphate [41]. Abscisic acid and geraniol biosynthesis occur at this stage through the isopentenyl diphosphate source [139]. Croteau and Purkett [140] reported that geranyl pyrophosphate synthase activity is localized in the leaf epidermal glands of sage (Salvia officinalisL.), where monoterpenes are biosynthesized, suggesting that geranyl pyrophosphate synthase supplies the C10 precursor for the production of monoterpenes. In this case, any repeated application of ABA can reach a toxic level in the epidermal cells as described by [122, 139], causing disruptions of geraniol biosynthesis through the cytosolic mevalonate pathway.

Geraniol usually undergoes biotransformation into other terpenoids in aromatic plants, which influences the quality of the essential oil [141]. Geranyl formate, geranyl butyrate, geranyl tiglate, and geranyl acetate are some of the acyclic monoterpenes derived from geraniol, which are regarded as geraniol esters [142]. It has been noted in the study conducted by [122] that any prolonged application of a low concentration of MeJA increases the content of geranyl tiglate. This was supported by [143], who described that jasmonates are upregulated by wounding stress and are directly involved in the biosynthesis of these terpenes. In addition, the accumulation of geranyl tiglate can be attributed to simulated hail damage as described by [122], followed by the subsequent daily application of methyl jasmonate. The accumulation of geranyl formate is attributed to the biosynthesis of geraniol, and the effects of subsequent daily use of methyl jasmonate [142].

Plants respond to defoliation and wounding through the induction of phenylpropanoids metabolism to accumulate phenolic compounds [144]. Phenolics provide cytotoxic effects, as well as the building blocks for polyphenolic-based cell wall modifications. Polyphenolic-based cell wall modifications assist with organ regeneration in defoliated or wounded plants [118, 144]. The level of endogenous phenolics in refoliated plants influences plant growth and development, clearly indicating the relation of the leaf refoliation with the leaf ontogeny [97]. The age of the plant is associated with the level of the total phenolics. On wampee (Clausena lansiumLour.), [145] reported high total leaf phenolics in early growth stages compared to the later growth stages. A high phenolic content was also observed in the early stages of leaf development of yerba-mate (Ilex paraguariesnsisA.St Hil.), which affected the development and quality of these plants [146]. High phenolics level in young leaves may be associated with defense and refoliation following defoliation [147].

Previous studies have demonstrated that defoliation, wounding and exogenous application of biostimulants on plants may effectively stimulate vegetative growth, improve nutrient acquisition, and increases the antioxidant capacity of plant tissue [69]. Aspects of phenolics accumulation are driven by upregulation of endogenous phytohormones. However, this occurs through crosstalk networks between these phytohormones, for which some commercially available [148]. A combination of spermine, methyl jasmonate, and epibrassinolide was found to induce secondary metabolites, including phenolics, in sweet basil (Ocimum basilicumL.) [149]. According to [150], maintenance of minerals is a prerequisite for providing co-factors for many enzymes of the phenolic pathway. The accumulation of caffeic acid, caffeoyl tartaric acid, p-Coumaroyl tyrosine and protocatechuic acid O-hexoside are a typical plant response to defoliation, including wounding stress [118, 151].

Biostimulants stimulate plant growth and terpene biosynthesis in a large number of aromatic plant species, which result in beneficial changes in terpene accumulation [152]. Poyh and Ono [153] recorded higher essential oil content for sage (S. officinalisL.) treated with 100 mg/L gibberellic acid. Fraternale et al. [154] reported a higher essential oil yield of Spanish marjoram (Thimus mastichinaL.) using a medium culture with CK as low as 0.1 mg/L. In the leaves of Spanish marjoram treated with CK, there were a greater number of glandular trichomes recorded at the later leaf developmental stage, which could be ascribed to increased essential oil yield. Foliar application of a biostilumat-28-homobrassinolide (10–6 M) also enhanced the essential oil yield of mint (M. arvensisL.) [155].

Advertisement

4. Conclusions

Essential oil plants are mostly grown for essential oil production; therefore, the aerial herbage material is a crucial component of these crops. Environmental stress factors, such as hail damage, can cause significant damage to these plants, reducing this valuable material, and directly affecting the essential oil yield and quality [72]. Natural and synthetic biostimulants have been extensively investigated on plant growth and development, and also on the recovery of plants following stress [60]. Based on [60], it was hypothesized that the application of biostimulants will recover the herbage yield and improve the biosynthesis of essential oil plants subjected to simulated hail damage. This chapter has detailed the potential recovery response of plants to hail damage, the response of plants treated with synthetic biostimulants, and the response of plants treated with natural biostimulants extracted from plants. Therefore, it is evident that the use of natural or synthetic biostimulants, as an alternative mitigation strategy against hail damage, might help in the recovery and improve essential oil plant yield following hail damage. However, future studies should explore;

  1. the extents of hail damage on different essential oil plants;

  2. determining the effects of root-applied synthetic cytokinin on the recovery of essential oil yield attributes, and the essential oil yield and quality of hail-damaged essential oil plants.

  3. determining the effects of cytokinin and the auxin ratio on hail-damaged essential oil plants, in vivostudy.

  4. identifying the effects of synthetic biostimulants as a contaminant of essential oil quality: A perfumery industry study.

  5. evaluate the use of combined plant growth regulator as a potential recovery mechanism of the herbage yield, and the essential oil yield and quality of simulated hail-damaged essential oil plants, and,

  6. evaluate the use of abscisic acid and methyl jasmonate as a potential mitigating mechanism on simulated hail-damaged rose geranium plants.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1. Halsnæs K, Larsen MAD, Kaspersen PS. Climate change risks for severe storms in developing countries in the context of poverty and inequality in Cambodia. National Hazards. 2018;94:261-278
  2. 2. Gobbo S, Ghiraldini A, Dramis A, Dal Ferro N, Morari F. Estimation of hail damage using crop models and remote sensing. Remote Sensing. 2021;13(14):2655
  3. 3. Khetsha ZP, Sedibe MM, Pretorius RJ. Effects of abscisic acid and methyl jasmonate on the recovery of hail damaged rose geranium (Pelargonium graveolens) plants. Acta Horticulturae. 2020;1287:31-40
  4. 4. Kundu S, Gantait S. Abscisic acid signal crosstalk during abiotic stress response. Plant Gene. 2017;11:61-69
  5. 5. Jamli JB. Physical analysis of hail fall risk in Iran and the consequent damages on agricultural crops. Atmospheric and Climate Sciences. 2014;4:919-930
  6. 6. Bal SK, Saha S, Fand BB, Singh NP, Rane J, Minhas PS. Hailstorms: Causes, Damage and Post-Hail Management in Agriculture. India: National Institute of Abiotic Stress Management Technical Bulletin-5; 2014
  7. 7. Weiss EA. Essential Oil Crops. United Kingdom: CAB International; 1997
  8. 8. Khetsha ZP, Sedibe MM, Pretorius RJ, Van Der Watt E. Plant growth regulators and simulated hail-damage improve rose-geranium (Pelargonium graveolensL’Hér.) leaf mineral status and phenolic composition. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research. 2021;19(4):3083-3095
  9. 9. Banchio E, Valladares G, Zygadlo J, Bogino PC, Rinaudi LV, Giordano W. Changes in composition of essential oils and volatile emissions ofMinthostachys mollis, induced by leaf punctures ofLiriomyza Huidobrensis. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology. 2007;35:68-74
  10. 10. Troncoso C, Becerra J, Bittner M, Perez C, Saez K, Sanchez-Olate M, et al. Chemical defense responses inEucalyptus globulus(Labill) plants. Journal of the Chilean Chemical Society. 2011;56:768-770
  11. 11. Potter LE, Brotzge JA, Erickson SA. Warning the public about hail: Determining the potential for short-term damage mitigation. In: Preprints, 5th Symposium. Policy and Socio-economic Research. Atlanta, United States of America: American Meteorological Society; 2010
  12. 12. Marè FA. Evaluating crop insurance as production risk management strategy [MSc thesis]. South Africa: University of the Free State; 2014
  13. 13. Henson RA, Heichel GH. Nitrogen accumulation and partitioning in hail-damaged soybeans. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 1986;9:1453-1468
  14. 14. Araya HT, Soundy P, Steyn JM, Teubes C, Learmonth RA, Nare M. Response of herbage yield, essential oil yield and composition of South African rose-scented geranium (Pelargoniumspp.) to conventional and organic nitrogen. Journal of Essential Oil Research. 2006;18:111-115
  15. 15. Sedibe MM. Yield and quality response of hydroponically grown rose geranium (Pelargoniumspp.) to changes in the nutrient solution and shading [PhD thesis]. South Africa: University of the Free State; 2012
  16. 16. Yu L, Liu H, Shao X, Yu F, Wei Y, Ni Z, et al. Effects of hot air and methyl jasmonate treatment on the metabolism of soluble sugars in peach fruit during cold storage. Postharvest Biology and Technology. 2016;113:8-16
  17. 17. Han Y, Ishibashi S, Iglesias-Gonzalez J, Chen Y, Love NR, Amaya E. Ca2+-induced mitochondrial ROS regulate the early embryonic cell cycle. Cell Reports. 2018;22:218-231
  18. 18. Ju Y, Min L, Zhao H, Meng J, Fang Y. Effect of exogenous abscisic acid and methyl jasmonate on anthocyanin composition, fatty acids, and volatile compounds of cabernet sauvignon (Vitis viniferaL.) grape berries. Molecules. 2016;21:1354
  19. 19. Nemhauser JL, Hong FX, Chory J. Different plant hormones regulate similar processes through largely non-overlapping transcriptional responses. Cell. 2006;126:467-475
  20. 20. Giannakoula A, Ilias IF, Maksimović JD. The effects of plant growth regulators on growth, yield and phenolic profile of lentil plants. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis. 2012;28:48-53
  21. 21. Anderson JP. Antagonistic interaction between abscisic acid and jasmonate-ethylene signalling pathways modulates defence gene expression and disease resistance in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell Online. 2004;16:3460-3479
  22. 22. Drábková LZ, Dobrev PI, Motyka V. Phytohormone profiling across the bryophytes. PLoS One. 2015;10:5
  23. 23. Mills E. Insurance in a climate of change. Science. 2005;309:1040-1044
  24. 24. Fernandes GW, Oki Y, Sá D, Sales MCE, Quintino MN, Freitas AV, et al. Hailstorm impact across plant taxa: Leaf fall in a mountain environment. Neotropical Biology and Conservation. 2012;7:8-15
  25. 25. Steiner JT. Can we reduce the hail problem? Weather and Climate. 1988;8:23-32
  26. 26. Schubert T. Hail damage to plants. Plant Pathology. 1991;347:1-2
  27. 27. Powell CL. Radar characteristics of hailstorms in South Africa the summer rainfall regions of South Africa frequently experience thunderstorms between September and April. In: 29th Annual Conference of South African Society for Atmospheric Sciences SASAS 2013; 26-27 September 2013; Durban, South Africa. 2013
  28. 28. Łukaszuk E, Ciereszko I. Plant responses to wounding stress. Biological Diversity—from Cell to Ecosystem. 2012;2012:73-85
  29. 29. Changnon SA. Data and approaches for determining hail risk in the contiguous United States. Journal of Applied Meteorology. 1999;38:1730-1739
  30. 30. Klein RN, Shapiro CA. Evaluating Hail Damage to Corn. United States of America: BRANDT Agronomy Bulletin; 2011
  31. 31. Suttle JC, Lulai E, Huckle LL, Neubauer JD. Wounding of potato tubers induces increases in ABA biosynthesis and catabolism and alters expression of ABA metabolic genes. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2013;170:560-566
  32. 32. Smékalová V, Doskočilova A, Komis G, Šamaj J. Crosstalk between secondary messengers, hormones and MAPK modules during osmotic stress signalling in plants. Biotechnology Advances. 2014;32:2-11
  33. 33. Sanchez-Serrano J, Schmidt R, Schell J, Willmitzer L. Nucleotide sequence of proteinase inhibitor II encoding cDNA of potato (Solanum tuberosum) and its mode of expression. Molecular and General Genetics. 1986;203:15-20
  34. 34. Christopher ME, Miranda M, Major IT, Constabel CP. Gene expression profiling of systemically wound-induced defenses in hybrid poplar. Planta. 2004;219:936-947
  35. 35. Kang HM, Saltveit ME. Wound-induced increases in phenolic content of fresh-cut lettuce is reduced by a short immersion in aqueous hypertonic solutions. Postharvest Biology and Technology. 2003;29:271-277
  36. 36. León J, Rojo E, José J, Sánchez-Serrano S. Wound signalling in plants. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2001;52:1-9
  37. 37. Torres N, Goicoechea N, Antolín MC. Influence of irrigation strategy and mycorrhizal inoculation on fruit quality in different clones of Tempranillo grown under elevated temperatures. Agricultural Water Management. 2018;202:285-298
  38. 38. Jindo K, Canellas LP, Albacete A, Figueiredo dos Santos L, Frinhani Rocha RL, Carvalho Baia D, et al. Interaction between humic substances and plant hormones for phosphorous acquisition. Agronomy. 2020;10(5):640
  39. 39. Mano Y, Nemoto K. The pathway of auxin biosynthesis in plants. Journal of Experimental Botany Advance Access. 2012;63:2853-2872
  40. 40. Gaspar T, Kevers C, Penel C, Greppin H, Reid DM, Thorpe TA. Plant hormones and plant growth regulators in plant tissue culture. In Vivo Cell Development Biology Plant. 1996;32:272-289
  41. 41. Olds CL, Glennon EK, Luckhart S. Abscisic acid: New perspectives on an ancient universal stress signaling molecule. Microbes and Infection. 2018;20:484-492
  42. 42. Saito S, Okamoto M, Shinoda M, Kushiro T, Koshiba T, Kamiya Y, et al. A plant growth retardant, uniconazole, is a potent inhibitor of ABA catabolism in Arabidopsis. Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry. 2006;70:1731-1739
  43. 43. Tardieu F, Parent B, Simonneau T. Control of leaf growth by abscisic acid: Hydraulic or non-hydraulic processes? Plant, Cell & Environment. 2009;33:636-647
  44. 44. Punpee P. Conditional up-regulation of cytokinin status increases growth and survival of sugarcane in water-limited onditions [PhD thesis]. Australia: University of Queensland; 2015
  45. 45. Dammann C, Rojo E, Sanchez-Serrano JJ. Abscisic acid and jasmonic acid activate wound inducible genes in potato through separate, organ-specific signal transduction pathways. The Plant Journal. 1997;11:773-782
  46. 46. Seo M, Koshiba T. Transport of ABA from the site of biosynthesis to the site of action. Journal of Plant Research. 2011;124:501-507
  47. 47. Tillberg E. Effect of light on abscisic acid content in photosensitive Scots pine (Pinus sylvestrisL.) seed. Plant Growth Regulation. 1992;11:147-152
  48. 48. Kong Z, Zhao D. The inhibiting effect of abscisic acid on fragrance of Kam sweet rice. Journal of Food and Nutrition Research. 2014;2:148-154
  49. 49. Sansberro PA, Mrogiski LA, Bottini R. Foliar sprays with ABA promote growth ofIlex paraguariensisby alleviating diurnal water stress. Plant Growth Regulation. 2004;42:105-111
  50. 50. Peňa-Cortés H, Sanchez-Serrano JJ, Mertens R, Willmitzer L, Salome P. Abscisic acid is involved in the wound-induced expression of the proteinase inhibitor II gene in potato and tomato. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, United States of America. 1989;86:9851-9855
  51. 51. Herde O, Peña-Cortés H, Wasternack C, Willmitzer L, Fisahn J. Electric signalling andpin2gene expression on different abiotic stimuli depend on a distinct threshold level of endogenous abscisic acid in several abscisic acid-deficient tomato mutants. Plant Physiology. 1999;119:213-218
  52. 52. Wang T, Li C, Wu Z, Jia Y, Wang H, Sun S, et al. Abscisic acid regulates auxin homeostasis in rice root tips to promote root hair elongation. Frontiers of Plant Science. 2018;8:1121
  53. 53. Dar TA, Uddin M, Khan MMA, Hakeem KR, Jaleel H. Jasmonates counter plant stress: A review. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2015;115:49-57
  54. 54. Piotrowska A, Bajguz A. Conjugates of abscisic acid, brassinosteroids, ethylene, gibberellins, and jasmonates. Phytochemistry. 2011;72:2097-2112
  55. 55. Huang H, Liu B, Liu L, Song S. Jasmonate action in plant growth and development. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2017;68:1349-1359
  56. 56. Turner JG, Ellis C, Devoto A. The jasmonate signal pathway. Plant Cell. 2002;14:S153-S164
  57. 57. Piotrowska A, Bajguz A, Godlewska-Żyłkiewicz B, Czerpak R, Kamińska M. Jasmonic acid as modulator of lead toxicity in aquatic plantWolffia arrhiza(Lemnaceae). Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2009;66:507-513
  58. 58. Guo Q, Major IT, Howe GA. Resolution of growth-defense conflict: Mechanistic insights from jasmonate signalling. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2018;44:E10768-E10777
  59. 59. Koo AJK, Howe GA. The wound hormone jasmonate. Photochemistry. 2009;70:1571-1580
  60. 60. Prins CL, Viera IJC, Freitas SP. Growth regulators and essential oil production. Brazilian Society of Plant Physiology. 2010;22:91-102
  61. 61. Xue R, Zhang B. Increased endogenous methyl jasmonate altered leaf and root development in transgenic soybean plants. Journal of Genetics and Genomics. 2007;34:339-346
  62. 62. Anderson JM. Jasmonic acid-dependent increase in the level of specific polypeptides in soybean suspension cultures and seedlings. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 1988;7:203-211
  63. 63. Kim HJ, Chen F, Wang X, Rajapaske NC. Effect of methyl jasmonate on secondary metabolites of sweet basil (Ocimum basilicumL.). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2006;54:2327-2332
  64. 64. Degenhardt DC, Lincoln DE. Volatile emissions from an odorous plant in response to herbivory and methyl jasmonate exposure. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 2006;32:725-743
  65. 65. Thaler JS, Farag MA, Paré PW, Dicke M. Jasmonate-deficient plants have reduced direct and indirect defences against herbivores. Ecology Letters. 2002;5:764-774
  66. 66. Loivamäki M, Holopainen JK, Nerg AM. Chemical changes induced by methyl jasmonate in oilseed rape grown in the laboratory and in the field. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2004;52:7607-7613
  67. 67. Konan YK, Kouassi KM, Kouakou KL, Koffi E, Kouassi KN, Sekou D, et al. Effect of methyl jasmonate on phytoalexins biosynthesis and induced disease resistance toFusarium oxysporumf. sp. Vasinfectum in cotton (Gossypium hirsutumL.). International Journal of Agronomy. 2014: Article ID 806439
  68. 68. Jiang Y, Ye J, Li S, Niinemets Ü. Methyl jasmonate-induced emission of biogenic volatiles is biphasic in cucumber: A high-resolution analysis of dose dependence. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2017;68:4679-4694
  69. 69. Parađiković N, Teklić T, Zeljković S, Lisjak M, Špoljarević M. Biostimulants research in some horticultural plant species-A review. Food and Energy Security. 2019;8:e00162
  70. 70. Taiz L, Zeiger E. Plant Physiology. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer; 2002
  71. 71. Cato SC, Macedo WR, Peres LEP, de Castro PR. Synergism among auxins, gibberellins and cytokinins in tomato cv. micro-tom. Horticultura Brasileira. 2013;31:549-553
  72. 72. Weiss D, Ori N. Mechanisms of cross talk between gibberellin and other hormones. Plant Pathology. 2007;144:1240-1246
  73. 73. Sharma S, Sharma A, Kaur M. Extraction and evaluation of gibberellic acid fromPseudomonasspp. plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2018;7:2790-2795
  74. 74. Kieber JJ. Tribute to Folke Skoog: Recent advances in our understanding of cytokinin biology. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 2002;21:1-2
  75. 75. Koprna R, De Diego N, Dundálková L, Spíchal L. Use of cytokinins as agrochemicals. Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry. 2016;24:484-492
  76. 76. Kudoyarova GR, Dodd IC, Veselov DS, Rothwell SA, Veselov SY. Common and specific responses to availability of mineral nutrients and water. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2015;66:2133-2144
  77. 77. Santoro MV, Nievas F, Zygadlo J, Giordano W, Banchio E. Effects of growth regulators on biomass and the production of secondary metabolites in peppermint (Mentha piperita) micropropagated in-vitro. American Journal of Plant Sciences. 2013;4:49-55
  78. 78. Egamberdieva D, Wirth SJ, Alqarawi AA, Abd_Allah EF, Hashem A. Phytohormones and beneficial microbes: Essential components for plants to balance stress and fitness. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2017;8:2104
  79. 79. Hedden P, Sponsel VA. Century of gibberellin research. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 2015;34:740-760
  80. 80. Van Der Watt E. Bio-stimulatory properties of aLupinus albusL. seed suspension [PhD thesis]. South Africa: University of the Free State; 2005
  81. 81. Hooykaas PJ, Hall MA, Libbenga KR. Regulation of gibberellin biosynthesis. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Plant Hormones. 1999;13:161
  82. 82. Sakamoto T, Kamiya N, Ueguchi-Tanaka M, Iwahori S, Matsuoka M. KNOX homeodomain protein directly suppresses the expression of a gibberellin biosynthetic gene in the tobacco shoot apical meristem. Genes Development. 2001;15:581-590
  83. 83. Leite VM, Rosolem CA, Rodrigues JD. Gibberellin and cytokinin effects on soybean growth. Scientia Agricola. 2003;60:537-541
  84. 84. Greenboim-Wainberg Y, Mayhom I, Borochov R, Alvarez J, Olszewski N, Ori N, et al. Crosstalk between gibberellic and cytokinin: The Arabidopsis GA response inhibitor SPINDLY plays a positive role in cytokinin signalling. Plant Cell. 2005;17:92-102
  85. 85. Su YH, Liu YB, Zhang XS. Auxin–cytokinin interaction regulates meristem development. Molecular Plant. 2011;4:616-625
  86. 86. Moubayidin L, Perilli S, Ioio RD, Di Mambro R, Costantino P, Sabatini S. The rate of cell differentiation controls the Arabidopsis root meristem growth phase. Current Biology. 2010;20:1138-1143
  87. 87. Verma P, Sen NL. The impact of plant growth regulators on growth and biochemical constituents of coriander (Coriandrum sativumL.). Journal of Herbs, Spices and Medicinal Plants. 2008;14:144-153
  88. 88. Schoene G, Yeager T. Effects of benzyladenine applied alone or in combination with gibberellic acid in sweet viburnum. SNA Research Conference. 2005;50:114-122
  89. 89. Barnes HW. Gibberellins and cytokinins: A review. Acta Horticulturae. 2013;1055:323-336
  90. 90. Hüster T. Growth and yield response of selected crops to treatment with ComCat [PhD thesis]. South Africa: University of the Free State; 2011
  91. 91. Li X, Zhang L, Ahammed GJ, Li ZX, Wei JP, Shen C, et al. Nitric oxide mediates brassinosteroid-induced flavonoid biosynthesis inCamellia sinensisL. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2017;214:145-151
  92. 92. Tang J, Han Z, Chai J. Q&A: What are brassinosteroids and how do they act in plants? BMC Biology. 2016;14:113
  93. 93. Sirhindi G, Kaur H, Bhardwaj R, Kaur NP, Sharma P. Therno protective role of 28-homobrassinolide on the growth and antioxidant enzymes activities in the seedling ofBrassica junceaL. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants. 2014;5:48074-48079
  94. 94. Rao SS, Vardhini BV, Sujatha E, Anuradha S. Brassinosteroids—A new class of phytohormones. Current Science. 2002;25:1239-1245
  95. 95. Yin W, Dong N, Niu M, Zhang X, Li L, Liu J, et al. Brassinosteroid-regulated plant growth and development and gene expression in soybean. The Crop Journal. 2019;7:411-418
  96. 96. Alyemeni M, Al-Quwaiz SM. Effect of 28-homobrassinolide on the performance of sensitive and resistant varieties ofVigna Radiata. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 2016;23:698-705
  97. 97. Kulaeva ON, Burkhanova EA, Fedina AB, Khokhlova VA, Bokebayeva GA, Vorbrodt HM, et al. Effect of brassinosteroids on protein synthesis and plant-cell ultrastructure under stress conditions. ACS Symposium Series. 1991;474:141-155
  98. 98. Maia JGS, Andrade EHA, Couto HA, da Silva ACM, Marx F, Henke C. Plant sources of Amazon rosewood oil. Quimica Nova Chemistry in Brazil. 2007;30:1906-1910
  99. 99. Senthil A, Pathmanaban G, Srinivasan PS. Effect of bioregulators on some physiological and biochemical parameters of soybean (Glycine maxL.). Legume Research—An International Journal. 2003;26:54-56
  100. 100. Vardhini BA, Anuradha S, Sujatha E, Rao SSR. Role of brassinosteroids in alleviating various abiotic and biotic stresses–A review. Plant Stress. 2010;4:55-61
  101. 101. Sezgin M, Kahya M. Phytohormones. Bitlis Eren University Journal of Science and Technology. 2018;8:35-39
  102. 102. Bulgari R, Cocetta G, Trivellini A, Vernieri P, Ferrante A. Biostimulants and crop responses: A review. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture. 2015;31:1-17
  103. 103. Michalski T. Possibilities of Maize Production Increase Using Non-conventional Technologies: Biostimulators in Modern Agriculture, Part I. General aspects. Warsaw: Editorial House Wieś Jutra; 2008
  104. 104. Yakhin OI, Lubyanov AA, Yakhin IA, Vakhitov VA, Ibragimov RI, Yumaguzhin MS, et al. Metabolic changes in wheat (Triticum aestivumL.) plants under action of bioregulator stifun. Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology. 2011;47:621
  105. 105. Carillo P, Colla G, El-Nakhel C, Bonini P, D’Amelia L, Dell’Aversana E, et al. Biostimulant application with a tropical plant extract enhances Corchorus olitorius adaptation to sub-optimal nutrient regimens by improving physiological parameters. Agronomy. 2019;9:249
  106. 106. Machado VPO, Pacheco AC, Carvalho MEA. Effect of biostimulant application on production and flavonoid content of marigold (Calendula officinalisL.). Revista Ceres. 2014;61:983-988
  107. 107. El-Khateeb MA, El-Attar AB, Nour RM. Application of plant biostimulants to improve the biological responses and essential oil production of marjoram (Majorana hortensis, Moench) plants. Middle East Journal of Agriculture Research. 2017;6:928-941
  108. 108. Sarraf M, Kataria S, Taimourya H, Santos LO, Menegatti RD, Jain M, et al. Magnetic field (MF) applications in plants: An overview. Plants (Basel, Switzerland). 2020;9(9):1139
  109. 109. Konefał-Janocha M, Banaś-Ząbczyk A, Bester M, Bocak D, Budzik S, Górny S, et al. The effect of stationary and variable electromagnetic fields on the germination and early growth of radish (Raphanus sativus). Polish Journal of Environmental Studies. 2018;28(2):709-715
  110. 110. Afzal I, Saleem S, Skalicky M, Javed T, Bakhtavar MA, Kamran M, et al. Magnetic field treatments improves sunflower yield by inducing physiological and biochemical modulations in seeds. Molecules. 2021;26(7):20-22
  111. 111. Vashisth A, Joshi DK. Growth characteristics of maize seeds exposed to magnetic field. Bioelectromagnetics. 2017;38(2):151-157
  112. 112. Kırdar E, Yücedağ C, Balaban B. The effects of magnetic field on germination of seeds and growth of seedlings of stone pine. Journal of Forests. 2016;3(1):1-6
  113. 113. Vian A, Davies E, Gendraud M, Bonnet P. Plant responses to high frequency electromagnetic fields. BioMed Research International. 2016;2:1-13
  114. 114. Podleśna A, Bojarszczuk J, Podleśny J. Effect of pre-sowing magnetic field treatment on some biochemical and physiological processes in faba bean (Vicia fabaL. spp. Minor). Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 2019;38(3):1153-1160
  115. 115. Govindaraj M, Masilamani P, Albert VA, Bhaskaran M. Effect of physical seed treatment on yield and quality of crops: A review. Agricultural Reviews. 2017;38(1):1-14
  116. 116. Vashisth A, Meena N, Krishnan P. Magnetic field affects growth and yield of sunflower under different moisture stress conditions. Bioelectromagnetics. 2021;42(6):473-483
  117. 117. Ikeuchi M, Iwase A, Rymen B, Lambolez A, Kojima M, Takebayashi Y, et al. Wounding triggers callus formation via dynamic hormonal and transcriptional changes. Plant Physiology. 2017;175:1158-1174
  118. 118. Nanda AK, Melnyk CW. The role of plant hormone during grafting. Semi-in-vivo Developmental Biology. 2018;131:49-58
  119. 119. Oosthuizen L, Coetzee J. Morphogenesis of trichomes ofPerlagonium scabrum. South African Journal of Botany. 1984;2:305-310
  120. 120. Ma D, Hu Y, Yang C, Liu B, Fang L, Wan Q, et al. Genetic basis for glandular trichome formation in cotton. Nature Communications. 2016;7:1-9
  121. 121. Addicott FF, Lynch RS. Physiology of abscission. Annual Review of Plant Physiology. 1955;6:211-238
  122. 122. Khetsha ZP. Using agricultural plant growth regulators as a mitigating strategy for hail-damaged rose geranium (Pelargonium graveolensL’Her) [PhD thesis]. South Africa: Central University of Technology, Free State; 2020
  123. 123. Kalve S, De Vos D, Beemster GT. Leaf development: A cellular perspective. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2014;5:362
  124. 124. Zhou Z, An L, Sun L, Zhu S, Xi W, Broun P, et al. Zinc Finger Protein5 is required for the control of trichome initiation by acting upstream of Zinc Finger Protein8 in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology. 2011;157:673-682
  125. 125. Zhou Z, Sun L, Zhao Y, An L, Yan A, Meng X, et al. Zinc Finger Protein 6 (ZFP6) regulates trichome initiation by integrating gibberellin and cytokinin signaling inArabidopsis thaliana. New Phytologist. 2013;198:699-708
  126. 126. Xue S, Dong M, Xingwang L, Xu S, Pang J, Zhang W, et al. Classification of fruit trichomes in cucumber and effects of plant hormones on type II fruit trichome development. Planta. 2019;249:407-416
  127. 127. Campos ML, de Almeida M, Rossi ML, Martinelli AP, Junior CGL, Figueira A, et al. Brassinosteroids interact negatively with jasmonates in the formation of anti-herbivory traits in tomato. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2009;60:4347-4361
  128. 128. Fambrini M, Pugliesi C. The dynamic genetic-hormonal regulatory network controlling the trichome development in leaves. Plants. 2019;8:253
  129. 129. Pattanaik S, Patra B, Singh SK, Yuan L. An overview of the gene regulatory network controlling trichome development in the model plants, Arabidopsis. Frontier in Plant Science. 2014;5:259
  130. 130. Stobbe H, Schmitt U, Eckstein D, Dujesiefken D. Developmental stages and fine structure of surface callus formed after debarking of living lime trees (Tiliasp.). Annals of Botany. 2002;89:773-782
  131. 131. Brilli F, Ruuskanen TM, Schinitzhofer R, Müller M, Breitenlechner M, Bittner V, et al. Detection of plant volatiles after leaf wounding and darkening by proton transfer reaction “time-of-flight” mass spectrometry (PTR-TOF). PLoS One. 2011;6:e20419
  132. 132. Rajeswara-Rao BR. Biomass yield, essential oil yield and essential oil composition of rose-scented geranium (Pelargoniumspp.) as influenced by row spacings and intercropping with corn mint (Mentha arvensisL.f. Piperascens Malinv. Ex Holmes). Industrial Crops and Products. 2000;16:133-144
  133. 133. Feibakhsh A, Pazoki H, Vahid Mohammadrezaei V, Ebrahimzadeh MA. Effect of phytohormones on the composition ofSambucus ebulusleaf essential oil. Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2014;13:581-586
  134. 134. Bruno M, Llardi V, Lupidi G, Quassinti L, Bramucci M, Fiorini D, et al. The non-volatile and volatile metabolites ofPrangos ferulaceaand their biological properties. Planta Medica. 2019;85:815-824
  135. 135. Rodriguez-Saona C, Crafts-Brandner SJ, Williams L, Pare P.Lygus hesperusfeeding and salivary gland extracts induce volatile emissions in plants. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 2002;28:1733-1747
  136. 136. Van Schie CN, Haring MA, Schuurink RC. Tomato linalool synthase is induced in trichomes by jasmonic acid. Plant Molecular Biology. 2007;64:251-263
  137. 137. Davis EM, Ringer KL, McConkey ME, Croteau R. Monoterpene metabolism, cloning, expression, and characterization of menthone reductases from peppermint. Plant Physiology. 2005;137:873-881
  138. 138. Wilmowicz E, Frankowski K, Kućko A, Świdziński M, de Dios AJ, Nowakowska A, et al. The influence of abscisic acid on the ethylene biosynthesis pathway in the functioning of the flower abscission zone inLupinus luteus. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2016;206:49-58
  139. 139. Burlat V, Oudin A, Courtois M, Rideau M, St-Pierre B. Co-expression of three MEP pathway genes and geraniol 10-hydroxylase in internal phloem parenchyma ofCatharanthus roseusimplicates multicellular translocation of intermediates during the biosynthesis of monoterpene indole alkaloids and isoprenoid-derived primary metabolites. Plant Journal. 2004;38:131-141
  140. 140. Croteau R, Purkett PT. Geranyl pyrophosphate synthase: Characterization of the enzyme and evidence that this chain-length specific prenyltransferase is associated with monoterpene biosynthesis in sage (Salvia officinalis). Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 1989;271:524-535
  141. 141. Demyttenaere JC, del Carmen HM, De Kimpe N. Biotransformation of geraniol, nerol and citral by sporulated surface cultures ofAspergillus nigerandPenicilliumsp. Phytochemistry. 2000;55:363-373
  142. 142. Liu W, Xu X, Zhang R, Cheng T, Cao Y, Li X, et al. EngineeringEscherichia colifor high-yield geraniol production with biotransformation of geranyl acetate to geraniol under fed-batch culture. Biotechnology for Biofuels. 2016;9:1-8
  143. 143. Zhang G, Zhao F, Chen L, Pan Y, Sun L, Bao N, et al. Jasmonate-mediated wound signalling promotes plant regeneration. Nature Plants. 2019;5:491-497
  144. 144. Bernards MA, Båstrup-Spohr L. Phenylpropanoid Metabolism Induced by Wounding and Insect Herbivory. Dordrecht: Springer; 2008
  145. 145. Chang X, Lu Y, Lin Z, Qiu J, Guo X, Pan J, et al. Impact of leaf development stages on polyphenolics profile and antioxidant activity inClausena lansium(Lour.) skeels. Hindawi. BioMed Research International. 2018;2018:7093691
  146. 146. Blum-Silva CH, Chavesa VC, Schenkela EP, Coelhob GC, Reginattoa FH. The influence of leaf age on methylxanthines, total phenolic content, and free radical scavenging capacity ofIlex paraguariensisaqueous extracts. Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia. 2015;25:1-6
  147. 147. Yoshioka T, Inokuchi T, Fujioka S, Kimura Y. Phenolic compounds and flavonoids as plant growth regulators from fruit and leaf ofVitex rotundifolia. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C Journal of Biosciences. 2004;59:509-514
  148. 148. Wani SH, Kumar V, Shriram V, Kumar SS. Phytohormones and their metabolic engineering for abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. The Crop Journal. 2016;4:162-176
  149. 149. Koca N, Karaman Ş. The effects of plant growth regulators and L-phenylalanine on phenolic compounds of sweet basil. Food Chemistry. 2014;166:515-521
  150. 150. Treutter D. Managing phenol contents in crop plants by phytochemical farming and breeding-visions and constraints. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2010;11:807-857
  151. 151. Bryant JP, Reichardt PB, Clausen TP, Werner RA. Effects of mineral nutrition on delayed inducible resistance in Alaska paper birch. Ecology. 1993;74:2072-2084
  152. 152. Farooqi AHA, Shukla A. Utilization of plant growth regulators in aromatic plant production. Chromatography. 1990;12:152-157
  153. 153. Poyh JA, Ono EO. Performance of the essential oil ofSalvia officinalisL. under the action of plant regulators. Acta Scientiarum Biological Sciences. 2006;28:189-193
  154. 154. Fraternale D, Giamperi L, Ricci D, Rocchi MBL, Guidi L, Epifano F, et al. The effect of triacontanol on micropropagation and on secretory system ofthymus mastichina. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture. 2003;74:87-97
  155. 155. Naeem M, Idrees M, Aftab T, Alam MM, Khan MM, Uddin M, et al. Employing depolymerised sodium alginate, triacontanol and 28-homobrassinolide in enhancing physiological activities, production of essential oil and active components inMentha arvensisL. Industrial Crops and Products. 2014;55:272-279

Written By

Zenzile Peter Khetsha, Moosa Mahmood Sedibe, Rudolph Johannes Pretorius, Phoka Caiphus Rathebe and Karabelo Moloantoa

Submitted: December 20th, 2021 Reviewed: December 24th, 2021 Published: February 4th, 2022