1. Introduction
Livestock has been domesticated for thousands of years, and generated into various breeds under a long artificial selection. They provide economic and high quality animal-derived proteins to meet the human nutrition requirement. The process of artificial selection has significantly enhanced crucial traits in agricultural animals [1, 2]. However, the genetic potential of farm animals has not yet been fully exploited. The quantitative trait is determined by multiple genes and regulated by the interplay of genetics, environment and their interaction [3]. The underlying biological mechanisms governing these phenotypic characteristics remain poorly understood. Therefore, the investigation into the formation mechanism of such intricate traits has consistently garnered significant attention within the realm of animal genetics and breeding.
Due to the limited number of molecular markers available for gene mapping, few breakthroughs have been made in the fine mapping of quantitative traits. Although quantitative genetics has been applied in animal breeding, leading to a technological revolution in the past century, selecting certain complex traits based solely on pedigree-derived breeding remains challenging due to the intricate nature of animal genetics and developmental mechanisms. The related concept and technology completion of the Human Genome Project has greatly promoted farm animal genomic research. With the completion of major livestock and poultry breed genome sequencing projects, coupled with the continuous emergence of high-throughput sequencing technologies (omics), agricultural animal genetic breeding research methods and means have gradually evolved from traditional conventional breeding to the integration of various omics technologies. The integration of diverse omics data for analyzing important economic traits aids in accurately and comprehensively revealing the formation mechanism.
2. Application of omics enhances the progress of animal selection and breeding
The omics mainly includes genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, epigenomics and metabolomics. The application of them in livestock can improve the detection efficiency in the subtle changes of phenotypic [4, 5]. In animal genetics and breeding, integrative analysis of omics data can promise to deliver comprehensive insights into the biological systems under study, and contribute to the identification of causal mutations, thereby enhancing the accuracy of genetic selection [6]. Additionally, it has contributed to the estimation of more accurate breeding values (BVs) and facilitated the selection of genetically superior animals at an early stage, thereby enhancing genetic gain [7, 8]. This, in turn, leads to improved animal productivity and profitability.
3. Conclusion
With the fast development of modern technology, modern animal breeding programs are constantly evolving with advances in breeding theory, biotechnology, and genetics. The application of the omics approach has the potential to revolutionize animal breeding practice, shifting it from a simplistic “black box” methodology to one that incorporates an understanding of regulatory networks and pathways that underlie the expression of crucial phenotypes. It establishes the groundwork for further investigations into the molecular mechanisms governing quantitative trait regulation and the development of molecular markers applicable to breeding practices. Therefore, the integration of Omics data to enhance livestock production is promising.
References
- 1.
Rexroad C, Vallet J, Matukumalli LK, Reecy J, Bickhart D, Blackburn H, et al. Genome to phenome: Improving animal health, production, and well-being - a new USDA blueprint for animal genome research 2018-2027. Frontiers in Genetics. 2019; 10 :327 - 2.
Erasmus LM, van Marle-Köster E. Moving towards sustainable breeding objectives and cow welfare in dairy production: A south African perspective. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 2021; 53 (5):470 - 3.
Womack JE, Jang HJ, Lee MO. Genomics of complex traits. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2012; 1271 (1):33-36 - 4.
Mu Y, Qi W, Zhang T, Zhang J, Mao S. Multi-omics analysis revealed coordinated responses of rumen microbiome and epithelium to high-grain-induced subacute rumen acidosis in lactating dairy cows. mSystems. 2022; 7 (1):e0149021 - 5.
Wang Y, Li J, Lu D, Meng Q , Song N, Zhou H, et al. Integrated proteome and phosphoproteome analysis of interscapular brown adipose and subcutaneous white adipose tissues upon high fat diet feeding in mouse. Journal of Proteomics. 2022; 255 :104500 - 6.
Chang LY, Toghiani S, Aggrey SE, Rekaya R. Increasing accuracy of genomic selection in presence of high density marker panels through the prioritization of relevant polymorphisms. BMC Genetics. 2019; 20 (1):21 - 7.
Pedrosa VB, Schenkel FS, Chen SY, Oliveira HR, Casey TM, Melka MG, et al. Genomewide association analyses of lactation persistency and milk production traits in Holstein cattle based on imputed whole-genome sequence data. Genes (Basel). 2021; 12 (11):1830 - 8.
Peng C, Wang J, Asante I, Louie S, Jin R, Chatzi L, et al. A latent unknown clustering integrating multi-omics data (LUCID) with phenotypic traits. Bioinformatics. 2020; 36 (3):842-850 - 9.
Bovo S, Ribani A, Muñoz M, Alves E, Araujo JP, Bozzi R, et al. Whole-genome sequencing of European autochthonous and commercial pig breeds allows the detection of signatures of selection for adaptation of genetic resources to different breeding and production systems. Genetics, Selection, Evolution. 2020; 52 (1):33 - 10.
Elsik CG, Tellam RL, Worley KC, Gibbs RA, Muzny DM, Weinstock GM, et al. The genome sequence of taurine cattle: A window to ruminant biology and evolution. Science. 2009; 324 (5926):522-528 - 11.
McCarthy MI, Abecasis GR, Cardon LR, Goldstein DB, Little J, Ioannidis JP, et al. Genome-wide association studies for complex traits: Consensus, uncertainty and challenges. Nature Reviews. Genetics. 2008; 9 (5):356-369 - 12.
Shi TP, Zhang L. Application of whole transcriptomics in animal husbandry. Yi Chuan. 2019; 41 (3):193-205 - 13.
Cánovas A, Reverter A, DeAtley KL, Ashley RL, Colgrave ML, Fortes MR, et al. Multi-tissue omics analyses reveal molecular regulatory networks for puberty in composite beef cattle. PLoS One. 2014; 9 (7):e102551 - 14.
Chakraborty D, Sharma N, Kour S, Sodhi SS, Gupta MK, Lee SJ, et al. Applications of omics Technology for Livestock Selection and Improvement. Frontiers in Genetics. 2022; 13 :774113 - 15.
Zhang Z, Wu S, Stenoien DL, Paša-Tolić L. High-throughput proteomics. Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.). 2014; 7 :427-454 - 16.
Soares R, Franco C, Pires E, Ventosa M, Palhinhas R, Koci K, et al. Mass spectrometry and animal science: Protein identification strategies and particularities of farm animal species. Journal of Proteomics. 2012; 75 (14):4190-4206 - 17.
Peddinti D, Memili E, Burgess SC. Proteomics in animal reproduction and breeding. In: Eckersall PD, Whitfield PD, editors. Methods in Animal Proteomics. New Jersey, USA: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011. pp. 369-396 - 18.
Yarmush ML, Jayaraman A. Advances in proteomic technologies. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering. 2002; 4 :349-373 - 19.
Bendixen E. The use of proteomics in meat science. Meat Science. 2005; 71 (1):138-149 - 20.
Almeida AM, Bassols A, Bendixen E, Bhide M, Ceciliani F, Cristobal S, et al. Animal board invited review: Advances in proteomics for animal and food sciences. Animal. 2015; 9 (1):1-17 - 21.
Li D, Wu Y, Shi K, Shao M, Duan Y, Yu M, et al. Untargeted metabolomics reveals the effect of rearing systems on bone quality parameters in chickens. Frontiers in Genetics. 2022; 13 :1071562 - 22.
Fingerman IM, McDaniel L, Zhang X, Ratzat W, Hassan T, Jiang Z, et al. NCBI Epigenomics: A new public resource for exploring epigenomic data sets. Nucleic Acids Research. 2011; 39 (Database issue):D908-D912 - 23.
Zentner GE, Henikoff S. Epigenome editing made easy. Nature Biotechnology. 2015; 33 (6):606-607 - 24.
Li Z, Ren T, Li W, Zhou Y, Han R, Li H, et al. Association between the methylation statuses at CpG sites in the promoter region of the SLCO1B3, RNA expression and color change in blue eggshells in Lushi chickens. Frontiers in Genetics. 2019; 10 :161 - 25.
Wang X, Kadarmideen HN. An epigenome-wide DNA methylation map of testis in pigs for study of complex traits. Frontiers in Genetics. 2019; 10 :405 - 26.
Wang Z, Wang D, Jiang K, Guo Y, Li Z, Jiang R, et al. A comprehensive proteome and acetyl-proteome atlas reveals molecular mechanisms adapting to the physiological changes from pre-laying to peak-laying stage in liver of hens (Gallus gallus). Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2021; 8 :700669