Open access

Introductory Chapter: Modern Anesthesiology as a Unifying Force

Written By

Anna Ng-Pellegrino and Stanislaw P. Stawicki

Published: 28 June 2023

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.111456

From the Edited Volume

Updates in Anesthesia - The Operating Room and Beyond

Edited by Anna Ng-Pellegrino and Stanislaw P. Stawicki

Chapter metrics overview

86 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

Modern anesthesiology has gained recognition as a leader in promoting patient safety and quality of care in the medical profession, with novel technological developments continually pushing for better clinical outcomes [1, 2]. There is also a tremendous amount of intellectual diversity within modern anesthesiology, including various schools of thought, subspecialties, interdisciplinary approaches, and a strong tradition of innovation (Figure 1). However, this has not always been the case [3]. As recently as a century ago, patients feared undergoing surgery because of the low likelihood of waking up from the anesthetic [4, 5, 6]. Not only did the options of inhaled anesthetic agents at that time impose many adverse reactions (changes in mentation, arrhythmias, liver toxicity), but anesthesia was administered via mask inhalation, hence, with an unprotected airway. The risk of aspiration of stomach contents was prevalent, leading to aspiration pneumonias and death [4].

Figure 1.

Word cloud reflecting the breadth of topics within the current book.

Anesthesia evolved dramatically from the 1900s, as there came to be successful implementations and novel applications of medical, surgical, and basic science knowledge with technological advances [3, 7, 8]. An extraordinary breakthrough occurred in 1926 when Arthur Guedel introduced the concept of a cuffed endotracheal tube through his experiments with submerging dogs underwater and under anesthesia [9]. The 1930s also provided the initial foundations for the modern concept of morbidity and mortality conferences, as anesthesia docs set up meetings with the coroner to learn about patient deaths from anesthesia [4].

Advertisement

2. Rapid growth and development

Modern anesthesiology dates back to the post-World War II era, with advances from the military experience of the most devastating war in human history becoming integrated into everyday clinical practice [8, 10]. A unique synergy emerged between surgery and anesthesiology – a trend that continues to this day [11]. This trend was further augmented by the influx of the newly available medical workforce, rich with experiences from the war theater [10]. From 1940s to 2000, the pace of progress, fueled by exponential growth in basic and clinical research, further accelerated the transition from “the art” into “the science” of anesthesiology [8, 12].

During the same time, patient safety organizations grew in number nationally and internationally. Increasingly more sophisticated anesthetic devices and adjunctive tools were created in this era [13, 14]. With improvement in technology came improvements in safely administering anesthesia through creative advances in airway equipment (video laryngoscopy), ventilators (safety valves and flowmeters set to prevent delivery of a hypoxic mixture to the patient), infusion pumps, and regional/neuraxial anesthetic kits [13, 14]. Monitors standardized to specifications by the American Society of Anesthesia were introduced and implemented in the 1980s–90s in the US. Subsequent innovations in monitoring devices allowed one to process hemodynamic and physiological information in noninvasive fashions (pulse oximeters, cerebral perfusion monitors, stroke volume variation monitoring, bispectral index (BIS) monitoring, modern point-of-care sonography) [2, 15, 16, 17]. Computer technology helped to improve the quality of care in the preoperative assessment stage and provided new opportunities for anesthesia training and simulation for crisis management [3, 18, 19].

Advertisement

3. Innovation: the core of anesthesiology’s DNA

More than 13 million surgeries were performed in the United States from 2019 to 2021 [6]. In the 2000s–2010s, more than 50% of surgical, diagnostic, and interventional procedures are being performed outside of the operating room (OR), including settings such as cardiac catheterization labs, MRI suites, interventional radiology departments, and dental suits. The last three decades showed tremendous growth in the role anesthesia plays in perioperative management. The preadmission testing clinic evolved into a concept known as a perioperative surgical home, where anesthesia staff conducts the management of the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative care of a patient [20]. By having patients undergo “prehabilitation”, where they concentrate on conditioning/preparing their mind and body weeks before surgery, would help to maximize wellness and reduce both complications and postoperative rehabilitation needs [21, 22, 23]. In addition, multidisciplinary care pathways and Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocols are being created that incorporate precision medicine and improve patient outcomes [24, 25]. This new role in anesthesia helped to break down the stigma that anesthesia services are limited to the operating room. Instead, being equipped with a vast knowledge of acute care and lifesaving skills, anesthesia personnel are provided with the opportunity to help transition their quality of care and expertise into meaningful change outside of the operating room.

Modern day anesthesiology also encompasses many dedicated subspecialties, with a focus on critical care, neurosciences, pediatrics, geriatrics, cardiothoracic, obstetrics, and regional and acute pain management [26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31]. As editors of this book, we would like to take the reader on an adventure that will stimulate one’s mindset on what is “current and state-of-the-art” in anesthesia practice and its subspecialties. With regards to airway management, a plastic surgery group in Europe provided a unique take on the use of supraglottic airways devices (i-gel LMA™, Intersurgical, UK) in the prone position. Another chapter discusses novel methods to provide paraoxygenation while an airway is being secured. The reader will hopefully embrace our chapters that focus on the anesthetic management of patients undergoing complex cardiac procedures, such as electrophysiology cases, left ventricular assist device (LVAD) placement, and extracorporeal circuit membrane oxygenation (ECMO) cannulation. As more surgical subspecialties have begun to offer minimally invasive and/or robotic procedures, chapters are devoted in this book to highlight Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Protocols in thoracic and neurosurgery cases. To address care for the aging population in the US, many institutions are creating guidelines for optimizing their care before surgery. The book chapter by McHugh offers a great summary of what is being done in the evaluation of the geriatric patient in the preoperative testing phase. To highlight concerns with the ongoing opioid epidemic in the US, there is a dedicated discussion of methods to curtail narcotic use in acute pain management, chronic pain management (interventional procedures), and regional pain management (local anesthetic nerve blocks) chapters. Lastly, we wish to emphasize the importance of collaboration and teamwork with surgical and medical specialties when taking care of a patient, whether it is in the setting of trauma and critical care, in patients with psychiatric disorders, or when managing patients who undergo life-threatening complications, such as cardiac arrest after neuraxial anesthesia.

Advertisement

4. Anesthesia beyond anesthesiology

The reach of modern anesthesiology does not begin, nor does it end in the operative theater. The future of anesthesia care will undoubtedly focus on topics such as the continued extension of anesthesia-related services to venues outside of the OR and the continued reliance on technology to further improve patient safety and quality of care, such as with telemedicine, the use of artificial intelligent machines, or the “internet of things” (IOT) construct [32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37]. Furthermore, as the world reflects on climate change and methods to prevent ongoing environmental harm, more anesthesia practices may turn to ways to achieve a “greener” operating room, such as minimizing the use of volatile agents and utilizing more total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) [38, 39]. There is even an opportunity for anesthesia practices to extend beyond a patients’ hospital stay. Many institutions foresee their anesthesia staff providing care weeks to months after surgery, as the “primary postoperative physician” [40, 41]. In addition, the concept of remote monitoring has extended into the home, to provide a “hospital at home” model of care [42, 43]. This highlights the use of anesthesia standard monitors to use at home and have the vital signs tracked over to a virtual remote center.

The clinical realm of anesthesia also does not end with anesthesiology-trained clinicians. For one the concept of “conscious sedation” has been extended to surgeons, gastroenterologists, dentists, intensivists, and emergency medicine physicians, among other specialties [44, 45, 46]. Ideally, further education can be provided by anesthesia staff to those eager to learn more about the nuances of airway management and anesthesia administration. Eventually, areas of clinical overlap may develop, with multi-specialty participation in “unified super-specialty areas” – such specialty and content expertise unification can currently be seen in areas such as critical care medicine, traumatology, geriatric medicine, and pain/palliative care [47, 48, 49, 50].

Advertisement

5. Synthesis and conclusion

This book recognizes the important role that anesthesiologists play within our increasingly complex and moderm healthcare system. It also highlights the various present and future roles that anesthesiologists will partake, both in the operating rooms and beyond. We also emphasize the embrace of multidisciplinary and multi-specialty approaches, both of which are inherently natural and seamless to the modern practice of anesthesiology. It is our hope, as the Editors of this unique collection of chapters, that we accurately and effectively portray modern anesthesiology as a true unifying force within the fabric of the contemporary healthcare environment.

References

  1. 1. Vanhonacker D, Verdonck M, Nogueira Carvalho H. Impact of closed-loop technology, machine learning, and artificial intelligence on patient safety and the future of Anesthesia. Current Anesthesiology Reports. 2022;12(4):451-460
  2. 2. Cipriano A et al. Reducing telemetry use while improving patient outcomes: University health network experience with the implementation of oximetry-based monitoring system. International Journal of Academic Medicine. 2018;4(2):112
  3. 3. Moon JS, Cannesson M. A century of technology in Anesthesia & analgesia. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2022;135(2S):S48-S61
  4. 4. Liu LL, Larson MD. Patient safety during anesthesia: 100 years of progress documented in Anesthesia & Analgesia. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2022;135(2S):S37-S47
  5. 5. Klafta JM, Roizen MF. Current understanding of patients' attitudes toward and preparation for anesthesia: A review. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 1996;83(6):1314-1321
  6. 6. Hansson N et al. No silver medal for Nobel prize contenders: Why anesthesia pioneers were nominated for but denied the award. Anesthesiology. 2016;125(1):34-38
  7. 7. Matioc AA. An Anesthesiologist’s perspective on the history of basic airway management: The “modern” era, 1960 to present. Anesthesiology. 2019;130(5):686-711
  8. 8. Kurup V and Barash P. History of Anesthesiology. A Guide to Anesthesiology for Medical Students. 2018;2018:4-5
  9. 9. Thomson J, Arthur E. Guedel (1883-1956): Self-trained Pioneer. Anesthesiology-Philadelphia Then Hagerstown. 2000;93(3, SUPP/2):A1163-A1163
  10. 10. Muravchick S, Rosenberg H. Austin Lamont and the evolution of modern academic American anesthesiology. The Journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists. 1996;84(2):436-441
  11. 11. Roberts CG. Some signposts of surgical Progress. Journal of the National Medical Association. 1949;41(1):3
  12. 12. Frader JE, Caniano DA. Research and innovation in surgery. In: Surgical Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998. pp. 216-241
  13. 13. Meyer J-U et al. Advanced technologies and devices for inhalational anesthetic drug dosing. Modern Anesthetics. 2008;182:451-470
  14. 14. Saracoglu KT et al. Anesthesia machines and Anesthetic breathing system. In: Improving Anesthesia Technical Staff’s Skills. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022. pp. 117-123
  15. 15. Kelly N et al. Clinician-performed ultrasound in hemodynamic and cardiac assessment: A synopsis of current indications and limitations. European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery. 2015;41:469-480
  16. 16. Stawicki S et al. Use of the esophageal echo-Doppler to guide intensive care unit resuscitations: A retrospective study. IJCCM. 2007;11:54-60
  17. 17. Kissin I. Depth of anesthesia and bispectral index monitoring. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2000;90(5):1114-1117
  18. 18. Marcks V, Hayes K, Stawicki SP. Operating room trauma simulation: The St. Luke's university health network experience. International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science. 2020;10(1):4
  19. 19. Southwick K et al. Screen-based simulation as a novel recertification tool for certified registered nurse Anesthetists. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2023;75:11-19
  20. 20. Kain ZN et al. The perioperative surgical home as a future perioperative practice model. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2014;118(5):1126-1130
  21. 21. Carli F, Scheede-Bergdahl C. Prehabilitation to enhance perioperative care. Anesthesiology Clinics. 2015;33(1):17-33
  22. 22. Wynter-Blyth V, Moorthy K. Prehabilitation: Preparing patients for surgery. BMJ: British Medical Journal (Online). 2017:358. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j3702
  23. 23. Durrand J, et al. Prehabilitation. Perioperative Medicine–Current Controversies. 2016. p. 15-47
  24. 24. Malige A, Sokunbi G. Efficacy of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol for Orthopedic spinal fusion procedures. International Journal of Academic Medicine. 2020;6(3):252-253
  25. 25. Frenzel Z, Fontem R, Gifford A. Implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for video-assisted Thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy decreases perioperative opioid use. International Journal of Academic Medicine. 2020;6(3):260-261
  26. 26. Capdeville M et al. The educational evolution of fellowship training in cardiothoracic anesthesiology–perspectives from program directors around the United States. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2018;32(2):607-620
  27. 27. Cladis F, Yanofsky S. Education in pediatric anesthesiology: The evolution of a specialty. International Anesthesiology Clinics. 2019;57(4):3-14
  28. 28. Shapiro DM et al. History and evolution of regional anesthesiology and acute pain medicine fellowship training. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine. 2020;45(4):311-314
  29. 29. Newman MF, Mathew JP, Aronson S. The evolution of anesthesiology and perioperative medicine. Anesthesiology. 2013;118(5):1005-1007
  30. 30. Prielipp RC, Cohen NH. The future of anesthesiology: Implications of the changing healthcare environment. Current Opinion in Anesthesiology. 2016;29(2):198-205
  31. 31. Teplick R, Rosenthal M. The evolution of the anesthesiologist: Novel perioperative roles and beyond. Anesthesiology Clinics. 2009;27(1):157-165
  32. 32. Varughese S, Ahmed R. Environmental and occupational considerations of anesthesia: A narrative review and update. Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2021;133(4):826
  33. 33. Bellini V et al. Artificial intelligence: A new tool in operating room management. Role of machine learning models in operating room optimization. Journal of Medical Systems. 2020;44(1):20
  34. 34. Stawicki S. Blockchain in Healthcare: From Disruption to Integration. Vol. 10. Switzerland AG: Springer Nature; 2023
  35. 35. Stawicki SP et al. Roadmap for the development of academic and medical applications of blockchain technology: Joint statement from OPUS 12 global and litecoin cash foundation. Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock. 2019;12(1):64
  36. 36. Kelley KC et al. Answering the challenge of COVID-19 pandemic through innovation and ingenuity. In: Coronavirus Disease-COVID-19. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021. pp. 859-873
  37. 37. Chauhan V et al. Novel coronavirus (COVID-19): Leveraging telemedicine to optimize care while minimizing exposures and viral transmission. Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock. 2020;13(1):20
  38. 38. Wong SSC et al. Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol for acute postoperative pain: A scoping review of randomized controlled trials. Asian Journal of Anesthesiology. 2020;58(3):79-93
  39. 39. Miller TE, Gan TJ. Total intravenous anesthesia and anesthetic outcomes. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2015;29:S11-S15
  40. 40. Bridges KH, McSwain JR, Wilson PR. To infinity and beyond: The past, present, and future of tele-anesthesia. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2020;130(2):276-284
  41. 41. Coppens M, Van Caelenberg E, De Regge M. Postoperative innovative technology for ambulatory anesthesia and surgery. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology. 2021;34(6):709-713
  42. 42. Leff B et al. Satisfaction with hospital at home care. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2006;54(9):1355-1363
  43. 43. Shepperd S et al. Randomised controlled trial comparing hospital at home care with inpatient hospital care. II: Cost minimisation analysis. BMJ. 1998;316(7147):1791-1796
  44. 44. Leroy P, Gorzeman M, Sury M. Procedural sedation and analgesia in children by non-anesthesiologists in an emergency department. Minerva Pediatrica. 2009;61(2):193-215
  45. 45. Soifer BE. Procedural anesthesia at the bedside. Critical Care Clinics. 2000;16(1):7-28
  46. 46. Amornyotin S. Sedation and monitoring for gastrointestinal endoscopy. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2013;5(2):47
  47. 47. Krell K. Critical care workforce. Critical Care Medicine. 2008;36(4):1350-1353
  48. 48. Bassette E et al. Hospice and palliative medicine fellowship after surgical training: A roadmap to the future of surgical palliative care. Journal of Surgical Education. 2022;79(5):1177-1187
  49. 49. Bach JA et al. The right team at the right time–multidisciplinary approach to multi-trauma patient with orthopedic injuries. International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science. 2017;7(1):32
  50. 50. Kelley KC et al. Emergency trauma providers as equal partners: From “proof of concept” to “outcome parity”. The American Surgeon. 2019;85(9):961-964

Written By

Anna Ng-Pellegrino and Stanislaw P. Stawicki

Published: 28 June 2023