Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Business Intelligence: An Important Tool to Develop Dynamic Capabilities and Sustainable Innovation in the Digital Age

Written By

Abdeslam Hassani and Hussam Al Halbusi

Submitted: 20 December 2022 Reviewed: 25 January 2023 Published: 22 February 2023

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.110200

From the Edited Volume

International Business - New Insights on Changing Scenarios

Edited by Muhammad Mohiuddin, Slimane Ed-Dafali, Elahe Hosseini and Samim Al-Azad

Chapter metrics overview

206 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

While the issue of business intelligence is rapidly gaining popularity across a wide range of domains, the majority of research treats it as a single capability or technique, such as big data analytics capability. However, as a tool for Big Data Decision-making or technique for enhancing operational research technique, there is still a low amount of work that examines business intelligence as a tool to develop dynamic capabilities of the organization and to contribute to sustainable innovation, in particular in the digital age. Therefore, to address this gap, this chapter aims to discuss how organizations can use technologies, including business intelligence as a tool for creating new knowledge, which in turn helps organizations to improve their dynamic capabilities and achieve sustainable innovation. Recognizing how these firms’ dynamic capabilities are started building, achieved sustained, enlarged, utilized, evolved, and phased out in phrases of their constituent micro-foundations. So, this study suggests business intelligence as a process that helps organizations collect and transform data into information and knowledge, which contributes to building dynamic capabilities. It is important for managers to understand how these firms’ dynamic capabilities are started building, achieved sustained, enlarged, utilized, evolved, and phased out in phrases of their constituent micro-foundations.

Keywords

  • business intelligence
  • dynamic capabilities
  • innovation
  • digitalization
  • sustainability

1. Introduction

Over the last several years, scholars and practitioners have recognized, considered, and identified how increased digitalization and datafication of social action facilitates new opportunities for arranging and changing patterns of organizations [1, 2, 3]. Among all businesses have an ongoing shift towards further digital forms of work in recent times. Digitalization can indeed be seen as the renovation of controller inputs into digital forms [4, 5]. Nonetheless, the digital revolution changes organizational capabilities by removing or reducing material constrictions related to work, such as time, space, location, or capital requirements. Whilst the work and information exchange could be digitized, it is further appropriate to consider trying to organize as an implementation of change [5, 6]. Once organizations use the digital format nature of work to produce unique forms, they are digitalizing the organization which include increasingly distributed and flexible work arrangements [7]. The automation of administrative task system applications, the adaptation of knowledge management systems [8], and the use of businesses as networking sites [9]. Enterprises can significantly enhance the amount of data that is transparent and inclusive because digitization drives the marginal cost of producing information goods to near zero and digital storage costs continue falling. Digital technology for contemporary businesses is a procedure of digitalization that many see as required to pursue innovation and remain competitive [10, 11].

The advancing technological accessibility enabled by a variety of networks and electronic tools delivers the facilities for digital data to be transmitted comfortably. As the fundamental network process that links individuals are becoming more rigorous, so will expectations for social and organizational internet access [12]. Furthermore, as demonstrated in prior research, the vastly increased accessibility of digital data allows individuals within companies to anticipate ever more social, and business interconnection since work activities are regarded as easily transportable [13, 14], compelling companies to expand the economy in their techniques to overcome to require to ensure levels of information technology connectivity. In simple, digital data contributes to increased requirements for technological and human integration, in which the compound process is repeated to the place where things in companies expect to be continuously connected to each other at all points of time [15].

Digital technologies can provide organizations with rapid access, enormous opportunities, and challenges [16]. Given the growing influences and reliance on digital technologies and applications in various market segments, the relevance and significance of implementing strategic understanding in organizations have a larger effect than ever on the development and sustainability of achieving competitive advantage and value [17, 18]. However, apart from the application of strategic understanding, the previous research on digitally enabled conceptualizations, for example, cloud computing, Internet of things (IoT), big data, and business intelligence sees them as valuable processes for solving challenges, which are frequently linked to attaining and sustaining value for stakeholders [19, 20]. Otherwise, technological innovations and human movement have consistently aided in the management of strategic knowledge and capabilities in businesses. Indeed, some intelligence tools and practices such as business and competitive intelligence can help firms create new knowledge, which contributes to developing dynamic capabilities within firms [21, 22].

Some previous research (e.g., [23, 24, 25] investigated the relationships between certain components related to business intelligence such as the analytical capacity on one side, and the dynamic capabilities, and performance of the organization on the other side. However, there is still a lack of research that examines the impact of business intelligence on certain internal mechanisms of company performance [26], in particular on sustainable innovation. This paper attempts to fill this research gap by examining how business intelligence can contribute to sustainable innovation through dynamic capabilities. This study aims to explore the role of business intelligence in developing dynamic capabilities and its direct and/or indirect contribution to innovation activities and the sustainable organizational performance of companies. More specifically, this study aims to answer the following research question:

Q1—How does business intelligence contributes to the development of dynamic capabilities and, therefore, to the sustainable innovation of organizations?

This paper attempt to explain how business intelligence can help to develop technological dynamic capabilities, which in turn contribute to sustainable innovation. Although this paper presents only a theoretical study, it proposes a research model which can guide managers to make the best choices regarding investment in technological resources such as business intelligence.

The remainder of this chapter is structured as follows: (1) this introduction, describing the relevance of the research topic and its context; (2) the definition of business intelligence; (3) the relationship between business intelligence, dynamic capabilities, and sustainable innovation; (4) the implications; (5) the limitations and future research, and; (6) the conclusion.

Advertisement

2. Business intelligence

In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in intelligence activities such as business intelligence, competitive intelligence, and artificial intelligence. In this section, we choose to highlight the need for organizations to build dynamic capabilities by using technologies especially, business intelligence, which helps them to be more competitive and innovative [27].

Business intelligence is a concept that emerged in the early 1970s when transactional information systems could not help managers make decisions. This weakness spurred the development of a set of tools and techniques based on advanced algorithms to process data faster to achieve organizational goals [28]. New decision-support information systems have enabled companies to process large volumes of data requiring rapid storage and access [29]. In their comprehensive literature review, [30] view business intelligence as a combination of policies, processes, cultures, and technologies used to store, manipulate, and analyze data. In addition, four main steps characterize business intelligence: system sources, data acquisition, data warehouse, and reporting and analysis [31, 32].

From another perspective, business intelligence is an umbrella term that can also be defined as a set of data aggregation processing methods from different departments such as marketing, sales, human resources, and finance that assists executives in decision-making [33]. For a long time, data related to different disciplines existed within organizations without being well leveraged. In addition, the emergence of new technologies has greatly contributed to flooding businesses with massive and varied data, which required a tool to help integrate, store, and analyze data in order to create information and knowledge for decision-making. Business intelligence’s main role is to transform data into information, then into knowledge and action [34]. To this end, it is relevant to distinguish between information and knowledge. According to [35], information is factual; it refers to a set of numbers, statistics, and scattered data, among others, on people, and companies, while knowledge is a set of information that has been filtered, analyzed, and then implemented. In the same vein, [36, 37] report that knowledge is the richest form of information. For these authors, knowledge is a set of information on a given subject, which has been interpreted, reformulated, and put into action by an individual based on his expertise and prior knowledge.

Advertisement

3. Business intelligence, dynamic capabilities, and sustainable innovation

Previous studies have reported that knowledge is a key lever for organizational learning, innovation, and developing a set of organizational capabilities, such as dynamic capabilities [38]. For this reason, [39, 40] suggest integrating knowledge flows and organizational learning as a dimension of dynamic capabilities. According to this perspective, intelligence tools and techniques based on information collection, analysis, and dissemination contribute to knowledge generation [41] and the development of dynamic capabilities [42, 43].

The dynamic capabilities approach is now the dominant framework in strategic management for explaining the reconfiguration of resources and competencies through which organizations can respond to changes in their environment and innovate [44]. The dynamic capabilities consist of three categories, identifying and assessing opportunities (sensing), mobilizing resources to take advantage of the identified opportunity (seizing), and continuously reconfiguring resources (transforming) [45]. Dynamic capabilities can be defined as “the firm’s ability to integrate, build, and reconfigure internal and external resources or competencies to address, and possibly shape, rapidly changing business environments” [46, 47]. This definition highlights the importance of reconfiguration of organizational resources that help managers to identify opportunities and threats then act quickly to adjust to frequent changes in the external environment.

A number of researchers consider the relationship between dynamic capabilities and technologies as a bidirectional relation. Indeed, on the one hand, and on the other hand, technologies including analytic tools contribute to developing dynamic capabilities, and the relevance of sensing and learning capabilities can be seen as a trigger of technologies capabilities [47]. In the era of advanced technologies that have invaded all organizations, many researchers consider information technologies capabilities, such as the expertise of staff in technical knowledge, the flexibility of the information technologies infrastructure, and the ability to manage information technologies one among dynamic capabilities dimensions [48]. In the same sense, [49] point out that the development of new technological capabilities helps managers to adapt quickly to the turbulence of the environment [50] suggests that information technologies grant organizations the capacity to transform and bring out new knowledge, which promotes the improvement of their dynamic capabilities. Indeed, to manage dynamic data and information, organizations necessitate having analytic capabilities and a governance plan to maximize value [51].

There have been several types of research reports that business intelligence and dynamic capabilities are significantly correlated in the area of business and management studies. Although most researchers in the field consider business intelligence a single capability, such as Big Data Analytics Capability [52], a tool of Big Data Decision-making [53], or a technique for enhancing Operational Research [37], it can be considered a trigger of dynamic capabilities [19]. Business intelligence plays an important role in creating knowledge and developing dynamics capabilities within firms. It improves the collection of relevant information on the needs of customers and external partners, which helps develop organizations’ sensing capacity [40].

Previous studies highlight several advantages of dynamic capabilities within organizations [53] reports that the dynamic capabilities approach helps managers to create a competitive advantage. In the same vein, the dynamic capabilities strategy is asserted to be an encouraging approach to improving the understanding of critical innovation management for environmental sustainability [54]. Businesses should start to consider their fundamental actions in order to integrate, coordinate, build, and reconfigure their resources and competencies in the context of external sustainable development innovations [11]. Dynamic capabilities enable a company to align its resources and competencies with strategic environmental policies and the general business environment. To look at it another way, a company’s dynamic capabilities evaluate its capacity and willingness to implement these changes in its competencies and resources in order to participate in the transformation to a more sustainable industry [44, 55]. Thus, it highly suggests that dynamic capabilities be evaluated particularly for various tasks because there are numerous multiple kinds of dynamic capabilities for carrying out various tasks, ranging from new product development to post-acquisition incorporation (e.g., see [46]).

Giving to past studies, businesses are indeed successful in bringing new technologies and products for environmental protection to the industry when they establish and organize their innovation capability around sustainable solutions [56, 57]. The implementation of clean and energy-efficient technologies is dependent on businesses’ opportunity to develop dynamic capabilities for this function. As a result, more studies on businesses’ dynamic capabilities for environmentally responsible advancements have indeed required the kind of dynamic capabilities that should be developed to successfully overcome starting to emerge emerging issues [58]. Therefore, continued studies make the argument that, while much progress was made in understanding organizational capabilities, the reasoning behind these shared occurrences takes account of these constructs’ micro-level, or “micro-foundations.” A micro foundations method is concerned with unpacking dynamic capabilities in terms of fundamental different elements [50, 59]. Dynamic capabilities should always be described in terms of organizational structures and managerial ways of implementing business models. The managerial and organizational practices related to how things are done in businesses are also known as procedures or patterns of current practice and learning, [6, 60] characterizes micro foundations as “distinct skills, processes, procedures, organizational structures, decision rules, and disciplines” that serve as the overall organizational underpinning for resources and capabilities.

To attain sustainable growth, businesses are progressively considering the importance of the building and advancement of environmentally sustainable innovations [4, 61]. Sustainable innovation is considered an innovative and principal characteristic of business operations that confront the existing system in order to develop innovative products and processes that not only produce value-added economic performance but also advantage the environmental ecosystems [62]. For instance, immaculate technology solutions are indeed a type of environmentally sustainable innovation that aims to minimize dependence on renewable sources while also promoting environmental sustainability through the development of many more produces more power advanced technology [63]. Sustainable innovation as a business enabler allows businesses to implement sustainable development concerns regarding their techniques whereas strengthening their competitiveness [64]. Since a wide range of stakeholders is involved in the design process, incorporating environmental policies complicates businesses’ innovation strategies. The sophistication of the innovation process influences everything from concept development to marketing practices [65]. According to [66, 67], this complexity is triggered by the robust and sophisticated innovation of operations and product higher-level technology and the ambiguity and variety of the technological and business domains in which businesses usually start competing.

This unpredictability complicates strategic directions, particularly one‘s innovation schemes and performance because this requires to face changes and be able to adapt the business’s capabilities to its environment [15, 68]. Given to [69], environmental sustainability innovation regularly encompasses a departure from the existing body of knowledge and is therefore competence-destroying. Sustainable innovation frequently necessitates a disruptive technological transformation or a complete solution overhaul [70]. Also, [71] contends that environmentally sustainable innovation varieties from responsibility affect so otherwise to doing completely diverse things. As a result, mainstream, market-driven perspectives to advancement are insufficient for smartly improving and maintaining innovation for environmental sustainability [72, 73].

As we mentioned above, the digital transformation age represents a set of opportunities that should be sensed and seized. To do so, firms must reconfigure their technological resources and mobilize their organizational capabilities, including business intelligence [74, 75]. Indeed, business intelligence as a tool for collecting and analyzing information helps to identify opportunities, predict market trends, and helps to anticipate external changes by reconfiguring internal resources, particularly technological resources. In the same manner, [76] reports that to take advantage of emerging big data opportunities, firms must continually renew and reconfigure their technological resources. Based on the discussion above, we propose the research model below (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Research model.

Advertisement

4. Implications

Some previous research investigated the relationships between certain components related to business intelligence such as the analytical capacity on one side, the dynamic capabilities, and the performance of the organization on the other side. However, there is still a lack of research that examines the impact of business intelligence on certain internal mechanisms of company performance [26, 77], in particular on sustainable innovation. This paper contributes to fill this research gap by examining how business intelligence can contribute to sustainable innovation through dynamic capabilities. It aims to explore the role of business intelligence in the development of dynamic capabilities and its direct and/or indirect contribution to innovation activities and the sustainable organizational performance of companies. Precisely, this study proposes a research model which shows the importance of business intelligence to build the technological dynamic capabilities that led to sustainable innovation. Although this paper presents only a theoretical study, it proposes a research model which can guide managers to make the best choices regarding investment in technological resources such as business intelligence [78].

Practically, to achieve global performance and be more competitive, firms’ managers need to question the ability of their organizations to innovate, which leads them to mobilize the dynamic capabilities for developing innovative products and services that lead to disrupting and energizing the market [79]. The research of [68, 80] using a survey of 175 Greek companies highlights that dynamic capabilities play a mediator role in the relationships between business intelligence and innovation (incremental and radical innovation). Given the importance of business intelligence in creating new knowledge [81, 82] and its contribution to developing dynamic capabilities [71], which lead to sustainable innovation, firms need to consider and give more attention to investing in digitalization and analytical technologies. Dynamic capabilities help firms to reconfigure resources continuously and achieve sustainable growth [6, 9, 83].

Advertisement

5. Limitations and future research

This study presents some limitations that can be seen as an opportunity for further research. First, the proposed research model in this paper may be considered in the future more qualitative and quantitative empirical investigations can be developed in the future to expand and validate our recommendations. As this will help to improve the understanding related to sustainable innovation, as it’s an important component of the economy of all countries. Second, our paper does not specify the context if it is in large companies or SMEs because business intelligence and the technological reconfiguration of resources require a large investment, which it’s limited in the SMEs context. Therefore, future research could examine and compare the research model by considering the firm as a control variable. Finally, researchers can also widen and strengthen this research area by recognizing businesses’ strategy catalysts, assessing their platform-based innovation management levels, and analyzing the influence on their performance, such as revenues development and customer attrition. Second, Future research may list the appropriate capabilities (e.g., digital analysis, network orchestrating, value co-creation skills) required for businesses to operate platform-based PSI systems, improving our knowledge of platform-based servitization’s operational characteristics.

Advertisement

6. Conclusion

In the age of digitalization, new technologies influence organizational capabilities, which allow the firm’s managers to develop prospecting and foresight techniques and practices to face environmental changing. Among these practices, many studies suggest business intelligence as a process that helps organizations collect and transform data into information and knowledge, which contributes to building dynamic capabilities. As mentioned above, dynamic capabilities refer to an organization’s ability to voluntarily create, expand, or change its resource base to address threats associated with the volatility of the business environment. Therefore, it is important for managers to understand how these firms’ dynamic capabilities are started building, achieved sustained, enlarged, utilized, evolved, and phased out in phrases of their constituent micro-foundations [84, 85].

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Université de Québec à Trois-Rivières for supporting this research.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

References

  1. 1. Kim S, Choi B, Lew Y. Where is the age of digitalization heading? The meaning, characteristics, and implications of contemporary digital transformation. Sustainability. 2021;13(16):8909
  2. 2. Trischler J, Westman Trischler J. Design for experience—A public service design approach in the age of digitalization. Public Management Review. 2022;24(8):1251-1270
  3. 3. Al Halbusi H et al. Exploring social media adoption in small and medium enterprises in Iraq: Pivotal role of social media network capability and customer involvement. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. 2022;2022:1-18
  4. 4. Grybauskas A, Stefanini A, Ghobakhloo M. Social sustainability in the age of digitalization: A systematic literature review on the social implications of industry 4.0. Technology in Society. 2022;2022:101997
  5. 5. Ghosh S, Hughes M, Hodgkinson I, Hughes P. Digital transformation of industrial businesses: A dynamic capability approach. Technovation. 2022;113:102414
  6. 6. Chen Y et al. Building data-driven dynamic capabilities to arrest knowledge hiding: A knowledge management perspective. Journal of Business Research. 2022;139:1138-1154
  7. 7. van Kersbergen K, Vis B. Digitalization as a policy response to social acceleration: Comparing democratic problem solving in Denmark and the Netherlands. Government Information Quarterly. 2022;2022:101707
  8. 8. Bamel U, Kumar S, Lim W, Bamel N, Meyer N. Managing the dark side of digitalization in the future of work: A fuzzy TISM approach. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge. 2022;7(4):100275
  9. 9. Fuegener A, Grahl J, Gupta A, Ketter W. Cognitive challenges in human–artificial intelligence collaboration: Investigating the path toward productive delegation. Information Systems Research. 2022;33(2):678-696
  10. 10. Bartschat M, Cziehso G, Hennig-Thurau T. Searching for word of mouth in the digital age: Determinants of consumers’ uses of face-to-face information, internet opinion sites, and social media. Journal of Business Research. 2022;141:393-409
  11. 11. Al Halbusi H. Digital entrepreneurship and personal resilience on new business models in the 21st century. In: Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship and Organizational Resilience During Unprecedented Times. IGI Global; 2023. pp. 331-351
  12. 12. Lee SM, Trimi S. Convergence innovation in the digital age and in the COVID-19 pandemic crisis. Journal of Business Research. 2021;123:14-22
  13. 13. Tsou HT, Chen JS. How does digital technology usage benefit firm performance? Digital transformation strategy and organisational innovation as mediators. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. 2021;2021:1-2
  14. 14. Blanka C, Krumay B, Rueckel D. The interplay of digital transformation and employee competency: A design science approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2022;178:121575
  15. 15. Spieth P, Röth T, Clauss T, Klos C. Technological frames in the digital age: Theory, measurement instrument, and future research areas. Journal of Management Studies. 2021;58(7):1962-1993
  16. 16. Zallio M, Clarkson P. Designing the Metaverse: A study on inclusion, diversity, equity, accessibility and safety for digital immersive environments. Telematics and Informatics. 2022;2022:101909
  17. 17. Venkitachalam K, Schiuma G. Strategic knowledge management (SKM) in the digital age–insights and possible research directions. Journal of Strategy and Management. 2022;15(2):169-174
  18. 18. Alshallaqi M et al. Resistance to digital innovation in low-income populations: The case of university Student’s resistance to using digital productivity applications. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022;2022:5547
  19. 19. Weaven S, Quach S, Thaichon P, Frazer L, Billot K, Grace D. Surviving an economic downturn: Dynamic capabilities of SMEs. Journal of Business Research. 2021;128:109-123
  20. 20. Banmairuroy W, Kritjaroen T, Homsombat W. The effect of knowledge-oriented leadership and human resource development on sustainable competitive advantage through organizational innovation's component factors: Evidence from Thailand’s new S-curve industries. Asia Pacific Management Review. 2022;27(3):200-209
  21. 21. Côrte-Real N, Ruivo P, Oliveira T. Leveraging internet of things and big data analytics initiatives in European and American firms: Is data quality a way to extract business value? Information Management. 2020;57(1):103141
  22. 22. Andronie M, Lăzăroiu G, Iatagan M, Hurloiu I, Dijmărescu I. Sustainable cyber-physical production systems in big data-driven smart urban economy: A systematic literature review. Sustainability. 2021;13(2):751
  23. 23. Akter S, Gunasekaran A, Wamba SF, Babu MM, Hani U. Reshaping competitive advantages with analytics capabilities in service systems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2020;159:120180
  24. 24. Ashrafi A, Ravasan AZ, Trkman P, Afshari S. The role of business analytics capabilities in bolstering firms’ agility and performance. International Journal of Information Management. 2019;47:1-15
  25. 25. Mangla SK, Raut R, Narwane VS, Zhang Z. Mediating effect of big data analytics on project performance of small and medium enterprises. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. 2020;34(1):168
  26. 26. Chen Y, Lin Z. Business intelligence capabilities and firm performance: A study in China. International Journal of Information Management. 2021;57:102232
  27. 27. Yalcin AS, Kilic HS, Delen D. The use of multi-criteria decision-making methods in business analytics: A comprehensive literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2022;174:121193
  28. 28. Hassani A, Mosconi E. Social media analytics, competitive intelligence, and dynamic capabilities in manufacturing SMEs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2022;175:121416
  29. 29. Zollo M, Winter SG. Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science. 2002;13:339-351. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.13.3.339.2780
  30. 30. Kunath M, Winkler H. Usability of information systems to support decision making in the order management process. Procedia Cirp. 2019;81:322-327
  31. 31. Al Halbusi H, Klobas JE, Ramayah T. Green core competence and firm performance in a post-conflict country, Iraq. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2022;2022:1-13. DOI: 10.1002/bse.3265
  32. 32. Turban E, Aronson JE. Decision Support Systems and Intelligent Systems. 6th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 2001
  33. 33. Foley É, Guillemette M. What is business intelligence? International Journal of Business Intelligence Research (IJBIR). 2010;1(4):1-28
  34. 34. Niño HAC, Niño JPC, Ortega R. Business intelligence governance framework in a university: Universidad de la costa case study. International Journal of Information Management. 2020;50:405-412
  35. 35. Kahaner L. Competitive Intelligence-How to Gather, Analyse, and Use Information to Move Your Business to the Top. 7 th ed. New York: Touchstone; 1996
  36. 36. Davenport TH, Prusak L. Information Ecology: Mastering the Information and Knowledge Environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press Inc; 1997
  37. 37. Abdelfattah F, Al Halbusi H, Al-Brwani RM. Influence of self-perceived creativity and social media use in predicting E-entrepreneurial intention. International Journal of Innovation Studies. 2022;6(3):119-127
  38. 38. Robertson J, Caruana A, Ferreira C. Innovation performance: The effect of knowledge-based dynamic capabilities in cross-country innovation ecosystems. International Business Review. 2021;2021:101866
  39. 39. Zahra SA, George G. The net-enabled business innovation cycle and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Information Systems Research. 2002;13:147-150. DOI: 10.1287/isre.13.2.147.90
  40. 40. Garcia AE. Inteligência competitiva: considerações sobre a prática no ambiente empresarial brasileiro. Revista Inteligência Competitiva. 2018;8(1):127-168
  41. 41. Trieu V-H et al. Applying and extending the theory of effective use in a business intelligence context. MIS Quarterly. 2022;46(1):645-678
  42. 42. Hassani A. Déterminants de l’intelligence compétitive et son rôle médiateur dans la relation entre la turbulence de l’environnement et la performance des PMEs. Québec: Université de Sherbrooke; 2020
  43. 43. Eisenhardt KM, Martin J. A: Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal. 2000;21(10-11):1105-1121
  44. 44. Alsaad A et al. Linking business intelligence with the performance of new service products: Insight from a dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. 2022;7(4):100262
  45. 45. Teece D. Dynamic capabilities: Routines versus entrepreneurial action. Journal Of Management Studies. 2012;49(8):1395-1401
  46. 46. Broccardo L, Truant E, Dana L-P. The interlink between digitalization, sustainability, and performance: An Italian context. Journal of Business Research. 2023;158:113621
  47. 47. Matarazzo M, Penco L, Profumo G, Quaglia R. Digital transformation and customer value creation in made in Italy SMEs: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of Business Research. 2021;123:642-656
  48. 48. Kim G, Shin B, Kim KK, Lee H. IT capabilities, process-oriented dynamic capabilities, and firm financial performance. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 2011;12(7):487
  49. 49. Acosta-Prado JC, Campos E, Longo-Somoza M. Technological capability and development of intellectual capital on the new technology-based firms. Cuadernos de Administración. 2014;27(48):11-39
  50. 50. Conboy K, Mikalef P, Dennehy D, Krogstie J. Using business analytics to enhance dynamic capabilities in operations research: A case analysis and research agenda. European Journal of Operational Research. 2020;281(3):656-672
  51. 51. Mikalef P, Krogstie J, Pappas I, Pavlou P. Exploring the relationship between big data analytics capability and competitive performance: The mediating roles of dynamic and operational capabilities. Information Management. 2020;57(2):103169
  52. 52. Shamim S, Zeng J, Shariq S, Khan Z. Role of big data management in enhancing big data decision-making capability and quality among Chinese firms: A dynamic capabilities view. Information Management. 2019;56(6):103135
  53. 53. Goerzig D, Bauernhansl T. Enterprise architectures for the digital transformation in small and medium-sized enterprises. Procedia CIRP. 2018;67:540-545
  54. 54. Chirumalla K. Building digitally-enabled process innovation in the process industries: A dynamic capabilities approach. Technovation. 2021;105:102256
  55. 55. Linde L, Sjödin D, Parida V, Wincent J. Dynamic capabilities for ecosystem orchestration A capability-based framework for smart city innovation initiatives. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2021;166:120614
  56. 56. Bianchi G, Testa F, Tessitore S, Iraldo F. How to embed environmental sustainability: The role of dynamic capabilities and managerial approaches in a life cycle management perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2022;31(1):312-325
  57. 57. Singh SK, Del Giudice M, Chiappetta Jabbour CJ, Latan H, Sohal A. Stakeholder pressure, green innovation, and performance in small and medium-sized enterprises: The role of green dynamic capabilities. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2022;31(1):500-514
  58. 58. Jafari-Sadeghi V, Mahdiraji H, Busso D, Yahiaoui D. Towards agility in international high-tech SMEs: Exploring key drivers and main outcomes of dynamic capabilities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2022;174:121272
  59. 59. Mousavi S, Bossink B, van Vliet M. Dynamic capabilities and organizational routines for managing innovation towards sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018;203:224-239
  60. 60. Slater SF, Mohr J, Sengupta S. Radical product innovation capability: Literature review, synthesis, and illustrative research propositions. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2014;31(3):552-566
  61. 61. Ghobakhloo M, Iranmanesh M, Grybauskas A, Vilkas M, Petraitė M. Industry 4.0, innovation, and sustainable development: A systematic review and a roadmap to sustainable innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2021;30(8):4237-4257
  62. 62. Mikalef P, van de Wetering R, Krogstie J. Building dynamic capabilities by leveraging big data analytics: The role of organizational inertia. Information Management. 2021;58(6):103412
  63. 63. Jafari-Sadeghi V, Mahdiraji HA, Bresciani S, Pellicelli A. Context-specific micro-foundations and successful SME internationalisation in emerging markets: A mixed-method analysis of managerial resources and dynamic capabilities. Journal of Business Research. 2021;134:352-364
  64. 64. Bağış M, Kryeziu L, Akbaba Y, Ramadani V, Karagüzel ES, Krasniqi BA. The micro-foundations of a dynamic technological capability in the automotive industry. Technology in Society. 2022;70:102060
  65. 65. Teece D. Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal. 2007;28(13):1319-1350
  66. 66. Munten P, Vanhamme J, Maon F, Swaen V, Lindgreen A. Addressing tensions in coopetition for sustainable innovation: Insights from the automotive industry. Journal of Business Research. 2021;136:10-20
  67. 67. Hermundsdottir F, Aspelund A. Sustainability innovations and firm competitiveness: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021;280:124715
  68. 68. Le T, Ikram M. Do sustainability innovation and firm competitiveness help improve firm performance? Evidence from the SME sector in Vietnam. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 2022;29:588-599
  69. 69. Fernandes CI, Veiga P, Ferreira JJ, Hughes M. Green growth versus economic growth: Do sustainable technology transfer and innovations lead to an imperfect choice? Business Strategy and the Environment. 2021;30(4):2021-2037
  70. 70. Castellano R, Punzo G, Scandurra G, Thomas A. Exploring antecedents of innovations for small-and medium-sized enterprises' environmental sustainability: An interpretative framework. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2022;2022
  71. 71. Du S, Bstieler L, Yalcinkaya G. Sustainability-focused innovation in the business-to-business context: Antecedents and managerial implications. Journal of Business Research. 2022;138:117-129
  72. 72. Rauter R, Globocnik D, Perl-Vorbach E, Baumgartner R. Open innovation and its effects on economic and sustainability innovation performance. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge. 2019;4(4):226-233
  73. 73. Silvestre BS, Ţîrcă D. Innovations for sustainable development: Moving toward a sustainable future. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019;208:325-332
  74. 74. De Luca AI, Falcone G, Stillitano T, Iofrida N, Strano A, Gulisano G. Evaluation of sustainable innovations in olive growing systems: A life cycle sustainability assessment case study in southern Italy. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018;171:1187-1202
  75. 75. Inigo EA, Albareda L. Sustainability oriented innovation dynamics: Levels of dynamic capabilities and their path-dependent and self-reinforcing logics. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2019;139:334-351
  76. 76. Teece D. The foundations of enterprise performance: Dynamic and ordinary capabilities in an (economic) theory of firms. The Academy of Management Perspectives. 2014;28(4):328-352
  77. 77. Cillo V, Petruzzelli A, Ardito L, Del Giudice M. Understanding sustainable innovation: A systematic literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2019;26(5):1012-1025
  78. 78. Nylund P, Brem A, Agarwal N. Innovation ecosystems for meeting sustainable development goals: The evolving roles of multinational enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021;281:125329
  79. 79. Mousavi S, Bossink B, van Vliet M. Microfoundations of companies' dynamic capabilities for environmentally sustainable innovation: Case study insights from high-tech innovation in science-based companies. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2019;28(2):366-387
  80. 80. Díaz-Chao Á, Ficapal-Cusí P, Torrent-Sellens J. Environmental assets, industry 4.0 technologies and firm performance in Spain: A dynamic capabilities path to reward sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021;281:125264
  81. 81. McKelvie A, Davidsson P. From resource base to dynamic capabilities: An investigation of new firms. British Journal of Management. 2009;20:S63-S80
  82. 82. Mikalef P, Boura M, Lekakos G, Krogstie J. Big data analytics capabilities and innovation: The mediating role of dynamic capabilities and moderating effect of the environment. British Journal of Management. 2018;30(2):272-298. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8551.12343
  83. 83. Sun Z, Sun L, Strang K. Big data analytics services for enhancing business intelligence. The Journal of Computer Information Systems. 2018;58(2):162-169
  84. 84. Song M, Tao W, Shen Z. Improving high-quality development with environmental regulation and industrial structure in China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2022;366:132997
  85. 85. Rodrigo L, Ortiz-Marcos I, Palacios M, Romero J. Success of organisations developing digital social innovation: Analysis of motivational key drivers. Journal of Business Research. 2022;144:854-862

Written By

Abdeslam Hassani and Hussam Al Halbusi

Submitted: 20 December 2022 Reviewed: 25 January 2023 Published: 22 February 2023