Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Mycorrhizal Symbiosis for Sustainable Optimization of Tropical Agriculture: A Review of Research

Written By

Ricardos M. Aguégué, Corentin Akpode, Tomabu Adjobimey, Haziz Sina, Sylvestre A. Assogba, Abdel D. Koda, Nadège A. Agbodjato, Nestor R. Ahoyo Adjovi, Adolphe Adjanohoun, Olubukola O. Babalola and Lamine Baba-Moussa

Submitted: 16 December 2022 Reviewed: 19 January 2023 Published: 15 February 2023

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.110084

From the Edited Volume

Symbiosis in Nature

Edited by Everlon Cid Rigobelo

Chapter metrics overview

171 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Excessive application of chemical fertilizers and other agrochemicals can cause significant imbalances in soils and agricultural ecosystems. To minimize these impacts, biofertilizers and organic fertilizers are needed to maintain a sustainable production system. The use of subterranean microorganisms in agriculture to stimulate plant growth and improve yields has recently received increasing interest. In this context, mycorrhizae represent a viable solution to mitigate these adverse effects. Mycorrhizal fungi are able to form a symbiotic relationship with the roots of plants in the environment. Mycorrhizal fungus helps the plant to absorb nutrients and water. In addition, mycorrhizal fungi play a crucial role in storing carbon (C) in the soil. Most previous studies have just considered the effects of AMF species on a specific crop in one particular area but have not assessed the balance of AMF in production systems in tropical agriculture. This consideration should allow for the optimization of cropping practices through a review of the work on the use of AMF in tropical agriculture production systems. In this paper, we will discuss, through different examples of experiments carried out in the tropics, the performance of different strategies for managing the potential of AMF to maintain a sustainable production system.

Keywords

  • bioinoculation
  • SDG#2
  • sustainable agriculture
  • symbiosis
  • tropical environment

1. Introduction

In Sub-Saharan Africa, the population increase is estimated at 2 billion in 2050. This is more than double what it was in 2010 (800 million inhabitants) [1, 2]. Food needs will evolve considerably, even four times those of 2010 [1, 3]. Indeed, the technical performance of African agriculture, particularly crop yields, which are generally low, would not be sufficient to cover such changes in needs [1] without an effective alternative in new agricultural technologies. It is, therefore, necessary to expand the cultivated land in Africa on a large scale by more than 122 million ha, that is, a growth of more than 47% compared to the initial situation in 2010.

In this context, it is essential to have a better yield of corn grains for the self-sufficiency of the population. Thus, in most cases, producers use chemical agricultural inputs (pesticides and mineral fertilizers), which, in the long run, degrade the soil and pollute waterways and the environment. Indeed, the contribution of organic fertilizer is necessary for these soils on which chemical fertilizers are used to avoid their rapid degradation by water and wind currents [4]. Establishing a reliable and sustainable agricultural technology without adverse effects on soil health and the environment to meet food needs remains the major concern of researchers in the agricultural field. Indeed, the organic farming system remains the best option because it obliges farmers to use organic amendment resources of the remains from livestock, green organic matter, and other organic manures [5, 6]. Nevertheless, these inputs are costly, and their forms remain relatively insoluble. Also, their effects on phosphorus availability in soils in organic agriculture are often limited [5, 7].

Techniques for regenerating the health of cultivated soils that incorporate a judicious combination of organic matter of different C/N ratios, on the one hand, and the use of the soil microflora and soil fauna, on the other, are needed to reduce the rate of mineralization of organic matter supplied to soils, thereby maintaining microbial life in these soils for long periods.

Beneficial microorganisms include arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) that are associated with at least 90% of terrestrial plants [8, 9]. A majority of terrestrial plants, especially grapevine [10], are colonized by about 400 arbuscular mycohizal fungi that allow them better nutrient uptake and stress tolerance [11]. The interactions between plant, soil, and mycorrhizal fungi are ecologically and agriculturally beneficial systems. In nature, most plants are in association with mycorrhizae. Thanks to this association, the plant increases its water and nutrient-absorption surface. Also, they have better accessibility to the elements available in the soil but not accessible. In addition, mycorrhizae contribute to the mobilization of carbon (C) in the soil.

In this review, we will synthesize research on the performance of different AMF potential management strategies to maintain a sustainable production system.

Advertisement

2. Functional diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the rhizosphere

The first classification was established by Taxter [12] and later modified by many mycorrhizologists [13, 14]. The classical identification of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi is based on the structural morphology of the spore. Those that have similar morphology and form a single type of spore wall are phylogenetically related. However, populations of spores isolated and identified from rhizophytic soils do not always constitute communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal species that infect roots [15]. Nevertheless, the low morphological variation among spores often makes their identification difficult.

Schwarzott et al. [16] describe the molecular classification based on in vitro DNA amplification of variable regions of the fungal genome from spores or from mycorrhized roots [17]. Indeed, multigene analysis has been used to identify arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi [18] to confirm the phylogenetic structure proposed by Schüßler et al. [13]. Furthermore, biochemical approaches based on the use of specific antibodies [19] and lipid profiles [20] are also used for the identification of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.

Morton and Benny [21], who classified arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the order Glomales, subdivided them into two suborders, Glominae (vesicles forming) and Gigasporinae. The Glominae include two large families, the Glomaceae represented by the genera Glomus and Sclerocystys, a genus eliminated by Redecker et al. [22], and the Acaulosporaceae by Acaulospora and Entrophospora. The Gigasporinae include three families, the Gigasporaceae represented by Gigaspora and Scutellospora, the Archaeosporaceae represented by the genus Archaeospora, and the Paraglomaceae by Paraglomus [23].

Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic classification of the kingdom Mycota (Fungi) based on the analysis of 18S rRNA nucleotide sequences [13]. 1Species currently named Glomus2contains Glomus fulvum, Gl. megalocarpum, Gl. pulvinatum; 3contains Kuklospora colombiana and Ku. kentinensis (formerly Entrophospora) [25]; 4contains one genus with Entrophospora infrequent and A. baltica [25], neither of which are phylogenetically characterized; 5Otospora [26] contains Otospora bareai[27].

Figure 1.

Phylogenetic relationships of Glomeromycetes taxa [13, 24].

Advertisement

3. Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in promoting crop growth

The success of a production technique could depend on controlling the factors that influence the development of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF). AMF are another group of symbiotic soil microbes capable of directly or indirectly influencing soil properties, affecting plant growth and community structure [28, 29]. Their multiple beneficial attributes allow them to be involved in many processes, such as biofertilization, biostimulation, and bioprotection [30]. Indeed, AMF confer many positive effects on host plants, including promoting plant growth, stabilizing soil aggregation, maintaining soil moisture, improving tolerance to abiotic and biotic stress, and increasing plant biodiversity [30, 31, 32, 33]. In addition, these beneficial fungi have shown a potential ability to increase crop resilience and performance [34] and are known to affect their host plants differently. AMF are present in the soil in the form of spores and extra radicular hyphae, as well as in plant roots, with which they form a mutualistic association, and are considered an essential component of various ecosystems [35, 36]. The most important contribution of AMF fungi to plant growth is due to the uptake of phosphorus and other elements by the extra-radical hyphae and their transfer to root tissues. Indeed, intra-root hyphae, vesicles, and intra- and extra-root spores are structures capable of AMF propagation [37]. In addition to being a propagule, vesicles (Figure 2) are a reserve organ; their production is related to the stage of AMF development, and their presence can vary with carbon allocation by the host plant [39, 40]. However, factors such as low light intensity and defoliation, factors that limit photosynthesis and thus the carbon content of the plant, significantly reduce sporulation as well as colonization of new roots [37]. AMF provides nutrients, primarily phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N), to host plants in exchange for carbon (C). The increase in available phosphorus and exchangeable potassium and magnesium levels in the soil of AMF-treated plants would certainly mean more leaves, branches, and biomass in AMF-treated plants than in control [41]. Mycorrhization of tissue-grown propagules can produce plants with increased levels of biologically active secondary metabolites [42]. The exploration of a larger volume of soil and the possibility of alteration of primary minerals by mycorrhizal fungi improve the phosphate nutrition of plants [43, 44]. This improved acquisition of inorganic nutrients by fungal symbionts also concerns other macro- (N, K, Mg, Na, S) and micro- (B, Br, Cl, Cu, Cr, Cs, Co, Fe, Mo, Mn, Ni, Si, Zn) soil nutrients [37, 44]. Mycorrhizal associations play a potential role in the decomposition and mineralization of plant organic matter and the mobilization of nutrients to the host plant [44, 45].

Figure 2.

Infected corn roots colonized by shrub-shaped mycorrhizal fungi structures. (A: vesicular; h: intra-root hyphae; H: extra-root hyphae (×180) [38].

Advertisement

4. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi as biofertilizers to increase crop yield

The work of Xie et al. [46] and Battini et al. [47] on tomato showed that AMFs were responsible for P mobilization in inoculated tomato plants. In addition, Balliu et al. [48] on tomato plants inoculated with AMF observed a significant increase in N uptake. Campo et al. [49] showed the importance of mycorrhizal fungi on growth, productivity, and disease resistance in the rice crop. In addition, in the pasture, the dry season appears to favor AMF species diversity. It is possible that the lower humidity of this season influences the sporulation of more species [5051]. Studies conducted by Nekou et al. [52] and Ngakou et al. [53] in Cameroon in 5 agro-ecological zones showed that the use of commercial mycorrhizal fungi on cowpea plants improved their growth by 17–46%. In Togo, inoculation of soybean plants with mycorrhizae resulted in an improvement in plant height from 14 to 32 cm [54]. Also, the work of Ngakou et al. [55] on garlic plants inoculated with mycorrhizae under greenhouse conditions observed an improvement in plant growth from 4.85 cm to 6.28 cm. Ogou et al. [54] obtained in Togo an average mycorrhizae-induced pod gain on soybean of +126.83% compared to the control. Moussa et al. [56] reported an average mycorrhizal inoculation-induced improvement of 23.4% on Vigna subterranea plants. Hemissi et al. [57], in Tunisia, obtained a gain of 20 kg/ha more wheat in mycorrhized plants than in control plants. The role of AMF on Drymaria cordata is indicative of the apparent potential of this association to improving production [41]. Similar efficacy of G. fasciculatum on the growth and performance of normal and regenerated Andrographis paniculata plants has been studied [58]. Numerous works have shown the effectiveness of endomycorrhizal symbiosis in improving maize productivity [59, 60, 61, 62, 63].

These improvements in plant growth and yield by arbuscular fungi are explained by the fact that mycorrhizae degrade and mineralize soil organic matter and mobilize the resulting nutrients to the plant [64, 65]. In addition, mycorrhizae develop extra-radical mycelial hyphae that explore a larger volume of soil not accessible to plant roots [66]. Solanum lycopersicum, inoculated with G. fasciculatum significantly improved morphological characteristics [67].

Another important point regarding plant health is the presence of toxic metals such as Cu, Cd, Zn, and Pb in the soil. It has been suggested that the most appropriate use for these elements is potentially toxic elements (PTEs) [68, 69]. AMF are capable of absorbing Cu, and 1 g of AMF hyphae has a Cu content of 3–14 mg [70].

Advertisement

5. Role of glomalin secreted by mycorrhizal fungi

The growth of mycorrhizal hyphae in the soil is accompanied by the production of glomalin (a glycoprotein), which improves the aggregation of soil particles [4471]. Glomalin is a hydrophobic protein. Glomalin, an N-linked glycoprotein [72], which is considered to be an AMF gene product, is defined as a protein secreted by AMF hyphae and spores [73]. It contains iron (2–5%), oxygen (4–6%), phosphorus (0:03–0.1%), carbon (36–59%), hydrogen (33–49%), and nitrogen (3–5%) [73, 74, 75]. The reddish-brown appearance of glomalin extracts is due to the iron content [7175]. According to Wright [76], the concentration of glomalin in soils is very high compared to humic acid, especially in the presence of insoluble humus or minerals in soils treated with sodium hydroxide. The glomalin secreted by the mycorrhizae in the soil allows the stabilization and optimization of the PTE. Moreover, in addition to its beneficial roles for the soil, in the rhizosphere of plants, it plays a protective role for the microorganism and the plant roots against toxins [73]. There is a strong relationship between glomalin concentration and soil aggregate stability [75, 77]. Because of this role, glomalin preserves unstable compounds in soil aggregates and thus reduces the degradation of soil organic matter [78]. N-linked glomalin [72], which is considered the gene product of AMF, is defined as a glycoprotein secreted by AMF hyphae and spores [73]. Glomalin, plays an excellent protective role for hyphae as well as promotes soil aggregation.

Glomalin is measured from the soil as Glomalin-Related Soil Protein (GRSP) [78, 79, 80]. Among soil microorganisms, AMF have the ability to stabilize soil structure, which reduces stress at the plant level [81, 82]. Indeed, glomalin produced by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi is one of the key factors of soil quality. It is essential for the formation of soil aggregates because it is one of the components of soil organic matter [75, 83]. Also, it contributes to the nutrient storage capacity and water holding capacity [83]. Land use change can alter the abundance and diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi species and the content of glomalin-related soil protein (GRSP) in the soil [84, 85, 86]. Glomalin from the decomposition of hyphae wall and spores of mycorrhizal fungi even after their death is quantified in soil as GRSP [87, 88]. GRSP is considered an essential component of the soil organic carbon (SOC) pool in terrestrial ecosystems [80, 89]. Indeed, GRSP is a key link in appreciating soil fertility, its water holding capacity, and aeration and nutrient content for better plant productivity [90].

GRSP is composed of two soil proteins: the easily extractable protein (EE-GRSP) and the total protein (T-GRSP). Assuming the C content of glomalin to be 32% [91], concerning equivalent dry mass of soil. The contribution of TG to SOC varies from season to season in agroforestry and forest [92]. Indeed, it is higher during the dry season compared to the rainy season, when it is 5.69% in soils under pasture, followed by AS3 (4.5%) and AS2 (4.31%). The work of Driver et al. [93] on Rhizophagus intraradices (N.C. Schenck & G.S. Sm). C. Walker & A. Schüßler showed that 80% of the glomalin secretion came from the wall of hyphae and spores.

The glomalin secreted by the mycorrhizae in the soil allows the stabilization and optimization of the PTE. In addition, glomalin plays a protective role for microorganisms and plant roots against toxins [73].

Advertisement

6. Mechanisms employed by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for salt stress amelioration

Soil salinity is a global problem because it negatively affects plant productivity and yield, especially in arid and semi-arid regions of the world. Under salt stress, plant growth and biomass have suffered a setback. The reasons may be the unavailability of nutrients and the expenditure of energy to counteract the toxic effects of NaCl. This is because excess salt decreases the availability of soil water to plants, inhibits plant metabolism and nutrient uptake, and is also responsible for osmotic imbalance [94]. Among the various biotechnological techniques used to combat the harmful effects of salt stress, the use of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) is considered an effective approach for bioenhancement of salt stress [95]. Possible mechanisms for salinity stress mitigation by AMF include: (1) enhancing plant nutrient uptake, particularly P; (2) elevating the K/Na ratio; (3) providing higher osmosolute accumulation; and (4) maintaining higher antioxidant enzyme activities [94]. AMF adjust all physiological and biochemical properties of the host plant (Figure 3) [96, 97, 98]. The mycorrhizal symbiosis with the roots of plants includes several stages, namely, (i) the formation of the appessoriun (ap), (ii) the penetration and development of hyphae into the root cortex (a), and (iii) the formation of vesicles in the root cortex (v). The salinity has a very negative impact on the productivity of the plant. Indeed, it inhibits the fundamental needs of the plant in water and nutrients, which leads to its physiological dryness and the decrease of the osmotic potential. Nevertheless, with the symbiosis of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, the plant resists saline stresses by a better absorption of water and nutrients. The action of mycorrhizae can be summarized as: (i) increased accumulation of osmolytes, which allows a decrease in osmotic potential; (ii) efficient management of water and photosynthesis; and (iii) production of antioxidants to scavenge ROS [96].

Figure 3.

The intricate functioning of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in ameliorating salt stress in plants [96].

AMF can protect cucumber growth from salt stress [99]. However, AMF inoculation ameliorated the negative effects by increasing biomass; pigment synthesis; antioxidant enzyme activity, including superoxide dismutase, catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, and glutathione reductase; and ascorbic acid content, which might be the result of lower levels of lipid peroxidation and electrolyte leakage. Mycorrhization has been found to increase the capacity of the host plant by improving its growth and biomass [96]. Colla et al. [100] reported improved growth, yield, water status, nutrient content, and fruit quality of Cucurbita pepo plants colonized by Glomus intraradices when exposed to salinity stress. Under NaCl stress, the combination of mycorrhizal fungi with compost significantly improved plant growth; P, K+, N, and Ca2+ uptake; leaf water potential; stomatal conductance; all antioxidant enzyme activities; and proline and soluble sugar content [101]. The application of anti-salinity increased the yield of green bean pods under all levels of salinity stress, especially with AMF followed by B. Megatherium, compared to non-inoculated plants [102].

The positive action of AMF under salt stress may be due to higher concentration of osmolytes (glycine-betaine, sugars) and polyamines and more and larger plastoglobules (higher concentration of α-tocopherol) in AMF-inoculated plants compared to in non-AMF-inoculated plants. While lower Na + and Cl—ions provide less ion toxicity, higher osmolytes and tocopherols provide osmotic adjustment and better ability to scavenge free radicals generated by salt stress, respectively [103]. Landwehr et al. [43] reported abundant AMF spores in extremely alkaline soils with a pH as high as 11, independent of soil types and NaCl, Na2CO3, Na2SO4, or CaSO4 salt types, although the degree of colonization varied among individuals. Saint-Etienne et al. [104] reported significant negative correlations between salt levels and soil mycorrhizal infection (measured as most probable number values); that is, as soil salinity increased from 5 to 22%, the level of infection decreased from 301 to 20 most probable numbers per 100 g of soil. Under salt stress conditions, a beneficial effect of AMF symbiosis has been observed on water status, osmolyte accumulation, and plant growth of Phragmites australis [105].

However, it should be noted that in the presence of NaCl, colonization of plant roots by some AMF is reduced [106], probably due to the suppression of arbuscular mycorrhizae formation due to the effect of NaCl on its fungi [95, 106, 107]. In addition, in the presence of NaCl, spore germination is delayed [107].

Advertisement

7. Interactions between mycorrhizae and beneficial rhizobacteria

Plant growth and development can be promoted or inhibited by microorganisms in the rhizosphere [108]. The synergistic action between plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and mycorrhizae (AMF) is of great importance for the improvement of productivity and sustainability of agricultural and natural ecosystems [109, 110, 111]. The beneficial effect of the interaction between RMPs and MFAs is demonstrated by several authors [108, 112, 113]. Indeed, the phytohormones produced by PGPRs allow a good development of the plant roots, which favors the colonization of the latter by AMF [112, 114]. According to Hodge [113], the accumulation of photosynthetic products is affected by the activities of AMF on PGPR in the mycorrhizosphere. As a result of increasing mycorrhizal colonization by PGPR, glomalin production increases [115].

The latest studies have shown various abiotic factors that have had marked effects on plant growth and development. Among these, N soil, pH, temperature, erosion, waterlog, salinity, heavy metals, fungicides, and drought are the major factors that affect plant growth [116, 117]. Hence, plant growth and yield will be affected [118]. However, diverse research [119, 120] have explored the significance of beneficial rhizobacteria and mycorrhizae in the growth and development of several plants in stress environments (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Potential mechanisms used by PGP Rhizobacteria and mycorrhizae for improving plant growth under stress circumstances [121].

This positive interaction mainly occurs among PGP rhizobacteria, mycorrhizae, and plants [122]. The addition of a single bacterial inoculum might have core effects on the rhizosphere structure. Still, it will depend on whether the fresh inoculum is already a part of that bacterial population or not [123]. Similarly, it can be more effective when a combination of PGPR is used [124]. The inoculum composed of the mixture of PGPR and AMF, due to the synergistic effect of its two microorganisms, allows for better colonization and nutrient uptake by plant roots [122]. In the same way, the rise in root exudates by the microbes triggers the fungus growth and hence increases the rate of root colonization BN [108]. After the inoculation of 20 different Medicago truncatula assents with Funneliformis mosseae strains, several interesting results on physiology and gene expression at the level of individual plants were observed [125]. Studying the P. fluorescens C7R12, it was shown as an operative biocontrol mediator in comparison to the Fusarium species [126]. Antifungal metabolites produced by Pseudomonas, instead of inhibiting the action of the G. mosseae strain, allowed the colonization of the roots by the hyphae of the latter [127]. In addition, the synthesis of Rhizobia exopolysaccharides (EPSs) improved the synergy between bacterial strains and mycorrhizal structure [128]. Thus, the combination of the rhizobacteria can raise the activity of arbuscular mycorrhizae in the symbiotic association [129]. The occurrence of PGP rhizobacteria, as well as mycorrhizae in the rhizosphere, can encourage the growth of fungus hyphae by enhancing cell permeability and help the roots in penetration to fungus [130], and fungus hyphae can raise the activities of bacterial strains, which solubilize the phosphorus [62, 131, 132, 133, 134]. In addition, AMF increase plant uptake of water and mineral elements, especially phosphorus, to the plant [135]. This is because the elongation of the extra-radical mycelium increases the exchange surface between soil minerals and plant roots. Thus, areas inaccessible to the plant are explored by the extra-root mycelia to collect water and nutrients and transfer them to the host plant, allowing for improved growth, yield, and quality of plant production [134]. Moreover, Raklami et al. noted that the field inoculation with PGPR- Rhizobia-mycorrhizae improved growth, nutrition, and productivity of bean and wheat plants compared to the uninoculated control and other treatments based on PGP rhizobacteria as well as mycorrhizae. All the treatments were beneficent for Vicia faba L. and Triticum durum L. plants. The best treatment was the inoculation with PGPR- Rhizobia-mycorrhizae. Plant growth under normal or stressful situations could be improved by the use of PGP rhizobacteria and mycorrhizal strains, alone or in combination [118].

Advertisement

Authors’ contributions

RMA, CA, TA: Conceptualization, methodology, writing—original draft; RMA, CA, TA; HS, SAA, ADK and NAA: Writing—Revision; NRAA, AA, OOB, and LB-M: Acquisition of financing; OOB and LB-M: Writing and editing. All authors have read and approved the published version of the manuscript. All authors participated equally in the work and approved the final submission.

Advertisement

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no financial interests or personal relationships that might have appeared to influence the work reported in this article.

References

  1. 1. Schmitt B, Forslund A, Tibi A, Guyomard H, Debaeke P. Comment assurer les disponibilités alimentaires du continent africain en 2050 ? Relecture africaine de l’étude INRAE (Place des agricultures européennes dans le monde) l’horizon 2050 conduite par INRAE à la demande de Pluriagri. France: Rapport de l’étude; 2021. 62 p
  2. 2. Undp A. Africa human development report 2012. In: Towards a Food Secure Future, 267,636. United Nations Development Program (UNDP); 2012
  3. 3. Paillard S. Agrimonde. Agricultures et alimentation du monde en 2050 : scénarios et défis pour un développement durable. 2009
  4. 4. Alalaoui AC. Fertilisation minérale des cultures: les éléments fertilisants majeurs (Azote, Potassium et Phosphore). Bulletin Mensuel d’Information et de Liaison. 2007;155:1-4
  5. 5. Colomb B, Carof M, Aveline A, Bergez JE. Stockless organic farming: Strengths and weaknesses evidenced by a multicriteria sustainability assessment model. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 2013;33(3):593-608
  6. 6. Watson CA, Atkinson D, Gosling P, Jackson L, Rayns FW. Managing soil fertility in organic farming systems. Soil Use & Management. 2002;18:239-247
  7. 7. Morel C, Le Clech B, Linères M, Pellerin S. Gare à la baisse de la biodisponibilité du phosphore. AlterAgri. 2006;79:21-23
  8. 8. Cairney JWG, Sawyer NA, Sharples JM, Meharg AA. Intraspecific variation in nitrogen source utilisation by isolates of the ericoid mycorrhizal fungus Hymenoscyphus ericae (Read) Korf and Kernan. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2000;32(8-9):1319-1322
  9. 9. Hibbett DS, Gilbert LB, Donoghue MJ. Evolutionary instability of ectomycorrhizal symbioses in basidiomycetes. Nature. 2000;407(6803):506-508
  10. 10. Trouvelot S, Bonneau L, Redecker D, Van Tuinen D, Adrian M, Wipf D. Arbuscular mycorrhiza symbiosis in viticulture: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 2015a;35(4):1449-1467
  11. 11. Heckman DS, Geiser DM, Eidell BR, Stauffer RL, Kardos NL, Hedges SB. Molecular evidence for the early colonization of land by fungi and plants. Science. 2001;293(5532):1129-1133. DOI: 101,126/science.1061457
  12. 12. Taxter RA. Revision of Ondogonaceae. Proceedings of the American Academic Arts Science. 1922;57:291-351
  13. 13. Schüßler A, Schwarzott D, Walker C. A new fungal phylum, the Glomeromycota: Phylogeny and evolution. Mycological Research. 2001;105:1413-1421
  14. 14. Sidhoum W. Diversité des mycorhizes arbusculaires chez la variété, Sigoise, d’olivier (Olea europea L.) : étude de leurs efficacités sur la croissance des plants. Université d’Oran Es-Senia; 2011 Mémoire de Magister en Biotechnologie, 182
  15. 15. Sanders IR. Plants and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal diversity: Are we looking at the relevant levels of diversity and are we using the right techniques? New Phytologist. 2004:415-418
  16. 16. Schwarzott D, Walker C, Schüßler A. Glomus, the largest genus of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomales), is nonmonophyletic. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 2001;21(2):190-197
  17. 17. Alguacil MM, Roldán A, Torres MP. Complexity of semi-arid gypsophilous shrub communities mediates the AMF biodiversity at the plant species level. Microbial Ecology. 2009;57(4):718-727
  18. 18. Redecker D, Raab P. Phylogeny of the Glomeromycota (arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi): Recent developments and new gene markers. Mycologia. 2006;98(6):885-895
  19. 19. Hahn A, Bonfante P, Horn K, Pausch F, Hock B. Production of monoclonal antibodies against surface antigens of spores from arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi by an improved immunization and screening procedure. Mycorrhiza. 1993;4(2):69-78
  20. 20. Madan R, Pankhurst C, Hawke B, Smith S. Use of fatty acids for identification of AM fungi and estimation of the biomass of AM spores in soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2002;34(1):125-128
  21. 21. Morton JB, Benny GL. Revised classification of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Zygonycetes): A new order, Glomales, two new busorders, Glomineae and Gigasporineae, with an emendation of Glomaceae. Mycotaxon. 1990;37:471-491
  22. 22. Redecker D, Morton JB, Bruns TD. Ancestral lineages of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomales). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 2000;14(2):276-284
  23. 23. Morton JB, Redecker D. Two new families of Glomales, Archaeosporaceae and Paraglomaceae, with two new genera Archaeospora and Paraglomus, based on concordant molecular and morphological characters. Mycologia. 2001;93(1):181-195
  24. 24. Walker C, Vestberg M, Demircik F, Stockinger H, Saito M, Sawaki H, et al. Molecular phylogeny and new taxa in the Archaeosporales (Glomeromycota): Ambispora fennica gen. sp. nov., Ambisporaceae fam. nov., and emendation of Archaeospora and Archaeosporaceae. Mycological Research. 2007;111(2):137-153
  25. 25. Sieverding E, Oehl F. Revision of Entrophospora and description of Kuklospora and Intraspora, two new genera in the arbuscular mycorrhizal Glomeromycetes. Journal of Applied Botany and Food Quality. 2006;80:69-81
  26. 26. Palenzuela J, Ferrol N, Boller T, Azcon-Aguilar C, Oehl F. Otospora bareai, a new fungal species in the Glomeromycetes from a dolomitic shrub land in sierra de Baza National Park (Granada, Spain). Mycologia. 2008;100:296-305
  27. 27. Krüger M, Stockinger H, Krüger C, Schüßler A. DNA-based species level detection of Glomeromycota: One PCR primer set for all arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytologist. 2009;183(1):212-223
  28. 28. Chouyia FE, Fiorentino N, Rouphael Y, Ventorino V, Fechtali T, Visconti D, et al. Assessing the effect of P-solubilizing bacteria and mycorrhizal fungi on tomato yield and quality under different crop rotations. Scientia Horticulturae. 2022;293(110):740
  29. 29. Idbella M, Bonanomi G, De Filippis F, Amor G, Chouyia FE, Fechtali T, et al. Contrasting effects of Rhizophagus irregularis versus bacterial and fungal seed endophytes on Trifolium repens plant-soil feedback. Mycorrhiza. 2021;31(1):103-115
  30. 30. Rouphael Y, Franken P, Schneider C, Schwarz D, Giovannetti M, Agnolucci M, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi act as biostimulants in horticultural crops. Scientia of Horticulturae. 2015;196:91-108
  31. 31. Gashgari R, Selim S, Abdel-Mawgoud M, Warrad M, Habeeb TH, Saleh AM, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizae induce a global metabolic change and improve the nutritional and health benefits of pennyroyal and parsley. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum. 2020;42(6):1-11
  32. 32. Keymer A, Pimprikar P, Wewer V, Huber C, Brands M, Bucerius SL, et al. Lipid transfer from plants to arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi. eLife. 2017;6:e29107
  33. 33. Parihar M, Rakshit A, Meena VS, et al. The potential of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in C cycling: A review. Archives of Microbiology. 2020;202:1581-1596
  34. 34. Zhu C, Tian G, Luo G, Kong Y, Guo J, Wang M, et al. N-fertilizer-driven association between the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community and diazotrophic community impact wheat yield. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 2018;254:191-201
  35. 35. Hodge A, Campbell CD, Fitter AH. An arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus accelerates decomposition and acquires nitrogen directly from organic material. Nature. 2001;413(6853):297-299
  36. 36. Zhang F, Zou YN, Wu QS, Kuˇca K. Arbuscular mycorrhizas modulate root polyamine metabolism to enhance drought tolerance of trifoliate orange. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2020;171(103):962
  37. 37. Smith SE, Read DJ. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. 3rd ed. Great Britain: Academic Press; 2008. pp. 11-145
  38. 38. Aguégué MR, Nestor RAA, Nadège AA, Pâcome NA, Marcellin A, Nicodeme WC, et al. Greenhouse evaluation of the growth of Zea mays L. inoculated by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi strains in native arbuscules on ferrous soil. Journal of Agricultural and Crop Research. 2020;8:55-63
  39. 39. Dodd JC, Boddington CL, Rodriguez A, Gonzalez-Chavez C, Mansur I. Mycelium of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) from different genera: Form, function and detection. Plant and Soil. 2000;226(2):131-151
  40. 40. Timonen S, Smith FA, Smith SE. Microtubules of mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices in symbiosis with tomato roots. Canadian Journal of Botany. 2001;79:307-313
  41. 41. Indira MN, Tejavathi DH. Growth response of in vitro regenerated Drymaria cordata (L.) Willdex Roem. & Schult. to inoculation with Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi. Current Trends in Biotechnology and Pharmacy. 2021;15(5):452-458
  42. 42. Kapoor R, Sharma D, Bhatnagar AK. Arbuscular mycorrhizae in micropropagation systems and their potential applications. Scientia Horticulturae. 2008;116(3):227-239
  43. 43. Landwehr M, Hildebrandt U, Wilde P, Nawrath K, Tóth T, Biró B, et al. The arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus geosporum in European saline, sodic and gypsum soils. Mycorrhiza. 2002;12(4):199-211
  44. 44. Duponnois R, Hafidi M, Wahbi S, Sanon A, Galiana A, Baudoin E, et al. La symbiose mycorhizienne et la fertilité des sols dans les zones arides: Un outil biologique sous-exploité dans la gestion des terres de la zone sahélo-saharienne. La Grande Muraille Verte: Capitalisation des recherches et valorisation des savoirs locaux, édité par A. Dia et Robin Duponnois, Synthèses. Marseille: IRD; 2012:351-369
  45. 45. Gobat JM, Aragno M, Matthey W. The living soil: Basic pedology-soil biology. The living soil: Basic pedology-soil biology; 2003
  46. 46. Xie Y, Wang F, Wang K, Yue H, Lan X. Responses of bacterial phoD gene abundance and diversity to crop rotation and feedbacks to phosphorus uptake in wheat. Applied Soil Ecology. 2020;154:103604
  47. 47. Battini F, Grønlund M, Agnolucci M, Giovannetti M, Jakobsen I. Facilitation of phosphorus uptake in maize plants by mycorrhizosphere bacteria. Scientific Reports. 2017;7(1):1-11
  48. 48. Balliu A, Sallaku G, Rewald B. AMF inoculation enhances growth and improves the nutrient uptake rates of transplanted, salt-stressed tomato seedlings. Sustainability. 2015;7(12):15967-15981
  49. 49. Campo S, Martín-Cardoso H, Olivé M, Pla E, Catala-Forner M, Martínez-Eixarch M, et al. Effect of root colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on growth, productivity and blast resistance in rice. Rice. 2020;13(1):1-14
  50. 50. Caproni AL, Granha JRDDO, Fornaciari AJ, Nobre CP, Mendonça LP, Berbara RLL. Diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in an Amazon environment after mining. Floresta e Ambiente. 2018;25
  51. 51. Coutinho ES, Barbosa M, Beiroz W, Mescolotti DL, Bonfim JA, Berbara RLL, et al. Soil constraints for arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi spore community in degraded sites of rupestrian grassland: Implications for restoration. European Journal of Soil Biology. 2019;90:51-57
  52. 52. Nekou GN, Sontsa-Donhoung AM, Bahdjolbe M, Tobolbaï R, Nwaga D. Response of the Leek (Allium porrum)-Mycorrhizal fungus Symbiosis to cutting levels, light exposure and seedling density. European Journal of Biology and Biotechnology. 2021;2(3):1-6
  53. 53. Ngakou A, Nwaga D, Ntonifor NN, Tamo M, Nebane CLN, Parh IA. Contribution of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF), rhizobia and Metarhizium anisopliae to cowpea production in Cameroon. International Journal of Agricultural Research. 2007;2(9):754-764
  54. 54. Ogou A, Tchabi A, Tounou AK, Agboka K, Sokame BM. Effet de quatre souches de champignons mychoriziens arbusculaires sur Meloidogyne spp. principal nématode parasitaire du soja (Glycine max, L.) au Togo. Journal of Applied Biosciences. 2018;127:12758-12769
  55. 55. Ngakou A, Takoukam TS, Ngo NL, Tobolbaï R, Maryamou I. Appropriate compost/soil ratios for sustainable production of garlic (Allium sativum L.) under Mycorrhization in pots experiment. Journal of Plant Science. 2020;15(3):64-73
  56. 56. Moussa M, Albert N, Fernand-Nestor FT. Influence de l’interaction mycorhizes-insectes floricoles sur les rendements de Vigna subterranea variété rouge (Fabaceae) à Dang (Ngaoundéré, Cameroun). International Journal of Biological and Chemical Science. 2018;12(4):1897-1913
  57. 57. Hemissi I, Labidi S, Dhifalli F, Hammami R, Hachana A, Hlel D, et al. Effet de la bio inoculation mycorhizienne et rhizobiale sur les composantes de rendement du blé dur (Triticum durum Desf.). In: Annales de l’INRA. Vol. 92. 2019
  58. 58. Tejavathi DH, Anitha P, Murthy SM, Nijagunaiah R. Effect of AM fungal association with normal and micropropagated plants of Andrographis paniculata Nees on biomass, primary and secondary metabolites. International Research Journal of Plant Science. 2011;2(12):338-348
  59. 59. Aguegue RM, Assogba SA, Salami HA, Koda AD, Agbodjato NA, Amogou O, et al. Organic fertilizer based on Rhizophagus intraradices: Valorization in a farming environment for maize in the south, Center and north of Benin. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 2021;5:605-610
  60. 60. Alori ET, Fawole OB, Afolayan AJ, Babalola OO. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi: Occurrence and factors affecting their distribution in selected soils of Southern Guinea Savanna of Nigeria. In: Dermesonlouoglou E, Giannou V, Gogou E, Taoukis P, editors. 29th Effost International Conference. Food Science Research and Innovation. Delivering sustainable solutions to the global economy and society. Food science and process engineering research applications contributing to food security and water conservation EFFOST2015_0755. Athens, Greece; 2015. pp. 2020-2026. Available from: http://www.effost2015.org/proceedings.php
  61. 61. Fasusi O, Amoo A, Babalola OO. Propagation and characterization of viable arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal spores within maize plant (Zea mays L.). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2021;101:5834-5841
  62. 62. Koda AD, Dagbenonbakin G, Assogba F, Agbodjato NA, N’tcha C, Assogba S, et al. Impact of native arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi based fertilizers on to increase maize productivity in North Benin. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 2020;16(9):1298-1306
  63. 63. Sylvestre AA, Nestor AAR, Saliou B, et al. Inoculation of native arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi based bio-fertilizers for improvement of maize productivity in Central Benin. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 2020;16(5):652-660
  64. 64. Igiehon ON, Babalola OO. Rhizobium and mycorrhizal fungal species improved soybean yield under drought stress conditions. Current Microbiology. 2021;78(4):1615-1627
  65. 65. Igiehon OO, Ademola EA, Anthony TI. A review on the consumption of vended fruits: Microbial assessment, risk, and its control. Food Quality and Safety. 2020;4(2):77-81
  66. 66. Clark RÁ, Zeto SK. Mineral acquisition by arbuscular mycorrhizal plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 2000;23(7):867-902
  67. 67. Kavatagi PK, Lakshman HC. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for their symbiotic efficiency on two varieties of Solanum lycopersicum. International Journal of Pharma and Biosciences. 2012;3(3):1007-1017
  68. 68. Alloway BJ. Heavy Metals in the Soil. London: Chapman and Hall; 1995
  69. 69. Gadd GM. Interactions of fungi with toxic metals. In: The Genus Aspergillus. Boston, MA: Springer; 1994. pp. 361-374
  70. 70. Gonzalez-Chavez C, D’haen J, Vangronsveld J, Dodd JC. Copper sorption and accumulation by the extraradical mycelium of different Glomus spp. (arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi) isolated from the same polluted soil. Plant and Soil. 2002;240(2):287-297
  71. 71. Rillig MC, Wright SF, Nichols KA, Schmidt WF, Torn MS. Large contribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to soil carbon pools in tropical forest soils. Plants and Soil. 2001;233:167-177
  72. 72. Schindler FV, Mercer ER, Rice JA. Chemical characteristics of glomalin-related soil protein (GRSP) extracted from soils of varying organic matter content. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2007;39:320-329
  73. 73. Atakan A, Özkaya HO. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Glomalin. Turkish Journal of Agriculture—Food, Science and Technology. 2021;9(12):2371-2375
  74. 74. Lovelock CE, Wright SF, Clark DA, Ruess RW. Soil stocks of glomalin produced by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi across a tropical rain forest land scape. Journal of Ecology. 2004;92:278-287
  75. 75. Wright SF, Upadhyaya A, Buyer JS. Comparison of N-linked oligo saccharides of glomalin from arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and soils by capillary electrophoresis. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 1998;30:1853-1857
  76. 76. Wright SF, Nichols K. Glomalin: Hiding place for a third of the world's stored soil carbon. Agricultural Research. 2002;50(9):4
  77. 77. Wright SF, Anderson RL. Aggregate stability andg lomalin in alternative crop rotations for the central Great Plains. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 2000;31:249-253
  78. 78. Rillig MC. Arbuscular mycorrhizae and terrestrial ecosystem processes. Ecological Letter. 2004;2004:740-754
  79. 79. Singh PK, Singh M, Tripathi BN. Glomalin: An arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal soil protein. Protoplasma. 2013;250:663-669
  80. 80. Wright SF, Upadhyaya A. Extraction of an abundant and unusual protein from soil and comparison with hyphal protein of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Soil Science. 1996;161:575-586
  81. 81. Lehmann A, Rillig MC. Understanding mechanisms of soil biota involvement in soil aggregation: A way forward with saprobic fungi? Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2015;88:298-302
  82. 82. Ortiz N, Armada E, Duque E, Roldan A, Azcon R. Contribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and/or bacteria to enhancing plant drought tolerance under natural soil conditions: Effectiveness of auto chthonous strains. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2015;174:87-96
  83. 83. Paul EA, Clark FE. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1989
  84. 84. Nogueira LR, Silva CF, Pereira MG, Gaia-Gomes JH, Silva EMR. Biological properties and organic matter dynamics of soil in pasture and natural regeneration areas in the Atlantic forest biome. Rev. Bras. Ciˆenc. Solo. 2016;40:1-13
  85. 85. da Silva CF, Pereira MG, Feitosa JCF, Fonseca Júnior AM, Gaia-Gomes JH, Menezes CEG. Soil organic matter fractions, chemical attributes and aggregation under forestry and agricultural systems. Communication Science. 2018;8:459-468
  86. 86. Silva CF, Pereira MG, Santos VL, Miguel DL, Silva EMR. Fungos Micorrízicos Arbusculares : Composição, Comprimento de Micélio Extrarradicular e Glomalina em Áreas de Mata Atlântica, Rio De Janeiro. Ciência Florest. 2016;26:419-433
  87. 87. Gillespie AW, Farrell RE, Walley FL, Ross AR, Leinweber P, Eckhardt KU, et al. Glomalin-related soil protein contains non-mycorrhizal-related heat-stable proteins, lipids and humic materials. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2011;43(4):766-777
  88. 88. Moreira FMS, Siqueira JO. In: Lavras E, editor. Microbiologia e bioquímica do solo. 2. da Ufla. 2006. p. 729
  89. 89. Jia X, Zhao Y, Liu T, Huang S, Chang Y. Elevated CO2 increases glomalin-related soil protein (GRSP) in the rhizosphere of Robinia pseudoacacia L. seedlings in Pb-and Cd-contaminated soils. Environmental Pollution. 2016;218:349-357
  90. 90. Fokom R, Adamou S, Teugwa MC, Boyogueno AB, Nana WL, Ngonkeu MEL, et al. Glomalin related soil protein, carbon, nitrogen and soil aggregate stability as affected by land use variation in the humid forest zone of South Cameroon. Soil and Tillage Research. 2012;120:69-75
  91. 91. Seguel A, Barea JM, Cornejo P, Borie F. Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in phosphorus-uptake efficiency and aluminium tolerance in barley growing in acid soils. Crop and Pasture Science. 2015;66(7):696-705
  92. 92. Priscila SM, da Cristiane F, Marcos GP, Eliane MR, da Ricardo MT, André LCF, et al. Short-term modifications of mycorrhizal fungi, glomalin and soil attributes in a tropical agroforestry. Acta Oecologica. 2022;114(103):815
  93. 93. Driver JD, Holben WE, Rillig MC. Characterization of glomalin as a hyphal wall component of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2005;37(1):101-106
  94. 94. Hajiboland R. Role of arbuscular mycorrhiza in amelioration of salinity. In: Salt Stress in Plants. New York, NY: Springer; 2013. pp. 301-354
  95. 95. Evelin H, Devi TS, Gupta S, Kapoor R. Mitigation of salinity stress in plants by arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis: Current understanding and new challenges. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2019;10:470
  96. 96. Evelin H, Kapoor R, Giri B. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in alleviation of salt stress: A review. Annals of Botany. 2009;104(7):1263-1280
  97. 97. Bencherif K, Dalpé Y, Lounès Hadj-Sahraoui A. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alleviate soil salinity stress in arid and semi-arid areas. In: Microorganisms in Saline Environments: Strategies and Functions. Cham: Springer; 2019. pp. 375-400
  98. 98. Plenchette C. Utilisation des mycorhizes en agriculture et horticulture. In: Strullu DG, Garbaye J, Perrin R, Plenchette C, editors. Les mycorhizes des arbres et des plantes cultivées. Paris: Lavoisier; 1991. pp. 131-196
  99. 99. Hashem A, Alqarawi AA, Radhakrishnan R, Al-Arjani ABF, Aldehaish HA, Egamberdieva D, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi regulate the oxidative system, hormones and ionic equilibrium to trigger salt stress tolerance in Cucumis sativus L. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 2018;25(6):1102-1114
  100. 100. Colla G, Rouphael Y, Cardarelli M, Tullio M, Rivera CM, Rea E. Alleviation of salt stress by arbuscular mycorrhizal in zucchini plants grown at low and high phosphorus concentration. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 2008;44(3):501-509
  101. 101. Ait-El-Mokhtar M, Baslam M, Ben-Laouane R, Anli M, Boutasknit A, Mitsui T, et al. Alleviation of detrimental effects of salt stress on date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) by the application of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and/or compost. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 2020;4:131
  102. 102. Abdel Motaleb NA, Abd Elhady SA, Ghoname AA. AMF and Bacillus Megatherium neutralize the harmful effects of salt stress on bean plants. Gesunde Pflanzen. 2020;72(1):29-39
  103. 103. Evelin H, Giri B, Kapoor R. Ultrastructural evidence for AMF mediated salt stress mitigation in Trigonella foenum-graecum. Mycorrhiza. 2013;23(1):71-86
  104. 104. Saint-Étienne L, Paul S, Imbert D, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal soil infectivity in a stand of the wetland tree Pterocarpus officinalis along a salinity gradient. Forest Ecology and Management. 2006;232:86-89
  105. 105. Al-Garni SMS. Increasing NaCl-salt tolerance of a halophytic plant Phragmites australis by mycorrhizal symbiosis. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Science. 2006;1(2):119-126
  106. 106. Sheng M, Tang M, Chan H, Yang B, Zhang F, Huang Y. Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizae on photosynthesis and water status of maize plants under salt stress. Mycorrhiza. 2008;18:287-296
  107. 107. Juniper S, Abbott LK. Soil salinity delays germination and limits growth of hyphae from propagules of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Mycorrhiza. 2006;16(5):371-379
  108. 108. Barea JM, Pozo MJ, Azcon R, Azcon-Aguilar C. Microbial co-operation in the rhizosphere. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2005;56(417):1761-1778
  109. 109. Adesemoye AO, Torbert HA, Kloepper JW. Enhanced plant nutrients use efficiency with PGPR and AMF in an integrated nutrient management system. Canadian Journal of Microbiology. 2008;54(10):876-886
  110. 110. Requena N, Jimenez I, Toro M, Barea JM. Interactions between plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Rhizobium spp. in the rhizosphere of Anthyllis cytisoides, a model legume for re vegetation in mediterranean semi-arid ecosystems. New Phytologist. 1997;136:667-677
  111. 111. Walley FL, Germida JJ. Response of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) to interactions between Pseudomonas species and Glomus clarum NT4. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 1997;24:365-371
  112. 112. Barea JM, Azcón R, Azcón-Aguilar C. Mycorrhizosphere interactions to improve plant fitness and soil quality. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2002;81(1):343-351
  113. 113. Hodge A. Microbial ecology of the arbuscular mycorrhizal. Microbiology and Ecology. 2000;32:91-96
  114. 114. Dwivedi D, Johri BN, Ineichen K, Wray V, Wiemken A. Impact of antifungals producing rhizobacteria on the performance of Vigna radiata in the presence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Mycorrhiza. 2009;19(8):559-570
  115. 115. Purin S, Rillig MC. The arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal protein glomalin: Limitations, progress, and a new hypothesis for its function. Pedobiologia. 2007;51:123-130
  116. 116. Ole, P., Pierdomenico, P., Laurentius, A.C.J., Voesenek, (2017). Flooding and low oxygen responses in plants. Functional Plant Biology, 44, 3-6.
  117. 117. Sehgal A, Sita K, Bhandari K, Kumar S, Kumar J, Prasad PVV, et al. Influence of drought and heat stress, applied independently or in combination during seed development, on qualitative and quantitative aspects of seeds of lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus) genotypes, differing in drought sensitivity. Plant Cell and Environment. 2018;42:198-211
  118. 118. Khan A, Ding Z, Ishaq M, Khan I, Ahmed AA, Khan AQ , et al. Applications of beneficial plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and mycorrhizae in rhizosphere and plant growth: A review. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering. 2020;13(5):199-208
  119. 119. Igiehon NO, Babalola OO. Biofertilizers and sustainable agriculture: Exploring arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2017;101:4871-4881
  120. 120. Igiehon NO, Babalola OO. Below-ground-above-ground plant-microbial interactions: Focusing on soybean, rhizobacteria, and Mycorrhizal fungi. The Open Microbiology Journal. 2018;12:261-279
  121. 121. Nadeem SM, Ahmad M, Zahir ZA, Javaid A, Ashraf M. The role of mycorrhizae and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) in improving crop productivity under stressful environments. Biotechnology Advances. 2014;32:429-448
  122. 122. Richardson AE, Barea J-M, McNeill AM, Prigent-Combaret C. Acquisition of phosphorus and nitrogen in the rhizosphere and plant growth promotion by microorganisms. Plant and Soil. 2009;321:305-339
  123. 123. Gadhave KR, Devlin PF, Ebertz A, Ross A, Gange AC. Soil inoculation with Bacillus spp. modifies root endophytic bacterial diversity, evenness, and community composition in a context-specific manner. Microbial Ecology. 2018;76(3):741-750
  124. 124. Gadhave KR, Hourston JE, Gange AC. Developing soil microbial inoculants for pest management: Can one have too much of a good thing? Journal of Chemical Ecology. 2016;42(4):348-356
  125. 125. Watts-Wlliams SJ, Cavagnaro TR, Tyerman SD. Variable effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal inoculation on physiological and molecular measures of root and stomatal conductance of diverse Medicago truncatula accessions. Plant Cell and Environment. 2018;42:285-294
  126. 126. Pivato B, Offre P, Marchelli S, Barbonaglia B, Mougel C, Lemanceau P, et al. Bacterial effects on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and mycorrhiza development as influenced by the bacteria, fungi, and host plant. Mycorrhiza. 2009;19:81-90
  127. 127. Barea JM, Jeffries P. Arbuscular mycorrhizas in sustainable soil-plant systems. Mycorrhiza. 1995:521-560
  128. 128. Bianciotto V, Andreotti S, Balestrini R, Bonfante P, Perotto S. Extracellular polysaccharides are involved in the attachment of Azospirillum brasilense and Rhizobium leguminosarum to arbuscular mycorrhizal structures. European Journal of Histochemistry. 2001;45(1):39-50
  129. 129. Artursson V, Finlay RD, Jansson JK. Interactions between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and bacteria and their potential for stimulating plant growth. Environmental Microbiology. 2006;8:1-10
  130. 130. Jeffries P, Gianinazzi S, Perotto S, Turnau K, Barea JM. The contribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in sustainable maintenance of plant health and soil fertility. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 2003;37(1):1-16
  131. 131. Linderman RG. Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae and soil microbial interactions. Mycorrhizae in Sustainable Agriculture. 1992;54:45-70
  132. 132. Agbodjato NA, Assogba SA, Babalola OO, Koda AD, Aguegue RM, Sina H, et al. Formulation of biostimulants based on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for maize growth and yield (research topic: Soil-plant-microbe interactions: An innovative approach towards improving soil health and plant growth). Frontiers in Agronomy. 2022;4:894489
  133. 133. Aguégué MR, Ahoyo Adjovi NR, Agbodjato NA, Noumavo PA, Assogba S, Salami H, et al. Efficacy of native strains of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on maize productivity on ferralitic soil in benin. Agricultural Research. 2021;2021:1-15
  134. 134. Barea JM, Azcón R, Azcón-Aguilar C. Mycorrhizosphere interactions to improve a sustainable production of legumes. In: Microbes for Legume Improvement. Cham: Springer; 2017. pp. 199-225
  135. 135. Baslam M, Qaddoury A, Goicoechea N. Role of native and exotic mycorrhizal symbiosis to develop morphological, physiological and biochemical responses coping with water drought of date palm, Phoenix dactylifera. Trees. 2014;28(1):161-172

Written By

Ricardos M. Aguégué, Corentin Akpode, Tomabu Adjobimey, Haziz Sina, Sylvestre A. Assogba, Abdel D. Koda, Nadège A. Agbodjato, Nestor R. Ahoyo Adjovi, Adolphe Adjanohoun, Olubukola O. Babalola and Lamine Baba-Moussa

Submitted: 16 December 2022 Reviewed: 19 January 2023 Published: 15 February 2023