Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Non-Coding RNA and Its Prospective Utilization in Plant Breeding

Written By

Debadatta Panda, Latha Ananda Lekshmi, Rachel Lissy Vargheese, Nallathambi Premalatha, Mahadevan Kumar and Lakshmanan Mahalingam

Submitted: 16 June 2022 Reviewed: 08 July 2022 Published: 08 November 2023

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.106429

From the Edited Volume

Case Studies of Breeding Strategies in Major Plant Species

Edited by Haiping Wang

Chapter metrics overview

83 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Non-coding RNA molecules are generally present in a dispersed manner throughout the genome. They may behave as long ncRNAs or convert into small RNAs of around 20–24 nts that are universally categorized using their size, function, or chromosomal position. ncRNAs are thought to play a vital role in regulating and modulating gene expression apart from their prospective role in several epigenetic mechanisms controlling specificity in biochemical pathways and phenotype development in clonal cells. They are also part of the natural defense system against viruses. ncRNA modulates genes by transcriptional and translational control of growth, development, and stress response alongside other RNA molecules. Some modes of action have unraveled in recent years. A lot more needs to be pondered upon for comprehending their involvement in the extremely intricate processes in a more wholesome manner. In this chapter, we will discuss the different ncRNA, their origin, classification, and their role in various physiological processes. Practical examples of the discovery of ncRNA in different crops and their functions have also been elucidated with the required details. The yield and quality enhancement, along with the better stress response being the aim of the crop improvement program, the prospective utilities of ncRNA are also explained in the subsequent part of the chapter.

Keywords

  • ncRNA
  • Epigentics
  • gene regulation
  • stress response
  • plant breeding

1. Introduction

RNA is the ribonucleic acid, one of the earliest formed molecules to shape life on earth. Being single-stranded, these are known to have a shorter life span and integrity compared to DNA. But, from other angles, these properties make RNA a magical molecule with a unique ability to work inside and outside the nucleus, leading to diverse sorts of roles in structural to regulatory aspects. In the case of the prokaryotes, most of the transcribed RNA is translated because of the smaller size of the genome and the variety and load of work endowed on it for the organism’s survivability. But, in the case of the eukaryotes, as the genome size gets bigger, the actual coding part of the chromosomes becomes sparse and rather scattered, mostly. Secondly, the coding genes occupy only 1–2% of the genome. A very high percentage of eukaryotic genomes around up to 90% undergo transcription to produce RNA, nevertheless only a little portion of transcripts get actually translated into proteins [1].

Out of the total RNAs, non-coding RNA (ncRNA) pertains to active and functional RNA molecules that are not translated into proteins, although being transcribed from DNA. They encompass a wide range of RNA molecules having the potential to play in the regulation of gene expression [1]. They can act as long ncRNAs or be converted into s very smaller size RNA molecule proteins in eukaryotic cells. Mostly ncRNA is categorized worldwide based on its size, function, or genetic origin [1].

Based on the size of the molecule, their origin, functionality, and ncRNA are sorted into either the long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) having nucleotide lengths of more than 200 nucleotides or the small RNAs (sRNAs), which are comparatively quite smaller in size. Again the sRNAs are further classified into different types of RNA, such as miRNA, siRNA, piRNA, which will be disused further in detail with the various aspects of their origin, features, functions, and other aspects in the later section of the chapter.

ncRNAs are responsible for a wide range of biological functions. They control gene expression at the transcriptional, RNA processing, and translational levels by the particular structural aspects of RNA itself. Recent discoveries also show their role in various epigenetic phenomena affecting multiple physiological pathways and expression of particular phenotypes in a different situation. The fraction of the coding region of the protein genome varies considerably and is oppositely proportionate to the genome’s size and complexity [2]. Many regulatory ncRNAs do have relatively high specificity of the target, whereas others serve as a major modulator of extensive regulatory signaling networks by acting across the genome [3]. They keep alien nucleic acids out of genomes and safeguard the genome against them. Non-coding RNAs target a single gene and pathways involving multiple genes at the genome level through distinct molecular mechanisms. Hence, these regulatory ncRNAs could be potential breeding targets for advanced breeding programs in plants [4]. They can regulate the synthesis of DNA and also take part in the reorganization of the genome. The biological activity of ribozymes and riboswitches is served by several ncRNAs that use the power of base pairing to interact with other nucleic acids preferentially [5].

Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), which act as a natural defense mechanism against—attacking viruses, have also been found as effectors in RNA-mediated gene silencing and hence now utilized in crop genetic modification [6]. The role of ncRNA has been observed in RNA interference and other regulatory mechanisms in plants; these provide a huge scope for the use of advanced molecular biology tools on these for enhancing the production potential of plants and modulation of growth and development of a plant to a certain extent. These have also been reported to influence the genes and biochemical pathways involving important traits like floral growth, maturation of seed, various biotic and abiotic stresses, along with pest and disease resistance processes. The ncRNA and their detailed structural to functional aspects are narrated meticulously in the upcoming sections of the chapter.

Advertisement

2. History of non-coding RNA

The beginning of the era of RNA dates back to the discovery of nucleic acids by Friedrich Miescher in the late 1860s. Later on, rigorous research was carried out about its structure, mode of action, and expression. Soon it became clear that majorly three kinds of RNA were involved in the protein production process, translation where mRNA was the carrier of genetic information ultimately translated into protein, and the process is assisted by tRNA and rRNA. Secondly, with the advent of newer technologies in molecular biology, several new RNA molecules appeared in the picture, out of which some had some role in the regulatory pathways or physiological pathways, for some other function is still unknown. Since, among all these only, mRNA codes for the protein, all other RNAs are termed non-coding RNA.

The first non-coding RNA to be discovered was the tRNA and its role in transferring amino acids was first observed by Paul C Zamecnik and Mahlon Hoagland in a cell-free system when RNA molecules were radioactively labeled [7]. Furthermore, it was the first non-coding RNA to be sequenced [8]. Later, in the early twenty-first century, many types of non-coding RNA, such as siRNA, miRNA, and piRNA, were discovered namely which had a role in gene regulation. During post-transcriptional gene silencing, a 25-nucleotide antisense RNA complementary to the target RNA was detected. This short interfering RNA, in virus-induced gene silencing, suppresses the production of viral proteins on binding with the target viral mRNA. This is a type of defense mechanism based on RNA against RNA and DNA viruses [9].

Caenorhabditis elegans is a completely sequenced nematode used as a model organism for many research programs. Out of its four larval stages, L1, L2, L3, and L4, it was found that the gene lin-4, the first miRNA discovered, was crucial for the transition of the larva from L1 to L2 [10].

H19 and Enod40 were the first eukaryotic lncRNA to be discovered [11]. The first plant lncRNA was discovered by Crespi in 1994. Long non-coding RNAs were first described during the whole genome sequencing and several types of lncRNA, such as Xist, Airn, MALATI, HOTAIR were discovered [12]. Table 1 summarizes the different discovery events of the ncRNAs.

S. No.Type of ncRNAYear of discoveryScientists discoveredRemark
1.tRNABefore the 1960sPaul C Zamecnik and Mahlon HoaglandAn adaptor molecule that mediates translation
2.rRNABefore 1965Ribosomal RNA
3.snRNA1966Small nuclear RNA
4.snoRNA1968Small nucleolar RNA—U3 species—first snoRNA discovered
5.siRNA1999Hamilton and BaulcombeSmall interfering RNA
phasiRNAChen et al. [13]
tasiRNA2004Trans-acting siRNA
easiRNASlotkin et al. [14]Epigenetically-acting siRNA
natsiRNA
6.miRNA1993Lee et al. [10]Micro RNA
7.piRNA2006Aravin et al. [15]PIWI: P-element Induced WImpy testis in Drosophila
8.lncRNAPachnis et al. [11]H19, XIST, and HOTAIR

Table 1.

List of ncRNA and their brief history.

Advertisement

3. Classification of non-coding RNAs

The major category of grouping non-coding RNAs is based on their origin, nature of biogenesis, as well as based on its mechanism of action. The non-coding RNA transcripts can either perform housekeeping or regulatory functions. Those non-coding RNAs dynamically involved in cellular and ribosomal functions include tRNAs, snRNAs, rRNAs, and snoRNAs, whereas the regulatory ncRNAs are actively involved in most of the plant growth and development processes dealing with biotic and abiotic stress responses and plant immunity [16]. These regulatory ncRNAs, such as miRNAs, piRNAs, siRNAs, and lncRNAs, are transcribed from DNA and are primarily involved in transcriptional and post-transcriptional gene regulations [17]. The basic classification of ncRNA is presented in Tables 2 and 3 described the brief details about the ncRNA. These regulatory ncRNAs cannot generally transcribe into proteins whereas housekeeping ncRNAs assist in protein translation [18].

Table 2.

Classification of ncRNA.

ncRNARemark
HousekeepingtRNAActively involved in decoding genetic information from mRNA at the site of ribosome subunits during protein translation.
rRNAIt is essentially a component of the ribosome, constituting small and large subunits of the ribosome. This ribozyme is RNA transcribed from ribosomal DNA (rDNA).
snRNASmall nuclear RNA (snRNA) is involved in the processing of pre-messenger RNA (hnRNA) in the nucleus, which is transcribed by either RNA polymerase II or RNA polymerase III, and the average length of snRNA is approximately 150 nucleotides.
snoRNASmall nucleolar RNAs have a role in tuning ribosomal and spliceosomal function by guiding ribose methylation and pseudouridylation at targeted nucleotide residues of ribosomal and small nuclear RNAs.
RegulatorymiRNAmicroRNAs regulate gene expression post-transcriptionally. They generally bind to the 3’-UTR (untranslated region) of their target mRNAs and repress protein production by destabilizing the mRNA and translational silencing.
siRNASmall interfering RNA is sometimes known as short interfering RNA or silencing RNA is a class of double-stranded RNA, typically 20–s24 (normally 21) base pairs in length, and operating within the RNA interference (RNAi) pathway.
i. hasiRNATrans-acting siRNAs are known to target complementary mRNAs for degradation and to function in development.
ii.tasiRNATrans-acting siRNA, represses gene expression through post-transcriptional gene silencing in land plants.
iii.easiRNAEpigenetically activated small interfering RNAs (easiRNAs) from reactivated transposable elements triggered by miRNA.
iii.natsiRNANatural antisense short interfering RNA. They are endogenous RNA regulators, which are between 21 and 24 nucleotides in length, and are generated from complementary mRNA transcripts, which are further processed into siRNA.
piRNApiwi-interacting RNA (piRNA) is the largest, expressed in animal cells. Mostly involved in the epigenetic and post-transcriptional silencing of transposable elements and other spurious or repeat-derived transcripts, but can also be involved in the regulation of other genetic elements in germ line cells.
lncRNALong non-coding (lnc) RNAs are longer than 200 nt, which primarily interact with mRNA, DNA, protein, and miRNA and consequently regulate gene expression at the epigenetic, transcriptional, post-transcriptional, translational, and post-translational levels in a variety of ways.
i. LinearMaintaining nuclear structure integrity and positively or negatively regulating genes in cis or trans by recruiting transcription factors or chromatin-modifying complexes to DNA targets in the nucleus.
ii.CircularFunction as a sponge to recruit miRNAs or transcriptional effectors to regulate target gene expression.

Table 3.

Brief details about the ncRNA classification.

Advertisement

4. Biogenesis of non-coding RNA

Basically, ncRNAs are consequence of various processes, such as the process of duplication, modification of transposons during the evolutionary process, pseudogenization of actual coding sequences, doubling of RNA viruses, part of some hairpin structures, double-stranded RNAs from heterochromatin regions and DNA repeats [19]. Despite having a similar structural build, the sRNA varies greatly in their method of biogenesis.

4.1 miRNA

MicroRNAs are generated out of primary microRNAs (pri-miRNAs) by the action of RNA polymerase II. These precursor molecules have a double-stranded secondary structure which later on gets cleaved by DICER-LIKE 1 (DCL1) molecules to form single-stranded siRNA. These raw miRNAs is further processed in the nucleus before being exported to the cytoplasm [1]. Mature single miRNA that incorporates the RISC complex binds with other complementary mRNA sequences [20].

4.2 IsomiRNAs

IsomiRNAs (IsomiRNAs) are one of the variants of miRNAs that arise because of the inaccurate cleavage action performed through the RNase III enzyme. These may also be developed via the process of post-transcriptional RNA editing [21, 22].

4.3 siRNA

siRNAs are derived from long dsRNAs produced during varied mechanisms, such as folding in an inverted sequence, from a long non-coding RNA, hybridization of two fully or partially complementary sequences . This further gets processed by the action of DCL2, DCL3, and DCL 4 proteins, leading to the formation of 22 nt, 24 nt, and 21 nt siRNA, respectively [3]. RNA-dependent RNA polymerases 2 and 6 (RDR2, RDR6), and DNA-dependent RNA polymerases IV and V in plants also take part in the production of siRNAs [23].

4.4 phasiRNA and tasiRNA

In plants, phasiRNAs are the partially degraded product of mRNA as being passed through the RISC complex. DCL proteins are involved in this slicing process of dsRNAs to form a group of 21- or 24-nt siRNAs, termed phasiRNAs, Trans-acting siRNAs (tasiRNAs) are a class of DCL4-dependent 21-nt phasiRNAs generated from non-coding TAS transcripts [24, 25].

4.5 lncRNA

lncRNAs have appeared from intergenic, particularly regions giving rise to long intergenic ncRNAs (lincRNAs) and those developed from intronic regions giving intronic ncRNAs (incRNAs) [26]. lincRNAs and IncRNAs belong to conventional linear lncRNAs. Circular RNAs (circRNAs) generally develop from coding regions or intronic regions.

4.5.1 Linear-long non-coding RNAs

The lncRNAs, such as lincRNAs and IncRNAs are linear lncRNAs transcribed by Pol II. Because of having similar features as that of mRNA with a 5_ m7G cap and a 3_ poly (A) tail, they undergo similar modifications later on called mRNA mimics [27].

4.5.2 Circular long non-coding RNAs

Mostly these are circRNAs derived from back-splicing reactions of internal exons in pre-mRNAs and further move to the cytoplasm. Some other circRNA localized in the nucleus is produced from excised intron lariats that fail to be debranched [27].

Advertisement

5. Characteristic features of non-coding RNA

Non-coding RNAs are RNA molecules that are transcribed from DNA but cannot code for a protein. With the advances in transcriptomics and sequencing techniques, thousands of small and long non-coding RNAs were identified. They generally play a major role in gene regulation at the transcriptional or post-transcription level and some regulatory ncRNAs possess high target specificity and some ncRNAs are involved in epigenetic mechanisms too. A few major ones are discussed below.

5.1 tRNA (transfer RNA)

Next to mRNA which is the coding RNA, tRNA, and rRNA are considered more prominent. tRNA typically contains less than 100 nucleotides and, as their name indicates, their job is to carry an amino acid to the protein-synthesizing machinery. tRNA usually takes a clover leaf secondary structure, which forms a 3D L- shaped structure by stacking the helices. The structure of tRNA was found to be almost similar among different tRNA species. The secondary structure includes the acceptor arm, anticodon arm, T-arm and D-arm, and a variable arm. It was found that the size of the acceptor arm, anticodon arm, and T-arm were conserved whereas the D-arm and variable arm differ in their sizes [28]. This difference in the sizes of the variable arm led to the grouping of tRNAs into two classes. The major proportion of tRNA belongs to class I with less than 10 nucleotides in the variable loop; the class II tRNAs included tRNASer, tRNALeu, and tRNATyr with more than 10 nucleotides [8].

5.2 rRNA (ribosomal RNA)

It is one of the longest and most stable RNA molecules which form a major constituent of protein-synthesizing organelle comprising nearly 60% of ribosome’s mass. Ribosomes of both prokaryotes and eukaryotes are made of smaller and larger subunits and they form a complex during translation. The smaller subunit of prokaryotes constitutes an RNA molecule with a Svedberg coefficient of 16S and its sedimentation rate is 30S after combining with other proteins. The larger subunit has two RNA molecules (5S and 23S) and they form a 50S subunit by binding with other proteins. On the contrary, the eukaryotic ribosome consists of 60S and 40S subunits with the larger subunit containing two long RNA molecules (18S and 28S) and the smaller subunit containing two short RNAs molecules (5S and 5.8S). A unique rRNA component, such as an undescribed helical structure, was found in the small subunit near the mRNA exit channel of 80S ribosome of Trypanosoma cruzi, a protozoan that causes Chagas disease. This structure was most likely involved in the binding of the ribosome to the 5’end of the mRNA facilitating translation [29].

5.3 snRNA (small nuclear RNA)

One of the most important post-transcriptional modifications is the splicing of pre-mRNA which is carried out by an RNA-protein complex known as spliceosome. Small nuclear RNAs form a part of this spliceosome and catalyze splicing [30]. On account of their sub-nuclear localization, snRNAs are grouped into spliceosomal uridylate snRNA, which is the most conserved among eukaryotes, small nucleolar RNA (snoRNA), and small Cajal-body-specific RNA (scaRNA) [31]. UsnRNA comprises U1–U6 being the most abundant and U7–U14 being the low abundant ones. The five major types U1, U2, U4, U5, and U6 are involved in the splicing of mRNA, whereas U3, U8, U13, and U14 are involved in the processing of mRNA [32]. Small nuclear ribonucleoprotein complexes (snRNPs) are formed by the association of each snRNA with one or more proteins.

5.4 snoRNA (small nucleolar RNA)

snoRNAs are functional non-coding RNAs with a length of 60–300 nucleotides, which are usually found near nucleoli and are prevalent in all eukaryotic organisms. Like snRNPs, they also form snoRNPs in association with a set of proteins [33]. snoRNA are majorly categorized into C/D box, snoRNAs which contain two conserved sequences box C (RUGAUGA and box D (CUGA) and direct 2′-O-ribose methylation, whereas H(ANANNA)/ACA box snoRNAs directs pseudouridylation. This classification is based on conserved sequence motifs [34]. The binding of fibrillarin, Nop56p, Nop58p, and 15.5 kDa/Snu13p snoRNP proteins are directed by the box C/D motif and form a kink turn, which is the most prevalent motif found in various RNAs. Proteins like dyskerin/Cbf5p, Gar1p, Nhp2p, and Nop10p are associated with the box H/ACA snoRNAs [35].

5.5 Other small non-coding RNA

Many types of small non-coding RNA have emerged in the last decade, but it is mainly classified into si (short interfering RNA), miRNA (microRNA), and piRNA (piwi-interacting RNAs). These are small non-coding RNAs with a length of about 20–30 nucleotides and form a protein complex with the Argonaute protein family and are present only in eukaryotes [36, 37].

5.5.1 miRNA and siRNA

Both miRNA and siRNA are initially part of a double-stranded RNA molecule with a guided strand and passenger strand. Their size is around 20–24 nucleotides only. A unique feature of siRNA is the occurrence of di-nucleotide overhang at the 3’OH. Phased siRNAs, trans-acting siRNAs, epigenetically activated siRNAs, and natsiRNAs are some of the types of siRNAs that play a role in regulating gene expression. A similar type of small non-coding RNA is the miRNA which is a small single-stranded RNA transcribed from DNA sequences into primary miRNA and processed into precursor miRNAs and finally becomes a mature miRNA [38]. Both siRNA and miRNA are almost similar in their biogenesis where an enzyme of the RNAse III family cleaves dsRNA into siRNA and miRNA. Respective RNA-induced silencing complexes are formed with the association of siRNA and miRNA termed siRSC and miRSC and are involved in gene regulation [39].

5.5.2 piRNA

piRNAs are also single-stranded with a length of 23–36 nucleotides and are more prevalent in animals. They bind to PIWI proteins that belong to the Argonaute protein family. The binding to PIWI and the independence from Dicer distinguished piRNA from siRNA and miRNA. piRNA is grouped into transposon-derived piRNA, miRNA-derived piRNA, lnc-derived piRNA, and Caenorhabditis-specific piRNA [40].

5.6 lncRNA (long non-coding RNA)

As previously said, non-coding RNA is of two types, small and long. lncRNA due to its length of more than 200 nucleotides develops complicated secondary and tertiary structures. They are prevalent either in the nucleus or in the cytoplasm of the cell. To sustain their function, structural conservation is more common than nucleotide sequence conservation. Furthermore, when compared to other non-coding RNAs the conservation is found to be less and low prevalence adds to the challenge of identifying and understanding the mode of action. Long non-coding RNA contains linear and circular lncRNA. They are synthesized from pre-mRNA by alternate splicing, which consists of a 5′ cap and 3′ tail. In circular ncRNA, the 5’end and 3′ end are linked forming a circle-like structure [41]. It was found that the level of expression varies between different types of lncRNA, some are organ and tissue-specific and the rest are expressed after encountering different external or internal stresses [42, 43].

Advertisement

6. Role of ncRNA in different physiological pathways in plants

Recent development in molecular biology tools has led to advanced research in the area of ncRNA, which in turn gave rise to newer insights about the various roles of ncRNA in plants. The finding and reports about these roles are summarized in Table 4.

Type of ncRNARoleExampleAuthor
miRNAThe mutation of DCL1 in different plants leads to lethal embryos or to pleiotropic developmental effects, which are attributed mainly to the significant decrease in the miRNAs levels.of ArabidopsisLiu et al. [44]; Nodine and Bartel, [45]
The transition of vegetative phase by regulating SPL genes in several angiosperm species.Rice, maize, barley, soybean
Regulate the epigenomic machinery by regulating the expression of genes involved in the rearrangement of chromatin.Choi et al. [46]
Monocot-specific miR444 controls tillering.RiceGuo et al. [47]
Monocot-specific miRNA is induced by nitrogen luxury conditions and regulates lodging resistance by targeting the lignin biosynthesis genes ZmLACCASE 3 (ZmLAC3) and ZmLAC5.Maize
miRNA represses auxin-responsive factors, promoting the development of lateral root growth and development.RiceMarin et al. [48]
Overexpression results in developmental defects characterized by dwarf-ism, serrated leaves, and early flowering.Arabidopsis RiceWu et al. [49]
siRNAInvolved in PTGSXie and Yu [50]
DNA methylationNuthiattu et al. [51]
natsiRNAPathogen resistanceKatiyar-Agarwal et al. [52]
Salt toleranceBorsani et al. [53]
Cell wall biosynthesisHeld et al. [54]
Alter gene expression under environmental stress conditions.Zhang et al. [55]
easiRNAHeritable transcriptional gene silencing
lncRNAResponse to environmental stimuli and stressWang et al. [56]
Involved in protein and miRNAs hijackAriel et al. [57]
Modulation of mRNA
stability and translation
Modification of chromatin at diverse levels
Stress-responsiveness is induced by the infection with powdery mildew and by heat.WheatXin et al. [58]
Tissue- or stress-specific expressionFoxtail millet
Black cottonwood Chinese white
poplar
Soybean
Peach
Brassica rapa,
Qi et al. [59]
Wang et al. [60]
Yu et al. [61]
Shuai et al. [62]
Ye et al. [63]
Chen et al. [64]
Photoperiod-sensitive male sterility (PSMS)RiceDing et al. [65]

Table 4.

Different ncRNA and their role in different processes in plant.

6.1 ncRNAs determining plant yield and nutrition

The role of ncRNAs in various physiological traits and growth parameters is well studied, moreover also have an indirect influence on yield through these traits viz., tillering modulation and panicle branching related genes in rice through SPL transcription factors controlling, such as OsTB1 [66] and DEP1 [67] (regulatory non-coding article). Zhang et al. [68] reported overexpression of miR397 resulted in increased panicle branching with desired grain size suppressing the LACCASE gene. Apart from miRNA, several lncRNAs controlling photoperiod sensitive male sterility LDMAR (for long-day specific male-fertility-associated RNA) in rice are responsible for panicle development, floral organ development, sexual reproduction, and also control the premature programmed cell death of developing anthers.

It is interesting to understand the role of ncRNA that was earlier considered junk having a role in nutrient use efficiency as well as nutrient absorption efficiency. Both miRNAs and lncRNAs are well involved in phosphate metabolism and homeostasis. miR399 suppresses phosphate homeostasis genes PHO2 leading to increased uptake of phosphorous [69]. Similarly, lncRNAs in rice control the expression of the OsPHO1 gene family during phosphate-deprived conditions [70]. Thus, modulating nutrient-related traits thereby contributes toward good yield performance. Not only phosphorus but these ncRNAs are also reported to be involved in root nodulation thereby on nitrogen metabolic pathway [71].

6.2 ncRNAs in plant growth and development

Apart from their major role in stress response, these ncRNAs, such as miRNAs, are actively involved in the regulation of the transition of the vegetative phase by regulating SPL genes in several angiosperm species. For example, the vital role of miR172 in flowering control has been studied in rice, maize, barley, and soybean. In rice, the monocot-specific miR444 controls tillering [47] and participates in antiviral defense. miR528, a monocot-specific miRNA, is induced by nitrogen luxury conditions in maize and regulates lodging resistance by targeting the lignin biosynthesis genes ZmLACCASE 3 (ZmLAC3) and ZmLAC5 [72]. si RNAs, on the other hand, are involved in transcriptional gene silencing regulated by RNA-directed DNA methylation and also have a vital role in genome stability. siRNAs are also reported to monitor, genome compatibility and dosage during reproduction and hybridization [73].

Advertisement

7. Function of ncRNA concerning prospective areas of utilization of ncRNA in plant breeding

A major portion of eukaryotic transcriptomes comprised of ncRNAs, which were considered “junk” till the recent past, actually carry out significant roles in almost all the biological processes via regulation of gene expression at transcriptional and post-translational stages. Thus, these diverse ncRNA plays a vital role in plant development and environmental responses, which can be well employed in applied plant breeding and crop improvement. In drosophila, 30 UTR of mRNA is required for oogenesis [74]. Many studies also report the significant role of 30 UTR mRNAs in transmitting information required for cell proliferation as well as cell differentiation during cancers [75].

7.1 Abiotic and biotic stress response

These ncRNAs have considerable responsibility for plant stress response as well as plant immunity that can be better utilized in plant breeding for crop improvements. Jha et al. [76] have highlighted the differential expressions of ncRNAs in plants when they are ubjected to unfavorable conditions. Zhang et al. [68] identified that 17 microRNA were downregulated and 16 upregulated when subjected to drought stress at the seedling stage. A similar study was carried out on maize screened for drought conditions by Liu et al. [77]. When drought condition was induced, eight and seven miRNAs were enhanced in leaves and roots, respectively, whereas 13 and seven miRNAs were found to be suppressed in leaves and roots, respectively. In addition, a single miRNA can be upregulated and downregulated to express the same stress reaction. For example, in maize miR156, miR164, and miR171 undergo varying expressions when subjected to drought conditions. Similarly, differential expression was exhibited by miR156, and miR171 in rice was also reported [78, 79]. Table 5 depicts the use of various miRNA in stress responses.

ApplicationCropGeneReferences
Viral diseasesPotatoHC-Pro (Potato virus-Y)Waterhouse et al. [80]
Silencing of viral coat proteinMissiou et al. [81]
medicinally important papayaSilencing of viral coat proteinKertbundit et al. [82]
Black gramHairpin construct of the non-coding intergenic region of mungbean yellow mosaic India virusPooggin et al. [83]
TobaccoTobacco mosaic virus asRNA CPPowell et al. [84]
PepperPMMoV RNAi PMMoV replicaseDalakouras et al. [85]
CassavasiRNAs designed to the replicase (Rep)-coding sequence of African cassava mosaic virusVanitharani et al. [86]
Cassava brown streak disease (CBSD)Patil et al. [87]
Bacterial diseasesArabidopsis thalianaCrown gall disease management strategy that targets the process of tumorigenesis (gall formation) by initiating RNAi of the iaaM and ipt oncogenesDunoyer et al. [88]
RiceLeaf blight RNAi OsSSI2Younis et al. [89]
Fungal diseaseNicotiana tabacumDownregulation of GST (glutathione S-transferases) enzyme against Phytophthora parasitica var. nicotianaeHernández et al. [90]
AppleApple scab fungus RNAi GFP & THNFitzgerald et al. [91]
Wheat and BarleyPowdery mildew fungi Blumeria graminisNowara et al. [92]
RiceSheath blight pathogen RNAi RPMK1-1/-2Ila Mukul Tiwari et al. [93]
BananaFusarium oxysporum f. sp. Cubense by RNAi-mediated knockdown of vital genes of fungus (velvet and Fusarium transcription factor 1)Ghag et al. [94]
Insect resistanceCottonCotton bollworm gut-specific-c cytochrome P450 gene CYP6AE14, which confers resistance to gossypolMao et al. [93]
CornIn plant expression of dsRNA against western corn rootworm larvae (Diabrotica virgifera)Baum et al. [95]
Mao et al. [93]
TobaccodsRNA against
EcR-USP (ecdysone receptor ultra-spiracle particle),
AChE (acetylcholinesterase) and HR3 involved in the regulation of molting and development in H. armigera
Zhu et al. [96]
Kumar [97]
Xiong et al. [98]
Nematode attackMegalaima incognita mitochondrial ATP synthase b subunit) silencing of root-knot nematodesHuang et al. [99]
Male sterilityTobaccoDownregulation of anther-specific gene TA29 by RNAiNawaz-ul-Rehman et al. [100]
TomatoMale sterility RNAi SmTAF10/13Toppino et al. [101]
Ricehairpin RNA for OsGEN-L (OsGEN-like) geneMoritoh et al. [102]
TomatoS-Adenosylmethionine decarboxylase
(SAMDC), control of tapetal-specific A9 promoter using RNAi
Sinha and Rajam [103]
QualityMaizeDownregulation of lysine-poor zein gene via RNAiAngaji et al. [104]
RiceIncreased 2-Acety-1-pyrroline production by silencing OSBADH2 geneKhandagale et al. [105]
CottonhpRNA-mediated gene silencing of two fatty acid desaturase genes, stearoyl-acylcarrier protein D9-desaturase and oleoylphosphatidylcholine u6-desaturase for the fatty acid composition of cottonseed oilLiu et al. [106]
PotatoSilencing the β-carotene hydroxylase gene (BCH) to enhance β-carotene contentEck et al. [107]
Brassica napusSilencing of DE-ETIOLATED1 (DET1) for increased levels of lutein, β-carotene, and zeaxanthinWei et al. [108]
TomatoSuppressing an endogenous photomorphogenesis regulatory gene, DET1, both carotenoid and flavonoid contents were increasedDavuluri et al. [109]
CassavaRemoving linamarin, using RNAi silencing CYP79D1/D2Meena et al. [110]
WheatEnhancing amylose content using asRNA, targeted gene: Sbe2aSestili et al. [111]
RiceReduce cadmium RNAi OsPCS1Li et al. [112]
BrassicaReduce erucic acid RNAi BnFAE1Shi et al. [113]
WheatReduce glutinin RNAi ɣ-gliadinsGil-Humanes et al. [114]
Secondary metabolitesRicehpRNA from an inverted repeat for glutelin, leading to lower glutelinKusaba et al. [115]
Papaver somniferumReduce the levels of the gene encoding the morphine biosynthetic enzyme salutaridinol 7-O-acetyltransferase (SalAT) led to the accumulation of the intermediate compounds, salutaridine and salutaridinolKempe et al. [116]
CottonRNAi construct of the d-cadinene synthase gene of gossypol synthesis fused to a seed-specific promoter caused seed-specific reduction of gossypolSunilkumar et al. [117]
Keeping qualityTomatoChimeric RNAi-ACS construct designed to target ACS homologs effectively repressed the ethylene productionGupta et al. [118]
TomatoSlSGR1 (encoding a STAYGREEN protein, retention of firmness and sustained cell membrane integrity and resulting in delayed fruit senescenceLuo et al. [119]
BananaEnhanced shelf-life RNAi MaMADS1/S2Elitzur et al. [120]

Table 5.

Application of RNAi in crop quality and stress breeding.

Sunar et al. [121] have found the role of siRNAs in response to abiotic stresses. Several studies of abiotic stress tolerance in wheat indicate that siRNA is upregulated when exposed to cold stress but are down-regulated when subjected to heat stress, NaCl and dehydration conditions [122]. Wang et al. [123] reported the contribution of lncRNA in abiotic stress response by utilizing two distinct mechanisms, either they block the miRNA interactions with their target by mimicking as competitive endogenous RNAs. This mechanism of abiotic stress tolerance was reported in rice. The alternative mechanism followed by lncRNAs is antisense lncRNAs interact with sense mRNAs, forming double-stranded RNAs thereby preventing the expression of the gene. Zhang et al. [124] mentioned such interactions in drought stress studies of maize.

7.2 Plant immunity

ncRNAs also regulate plant disease resistance by switching on downstream R-genes, as well as the genes responsible for pathogenesis-related proteins or phenolic compounds or phytoalexins, and several other phytohormones signals in response to pathogen attack. miRNAs are engaged in Resistance gene (R-gene) regulation, whose activation is essential at the time of invasion by the pathogen. miRNAs, such as miR482, are downregulated during pathogen infection in potato, whereas its overexpression may lead to hypersensitive reactions [125]. Tables 6 and 7 shows the crop-wise representation of different miRNA and other ncRNAs in maintaining plant immunity.

CropFunction and targetReferences
ArabidopsisTrigger phasiRNA production target is RPS5Boccara et al. [126]
Regulate immune receptor targeting PPRLKatiyar-Agarwal et al. [52]
As transcription factor targeting GRFsSoto-Suarez et al. [127]
Regulate receptor-like kinase targeting ARLPK1/ARLPK2Niu et al. [57]
ROS accumulation, targeting genes; PPR1/PPR2 and At5g38850/At3g04220Park et al. [128]
Nie et al. [129]
PR gene expression; MEMB12Zhang et al. [130]
Callose deposition; MET2Salvador-Guirao et al. [131]
Hormone; TIR1/AFB2/AFB3Navarro et al. [132]
miRNA biosynthesis pathway; SERRATENiu et al. [57]
RiceAct as transcription factor for the targeted genes NF-YAs, NAC60 and IPA1Li et al. [133]
Wang et al. [134]
Liu et al. [135]
ROS accumulation; ASCORBATE OXIDASEWu et al. [136]
Yao et al. [137]
PR gene expression; Nramp6Campo et al. [138]
Sanchez-Sanuy et al. [139]
Callose deposition; ARF16Li et al. [140]
TobaccoTrigger phasiRNA production, target is N-geneLi et al. [141]
Deng et al. [142]
Trigger phasiRNA production, target is EU713768de Vries et al. [143]
BrassicaRegulate immune receptor, targets BraTNL1He et al. [144]
MedicagoTrigger phasiRNA production, Medtr4g023400/ Medtr4g014580/ Medtr5g071220Zhai et al. [145]
SoybeanRegulate immune receptorCui et al. [146]
BarleyTrigger phasiRNA production, MLA1Liu et al. [147]

Table 6.

miRNA in plant immunity.

CropFunction and targetReferences
ArabidopsisRegulate immune receptor targeting TOE1/TOE2Zou et al. [148]
RiceAct as transcription factor for ST1Zhang et al. [149]
TomatoRegulate immune receptorJiang et al. [150]
Jiang et al. [151]
Regulate receptor-like kinaseHong et al. [152]
ROS accumulation;
SIGRX21/SIGRX22 and
RBOH
Cui et al. [153]
Cui et al. [154]
PR-gene expression; miR168aHou et al. [155]

Table 7.

Other ncRNAs in plant immunity.

Other than stress breeding, the aspects of immunity, ncRNA, especially miRNA, have been explored in detail for their potential use in different attributes of crop breeding like enhancing the quality of the yield and its keeping quality, deposition of the secondary metabolites. It can also be used to induce male sterility in the plant, which is an important aspect of hybrid breeding. Table 5 encapsulates different reports of usage of miRNA in various crops in the above-mentioned aspects of crop breeding.

Advertisement

8. Different repositories and databases of ncRNA research

In the recent past, non-coding RNAs have grabbed the attention of many researchers for their role in gene regulation. Different databases for housekeeping non-coding RNA and regulatory ncRNA have been developed which provided the scientists with a lot of information for their functional study. The sequence of tRNA was the one first compiled and published in 1989 with 455 tRNA sequences and 981 tRNA genes [156]. The primitive database for non-coding RNA was ncRNAdb which had 30,000 sequences with no specificities [157] and later the amount of information drastically increased and individual databases for each non-coding RNA are developed, such as silva for rRNA, miRNase for miRNA, snOPY for small nucleolar RNA.

Countless novel techniques had been emerged in the past decade, which led to the discovery of several new ncRNAs and ncRNA genes that are functionally characterized by modern biotechnological tools. Eukaryotic sRNAs, such as miRNA and siRNA, are short sequenced RNA molecules with a length of a maximum of 25 nucleotides. Detection algorithms of sRNA from RNA seq data involve mapping of single or paired-end reads to a reference genome later converted into genome-wide distribution. This is feasible when the size of sRNA is small and where the distribution remains uniform throughout the transcript. However, in bacteria with a lengthier sRNA ranging from 50 to 350 nucleotides, algorithms have to be designed in such a way to overcome the challenges imposed due to the extremely variable number of small transcripts. One such tool is APERO (analysis of paired-end RNA-seq output), which is used to detect bacterial sRNAs from the sequence data of RNA neglecting the need of converting the reads to genome-wide coverage which leads to the loss of information. Instead, it is based on detecting the 5’end of the small transcripts and recognizing the extension of the transcript where the conserved information of sequenced fragments increases the accuracy [158]. Table 8 brings together different databases available for the advanced panel of research on ncRNAs.

S. No.DatabaseSpecification
1.tRNAdbtRNA sequences and tRNA genes
2.miRTarBasemicroRNA-target interactions database
3.snoRNAArchaeal snoRNAs
4.RiboVisionRibosomal annotations
5.RfamCollection of non-coding RNA families
6.piRBasepiRNA
7.NONCODENon-coding RNAs
8.lncRNAdbEukaryotic long non-coding RNAs
9.GtRNAdbtRNA gene predictions
10.5SrRNAdb5S ribosomal RNAs

Table 8.

Different databases and their specifications.

Recent years have witnessed the advancement in sequencing methodologies, such as long-end sequencing and optical mapping, for more accurate and faster sequencing at affordable rates. Cufflinks, and CIRCexplorer [159, 160] are some of the bioinformatics tools used for the discovery of ncRNA. Molecular approaches, such as cloning and hybridization techniques, were able to detect and characterize ncRNAs, but they came with a lot of false positives. Currently, the most reliable approach for predicting and functionally characterizing ncRNAs are NGS (Next Generation Sequencing) and CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing techniques [161]. The list of databases developed for non-coding RNA and specific ncRNA is given below. (https://rnacentral.org/expert-databases) [162].

Advertisement

9. Conclusion

Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) possess little or no protein-coding capacity yet are indeed functional. They make up a huge and significant percentage of eukaryotic transcriptomes. It modulates expression levels at various stages of protein synthesis, playing an important regulative involvement in practically all biological processes. MicroRNAs (miRNAs), small interference RNAs (siRNAs), circular RNAs (circRNAs), and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are the major non-coding RNAs. These can either operate as long ncRNAs or be converted into small RNAs. They are classed worldwide based on their size, function, and genetic origin. Non-coding modulates its targets via interacting with DNA, RNA, and proteins. These have a role in multiple epigenetic mechanisms controlling phenotypes, as well as the specification of various physiological pathways. MicroRNAs control the level of gene expression by increasing the disintegration of target mRNAs or inhibiting translation. They are involved in many aspects of plant growth and have the power to reconfigure responses to various biotic and abiotic stresses. The modulation of immunological responses in plants has been linked to non-coding RNAs, DNA and RNA methylation, along with other epigenetic changes. Regulatory ncRNAs in plants are being highlighted as potential targets for molecular breeding of agricultural trait improved crop plants, such as improved abiotic and biotic stress tolerance, herbicide resistance, yield, enhancement, and plants with amazing nutritional value with prospective high agricultural importance. Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) are also observed to work as a defense system against invading viruses as effectors molecules in RNA-mediated gene silencing and are being exploited in agricultural genetic modification. They also act as key moderators in the level of plant immunity and adaptation to different environments. Plant lncRNAs participate in a wide range of biological processes, including regulation of flowering time and morphogenesis of reproductive organs, as well as abiotic and biotic stress responses. Given the discoveries of these ncRNA in the above-discussed processes, be it physical or physiological, they show a new ray of light toward the use of them in crop breeding. In this regard, the areas, especially the quality breeding, stress breeding for abiotic and biotic stresses, have a huge potential. Along with that, looking at their role in changing the flowering and morphogenesis of plants, further research may be carried forward in the direction of their utilization in altering plant growth duration or producing genotypes for off-season breeding. The role of ncRNAs in epigenetics also can be further studied for their exact role in the inheritance pattern of different important traits. Over the last two decades, the research on non-coding RNAs has shown newer insights about their structure, properties, and possible utilities in different fields of life science. Further work is required to be expanded in newer areas to more agriculturally important crops to harness the wonders of ncRNAs.

References

  1. 1. Quan M, Chen J, Zhang D. Exploring the secrets of long non-coding RNAs. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2015;16(3):5467-5496. DOI: 10.3390/ijms16035467
  2. 2. Taft RJ, Pheasant M, Mattick JS. The relationship between non-protein-coding DNA and eukaryotic complexity. BioEssays. 2007;29:288-299. DOI: 10.1002/bies.20544
  3. 3. Shin SY, Shin C. Regulatory non-coding RNAs in plants: Potential gene resources for the improvement of agricultural traits. Plant Biotechnology Reports. 2016;10:35-47
  4. 4. Zhou M, Luo H. MicroRNA-mediated gene regulation: Potential applications for plant genetic engineering. Plant Molecular Biology. 2013;83:59-75
  5. 5. Cech TR, Steitz JA. The non-coding RNA revolution—Trashing old rules to forge new ones. Cell. 2014;157(1):77-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.008
  6. 6. Diriba GD. Advances on the application of non-coding RNA in crop improvement. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2021;20(11):440-450. DOI: 10.5897/AJB2021.17348
  7. 7. Kresge N, Simoni RD, Hill RL. The discovery of tRNA by Paul C. Zamecnik. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2005;280(40):e37-e39. DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9258(20)79029-0
  8. 8. Sprinzl M, Horn C, Brown M, Ioudovitch A, Steinberg S. Compilation of tRNA sequences and sequences of tRNA genes. Nucleic Acids Research. 1998;26:148-153. DOI: 10.1093/nar/26.1.148
  9. 9. Hamilton AJ, Baulcombe DC. A species of small antisense RNA in posttranscriptional gene silencing in plants. Science. 1999;286(5441):950-952. DOI: 10.1126/science.286.5441.950
  10. 10. Lee RC, Feinbaum RL, Ambros V. The C. elegans heterochronic gene lin-4 encodes small RNAs with antisense complementarity to lin-14. Cell. 1993;75(5):843-854. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90529-y
  11. 11. Pachnis V, Belayew A, Tilghman SM. Locus unlinked to alpha-fetoprotein under the control of the murine raf and Rif genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1984;81(17):5523-5527. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.81.17.5523
  12. 12. Fatica A, Bozzoni I. Long non-coding RNAs: New players in cell differentiation and development. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2014;15(1):7-21. DOI: 10.1038/nrg3606
  13. 13. Chen HM, Chen LT, Patel K, Li YH, Baulcombe DC, Wu SH. 22-nucleotide RNAs trigger secondary siRNA biogenesis in plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2010;107(34):15269-15274. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1001738107
  14. 14. Slotkin RK, Vaughn M, Borges F, Tanurdžić M, Becker JD, Feijó JA, et al. Epigenetic reprogramming and small RNA silencing of transposable elements in pollen. Cell. 2009;136(3):461-472. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.12.038
  15. 15. Aravin A, Gaidatzis D, Pfeffer S, Lagos-Quintana M, Landgraf P, Iovino N, et al. A novel class of small RNAs bind to MILI protein in mouse testes. Nature. 2006;442(7099):203-207. DOI: 10.1038/nature04916
  16. 16. Morris KV, Mattick JS. The rise of regulatory RNA. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2014;15(6):423-437. DOI: 10.1038/nrg3722
  17. 17. D’Ario M, Griffiths-Jones S, Kim M. Small RNAs: Big impact on plant development. Trends in Plant Science. 2017;22(12):1056-1068. DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2017.09.009
  18. 18. Brosnan CA, Voinnet O. The long and the short of non-coding RNAs. Current Opinion in Cell Biology. 2009;21(3):416-425. DOI: 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.04.001
  19. 19. Voinnet O. Origin, biogenesis, and activity of plant microRNAs. Cell. 2009;136(4):669-687
  20. 20. Khraiwesh B, Zhu JK, Zhu J. Role of miRNAs and siRNAs in biotic and abiotic stress responses of plants. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2012;1819(2):137-148
  21. 21. Wyman SK, Knouf EC, Parkin RK, Fritz BR, Lin DW, Dennis LM. Post-transcriptional generation of miRNA variants by multiple nucleotidyl transferases contributes to miRNA transcriptome complexity. Genome Research. 2011;21:1450-1461
  22. 22. Banerjee A, Roychoudhury A, Krishnamoorthi S. Emerging techniques to decipher microRNAs (miRNAs) and their regulatory role in conferring abiotic stress tolerance of plants. Plant Biotechnology Reports. 2016;10(4):185-205
  23. 23. Bologna NG, Voinnet O. The diversity, biogenesis, and activities of endogenous silencing small RNAs in Arabidopsis. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 2014;65:473-503
  24. 24. Chen X. Small RNAs and their roles in plant development. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology. 2009;25:21-44
  25. 25. Fei Q , Xia R, Meyers BC. Phased, secondary, small interfering RNAs in posttranscriptional regulatory networks. Plant Cell. 2013;25:2400-2415
  26. 26. Chekanova JA. Long non-coding RNAs and their functions in plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2015;27:207-216
  27. 27. Wu H, Yang L, Chen LL. The diversity of long non-coding RNAs and their generation. Trends in Genetics. 2017;33:540-552
  28. 28. Krahn N, Fischer JT, Söll D. Naturally occurring tRNAs with non-canonical structures. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2020;11:596914. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.596914
  29. 29. Gao H, Ayub MJ, Levin MJ, Frank J. The structure of the 80S ribosome from Trypanosoma cruzi reveals unique rRNA components. In: Single-Particle Cryo-Electron Microscopy: The Path Toward Atomic Resolution: Selected Papers of Joachim Frank with Commentaries. 2005. pp. 383-388. DOI: 10.1142/9789813234864_0038
  30. 30. Morais P, Adachi H, Yu YT. Spliceosomal snRNA epitranscriptomics. Frontiers in Genetics. 2021;12:652129. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.652129
  31. 31. Ohtani M. Transcriptional regulation of snRNAs and its significance for plant development. Journal of Plant Research. 2017;130(1):57-66. DOI: 10.1007/s10265-016-0883-3
  32. 32. Solymosy F, Pollák T. Uridylate-rich small nuclear RNAs (UsnRNAs), their genes and pseudogenes, and UsnRNPs in plants: Structure and function. A comparative approach. CRC Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. 1993;12:275-369. DOI: 10.1080/07352689309701904
  33. 33. Kiss T. Small nucleolar RNAs: An abundant group of non-coding RNAs with diverse cellular functions. Cell. 2002;109(2):145-148. DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00718-3
  34. 34. Dragon F, Lemay V, Trahan C. snoRNAs: biogenesis, structure, and function. e LS. 2001
  35. 35. Liang J, Wen J, Huang Z, Chen XP, Zhang BX, Chu L. Small nucleolar RNAs: Insight into their function in cancer. Frontiers in Oncology. 2019;9:587. DOI: 10.1038/npg.els.0003813
  36. 36. Carthew RW, Sontheimer EJ. Origins and mechanisms of miRNAs and siRNAs. Cell. 2009;136(4):642-655. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.035
  37. 37. Meister G. Argonaute proteins: Functional insights and emerging roles. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2013;14(7):447-459. DOI: 10.1038/nrg3462
  38. 38. O'Brien J, Hayder H, Zayed Y, Peng C. Overview of microRNA biogenesis, mechanisms of actions, and circulation. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2018;9:402. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00402
  39. 39. Tang G. siRNA and miRNA: An insight into RISCs. Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 2005;30(2):106-114. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2004.12.007
  40. 40. Han BW, Zamore PD. PiRNAs. Current Biology. 2014;24(16):R730-R733. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.07.037
  41. 41. Yu CY, Kuo HC. The emerging roles and functions of circular RNAs and their generation. Journal of Biomedical Science. 2019;26(1):1-2. DOI: 10.1186/s12929-019-0523-z
  42. 42. Zampetaki A, Albrecht A, Steinhofel K. Long non-coding RNA structure and function: Is there a link? Frontiers in Physiology. 2018;9:1201. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01201
  43. 43. Graf J, Kretz M. From structure to function: Route to understanding lncRNA mechanism. BioEssays. 2020;42(12):2000027. DOI: 10.1002/bies.202000027
  44. 44. Liu B, Li P, Li X, Liu C, Cao S, Chu C, et al. Loss of function of OsDCL1 affects microRNA accumulation and causes developmental defects in rice. Plant Physiology. 2005;139(1):296-305. DOI: 10.1104/pp.105.063420
  45. 45. Nodine MD, Bartel DP. MicroRNAs prevent precocious gene expression and enable pattern formation during plant embryogenesis. Genes & Development. 2010;24(23):2678-2692. DOI: 10.1101/gad.1986710
  46. 46. Choi K, Kim J, Müller SY, Oh M, Underwood C, Henderson I, et al. Regulation of microRNA-mediated developmental changes by the SWR1 chromatin remodeling complex. Plant Physiology. 2016;171(2):1128-1143. DOI: 10.1104/pp.16.00332
  47. 47. Guo S, Xu Y, Liu H, Mao Z, Zhang C, Ma Y, et al. The interaction between OsMADS57 and OsTB1 modulates rice tillering via DWARF14. Nature Communications. 2013;4(1):1-12. DOI: 10.1038
  48. 48. Marin E, Jouannet V, Herz A, Lokerse AS, Weijers D, Vaucheret H, et al. miR390, Arabidopsis TAS3 tasiRNAs, and their AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR targets define an autoregulatory network quantitatively regulating lateral root growth. The Plant Cell. 2010;22(4):1104-1117. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.109.072553
  49. 49. Wu HJ, Wang ZM, Wang M, Wang XJ. Widespread long non-coding RNAs as endogenous target mimics for microRNAs in plants. Plant Physiology. 2013;161(4):1875-1884. DOI: 10.1104/pp.113.215962
  50. 50. Xie M, Yu B. siRNA-directed DNA methylation in plants. Current Genomics. 2015;16(1):23-31. DOI: 10.2174/1389202915666141128002211
  51. 51. Nuthikattu S, McCue AD, Panda K, Fultz D, DeFraia C, Thomas EN, et al. The initiation of epigenetic silencing of active transposable elements is triggered by RDR6 and 21-22 nucleotide small interfering RNAs. Plant Physiology. 2013;162(1):116-131. DOI: 10.1104/pp.113.216481
  52. 52. Katiyar-Agarwal S, Morgan R, Dahlbeck D, Borsani O, Villegas A, Zhu J-K, et al. A pathogen-inducible endogenous siRNA in plant immunity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2006;103(47):18002-18007. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.06082581
  53. 53. Borsani O, Zhu J, Verslues PE, Sunkar R, Zhu JK. Endogenous siRNAs derived from a pair of natural cis-antisense transcripts regulate salt tolerance in Arabidopsis. Cell. 29 Dec 2005;123(7):1279-1291. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.11.035
  54. 54. Held MA, Penning B, Brandt AS, Kessans SA, Yong W, Scofield SR, et al. Small-interfering RNAs from natural antisense transcripts derived from a cellulose synthase gene modulate cell wall biosynthesis in barley. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2008;105(51):20534-20539. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0809408105
  55. 55. Zhang X, Xia J, Lii YE. et al. Genome-wide analysis of plant nat-siRNAs reveals insights into their distribution, biogenesis and function. Genome Biology. 2012;13:R20. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2012-13-3-r20
  56. 56. Wang H, Chung PJ, Liu J, Jang IC, Kean MJ, Xu J, et al. Genome-wide identification of long non-coding natural antisense transcripts and their responses to light in Arabidopsis. Genome Research. 2014;24(3):444-453. DOI: 10.1101/gr.165555.113
  57. 57. Ariel F, Romero-Barrios N, Jégu T, Benhamed M, Crespi M. Battles and hijacks: Non-coding transcription in plants. Trends in Plant Science. 2015;20(6):362-371. DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2015.03.003
  58. 58. Xin M, Wang Y, Yao Y, Song N, Hu Z, Qin D, et al. Identification and characterization of wheat long non-protein coding RNAs responsive to powdery mildew infection and heat stress by using microarray analysis and SBS sequencing. BMC Plant Biology. 2011;11(1):1-3. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-11-61
  59. 59. Qi X, Xie S, Liu Y, Yi F, Yu J. Genome-wide annotation of genes and non-coding RNAs of foxtail millet in response to simulated drought stress by deep sequencing. Plant Molecular Biology. 2013;83(4):459-473
  60. 60. Wang L, Zhao S, Gu C, et al. Deep RNA-Seq uncovers the peach transcriptome landscape. Plant Molecular Biology. 2013;83:365-377. DOI: 10.1007/s11103-013-0104-6
  61. 61. Yu X, Yang J, Li X, Liu X, Sun C, Wu F, et al. Global analysis of cis-natural antisense transcripts and their heat-responsive nat-siRNAs in Brassica rapa. BMC Plant Biology. 2013;13(1):1-3. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-13-208
  62. 62. Shuai P, Liang D, Tang S, Zhang Z, Ye CY, Su Y, et al. Genome-wide identification and functional prediction of novel and drought-responsive lincRNAs in Populus trichocarpa. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2014;65(17):4975-4983. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/eru256
  63. 63. Ye CY, Xu H, Shen E, Liu Y, Wang Y, Shen Y, et al. Genome-wide identification of non-coding RNAs interacted with microRNAs in soybean. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2014;5:743. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00743
  64. 64. Chen J, Quan M, Zhang D. Genome-wide identification of novel long non-coding RNAs in Populus tomentosa tension wood, opposite wood and normal wood xylem by RNA-seq. Planta. 2015;241(1):125-143. DOI: 10.1007/s00425-014-2168-1
  65. 65. Ding J, Lu Q , Ouyang Y, Mao H, Zhang P, Yao J, et al. A long non-coding RNA regulates photoperiod-sensitive male sterility, an essential component of hybrid rice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2012;109(7):2654-2659. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1121374109
  66. 66. Takeda T, Suwa Y, Suzuki M, Kitano H, Ueguchi-Tanaka M, Ashikari M, et al. The OsTB1 gene negatively regulates lateral branching in rice. The Plant Journal. 2003;33(3):513-520. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2003.01648.x
  67. 67. Huang X, Qian Q , Liu Z, Sun H, He S, Luo D, et al. Natural variation at the DEP1 locus enhances grain yield in rice. Nature Genetics. 2009;41(4):494-497. DOI: 10.1038/ng.352
  68. 68. Zhang F, Luo X, Zhou Y, Xie J. Genome-wide identification of conserved microRNA and their response to drought stress in Dongxiang wild rice (Oryza rufipogon Griff.). Biotechnology Letters. 2016;38(4):711-721. DOI: 10.1007/s10529-015-2012-0
  69. 69. Aung K, Lin S-I, Wu C-C, Huang Y-T, Su C-l, Chiou T-J. pho2, a phosphate overaccumulator, is caused by a nonsense mutation in a microRNA399 target gene. Plant Physiology. 2006;141(3):1000-1011. DOI: 10.1104/pp.106.078063
  70. 70. Jabnoune M, Secco D, Lecampion C, Robaglia C, Shu Q , Poirier Y. A rice cis-natural antisense RNA acts as a translational enhancer for its cognate mRNA and contributes to phosphate homeostasis and plant fitness. The Plant Cell. 2013;25(10):4166-4182. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.113.116251
  71. 71. Campalans A, Kondorosi A, Crespi M. Enod40, a short open reading frame–containing mRNA, induces cytoplasmic localization of a nuclear RNA binding protein in Medicago truncatula. The Plant Cell. 2004;16(4):1047-1059. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.019406
  72. 72. Sun Q , Liu X, Yang J, Liu W, Du Q , Wang H, et al. MicroRNA528 affects lodging resistance of maize by regulating lignin biosynthesis under nitrogen-luxury conditions. Molecular Plant. 2018;11(6):806-814. DOI: 10.1016/j.molp.2018.03.013
  73. 73. Calarco JP, Borges F, Donoghue MT, Van Ex F, Jullien PE, Lopes T, et al. Reprogramming of DNA methylation in pollen guides epigenetic inheritance via small RNA. Cell. 2012;151(1):194-205. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.09.001
  74. 74. Jenny A, Hachet O, Závorszky P, Cyrklaff A, Weston MD, Johnston DS, et al. A translation-independent role of oskar RNA in early Drosophila oogenesis. 2006:2827-2833. DOI: 10.1242/dev.02456
  75. 75. Fan H, Villegas C, Huang A, Wright JA. Suppression of malignancy by the 3′ untranslated regions of ribonucleotide reductase R1 and R2 messenger RNAs. Cancer Research. 1996;56(19):4366-4369
  76. 76. Jha UC, Nayyar H, Jha R, Khurshid M, Zhou M, Mantri N, et al. Long non-coding RNAs: Emerging players regulating plant abiotic stress response and adaptation. BMC Plant Biology. 2020;20(1):1-20. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-020-02595-x
  77. 77. Liu X, Zhang X, Sun B, Hao L, Liu C, Zhang D, et al. Genome-wide identification and comparative analysis of drought-related microRNAs in two maize inbred lines with contrasting drought tolerance by deep sequencing. PLoS One. 2019;14(7):e0219176. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219176
  78. 78. Cheah BH, Nadarajah K, Divate MD, Wickneswari R. Identification of four functionally important microRNA families with contrasting differential expression profiles between drought-tolerant and susceptible rice leaf at vegetative stage. BMC Genomics. 2015;16(1):1-18. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-015-1851-3
  79. 79. Zhou L, Liu Y, Liu Z, Kong D, Duan M, Luo L. Genome-wide identification and analysis of drought-responsive microRNAs in Oryza sativa. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2010;61(15):4157-4168. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erq237
  80. 80. Waterhouse PM, Graham MW, Wang M-B. Virus resistance and gene silencing in plants can be induced by simultaneous expression of sense and antisense RNA. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1998;95(23):13959-13964. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.23.13959
  81. 81. Missiou A, Kalantidis K, Boutla A, Tzortzakaki S, Tabler M, Tsagris M. Generation of transgenic potato plants highly resistant to potato virus Y (PVY) through RNA silencing. Molecular Breeding. 2004;14(2):185-197
  82. 82. Kertbundit S, Pongtanom N, Ruanjan P, Chantasingh D, Tanwanchai A, Panyim S, et al. Resistance of transgenic papaya plants to papaya ringspot virus. Biologia Plantarum. 2007;51(2):333-339. DOI: 10.1007/s10535-007-0065-1
  83. 83. Pooggin M, Shivaprasad P, Veluthambi K, Hohn T. RNAi targeting of DNA virus in plants. Nature Biotechnology. 2003;21(2):131-132. DOI: 10.1038/nbt0203-131b
  84. 84. Powell P, Stark D, Sanders P, Beachy R. Protection against tobacco mosaic virus in transgenic plants that express tobacco mosaic virus antisense RNA. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1989;86(18):6949-6952. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.86.18.6949
  85. 85. Dalakouras A, Wassenegger M, Dadami E, Ganopoulos I, Pappas ML, Papadopoulou K. Genetically modified organism-free RNA interference: Exogenous application of RNA molecules in plants. Plant Physiology. 2020;182(1):38-50. DOI: 10.1104/pp.19.00570
  86. 86. Vanitharani R, Chellappan P, Fauquet CM. Short interfering RNA-mediated interference of gene expression and viral DNA accumulation in cultured plant cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2003;100(16):9632-9636. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1733874100
  87. 87. Patil BL, Ogwok E, Wagaba H, Mohammed IU, Yadav JS, Bagewadi B, et al. RNAi mediated resistance to diverse isolates belonging to two virus species involved in cassava brown streak disease. Molecular Plant Pathology. 2011;12(1):31-41. DOI: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2010.00650.x
  88. 88. Dunoyer P, Himber C, Ruiz-Ferrer V, Alioua A, Voinnet O. Intra-and intercellular RNA interference in Arabidopsis thaliana requires components of the microRNA and heterochromatic silencing pathways. Nature Genetics. 2007;39(7):848-856. DOI: 10.1038/ng2081
  89. 89. Younis A, Siddique MI, Kim C-K, Lim K-B. RNA interference (RNAi) induced gene silencing: A promising approach of hi-tech plant breeding. International Journal of Biological Sciences. 2014;10(10):115. DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.10452
  90. 90. Hernández I, Chacón O, Rodriguez R, Portieles R, López Y, Pujol M, et al. Black shank resistant tobacco by silencing of glutathione S-transferase. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2009;387:3004. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.07.003
  91. 91. Fitzgerald A, Van Kan JA, Plummer KM. Simultaneous silencing of multiple genes in the apple scab fungus, Venturia inaequalis, by expression of RNA with chimeric inverted repeats. Fungal Genetics and Biology. 2004;41(10):963-971. DOI: 10.1016/j.fgb.2004.06.006
  92. 92. Nowara D, Gay A, Lacomme C, Shaw J, Ridout C, Douchkov D, et al. HIGS: Host-induced gene silencing in the obligate biotrophic fungal pathogen Blumeria graminis. The Plant Cell. 2010;22(9):3130-3141. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.110.077040
  93. 93. Mao Y-B, Cai W-J, Wang J-W, Hong G-J, Tao X-Y, Wang L-J, et al. Silencing a cotton bollworm P450 monooxygenase gene by plant-mediated RNAi impairs larval tolerance of gossypol. Nature Biotechnology. 2007;25(11):1307-1313. DOI: 10.1038/nbt1352
  94. 94. Ghag SB, Shekhawat UKS, Ganapathi TR. Native cell-death genes as candidates for developing wilt resistance in transgenic banana plants. AoB Plants. 2014;6. DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/plu037
  95. 95. Baum JA, Bogaert T, Clinton W, Heck GR, Feldmann P, Ilagan O, et al. Control of coleopteran insect pests through RNA interference. Nature Biotechnology. 2007;25(11):1322-1326. DOI: 10.1038/nbt1359
  96. 96. Zhu J-Q , Liu S, Ma Y, Zhang J-Q , Qi H-S, Wei Z-J, et al. Improvement of pest resistance in transgenic tobacco plants expressing dsRNA of an insect-associated gene EcR. PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e38572. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038572
  97. 97. Kumar M. RNAi-Mediated Targeting of Acetylcholinesterase Gene of Helicoverpa Armigera for Insect Resistance in Transgenic Tobacco and Tomato: PhD thesis. University of Delhi; 2011. DOI: 10.1007/s11103-015-0414-y
  98. 98. Xiong Y, Zeng H, Zhang Y, Xu D, Qiu D. Silencing the HaHR3 gene by transgenic plant-mediated RNAi to disrupt Helicoverpa armigera development. International Journal of Biological Sciences. 2013;9(4):370. DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.5929
  99. 99. Huang Y, Mei M, Mao Z, Lv S, Zhou J, Chen S, et al. Molecular cloning and virus-induced gene silencing of MiASB in the southern root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita. European Journal of Plant Pathology. 2014;138(1):181-193
  100. 100. Nawaz-ul-Rehman MS, Mansoor S, Khan AA, Zafar Y, Briddon RW. RNAi-mediated male sterility of tobacco by silencing TA29. Molecular Biotechnology. 2007;36(2):159-165. DOI: 10.1007/s12033-007-0025-1
  101. 101. Toppino L, Kooiker M, Lindner M, Dreni L, Rotino GL, Kater MM. Reversible male sterility in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) by artificial microRNA-mediated silencing of general transcription factor genes. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2011;9(6):684-692. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2010.00567.x
  102. 102. Moritoh S, Miki D, Akiyama M, Kawahara M, Izawa T, Maki H, et al. RNAi-mediated silencing of OsGEN-L (OsGEN-like), a new member of the RAD2/XPG nuclease family, causes male sterility by defect of microspore development in rice. Plant and Cell Physiology. 2005;46(5):699-715. DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pci090
  103. 103. Sinha R, Rajam MV. RNAi silencing of three homologues of S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase gene in tapetal tissue of tomato results in male sterility. Plant Molecular Biology. 2013;82(1):169-180. DOI: 10.1007/s11103-013-0051-2
  104. 104. Angaji S, Hedayati SS, Hosein R, Samad S, Shiravi S, Madani S. Application of RNA interference in plants. Plant Omics. 2010;3(3):77-84
  105. 105. Khandagale K, Chavhan R, Nadaf A. RNAi-mediated down regulation of BADH2 gene for expression of 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline in non-scented indica rice IR-64 (Oryza sativa L.). 3 Biotech. 2020;10(4):145. DOI: 10.1007/s13205-020-2131-8
  106. 106. Liu Q , Singh SP, Green AG. High-stearic and high-oleic cottonseed oils produced by hairpin RNA-mediated post-transcriptional gene silencing. Plant Physiology. 2002;129(4):1732-1743. DOI: 10.1104/pp.001933
  107. 107. Eck VJ, Conlin B, Garvin DF, et al. Enhancing beta-carotene content in potato by rnai-mediated silencing of the beta-carotene hydroxylase gene. American Journal of Potato Research. 2007;84:331. DOI: 10.1007/BF02986245
  108. 108. Wei S, Li X, Gruber MY, Li R, Zhou R, Zebarjadi A, et al. RNAi-mediated suppression of DET1 alters the levels of carotenoids and sinapate esters in seeds of Brassica napus. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2009;57(12):5326-5333. DOI: 10.1021/jf803983w
  109. 109. Davuluri GR, Van Tuinen A, Fraser PD, Manfredonia A, Newman R, Burgess D, et al. Fruit-specific RNAi-mediated suppression of DET1 enhances carotenoid and flavonoid content in tomatoes. Nature Biotechnology. 2005;23(7):890-895. DOI: 10.1038/nbt1108
  110. 110. Meena AK, Verma L, Kumhar BL. RNAi, it’s mechanism and potential use in crop improvement: A review. International Journal of Pure and Applied Bioscience. 2017;5(2):294-311
  111. 111. Sestili F, Janni M, Doherty A, Botticella E, D’Ovidio R, Masci S, et al. Increasing the amylose content of durum wheat through silencing of the SBEIIagenes. BMC Plant Biology. 2010;10(1):1-12. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-10-144
  112. 112. Li JC, Guo JB, Xu WZ, Ma M. RNA interference-mediated silencing of phytochelatin synthase gene reduce cadmium accumulation in rice seeds. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology. 2007;49(7):1032-1037. DOI: DOI/10.1111/j.1672-9072.2007.0047
  113. 113. Shi J, Lang C, Wu X, Liu R, Zheng T, Zhang D, et al. RNAi knockdown of fatty acid elongase1 alters fatty acid composition in Brassica napus. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2015;466(3):518-522. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.09.062
  114. 114. Gil-Humanes J, Pistón F, Hernando A, Alvarez JB, Shewry PR, Barro F. Silencing of γ-gliadins by RNA interference (RNAi) in bread wheat. Journal of Cereal Science. 2008;48(3):565-568. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcs.2008.03.005
  115. 115. Kusaba M, Miyahara K, Iida S, Fukuoka H, Takano T, Sassa H, et al. Low glutelin content1: A dominant mutation that suppresses the glutelin multigene family via RNA silencing in rice. The Plant Cell. 2003;15(6):1455-1467. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.011452
  116. 116. Kempe K, Higashi Y, Frick S, Sabarna K, Kutchan TM. RNAi suppression of the morphine biosynthetic gene salAT and evidence of association of pathway enzymes. Phytochemistry. 2009;70(5):579-589. DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2009.03.002
  117. 117. Sunilkumar G, Campbell LM, Puckhaber L, Stipanovic RD, Rathore KS. Engineering cottonseed for use in human nutrition by tissue-specific reduction of toxic gossypol. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2006;103(48):18054-18059. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0605389103
  118. 118. Gupta A, Pal RK, Rajam MV. Delayed ripening and improved fruit processing quality in tomato by RNAi-mediated silencing of three homologs of 1-aminopropane-1-carboxylate synthase gene. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2013;170(11):987-995. DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2013.02.003
  119. 119. Luo Z, Zhang J, Li J, Yang C, Wang T, Ouyang B, et al. A STAY-GREEN protein S l SGR 1 regulates lycopene and β-carotene accumulation by interacting directly with S l PSY 1 during ripening processes in tomato. New Phytologist. 2013;198(2):442-452. DOI: 10.1111/nph.12175
  120. 120. Elitzur T, Yakir E, Quansah L, Zhangjun F, Vrebalov J, Khayat E, et al. Banana MaMADS transcription factors are necessary for fruit ripening and molecular tools to promote shelf-life and food security. Plant Physiology. 2016;171(1):380-391. DOI: 10.1104/pp.15.01866
  121. 121. Sunkar R, Zhu J-K. Novel and stress-regulated microRNAs and other small RNAs from Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell. 2004;16(8):2001-2019. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.104.022830
  122. 122. Yao Y, Ni Z, Peng H, Sun F, Xin M, Sunkar R, et al. Non-coding small RNAs responsive to abiotic stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Functional & Integrative Genomics. 2010;10(2):187-190. DOI: 10.1007/s10142-010-0163-6
  123. 123. Wang J, Meng X, Dobrovolskaya OB, Orlov YL, Chen M. Non-coding RNAs and their roles in stress response in plants. Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics. 2017;15(5):301-312. DOI: 10.1016/j.gpb.2017.01.007
  124. 124. Zhang W, Han Z, Guo Q , Liu Y, Zheng Y, Wu F, et al. Identification of maize long non-coding RNAs responsive to drought stress. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e98958. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098958
  125. 125. Yang L, Mu X, Liu C, Cai J, Shi K, Zhu W, et al. Overexpression of potato miR482e enhanced plant sensitivity to Verticillium dahliae infection. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology. 2015;57(12):1078-1088. DOI: 10.1111/jipb.12348
  126. 126. Boccara M, Sarazin A, Thiebeauld O, Jay F, Voinnet O, Navarro L, et al. The Arabidopsis miR472-RDR6 silencing pathway modulates PAMP-and effector-triggered immunity through the post-transcriptional control of disease resistance genes. PLoS Pathogens. 2014;10(1):e1003883. DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003883
  127. 127. Soto-Suárez M, Baldrich P, Weigel D, Rubio-Somoza I, San SB. The Arabidopsis miR396 mediates pathogen-associated molecular pattern-triggered immune responses against fungal pathogens. Scientific Reports. 2017;7(1):1-14
  128. 128. Park YJ, Lee HJ, Kwak KJ, Lee K, Hong SW, Kang H. MicroRNA400-guided cleavage of pentatricopeptide repeat protein mRNAs renders Arabidopsis thaliana more susceptible to pathogenic bacteria and fungi. Plant and Cell Physiology. 2014;55(9):1660-1668. DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pcu096
  129. 129. Nie P, Chen C, Yin Q , Jiang C, Guo J, Zhao H, et al. Function of miR825 and miR825* as negative regulators in Bacillus cereus AR156-elicited systemic resistance to Botrytis cinerea in Arabidopsis thaliana. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019;20(20):5032. DOI: 10.3390/ijms20205032
  130. 130. Zhang X, Zhao H, Gao S, Wang W-C, Katiyar-Agarwal S, Huang H-D, et al. Arabidopsis Argonaute 2 regulates innate immunity via miRNA393∗−mediated silencing of a Golgi-localized SNARE gene, MEMB12. Molecular Cell. 2011;42(3):356-366. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.04.010
  131. 131. Salvador-Guirao R, Baldrich P, Weigel D, Rubio-Somoza I, San SB. The microRNA miR773 is involved in the Arabidopsis immune response to fungal pathogens. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions. 2018;31(2):249-259. DOI: 10.1094/MPMI-05-17-0108-R
  132. 132. Navarro L, Dunoyer P, Jay F, Arnold B, Dharmasiri N, Estelle M, et al. A plant miRNA contributes to antibacterial resistance by repressing auxin signaling. Science. 2006;312(5772):436-439. DOI: 10.1126/science.1126088
  133. 133. Li Y, Zhao S-L, Li J-L, Hu X-H, Wang H, Cao X-L, et al. Osa-miR169 negatively regulates rice immunity against the blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2017;8:2. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00002
  134. 134. Wang Z, Xia Y, Lin S, Wang Y, Guo B, Song X, et al. Osa-miR164a targets Os NAC 60 and negatively regulates rice immunity against the blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. The Plant Journal. 2018;95(4):584-597. DOI: 10.1111/tpj.13972
  135. 135. Liu M, Shi Z, Zhang X, Wang M, Zhang L, Zheng K, et al. Inducible overexpression of ideal plant Architecture1 improves both yield and disease resistance in rice. Nature Plants. 2019;5(4):389-400. DOI: 10.1038/s41477-019-0383-2
  136. 136. Wu J, Yang R, Yang Z, Yao S, Zhao S, Wang Y, et al. ROS accumulation and antiviral defense control by microRNA528 in rice. Nature Plants. 2017;3(1):1-7. DOI: 10.1038/nplants.2016.203
  137. 137. Yao S, Yang Z, Yang R, Huang Y, Guo G, Kong X, et al. Transcriptional regulation of miR528 by OsSPL9 orchestrates antiviral response in rice. Molecular Plant. 2019;12(8):1114-1122. DOI: 10.1016/j.molp.2019.04.010
  138. 138. Campo S, Peris-Peris C, Siré C, Moreno AB, Donaire L, Zytnicki M, et al. Identification of a novel micro RNA (mi RNA) from rice that targets an alternatively spliced transcript of the N ramp6 (natural resistance-associated macrophage protein 6) gene involved in pathogen resistance. New Phytologist. 2013;199(1):212-227. DOI: 10.1111/nph.12292
  139. 139. Sánchez-Sanuy F, Peris-Peris C, Tomiyama S, Okada K, Hsing Y-I, San Segundo B, et al. Osa-miR7695 enhances transcriptional priming in defense responses against the rice blast fungus. BMC Plant Biology. 2019;19(1):1-16. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-019-2156-5
  140. 140. Li Y, Zhang Q , Zhang J, Wu L, Qi Y, Zhou J-M. Identification of microRNAs involved in pathogen-associated molecular pattern-triggered plant innate immunity. Plant Physiology. 2010;152(4):2222-2231. DOI: 10.1104/pp.109.151803
  141. 141. Li F, Pignatta D, Bendix C, Brunkard JO, Cohn MM, Tung J, et al. MicroRNA regulation of plant innate immune receptors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2012;109(5):1790-1795. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1118282109
  142. 142. Deng Y, Wang J, Tung J, Liu D, Zhou Y, He S, et al. A role for small RNA in regulating innate immunity during plant growth. PLoS Pathogens. 2018;14(1):e1006756. DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006756
  143. 143. de Vries S, Kukuk A, von Dahlen JK, Schnake A, Kloesges T, Rose LE. Expression profiling across wild and cultivated tomatoes supports the relevance of early miR482/2118 suppression for Phytophthora resistance. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2018;285(1873):20172560. DOI: DOI/10.1098/rspb.2017.2560
  144. 144. He X-F, Fang Y-Y, Feng L, Guo H-S. Characterization of conserved and novel microRNAs and their targets, including a TuMV-induced TIR–NBS–LRR class R gene-derived novel miRNA in brassica. FEBS Letters. 2008;582(16):2445-2452. DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2008.06.011
  145. 145. Zhai J, Jeong D-H, De Paoli E, Park S, Rosen BD, Li Y, et al. MicroRNAs as master regulators of the plant NB-LRR defense gene family via the production of phased, trans-acting siRNAs. Genes & Development. 2011;25(23):2540-2553. DOI: 10.1101/gad.177527.111
  146. 146. Cui X, Yan Q , Gan S, Xue D, Dou D, Guo N, et al. Overexpression of gma-miR1510a/b suppresses the expression of a NB-LRR domain gene and reduces resistance to Phytophthora sojae. Gene. 2017;621:32-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2017.04.015
  147. 147. Liu J, Cheng X, Liu D, Xu W, Wise R, Shen Q-H. The miR9863 family regulates distinct Mla alleles in barley to attenuate NLR receptor-triggered disease resistance and cell-death signaling. PLoS Genetics. 2014;10(12):e1004755. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004755
  148. 148. Zou Y, Wang S, Zhou Y, Bai J, Huang G, Liu X, et al. Transcriptional regulation of the immune receptor FLS2 controls the ontogeny of plant innate immunity. The Plant Cell. 2018;30(11):2779-2794. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.18.00297
  149. 149. Zhang H, Tao Z, Hong H, Chen Z, Wu C, Li X, et al. Transposon-derived small RNA is responsible for modified function of WRKY45 locus. Nature Plants. 2016;2(3):1-8. DOI: 10.1038/nplants.2016.16
  150. 150. Jiang N, Cui J, Shi Y, Yang G, Zhou X, Hou X. Tomato lncRNA23468 functions as a competing endogenous RNA to modulate NBS-LRR genes by decoying miR482b in the tomato-Phytophthora infestans interaction. Horticulture Research. 2019:6-28. DOI: 10.1038/s41438-018-0096-0
  151. 151. Jiang N, Cui J, Hou X, Yang G, Xiao Y, Han L, et al. Sl-lncRNA15492 interacts with Sl-miR482a and affects Solanum lycopersicum immunity against Phytophthora infestans. The Plant Journal. 2020;103(4):1561-1574. DOI: 10.1111/tpj.14847
  152. 152. Hong Y-H, Meng J, Zhang M, Luan Y-S. Identification of tomato circular RNAs responsive to Phytophthora infestans. Gene. 2020;746:144652. DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2020.144652
  153. 153. Cui J, Luan Y, Jiang N, Bao H, Meng J. Comparative transcriptome analysis between resistant and susceptible tomato allows the identification of lnc RNA 16397 conferring resistance to Phytophthora infestans by coexpressing glutaredoxin. The Plant Journal. 2017;89(3):577-589. DOI: 10.1111/tpj.13408
  154. 154. Cui J, Jiang N, Meng J, Yang G, Liu W, Zhou X, et al. LncRNA33732-respiratory burst oxidase module associated with WRKY1 in tomato-Phytophthora infestans interactions. The Plant Journal. 2019;97(5):933-946. DOI: 10.1111/tpj.13408
  155. 155. Hou X, Cui J, Liu W, Jiang N, Zhou X, Qi H, et al. LncRNA39026 enhances tomato resistance to Phytophthora infestans by decoying miR168a and inducing PR gene expression. Phytopathology. 2020;110(4):873-880. DOI: 10.1094/PHYTO-12-19-0445-R
  156. 156. Sprinzl M, Hartmann T, Weber J, Blank J, Zeidler R. Compilation of tRNA sequences and sequences of tRNA genes. Nucleic Acids Research. 1989;17(Suppl):r1-r172. DOI: 10.1093/nar/17.suppl.r1
  157. 157. Szymanski M, Erdmann VA, Barciszewski J. Non-coding RNAs database (ncRNAdb). Nucleic Acids Research. 2007;35(suppl_1):D162-D164. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkl994
  158. 158. Leonard S, Meyer S, Lacour S, Nasser W, Hommais F, Reverchon S. APERO: A genome-wide approach for identifying bacterial small RNAs from RNA-Seq data. Nucleic Acids Research. 2019;47(15):e88. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz485
  159. 159. Zhang XO, Wang HB, Zhang Y, Lu X, Chen LL, Yang L. Complementary sequence-mediated exon circularization. Cell. 2014;159(1):134-147. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.001
  160. 160. Trapnell C, Roberts A, Goff L, Pertea G, Kim D, Kelley DR, et al. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and cufflinks. Nature Protocols. 2012;7(3):562-578. DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2012.016
  161. 161. Liu D, Mewalal R, Hu R, Tuskan GA, Yang X. New technologies accelerate the exploration of non-coding RNAs in horticultural plants. Horticulture Research. 2017;4. DOI: 10.1038/hortres.2017.31
  162. 162. Annonymous. RNAcentral Expert Databases. Available from: https://rnacentral.org/expert-databases 2006. [Accessed: 2022.06.03]

Written By

Debadatta Panda, Latha Ananda Lekshmi, Rachel Lissy Vargheese, Nallathambi Premalatha, Mahadevan Kumar and Lakshmanan Mahalingam

Submitted: 16 June 2022 Reviewed: 08 July 2022 Published: 08 November 2023