Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Reproductive Strategies of the Female Gametophyte

Written By

Xiaoyan Liu and Ryushiro D. Kasahara

Submitted: 13 December 2022 Reviewed: 04 January 2023 Published: 27 January 2023

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.109805

From the Annual Volume

Plant Physiology Annual Volume 2023

Edited by Jen-Tsung Chen

Chapter metrics overview

83 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Reproduction refers to the biological process of producing offspring. Sexual reproduction in angiosperms is a complex and precise process of regulation, which requires the mutual recognition of male and female gametes. The pollen tube, as a medium for transmission of male gametes, is attracted by chemoattractant derived from synergid cells in a target ovule. We first identified that MYB98 plays an important role in pollen tube guidance by regulating the downstream LURE peptides. Moreover, we discovered that if the first pollen tube penetrates the ovule but fertilization fails, the second pollen tube is attracted by another synergid cell to increase the chances of fertilization as a “wise” back-up system (Fertilization Recovery System). Similar feedback mechanisms also occur to seed development after the pollen tube guidance. We further identified a phenomenon, the pollen tube-dependent ovule enlargement morphology (POEM), that the pollen tube contents (PTCs) enlarge ovules and initiate seed coat formation without fertilization. Furthermore, we identified the POEM in rice by knocked-out GCS1 genes in rice genome, which led to fertilization failure and to produce enlarged sugar grain. In this chapter, we discuss from the reproductive strategies of the plants to the agricultural application based on our previous discoveries.

Keywords

  • pollen tube guidance
  • MYB98
  • LUREs
  • fertilization recovery system
  • POEM
  • sugar rice

1. Introduction

Seed plants, also known as higher vascular plants, include gymnosperms and angiosperms, which have evolved a unique life cycle: flowering, pollination, fertilization, and seed formation. Double fertilization is a flowering plant mechanism whereby two immotile sperm cells fertilize two different female gametes. In order to achieve the fusion of sexual gametes (fertilization), the mature pollen (male gametophyte) is dispersed from the anther to the stigmas that undergo the long journey to the ovule (inside the ovule is the female gametophyte), which requires the mutual recognition of male and female gametes (Figure 1). In this chapter, we will discuss from the pollen tube guidance, fertilization, the induction of seed development, and to the agricultural application based on our previous discoveries.

Figure 1.

The Arabidopsis male and female gametophyte. A. The flower of Arabidopsis. B. Anther of Arabidopsis thaliana, Anthers dehiscent, exposing pollen grains. C. Stigmas bearing pollen grains. D. Pollen tube stained by aniline blue, WT self-cross 8HAP. E. Pollens fall onto the stigma to grow pollen tubes. F. Male gametophyte (pollen grain), with one vegetative cell and two sperm cells inside. G. Female gametophyte, consists of seven cells and four different cell types: three antipodal cells, two synergid cells, one egg cell, and one central cell.

Advertisement

2. Development of gametophytes

During the angiosperm life cycle, the angiosperm gametophytes develop within sporophytic tissues that constitute the sexual organs of the flower. The sporophyte produces two types of spores, microspores and megaspores, that give rise to male gametophytes and female gametophytes, respectively [1]. Female gametophyte development goes through two processes referred to as megasporogenesis and megagametogenesis. The diploid megaspore mother cell undergoes meiosis and gives rise to four haploid megaspores. After that, three megaspores go through cell death, and the only megaspore left goes through three rounds of mitosis without cytokinesis, resulting in a multinucleate coenocyte. Subsequently, cell walls form around these nuclei, forming the cellular female gametophyte (Figure 1G), which consists of seven cells and four different cell types: three antipodal cells, two synergid cells, one egg cell, and one central cell [2]. The male gametophyte (Figure 1F), also referred to as the pollen grain or microgametophyte, develops within the anther (Figure 1B) and is composed of two sperm cells encased within a vegetative cell.

Advertisement

3. Pollen adhesion

Once a pollen grain adheres to the stigma, compatible pollen must be distinguished from potential pathogens (fungal spores or bacteria). In response to compatible pollen, stigmas initiate a basal response pathway that transfers water to the desiccated pollen grain for pollen hydration and germination [3].

In self-incompatible plants of the genus Brassica, self-related pollen grains are recognized and prevented to germinate by interaction with the epidermal cells of the stigma (Figure 2B). The self-incompatibility (SI) phenomenon is genetically controlled by a complex and polymorphic locus [4]. Among the genes, S locus is a pair of sequence-related genes, the cell wall localized S-locus glycoprotein (SLG) gene and the plasma membrane spanning receptor protein kinase (SRK) gene, both of which are expressed specifically in the stigma epidermal cells. The pollen coat localized S-locus cysteine-rich/S-locus protein 11 (SCR/SP11) ligands interacts with S-receptor kinase (SRK), thereby inducing its self-activation during the self-pollen recognition process [5, 6, 7]. However, for compatible pollen, due to the absence of pollen coat protein, self-activation of SRK is inhibited by thioredoxin H-like1 (THL1), resulting pollen hydration and germination [8, 9]. ​Upon phosphorylation and activation, SRK forms a complex with M-locus protein kinase (MLPK, a plasma-membrane-localized receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase protein), which in turn interacts with arm-repeat-containing protein 1 (ARC1, a pistil specific E3 ubiquitin ligase protein) [10, 11]. The activated ARC1 is directly involved in the ubiquitination of Exo70A1, a plasma membrane-localized peptide, which is involved in the secretory vesicle delivery to the papillae surface [12, 13, 14]. The study shows that in the absence of functional Exo70A1, the exocyst complex-derived stigmatic secretion failed [15]. In addition, studies indicate that pollen-specific plasma-membrane-localized aquaporins (NIP4;1, NIP4;2, TIP1;3, TIP5;1) are potential macromolecules involved in pollen hydration by rendering pollen PM permeable to water and other solutes [16, 17].

Figure 2.

Pollen landing on stigma to germinate pollen tube. A. Pollen adhesion, hydration, and germination. B. SRK recognizes pollen of the same plant by interacting with SCR/SP11 thereby phosphorylating ARC1 which, in turn, interacts with Exo70A1 and evokes self-incompatibility by hindering stigmatic secretion. In the absence of SRK interaction with pollen-specific SCR/SP11, it interacts with stigma-specific THL1 and ARC1 phosphorylation is hindered. Hence, normal stigmatic secretion proceeds and pollen gets hydrated. C. Model of compatible pollen recognition. Before pollination, RALF23/33 induces ROS production in the stigmatic papilla cells through an ANJ-FER-ROP2-RBOHD pathway. After pollination with compatible pollen, PCP-Bs from the pollen coat compete with RALF23/33 for interaction with the ANJ-FER complex, repressing ROS production and initiating stigmatic responses.

Although the main mechanisms of action of different types of self-incompatibility systems have been clarified, in contrast, relatively little attention has been paid to compatible pollen recognition and the corresponding cellular responses in the stigmatic papillae. In Arabidopsis thaliana, the pollen coat PCP-Bs are excellent candidates for the pollen ligand to initiate the basal compatible pollen acceptance pathway in the papilla. The loss of PCP-Bs notably slows pollen hydration and germination [18]. Recently, a stigmatic gatekeeper, the ANJEA–FERONIA (ANJ–FER) receptor kinase complex, perceives the RAPID ALKALINIZATION FACTOR peptides RALF23 and RALF33 to induce reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in the stigma papillae, whereas pollination reduces stigmatic ROS, allowing pollen hydration. Upon pollination, PCP-Bs compete with RALF23/33 for binding to the ANJ-FER complex, leading to a decline of stigmatic ROS that facilitates pollen hydration (Figure 1C) [19].

Advertisement

4. Pollen tube guidance at the micropylar region

Several studies have reported that the pollen tubes fail to grow onto ovules containing abnormal female gametophytes, suggesting that the embryo sac provides a guiding cue for the pollen tubes [20, 21, 22]. The study on Oenothera showed that PT directly enters synergid cell, which is where it bursts and releases their contents along with two sperm cells. Later studies further demonstrated the synergid cell as being the only source of short-distance pollen tube attractants at the micropylar region [23, 24]. The synergid cells have structural specializations that facilitate the fertilization process. Each synergid cell consists of large vacuole at its chalazal end, and a nucleus and stack of ER, along with Golgi complexes, at its micropylar end [25]. The micropylar tip of each synergid cell wall is extensively invaginated, forming a structure referred to as the filiform apparatus [26]. MYB98, a synergid cell-specific R2R3 transcription factor, affects the development of filiform apparatus and is crucially important for micropylar PT guidance [27].

A later study showed that MYB98 affects the expression of arrays of SC-specific genes encoding defensin-like cysteine-rich proteins (CRPs), which are secreted into the filiform apparatus and are involved in PT guidance [28]. LURE1 and LURE2, two of the synergid cell produced CRPs, are directly involved in micropylar pollen tube guidance [29, 30]. Recent studies have shown that these proteins interact with receptors such as PRK6 [31] and MIDIS1-MIK [32] that are produced by the PTs and guide it toward the micropylar. The pollen tube tip-specific LIP1 and LIP2, members of RLKs, also regulate micropylar PT guidance and affect PT attraction toward LURE1 (Figure 3A). The study in Torenia fournieri showed that AMOR, an arabinogalactan polysaccharide secreted by mature ovules, also plays a positive role in rendering the growing PT competent to interact with LURE attractants [33]. The AtLURE1/PRK6-mediated signaling pathway thus guarantees a strong and biased precedence for own pollen tubes and contributes to prezygotic reproductive isolation in the genus Arabidopsis. Except LUREs, another group of CRPs, XIUQIU1–4 (Figure 3A), attracts PTs without any species bias [34, 35]. However, the interaction of XIUQIU to as yet unknown PT-receptor/s is likely conserved across Brassicaceae members as it can effectively attract PTs ofArabidopsis lyrata and Capsella rubella.

Figure 3.

Pollen tube guidance and double fertilization. A. Micropylar guidance is regulated by LURE-PRK6/MDIS1-MIK interaction, TIC2, XIUQIU, AMOR. Central cell localized CCG and synergid cell localized MYB98 affect CRP biosynthesis. B. HAP2/GCS1 interacts with DMP8 and DMP9, which are required for the EC1-induced translocation of HAP2/GCS1 from internal storage vesicle to the sperm plasma membrane to ensure successful fertilization.

In addition to the important role of synergid cell in pollen tube guidance, central cells also seem to influence pollen tube guidance. A central cell-specific Central Cell Guidance (CCG), encoding a nuclear protein with an N-terminal conserved zinc b-ribbon domain, has also been reported to affect micropylar pollen tube guidance [36, 37]. Interestingly, in ccg mutant, MYB98 and other CRP genes, including LURE1, are downregulated [37]. This is most likely due to the changes in MYB98 expression, or MYB98 along with CCG and CBP1, co-regulate the expression of those CRPs. However, if they were to co-regulate along with MYB98, additional evidence and explanations are required [38].

Advertisement

5. Discharge of sperm cells from the pollen tube tip to fertilization

Pollen tube growth arrests within a synergid and the pollen tube tip bursts, releasing the PT contents, including the two sperm cells [39]. This process is accompanied by the degeneration of the receptive synergid and is rapidly followed by the fusion of one sperm with the egg and one sperm with the central cell to give rise to the zygote and endosperm, respectively [40, 41].

Double fertilization proceeds through the recognition, attachment, and membrane fusion of male and female gametes, and these processes are directly regulated by proteins on the gamete surface (Figure 3B) [42]. Male gametic membrane proteins HAP2/GCS1, GEX2, DMP8, and DMP9 have been identified as fertilization regulators affecting male-female gamete fusion [43, 44, 45, 46]. The first gamete fusogen identified was HAP2/GCS1, which share a similar structure with two distinct families of exoplasmic fusogens: the somatic Fusion Family (FF) and class II viral glycoproteins [47]. The egg cell-specific EC1, which was reported to be crucial for sperm cell activation [48], also plays an important role in sperm cell attachment to the plasma membrane of both the egg cell and central cell [46]. EC1 proteins accumulate in storage vesicles of the egg cell. Upon sperm arrival, EC1-containing vesicles are exocytosed. The sperm endomembrane system responds to exogenously applied EC1 peptides by redistributing the potential gamete fusogen HAP2/GCS1 to the cell surface. These findings provide evidence that mutual gamete activation, regulated exocytosis, and sperm plasma membrane modifications govern flowering plant gamete interactions. However, it is yet unclear whether the EC1 acts solely or in coordination with sperm cell-specific signal during the process. Recent study reported that two sperm DUF679 membrane proteins DMP8 and DMP9 interact with HAP2/GCS1, which are required for the EC1-induced translocation of HAP2/GCS1 from internal storage vesicle to the sperm plasma membrane to ensure successful fertilization [49].

Once these two cells fuse at fertilization, their nuclei must then navigate toward each other and fuse. When an animal egg cell is fertilized, cable-like protein filaments called microtubules guide the two nuclei into contact. These microtubules are organized by a cellular structure called a centrosome [50, 51]. However, flowering plants do not have centrosomes [52]. Kawashima et al. [53] found that the fertilization requires an intact F-actin network. The sperm nucleus becomes surrounded by a star-shaped structure of F-actin cables, and that this F-actin structure migrates together with the sperm nucleus. The F-actin network constantly moves inward, from the edges of the cell toward the nucleus, prior to fertilization. ROP8 is a female gamete-specific Rho-GTPase that regulates F-actin dynamics. Previous research has shown that the Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein family verprolin-homologous and suppressor of the cAMP receptor (WAVE/SCAR) family are effector proteins that directly interact with ROPs and promote actin nucleation [54, 55]. The WAVE/SCAR complex is the main activator of the F-actin regulatory ACTIN RELATED PROTEIN 2/3 (ARP2/3) protein complex [56, 57]. However, further study demonstrated that the F-actin regulator, SCAR2, but not the ARP2/3 protein complex, regulates F-actin dynamics in female gametophytic cells for fertilization. In addition, the class XI myosin XI-G controls active F-actin movement in the Arabidopsis central cell [58].

Advertisement

6. Fertilization recovery system and polytubey blocking

In normal conditions, although hundreds of pollens may land on the stigma and growing pollen tubes into the transmitting tract of a pistil, usually only a single tube, in response to attractants, emerges from the septum in the vicinity of each ovule to target the ovule [59, 60]. Even the attraction of more than one pollen tube has been observed in different gametophytic mutants [61, 62, 63, 64, 65]. The mechanism regulating pollen tube number remains unclear. As we discussed earlier, the synergid plays a role in attracting the pollen tube. In Arabidopsis, pollen tube growth arrests within a synergid cell and accompanied by the degeneration of the receptive synergid. Thus, the second pollen tube is attracted by another synergid. Kasahara et al. [66, 67] investigated the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon in Arabidopsis upon frequently observing ovules that accepted two pollen tubes in the fertilization defective hap2–1 (allelic to gcs1) mutant. They observed that the fertility rate of the ovules pollinated with pollen from male gametophytic mutants was not around 50%, as expected, it is 60–70%. This result was revealed once fertilization failed with the first pollen tube, attracted a second one through a second synergid cell, so increasing the fertility rate. This phenomenon is called fertilization recovery system (Figure 4A and B).

Figure 4.

Fertilization recovery system and polytubey. A. One pollen is being directed toward the ovule. B. The first pollen tube penetrates the ovule but fertilization fails, the second pollen tube is attracted by another synergid cell to increase the chances of fertilization as a “wise” back-up system (Fertilization Recovery System). C. Fertilization signals (ECS1 and ECS2) block polytubey. ECS1 and ESC2 specifically cleave the pollen tube attractor LURE1. D. FERONIA, ANJEA, and HERCULES RECEPTOR KINASE 1 receptor-like kinases located at the septum interact with pollen tube-specific RALF6, 7, 16, 36, and 37 peptide ligands to establish polytubey block. In addition, NO affects LURE1 and suppresses pollen tube attraction at micropylar.

In addition to the fertilization recovery system, plants, like animals, also have an important task of avoiding polyspermy. In Arabidopsis, the block to polyspermy is facilitated by a mechanism that prevents polytubey. How exactly do plants control the number of pollen tubes they attract? Three block mechanisms have been discovered recently, occurring in the septum, the micropyle, and after fertilization. The first polytubey block is located at the septum, FERONIA, ANJEA, and HERCULES RECEPTOR KINASE 1 receptor-like kinases located at the septum interact with pollen tube-specific RALF6, 7, 16, 36, and 37 peptide ligands to establish polytubey block (Figure 4D) [68]. In addition, Duan et al. [69] demonstrated that pollen tube arrival at the ovule triggers the accumulation of nitric oxide at the filiform apparatus in a process that is dependent on FERONIA and mediated by de-esterified pectin. Nitric oxide nitrosates both precursor and mature forms of the chemoattractant LURE11, respectively, blocking its secretion and interaction with its receptor, to suppress pollen tube attraction. Fertilization signals can also block polytubey. After successful fertilization, the aspartic endopeptidases ECS1 and ECS2 are secreted to the extracellular space from a cortical network located at the apical domain of the Arabidopsis egg cell. ECS1 and ESC2 specifically cleave the pollen tube attractor LURE1 (Figure 4C). In consequence, polytubey is frequent in ecs1 ecs2 double mutants. These findings demonstrate that plant egg cells sense successful fertilization and elucidate a mechanism as to how a relatively fast post-fertilization block to polytubey is established by fertilization-induced degradation of attraction factors [70].

Advertisement

7. Pollen tube-dependent ovule enlargement morphology (POEM)

As discussed earlier, once two sperm cells fused to egg cell and central cell, to give rise to embryo and endosperm, which is the start of seed development. However, nobody knows the mechanism of initiation of seed development, except double fertilization. The discovery of pollen tube-dependent ovule enlargement morphology (POEM) brings a turning point, interesting in that the PTC itself is enough to initiate the ovule enlargement (Figure 5) even though it may not grow to the regular seed size [71]. As a preparation for fertilization, PTC initiated the developmental activity of various cells in the ovule. While studies have suggested that fertilization is a prerequisite for seed coat development [72, 73]. The studies demonstrated that just PTC release into the ovule is enough to initiate seed coat and endosperm development [74, 75]. In addition, the expression of numerous genes is responsible for cell expansion, cell division, and seed coat development in gcs1/gcs1 pollinated ovules. As a preparation for fertilization, PTC initiates the developmental activity of various cells in the ovule. After mobilization, the ovules are waiting for the signal from double fertilization to continue the seed development, in addition to the phenotype of ovule size and seed coat formation.

Figure 5.

Pollen tube-dependent ovule enlarged morphology (POEM). After the pollen tube arrests within a synergid, the pollen tube bursts and releases its contents with two sperm cells. Double fertilization is accomplished by these sperm cells fertilizing egg cell and central cell to give rise to the zygote and endosperm, respectively. However, if the ovule gets gcs1 mutant pollen tube, gcs1 sperm cells fail to fertilize. The ovule will be enlarged and initiate seed coat formation without fertilization.

Discovery of the POEM phenomenon showed its potential applications in crop breeding for seed size increment and apomixis induction. However, POEM has only been reported in Arabidopsis. There are great differences between mono and dicotyledon plants. To investigate if this phenomenon is conserved in monocot as well, Honma et al. [76] developed genome-edited rice plants by knocking-out homologs of rice GCS1 using the CRISPR/Cas9 technology, which led to fertilization failure and pollen tube-dependent ovule enlargement morphology (POEM) phenomenon. Apparently, the POEMed-like rice ovule can grow near-normal seed size unlike earlier observations in Arabidopsis in which gcs1 ovules were aborted quite early. The POEMed-like rice ovules contained 10–20% sugar, with extremely high sucrose content (98%). Transcriptomic analysis revealed that the osgcs1 ovules had downregulation of starch biosynthetic genes, which would otherwise have converted sucrose to starch. Overall, this study shows that pollen tube content release is sufficient to trigger sucrose unloading at rice ovules. However, successful fertilization is indispensable to trigger sucrose-starch conversion. These findings are expected to pave the way for developing novel sugar-producing crops suited for diverse climatic regions.

Advertisement

8. Summary

This chapter discusses the journey of the pollen from the stigma to fertilization as well as the POEM phenomenon. These processes are achieved through the involvement of various male-female interactions. The molecular mechanisms underlying pollen tube guidance from the funiculus to the female gametophyte are well known in Arabidopsis, because the pollen tube attractants AtLURE1 peptides had previously been identified downstream of the master synergid cell regulator MYB98. Recently, more and more factors related to fertilization journey have been elucidated. During the final step after pollen tube bursting, HAP2/ GCS1, GEX2, DMP8, and DMP9 have been identified as direct male-related key fertilization factors. The F-actin network is also required for sperm nucleus migration. The fertilization recovery system is to increase the chances of fertilization as a “wise” back-up system. Combining fertilization recovery system with recent research on polytubey blocking, the process of how ovule attracts pollen tube is becoming clear. Finally, very few factors related to new plant phenomena and POEM have been identified. New insights into the underlying molecular mechanisms are anticipated.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

These works were supported by the Precursory Research for Embryonic Science and Technology (13416724, Kasahara Sakigake Project), Japan Science and Technology Agency. These works were also supported by a grant-in-aid (25840106) from the Japanese Society for the promotion of Science (JSPS). These works were also supported by FAFU-UCR Joint Center and Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Haixia Applied Plant Systems Biology, Haixia Institute of Science and Technology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1. Twell D. Male gametogenesis and germline specification in flowering plants. Sexual Plant Reproduction. 2011;24:149-160. DOI: 10.1007/s00497-010-0157-5
  2. 2. Yadegari R. Female gametophyte development. The Plant Cell. 2004;16:S133-S141. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.018192
  3. 3. Jennifer, Doucet, Hyun, et al. Pollen acceptance or rejection: A tale of two pathways. Trends in Plant Science. 2016;21:1058-1067. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants
  4. 4. Boyes DC, Nasrallah ME, Vrebalov J, et al. The self-incompatibility (S) haplotypes of brassica contain highly divergent and rearranged sequences of ancient origin. The Plant Cell. 1997;9:237-247. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.9.2.237
  5. 5. Schopfer CR, Nasrallah ME, Nasrallah JB, Schopfer CR, Nasrallah ME, Nasrallah JB. The male determinant of self-incompatibility in brassica. Science. 1999;286:1697-1700. DOI: 10.1126/science.286.5445.1697
  6. 6. Kemp BP, Doughty J. S cysteine-rich (SCR) binding domain analysis of the brassica self-incompatibility S-locus receptor kinase. The New Phytologist. 2007;175:619-629. DOI: 10.111 1/j.1469-8137.2007.02126.x
  7. 7. Shimosato H, Yokota N, Shiba H, Iwano M, Entani T, Che F-S, et al. Characterization of the SP11/SCR high-affinity binding site involved in self/nonself recognition in Brassica self-incompatibility. The Plant Cell. 2007;19:107-117. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.105.038869
  8. 8. Bower MS, Matias DD, Fernandes-Carvalho E, Mazzurco M, Gu T, Rothstein SJ, et al. Two members of the thioredoxin-h family interact with the kinase domain of a Brassica S locus receptor kinase. The Plant Cell. 1996;8:1641-1650. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.8.9.1641
  9. 9. Cabrillac D, Cock JM, Dumas C, Gaude T. The S-locus receptor kinase is inhibited by thioredoxins and activated by pollen coat proteins. Nature. 2001;410:220-223. DOI: 10.1038/35065626
  10. 10. Gu T, Mazzurco M, Sulaman W, Matias DD, Goring DR. Binding of an arm repeat protein to the kinase domain of the S-locus receptor kinase. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1998;95:382-387. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.1.382
  11. 11. Stone SL, Anderson EM, Mullen RT, Goring DR. ARC1 is an E3 ubiquitin ligase and promotes the ubiquitination of proteins during the rejection of self-incompatible Brassica pollen. The Plant Cell. 2003;15:885-898. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.009845
  12. 12. Samuel MA, Chong YT, Haasen KE, Aldea-Brydges MG, Stone SL, Goring DR. Cellular pathways regulating responses to compatible and self-incompatible pollen in Brassica and Arabidopsis stigmas intersect at Exo70A1, a putative component of the exocyst complex. The Plant Cell. 2009;21:2655-2671. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.109.069740
  13. 13. Yang K, Zang HC, Converse R, Zhu LQ , Yang YJ, Xue LY, et al. Interaction between two self-incompatible signal elements, EXO70A1 and ARC1. Acta Agronomica Sinica. 2012;37:2136-2144. DOI: 10.1016/S1875 -2780(11)60054-0
  14. 14. Liu J, Zhang H, Lian X, Converse R, Zhu L. Identification of interacting motifs between armadillo repeat containing 1 (ARC1) and exocyst 70 A1 (Exo70A1) proteins in Brassica oleracea. The Protein Journal. 2016;35:34-43. DOI: 10.1007/s1093 0-015-9644-8
  15. 15. Safavian D, Goring DR. Secretory activity is rapidly induced in stigmatic papillae by compatible pollen, but inhibited for self-incompatible pollen in the Brassicaceae. PLoS One. 2013;8:e84286. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084286
  16. 16. Wudick MM, Luu DT, Tournaire Roux C, Sakamoto W, Maurel C. Vegetative and sperm cell-specific aquaporins of Arabidopsis highlight the vacuolar equipment of pollen and contribute to plant reproduction. Plant Physiology. 2014;164:1697-1706. DOI: 10.1104/pp.113.228700
  17. 17. Pérez DGJA, Barberini ML, Amodeo G, Muschietti JP. Pollen aquaporins: What are they there for? Plant Signaling & Behavior. 2016;11:e1217375-e1217375. DOI: 10.1080/15592 324.2016.1217375
  18. 18. Wang L, Clarke LA, Eason RJ, Parker CC, Qi B, Scott RJ, et al. PCP-B class pollen coat proteins are key regulators of the hydration checkpoint in Arabidopsis thaliana pollen-stigma interactions. The New Phytologist. 2017;213:764-777
  19. 19. Liu C, Shen L, Xiao Y, et al. Pollen PCP-B peptides unlock a stigma peptide-receptor kinase gating mechanism for pollination. Science. 2021;372:171-175. DOI: 10.1126/science.abc6107
  20. 20. Hulskamp M, Schneiz K, Pruit RE. Genetic evidence for a long-range activity that directs pollen tube guidance in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell. 1995;7:57-64
  21. 21. Ray A. Three’s company: Regulatory cross-talk during seed development. The Plant Cell. 1997;9:665-667
  22. 22. Shimizu KK, Attractive OK. Repulsive interactions between female and male gametophytes in Arabidopsis pollen tube guidance. Development. 2000;127:4511-4518
  23. 23. Higashiyama T, Kuroiwa H, Kawano S, Kuroiwa T. Guidance in vitro of the pollen tube to the naked embryo sac of Torenia fournieri. The Plant Cell. 1998;10:2019-2031. DOI: 10.1105/ tpc.10.12.2019
  24. 24. Higashiyama T, Yabe S, Sasaki N, Nishimura Y, Miyagishima SY, Kuroiwa H, et al. Pollen tube attraction by the synergid cell. Science. 2001;293:1480-1483. DOI: 10.1126/science.1062429
  25. 25. Jensen WA. The ultrastructure and histochemistry of the synergids of cotton. American Journal of Botany. 1965;52:238-256. DOI: 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1965.tb06781.x
  26. 26. Gunning BES, Pate JS. “Transfer cells” plant cells with wall ingrowths, specialized in relation to short distance transport of solutes—Their occurrence, structure, and development. Protoplasma. 1969;68:107-133. DOI: 10.1007/bf01247900
  27. 27. Kasahara RD, Portereiko MF, Sandaklie Nikolova L, Rabiger DS, Drews GN. MYB98 is required for pollen tube guidance and synergid cell differentiation in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell. 2005;17(11):2981-2992. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.105.034603
  28. 28. Punwani JA, Rabiger DS, Drews GN. MYB98 positively regulates a battery of synergid-expressed genes encoding filiform apparatus–localized proteins. The Plant Cell. 2007;19:2557-2568. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.107.052076
  29. 29. Okuda S, Tsutsui H, Shiina K, Sprunck S, Takeuchi H, Yui R, et al. Defensin-like polypeptide LUREs are pollen tube attractants secreted from synergid cells. Nature. 2009;458:357. DOI: 10.1038/nature07882
  30. 30. Takeuchi H, Higashiyama T. A species-specific cluster of defensin-like genes encodes diffusible pollen tube attractants in Arabidopsis. PLoS Biology. 2012;10:e1001449. DOI: 10.1371/ journal.pbio.1001449
  31. 31. Takeuchi H, Higashiyama T. Tip-localized receptors control pollen tube growth and LURE sensing in Arabidopsis. Nature. 2016;531:245. DOI: 10.1038/nature17413
  32. 32. Wang T, Liang L, Xue Y, Jia PF, Chen W, Zhang MX, et al. A receptor heteromer mediates the male perception of female attractants in plants. Nature. 2016;531:241. DOI: 10.1038/nature16975
  33. 33. Mizukami Akane G, Inatsugi R, Jiao J, Kotake T, Kuwata K, Ootani K, et al. The AMOR arabinogalactan sugar chain induces pollen-tube competency to respond to ovular guidance. Current Biology. 2016;26:1091-1097. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.02.040
  34. 34. Meng JG, Zhang MX, Yang WC, Li HJ. TICKET attracts pollen tubes and mediates reproductive isolation between relative species in Brassicaceae. Science China. Life Sciences. 2019;62:1413-1419. DOI: 10.1007/s11427-019-9833-3
  35. 35. Zhong S, Liu M, Wang Z, Huang Q , Hou S, Xu YC, et al. Cysteine-rich peptides promote interspecific genetic isolation in Arabidopsis. Science. 2019;364:9564. DOI: 10.1126/science.aau9564
  36. 36. Chen YH, Li HJ, Shi DQ , Yuan L, Liu J, Sreenivasan R, et al. The central cell plays a critical role in pollen tube guidance in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell. 2007;19:3563-3577. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.107.053967
  37. 37. Li HJ, Zhu SS, Zhang MX, Wang T, Liang L, Xue Y, et al. Arabidopsis CBP1 is a novel regulator of transcription initiation in central cell-mediated pollen tube guidance. The Plant Cell. 2015;27:2880-2893. DOI: 10.1105/ tpc.15.00370
  38. 38. Erdmann RM, Hofmann A, Walter H-K, Wagenknecht H-A, GroßHardt R, Gehring M. Molecular movement in the Arabidopsis thaliana female gametophyte. Plant Reproduction. 2017;30:141-146. DOI: 10.1007/s00497-017-0304-3
  39. 39. Russell S. Double fertilization. International Review of Cytology. 1992;140:357-388
  40. 40. Faure JE, Dumas C. Fertilization in flowering plants. New approaches for an old story. Plant Physiology. 2001;125:102-104
  41. 41. Weterings K, Russell SD. Experimental analysis of the fertilization process. The Plant Cell. 2004;16:S107-S118
  42. 42. Mori T, Kawai-Toyooka H, Igawa T, Igawa T, Nozaki H. Gamete dialogs in green lineages. Molecular Plant. 2015;8:1442-1454
  43. 43. Mori T, Kuroiwa H, Higashiyama T, Kuroiwa T. GENERATIVE CELL SPECIFIC 1 is essential for angiosperm fertilization. Nature Cell Biology. 2006;8:64-71
  44. 44. von Besser K, Frank AC, Johnson MA, Preuss D. Arabidopsis HAP2 (GCS1) is a sperm-specific gene required for pollen tube guidance and fertilization. Development. 2006;133:4761-4769. DOI: 10.1242/dev.02683
  45. 45. Mori T, Igawa T, Tamiya G, Igawa T, Nozaki H. Gamete attachment requires GEX2 for successful fertilization in Arabidopsis. Current Biology. 2014;24:170-175
  46. 46. Cyprys P, Lindemeier M, Sprunck S. Gamete fusion is facilitated by two sperm cell-expressed DUF679 membrane proteins. Nature Plants. 2019;5:253-257. DOI: 10.1038/s41477-019-0382-3
  47. 47. Brukman NG, Li X, Podbilewicz B. Fusexins, HAP2/GCS1 and evolution of gamete fusion. Frontiers in Cell and Development Biology. 2022;9:824024. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.824024
  48. 48. Sprunck S, Rademacher S, Vogler F, Gheyselinck J, Grossniklaus U, Dresselhaus T. Egg cell-secreted EC1 triggers sperm cell activation during double fertilization. Science. 2012;338:1093-1097. DOI: 10.1126/science.1223944
  49. 49. Wang W, Xiong H, Zhao P, Sun M. DMP8 and 9 regulate HAP2/GCS1 trafficking for the timely acquisition of sperm fusion competence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2022;45:119
  50. 50. Schatten G. The centrosome and its mode of inheritance: The reduction of the centrosome during gametogenesis and its restoration during fertilization. Developmental Biology. 1994;165:299-335. DOI: 10.1006/dbio.1994.1256
  51. 51. Reinsch S, Gonczy P. Mechanisms of nuclear positioning. Journal of Cell Science. 1998;111:2283-2295
  52. 52. Carvalho Santos Z, Azimzadeh J, Pereira Leal JB, Bettencourt DM. Evolution: Tracing the origins of centrioles, cilia, and flagella. Journal of Cell Biology. 2011;194:165-175. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201011152
  53. 53. Kawashima T, Maruyama D, Shagirov M, Li J, Hamamura Y, Yelagandula R, et al. Dynamic F-actin movement is essential for fertilization in Arabidopsis thaliana. Elife. 2014;3:e04501. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.04501
  54. 54. Uhrig JF, Mutondo M, Zimmermann I, Deeks MJ, Machesky LM, Thomas P. The role of Arabidopsis scar genes in arp2-arp3-dependent cell morphogenesis. Development. 2007;134:967-977
  55. 55. Makoto Y, Chunhua Z, Szymanski DB. Arp2/3-dependent growth in the plant kingdom: Scars for life. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2013;4:166. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00166
  56. 56. Basu D, Le J, El Essal ED, Huang S, Zhang C, Mallery EL. Distorted3/scar2 is a putative Arabidopsis wave complex subunit that activates the arp2/3 complex and is required for epidermal morphogenesis. The Plant Cell. 2005;17:502-524
  57. 57. Frank M, Egile C, Dyachok J, Frank M, et al. Activation of Arp2/3 complex-dependent actin polymerization by plant proteins distantly related to Scar/WAVE. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2004;101:16379-16384
  58. 58. Ali MF, Fatema U, Peng X, Hacker SW, Maruyama D, Sun MX, et al. ARP2/3-independent WAVE/SCAR pathway and class XI myosin control sperm nuclear migration in flowering plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2020;51:117
  59. 59. Mogensen HL. Pollen tube-synergid interactions in Proboscidea louisianica (Martineaceae). American Journal of Botany. 1978;65:953-964. DOI: 10.2307/2442682
  60. 60. Palanivelu R, Preuss D. Distinct short-range ovule signals attract or repel Arabidopsis thaliana pollen tubes in vitro. BMC Plant Biology. 2006;6:7. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-6-7
  61. 61. Shimizu KK, Okada K. Attractive and repulsive interactions between female and male gametophytes in Arabidopsis pollen tube guidance. Development. 2000;127:4511-4518. DOI: 10.5167/uzh-71801
  62. 62. Huck N, Moore JM, Federer M, Grossniklaus U. The Arabidopsis mutant feronia disrupts the female gametophytic control of pollen tube reception. Development. 2003;130:2149-2159. DOI: 10.1242/dev.00458
  63. 63. Rotman N, Rozier F, Boavida L, Dumas C, Berger F, Faure JE. Female control of male gamete delivery during fertilization in Arabidopsis thaliana. Current Biology. 2003;13:432-436. DOI: 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00093-9
  64. 64. Escobar Restrepo J-M, Huck N, Kessler S, Gagliardini V, Ghey Selinck J, Yang W-C, et al. The FERONIA receptor-like kinase mediates male–female interactions during pollen tube reception. Science. 2007;317:656-660. DOI: 10.1126/science.1143562
  65. 65. Capron A, Gourgues M, Neiva LS, Faure JE, Berger F, Pagnussat G, et al. Maternal control of male-gamete delivery in Arabidopsis involves a putative GPI-anchored protein encoded by the LORELEI gene. The Plant Cell. 2008;20:3038-3049. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.108.061713
  66. 66. Kasahara RD, Maruyama D, Hamamura Y, Sakakibara T, Twell D, Higashiyama T. Fertilization recovery after defective sperm cell release in Arabidopsis. Current Biology. 2012;22:1084-1089. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.069
  67. 67. Kasahara RD, Maruyama D, Higashiyama T. Fertilization recovery system is dependent on the number of pollen grains for efficient reproduction in plants. Plant Signaling & Behavior. 2013;8:e23690. DOI: 10.4161/psb.23690
  68. 68. Zhong S, Li L, Wang Z, Ge Z, Li Q , Bleckmann A, et al. RALF peptide signaling controls the polytubey block in Arabidopsis. Science. 2022;375:290-296
  69. 69. Duan Q , MCJ L, Kita D, et al. FERONIA controls pectin- and nitric oxide-mediated male–female interaction. Nature. 2021;579:561-566. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2106-2
  70. 70. Yu X, Zhang X, Zhao P, et al. Fertilized egg cells secrete endopeptidases to avoid polytubey. Nature. 2021;592:433-437. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03387-5
  71. 71. Kasahara RD, Notaguchi M, Nagahara S, Suzuki T, Susaki D, Honma Y, et al. Pollen tube contents initiate ovule enlargement and enhance seed coat development without fertilization. Science Advances. 2016;2:e1600554. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1600554
  72. 72. Beeckman T, De Rycke R, Viane R, Inzé D. Histological study of seed coat development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Plant Research. 2000;113:139-148. DOI: 10.1007/pl00013924
  73. 73. Figueiredo DD, Batista RA, Roszak PJ, Hennig L, Köhler C. Auxin production in the endosperm drives seed coat development in Arabidopsis. eLife. 2016;5:e20542. DOI: 10.7554/ eLife.20542
  74. 74. Liu X, Adhikari PB, Kasahara RD. Pollen tube contents from failed fertilization contribute to seed coat initiation in Arabidopsis. F1000Research. 2019;8:348. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.18644.2
  75. 75. Liu X, Adhikari PB, Kasahara RD. Pollen tube content facilitates and increases the potential of endosperm proliferation irrespective of fertilization in Arabidopsis thaliana. F1000Research. 2019;8:348
  76. 76. Honma Y, Adhikari PB, Kuwata K, Kagenishi T, Yokawa K, Notaguchi M, et al. High-quality sugar production by osgcs1 rice. Communications Biology. 2020;3:617. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-020-01329-x

Written By

Xiaoyan Liu and Ryushiro D. Kasahara

Submitted: 13 December 2022 Reviewed: 04 January 2023 Published: 27 January 2023