Negative impacts of abiotic stresses on production of various crops.
Abstract
Climate change is resultant from modern-day chemical agriculture, which is creating negative impacts on crop production. Global agriculture is now facing various problems arising due to abiotic stresses such as flood, drought, temperature extremes, light extremes, salinity, heavy metal stress, nutrient toxicity/deficiency. These stresses not only hamper the growth and production but also reduce the quality of crops through morphological, physiological, biochemical changes and synthesis of ROS. Further, they negatively impact on entire environment specially soil health. Deterioration of yield and quality often occurs due to lack of essential inputs to plants under abiotic stresses. Although plants adopt defensive mechanisms, such abiotic stresses need to be addressed properly with various eco-friendly organic farming approaches. Different organic inputs like organic manures, biofertilizers, bio-priming with micro-organisms, bio-stimulants (seaweed extracts, humic acid, micro-organisms, etc.), mulches, biochar are known to alleviate abiotic stresses under climate change scenario. Further, various organic agronomic practices viz. crop rotation, intercropping, tillage, sowing methods and time, nutrient, water and intercultural operations, use of PGPB, organic formulations, grafting, selection of resistant/tolerant varieties and other scientific/wise uses of organic inputs can mitigate/escape the negative impacts of abiotic stresses resulting in upliftment in crop production as well as the quality of produce.
Keywords
- abiotic stresses
- agronomic management
- climate change
- crop growth
- organic farming practices
- production
1. Introduction
Food scarcity is a major challenge in today’s agriculture. In order to meet the food demand of ever-increasing population, worldwide, farmers are aiming to improve agricultural productivity at the expanse of environment through application of chemical fertilizers and pesticides. Unscientific and over use of chemicals and other management practices degrades soil, water and other valuable natural resources leading to climate change scenario which is a great concern for sustainable agriculture. Further, shrinkage of agricultural land due to population growth, aim/migration for alternative job, urbanization, deforestation, anti-environmental anthropogenic activities, etc. are creating major issues of agriculture and urging for improvement of agricultural productivity and fulfillment of this urge is questionable under climate change scenario as plant has sessile growth habit. Crop growth mostly depends on interaction between genetic trait of variety with growing environment. Climate change, therefore, exerts various stresses on crops and affects crop negatively. The stresses can be biotic (living) and abiotic (non-living) stresses which often put both sole and combined impact on crop.
Abiotic stresses such as drought, flood, salinity, temperature extremes (hot/cold), heavy metals, light, wind, nutrients/chemicals, etc. due to climate change decide distribution of plants in various environmental conditions [1] and thereafter, affect crop growth especially at reproductive stage resulting in poor crop productivity throughout the world [2]. Abiotic stresses also trigger various biotic stresses leading to poor crop productivity through disruption of seed germination, vegetative growth, dry matter production and its translocation to reproductive parts [3]. World experiences around 70% yield loss due to abiotic stresses [4]. Severity in abiotic stresses causes imbalance between demand and supply of nutrients, inactivation of enzymatic activities, suppression of various genes responsible for the quality expression, etc. [5] resulting loss of yield and quality of crop through hampering crop from morphological to molecular levels [6].
These abiotic stresses indeed are serious barriers in front of food security of global population and therefore, suitable strategies are highly needed to cope with these and to achieve good crop growth, yield and quality under climate change scenario. Although few mechanisms like escaping stress, stress avoidance and stress tolerance are done by plants through making various molecular, cellular and physiological changes, there is need to explore and adopt various strategies like traditional and modern breeding approaches, agronomic management practices, exogenous applications of stress tolerating compounds, etc. to mitigate harmful impacts of abiotic stresses on crop to a high extent. Agronomic management strategies cover various technologies including organic farming approaches to alleviate abiotic stresses. Organic farming consists of chemical excluded farming practices which mostly rely on natural and organic inputs/products to improve crop growth and yield as well as other allied sectors. Various organic farming inputs (manures, biofertilizers, crop residues, bio-stimulants, etc.) and practices (selection of varieties, tillage, sowing, nutrient, weed, water management practices, etc.) play a key role in addressing various abiotic stresses and allows the crop to grow well by coping up the climate change situation. Although the published information is less in this regard, an insight knowledge on organic farming activates against abiotic stresses is highly needed. Therefore, an attempt was made in this chapter to highlight negative impacts of abiotic stresses on crop and their mitigation strategies through various organic farming approaches.
2. Various abiotic stresses
Abiotic stress is resulted due to the negative influence of physical or chemical environment on biological organisms either alone or in various forms of interaction. In agriculture, crop production is highly hampered due to abiotic stresses. They individually or as combination impair the normal metabolisms and other physiological functions in plants and thereby, affect crop growth and development. Combined influence of various stresses is more pronounced on crop production than their individual adverse effect. There are different types of stresses viz. drought, flood, heat and cold stresses, heavy metals, toxicity due to nutrients and pesticides, high light, low light, UV exposure, photo-inhibition, shade, wind velocity, air pollution, etc. which negatively impact on crop plants (Figure 1). In the following section, these stresses are briefly highlighted.
2.1 Drought stress
Among the different natural resources, water is now highly precious and scarce for living organisms including crop. Water regulates various physiological and biochemical activities of plant like photosynthesis, transpiration, nutrient uptakes, translocation of assimilates, etc. Plant growth, internal activities are seriously hampered if water availability deviates from normal which is now a common phenomenon throughout the globe as an effect of climate change due to unscientific, non-eco-friendly anthropogenic activities. Water stress mostly occurs in the form drought and flood. Drought or water scarcity may arise due to various reasons such as long period of no occurrence or less intensity of rainfall from usual, low river and stream flows, reduced ground water table, etc. in a region. In agriculture, during crop growth stages, drought may arise due to late onset and early cessation of rainfall, break of monsoon for long period, less availability of irrigation water, faulty or no water conservation practices/structures resulting in serious damage to crop growth and yield. Moreover, Under the situation of soil moisture availability, if salt concentration is high in soil, plant can’t uptake water from soil properly and even, exosmosis occurs. This situation, thus creates apparent drought. High temperature triggers evapotranspiration as a part of internal cooling process, resulting in drought or water deficiency. Further, drought can also be resulted from low temperature, under which water freezes in the intercellular spaces creating protoplasmic dehydration and death of cell and eventually, the plant. Altogether, drought affects plant’s germination and normal functioning.
2.2 Flood stress
When water availability becomes unnecessarily high as compared to normal for a particular period in an area, flood occurs. It may be resulted from sudden outburst of cloud coupled with excessive rainfall for a short time period (flash flood) or due to continuous rainfall for few days or high water-table or overflow of river, ponds and dams associated with less drainage facility. Flash flood lasts for a very less time period from a day to only few weeks. However, deep water flood lasts for a longer period of time.
2.3 Salinity stress
Throughout the globe specially during arid and semi-arid areas, salinity is a major issue. It arises in areas where potential evapotranspiration is greater than the rainfall as well as insufficient leaching of salts beyond rhizospheric zone owing from poor rainfall. Presence of excess salts in soil drastically hampers the crop growth [8]. Soil salinity can be developed by both natural phenomena (Weathering of rocks, flooding and intrusion of sea water to agricultural land, seepage of saline water, wind blow, etc.) and human induced activities (poor water quality of irrigation, deforestation, overgrazing, intensive cropping, etc.). Salinity is indicated by electrical conductivity (EC). Usually, soil having EC > 4 dS/m, exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) < 15.0 and pH <8.5 is called as saline soil [9]. Saline soil contains chloride, sulfate salts of sodium, magnesium and calcium ions. Presence of these salts in excessive quantities deteriorates soil health through changing cation exchange capacity, negatively impacting soil micro-organisms’ survival, multiplication and activities, disrupting soil physical properties through deflocculation and reduction of hydraulic conductivity, etc.
2.4 Temperature stress
Temperature stress indicates both rise and fall of temperature from normal. Sudden change in temperature occurs due to climate change. Specifically, heat stress or high temperature situation arise due to due to global warming and anthropogenic activities resulting in change biodiversity, crop ecosystem, impairment of crop growth and production especially in areas of tropics and sub-tropics. Heat stress results in respiration greater than photosynthesis causing starvation injury through deficit of food reserves in plants. According to different degree of high temperature tolerance, plants are categorized as psychrophiles (up to 15–20°C), mesophiles (up to 35–45°C) and thermophiles (up to 45–100°C) [10].
In contrast to heat stress, an opposite phenomenon known as cold stress or low temperature occurs mostly in temperate areas. There are two types of cold stress viz. chilling stress and freezing stress both affecting the crop’s physiological, biochemical activities and eventually, hampering crop’s growth, yield and quality. Similar to heat stress, plants are also grouped into three based on cold stress tolerance: Chilling sensitive (Plants are extremely sensitive above 0°C and below 15°C), chilling resistant (plants can tolerate low temperature but highly suffer under formation of ice crystals in intra and inter cellular spaces) and frost resistant (plants are tolerant to extremely low temperature).
2.5 Heavy metal toxicity
Heavy metals impart mutagenic effects on plants by contaminating irrigation water, food chain and environment [11]. These are inorganic, non-biodegradable compounds with atomic mass >20 and density >5 g/cm3. The source of heavy metals in the soil is use of irrigation water from contaminated area, excessive application of chemical fertilizer and pesticides. Plants absorb heavy metals from soil through roots. Ag, Cr, Cd, As, Sb, Pb, Se, and Hg are some major heavy metals which at high concentrations are non-essential and thereby, hamper soil quality and plant’s normal functioning. Other than these, there are some essential elements viz. Zn, Cu, Ni, Fe, Co, etc. which at high concentrations create heavy metal toxicity in soil and plant.
2.6 Light stress
Light is essential resource not only for plant growth but also for all life. In fact, harnessing of high amount of solar energy is the prime aim of crop production. However, excessive or low light can cause negative impact on crop such as poor crop growth, wilting, dwarfing, less photosynthesis, cell damage, low productivity and quality and even death of the plant.
2.7 Wind velocity
Wind plays a major role in maintenance of aeration, pollination, etc. in crop’s microclimate. However, high wind velocity over the cropped area can exert stress on crop. Wind velocity occurs due to movement of wind from one direction to other at a particular speed. It can create high evapo-transpiration, sand injury, crop lodging, pollen shedding, loss of pollen through desiccation, etc.
2.8 Chemical toxicity
Continuous dependence on chemical based inorganic fertilizers and pesticides specially after green revolution is a great concern now in present day intensive agriculture condition. Further, rapid industrialization and excessive use of untreated sewage water hampers crop’s growth and productivity through exerting detrimental impacts of the chemical toxicity on the soil- plant-atmospheric continuum.
2.9 Nutrient toxicity/deficiency
Nutrient toxicity or deficiency resulted from excessive or scarce application of fertilizers and manures as well as soil own nutritional status impairs plant growth, productivity and quality of the crop. This situation is very common in today’s intensive agriculture due to non-judicious, unscientific nutrient management practices by the farmers.
3. Negative impacts of abiotic stresses on crop
Plants are negatively impacted by abiotic stress. In most cases, abiotic stresses exert combined impact on crop plants and it causes more harm over individual impact of stress. Hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl radicals, superoxide radicals, singlet oxygen and other reactive oxygen species (ROS) are synthesized under various abiotic stresses, specially under drought stress. In combinations, these cause lipid peroxidation, protein oxidation etc. and affect nucleic acids and enzyme activity resulting in death of cell. Accordingly, plants adopt defensive mechanisms against stresses. For instance, under drought stress, partial or complete closure of stomata is the one such adoptive approach by plants, which further restricts entry of sunlight, CO2 and impairs electron flow through electron transport chain, resulting in decline in photosynthesis. Various negative impacts of abiotic stress on plants are shown in Figure 2 and Table 1 and highlighted hereunder.
Crop | Abiotic stress | References | Crop | Abiotic stress | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lentil | Drought stress | [12] | Lentil | Heat stress | [13] |
Chick pea | [14] | Wheat | [15, 16, 17, 18] | ||
Soybean | [19] | Rice | [20] | ||
Common bean | [21] | Ground nut | [13] | ||
Mung bean | [22] | Chick pea | [13] | ||
Faba bean | [23] | Pea | [24] | ||
Barley | [5] | Pigeon pea | [13] | ||
Wheat | [25] | Cow pea | [13] | ||
Cotton | [26] | Soybean | [13] | ||
Maize | [27] | Mung bean | [24] | ||
Spotted bean | [12] | Common bean | [28] | ||
Black gram | [29] | Broad bean | [24] | ||
Cow pea | [30] | Lupin | [24] | ||
Pigeon pea | [23] | Groundnut, chickpea, green gram, soybean, pigeon pea | Cd stress | [31] | |
Lupin | [23] | Grass pea, chick pea | Pb stress | [31] | |
Soybean | Salinity stress | [31] | Chick pea, green gram | Cr stress | [31] |
Chick pea | [31] | Pea, lentil, soybean, black gram | Hg stress | [31] | |
Lentil | [31] | Pea, chick pea, cowpea, green gram | Cu stress | [31] | |
Mung bean | [32] | Chick pea, cowpea, pigeon pea | Ni stress | [31] | |
Faba bean | [33] | Cowpea, chick pea | Zn stress | [31] | |
Wheat | [34] | Pea, chick pea | As stress | [31] | |
Soybean | Cold stress | [28] | |||
Rice | [35] | ||||
Broad bean, Pea | [28] | ||||
Chick pea | [28] |
3.1 Drought stress
Drought stress arises under water scarcity. It hampers seed germination as well as early stand establishment of a crop arising through depletion of seed reserves and mechanical obstruction by the hard soil under drought, resulting in poor vegetative growth and yield of crop. The various impacts of drought on physiological and biochemical activities of plants are shown in Figure 3. When drought arises, cell solutes concentrations increase due to less water uptake and it not only causes high intra- and inter-competitions for water among crop plants and between crop and weeds, but also exerts toxicity on plants. Further, under drought condition, nutrients show variations in their availability for plant’s uptake. Few nutrients become more available (viz. nitrogen) and few become unavailable or less available (viz. phosphorus), while no distinct impact of drought occurs on some nutrients (viz. potassium). This creates alterations in nutrient uptake by plants resulting in impairment of nutrient metabolisms in cell [36]. Under drought stress, as the activities of enzymes such as nitrate reductase, glutamine synthetase, etc. decrease, ammonia assimilation to organic form is restricted. Among the different categories of plants, C4 ones suffer more than C3 plants due to closure of stomata resulting in less photosynthesis [37].
3.2 Flood stress
When flood occurs, anaerobic situation arises due to water logging or submergence, which further causes depletion in oxygen as well as restriction of movement of oxygen and other gases in root zone of plant. As a consequence, chlorosis of plant leaves and decay/death of cell occur. Less root respiration, poor root proliferation and other physiological disorders are some common phenomena visible under flood condition. Various negative impacts of flood are shown in Figure 3.
3.3 Salinity stress
Salinity creates two prime impacts on plants viz. osmotic stress and ion toxicity. Under the situation of salinity, drought stress is aggravated due to limited water uptake by plants from the soil resulting from greater osmotic pressure to root cell (osmotic pressure of soil solution > osmotic pressure in plant’s cell sap). Oxidative damage due to soil salinity include detrimental impact on protein, nucleic acid and certain enzymes of plant as there is synthesis of ROS [38]. Under soil salinity, even if uptake of water takes place, there is also intrusion of various salts (Na+, Cl−, etc.) inside the plant along with water, which exert negative impact on plant’s cell through by impairing activities of various essential enzymes. Plants show burnt like visual symptoms on leaves under excessive salt uptake. Salt stress not only increases the Na+, Cl−, etc., but also causes deficiency of various essential elements like calcium (Ca2+), potassium (K+), magnesium (Mg2+), nitrate (NO3−), etc. in rhizospheric zone of soil. Calcium (Ca2+), potassium (K+), magnesium (Mg2+), nitrate (NO3−) are known to influence photosynthesis and therefore, their limited uptake by plants under soil salinity results in less photosynthesis and translocation of assimilates from source to sink. Some major impacts of soil salinity include less leaf expansion, stunted growth, less dry weight of plant, sterility of florets, loss of pollen viability, high epidermal thickness, mesophyll thickness, palisade cell length and diameter, spongy cell diameter, reduction of intercellular space in leaves of plant [7]. Partial or complete of stomata under high salt situation causes less transpiration and cell division resulting in reduction in plant’s growth, defoliation and senescence of aerial parts and eventually, plant dies [39]. Under salinity stress, Na+/K+ ratio of the cell is excessively increased, resulting in reduction in cell turgidity, enzyme activity and membrane potential of plant. Further, due to abundance of Na+ in cell, various essential enzymatic activities get downregulated resulting in impairments of cell expansion as well as division, membrane stability and cytosolic metabolism.
3.4 Temperature stress
High temperature or heat stress increases evapotranspiration loss of water resulting in drought like situation. This is further triggered under increase of soil temperature coupled with drought. Due to high temperature, respiration exceeds photosynthesis resulting in depletion of food reserve or loss of carbon (respiration rate doubles with each 10°C rise in tissue temperature). It is also observed that sudden temperature rise causes relatively more harm than gradual increase in temperature due to higher reductions of biochemical, physiological and molecular activities of the plant by sudden temperature rise. Among the categories of plant, C3 plants suffer comparatively more than C4 plants due to fluctuations in energy supply and carbon metabolisms under high temperature (Figure 4) [40].
On the other hand, cold stress or low temperature causes chilling and freezing injuries to the plant. Chilling injury results in disfunctioning of physiological properties, while freezing injury results in cell dehydration. Some major impacts of cold stress on plant include Wilting, bleaching through pigment photo-oxidation, leaf necrosis, browning, cell death, etc.
3.5 Heavy metal toxicity
When there is abundance of heavy metals in soil, plant’s physiological, morphological, biochemical, molecular activities are highly affected. After being taken up by the plant’s roots, these metals (Pb, Cu, Hg, etc.) move inside the plant through xylem due to transpiration pool and negatively impact nutrient distribution, photosynthesis, enzyme activities, Cu/Zn-SOD, ethylene receptors, etc. resulting in reduction of molecular oxygen content and increment of ROS [41]. Synthesis of ROS thereafter, damages the plant at cellular level.
3.6 Other abiotic stresses
Chemical toxicity/persistence in environment is a great concern today, which results from excessive and unscientific application of chemicals. Environmental hazard or pollution under chemical toxicity leads to poor ecosystem health and diversity. These chemicals not only include pesticides but also cover inorganic fertilizer. Unnecessary use of pesticides and fertilizers are creating climate change resulting in reductions of crop growth, yield and quality. Specifically, complete dependence on chemicals for crop production results in damage of soil health and eventually, soil productivity declines. Contamination of underground fresh water as well as surface water, air pollution, land pollution, etc. is commonly associated with chemical toxicity. Plants known to be grown in an area earlier, are facing trouble in adaptation to changing climate in the same area. Changing climate is linked with various biotic and abiotic stresses which exert detrimental impacts on crop’s germination, photosynthesis, translocation of assimilates, etc. and thereby, reduces crop yield. On a contrary, nutrient deficiency arises due to scarcity of nutrients in soil, resulting in their less uptake by plant roots and translocation inside the plants. As a consequence, plants show various deficiency symptoms and its growth diminishes, leading to poor yield and quality of crop.
When wind blows at high velocity over the crop field, plants specially the tall growing or weaker one lodges down, resulting in poor growth, shedding of flower, pollen, grains and thereby, reduction in yield. High wind velocity also causes soil erosion and washes the essential nutrients away from plants. Further, there is an increase in evapotranspiration loss of water under high wind velocity, which demands for frequent water application leading to high cost of cultivation and failure of supply of water leads to poor growth and yield of crop.
Light is one of the prime requisites for photosynthesis and therefore excessive light can disrupts photosynthetic apparatus (photoinactivation and photodamage), while scarcity of light reduces photosynthesis and dry matter production. Plant’s growth reduces when light is less or shading by taller plants/trees or other structures occurs. Due to hot sunlight intensity, heat stress or drought stress occurs which alone or together, affects the crop growth. UV ray impairs DNA and causes leaf bleaching, oxidative stress through synthesizing ROS. Under excessive light, breakdown of D1 protein of PS II and decrement of PS I polypeptides like PsaA, PsaB, and PsaC occurs in plants [42].
4. Organic farming and its components
Sustainable agriculture greatly relies on non-chemical, eco-friendly organic farming approaches. Organic farming is defined as holistic production management system which promotes and improves agro-ecosystem health covering bio-diversity, biological cycle and soil biological properties. It completely or largely excludes the use of synthetic off-farm inputs like fertilizers, pesticides, growth regulators, livestock feed additives, etc. and mostly relies on on-farm agronomic, biological and mechanical inputs such as crop rotations, crop residues, organic manures, biofertilizers, green manuring, organic wastes, mineral grade rock additives, biological means of nutrient mobilization and plant protection (botanical pesticides), etc. leading to improvement of soil health, crop growth and yield as well as safety of environment. The major components of organic farming are briefly highlighted below.
4.1 Organic manures and biochar
Organic manures are the sources of nutrients produced by decomposition of organic waste materials (crop residues, plant-based wastes from house/farm/market, etc., animal-based wastes like urine, dung, litter, excreta, etc.) through microbial actions. These are known as bulky organic manures (FYM, vermicompost, poultry manures, common compost, night soil, sewage and sludge, kitchen compost, etc.) as their requirements are high. Besides, there are concentrated organic manures like oilcakes, bone meal, blood meal, horn and hoof meals, fish meal, meat meal, etc. in which more nutrients are present and they, therefore, supply different nutrients relatively in large quantities from unit quantity applied than bulky ones. Apart from solid organic manures, there are various organic liquid manures/ITK formulations such as
Biochar is an excellent soil ameliorant produced under high temperature through controlled pyrolysis of organic substances. Quality of biochar depends on feedstock, temperature and pyrolysis conditions and time. Application of biochar improves plant growth and yield by reviving soil health.
4.2 Crop rotation and other agronomic practices
Crop rotation involves diversification of crops, that is, growing of different crops in succession on same field to avoid pest, disease and weed infestation, improve soil fertility, recycle nutrient reserves, utilize different resources properly, enhance crop productivity, profitability, etc. Besides, there are various other agronomic practices such as variety selection, land preparation, mulching, crop residue retention on soil surface, manure application, time and method sowing, seed rate, spacing and depth, physical, cultural or biological methods of weed, pest and disease control, timely and adequate irrigation, timely harvest and post-harvest operations, followed in organic farming to enhance crop productivity, quality and profitability in production.
4.3 Crop residue
Crop residue is the remaining left after harvesting and separating the economic part from the entire plants. These residues are often burnt leading to environmental pollution. There can be multiple uses of these crop residues like mulching materials, livestock feed, raw materials for manure preparation, substrates for mushroom cultivation, roof thatching, etc. Crop residues can conserve soil moisture, reduce weed infestation and promote crop protection.
4.4 Bio-fertilizers
These are the substances containing living organisms, that is, micro-organisms which are helpful for crop growth and productivity by improving soil health and fertility as well as uptake of nutrients and water by the plants. Seed inoculation or soil application of biofertilizer containing various bacteria (rhizobium, azotobacter, azospirillum, etc.), fungi (VAM, AMF,
4.5 Bio-pesticides and other protection measures
Bio-pesticides such as nicotine, pyrethrum, rotenone, subabilla, ryanin, margosa, neem, etc. are natural plant-based products containing secondary metabolites like alkaloids, terpenoids, phenolics and minor secondary chemicals. Besides, resistant variety selection, myco-pesticides, release of natural enemies or growing trap crop or plants which act as host for biocontrol agents can protect crops from disease and pest damages. Further, various agronomic approaches like mulching, soil solarization, stale seed bed technique, timely and line sowing, crop rotation, intercropping, smother crops, use of botanical extracts, etc. can suppress weed problem.
5. Different organic farming approaches to mitigate abiotic stresses
Over the years, organic farming has served as an eco-friendly approach to improve agricultural productivity in a sustainable manner. Further, it acts as buffer against various biotic and abiotic stresses which are often less highlighted. In the following section, different organic farming practices having the potential to mitigate various abiotic stresses are mentioned.
Apart from the organic manures, biochar application can alleviate various abiotic stresses specially drought stress. Shashi et al. [45] observed positive result on maize from rice husk @ 20 t/ha biochar under drought condition by enhancing bacterial and fungal communities in soil. Biochar specially from poultry manure shows excellent properties to mitigate salinity stress by reducing Na and increasing CEC and SOC contents in soil. Further, biochar can protect plants from high and low temperatures as well as alleviates metal toxicity by immobilizing heavy metals, followed by reducing their mobility. Positive impact of biochar in mitigating different abiotic stresses in rice is summarized in Table 2.
Abiotic stresses | Biochar type | References |
---|---|---|
Acidity | Sewage sludge | [46] |
Salinity | Bamboo | [47] |
Salinity | Rice husk | [48] |
Nutrient deficiency | Rice straw | [49] |
Saline-sodic stress | Wheat straw | [50] |
Saline-sodic stress | Groundnut shell | [51] |
Cold stress | Bamboo | [52] |
Nutrient deficiency | Rice residue | [53] |
Cold stress | Bamboo | [54] |
Nutrient deficiency | Rice husk | [55] |
Heat stress | Rice husk | [56] |
Heat stress | Rice husk | [57] |
Cd stress | Rice and maize residues | [58] |
Cd and Pb stresses | Wheat straw | [59] |
Microorganisms | Crop | Abiotic stress | Impacts | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Rice | Temperature stress | High endogenous hormone and photosynthesis | [61] | |
Berseem | Salinity stress | High dry matter and nodulation | [62, 63] | |
Cotton | Salinity and alkalinity stress | High seed germination, plant height, fresh and dry weights through increased uptake of K+, Mg2+ and Ca2+ and decreased uptake of Na+ | [64] | |
Maize | High temperature and salinity stresses | Calcisol produced by bacteria | [65] | |
Tomato, pepper | Salinity and water stresses | High biomass production | [66] | |
Lettuce | Salinity stress | High shoot production | [67] | |
Rice, mangroves | Heavy metal (Fe) toxicity | Improvement in crop growth | [68, 69] | |
Canola, barley | Cd toxicity | Enhancement in IAA, siderophore and 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase | [70] | |
Basil | Water stress | High antioxidant and photosynthetic pigments | [71] | |
Rice | Drought stress | High antioxidant and photosynthetic efficiency | [72] | |
Inoculation with AMF and PGPR | Date palm | Drought stress | High proline content and relative water content; low SOD, CAT, GST and POX activities in leaf | [73] |
Different plants | Drought stress | Low SOD activity | [74] | |
Tomato | Ni, Pb, Zn toxicity | Reduction in accumulation of heavy metals in plants | [75] | |
Tomato | Ni, Cd toxicity | Less uptake and translocation of heavy metals | [76] | |
Pea | Nutrient deficiency | Stimulation of root and high nutrient uptake | [77] | |
Pea | Zn and Ni toxicity | Enhancement of plant growth parameters | [78] | |
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi | Olive | Drought stress | High turgor potential and mineral nutrient uptake | [79] |
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi | Soybean | Drought stress | High leaf area index, photosynthesis, growth and yield | [80] |
Pangola grass | Drought stress | High stomatal conductivity, low lipid peroxidation | [81] | |
Wheat | Drought stress | High chlorophyll, osmotic potential, antioxidant activities | [82] | |
Onion | Drought stress | High fresh and dry matter, phosphorus content | [83] | |
Tomato | Salinity stress | High ion uptake, chlorophyll, growth and dry matter | [84] | |
Tomato | Salinity stress | High root, shoot, leaf number, growth hormone synthesis | [85] | |
Salinity stress | Stomatal conductance, root and shoot dry matter, sugar content | [86] | ||
Salinity stress | High root and shoot dry matter, Zn, Cu, P uptakes | [87] | ||
Cucumber | Salinity stress | High biomass, synthesis of antioxidant enzymes and photosynthesis pigments | [88] | |
Barley | Temperature stress | High survival rate | [89] | |
Maize | Temperature stress | Maintenance of PS II heterogeneity | [90] | |
Cucumber | Temperature stress | High photosynthetic rate | [91] | |
Temperature stress | High plant growth, chlorophyll and antioxidants, low oxidative damage | [92] | ||
Glomus isolates | Maize | Heavy metal stress | High Mg, P and K contents in plants, dry matter | [93] |
Heavy metal stress | High crop growth and yield | [94] | ||
Heavy metal stress | Low Cd content in root and shoots | [95] | ||
Heavy metal stress | Low Zn and Cu toxicity | [96] | ||
Heavy metal stress | Low root and shoot concentrations, Zn uptake | [97] | ||
Flood stress | High P content in plant | [98] | ||
Flood stress | High growth and P content in leaves | [99] | ||
Flood stress | High sugar and proline content | [100] |
Bio-stimulants are organic or inorganic substances rich in bioactive compounds and/or micro-organisms, which improve crop growth through developing root for high absorption and assimilation efficiency of nutrients, regulating proper water balance in plants as well as tolerating various abiotic stresses by synthesizing proline, simple sugars, alcohols, abscisic acid, osmotic compounds and antioxidants (to scavenge ROS) [101]. Role of bio-stimulants in plants is shown in Figure 5. It increases the contents of carotenoids, phenolic compounds and other secondary metabolites in plants as defense against stresses. It is applied as soil drench (directly/through irrigation) or foliar spray or treatment of seeds. Mitigation of various abiotic stresses by bio-stimulants is listed in Table 4.
Abiotic stress | Crop | Bio-stimulants | Impacts | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cold stress | Coriander | Asahi SL @0.1% | High chlorophyll | [102] |
Tomato | High shoot and root length and biomass, low electrolyte leakage, lipid peroxidation, proline accumulation, SOD, CAT, APX , POD and GR activities | [102] | ||
Strawberry | Pepton 85/16 @ 2 L/ha or 4 L/ha | New root initiation, more flowering and fruiting | [103] | |
Lettuce | Pepton 85/16 @ 04, 0.8, 1.6 g/L | High fresh and dry weights, relative growth rate | [104] | |
Lettuce | Terra-Sorb Foliar | High root fresh weight, green cover % | [105] | |
Chilli | 5-Aminolevulinic acid | High chlorophyll, relative water content, shoot and root biomass, SOD activity, low membrane permeability | [106] | |
Pepper | High plant growth and regulation of endogenous GA4, abscisic acid, jasmonic acid and salicylic acid | [107] | ||
Drought stress | Tomato | Megafol @ 2 ml/L | Increased leaf area | [108] |
Spinach | Increased leaf area, fresh and dry weights | [109] | ||
Pea | High root and shoot lengths, pods/plant, chlorophyll content and grain yield | [109] | ||
Tomato, chilli | Low ethylene synthesis, high fresh and dry weights of seedling | [110] | ||
Tomato | High relative water content, plant growth, foliar density, proline and sugar contents, chlorophyll content, low lipid peroxidation | [111] | ||
Mustard | Increase in chlorophyll activity | [112] | ||
Tomato | VIVA | High shoot and root biomass | [113] | |
Basil | High CAT, GPX and chlorophyll activities | [114] | ||
Pumpkin | Moringa leaf extract | High growth, harvest index, water use efficiency, low electrolyte leakage | [115] | |
Soybean | High growth, chlorophyll content, amino acid, sugar, low ABA and JA | [116] | ||
Wheat | Enhancement in IAA, decrease in ABA | [117] | ||
Lucerne | Low electrolyte leakage, ABA level, high growth, chlorophyll content, relative water content, nutrient concentrations | [118] | ||
Foxtail millet | ACC deaminase production, high seedling growth | [119] | ||
Potato | High tuber weight, soluble sugar and CAT, POD, SOD activities | [120] | ||
Tobacco | Arbuscular mychorrhizal fungi and PGPR | High growth, chlorophyll content, phenol and flavonoid levels | [121] | |
Finger millet | High plant growth, nutrient contents, leaf pigment and proline contents, SOD, CAT, GPX activities, low lipid peroxidation | [122] | ||
Maize | ( | High ABA, IAA, GA, relative water content, protein content, photosynthetic pigments | [123] | |
Rice | Commercial seaweed extract ( | High plant biomass, yield, leaf area index, chlorophyll content | [124] | |
Tomato | Protein hydrolysate | High plant growth, pollen viability, leaf water potential, lycopene content | [125] | |
Flood stress | Sesame | High fresh and dry biomass, root and shoot length, chlorophyll content | [126] | |
Wheat | Low ethylene synthesis, high seedling growth | [127] | ||
Heat stress | Common bean | Brassinosteroids @ 25, 50 and 100 ppm | High plant growth, leaves, branches and shoots/plant, fresh and dry weights, nutrient contents | [128] |
Green gram | Glutathione @ 0.5 Μm | High chlorophyll, proline contents, low ROS | [129] | |
Chick pea | Proline @ 5, 10, 15 Μm | High germination, shoot and root lengths, proline content, chlorophyll synthesis, low electrolyte leakage, lipid peroxidation | [130] | |
Chick pea | Abscisic acid @ 2.5 Μm | High shoot length, chlorophyll content | [131] | |
Tomato | High growth, APX, SOD, GSH activities, ion uptake (Fe, P, K), chlorophyll content. | [132] | ||
Chinese cabbage | High shoot, leaf developments, JA and salicylic acid production, low ABA | [133] | ||
Rice | Brassinosteroids, amino acids, nitophenolatres, or botanical extracts | High photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, low lipid peroxidation and proline content | [134] | |
Tomato | Commercial seaweed extracts | Improved root system, chlorophyll content, high growth | [135] | |
Fe deficiency | Strawberry | Actiwave ( | High vegetative growth, chlorophyll content, stomatal density, photosynthesis, fruit production, berry weight | [136] |
NPK deficiency | Tomato | Amino acids @ 0.1, 0.2 ml/L water | High plant growth, root and leaf | [137] |
Okra | Kelpak ( | More number of leaves, roots, stem thickness, shoot weight, root weight, leaf area | [138] | |
Garlic | Bio-Cozyme @ 2 kg/ha | High bulb yield, plant height, nutrient in leaves | [139] | |
Salinity | Lettuce | High germination, seedling growth, chlorophyll, dry mass | [140] | |
Chilli | High plant dry weight, carbon di oxide assimilation, nitrate concentration | [141] | ||
Pea | High plant growth | [142] | ||
Pumpkin | High fresh weight, potassium uptake, low sodium uptake | [143] | ||
Common bean | Humic acid@ 0.05%, 0.1% | High nitrogen and phosphorus, plant root and shoot growth, low electrical conductivity, electrolyte leakage | [144] | |
Strawberry | Acadian ( | High growth and yield | [145] | |
Lettuce | Super Fifty ( | High root, stem and total plant biomass | [146] | |
Lettuce | Protein hydrolysates @ 2.5 ml/L | High plant shoot and root growths, fresh yield, low oxidative stress | [147] | |
Tomato | High fresh and dry weights, uptakes of phosphorus and potassium, water use efficiency, low ethylene production | [148] | ||
Cucumber | High fruit yield | [149] | ||
Common bean | Licorice root extract @ 0.50% | Plant growth, yield, relative water content, total soluble sugars, low electrolyte leakage | [150] | |
Common bean | Propolis and maize grain extract @ 1%, 2% | High germination, seedling growth, proline, total soluble sugars, low electrolyte leakage, ABA, lipid peroxidation | [151] | |
Common bean | Moringa oleifera | High shoot and root growths, total soluble sugars, proline, SOD, APX, GR activities | [152] | |
Chick pea | High chlorophyll, carotenoids, plant growth, soluble sugars, CAT, SOD, POD, APX activities, low MDA | [153] | ||
Tomato | High protein, chlorophyll, low proline | [154] | ||
Onion | Bee-honey based bio-stimulant @ 25–50 g/L | High water use efficiency, bulb yield, antioxidants, photosynthetic pigments | [155] | |
Chilli | Humic acid @ 50, 100, 150 mg/kg | High fresh and dry weights, nutrient uptakes, low membrane damage | [156] | |
Pea | Low electrolyte leakage, high proline, chlorophyll, total soluble sugar, plant growth | [157] | ||
Tomato | Increase plant growth and photosynthetic characters | [158] | ||
Ground nut | High growth, auxin and total amino acids, low proline, electrolyte leakage, lipid peroxidation | [159] | ||
Common bean | High root and shoot length and weight, chlorophyll content | [160] | ||
Soybean | High antioxidant (SOD, GSH) activities, chlorophyll content | [161] | ||
Wheat | High plant biomass, chlorophyll, carotenoids, uptake of nutrients, low Na, ABA contents | [162] | ||
Wheat | High root and shoot length and weight, relative water content, chlorophyll content, antioxidant (SOD, POD, CAT) activities | [163] | ||
Soybean | High seedling growth | [164] | ||
Cucumber | High biomass, SOD, CAT, APX and GR activities, JA, SA contents, low lipid peroxidation, electrolyte leakage | [88] | ||
Maize | Humic acid | High photosynthesis rate, plasma membrane proton pumps activity | [165] | |
Rice | Panchagavya | High plant growth, chlorophyll, carotenoid, anthocyanin contents, low CAT, SOD, POX activities | [166] | |
Tomato | Seaweed extract ( | High plant growth, soluble sugar, total protein, chlorophyll content, carotenoids, low hydrogen peroxide, APX activity | [167] | |
Wheat | High plant growth, nutrient content, proline contents, CAT and POD activities | [168] | ||
Heavy metal stress | Rice | High growth, chlorophyll content, SA, low ABA, Ni and Cd | [169] | |
Cucumber | High growth, chlorophyll content, IAA and GA | [170] | ||
Soybean | High shoot and root growth, SA, chlorophyll content, low ABA, POD activities, low Cd accumulation | [171] | ||
Sunflower | Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi | High growth, antioxidant activities, fatty acid contents | [172] |
Various other agronomic practices also can protect the crop from being affected by abiotic stresses under climate change scenario (Figure 6, Table 5). For instance, proper selection of resistant/tolerant crop and varieties under a prevalent abiotic stress is one useful strategy. To achieve this, breeding activities should include identification of responsive genes. Grafting is another one, which is widely used in horticulture to counter various abiotic stresses specially, salinity, nutrient or water deficiency, heavy metal toxicity, etc. Here, scion susceptible to stress is grafted to stress tolerant root stock. Exogenous application of plant components such as amino acid, sugars, etc. and phytohormones such as ABA, GA3, jasmonic acid, salicylic acid, brassinosteriods, etc. protects crop from abiotic stresses. Application of citric acid and vitamin C exhibit antioxidant properties which inactivates heavy metals such as Cu, Pb, Al, etc. as well as helps crop to overcome salinity and drought stresses through ROS scavenging activities. Soil and foliar applications of humic substances, beneficial fungi, bacteria, chitosan, sea weed extracts, etc. can combat abiotic stresses. Tillage also plays key role in conserving moisture and nutrients as well as breaking hard pan and high percolation of water and thereby, mitigates drought, flood and salinity. Keeping the land fallow for a season or year can rejuvenate the soil fertility and moisture content for next crop. Timely and properly sowing, adequate seed rate, spacing and depth, seed treatment also allows the crop to grow and utilize resources properly resulting in surviving and withstanding of climate change scenario. For instance, wheat, if sown on time, can escape terminal heat stress. Further, adequate and timely water, nutrient and interculture (weeding) managements accelerate crop growth by conservating water, nutrients, light, etc. which otherwise could be utilized by weeds and thereby, mitigate drought, salinity, nutrient deficiency, etc. Tall variety is susceptible to lodge by high wind velocity, while dwarf, robust variety can withstand the wind stress. Shelterbelt also protects the crop from high wind. Sometimes, crop suffers from hot sunlight and requires shading from tall growing crop and thus, intercropping or agroforestry is beneficial. On a contrary, shading of tall weeds on crop affects crop growth and therefore, timely weed management is needed. Under saline condition, frequent flooding with irrigation water or irrigation to root by drip method, scraping of surface salts, application of plant growth promoting bacteria, etc. are the key mitigation practices. PGPB alleviates salinity through hydraulic conduct, osmotic accumulation, toxic sodium removal, higher osmotic activity. Further, use of organic product such as brewer’s spent grain as soil amendment not only improves soil fertility but also alleviates heavy metal, nutrient deficiency, salinity, drought stresses, etc. Intercropping/Mixed cropping also conserves soil and water, suppresses weeds, reduces salt accumulation on surface through evaporation and thereby, alleviates various stresses. Sometimes, allelopathic potential of many crops on weeds are utilized to suppress weeds resulting in conservation of resources and good crop growth. Under the scarcity of water, precise and wise use of water, clipping of leaves (to reduce transpiration water loss), organic anti-transpirants (like wax, panchagavya) application, broadcasting of seeds, closer spacing, more plant population/hill, double transplanting, etc. are useful. Apart from drainage, double transplanting is also beneficial for flood condition where main field is too flooded to transplant seedlings on time. It is well known fact that various biotic stresses like pest, disease and weeds trigger abiotic stresses. Addressing these biotic stresses by botanical extracts, bio-pesticides, release of natural enemies or living organisms, trap cropping, etc. can help the crop to avoid various abiotic stresses.
Abiotic stresses | Agronomic management practices in organic farming | Abiotic stresses | Agronomic management practices in organic farming |
---|---|---|---|
Drought |
| Flood |
|
Salinity |
| ||
High temperature |
| Low temperature |
|
Heavy metal toxicity |
| ||
Wind velocity |
| ||
Low light |
| Excess chemicals and nutrients |
|
High light |
| Nutrient scarcity |
|
6. Conclusion
Abiotic stress is creating detrimental effect on living organisms specially on plants since long. Its negative impact on crop is becoming prominent in recent days in the context of climate change scenario. In most of the cases, an abiotic stress combines with other abiotic or biotic stresses to exert combined impact on crop growth, yield and quality and the extent of impact on crop varies from mild to severe resulting in hampering crop growth accordingly. Although plants adopt some internal defensive mechanisms to counter these stresses, in most of the times, they require external stimuli/practices/inputs to mitigate abiotic stresses. Due to population rise, crop yield loss through abiotic stresses cannot be accepted at this moment or future and therefore, suitable agronomic and breeding interventions are highly needed. Since chemical-based farming is a barrier against sustainable agricultural production as it deteriorates soil health and is hazardous to the environment due to toxic chemical footprint, organic farming is emerging as its potential alternative. Various organic farming inputs such as organic manures, biofertilizers, bio-priming with micro-organisms, bio-stimulants (seaweed extracts, humic acid, micro-organisms etc.), mulches, biochar etc. have the potential to mitigate abiotic stresses under climate change scenario. Further, organic farming practices like crop rotation, inter cropping, tillage, time and method of sowing, nutrient, water and intercultural operations, use of PGPB, organic formulations, grafting, selection of resistant/tolerant varieties and other scientific/wise uses of organic inputs can help the crop to mitigate/escape the detrimental effects of various abiotic stresses to a great extent. Still, there is need on proper research or study on the abiotic stress potential of organic farming further. Available organic farming technologies as well as information/awareness about them are very also scanty at this moment. Therefore, proper multi-locational research experiments, transfusion of modern practices/awareness through strong extension services, policy interventions and advanced breeding approaches are highly required to address harmful abiotic stresses as well as to get high crop growth, yield and quality. Various strategies should be jointly implemented rather than using individually to get the best result from organic farming in making crop to cope up successfully with climate change scenario.
References
- 1.
Chaves MM, Maroco JP, Pereira JS. Understanding plant responses to drought- from genes to the whole plant. Functional Plant Biology. 2003; 30 :239-264 - 2.
Rao IM, Beebe SE, Polania J, Ricaurte J, Cajiao C, Garc’ıa R, Rivera M. Can tepary bean be a model for improvement of drought resistance in common bean? African Crop Science Journal. 2013; 21 :265-281 - 3.
Prasad PVV, Pisipati SR, Momcilovic I, Ristic Z. Independent and combined effects of high temperature and drought stress during grain filling on plant yield and chloroplast protein synthesis elongation factor (EFTu) expression in spring wheat. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 2011; 197 :430-441 - 4.
Acquadh. Principle of Plant Genetics and Breeding. Oxford: Willey Blackwell; 2007 - 5.
Kumar S. Abiotic stresses and their effects on plant growth, yield and nutritional quality of agricultural produce. International Journal of Food Science and Agriculture. 2020; 4 (4):367-378 - 6.
Fahad S, Bajwa AA, Nazir U, Anjum SA, Farooq A, Zohaib A, et al. Crop production under drought and heat stress: Plant responses and management options. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2017; 29 :8 - 7.
Das R, Biswas S. Influence of abiotic stresses on seed production and quality. In: Seed Biology Updates. IntechOpen; 2022. pp. 1-24 - 8.
Bockheim JG, Gennadiyev AN. The role of soil-forming processes in the definition of taxa in soil taxonomy and the world soil reference base. Geoderma. 2000; 95 (1–2):53-72 - 9.
Abrol IP. Salt-affected soils: An overview. In: Chopra VL, Paroda SL, editors. Approaches for Incorporating Drought and Salinity Resistance in Crop Plants. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Publishing Company; 1986. pp. 1-23 - 10.
Levitt J. Responses of plants to environmental stresses. Academic Press. 1980; 1 :496 - 11.
Wuana RA, Okieimen FE. Heavy metals in contaminated soils: A review of sources, chemistry, risks and best available strategies for remediation. ISRN Ecology. 2011; 2011 :1-20. DOI: 10.5402/2011/402647 - 12.
Farooq M, Nadeem F, Gogoi N, Ullah A, Alghamdi SS, Nayyar H, et al. Heat stress in grain legumes during reproductive and grain-filling phases. Crop & Pasture Science. 2017; 68 :985-1005 - 13.
Bethke PC et al. Tuber water and pressure potentials decrease and sucrose contents increase in response to moderate drought and heat stress. American Journal of Potato Research. 2009; 86 :519 - 14.
Kang JS, Singh H, Singh G, Kang H, Kalra VP, Kaur J. Abiotic stress and its amelioration in cereals and pulses: A review. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2017; 6 (3):1019-1045 - 15.
Singh S et al. Effect of water stress at different stages of grain development on the characteristics of starch and protein of different wheat varieties. Food Chemistry. 2008; 108 :130-139 - 16.
Di Caterina R et al. Influence of salt stress on seed yield and oil quality of two sunflower hybrids. Annual Applied Biology. 2007; 151 :145-154 - 17.
Liu Y, Li J, Zhu Y, Jones A, Rose RJ, Song Y. Heat stress in legume seed setting: Effects, causes, and future prospects. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2019; 10 :938 - 18.
Vaz Patto MC, Amarowicz R, Aryee ANA, Boye JI, Chung HJ, Martín-Cabrejas MA, et al. Achievements and challenges in improving the nutritional quality of food legumes. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. 2015; 34 :105-143 - 19.
Dong B, Zheng X, Liu H, Able JA, Yang H, Zhao H, et al. Effects of drought stress on pollen sterility, grain yield, abscisic acid and protective enzymes in two winter wheat cultivars. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2017; 8 (June):1-14 - 20.
Sekhon HS et al. Water use efficiency under stress environments. In: Climate Change and Management of Cool Season Grain Legume Crops. The Netherlands: Springer; 2010. pp. 207-227 - 21.
Ni Z, Li H, Zhao Y, Peng H, Hu Z, Xin M, et al. Genetic improvement of heat tolerance in wheat: Recent progress in understanding the underlying molecular mechanisms. Crop Journal. 2018; 6 (1):32-41 - 22.
Asseng S, Foster I, Turner NC. The impact of temperature variability on wheat yields. Global Change Biology. 2011; 17 (2):997-1012 - 23.
Kazai P, Noulas C, Khah E, Vlachostergios D. Yield and seed quality parameters of common bean cultivars grown under water and heat stress field conditions. AIMS Agriculture and Food. 2019; 4 :285-302 - 24.
Wilhelm I. Crop physiology and metabolism. Crop Science. 1999; 39 :1733-1741 - 25.
Jagadish S, Craufurd P, Wheeler T. High temperature stress and spikelet fertility in rice ( Oryza sativa L.). Journal of Experimental Botany. 2007;58 (7):1627-1635 - 26.
Redden RJ, Vara HJL, Prasad PV, Ebert AW, Yadav SS, O’Leary GJ. Temperature, climate change, and global food security. Temperature and Plant Development. 2014; 8 :181-202 - 27.
Vafa P et al. The effect of drought stress on grain yield, yield components and protein content of durum wheat cultivars in Ilam Province, Iran. International Journal of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering. 2014; 8 :631-636 - 28.
Wardlaw IF et al. Contrasting effects of chronic heat stress and heat shock on kernel weight and flour quality in wheat. Functional Plant Biology. 2002; 29 :25-34 - 29.
Triboï E et al. Environmentally induced changes in protein composition in developing grains of wheat are related to changes in total protein content. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2003; 54 :1731-1742 - 30.
Flagella Z et al. Changes in seed yield and oil fatty acid composition of high oleic sunflower ( Helianthus annuus L.) hybrids in relation to the sowing date and the water regime. European Journal of Agronomy. 2002;17 :221-230 - 31.
Lin CJ et al. Influence of high temperature during grain filling on the accumulation of storage proteins and grain quality in rice ( Oryza sativa L.). Food Chemistry. 2010;58 :10545-10552 - 32.
Sadeghipour O. The influence of water stress on biomass and harvest index in three mung bean ( Vigna radiata L. (Wilczek)) cultivars. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences. 2009;8 :245-249 - 33.
Silva JAB et al. Microtuberization of Andean potato species ( Solanum spp.) as affected by salinity. Scientia Horticulturae. 2001;89 :91-101 - 34.
Dornbos DL, Mullen RE. Soybean seed protein and oil contents and fatty acid composition adjustments by drought and temperature. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society. 1992; 69 :228-231 - 35.
Hoegy P et al. Impacts of temperature increase and change in precipitation pattern on crop yield and yield quality of barley. Food Chemistry. 2013; 136 :1470-1477 - 36.
Samarah NH. Effects of drought stress on growth and yield of barley. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 2005; 25 (1):145-149 - 37.
Alfonso SU, Brüggemann W. Photosynthetic responses of a C3 and three C4 species of the genus Panicum with different metabolic subtypes to drought stress. Photosynthesis Research. 2012; 112 :175-191 - 38.
Gomez JM, Jimenz A, Olmas E, Sevilla F. Location and effects of long term NaCl stress on superoxide dismutase and ascorbate peroxidase isoenzymes of pea ( Pisum sativum cv. Puget) chloroplasts. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2004;55 :119-130 - 39.
Shannon MC, Grieve CM. Tolerance of vegetable crops to salinity. Scientia Horticulturae. 1999; 78 :5-38 - 40.
Salvucci ME, Crafts-Brandner SJ. Relationship between the heat tolerance of photosynthesis and the thermal stability of rubisco activase in plants from contrasting thermal environments. Plant Physiology. 2004; 134 :1460-1470 - 41.
Polle A, Schützendübel A. Heavy metal signalling in plants: Linking cellular and organismic responses. In: Hirt H, Shinozaki K, editors. Plant Responses to Abiotic Stress. Topics in Current Genetics. Vol. 4. Switzerland: Springer Nature; 2003. pp. 187-215 - 42.
Jiao S, Hilaire E, Guikema JA. Identification and differential accumulation of two isoforms of the CF1-b subunit under high light stress in Brassica rapa . Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2004;42 :883-890 - 43.
Král M, Dvořák M, Capouchová I. The straw as mulch and compost as a tool for mitigation of drought impacts in the potatoes cultivation. Plant, Soil and Environment. 2019; 65 (11):530-535 - 44.
Nabati DA, Schmidt RE, Parrish DJ. Alleviation of salinity stress in Kentucky bluegrass by plant growth regulators and iron. Crop Science. 1994; 34 (1):198-202 - 45.
Shashi M, Mannan M, Islam M, Rahman M. Impact of rice husk biochar on growth, water relations and yield of maize ( Zea mays L.) under drought condition. The Agriculturists. 2018;16 :93-101 - 46.
Khan S, Wang N, Reid BJ, Freddo A, Cai C. Reduced bioaccumulation of PAHs by Lactuca sativa L. grown in contaminated soil amended with sewage sludge and sewage sludge derived biochar. Environmental Pollution. 2013;175 :64-68 - 47.
Dong D, Feng Q, Mcgrouther K, Yang M, Wang H, Wu W. Effects of biochar amendment on rice growth and nitrogen retention in a waterlogged paddy field. Journal of Soils and Sediments. 2014; 15 (1):153-162 - 48.
Jinyang W, Pan X, Liu Y, Zhang X, Xiong Z. Effects of biochar amendment in two soils on greenhouse gas emissions and crop production. Plant and Soil. 2012; 360 (1–2):287-298 - 49.
Kamara A, Kamara HS, Kamara MS. Effect of rice straw biochar on soil quality and the early growth and biomass yield of two rice varieties. Agricultural Sciences. 2015; 6 :798 - 50.
Feng J, Cheng R, Qul AA, Yan QG, Li YG, Jian BL, et al. Effects of biochar on sodium ion accumulation, yield and quality of rice in saline-sodic soil of the west of Songnen plain, northeast China. Plant, Soil and Environment. 2018; 64 :612-618 - 51.
Ran C, Gulaqa A, Zhu J, Wang X, Zhang S, Geng Y, et al. Benefits of biochar for improving ion contents, cell membrane permeability, leaf water status and yield of rice under saline-sodic paddy field condition. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 2020; 39 :370-377 - 52.
Liu Y, Lu H, Yang S, Wang Y. Impacts of biochar addition on rice yield and soil properties in a cold waterlogged paddy for two crop seasons. Field Crops Research. 2016; 191 :161-167 - 53.
Haefele S, Konboon Y, Wongboon W, Amarante S, Maarifat A, Pfeiffer E, et al. Effects and fate of biochar from rice residues in rice-based systems. Field Crops Research. 2011; 121 :430-440 - 54.
Liu Y, Yang S, Lu H, Wang Y. Effects of biochar on spatial and temporal changes in soil temperature in cold waterlogged rice paddies. Soil and Tillage Research. 2018; 181 :102-109 - 55.
Huang M, Long F, Jiang LG, Yang SY, Zou YB, Uphoff N. Continuous applications of biochar to rice: Effects on grain yield and yield attributes. Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 2019; 18 :563-570 - 56.
Kartika K, Lakitan B, Wijaya A, Kadir S, Widur LI, Siaga E, et al. Effects of particle size and application rate of rice-husk biochar on chemical properties of tropical wetland soil, rice growth and yield. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 2018; 12 :817-826 - 57.
Fahad S, Hussain S, Saud S, Hassan S, Tanveer M, Ihsan MZ, et al. A combined application of biochar and phosphorus alleviates heat-induced adversities on physiological, agronomical and quality attributes of rice. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2016; 103 :191-198 - 58.
He T, Meng J, Chen W, Liu Z, Cao T, Cheng X, et al. Effects of biochar on cadmium accumulation in rice and cadmium fractions of soil: A three-year pot experiment. BioResources. 2017; 12 :622-642 - 59.
Bian R, Joseph S, Cui L, Pan G, Li L, Liu X, et al. A three-year experiment confirms continuous immobilization of cadmium and lead in contaminated paddy field with biochar amendment. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2014; 272 :121-128 - 60.
Glick BR, Cheng Z, Czarny J, Duan J. Promotion of plant growth by ACC deaminase-producing soil bacteria. European Journal of Plant Pathology. 2007; 119 :329-339 - 61.
Chi F, Yang P, Han F, Jing Y, Shen S. Proteomic analysis of rice seedlings infected by Sinorhizobium meliloti 1021. Proteomics. 2010;10 :1861-1874 - 62.
Hussain N, Mujeeb F, Tahir M, Khan GD, Hassan NM, Bari A. Effectiveness of Rhizobium under salinity stress. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences. 2002; 1 :12-14 - 63.
Antoun H, Prevost D. Ecology of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. In: Siddiqui ZA, editor. PGPR: Biocontrol and Biofertilization. Dordrecht: Springer; 2005. pp. 1-38 - 64.
Yao L, Wu Z, Zheng Y, Kaleem I, Li C. Growth promotion and protection against salt stress by Pseudomonas putida Rs-198 on cotton. European Journal of Soil Biology. 2010;46 :49-54 - 65.
Egamberdiyeva D. The effect of plant growth promoting bacteria on growth and nutrient uptake of maize in two different soils. Applied Soil Ecology. 2007; 36 :184-189 - 66.
Alavi P, Starcher MR, Zachow C, Müller H, Berg G. Root-microbe systems: The effect and mode of interaction of stress protecting agent (SPA) Stenotrophomonas rhizophila DSM14405T. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2013;4 :141 - 67.
Kohler J, Caravaca F. An AM fungus and a PGPR intensify the adverse effects of salinity on the stability of rhizosphere soil aggregates of Lactuca sativa Roldan. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2010;42 :429-434 - 68.
Gill SS, Khan NA, Tuteja N. Cadmium at high dose perturbs growth, photosynthesis and nitrogen metabolism while at low dose it up regulates sulfur assimilation and antioxidant machinery in garden cress ( Lepidium sativum L.). Plant Science. 2012;182 :112-120 - 69.
Samuel S, Muthukkaruppan SM. Characterization of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and fungi associated with rice, mangrove and effluent contaminated soil. Current Botany. 2011; 2 :22-25 - 70.
Baharlouei K, Pazira E, Solhi M. Evaluation of inoculation of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on cadmium. Singapore: International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology, IPCBEE. IACSIT Press; 2011; Vol. 6 - 71.
Bhardwaj D, Ansari MW, Sahoo RK, Tuteja N. Biofertilizers function as key player in sustainable agriculture by improving soil fertility, plant tolerance and crop productivity. Microbial Cell Factories. 2014; 13 :66 - 72.
Ruiz-Sanchez M, Aroca R, Munoz Y, Polon R, Ruiz-Lozano JM. The arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis enhances the photosynthetic efficiency and the antioxidative response of rice plants subjected to drought stress. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2010; 167 :862-869 - 73.
Hrkousse O, Simani A, Jadrane I, Aitboulahsen M, Mazri MA, Zouahri A, et al. Role of local biofertilizer in enhancing the oxidative stress defence systems of date palm seedling ( Phoenix dactylifera ) against abiotic stress. Applied and Environmental Soil Science. 2021;6628544 :1-13 - 74.
Kohler J, Hernandez JA, Caravaca F, Rold´an A. Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi modify alleviation biochemical mechanisms in waterstressed plants. Functional Plant Biology. 2008; 35 (2):141 - 75.
Burd GI, Dixon DG, Glick BR. Plant growth-promoting bacteria that decrease heavy metal toxicity in plants. Canadian Journal of Microbiology. 2000; 46 :237-245 - 76.
Madhaiyan M, Poonguzhali S, Sa T. Metal tolerating methylotrophic bacteria reduces nickel and cadmium toxicity and promotes plant growth of tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum L.). Chemosphere. 2007;69 :220-228 - 77.
Safronova VI, Stepanok VV, Engqvist GL, Alekseyev YV, Belimov AA. Root-associated bacteria containing 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase improve growth and nutrient uptake by pea genotypes cultivated in cadmium supplemented soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 2006; 42 :267-272 - 78.
Wani PA, Khan MS, Zaidi A. Effect of metal tolerant plant growth-promoting Rhizobium on the performance of pea grown in metal-amended soil. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 2008; 55 :33-42 - 79.
Ouledali S, Ennajeh M, Zrig A, Gianinazzi S, Khemira H. Estimating the contribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to drought tolerance of potted olive trees (Olea europaea). Acta Physiologiae Plantarium. 2018; 40 :1-81 - 80.
Pavithra D, Yapa N. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation enhances drought stress tolerance of plants. Groundwater for Sustainable Development. 2018; 7 :490-494 - 81.
Pedranzani H, Rodríguez-Rivera M, Gutiérrez M, Porcel R, Hause B, Ruiz-Lozano JM. Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis regulates physiology and performance of Digitaria eriantha plants subjected to abiotic stresses by modulating antioxidant and jasmonate levels. Mycorrhiza. 2016;26 :141-152 - 82.
Rani B. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi on biochemical parameters in wheat Triticum aestivum L. under drought conditions [Doctoral Dissertation]. Hisar: CCSHAU; 2016 - 83.
Nelsen CE, Safir GR. Increased drought tolerance of mycorrhizal onion plants caused by improved phosphorus nutrition. Planta. 1982; 154 :407-413 - 84.
Hajiboland R, Aliasgharzadeh N, Laiegh SF, Poschenrieder C. Colonization with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improves salinity tolerance of tomato Solanum lycopersicum L. plants. Plant and Soil. 2010;331 :313-327 - 85.
Khalloufi M, Martínez-Andújar C, Lachaâl M, Karray-Bouraoui N, Pérez-Alfocea F, Albacete A. The interaction between foliar GA3 application and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation improves growth in salinized tomato Solanum lycopersicum L. plants by modifying the hormonal balance. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2017;214 :134-144 - 86.
Hajiboland R, Dashtebani F, Aliasgharzad N. Physiological responses of halophytic C4 grass, Aeluropus littoralis to salinity and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonization. Photosynthetica. 2015;53 :572-584 - 87.
Giri B, Kapoor R, Mukerji KG. Improved tolerance of acacia nilotica , to salt stress by arbuscular mycorrhiza,Glomus fasciculatum , may be partly related to elevated K/Na ratios in root and shoot tissues. Microbial Ecology. 2007;54 :753-760 - 88.
Hashem A, Alqarawi AA, Radhakrishnan R, Al-Arjani AF, Aldehaish HA, Egamberdieva D, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi regulate the oxidative system, hormones and ionic equilibrium to trigger salt stress tolerance in Cucumis sativus L. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 2018;25 :1102-1114 - 89.
Hajiboland R, Joudmand A, Aliasgharzad N, Tolrá R, Poschenrieder C. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alleviate low-temperature stress and increase freezing resistance as a substitute for acclimation treatment in barley. Crop & Pasture Science. 2019; 70 :218-233 - 90.
Mathur S, Jajoo A. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi protects maize plants from high temperature stress by regulating photosystem II heterogeneity. Industrial Crops and Products. 2020; 143 :111934 - 91.
Ma J, Janoušková M, Ye L, Bai LQ, Dong RR, Yan Y, et al. Role of arbuscular mycorrhiza in alleviating the effect of cold on the photosynthesis of cucumber seedlings. Photosynthetica. 2019; 57 :86-95 - 92.
Chu XT, Fu JJ, Sun YF, Xu YM, Miao YJ, Xu YF, et al. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation on cold stress-induced oxidative damage in leaves of Elymus nutans Griseb. South African Journal of Botany. 2016;104 :21-29 - 93.
Kaldorf M, Kuhn AJ, Schröder WH, Hildebrandt U, Bothe H. Selective element deposits in maize colonized by a heavy metal tolerance conferring arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. Journal of Plant Physiology. 1999; 154 :718-728 - 94.
Kelkar TS, Bhalerao SA. Beneficiary effect of arbuscular mycorrhiza to Trigonella foenum-graceum in contaminated soil by heavy metal. Research Journal of Recent Sciences. 2013;2 :29-32 - 95.
Jiang QY, Zhuo F, Long SH, Zhao HD, Yang DJ, Ye ZH, et al. Can arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi reduce Cd uptake and alleviate Cd toxicity of Lonicera japonica grown in Cd-added soils? Scientific Reports. 2016; 6 :21805 - 96.
Lingua G, Franchin C, Todeschini V, Castiglione S, Biondi S, Burlando B, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi differentially affect the response to high zinc concentrations of two registered poplar clones. Environmental Pollution. 2008; 153 :137-147 - 97.
Li XL, Christie P. Changes in soil solution Zn and pH and uptake of Zn by arbuscular mycorrhizal red clover in Zn-contaminated soil. Chemosphere. 2001; 42 :201-207 - 98.
Miller SP, Sharitz RR. Manipulation of flooding and arbuscular mycorrhiza formation influences growth and nutrition of two semiaquatic grass species. Functional Ecology. 2000; 14 :738-748 - 99.
Fougnies L, Renciot S, Müller F, Plenchette C, Prin Y, De Faria SM, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization and nodulation improve flooding tolerance in Pterocarpus officinalis Jacq. seedlings. Mycorrhiza. 2007; 17 :159-166 - 100.
Solís-Rodríguez UR, Ramos-Zapata JA, Hernández-Cuevas L, Salinas-Peba L, Guadarrama P. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi diversity and distribution in tropical low flooding forest in Mexico. Mycological Progress. 2020; 19 :195-204 - 101.
Bulgari R, Franzoni G, Ferrante A. Biostimulants application in horticultural crops under abiotic stress conditions. Agronomy. 2019; 9 :306 - 102.
Pokluda R, Sękara A, Jezdinský A, Kalisz A, Neugebauerová J, Grabowska A. The physiological status and stress biomarker concentration of Coriandrum sativum L. plants subjected to chilling are modified by biostimulant application. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture. 2016;32 :258-268 - 103.
Marfà O, Cáceres R, Polo J, Ródenas J. Animal protein hydrolysate as a biostimulant for transplanted strawberry plants subjected to cold stress. Acta Horticulturae. 2009; 842 :315-318 - 104.
Polo J, Barroso R, Ródenas J, Azcón-Bieto J, Cáceres R, Marfà O. Porcine hemoglobin hydrolysate as a biostimulant for lettuce plants subjected to conditions of thermal stress. HortTechnology. 2006; 16 :483-487 - 105.
Botta A. Enhancing plant tolerance to temperature stress with amino acids: An approach to their mode of action. Acta Horticulturae. 2012; 1009 :29-36 - 106.
Korkmaz A, Korkmaz Y, Demirkiran AR. Enhancing chilling stress tolerance of pepper seedlings by exogenous application of 5-aminolevulinic acid. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2010; 67 :495-501 - 107.
Kang SM, Khan AL, Waqas M, You Y-H, Hamayun M, Joo GJ, et al. Gibberellin-producing Serratia nematodiphila PEJ1011 ameliorates low temperature stress inCapsicum annuum L. European Journal of Soil Biology. 2015;68 :85-93 - 108.
Petrozza A, Santaniello A, Summerer S, Di Tommaso G, Di Tommaso D, Paparelli E, et al. Physiological responses to Megafol® treatments in tomato plants under drought stress: A phenomic and molecular approach. Scientia Horticulturae (Amsterdam). 2014; 174 :185-192 - 109.
Xu C, Leskovar DI. Effects of A. nodosum seaweed extracts on spinach growth, physiology and nutrition value under drought stress. Scientia Horticulturae (Amsterdam). 2015;183 :39-47 - 110.
Mayak S, Tirosh T, Glick BR. Plant growth-promoting bacteria that confer resistance to water stress in tomatoes and peppers. Plant Science. 2004; 166 :525-530 - 111.
Goñi O, Quille P, O’Connell S. Ascophyllum nodosum extract biostimulants and their role in enhancing tolerance to drought stress in tomato plants. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2018;126 :63-73 - 112.
Kałuzewicz A, Krzesiński W, Spizewski T, Zaworska A. Effect of biostimulants on several physiological characteristics and chlorophyll content in broccoli under drought stress and re-watering. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca. 2017; 45 :197-202 - 113.
Petrozza A, Summerer S, Di Tommaso G, Di Tommaso D, Piaggesi A. An evaluation of tomato plant root development and morpho- physiological response treated with VIVA® by image analysis. Acta Horticulturae. 2013; 1009 :155-160 - 114.
Heidari M, Golpayegani A. Effects of water stress and inoculation with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on antioxidant status and photosynthetic pigments in basil ( Ocimum basilicum L.). Journal of Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences. 2012;11 :57-61 - 115.
Abd El-Mageed TA, Semida WM, Rady MM. Moringa leaf extract as biostimulant improves water use efficiency, physio-biochemical attributes of squash plants under deficit irrigation. Agricultural Water Management. 2017; 193 :46-54 - 116.
Asaf S, Hamayun M, Khan AL, Waqas M, Khan MA, Jan R, et al. Salt tolerance of Glycine max . L induced by endophytic fungusAspergillus flavus CSH1, via regulating its endogenous hormones and antioxidative system. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2018;128 :13-23 - 117.
Barnawal D, Bharti N, Pandey SS, Pandey A, Chanotiya CS, Kalra A. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria enhance wheat salt and drought stress tolerance by altering endogenous phytohormone levels and TaCTR1/TaDREB2 expression. Physiologia Plantarum. 2017; 161 :502-514 - 118.
Kang SM, Khan MA, Hamyun M, Kim LR, Kwon EH, Kang YS, et al. Phosphate-solubilizing Enterobacter ludwigii AFFR02 andBacillus megaterium Mj1212 rescues alfalfa’s growth under post-drought stress. Agriculture. 2021;11 :485 - 119.
Niu X, Song L, Xiao Y, Ge W. Drought-tolerant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria associated with foxtail millet in a semi-arid agroecosystem and their potential in alleviating drought stress. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2018; 8 :2580 - 120.
Batool T, Ali S, Seleiman MF, Naveed NH, Ali A, Ahmed K, et al. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria alleviates drought stress in potato in response to suppressive oxidative stress and antioxidant enzymes activities. Scientific Reports. 2020; 2020 (10):1-19 - 121.
Begum N, Wang L, Ahmad H, Akhtar K, Roy R, Khan MI, et al. Co-inoculation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and the plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria improve growth and photosynthesis in tobacco under drought stress by up-regulating antioxidant and mineral nutrition metabolism. Microbial Ecology. 2022; 83 :971-988 - 122.
Chandra D, Srivastava R, Glick BR, Sharma AK. Drought-tolerant Pseudomonas spp. improve the growth performance of finger millet ( Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.) under non-stressed and drought-stressed conditions. Pedosphere. 2018;28 (2):227-240 - 123.
Yasmin H, Nosheen A, Naz R, Bano A, Keyani R. L-tryptophan-assisted PGPR-mediated induction of drought tolerance in maize ( Zea mays L). Journal of Plant Interactions. 2017;12 (1):567-578 - 124.
Abdel Megeed TM, Gharib HS, Hafez EM, El-Sayed A. Effect of some plant growth regulators and biostimulants on the productivity of Sakha108 rice plant ( Oryza sativa L.) under different water stress conditions. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research. 2021;19 (4):2859-2878 - 125.
Francesca S, Cirillo V, Raimondi G, Maggio A, Barone A, Rigano MM. A novel protein hydrolysate-based biostimulant improves tomato performances under drought stress. Plants. 2021; 10 :1-13 - 126.
Ali S, Khan MA, Kim W-CJABC. Pseudomonas veronii KJ mitigates flood stress-associated damage inSesamum indicum L. Applied Biological Chemistry. 2018;2018 (61):575-585 - 127.
Rauf M, Awais M, Ud-Din A, Ali K, Gul H, Rahman MM, et al. Molecular mechanisms of the 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase producing Trichoderma asperellum MAP1 in enhancing wheat tolerance to waterlogging stress. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2021;11 :2213 - 128.
El-Bassiony AM, Ghoname AA, El-Awadi ME, Fawzy ZF, Gruda N. Ameliorative Effects of brassinosteroids on growth and productivity of snap beans grown under high temperature. Gesunde Pflanzen. 2012; 64 :175-182 - 129.
Nahar K, Hasanuzzaman M, Alam MM, Fujita M. Exogenous glutathione confers high temperature stress tolerance in mung bean ( Vigna radiata L.) by modulating antioxidant defense and methylglyoxal detoxification system. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2015;112 :44-54 - 130.
Kaushal N, Gupta K, Bhandhari K, Kumar S, Thakur P, Nayyar H. Proline induces heat tolerance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) plants by protecting vital enzymes of carbon and antioxidative metabolism. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants. 2011; 17 :203-213 - 131.
Kumar S, Kaushal N, Nayyar H, Gaur P. Abscisic acid induces heat tolerance in chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.) seedlings by facilitated accumulation of osmoprotectants. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum. 2012;34 :1651-1658 - 132.
Khan MA, Asaf S, Khan AL, Jan R, Kang SM, Kim KM, et al. Extending thermotolerance to tomato seedlings by inoculation with SA1 isolate of Bacillus cereus and comparison with exogenous humic acid application. PLoS One. 2020;15 (4):e0232228 - 133.
Kang SM, Khan AL, Waqas M, Asaf S, Lee KE, Park YG, et al. Integrated phytohormone production by the plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Bacillus tequilensis SSB07 induced thermotolerance in soybean. Journal of Plant Interactions. 2019;14 :416-423 - 134.
Quintero-Calderón EH, Sánchez-Reinoso AD, Chávez-Arias CC, Garces-Varon G, Restrepo-Díaz H. Rice seedlings showed a higher heat tolerance through the foliar application of biostimulants. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca. 2021; 49 :1 - 135.
Niu C, Wang G, Sui J, Liu G, Ma F, Bao Z. Biostimulants alleviate temperature stress in tomato seedlings. Scientia Horticulturae. 2021; 2022 (293):110712 - 136.
Spinelli F, Fiori G, Noferini M, Sprocatti M, Costa G. A novel type of seaweed extract as a natural alternative to the use of iron chelates in strawberry production. Scientia Horticulturae (Amsterdam). 2010; 125 :263-269 - 137.
Cerdán M, Sánchez-Sánchez A, Jordá JD, Juárez M, Sánchez-Andreu J. Effect of commercial amino acids on iron nutrition of tomato plants grown under lime-induced iron deficiency. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science. 2013; 176 :859-866 - 138.
Papenfus HB, Kulkarni MG, Stirk WA, Finnie JF, Van Staden J. Effect of a commercial seaweed extract (Kelpak®) and polyamines on nutrient-deprived (N, P and K) okra seedlings. Scientia Horticulturae (Amsterdam). 2013; 151 :142-146 - 139.
Anjum K, Ahmed M, Baber JK, Alizai MA, Ahmed N, Tareen MH. Response of garlic bulb yield to bio-stimulant (Bio-cozyme) under calcareous soil. Life Sciences: An International Journal. 2014; 8 :3058-3062 - 140.
Barassi CA, Ayrault G, Creus CM, Sueldo RJ, Sobrero MT. Seed inoculation with Azospirillum mitigates NaCl effects on lettuce. Scientific Horticulturae (Amsterdam). 2006;109 :8-14 - 141.
Del Amor FM, Cuadra-Crespo P. Plant growth-promoting bacteria as a tool to improve salinity tolerance in sweet pepper. Functional Plant Biology. 2012; 39 :82-90 - 142.
Del Pilar CM, Berrido SI, Ligero F, Lluch C. Rhizobium strain effects on the growth and nitrogen assimilation in Pisum sativum and Vicia faba plant growth under salt stress. Journal of Plant Physiology. 1999;154 :127-131 - 143.
Yildirim E, Taylor AG, Spittler TD. Ameliorative effects of biological treatments on growth of squash plants under salt stress. Scientific Horticulturae (Amsterdam). 2006; 111 :1-6 - 144.
Aydin A, Kant C, Turan M. Humic acid application alleviate salinity stress of bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants decreasing membrane leakage. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 2012;7 :1073-1086 - 145.
Ross R, Holden D. Commercial extracts of the brown seaweed Ascophyllum nodosum enhance growth and yield of strawberries. HortScience. 2010;45 :S141-S141 - 146.
Guinan KJ, Sujeeth N, Copeland RB, Jones PW, O’Brien NM, Sharma HSS, et al. Discrete roles for extracts of Ascophyllum nodosum in enhancing plant growth and tolerance to abiotic and biotic stresses. Acta Horticulturae. 2013;1009 :127-135 - 147.
Lucini L, Rouphael Y, Cardarelli M, Canaguier R, Kumar P, Colla G. The effect of a plant-derived biostimulant on metabolic profiling and crop performance of lettuce grown under saline conditions. Scientific Horticulturae (Amsterdam). 2015; 182 :124-133 - 148.
Mayak S, Tirosh T, Glick BR. Plant growth-promoting bacteria confer resistance in tomato plants to salt stress. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2004; 42 :565-572 - 149.
Demir K, Günes A, Inal A, Alpaslan M. Effects of humic acids on the yield and mineral nutrition of cucumber ( Cucumis Sativus , L.) grown with different salinity levels. Acta Horticulturae. 1999;492 :95-104 - 150.
Rady MM, Desoky ESM, Elrys AS, Boghdady MS. Can licorice root extract be used as an effective natural biostimulant for salt-stressed common bean plants? South African Journal of Botany. 2019; 121 :294-305 - 151.
Semida WM, Rady MM. Presoaking application of propolis and maize grain extracts alleviates salinity stress in common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Scientific Horticulturae (Amsterdam). 2014;168 :210-217 - 152.
Rady MM, Varma B, Howladar SM. Common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) seedlings overcome NaCl stress as a result of presoaking inMoringa oleifera leaf extract. Scientific Horticulturae (Amsterdam). 2013;162 :63-70 - 153.
Abdel Latef AAH, Srivastava AK, Saber H, Alwaleed EA, Tran LSP. Sargassum muticum andJania rubens regulate amino acid metabolism to improve growth and alleviate salinity in chickpea. Scientific Reports. 2017;7 :1-12 - 154.
Arroussi HE, Benhima R, Elbaouchi A, Sijilmassi B, Mernissi NE, Aafsar A, et al. Dunaliella salina exopolysaccharides: A promising biostimulant for salt stress tolerance in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum ). Journal of Applied Phycology. 2018;30 :2929-2941 - 155.
Semida WM, Abd El-Mageed TA, Hemida K, Rady MM. Natural bee-honey based biostimulants confer salt tolerance in onion via modulation of the antioxidant defence system. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology. 2019; 94 :1-11 - 156.
Mesut Çimrin K, Türkmen Ö, Turan M, Tuncer B. Phosphorus and humic acid application alleviate salinity stress of pepper seedling. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2010; 9 :5845-5851 - 157.
Sapre S, Gontia-Mishra I, Tiwari S. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria ameliorates salinity stress in pea ( Pisum sativum ). Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 2022;41 :647-656 - 158.
Mellidou I, Ainalidou A, Papadopoulou A, Leontidou K, Genitsaris S, Karagiannis E, et al. Comparative transcriptomics and metabolomics reveal an intricate priming mechanism involved in PGPR-mediated salt tolerance in tomato. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2021; 12 :713984 - 159.
Alexander A, Singh VK, Mishra A. Halotolerant PGPR Stenotrophomonas maltophilia BJ01 induces salt tolerance by modulating physiology and biochemical activities ofArachis hypogaea . Frontiers in Microbiology. 2020;11 :1-12 - 160.
Gupta S, Pandey S. ACC deaminase producing bacteria with multifarious plant growth promoting traits alleviates salinity stress in french bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris ) plants. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2019;10 :1506 - 161.
Khan MA, Asaf S, Khan AL, Adhikari A, Jan R, Ali S, et al. Halotolerant rhizobacterial strains mitigate the adverse effects of Nacl stress in soybean seedlings. BioMed Research International. 2019; 2019 :9530963 - 162.
Ikram M, Ali N, Jan G, Iqbal A, Hamayun M, Jan FG, et al. Trichoderma reesei improved the nutrition status of wheat crop under salt stress. Journal of Plant Interactions. 2019;14 (1):590-602 - 163.
Zhang S, Gan Y, Xu B. Application of plant-growth-promoting fungi Trichoderma longibrachiatum T6 enhances tolerance of wheat to salt stress through improvement of antioxidative defense system and gene expression. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2016;7 :1405 - 164.
Hamayun M, Hussain A, Khan SA, Kim HY, Khan AL, Waqas M, et al. Gibberellins producing endophytic fungus Porostereum spadiceum AGH786 rescues growth of salt affected soybean. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2017;8 :686 - 165.
Souza AC, Zandonadi DB, Santos MP, Canellas NOA, de Paula SC, da Silva Irineu LES, et al. Acclimation with humic acids enhances maize and tomato tolerance to salinity. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture. 2021; 8 (1):1-13 - 166.
Khan MS, Pandey MK, Hemalatha S. Comparative studies on the role of organic biostimulant in resistant and susceptible cultivars of rice grown under saline stress—organic biostimulant alleviate saline stress in tolerant and susceptible cultivars of rice. Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology. 2018; 21 (5):459-467 - 167.
El Boukhari MELM, Barakate M, Bouhia Y, Lyamlouli K. Trends in seaweed extract based biostimulants: manufacturing process and beneficial effect on soil-plant systems. Plants. 2020; 9 (3):359 - 168.
Nawaz A, Shahbaz M, Asadullah M, Imran A, Marghoob MU, Imtiaz M, et al. Potential of salt tolerant PGPR in growth and yield augmentation of wheat ( Triticum aestivum L) under saline conditions. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2020;11 :2019 - 169.
Jan R, Khan MA, Asaf S, Lubna LIJ, Kim KM. Metal resistant endophytic bacteria reduces cadmium, nickel toxicity, and enhances expression of metal stress related genes with improved growth of oryza sativa, via regulating its antioxidant machinery and endogenous hormones. Plants (Basel). 2019; 8 (10):363 - 170.
Kang SM, Asaf S, Khan AL, Lubna KA, Mun BG, Khan MA, et al. Complete genome sequence of Pseudomonas psychrotolerans CS51, a plant growth-promoting bacterium, under heavy metal stress conditions. Microorganisms. 2020;8 (3):382 - 171.
Sahile AA, Khan MA, Hamayun M, Imran M, Kang SM, Lee IJ. Novel Bacillus cereus Strain, ALT1, enhance growth and strengthens the antioxidant system of soybean under cadmium stress. Agronomy. 2021;11 :404 - 172.
Abdallah EF, Abeer H, Alqarawi AA, Hend AA. Alleviation of adverse impact of cadmium stress in sunflower ( Helianthus annuus L.) by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 2015;47 (2):785-795