Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Probiotic Effects on Disease Prevention and Treatment

Written By

Kajal Farahmandi and Sadegh Sulaimany

Submitted: 23 November 2022 Reviewed: 23 December 2022 Published: 26 January 2023

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.109717

From the Edited Volume

Advances in Probiotics for Health and Nutrition

Edited by Vasudeo Zambare, Mohd Fadhil Md. Din, Puja Gupta and Bhupendra Gopalbhai Prajapati

Chapter metrics overview

314 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Research on the probiotic effect in preventing or treating diseases has attracted scientists’ attention for many decades. Findings of probiotics effects on human health indicate that they are not only no detrimental but also may have a beneficial effect on the host. Indeed, the effectiveness of probiotics depends on the type of utilized strain, duration, dose administration, and single or combined strains used that can be different in a specific disease. Therefore, probiotics can play a significant role in the treatment and prevention of different diseases through several mechanisms; for instance, stimulating respiratory immunity in the airway and enhancing resistance to respiratory tract infections, can prevent or reduce the duration of respiratory system diseases. By ameliorating glucose metabolism, reducing inflammation and oxidative stress in pancreatic cells, and preventing the destruction of β-pancreatic cells, may prevent the onset of diabetes and the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy as well. Moreover, using their metabolites, especially short-chain fatty acids production, probiotics may have an important effect on weight modifications. Finally, from the regulation of important neurotransmitters and regulation of inflammatory markers, it may be effective in mental disorders improvement.

Keywords

  • probiotics
  • microbiota
  • diarrhea
  • irritable bowel syndrome
  • inflammatory bowel disease
  • Crohn’s disease
  • ulcerative colitis
  • respiratory diseases
  • metabolic disorders
  • mental disorders
  • diabetes
  • obesity

1. Introduction

Research on the probiotic effect in preventing or treating diseases has attracted researchers’ attention for many decades. The importance of probiotics in such areas can be indicated by close to 300 meta-analyses published from 2000 to 2020 investigating the efficacy of probiotics in preventing and treating diseases. Probiotics are defined as live non-pathogenic microorganisms that confer beneficial health to the host when administered in a sufficient number [1] (1 × 109 colony forming units (CFU) per serving [2]). However, a concern has increased that probiotics may not survive in sufficient numbers when they are added to dairy products or pass through the gastrointestinal tract and may not be helpful as would be expected [3, 4]. Therefore, improving the shelf-life of probiotic strains is important. According to research, microencapsulation of probiotic strain by spray drying through adding additives like tragacanth to skim milk could remarkably enhance the survival of the cells during drying [5]. Amara and Shibl showed that probiotics are not only helpful in supporting health or managing pathogenic infections, but also effective for the treatment and controlling of diseases [6]. In addition, the utilization of fermented foods which are the usual source of lactic acid bacteria can confer remarkable health benefits, such as decreasing the incidence rate of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular illnesses [7], and also helpful metabolic effects [8].

Categorizing 294 meta-analysis articles have been done from the year of 2000 until 2020, on the effects of probiotics in the prevention and treatment of diseases, demonstrated that only 21% of these studies reported the ineffectiveness of probiotics in the prevention or treatment of various diseases but 79% showed a positive effect. It is worth saying that no analysis was found to report a negative effect of probiotics. This shows the importance of probiotics on human health that they are not only not detrimental but also may have a beneficial effect on the host. Besides, the statistics of the efficacy percentage of probiotics on diseases indicate that probiotic supplements may be more effective in preventing or treating some diseases (80.95–100%), including; diabetes, infections, irritable bowel syndrome, enterocolitis, and diarrhea. It is worth mentioning that these results have been conducted with more than 14 meta-analysis articles from 2000 to 2020 on each of these diseases (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

The effectiveness percent of probiotics on diseases with the highest number of studies (from 2000 to 2020).

Probiotics have been used to modulate the microbial community in a beneficial way and as a result, immunity improves against many infections that threaten human and animal lives [9]. Probiotics exert their beneficial effects on the host through different mechanisms different mechanisms including straightly eliminating or inhibiting the growth of pathogens by producing antimicrobial substances, destroying toxins, regulating the immune system, reintroducing the microbiota balance, competing with pathogenic microbes for adhesion sites and nutrients, enhancing intestinal barrier function, and immunomodulation [10, 11, 12, 13].

Using antibiotics in a large amount unselectively annihilates normal intestine and genital tract flora, and damages the host’s mechanisms of immunity [14]. Nowadays, spreading antibiotic resistance among human pathogens is a major public health concern in the world. It can affect people at any stage of life, as well as the healthcare, veterinary, and agriculture industries. As it is clear antimicrobial resistance is increasing nowadays due to the overuse or misuse of antibiotics against infections; however, probiotics can be used as a great alternative to them [15, 16]. As probiotics help to balance the intestinal microbiota composition, they can protect the host against diseases [17]. However, it should be noted that to produce probiotic supplements for humans or animals, strains containing antibiotic resistance genes must be distinguished from other strains, as there is a possible risk of spreading resistance genes to other pathogenic or non-pathogenic strains [18].

It is the purpose of this chapter to provide a comprehensive review of the research that has been conducted on the importance of probiotics in the prevention/treatment of several common human diseases.

Advertisement

2. Distribution of probiotic articles by type disease

Figure 2 shows the distribution of meta-analysis probiotic articles published from 2000 to 2020 by anatomical of physiological target. The greatest number of studies were associated with digestive system diseases (139 out of 283 or 49.11% of the total) and the least of them were related to disorders of the nervous system, eye, and adnexa. Figure 2 illustrates the proportion of probiotics in the treatment of different diseases as well.

Figure 2.

Distribution of probiotics-disease-related meta-analysis articles based on the category of diseases (2000–2020). The effectiveness of probiotics was defined as the percentage of completed curing or just improvement of some parameters in patients based on the result of each meta-analysis study.

Advertisement

3. Efficacy of probiotics on gastrointestinal diseases

Probiotics have a positive effect on intestinal function. They enhance the structure of mucus barrier and make intestinal connections closer by boosting the amount of mucus produced. They decrease inflammation and restore normal bowel movements as well [19, 20]. So, these mechanisms of action lead to probiotics having a major role in the management of gastrointestinal disorders.

3.1 Diarrhea

Among the probiotic studies conducted on digestive system diseases, diarrhea is approximately the most studied case. Evidence demonstrates that epidemiological relevance of acute diarrhea, whether caused by virus or associated by using antibiotic, is very high in the world, particularly, in developing countries [21]. Evidence show Limosilactobacillus reuteri ATCC 55730 [22, 23] and Saccharomyces boulardii [24, 25] play an important role in treating acute diarrhea in children. Research shows that two probiotic strains including Lactobacillus GG and Saccharomyces boulardii play important role in preventing antibiotic-associated diarrhea in both adult patients and children as well [21, 26]. Research reported that treatment by probiotics could reduce acute diarrheal illness by approximately 1 day [27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32].

Probiotics’ preventive or therapeutic effect in almost all types of diarrheas is related to some parameters including strain type, the antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties of the probiotic strain, and utilized dosage [11, 12, 13]. The effectiveness of probiotics on diarrhea has been imputed to their immunostimulatory effect and also restoring gut microflora to the balance situation [33, 34].

3.2 Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)

In rodents with intestinal inflammation, it has been proven that probiotics can reduce intestinal cytokine secretion and improve epithelial barrier function [35]. And a reduction of IBS symptoms happened in IBS patients due to enhanced cytokine profile [36] after probiotic supplementation was used [19, 37, 38, 39]. A meta-analysis of 15 human studies including 1793 IBS patients also indicated that probiotic therapy reduced pain and symptom severity scores in these people [40]. Furthermore, studies both in humans and animals show that different probiotic strains can be effective in alleviating abdominal pain and decreasing visceral hypersensitivity by changing the expression of neurotransmitters and receptors which are associated with the pain pathways such as the opioid or the cannabinoid receptors [41, 42]. However, taking into account the effectiveness of probiotics based on the type of strain used, duration, dose of administration, and single or combined strains used, can be different in a specific disease. Although many research showed the efficacy of probiotics on IBS patients, however, Connell et al. reported that VSL#3 probiotic supplement which is the combination of eight bacterial strains, not had any positive effect on abdominal pain, stool consistency, abdominal bloating, or quality of life in patients with IBS [43].

3.3 Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)

IBD is a collective term used to describe Crohn’s disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC), and nonspecific colitis [44]. The inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract is in common characteristic of these diseases although each of them has distinct features, the inflammation may lead to pain, diarrhea, and bleeding [44]. The precise cause of IBS is unknown; however, it is thought that a multifactor is involved, the complex interplay of genetics and epigenome, environmental factors, and microbiome [45].

It is shown that probiotic administration alleviated the severity of the colitis by decreasing the NF-κB DNA binding activity, and also reducing the accumulation of leukocytes, and downregulating IL-6 and TNF-α production. Probiotics also might be useful in preserving remission and preventing relapse of UC [46, 47]. Other researchers demonstrated the efficacy of probiotics on this disease as well [48, 49]. It should be noted that based on investigating all meta-analysis studies of probiotics on UC published from 2000 to 2020, probiotics supplementations was 100% effective for remission induction and preventing relapse of UC. Therefore, probiotic therapy seems to be a safe and effective method for patient with UC, however, evidence has not proven efficacy of this supplement on CD patients so far [49, 50, 51, 52]. A clinical trial confirmed this statement. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of adult patients with UC and CD, treatment with a multi-strain probiotic supplement or placebo for 4 weeks. The result showed that utilizing probiotics could reduce intestinal inflammation in patients with UC, but not in CD [53].

Advertisement

4. Efficacy of probiotics on respiratory diseases

Studies report that probiotics can play a significant role in treatment and preventing or reducing the duration of respiratory system diseases [54, 55, 56] and it might be a practical alternative to promote recovery from these diseases [57, 58]. Besides, some evidence showed that probiotics may stimulate respiratory immunity by improving T regulatory response in the airway and enhance resistance to respiratory tract infections caused by bacteria and viruses [59, 60, 61]. Probiotics impact lung microbiota [62] and then exert anti-inflammatory activity in the lungs [63]. For instance, orally administered of Lactobacillus helveticus can modulated the immune response in a positive way [64, 65, 66, 67]. And this probiotic strain by increasing the number of cells secreting IgA in the intestine and bronchial-associated lymphoid tissue has an immunoprotective impact on mucosal immunity [68]. Evidence indicates that lactic acid bacteria and their metabolites move from gut to lung and exert various immunomodulatory actions [69]. Different probiotic strains including Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus were reported to be a great option in treating rotavirus infection in both animals and humans [70, 71, 72]. Besides, among chronic respiratory diseases, some probiotic strains have improved at least one symptom of allergic rhinitis (AR). In particular, Lactobacillus paracasei LP-33 can enhance the quality of life of patients with AR, according to a meta-analysis study carried out recently [73].

4.1 Influenza

An animal study was done by Lu et al. [69] evaluated the effect of Lactobacillus mucosae 1025, Bifidobacterium breve CCFM1026, and their mixture on mice infected with the influenza virus for 19 days. The result shows that the clinical symptoms were improved by probiotic treatments. L. mucosae 1025 could directly decrease viral loading in the lung, and B. breve CCFM1026 might alter the immune responses. However, the mixture reduced viral loading and increased the antiviral protein MxA expression, which none of the single strains alone were not able to increase MxA expression. It is reported this is because of increasing the amount of butyrate production resulting from changing the gut microbiota composition [69]. In addition, other probiotic strains which are tested in mice with influenza infection and their effectiveness were determined are Bacillus subtilis 3 [74], Lactobacillus rhamnosus M21 [75], Bacillus subtilis PY79 [76]. Studies indicate Bacillus subtilis 3 is not only effective for the prevention and treatment of influenza but also helpful in the prevention and treatment of bacterial infections in both animal models [77, 78] and humans [78, 79]. The antibacterial property of this strain is due to its ability to produce an antibiotic named aminocoumarin which can suppress a wide range of pathogens and also strengthen host resistance [80]. Furthermore, a double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of the combination of different probiotic strains containing Lacticaseibacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei, Lactobacillus casei 431 and Lactobacillus fermentum PCC on patients with a common cold and influenza-like infections was conducted by Zhang et al. [81]. In this trial, probiotic mixture 50–60% compared to the placebo group decreased the outbreak of common cold and influenza-like symptoms [81].

4.2 Covid-19

The evidence indicates that gut microbiota dysbiosis happened in COVID-19 patients even 6 months after recovery [82]. Restoring gut microbiota balance has been demonstrated to promote host resistance to viruses or invading pathogens at the respiratory mucosa level [83, 84]. Therefore, administration of prebiotics and probiotics are suggested to COVID-19 patients, to modulate the balance of gut microbiota and decrease the risk of secondary infection due to bacterial translocation [85].

In Covid-19 infected patients, reducing probiotic strains, especially Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium may postpone recovery. Consequently, it is suggested that host-microbiota balance should be preserved in the gut and lung which can be beneficial in fighting against COVID-19 [86]. Besides, Mahooti et al. [87] recommend that because probiotics have antiviral properties against other viruses, so they can be a complementary treatment against SARS CoV-2.

In numerous human studies, it has been shown that probiotics, especially, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, has the ability to improve the barrier of intestinal and lung and homeostasis, by increasing regulatory T cells, enhancing anti-viral defense, and reduce pro-inflammatory cytokines in systemic and respiratory infections. These immunomodulatory agents may be helpful in individuals who have been infected or are at risk of developing, COVID-19 [88].

4.3 Pneumonia

It seems probiotic therapy is a fascinating option as a nonantibiotic method for protection of the host microbiota balance and VAP prevention. Probiotics may probably decrease the incidence of VAP through diverse local and systemic effects that limit the colonization of pathogen species or improve host immune defenses [89]. Numerous studies confirmed the promising efficacy of probiotics on the prevention of VAP [90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95].

A RCT shows that the combination of four probiotic strains including Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5, Lactobacillus plantarum, Bifidobacterium lactis BB-12, and Saccharomyces boulardii could reduce the incidence of VAP by 11.9%, the time of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and the length of hospital stay [96]. In addition, a clinical trial shows that using a mixture of probiotic supplements containing Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, and Streptococcus spp. for 14 days, can significantly reduce the length of ICU and hospital stays in VAP patients [97].

Despite a meta-analysis of including 15 randomized controlled trials involving 2039 patients which reported that probiotic therapy could prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), and decrease the duration of antibiotic treatment of VAP, however, they had not shown any significant impact on the duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay and mortality [98]. Another meta-analysis also confirmed that there was no remarkable difference in ICU length of stay between probiotics and placebo groups [92].

Among the investigation we have done on reviewing probiotic meta-analysis studies until 2020, out of 6 studies on pneumonia, 5 of them related to VAP, and one study was on nosocomial pneumonia. The statistics show that probiotic supplementation could be 66.66% effective to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Advertisement

5. Efficacy of probiotics on metabolic diseases

Many hypotheses surround the feasible involvement of the intestinal microbiota in metabolic disorders such as diabetes and obesity.

5.1 Diabetes

Some evidence suggests that in diabetic patients, disruption in antioxidant defenses happens and free radicals are produced in large amounts [99, 100]. Oxidative stress is considered as one of the major factors in insulin resistance [101], the onset of diabetes and the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy as well [102, 103]. Evidence recommends that some probiotic strains are effective in reducing inflammation and oxidative stress in pancreatic cells [104, 105], and they play an important role in preventing the destruction of β-pancreatic cells [106, 107]. A preclinical study of the effect of probiotics on diabetic rats showed that the combination of two probiotic strains including Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus casei could significantly suppress oxidative damage by repressing the lipid peroxidation and protecting the antioxidant content of glutathione, superoxide dismutase, catalase and glutathione peroxidase in their pancreases [108]. It has also been demonstrated that Bifidobacterium adolescentis enhances insulin sensitivity [109] by increasing the amount of production of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) [110]. GLP-1, a growth factor for pancreatic cells, through complicated mechanisms like modulation of insulin secretion, pancreatic cell mass and food consumption improve glucose tolerance [111]. Furthermore, probiotics have also been found to be effective in reducing blood glucose levels [112, 113, 114]. This may be because of properties of probiotics that can ameliorate glucose metabolism via increasing the bioavailability of gliclazide, suppressing or postponing the intestinal absorption of glucose and changing the autonomic nervous activity [115, 116, 117]. The result of a clinical trial on 79 diabetic people who had used metformin as a daily treatment, and received multi-probiotic strains or placebo two times a day for 12 weeks, indicates glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and weight significantly decreased in the probiotic-utilizing group compared to placebo [118].

5.2 Obesity

Many recent meta-analysis studies proved that probiotics significantly had a promising effect on weight loss and body mass index (BMI) improvement [119, 120, 121, 122]. Besides, in one study, it was shown that when the combination of different probiotic strains was used for more than 8 weeks, reducing the body weight and BMI happened [123]. However, some other meta-analysis studies did not approve this statement [124, 125]. Furthermore, in another research was done by million and colleagues reported different species of Lactobacillus have different effects on weight in both humans and animals [126]. According to this research probiotic strains associated with weight gain in animals were Lactobacillus fermentum and Lactobacillus ingluviei. And a probiotic strain with anti-obesity effect was Lactobacillus plantarum, in addition, Lactobacillus gasseri was an effective strain for weight loss in both humans and animals [126]. Contradictory results on the effect of probiotics in weight modifications may be due to differences in the probiotic strains and host.

The gut microbiota effects on energy regulation can be a prime factor in the development of obesity [127, 128]. Human intestinal microbiota is a complicated ecosystem that includes numerous kinds of microorganisms like bacteria, viruses, archaea, fungi, protists, nematodes, and phages, involved in various functions of host metabolism [129]. A higher proportion in the strains of Bacteroides fragilis, Clostridium leptum, and Bifidobacterium catenulatum and a lower percentage of Clostridium coccoides, Lactobacillus sensu lato, and Bifidobacterium display considerable weight loss [130, 131], therefore, probiotics may be a powerful tool in modulating obesity by changing the gut microbiota composition [132, 133].

The gut microbiota remarkedly can ferment the indigestible carbohydrates into short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs). SCFAs are the main metabolites of intestinal microbiota which have an important role in energy, glucose, lipid homeostasis and intestinal health [134, 135]. The most plentiful SCFAs are acetate, butyrate, and propionate (encompass 95% of all SCFAs), which are the main substrates for glucose metabolism [129]. Multiple animal studies have shown that the gut microbiota and their metabolites, especially SCFAs, have a significant role in obesity [136, 137, 138] and also in the prevention and treatment of obesity-associated insulin resistance [139, 140, 141, 142]. Therefore, it is recommended that SCFAs have the ability to control host energy metabolism in the advancement of diet-induced weight and also can be applied for de-novo synthesis of lipid and glucose [143]. However, in human studies, there is contradiction in the association between SCFAs and obesity. For instance, some studies have demonstrated a positive interaction between fecal SCFAs levels [144, 145, 146] and obesity while others reported an unfavorable result [147]. Evidence shows that acetate plays an important role in the hypothalamic control of appetite [139] and also increase anorexigenic neuropeptide expression [139] so it is suggested that acetate may be a functional treatment for obesity. Among acetate-producing probiotic strains we can suggest Methanobrevibacter smithii and Blautia hydrogenotrophica [148]. Chambers et al. have demonstrated that colonic propionate can acutely lessen energy intake and prevent long-term weight gain in people [149]. Considering probiotics, the species of genera Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium basically create butyrate and propionate [150]. Butyrate has the ability to alleviate obesity and other metabolic complications which are very usual in western nations [151]. For presentation, a decrease in the number of microbes that produce butyrate in humans is connected with an elevated threat of metabolic disease [152]. Clostridium butyricum, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Eubacterium rectale, Roseburia are some of probiotic strains found in the intestines of healthy animals and humans which produce butyrate [153, 154].

5.3 Other metabolic disorders

Meta-analysis studies reporting the effectiveness of probiotic supplementation on lipid and glucose metabolism on pregnant women [155] and patients with diabetes [156]. And also, the result of another meta-analysis study suggests that probiotics should be used as a new way to control and management of lipid profile and blood pressure in type 2 diabetic patients [157]. Probiotics play their role in reducing serum cholesterol (hypocholesterolemia) through some mechanisms including binding cholesterol and fatty acids to the probiotic bacteria’s cellular membrane [147], deconjugation of bile acids by the presence of bile salts hydrolase enzymes in lactic acid bacteria [139, 148, 149, 150], the transformation of cholesterol to coprostanol and excreted into feces [147]. A clinical trial of 84 pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) receiving 300 mg/day of yogurt contained two probiotic strains including Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium lactis or placebo (ordinary yogurt) for 2 months reported that consumption of yogurt probiotics can manage blood glucose better and also the rate of macrosomia might be reduced in pregnant women by GDM through this regimen [158].

Advertisement

6. Effect of probiotics on mental illnesses

6.1 Depression and anxiety

Depression and anxiety are common psychological disorders that they are highly comorbid with each other, and are important public health problems. The efficacy of probiotics on depression and anxiety through meta-analysis studies over the course of 20 years (from 2000 to 2020) was reviewed comprehensively. Half of these studies showed that probiotics could improve the symptoms of these patients [159, 160, 161, 162] while the other half reported, probiotic therapy for these mental disorders is not proven [163, 164, 165, 166]. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial treatment of 65 multiple sclerosis patients with multi-strain probiotics, promoted mental health parameters [167]. Recent research found that two hypotheses may explain the potential positive effect of probiotics on mood and cognition; one theory is controlling important neurotransmitters and the other is regulating inflammatory markers by these probiotics [168]. Studies exhibit that cytokines increase by inflammatory factors, and subsequently, cytokines effect on synthesis, release, and absorption of neurotransmitters [169, 170, 171]. Ultimately, the increased levels of proinflammatory cytokines are associated with neurological disorders such as depression and anxiety. Probiotics improve mood and insomnia in depressed patients [172, 173, 174] by reducing inflammatory cytokines Interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β), [175, 176], Interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) [172, 173, 174, 176].

Advertisement

7. Conclusion

The effects of probiotics have been widely investigated in a broad spectrum of diseases and are currently suggested as a possible treatment or prevention for several diseases. Different mechanisms are known for the beneficial effects of probiotics, including directly eliminating or preventing pathogens growth by producing antimicrobial substances, eliminating toxins, competing for binding to receptors of epithelial cells, regulating the immune response, reintroducing the microbiota balance, enhancing tight intestinal connections, and also increasing mucus production. Probiotic therapy seems to be a safe and effective method especially, for patients with UC for remission induction and preventing relapse of UC, but, evidence has not proven the efficacy of this supplement on CD patients so far. However, it is needed to taking into account that the biological effects of probiotics on a special disease can be distinctly strain-specific. Therefore, more randomized clinical trials of various probiotic strains in both form of single and mixture on those patients are needed to definitively prove the effectiveness of probiotic microorganisms on these diseases.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1. Reid G. Probiotics: Definition, scope and mechanisms of action. Best Practice & Research. Clinical Gastroenterology 2016;30(1):17-25
  2. 2. Accepted Claims about the Nature of Probiotic Microorganisms in Food—Canada.ca [Internet]. 2022. Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/food-nutrition/food-labelling/health-claims/accepted-claims-about-nature-probiotic-microorganisms-food.html
  3. 3. Yao M, Xie J, Du H, McClements DJ, Xiao H, Li L. Progress in microencapsulation of probiotics: A review. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. 2020;19(2):857-874
  4. 4. Scourboutakos MJ, Franco-Arellano B, Murphy SA, Norsen S, Comelli EM, L’Abbé MR. Mismatch between probiotic benefits in trials versus food products. Nutrients. 2017;9(4):400
  5. 5. Farahmandi K, Rajab S, Tabandeh F, Shahraky MK, Maghsoudi A, Ashengroph M. Efficient spray-drying of Lactobacillus rhamnosus PTCC 1637 using total CFU yield as the decision factor. Food Bioscience. 2021;40:100816
  6. 6. Amara AA, Shibl A. Role of probiotics in health improvement, infection control and disease treatment and management. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal. 2015;23(2):107-114
  7. 7. Marco ML, Heeney D, Binda S, Cifelli CJ, Cotter PD, Foligné B, et al. Health benefits of fermented foods: Microbiota and beyond. Current Opinion in Biotechnology. 2017;44:94-102
  8. 8. Taylor BC, Lejzerowicz F, Poirel M, Shaffer JP, Jiang L, Aksenov A, et al. Consumption of fermented foods is associated with systematic differences in the gut microbiome and metabolome. mSystems [Internet]. 2020;5(2). Available from: https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/mSystems.00901-19
  9. 9. Fuller R. Probiotics in man and animals. The Journal of Applied Bacteriology. 1989;66(5):365-378
  10. 10. Wan MLY, Forsythe SJ, El-Nezami H. Probiotics interaction with foodborne pathogens: A potential alternative to antibiotics and future challenges. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2019;59(20):3320-3333
  11. 11. Roussel C, Sivignon A, de Vallée A, Garrait G, Denis S, Tsilia V, et al. Anti-infectious properties of the probiotic Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-3856 on enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) strain H10407. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2018;102(14):6175-6189
  12. 12. De Vrese M, Offick B. Probiotics and prebiotics: Effects on diarrhea. Bioactive Foods in Promoting Health. 2010. pp. 205-227
  13. 13. Patel R, DuPont HL. New approaches for bacteriotherapy: Prebiotics, new-generation probiotics, and synbiotics. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2015;60(suppl_2):108-121
  14. 14. Tegegne BA, Kebede B. Probiotics, their prophylactic and therapeutic applications in human health development: A review of the literature. Heliyon. 2022;8(6):e09725
  15. 15. Stavropoulou E, Tsigalou C, Bezirtzoglou E. Spreading of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) across clinical borders. Erciyes Medical Journal. 2019;41:238-243
  16. 16. Bezirtzoglou E, Alexopoulos A, Voidarou C. Apparent antibiotic misuse in environmental ecosystems and food. Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease. 2008;20(4):197-198
  17. 17. Choudhari G, Zambare V, Pawar R. Screening, isolation and characterization of probiotically safe lactic acid bacteria from human faeces for biofilm formation. International Journal of Research in BioSciences. 2018;7(2):10-18
  18. 18. Pawar R, Zambare V, Nabar B. Comparative assessment of antibiotic resistance in lactic acid bacteria isolated from healthy human adult and infant feces. Nepal Journal of Biotechnology. 2020;8(2):69-75
  19. 19. McFarland LV, Dublin S. Meta-analysis of probiotics for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2008;14(17):2650-2661
  20. 20. Whelan K, Quigley EMM. Probiotics in the management of irritable bowel syndrome and inflammatory bowel disease. Current Opinion in Gastroenterology. 2013;29(2):184-189
  21. 21. Cremonini F, Di Caro S, Nista EC, Bartolozzi F, Capelli G, Gasbarrini G, et al. Meta-analysis: The effect of probiotic administration on antibiotic-associated diarrhoea. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2002;16(8):1461-1467
  22. 22. Chmielewska A, Ruszczyński M, Szajewska H. Lactobacillus reuteri strain ATCC 55730 for the treatment of acute infectious diarrhoea in children: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pediatria Wspolczesna. 2008;10(1):32-36
  23. 23. Szajewska H, Urbańska M, Chmielewska A, Weizman Z, Shamir R. Meta-analysis: Lactobacillus reuteri strain DSM 17938 (and the original strain ATCC 55730) for treating acute gastroenteritis in children. Beneficial Microbes. 2014;5(3):285-293
  24. 24. Jun P, Jiang H, Xusheng Q , Ziliang T. A meta analysis of the efficacy of Saccharomyces boulardii in children with acute diarrhea. African Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 2012;6(21):1508-1514
  25. 25. Dinleyici EC, Eren M, Yargic ZA, Vandenplas Y. Costeffectiveness of add-on probiotics (Saccharomyces boulardii) in children with acute rotavirus diarrhea in Turkey (SB-cosTR). In: Proceedings of the 44th Annual Meeting of the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition. 2011. pp. 25-28
  26. 26. Hawrelak JA, Whitten DL, Myers SP. Is Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG effective in preventing the onset of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea: A systematic review. Digestion. 2005;72(1):51-56
  27. 27. Bhat S, Shreekrishna GN, Savio CD. Efficacy of probiotics in acute diarrhoea in children. International Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics. 2018;5(4):1646-1650
  28. 28. Alien SJ, Okoko B, Martínez E, Gregorio G, Dans LF. Probiotics fortreating infectious diarrhoea. Cochrane Datábase of Systematic Reviews. 2003;(4):CD003048. DOI: 10.1002/14651858
  29. 29. Huang JS, Bousvaros A, Lee JW, Diaz A, Davidson EJ. Efficacy of probiotic use in acute diarrhea in children: A meta-analysis. Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 2002;47(11):2625-2634
  30. 30. Van Niel CW, Feudtner C, Garrison MM, Christakis DA. Lactobacillus therapy for acute infectious diarrhea in children: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2002;109(4):678-684
  31. 31. Szajewska H, Mrukowicz JZ. Probiotics in the treatment and prevention of acute infectious diarrhea in infants and children: A systematic review of published randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. 2001;33:S17-S25
  32. 32. Chen K, Xin J, Zhang G, Xie H, Luo L, Yuan S, et al. A combination of three probiotic strains for treatment of acute diarrhoea in hospitalised children: An open label, randomised controlled trial. Beneficial Microbes. 2020;11(4):339-346
  33. 33. Isolauri E, Sütas Y, Kankaanpää P, Arvilommi H, Salminen S. Probiotics: Effects on immunity. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2001;73(2):444s-450s
  34. 34. Erickson KL, Hubbard NE. Probiotic immunomodulation in health and disease. The Journal of Nutrition. 2000;130(2):403S-409S
  35. 35. Madsen K, Cornish A, Soper P, McKaigney C, Jijon H, Yachimec C, et al. Probiotic bacteria enhance murine and human intestinal epithelial barrier function. Gastroenterology. 2001;121(3):580-591
  36. 36. O’Mahony L, McCarthy J, Kelly P, Hurley G, Luo F, Chen K, et al. Lactobacillus and bifidobacterium in irritable bowel syndrome: Symptom responses and relationship to cytokine profiles. Gastroenterology. 2005;128(3):541-551
  37. 37. Nikfar S, Rahimi R, Rahimi F, Derakhshani S, Abdollahi M. Efficacy of probiotics in irritable bowel syndrome: A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 2008;51(12):1775-1780
  38. 38. Zhang Y, Li L, Guo C, Mu D, Feng B, Zuo X, et al. Effects of probiotic type, dose and treatment duration on irritable bowel syndrome diagnosed by Rome III criteria: A meta-analysis. BMC Gastroenterology. 2016;16(1):62
  39. 39. Cayzeele-Decherf A, Pélerin F, Leuillet S, Douillard B, Housez B, Cazaubiel M, et al. Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-3856 in irritable bowel syndrome: An individual subject meta-analysis. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2017;23(2):336-344
  40. 40. Didari T, Mozaffari S, Nikfar S, Abdollahi M. Effectiveness of probiotics in irritable bowel syndrome: Updated systematic review with meta-analysis. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2015;21(10):3072-3084
  41. 41. Rousseaux C, Thuru X, Gelot A, Barnich N, Neut C, Dubuquoy L, et al. Lactobacillus acidophilus modulates intestinal pain and induces opioid and cannabinoid receptors. Nature Medicine. 2007;13(1):35-37
  42. 42. Verdu EF, Bercik P, Verma-Gandhu M, Huang XX, Blennerhassett P, Jackson W, et al. Specific probiotic therapy attenuates antibiotic induced visceral hypersensitivity in mice. Gut. 2006;55(2):182-190
  43. 43. Connell M, Shin A, James-Stevenson T, Xu H, Imperiale TF, Herron J. Systematic review and meta-analysis: Efficacy of patented probiotic, VSL# 3, in irritable bowel syndrome. Neurogastroenterology & Motility. 2018;30(12):e13427
  44. 44. Schölmerich J. Treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Praxis. 2007;96(9):337-343
  45. 45. De Souza HSP, Fiocchi C, Iliopoulos D. The IBD interactome: An integrated view of aetiology, pathogenesis and therapy. Nature Reviews. Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2017;14(12):739-749
  46. 46. Hegazy SK, El-Bedewy MM. Effect of probiotics on pro-inflammatory cytokines and NF-κB activation in ulcerative colitis. World Journal of Gastroenterology: WJG. 2010;16(33):4145
  47. 47. Sang LX, Chang B, Zhang WL, Wu XM, Li XH, Jiang M. Remission induction and maintenance effect of probiotics on ulcerative colitis: A meta-analysis. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2010;16(15):1908-1915
  48. 48. Elahi B, Nikfar S, Derakhshani S, Vafaie M, Abdollahi M. On the benefit of probiotics in the management of pouchitis in patients underwent Ileal pouch anal anastomosis: A meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 2008;53(5):1278-1284
  49. 49. Rahimi R, Nikfar S, Rahimi F, Elahi B, Derakhshani S, Vafaie M, et al. A meta-analysis on the efficacy of probiotics for maintenance of remission and prevention of clinical and endoscopic relapse in Crohn’s disease. Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 2008;53(9):2524-2531
  50. 50. Doherty G, Bennett G, Patil S, Cheifetz A, Moss AC. Interventions for prevention of post-operative recurrence of Crohn’s disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009;(4):Cd006873
  51. 51. Jin X, Chen X, Zhang Z, Hu W, Ou R, Li S, et al. Long noncoding RNA SNHG12 promotes the progression of cervical cancer via modulating miR-125b/STAT3 axis. Journal of Cellular Physiology. 2019;234(5):6624-6632
  52. 52. Derwa Y, Gracie DJ, Hamlin PJ, Ford AC. Systematic review with meta-analysis: The efficacy of probiotics in inflammatory bowel disease. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2017;46(4):389-400
  53. 53. Bjarnason I, Sission G, Hayee BH. A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of a multi-strain probiotic in patients with asymptomatic ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. Inflammopharmacology [Internet]. 2019;27(3):465-473. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10787-019-00595-4
  54. 54. King S, Glanville J, Sanders ME, Fitzgerald A, Varley D. Effectiveness of probiotics on the duration of illness in healthy children and adults who develop common acute respiratory infectious conditions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Nutrition. 2014;112(01):41-54
  55. 55. Liu S, Hu P, Du X, Zhou T, Pei X. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG supplementation for preventing respiratory infections in children: A meta-analysis of randomized, Placebo-controlled Trials. Indian Pediatrics. 2013;50(4):377-381
  56. 56. Wang Y, Li X, Ge T, Xiao Y, Liao Y, Cui Y, et al. Probiotics for prevention and treatment of respiratory tract infections in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine. 2016;95(31):e4509
  57. 57. Darbandi A, Asadi A, Ghanavati R, Afifirad R, Emamie AD, Talebi M. The effect of probiotics on respiratory tract infection with special emphasis on COVID-19: Systemic review 2010-20. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2021;105:91-104
  58. 58. Hao Q , Dong BR, Wu T. Probiotics for preventing acute upper respiratory tract infections. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2011;9:CD006895
  59. 59. Budden KF, Gellatly SL, Wood DLA, Cooper MA, Morrison M, Hugenholtz P, et al. Emerging pathogenic links between microbiota and the gut–lung axis. Nature Reviews. Microbiology. 2017;15(1):55-63
  60. 60. Forsythe P. Probiotics and lung immune responses. Annals of the American Thoracic Society. 2014;11(Supplement 1):S33-S37
  61. 61. Mortaz E, Adcock IM, Folkerts G, Barnes PJ, Paul Vos A, Garssen J. Probiotics in the management of lung diseases. Mediators of Inflammation. 2013:1-10
  62. 62. Enaud R, Prevel R, Ciarlo E, Beaufils F, Wieërs G, Guery B, et al. The gut-lung axis in health and respiratory diseases: A place for inter-organ and inter-kingdom crosstalks. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. 2020;10:9
  63. 63. McAleer JP, Kolls JK. Contributions of the intestinal microbiome in lung immunity. European Journal of Immunology. 2018;48(1):39-49
  64. 64. Vinderola G, Matar C, Perdigón G. Milk fermented by Lactobacillus helveticus R389 and its non-bacterial fraction confer enhanced protection against Salmonella enteritidis serovar Typhimurium infection in mice. Immunobiology. 2007;212(2):107-118
  65. 65. Vinderola G, Matar C, Perdigón G. Milk fermentation products of L. helveticus R389 activate calcineurin as a signal to promote gut mucosal immunity. BMC Immunology. 2007;8(1):1-10
  66. 66. LeBlanc JG, Matar C, Valdez JC, LeBlanc J, Perdigon G. Immunomodulating effects of peptidic fractions issued from milk fermented with Lactobacillus helveticus. Journal of Dairy Science. 2002;85(11):2733-2742
  67. 67. LeBlanc J, Fliss I, Matar C. Induction of a humoral immune response following an Escherichia coli O157: H7 infection with an immunomodulatory peptidic fraction derived from Lactobacillus helveticus-fermented milk. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology. 2004;11(6):1171-1181
  68. 68. Matar C, Valdez JC, Medina M, Rachid M, Perdigon G. Immunomodulating effects of milks fermented by Lactobacillus helveticus and its non-proteolytic variant. Journal of Dairy Research. 2001;68(4):601-609
  69. 69. Lu W, Fang Z, Liu X, Li L, Zhang P, Zhao J, et al. The potential role of probiotics in protection against influenza a virus infection in mice. Food. 2021;10(4):902
  70. 70. Kandasamy S, Vlasova AN, Fischer D, Kumar A, Chattha KS, Rauf A, et al. Differential effects of Escherichia coli Nissle and Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain GG on human rotavirus binding, infection, and B cell immunity. The Journal of Immunology. 2016;196(4):1780-1789
  71. 71. Shornikova AV, Casas IA, Mykkänen H, Salo E, Vesikari T. Bacteriotherapy with Lactobacillus reuteri in rotavirus gastroenteritis. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal. 1997;16(12):1103-1107
  72. 72. Lee DK, Park JE, Kim MJ, Seo JG, Lee JH, Ha NJ. Probiotic bacteria, B. longum and L. acidophilus inhibit infection by rotavirus in vitro and decrease the duration of diarrhea in pediatric patients. Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology. 2015;39(2):237-244
  73. 73. Farahmandi K, Mohr AE, McFarland LV. Effects of probiotics on allergic rhinitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy. 2022;36(4):440-450
  74. 74. Starosila D, Rybalko S, Varbanetz L, Ivanskaya N, Sorokulova I. Anti-influenza activity of a Bacillus subtilis probiotic strain. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2017;61(7):e00539-e00517
  75. 75. Song JA, Kim HJ, Hong SK, Lee DH, Lee SW, Song CS, et al. Oral intake of Lactobacillus rhamnosus M21 enhances the survival rate of mice lethally infected with influenza virus. Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection. 2016;49(1):16-23
  76. 76. Song M, Hong HA, Huang JM, Colenutt C, Khang DD, Nguyen TVA, et al. Killed Bacillus subtilis spores as a mucosal adjuvant for an H5N1 vaccine. Vaccine. 2012;30(22):3266-3277
  77. 77. Sorokulova IB, Kirik DL, Pinchuk IV. Probiotics against Campylobacter pathogens. Journal of Travel Medicine. 1997;4(4):167-170
  78. 78. Sorokulova I. Preclinical testing in the development of probiotics: A regulatory perspective with Bacillus strains as an example. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2008;46(Supplement_2):S92-S95
  79. 79. Gracheva NM, Gavrilov AF, Solov’eva AI, Smirnov VV, Sorokulova IB, Reznik SR, et al. The efficacy of the new bacterial preparation biosporin in treating acute intestinal infections. Zhurnal Mikrobiologii, Epidemiologii, i Immunobiologii. 1996;(1):75-77
  80. 80. Rybalko SL, Khristova ML, Shapiro AV, Varbanets LD, Zubkova NL, Zadorozhna VI, et al. Usage of new bacterial adjuvants for vaccination by anti-influenza and anti-poliomyelitis vaccines. Biopolymers and Cell. 2003;19(3):262-269
  81. 81. Zhang H, Yeh C, Jin Z, Ding L, Liu BY, Zhang L, et al. Prospective study of probiotic supplementation results in immune stimulation and improvement of upper respiratory infection rate. Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology. 2018;3(2):113-120
  82. 82. Chen Y, Gu S, Chen Y, Lu H, Shi D, Guo J, et al. Six-month follow-up of gut microbiota richness in patients with COVID-19. Gut. 2022;71(1):222-225
  83. 83. Zelaya H, Alvarez S, Kitazawa H, Villena J. Respiratory antiviral immunity and immunobiotics: Beneficial effects on inflammation-coagulation interaction during influenza virus infection. Frontiers in Immunology. 2016;7:633
  84. 84. Racedo S, Villena J, Salva S, Alvarez S. Influence of yogurt consumption on the respiratory immune response. Food and Agricultural Immunology. 2009;20(3):231-244
  85. 85. Xu K, Cai H, Shen Y, Ni Q , Chen Y, Hu S, et al. 冠状病毒病 (COVID-19) 诊疗浙江经验 management of COVID-19: The Zhejiang experience. Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao. Yi Xue Ban. 2019;2020:147-157
  86. 86. Nguyen QV, Chong LC, Hor YY, Lew LC, Rather IA, Choi SB. Role of probiotics in the management of COVID-19: A computational perspective. Nutrients. 2022;14(2):274
  87. 87. Mahooti M, Miri SM, Abdolalipour E, Ghaemi A. The immunomodulatory effects of probiotics on respiratory viral infections: A hint for COVID-19 treatment? Microbial Pathogenesis. 2020;148:104452
  88. 88. Bottari B, Castellone V, Neviani E. Probiotics and COVID-19. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition. 2021;72(3):293-299
  89. 89. Morrow LE, Kollef MH, Casale TB. Probiotic prophylaxis of ventilator-associated pneumonia: A blinded, randomized, controlled trial. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2010;182(8):1058-1064
  90. 90. Batra P, Soni KD, Mathur P. Efficacy of probiotics in the prevention of VAP in critically ill ICU patients: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Journal of Intensive Care. 2020;8(1):1-14
  91. 91. Su M, Jia Y, Li Y, Zhou D, Jia J. Probiotics for the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Respiratory Care. 2020;65(5):673-685
  92. 92. Fan QL, Yu XM, Liu QX, Yang W, Chang Q , Zhang YP. Synbiotics for prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia: A probiotics strain-specific network meta-analysis. Journal of International Medical Research. 2019;47(11):5349-5374
  93. 93. Bo L, Li J, Tao T, Bai Y, Ye X, Hotchkiss RS, et al. Probiotics for preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2014;10:CD009066
  94. 94. Siempos II, Ntaidou TK, Falagas ME. Impact of the administration of probiotics on the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Critical Care Medicine. 2010;38(3):954-962
  95. 95. Shimizu K, Yamada T, Ogura H, Mohri T, Kiguchi T, Fujimi S, et al. Synbiotics modulate gut microbiota and reduce enteritis and ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients with sepsis: A randomized controlled trial. Critical Care. 2018;22(1):1-9
  96. 96. Tsilika M, Thoma G, Aidoni Z, Tsaousi G, Fotiadis K, Stavrou G, et al. A four-probiotic preparation for ventilator-associated pneumonia in multi-trauma patients: Results of a randomized clinical trial. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 2022;59(1):106471
  97. 97. Mahmoodpoor A, Hamishehkar H, Asghari R, Abri R, Shadvar K, Sanaie S. Effect of a probiotic preparation on ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit: A prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial. Nutrition in Clinical Practice. 2019;34(1):156-162
  98. 98. Zhao J, Li L, qing, Chen C yang, Zhang G sheng, Cui W, Tian B ping. Do probiotics help prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically ill patients? A systematic review with meta-analysis. ERJ Open Research. 2021;7(1):00302-2020
  99. 99. Maritim AC, Sanders aRA, Watkins Iii JB. Diabetes, oxidative stress, and antioxidants: A review. Journal of Biochemical and Molecular Toxicology. 2003;17(1):24-38
  100. 100. Lipinski B. Pathophysiology of oxidative stress in diabetes mellitus. Journal of Diabetes and its Complications. 2001;15(4):203-210
  101. 101. Houstis N, Rosen ED, Lander ES. Reactive oxygen species have a causal role in multiple forms of insulin resistance. Nature. 2006;440(7086):944-948
  102. 102. Rösen P, Nawroth PP, King G, Möller W, Tritschler H, Packer L. The role of oxidative stress in the onset and progression of diabetes and its complications: A summary of a congress series sponsored byUNESCO-MCBN, the American Diabetes Association and the German diabetes society. Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews. 2001;17(3):189-212
  103. 103. Behl T, Kaur I, Kotwani A. Implication of oxidative stress in progression of diabetic retinopathy. Survey of Ophthalmology. 2016;61(2):187-196
  104. 104. Harisa GI, Taha EI, Khalil AF, Salem MM. Oral administration of Lactobacillus acidophilus restores nitric oxide level in diabetic rats. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. 2009;3(3):2963-2969
  105. 105. Valladares R, Sankar D, Li N, Williams E, Lai KK, Abdelgeliel AS, et al. Lactobacillus johnsonii N6. 2 mitigates the development of type 1 diabetes in BB-DP rats. PLoS One. 2010;5(5):e10507
  106. 106. Lin MY, Yen CL. Antioxidative ability of lactic acid bacteria. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 1999;47(4):1460-1466
  107. 107. Uskova MA, Kravchenko LV. Antioxidant properties of lactic acid bacteria--probiotic and yogurt strains. Voprosy Pitaniia. 2009;78(2):18-23
  108. 108. Yadav H, Jain S, Sinha PR. Oral administration of dahi containing probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus casei delayed the progression of streptozotocin-induced diabetes in rats. Journal of Dairy Research. 2008;75(2):189-195
  109. 109. Chen J, Wang R, Li XF, Wang RL. Bifidobacterium adolescentis supplementation ameliorates visceral fat accumulation and insulin sensitivity in an experimental model of the metabolic syndrome. British Journal of Nutrition. 2012;107(10):1429-1434
  110. 110. Cani PD, Daubioul CA, Reusens B, Remacle C, Catillon G, Delzenne NM. Involvement of endogenous glucagon-like peptide-1 (7-36) amide on glycaemia-lowering effect of oligofructose in streptozotocin-treated rats. Journal of Endocrinology. 2005;185(3):457-465
  111. 111. Drucker DJ. Glucagon-like peptides: Regulators of cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. Molecular Endocrinology. 2003;17(2):161-171
  112. 112. Pan YQ , Zheng QX, Jiang XM, Chen XQ , Zhang XY, Wu JL. Probiotic supplements improve blood glucose and insulin resistance/sensitivity among healthy and GDM pregnant women: A systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2021;2021:1-17
  113. 113. Peng TR, Wu TW, Chao YC. Effect of probiotics on the glucose levels of pregnant women: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicina (B Aires). 2018;54(5):77
  114. 114. Nikbakht E, Khalesi S, Singh I, Williams LT, West NP, Colson N. Effect of probiotics and synbiotics on blood glucose: A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. European Journal of Nutrition. 2018;57(1):95-106
  115. 115. Borthakur A, Gill RK, Tyagi S, Koutsouris A, Alrefai WA, Hecht GA, et al. The probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus stimulates chloride/hydroxyl exchange activity in human intestinal epithelial cells. The Journal of Nutrition. 2008;138(7):1355-1359
  116. 116. Al-Salami H, Butt G, Tucker I, Skrbic R, Golocorbin-Kon S, Mikov M. Probiotic pre-treatment reduces Gliclazide permeation (ex vivo) in healthy rats but increases it in diabetic rats to the level seen in untreated healthy rats. Archives of Drug Information. 2008;1(1):35-41
  117. 117. Yamano T, Tanida M, Niijima A, Maeda K, Okumura N, Fukushima Y, et al. Effects of the probiotic strain Lactobacillus johnsonii strain La1 on autonomic nerves and blood glucose in rats. Life Sciences. 2006;79(20):1963-1967
  118. 118. Madempudi RS, Ahire JJ, Neelamraju J, Tripathi A, Nanal S. Efficacy of UB0316, a multi-strain probiotic formulation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A double blind, randomized, placebo controlled study. PLoS One. 2019;14(11):e0225168. Available from: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0225168
  119. 119. Koutnikova H, Genser B, Monteiro-Sepulveda M, Faurie JM, Rizkalla S, Schrezenmeir J, et al. Impact of bacterial probiotics on obesity, diabetes and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease related variables: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open. 2019;9(3):e017995
  120. 120. Wang ZB, Xin SS, Ding LN, Ding WY, Hou YL, Liu CQ , et al. The potential role of probiotics in controlling overweight/obesity and associated metabolic parameters in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2019;2019:1-14
  121. 121. Borgeraas H, Johnson LK, Skattebu J, Hertel JK, Hjelmesaeth J. Effects of probiotics on body weight, body mass index, fat mass and fat percentage in subjects with overweight or obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Obesity Reviews. 2018;19(2):219-232
  122. 122. John GK, Wang L, Nanavati J, Singh R, Mullin G. Mo1963—Lactobacillus probiotics reduce body mass index, body weight, and fat mass in overweight and obese subjects: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Gastroenterology. 2018;154(6):S-865-S-866
  123. 123. Zhang Q , Wu Y, Fei X. Effect of probiotics on body weight and body-mass index: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition. 2016;67(5):571-580
  124. 124. Suzumura EA, Bersch-Ferreira ÂC, Torreglosa CR, da Silva JT, Coqueiro AY, Kuntz MGF, et al. Effects of oral supplementation with probiotics or synbiotics in overweight and obese adults: A systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized trials. Nutrition Reviews. 2019;77(6):430-450
  125. 125. Park S, Bae JH. Probiotics for weight loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrition Research. 2015;35(7):566-575
  126. 126. Million M, Angelakis E, Paul M, Armougom F, Leibovici L, Raoult D. Comparative meta-analysis of the effect of Lactobacillus species on weight gain in humans and animals. Microbial Pathogenesis. 2012;53(2):100-108
  127. 127. Flint HJ, Scott KP, Louis P, Duncan SH. The role of the gut microbiota in nutrition and health. Nature Reviews. Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2012;9(10):577
  128. 128. Moreno-Indias I, Cardona F, Tinahones FJ, Queipo-Ortuño MI. Impact of the gut microbiota on the development of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2014;5:190
  129. 129. Cerdó T, García-Santos JA, G. Bermúdez M, Campoy C. The role of probiotics and prebiotics in the prevention and treatment of obesity. Nutrients. 2019;11(3):635
  130. 130. Cotillard A, Kennedy SP, Kong LC, Prifti E, Pons N, Le Chatelier E, et al. Dietary intervention impact on gut microbial gene richness. Nature. 2013;500(7464):585
  131. 131. Le Chatelier E, Nielsen T, Qin J, Prifti E, Hildebrand F, Falony G, et al. Richness of human gut microbiome correlates with metabolic markers. Nature. 2013;500(7464):541
  132. 132. Kadooka Y, Sato M, Ogawa A, Miyoshi M, Uenishi H, Ogawa H, et al. Effect of Lactobacillus gasseri SBT2055 in fermented milk on abdominal adiposity in adults in a randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Nutrition. 2013;110(9):1696-1703
  133. 133. Zarrati M, Shidfar F, Nourijelyani K, Mofid V, Hossein Zadeh-Attar MJ, Bidad K, et al. Lactobacillus acidophilus La5, Bifidobacterium BB12, and Lactobacillus casei DN001 modulate gene expression of subset specific transcription factors and cytokines in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of obese and overweight people. BioFactors. 2013;39(6):633-643
  134. 134. Murugesan S, Nirmalkar K,Hoyo-Vadillo C, García-Espitia M, Ramírez-Sánchez D, García-Mena J. Gut microbiome production of short-chain fatty acids and obesity in children. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. 2018;37(4):621-625
  135. 135. de Clercq NC, Groen AK, Romijn JA, Nieuwdorp M. Gut microbiota in obesity and undernutrition. Advances in Nutrition. 2016;7(6):1080-1089
  136. 136. den Besten G, Lange K, Havinga R, van Dijk TH, Gerding A, van Eunen K, et al. Gut-derived short-chain fatty acids are vividly assimilated into host carbohydrates and lipids. American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. 2013;305(12):G900-G910
  137. 137. Liou AP, Paziuk M, Luevano JM Jr, Machineni S, Turnbaugh PJ, Kaplan LM. Conserved shifts in the gut microbiota due to gastric bypass reduce host weight and adiposity. Science Translational Medicine. 2013;5(178):178ra41-178ra41
  138. 138. Perry RJ, Peng L, Barry NA, Cline GW, Zhang D, Cardone RL, et al. Acetate mediates a microbiome–brain–β-cell axis to promote metabolic syndrome. Nature. 2016;534(7606):213-217
  139. 139. Frost G, Sleeth ML, Sahuri-Arisoylu M, Lizarbe B, Cerdan S, Brody L, et al. The short-chain fatty acid acetate reduces appetite via a central homeostatic mechanism. Nature Communications. 2014;5:3611
  140. 140. Li Z, Yi CX, Katiraei S, Kooijman S, Zhou E, Chung CK, et al. Butyrate reduces appetite and activates brown adipose tissue via the gut-brain neural circuit. Gut. 2018;67(7):1269-1279
  141. 141. Den Besten G, Bleeker A, Gerding A, van Eunen K, Havinga R, van Dijk TH, et al. Short-chain fatty acids protect against high-fat diet–induced obesity via a PPARγ-dependent switch from lipogenesis to fat oxidation. Diabetes. 2015;64(7):2398-2408
  142. 142. Lu Y, Fan C, Li P, Lu Y, Chang X, Qi K. Short chain fatty acids prevent high-fat-diet-induced obesity in mice by regulating G protein-coupled receptors and gut microbiota. Scientific Reports. 2016;6:37589
  143. 143. Kim KN, Yao Y, Ju SY. Short chain fatty acids and fecal microbiota abundance in humans with obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrients. 2019;11(10):2512
  144. 144. Rahat-Rozenbloom S, Fernandes J, Gloor GB, Wolever TMS. Evidence for greater production of colonic short-chain fatty acids in overweight than lean humans. International Journal of Obesity. 2014;38(12):1525-1531
  145. 145. Fernandes J, Su W, Rahat-Rozenbloom S, Wolever TMS, Comelli EM. Adiposity, gut microbiota and faecal short chain fatty acids are linked in adult humans. Nutrition & Diabetes. 2014;4(6):e121-e121
  146. 146. Riva A, Borgo F, Lassandro C, Verduci E, Morace G, Borghi E, et al. Pediatric obesity is associated with an altered gut microbiota and discordant shifts in F irmicutes populations. Environmental Microbiology. 2017;19(1):95-105
  147. 147. Barczyńska R, Litwin M, Sliżewska K, Szalecki M, Berdowska A, Bandurska K, et al. Bacterial microbiota and fatty acids in the faeces of overweight and obese children. Polish Journal of Microbiology. 2018;67(3):339-345
  148. 148. Ashaolu TJ. Immune boosting functional foods and their mechanisms: A critical evaluation of probiotics and prebiotics. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. 2020;130:110625
  149. 149. Chambers ES, Viardot A, Psichas A, Morrison DJ, Murphy KG, Zac-Varghese SEK, et al. Effects of targeted delivery of propionate to the human colon on appetite regulation, body weight maintenance and adiposity in overweight adults. Gut. 2015;64(11):1744-1754
  150. 150. Pessione E. Lactic acid bacteria contribution to gut microbiota complexity: Lights and shadows. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. 2012;2:86
  151. 151. Brahe LK, Astrup A, Larsen LH. Is butyrate the link between diet, intestinal microbiota and obesity-related metabolic diseases? Obesity Reviews. 2013;14(12):950-959
  152. 152. Isolauri E. Microbiota and obesity. Intestinal Microbiome: Functional Aspects in Health and Disease. 2017;88:95-106
  153. 153. Kumar A, Wu H, Collier-Hyams LS, Kwon YM, Hanson JM, Neish AS. The bacterial fermentation product butyrate influences epithelial signaling via reactive oxygen species-mediated changes in cullin-1 neddylation. The Journal of Immunology. 2009;182(1):538-546
  154. 154. Louis P, Flint HJ. Diversity, metabolism and microbial ecology of butyrate-producing bacteria from the human large intestine. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2009;294(1):1-8
  155. 155. Han MM, Sun JF, Su XH, Peng YF, Goyal H, Wu CH, et al. Probiotics improve glucose and lipid metabolism in pregnant women: A meta-analysis. Annals of Translational Medicine. 2019;7(5):99-111
  156. 156. Tabrizi R, Moosazadeh M, Lankarani KB, Akbari M, Heydari ST, Kolahdooz F, et al. The effects of synbiotic supplementation on glucose metabolism and lipid profiles in patients with diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins. 2018;10(2):329-342
  157. 157. He J, Zhang F, Han Y. Effect of probiotics on lipid profiles and blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis of RCTs. Medicine. 2017;96(51):e9166
  158. 158. Sahhaf Ebrahimi F, Homayouni Rad A, Mosen M, Abbasalizadeh F, Tabrizi A, Khalili L. Effect of L. acidophilus and B. lactis on blood glucose in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: A randomized placebo-controlled trial. Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome. 2019;11(1):1-7. Available from: https://dmsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13098-019-0471-5
  159. 159. Huang R, Wang K, Hu J. Effect of probiotics on depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutrients. 2016;8(8):483
  160. 160. Liu RT, Walsh RFL, Sheehan AE. Prebiotics and probiotics for depression and anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 2019;102:13-23
  161. 161. Reis DJ, Ilardi SS, Punt SEW. The anxiolytic effect of probiotics: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical and preclinical literature. PLoS One. 2018;13(6):e0199041
  162. 162. Huang R, Ning H, Yang L, Jia C, Yang F, Xu G, et al. Efficacy of probiotics on anxiety: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Neuropsychiatry. 2017;07(06):862-871
  163. 163. Liu B, He Y, Wang M, Liu J, Ju Y, Zhang Y, et al. Efficacy of probiotics on anxiety-a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Depression and Anxiety. 2018;35(10):935-945
  164. 164. Zhang N, Liao X, Zhang Y, Li M, Wang W, Zhai S. Probiotic supplements for relieving stress in healthy participants: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine. 2019;98(20):e15416
  165. 165. Nikolova V, Zaidi SY, Young AH, Cleare AJ, Stone JM. Gut feeling: Randomized controlled trials of probiotics for the treatment of clinical depression: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology. 2019;9:2045125319859963
  166. 166. Ng QX, Peters C, Ho CYX, Lim DY, Yeo WS. A meta-analysis of the use of probiotics to alleviate depressive symptoms. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2018;228:13-19
  167. 167. Rahimlou M, Hosseini SA, Majdinasab N, Haghighizadeh MH, Husain D. Effects of long-term administration of multi-strain probiotic on circulating levels of BDNF, NGF, IL-6 and mental health in patients with multiple sclerosis: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Nutritional Neuroscience. 2020;25(2):411-422. DOI: 101080/1028415X20201758887. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1028415X.2020.1758887
  168. 168. Wallace CJK, Milev R. The effects of probiotics on depressive symptoms in humans: A systematic review. Annals of General Psychiatry. 2017;16(1):14
  169. 169. Miller AH, Maletic V, Raison CL. Inflammation and its discontents: The role of cytokines in the pathophysiology of major depression. Biological Psychiatry. 2009;65(9):732-741
  170. 170. Anisman H, Merali Z, Hayley S. Neurotransmitter, peptide and cytokine processes in relation to depressive disorder: Comorbidity between depression and neurodegenerative disorders. Progress in Neurobiology. 2008;85(1):1-74
  171. 171. Dunn AJ. Effects of cytokines and infections on brain neurochemistry. Clinical Neuroscience Research. 2006;6(1-2):52-68
  172. 172. Paterson LM, Nutt DJ, Wilson SJ. NAPSAQ-1: National Patient Sleep Assessment Questionnaire in depression. International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice. 2009;13(1):48-58
  173. 173. Jackson ML, Butt H, Ball M, Lewis DP, Bruck D. Sleep quality and the treatment of intestinal microbiota imbalance in chronic fatigue syndrome: A pilot study. Sleep Science. 2015;8(3):124-133
  174. 174. McEwen BS. Physiology and neurobiology of stress and adaptation: Central role of the brain. Physiological Reviews. 2007;87(3):873-904
  175. 175. Luo J, Wang T, Liang S, Hu X, Li W, Jin F. Ingestion of Lactobacillus strain reduces anxiety and improves cognitive function in the hyperammonemia rat. Science China. Life Sciences. 2014;57(3):327-335
  176. 176. Ait-Belgnaoui A, Durand H, Cartier C, Chaumaz G, Eutamene H, Ferrier L, et al. Prevention of gut leakiness by a probiotic treatment leads to attenuated HPA response to an acute psychological stress in rats. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2012;37(11):1885-1895

Written By

Kajal Farahmandi and Sadegh Sulaimany

Submitted: 23 November 2022 Reviewed: 23 December 2022 Published: 26 January 2023