Abstract
In tropical, subtropical, and temperate climates, radish (Raphanus sativus L.) is a popular root vegetable. Radish diversity is intense from the eastern Mediterranean to the Caspian Sea. Many radish varieties have varied leaf morphology, root color, size, shape, flavor, vernalization requirements, and maturity times. Early radish variants were long and tapered rather than cylindrical, bulbous, elliptic, or spherical. For black Spanish radish, European-cultivated variety, and Asian-cultivated radish, three separate domestication processes occurred. The original radishes were black, followed by white in the 1500s then red and round in the 1700s. These are R. sativus L. var. radicula (sativus) or R. sativus L. var. niger radishes. Because of protogyny, self-incompatibility, open architecture, and biennial bolting, radish crosses readily. The fundamental methods for using heterotic breeding potential are SI, CMS, and doubled haploids (DH). This chapter discusses the various breeding strategies like inbred line development by the use of self-incompatibility, hybrid development by using male sterility system, population improvement, mutation breeding, haploid breeding, breeding strategies for biotic and abiotic stresses, QTL mapping, and genome wide and genomic tool in radish. Rapid developments in our understanding of advanced biotechnology technologies will increase our ability to identify cultivars and parental lines, check seed genetic purity, analyze phylogenetic links and genetic diversity, and add specific transgenic traits.
Keywords
- radish
- breeding
- genetics
- F1 hybrid
- Alternaria
- Fusarium
1. Introduction
Radish (
Physical attractiveness, including length, form, size, and skin tone, has a significant influence on consumer desire and marketing judgment [11]. The skin is generally white, but it may take on pink, red, purple, yellow, and green tones. Red radishes, on the other hand, are around 40 cm long and have a mild flavor (not as spicy) [5]. The anthocyanin pelargonidin is responsible for red colors, whereas a cyanidin derivative is responsible for purple hues. Even while quality-related characteristics are highly heritable, cultivation practices often have a significant impact on them. Radishes’ swelling taproots may take the shape of an oval, tapering, or cylindrical object [12]. Furthermore, cylindrical root variations are often collected mechanically [13]. Radish roots are high in antler velvet, generate beneficial phytochemicals, have cancer-preventive effects, and increase the flavor of Brassica products greatly [14]. Furthermore, radishes provide us with complex carbohydrates, dietary fiber, and organic nutrients and minerals [15].
Omics methodologies based on next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques provide a significant amount of genomic research [16], which also allows for the distribution and acquisition of positional markers on the chromosomes as well as the identification of new genes and sequences [17]. Furthermore, genome-wide studies show the genetic foundation of some characteristics [18]. The ability to re-sequence genomes allows for genome-wide investigation of important markers and higher-throughput genotyping [19]. Less research has been generated that examines the most crucial historical events as well as current achievements in radish breeding. As a consequence, we have a wealth of information on all aspects of radish breeding and its countless accomplishments in this sector. We anticipate that vegetable breeders will benefit from this chapter in the future.
2. An overview of radish breeding
2.1 Origin and distribution
Radish is an annual vegetable in the Cruciferae family. From the Mediterranean to the Black Sea, the genus Raphanus was separated into the Raphanus DC. and Hesperidopsis Boiss sections. Each part has six species (
2.2 Botany of radish
Radish (
2.3 Characteristics traits
It is a self-incompatible allogamous species. The considerable genetic variety of radish landraces and wild radish populations is paralleled in cultivar DNA polymorphism. Self-incompatibility may be overcome by bud pollination or high-concentration CO2 treatment, permitting the development of self-compatible progeny [49]. However, they exhibit inbreeding depression, making it difficult to get inbred lines. S-receptor kinase (SRK) is the recognition molecule of the stigma, similar to the self-incompatibility of Brassica species, whereas SP11, also known as SCR, is the recognition molecule of pollen [50]. These recognition molecule genes, SRK and SP11/SCR, have several alleles and are passed down through generations as the S haplotype. There are numerous S haplotypes in
Among Brassica crops, Japanese and South Korean radish cultivars are often resistant to clubroot. Radish may be used to breed resistance in Brassica plants [59]. A quantitative trait locus (QTL) promoting clubroot resistance has been found on LG1 [60], which correlates with
2.4 Breeding goals
The strong nutritional value and chemical components of the Brassicaceae family have significantly improved human health and well-being [65]. Root length is highly valued by consumers, who constantly rate radishes in terms of root length, diameter, and color. These factors are all highly important throughout the purchasing experience, and therefore, visual signals like the label’s color and location on the product are crucial. Too many gene-mapping studies have been devoted to the categorization of significant color-gene relationships in various plants [66]. The development of color genetics, which is essential to the success of radish crops, would be aided by the discovery and detection of key plant genes involved in radish color [67]. Numerous studies have been conducted thus far on the inheritance patterns of radish skin [68]. It was discovered that the most extensively studied varieties of radish, including red (30%), white (13%), and black (6%), had a total of 609 distinct chemical elements, distributed across 23 different groups [69]. The main plant sections from which the nutrients, anti-oxidants, and phytochemicals described in this study were derived were the roots, sprouts, and leaves [69]. Researchers have been interested in the natural red pigment that is abundant in red flesh radishes and is used widely in the food, wine, and cosmetics sectors [70]. Achieving uniformity in radish breeding in terms of color, size, and yield is becoming increasingly crucial [71]. Radishes’ esthetic appeal and health advantages are significantly influenced by color [72]. However, there is little study on the detection, characterization, and quantification of flavonoids in multicolor radish. Despite this, Zhang [73] discovered that the anthocyanin molecules that gave red and purple radishes their color pigment were relatively similar. These substances included pelargonin, callistephin, and red cyanidin [73]. Purple ZJL contains cyanidin o-syringic acid and cyanin, but dark red TXH has more callistephin and pelargonin. The metabolites that give colorful radishes their distinctive colors are more often associated with the secondary plant chemical biosynthesis pathway than SZB genes, in contrast. This approach could be useful for creating new, high-quality varieties of radish [73].
2.5 Breeding methods
The form of the leaves, the color of the petiole and leaf blades, and the quantity of surface hair are the important factors in radish breeding. Roots that are beyond their prime, on the other hand, are picked based on their internal solidity and outer morphology. Watts [74] formulated an immersion method for the solidity test in which the roots are immersed in water; acceptable solid roots sink and are selected for planting, but unsuitable pithy roots float and are discarded. In the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, mass and repeating selections were utilized to boost productivity and uniformity. However, hybrid breeding began in the 1950s to examine the prospects of heterotic vigor. Twenty-first-century biochemical, molecular, and biotechnological tools facilitated and diversified breeding tactics for quality and stress tolerance. Population improvement techniques for radish, like those used for other crops, include mutation breeding, backcross breeding, hybrid breeding (synthetics, heterotic F1 hybrids), molecular and transgenic methods, gamete selection, family selection, line breeding, recurrent selection, and mass-pedigree breeding [75, 76].
2.6 Radish breeding by using self-incompatibility system
Self-incompatibility (SI) is a mechanism that promotes stigmatization of self-pollen, prohibits self-fertilization and inbreeding, and demands outcrossing. Selfing may be prevented
Because radish is a self-incompatibility crop with significant heterosis, the generation of F1 hybrids based on self-incompatibility is desired to remove the time-consuming manual emasculation [86]. The basic purpose of a plant breeder is to identify S haplotype breeding lines. The plant breeder can keep the parental lines from crossing [87]. The S haplotypes of parental lines must be determined in order to achieve F1 hybrid breeding because each parental line’s S haplotype must indicate compatibility between parental lines [88, 89]. The abundance of S haplotype establishes a specific S haplotype using traditional procedures such as the test cross method, pollination, isoelectric focusing, immunoblot analysis, and pollen tube fluorescence analysis [85, 90]. The S alleles of the S haplotype are highly diverse [89]. In addition, Nikura and Matsuura found 37 alleles in Radish [91].
2.7 Radish breeding by use of male sterility system
Male sterility (MS) is a condition in which plants are unable to produce viable pollen, which is required for efficient hybrid seed commercial production. It often manifests itself in floral development as an incompatibility of nuclear-mitochondrial interaction in alloplasmic lines created by spontaneous mutation. It may also occur in wide crosses (intraspecific, interspecific, and intergeneric). Staminal MS systems are common in radish. Male sterility systems that contain nuclear and/or mitochondrial genomes include genic male sterility (GMS), cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS), and cytoplasmic-genic male sterility (CGMS). Transgenic male sterility (TMS), a new kind of male sterility, was developed using biotechnological technologies. Based on the process of male sterility induction and fertility restoration, all TMS systems developed to date may be classified into five kinds [94].
Plants with cytoplasmic male sterility, which is inherited from their mothers, are unable to generate effective pollen. The CGMS hermaphrodite state is restored by a collection of nuclear genes known as restorers of fertility (Rf), which inhibit the CMS genes’ activity. The Ogura CMS system has been applied in a number of contexts and is now commercially available. Ogura [95] found the CMS in a Japanese radish cultivar, giving rise to the term Ogura CMS. Ogura CMS is regulated by a recessive nuclear gene (
The genotype of male sterile plants is
Similar to CMS, the genetic emasculation approach in radish allows for the harnessing of heterotic vigor for yield, uniformity, adoption, and earliest maturity as well as the production of high-quality seeds. Despite being one of India’s most important salad crops, the first CMS-based radish hybrids and Public Sector CMS lines were reported in 2018 from ICAR-IIVR, Varanasi, UP, (2018) by Singh and colleagues.
2.8 Population improvement
Cross-pollinated crops and Brassica vegetables have benefited from population improvement. In India, mass selection has been routinely utilized to enhance the genetics of radish. This approach is useful for genetic gain of simply inherited monogenic characteristics, but it is inefficient for qualities regulated by polygenes. Significant genetic variety for variables of relevance, as found by several studies in radish [103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108], is a precondition for crop development. Many cultivars have been produced across the globe with various goals in mind. Based on progeny appraisal, changes such as mass pedigree and family selection are superior to basic mass selection. The decision between these strategies is determined by the population’s homogeneity. Recurrent selection is a preferable choice for improving quantitative traits, particularly those controlled by additive gene activity. This approach is helpful for improving leaf morphology, root form, size, color, yield, and other economic features. Kashi Lohit, a red radish cultivar, was developed at ICAR-IIVR in Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, using a simple recurrent selection to target red color root, tapering root form, and yield. Kashi Lohit has around 30–125% more nutrients such as ascorbic acid, total phenolics, anthocyanins, and antioxidants than white-rooted commercial radish cultivars [109]. Inbred lines may be produced by breaking down SI barriers using either BP or chemical induction procedures (NaCl or CO2). Many cultivars have been released in India by public sector organizations including Kashi Hans, Kashi Sweta, Kashi Mooli-40, Kashi Lohit, and Kashi Aardra as some of the characters. VRRAD-150 (ICAR-IIVR, Varanasi); Pusa Desi, Pusa Reshmi, Pusa Chetki, and others. Pusa Himani, Pusa Mridula, Pusa Jamuni, and Pusa Gulabi [ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi]; Hisar Sel-1 [Hisar Agricultural Research Institute]. Hisar University (HAU)]; Kalyanpur-1 [Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Technology] Kanpur’s College of Science, Agriculture, and Technology (CSAUAT)]; Chaudhary, Palam Hriday Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur]; Punjab Safed and Punjab Pasand [Punjab Agricultural University (PAU)]; as well as Arka Nishant [ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticulture Research] (IIHR), Bengaluru].
2.9 Mutation breeding
Mutation breeding refers to the technique of developing and using genetic variation
2.10 Breeding for biotic and abiotic stresses
Heat, rain, Alternaria blight, Fusarium wilt, white rust, aphids, and beetles are all major abiotic and biotic elements affecting radish cultivation. As a consequence, improving radish stress tolerance is an important breeding target. Radish takes a lot of breeding during the off-season. In India, breeding lines, cultivars, and hybrids resistant to heat stress (38–43°C), such as cvs, have been developed. Despite the North Indian plains’ subtropical environment which has three seasons—summer, rainy, and winter—Pusa Chetki, Kashi Mooli-40, VRRAD-200, Chetki group, VRRADH-41, and VRRADH-42; and tolerance to high humidity make it feasible to produce radish commercially practically year-round. There are several sources of resistance to Fusarium wilt, according to Ashizawa [111], Peterson and Pound [112], and Soh [113]. Furthermore, after screening 260 accessions from 9 Asian and European countries, Jeon [114] discovered 54 radish accessions that were resistant to Fusarium wilt. Ghimire [115] also tested radish for
2.11 Molecular markers to QTL breeding
Radish has been demonstrated to have a variety of economically important characteristics, such as yield, insect resistance, and disease resistance [2]. Yield is a complex trait governed by polygenic characteristics; it is difficult to discover these traits through standard breeding since they depend on phenotypic expression and interact with the environment and genotype. These challenges are addressed by the novel molecular breeding approach, which uses DNA markers for quantitative trait identification and linkage mapping [116]. Several DNA markers are utilized in breeding programs, including restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLPs), random amplified polymorphism DNA (RAPD), simple sequence repeats (SSRs), and single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) [117].
Biochemical- and DNA-based markers enable the identification and description of cultivars and parental lines of hybrids, assessing the genetic purity of seed, diversity in agricultural cultivars and their wild variants, phylogenetic analysis, and pinpointing the origin of the germplasm. The identification of isoenzymes was the first tool for genetic analysis [124]. This method was used by Tai-Young [125] to identify cultivars and validate the purity of radish seeds. DNA is now frequently examined by directly using PCR-based molecular approaches such as amplified fragment-length polymorphism (AFLP), random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), and inter-simple sequence repeats (ISSR). Wang [126] classified 65 cultivated radish accessions from 21 European, Asian, and North African countries into four groups based on their origin (Europe, Middle East, South Asia, and East Asia) in a neighbor-joining tree. Along with RAPD and ISSR marker information, reliable descriptors based on isoenzymes were established for the different stages of radish development [127]. Furthermore, Nakatsuji [128] generated 417 radish SSR markers utilizing cDNA data and SSR-enriched genomic libraries, which may be used for genetic research in radish and related species. The genetic diversity of the collection was studied using 144 radish cultivars. An SSR-enriched collection was used to generate genomic SSR markers [129]. Furthermore, the genetic diversity of 126 radish F1 cultivars was assessed using 60 SSRs and 29 agronomic parameters [130].
The expression of the
2.12 Haploid breeding
In traditional breeding, the inbreds that are selfed and chosen during 6–8 generations of selfing constitute a major component of the commercial seed production of F1 hybrids, which is detrimental to inbred vigor and inbreeding-depressive effects in Brassica crops, including radish. The microspore-produced doubled haploid (DH), which creates inbred lines with 100% homozygosity in only one generation, is an attractive tool because using DHs as parental lines may speed up breeding operations, create novel hybrids and varieties, conduct fundamental genetic research, and save time [135, 136]. Male gametophytic cells are cultured
2.13 Genomics and genomics tools
Today, genomics drive crop production, and the radish crop has been employed to investigate the underlying genotypic differences. The rapid rise of genomic data has spurred research into the genetic basis of plant characteristics such as better production, flowering, and disease resistance [141]. Several comprehensive studies on radish genome structure and chromosomal rearrangement during polyploidy events have been conducted [142], from which several genomic sequences have been generated [61]. Another research demonstrated that by combining the 454, Illumina, and PacBio sequencing technologies with bacterial artificial chromosome clones created by end sequencing, the whole genome of the Asian radish cultivar WK10039 was sequenced [143]. Numerous genetic investigations on the cultivated radish have been undertaken during the last 10 years [144]. A chromosome-scale genome assembly (
2.14 Genetic engineering
Genetic engineering is significant in agriculture since it improves agricultural characteristics and meets the needs of undernourished nations. The improvement of metabolic engineering methods and gene technology has sped up the development of usable germplasms [155]. Plant approaches advance by enhancing attributes; scientists have successfully developed transgenic radishes with a variety of agronomic qualities [156]. According to Tzfira and Citovsky [157] and Lacroix and Citovsky [158], some radish types contain beneficial features, such as better yield, that are passed on to the host plant. Gene transfer is carried out with the assistance of the pathogen
3. Conclusions and future perspectives
A few of the crucial radish breeding features are higher yield, early maturity, late bolting, pungency, cold hardiness, drought resistance, heat tolerance, and soil adaptation. Self-incompatibility alleles found in the radish genome make it possible to produce F1 hybrids without the time-consuming and labor-intensive manual emasculation necessary for radish. To prevent hand emasculation, it is essential to know the S haplotypes of the parental lines when creating F1 combinations. Inter- and intra-specific hybridizations are essential for the effective generation of radish yield because they allow the introduction of favorable agronomic features into the population. It is crucial to get comprehensive genetic data on chromosomes as well as the knowledge of inheritance. Researchers must comprehend the regulatory variables that synchronize at different developmental stages for each of the above-mentioned features in order to better understand and predict resistance, yield characteristics, and fruit quality. It is still essential to create a reliable and long-lasting plan for plant disease resistance, which is now being thought about. This is due to the ability of diseases to produce new bacterial strains, which may evade resistance. Scientists will now have accurate knowledge on disease resistance genes for a range of diseases as well as genes encoding essential biochemical features of the plant thanks to the completion of large-scale sequencing of the radish genomes earlier this year. One such method is speed breeding; as the cost of genome sequencing decreases, RAD-sequencing and DNA microarrays will be used more often, allowing for quicker genome mapping and tagging of novel quantitative trait loci. In order to enhance the number of resistant radish genotypes, these quantitative trait loci (QTLs) may introduce resistance into high-yielding radish genotypes and combine them with important resistance genes. Additionally, to increase radish crop output and quality, GWAS (genome-wide association studies) may map traits to particular candidate genes on a genome-wide scale. Using trait-specific genetic resources, heterotic potential, hundreds of molecular markers, highly saturated genetic maps, and effective contemporary technologies will all contribute to the development of prospective radish varieties and hybrids with improved quality and stress tolerance. Significant genetic and metabolic variety has been found, opening the door to breeding for genetic improvement and controlled harvest variability in agriculture. Finally, the use of trait-specific genetic resources, as well as the availability of thousands of molecular markers, highly saturated genetic maps, and efficient modern tools, will undoubtedly aid in the development of potential radish varieties and hybrids with improved quality and stress tolerance. Future radish breeding strategies that are crucial for boosting output and productivity as well as the effective use of input resources include targeted breeding strategies to create model crop ideotypes, improve nutritional quality, increase sustainability of production, increase adaptability to various climatic conditions, and increase tolerance to insects and diseases and efforts to pyramid two- or multi-tiered breeding approaches to widen the genetic base.
References
- 1.
Richharia RH. Cytological investigation of Raphanus sativus , Brassica oleracea, and their F 1 and F2 hybrids. Journal of Genetics. 1937;1 :19-44 - 2.
Kaneko Y, Matsuzawa Y. Radish: Raphanus sativus L. In: Genetic Improvement of Vegetable Crops. London, UK: Elsevier; 1993. pp. 487-510 - 3.
Patra JK, Das G, Paramithiotis S, Shin HS. Kimchi and other widely consumed traditional fermented foods of Korea: A review. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2016; 7 :1493 - 4.
Ebert AW. Ex situ conservation of plant genetic resources of major vegetables. In: Conservation of Trop. Plant Speci. New York: Springer; 2013. pp. 373-417 - 5.
Singh A, Sharma S. Radish. In: Antioxidants in Vegetables and Nuts-Properties and Health Benefits. Singapore: Springer Nature; 2020. pp. 209-235 - 6.
Kaneko Y, Kimizuka-Takagi C, Bang SW, Matsuzawa Y. Radish. In: Kole C, editor. Vegetables. Genome Mapping and Molecular Breeding in Plants. Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer; 2007; 5 :141-160 - 7.
Simard MJ, Légère A. Synchrony of flowering between canola and wild radish ( Raphanus raphanistrum ). Weed Science. 2004;6 :905-912 - 8.
Kumar R, Solankey SS, Singh M. Breeding for drought tolerance in vegetables. Vegetable Science. 2012; 39 :1-15 - 9.
Dixon GR. Vegetable Brassicas and Related Crucifers. Walllingford, Oxfordshire: CABI; 2007; 14 :327 - 10.
Porteus MH, Carroll D. Gene targeting using zinc finger nucleases. Nature Biotechnology. 2005; 8 :967-973 - 11.
Petropoulos SA, Sampaio SL, Di Gioia F, Tzortzakis N, Rouphael Y, Kyriacou MC, et al. Grown to be blue—Antioxidant properties and health effects of colored vegetables. Part I: Root vegetables. Antioxidants. 2019; 12 :617 - 12.
Rubatzky VE, Yamaguchi M. Cole crops, other brassica, and crucifer vegetables. In: World Vegetables. Boston, MA: Springer; 1997. pp. 371-417 - 13.
Bhardwaj RK, Kumari R, Vikram A. Efficient methods for the improvement of temperate root vegetables. Accel Plant Breed. 2020; 2 :155-196 - 14.
Cartea ME, Velasco P, Obregón S, Padilla G, de Haro A. Seasonal variation in glucosinolate content in Brassica oleracea crops grown in northwestern Spain. Phytochemistry. 2008; 2 :403-410 - 15.
El-Ramady HR, Domokos-Szabolcsy É, Abdalla NA, Taha HS, Fári M. Postharvest management of fruits and vegetables storage. In: Sustainable Agriculture Review. Cham: Springer; 2015; 15 :65-152 - 16.
Wang Y, Xu L, Chen Y, Shen H, Gong Y, Limera C, et al. Transcriptome profiling of radish ( Raphanus sativus L.) root and identification of genes involved in response to lead (Pb ) stress with next generation sequencing. PLoS One. 2013;6 :66539 - 17.
Kim J, Manivannan A, Kim DS, Lee ES, Lee HE. Transcriptome sequencing assisted discovery and computational analysis of novel SNPs associated with flowering in Raphanus sativus in-bred lines for marker-assisted backcross breeding. Horticulture Research. 2019;1 :1-12 - 18.
Kobayashi H, Shirasawa K, Fukino N, Hirakawa H, Akanuma T, Kitashiba H. Identification of genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphisms among geographically diverse radish accessions. DNA Research. 2020; 27 :dsaa001 - 19.
Kitamura S. Varieties and transitions of radish. In: Nishiyama I, editor. Japanese Radish. Japan: Jpn Soc From Sci Tokyo; 1958. pp. 1-19 (in Japanese) - 20.
Banga O. Radish, Raphanus sativus (Cruciferae). In: Simmonds NW, editor. Evolution of Crop Plants. London: Longman; 1976. pp. 60-62 - 21.
Hida K. Root crops: Radish. In: Matsuo T, editor. Collected Data of Plant Genetic Resources. Vol. 2. Tokyo: Koudansha; 1990. pp. 823-834. (in Japanese) - 22.
Panetsos CA, Baker HG. The origin of variation in wild Raphanus sativus (Cruciferae) in California. Genetica. 1967; 38 :243-274 - 23.
Eber F, Chevre AM, Baranger A, Vallee P, Tanguy X, Renard M. Spontaneous hybridization between a malesterile oilseed rape and two weeds. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 1994; 88 :362-368 - 24.
Eber F, Boucherie R, Broucqsault LM, Bouchet Y, Chevre AM. Spontaneous hybridization between vegetable crops and weeds. 1. Garden radish (Raphanus sativus L.) and wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.). Agronomie. 1998; 18 :489-497 - 25.
Kato M, Tokumasu S. Anelectrophoretic study of esterase and peroxidase isozyme in Brassicoraphanus. Euphytica. 1979; 28 :339-349 - 26.
Harberd DJ. Cytotaxonomic studies of brassica and relatedgenera. In: Vaughan JG, Mac Leod AJ, Jones BMG, editors. The Biology and Chemistry of the Cruciferae. London: Academic; 1976. pp. 47-68 - 27.
Prakash S, Takahata Y, Kirti PB, Chopra VL. Cytogenetics. In: Gomez-Campo C, editor. Biologyof Brassica Coenospecies. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1999. pp. 59-106 - 28.
Tsunoda S (1979) Ecology of wild species of the tribe Brassiceae and origin of cultivation. In: Recent Advances in Breeding. Jpn Soc Breed, 20: 41-45. (in Japanese) - 29.
Tsunoda S. The history of cultivated plants in the tribe Brassiceae. (1) cultivated plants and wild allies in the tribe Brassiceae. Agriculture & Horticulture. 1991; 66 :233-239. (in Japanese) - 30.
Warwick SI. Guide to the wild germplasm of brassica and allied crops. IV. Wild species in the tribe Brassiceae (Cruciferae) as sources of agronomic traits. Technology and Bulletin. 1993; 17E :1-19 - 31.
Hinata K. Radish Asahi World Plant, Encyclopedia, Japan. 1995; 67 :206-207. (in Japanese) - 32.
Furusato K, Miyazawa A. Varieties of Japanese radish viewed from horticulture. In: Nishiyama I, editor. Japanese Radish. Tokyo: Jpn Soc From Sci; 1958. pp. 138-161. (in Japanese) - 33.
Aoba T. Geographical distribution of domestic varieties in radish. In: Vegetables. Tokyo: Publication Department, Housei University; 1981. pp. 232-251. (in Japanese) - 34.
Aoba. Pedigree and variation of wild radish in Japan. Technology & Agriculture. 1988; 12 :94-114 (in Japanese) - 35.
Bateman AJ. Self-incompatibility systems in angiosperms. 3. Cruciferae (No. RESEARCH). Heredity. 1955; 9 :53-68 - 36.
Bailey LH. Manual of Cultivated Plants. Rev. ed. USA: Macmillan Company, Cornella University; 1949 - 37.
Kremer JC. Influence of honeybee habits on radish seed yield. Q. Bull. Mich. Agric. Exp. Stn. 1945; 27 :413-420 - 38.
Nishio T. Economic and academic importance of radish. In: The Radish Genome. Compendium of Plant Genomes. Cham: Springer; 2017. pp. 1-10 - 39.
Singh A, Sharma S, Dolly. Radish. In: Nayik GA, Gull A, editors. Antioxidants in Vegetables and Nuts-Properties and Health Benefits. Singapore: Springer; 2020. pp.209-235 - 40.
Kercher S, Conner JK. Patterns of genetic variability within and among populations of wild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum (Brassicaceae). American Journal of Botony. 1996; 11 :1416-1421 - 41.
Gopalakrishnan TP. Vegetable Crops. India: New India Publication; 2007. pp. 244-247 - 42.
Radchenko TG. Role of Honeybees as Pollinators in Increasing the Seed Crop from Cabbage and Radish. Beijing, China: Bdzhilnistvo; 1966; 2 :72-74 - 43.
Crane M, Mather K. The natural cross-pollination of crop plants with particular reference to the radish. Annals of Applied Biology. 1943; 4 :301-308 - 44.
Young HJ, Stanton ML. Influences of floral variation on pollen removal and seed production in wild radish. Ecology. 1990; 2 :536-547 - 45.
Jones HA, Rosa JT. Truck Crop Plants. London: Macmillan & Co., Ltd.; 1928. p. 538 - 46.
Kalia P. Root vegetable crops. Journal ofNew Seeds. 2005; 2-3 :247-275 - 47.
Lim S, Lee EJ, Kim J. Decreased sulforaphene concentration and reduced myrosinase activity of radish ( Raphanus sativus L.) root during cold storage. Postharvast Biology and Technology. 2015;100 :219-225 - 48.
Brickell C. The Royal Horticultural Society Encyclopedia of Gardening (Print). London: Dorling Kindersley; 1992. pp. 356-357 - 49.
Niikura S, Matsuura S. Genetic analysis of the reaction level of self-incompatibility to a 4% CO2 gas treatment in the radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2000; 101 :1189-1193 - 50.
Okamoto S, Sato Y, Sakamoto K, Nishio T. Distribution of similar self-incompatibility (S) haplotypes in different genera, Raphanus and brassica. Sexual Plant Reproduction. 2004; 17 :33-39 - 51.
Sakamoto K, Kusaba M, Nishio T. Polymorphism of the S-locus glycoprotein gene (SLG) and the S-locus related gene (SLR1) in Raphanus sativus L. and self-incompatible ornamental plants in the Brassicaceae. Molecular & General Genetics. 1998; 258 :397-403 - 52.
Tsuro M, Suwabe K, Kubo N, Matsumoto S, Hirai M. Mapping of QTLs controlling root shape and red pigmentation in radish, Raphanus sativus L. Breeding Science. 2008; 58 :55-61 - 53.
Hashida T, Nakatsuji R, Budahn H, Schrader O, Peterka H, Fujimura T, et al. Construction of a chromosome-assigned, sequence-tagged linkage map for the radish, Raphanus sativus L. and QTL analysis of morphological traits. Breeding Science. 2013; 63 :218-226 - 54.
Ozeki Y. Study on the relationship between the anthocyanin molecular species and color phenotype of roots in the inbred lines of red radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Japan Food Chem Res Found Res Rep. 2010; 16 :33-39 (in Japanese with English summary) - 55.
Park NI, Xu H, Li X, Jang IH, Park S, Ahn GH, et al. Anthocyanin accumulation and expression of anthocyanin biosynthetic genes in radish (Raphanus sativus). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2011; 59 :6034-6039 - 56.
Ishida M, Kakizaki T, Morimitsu Y, Ohara T, Hatakeyama K, Yoshiaki H, et al. Novel glucosinolate composition lacking 4-methylthio-3-butenyl glucosinolate in Japanese white radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Thoer Appl Genet. 2015; 128 :2037-2046 - 57.
Zou Z, Ishida M, Li F, Kakizaki T, Suzuki S, Kitashiba H, et al. QTL analysis using SNP markers developed by next-generation sequencing for identification of candidate genes controlling 4-methylthio-3-butenyl glucosinolate contents in roots of radish, Raphanus sativus L. PLoS One. 2013; 8 :e53541 - 58.
Nasu S, Kitashiba H, Nishio T. “Na-no-hana project” for recovery from the tsunami disaster by producing salinity-tolerant oilseed rape lines: Selection of salinity-tolerant lines of brassica crops. Journal of Integrated Field Science. 2012; 9 :33-37 - 59.
Akaba M, Kaneko Y, Hatakeyama K, Ishida M, Bang SW, Matsuzawa Y. Identification and evaluation of clubroot resistance of radish chromosome using a Brassica napus–Raphanus sativus monosomic addition line. Breeding Science. 2009; 59 :203-206 - 60.
Kamei A, Tsuro M, Kubo N, Hayashi T, Wang N, Fujimura T, et al. QTL mapping of clubroot resistance in radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2010; 120 :1021-1027 - 61.
Kitashiba H, Li F, Hirakawa H, Kawanabe T, Zou Z, Hasegawa Y, et al. Draft sequences of the radish (Raphanus sativus L.) genome. DNA Research. 2014; 21 :481-490 - 62.
Takahata Y, Komatsu H, Kaizuma N. Microspore culture of radish (Raphanus sativus L.): Influence of genotype and culture conditions on embryogenesis. Plant Cell Reports. 1996; 16 :163-166 - 63.
Park B-J, Liu Z, Kanno A, Kameya T. Transformation of radish (Raphanus sativus L.) via sonication and vacuum infiltration of germinated seeds with agrobacterium harboring a group 3 LEA gene from B. napus. Plant Cell Reports. 2005; 24 :494-500 - 64.
Cho MA, Min SR, Ko SM, Liu JR, Choi PS. Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Plant Biotechnol. 2008; 25 :205-208 - 65.
Al-Shehaz A. Brassicaceae (mustard family). Encyclopedia of life Sciences. Chichester: Wiley; 2001. pp. 1-5 - 66.
Yu D, Gu X, Zhang S, Dong S, Miao H, Gebretsadik K, et al. Molecular basis of heterosis and related breeding strategies reveal its importance in vegetable breeding. Horticulture Research. 2021; 8 :1-17 - 67.
Schreiner M, Peters H-K, Schonhof KA, Widell S. Seasonal climate effects on root colour and compounds of red radish. Journal ofthe Science of Food and Agriculture. 2002; 11 :1325-1333 - 68.
Yarnell SH. Cytogenetics of the vegetable crops. II. Crucifers. The Botonical Review. 1956; 2 :81-166 - 69.
Gamba M, Asllanaj E, Raguindin PF, Glisic M, Franco OH, Minder B, et al. Nutritional and phytochemical characterization of radish (Raphanus sativus): A systematic review. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2021; 113 :205-218 - 70.
Jing P, Zhao SJ, Ruan SY, Xie ZH, Dong Y, Yu LL. Anthocyanin and glucosinolate occurrences in the roots of Chinese red radish (Raphanus sativus L.), and their stability to heat and pH. Food Chemistry. 2012; 4 :1569-1576 - 71.
Elsayed AYA, Hamdino MI, Ahmed A, Shabana AI. Expected genetic gain in radish (Raphanus sativus var. red radicula) submitted to different procedures of selection. Egypt Journal of Plant Breed. 2016, 2016; 20 :313-328 - 72.
Zhang J, Zhao J, Tan Q , Qiu X, Mei S. Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals key genes associated with pigmentation in radish (Raphanus sativus L.) skin and flesh. Scientific Reports. 2021; 1 :1-11 - 73.
Zhang J, Qiu X, Tan Q , Xiao Q , Mei S. A comparative metabolomics study of flavonoids in radish with different skin and flesh colors (Raphanus sativus L.). Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry. 2020; 49 :14463-14470 - 74.
Watts LE. The use of a new technique in breeding for solidity in radish. Journal ofHorticulture Science. 1960; 35 :221-226 - 75.
Ram HH. Vegetable Breeding – Principles and Practices. New Delhi: Kalyani Publishers; 2005. pp. 324-328 - 76.
Singh BK, Singh B, Singh PM. Breeding cauliflower: A review. International Journal of Vegetable Science. 2018; 24 (1):58-84 - 77.
Stout AB. Further experimental studies on self-incompatibility in hermaphroditic plants. Journal of Genetics. 1920; 9 :85-129 - 78.
Dickinson HG. Pollen-stigma interactions: So near yet so far. Trends in Genetics. 2000; 16 :373-376 - 79.
Karron JD, Marshall DL, Olilveras DM. Numbers of sporophytic self-incompatibility alleles in populations of wild radish. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 1990; 79 :457-460 - 80.
Okazaki K, Hinata K. Analysis of S-alleles and S-glycoproteins in F1 hybrid varieties of Japanese radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Japan Journal of Breed. 1984; 34 :237-245 - 81.
Haseyama Y, Kitashiba H, Okamoto S, et al. Nucleotide sequence analysis of S-locus genes tounify S haplotype nomenclature in radish. Molecular Breeding. 2018; 38 :116 - 82.
Oikawa E, Takuno S, Izumita A, et al. Simple and efficient methods for S genotyping and S screening in genus brassica by dot-blot analysis. Molecular Breeding. 2011; 28 :1-12 - 83.
Wang Q , Zheng P, Zhang L. Identification and classification of S-haplotypes in radish (Raphanus sativus). Plant Breeding. 2019; 138 :121-130 - 84.
Haruta T. Studies on the genetics of self-and cross-incompatibility in cruciferous vegetables. Res Bull Takii Plant Breed Exp Stn. 1962; 2 :1-169 - 85.
Ruffio-Chable V, Herve Y, Dumas C, Gaude T. Distribution of S-haplotypes and its relationship with self-incompatibility in Brassica oleracea part 1- inbred lines of cauliflower (B. oleracea var. botrytis). Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 1997; 94 :338-346 - 86.
Nishio T, Sakamoto K. Polymorphism of self-incompatibility genes. In: The Radish Genome. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2017. pp. 177-188 - 87.
Wang R, Mei Y, Xu L, Zhu X, Wang Y, Guo J, et al. Genome-wide characterization of differentially expressed genes provides insights into regulatory network of heat stress response in radish ( Raphanus sativus L.). Functional and Integrative Genomics. 2018;18 :225-239 - 88.
Nou S, Watanabe M, Isogai A, Hinata K. Comparison of S-alleles and S-glycoproteins between two wild populations of Brassica campestris in Turkey and Japan. Sex Plant Reproduction. 1993; 6 :79-86 - 89.
Ockendon DJ. The S-allele collection of Brassica oleracea. In: III International Symposium on Brassicas and XII Crucifer Genetics Workshop. Wellesbourne, United Kingdom: Acta Hortic. 2000; 539 :25-30 - 90.
Georgia AVS, Ockendon J, Gabrielson R, Ma ire. Self-incompatibility alleles in broccoli. Horticulture Science. 1982; 17 :748-749 - 91.
Niikura S, Matsura S. Genetic variation of the self-incompatibility alleles (S-alleles) in the cultivated radish ( Raphanus sativus ) the R-R method. Acta Horticulture. 2001;546 :359-366 - 92.
Nishio T, Kusaba M, Sakamoto K, Ockendon DJ. Polymorphism of the kinase domain of the S-locus receptor kinase gene (SRK) in Brassica oleracea L. Theory and Applied Genetics. 1997; 95 :335-342 - 93.
Cox K, Beaton C. Fruit and Vegetables for Scotland: What to Grow and How to Grow it. Scotland: Birlinn Ltd.; 2020 - 94.
Kumar S. Male sterility in vegetables. In: Singh KP, Bahadur A, editors. Olericulture-Fundamental of Vegetable Production, I. Ludhiana: Kalyani Publication; 2014. pp. 431-439 - 95.
Ogura H. Studies of male sterility in Japanese radish with special reference to the utilization of this sterility towards the practical raising of hybrid seeds. Meun Fac Agric Kagoshima Univ. 1968; 6 :39-78 - 96.
Handa H, Gualberto JM, Grienenberger JM. Characterization of the mitochondrial orfB gene and its derivative, orf224, a chimeric open reading frame specific to one mitochondrial genome of the “Polima” male-sterile cytoplasm in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Current Genetics. 1995; 28 (6):546-552 - 97.
Jean M, Brown GG, Landry BS. Genetic mapping of fertility restorer genes for the Polima cytoplasmic male sterility in canola (Brassica napus L.) using DNA markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 1997; 95 :321-328 - 98.
Homme YL, Brown GG. Organizational differences between cytoplasmic male sterile and male fertile brassica mitochondrial genomes are confined to a single transposed locus. Nucleic Acids Research. 1993; 21 (8):1903-1909 - 99.
Homme YL, Stahl RJ, Li X, et al. Male sterility induced by Brassica napus cytoplasm is correlated with expression of a chimeric gene homologous to the pol CMS associated orf224 gene. Current Genetics. 1997; 31 :325-335 - 100.
Cardi T, Earle ED. Production of new CMS Brassica oleracea by transfer of ‘Anand’ cytoplasm from B. rapa through protoplast fusion. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 1997; 94 :204-212 - 101.
Bonnet A. Behaviour of cytoplasmic male sterility of Japanese origin in European radish varieties. Versailles: Eucarpia Cruciferae Newsletter. 1970. pp. 83-88 - 102.
Yamagishi H. Distribution and allelism of restorer genes for Ogura cytoplasmic male sterility in wild and cultivated radishes. Genes & Genetic Systems. 1998; 73 :79-83 - 103.
Jatoi SA, Javaid A, Iqbal M, et al. Genetic diversity in radish germplasm for morphological traits and seed storage proteins. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 2011; 43 (5):2507-2512 - 104.
Park KW, Lee JM, Munchen TU, Fritz D. A study of correlation between pithiness in petilole and root of radish. Korean Society of Horticulture and Science. 1989; 7 (1):36-37 - 105.
Rabbani MA, Murakami Y, Kuginuki Y, Takayanagi K. Genetic variation in radish germplasm from Pakistan using morphological traits and RAPDs. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution. 1998; 45 :307-331 - 106.
Singh BK, Koley TK, Karmakar P, et al. Pigmented radish (Raphanus sativus L.): Genetic variability, heritability and inter-relationships of total phenolics, anthocyanins and antioxidant activity. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2017; 87 (12):1600-1606 - 107.
Sudan SK, Samnotra RK, Gupta AK. A short note on field screening of radish varieties under sub-tropical conditions. Himachal Journal Agriculture Research. 1991; 17 (1-2):104 - 108.
Yamane K, Lü N, Ohnishi O. Multiple origins and high genetic diversity of cultivated radish inferred from polymorphism in chloroplast simple sequence repeats. Breeding Science. 2009; 59 :55-65 - 109.
Singh BK, Singh J. Lal muli karegi tanaw dur, aankhon ko roshani degi bharpur. Dainik Jagran. 2019; 15 :14 - 110.
Jain SM, Suprasanna P. Induced mutations for enhancing nutrition and food production. Geneconserve. 2011; 40 :201-215 - 111.
Ashizawa M, Hida K, Yoshikawa H. Studies on the breeding of Fusarium resistance in radish. I. Screening of radish varieties for Fusarium resistance. Bull Veg Ornam Crops Res Sta. 1979; A6 :39-70 - 112.
Peterson J, Pound G. Studies on resistance in radish to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. conglutinance race 2. Phytopathology. 1960; 50 :807-816 - 113.
Soh JW, Han KS, Lee SC, Lee JS. Evaluation of resistance of Fusarium wilt in radish genetic resources. Korean Journal of Horticulture Science and Technology. 2013; 31 (S2):92 - 114.
Jeon YA, Sung JS, Rhee JH, et al. Evaluation of resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. raphani in radish germplasm. Korean Journal Breed Science. 2017; 49 (4):344-350 - 115.
Ghimire MS, Khana P, Pokhrel A, et al. Response of different cultivars of radish (Raphanus Sativus L.) to Alternaria leaf spot on seed production during winter at Rupandehi Nepal. International Journal of Applied Sciences Biotechnology. 2016; 4 (3):318-324 - 116.
Xu L, Wang L, Gong Y, Dai W, Wang Y, Zhu X, et al. Genetic linkage map construction and QTL mapping of cadmium accumulation in radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Theory and Applied Genetics. 2012; 125 :659-670 - 117.
Muminović J, Merz A, Melchinger AE, Lübberstedt T. Genetic structure and diversity among radish varieties as inferred from AFLP and ISSR analyses. J. of the a. Society for Horticulture Science. 2005; 130 :79-87 - 118.
Curtis IS. Genetic engineering of radish: Current achievements and future goals. Plant Cell Reports. 2011; 30 :733-744 - 119.
Lee O, Koo H, Yu JW, Park HY. Genotyping-by-sequencing-based genome-wide association studies of Fusarium wilt resistance in radishes (Raphanus sativus L.). GEN. 2021; 12 :858 - 120.
Yu X, Choi SR, Ramchiary N, Miao X, Lee SH, Sun HJ, et al. Comparative mapping of Raphanus sativus genome using brassica markers and quantitative trait loci analysis for the Fusarium wilt resistance trait. Theory and Applied Genetics. 2013; 126 :2553-2562 - 121.
Kamei A, Tsuro M, Kubo N, Hayashi T, Wang N, Fujimura T, et al. QTL mapping of clubroot resistance in radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Theory and Applied Genetics. 2010; 120 :1021-1027 - 122.
Budahn H, Peterka H, Mousa M, Ding Y, Zhang S, Li J. Molecular mapping in oil radish (Raphanus sativus L.) and QTL analysis of resistance against beet cyst nematode (Heterodera schachtii). Theory and Applied Genetics. 2009; 118 :775-782 - 123.
Fan L, Wang Y, Xu L, Tang M, Zhang X, Ying J, et al. A genome-wide association study uncovers a critical role of the RsPAP2 gene in red-skinned Raphanus sativus L. Horticulture Research. 2020; 7 :1-13 - 124.
Byrne DH, Littleton TG. Electrophoretic characterization of diploid plums of southeastern United States. Journal of American Society of Horticulture Sciences. 1988; 113 (6):918-924 - 125.
Tai-Young P, Jinkug K, Kyu-Yong S, Wah-Mo Y. Cultivar identification and seed purity test by electrophoresis of isozymes in radish and Chinese cabbage. Journal of Korean Society for Horticulture and Sciences. 1995; 36 :805-811 - 126.
Wang N, Kitamoto N, Ohsawa R, Fujimura T. Genetic diversity of radish (Raphanus sativus) germplasms and relationships among worldwide accessions analyzed with AFLP markers. Breeding Science. 2008; 58 (2):107-112 - 127.
Cruz SM, Nery MC, Pinho EVRV, de Laia ML. Molecular characterisation of radish cultivars. Rev Ciên Agron. 2014; 45 (4):815-822 - 128.
Nakatsuji R, Hashida T, Matsumoto N, et al. Development of genomic and EST-SSR markers in radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Breeding Science. 2011; 61 :413-419 - 129.
Bae KM, Sim SC, Hong JH, et al. Development of genomic SSR markers and genetic diversity analysis in cultivated radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Horticulture, Environment and Biotechnology. 2015; 56 :216-224 - 130.
Lee ON, Park HY. Assessment of genetic diversity in cultivated radishes (Raphanus sativus) by agronomic traits and SSR markers. Scientia Horticulturae. 2017; 223 :19-30 - 131.
Duroc Y, Gaillard C, Hiard S, et al. Nuclear expression of a cytoplasmic male sterility gene modifies mitochondrial morphology in yeast and plant cells. Plant Science. 2006; 170 :755-767 - 132.
Grelon M, Budar F, Bonhomme S, Pelletier G. Ogura cytoplasmic male-sterility (CMS)- associated orf138 is translated into a mitochondrial membrane polypeptide in male sterile brassica cybrids. Molecular & General Genetics. 1994;243 :540-547 - 133.
Yamagishi H, Terachi T. Intra- and inter-specific variations in the mitochondrial gene orf138 of Ogura-type male sterile cytoplasm from Raphanus sativus and Raphanus raphanistrum. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2001; 103 :725-732 - 134.
Nie S, Li C, Xu L, et al. De novo transcriptome analysis in radish (Raphanus sativus L.) and identification of critical genes involved in bolting and flowering. BMC Genomics. 2016; 17 :389-405 - 135.
Forster BP, Heberle-Bors E, Kasha KJ, Touraev A. The resurgence of haploids in higher plants. Trends in Plant Science. 2007; 12 :368-375 - 136.
Gu HH, Zhao ZQ , Sheng XG, et al. Efficient doubled haploid production in microspore culture of loose-curd cauliflower. Euphytica. 2014; 195 :467-475 - 137.
Lichter R. Induction of haploid plants from isolated pollen of Brassica napus L. ZPflanzenphysiology. 1982; 105 :427-434 - 138.
Chun C, Park H, Na H. Microspore-derived embryo formation in radish R. sativus L. according to nutritional and environmental conditions. Horticulture, Environment and Biotechnology. 2011;52 (5):530-535 - 139.
Sugimoto K. F1 hybrid production using doubled haploid of microspore-derived ‘Moriguchi’ radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Journal of Japan Socirty for Horticulture and Sciences. 2002; 71 (2):187-191 - 140.
Tuncer B. Callus formation from isolated microspore culture in radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences. 2017; 27 (1):277-282 - 141.
Tuberosa R, Salvi S. Genomics-based approaches to improve drought tolerance of crops. Trends in Plant Sciences. 2006; 11 :405-412 - 142.
Li Z, Zhou M, Zhang Z, Ren L, Du L, Zhang B, et al. Expression of a radish defensin in transgenic wheat confers increased resistance to Fusarium graminearum and Rhizoctonia cerealis. Functional and Integrated Genome. 2011; 11 :63-70 - 143.
Jeong YM, Chung WH, Choi AY, Mun JH, Kim N, Yu HJ. The complete mitochondrial genome of cultivated radish WK10039 (Raphanus sativus L.). Mitochondrial DNA Part A. 2016; 27 :941-942 - 144.
Jeong YM, Chung WH, Mun JH, Kim N, Yu HJ. De novo assembly and characterization of the complete chloroplast genome of radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Gene. 2014; 551 :39-48 - 145.
Mitsui Y, Michihiko S, Kenji K, Nobukazu N, Mari S, Misaki I, et al. The radish genome and comprehensive gene expression profile of tuberous root formation and development. Scientific Reports. 2015; 5 :1-14 - 146.
Lee YJ, Mun JH, Jeong YM, Joo SH, Yu HJ. Assembly of a radish core collection for evaluation and preservation of genetic diversity. Horticulture, Environment and Biotechnology. 2018; 59 :711-721 - 147.
Shen D, Sun H, Huang M, Zheng Y, Li X, Fei Z. Radish Base: A database for genomics and genetics of radish. Plant and Cell Physi. 2013; 54 :33 - 148.
Tanaka Y, Tsuda M, Yasumoto K, Yamagishi H, Terachi T. A complete mitochondrial genome sequence of Ogura-type male-sterile cytoplasm and its comparative analysis with that of normal cytoplasm in radish (Raphanus sativus L.). BMC Genomics. 2012; 13 :1-12 - 149.
Hu T, Wei Q , Wang W, Hu H, Mao W, Zhu Q , et al. Genome-wide identification and characterization of CONSTANS-like gene family in radish (Raphanus sativus). PLoS One. 2018; 13 :e0204137 - 150.
Xiaohui Z, Zhen Y, Shiyong M, Yang Q , Xinhua Y, Xiaohua C, et al. A de novo genome of a Chinese radish cultivar. Horticulture Journal. 2015; 1 :155-164 - 151.
Li F, Hasegawa Y, Saito M, Shirasawa S, Fukushima A, Ito T, et al. Extensive chromosome homoeology among Brassiceae species were revealed by comparative genetic mapping with high-density EST-based SNP markers in radish (Raphanus sativus L.). DNA Research. 2011; 18 :401-411 - 152.
Boetzer M, Henkel CV, Jansen HJ, Butler D, Pirovano W. Scaffolding pre-assembled contigs using SSPACE. Bioinformatics. 2011; 27 :578-579 - 153.
Shirasawa K, Hirakawa H, Fukino N, Kitashiba H, Isobe S. Genome sequence and analysis of a Japanese radish (Raphanus sativus) cultivar named ‘Sakurajima Daikon’possessin giant root. DNA Research. 2020; 27 :10 - 154.
Varshney RK, Bohra A, Yu J, Graner A, Zhang Q , Sorrells ME. Designing future crops: Genomicsassisted breeding comes of age. Trends in Plant Science. 2021; 26 :631-649 - 155.
Wang J, Qiu Y, Wang X, Yue Z, Yang X, Chen X, et al. Insights into the species-specific metabolic engineering of glucosinolates in radish (Raphanus sativus L.) based on comparative genomic analysis. Scientific Reports. 2017; 1 :1-9 - 156.
Curtis IS, Nam HG. Transgenic radish (Raphanus sativus L. longipinnatus Bailey) by floral-dip method–plant development and surfactant are important in optimizing transformation efficiency. Transgenic Research. 2001; 10 :363-371 - 157.
Tzfira T, Citovsky V. Agrobacterium: From Biology to Biotechnology. New York, NY: Springer; 2008 - 158.
Lacroix B, Citovsky V. Pathways of DNA transfer to plants from agrobacterium tumefaciens and related bacterial species. Annual Review of Phytopathology. 2019; 25 :231-251 - 159.
Ali MA, Azeem F, Abbas A, Joyia FA, Li H, Dababat AA. Transgenic strategies for enhancement of nematode resistance in plants. Frontiers in Plant Sciences. 2017; 8 :750 - 160.
Gelvin SB. Agrobacterium in the genomics age. Plant Physiology. 2009; 150 :1665-1676 - 161.
Giri A, Narasu ML. Transgenic hairy roots: Recent trends and applications. Biotechnology Advances. 2000; 18 :1-22 - 162.
Berkov S, Pavlov A, Kovatcheva P, Stanimirova P, Philipov S. Alkaloid spectrum in diploid and tetraploid hairy root cultures of Datura stramonium. Z Natur f. 2003; 58 :42-46 - 163.
Curtis IS. The noble radish: Past, present and future. Trends in Plant Sciences. 2003; 8 :305-307 - 164.
Li S, Zhan N, i J, Xian J. A new male sterile line of “Duane-13” radish (Raphanus sativus L.) produced by ethyl methanesulfonate mutagenesis. Genetics Research and Crop Evolution. 2019; 66 :981-987 - 165.
Hayta S, Smedley MA, Demir SU, Blundell R, Hinchliffe A, Atkinson N, et al. An efficient and reproducible agrobacterium-mediated transformation method for hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Methodology. 2019; 15 :1-15 - 166.
Rissler J, Mellon M, Mellon MG. The Ecological Risks of Engineered Crops. USA: MIT Press; 1996 - 167.
Snow AA, Palma PM. Commercialization of transgenic plants: Potential ecological risks. Biological Sciences. 1997; 47 :86-96 - 168.
Pua EC, Sim GE, Chi GL, Kong LF. Synergistic effect of ethylene inhibitors and putrescine on shoot regeneration from hypocotyl explants of Chinese radish (Raphanus sativus L. var. longipinnatus Bailey) in vitro. Plant Cell Reports. 1996; 15 :685-690