Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Perspective Chapter: Hyperspectral Imaging for the Analysis of Seafood

Written By

Samuel Ortega, Stein-Kato Lindberg, Kathryn E. Anderssen and Karsten Heia

Submitted: 29 August 2022 Reviewed: 24 October 2022 Published: 25 November 2022

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.108726

From the Edited Volume

Hyperspectral Imaging - A Perspective on Recent Advances and Applications

Edited by Jung Y. Huang

Chapter metrics overview

131 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Hyperspectral imaging technology is able to provide useful information about the interaction between electromagnetic radiation and matter. This information makes possible chemical characterization of materials in a non-invasive manner. For this reason, the technology has been of great interest for the food industry in recent decades. In this book chapter, we provide a survey of the current status of the use of hyperspectral technology for seafood evaluation. First, we provide a brief description of the optical properties of tissue and an introduction to the instrumentation used to capture these images. Then, we survey the main applications of hyperspectral imaging in the seafood industry, including the quantification of different chemical components, the estimation of freshness, the quality assessment of seafood products, and the detection of nematodes, among others. Finally, we provide a discussion about the current state of the art and the upcoming challenges for the application of this technology in the seafood industry.

Keywords

  • hyperspectral imaging
  • food quality
  • seafood industry
  • spectroscopy
  • fish

1. Introduction

Hyperspectral imaging is a technology able to measure simultaneously both the spectral and the spatial features of objects or materials under examination. The spectral properties are produced by the interaction between the electromagnetic radiation and the different constituents in a sample, which produces distinct absorption, reflection, and scattering effects on the incident light [1]. The aforementioned optical properties of the different materials are related to their chemical composition and physical properties. Hyperspectral technology for food quality inspection has two main advantages. First is its non-invasive nature, which makes it possible to perform a chemical analysis of the samples without the need to handle them in any way. Secondly, the measurement is very quick to perform as data can be obtained for an entire sample in the matter of seconds. These aspects make the technology easy to integrate with a conveyor belt, which makes it possible to analyze every sample individually. This is preferable to random screening, where the properties of a small batch of subsamples are analyzed, and it is assumed that their chemical properties are the same for the whole population.

For these reasons, in recent years, hyperspectral imaging has awakened the interest of many researchers for the analysis of food products. According to Scopus, the total number of scientific articles related to studies on hyperspectral imaging for food applications is 1305 in the past 22 years (from 2000 to 2022), with an increasing trend in the number of publications (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Scientific publications related to the use of hyperspectral imaging for food applications.

The range of applications within the food industry is wide and has been extensively covered in the literature by several literature reviews. Those studies cover a wide range of applications including wheat-based products [2], dairy products [3, 4], cereals [5], fruits and vegetables [6, 7], meat [8, 9, 10], or condiments [11]. Additionally, it has also been applied to detect adulteration [12] or fraud [13].

Furthermore, other researchers have analyzed the potential of hyperspectral imaging for food microbiology inspection [14] or for the optimization of agricultural procedures [15].

The common motivation for all of these research efforts is to find new technologies able to determine quality parameters on food products, with the goal of avoiding the use of traditional characterization techniques, which are usually destructive, time consuming, and, in certain cases, subjective.

In this book chapter, we provide a survey of the current status on the use of hyperspectral imaging technology in the seafood industry as well as potential future applications. It is worth noting that the workflow for the investigation of hyperspectral imaging in this field requires an appropriate experimental design, the use of adequate instrumentation to carry out data acquisition campaigns, the collection of reference data, and finally the image processing of the hyperspectral images. For this reason, the research performed in this field usually requires a close multidisciplinary collaboration of skilled professionals from different fields, such as biologists, physicists, and engineers, among others.

This book chapter is organized as follows. First, a brief description of the optical properties of different tissue constituents is provided. Second, we discuss the most relevant factors about the instrumentation that should be considered for food inspection applications. Then, we provide a survey about the specific proposed solutions for the use of hyperspectral imaging evaluation of seafood products. This survey is not technical, and it has been focused on the goal of providing a description of the wide range of applications that have been covered in the literature until now. We also provide the readers with a summary table containing more specific details of the different research works presented in this book chapter. Finally, we discuss the current limitations of the technology and the potential future trends for hyperspectral imaging use in the seafood industry.

Advertisement

2. Optical properties of biological tissue

The quantification of the chemical constituents of biological tissue is possible due to the optical properties of light when propagating within it. The three types of interactions between electromagnetic radiation and tissue that can be measured are absorption, refraction, and scattering [16]. Light absorption is related to the amount of electromagnetic radiation that is transformed into energy by tissue molecules. The different molecules will present specific absorption peaks, which are related to the transitions between two energy levels by light at specific wavelengths.

The absorption peaks of different biological tissue constituents in the visible and near-infrared regions of the electromagnetic spectrum have been widely characterized in the literature. For that reason, the absorption spectra of water, lipids, proteins, collagen, and hemoglobin in its different oxygenation states are known [17, 18]. A representation of those absorption peaks in the spectral range from 500 to 1600 nm is presented in Figure 2 [19].

Figure 2.

Absorption peaks of different tissue constituents in the spectral range from 500 to 1600 nm. Reproduced from [19]; creative commons BY 4.0; published by SPIE (2011).

Advertisement

3. Instrumentation

Every hyperspectral acquisition system is composed of a lens, an optical element employed to perform the spectral sampling, an electronic sensor, and a light source. There are different types of hyperspectral systems depending on how the sampling of the electromagnetic spectra is accomplished. This information is beyond the scope of this book chapter, but readers who are interested in this can refer to different reviews on hyperspectral imaging hardware in the literature [20].

A relevant characteristic of hyperspectral imaging instrumentation that is extensively mentioned in this book chapter is the spectral range. The spectral range defines the region of the electromagnetic spectrum that a hyperspectral camera is able to measure. In commercial hyperspectral systems, there are standard definitions for the spectral range. Visible and near-infrared (VNIR) refers to the spectral range from 400 to 1000 nm, while near-infrared (NIR) and short-wave infrared (SWIR) are used for the ranges 1000–1700 nm and 1000–2500 nm, respectively. Other key parameters in hyperspectral imaging instrumentation are the spectral resolution and the spatial resolution, but these concepts will not be used in this book chapter.

Although the details of hyperspectral cameras are not relevant for this book chapter, the selection of the illumination type to produce the appropriate light–tissue interactions within the sample is relevant. Using a diffuse reflectance illumination scheme, the light is evenly delivered to the sample, and it is measured by a hyperspectral camera after being reflected off its surface. With this illumination mode, the interaction of light and matter is only measured from the surface of the sample. In some cases, the diffuse light can penetrate a small distance into the sample depending on its translucency. However, in complex and inhomogeneous samples, this type of illumination is not enough for accurate characterization of their chemical composition [21, 22]. For this reason, some researchers have proposed the use of interactance (also known as transflectance) illumination, where the light is able to penetrate deeper into the sample. This illumination mode consists of a focused light illuminating the sample in a different spatial location to where the spectral information is captured, allowing the hyperspectral camera to measure the light interaction after multiple internal reflections have occurred inside the sample [23]. In the applications mentioned in this book chapter, both types of light illumination schemes are used.

Advertisement

4. Applications of hyperspectral imaging in the seafood industry

4.1 Chemical composition

The analysis of the chemical composition of seafood products is important for the determination of their overall quality or nutritional value, among others. However, conventional chemical analysis techniques are destructive and time consuming. For that reason, in recent years, hyperspectral imaging has been foreseen as a technology suitable for providing a non-invasive measurement of those chemical properties.

For example, in Atlantic salmon, moisture and fat content are considered to be closely related to the overall quality of the product. The fat content has consequences for both the customers and the industry. For the customers, the amount of fat present in a fresh fillet determines the flavor and texture of the product. For the industry, it is important to quantify the amount of fat in a salmon fillet to determine its target market. For example, the optimum fat content for smoked salmon is between 8 and 12% [24], while salmons with higher fat content and marbling are preferred for sushi and sashimi [25, 26]. Similarly, the moisture is related to the shelf-life of seafood products.

Several research studies have been focused on non-invasive determination of moisture and fat using hyperspectral imaging. Several authors have proposed using NIR spectroscopy to estimate fat and moisture in Atlantic salmon. Zhu et al. obtained accurate models using only the spectral information of the samples [27]. However, fat content is not uniform throughout a sample, and Zhang et al. demonstrated that more robust models for fat and moisture can be obtained if texture features extracted from characteristic spectral bands are used as predictors [28]. Using the aforementioned approaches, the authors not only predicted the overall fat and moisture content for the samples but also provided their spatial distribution within the salmon fillets (Figure 3). In a more technical approach, Dixit et al. performed a comparison between two different hyperspectral technologies (line scan and snapshot) working in different spectral ranges for the determination of fat in Atlantic salmon [29]. The authors concluded that the spectral range from 670 to 950 nm was able to provide an equivalent performance in the prediction of fat compared to the spectral range from 550 to 1700 nm, which may lead to the use of cheaper instrumentation for this application due to the narrower spectral range needed.

Figure 3.

Spatial mapping of moisture (a) and fat (b). Reprinted by permission from springer nature customer service Centre GmbH: Springer nature, food and bioprocess technology [27] [COPYRIGHT: Springer nature] (2013).

Another important quality indicator for fish is blood content. During capture, fish are, as a rule, drained of their blood by cutting through the gills. This is mainly done in order to kill the fish quickly, but it also has the effect of preventing the blood from settling in the muscle and changing its color. The appearance of a fish fillet impacts its perceived quality, and a red hue in a whitefish fillet can be off-putting to the consumer. In the case of smoked products, any remaining blood turns brown and can, for instance, be perceived as dark spots in a smoked salmon fillet.

Skjelvareid et al. demonstrated that hyperspectral imaging can detect and quantify blood in whitefish fillets [30]. The hemoglobin in the blood absorbs light very strongly in a specific region of the visual spectrum and therefore stands out against the white fish muscle. The different oxidation states of the hemoglobin can also be distinguished by their spectral signature, which makes it possible to do a pixelwise spectral unmixing by using the known reference spectra for the hemoglobin. An example of the quantification of blood in Atlantic cod fillets can be observed in Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Quantification of blood in cod fillets using hyperspectral imaging. a) Calibrated color image based on diffuse reflectance hyperspectral imaging. b) Estimated blood concentration based on diffuse reflectance hyperspectral imaging. c) Estimated blood concentration based on interactance hyperspectral imaging [31].

The same method has been applied to salmon fillets as well. The pigments in the salmon muscle absorb light in the same spectral region as the hemoglobin but with a different spectral profile. It is therefore possible to distinguish the blood from the pigments by taking both of them into account.

Two illumination setups are presented in the above publications. The first one is a diffuse illumination for reflectance imaging, while the other is an interactance. The idea is that surface reflection does not give enough information about the internal properties of the fillet, such that the focused light source of the interactance setup is necessary to penetrate further into the muscle. To ensure that the light recorded by the camera has propagated through the muscle and been attenuated by it, the focused light source is placed a certain distance from the field of view of the camera, which reduces surface reflection in the camera field of view while providing a good signal from the inside of the fillet [31]. This technique has also been shown to work for quantifying blood in whole whitefish through the skin, which, at the time of writing, is being developed into a commercial quality control method [32].

4.2 Analysis of freshness

Technologies able to non-invasively estimate the freshness of seafood products are in demand for the industry. There are currently different techniques for the estimation of freshness in seafood products; however, such methods are labor intensive and usually destructive and cannot be applied to every specimen in the product line. The possibility of technology able to perform rapid freshness analysis for every sample could bring to the industry new alternatives for decision making with the goal to improve the processing and sorting of the raw materials.

Several researchers have investigated the estimation of the freshness of seafood products using hyperspectral imaging. Usually, the approaches followed by those researchers consist of the utilization of spectral data together with multivariate analysis methods to predict the values of different reference measurements related to the freshness.

A basic common reference method for the estimation of freshness is the storage time. Some researchers have successfully estimated storage time as a freshness indicator for fillets from different fish species using hyperspectral imaging, for example, pearl gentian grouper [33], Atlantic salmon [34], and Atlantic cod [35]. Kimiya et al. [34] and Sivertsen et al. [35] attributed the spectral changes between the different storage times to the oxidation of hemoglobin and myoglobin proteins during the chilled storage, which enables the successful estimation of the storage time based on the spectral information.

The total volatile basic nitrogen (TVB-N) is often used as a biomarker of protein and amine degradation and is considered a proxy freshness of fresh meat and fish products [36]. TVB-N has been widely used as a reference value for freshness estimation using hyperspectral imaging. In the literature, TVB-N estimation in fillets from different species can be found, including rainbow trout [37], grass carps [38, 39], or tilapia [40]. Figure 5 shows the spatial distribution of TVB-N values within grasp carp fillets. All the above research presented accurate models for predicting TVB-N values using the VNIR spectral range. However, Yu et al. demonstrated that combining the VNIR and NIR spectral ranges resulted in improved estimations [40].

Figure 5.

Spatial distribution of TVB-N values for freshness estimation. (a), (b) and (c) shows the TVB-N for different fillets (8.26, 12.98, and 15.69 mg N/100 g, respectively). Reprinted from innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 21, Jun-Hu Cheng, Da-Wen Sun, Xin-An Zeng, Hong-Bin Pu, non-destructive and rapid determination of TVB-N content for freshness evaluation of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) by hyperspectral imaging [38], page 9, Copyright (2014), with permission from Elsevier.

Although storage time and TVB-N methods have been the more common reference methods for determining freshness using hyperspectral imaging, other researchers have used alternative methods with successful results. Zhang et al. used electrical conductivity on largemouth bass fillets [41], while sensory evaluation of the shelf-life was used as a reference method for the estimation of freshness by Khoshnoudi-Nia et al. [42].

4.3 Quality characterization

Quality evaluation of seafood products, and food products in general, is mainly determined by how the odor, color, and texture of the product is perceived by customers. Traditionally, this quality evaluation has been addressed by sensory evaluation panels, who are a group of people trained to perform a quality judgment of seafood products. In recent years, some solutions based on hyperspectral imaging have been investigated to produce objective measurements of these quality parameters for different seafood products to help the industry stakeholders optimize their production.

Texture is a significant feature for the quality perception of seafood products by customers. For the texture evaluation, there are instruments that allow one to perform objective measurements, which are more repeatable than the subjective opinion of a sensory panel. However, the use of texture analyzers is time consuming and destructive. For this reason, some researchers have proposed the use of hyperspectral imaging for the characterization of texture features in seafood products. In those studies, the reference texture data are usually collected using a variety of mechanical instruments able to measure the force needed to compress or tear a sample. Wang et al. developed multivariate regression models based on the spectral data from commercial crisp grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus) fillets to predict their hardness attributes using the spectral information in the VNIR spectral range [43]. Another research study demonstrated that the use of hyperspectral images in the SWIR spectral range is also suitable for the estimation of texture features in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) fillets [44]. The results of these studies showed high correlation between the predicted texture values from the spectral data and the texture measurements. In another innovative study, the authors also obtained promising models for the estimation of texture parameters of fish by using spectral and textural data from eyes and gills [45]. This approach has the advantage of being able to predict the texture of the fish before it is cut into fillets.

Wang et al. proposed the use of artificial neural networks together with VNIR spectral data for the characterization of color in large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea) fillets [46]. In this study, the color variations in the samples were produced by storing the samples in different conditions and acquiring hyperspectral data. The corresponding reference measurements used a colorimeter to quantify the color parameters of the sample. The results of this study showed that hyperspectral imaging is a potential tool for color characterization of samples, with some advantages over the colorimeters. Colorimeters require point measurements, which present two main disadvantages: there is a need for physical contact with the sample, and the measurements are performed in a limited number of spots on the sample.

4.4 Detection of nematodes

Parasites in fish are a significant problem for seafood producers and consumers, presenting both quality and health concerns. Typically, the presence of parasites in products leads to rejection of the product by both purchasers and sellers. Parasites, such as Anisakis simplex and Pseudoterranova decipiens, are commonly present in whitefish fillets [47]. Today, every single fillet is inspected by transillumination on candling tables [48], and nematodes are removed manually. The detection rate using candling tables has been reported as low as 23% in a recent study by Mercken et al. [49]. Manual screening for parasites is an expensive operation previously reported to account for half of the production cost for Pacific cod from the Bering Sea and the Gulf of Alaska [50]. Several different instrumental methods have been evaluated for nematode detection: fluorescence [51], ultrasonic waves [52], X-ray and computer tomography [31], and multispectral imaging [53]. The first conceptualization on the use of spectroscopic techniques for nematode detection was proposed by Pau et al. in 1991, where the spectral differences between the parasites and the fish muscle were shown [54]. The chemical differences between nematodes and fish muscle were documented by Stormo et al. [55], and a later work discussed the impact of selecting a limited number of wavelengths based on such chemical differences [56]. In Sigernes et al., the authors developed a custom spectral imager targeting a wide variety of seafood industry applications [57]. In that work, the authors showed as a proof of concept that the spectral information can be potentially used to identify nematodes in fish samples. Using the same instrumentation, Heia et al. conducted the first research study on the detection of nematodes with hyperspectral images [58]. Using the transmittance illumination mode, this work served as a proof of concept to show the potential of spectral imaging for nematode detection. The goal of using transillumination was to be able to detect nematodes deeply embedded in the fish flesh. However, this preliminary work was limited by a low number of samples and ideal laboratory conditions. With the goal of making the system more suitable for an industrial setting, Sivertsen et al. further investigated this research line. First, a transillumination setup based on a commercial hyperspectral camera with a higher number of samples was evaluated [59]. However, despite the promising results in the detection of nematodes, the transmittance setup still presented obstacles for implementation in industry, for example, a low imaging speed and challenges regarding the optimization of the light conditions. For those reasons, in a subsequent study, Sivertsen et al. proposed for the first time the use of interactance hyperspectral imaging for the detection of nematodes [60]. In this work, the authors were able to satisfy industrial needs for fast acquisition and processing of the images. However, although the detection rate of nematodes was comparable with the human manual inspection, the detection rate was still low and the false positive rate too high to meet industrial requirements.

In an ongoing research project funded by the Norwegian Seafood Research Fund (FHF), entitled Commercial Nematode Detection in Whitefish Fillets (901614), a solution is being developed to perform nematode detection using hyperspectral imaging. The project is being conducted by the Norwegian Institute of Food, Fisheries and Aquaculture Research (Nofima) and Maritech, a company commercializing a hyperspectral solution for seafood inspection called Maritech Eye™. In the previous approaches, only the spectral information from the nematodes and the fish muscle was exploited. In this project, a solution based on a deep learning neural network, where both the spatial and the spectral features of the data are utilized to detect the nematodes, is proposed. Figure 6 shows the manual annotation of the nematodes as well as the automatic detection of the nematodes using hyperspectral image analysis with a deep neural network. The experiment to demonstrate the feasibility of this approach was tested under industrial conditions in a cod production factory belonging to the company Maredeus (Portugal). The results of the proposed approach were accurate, with a high detection rate and almost no false positives. In addition, the system was able to operate at industrial speed (400 mm/second), including both the image acquisition and the data analysis, which would make it possible to use this approach as an industrial solution for the detection of nematodes.

Figure 6.

Manual annotation of nematodes (blue) and automatic prediction (yellow) of their location on cod fillets based on hyperspectral image analysis.

4.5 Identification of different species

Another challenge for seafood production lines is the automatic sorting of different species when they are processed simultaneously. Additionally, the use of imaging technologies able to identify different fish species is attractive both for the consumer and for the industry, since they can help to mitigate fraud in fish mislabeling [61]. In a research study performed by Chauvin et al., the authors evaluated the potential of the spectral information of fillets from different species in order to correctly classify them [62, 63]. A total of 22 fish species were recorded using diffuse reflectance illumination (VNIR and SWIR spectral ranges) and fluorescence excitation (VIS). Using this data, different supervised classifiers based on the spectral data from the different species were trained. The results obtained in this study suggest that the combination of spectral channels from the different spectral ranges and imaging modalities improve the classification compared to single-mode data (i.e., only VNIR, only SWIR, or only fluorescence). Finally, the authors investigated reducing the number of spectral bands needed for species identification without compromising on the performance of the classifier. The outcome of this research was a selection of 7 spectral bands that can be potentially used for the identification of species. This finding paves the way for the future development of cheap instruments based on LED illumination using such specific wavelengths to perform the species sorting.

Beyond the seafood industry, hyperspectral imaging has also been investigated for species identification with the goal of using this technology as a complementary tool to existing molecular and morphological techniques for faunal biodiversity assessment. Kolmann et al. performed a study in South American fish species that are difficult to distinguish even under controlled conditions: piranhas and pacus (both from the family Serrasalmidae) [64]. The authors were able to successfully discriminate between 47 different species and subspecies, using only their spectral information (Figure 7). The outcomes of this study demonstrated hyperspectral imaging as a potential technology for biodiversity screening.

Figure 7.

Comparative spectral signatures from four different body regions of a pacu (Myloplus schomburgkii) (right) and a piranha (Serrasalmus geryi) (left). Reproduced from [64]; creative commons BY 4.0; published by springer nature limited (2021).

4.6 Damage detection

One of the main pretreatments applied to freshwater fish is scale removal; however, methods to do this can produce damage to the product. With the goal of better characterizing the damages caused by the different physical scale removal methods, Wang et al. proposed the utilization of VNIR spectral data as a tool to visualize such damages [65]. The results of this study were positive, showing an accurate identification of the damaged areas based only on the spectral information.

Another type of damage occurs when fish are caught. Jensen et al. proposed the use of a catch damage index based on VNIR hyperspectral information to characterize the catch damage when different trawling strategies are used [66]. The method is based on the estimation of the residual blood in fish muscle by using constrained spectral unmixing [30]. Using this application of hyperspectral image processing, it was possible to conduct an experiment to evaluate the effect of different trawling strategies on fish damage.

4.7 Detection of contamination agents

Plastic contamination in marine environments leads to the ingestion of microplastics by fish. There is evidence that indicates that microplastics intake causes harmful effects to fish health [67]. In recent years, research has shown an increasing trend in the presence of microplastics in seafood products [68]. However, the methods to accurately quantify the presence of microplastics are complex and expensive, which complicates the experimental trials required to quantify the effect of this problem. For this reason, Zhang et al. proposed the use of hyperspectral imaging in the range from 900 to 1700 nm for the identification of microplastics [69]. With the goal of training a supervised classifier based on the spectral information, the intestinal tract contents of different fish were contaminated with plastic polymers of different chemical composition, size, and color. Then, the accuracy of the proposed methodology was evaluated, both in prepared samples and in fish samples from three different species. The results of this experiment indicated that hyperspectral imaging can be a suitable technology to detect the presence of microplastics in the intestinal tract of fish. However, the precision in the detection is affected by the size of the plastic particles, which makes it necessary to increase the dataset to improve the machine learning models to improve the detection of small plastic particles.

From the food safety perspective, the detection of harmful microorganisms present in fish is a relevant topic. With the goal of developing imaging technologies for the detection of Enterobacteriaceae contamination in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) flesh, He et al. investigated the use of the NIR spectra for monitoring the presence of such bacteria [70]. After capturing hyperspectral images of salmon contaminated with Enterobacteriaceae at different storage periods, the authors were able to quantify the presence and severity of the bacterial contamination. It is worth noticing that hyperspectral imaging technology is not able to measure the bacteria presence by itself; however, there are differences between the spectra from contaminated and non-contaminated salmon flesh.

4.8 Applications in aquaculture

Aquaculture production has significantly grown during the past 20 years [71]. This is mainly due to the increasing demand for seafood products, together with the goal of the seafood industry to increase productivity. Thus, there is a current demand for novel information and digital technologies that can be applied in aquaculture to improve the productivity of fish farms [72]. Nowadays, the use of hyperspectral imaging technologies in aquaculture is limited to a few contributions.

In Atlantic salmon (S. salar) farming, the transition from juvenile freshwater fish (parr) to seawater adapted fish (smolt) is called smoltification. Smoltification involves changes in the morphology, physiology, and biochemistry of juvenile salmon. From a fish farmer perspective, it is important to monitor the smoltification process for two principal reasons. On the one hand, an incomplete smoltification process at the time the salmon is transferred to seawater leads to poor salmon welfare and an increased risk of mortality. On the other hand, a late transition to seawater generates negative consequences for the farmer since the production chain is not optimized, which induces economic losses. With the goal of providing the aquaculture industry with a solution to this problem, Svendsen et al. studied the relationship between the spectral information and the physiological changes in juvenile salmons [73]. After analyzing more than 300 fish from three different farms, the authors were able to perform an accurate discrimination between parr and smolt with high sensitivity and specificity. The classification was performed using a machine learning classifier (Support Vector Machine) using only three specific spectral channels.

Salmon lice (Lepeophtheirus salmonis) are parasites that live on salmonid fishes. The salmon lice represent a huge problem for both farmed and wild salmon because they can produce severe fin damage, bleeding, and open wounds in the host. Salmon affected by these parasites are likely sensitive to other pathogens, leading to increased sickness. Therefore, salmon lice are a problem that generates negative effects in salmon welfare and leads to significant economic losses for the farmers and suffering for the fish. Early warnings for lice could help farmers to take action to eliminate the infestation. However, the identification and counting of these parasites are challenging tasks even for skilled staff. With the goal of providing an automatic solution to this problem, Pettersen et al. conducted an experiment where underwater hyperspectral imaging was applied for the detection of salmon lice [74]. First, the authors recorded and characterized the spectral signature of different salmon lice subtypes in laboratory conditions, in both air and underwater conditions. Finally, they tested the method to identify the different lice subtypes in salmon using the underwater hyperspectral imaging system. Although the research suggested underwater hyperspectral imaging as a promising technology for the detection of salmon lice in sea cages, it can be considered as a proof of concept, and more research needs to be performed to optimize the instrumentation for use as a final product in aquaculture farms.

The use of hyperspectral imaging has also been applied in an indirect manner with the goal to improve the quality of the fish feed in aquaculture. Marine fishmeal powder is added as protein supplement in fish feed in aquaculture, but recently, the adulteration of this product with cheaper alternatives with lower nutritional value has become a common trend. To address this fraud, Kong et al. proposed the use of NIR hyperspectral imaging and convolutional neural networks for the identification of adulterants in marine fishmeal [75].

The aforementioned examples suggest that hyperspectral imaging technology can contribute to improvements in aquaculture in the near future.

Advertisement

5. Summary table

In this section, we provide a summary of the main research works that have been covered in this book chapter. In Table 1, the information about each research work is specified. This information includes the type of application, the fish species, the type of samples, the number of specimens, the illumination modality, the spectral range, and the image-processing method used to retrieve information from the hyperspectral images.

ApplicationFish SpeciesSample TypeNIllum.Spectral RangeProcessing MethodRef.
Chemical composition (fat and moisture)Atlantic SalmonFillets5DR900–1700 nmPLSR[27]
Chemical composition (fat and moisture)Atlantic SalmonFillets10DR900–1700 nmOptimal Band Selection, Texture Feature Extraction, Multivariate Regression Algorithms[28]
Chemical composition (fat)Atlantic SalmonFillets45DR550–1700 nm
470–630 nm
670–950 nm
PLSR[29]
Chemical composition (blood)Atlantic CodHomogenized samples9IA430–1000 nmConstrained Spectral Unmixing[30]
Freshness estimation (storage time)Pearl Gentian GrouperFillets22DR900–1700 nmPLSR[33]
Freshness estimation (storage time)Atlantic SalmonFillets48IA400–1000 nmPLSR[34]
Freshness estimation (storage time)Atlantic CodFillets49IA400–1000 nmPLSR[35]
Freshness estimation (TVB-N)Grass CarpFillets30DR400–1000 nmPLSR, Optimal Band Selection[38, 39]
Freshness estimation (TVB-N)TilapiaFillets40DR400–1000 nm 900–1700 nmSpectral data fusion, Multivariate Regression Algorithms[40]
Freshness estimation (sensory analysis)Largemouth BassFillets20DR400–1000 nmPLSR, Optimal Band Selection[41]
Freshness estimation (sensory analysis)Rainbow TroutFillets40DR430–1010 nmMultivariate Regression Algorithms[42]
Texture characterizationCrisp Grass CarpFillets15DR400–1100 nmMultivariate Regression Algorithms[43]
Texture characterizationRainbow TroutFillets80DR1000–2500 nmPLSR[44]
Texture characterizationCrucian CarpFillets and Whole Fish84DR900–1700 nmPLSR, Spectral and Textural Feature Extraction[45]
Color characterizationLarge Yellow CroakerFillets15DR400–1000 nmArtificial Neural Networks[46]
Nematode detectionAtlantic CodFillets8IA350–950 nmPLS-DA[58]
Nematode detectionAtlantic CodFillets40IA400–1000 nmFisher Discriminant Ratio[59]
Nematode detectionAtlantic CodFillets43IA400–1000 nmCustom local calibration, Fisher Linear Classifier[60]
Identification of species22 Different SpeciesFillets133DR
FL
419–1007 nm
438–718 nm
842–2532 nm
Artificial Neural Networks, Band selection methods[62]
Identification of species and subspeciesPiranhas and PacusLive fish176DR325–1075 nmAdaptative Coherence Estimator[64]
Damage characterization (scale removal)Fresh CarpWhole fish50DR387–1024 nmDecision Trees, Self-Organizing Maps[65]
Damage characterization (catch damage)Atlantic CodWhole Fish600IA400–1000 nmConstrained Spectral Unmixing[66]
Detection of microplasticsSea Bass
Redeye Mullets
Goosefishes
Internal organs20DR900–1700 nmSVM classification[69]
Detection of bacteria contaminationAtlantic SalmonFillets30DR900–1700 nmPLS, Optimal Band Selection[70]
Smoltification monitoringAtlantic SalmonLive Fish314DR400–1000 nmSVM classification[73]
Salmon lice detectionAtlantic SalmonLive Fish7DR370–800 nmPLS-DA, SAM[74]

Table 1.

Summary table.

N: Number of samples, Illum: Illumination Mode (DR: Diffuse Reflectance, IA: Interactance, FL: Fluorescence). PLSR: Partial Least Squares Regression, SVM: Support Vector Machines, PLS-DA: Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis, SAM: Spectral Angle Mapper.

Advertisement

6. Conclusions

In this book chapter, we have surveyed the main applications of hyperspectral imaging for seafood industry-related problems. The main goal in most of the research carried out in this field is to provide an alternative to the expensive, time-consuming, and invasive reference methods that are currently employed for the characterization of seafood products. Additionally, the advantage of hyperspectral technology is its applicability to industrial production chains, where the analysis can be performed individually for every sample, which can lead to the optimization of production and decision making for the industry.

Although the application field of this technology is wide and promises to address actual problems for both the industry and the consumers, there are still challenges that must be carefully investigated in the upcoming years.

As far as the instrumentation is concerned, there are still uncertainties about which type of illumination (diffuse reflectance or interactance) is more appropriate for each application. Additionally, there is no strict criterion for the selection of the most adequate spectral range for each application. In this sense, more comparative research should be carried out in order to have clearer arguments on which spectral range should be used for different applications.

The number of processing methods used to extract information from hyperspectral data is huge and diverse. An appropriate evaluation of these methods should be carefully carried out to gain a better understanding of their limitations and advantages for each scenario. Additionally, most of the methods covered in the literature are based exclusively on the spectral information, while the spatial information is usually underrated. However, the trend in hyperspectral image analysis in other fields is to try to exploit simultaneously both the spatial and the spectral features of the data, especially with the rise of sophisticated deep learning architectures to this end [76, 77].

Regarding the future of this research line, the upcoming challenges should be focused on the transfer of knowledge to industry, where this technology could be employed to improve production chains and decision making. In this sense, commercial products consisting of industrial-grade spectral imaging systems have been recently launched, such as the QMonitor (QVision AS, Oslo, Norway) or the Maritech Eye (Maritech Systems AS, Molde, Norway). Both systems are based on interactance illumination mode. The QMonitor is a multispectral NIR system, while the Maritech Eye is a hyperspectral system in the VNIR spectral range. These devices have been proven to be useful for different food quality applications [78, 79, 80, 81, 82] and are currently used in food industry production facilities.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

This project is supported by DigiFoods, a Norwegian Strategic Research Initiative (project number 309259), and is also part of NFR funding grant 294805.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1. Lu R, editor. Light Scattering Technology for Food Property, Quality and Safety Assessment. London: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group; 2017
  2. 2. Badaró AT, Hebling e Tavares JP, Blasco J, Aleixos-Borrás N, Barbin DF. Near infrared techniques applied to analysis of wheat-based products: Recent advances and future trends. Food Control. 2022;140:109115. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.109115
  3. 3. Hebling e Tavares JP, da Silva Medeiros ML, Barbin DF. Near-infrared techniques for fraud detection in dairy products: A review. Journal of Food Science. 2022;87(5):1943-1960. DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.16143
  4. 4. Bittante G, Patel N, Cecchinato A, Berzaghi P. Invited review: A comprehensive review of visible and near-infrared spectroscopy for predicting the chemical composition of cheese. Journal of Dairy Science. 2022;105(3):1817-1836. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2021-20640
  5. 5. An D, Zhang L, Liu Z, Liu J, Wei Y. Advances in infrared spectroscopy and hyperspectral imaging combined with artificial intelligence for the detection of cereals quality. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2022:1-31. DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2022.2066062
  6. 6. He Y, Xiao Q, Bai X, Zhou L, Liu F, Zhang C. Recent progress of nondestructive techniques for fruits damage inspection: A review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2022;62(20):5476-5494. DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2021.1885342
  7. 7. Lu Y, Saeys W, Kim M, Peng Y, Lu R. Hyperspectral imaging technology for quality and safety evaluation of horticultural products: A review and celebration of the past 20-year progress. Postharvest Biology and Technology. 2020;170:111318. DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2020.111318
  8. 8. Antequera T, Caballero D, Grassi S, Uttaro B, Perez-Palacios T. Evaluation of fresh meat quality by hyperspectral imaging (HSI), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): A review. Meat Science. 2021;172:108340. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108340
  9. 9. Jia W, van Ruth S, Scollan N, Koidis A. Hyperspectral imaging (HSI) for meat quality evaluation across the supply chain: Current and future trends. Current Research in Food Science. 2022;5:1017-1027. DOI: 10.1016/j.crfs.2022.05.016
  10. 10. Falkovskaya A, Gowen A. Literature review: Spectral imaging applied to poultry products. Poultry Science. 2020;99(7):3709-3722. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.04.013
  11. 11. Mei J, Zhao F, Xu R, Huang Y. A review on the application of spectroscopy to the condiments detection: From safety to authenticity. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2022;62(23):6374-6389. DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2021.1901257
  12. 12. Faith Ndlovu P, Samukelo Magwaza L, Zeray Tesfay S, Ramaesele Mphahlele R. Destructive and rapid non-invasive methods used to detect adulteration of dried powdered horticultural products: A review. Food Research International. 2022;157:111198. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111198
  13. 13. Nobari Moghaddam H, Tamiji Z, Akbari Lakeh M, Khoshayand MR, Haji Mahmoodi M. Multivariate analysis of food fraud: A review of NIR based instruments in tandem with chemometrics. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis. 2022;107:104343. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2021.104343
  14. 14. Soni A, Dixit Y, Reis MM, Brightwell G. Hyperspectral imaging and machine learning in food microbiology: Developments and challenges in detection of bacterial, fungal, and viral contaminants. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. 2022;21(4):3717-3745. DOI: 10.1111/1541-4337.12983
  15. 15. Khan A, Vibhute AD, Mali S, Patil CH. A systematic review on hyperspectral imaging technology with a machine and deep learning methodology for agricultural applications. Ecological Informatics. 2022;69:101678. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101678
  16. 16. Tuchin VV. Tissue Optics: Light Scattering Methods and Instruments for Medical Diagnosis. 3rd ed. Bellingham WA: SPIE; 2015
  17. 17. Wilson RH, Nadeau KP, Jaworski FB, Tromberg BJ, Durkin AJ. Review of short-wave infrared spectroscopy and imaging methods for biological tissue characterization. Journal of Biomedical Optics. 2015;20(3):030901. DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.20.3.030901
  18. 18. Khodabux K, Lomelette M, Jhaumeerlaulloo S, Ramasami P, Rondeau P. Chemical and near-infrared determination of moisture, fat and protein in tuna fishes. Food Chemistry. 2007;102(3):669-675. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.05.057
  19. 19. Nachabe R et al. Diagnosis of breast cancer using diffuse optical spectroscopy from 500 to 1600 nm: Comparison of classification methods. Journal of Biomedical Optics. 2011;16(8):087010. DOI: 10.1117/1.3611010
  20. 20. Li Q, He X, Wang Y, Liu H, Xu D, Guo F. Review of spectral imaging technology in biomedical engineering: Achievements and challenges. Journal of Biomedical Optics. 2013;18(10):100901. DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.18.10.100901
  21. 21. Wold JP et al. Non-contact Transflectance near infrared imaging for representative on-line sampling of dried salted coalfish (Bacalao). Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy. 2006;14(1):59-66. DOI: 10.1255/jnirs.587
  22. 22. Wu D, Sun D-W. Advanced applications of hyperspectral imaging technology for food quality and safety analysis and assessment: A review — Part I: Fundamentals. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies. 2013;19:1-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.ifset.2013.04.014
  23. 23. Sivertsen AH, Chu C-K, Wang L-C, Godtliebsen F, Heia K, Nilsen H. Ridge detection with application to automatic fish fillet inspection. Journal of Food Engineering. 2009;90(3):317-324. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.06.035
  24. 24. Downey G. Non-invasive and non-destructive percutaneous analysis of farmed salmon flesh by near infra-red spectroscopy. Food Chemistry. 1996;55(3):305-311. DOI: 10.1016/0308-8146(95)00118-2
  25. 25. Hsin-I Feng C. The tale of sushi: History and regulations. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. 2012;11(2):205-220. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-4337.2011.00180.x
  26. 26. Richardsen R and Østli J. Norwegian Trout in Japan. Consumer Preferences, Perceptions and Competitors. 2003. [Online]. Available: https://nofima.brage.unit.no/nofima-xmlui/handle/11250/282799
  27. 27. Zhu F, Zhang H, Shao Y, He Y, Ngadi M. Mapping of fat and moisture distribution in Atlantic Salmon using near-infrared hyperspectral imaging. Food and Bioprocess Technology. 2014;7(4):1208-1214. DOI: 10.1007/s11947-013-1228-z
  28. 28. Zhang H et al. Non-destructive determination of fat and moisture contents in Salmon (Salmo salar) fillets using near-infrared hyperspectral imaging coupled with spectral and textural features. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis. 2020;92:103567. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2020.103567
  29. 29. Dixit Y, Reis MM. Hyperspectral imaging for assessment of total fat in salmon fillets: A comparison between benchtop and snapshot systems. Journal of Food Engineering. 2023;336:111212. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2022.111212
  30. 30. Skjelvareid MH, Heia K, Olsen SH, Stormo SK. Detection of blood in fish muscle by constrained spectral unmixing of hyperspectral images. Journal of Food Engineering. 2017;212:252-261. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2017.05.029
  31. 31. Heia K, Washburn KE, and Skjelvareid MH. Automatic Quality Control of Internal Defects in cod - Results from Hyperspectral, Ultrasound and X-ray Imaging. 2017. [Online]. Available: https://nofima.brage.unit.no/nofima-xmlui/handle/11250/2480578
  32. 32. Maritech AS. Maritech Eye. 2022. https://maritech.com/our-solutions-seafood-production/maritech-eye/
  33. 33. Chen Z, Wang Q, Zhang H, Nie P. Hyperspectral imaging (HSI) Technology for the non-Destructive Freshness Assessment of pearl gentian grouper under different storage conditions. Sensors. 2021;21(2):583. DOI: 10.3390/s21020583
  34. 34. Kimiya T, Sivertsen AH, Heia K. VIS/NIR spectroscopy for non-destructive freshness assessment of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) fillets. Journal of Food Engineering. 2013;116(3):758-764. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.01.008
  35. 35. Sivertsen AH, Kimiya T, Heia K. Automatic freshness assessment of cod (Gadus morhua) fillets by Vis/Nir spectroscopy. Journal of Food Engineering. 2011;103(3):317-323. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.10.030
  36. 36. Bekhit AE-DA, Holman BWB, Giteru SG, Hopkins DL. Total volatile basic nitrogen (TVB-N) and its role in meat spoilage: A review. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 2021;109:280-302. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.01.006
  37. 37. Moosavi-Nasab M, Khoshnoudi-Nia S, Azimifar Z, Kamyab S. Evaluation of the total volatile basic nitrogen (TVB-N) content in fish fillets using hyperspectral imaging coupled with deep learning neural network and meta-analysis. Scientific Reports. 2021;11(1):5094. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84659-y
  38. 38. Cheng J-H, Sun D-W, Zeng X-A, Pu H-B. Non-destructive and rapid determination of TVB-N content for freshness evaluation of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) by hyperspectral imaging. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies. 2014;21:179-187. DOI: 10.1016/j.ifset.2013.10.013
  39. 39. Cheng J-H, Sun D-W, Wei Q. Enhancing visible and near-infrared hyperspectral imaging prediction of TVB-N level for fish fillet freshness evaluation by filtering optimal variables. Food Analytical Methods. 2017;10(6):1888-1898. DOI: 10.1007/s12161-016-0742-9
  40. 40. Yu H-D et al. Hyperspectral imaging in combination with data fusion for rapid evaluation of tilapia fillet freshness. Food Chemistry. 2021;348:129129. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129129
  41. 41. Zhang W, Cao A, Shi P, Cai L. Rapid evaluation of freshness of largemouth bass under different thawing methods using hyperspectral imaging. Food Control. 2021;125:108023. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108023
  42. 42. Khoshnoudi-Nia S, Moosavi-Nasab M. Prediction of various freshness indicators in fish fillets by one multispectral imaging system. Scientific Reports. 2019;9(1):14704. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-51264-z
  43. 43. Wang QX, Su LH, Zou J, Chen NX, Wu T, Yang L. Research on hardness detection method of crisped grass carp based on visible - near infrared hyperspectral technology. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 2021;1757(1):012002. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1757/1/012002
  44. 44. Khoshtaghaza MH, Khojastehnazhand M, Mojaradi B, Goodarzi M, Saeys W. Texture quality analysis of rainbow trout using hyperspectral imaging method. International Journal of Food Properties. 2016;19(5):974-983. DOI: 10.1080/10942912.2015.1042111
  45. 45. Wang X, Shan J, Han S, Zhao J, Zhang Y. Optimization of fish quality by evaluation of Total volatile basic nitrogen (TVB-N) and texture profile analysis (TPA) by near-infrared (NIR) hyperspectral imaging. Analytical Letters. 2019;52(12):1845-1859. DOI: 10.1080/00032719.2019.1571077
  46. 46. Wang S, Das AK, Pang J, Liang P. Real-time monitoring the color changes of large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea) fillets based on hyperspectral imaging empowered with artificial intelligence. Food Chemistry. 2022;382:132343. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132343
  47. 47. McClelland G. Spatial and temporal distributions of larval sealworm (Pseudoterranova decipiens, Nematoda: Anisakinae), in Hippoglossoides platessoides (Pleuronectidae) in eastern Canada from 1980 to 1990. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 2000;57(1):69-88. DOI: 10.1006/jmsc.1999.0518
  48. 48. Hafsteinsson H, Rizvi SSH. A review of the Sealworm problem: Biology, implications and solutions. Journal of Food Protection. 1987;50(1):70-84. DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X-50.1.70
  49. 49. Mercken E et al. Sensitivity of candling as routine method for the detection and recovery of ascaridoids in commercial fish fillets. Scientific Reports. 2022;12(1):1358. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-05235-6
  50. 50. Bublitz CG, Choudhury GS. Effect of light intensity and color on worker productivity and parasite detection efficiency during candling of cod fillets. Journal of Aquatic Food Product Technology. 1993;1(2):75-89. DOI: 10.1300/J030v01n02_08
  51. 51. Pippy JHC. Use of ultraviolet light to find parasitic nematodes in situ. Journal of the Fisheries Board of Canada. 1970;27(5):963-965. DOI: 10.1139/f70-107
  52. 52. Hafsteinsson H, Parker K, Chivers R, Rizvi SSH. Application of ultrasonic waves to detect Sealworms in fish tissue. Journal of Food Science. 1989;54(2):244-247. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1989.tb03053.x
  53. 53. Wold JP, Westad F, Heia K. Detection of parasites in cod fillets by using SIMCA classification in multispectral images in the visible and NIR region. Applied Spectroscopy. 2001;55(8):1025-1034. DOI: 10.1366/0003702011952929
  54. 54. Pau LF. Fish Quality Control by Computer Vision. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge; 2017
  55. 55. Stormo SK, Ernstsen A, Nilsen H, Heia K, Sivertsen AH, Elvevoll E. Compounds of parasitic roundworm absorbing in the visible region: Target molecules for detection of roundworm in Atlantic cod. Journal of Food Protection. 2004;67(7):1522-1525. DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X-67.7.1522
  56. 56. Stormo SK, Sivertsen AH, Heia K, Nilsen H, Elvevoll E. Effects of single wavelength selection for Anisakid roundworm larvae detection through multispectral imaging. Journal of Food Protection. 2007;70(8):1890-1895. DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X-70.8.1890
  57. 57. Sigernes F, Lorentzen DA, Heia K, Svenøe T. Multipurpose spectral imager. Applied Optics. 2000;39(18):3143. DOI: 10.1364/AO.39.003143
  58. 58. Heia K, Sivertsen AH, Stormo SK, Elvevoll E, Wold JP, Nilsen H. Detection of nematodes in cod (Gadus morhua) fillets by imaging spectroscopy. Journal of Food Science. 2007;72(1):E011-E015. DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2006.00212.x
  59. 59. Sivertsen AH, Heia K, Stormo SK, Elvevoll E, Nilsen H. Automatic nematode detection in cod fillets (Gadus Morhua) by Transillumination hyperspectral imaging. Journal of Food Science. 2011;76(1):S77-S83. DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01928.x
  60. 60. Sivertsen AH, Heia K, Hindberg K, Godtliebsen F. Automatic nematode detection in cod fillets (Gadus morhua L.) by hyperspectral imaging. Journal of Food Engineering. 2012;111(4):675-681. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2012.02.036
  61. 61. Hassoun A et al. Fraud in animal origin food products: Advances in emerging spectroscopic detection methods over the past five years. Food. 2020;9(8):1069. DOI: 10.3390/foods9081069
  62. 62. Chauvin J et al. Simulated annealing-based hyperspectral data optimization for fish species classification: Can the number of measured wavelengths Be reduced? Applied Sciences. 2021;11(22):10628. DOI: 10.3390/app112210628
  63. 63. Qin J et al. Detection of fish fillet substitution and mislabeling using multimode hyperspectral imaging techniques. Food Control. 2020;114:107234. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107234
  64. 64. Kolmann MA et al. Hyperspectral data as a biodiversity screening tool can differentiate among diverse Neotropical fishes. Scientific Reports. 2021;11(1):16157. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-95713-0
  65. 65. Wang H, Qiu X, Zeng F, Shao W, Ma Q, Li M. Detection of physical descaling damage in carp based on hyperspectral images and dimension reduction of principal component analysis combined with pixel values. Journal of Food Science. 2022;87(6):2663-2677. DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.16144
  66. 66. Jensen TK et al. Effect of the T90-codend on the catch quality of cod (Gadus morhua) compared to the conventional codend configuration in the Barents Sea bottom trawl fishery. Fisheries Research. 2022;250:106277. DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2022.106277
  67. 67. Jovanović B. Ingestion of microplastics by fish and its potential consequences from a physical perspective. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management. 2017;13(3):510-515. DOI: 10.1002/ieam.1913
  68. 68. Wootton N, Reis-Santos P, Gillanders BM. Microplastic in fish – A global synthesis. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries. 2021;31(4):753-771. DOI: 10.1007/s11160-021-09684-6
  69. 69. Zhang Y et al. Hyperspectral imaging based method for rapid detection of microplastics in the intestinal tracts of fish. Environmental Science & Technology. 2019;53(9):5151-5158. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b07321
  70. 70. He H-J, Sun D-W. Selection of informative spectral wavelength for evaluating and Visualising Enterobacteriaceae contamination of Salmon flesh. Food Analytical Methods. 2015;8(10):2427-2436. DOI: 10.1007/s12161-015-0122-x
  71. 71. Naylor RL et al. A 20-year retrospective review of global aquaculture. Nature. 2021;591(7851):551-563. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03308-6
  72. 72. Yue K, Shen Y. An overview of disruptive technologies for aquaculture. Aquaculture and Fisheries. 2022;7(2):111-120. DOI: 10.1016/j.aaf.2021.04.009
  73. 73. Svendsen E et al. Identification of spectral signature for in situ real-time monitoring of smoltification. Applied Optics. 2021;60(14):4127. DOI: 10.1364/AO.420347
  74. 74. Pettersen R, Lein Braa H, Gawel BA, Letnes PA, Sæther K, Aas LMS. Detection and classification of Lepeophterius salmonis (Krøyer, 1837) using underwater hyperspectral imaging. Aquacultural Engineering. 2019;87:102025. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2019.102025
  75. 75. Kong D et al. Hyperspectral imaging coupled with CNN: A powerful approach for quantitative identification of feather meal and fish by-product meal adulterated in marine fishmeal. Microchemical Journal. 2022;180:107517. DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2022.107517
  76. 76. Jaiswal G, Sharma A, Yadav SK. Critical insights into modern hyperspectral image applications through deep learning. WIREs: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. 2021;11(6):e1426. DOI: 10.1002/widm.1426
  77. 77. Audebert N, Le Saux B, Lefevre S. Deep learning for classification of hyperspectral data: A comparative review. IEEE Geoscience Remote Sensor Management. 2019;7(2):159-173. DOI: 10.1109/MGRS.2019.2912563
  78. 78. Wold JP, Veiseth-Kent E, Høst V, Løvland A. Rapid on-line detection and grading of wooden breast myopathy in chicken fillets by near-infrared spectroscopy. PLoS One. 2017;12(3):e0173384. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173384
  79. 79. Wold JP, Kermit M, Woll A. Rapid nondestructive determination of edible meat content in crabs (cancer Pagurus) by near-infrared imaging spectroscopy. Applied Spectroscopy. 2010;64(7):691-699. DOI: 10.1366/000370210791666273
  80. 80. O’Farrell M, Wold JP, Høy M, Tschudi J, Schulerud H. On-line fat content classification of inhomogeneous pork trimmings using multispectral near infrared Interactance imaging. Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy. 2010;18(2):135-145. DOI: 10.1255/jnirs.876
  81. 81. Wold JP, Solberg LE, Gaarder MØ, Carlehøg M, Sanden KW, Rødbotten R. In-line estimation of fat marbling in whole beef striploins (longissimus lumborum) by NIR hyperspectral imaging. A closer look at the role of myoglobin. Food. 2022;11(9):1219. DOI: 10.3390/foods11091219
  82. 82. Wold JP, O’Farrell M, Høy M, Tschudi J. On-line determination and control of fat content in batches of beef trimmings by NIR imaging spectroscopy. Meat Science. 2011;89(3):317-324. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.05.001

Written By

Samuel Ortega, Stein-Kato Lindberg, Kathryn E. Anderssen and Karsten Heia

Submitted: 29 August 2022 Reviewed: 24 October 2022 Published: 25 November 2022