Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Quality of Pork Meat Fed with Acorns (Quercus spp.)

Written By

Paulina G. Flores

Submitted: 01 August 2022 Reviewed: 03 November 2022 Published: 24 November 2022

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.108867

From the Edited Volume

Nut Crops - New Insights

Edited by Muhammad Akram

Chapter metrics overview

68 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Pork is one of the most popular foods in Chile. Consumers are concerned about their nutritional quality and about the characteristics of the production systems. Outdoor production systems are the most valued by consumers due to animal welfare conditions related to the nutritional quality of the product. On the other hand, intensive or traditional confined pig production systems represent an environment that alters the nutrients in meat products. For this reason, outdoor production systems become more important, especially when nuts (Quercus spp.) are included in pig feeding. Acorn nuts have a high level of fatty acids transferred to the meat, increasing flavor and juiciness. This proposal is a bibliographic review that will also include the advantage of controlling an invasive species, such as wild boar for a small producer in southern Chile, who could obtain a meat product with healthy fatty acids, favoring the sustainability of the ecosystem.

Keywords

  • feed
  • nuts
  • meat quality
  • pig production system
  • wild boar

1. Introduction

Pork meat is one of the most popular food products in Chile. Its consumption reaches a value close to 23% of the total meat consumed. Consumers of meat products are increasingly interested in the nutritional quality of meat, and pork has particular attention given the implications for people’s health [1]. Feed quality influences the fat intramuscular fat content of the pig, with some aspects of quality decreasing as the composition of fatty acid in intramuscular lean carcass content [2]. Compared to extensive and natural systems, the inferior quality of pork from intensive systems presents quality defects such as exudates from meat juices and a decrease in the amount of intramuscular fat [3].

Advertisement

2. Meat composition

The composition of meat comprises moisture, protein, fat, minerals, and a small proportion of carbohydrates. Chemically, a piece of lean meat contains approximately 72% water, 21% protein, 5% fat, and 1% ash. The macronutrient protein is the most valuable component in nutrition and processing [4]. In addition, it is a source of essential amino acids, vitamin B12, iron, and zinc [5]. It is low in carbohydrates and does not contain dietary fiber (Table 1).

2.1 Acorn characteristics

Quercus robur L., the common oak, is a plant in the family Fagaceae [7] composed of 300 species around the world, including deciduous and evergreen trees [8]. The Quercus genus can be located in America, temperate Europe, Asia, and subtropical Africa [9]. This tree, whose fruit is known as “bellota” has different shapes and varies in size [10]. Because of their content and nutritional importance, they have been called “secondary human food,” being part of the human diet for centuries, as raw material in bread making [8, 11].

In Europe, the Quercus tree is considered the main tree species in floodplain forests of central Europe [8]. In the Czech Republic, the clear-cut silvicultural system represents a predominant method of regeneration of oak stands in a flooded forest [11].

The consumption of acorns in human food has a long history. The population of Italy and Spain consumes this fruit.

Using acorns in human nutrition has a long history. In Italy and Spain, it has been part of the local diet for some time, contributing up to 25% of consumed food by the poorest classes as a substitute for coffee [12]. Algeria, Morocco, and the US used acorn oil as a cooking oil and medicine for burns and injuries [13].

Acorn oils have similar properties to olive oil, such as color, iodine value, UV extinction coefficient, fatty acid composition, and refractive index [14, 15]. In South America, the Q. robur tree is part of the forests of Southern Chile, including Chilean Patagonia and Argentina. The fruits of this tree are part of the diet of wild boars and domestic pigs, and it is used as an ornamental tree species in squares in different cities (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Oak tree (Quercus robur) in the square of Coyhaique city, Chilean Patagonia.

Acorn’s nutritional composition is rich in unsaturated fatty acids (75–90%), especially oleic acid (65%) and linoleic acid. These unsaturated fatty acids are essential for synthesizing eicosanoids, favoring the reduction of blood triglycerides and the increase of HDL cholesterol [16]. Compared to commercial foods, acorns have a higher content of crude fat, net energy, and metabolizable energy [17] (Table 2).

Meat productsaEnergy (kcal)Protb (g)Fat (g)Satc fat (g)Cld (mg)Vite B12 (mcg)Fef (mg)Zng (mg)
Meat, raw/unprepared
Beef ribeye
(Lh. thoracis)
16617.5122.079000683.111.873.85
Beef strip loin
(L. lumborum)
22820.6115.496251811.061.473.53
Beef tenderloin (Psoas major)24719.6118.168410851.011.422.90
Beef top sirloin (Pluteus medius et al.)20120.3012.715127751.051.483.55
Beef tri-tip (m. tensor fasciae,latae)14221.265.631729611.041.543.85
Beef eye round (Semitendinosus)12423.273.441276601.831.453.40
Beef brisket (Deep pectoral et al.)13221.475.111844671.812.065.21
Beef flank (Rectus abdominis)15521.227.172978651.091.553.70
Beef, ground 80% lean, 20% fat25417.1720.007581712.141.944.18
Beef, ground 90% lean, 10% fat17620.0010.003927652.212.244.79
Beef, ground 93% lean, 7% fat15220.857.002878632.232.334.97
Beef, ground 97% lean, 3% fat12121.983.001480602.262.445.21
Pork loin (L. lumborum)19819.7412.584360630.530.791.74
Pork ham
(Biceps femoris et al.)
24517.4318.876540730.630.851.93
Pork, ground 84% lean, 16% fat21817.9916.004930680.730.881.91
Pork, ground 96% lean,
4% fat
12121.104.001420590.640.861.93

Table 1.

Nutritional composition of different food products [6].

All products are standardized to a 100 g serving


Prot: Protein


Sat: Saturated


Cl: Cholesterol


Vit: Vitamin


Fe: Iron


Zn: Zinc


L: Longissimus


Nutrient compositionFeedstuffFresh acornsP*
Moisture (g/100 g)14b32.4a0.0017
Crude protein (g/100 g)15.6a5.6b0.0001
Crude fat (g/100 g)3.3b5a0.002
Fibrer (g/100 g)6.8a5.6b0.013
Ash (g/100 g)3.7a2.7b0.010
Net energy (Mcal/kg)1.73b1.85a0.09
Metabolizable energy (Mcal/kg)2.9b3.13a0.011
Value D80b88a0.0012
Fatty acid profile mg/100 mg
C 14:018.16a0.12b0.0032
C16:017.48nsA
C 16:1n-91.181.7ns
C 16:1n-70.16
C 17:00.05
C18:01.72
C18:1n-918.39b27.3a0.0016
C18:1n-70.75b5.84a0.0031
C18:2n-657.7a39.1b0.009
C 20:03.51b4.58a0.0001
C18:3n-31.65
C 20:219.75a0.06b0.0001
SFAB23.9
MUFAC19.1b35.01a0.0001
PUFAD61.2a40.8b0.0001
n6:n3E16.4b23.7a0.001
P:SF3.1a1.7b0.001

Table 2.

Analyzed composition of feed (g/100 g) and fatty acid (mg/100 mg) [17] composition.

ns: not significant


∑ Saturated fatty acids: C14 + C16 + C17 + C18 + C20


∑ Monounsaturated fatty acids: C16:1 + C18:1n-9 + C18:1n-7


∑ Polyunsaturated fatty acids: C18:2n-6 + C18:3n-3 + C20:2


n-6:n-3: Fatty acids ratio (linoleic acid/linolenic acid)


P:S: Polyunsaturated: Saturated fatty acids ratio


The p-value corresponds to the Student t-test between feedstuff and fresh acorn


In Europe, acorns are used as a feed source for free-range animals, especially Iberian pigs, during the montanera season [18]. Montanera is the fattening period of Iberian pigs that weigh more than 40 kg in two or three months. In the Iberian Peninsula, the Iberian pig is an autochthonous breed. The Iberian pig system is linked to the dehesa lands of Quercus spp., in the Iberian Peninsula [19]. The abundant food provided by acorns is used to fatten the pigs from early November to late February [20].

In the dehesa, the pig diet is based upon acorns and grass, the most abundant resources in the area during this period [21]. Grazing is a repeated ingestion of small quantities of food [20]. Grass bites can be very light, but pigs need a lot of them as a source of protein to compensate for the low concentration of this nutrient in the acorn.

Pigs have a good sense of smell and taste [22]. They select their food depending on crude protein content and essential amino acids such as lysine, methionine, and tryptophan [23]. This sensory ability allows pigs to differentiate between acorn fruits from different oak trees [24].

The feeding systems for pigs, whose feeding base is the acorn fruit, contribute to delivering characteristics to the carcass and the meat, especially in the composition of fatty acids of the adipose tissues [20].

2.2 Fatty acids composition and other compounds in muscle as an effect of acorns feeding

The fatty acid composition of the diet reflects the quality of the tissue. Animals fed n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) are a source of fatty acids in the human diet [25]. That is, by consuming meat from pigs fed on acorns and plants rich in n-6:n-3 fatty acids [26]. Several meat products reflect the diet of animals, such as fresh meats, sausages, cured meats, hams, and smoked meats, providing an unlimited range of highly appreciated flavors and aromas [27].

The evidence of an exclusive feeding of acorns in the animal diet is consistent in showing a higher lipid content (81.69% of total fatty acids) while feeding pigs with grass and chestnuts (78.80% and 77. 62% of total fatty acids, respectively) have a lower fatty acid value [28, 29].

The highest percentages of monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA), especially C18:1n-9, have also been found in diets rich in acorns [29], as well as in ham and loin muscles of Iberian pigs fed exclusively with acorns and grass in the fattening of montanera systems [30, 31].

Wild boars (Sus scrofa) raised with acorns had significantly (P = 0.0001) higher proportions of C18:1 n-9 in Longissimus lumborum (LL) muscle than wild boars feeding with commercial concentrate, based mainly on corn [17]. There is a significant difference between pigs under free-range systems and confinement, as showed in Table 3.

Fatty acid compositionWild boar ()Iberian pig ()
C 14:01.221.31
C16:023.5124.19
C 16:1n-90.42
C 16:1n-72.69
C 17:00.330.14
C18:012.110.22
C18:1n-941.151.39
C18:1n-73.11
C18:2n-613.15.41
C 20:00.190.17
C18:3n-30.510.37
C 20:20.570.21
SFAa38.7736.02
MUFAb48.1157.13
PUFAc14.476.85
n6:n3d20.76
P:Se0.39

Table 3.

Fatty acid composition (mg/100 mg) of L. lumborum muscle from wild boars [17] and Iberian pigs [32] fed with acorns.

∑ Saturated fatty acids: C14 + C16 + C17 + C18 + C20.


∑ Monounsaturated fatty acids: C16:1 + C18:1n-9 + C18:1n-7.


∑ Polyunsaturated fatty acids: C18:2n-6 + C18:3n-3 + C20:2.


n-6:n-3: Fatty acids ratio (linoleic acid/linolenic acid).


According to Ref. [33], the hypothesis is that fatty acids composition depends on muscle type (oxidative or glycolytic), where a fasted period can be sufficient to decrease MUFA and n-6, but Ref. [26] suggests that a new experiment must have been made to verify this hypothesis.

The antioxidant composition effect also has been widely documented as the influence of feeding on the tocopherol content in muscle. γ tocopherol vitamin content of muscle acquired from free-range pigs is recognized in acorn feeding diets [31, 34]. The meat from these pigs is evidence of high quality [21]. Diet used in finishing phase (up to 155 kg body weight) is based on grass and acorn without restrictions [30, 31].

Chemical and antioxidant composition increase energy and fat levels in feed [17]. Some researchers showed negative protein digestibility because of acorn shells, especially on lysine amino acids [35, 36, 37].

It is important to consider that the values realized in the previous table, although they show high values of fatty acids, especially those MUFA and PUFA that contribute to the concentration of essential fatty acids, come from intensive systems, which are becoming more and more relegated from the point of view of the consumer. In addition, it should be noticed that the free-range systems, where the Iberian pig predominates, also get outstanding values in meat at levels of essential fatty acids. The high sensory value from pig meat under extensive systems is attributed to essential fatty acids [38], especially in dry cured products with a strong flavor [19, 39, 40].

Table 4 shows a descriptive sensory analysis made using a hedonic scale to reflect the perception by consumers of meat sensory characteristics from wild board fed with 20% and 40% of acorn diet inclusion. The Control group received a commercial concentrate base in corn. The consumers detected a positive relationship between the percentages of MUFA and PUFA with flavor, tenderness, and juiciness attributes. This is explained by the evidence that meat from animals fed with acorns was perceived as juicier and more tender by a sensory panel [17].

Control20%40%R2
Flavor4.99c5.04b5.33a0.620
Tenderness4.43c5.05b5.22a0.812
Juiciness4.4c4.71b5a0.849

Table 4.

Sensory characteristics of L. lumborum muscle from wild boars fed the experimental diets.

*Values with different superscripts are significantly different using the Duncan test (P < 0.05).

Differences in meat from wild boar compared to pork have been reported in particular considering cholesterol contents. In Brazil, Ref. [41] analyzed cholesterol in the meat of wild boar (2n = 36) and crossbreeds (2n = 37 y 38) founding lower cholesterol values in wild boards. Similar results were found in Ref. Table 5 [42].

KaryotypeCholesterol [41]Cholesterol [42]
2n = 3629.60 ± 6.620.9 ± 4.52
2n = 3762.58 ± 17.536.8 ± 5.5
2n = 3828.94b ± 5.337.2 ± 8.2

Table 5.

Cholesterol content in Semimembranosus muscle of the different karyotype groups (mg/100 g).

Advertisement

3. Other values from feeding with acorn and sustainability systems

Meat products derived from animals raised under extensive, free-range conditions, mainly feeding with acorns and grass in silvopastoral systems, as occurs, for example, in the Spanish system called montanera, comply with these requirements [32], and their high content of essential fatty acids makes it healthier than other animal products [43]. The extensive, free-range conditions contribute to the conservation of the dehesa ecosystem, where the extensive grazing system is a major determinant of biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in a forested Mediterranean grassland environment [44]. The environmental and economic importance of dehesas is due to their use in extensive free range and also to their characteristic high biodiversity [45]. This makes sense when the use of a site is done in a controlled manner, especially when it is already known that grazing can have different effects on soil fertility and the communities of microorganisms, plants, and animals that develop from these soils depend on the local climate, topography, and physicochemical properties of the parent soil material [46], affecting soil fertility thought trampling and dung generating an easily litter degradation [47, 48].

The animals also remove the plant biomass, encouraging fast-growing species with high content of nutrients on their leaves and palatability [49]. On the opposite, the abandonment of free-range grazing leads to the existence of marginal areas grazing affects grassland dynamics, changing the species colonization and extinction relationships via consumption, mechanical disturbance, seed dispersal, and altered soil fertility due to dung-borne nutrient input [50]. Also, these sites are associated with a reduction in soil fertility-associated variables such as organic matter, total nitrogen, the availability of phosphorus [51], soil disturbance, carbon emission, and soil degradation [52].

There is an important point that stands out in the publication of Ref. [53], which is related to the sustainability of ecosystems, such as human impacts on the soil that remain unexplored. One potential source of anthropogenic soil carbon emissions is invasive species, with research suggesting that human-propagated animals ranging from insects such as mountain pine beetles and earthworms to herbivorous mammals, such as cattle, deer, goats, rabbits, and pigs, cause serious disturbances to soil properties through loss of vegetation and direct soil disturbance. They also evaluated the global ramifications of one of the most widely spread human species, wild pigs (Sus scrofa), on soil disturbance and CO2 emissions.

This makes sense since, although in Chile, wild boars are raised for commercial intentions in confinement conditions [54], however, an important part of the population lives free on the edge of the Andes Mountain range, from the region of Araucania to the Aysen region, in the heart of Chilean Patagonia [55].

The wild boar, an invader of South America [56], arrives in Chile in two ways, a direct importation from Germany and subsequent release in 1952 in the Villarrica National Park, and then by specimens that by their own means pass from Argentina from 1958 onwards [57]. It is an exotic species little studied, and only recently has it been published about its diet in southern America, focusing attention on the predation of birds and seeds of endemic trees (Figure 2) [55].

Figure 2.

Wild boar Sus scrofa scrofa from Chillan city, Chile.

Their presence has a powerful impact, and often they could be responsible for the impoverishment of the local flora and fauna, as has happened in other places with invasive animal species [58, 59]. Management of wild boar population size in Chile is predominantly carried out by hunting at bait sites or by hunting dogs. The capture of live traps to latest keep them in confinement for meat production is another way of controlling the population. Wild boars and domestic pigs becoming from Sus scrofa domesticus. Wild boar can be reared in captivity.

The information found on the benefits of acorn-fed wild boar meat and the antecedents on the breeding of the Iberian pig in montaneras and Dehesas, very widespread agrosilvopastoral ecosystems in the Mediterranean ecosystems of the Iberian Peninsula, reveals an important alternative for the control of a species invasive within the Patagonian ecosystems. The economic and environmental importance of the Dehesas is because of the use of extensive livestock farming and also to their characteristic high biodiversity, the same livestock environment declared for the silvopastoral system’s characteristic of southern Chile, where the wild boar lives.

Wild boar causes serious impacts on biodiversity and ecosystems in silvopastoral systems in Patagonia by affecting physicochemical soil and water bodies properties, plant diversity, predating on wild animals, seeds, and seedlings, destroying bird nests, and interacting with fauna by competition, hybridization, and transmission of Toxoplasma gondii and Trichinella spp., zoonotic and commercially important diseases [60, 61, 62] found that wild boar can cause economic losses in production activities because of the consumption of livestock offspring sprouts that feed cattle. In this way, the interspecific interaction between wild boars and other species can affect native ecosystems, but more studies are needed [63].

The incorporation of Q. robur into the Argentine Patagonian forest has been reported, standing out for its high productivity in forest environments where attempts have been made to diversify production systems and thus maintain the sustainability of the ecosystem. According to [64], Q. robur, at 150 years of age, reaches 25–30 m in height in the best sites in central Europe. In Patagonia, at 45–50 years, it reaches dominant heights of 20 to 24 m, which indicates that this species’ turn would be well advanced.

There is a known conflict in the management of invasive species to conserve the ecological, social, and cultural values of the invaded ecosystems in complement to the use or utility of exotic species in productive activities [65]. As suggested by [63], management has become a complex issue that requires an interdisciplinary study with multiple approaches to develop an adaptive management strategy.

The vision of control of this species for economic and sustainable purposes of the environment will be an alternative to a meat organic farm system in an environment where extensive livestock is the pillar of the Patagonian agricultural tradition, and wild boars are one of the most damaging invasive species in the world, with a significant impact on the Patagonian forest degradation [66].

Meat production from wild boars in countries such as Chile has been increasing over the last decade, with an expanding demand both in Chile and overseas [67], for its benefits of being a meat product with healthy fatty acids and an alternative to contribute to the sustainability of the ecosystem.

Advertisement

4. Conclusions

There is great interest in the consumption of animal meat from free-range systems. Pork is very popular and generally provides an important source of nutrients, mainly protein. When pigs receive acorns, the fruit of the oak Q. robur, in their diet, they showed an increase in the level of essential fatty acids. Examples of this are the Iberian pig in the Spanish Iberian province and the wild boar in southern Chile. Both show an increase in the level of fatty acids n3 and n6 and a decrease in cholesterol when acorns are part of their diet.

The Iberian pig is endemic in Spain, the wild boar is an introduced species that harm the ecosystem. Therefore, its use as a productive species could contribute as a measure of control of the species and also contribute to the sustainability of the environment.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

The author thanks the Government of the Chile Ministry of Education, URY project number 21991 Mineduc, Innovation, Technology, and Transfer Unit, Research Direction, for the financial support of the present book chapter. The author also wishes to acknowledge the University of Aysen for its support during the writing of this manuscript. The content of this chapter reflects only the author’s view. The Government of Chile, the Ministry of Education, the University of Aysen, and the Innovation, Technology, and Transfer Unit are not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1. Raes K, De Smet S, Demeyer D. Effect of dietary fatty acids on incorporation of long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids and conjugated linoleic acid in lamb, beef and pork meat: A review. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2004;113:199-221. DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2003.09.001
  2. 2. Cameron ND, Enser M, Nute GR, Whittington FM, Penman JC, Fisken AC, et al. Genotype with nutrition interaction on fatty acid composition of intramuscular fat and the relationship with flavour of pig meat. Meat Science. 2000;55:187-195. DOI: 10.1016/S0309-1740(99)00142-4
  3. 3. Wojtysiak D, Połtowicz K. Carcass quality, physico-chemical parameters, muscle fibre traits and myosin heavy chain composition of m. longissimus lumborum from Puławska and Polish Large White pigs. Meat Science. 2014;97:395-403
  4. 4. Pereira P, Vicente A. Meat nutritional composition and nutritive role in the human diet. Meat Science. 2013;93:586-592. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.09.018
  5. 5. McAfee AJ, McSorley EM, Cuskelly GJ, Moss BW, Wallace JM, Bonham MP, et al. Red meat consumption: An overview of the risks and benefits. Meat Science. 2010;84:1-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.08.029
  6. 6. USDA, AMS. 2016. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service Retail reports (2016) Retrieved 2016 December from: https://www.ams.usda.gov/market-news/retail
  7. 7. Antov MG, Šćiban MB, Prodanović JM, Kukić DV, Vasić VM, Đorđević TR, et al. Common oak (Quercus robur) acorn as a source of natural coagulants for water turbidity removal. Industrial Crops and Products. 2018;117:340-346. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.03.022
  8. 8. Brischke C, Welzbacher CR, Rapp AO, Augusta U, Brandt K. Comparative studies on the in-ground and above-ground durability of European oak heartwood (Quercus petraea Liebl. and Quercus robur L.). European Journal of Wood and Wood Products. 2009;67:329-338. DOI: 10.1007/s00107-009-0329-x
  9. 9. Shahbaz SE, Abdulrahman SS, Abdulrahman HA. Use of leaf anatomy for identification of Quercus L. species native to Kurdistan-Iraq. Science Journal of University of Zakho. 2015;3:222-232
  10. 10. Pritchard HW, Daws MI, Fletcher BJ, Gaméné CS, Msanga HP, Omondi W. Ecological correlates of seed desiccation tolerance in tropical African dryland trees. American Journal of Botany. 2004;91:863-870. DOI: 10.3732/ajb.91.6.863
  11. 11. Martiník A, Dobrovolny L, Palátová E. Tree growing space and acorn production of Quercus robur. Dendrobiology. 2014:71. DOI: 10.12657/denbio.071.010
  12. 12. Hill AF. Economic Botany: A Textbook of Useful Plants and Plant Products. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1952. p. 560
  13. 13. Taib M, Bouyazza L, Lyoussi B. Acorn oil: Chemistry and functionality. Journal of Food Quality. 2020;2020:1-11. DOI: 10.1155/2020/8898370
  14. 14. Deforce K, Bastiaens J, Van Calster H, Vanhoutte S. Iron age acorns from Boezinge (Belgium): The role of acorn consumption in prehistory. Archaologisches Korrespondenzblatt. 2009;12:381-392
  15. 15. Vinha AF, Barreira JC, Costa AS, Oliveira MBPA. New age for Quercus spp. fruits: Review on nutritional and phytochemical composition and related biological activities of acorns. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. 2016;15:947-981
  16. 16. Uddin G, Rauf A. Phytochemical screening, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of aerial parts of Quercus robur L. Middle-East Journal of Medicinal Plants Research. 2012;1:1-4
  17. 17. Flores PG, Morales R, Skewes O. Chemical properties and sensory characteristics of wild boar meat (Sus scrofa scrofa) fed with acorns (Quercus robur). Revista de Producción. Animal. 2020;33:1-12
  18. 18. Cantos E, Espín JC, López-Bote C, de la Hoz L, Ordóñez JA, Tomás-Barberán FA. Phenolic compounds and fatty acids from acorns (Quercus spp.), the main dietary constituent of free-ranged Iberian pigs. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2003;51:6248-6255
  19. 19. Ayuso D, González A, Peña F, Hernández-García FI, Izquierdo M. Effect of fattening period length on intramuscular and subcutaneous fatty acid profiles in Iberian pigs finished in the montanera sustainable system. Sustainability. 2020;12:7937. DOI: 10.3390/su12197937
  20. 20. Rodríguez-Estévez V, García A, Peña F, Gómez AG. Foraging of Iberian fattening pigs grazing natural pasture in the dehesa. Livestock Science. 2009;120:135-143. DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2008.05.006
  21. 21. Szyndler-Nędza M, Świątkiewicz M, Migdał Ł, Migdał W. The quality and health-promoting value of meat from pigs of the native breed as the effect of extensive feeding with acorns. Animals. 2021;11:789. DOI: 10.3390/ani11030789
  22. 22. Roura E, Humphrey B, Tedó G, Ipharraguerre I. Unfolding the codes of short-term feed appetence in farm and companion animals. A comparative oronasal nutrient sensing biology review. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 2008;88:535-558
  23. 23. Kyriazakis I, Emmans GC, Whittemore CT. Diet selection in pigs: Choices made by growing pigs given foods of different protein concentrations. Animal Science. 1990;51:189-199. DOI: 10.1017/S1357729800050712
  24. 24. Canelo T, Pérez-Izquierdo C, Gaytán Á, Bonal R. Intraguild predation of weevils by livestock reduces acorn pests in oak silvopastoral systems. Journal of Pest Science. 2021;94:541-551. DOI: 10.1007/s10340-020-01278-8
  25. 25. Pal J, Shukla BN, Maurya AK, Verma HO, Pandey G, Amitha A. A review on role of fish in human nutrition with special emphasis to essential fatty acid. International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies. 2018;6:427-430
  26. 26. de Tonnac A, Guillevic M, Mourot J. Fatty acid composition of several muscles and adipose tissues of pigs fed n-3 PUFA rich diets. Meat Science. 2018;140:1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.11.023
  27. 27. Michel F, Hartmann C, Siegrist M. Consumers’ associations, perceptions and acceptance of meat and plant-based meat alternatives. Food Quality and Preference. 2021;87:104063. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.104063
  28. 28. Rey AI, Daza A, López-Carrasco C, López-Bote CJ. Quantitative study of the tocopherols accumulation in muscle and backfat from Iberian pigs kept free-range as affected by time of free-range feeding or weight gain. Animal Science. 2006;82:901-908. DOI: 10.1017/ASC2006113
  29. 29. Pugliese C, Sirtori F, Ruiz J, Martin D, Parenti S, Franci O. Effect of pasture on chestnut or acorn on fatty acid composition and aromatic profile of fat of Cinta Senese dry-cured ham. Grasas y aceites. 2009;60:271-276. DOI: 10.3989/gya.130208
  30. 30. Lebret B, Lenoir H, Fonseca A, Riquet J, Mercat M. Finishing season and feeding resources influence the quality of products from extensive-system gascon pigs. Part 2: Muscle traits and sensory quality of dry-cured ham. Animal. 2021;15:100305. DOI: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100305
  31. 31. Tejerina D, García-Torres S, De Vaca MC, Vázquez FM, Cava R. Effect of production system on physical–chemical, antioxidant and fatty acids composition of longissimus dorsi and Serratus ventralis muscles from Iberian pig. Food Chemistry. 2012;133:293-299. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.01.025
  32. 32. Tejeda JF, Hernández-Matamoros A, Paniagua M, González E. Effect of free-range and low-protein concentrated diets on growth performance, carcass traits, and meat composition of Iberian pig. Animals. 2020;10:273. DOI: 10.3390/ani10020273
  33. 33. Malmfors B. Fatty acid composition of porcine back fat and muscle lipids as affected by sex, weight and anatomical location. Sweden Journal of Agriculture Research. 1978;8:25-38
  34. 34. Ortiz A, Tejerina D, Díaz-Caro C, Elghannam A, García-Torres S, Mesías FJ, et al. Is packaging affecting consumers’ preferences for meat products? A study of modified atmosphere packaging and vacuum packaging in Iberian dry-cured ham. Journal of Sensory Studies. 2020;35:e12575. DOI: 10.1111/joss.12575
  35. 35. Marín-García PJ, Llobat L. How does protein nutrition affect the epigenetic changes in pig? A review. Animals. 2021;11:544. DOI: 10.3390/ani11020544
  36. 36. Liao SF, Wang T, Regmi N. Lysine nutrition in swine and the related monogastric animals: Muscle protein biosynthesis and beyond. Springerplus. 2015;4:1-12. DOI: 10.1186/s40064-015-0927-5
  37. 37. Eugenio FA, Van Milgen J, Duperray J, Sergheraert R, Floc’h L. Feeding intact proteins, peptides, or free amino acids to monogastric farm animals. Amino Acids. 2022:1-12
  38. 38. Mekki I, Smeti S, Hajji H, Yagoubi Y, Mahouachi M, Atti N. Effect of oak acorn (Quercus ilex) intake during suckling and fattening of Barbarine lambs on growth, meat quality and fatty acid profile. Journal of Animal Feed Science. 2019;28:22-30. DOI: 10.22358/jafs/102757/2019
  39. 39. Perez-Santaescolastica C, Fraeye I, Barba FJ, Gomez B, Tomasevic I, Romero A, et al. Application of non-invasive technologies in dry-cured ham: An overview. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2019;86:360-374. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.02.011
  40. 40. Carrapiso AI, Tejeda JF, Noguera JL, Ibáñez-Escriche N, González E. Effect of the genetic line and oleic acid-enriched mixed diets on the subcutaneous fatty acid composition and sensory characteristics of dry-cured shoulders from Iberian pig. Meat Science. 2020;159:107933. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.107933
  41. 41. Lui JF, Macuco VSO, Neto AC, Tosta PA, Malheiros EB. Lipídeo, proteína e colesterol na carne de javalis (Sus scrofa scrofa) de diferentes grupos genéticos. Archivos de zootecnia. 2007;56:951-954
  42. 42. Skewes O, Morales R, Mendoza N, Smulders FJM, Paulsen P. Carcass and meat quality traits of wild boar (Sus scrofa s. L.) with 2n= 36 karyotype compared to those of phenotypically similar crossbreeds (2n= 37 and 2n= 38) raised under the same farming conditions 2: Fatty acid profile and cholesterol. Meat Science. 2009;83:195-200. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.04.017
  43. 43. González-Domínguez R, Sayago A, Fernández-Recamales Á. Fatty acid profiling for the authentication of Iberian hams according to the feeding regime. Food. 2020;9:149. DOI: 10.3390/foods9020149
  44. 44. Oggioni SD, Ochoa-Hueso R, Peco B. Livestock grazing abandonment reduces soil microbial activity and carbon storage in a Mediterranean Dehesa. Applied Soil Ecology. 2020;153:103588. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2020.103588
  45. 45. Hoffmann I, Boerma D. Ecosystem Services Provided by Livestock Species and Breeds, with Special Consideration to the Contributions of Small-scale Livestock Keepers and Pastoralists. Rome: FAO; 2014
  46. 46. Eldridge DJ, Delgado-Baquerizo M. Grazing reduces the capacity of landscape function analysis to predict regional-scale nutrient availability or decomposition, but not total nutrient pools. Ecological Indicators. 2018;90:494-501. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.03.034
  47. 47. Pietrosemoli S, Raczkowski C, Green JT Jr, Villamide MJ. Effects of growing-finishing pig stocking rates on bermudagrass ground cover and soil properties. Animals. 2020;10(9):1666. DOI: 10.3390/ani10091666
  48. 48. Sun B, Overbury T, Hopkins DW. Soil carbon and nutrient variations in an arable-ley rotation with organic pig production. Biological Agriculture & Horticulture. 2022;38(1):61-71. DOI: 10.1080/01448765.2021.1991845
  49. 49. De Deyn GB, Cornelissen JH, Bardgett RD. Plant functional traits and soil carbon sequestration in contrasting biomes. Ecology Letters. 2008;11:516-531. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01164.x
  50. 50. Peco B, Sánchez AM, Azcárate FM. Abandonment in grazing systems: Consequences for vegetation and soil. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 2006;113:284-294. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2005.09.017
  51. 51. Vinograd A, Zaady E, Kigel J. Dynamics of soil nutrients in abandoned sheep corrals in semi-arid Mediterranean planted forests under grazing. Journal of Arid Environments. 2019;164:38-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2019.02.007
  52. 52. Sanderman J, Hengl T, Fiske GJ. Soil carbon debt of 12,000 years of human land use. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2017;114:9575-9580. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1706103114
  53. 53. O’Bryan CJ, Patton NR, Hone J, Lewis JS, Berdejo-Espinola V, Risch DR, et al. Unrecognized threat to global soil carbon by a widespread invasive species. Global Change Biology. 2022;28:877-882
  54. 54. Skewes O, Morales R. Wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) breeding in Chile. Basic aspects of distribution, size and management. Agro-Ciencia. 2006;22:29-36
  55. 55. Skewes O, Moraga CA, Arriagada P, Rau JR. El jabalí europeo (Sus scrofa): Un invasor biológico como presa reciente del puma (Puma concolor) en el sur de Chile. Revista chilena de historia natural. 2012;85:227-232. DOI: 10.4067/S0716-078X2012000200009
  56. 56. Jaksic FM, Iriarte JA, Jiménez JE, Martínez DR. Invaders without frontiers: Cross-border invasions of exotic mammals. Biological Invasions. 2002;4:157-173. DOI: 10.1023/A:1020576709964
  57. 57. Skewes O. Status des Wildschweines, Sus scrofa L., in Chile [thesis]. Dokumentation einer Fremdansiedlung von europäischem Wild; 1990
  58. 58. Courchamp F, Chapuis JL, Pascal M. Mammal invaders on islands: Impact, control and control impact. Biological Reviews. 2003;78:347-383. DOI: 10.1017/S1464793102006061
  59. 59. Fahlman Å, Lindsjö J, Norling TA, Kjellander P, Ågren EO, Bergvall UA. Wild boar behaviour during live-trap capture in a corral-style trap: Implications for animal welfare. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica. 2020;62:1-11. DOI: 10.1186/s13028-020-00557-9
  60. 60. Barrios-Garcia MN, Ballari SA. Impact of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in its introduced and native range: A review. Biological Invasions. 2012;14:2283-2300. DOI: 10.1007/s10530-012-0229-6
  61. 61. Winter M, Abate SD, Pasqualetti MI, Fariña FA, Ercole ME, Pardini L. Toxoplasma gondii and Trichinella infections in wild boars (Sus scrofa) from Northeastern Patagonia, Argentina. Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 2019;168:75-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.04.014
  62. 62. Bueno CG, Barrio IC, García-González R, Alados CL, Gómez-García D. Does wild boar rooting affect livestock grazing areas in alpine grasslands? European Journal of Wildlife Research. 2010;56:765-770. DOI: 10.1007/s10344-010-0372-2
  63. 63. Ballari SA, Valenzuela AE, Nuñez MA. Interactions between wild boar and cattle in Patagonian temperate forest: Cattle impacts are worse when alone than with wild boar. Biological Invasions. 2020;22:1681-1689. DOI: 10.1007/s10530-020-02212-w
  64. 64. Mayer H. Walbau auf soziologisch-ökologischer Grundlage. 4th ed. Germany: Gustav Fischer; 1992. p. 522
  65. 65. Vaz AS, Kueffer C, Kull CA, Richardson DM, Vicente JR, Kühn I. Integrating ecosystem services and disservices: Insights from plant invasions. Ecosystem Services. 2017;23:94-107. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.017
  66. 66. Bercê W, Bello C, Mendes CP, Vancine MH, Galetti M, Ballari SA. Invasive wild boar’s distribution overlap with threatened native ungulate in Patagonia. Journal of Mammalogy. 2021;102:1298-1308. DOI: 10.1093/jmammal/gyab099
  67. 67. Hodgkinson SM, Matus F, Lopez IF. Behavior of grazing European wild boar (Sus scrofa) in a semi-extensive production system. Ciencia e investigación agraria: revista latinoamericana de ciencias de la agricultura. 2013;40:193-199

Written By

Paulina G. Flores

Submitted: 01 August 2022 Reviewed: 03 November 2022 Published: 24 November 2022