Open access peer-reviewed chapter

A Study on Edible Polymer Films for Food Packaging Industry: Current Scenario and Advancements

Written By

Deepak R. Kasai, Devi Radhika, Raju K. Chalannavar, Ravindra B. Chougale and Bhagyavana Mudigoudar

Submitted: 14 August 2022 Reviewed: 12 September 2022 Published: 09 November 2022

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.107997

From the Edited Volume

Advances in Rheology of Materials

Edited by Ashim Dutta and Hafiz Muhamad Ali

Chapter metrics overview

201 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Over the past two decades, food packaging and packaging industry have paid close attention to create biodegradable and edible polymer films and coatings. In a broad way, edible polymers emerged as a new class of materials that garnered significant properties due to their advantages over synthetic petroleum-based films. When compared to conventional packaging materials, edible polymer films can fundamentally simplify products, improving their potential to be recycled. This work aims to give readers a thorough introduction to edible polymer films, by discussing present research trends, classification, functionality and composition, fabrication, and characterization. The work also emphasizes the advantages and disadvantages of edible polymer films based on meat, poultry, dairy products, fruits, nuts, and vegetables.

Keywords

  • edible polymer
  • coatings
  • food packaging
  • antimicrobial
  • functionality
  • applications

1. Introduction

Many efforts have been made to create eco-friendly packaging material in response to the challenges caused by plastic waste in the packaging business. Food packaging is critical for storing foods, protecting them from infection, and maintaining food quality throughout the packaging-to-consumption process [1]. Several types of plastics are being used as packaging material due to their low cost, high performance, and easy production. Almost half of the packaging materials used in single-use throwaway applications, particularly food packaging, are produced from petrochemical polymers, such as plastics [2]. However, petrochemical plastics have a number of drawbacks, including environmental challenges, health dangers, and poor food quality due to their non-biodegradability [3, 4]. Also, production and consumption of plastics in the last few decades has put enormous stress on the environment by releasing plastic waste. Thus, there is a need to look for alternative packaging materials that should not impose any problems, renewable, disposable, recyclable, and easily degradable [5]. A thin coating that covers the food surface is known as an edible package.

The growing demand for high-quality products with a long shelf life has led to the development of new processing technologies that guarantee natural qualities and appearance. As a result, the packaging industry as well as a number of young researchers are attempting to develop edible polymer films as biodegradable packaging materials [6]. In this case, edible polymer films would be an excellent choice for packaging. Edible polymers can be taken whole or in part by humans and lower animals through the oral cavity, with no negative health effects. Many advantageous properties, such as non-pollutant products, since they contain natural and biodegradable components generated from both natural and manmade materials are considered. Edible polymers have emerged as a suitable candidate for food packaging applications and have received significant attention in recent years [7]. The requirements imposed on edible polymer films were exclusively based on the product’s specific qualities and changes in those attributes throughout production and storage [8]. Edible polymers have the ability to expand organoleptic properties of packaged foods materials. As the author reported, edible polymer has properties, such as flavorings, colorings, and sweeteners. Natural polymers and food-grade additives have become increasingly popular in the medical and food industries. Polysaccharides, proteins, and lipids, as well as plasticizers and surfactants, can be used to make these edible polymers. The ability of edible polymers is primarily determined by their barrier, mechanical, and color properties, which are influenced by the film composition and production procedure.

Advertisement

2. Edible polymer films: present research trends

In recent years, the use of edible films made from natural polymers and food-grade additives has steadily increased. Various materials, including polysaccharides, proteins, lipids, and resins, can be used to make these films, either with or without the inclusion of other ingredients (e.g., plasticizers and surfactants) [9, 10]. The moisture barrier performance of polysaccharide-based films is typically subpar, but they exhibit selective O2 and CO2 permeability and oil resistance [11]. Edible films can be fabricated based on cellulose, starch (natural and modified), pectin, seaweed extracts (alginates, carrageenan, and agar), gums (acacia, tragacanth, and guar), pullulan, and chitosan [12]. Films are made harder, crisper, more compact, viscous, sticky, and capable of producing gels; thanks to these substances. Other significant sources of polysaccharide-based biomaterials have been regarded as marine creatures, such as seaweed, bacteria, and microalgae [13, 14]. Moreover, edible polymers needed to meet a variety of requirements in order to be used as packaging and food components, including high barrier and mechanical efficiency, biochemical, physicochemical, and microbiological stabilities, as well as being nontoxic, nonpolluting, and inexpensive [15]. An emerging area of study in material science is the inclusion of active compounds derived from industrial wastes into edible films. Furthermore, inclusion of active components derived from industrial wastes become a hot area in materials research [16]. It was discovered that edible films may operate as transporters of active substances, such as antioxidants, antimicrobials, and texture enhancers [17], and many methods of obtaining them have been published.

In the past several years, the food industry has employed a lot of edible films made from polysaccharides (cellulose, starch, pectin, seaweed, gums, chitosan, and pullulan), but lignocellulosic materials have just recently been shown to be viable for making edible films. Authors Slavutsky and Bertuzzi have reported starch films reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals derived from sugarcane bagasse [18]. In addition, Shimokawa et al. used hemicellulose fractions from Pinus densiflora leaves to create translucent and transparent films [19]. The compounds these authors obtained have high promise as edible films and characteristics resembling those of xylan. By using acid hydrolysis to separate crystalline cellulose nanofibrils from cotton linter, composite films with pronounced improvements in optical and mechanical properties, water vapor barrier qualities, and thermal stability were created [20]. Alginate-carbohydrate solutions containing 5% alginate and 0.5% pectin, carrageenan (or), potato starch (modified or unmodified), gellan gum, or cellulose were used to make composite alginate films (cellulose extracted from soybean chaff or commercial cellulose) [21]. With the alginate matrix, all of those carbohydrates were able to create composite films. However, using the cellulose from soybean chaff could result in composite films or casings made of alginate that have mechanical properties comparable to those of microcrystalline cellulose used in commercial products. Table 1 represents the various edible films prepared using polymer and essential oils and other components.

Matrix PolymerEssential Oil UsedTargeted ProductFilm Formation MethodObservations and RemarksReference
Carboxymethyl chitosan: PullulanGalangal essential oil (GEO)MangoCastingDeveloped film exhibited excellent thermal stability, biodegradability and mechanical properties and was able to provide good preservation effect on mango.[22]
Gelatin–chitosan blendFerulago angulate essential oil (FAEO)Turkey meatCastingFAEO incorporated gelatin-chitosan blend film improved the water solubility and WVP. Increased anti-microbial property of the film helped in enhancing the shelf life of turkey meat.[23]
Millet starchClove essential oilCastingInclusion of clove oil enhanced the anti-oxidant activity and antimicrobial properties of the film.[24]
SPI-gum acacia conjugatesOregano essential oil (OG-EO), lemon essential oil (LM-EO), fruit of Amomum tsaoko Crevost et Lemaire (ACL-EO) and/or grapefruit essential oil (GF-EO)CastingGF-EO contained film exhibited better WVP, mechanical properties and glass transition temperature than other EO containing films. However, radical scavenging activity and antimicrobial activity was superior for LM-EO incorporated films.[25]
Basil seed gumOregano essential oilCastingThe resulting film showed a significant reduction in WVP with antimicrobial and antioxidant activity.[26]
SPI:Acetem: Tween 60Carvacrol and cinnamaldehydeCastingThe addition of emulsions significantly reduced the tensile strength of the films and improved their EAB. An only slight improvement is reported with the addition of essential oils[27]
Gelatin: MMTGinger essential oil (GEO)CastingSynergetic effect of GEO with MMT significantly improved the mechanical properties like EAB, puncture force, and puncture deformation.[28]
ZeinZataria multiflora Boiss. essential oil (ZEO)Minced meatCastingAddition of ZEO along with monolaurin significantly improved the antioxidant activity and antimicrobial properties against Listeria monocytogenes and E.coli[29]
WPIAlmond and walnut oilsCastingAddition of oils increased the opacity of the film whereas swelling, water vapor permeability, and surface hydrophilicity were reduced.[30]
Chitosan:MMTRosemary essential oil and ginger essential oilfresh poultry meatCastingIncorporation EOs improved only the barrier to oxidation but not the antimicrobial properties. Overall performance of EOs in Chitosan/MMT film is not significant[31]

Table 1.

Various edible polymer films, fabrication techniques observed remarks.

Industry research futures (MRFR) predicts that the edible packaging market (based on protein, lipids, polysaccharides, and others) would be worth USD 2.14 billion by 2030, up from USD 783,32 million in 2021, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.79 percent (2022–2030). Throughout the projection period, north America will dominate the edible packaging market, followed by the United Kingdom, Japan, Indonesia, and Israel [32]. In order to enable their commercial implementation, researchers have been working nonstop for the past three decades to create edible films that can compete with traditional plastic films. Meanwhile, the packaging sector faces challenges in the areas of high moisture content, high pressure and modified atmosphere, natural and fresh goods, among others, and with an environmentally friendly approach [33].

Advertisement

3. Classification

Films and coatings are made from edible polymers and material composition, as well as the material thickness, differs between the two. Bags, pouches, capsules, and casings are all made with films. Coatings are also applied directly to the surface of the meal. Hydrocolloids, lipids, and their composites are the three types of edible polymers. Hydrocolloids are long-chain hydrophilic polymers. The texture (chewy or creamy, lengthy or spreadable, and elastic or brittle) and sensory qualities (taste, mouth feel, and opacity) of the gel vary depending on the kind of hydrocolloid. Because of its hydrophilic feature, it can create viscous dispersion or gels in water. This is because the hydrocolloid’s hydroxyl group bonds with water molecules, thickening the water or forming gels. They are weak water barriers because they can capture or immobilize water molecules in a three-dimensional network.

Fatty acids containing carbon atoms [34, 35, 36, 37, 38] generated from vegetable oils and waxes make up the other family of lipids [3]. They are generally opaque, waxy tasting, and slippery, and can be used to adjust color, flavor, sweetener, and salt concentrations, among other things [39]. Lipids are hydrophobic by nature, making them effective water vapor barriers with minimal permeability. The water permeability of edible composites made of hydrophilic hydrocolloids and hydrophobic lipids can be enhanced by combining them.

Based on their main components, edible films and coatings are divided into different categories. There are four major categories of edible coatings and films, including polysaccharides, proteins, lipids, composites, and polymers. Figure 1 summarizes the classifications of edible films fabricated from various materials [40].

Figure 1.

Classification of edible films [40].

3.1 Polysaccharide-based edible films

The most prevalent natural polymer is polysaccharide, and in recent years, it has been frequently employed to create edible films or coatings. It is well known that polysaccharides contain a strong oxygen barrier and sites for the creation of hydrogen bonds, which can be exploited to incorporate functional ingredients including taste, coloring, and antioxidant compounds. These materials lack effective water vapor barriers, however, this problem can be solved by combining them with other hydrophobic macromolecules, such as lipids [41, 42]. Natural-based packaging has been created using polysaccharides [43]. Edible films and coatings are created using polysaccharides, including starch, pectin, cellulose, exudate gums, and seaweed extracts. After considering their suitability in terms of the physical, mechanical, and functional characteristics of edible films and coatings, these substances are chosen. Although polysaccharide-based films and coatings have poor moisture barrier qualities, they are only slightly more permeable to oxygen and selectively permeable to oxygen (O2) and carbon dioxide (CO2) than other materials. Because they can alter the atmosphere inside the product, they are useful for the preservation of fruits and vegetables where they can lower the respiration rate. Pea starch-based edible films improved the use of pea starch in both food and non-food applications when guar gum and glycerol were added [44]. Edible films made of polysaccharides have a well-organized hydrogen-bonded network, which makes them effective oxygen blockers. Polysaccharide coatings are used to enhance the shelf life of products without causing any anaerobic conditions. They are colorless, free of oil, and have no oil content [41]. One can prepare the polysaccharide-based film either wetly or dryly. Several authors created polysaccharide-based edible films and coatings. Author Arantzazu Valdes et al. have created the natural pectin polysaccharides as edible coatings to improve organoleptic and nutritional characteristics and extend shelf-life [45]. Author Aarushi et al. has prepared Seaweed polysaccharide-based edible coatings and films. Authors emphasized the structure, extraction, and gelling mechanism of the alginate and carrageenan with incorporation of additives, such as plasticizers, nutraceuticals, flavors, and surfactants in the films [46]. Also, Prerna Singh et al. have prepared starch-based edible films with the objective of standardizing the production methodology and formulation for the creation of starch-based biodegradable antimicrobial films to increase the shelf-life of food and food items [47]. Similarly, author Poonam Singh et al. have developed cellulose-based films cross-linked with citric acid for probiotic entrapment. Authors concluded the probiotic bacteria were successfully entrapped into the films with acceptable viability [48]. All of these properties of polysaccharide coatings and edible films can extend fruit shelf life [41]. Alginate is a polymer found in brown algae (Phaeophyceae). Alginate consist of α-L-guluronate (G) and R-D-mannuronate (M) links in th (1–4) chain [41, 49]. Pullulan, a polysaccharide with microbial qualities comprised of maltotriose and (1,6) glycosidic units generated by Aureobasidium pullulans from starch [10], is another polymer with microbial features. Pullulan is a water-soluble, colorless, odorless, and tasteless edible film that is also oil permeable and heat sealable [41].

3.2 Protein-based edible films

In recent years, protein-based edible films have drawn interest due to their advantages over synthetic films, including their usage as edible packaging materials. Furthermore, protein-based edible films can be utilized for the individual packaging of tiny amounts of food, particularly goods that are not currently wrapped individually for practical reasons, such as beans, almonds, and cashew nuts. In addition, protein-based edible films can be used at the interfaces between different layers of components inside diverse diets. Moreover, protein-based edible films can be used to transport antibacterial and antioxidant compounds. In order to better protect and confine the food matrix, many young researchers began to examine and produce nanostructured antibacterial edible coatings [28]. Protein-based packages can be active because the contact of the packaging with the packed food or the surrounding environment activates it. For illustrate Figure 2 depicts the various materials and technologies that improve the value of food packages with protein [50]. Having a look at antioxidant and antibacterial compounds, which are most often employed components in the production of an active film or coating. The major goals of the active packages are to delay oxidation (by binding pro-oxidation substances or releasing antioxidants) and to limit pathogen development (organic acids, negatively charged phosphate groups, essential oils, anthocyanins, and chitosan) [51, 52]. Chemical, biochemical, or biological changes on the product’s surface activate the release of active substances, ensuring a longer freshness and shelf life. Many significant protein sources may be found in a variety of vegetable and animal sources. Because of the abundance of resources in these fundamental goods, researchers began to extract polypeptides from a wide range of vegetable and animal products or by-products [53, 54]. Many authors prepared protein-based edible films for effective packaging material. Among them, Seung YongCho et al. have prepared oxygen barrier bilayer film pouches from cron zein and soya protein isolate for olive oil packaging for use with instant noodles [55]. Authors Burcu Gokkaya Erdem and Sevim Kaya have prepared edible film by freeze-drying from whey protein isolate and sunflower oil and evaluated functional properties of the films. Authors noticed that oil incorporation into the film matrix has decreased lipid droplet size and increased opacity [56]. Another author Nevena Hromis et al. have investigated possible application of edible pumpkin oil cake film as pouches for flaxseed oil protection. Author concluded that PuOC-based pouches present good protection for flaxseed oil [57]. Similarly, Long-Feng Wang and Jong-Whan Rhim have fabricated and studied the applications of agar/alginate/collagen ternary blend functional food packaging films. Authors noticed that ternary blend films exhibited good antifogging properties as well active packaging materials for highly respiring fresh agricultural products [58]. In continuation of protein edible films, author Jose Maria Lagaron et al. successfully produced a bio-composite material by melting compounding polyhydroxyalkanoates with a keratin component generated from poultry feathers [59]. Also, Moreira, Maria del Rosario et al. have investigated the antimicrobial property of bioactive packaging material prepared from edible chitosan and casein polymers for carrot, cheese, and salami [60]. Also, Xinyu Liu et al. have conducted the review on Site-selective protein modification with polymers for advanced biomedical applications. Author tried to elaborate current achievements in site-selective protein modification with polymers into five sections: site-selective protein modification; site-selective polymer modification; site-selective in situ generations of polymers from proteins; polymer biosafety; and biomedical applications [61]. Farhan et al. claim that a water extract from the germination of fenugreek seeds may be used to create an edible film of semi-refined-carrageenan. This edible film can be utilized as an alternative to standard plastic films used in the packaging of chicken flesh for fresh chicken breast [62, 63]. Meanwhile, Furcellaran, a genus of red algae, is one of the most important carrageenan sources. Jamróz et al. combined furcellaean with nanofillers, maghemite nanoparticles, and graphene oxide to produce a film with strong antibacterial activity (for the nanofillers) but not exceptional mechanical qualities [64]. Author prepared Syzygium cumini leaves extract doped PVA and PVA/chitosan blend films for food packaging applications. The authors attempted to investigate the physicochemical characteristics of created blend films using XRD, SEM, AFM, FTIR, TGA, and UTM, as well as the films’ antimicrobial capabilities. They determined that produced mixes might be used in packaging materials to extend food shelf life (Figure 2) [65].

Figure 2.

Materials and technologies that improve the value of food packages with protein [50].

3.3 Lipid-based edible films

Lipids are organic substances that come from living things including plants, animals, and insects. The presence of phospholipids, phosphatides, mono-, di-, and tri-glycerides, terpenes, cerebrosides, fatty alcohols, and fatty acids make up the variety of lipid functional groups [66, 67]. Lipids in coatings and edible film offer a variety of benefits, including gloss, the reduction of moisture loss, lower costs, and less complicated packaging [68]. For making lipid-based edible films and coatings more hydrophobic, a very wide variety of chemicals are available. Proteins, polysaccharides, lipids, or any combination of these substances can be used to create edible coatings and films, but the nature of these constituent materials has a significant impact on how well the coatings and films work [69]. Generally, lipids are a possible coating or film-forming substance in this context since the mechanical and barrier properties of edible films are strongly related to the polarity of film components. Lipids are defined as tiny, hydrophobic, naturally occurring compounds. Examples include fats, waxes, sterols, fat-soluble vitamins, and others. Having look at lipids, hydrophobic compounds (lipids) are typically used as a barrier against the transmission of water vapor due to their polar property. Lipid compounds often exhibit mass transfer resistance to vapor and gas transport due to both their hydrophobic nature and structural makeup. To increase the hydrophobicity of edible films, a variety of lipid compounds can be utilized. The waxes of natural origin, vegetable oils, aceto-glycerides, and fatty acids are among the hydrophobic substances that exhibit good potential [70]. Generally, hydrocolloid films are frequently enhanced with lipid components, such as fatty acids and natural waxes, to improve their water barrier qualities [71, 72].

Triglycerides, the main component of fats and oils, are derived from plants and animals, respectively. Although this combination differs physically because fats are solids and oils are liquids, it is chemically comparable [73]. In 2016, Rodrigues et al. created a palm fruit oil film with preferred water resistance and water vapor barrier for food packaging [74]. In order to improve the quality of food, Vargas et al. (2011) utilized sunflower oil in edible coatings and on pig meat hamburgers. This was done because it was crucial to oxygenate meat and control water vapor in order to avoid an unfavorable reaction [75]. Rice bran oil was tested by Hassani et al. (2012) to increase the shelf life of kiwi fruit. Fruits were mostly preserved based on flavor, color, and firmness [76]. Another level source for the creation of edible films is essential oils. By lowering lipid oxidation, essential oils obtained from diverse plants can increase the shelf-life of food. The water vapor permeability of the films is decreased by adding essential oils [77, 78]. The growth of yeast, bacteria, and mold is inhibited by the use of anise oil, clove oil, and cinnamon oil. The shelf life of dried fish may be extended from 3 to 21 days by adding anise oil (4–6%) to an edible film. This prevents the formation of yeast, bacteria, and mold [79]. One of the main drawbacks is that strong aromas found in essential oils may alter the organoleptic characteristics of food items. Additionally, some essential oils have the propensity to cause allergic reaction issues. As a result, the concentration of essential oils affects their toxicity and organoleptic characteristics [80]. In talk, Aloe veras also considered an appreciable candidate in the food industry being edible material. A. vera gel’s primary applications are in the sectors of cosmetics and medicine because of its anti-inflammatory, antiviral, and anticancer properties. It has, however, recently found use as edible films for ice cream, drinks, and other liquids [81, 82, 83].

3.4 Synthetic and composite edible polymers

Diverse edible polymers that combine polysaccharides, proteins, and/or lipids may exist in nature. Synthetic and composite films are prepared by the use of multiple components. The purpose of using numerous components is to gain benefits from their synergistic interactions. This strategy enables one to make use of the unique functional traits of each type of film former. Proteins and carbohydrates, proteins and lipids, carbohydrates and lipids, synthetic polymers, and natural polymers can all be combined to make films [7]. These heterogeneous films were applied in a variety of ways, including consecutive layers, a solution in a common solvent, an emulsion, suspension, or dispersion of the non-miscible ingredients. The barrier qualities of the produced films are influenced by the application technique. Kamper and Fennema have developed emulsion films made of methylcellulose and fatty acids in order to enhance the vapor barrier property of cellulose film [84]. Composite edible polymer films exhibit good barrier qualities because a hydrophilic layer and a hydrophobic layer, which includes lipids, bind together [85]. Composite edible films have been categorized as binary or ternary based on the quantity of biopolymers, as illustrated in Figure 3. A binary edible film made of locust bean gum (LBG) and carrageenan is a famous example [87]. Many combinations of carbohydrate-carbohydrate, carbohydrate-protein, and protein–protein are feasible in such systems [88, 89, 90]. There is a large body of literature on composite films and coatings made from the combination of two hydrocolloids, but the combination of three hydrocolloids for the creation of edible films or coatings is uncommon. A wide range of polysaccharide-based materials, including tamarind starches, have lately been employed in the production of edible films (Chandra mohan et al. 2016). PVA/Syzygium cumini leaves extract (PSN) and PVA/chitosan/S. cumini leaves extract blend films were prepared as potential candidates in packaging material to extend the shelf life of foodstuffs [65]. In order to increase the mechanical, thermal, and antibacterial characteristics of chitosan films, betel leaf extract (BE) was included into chitosan and chitosan/vanillin (CH/Vn) mix films [91]. The researchers confirmed that the plant-extract-doped polymer material may be used as a new antibacterial agent in food packaging. Looking into different series, such as chitosan and its nanoparticles, cellulose derivatives, including methyl cellulose and hydroxyl propyl methyl cellulose, pullulan, and natural gums, were prepared and studied as edible packaging material [92, 93, 94]. Many natural gums have been extracted from different sources, such as gum ghatti, locust bean gum, and sage seed gum [87, 95, 96]. Furthermore, proteins and polysaccharides have found extensive use in the creation of edible films and coatings. Some of the model proteins include whey protein, sodium caseinate, soya protein isolates, and collagen [97, 98, 99].

Figure 3.

Barrier characteristics of composite edible films and coatings are shown schematically [86].

Suppakul et al. has prepared the soy protein and corn zein bilayer edible film for coating olive oil condiments. Study reported that incorporation of corn zein enhanced the tensile strength, moisture barrier properties, reduced the elongation at break and oxygen barrier properties [89]. Author Gu and Wang et al. has prepared the zein/gliadin binary film. Study reported that improved flexibility elongation at break, decreased brittleness and gliadin has significant impact on moisture content and solubility [100]. In another work, Song et al. created binary films out of scarcely bran protein and gelatin [101]. Authors concluded prepared films exhibited excellent film forming properties and composite film was complexed with grapefruit seed extract to enhance the antibacterial and antioxidant properties. The result of the study showed, when compared to the control preparation, the count of escherichia coli O157:H7 and listeria monocytogenes was dramatically reduced (without grapefruit seed extract). Similarly, salicylic acid and acetyl salicylic acid were utilized as fillers in the zein films, and their structure and mechanical characteristics were investigated [102]. Thakur et al. has formulated the bilayer film using starch combined with ι-carrageenan. Steric acid and glycerol were used as plasticizers [90]. Furthermore, Antoniou et al. has prepared binary film using chitosan nanoparticles and tara gum and characterized for thermomechanical, antimicrobial and barrier properties [103]. Authors confirmed that complexation process improved the tensile strength and elongation at break. In addition, Mei et al. has formulated the water chestnut starch and chitosan based bi-layered films [104]. Author concluded that addition of fruit extract has influence on the pH and moisture content of the film and demonstrated better mechanical properties. Martins et al. has fabricated the Locust bean gum combined with κ-carrageenan edible films. The study revealed that the two biopolymers had a high synergy [87].

In another research work, edible films made of chitosan and fish gelatin were irradiated with an electron beam. Quercetin was trapped in the composite film due to a decreased release profile caused by irradiation [105]. The study of gelatin/chitosan composite edible films filled with antimicrobial extract (ethanolic extracts of cinnamon, rosemary, guarana and boldo-do-chile) shown antimicrobial and antioxidant properties [106]. A number of research have concentrated on creating ternary blend films. Mention few, Jia et al. has ternary edible films using Konjac glucomannan, chitosan and soy protein isolate using glycerol as the plasticizer [99]. Wang et al. has studied the whey protein isolate, gelatin and alginate ternary edible films and demonstrated the mechanical properties and barrier properties, such as water vapor permeability and oxygen permeability [107]. A ternary edible film made of konjac glucomannan, chitosan, and nisin was created, and its physical, mechanical, barrier, optical, structural, and antibacterial characteristics were investigated [108]. In the study, it was observed that ternary blend films exhibited high tensile strength, optimum transparency, and strong antimicrobial efficacy against S. aureus, L. monocytogenes, and B. cereus. Wang and Rhim formulated the ternary blend films from agar, alginate, and collagen. Also, blended films were successfully functionalized with silver nanoparticles and grapefruit seed extract as antimicrobial agents [58]. Polycaprolactone, methylcellulose, and polycaprolactone were combined with several antimicrobial substances, including organic acids, rosmarinic acid, an Asian essential oil blend, and an Italian essential oil combo, to create quadruple edible films. The prepared antimicrobial films could significantly resist the growth of both S. aureus and E. coli [109].

Advertisement

4. Functionality and composition

The majority of foods are recognized to be vulnerable to mechanical harm, physiological degradation, water loss, and rot when in storage. As a result of water loss, plants become less turgid, which accelerates the loss of nutrients and organoleptic qualities and is a key factor in degradation. Spoilage might be reduced by using edible coatings and cold storage [110]. Edible films are often used to carry active compounds, such as antioxidants, tastes, fortified nutrients, colorants, antibacterial agents, or spices, while also acting as a barrier against gases or vapor. Controlling mass transfers, providing mechanical protection, and enhancing sensory perception are the three most crucial functions of an edible film or coating. Controlling mass transfers includes keeping food from drying out, managing gas microenvironments around food, and limiting component and additive migration in food systems. Edible films have two main functions: to maintain the food’s mechanical integrity or handling features and to act as a selective barrier to different gases, moisture, aromas, and lipids. Edible films and coatings can improve the look of coated food and govern adhesion, cohesion, and durability in addition to their barrier capabilities. Edible films act as a conduit for interactions between the environment, the product, and the packaging. Typically, these interactions involve a range of physical, chemical, and biological activities that change the natural environment in which the food is packed, improving the product’s sustainability, safety, quality, and shelf life [111]. Perhaps, by modifying and controlling the internal environment of individual items, edible coatings on fresh foods can offer an alternative to modified atmosphere storage by decreasing quality changes and quantity losses. Even while oxygen entry may lower food quality due to oxidation of the fragrance components in the food, altering internal atmosphere by the application of edible coatings might exacerbate diseases linked to excessive carbon dioxide or low oxygen concentration [112]. For fresh items, edible film with higher water vapor permeability is also preferred, yet exceptionally high-water vapor permeability is also not preferred since it may cause fruit to lose too much moisture during storage. To maintain the integrity of the package throughout distribution, an edible film must have sufficient mechanical strength. Acceptance of finished items is largely determined by the sensory qualities of an edible coating or film. In conclusion, the most beneficial characteristic of edible films and coatings are their edibility and inherent biodegradability [113, 114].

4.1 Physical and mechanical protection

In general, edible films and coatings shield packed or coated foods from physical harm brought on by mechanical forces including pressure, vibration, and collision. The tensile strength of edible films should typically be lower than that of conventional plastic films, however, their elongation at break varies greatly. The majority of edible and coated films are extremely moisture-sensitive [115]. However, their physical strength decreases at greater relative humidity levels because absorbed moisture works as a plasticizer. Consider the importance of temperature in influencing the physical and mechanical qualities [116, 117, 118]. When temperatures rise over the glass transition point, materials’ physical strength is drastically reduced.

4.2 Functions of migration, permeation, and barriers

Mass transfer events, such as moisture absorption, oil absorption, oxygen invasion, taste loss, unwanted odor absorption, and migration of packing materials into food in general deteriorate the quality of foodstuffs [119, 120]. Deterioration mechanism involves penetration of oxygen into foods, which causes the oxidation of food ingredients; inks, solvents, and monomeric additives in packaging materials might migrate into foods. Edible films and coatings prevent the migration phenomenon and quality deterioration [114, 116]. It is best to use stand-alone edible films to measure the transmission rates of certain migrants in order to define the barrier qualities of edible films and coatings. The majority of study has focused on the oil resistance, taste permeability, oxygen permeability, carbon dioxide permeability, and water vapor permeability of edible films.

When it comes to handling convenience, edible films and coatings provide a number of advantages. The reinforced surface strength of delicate items facilitates handling easier. Fruits and vegetables with coatings are far more resistant to bruising and tissue damage brought on by impact and vibration. Edible films and coatings serve a number of extremely important purposes, including quality maintenance and improvement [121]. They may prevent the microbiological degradation of food goods as well as surface dehydration, moisture absorption, ingredient oxidation, fragrance loss, frying oil absorption, and ingredient oxidation. In view of physical and chemical quality, edible films and coatings improve visual quality, surface smoothness, taste conveyance, edible color printing, and other marketing-related quality criteria [121].

4.3 Extension of shelf life and improvement of safety

Extension of shelf life and increased safety are closely connected to the improvement and maintenance of quality. Food items with higher protective functions have longer shelf lives and are less likely to become contaminated by foreign objects [120, 121, 122, 123]. Due to the recent significant rise in the market for fresh produce and minimally processed goods, it is necessary to keep these items safe and increase their shelf life [124, 125]. Improved systematic methods are required to preserve safety and shelf life due to the enormous size of modern food manufacturing, distribution networks, food service franchises, and fast food restaurants.

4.4 Transporters for active ingredients and controlled release

For food components, medicines, nutraceuticals, and agrochemicals, edible films and coatings can be used in the form of hard capsules, soft gel capsules, microcapsules, soluble strips, flexible pouches, coatings on hard particles, among other forms [120, 126]. Many food-grade preservatives and natural antimicrobials have been combined into edible film and coating materials. They act as successful examples of how to efficiently inactivate spoilage or pathogenic bacteria on the surface of susceptible food items [127, 128]. To prevent the autooxidation of high-fat food items, natural antioxidants have also been integrated into edible film and coating materials [129]. The capacity for regulated release is the most crucial factor to consider when evaluating the efficacy of various applications [123]. One needs to concentrate on this because various release rates, such as instantaneous release, gradual release, a particular release rate, or non-migration of active chemicals, are necessary depending on the application. To create controlled-release systems, a variety of different active ingredients can be added to film-forming polymers. Antimicrobials, antioxidants, bioactive nutraceuticals, medicines, flavors, inks, fertilizers, insecticides, insect repellents, and medical/biotechnology diagnostic agents are good examples of active chemicals needing certain migration rates. To inactivate contaminated spoilage or pathogenic bacteria, several natural phenolic compounds have been added to edible coating materials and applied to microbiologically vulnerable foods [130, 131, 132, 133, 134].

Advertisement

5. Fabrication of edible films

Understanding the chemical makeup and structural details of additives, biopolymers, and other materials that create films is crucial for configuring them for particular uses [122, 135]. It is crucial to use a solvent that is both water and ethanol soluble when wet casting or combining active agents. There two types of film-making techniques are dry and wet [116]. In dry method of making edible films does not require liquid solvents, such as water or alcohol. Dry techniques include molten casting, extrusion, and heat pressing. Generally, heat is provided to the film-forming materials during the dry process to raise the temperature over the melting point of the film forming ingredients, causing them to flow. During film preparation, it is important to note down the impact of plasticizers and other additives on the thermoplasticity of film-forming materials must be determined. Plasticizers lower the glass transition temperature.

The wet technique disperses film-forming ingredients in solvents before drying to remove the solvent and produce a film structure. One of the most significant components of the wet process is solvent selection. Only water, ethanol, and their combinations are suitable as solvents since the film-forming solution needs to be eatable and biodegradable [136]. To create film-forming solutions, all the components of film-forming materials should be dissolved or uniformly distributed in the solvents. By using a sprayer, spreader, or dipping roller, the film-forming solution should be applied to flat surfaces. Once cured, the solvent should be removed to create a film structure. The development of uniform edible film and coating systems including active additives depends heavily on the components’ compatibility with the solvent. To create film-forming solutions, all constituents, including active additives, biopolymers, and plasticizers, should be uniformly dissolved in the solvent. The coating procedure is also impacted by the film-forming solution’s viscosity. A reduced viscosity speeds up the film-forming solution’s separation from the flat surface, which results in an uneven coating on the surface and the coating solution trickling down to the floor. To decrease this coating phase separation, higher viscosity of the film-forming fluid is preferred, unless doing so results in an unacceptably thick coating thickness. The likelihood of a film layer developing on the flat surface during the high-speed coating process increases if the film-forming solution has lower surface tension and a greater viscosity. However, coated films’ lower surface energies after drying make it more difficult to remove the film off flat surfaces. Table 2 summarizes the different edible films prepared using polysaccharide as edible matrix and industrial waste.

Edible matrixIndustry wasteEdible filmReference
PolysaccharidesSugarcane bagasseStarch (4%), glycerol (20% dry weight), water, and appropriate amount of cellulose nanocrystals obtained from sugarcane bagasse (3% dry weight)[18]
P. densiflora leavesHemicellulose fractions of P. densiflora leaves with 1% w/w polysaccharide) lecithin[19]
Cotton linter pulpCrystalline cellulose nanofibrils from cotton linter pulp to reinforce sodium carboxymethyl cellulose films (2% w/v) and 0.9 g of glycerol (30 wt %) to 150 mL of distilled water[20]
Soybean chaffComposite alginate films obtained from alginate–carbohydrate solutions containing 5 wt % alginate and 0.25 wt % cellulose extracted from soybean chaff[21]
Apple, carrot, and hibiscusApple, carrot, and hibiscus-based pectin edible films[137]
Lime bagasse and lime pomace pectic extractsLime bagasse pectic extract and lime pomace pectic extract at 0.70, 0.85, and 1.00% pectin equivalents with Mexican lime EO and 0.70 wt % glycerol plasticizer[138]
Pectin from citrusMicroparticles and films containing sunflower oil produced by ionic gelation with a 1:1 alginate–pectin mixture and electrostatically coated with whey and egg white proteins[139]
M. stellatus seaweedsHybrid carrageenan extracted from M. stellatus seaweeds[140]
Pyropia columbina red algaeCarrageenan/porphyran-based films obtained from a P. columbina aqueous fraction formed by casting from aqueous dispersions with different levels of glycerol[141]
M. stellatus seaweedEdible active films from different M. stellatus crude aqueous extracts[142]
Porphyra columbina seaweedAntioxidant phycobiliprotein/phycocolloid-based films obtained from mixtures of two aqueous fractions extracted from P. columbina red seaweed[143]
Brown seaweeds Laminaria digitate and Ascophyllum nodosumFilm-forming carbohydrate-rich extracts from the brown seaweeds L. digitata and A. nodosum obtained with Na2CO3 or NaOH at different temperatures and with different acid pretreatments (H2SO4 and HCl)[144]
Chitosan and protein concentrate from shrimp wasteChitosan solution (2% w/w) dissolved in a 0.15 M lactic acid solution (pH 3.2) and sonicated[145]
Chitosan and potato and cassava starchesStarch and chitosan films obtained by the variation of the starch source (potato and cassava starches), starch concentration (0.5 and 1.0 wt %), and type of plasticizer (glucose and glycerol)[146]
Marine industry byproducts: chitosan and fish gelatinChitosan and fish gelatin (1:1 w/w), entrapping natural antioxidants [ferulic acid, quercetin, and tyrosol (~50 mg/g)], used to prepare edible active films by casting[147, 148]
Chitosan and zeinComposite edible films fabricated with zein and chitosan and supplemented with phenolic compounds (ferulic acid or gallic acid) and dicarboxylic acids (adipic acid or succinic acid)[149]
Cashew tree gumStarch-cashew tree gum nanocomposite film; sage seed gum edible films with two different plasticizers (glycerol and sorbitol: 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100% w/w)[150]
Locust bean gum0.4 and 0.6% w/v κ-carrageenan and locust bean gum suspended in distilled water under agitation for 1 h at 25°C with 0.3% w/v glycerol (87% v/v) in solution and homogenized at 80°C for 30 min[151]
Basil seed gumBasil seed gum and different plasticizer concentrations added to deionized water and heated to 80°C under mild stirring[152, 153]
Brea gumBrea gum (10% w/v), glycerol (25% w/w Brea gum), water, and montmorillonite (5% w/w Brea gum)[154, 155]

Table 2.

Several edible films prepared using polysaccharide as edible matrix and industrial waste.

System that is commercially viable includes new processing technologies, such as extrusion, roll orientation, conveyor drying, bath coating, pan coating, or other procedures, which would be needed to produce edible films and coatings. These new manufacturing technologies should be economically viable and compatible with the methods now used to produce packaging films and food coatings. Therefore, composition of film-forming materials should be carefully tuned, and the film-forming processes must be updated correspondingly, to fulfill the feasibility of new production systems [1].

Advertisement

6. Characterization and performance analysis

The appropriate use of edible packaging films largely depends on their mechanical and barrier properties. Therefore, it is critical to establish precise approaches for assessing film performances, particularly for the measurement of permeability values that can be effectively applied to forecast the self-life of products. The instruments employed to determine permeability are standardized ones and available for water vapor and permanent gas transfers. They were developed for use with synthetic and plastic packaging films. The rate of water vapor transmission per unit area of flat material with a unit thickness and per unit vapor pressure differential between two particular surfaces, under predetermined temperature and humidity conditions, is known as water vapor permeability (WVP). Based on infrared sensors, such as the Permatran-W series offered by Mocon, or WVP tester L80–4000 series of Dr. Lissy which works on the principle of coulombic or spectrophotometer method several methodologies have been refined by Holland and Santangelo [156]. In contrast to hydrophilic polymers, these approaches are particularly suited for high-barrier efficiency polymers, such as plastics or wax-based edible films [157]. The “cup method,” which is based on the gravimetric methodology, is the approach most frequently utilized by those who work on edible packaging.

For the purposes of applying edible coatings on fruits and vegetables, it was frequently investigated how permeable they were to gases, especially oxygen and carbon dioxide. The ASTM D1434 and ISO 2556 standards’ manometric and volumetric methodologies were not used for edible films [158, 159]. In this regard, Oxtran device was the best one that could be used to measure gas permeability through edible films. As a result, plastic research on the gas permeability of edible packaging was conducted using the gas chromatographic method created by Karel et al. and Lieberman et al. for collagen films [160, 161]. A gas chromatographic technique has recently been improved by Debeaufort and Voilley to quantify permanent gases, water, and organic vapor [162]. If the mechanical qualities of an edible film or coating do not allow for the maintenance of the film togetherness during usage, packing, and transport procedures, even one with excellent barrier properties may not be effective. Therefore, it is necessary to ascertain the mechanical strength and injury of edible films. To analyze the tensile strength, young’s modulus, elongation at break, and elasticity of edible films, instruments, such as a universal testing machine, dynamic mechanical thermal analyzer, and texturometer, are frequently utilized [163]. Numerous other aspects of films are frequently researched, particularly in order to comprehend their mechanical and barrier properties, such as thickness, degradability, solubility, opacity, color, antimicrobial activity, and thermal stability.

Advertisement

7. Rheology of edible films

Ideally, the functional characteristics of a packaging film, more especially the physical and rheological characteristics of a film-forming solution, can be used to verify the film’s performance (FFS). In fact, rheological characteristics are crucial to the creation of high-quality composite films. They must be taken into account while enhancing the design process since they have an impact on the spreadability, thickness, uniformity, and functioning of FFS [164]. It is well-known fact that physical parameters of film plays are crucial to investigate the properties, such as tensile strength, Young’s modulus, and elongation at break. In addition, the physical characteristics of films were also examined, such as their shape, morphology (heterogeneous and homogeneous), solubility as well as their transparency, and light transmission. The rheological characteristics associated with the film-forming solutions play a crucial role in defining properties, such as thickness, dispersion, and uniformity of liquid coating layer, applied to the edible film by dipping brushing or spraying. Also, with respect to film formation, a moderate viscosity is the required flow property for the film-forming solution since high or low viscosities would result in uneven film formation [165]. For coating applications, some writers have advised a viscosity lower than 700 mPas; however, the proper viscosity for other film solution treatment circumstances, such as mixing, pumping, and transfer to the casting line, as well as spreading the solution smoothly, is around 1000–10,000 mPas [166, 167]. The behavior of the flow of film solutions has an impact on the mechanical properties and the optimization of the designing process during application. Additionally, it is claimed that rheological parameters can be used to assess how polysaccharide solution systems’ structure–function interaction [168]. Therefore, modification and alteration in the molecular structure, it is required to analyze the rheological characteristics of the edible film solutions in order to provide a comprehensive understanding of the physical characteristics of edible films.

Ideally speaking on influence of concentration degree of deacetylation (DD), for example, an increase in the concentration of glycerol has a significant influence on apparent viscosity (AV), consistency coefficient (CC), and flow behavior index values of deacetylation samples. In one study addition of 5% glycerol has shown descending order of AV and CC of prepared films. At a subsequent addition of glycerol (10%), these values did, however, continue to decline for only 100DD samples. The samples’ pseudoplastic behavior was shown by the n values, which ranged from 0.70 to 0.77 [169]. Principally, it was connected to the network’s polysaccharide macromolecules with a lot of hydroxyl groups being destroyed by shearing [170]. In terms of pseudoplastic flow behavior, AV, and CC values, only the 100DD-10G (n = 0.77) sample was less favorable. As a result, this solution disperses and flows more readily, reflecting the fact that glycerol has disrupted the intermolecular link among the glucomannan polysaccharides. Therefore, glycerol’s inhibition impact was more pronounced for 100DD. Glycerol increase may be offered at a lower DD, preserving the properties of the existing hydrogen bonds while creating new ones.

In our previous work, we tried to figure out influence of Syzygium cumini (S. cumini) leaves extract, morphological, thermal, and mechanical as well as on antimicrobial activity of the PVA and PVA/chitosan blend films for packaging applications [171]. The findings showed that the S. cumini leaves extract in PVA and PVA/chitosan films had a significant physical interaction at lower concentrations, which contributed to the films’ smooth uniform morphology, increased degree of crystallinity, lower degradation temperature, and improved mechanical properties. Table 3 depicts the mechanical properties of PVA and PVA/chitosan-doped blend films. As it is observed that at a lower concentration of S. cumini leaves extract, tensile strength increased, elongation at break and Young’s modulus decreased. Figure 4 depicts the SEM micrographs of pure PVA, chitosan, PSN-1, PSN-4, PCS-1, PCS-3, PCSHN-1, PCHSN-3, PCHS-1, and PCHS-4 blend films [171].

Sl. NoSample NameTensile strength (Ts)Young’s modulus (Ym)Elongation at break (%Eb)
01Chitosan40.37 ± 21603.693.90
02PVA21.70±24.48394.32
03PSn-124.95±27.58317.12
04PSn-223.2418.85342.55
05PSn-312.1724.98242.46
06PSn-420.0022.95296.06
07PchSn-130.8123.18213.10
08PchSn-214.7423.16150.72
09PchSn-319.1119.11135.05
10PchSn-421.7621.76153.72
11PCS362.9618.4211.67
12PCS448.0861.26117.82
13PCS518.8322.59138.97
14PChs-136.1481.78165.43
15PChs-226.4163.6659.11
16PChs-330.2676.2560.51
17PChs-432.32114.3059.10

Table 3.

Mechanical properties of PVA, chitosan, and blend films.

Figure 4.

SEM micrographs of pure PVA, chitosan, PSN-1, PSN-4, PCS-1, PCS-3, PCSHN-1, PCHSN-3, PCHS-1, and PCHS-4 blend films [171].

Figure 5 it is depicted that, binary PVA/S. cumini leaves extract showed smooth homogeneous morphology, whereas high concentration of S. cumini leaves extract (PSN-4) showed low compatibility exhibiting strand-like appearance, indicating phase separation. Similarly, in another work, we tried to analyze influence of Betel leaves extract on chitosan/vanillin films [91].

Figure 5.

Scanning electron microscopy micrographs of pure chitosan, vanillin, betel leaf extract, CH/BE (CBE) and CH/Vn/BE (CVB, CVBA) blend films [91].

Figure 6 presents the SEM micrographs of different Betel leaf extract (BE) doped chitosan blend films. At a lower concentration of BE, smooth homogeneous morphology was observed (CBE-1), later at a higher concentration of BE immiscibility was noticed (CBE-4). In case of ternary blend films Chitosan/vanillin/BE, showed good miscibility and smooth homogeneous morphology (CVB-1 and CVBA-1) due to compatibility of BE at molecular level as chitosan is recovered by the vanillin network implying the appreciable adhesion and compatibility [91]. Similarly, X-ray diffractogram of binary chitosan/BE films showed a significant change in 2θ value, indicating the decrease in degree of crystallinity (51.59, 70.89, and 31.94%) with an increase in the filler BE, attributed to the dispersion of BE lead to the weak interaction in the chitosan matrix. The diffraction model of ternary CH/Vn/BE blend films showed diffraction peaks at 18.50, 20.39, 28.50, 35.09 and 42.19° for CVB-1; 22.2, 31.09, 34.30 and 44.90° for CVB-2; and 7.06, 20.59, 22.79, 28.49 and 38.49° for CVB-3. The 2q value in each formulation was significantly improved by the addition of BE, lengthening the distance between the chitosan chains. The findings from the contact angle investigation and the oxygen barrier qualities may be closely connected with this [91].

Figure 6.

Edible films and coatings: schematic presentation [172].

Advertisement

8. Concerns relating to consumers

Consumer acceptability may have a considerable impact on the potential usage of edible materials because edible films are consumable components of food products [1]. Consumer acceptability, which is influenced by organoleptic characteristics, welfare, selling, and cultural resistance to the use of new materials, is a comprehensive indicator of consumers’ subjective product preferences. However, it is important to note down organoleptic characteristics, including flavor, odorless, sensory feasibility with packed foodstuffs, texture, and appearance [135]. Innovative edible film’s potential for toxicity or allergenicity and microbiota changes in packaging stuffs are major safety concerns. More than consumer approval, there are several other issues that prevent edible films from being used commercially, including complexity associated with the production, huge investment to install new film manufacturing equipment, potential conflict with traditional packaging, and regulatory issues.

Advertisement

9. Applications

Heightened active packaging concept is a result of growing consumer demand for retaining quality and freshness of foodstuffs higher quality. A kind of packaging material that modifies the environment around the food to preserve food quality and freshness, enhance sensory qualities, or lengthen food safety and shelf life. In this regard. Edible films are considered suitable candidates for packaging as they are eco-friendly and biodegradable in nature. Generally, edible films are used to pack vegetables, fruits, meat, fish, dairy products (cheese, milk, and yogurt), and poultry products. Various examples of packaging materials include biopolymers, bioplastics, and edible films prepared from natural origin raw materials from agricultural or marine sources [78].

9.1 Edible films for meat, poultry, and seafood packaging

Generally, active edible films provide a preservative barrier to products made from meat, poultry, and seafoods. As this food is quite perishable due to high percentage of water. Edible films around the meat products protect the shrinkage loss, retain discoloration, resist microbial attack, and oxidative off-flavor. A variety of edible biopolymers are employed as coatings for meat products [173, 174]. With advantageous properties, such as biopolymer, hydrophilic, and good film-forming ability, author Kontominas MG have investigated sodium alginate-based edible films by mixing active and antimicrobial agents to enhance the shelf-life of meat product [175]. Author Takma and colleagues prepared the alginate-based edible films using black cumin oil as an antimicrobial agent to pack chicken breast meat [176]. Furthermore, Qussalah et al. have proved sodium alginate films successfully inhibit Salmonella typhimurium when mixed with cinnamon, savory, and oregano oil [177].

However, Seafood is most perishable food material which has a very short shelf life also contamination possibilities are more during transportation due to surrounding environment, which leads to the spoilage of quality and loss of nutritional values and may lead to foodborne diseases. To ensure quality and shelf-life use of antimicrobial agents in the catfish gelatin which helps to control microbial attack and enhances the shelf life of shrimp by nearly about 10 days. Gelatin and whey protein-based enriched films doped with cinnamon oil and clove essential oil as an active antimicrobial agent retards the microbial attack on rainbow trout fish and active agent improves the quality of chicken breast fillet’s shelf life [178, 179].

9.2 Edible films for packaging of dairy products

Every day we consume dairy products, including cheese, yogurt, and milk which are an essential part of our daily diet. Among others, specifically, cheese is rich in lipids, proteins, and vitamins. Having said that, edible films regulate and control the ripening process, inhibit mass transfer, and lengthen the shelf life. Different edible casting techniques include spraying, dipping, brushing and electrostatic brushing, and casting is used to prepare film. Film covered on the cheese will increase the shelf life, brushing is normally used for small-sized cheese packaging, and for irregular shape cheese dipping method is preferred. Similarly, uniform and thin layer coating the cheese spraying method is most preferred one. On the other hand, electrostatic spraying prevents solution wastage and gives higher efficiency. Films prepared from casting technique generally create the barrier between the cheese and surrounding environment [180]. When compared to polysaccharide films, films fabricated from whey protein sources exhibit better gas barrier characteristics. As whey protein films are transparent in nature which allow consumer to see the quality of the cheese. Speaking of other dairy products, that is, butter, which contain high fat hence more found of lipid oxidation, and shelf life get reduces. To protect corn starch edible materials prepared using ginger oil stops lipid oxidation when stored at 2 to 5°C [181].

9.3 Edible films for packaging of fruits, vegetable, nuts, and grains

Gas exchanges via respiration and transpiration occur during ripening and storage, as well as microbial growth, particularly molds and rots, are the main causes of fruit and vegetable deterioration [182]. Most commonly waxes, such as paraffin, beeswax, shellac, carnauba, and candellilla, are utilized as coating agents for all kinds of fruits [183]. Waxes and oils are very effective water barriers that can stop weight loss, whether they are used alone or in an emulsion with hydrocolloid or protein solutions. A thick wax layer coated on fruits significantly alters the CO2 leading to anaerobic storage that causes unequal ripening up to adulteration of fruits and vegetables [184]. Consequently, in order to have better control over the ripening, several edible films were created that increase CO2 and ethylene evaporation while decreasing oxygen penetration in the fruit. The inherent antifongic nature of the hydrocolloid employed or the incorporation of antimicrobial compounds within the film can both delay and prevent spotting. In this way, chitosan films encourage the fruit to produce the chitinase enzyme, a naturally occurring antifongic substance. Author Mazza and Qi have investigated the coatings prepared from gums, gelatin, and starch can prevent the non-enzymatic browning of peeled and blanched potatoes [185]. The bactericidal activity against escherichia coli (0157:H7) of apple puree-origin FFFs added with oregano, lemongrass, or cinnamon essential oils. They concluded that prepared materials have 50% bacteria killing property (0.034, >0.34, and 0.28) after incubation for 3 min at 21°C [186]. As opposed to those with carvacrol, carrot puree edible films containing cinnamadehyde have shown appreciable inhibitory activity of Staphylococcus aureus and E. coli [187]. Otoni and colleagues prepared papaya puree films blended with cinnamaldehyde nanoemulsions of various sizes. They reported all films to exhibit antimicrobial activity against S. aureus, E. coli, and S. enterica for fruits containing low preservative content [188]. Last but not least, edible films based on fruits and vegetables may also be created with unique health-promoting capabilities, such as probiotic or prebiotic films, by enhancing the market demand for sensory qualities and nutritious dietary components [189]. Therefore, applications are anticipated to be continually used in a world that is becoming more and more concerned with health-related issues. Figure 7 summarizes the various components crucial to film formation, primary traits, and uses for edible films.

Figure 7.

Components crucial to film formation, primary traits, and uses for edible films [172].

9.4 Edible films for packaging of confectionaries

Confectionary products, such as chocolates, candies, boiled sweets, toffees, and caramels, always require active packaging material which ensures protection from moisture attack, dust and dirt contaminating agents and prevents loss of sugar, fat bloom, stickiness, desiccation, and hardening. Generally, mindset is made to avoid intermixing of flavors of the various confectionary foods. In fact, milk and whey proteins, cellulose-based films, and shellac or wax lower the water and oil migrations, such as the greasy or oily feeling on fingers. Author Nelson and Fennema reported that methylcellulose films and coatings have shown lower lipid permeability which have ability to reduce fat mobility and inhibits the whitening or blooming of chocolates [190]. In comparison to the conventional confectioner’s glaze, zein-ethanol bleeding employed as film-forming solution produces better results with faster drying times [126]. Author Dyhr and Sorensen have concluded that sorbitol-based coatings have ability to replace conventional sugar coatings on chewable dragees [191]. Bilayer films prepared from wax and hydrocolloid have shown improved adhesiveness which was applied on chewing gum sheets to enhance the shelf life [192].

Advertisement

10. The future and conclusion

The use of edible polymer films and coatings has great promise for enhancing food quality, shelf life, and safety. Continued study in the active packaging is justifiable given the potential benefits of edible polymers as carriers of antibacterial, coloring, antioxidant agents, vitamins, probiotics, and nutraceuticals. It has been realized that efficiency and active properties of edible polymers are largely influenced by the inherent properties of film-forming materials, such as biopolymers, plasticizers, and dopants. After analyzing particular functions, in both commonplace like polymers and specified applications, edible biopolymers are competitive. In an advantageous path, biopolymer can be effectively replaced by petroleum-based plastics used for packaging. Many studies have shown that active biopolymers, such as polysaccharides, lipids, and proteins, are used to prepare biodegradable polymer films. Table 4 list out the different functions of edible films for the packaging applications.

FunctionProperties of edible films
Edible film, coating for foodProtectionWater and gas barrier
Protection from light and ultraviolet
AntimicrobialPrevention of microbial growth
Enhanced the food shelf-life
AntioxidantPrevents enzymatic browsing
More consumer acceptance
Shelf-lifeMore demand in the market
Reduces food product waste
EstheticShiny and smooth surface
Prevents aroma loss
SustainableEdible and bio-based
Reduces plastic waste

Table 4.

Different functions of edible films for the packaging applications [193].

The use of edible polymers on numerous food products is still evolving. The future enhancement of food quality and preservation during operations and storage is very bright thanks to edible polymer films and coatings. A novel innovative edible polymer is under progress, to enable the inclusion or regulated release of active chemicals using nanotechnology solutions, such as nanoencapsulation and development of multifaceted systems. As edible packaging serves intelligent packaging systems due to both active, selective, and infinite potential usage. The future trend may allow using nanoscale nutrients, different active dopants, and suitable delivery systems for biodegradable polymeric edible films in collaboration with nanotechnologies as they take a promise to improve the nutritional qualities of foods. However, nanocomposite concepts also being the motivation for novel systems in the field of edible films. Many other types of materials have been realized, and many more are on the way. However, more research is anticipated to focus on edible films and coatings’ actual practical uses in the food business. Therefore, more effort is needed to manufacture desired edible polymer films and coatings for superior functionality and processing to commercial breakthrough.

Acknowledgments

Authors thankfully acknowledge the faculty of engineering and technology, Jain University, Bangalore for support and encouragement for research.

Conflict of interest

The authors affirm that they have no affiliations or conflicts of interest that could have seemed to affect the research presented in this study.

References

  1. 1. Petersen K, Nielsen PV, Bertelsen G, Lawther M, Olsen MB, Nilsson NH, et al. Potential of biobased materials for food packaging. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 1999;10:52-68
  2. 2. Hopewell J, Dvorak R, Kosior E. Plastics recycling: Challenges and opportunities. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 2009;364(1526):2115-2126
  3. 3. Callegarin F, Gallo J-AQ , Debeaufort F, Voilley A. Lipids and biopackaging. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society. 1997;74(10):1183-1192
  4. 4. Filho JGDO, De Deus IPB, Valadares ACF, Fernandes CC, Estevam EBB, Egea MB. Chitosan film with citrus limonia essential oil: Physical and morphological properties and antibacterial activity. Colloids Interfaces. 2020;4:18
  5. 5. Cutter CN. Opportunities for bio-based packaging technologies to improve the quality and safety of fresh and further processed muscle foods. Meat Science. 2006;74:131-142
  6. 6. Hammam ARA. Technological, applications, and characteristics of edible films and coatings: A review, Dairy and Food Science Department, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USA. Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019
  7. 7. Shit SC, Shah PM. Edible polymers: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Polymers. 2014, 2014, Article ID 427259:13. DOI: 10.1155/2014/427259
  8. 8. Kokoszka S, Lenart A. Edible coatings—formation, characteristics and use—A review. Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences. 2007;57(4):399-404
  9. 9. Cerqueira MA, Bourbon AI, Pinheiro AC, Martins JT, Souza BWS, Teixeira JA, et al. Galactomannans use in the development of edible films/coatings for food applications. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 2011;22:662
  10. 10. Nur Hanani ZA, Roos YH, Kerry JP. Use and application of gelatin as potential biodegradable packaging materials for food products. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2014;71:94
  11. 11. Costa MJ, Cerqueira MA, Ruiz HA, Fougnies C, Richel A, Vicente AA. Use of wheat bran arabinoxylans in chitosan-based films: Effect on physicochemical properties. Industrial Crops and Products. 2015;66:305
  12. 12. Sánchez-Ortega I, García-Almendárez BE, Santos-López EM, Amaro-Reyes A, Barboza-Corona JE, Regalado C. Antimicrobial edible films and coatings for meat and meat products preservation. The Scientific World Journal. 2014;2014:1. Article ID 248935
  13. 13. Paula GA, Benevides NMB, Cunha AP, de Oliveira AV, Pinto AMB, Morais JPS, et al. Development and characterization of edible films from mixtures of κ-carrageenan, ι-arrageenan, and alginate. Food Hydrocolloids. 2015;47:140
  14. 14. Hosseini SF, Rezaei M, Zandi M, Farahmandghavi F. Bio-based composite edible films containing Origanum vulgare L. essential oil. Industrial Crops and Products. 2015;67:403
  15. 15. Bergo P, Sobral PJA, Prison JM. Effect of glycerol on physical properties of cassava starch films. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation. 2010;34(2):401-410
  16. 16. Slavutsky AM, Bertuzzi MA. Water barrier properties of starch films reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals obtained from sugarcane bagasse. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2014
  17. 17. Acevedo-Fani A, Salvia-Trujillo L, Rojas-Graü MA, Martín-Belloso O. Edible films from essential-oil-loaded nanoemulsions: Physicochemical characterization and antimicrobial properties. Food Hydrocolloids. 2015;47:168
  18. 18. Slavutsky AM, Bertuzzi MA. Water barrier properties of starch films reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals obtained from sugarcane bagasse. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2014;110:53
  19. 19. Shimokawa T, Togawa E, Kakegawa K, Kato A, Hayashi N. Film formation and some structural features of hemicellulose fractions from Pinus densiflora leaves. Journal of Wood Science. 2015;61:53-59
  20. 20. Oun AA, Rhim J-W. Preparation and characterization of sodium carboxymethyl cellulose/cotton linter cellulose nanofibril composite films. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2015;127:101
  21. 21. Harper BA, Barbut S, Smith A, Marcone MF. Mechanical and microstructural properties of “wet” alginate and composite films containing various carbohydrates. Journal of Food Science. 2015;80:E84
  22. 22. Zhou W, He Y, Liu F, Liao L, Huang X, Li R, et al. Carboxymethyl chitosan-pullulan edible films enriched with galangal essential oil: Characterization and application in mango preservation. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2021;256:117579. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117579
  23. 23. Nunes JC, Melo PTS, Lorevice MV, Aouada FA, de Moura MR. Effect of green tea extract on gelatin-based films incorporated with lemon essential oil. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2020;58(1):1-8. DOI: 10.1007/s13197-020-04469-4
  24. 24. Naseri HR, Beigmohammadi F, Mohammadi R, Sadeghi E. Production and characterization of edible film based on gelatin–chitosan containing Ferulago angulate essential oil and its application in the prolongation of the shelf life of turkey meat. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation. 2020;44(8):e14558
  25. 25. Al-Hashimi AG, Ammar AB, Lakshmanan G, Cacciola F, Lakhssassi N. Development of a millet starch edible film containing clove essential oil. Food. 2020;9(2):1-14. DOI: 10.3390/foods9020184
  26. 26. Hashemi SMB, Mousavi Khaneghah A. Characterization of novel basil-seed gum active edible films and coatings containing oregano essential oil. Progress in Organic Coatings. 2017;110:35-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2017.04.041
  27. 27. Otoni CG, Avena-Bustillos RJ, Olsen CW, Bilbao-Sáinz C, McHugh TH. Mechanical and water barrier properties of isolated soy protein composite edible films as affected by carvacrol and cinnamaldehyde micro and nanoemulsions. Food Hydrocolloids. 2016;57:72-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.01.012
  28. 28. Alexandre EMC, Lourenço RV, Bittante AMQB, Moraes ICF, do Sobral PJA. Gelatin-based films reinforced with montmorillonite and activated with nanoemulsion of ginger essential oil for food packaging applications. Food Packaging and Shelf Life. 2016;10:87-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.fpsl.2016.10.004
  29. 29. Moradi M, Tajik H, Razavi Rohani SM, Mahmoudian A. Antioxidant and antimicrobial effects of zein edible film impregnated with Zataria multiflora Boiss. Essential oil and monolaurin. LWT Food Science and Technology. 2016;72:37-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2016.04.026
  30. 30. Galus S, Kadzińska J. Whey protein edible films modified with almond and walnut oils. Food Hydrocolloids. 2016;52:78-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.06.013
  31. 31. Pires JRA, de Souza VGL, Fernando AL. Chitosan/montmorillonite bionanocomposites incorporated with rosemary and ginger essential oil as packaging for fresh poultry meat. Food Packaging and Shelf Life. 2018;17:142-149. DOI: 10.1016/j.fpsl.2018.06.011
  32. 32. M.R. Future Edible Packaging Market worth USD 2.14 billion by 2030, registering a CAGR of 6.79%—Report by Market Research Future (MRFR) GlobeNewswire News Room. 2021
  33. 33. Campos CA, Gerschenson LN, Flores SK. Development of edible films and coatings with antimicrobial activity. Food and Bioprocess Technology. 2011;4:849-875
  34. 34. Ko S, Janes ME, Hettiarachchy NS, Johnson MG. Physical and chemical properties of edible films containing nisin and their action against listeria monocytogenes. Journal of Food Science. 2001;66(7):1006-1011
  35. 35. Paulsen BS. Biologically active polysaccharides as possible lead compounds. Phytochemistry Reviews. 2002;1:379-387
  36. 36. Butler BL, Vergano PJ, Testin RF, Bunn JM, Wiles JL. Mechanical and barrier properties of edible chitosan films as affected by composition and storage. Journal of Food Science. 1996;61(5):953-956
  37. 37. Alves VD, Costa N, Coelhoso IM. Barrier properties of biodegradable composite films based on kappa-carrageenan/pectin blends and mica flakes. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2010;79:269-276
  38. 38. Navarro-Tarazaga ML, Massa A, Perez-Gago MB. Effect of beeswax content on hydroxypropyl methylcellulose-based edible film properties and postharvest quality of coated plums (Cv. Angeleno). LWT - Food Science and Technology. 2011;44:2328-2334
  39. 39. Guilbert S, Gontard N, Cuq B. Technology and applications of edible protective films. Packaging Technology and Science. 1995;8:339-346
  40. 40. Mellinas C, Valdes A, Ramos M, Burgos N, del Carmen Garrigos M, Jimenez A. Active edible films: Current state and future trends. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2016;133(2):42631. DOI: 10.1002/APP.42631
  41. 41. Mohamed SAA, El-Sakhawy M, El-Sakhawy MA-M. Polysaccharides, protein and lipid -based natural edible films in food packaging: A review. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2020;238:116178
  42. 42. Petkoska AT, Daniloski D, D’Cunha NM, Naumovski N, Broach AT. Edible packaging: Sustainable solutions and novel trends in food packaging. Food Research International. 2021;140:109981
  43. 43. Cazón P, Velazquez G, Ramírez JA, Vázquez M. Polysaccharide-based films and coatings for food packaging: A review. Food Hydrocolloids. 2017;68:136-148
  44. 44. Saberi B et al. Optimization of physical and optical properties of biodegradable edible films based on pea starch and guar gum. Industrial Crops and Products. 2016;86:342-352. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.04.015
  45. 45. Valdés A, Burgos N, Jiménez A, Garrigós MC. Natural pectin polysaccharides as edible coatings. Coatings. 2015;5:865-886. DOI: 10.3390/coatings5040865
  46. 46. Sachdeva A, Gupta V, Rahi RK, Neelam D. Seaweed polysaccharides based edible coatings and films: An alternative approach. International Journal of Scientific Research;12(03 (A)):41198-41206
  47. 47. Singh P, Chatli AS, Mehndiratta HK. Development of starch based edible films. International Journal of Development Research. October, 2018;08(10):23501-23506
  48. 48. Singh P, Magalhaes S, Alves L, Antunes F, Miguel M, Lindman B, et al. Cellulose-based edible films for probiotic entrapment author links open overlay panel. Food Hydrocolloids. 2019;88:68-74
  49. 49. Pop OL, Brandau T, Vodnar DC, Socaciu C. Study of bifidobacterium lactic 300b survival during encapsulation, coating and freeze drying process and the release in alkaline media. Bulletin of the University of Agricultural Sciences & Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca. Agriculture. 2012;69:372-379
  50. 50. Mihalca V, Kerezsi AD, Weber A, Gruber-Traub C, Schmucker J, Vodnar DC, et al. Protein-based films and coatings for food industry applications. Polymers. 2021;13:769. DOI: 10.3390/polym13050769
  51. 51. Adilah ZAM, Jamilah B, Hanani ZAN. Functional and antioxidant properties of protein-based films incorporated with mango kernel extract for active packaging. Food Hydrocolloids. 2018;74:207-218
  52. 52. Mousavi Khaneghah A, Hashemi SMB, Limbo S. Antimicrobial agents and packaging systems in antimicrobial active food packaging: An overview of approaches and interactions. Food and Bioproducts Processing. 2018;111:1-19
  53. 53. Parimi NS, Singh M, Kastner JR, Das KC, Forsberg LS, Azadi P. Optimization of protein extraction from spirulina platensis to generate a potential co-product and a biofuel feedstock with reduced nitrogen content. Frontiers in Energy Research. 2015;3:30
  54. 54. Soto-Sierra L, Stoykova P, Nikolov ZL. Extraction and fractionation of microalgae-based protein products. Algal Research. 2018;36:175-192
  55. 55. Cho SY, Lee SY, Rhee C. Edible oxygen barrier bilayer film pouches from corn zein and soy protein isolate for olive oil packaging. LWT - Food Science and Technology. 2010;43(8):1234-1239
  56. 56. Erdem BG, Kaya S. Edible film fabrication modified by freeze drying from whey protein isolate and sunflower oil: Functional property evaluation. Food Packaging and Shelf Life. 2022;33:100887
  57. 57. Hromis N, Lazić V, Popovic S, Suput D, Bulut S, Kravic S, et al. The possible application of edible pumpkin oil cake film as pouches for flaxseed oil protection. Food Chemistry. 2022;371(1):131197
  58. 58. Wang L-F, Rhim J-W. Preparation and application of agar/alginate/collagen ternary blend functional food packaging films. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2015 Sep;80:460-468. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.07.007 Epub 2015 Jul 15
  59. 59. Pardo-Ibáñez P, Lopez-Rubio A, Martínez-Sanz M, Cabedo L, Lagaron JM. Keratin–polyhydroxyalkanoate melt-compounded composites with improved barrier properties of interest in food packaging applications. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2014;131(4):39947. DOI: 10.1002/app.39947
  60. 60. del Rosario Moreira M, Mariana P, Marcovich NE, Roura SI. Antimicrobial effectiveness of bioactive packaging materials from edible chitosan and casein polymers: Assessment on carrot, cheese, and salami. Journal of Food Science. 2011;76(1):54-63
  61. 61. Liu X, Sun J, Gao W. Site-selective protein modification with polymers for advanced biomedical applications. Biomaterials. 2018;178:413-434
  62. 62. Farhan A, Hani NM. Active edible films based on semi-refined κ-carrageenan: Antioxidant and color properties and application in chicken breast packaging. Food Packaging and Shelf Life. 2020;24:100476
  63. 63. Pop OL, Pop CR, Dufrechou M, Vodnar DC, Socaci SA, Dulf FV, et al. Edible films and coatings functionalization by probiotic incorporation: A review. Polymers. 2020;12:12
  64. 64. Jamróz E, Kopel P, Tkaczewska J, Dordevic D, Jancikova S, Kulawik P, et al. Nanocomposite furcellaran films—The influence of nanofillers on functional properties of furcellaran films and effect on linseed oil preservation. Polymers. 2019;2046:11
  65. 65. Kasai D, Chougale R, Masti S, Chalannavar R, Malabadi RB, Gani R. Influence of Syzygium cumini leaves extract on morphological, thermal, mechanical, and antimicrobial properties of PVA and PVA/chitosan blend films. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2018;135(17):46188
  66. 66. Belitz H-D, Grosch W, Schieberle P. Food Chemistry. fourth ed. Heidelberg: Springer; 2009
  67. 67. Chow CK. Fatty Acids in Foods and their Health Implications. 3rd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2008
  68. 68. Huber KC, Embuscado ME. Edible Films and Coatings for Food Applications. New York, NY: Springer Science Business Media; 2009. pp. 2-10. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-92824-1
  69. 69. Maraw P, Verma AK. Comprehensive review on application of edible film on meat and meat products: An eco-friendly approach. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2017;57:1270-1279. DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2014.986563
  70. 70. Rhim JW, Shellhammer TH. Lipid-based edible films and coatings. In: Innovations in Food Packaging; Han, J.H., Ed.; Elsevier, 2005; pp. 362-383. DOI:10.1016/B978-012311632-1/50053-X
  71. 71. Fabra MJ, Talens P, Chiralt A. Tensile properties and water vapor permeability of sodium caseinate films containing oleic acid-beeswax mixtures. Journal of Food Engineering. 2008;85:393-400. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.07.022
  72. 72. Vargas M, Albors A, Chiralt A, Gonzalez-Martinez C. Characterization of Chitosan-oleic acid composite films. Food Hydrocolloids. 2009;23:536-547. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2008.02.009
  73. 73. Igoe RS. Dictionary of Food Ingredients. fifth ed. New York: Springer Science + Business Media; 2011
  74. 74. Rodrigues DC, Cunha AP, de Brito ES, Gallao M, De Azeredo HMC, Rodrigues DC. Mesquite seed gum and palm fruit oil emulsion edible films: Influence of oil content and sonication. Food Hydrocolloids. 2016;56:227-235
  75. 75. Vargas M, Albors A, Chiralt A. Application of chitosan-sunflower oil edible films to pork meat hamburgers. Italian Oral Surgery. 2011;1:39-43
  76. 76. Hassani F, Garousi F, Javanmard M. Edible coating based on whey protein concetrate- ricebran oil to maintain the physical and chemical properties of the kiwifruit (Actinida deliciosa). Trakia Journal of Sciences. 2012;10(1):26-34
  77. 77. Tongnuanchan P, Benjakul S, Prodpran T. Properties and antioxidant activity of fish skin gelatin film incorporated with citrus essential oils. Food Chemistry. 2012;134:1571-1579
  78. 78. Cha DS, Chinnan MS. Biopolymer-based antimicrobial packaging: A review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2004;44(4):223-237
  79. 79. Matan N. Antimicrobial activity of edible film incorporated with essential oils to preserve dried fish (Decapterus maruadsi). International Food Research Journal. 2012;19(4):1733-1738
  80. 80. Sanchez-Gonzalez L, Vargas M, Gonzalez-Martinez C, Chiralt A, Chafer M. Use of essential oils in bioactive edible coatings. Food Engineering Reviews. 2011;3:1-16
  81. 81. Khoshgozaran-Abras S, Azizi MH, Hamidy Z, Bagheripoor-Fallah N. Mechanical, physicochemical and color properties of chitosan based-films as a function of Aloe vera gel incorporation. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2012;87:2058-2062
  82. 82. Dang KTH, Singh Z, Swinny EE. Edible coatings influence fruit ripening, quality, and aroma biosynthesis in mango fruit. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2008;56:1361-1370
  83. 83. Valverde JM, Valero D, Anez-Romero DM, Guillen FN, Castillo S, Serrano M. Novel edible coating based on aloe vera gel to maintain table grape quality and safety. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2005;53:7807-7813
  84. 84. Kamper SL, Fennema ON. Water vapor permeability of an edible, fatty acid, bilayer film. Journal of Food Science. 1984;49:1482-1485
  85. 85. Tavassoli-Kafrani E, Shekarchizadeh H, Masoudpour-Behabadi M. Development of edible films and coatings from alginates and carrageenans. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2016;137:360-374. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.10.074
  86. 86. Dhumal CV, Sarka P. Composite edible films and coatings from food-grade biopolymers. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2018;55:4369-4383
  87. 87. Martins JT, Cerqueira MA, Bourbon AI, Pinheiro AC, Souza BW, Vicente AA. Synergistic effects between κ-carrageenan and locust bean gum on physicochemical properties of edible films made thereof. Food Hydrocolloids. 2012;29:280-289. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2012.03.004
  88. 88. Podshivalov A, Zakharova M, Glazacheva E, Uspenskaya M. Gelatin/potato starch edible biocomposite films: Correlation between morphology and physical properties. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2017;157:1162-1172. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.10.079
  89. 89. Suppakul P, Boonlert R, Buaphet W, Sonkaew P, Luckanatinvong V. Efficacy of superior antioxidant Indian gooseberry extract-incorporated edible Indian gooseberry puree/methylcellulose composite films on enhancing the shelf life of roasted cashew nut. Food Control. 2016;69:51-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.04.033
  90. 90. Thakur R et al. Characterization of rice starch-ι-carrageenan biodegradable edible film. Effect of stearic acid on the film properties. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2016;93:952-960. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.09.053
  91. 91. Kasai D, Chougale R, Masti S, Gouripur G, Malabadi R, Chalannavar R, et al. Preparation, characterization and antimicrobial activity of betel-leaf-extract-doped polysaccharide blend films. Green Materials. June 2021;9(2):49-68. DOI: 10.1680/jgrma.20.00014
  92. 92. Hosseini SF, Rezaei M, Zandi M, Farahmandghavi F. Development of bioactive fish gelatin/chitosan nanoparticles composite films with antimicrobial properties. Food Chemistry. 2016;194:1266-1274. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.09.004
  93. 93. Choi WS, Singh S, Lee YS. Characterization of edible film containing essential oils in hydroxypropyl methylcellulose and its effect on quality attributes of ‘Formosa’ plum (Prunus salicina L.). LWT Food Science and Technology. 2016;70:213-222. DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2016.02.036
  94. 94. Pan H, Jiang B, Chen J, Jin Z. Assessment of the physical, mechanical, and moisture-retention properties of pullulan-based ternary co-blended films. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2014;112:94-101. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.05.044
  95. 95. Zhang P, Zhao Y, Shi Q. Characterization of a novel edible film based on gum ghatti: Effect of plasticizer type and concentration. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2016;153:345-355. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.07.082
  96. 96. Razavi SMA, Mohammad Amini A, Zahedi Y. Characterisation of a new biodegradable edible film based on sage seed gum: influence of plasticiser type and concentration. Food Hydrocolloids. 2015;43:290-298. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.05.028
  97. 97. Zhang W, Chen J, Chen Y, Xia W, Xiong YL, Wang H. Enhanced physicochemical properties of chitosan/whey protein isolate composite film by sodium laurate-modified TiO2 nanoparticles. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2016;138:59-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.11.031
  98. 98. Eghbal N, Yarmand MS, Mousavi M, Degraeve P, Oulahal N, Gharsallaoui A. Complex coacervation for the development of composite edible films based on LM pectin and sodium caseinate. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2016;151:947-956. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.06.052
  99. 99. Jia D, Fang Y, Yao K. Water vapor barrier and mechanical properties of konjac glucomannan–chitosan–soy protein isolate edible films. Food and Bioproducts Processing. 2009;87:7-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.fbp.2008.06.002
  100. 100. Gu L, Wang M. Effects of protein interactions on properties and microstructure of zein–gliadin composite films. Journal of Food Engineering. 2013;119:288-298. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.05.022
  101. 101. Song HY, Shin YJ, Song KB. Preparation of a barley bran protein–gelatin composite film containing grapefruit seed extract and its application in salmon packaging. Journal of Food Engineering. 2012;113:541-547. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2012.07.010
  102. 102. Singh N, Georget DM, Belton PS, Barker SA. Physical properties of zein films containing salicylic acid and acetyl salicylic acid. Journal of Cereal Science. 2010;52:282-287. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcs.2010.06.008
  103. 103. Antoniou J, Liu F, Majeed H, Zhong F. Characterization of tara gum edible films incorporated with bulk chitosan and chitosan nanoparticles: A comparative study. Food Hydrocolloids. 2015;44:309-319. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.09.023
  104. 104. Mei J, Yuan Y, Guo Q , Wu Y, Li Y, Yu H. Characterization and antimicrobial properties of water chestnut starch–chitosan edible films. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2013;61:169-174. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.06.026
  105. 105. Benbettaïeb N, Chambin O, Karbowiak T, Debeaufort F. Release behavior of quercetin from chitosan-fish gelatin edible films influenced by electron beam irradiation. Food Control. 2016;66:315-319. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.02.027
  106. 106. Bonilla J, Sobral PJ. Investigation of the physicochemical, antimicrobial and antioxidant properties of gelatin-chitosan edible film mixed with plant ethanolic extracts. Food Bioscience. 2016;16:17-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.fbio.2016.07.003
  107. 107. Wang L, Auty MA, Kerry JP. Physical assessment of composite biodegradable films manufactured using whey protein isolate, gelatin and sodium alginate. Journal of Food Engineering. 2010;96:199-207. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2009.07.025
  108. 108. Li B, Kennedy J, Peng J, Yie X, Xie B. Preparation and performance evaluation of glucomannan–chitosan–nisin ternary antimicrobial blend film. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2006;65:488-494. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.02.006
  109. 109. Takala PN et al. Antimicrobial effect and physicochemical properties of bioactive trilayer polycaprolactone/methylcellulose-based films on the growth of foodborne pathogens and total microbiota in fresh broccoli. Journal of Food Engineering. 2013;116:648-655. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.01.005
  110. 110. Dhall RK. Advances in edible coatings for fresh fruits and vegetables: A review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2013;53(5):435-450
  111. 111. Yildirim S, Röcker B, Pettersen MK, Nilsen-Nygaard J, Ayhan Z, Rutkaite R, et al. Active packaging applications for food. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. 2018;17(1):165-199. DOI: 10.1111/1541-4337.12322
  112. 112. Kamal I. Edible films and coatings: Classification, preparation, functionality and applications- A review. Achieves of Organic and Inorganic Chemical Sciences. 2019;4(2):501-510
  113. 113. Guilbert S, Gontard N, Gorris LGM. Prolongation of the shelf life of perishable food products using biodegradable films and coatings. Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft und Technologie. 1996;29:10-17
  114. 114. Krochta JM. Proteins as raw materials for films and coatings: Definitions, current status, and opportunities. In: Gennadios A, editor. Protein-Based Films and Coatings. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2002. pp. 1-41
  115. 115. Guilbert S, Gontard N. Edible and biodegradable food packaging. In: Ackermann P, Jägerstad M, Ohlsson T, editors. Foods and Packaging Materials—Chemical Interactions. Cambridge, U.K: The Royal Society of Chemistry; 1995. pp. 159-168
  116. 116. Guilbert S, Cuq B, Gontard N. Recent innovations in edible and/or biodegradable packaging materials. Food Additives & Contaminants. 1997;14(6-7):741-751
  117. 117. Miller KS, Upadhyaya SK, Krochta JM. Permeability of D-limonene in whey protein films. Journal of Food Science. 1998;63(2):244-247
  118. 118. Wu Y, Weller CL, Hamouz F, Cuppett SL, Schnepf M. Development and application of multicomponent edible coatings and films: A review. Advances in Food and Nutrition Research. 2002;44:347-394
  119. 119. Debeaufort F, Quezada-Gallo JA, Voilley A. Edible films and coatings: tomorrow’s packaging: A review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 1998;38(4):299-313
  120. 120. Kester JJ, Fennema OR. Edible films and coatings: A review. Food Technology. 1986;48(12):47-59
  121. 121. Krochta JM. Edible protein films and coatings. In: Damodaran S, Paraf A, editors. Food Proteins and Their Applications. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1997. pp. 529-549
  122. 122. Han JH. Protein-based edible films and coatings carrying antimicrobial agents. In: Gennadios A, editor. Protein-Based Films and Coatings. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2002. pp. 485-499
  123. 123. Han JH. Antimicrobial food packaging. In: Ahvenainen R. editors. Novel Food Packaging Techniques. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, U.K. 2003. pp. 50-70
  124. 124. Baldwin EA, Nispero-Carriedo MO, Baker RA. Edible coatings for lightly processed fruits and vegetables. Hort Science. 1995;30(1):35-38
  125. 125. Park HJ. Development of advanced edible coatings for fruits. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 2000;10:254-260
  126. 126. Gennadios A, Weller CL. Edible films and coatings from wheat and corn proteins. Food Technology. 1990;44(10):63-69
  127. 127. Goswami N, Han JH, Holley RA. Effectiveness of antimicrobial starch coating containing thyme oil against Salmonella, Listeria, Campylobacter and Pseudomonas on chicken breast meat. Food Science and Biotechnology. 2009;18(2):425-431
  128. 128. Rossi-Marquez G, Garcia B, Han JH, Castaño E, Regalado C. Effect of temperature, pH, and film thickness on nisin release from antimicrobial whey protein isolate edible films. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2009;89(14):2492-2497
  129. 129. Han JH, Hwang H-M, Min S, Krochta JM. Coating of peanuts with whey protein film containing α-tocopherol and ascorbyl palmitate. Journal of Food Science. 2008;73(8):E349-E355
  130. 130. Ayala-Zavala JF, Silva-Espinoza BA, Cruz-Valenzuela MR, Leyva JM, Ortega-Ramı’rez LA, et al. Pectin-cinnamon leaf oil coatings add antioxidant and antibacterial properties to fresh-cut peach. Flavour and Fragrance Journal. 2013;28(1):39-45
  131. 131. Corrales M, Han JH, Tauscher B. Antimicrobial properties of grape seed extracts and their effectiveness after incorporation into pea starch films. International Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2009;44(2):425-433
  132. 132. Fernandez-Pan I, Royo M, Ignacio Maté J. Antimicrobial activity of whey protein isolate edible films with essential oils against food spoilers and foodborne pathogens. Journal of Food Science. 2012;77(7):M383-M390
  133. 133. Mehyar G, Blank G, Han JH, Hydamaka A, Holley RA. Effectiveness of trisodium phosphate, lactic acid and commercial antimicrobials against pathogenic bacteria on chicken skin. Food Protection Trends. 2005;25(5):351-362
  134. 134. Min SC, Harris LJ, Han JH, Krochta JM. Listeria monocytogenes inhibition by whey protein films and coatings incorporating lysozyme. Journal of Food Protection. 2005;68(11):2317-2325
  135. 135. Nussinovitch A. Water-Soluble Polymer Applications in Foods. Oxford, U.K: Blackwell Science; 2003. pp. 29-69
  136. 136. Peyron A. Lenrobage et les produits filmogenes: un nouveau mode de mballage. Viandes-et-Produits-Carnes. 1991;12(2):41-46
  137. 137. Ravishankar S, Jaroni D, Zhu L, Olsen C, McHugh T, Friedman M. Inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes on Ham and Bologna using pectin-based apple, carrot, and hibiscus edible films containing carvacrol and cinnamaldehyde. Journal of Food Science. 2012;77:M377
  138. 138. Sánchez Aldana D, Andrade-Ochoa S, Aguilar CN, Contreras-Esquivel JC, Nevárez-Moorillón GV. Antibacterial activity of pectic-based edible films incorporated with Mexican lime essential oil. Food Control. 2015;50:907
  139. 139. Aguilar KC, Tello F, Bierhalz ACK, Garnica Romo MG, Martínez Flores HE, Grosso CRF. Protein adsorption onto alginate-pectin microparticles and films produced by ionic gelation. Journal of Food Engineering. 2015;154:17
  140. 140. Larotonda FDS, Torres MD, Gonçalves MP, Sereno AM, Hilliou L. Hybrid carrageenan-based formulations for edible film preparation: Benchmarking with kappa carrageenan. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2015. DOI: 10.1002/APP.42263
  141. 141. Cian R, Salgado P, Drago S, Mauri A. Effect of glycerol and Ca+2 addition on physicochemical properties of edible carrageenan/porphyran-based films obtained from the red alga, Pyropia columbina. Journal of Applied Phycology. 2014;26:1
  142. 142. Blanco-Pascual N, Gómez-Guillén MC, Montero MP. Integral Mastocarpus stellatus use for antioxidant edible film development. Food Hydrocolloids. 2014;40:128
  143. 143. Cian RE, Salgado PR, Drago SR, González RJ, Mauri AN. Development of naturally activated edible films with antioxidant properties prepared from red seaweed Porphyra columbina biopolymers. Food Chemistry. 2014;146:6
  144. 144. Blanco-Pascual N, Montero MP, Gómez-Guillén MC. Antioxidant film development from unrefined extracts of brown seaweeds Laminaria digitata and Ascophyllum nodosum. Food Hydrocolloids. 2014;37:100
  145. 145. Arancibia MY, Alemán A, López-Caballero ME, Gómez-Guillén MC, Montero P. Development of active films of chitosan isolated by mild extraction with added protein concentrate from shrimp waste. Food Hydrocolloids. 2015;43:91
  146. 146. Santacruz S, Rivadeneira C, Castro M. Edible films based on starch and chitosan. Effect of starch source and concentration, plasticizer, surfactant’s hydrophobic tail and mechanical treatment. Food Hydrocolloids. 2015;49:89
  147. 147. Benbettaïeb N, Karbowiak T, Brachais C-H, Debeaufort F. Coupling tyrosol, quercetin or ferulic acid and electron beam irradiation to cross-link chitosan–gelatin films: A structure–function approach. European Polymer Journal. 2015;67:113
  148. 148. BenBettaïeb N, Karbowiak T, Bornaz S, Debeaufort F. Spectroscopic analyses of the influence of electron beam irradiation doses on mechanical, transport properties and microstructure of chitosan-fish gelatin blend films. Food Hydrocolloids. 2015;46:37
  149. 149. Cheng S-Y, Wang B-J, Weng Y-M. Antioxidant and antimicrobial edible zein/chitosan composite films fabricated by incorporation of phenolic compounds and dicarboxylic acids. LWT - Food Science and Technology. 2015;63:115
  150. 150. Pinto AMB, Santos TM, Caceres CA, Lima JR, Ito EN, Azeredo HMC. Starch-cashew tree gum nanocomposite films and their application for coating cashew nuts. LWT - Food Science and Technology. 2015;62:549
  151. 151. Fuciños C, Míguez M, Cerqueira M, Costa M, Vicente A, Rúa M. Microencapsulation of anthocyanins with different wall materials and its application in active biodegradable films. Food and Bioprocess Technology. 2015;8:1
  152. 152. Mohammad Amini A, Razavi SMA, Zahedi Y. The influence of different plasticisers and fatty acids on functional properties of basil seed gum edible film. International Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2015;50:1137
  153. 153. Khazaei N, Esmaiili M, Djomeh ZE, Ghasemlou M, Jouki M. Characterization of new biodegradable edible film made from basil seed (Ocimum basilicum L.) gum. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2014;102:199
  154. 154. Slavutsky AM, Bertuzzi MA. Thermodynamic study of water sorption and water barrier properties of nanocomposite films based on brea gum. Applied Clay Science. 2015;108:144
  155. 155. Slavutsky AM, Bertuzzi MA, Armada M, García MG, Ochoa NA. Preparation and characterization of montmorillonite/brea gum nanocomposites films. Food Hydrocolloids. 2014;35:270
  156. 156. Holland RV, Santangelo RA. Packaging films: New techniques in permeability measurements. CSIRO Food Research Quarterly. 1984;44:20
  157. 157. Krochta JM. Control of mass transfer in food with edible coatings and films. In: Singh RP, Wirakartakusumah MA, editors. Adances in Food Engineering. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1992. p. 517
  158. 158. ASTM D1434. Standard Test Method for Determining Gas Permeability Characteristics of Plastic Film and Sheeting. ASTM Book of Standards; 1988. p. 255
  159. 159. ISO 2556. Plastiques: Détermination du coefficient de transmission d’un gaz par les feuilles et plaques minces sous pression atmosphérique —Méthode manométrique. Paris: Association Française de Normalization; 1980
  160. 160. Karel M, Issenberg P, Ronsivalli L, Jurin V. Application of gas chromatography to the measurement of gas permeability of packaging materials. Food Technol. 1963;3:91
  161. 161. Liebermann ER, Gilbert SG, Srivinasa V. The use of gas permeability as a molecular probe for the study of cross-linked collagen structures. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences II. 1972;34:694
  162. 162. Debeaufort F, Voilley A. Aroma compound and water vapor permeability of edible Films and polymeric packagings. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 1994;42(12):2871
  163. 163. Park HJ, Weller CL, Vergano PJ, Testin RF. Permeability and mechanical properties of cellulose-based edible films. Journal of Food Science. 1993;58(6):1361
  164. 164. Silva-Weiss A, Bifani V, Ihl M, Sobral PJA, Gómez-Guillén MC. Structural properties of films and rheology of film-forming solutions based on chitosan and chitosan-starch blend enriched with murta leaf extract. Food Hydrocolloids. 2013;31:458-466
  165. 165. Wu J, Zhong F, Li Y, Shoemaker CF, Xia W. Preparation and characterization of pullulan–chitosan and pullulan–carboxymethyl chitosan blended films. Food Hydrocolloids. 2013;30(1):82-91
  166. 166. Nair SB, Jyothi AN, Sajeev MS, Misra R. Rheological, mechanical and moisture sorption characteristics of cassava starch-konjac glucomannan blend films. Starch/Staerke. 2011;63(11):728-739
  167. 167. Rossman JM. Commercial manufacture of edible films. In: Huber KC, Embuscado ME, editors. Edible Films and Coatings for Food Applications. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2009. pp. 367-390
  168. 168. Chen C-H, Kuo W-S, Lai L-S. Rheological and physical characterization of film-forming solutions and edible films from tapioca starch/decolorized hsian-tsao leaf gum. Food Hydrocolloids. 2009;23(8):2132-2140
  169. 169. Saricaoglu FT, Tural S, Gul O, Turhan S. High pressure homogenization of mechanically deboned chicken meat protein suspensions to improve mechanical and barrier properties of edible films. Food Hydrocolloids. 2018;84:135-145
  170. 170. Ma Q , Du L, Yang Y, Wang L. Rheology of film-forming solutions and physical properties of tara gum film reinforced with polyvinyl alcohol (PVA). Food Hydrocolloids. 2017b;63(Supplement C):677-684
  171. 171. Kasai D, Chougale R, Masti S, Chalannavar R, Malabadi R, Gani R. Influence of Syzygium cumini leaves extract on morphological, thermal, mechanical, and antimicrobial properties of PVA and PVA/chitosan blend films. Journal of Polymers and the Environment. 2019;27:472-488
  172. 172. Otoni CG, Avena-Bustillos RJ, Azeredo HMC, Lorevice MV, Moura MR, Mattoso LHC, et al. Recent advances on edible films based on fruits and vegetables—A review. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. 2017;16:1151-1169
  173. 173. Gaikwad KK, Singh S, Negi YS, Lee YS. The effect of transpolyisoprene/LDPE based active films on oxidative stability in roasted peanuts. Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization. 2020;14:1857-1864. DOI: 10.1007/s11694-020-00433-0
  174. 174. Ustunol Z. Edible films and coatings for meat and poultry. In: Edible Films and Coatings for Food Applications. New York, NY: Springer; 2009. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-92,824-1-8
  175. 175. Kontominas MG. Use of alginates as food packaging materials. Foods. 2020;9(10):1440. DOI: 10.3390/foods9101440
  176. 176. Konuk Takma D, Korel F. Active packaging films as a carrier of black cumin essential oil: Development and effect on quality and shelf-life of chicken breast meat. Food Packaging and Shelf Life. 2019;19:210-217. DOI: 10.1016/j.fpsl.2018.11.002
  177. 177. Oussalah M, Caillet S, Salmiéri S, et al. Antimicrobial effects of alginate-based film containing essential oils for the preservation of whole beef muscle. Journal of Food Protection. 2006;69:2364-2369. DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X-69.10.2364
  178. 178. Andevari GT, Rezaei M. Effect of gelatin coating incorporated with cinnamon oil on the quality of fresh rainbow trout in cold storage. International Journal of Food Science & Technology. 2011;46:2305-2311. DOI: 10.1111/J.1365-2621.2011.02750.X
  179. 179. Fernández-Pan I, Carrión-Granda X, Maté JI. Antimicrobial efficiency of edible coatings on the preservation of chicken breast fillets. Food Control. 2014;36:69-75. DOI: 10.1016/J.FOODCONT.2013.07.032
  180. 180. Cruz-Diaz K, Cobos Á, Fernández-Valle ME, et al. Characterization of edible films from whey proteins treated with heat, ultrasounds and/or transglutaminase application in cheese slices packaging. Food Packaging and Shelf Life. 2019;22:100397. DOI: 10.1016/j.fpsl.2019.100397
  181. 181. Costa MJ, Maciel LC, Teixeira JA, et al. Use of edible films and coatings in cheese preservation: opportunities and challenges. Food Research International. 2018;107:84-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.02.013
  182. 182. Baker RA, Baldwin EA, Nisperos-Carriedo MO. Edible coatings and films for processed foods. In: Krochta JM, Baldwin EA, Nisperos-Carriedo MO, editors. Edible Coatings and Films to Improve Food Quality. Basel: Technomic Publishing Co. Inc.; 1994. p. 89
  183. 183. Baldwin E. Edible coatings for fresh fruits and vegetables: past, present and future. In: Krochta JM, Baldwin EA, Nisperos-Carriedo MO, editors. Edible Coatings and Films to Improve Food Quality. Basel: Technomic Publishing Co. Inc.; 1994. p. 25
  184. 184. Lindstrom TR, Morimoto K, Cante CY. Edible films and coatings. In: Hui YH, editor. Encyclopedia of Food Science and Technology. New York: Wiley Interscience; 1992. p. 1
  185. 185. Mazza G, Qi H. Control after-cooking darkening in potatoes with edible film-forming products and calcium chloride. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 1991;39(10):2163-2166
  186. 186. Rojas-Graü MA, Avena-Bustillos RJ, Friedman M, Henika PR, Martín-Belloso O, McHugh TH. Mechanical, barrier, and antimicrobial properties of apple puree edible films containing plant essential oils. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2006;54(24):9262-9267. DOI: 10.1021/jf061717u
  187. 187. Wang X, Liu H, Wei J, Ma Z. Effects of oregano oil, carvacrol, cinnamaldehyde, and citral on antimicrobial, mechanical and barrier properties of carrot puree films. Proceedings SPIE 7752, PIAGENG 2010. 2011a
  188. 188. Otoni CG, de Moura MR, Aouada FA, Camilloto GP, Cruz RS, Lorevice MV, et al. Antimicrobial and physical-mechanical properties of pectin/papaya puree/cinnamaldehyde nanoemulsion edible composite films. Food Hydrocolloids. 2014;41:188-194. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.04.013
  189. 189. Espitia PJP, Batista RA, Azeredo HMC, Otoni CG. Probiotics and their potential applications in active edible films and coatings. Food Research International. 2016;90:42-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2016.10.026
  190. 190. Nelson NL, Fennema OR. Methylcellulose films to prevent lipid migration in confectionery products. Journal of Food Science. 1991;56(2):504
  191. 191. Dyrh HH, Sorensen, L.B.O. A. method for applying a hard coating on cores of edible or chewable material and coated material obtained by the method. World Patent, No. WO91/09989. 1991
  192. 192. Meyers MA. Use of edible film to prolong chewing gum shelf life. U.S. Patent No. 5286502. 1994
  193. 193. Arshad R, Sameen A, Huma N, Zia MA. Exploring the potential of active edible coating on the shelf stability of dairy products. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2020;57(1):237-244. DOI: 10.21162/PAKJAS/20.8182

Written By

Deepak R. Kasai, Devi Radhika, Raju K. Chalannavar, Ravindra B. Chougale and Bhagyavana Mudigoudar

Submitted: 14 August 2022 Reviewed: 12 September 2022 Published: 09 November 2022