Open access

Introductory Chapter: Antibiotics and Probiotics in Animal Food – Impact and Regulation

Written By

Asghar Ali Kamboh, Riaz Ahmed Leghari and Nazar Ali Korejo

Published: 04 January 2023

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.108682

From the Edited Volume

Antibiotics and Probiotics in Animal Food - Impact and Regulation

Edited by Asghar Ali Kamboh

Chapter metrics overview

84 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

In farm animals, use of antibiotics is very common since decades to control, treat, and prevent infections. The first antibiotic, i.e., penicillin, was discovered by Alexander Fleming in 1928 when he was working on Staphylococcus bacteria. Interestingly, some traces of tetracycline antibiotic were recognized in the guts of ancient mummies and skeletons from ancient Nubians (350–550 AD) showing that antibiotics were actually discovered by the peoples of old world [1]. Since discovery, penicillin was recognized as a marvel drug as it saved billions of human and animal lives. In the Second World War, penicillin was heavily used to treat troops that led to the start of antibiotic resistance due to emergence of resistant bacteria [2]. After world war, Thomas Jukes, a British-American biologist, revealed that in-feed antibiotics in poultry may help to improve performance of birds. This study makes a revolution in commercial farming and many antibiotics such as tetracycline, bacitracin, penicillin, etc., were adopted to use as growth promoters by adding a sub-therapeutic level in the feed [3]. Today, the annual business of antibiotic industry is about 25 billion USD [2].

It has been estimated that from 1961 to 2014, global meat consumption raised from 24 to 43 kg per capita. This happens due to industrialized farming practices that primarily use antibiotics to increase yields, control diseases, reduce labor costs, and contain economic risks for producers [3]. As a net result, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is increasing day by day, and currently, it is a global threat that is recognized as a “ticking time bomb” by the researchers. Because, it is estimated that dissemination frequency of AMR and its environmental reservoirs may create the superbugs in the near future [4].

The history of probiotics is as old as the use of fermented foods in human diet. The word probiotic was first used by the Lilley and Stillwell in 1965. They adopted this term from a Greek word that means “for life.” Since beginning, the word probiotic was adopted to express the microbial products (secretion) that have effect on the growth of other microorganisms. In 1974, Parker used and redefined it as “organisms and their substances which effects intestinal balance.” Later in 1989, Fuller made some modifications in the definition and defined it as “live microorganisms that beneficially affects intestinal microbial balance” [5]. Currently, probiotics are used in humans, animals, poultry, and fish farming to optimize the gut health and to reduce the chances of disease occurrence. These are well-known alterative of antibiotic growth promoters [6].

Advertisement

2. Merits and demerits of antibiotics and probiotics use

There are plenty of evidences that clearly established that use of antimicrobials in farm animals for therapeutic and/or growth promotion causes the creation of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in the environment that ultimately deteriorate the therapeutic options in human medicine [7, 8, 9]. About, 7 million deaths in hospitals have been estimated due to antibiotic-resistant infection [10]. Antibiotics that are used in food-producing animals such as poultry led to transfer of resistant bacteria to human beings via animal food. In the human gut, these bacteria may further transfer resistant genes into the non-pathogenic commensal flora [11]. It is estimated that the antibiotics used in poultry are not completely metabolized in body tissues that accumulate in meat [12] and also excreted into the environment via poultry droppings [13]. The global consumption of antibiotics is around 100,000–200,000 tons per year. Among this about 46.1% use is for animals alone (with majority of use in commercial poultry). The summary of commonly used antibiotics in poultry industry is presented in Table 1.

Antibiotic nameClassUse in poultry*
Enrofloxacin, SarafloxacinQuinolonesInfections cure
Neomycin, GentamicinAminoglycosidesInfections cure
Tylosin , ErythromycinMacrolidesInfections cure
Penicillinß-LactamsInfections cure, AGP
LincomycinLincosamidesInfections cure, AGP
BacitracinPolypeptidesAGP
Monensin, bambermycin, semduramicin, salinomycinIonophoresAGP
Chlortetracycline, oxytetracycline, tetracyclineTetracyclinesInfections cure

Table 1.

Summary of commonly used antibiotics in poultry.

AGP: Antibiotic growth promoter


Adopted from Ref. [13].

When poultry droppings used as manure in agriculture fields, then these antimicrobials enter into the soil ecosystem and made significant alterations in the soil contagious communities [14]. Moreover, crops/vegetables cultivated in such fields when consumed by humans transmit antimicrobial-resistant genes to them [10, 15].

In 1981, the American Council for Agricultural Science and Technology published a report on the use of antibiotics in feed animals [16]. Though the report did not provide any data that use of antibiotics in animals causes the emergence of resistant microorganisms that may produce drug-resistant infections in human beings; however, it started a debate on the use of antibiotics in food animals [17]. In the last decade of the twentieth century, several countries such as Sweden, Denmark, Namibia, and European Union Commission banned the use of antibiotics in food-producing animals and directed to adopted suitable alternative approaches to get optimal animal production [6].

By the start of the twenty-first century, pharmacists and nutritionists are trying to develop some alternatives to maintain or enhance farm animals’ performance and well-being. Many substitutes were tested experimentally using in vivo and vitro approaches for their effectiveness in both animals and humans. Among those tested alternatives, one is probiotics [18, 19].

Probiotics could be defined as the live microorganisms that have useful effects on the host health when fed in suitable amount [20]. These were recognized as one of the best replacements due to their multiple useful aspects for both for humans and animals [21]. Probiotic can be used to decrease the dangerous bacteria and to increase the growth and production of animals by improving gut function [22]. Probiotics have also been recommended in mice for treatment of antibiotics-induced dysbiosis [23] and in humans [24]. Probiotics include the microorganisms of various species such as bacteria, yeast, and fungi. Some probiotics of bacterial origin (namely Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Streptococcus, and Bacillus subtilis) also have antimicrobial effects against many pathogenic microbes such as Staphylococcus aureus, E. coli, Salmonella typhimurium, and Clostridium perfringens, etc. However, correct dose and proper selection of probiotics strains are important to get maximum health effects [25, 26].

Advertisement

3. Future perspective of antibiotics and probiotics use

It has been estimated that true survival and well-being of human being are hidden in chemical-free organic food production that is only possible via the use of good substitutes of synthetic growth promoters such as medicinal plants, prebiotics, probiotics, etc. [27]. Because the use of antibiotics in food-producing animals causes the creation of resistant microorganisms that disseminate to human beings via the food items (milk, meat, eggs, etc.), animal movements, food handlers and by other indirect mechanical means. Available data show that probiotics are good and feasible alternative of synthetic growth promoters to use in food-producing animals. These are known for their positive effects on GIT health. They protect the gut from pathogenic bacteria by producing selective antimicrobial substances and reducing toxin production and also enhance the digestion by stimulation of digestive enzyme synthesis. Probiotics help to restore gut mucosa, upregulate the intestinal motility, improve mucous production, and modulate the host innate immunity by stimulation of Th1 and Th2 immune components. Probiotics create cross-feeding between various bacterial strains of intestinal ecosystem and also reduce the blood cholesterol level via bile salt hydrolase action [28]. Keeping in view the available studies, probiotics could be used in the feed of animals to enhance their growth potential in combination of good animal husbandry practices. There is need of further studies concerning their mechanism of action, mode of delivery and to improve their in vivo efficacy.

References

  1. 1. Nelson ML, Dinardo A, Hochberg J, Armelagos GJ. Brief communication: Mass spectroscopic characterization of tetracycline in the skeletal remains of an ancient population from Sudanese Nubia 350-550 CE. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 2010;143(1):151-154
  2. 2. Hopwood DA. Streptomyces in Nature and Medicine: The Antibiotic Makers. New York: Oxford University Press; 2007
  3. 3. Kirchhelle C. Pharming animals: A global history of antibiotics in food production (1935-2017). Palgrave Communications. 2018;4(1):1-13
  4. 4. Abia Akebe LK, Sibanda T, Selvarajan R, El-Liethy MA, Kamika I. Environmental reservoirs of antibiotic resistance determinants: A ticking time bomb for the future emergence of super-bugs of environmental and public health importance. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2022;2022:758
  5. 5. Fuller R. History and development of probiotics. In: Probiotics. Dordrecht: Springer; 1992. pp. 1-8
  6. 6. World Health Organization. Impacts of Antimicrobial Growth Promoter Termination in Denmark. Denmark: WHO; 2003. pp. 1-57
  7. 7. Li Y, Zhu G, Ng WJ, Tan SK. A review on removing pharmaceutical contaminants from wastewater by constructed wetlands: Design, performance and mechanism. Science of the Total Environment. 2014;468:908-932
  8. 8. Zhang YJ, Hu HW, Gou M, Wang JT, Chen D, He JZ. Temporal succession of soil antibiotic resistance genes following application of swine, cattle and poultry manures spiked with or without antibiotics. Environmental Pollution. 2017;231:1621-1632
  9. 9. Kamboh AA, Shoaib M, Abro SH, Khan MA, Malhi KK, Yu S. Antimicrobial resistance in Enterobacteriaceae isolated from liver of commercial broilers and backyard chickens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research. 2018;27:627-634
  10. 10. Xie WY, Shen Q , Zhao FJ. Antibiotics and antibiotic resistance from animal manures to soil: A review. European Journal of Soil Science. 2018;69:181-195
  11. 11. Guetiya Wadoum RE, Zambou NF, Anyangwe FF, Njimou JR, Coman MM, Verdenelli MC, et al. Abusive use of antibiotics in poultry farming in Cameroon and the public health implications. British Poultry Science. 2016;57:483-493
  12. 12. Kumar K, Gupta SC, Chander Y, Singh AK. Antibiotic use in agriculture and its impact on the terrestrial environment. Advances in Agronomy. 2005;87:1-54
  13. 13. Muhammad J, Khan S, AEL H, Ditta A, Nawab J, Ali A. Antibiotics in poultry manure and their associated health issues: A systematic review. Journal of Soils and Sediments. 2020;20:486-497
  14. 14. Zhao M, Fang Y, Ma L, Zhu X, Jiang L, Li M, et al. Synthesis, characterization and in vitro antibacterial mechanism study of two Keggin-type polyoxometalates. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry. 2020;210:111131
  15. 15. Luby E, Ibekwe AM, Zilles J, Pruden A. Molecular methods for assessment of antibiotic resistance in agricultural ecosystems: Prospects and challenges. Journal of Environmental Quality. 2016;45:441-453
  16. 16. Dibner JJ, Richards JD. Antibiotic growth promoters in agriculture: History and mode of action. Poultry Science. 2005;84:634-643
  17. 17. Aarestrup F. Effects of Termination of AGP Use on Antimicrobial Resistance in Food Animals. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2003. pp. 6-11
  18. 18. Bhandary T, Riyaz AL, Paari KA. Probiotic properties of bacillus subtilis isolated from dried anchovies (stolephorus indicus) and evaluating its antimicrobial, antibiofilm and growth-enhancing potential in danio rerio. Journal of Animal Health Production. 2021;9(3):205-212
  19. 19. Kabir ME, Alam MJ, Hossain MM, Ferdaushi Z. Effect of feeding probiotic fermented rice straw-based total mixed ration on production, blood parameters and faecal microbiota of fattening cattle. Journal of Animal Health Production. 2022;10(2):190-197
  20. 20. FAO/WHO. Guidelines for the Evaluation of Probiotics in Food. London, Ontario, Canada: WHO; 2002
  21. 21. Zorriehzahra MJ, Delshad ST, Adel M, et al. Probiotics as beneficial microbes in aquaculture: An update on their multiple modes of action: A review. The Veterinary Quarterly. 2016;36:228-241
  22. 22. Alagawany M, Abd El-Hack ME, Farag MR, et al. The use of probiotics as eco-friendly alternatives for antibiotics in poultry nutrition. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2018;25:10611-10618
  23. 23. Ekmekciu I, Von KE, Fiebiger U, et al. The probiotic compound VSL#3 modulates mucosal, peripheral, and systemic immunity following murine broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. 2017;7:167
  24. 24. Hempel S, Newberry SJ, Maher AR, et al. Pobiotics for the prevention and treatment of antibiotic-associated diarrhea: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2012;307:1959-1969
  25. 25. Iannitti T, Palmieri B. Therapeutical use of probiotic formulations in clinical practice. Clinical Nutrition. 2010;29:701-725
  26. 26. Coman MM, Mazzotti L, Silvi S, Scalise A, Orpianesi C, Cresci A, et al. Antimicrobial activity of SYNBIO® probiotic formulation in pathogens isolated from chronic ulcerative lesions: In vitro studies. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2020;128(2):584-597
  27. 27. Lagua E, Ampode KM. Turmeric powder: Potential alternative to antibiotics in broiler chicken diets. Journal of Animal Health Production. 2021;9(3):243-253
  28. 28. Yaqoob MU, Wang G, Wang M. An updated review on probiotics as an alternative of antibiotics in poultry—A review. Animal Bioscience. 2022;35(8):1109

Written By

Asghar Ali Kamboh, Riaz Ahmed Leghari and Nazar Ali Korejo

Published: 04 January 2023