Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Obesity and Cardiovascular Risk

Written By

Pedro Felipe Parra Velasco

Submitted: 18 May 2022 Reviewed: 29 July 2022 Published: 06 March 2023

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.106877

From the Edited Volume

Novel Pathogenesis and Treatments for Cardiovascular Disease

Edited by David C. Gaze

Chapter metrics overview

130 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Obesity is considered a pandemic of the present century and is associated with severe noncommunicable chronic diseases, especially cardiovascular diseases, which remain the leading cause of death in the world. Visceral adiposity is a usual localization for ectopic fat depots and increases the risk of cardiovascular diseases. Endothelial dysfunction in obesity explains atherosclerosis and higher risk of incident coronary artery disease. Further microvascular disease caused by chronic inflammatory state increases cytokines and reduces the nitric oxide, and chronic inflammation has been characterized by the imbalance between proinflammatory and procoagulant and anti-inflammatory and anticoagulant activities of the endothelium to generate a procoagulant state. An important topic is the gut microbiota that influences the progression of atherosclerosis. Some studies have shown the influence of gut dysbiosis and progression of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. Additionally studies talking about overweight and obesity with coronary artery disease are explained by levels of blood pressure, cholesterol, and glucose; however, another important causative factor is the ectopic fat deposition, especially pericardial and epicardial spaces, which may further contribute to the burden of coronary atherosclerosis. So, diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases in obesity requires a lot of knowledge to suspect, diagnose, and to treat.

Keywords

  • obesity
  • cardiovascular risk
  • fatty tissue
  • atherosclerosis
  • coronary artery disease (CAD)

1. Introduction

Obesity is a disorder characterized by a disproportionate increase in body weight in relation to height, mainly due to the accumulation of fat, is considered a pandemic of the present century. It is associated with several noncommunicable chronic diseases, namely metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), cardiovascular diseases (CVD), obstructive sleeping apnea, osteoarthropathies, and cancer [1].

It is estimated that 39–49% of the world’s population (2.8–3.5 billon people) are overweight. Among adult men, the prevalence of obesity in the Hispanic, black, and white is higher than in Asians, respectively. In women, the prevalence of obesity behavior is almost the same as the men. The black women have the most prevalence following the Hispanic, white, and Asian. In addition, children and adolescents are also affected; between 2 and 19-year-olds, 17% are obese and the males and females are equally [2, 3].

Knowing that the obesity is a complex disease, the prevalence is based on racial/ethnic and sex factors. For example, among adult men, the prevalence of obesity in the Hispanic, black, and white is higher than in Asians, respectively. In women, the prevalence is almost the same as the men. The black women have the most prevalence following the Hispanic, white, and Asian showing there is a socioeconomic inequality structure as well. In addition, children and adolescents are also affected; between 2 and 19-year-olds 17% are obese and the males and females are equally [2].

In general terms, the trends in obesity prevalence around the world are getting up constantly, which means it highlights the significant impact that the obesity will continue to have on CVD the incidence, prevalence, and deaths globally.

At this time, obesity is linked to numerous diseases of the cardiovascular system: stroke, venous thromboembolic disease and pulmonary hypertension, cardiovascular disease, heart failure, arrhythmias such as atrial fibrillation, and sudden cardiac death [4].

Advertisement

2. Visceral adiposity, liver fat, and cardiovascular risk

There is a strongly correlation between overall obesity and abdominal obesity; although, there are two kinds of patients: either the ones with overall obesity but not abdominal obesity.

Abdominal obesity is linked to increased cardiovascular diseases. Along these lines, there still exists underdiagnosis to classify the CVD risk among obese patients. Trying to unmask and making a good clinical patient evaluation, organizations, expert panels, and a lot of evidence support have shown and recommended the waist circumference (WC) measurements with body mass index (BMI) applied in the clinical practice may add critical information and successful prediction of cardiovascular risk and mortality focusing on visceral adiposity.

Fortunately imaging techniques can be used to quantify adipose tissue and ectopic fat depots volumes. The National Library of Medicine described the adipose tissue as a storage of energy in the form of triacylglycerols and ectopic fat depots and is defined by excess adipose tissue in locations not classically associated with adipose tissue storage, some fat depots are more linked to risk factors for disease than others. Techniques such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are extraordinary and the most advanced in the study of human body composition and of its relationship with CVD risk. However, other techniques such as bio-impedance body composition are more available in the practice [5].

The abdominal adiposity can be divided into: obesity, subcutaneous, and visceral obesity. Overweight or obese patients with low levels of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) have been identified as having a more favorable cardiovascular risk profile, commonly known as metabolically healthy obese patients. Some recent data suggest that metabolically healthy obesity may be a transitory phenotype, the time of which may be variable by race, ethnicity, and gender. The relationship between visceral adipose tissue and cardiovascular risk is known, the first one being a clear accelerator for the development of cardiovascular diseases.

The concept called adipose tissue expandability refers to the ability of the adipocyte to be contained in the places where it normally lives. When this expansion capacity of adipose tissue is exceeded, it begins to be located in organs abnormally, developing diseases such as hepatic steatosis, which is directly related to a higher risk of developing cardiovascular events. Thus, it is important to identify that patients with increased visceral adiposity are the ones with the highest risk independent of weight.

Advertisement

3. Ectopic fat depots and CVD risk

3.1 Ectopic fat depots

Although the major known ectopic fat depot is the hepatic depot, there are other abnormal fat depots that contribute to the development of cardiovascular diseases. Some of these are: pericardial and epicardial depots despite being used many times in an undifferentiated way, they have a different anatomical locations and their relationship with cardiovascular diseases is different. The pericardial depot is located at the level of the pericardial sac and has been related to a high BMI, traditional cardiovascular risk (CVR) risk factors, and elevated atherogenic cholesterol. Additionally, the amount of pericardial fat has been associated with an increased risk of coronary heart disease, atherosclerosis, and heart failure adjusting for age, sex, BMI, and abdominal circumference; but not adjusting for traditional CVR factor and either when adjusting for levels of more atherogenic cholesterol particles [6].

VAT on the other hand represents the visceral fat contained between the external myocardium wall and the visceral lamina of the pericardium. It has been associated with a general CVR score and arterial stiffness in patients with CVD and DM2 [7].

Reports from multiple studies presented a high association between the pericardial depots and CVD. For example, a study of atherosclerosis showed the pericardial fat and a higher risk of all CVD causes, hard atherosclerotic CVD, and HF but not intra-thoracic fat [8]. Another study that analyzed all-cause mortality risk after adjustment for age, sex, lifestyle variables, lipids, glucose, and adipocytokines was higher by increment in pericardial fat, but it did not proof enough information to predict the events of CVD beyond traditional risk factors [9].

Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) is the visceral fat layer located around the heart and is believed to be important for the buffering of the coronary arteries and in providing fatty acids as a source of energy for the cardiac muscle. Reviews have shown that this deposit may be considered highly insulin resistant and also indicator of cardiovascular risk because of the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines and carotid artery stiffness. In addition, this can produce sleep apnea severity in woman independently of BMI, and this last one is associated with higher CVD risk [10, 11].

Currently, the way to reduce the announced ectopic fat (adipose tissue depots) has been investigated. There are a lot of nonpharmacological strategies to be applied based on lifestyle interventions, some authors dare to say could be more effective than pharmacological therapies. One of those strategies are exercises such as aerobic in nature, which may reduce VAT unchanged on weight loss; and reports of losing VAT by only resistance and high-intensity raining are equivocal [12, 13]. Thus, exercise interventions not just can decrease the VAT, apparently have impact in reducing hepatic, epicardial, and pericardial fat. However, there is not enough information to support a significant reduction in epicardial fat with exercise as the caloric restriction strategy to reduce it [14].

The recommendation for physical activity of 150 min per week may be sufficient to reduce VAT with no further reduction with additional activity. It is very important to highlight that exercise can reduce VAT even in the absence of weight loss [15].

According to data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, central obesity has higher risk of cardiovascular mortality compared with patients with the same BMI but without central adiposity. This has been called normal weight central obesity and expected survival estimates were consistently lower for those with central obesity when controlled for age and BMI [16, 17].

Advertisement

4. Endotelial disfunction

4.1 Atherosclerosis in obesity

The process to atherosclerosis begins with fatty streaks resulting in thickening of the intima arterial layer. Obesity is considered a storm, which accelerates this process by several mechanisms such as insulin resistance through adipocytokines, endothelial dysfunction, hypercoagulability, and inflammation. The VAT makes systemic and vascular inflammation that promotes atherogenesis. Further, insulin resistance has been associated to metabolic syndrome, proinflammatory, and prothrombotic states.

Endothelial dysfunction in obesity has two principal causes: diminished bioavailability of nitric oxide and increased oxidative stress. A good marker of early atherosclerosis is carotid intima media thickness [18].

Several prospective epidemiological studies demonstrate that obesity and higher risk of incident coronary artery disease (CAD) are strongly linked. Excess visceral fat rather than body weight has been linked to increased risk of cardiovascular events. BMI, higher measures of central adiposity, including WC and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), were aligned with a higher risk of CAD and cardiovascular mortality independently of BMI [19, 20].

Another important concept is the duration of obesity and abdominal adiposity, expressed as excess BMI-years and WC-years, which are stronger predictors of CAD, highlighting these measurements must be evaluated together [21].

4.2 Microvascular disease and obesity

The chronic inflammatory conditions developed from the obesity are linked to abnormalities in the coronary microvasculature. Coronary microvascular disease is pathophysiologically associated with endothelial dysfunction and possibly to small vessel remodeling and also disturbing coronary blood flow; this microvascular disease is independently associated with higher BMI [22].

Obesity has implications in macrophages and adipocytes that generate a proinflammatory state that increases the cytokines and reduces the nitric oxide. All this cascade promotes endothelial dysfunction (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

OBESTITY and PROINFLAMATORY STATE.

Proinflamatory state:

IL1β, IL 6, Leptin, TNFα, PCR,
NO.

Endothelial Dysfunction:

ROS, angiotensinogen, calprotectin
NO, Ghrelin.

Metabolic disorders: Changes in glucose and lipid metabolism, insulin resistance, hypertension, atherosclerosis.

IL1 β: Interleukin 1 β, IL6: Interleukin 6, TNF Tumor Necrosis Factor, Nitric Oxide, ROS: Reactive Oxygen Species.

Normally the endothelium regulates vascular homeostasis; it is the natural inner lining of the vessels. Its layers are: tunica intima, tunica media, and the vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC). But there is a combination-coordination of multiple factors such as blood flow, distribution of nutrients, hormones, and other macronutrients, and migration and proliferation of VSMC. The VSMC is an important component of vessel wall remodeling in response to injury, which controls coagulation and fibrinolysis activities, reduces vascular tone and regulates cellular and vascular adhesions, inhibits leukocyte adhesions, and modulates inflammatory activities and angiogenesis (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Endothelial dysfunction and obesity.

Vasodilators: Apelin, H2S, NO, PGI2, IgF1.

Permeability: NO, VEGF, ROS, PGI2, PAI1, FGF, Leptin.

Anticoagulant factors: Anti thrombin III, Thrombomodulin.

Angiogenic factors: FGF, TGFβ, VEGF.

Vasoconstrictors: ROS, VCAM, PgH2, Ang II, Resistin.

Inflammatory mediators: Leucotriens, integrins Inmunoglobulins.

Procoagulant factors: TF, PAF, vWF, TXA2, PAI.

Proliferation: NO, TxA2, ROS, PgH2.

H2S: Hydrogen Sulfide, NO: Nitric Oxide, PGI2: Proctaciclin, IgF1: Insulin Like growth factor 1, VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor, PAI1: Plaminogen Activator Inhibitor, FGF: Fibroblast Growth Factor, TGFβ: Transforming Growth Factor β, ROS: Reactive Oxygen Species, VCAM: Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule1, PgH2: Prostaglandin H2, Ang II: Angiotensin II, TF: Tissue Factor; vWF: Von Willebrand Factor, PAF: Platelet Activating Factor, TXA2: thromboxane A2, PAI: Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor1.

Nevertheless, the endothelial dysfunction is usually characterized by the disrupt between secretion and release of vasoconstriction and vasodilation agents, pushing the vascular endothelial toward prothrombotic and proatherogenic effects [23].

Secondly, the distorted provokes that the leukocyte adhesion, activation of platelets, pro-oxidation of mitogens, impaired PGI2, coagulation, and nitric oxide (NO) productions are the features or ¨faulty physiological properties¨ resulted from a dysfunction of endothelium, as well decreased synthesis of EDHF, and vasoconstriction factors including Ang II and prostaglandin (PGH2), atherosclerosis, and thrombosis (Figure 3) [23].

Figure 3.

Proinflamatory and anti-inflammatory state in obesity.

The major participating agents of endothelial dysfunction in obesity include: insulin resistance, oxidized form of low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL), adipose tissues related inflammation, and decreased NO bioavailability. Others such as elevated production of ROS and arginase, advanced glycation end products (RAGE), and phenotypic alterations in perivascular adipose tissue result in mild inflammation and elevated leptin with subsequent reduction of adiponectin secretions [24].

Further obesity generates a procoagulant state, which is explained by several mechanisms:

  1. Adipose tissue in obesity secretes decreased levels of adiponectin, thereby facilitating the susceptibility of platelets aggregation with the subsequent increased PAI-1 production, which further inhibits fibrinolysis.

  2. Macrophages found in adipose tissue also produce TF, which combines with the elevated liver secretion of FVII and FVIII to promote the possibility of coagulation abnormalities.

  3. Inflammation has been characterized by the imbalance between proinflammatory and procoagulant, and anti-inflammatory and anticoagulant activities of the endothelium, leading to disturbance of the hemostatic system.

4.3 Endothelial dysfunction, epigenetic modifications, and vascular calcification

Epigenetic modifications such as DNA methylation and histone acetylation are described. Previous studies have recognized changes in expression of methyltransferase linked with hypomethylation of hypermethylated genomic regions. These findings are linked between epigenetic modifications and atherosclerosis.

Vascular calcification (VC) is one of the mechanisms that influences vascular remodeling due to the differentiation of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), alterations in elastin, collagen, and endothelial dysfunction. VC increases the chances of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity, especially in individuals with obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and chronic kidney disease [25]. Several studies have identified the correlation between ROS generation, particularly H2 O2 (hydrogen peroxide), and the progression of vascular calcification. An elevated level of ROS triggers MMP (matrix metalloproteinase) activity and alteration in collagen and elastin deposition [26].

4.4 How the gut microbiota affects on vascular endothelium

Gut microbiota is the collection of bacteria that inhabitat gastrointestinal tract and have many repercussions in health. Several studies have indicated that gut microbiota plays a contributing role in atherosclerosis through modulating inflammation and the secretion of microbial metabolites. Recent studies have shown the influence of gut disbiosis and progression of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. Bacteria such as Akkermansia muciniphila promote barrier function and have attenuating effect against atherosclerosis [27].

Scientists have found that the relative abundance of Roseburia and Eubacterium was lower, while Collinsella was higher in atherosclerosis patients compared with healthy controls [28].

Variety of metabolites are derived from the gut microbiota, as well as co-metabolism of gut microbiota such as amines methylamines, polyamines, short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), and secondary bile acids (BAs). SCFAs are a group of well-established gut microbial metabolites that are critically involved in metabolic diseases [27].

Diet has an important role in biodiversity of microbiome and hemostasis for maintaining human health. Disbiosis has been associated with progression of various diseases including CVD, obesity, diabetes, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, and some types of cancer.

4.5 Molecular endothelial dysfunction in obesity

There are many bioquimical makers of endothelial dysfunction: first MCP1 (monocyte chemotactic and activating factor). This protein is synthesized by several types of cells, including inflammatory and inflammation-mediated cells, monocytic cells, human tubular epithelial cells (TECs), and renal-mediated cells in response to various stimuli and when joint to chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2) initiates various monocyte-mediated proinflammatory signals and monocyte chemoattractant activities, facilitating monocytes migration to the subendothelium and combines with ox-LDL to form foam cells, forming a fatty streak and eventual atherosclerotic plaque (Figure 4) [29].

Figure 4.

Bioquimical markers of endothelial dysfunction.

Advertisement

5. Obesity and atherosclerosis

Obesity increases morbidity and mortality especially when associated to hypertension and CAD [30].

Obesity is associated with overt atherosclerotic lesions even after accounting for the impact of these metabolic cardiovascular risk factors. The association of obesity with raised atherosclerotic lesions among men in the Pathobiological Determinants of Atherosclerosis in Youth study was present only for those with a thick abdominal panniculus, indicating the fundamental role of central adiposity in the development of atherosclerotic disease [31]. Chronic inflammation induced by obesity increases the likelihood of low-density lipoprotein oxidation, which promotes atherogenesis [32]. Other factors together increase atherosclerosis are insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome.

Endothelial dysfunction in obesity is principally caused by diminished bioavailability of nitric oxide in the setting of inflammation and oxidative stress [33].

A prospective study published by Whintlock et al. describes an increase of probability of mortality stroke in a range of 25–50 kg/m2, each 5 kg/m2 is associated with 40% higher stroke mortality. A prospective cohort study with 3.2 million person-year by follow-up from 1964 to 2015 concluded that overweight and obesity shortened longevity and increased lifetime risk [34].

There are important differences in obesity according to gender that must be taken into account, such as the impact of hormones in women against the development of atherosclerosis.

Before menopause, women generally have greater vagal than sympathetic tone, and lower levels of total cholesterol and LDL-C than men. Additionally, differences in glucose and lipid metabolism, sex hormones, and cytokine production are thought to explain why men are at an increased risk of CVD [35, 36]. This recalls the protective effect of estrogens in maintaining health and distribution of body fat. This is likely explained by the aforementioned differences in hormone-driven patterns of fat distribution, with men more likely to deposit visceral fat, compared with subcutaneous fat in women, considering that visceral fat has been associated with greater cardiometabolic risk [37, 38].

Obesity is characterized by an increased risk of diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia, and independently associated with CVD. Several prospective epidemiological studies demonstrate that obesity is associated with higher risk of incident coronary artery disease [39]. There are controversies if obesity causes high risk of CVD or the complications of obesity are the cause of them. Some large prospective analyses have indicated that the link between obesity and CAD is mediated largely by hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, and other comorbidities, whereas other prospective studies suggest a significant residual CAD risk in obesity even after accounting for these risk factors [40].

A meta-analysis of 21 studies including 1.8 million individuals suggested that approximately half of the associations of overweight and obesity with CAD are explained by levels of blood pressure, cholesterol, and glucose [41]. There are three mechanisms linked to metabolic syndrome, that is, production of adipocytokines, oxidative stress, and a prothrombotic state [42].

Other important causative factor is the ectopic fat deposition, especially pericardial and epicardial spaces, which may further contribute to the burden of coronary atherosclerosis [43].

Some studies of pathobiology have shown that arteries with intramyocardial course in perfect condition could have atherosclerosis in epicardial segment of the same artery. Thus, local production of adipocytokines by epicardial fat may modulates blood vessel biology through paracrine signaling or through vasa vasorum [44].

Advertisement

6. Diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) in obesity

CAD has been associated with higher measures of central adiposity, including WC and WHR inclusive those with normal weight and BMI. The degree and duration of obesity expressed as excess BMI years and WC years are stronger predictors of CAD [21].

Many changes can occur in the patients with CAD. There are noninvasive and invasive modalities to assess CAD in patients with obesity. These will be described below.

6.1 Noninvasive CAD assessment

6.1.1 Electrocadiography

Obesity has the potential to affect the ECG in several ways: displacing the heart by elevating the diaphragm in the supine position, increasing the cardiac workload, and increasing the distance between the heart and the recording electrodes.

Several electrocardiographic changes are associated with obesity (Table 1).

Table 1.

Electrocardiographic changes in importance order.

More frequent ST-segment depression is seen in patients with overweight and CAD, and insulin concentration may be related to the development of the ST-segment depression over time [21].

6.1.2 Treadmill stress test

Many patients with obesity fail to achieve 80–85% of the age-predicted heart rate needed for diagnostically valid results.

Chronotropic competence can be reduced in obesity, with a prior study showing that peak heart rate, heart rate recovery, and chronotropic index are lower in patients with obesity, regardless of fitness level [45].

6.1.3 Stress ecocardiography

Stress echocardiography is highly feasible in most cases for patients with obesity through either physiological stress (treadmill exercise) or pharmacological stress (dobutamine).

However, stress echocardiography is highly operator-dependent and can be limited in the presence of poor acoustic windows related to pulmonary disease, breast size, obesity, and respiratory motion. Contrast study in obesity patients is suggested because the sensitivity is better than without contrast. Contrasted images improved sensitivity and specificity (82% vs 70% and 78% vs. 67%, respectively) [46].

6.1.4 PET (positron emission tomography) rubidium

PET rubidium has a 91% sensitivity and 89% specificity and produces less irradiation exposure, better quality of images, a greater degree of diagnosis, reduces invasive examination, and low cardiac death rates in obesity [47].

Therefore, PET rubidium is the nuclear imaging technique of choice for patients with obesity.

6.1.5 Stress cardiac MRI (magnetic resonance imaging)

Stress cardiac MRI and PET are likely the diagnostic techniques least affected by obesity.

The presence of ischemia predicted adverse events at 5 years of follow-up, regardless of whether scar was present. Lack of inducible ischemia is associated with a low annual major adverse coronary events (MACEs) rate of 0.3% at 2 years in patients with obesity [48].

6.1.6 CT calcium score

CAC (coronary artery calcium) is a marker of atherosclerosis that is predictive of cardiovascular events. This technique offers the possibility of determining the presence and extent of calcified coronary artery plaque. Some studies suggest that waist circumference (WC) and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) provide more useful prognostic information than BMI on the likelihood of elevated CAC. This concept emphasizes the importance of abdominal obesity and pathophysiology of atherosclerosis [49].

6.1.7 Cardiac CT coronary angiography

CT coronary angiography is an alternative for the quantification of calcified or noncalcified plaque. This approach is useful in specific subset of symptomatic patients with obesity or when stress test is equivocal, uninterpretable stress test, or in cases when a discrepancy exists between clinical presentation and stress test results. This technique allows evaluation of luminal stenosis and plaque characterization and quantification [50].

One major challenge with CT coronary angiography is that image quality degrades as BMI increases; this degradation increases in background noise. In patients with overweight can reduce signal-to-noise ratio, and low vessel opacification may occur when contrast is inspected.

6.2 Invasive evaluation of CAD in obesity

6.2.1 Coronary angiography

Patients undergoing catheterization have potential difficulties: suboptimal radiographic visualization, vascular access laborious, bleeding, radial access is preferred in obesity patients because it has been associated with three times lower rate of complications than transfemoral access and higher radiation exposure to both patients with obesity and staff [51].

6.2.2 PCI and obesity

In the Cath PCI Registry after multivariable adjustment obesity was independently associated with a greater mortality rate and lower bleeding rate. Adequate anticoagulation is important in this subpopulation [52, 53]. Another study reported that patients with severe obesity have major risk of contrast-induced nephropathy. Dialysis and vascular complications, gastrointestinal bleeding, and MACE (Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events) are not statistically different [54].

6.2.3 Intravascular ultrasound

Several intravascular imaging techniques such as intravascular ultrasound, virtual histology intravascular ultrasound, and optical coherence tomography allow in vivo assessment of plaque burden, plaque morphology, and response to therapy.

Abdominal visceral adiposity independently predicted the presence and extent of noncalcified coronary plaque that also contained multiple features of plaque vulnerability [55].

The appropriate choice of test to assess CVD depends on local expertise, the relative strengths and weaknesses of each modality, and individual patient characteristics that contribute to the pretest likelihood of CVD and the risk/benefit ratio of using a given modality.

Advertisement

7. Clinical management, treatment, and secondary cardiac disease

Obesity paradox refers to the fact that although obesity increases the risk of CVD for those who had already an CVD, excess weight is not a risk factor to develop adverse outcomes including death [56].

Although weight loss would be believed to significantly benefit cardiovascular outcomes, this benefit has only been shown in weight loss performed through bariatric surgery in which more than 10–15% of body weight is lost; therefore, that modest weight loss has not been shown to impact cardiovascular outcomes [57, 58].

To treat obesity requires a multidisciplinary management in which the eating pattern, amount of exercise, stress, sleep pattern are evaluated. So, it is not enough exercise and nutrition to evaluate all the factors related to weight gain together.

Some clinical trials demonstrate the cardiovascular impact of Mediterranean diet in reducing MACE in patients with high cardiovascular risk. However, lifestyle changes in diabetes patients have failed to show a significant reduction in MACE, only those with weight loss greater than 10% had significant results [59, 60].

Pharmacological treatment has impact on weight reduction as well. For example, liraglutide has been shown to reduce death by 13% and 22% from cardiovascular causes in patients with type 2 diabetes in LEADER trial [61].

Recently semaglutide at 2.4 mg dose in obese patients without diabetes has demonstrated a significant body weight reduction (14.9% vs. 2.4% with placebo). In total, 69% of body weight reduction ≥10% at 68 weeks and 50% body weight reduction ≥15% .

Further reduction in waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, and improvement of physical function [62].

Orlistat was approver in 1998 for the treatment of obesity and demonstrated 37% reduction in progression from prediabetes to diabetes and significant reduction of associated disease such as hypertension and blood lipid levels [63].

Naltrexone SR/Bupropion SR is another drug approved in the United States for the treatment of obesity and has cardiovascular security trial (LIGHT trial – Cardiovascular Outcomes Study of Naltrexone SR/Bupropion SR in Overweight and obese subjects with cardiovascular risk factors). Bupropion suppresses appetite transiently due to an endorphin-mediated mechanism of action. Naltrexone blocks the endorphin, which allows a long-term appetite suppression effect [64]. However, because of the early unanticipated termination of the trial, it is not possible to assess non-inferiority to the prespecified upper limit of 1.4. Consequently, the cardiovascular safety of this treatment remains uncertain and will require evaluation in a new adequately powered outcome trial.

Lorcaserine was approved in the obesity treatment but recently was removed for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), due to a possible increased risk of cancer [65].

Finally, patients with body mass index greater than 35 kg/m2 with comorbidities or greater than 40 kg/m2 without them get benefit from bariatric surgery. Non-randomized prospective studies desmonstrated a reduction of cardiovascular death in this group of patients [66].

Advertisement

8. Conclusions

In conclusion, obesity patients have an important difference than patients with normal weight. First, the chronic inflammation is the principal cause of molecular and cellular changes that have been linked to development of chronic diseases and manifestations due to decreased expansibility of adipose tissue. Endothelial dysfunction is an important factor that contributes to vascular calcification and atherosclerosis. In addition, the intestinal microbiota plays an important role in the development and inflammation of atherosclerotic plaque. Obesity is linked to major risk of CVD and is directly proportional to the amount of excess weight, it can be explained by blood pressure, cholesterol, and glucose levels. Diagnosis must be evaluated according to the risk and the clinical probability of suffering an event, evaluating the expected changes at the electrocardiographic level that can lead to overdiagnosis. Finally, remember that there are currently multiple noninvasive studies for the early diagnosis of cardiovascular disease, which have allowed more timely diagnoses to be made in obese patients.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1. Rangel-Huerta OD, Pastor-Villaescusa B, Gil A. Are we close to defining a metabolomic signature of human obesity? A systematic review of metabolomics studies. Metabolomics. 13 Jun 2019;15(6):93. DOI: 10.1007/s11306-019-1553-y. PMID: 31197497; PMCID: PMC6565659
  2. 2. Flegal KM, Kruszon-Moran D, Carroll MD, Fryar CD, Ogden CL. Trends in obesity among adults in theunited states, 2005 to 2014. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2016;315(21):2284-2291
  3. 3. Bray GA, Heisel WE, Afshin A, Jensen MD, Dietz WH, Long M, et al. The science of obesity management: An endocrine society scientific statement. Endocrine Reviews. 2018;39(2):79-71
  4. 4. Heit JA, Spencer FA, White RH. The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism. Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis. 2016;41:3-14. DOI: 10.1007//s11239-015-1311-6
  5. 5. Sahakyan KR, Somers VK, Rodriguez-Escudero JP, Hodge DO, Carter RE, Sochor O, et al. Normal-weight central obesity: Imlications for total and cardiovascular mortality. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2015;163:827-835. DOI: 10.7326/M14-2525
  6. 6. Larsen BA, Laughlin GA, Saad SD, Barrett-Connor E, Allison MA, Wassel CL. Pericardial fat is associated with all casus mortality but not incidente CVD: The rancho Bernardo study. Atherosclerosis. 2015;239:470-475. DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.02.022
  7. 7. Al-Talabany S, Mordi I, Graeme Houston J, Colhoun HM, Weir-McCall JR, Matthew SZ, et al. Epicardial adipose tissue is related to arterial stiffness and inflammation in patients with cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders. 2018;18:31. DOI: 10.1186/s12872-018-0770-z
  8. 8. Shah RV, Anderson A, Ding JZ, Budoff M, Rider O, Petersen SE, et al. Pericardial, but not hepatic, fat by CT is associated with cv outcomes and structure: The multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. JACC Cardiovascular Imaging. 2017;10:1016-1027. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.10.024
  9. 9. Larsen BA, Laughlin GA, Saad SD, Barrett-Connor E, Allison MA, Wassel CL. Pericardial fat is associated with all-cause mortality but not incident CVD: The rancho Bernardo. Study. Atherosclerosis. 2015;239:470-475. DOI: 10.10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.02.022
  10. 10. Iacobellis G. Local and systemic effects of the multifaceted epicardial adipose tissue depot. Nature Reviews Endocrinology. Jun 2015;11(6):363-371. DOI: 10.1038/nrendo.2015.58. Epub 2015 Apr 7. PMID: 25850659
  11. 11. St-Onge MP, Grandner MA, Brown D, Conroy MB, Jean-Louis G, Coons M, et al. On behalf of the American Heart Association obesity, behavior change, diabetes, and nutrition committees of the council on lifestyle and Cardiometabolic health; council on cardiovascular disease in the young; council on clinical cardiology; and stroke council. Sleep duration and quality: Impact. Association. Circulation. 2016;134:e367-e386
  12. 12. Verheggen RJ, Maessen MF, Green DJ, Hermus AR, Hopman MT, Thijssen DH. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of exercise training versus hypocaloric diet: Distinct effects on body weight and visceral adipose tissue. Obesity Reviews. 2016;17:664-690. DOI: 10.1111/obr.12406
  13. 13. Hintze LJ, Messier V, Lavoie MÉ, Brochu M, Lavoie JM, Prud’homme D, et al. A one-year resistance training program following weight loss has no significant impact on body composition and energy expenditure in postmenopausal women living with overweight and obesity. Phyisiology Behaviour. 15 May 2018;189:99-106. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.03.014. Epub 2018 Mar 13. PMID: 29549030
  14. 14. Rabkin SW, Campbell H. Comparison of reducing epicardial fat by exercise, diet or bariatric surgery weight loss strategies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obesity Reviews. 2015;2015(16):406-415. DOI: 10.1111/obr.12270
  15. 15. Friedenreich CM, Neilson HK, O’Reilly R, Duha A, Yasui Y, Morielli AR, et al. Effects of a high vs moderate volume of aerobic exercise on adiposity outcomes in postmenopausal women: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncology. 2015;1:766-776. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2239
  16. 16. Sahakyan KR, Somers VK, Rodriguez-Escudero JP, Hodge DO, Carter RE, Sochor O, et al. Normal-weight central obesity: Implications for total and cardiovascula mortality. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2015;163:827-835
  17. 17. Coutinho T, Goel K, de Sa DC, Carter RE, Hodge DO, Kragelund C, et al. Combining body mass index with measures of central obesity in the assessment of mortality in subjects with coronary disease: Role of normal weight central obesity. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2013;61:553-560. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.10.035
  18. 18. De Michele M, Panico S, Iannuzzi A, Celentano E, Ciardullo AV, Galasso R, et al. Association of obesity and central fat distribution with carotid artery wall thickening in middle-aged women. Stroke. 2002;33:2923-2928. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.0000038989.90931.be
  19. 19. Romero-Corral A, Somers VK, Sierra-Johnson J, Korenfeld Y, Boarin S, Korinek J, et al. Normal weight obesity: A risk factor for cardiometabolic dysregulution and cardiovascular mortality. European Heart Journal. 2010;31:737-746. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp487
  20. 20. Sahakyan KR, Somers VK, Rodriguez-Escudero JP, Hodge DO, Carter RE, Sochor O, et al. Normal-weight central obesity: Implications for total and cardiovascular mortality. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2015;163:827-835. DOI: 10.7326/M14-2525
  21. 21. Reis JP, Allen N, Gunderson EP, Lee JM, Lewis CE, Loria CM, et al. Excess body mass index- and waist circumference-years and incident cardiovascular disease: The CARDIA study. Obesity. 2015;23:879-885. DOI: 10.1002/oby.21023
  22. 22. Kwaifa IK, Bahari H, Yong YK, Md NS. Endothelial dysfunction in obesity-induced inflammation: Molecular mechanisms and clinical implications. Biomolecules. 2020;10(2):291
  23. 23. Sena CM, Pereira AM, Seica R. The endothelial dysfunction-a major mediator of diabetic vascular disease. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2013;1832:2216-2231
  24. 24. Olive M, Harten I, Mitchell R, Beers JK, Djabali K, Cao K, et al. Cardiovascular pathology in Hutchinson-Gilford progeria: Correlation with the vascular pathology of ageing. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2010;30:2301-2309
  25. 25. Omar A, Chatterjee TK, Tang Y, Hui DY, Weintraub NL. The proinflammatory phenotype of perivascular adipocytes. Atherosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology. 2014;34:1631-1636
  26. 26. Gerhard M, Roddy MA, Creager SJ, Creager MA. Aging progressively impairs endothelium-dependent vasodilation in forearm resistance vessels of humans. Hypertension. 1996;27:849-853ç
  27. 27. Li X, Shimizu Y, Kimura I. Gut microbial metabolite short-chain fatty acids and obesity. Bioscience, Microbiota Food Health. 2017;36:135-140
  28. 28. Karlsson FH, Fak F, Nookaew I, Tremaroli V, Fagerberg B, Petranovic D, et al. Symptomatic atherosclerosis is associated with an altered gut metagenome. Nature Communications. 2012;3:1245. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2266
  29. 29. Zhang X, Liu X, Shang H, Xu Y, Qian M. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 induces endothelial cell apoptosis in vitro through a p53-dependent mitochondrial pathway. Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica. 2011;43:787-795
  30. 30. Rocha VZ, Libby P. Obesity, inflammation, and atherosclerosis. Nature Reviews. Cardiology. 2009;6(6):399-409. DOI: 10.1038/nrcardio.2009.55
  31. 31. Zieske AW, Malcom GT, Strong JP. Natural history and risk factors of atherosclerosis in children and youth: The PDAY study. Pediatric Pathology & Molecular Medicine. 2002;21:213-237. DOI: 10.1080/15227950252852104
  32. 32. Romero-Corral A, Somers VK, Sierra-Johnson J, Korenfeld Y, Boarin S, Korinek J, et al. Normal weight obesity: A risk factor for cardiometabolic dysregulation and cardiovascular mortality. European Heart Journal. 2010;31:737-746. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp487
  33. 33. Engin A. Endothelial dysfunction in obesity. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. 2017;960:345-379. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-48382-5_15
  34. 34. Prospective Studies C, Whitlock G, Lewington S, Sherliker P, Clarke R, Emberson J, et al. Body-mass index and cause-specific mortality in 900 000 adults: Collaborative analyses of 57 prospective studies. Lancet. 2009;373(9669):1083-1096. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60318-4
  35. 35. Khan SS, Ning H, Wilkins JT, Allen N, Carnethon M, Berry JD, et al. Association of body mass index with lifetime risk of cardiovascular disease and compression of morbidity. JAMA Cardiology. 2018;3(4):280-287. DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.0022
  36. 36. Song X, Tabak AG, Zethelius B, Yudkin JS, Soderberg S, Laatikainen T, et al. Obesity attenuates gender differences in cardiovascular mortality. Cardiovascular Diabetology. 2014;13(1):144. DOI: 10.1186/s12933-014-0144-5
  37. 37. Varlamov O, Bethea CL, Roberts CT Jr. Sex-specific differences in lipid and glucose metabolism. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2014;5:241
  38. 38. Sironi AM, Petz R, De Marchi D, Buzzigoli E, Ciociaro D, Positano V, et al. Impact of increased visceral and cardiac fat on cardiometabolic risk and disease. Diabetic Medicine. 2012;29(5):622-627. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03503.x
  39. 39. Calle EE, Thun MJ, Petrelli JM, Rodriguez C, Heath CW Jr. Body-mass index and mortality in a prospective cohort of U.S. adults. betwen multiple cardiovascular risk factors and atherosclerosis in children and young adults. N Engl J Med. 198;338:1650-1656. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199806043382302
  40. 40. Hubert HB, Feinleib M, McNamara PM, Castelli WP. Obesity as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease: A 26-year follow-up of participants in the Framingham heart study. Circulation. 1983;67:968-977. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.67.5.968
  41. 41. Lu Y, Hajifathalian K, Ezzati M, Woodward M, Rimm EB, Danaei G. Global burden of metabolic risk factors for chronic diseases collaboration (BMI mediated effects). Metabolic mediators of the effects of body-mass index, overweight, and obesity on coronary heart disease and stroke: A pooled analysis of 97 prospective cohorts with 1·8 million participants. Lancet. 2014;383(9921):970-983. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61836-X
  42. 42. Grundy SM. Metabolic syndrome update. Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2016;26:364-373. DOI: 10.1016/j.tcm.2015.10.004
  43. 43. Shimabukuro M, Hirata Y, Tabata M, Dagvasumberel M, Sato H, Kurobe H, et al. Epicardial adipose tissue volume and adipocytokine imbalance are strongly linked to human coronary atherosclerosis. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2013;33:1077-1084. DOI: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.112.300829
  44. 44. Ishii T, Asuwa N, Masuda S, Ishikawa Y. The effects of a myocardial bridge on coronary atherosclerosis and ischaemia. J Pathol. 1998;185:4-9
  45. 45. Adachi H, Hashimoto R, Tsuruta M, Jacobs DR Jr, Crow RS, Imaizumi T. Hyperinsulinemia and the development of ST-T electrocardiographic abnormalities: An 11-year follow-up study. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:1688-1692. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.20.11.1688
  46. 46. Gondoni LA, Titon AM, Nibbio F, Augello G, Caetani G, Liuzzi A. Heart rate behavior during an exercise stress test in obese patients. Nutrition, Metabolism, and Cardiovascular Diseases. 2009;19:170-176. DOI: 10.1016j.numecd.2008.07.001
  47. 47. Hu SJ, Liu SX, Katus HA, Luedde M. The value of contrast dobutamine stress echocardiography on detecting coronary artery disease in overweight and obese patients. The Canadian Journal of Cardiology. 2007;23:885-889. DOI: 10.1016/s0828-282x(07)70844-9
  48. 48. Chow BJ, Dorbala S, Di Carli MF, Merhige ME, Williams BA, Veledar E, et al. Prognostic value of PET myocardial perfusion imaging in obese patients. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2014;7:278-287. DOI: 10.1016/jjcmg.2013.12.008
  49. 49. Shah RV, Heydari B, Coelho-Filho O, Abbasi SA, Feng JH, Neilan TG, et al. Vasodilator stress perfusion CMR imaging is feasible and prognostic in obese patients. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2014;7:462-472. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.11.011
  50. 50. See R, Abdullah SM, McGuire DK, Khera A, Patel MJ, Lindsey JB, et al. The association of differing measures of overweight and obesity with prevalent atherosclerosis: The Dallas heart study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2007;50:752-759. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.04.066
  51. 51. Labounty TM, Gomez MJ, Achenbach S, Al-Mallah M, Berman DS, Budoff MJ, et al. Body mass index and the prevalence, severity, and risk of coronary artery disease: An international multicentre study of 13 874 patients. European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging. 2013;14:456-463. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jes179
  52. 52. Hibbert B, Simard T, Wilson KR, Hawken S, Wells GA, Ramirez FD, et al. Transradial versus transfemoral artery approach for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in the extremely obese. JACC. Cardiovascular Interventions. 2012;5:819-826. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.04.009
  53. 53. Ohashi N, Yamamoto H, Horiguchi J, Kitagawa T, Kunita E, Utsunomiya H, et al. Association between visceral adipose tissue area and coronary plaque morphology assessed by CT angiography. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2010;3:908-917. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.06.014
  54. 54. Payvar S, Kim S, Rao SV, Krone R, Neely M, Paladugu N, et al. In hospital outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions in extremely obese and normal-weight patients: Findings from the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry). Journal of American College of Cardiology. 2013;62:692-696. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.058
  55. 55. Buschur ME, Smith D, Share D, Campbell W, Mattichak S, Sharma M, et al. The burgeoning epidemic of morbid obesity in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: Insight from the blue cross blue shield of Michigan cardiovascular consortium. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2013;62:688-689. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.06.004 [PubMed: 23948512]
  56. 56. Lavie CJ, Laddu D, Arena R, Ortega FB, Alpert MA, Kushner RF. Healthy weight and obesity prevention: JACC health promotion series. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 25 Sep 2018;72(13):1514-1515. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.1037. PMID: 30236314
  57. 57. Ma C, Avenell A, Bolland M, Hudson J, Stewart F, Robertson C, et al. Effects of weight loss interventions for adults who are obese on mortality, cardiovascular disease, and cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2017;359:j4849. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j4849
  58. 58. Sjöström L, Peltonen M, Jacobson P, Sjöström CD, Karason K, Wedel H, et al. Bariatric surgery and long-term cardiovascular events. JAMA. 2012;307:56-65. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2011.1914
  59. 59. Estruch R, Ros E, Salas-Salvadó J, Covas M-I, Corella D, Arós F, et al. Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with a Mediterranean diet supplemented with extra-virgin Olive oil or nuts. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2018;378(25):e34
  60. 60. Gregg EW, Jakicic JM, Lewis CE, Regensteiner JG, Pi-Sunyer X, Wing RR, et al. Look AHEAD research group. Association of the magnitude of weight loss and changes in physical fitness with long-term cardiovascular disease outcomes in overweight or obese people with type 2 diabetes: A post-hoc analysis of the look AHEAD randomised clinical trial. The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology. 2016;4:913-921. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(16)30162-0
  61. 61. Mann JFE, Nauck MA, Nissen SE, Pocock S, Ph D, Zinman B, et al. Liraglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin. 2016;54(9):101
  62. 62. Wilding JPH, Batterham RL, Calanna S, Davies M, Van Gaal LF, Lingvay I, et al. Once-weekly Semaglutide in adults with overweight or obesity. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2021;384(11):989-1002
  63. 63. Js T, J H, Mn B, L S. Xenical in the prevention of diabetes in obese subjects (XENDOS) study. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(1):155-161
  64. 64. Nissen SE, Wolski KE, Prcela L, Wadden T, Buse JB, Bakris G, et al. Effect of naltrexone-bupropion on major adverse cardiovascular events in overweight and obese patients with cardiovascular risk factors: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;315(10):990-1004
  65. 65. FDA. El ensayo clínico de seguridad demuestra un posible aumento del riesgo de cáncer con el medicamento para la perdida de peso Beviq, Belviq R (lorcaserina). Estados Unidos: Food and Drug administration; 14 de Enero de 2020, 24 de Julio de 2022
  66. 66. English WJ, Spann MD, Aher CV, Williams DB. Cardiovascular risk reduction following metabolic and bariatric surgery. Annals of Translation Medicine. 2020;8(S1):S12-S12

Written By

Pedro Felipe Parra Velasco

Submitted: 18 May 2022 Reviewed: 29 July 2022 Published: 06 March 2023