Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Prospects of Biochar as a Renewable Resource for Electricity

Written By

Ariharaputhiran Anitha and Nagarajan Ramila Devi

Submitted: 15 August 2022 Reviewed: 19 September 2022 Published: 26 October 2022

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.108161

From the Edited Volume

Biochar - Productive Technologies, Properties and Applications

Edited by Mattia Bartoli, Mauro Giorcelli and Alberto Tagliaferro

Chapter metrics overview

166 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

To face the change in energy paradigm, we need to devise technology that utilizes renewable resources and eventually realizes sustainability. Fuel cells generate electricity in a greener way, the efficiency and its cost-effectiveness depend mainly on the electrode material. Biochar serves as the promising electrode material, fuel, and separator membrane for fuel cells by being cheap, renewable, and possessing excellent electrochemical performance. The chapter is expected to provide a database of knowledge on how biochar with diversified physical and chemical features and functionalities can be effectively utilized for the possible application as electrode material for energy systems. The chapter appreciates the immense wealth of choice of biochar available with us for an important application in the area of energy as electrode material, fuel, and separator membrane for fuel cells.

Keywords

  • biochar
  • biomass carbon
  • fuel cells
  • electrode
  • separator

1. Introduction

The enormous usage of fossil fuels leads to harmful environmental damage, viz., global warming, depletion of energy resource, and lack of sustainable growth. To overcome this situation, now the world is in need of pollution-free green energy source. Moreover, the energy source should be available anytime anywhere in order to be a perennial source and to have a sustainable development. In regard of this, waste has to be used in a vast amount as an energy source instead of traditional fossil fuels which liberates huge amount of carbon dioxide, i.e., waste to wealth conversion. The energy derived from biomass termed biomass energy is the fourth largest energy source next to three fossil fuels, viz., coal, petroleum and natural gas. About 5% of the United States’ primary energy need is fulfilled by biomass in 2021. As biomass is a carbon-neutral resource, the energy produced out of it is considered clean green energy.

It is noteworthy to know about the biomass and biochar. Biomass is the matter from biological organisms and biochar is the product obtained by the thermal/chemical processing of biomass. The sources of biomass include forest residue, agricultural crops and residues, domestic waste, municipal waste, marine waste, and industrial waste [1]. Biomass though worthless, but it is a great source for valuable biochar. The biochar finds its multifarious applications such as:

  • Adsorbent for toxic pollutants [2]

  • Soil amendment to improve soil health

  • Catalyst support for electrolysis [3, 4]

  • Electrode material for electrochemical energy devices, viz., lithium-ion batteries [5], supercapacitors [6, 7], and fuel cells [8, 9].

The widespread utility of these electrochemical energy devices is hampered due to the high cost of the electrode materials. There arises revolution in the field of energy due to the utility of biochar as electrode material in electrochemical energy devices as it replaces the costlier electrode materials, thereby paves the way to the production of electrical energy at low cost. In addition to that, it gives value-added utilization of biomass in the field of energy.

A brief description of fuel cells is worthwhile here. Fuel cell converts the chemical energy of fuel and oxidizing agent into electricity by electrochemical redox reactions. It serves as an endless power source for space vehicles and submarines. The main components of fuel cells are the cathode, anode, and electrolyte which facilitate the passage of ions. Fuel cells are of many types, such as proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC), solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC), microbial fuel cell (MFC), and direct carbon fuel cell (DCFC).

In this chapter, detailed survey of utility of biochar as electrode material and separator in MFC and as fuel in DCFC is given in systematic way. This enables us to understand the value-added utilization of biomass in the field of energy and to explore many other biomass for its utility in the near future.

Advertisement

2. Microbial fuel cell (MFC)

Microbial fuel cell (MFC), a bioelectrochemical device, employs organic waste to produce electrical energy [10, 11]. In MFC, proton exchange membrane separates the anode and cathode. Electrodes used in MFC are crucial in determining its efficiency [12]. Electrogenic bacteria on the surface of the anode oxidizes the organic matter to generate electrons and protons [13, 14]. The electrons generated flow reaches the cathode to combine with an electron acceptor via an external circuit [15, 16]. Due to superior electrochemical oxidation capacity, great abundance, and clean reaction product, oxygen is the most widely used electron acceptor [17, 18]. However, the poor cathode oxygen reduction reaction and high oxygen mass transfer resistance significantly lower the performance of MFC [19]. The working mechanism of MFC is given as follows:

Acetate and glucose in organic compounds are oxidized in MFCs, which generate electrons, flow down to an external circuit, and produce electricity, whereas organic compounds are anaerobically oxidized and result in the evolution of protons, electrons, and CO2. In MFC, water is generated in cathode by the reduction of protons and electrons with the usage of oxygen supplied from outside. The protons and electrons thus liberated reach the cathode through an electrical circuit in presence of electrolyte medium. The formation of water in MFC is represented by the equation given as follows [20]:

CH3COO+4H2O2HCO3+9H++8e.E1
2O2+8H++8e4H.E2

In MFC, oxidation occurs at the anode and reduction at the cathode, thereby creates the potential difference between the electrodes, leading to the generation of bioelectricity as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Working of MFC.

Biochar can act as electrodes (anode/cathode), electrocatalysts, and proton exchange membranes b [21]. Biochar acting as electrodes should possess high porosity, rich carbon content, excellent electrical conductivity, large surface area, and cost-effective. Moreover, it should be nonbiodegradable, biocompatible, and pave way to waste to wealth conversion. Table 1 lists the biochar derived from various biomass, its method of preparation, processing temperature, its utility as electrode material for MFC, and the power density derived from it.

2.1 Biochar as separator

Proton exchange membrane (PEM) in MFC is superior in its performance when it possesses large proton conductivity, minimal oxygen, and substrate crossover, decreased biofouling rate, and low cost. As the source of biochar is abundant and easily available, the biochar possesses strong cation exchange properties, a high concentration of surface-active sites, and excellent porous nature supports its use in PEMs. In PEM fuel cell, the biochar acts as the unique separator which usually replaces the Nafion polymer membrane. Moreover, the biochar acts as a porous membrane having expanding sustainability than the other membrane and cost-effective eco-friendly catalyst material. The biochar-built PEM fuel cell was applicable for the Industrial and lab scale preparation.

2.2 Biochar based catalyst

The basic mechanism of oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) is the absorption of proton from the electrolyte by the oxygen molecule at the cathode. Followed by this, the transfer of electrons takes place from anode to metallic wire. Reaction requires more energy for the production of fuels. For the good performance of MFC, the anode and cathode play the catalyst role. For enhancing the sustainability, stability, and activity, the cathode fabrication is very important. The necessity of good cathodic material is to reduce the activation potential of ORR reaction and the cost-effective process. Initially, the fuel reactions were carried out using a platinum catalyst which serves as the catalyst for the reduction of oxygen and reduction. The economic preparation of the material was not affordable for the large-scale preparation as well as not suitable for the domestic purpose application. For the replacement of notable platinum catalyst, the non-transition metal, 2D material, carbon material, and porous material are used for the fuel reaction. In recent research, the usage of biochar material from natural sources acts as the cathodic material for the ORR reduction and showed the good performance than the other catalyst materials. The mechanistic reactions are explained in various ways.

List of biochar derived from various biomass and its utility as separator, PEM, and catalyst for ORR are given in Table 2.

S.NoBiomassElectrodeMethod of preparationProcessing temperature
(°C)
Power Density (mW/m2)Ref
1Balsa woodCathodePyrolysis800200.0[22]
2BananaCathodeThermal treatment550393.7[23]
900483.7
KOH activation550424.6
900528.2
3Biodigester plant wasteCathodeKHCO3 activation850NA*[24]
4Pinus resinosaCathodePyrolysis850356.0[25]
5Coconut shellAnodePyrolysis400283.4 ± 9.6[26]
6Pinewood chipsAnodeCarbonization1000457.0[27]
Pine sawdust532.0
7Peanut shellsAnodePyrolysis800NA*[28]
8Maple woodAnodePyrolysis350–60041.4[29]
9Rubber tree sawdustAnodePyrolysis500326.0[30]
10Waste woodAnode and cathodePyrolysis1000600.0[31]
11WoodCathodeKOH activation1000146.7[32]
12Corn strawAnode and cathodeKOH activation900889.0[33]
13Giant cane stalkCathodeNA900NA*[34]
14Watermelon rindCathodeKOH activation18026.2[35]

Table 1.

Sources of biochar and its utility in MFC.

NA*—not available.

S.NoBiomassFunctionMethod of preparationProcessing temperature
(°C)
Power Density (mW/m2)Refs.
1Giant cane-clay compositeSolid separatorsPyrolysis35040.0[36]
Nitrogen flow900
2Coconut shell biochar blended with metal (20%)Anode
CS-Si0.2
Pyrolysis50016.8[37]
CS-Zn0.222.9
CS-Cu0.238.7
3Sewage sludgeCatalyst (ORR)Carbonization900500.0[38]
4Banana peelPEMH2SO4 activation60041.1[39]

Table 2.

Sources of biochar, its preparation, functions in MFC, and the power obtained.

Advertisement

3. Direct carbon fuel cell

Global energy demand depends mainly on conventional sources such as coal, petroleum, and natural gas since earlier days. The excess use of coal as an energy source in the past is due to its low cost, abundance, and extensive distribution throughout the world [40]. As these sources are nonrenewable, its continuous usage leads to scarcity. Moreover, continuous usage of conventional sources leads to environmental damage, thereby exploration of clean energy source is the need of the hour. This put forward the steps to initiate energy generation from renewable sources like biomass. The direct carbon fuel cell (DCFC) employs carbon as anode operates on a high-temperature range of 700–900°C. It is superior over other fuel cells by attaining 80% efficiency (for power generation) [41, 42]. The carbon used as fuel in DCFC may be coal, biomass, and organic waste which are abundantly found in nature. DCFC transforms chemical energy trapped in the solid carbon fuel into electrical energy. DCFC accounts for green energy generation as it does not require any gasification processes and other conventional electric generators [43, 44]. The elemental carbon act as fuel contains high-energy density and is oxidized electrochemically at the electrodes [43, 44].

Based on the working electrolyte, there are three main categories of DCFCs, namely, molten hydroxide, molten carbonate, and solid oxide DCFCs. Molten hydroxide and molten carbonate DCFC utilizes NaOH/KOH and carbonates, respectively, as their electrolyte. The electrolyte is filled in a metal vessel, which acts as the cathode. The carbon materials function both as fuel and the anode and are dipped into the electrolyte. Solid oxide DCFC resembles the other two DCFCs except using an oxygen ion (O2−) conducting ceramic electrolyte. The most commonly used electrolyte is Y2O3 stabilized zirconia due to high ionic conductivity, better stability, chemical and thermal compatibility, mechanical robustness, easy fabrication, and low cost [45, 46, 47]. Solid oxide DCFC though favorable for its simple design, but it has the limitation of low output [48]. This low output is explicitly due to the limited reaction zone at the carbon fuel and the electrolyte interface.

A DCFC consumes solid carbon and oxygen to produce electrical energy through electrochemical anodic and cathodic reactions [49, 50]. The overall reaction involved in DCFC is the simple combination of carbon and oxygen to form carbon dioxide. Electrooxidation of carbon occurs at the anode, whereas electroreduction of oxygen occurs at the cathode [40, 49, 50]. Working of different types of DCFC is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Working of different types of DCFC.

Reaction at the anode (oxidation of carbon).

C+electrolyte4OHCO2+2H2O+4e.E3
C+electrolyte2CO323CO2+4e.E4

Overall anodic reaction.

C+2O2CO2+4e.E5

Reaction at the cathode(reduction of oxygen).

O2+2H2O+4e4OH.E6
2CO2+O2+4e2CO32.E7
O2+4e2O2.E8

If DCFC is supposed to operate at a high temperature (above 700°C), carbon electrooxidation is overlooked by the reverse Boudouard reaction (electrooxidation of CO). So direct electrooxidation of solid carbon is overlooked by direct electrooxidation of CO, termed as CO shuttling mechanism [51] which leads to low carbon fuel utilization [52].

C+CO22CO.E9

Being reverse Boudouard reaction is endothermic, decreasing the working temperature of DCFC will enhance the CO reduction in the anode exhaust, thereby increase carbon fuel usage [49, 53]. DCFC attracts the scholarly attraction owing to its low-maintenance cost, simple cell structure, and rich availability of carbon feedstocks, i.e., biomass. List of biochar derived from biomass which finds its utility in various types of DCFC is given in Table 3.

S.NoBiomassElectrolyteProcessing temperature
(°C)
Open circuit voltage (V)Power Density (mW/m2)Refs.
1Corn cobSamarium doped ceria (SDC) with eutectic carbonate phase7501.05185.0[54]
2Almond shellCeria-carbonate composite7001.07127.0[55]
3Olive woodCeria-doped samarium (SDC) combined with molten carbonate7001.02105.0[56]
4Beech wood chipsYttria-stabilized zirconia8001.00100.0[57]
5Acacia wood chipsYttria-stabilized zirconia8000.8090.0
6Waste coffee groundsYttria-stabilized zirconia9001.1087.2[58]
7Miscanthus strawYttria-stabilized zirconia8001.1570.0[59]
8Molten Carbonate0.8812.0
9CoconutYttria-stabilized zirconia8000.8760.0[60]
10WheatScSZ electrolyte layer8001.1867.0[61]
11SpruceScSZ8001.1657
12WoodMolten carbonate7001.0025[62]
13Refuse plastic/
paper fuel
Molten carbonate7001.2022[63]
14Refuse derived
fuel
Molten carbonate7001.0017
15Sunflower
husks
Molten hydroxide4501.0122[64]
16willow shavings0.8720
17Pine1.0518
18Black liquorYttria-stabilized zirconia700–8000.80122[65]
19Eucalyptus leavesMolten carbonate7000.84NA*[66]
20Neem leaves0.73
21Mast leaves0.71
22Melon seed huskMolten carbonate4500.71550.0[67]
23Palm kernel shellYttria-stabilized zirconia8500.81330.0[68]
24Pine pelletsMolten hydroxide8000.84766.0[69]
25Pine bark pelletsMolten hydroxide8001.07450.0[70]
26Pistachio shellsYttria-stabilized zirconia8000.94155.0[71]
27Pecan shells140.0
28Sawdust100.0
29Pomelo peelYttria-stabilized zirconia8501.023090.0[72]
30ReedCeria-doped samarium (SDC) combined with molten carbonate7500.963780.0[73]
31Rice huskYttria-stabilized zirconia7500.811790.0[74]
32Rubber woodYttria-stabilized zirconia8500.77294.0[75]
33Walnut shellYSZ8000.971470.0[76]
34Wheat strawYSZ8001.01870.0[77]
35CorncobMiscanthus straw biomass0.982040.0
36Bagasse0.992600.0

Table 3.

List of Biochar served as fuel in DCFC.

NA*—not available.

Advertisement

4. Challenges and future perspective

To understand the mechanism behind the electrochemical reaction kinetics and carbon oxidation at the anode/electrolyte interface is still a challenge for us. In addition to that, metallic components in the biochar inhibit the electrochemical performance of the fuel cell. Determining the amount of ash accumulation is also a key factor and should be researched into as well to determine the lifetime of DCFC. Technological expertise in the cell design along with the clear understanding of kinetics will solve the issues in near future.

Advertisement

5. Conclusion

Biochar an inexhaustive renewable resource solves many environmental issues arised in recent decades, viz., pollution, remediation in soil, and water. Research studies in recent years advocate the multifarious utility of biochar as fuel in DCFC and as electrodes, separator, and catalyst for ORR in MFC. Moreover, biochar-based MFCs remove hazardous chemicals from wastewater, DCFC utilizes carbon from zero-cost sources as fuel along with the generation of electricity.

References

  1. 1. Kalyani P, Anitha A. Biomass carbon & its prospects in electrochemical energy systems. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2013;38(10):4034-4045. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.01.048
  2. 2. Anitha A. Performance of activated carbon from Acalypha indica (Kuppaimeni) leaf as an adsorbent for copper (II) ions. Journal of Advanced Scientific Research. 2020;11(3):214-219. Available from: https://www.sciensage.info/index.php/JASR/article/view/529
  3. 3. Palanichamy K, Ariharaputhiran A. Areca leaves as a source of carbon: Preliminary investigation as catalyst support for electrolytic hydrogen evolution in acidic medium. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2013;38(5):2263-2270. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.12.003
  4. 4. Kalyani P, Anitha A, Darchen A. Activated carbon from grass – A green alternative catalyst support for water electrolysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2013;38(25):10364-10372. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.06.022
  5. 5. Fey GTK, Lin YY, Huang KP, Lin YC, Kumar TP, Cho YD, et al. Green energy anode materials: Pyrolytic carbons derived from peanut shells for lithium ion batteries. Advanced Materials Research. 2011;415-417:1572-1585. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.415-417.1572
  6. 6. Kalyani P, Anitha A. Capacitor behaviour of activated carbon from used tea dust powder. Asian Journal of Chemistry. 2015;27(4):1365-1370. DOI: 10.14233/ajchem.2015.17970
  7. 7. Anitha A, Kalyani P. Refuse derived energy - Tea derived boric acid activated carbon as an electrode material for electrochemical capacitors. Portugaliae Electrochimica Acta. 2013;31(3):165-174. DOI: 10.4152/pea.201303165
  8. 8. Jafri N, Wong WY, Doshi V, Yoon LW, Cheah K. A review on production and characterization of biochars for application in direct carbon fuel cells. Process Safety and Environment Protection. 2018;118:152-166. DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2018.06.036
  9. 9. Patwardhan SB, Pandit S, Gupta PK, Jha NK, Rawat J, Joshi HC, et al. Recent advances in the application of biochar in microbial electrochemical cells. Fuel. 2022;311:122501. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122501
  10. 10. Firdous S, Jin W, Shahid N, Bhatti Z, Iqbal A, Abbasi U, et al. The performance of microbial fuel cells treating vegetable oil industrial wastewater. Environmental Technology & Innovation. 2018;10:143-151. DOI: 10.1016/j.eti.2018.02.006
  11. 11. Thomas YRJ, Picot M, Carer A, Berder O, Sentieys O, Barriere F. A single sediment-microbial fuel cell powering a wireless telecommunication system. Journal of Power Sources. 2013;241:703-708. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.05.016
  12. 12. Elshobary ME, Zabed HM, Yun J, Zhang G, Qi X. Recent insights into microalgae-assisted microbial fuel cells for generating sustainable bioelectricity. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2021;46(4):3135-3159. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.251
  13. 13. Bhande R, Noori M, Ghangrekar M. Performance improvement of sediment microbial fuel cell by enriching the sediment with cellulose: Kinetics of cellulose degradation. Environmental Technology & Innovation. 2019;13:189-196. DOI: 10.1016/j.eti.2018.11.003
  14. 14. Xiao Y, Zheng Y, Wu S, Zhang EH, Chen Z, Liang P, et al. Pyrosequencing reveals a core community of anodic bacterial biofilms in bioelectrochemical systems from China. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2015;6:1410. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01410
  15. 15. Oh S, Min B, Logan BE. Cathode performance as a factor in electricity generation in microbial fuel cells. Environmental Science & Technology. 2004;38(18):4900-4904. DOI: 10.1021/es049422p
  16. 16. Rismani-Yazdi H, Carver SM, Christy AD, Tuovinen IH. Cathodic limitations in microbial fuel cells: An overview. Journal of Power Sources. 2008;180(2):683-694. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.02.074
  17. 17. Dong H, Yu H, Wang X, Zhou Q, Feng J. A novel structure of scalable air-cathode without Nafion and pt by rolling activated carbon and PTFE as catalyst layer in microbial fuel cells. Water Research. 2012;46(17):5777-5787. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.08.005
  18. 18. Renslow R, Donovan C, Shim M, Babauta J, Nannapaneni S, Schenk J, et al. Oxygen reduction kinetics on graphite cathodes in sediment microbial fuel cells. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 2011;13(48):21573-21584. DOI: 10.1039/C1CP23200B
  19. 19. Wang Z, Mahadevan GD, Wu Y, Zhao F. Progress of air-breathing cathode in microbial fuel cells. Journal of Power Sources. 2017;356:245-255. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.02.004
  20. 20. Jadhav DA, Carmona-Martínez AA, Chendake AD, Pandit S, Pant D. Modeling and optimization strategies towards performance enhancement of microbial fuel cells. Bioresource Technology. 2021;320:124256. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124256
  21. 21. Li S, Ho S-H, Hua T, Zhou Q, Li F, Tang J. Sustainable biochar as an electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction in microbial fuel cells. Green Energy Environment. 2021;6(5):644-659. DOI: 10.1016/j.gee.2020.11.010
  22. 22. Chang HC, Gustave W, Yuan ZF, Xiao Y, Chen Z. One-step fabrication of binder-free air cathode for microbial fuel cells by using balsa wood biochar. Environmental Technology & Innovation. 2020;18:100615. DOI: 10.1016/j.eti.2020.100615
  23. 23. Yuan H, Deng L, Qi Y, Kobayashi N, Tang J. Nonactivated and activated biochar derived from bananas as alternative cathode catalyst in microbial fuel cells. The Scientific World Journal. 2014:1-8. Article No. 832850. DOI: 10.1155/2014/832850
  24. 24. Mutuma BK, Sylla NF, Bubu A, Ndiaye NM, Santoro C, Brilloni A, et al. Valorization of biodigestor plant waste in electrodes for supercapacitors and microbial fuel cells. Electrochimica Acta. 2021;391:138960. DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.138960
  25. 25. Nastro RA, Flagiello F, Silvestri N, Gambino E, Falcucci G, Chandrasekhar K. Use of Biochar-Based cathodes and increase in the electron flow by pseudomonas aeruginosa to improve waste treatment in microbial fuel cells. Processes. 2021;9:1941. DOI: 10.3390/pr9111941
  26. 26. Thipraksa J, Chaijak P. Improved the coconut shell biochar properties for bio-electricity generation of microbial fuel cells from synthetic wastewater. Journal of Degraded and Mining Lands Management. 2022;9(4):3613-3619. DOI: 10.15243/jdmlm.2022.094.3613
  27. 27. Huggins T, Wang H, Kearns J, Jenkins P, Ren ZJ. Biochar as a sustainable electrode material for electricity production in microbial fuel cells. Bioresource Technology. 2014;157:114-119. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.058
  28. 28. Gajbhiye P, Maan KS, Malik N, Farque O, Rajabali K. Biochar production for microbial fuel cell electrode. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research 2022;9(6):404885. Available from: https://www.jetir.org/view?paper=JETIR2206791
  29. 29. Khudzari JM, Gariepy Y, Kurian J, Tartakovsky B, Raghavan GSV. Effects of biochar anodes in rice plant microbial fuel cells on the production of bioelectricity, biomass, and methane. Biochemical Engineering Journal. 2018;141:190-199. DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2018.10.012
  30. 30. Chaijak P, Sato C, Lertworapreecha M, Sukkasem C, Boonsawang P, Paucar N. Potential of biochar-anode in a ceramic-separator microbial fuel cell (CMFC) with a laccase-based air cathode. Polish Journal of Environmenal Studies. 2020;29(1):499-503. DOI: 10.15244/pjoes/99099
  31. 31. Huggins T, Latorre A, Biffinger J, Ren Z. Biochar based microbial fuel cell for enhanced wastewater treatment and nutrient recovery. Sustainability. 2016;8(2):169. DOI: 10.3390/su8020169
  32. 32. Huggins TM, Pietron JJ, Wang H, Ren ZJ, Biffinger JC. Graphitic biochar as a cathode electrocatalyst support for microbial fuel cells. Bioresource Technology. 2015;195:147-153. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.06.012
  33. 33. Wang B, Wang Z, Jiang Y, Tan G, Xu N, Xu Y. Enhanced power generation and wastewater treatment in sustainable biochar electrodes based bioelectrochemical system. Bioresource Technology. 2017;241:841-848. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.05.155
  34. 34. Marzorati S, Goglio A, Fest-Santini S, Mombelli D, Villa F, Cristiani P, et al. Airbreathing bio-cathodes based on electro-active biochar from pyrolysis of giant cane stalks. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2019;44(9):4496-4507. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.07.167
  35. 35. Mo RJ, Zhao Y, Wu M, Xiao HM, Kuga S, Huang Y, et al. Activated carbon from nitrogen rich watermelon rind for high-performance supercapacitors. RSC Advances. 2016;6(64):59333-59342. DOI: 10.1039/C6RA10719B
  36. 36. Cristiani P, Goglio A, Marzorati S, Fest-Santini S, Schievano A. Biochar-Terracotta Conductive composites: New design for bioelectrochemical systems. Frontiers in Energy Research. 2020;8:1-12. DOI: 10.3389/fenrg.2020.581106
  37. 37. Naveenkumar M, Senthilkumar K. Microbial fuel cell for harvesting bio-energy from tannery effluent using metal mixed biochar electrodes. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2021;149:106082. DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2021.106082
  38. 38. Yuan Y, Yuan T, Wang D, Tang J, Zhou S. Sewage sludge biochar as an efficient catalyst for oxygen reduction reaction in an microbial fuel cell. Bioresource Technology. 2013;144:115-120. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.06.075
  39. 39. Chakraborty I, Sathe SM, Dubey BK, Ghangrekar MM. Waste-derived biochar: Applications and future perspective in microbial fuel cells. Bioresource Technology. 2020;312:123587. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123587
  40. 40. Giddey S, Badwal SPS, Kulkarni A, Munnings C. A comprehensive review of direct carbon fuel cell technology. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science. 2012;38:360-399. DOI: 10.1016/j.pecs.2012.01.003
  41. 41. Cherepy NJ, Krueger R, Fiet KJ, Jankowski AJ, Cooper JF. Direct conversion of carbon fuels in a molten carbonate fuel cell. Journal of the Electrochemical Society. 2005;152:A80-A87. DOI: 10.1149/1.1836129
  42. 42. Park SW, Jang CH, Baek KR, Yang JK. Torrefaction and low-temperature carbonization of woodybiomass: Evaluation of fuel characteristics of the products. Energy. 2012;45:676-685. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2012.07.024
  43. 43. Hackett GA, Zondlo JW, Svensson R. Evaluation of carbon materials for use in a direct carbon fuel cell. Journal of Power Sources. 2006;168:111-118. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.02.021
  44. 44. Li X, Zhu ZH, Chen JL, De Marco R, Dicks A, Bradley J, et al. Surface modification of carbon fuels for direct carbon fuel cells. Journal of Power Sources. 2009;186:1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.09.070
  45. 45. Hagen A, Barfod R, Hendriksen P, Liu Y, Ramousse S. Degradation of anode supported SOFCs as a function of temperature and current load. Journal of the Electrochemical Society. 2006;153:A1165. DOI: 10.1149/1.2193400
  46. 46. Holzer L, Iwanschitz B, Hocker T, Munch B, Prestat M, Wiedenmann D, et al. Microstructure degradation of cermet anodes for solid oxide fuel cells: Quantification of nickel grain growth in dry and in humid atmospheres. Journal of Power Sources. 2011;196:1279-1294. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.08.017
  47. 47. Nelson G, Grew K, Izzo J, Lombardo J, Harris W, Faes A, et al. Three-dimensional microstructural changes in the Ni–YSZ solid oxide fuel cell anode during operation. Acta Materialia. 2012;60(8):3491-3500. DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.02.041
  48. 48. Li C, Shi Y, Cai N. Performance improvement of direct carbon fuel cell by introducing catalytic gasification process. Journal of Power Sources. 2010;195(15):4660-4666. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.01.083
  49. 49. Jiang C, Ma J, Corre G, Jain SL, Irvine JTS. Challenges in developing direct carbon fuel cells. Chemical Society Reviews. 2017;46(10):2889-2912. DOI: 10.1039/C6CS00784H
  50. 50. Kacprzak A. Hydroxide electrolyte direct carbon fuel cells-Technology review. International Journal of Energy Research. 2019;43:65-85. DOI: 10.1002/er.4197
  51. 51. Gur T. Critical review of carbon conversion in carbon fuel cells. Chemical Reviews. 2013;113:6179-6206. DOI: 10.1021/cr400072b
  52. 52. Cao T, Huang K, Shi Y, Cai N. Recent advances in high-temperature carbon–air fuel cells. Energy & Environmental Science. 2017;10:460-490. DOI: 10.1039/C6EE03462D
  53. 53. Behling N, Managi S, Williams M. Updated look at the DCFC: The fuel cell technology using solid carbon as the fuel. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration. 2019;36:181-187. DOI: 10.1007/s42461-018-0022-x
  54. 54. Yu J, Zhao Y, Li Y. Utilization of corn cob biochar in a direct carbon fuel cell. Journal of Power Sources. 2014;270:312-317. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.07.125
  55. 55. Elleuch A, Boussetta A, Yu J, Halouani K, Li Y. Experimental investigation of direct carbon fuel cellfueled by almond shell biochar: Part I. Physico-chemical characterization of the biochar fuel and cell performance examination. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2013;38:16590-16604. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.08.090
  56. 56. Elleuch A, Halouani K, Li Y. Investigation of chemical and electrochemical reactions mechanisms in a direct carbon fuel cell using olive wood charcoal as sustainable fuel. Journal of Power Sources. 2015;281:350-361. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.01.171
  57. 57. Dudek M, Socha R. Direct electrochemical conversion of the chemical energy of raw waste wood to electrical energy in tubular direct carbon solid oxide fuel cells. International of Electrochemical Science. 2014;9:7414-7430. Available from: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.660.7996
  58. 58. Jang H, Ocon JD, Lee S, Lee JK, Lee J. Direct power generation from waste coffee grounds in a biomass fuel cell. Journal of Power Sources. 2015;296:433-439. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.07.059
  59. 59. Adeniyi OD, Ewan BCR, Adeniyi MI, Abdulkadir M. The behaviour of biomass char in two direct carbon fuel cell designs. Journal of Energy Challenges and Mechanics. 2014;1:1-6. Available from: https://www.nscj.co.uk/JECM/PDF/1-4-6-Adeniyi.pdf
  60. 60. Munnings C, Kulkarni A, Giddey S, Badwal SPS. Biomass to power conversion in a direct carbon fuel cell. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2014;39:12377-12385. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.03.255
  61. 61. Adeniyi OD. Solid oxide direct carbon fuel cell electrochemical performance using wheat and spruce carbon fuels. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery Utilization and Environmental effects. 2015;37(22):2401-2407. DOI: 10.1080/15567036.2012.715230
  62. 62. Ahn SY, Eom SY, Rhie YH, Sung YM, Moon CE, Choi GM, et al. Utilization of wood biomass char in a direct carbon fuel cell (DCFC) system. Applied Energy. 2013;105:207-216. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.01.023
  63. 63. Ahn SY, Eom SY, Rhie YH, Sung YM, Moon CM, Choi GM, et al. Application of refuse fuels in a direct carbon fuel cell system. Energy. 2013;51:447-456. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2012.12.025
  64. 64. Kacprzak A, Kobylecki R, Wlodarczyk R, Bis Z. The effect of fuel type on the performance of a direct carbon fuel cell with molten alkaline electrolyte. Journal of Power Sources. 2014;255:179-186. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.01.012
  65. 65. Teoh SW, Yoon LW, Wong WY, Low JH. Application of black liquor derived carbonaceous compound as fuel in direct carbon fuel cell. International Journal of Integrated Engineering. 2022;14(2):146-156. Available from: https://publisher.uthm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/ijie/article/view/10949
  66. 66. Adeniyi OD, Idemudia GE, Usman AA, Adeniyi MI, Paul SH, Olutoye MA, et al. Electrical power generation from direct carbon duel fuel using biochar from eucalyptus, neem and mast leaves. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research. 2018;9(4):406
  67. 67. Adeniyi OD, Ngozichukwu B, Adeniyi MI, Olutoye MA, Musa U, Ibrahim MA. Power generation from melon seed husk biochar using fuel cell. Ghana Journal of Science. 2020;61(2):38-44. DOI: 10.4314/gjs.v61i2.4
  68. 68. Jafri N, Yoon LW, Wong WY, Cheah KHSN. Power generation from palm kernel shell biochar in a direct carbon fuel cell. Applied Sciences. 2020;2:386. DOI: 10.1007/s42452-020-2189-2
  69. 69. Hao W, Luo P, Wu Z, Mi Y, Gao Z. The effect of biomass pyrolysis temperature on the performance of biochar-fed molten hydroxide direct carbon fuel cells. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2021;150:106122. DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2021.106122
  70. 70. Hao W, Luo P, Wu Z, Sun G, Mi Y. Feasibility of pine bark pellets and their pyrolyzed biochar pellets as fuel sources in molten hydroxide direct carbon fuel cells. Energy & Fuels. 2020;34:16756-16764. DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c03171
  71. 71. Konsolakis M, Kaklidi N, Marnello GE, Zaharaki D, Komnitsa K. Assessment of biochar as feedstock in a direct carbon solid oxide fuel cell. RSC Advances. 2015;5:73399-73409. DOI: 10.1039/C5RA13409A
  72. 72. An W, Sun X, Jiao Y, Juliao PSB, Wang W, Wang S, et al. A solid oxide carbon fuel cell operating on pomelo peel char with high power output. International Journal of Energy Research. 2018;43(7):2514-2526. DOI: 10.1002/er.4097
  73. 73. Wang J, Fan L, Yao T, Gan J, Zhi X, Hou N, et al. A High-Performance direct carbon fuel cell with reed rod biochar as fuel. Journal of the Electrochemical Society. 2019;166(4):F175-F179. DOI: 10.1149/2.0321904jes
  74. 74. Palniyandy LK, Wong WY, Yap JJ, Doshi V, Yoon LW. Effect of alkaline pre-treatment on rice husk-derived biochar for direct carbon fuel cell. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology 6th EURECA 2016 Special Issue May. 2017: 84 – 100. Available from: https://jestec.taylors.edu.my/Special%20Issue%20eureca%202016_1/eureca6_paper%207.pdf
  75. 75. Palniyandy LK, Yoon LW, Wong WY, Yong ST, Pang MM. Application of biochar derived from different types of biomass and treatment methods as a fuel source for direct carbon fuel cells. Energies. 2019;12(13):2477. DOI: 10.3390/en12132477
  76. 76. Xie Y, Xiao J, Liu Q, Wang X, Liu J, Wu P, et al. Highly efficient utilization of walnut shell biochar through a facile designed portable direct carbon solid oxide fuel cell stack. Energy. 2021;227:120456. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.120456
  77. 77. Qiu Q, Zhou M, Cai W, Zhou Q, Zhang Y, Wang W, et al. A comparative investigation on direct carbon solid oxide fuel cells operated with fuels of biochar derived from wheat straw, corncob, and bagasse. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2019;121:56-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.12.016

Written By

Ariharaputhiran Anitha and Nagarajan Ramila Devi

Submitted: 15 August 2022 Reviewed: 19 September 2022 Published: 26 October 2022