Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Recent Advances in Infrared Nonlinear Optical Crystal

Written By

Senthil Kumar Chandran, Chinnakannu Elavarasi, Srinivasan Manikam and John James Gnanapragasam

Submitted: 25 April 2022 Reviewed: 19 September 2022 Published: 14 December 2022

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.108173

From the Edited Volume

Crystal Growth and Chirality - Technologies and Applications

Edited by Riadh Marzouki and Takashiro Akitsu

Chapter metrics overview

132 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

The search and growth of nonlinear optical (NLO) crystals in the infrared (IR) area are significant and of high importance in the fields of NLO, signal communication, solid-state chemistry, and laser frequency conversion. Infrared NLO crystals have a wide IR transparent range, high laser damage threshold (LDT) value, and large NLO coefficients. This chapter presents the recent advances in IR-NLO crystals and especially emphasizes their crystal growth method, crystal structures, band gap value, LDT, and NLO properties. Based on its structural variety, it is categorized into chalcogenides, chalcohalides, oxides, halides, and oxyhalides. This chapter describes several kinds of IR-NLO crystals and their structural, band gap value, thermal, optical, LDT, and NLO properties and also describes the significance of these crystals in laser frequency conversion, optical parameter oscillator, and other optical applications.

Keywords

  • crystal growth
  • laser-induced damage thresholds
  • infrared crystal
  • transmittance
  • optical parameter oscillator

1. Introduction

Nonlinear optical (NLO) crystals are important for frequency conversion and are widely used in different laser-oriented applications. High-efficiency NLO crystals need in high-efficiency laser methods, so it is essential to growing novel NLO crystals with good properties. In the past five decades, many valuable NLO crystals in the near-infrared (NIR), visible, and ultraviolet areas have been commercialized, such as LiNbO3, LiB3O5 (LBO), β-BaB2O4 (β-BBO), KTiOPO4 (KTP), and KH2PO4 (KDP). These crystals are commonly used in basic science and technology, such as laser generation, artificial nuclear fusion, and so on. However, due to the increasing practical or market necessities, only a few crystals can be successfully used in deep-UV(DUV) and mid/far-IR areas. Nevertheless, NLO crystals that can powerfully produce high-power mid-IR lasers in the spectral area of 2−25 μm are very rare. Up to now, several useful NLO crystals have been originated and used in DUV, UV-Vis, and near IR, but they cannot be implemented in mid-infrared spectra because they have two atmospheric transparent regions, 3–5 and 8–14 mm, owing to strong absorption [1, 2, 3, 4, 5].

Second-order nonlinear optical (NLO) crystals are significant for producing coherent energy in the IR region (3−20 μm). IR lasers have several vital applications in various devices, such as optical parametric oscillators (OPO), remote sensing, optical sensing, instrumental spectroscopy, industry, military, analytical devices optical imaging, laser guidance, telecommunication, medical diagnostics, and long-distance communications. Such instruments are used to identify various elements and precise vibrational spectra [6, 7, 8, 9]. Even after several years of deep research, only three unresolved NLO crystals have been commercially accessible in the mid and far-IR areas, namely, AgGaSe2, AgGaS2, and ZnGeP2. However, some inadequacies still exist in these IR-NLO crystals, such as the inherent efficiency loss arising from dual photon absorption, low MIR cut-off edge, non-phase matchable behavior, and low laser damage threshold. Already commercial ones cannot meet the commercial conditions because of their inherent disadvantages. Hence, it is essential to find out new efficient MIR NLO crystals with more stable efficiency [3, 7, 8, 10].

The large size high-quality mid-IR-NLO crystals for laser device applications are grown by Bridgman-Stockbarger (BS) method and molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) growth method [5]. The IR-NLO crystal can be separated into five categories: chalcogenides, chalcohalides, oxides, oxyhalides, halides, and chalcohalides [4]. This chapter will emphasize second-order NLO inorganic crystals in the MIR region. We did not focus on the commercially accessible LiNbO3, LiB3O5 (LBO), β-BaB2O4 (β-BBO), KH2PO4, and KTiOPO4 NLO crystals, these crystals have absorption bands in this region. Instead, this chapter focus on the chalcogenides, chalcohalides, oxides, halides, and oxyhalides. These crystals are promising materials for MIR applications due to they have wide transmittance in the MIR region [11].

Advertisement

2. Main conditions at NLO crystal select for changing coherent energy in the IR region

The selection of high-quality crystals is mainly tough when designing new, appropriate NLO crystals for the IR region. It should be highlighted that the balance between SHG coefficients and energy gap is an important feature to attain noble optical functioning in a mid-IR-NLO crystal [3]. The mid-IR-NLO crystals are significant to develop high-power tunable laser output extending the two atmospheric bands (3–5 μm and 8–14 μm) [4]. The accessibility of bulk-size single crystals is vital for the production of NLO devices. It is a great task to grow novel mid-IR-NLO crystals with desirable properties for useful applications. The good mid-IR-NLO crystals should satisfy the following basic criteria [2, 3, 6, 10, 12, 13]:

  1. High second harmonic generation (SHG) responses

  2. High laser damage threshold

  3. Wide IR optical transparency range

  4. Moderate birefringence

  5. Good thermal stability

  6. Good mechanical properties

  7. Good facile growth of big size crystals

  8. Splendid chemical stability

  9. Crystal with non-centrosymmetric space group

  10. Congruent-melting performance to enable single-crystal growth

  11. Low absorption loss at suitable laser wavelengths

Advertisement

3. Chalcogenides

Chalcogenides are new kind of material denoting the chalcogen elements (sulfide, selenide, and telluride) of the group VIA. The chalcogenides are designed by covalent bonding and originate in a variety of structures, mostly formatted in octahedral or trigonal geometry. Chalcogenides are useful in many fields, such as photocatalyst, thermoelectric, MIR-NLO, photovoltaic, sensor, fuel cell, and battery [6, 14, 15]. Chalcogenides are suitable crystals for MIR-NLO as they exhibit wide transparency in IR regions and can obtain large SHG responses in this region [16]. Normally, chalcogenides are capable materials for MIR-NLO devices owing to their many benefits, such as large optical nonlinearity, broad transparency range, and large birefringence. II-IV-V2 and I-III-VI2 chalcopyrites are now the leading functional MIR-NLO crystals in the market and laboratory. In the past two decades, more consideration has been given to discovering chalcogenides as MIR-NLO crystals for their structural diversity. Quaternary chalcogenide crystals own a high bandgap (Eg) and high LDT. But the small nonlinearity coefficients slowed down their use in high-power laser generation. Though such kinds of crystals have many MIR-NLO benefits, many of them also have some inadequacies. To meet the requirement of laser device manufacture, some advanced growth methods are adopted to produce high purity and high-quality big size crystals of the chalcogenide. But, quaternary chalcogenide crystals, such as Li2Ga2GeS6, LiGaGe2Se6, AgGaGeS4, and Ba2GaGeS6, are grown in bulk-sized crystals, which is desirable for optical devices [5, 6, 10, 16]. There are different kinds of chalcogenides, generally, alkali metal chalcogenides and transition metal chalcogenides (TMCs), which again can be categorized into binary, ternary, and quaternary chalcogenides. The chalcogenides have weaker interatomic bonds than the oxides, resulting in good optical transparencies in the IR regions. Meanwhile, the chalcogenides exhibit adjustable structure and optical properties [6, 14, 15, 17].

3.1 Cataloguing of chalcogenides based on number of components

Chalcogenides are classified based on their number of components, such as binary, ternary and quaternary structures, number of metals, number of chalcogen ions, and so on though, both ternary and quaternary elements of chalcogenides are systematically analyzed compared to binary chalcogenides [18, 19].

3.1.1 Binary chalcogenides

Binary chalcogenides containes two kinds of ions (metal ions and chalcogen anion). The CdS, CdSe, Ga2S3, GaS, In2S3, GaSe MnS, SnS, SnS2, ZnS, and ZnSe are an example of binary chalcogenides. For instance, CdS is one of the most considered chalcogenides. It has an energy gap value of 2.3 eV and is comparatively active under visible light. Its special size and structure-based optical and electronic properties are desirable for various kinds of applications. Owing to its numerous possible applications CDS chalcogenides are assumed to be the most significant materials [18, 19].

3.1.2 Ternary chalcogenides

When selecting a crystal for laser energy conversion in the IR, it is essential to have an ideal mixture of various considerations like birefringence value not less than 0.03 and LDT value of around 100 Mcm−2, energy gap value of more than 3.3 eV and the NLO coefficient should be more than 4 pm V−1 [20]. The Li- and Ba-having chalcogenides meet these desires. The ZnGeP2, AgGaSe2, CdSiP2, and AgGaTe2 crystals have high NLO susceptibility, but their forbidden energy band is too low. The most commonly used nonlinear crystals for the MIR are AgGaS2 AgGaSe2, and ZnGeP2. However, they all own serious disadvantages [6, 21, 22]. In recent times, consideration was given to chalcogenide crystals, such as alkali and alkali-earth metals (Li and Ba) (Table 1). These crystals permit one to resolve some difficulties in the MIR region. The birefringence value in Li-comprising crystals is significantly larger. LiBC2 (B = Ga; C = S,Se) crystals can be applied for SHG applications wavelengths between 1.4 and 12 μm [23, 24]. Telluride crystals also have MIR properties, especially LiGaTe2 has phase-matching in the entire transparency region. The SHG conversion efficiency of LiGaTe2 is 10.6 μm, which is higher than that of AGSe [25]. To enhance the energy gap, Ag cation is to be substituted with alkali/alkaline earth metal (Li, Ba). Adding these metal, we can get LiBC2 (B = In, Ga; C = S, Se, Te) and BaGa4C7 (C = S, Se) group crystals. These crystals own a high bandgap value [26, 27, 28]. A little mass of Li is the reason for high thermal conductivity and high vibrational frequencies. The thermal conductivity of Li mixtures is around five times higher than that of AGS (Se) [29] and four to eight times more than that of BaGa4S7 (Se) (Figure 1) [6, 28]. The laser damage threshold for LGS is 3.5 Jcm−2, which is five times larger than LISe [30]. A similar result has been obtained when the Ag ion is substituted with Ba. BaGa4S7 crystal has high LDT and NLO susceptibility. Though, Ba cation slightly drops the band gap value. The point group is mm2 and m for BaGa4S7 (Figure 1) and BaGa4Se7, respectively. Wide transparency regions of 0.35–12 and 0.47–15.0 μm, and energy gaps of 3.54 and 2.64 eV were found for both BaGa4S7 and BaGa4Se7 crystals, respectively. Both crystals have strong absorption peak at 15 μm. The BaGa4Se7 showed high nonlinear susceptibility of d11 = 18.2 pm V−1 [6, 31, 32].

CrystalPoint groupTransparency range (μm)Band gap (ev)Nonlinear coeff. (pm V1)Laser damage threshold (MW cm2)
AgGaS242 m0.47–132.7d32 = 8, 1.06 d36 = 19, 1.0634 at 10 ns, 1064 nm
ZnGeP242 m0.74–122d36=75, 9.6100 at 10 ns, 2000 nm
AgGaSe242 m0.76–181.8d32 = 19.6,3.4 d36 = 39, 1.0613 at 30 ns, 2000 nm
LiGaTe242 m0.52–202.31d36 = 43, 4.5
LiGaS2mm20.32–124.15d31 = 5.8, 2.3 d24 = 5.1, 2.3240 at 14 ns, 1064 nm
LiGaSe2mm20.37–143.57d31 = 9.9,2.3 d24 = 7.7, 2.380 at 5.6 ns, 1064 nm
LiInS2mm20.34–13.23.57d31 = 7.25 d24 = 5.66, 2.340* 14 ns, 1064 nm
LiInSe2mm20.46–142.86d31 = 11.78 d24 = 8.17, 2.340* 10 ns, 1064 nm
BaGa4S7mm20.35–13.73.54d32 = 5.7, 2.3250 at 14 ns, 1064 nm
BaGa4Se7m0.47–182.64d11 = 18.2, 2.3 d13 = −0.6, 2.3

Table 1.

Point group, transparency range, band gap, and LDT value of ternary chalcogenides.

Figure 1.

Single crystals of BaGa4S7.

3.1.3 Quaternary chalcogenides

Quaternary chalcogenides have four kinds of ions together with a chalcogen anion. These kinds of materials have different applications, such as MIR-NLO, solar cell absorbers, photocatalysts, and so on. Quaternary materials adopt different kinds of elements, which permits comparatively complex structural, electronic, and optical properties [6, 33]. Using the quaternary crystals, the IR-NLO parameters can be enhanced with a high content of NLO-active parts [6]. A compact organization of the microscopic NLO-active parts increases high macroscopic NLO outcomes [6]. The birefringence value of AgGaSe2 is 0.05 and this value for AgGaGe3Se8 is 0.11. The enhanced LDT value of AgGaGeS4 shows that it is a potential alternative crystal to the generally used AgGaS2 for IR-NLO applications. Li2In2SiSe6, Li2In2GeSe6, Li2Ga2GeS6, and LiGaGe2Se6 are the Li-having quaternary chalcogenides crystals (Table 2) [634, 35, 36, 37]. All these crystals have non-centrosymmetric crystal structures. Li2Ga2GeS6 (Figure 2), LiGaGe2Se6 (Figure 3) crystals have orthorhombic crystal systems with space group Fdd2 and Li2In2GeSe6, Li2In2SiSe6 crystals own monoclinic crystal systems with space group Cc. Ba-having quaternary BaGa2GeS6, BaGa2GeSe6 structures, which are promising crystals for NLO applications [37]. The NLO susceptibilities of Li2Ga2GeS6 are 16 pm/V, which is significantly higher than LiGaS2 (5.8 pm/V). A similar result was noted for LiGaGe2Se6. BaGa2GeS6 and BaGa2GeSe6 crystals also have improved NLO parameters. The SHG experiments showed that both materials have phase-matched behavior. The calculated SHG coefficient is ∼2.1 and ∼3.5 times higher than that of AgGaS2. The nonlinear susceptibilities are 26.3 pm/V and 43.7 pm/V for BaGa2GeS6 and BaGa2GeSe6, respectively [37]. The transparency region in Li2Ga2GeS6 and LiGaGe2Se6 is 0.35–12 and 0.37–14 μm, respectively. For BaGa2GeS6 and BaGa2GeSe6, the transparency regions are 0.380–13.7 μm and 0.44–18 μm, respectively. Band gaps of BaGa2GeS6 and BaGa2GeSe6 are 3.26 and 2.81 eV, respectively. Li2In2GeSe6 and Li2In2SiSe6 crystals have the energy gap values of 2.30 and 3.61 eV, respectively [6].

CrystalPoint groupTransparency range (μm)Band gap (ev)Nonlinear coeff., (pm V−1)Optical damage threshold (MW cm−2)
AgGaGeS4mm20.42–122.8d31 = 15, 1.0650 at 15 ns, 1064 nm
AgGaGe3Se8mm20.6–182.4d31 = 33.4
Li2Ga2GeS6mm20.35–142.51deff = 16, 1.06>50 at 15 ns, 1064 nm
LiGaGe2Se6mm20.47–182.64d15 = 18.6, 2.0950 at 10 ns, 1064 nm
Li2In2GeS6m0.363.45≈d36 = 12.6, 10.6
Li2In2GeSe6m0.542.30≈d36 AGSe
Li2In2SiS6m0.343.61≈d36 AGS
BaGa2GeS630.38–143.26deff = 26.3, 2.09
BaGa2GeSe630.44–182.81deff = 43.7, 2.09

Table 2.

Point group, transparency range, band gap, and LDT value of quaternary chalcogenides.

Figure 2.

Crystal of LiGaGe2Se6.

Figure 3.

Crystal structure of LiGaGe2Se6.

Advertisement

4. Chalcohalides

Chalcohalides could be considered potential materials for mid-IR applications. The chalcohalides contain a combination of sulfur and halogen. Chalcohalides have non-centrosymmetric coordinated surroundings that can stimulate mid-IR-NLO efficiency. Based on the chemical compounds present in the chalcohalides, it can be divided into [4]:

  1. Alkali/alkaline-earth metal chalcohalides

  2. Adduct-type chalcohalides

  3. Lewis acid adducts chalcohalides

  4. Main group element clusters chalcohalides

  5. Other group main metal chalcohalides

  6. Transition metal chalcohalides

4.1 Alkali/alkaline-earth metal chalcohalides

The Ba4Ge3S9Cl2 chalcohalide has excellent mid-IR-NLO properties [38]. It has a space group P63. The bandgap energy of Ba4Ge3S9Cl2 was 2.91 eV. The SHG response of Ba4Ge3S9Cl2 was 2.4 times higher than that of AGS [38]. The bandgap of Ba4Ge3S9Cl2 is 2.67 eV, which was calculated by the DFT method. NLO coefficients are found to be d15 = d24 = 7.61 and d33 = 13.81 pm/V. The bandgap of NaBa4Ge3S10Cl was 3.49 eV and SHG efficiency was 0.3 times that of AgGaS2 (AGS) [39]. The theoretically calculated bandgap of this crystal is 2.94 eV. Then, the NLO coefficients are calculated to be d15 = d24 = 3.89 and d33 = 9.32 pm/V. The mid-IR-NLO crystals [A3X] [Ga3PS8] (A = K, Rb; X = Cl, Br) were synthesized and reported by B.W. Liu et al. in the year 2016 [40]. Two Cl-crystals [K3Cl][Ga3PS8] and [Rb3Cl][Ga3PS8] are having isostructural with space group Pmn21, while the other two Br-crystals [Rb3Br][Ga3PS8] and [K3Br][Ga3PS8] belong to Pm space group. These four compounds showed outstanding mid-IR-NLO behavior and the energy gaps of [K3Cl][Ga3PS8], [Rb3Cl][Ga3PS8], [K3Br][Ga3PS8], and [Rb3Br][Ga3-PS8] are 3.60, 3.65, 3.85, and 3.50 eV, respectively. All four compounds showed large SHG responses of 4.0, 5.0, 7.0, and 9.0 times that of AgGaS2 (AGS) at 1064 nm [39]. Moreover, these four compounds have higher laser threshold damage (LDT) of 37, 35, 31, and 29 times than that of AGS (Table 3).

CrystalSpace groupBand gap (ev) (DFT)SHG AgGaS2 (AGS) timesNonlinear coefficients (pm/V)Laser threshold damage (LDT) AgGaS2 (AGS)
Ba4Ge3S9Cl2P632.672.4d15 = d24 = 7.61 and d33 = 13.81
NaBa4Ge3S10Cl3.490.3are d15 = d24 = 3.89 and d33 = 9.32
[K3Cl][Ga3PS8]Pmn213.604.037
[Rb3Cl][Ga3PS8]Pmn213.655.035
[K3Br][Ga3PS8]Pm3.85,7.035
[Rb3Br][Ga3PS8]Pm3.509.029

Table 3.

Space group, band gap, and LDT value of alkali/alkaline-earth metal chalcohalides.

4.2 Adduct-type chalcohalides

The (SbI3) (S8)3 and (SnI4)-(S8)2 are the adduct-type of chalcohalides. The (TI3). (S8)3 (T = As, Sb) [4, 41, 42, 43, 44] adduct-type chalcohalides have isostructural with R3m space group (Table 4). The (SbI3). (S8)3 and (AsI3). (S8)3 chalcohalides have reasonable energy gap value of 2.52 and 2.31 eV and their theoretical energy gaps are 2.69 and 2.21 eV, respectively. SHG responses of these two chalcohalides have 1.0 and 0.8 times that of AgGaS2. They also have wide IR transparent wavelengths around 2.5–25.0 μm and 0.4–25.0 μm [41, 42]. The calculated NLO coefficients are d15 = 9.21, d22 = 9.22, d33 = 6.91 pm/V for (SbI3).(S8)3 and d15 = 3.40, d22 = 6.21, d33 = 0.73 pm/V for (AsI3).(S8)3. The chalcohalides (SnI4). (S8)2 has space group Fdd2 [44] and a wide IR window in the range of 2.5–25.0 μm. The energy gap of (SnI4). (S8)2 is 2.17 eV. The SHG response of (SnI4). (S8)2 is 0.5 times stronger than that of AgGaS2 at 2.1 μm.

CrystalSpace groupBand gap (ev)SHG AgGaS2(AGS) timesIR transparent ranges (μm)NLO coefficients (pm/V)
(SbI3) (S8)3R3m2.521.02.5–25.0d15 = 9.21, d22 = 9.22, d33 = 6.91
(AsI3). (S8)3R3m2.31 eV0.80.4–25.0d15 = 3.40, d22 = 6.21, d33 = 0.73
(SnI4). (S8)2Fdd22.17 eV0.52.5–25.0

Table 4.

Space group, band gap, SHG, and transparency range value of adduct-type chalcohalides.

4.3 Lewis acid adduct chalcohalides

Lewis acid adduct chalcohalides have sulfur-nitrogen rings with a variety of structures. These chalcohalides have moderate band gaps and IR-NLO properties (Table 5). A new chalcohalide (NSF)4 [45] has a space group of P-421c. The calculated energy gaps are 4.57 eV (HSE06 method) and 3.58 eV (GGA method). For a high LDT, the large bandgap is more advantageous. The birefringence for (NSF)4 is 0.220 at 1064 nm and the calculated NLO coefficient for (NSF)4 is d14 = 3.20 pm/V. Increased bandgap occurs due to the large electronegativity of F atoms in the compound. S3N5PF2 crystal [46] has an R3m space group. It has a wide bandgap of 3.49 eV (HSE06). The estimated birefringence is around 0.110 at 1064 nm and NLO coefficients are d15 = 1.71, d21 = 0.19 and d33 = 3.69 pm/V. The d33 coefficient is around 9.2 times stronger than that of KDP.

CrystalSpace groupBand gap (HSE06) (ev)NLO coefficient (pm/V)
(NSF)4P-421c4.57d14 = 3.20
S3N5PF2R3m3.49d15 = 1.71, d21 = 0.19 and d33 = 3.69

Table 5.

Space group and band gap, and value of Lewis acid adduct chalcohalides.

4.4 Main group element clusters chalcohalides

The chalcohalides (Bi4S4)(AlCl4)4 belong to the space group I-4 (Figure 4) [47] and it has two classes of main group component clusters that are in AlCl4 tetrahedron and Bi4S4 cube. The energy gap of (Bi4S4)(AlCl4)4 is calculated to be 3.59 eV. (Bi4S4)(AlCl4)4 is the largest main group element cluster chalcohalide, which has an NLO coefficient value of d14 = 1.52 pm/V and it is 3.8 times stronger than that of KDP. The DFT method showed that the main group component cluster chalcohalides has insignificant NLO coefficients.

Figure 4.

Crystal structure of (Bi4S4)(AlCl4)4.

4.5 Other main groups of metal chalcohalides

Both In5S5Cl [48] and In5S5Br [49] have isostructural properties, which are having the space groups Pmn21. The In5S5Cl and In5S5Br materials have band gap of 1.76 and 1.84 eV, respectively (Table 6). The estimated NLO coefficients are found to be d15 = 0.36, d24 = 2.83, d33 = 13.38 pm/V for In5S5Cl and d15 = 2.07, d24 = 2.21, d33 = 7.38 pm/V for In5S5Br. When compared with the NLO coefficients of AGS, the main group metal chalcohalides In5S5Cl and In5S5Br have d33=1.0 and 0.5 times than that of AGS. The (CS3N2Br)Br3 main group metal chalcohalides [50] crystallizes in space group Pna21. The estimated energy gap for (CS3N2Br)Br3 is 2.21 eV (HSE06), and the NLO coefficients of (CS3N2Br)Br3 are d15 = 8.90, d24 = 5.40, d33 = 1.00 pm/V. From the NLO coefficient result, d15 has a good NLO coefficient, which is about 0.6 times that of AGS.

CrystalSpace groupBand gap (HSE06) evNLO coefficient (pm/V)NLO coefficient (AGS) times
In5S5ClPmn211.76d15 = 0.36, d24 = 2.83, d33 = 13.381.0
In5S5BrPmn211.84d15 = 2.07, d24 = 2.21, d33 = 7.380.5
(CS3N2Br)Br3Pna212.21d15 = 8.90, d24 = 5.40, d33 = 1.000.6

Table 6.

Space group, band gap, and SHG value of other main groups of metal chalcohalides.

4.6 Transition metal chalcohalides

Asymmetric distribution of electron clouds is generally caused by polyhedron with the d10 transition metals because of the dp orbital hybridization and group distortion, so it produces high SHG behavior. Due to the dp hybridization, the compound has a red-shifted absorption edge, this might reduce the bandgap of IR-NLO materials. To enhance the chalcogenides energy gap, halogen elements are introduced, that is, by combining cations with d10 configuration, which led to the equilibrium among energy gaps and SHG behavior in the IR-NLO crystals. So, they separated the asymmetric chalcohalides with a d10 electronic configuration. The transition metal chalcohalide Ag2HgSI2 has the space group Cmc21 [51]. The bandgap of Ag2HgSI2 is 2.65 eV and it is compared with AGS of (2.70 eV). The SHG of Ag2HgSI2 is 4.2 times stronger than that of KDP. The theoretical birefringence of Ag2HgSI2 is 0.210 at 1064 nm. The crystal (P4S3)3(CuCl)7 belongs to the space group P31c [52]. The bandgap of (P4S3)3(CuCl)7 is 2.77 eV (HSE06 method) and NLO coefficients of (P4S3)3(CuCl)7 are d33 = 3.34 and d15 = d24 = 1.81 pm/V. In the NLO coefficients, the d33 value is about 8.5 times that of KDP and has a birefringence value of 0.150 at 1064 nm.

Advertisement

5. Oxide crystal

Normally, oxide-based materials have a high laser damage threshold and many of them have limited IR transparency within the range of 6 μm. Here, we would like to explain the new oxide-based NLO materials, which are very important for the development of IR transparent regions beyond 6 μm. Several new NLO oxide crystals were identified, which have high IR cutoff wavelengths that are up to 6 μm. For instance β-BaTeMo2O9 [53], MnTeMoO6 [54], Cs2TeW3O12 [55], V2Te2O9 [56], Li3VO4 [57] , M2LiVO4 (M = Rb, Cs) [58], Li2K4TiOGe4O12 [59], and Rb4Li2TiOGe4O12 [60]. Moreover, for the oxide-based NLO material, IR transparent range is a difficult factor to attain. Pb17O8Cl18 was new IR-NLO material discovered by Pan and Poeppelmeier et al. [61] in 2015. Pb17O8Cl18 single crystal was synthesized by modified spontaneous crystallization in an open model. Tao’s et al. [62] reported a new LiNbO3-type NLO crystal. Li2ZrTeO6 crystal (size: 16 × 15 × 12 mm3) is grown by top-seeded solution growth (TSSG) method. To maintain the structural qualities of LiNbO3, Zr4+and Te6+ were substituted for Nb5+ to form Li2ZrTeO6 and it crystallized in the trigonal crystal system with space group R3 (Figure 5). LiNbO3 belongs to the space group, R3c, which has a close structural feature with Li2ZrTeO6 [63]. La3SnGa5O14 is a new IR-NLO crystal, it belongs to the langasite family and has a space group P321 [64]. Polycrystalline La3SnGa5O14 was produced using a solid-state reaction and a single crystal were grown by Czochralski method. The single crystal of Pb17O8Cl18 has a bandgap of 3.44 eV and it has high IR transparency (13.9 μm). La3SnGa5O14 has a wide energy gap value of 4.60 eV and transparency of 10 μm.

Figure 5.

Crystal structures of Li2ZrTeO6.

The SHG responses of Pb17O8Cl18 showed a response at 2090 nm and 1064 nm, which is phase-matchable, and it is two times stronger than that of AgGaS2 and four times higher than that of KDP. Li2ZrTeO6 showed a huge powder SHG behavior at 1064 nm, which is 2.5 times higher than that of KDP [63]. For Li2ZrTeO6 and LiNbO3, there is a variation in the SHG responses, which is closely correlated, and it is due to the different sizes of octahedral distortions in their crystal structure. The SHG efficiency of La3SnGa5O14 is 0.4 times that of AgGaS2 and when compared to AgGaS2 (13 μm) it has wide IR transparency. Pb17O8Cl18 has an LDT of 12.8 MW/cm2 (Table 7). These characteristics reveal that Pb17O8Cl18 is one of the good mid-IR-NLO crystals for the next generation. Li2ZrTeO6 has an outstanding optical performance and a very high LDT greater than 1.3 GW/cm2and it was more than 22 times that of LiNbO3. It has a higher IR transparent range that is up to 7.4 μm. La3SnGa5O14,which has the highest LDT of 846 MW/cm2, is an alternative NLO crystal in the mid-IR region. It is transparent beyond 10 μm. The langasite family provided valuable information to design a new NLO crystal in the IR area.

CrystalSpace groupBandgap (eV)IR rangeSHGLDT (× AGS, MW/cm2)
Li2ZrTeO6R34.067.4 μm2.5 times (KDP)> 1300 MW/cm2
La3SnGa5O14P3214.60 eV10 μm0.4 times that of AgGaS228 × AGS, 846 MW/cm2
Pb17O8Cl18Fmm23.44 eV13.9 μm2 times (AgGaS2) and 4 times (KDP)12.8 × AGS (on powder)

Table 7.

Space group, band gap, transparency range, and SHG value of oxide crystal.

Advertisement

6. Halides

A halide has a binary form in which one region is a halogen and the other region is a component or radical that is less electronegative/electropositive than the halogen [65]. For preparing NLO halides, the physical, chemical, and crystallographic aspects are important. In halides, hyperpolarizabilities were used to find out the NLO susceptibilities. Moreover, these crystals have high LDT and good mechanical properties. HgBr2 crystal was grown using a lowering temperature technique with a size of about 15 × 15 × 1.5 mm3 [66]. Tl3PbBr5, Tl4PbI6, Tl4HgI6, and Tl3PbI5 were grown by the vertical Bridgman method [5]. The 3:1:5 ratio showed orthorhombic symmetry and the 4:1:6 ratio indicated tetragonal symmetry. In this method, they maintained the temperature gradients in the range from 20 K/cm to 30 K/cm and cooling rates were in the range from 5 to 10 K/h, which showed a growth of 1 cm/day and 3–5 cm/day. Tl3PbCl5 [67] and Tl3PbBr5 [68] single crystals were grown by Bridgman-Stockbarger technique. Tl3PbI5 is colorless and Tl3PbBr5 (Figure 6) crystal is a yellow color and transparent. Tl4HgI6 crystal is grown using Bridgman-Stockbarger method [6970] and they melt consistently at 396°C. The crystal was red and when the iodine concentration increases in the stoichiometric ratio, the crystal becomes changed to black. It belongs to the point symmetry group C4v. BaMgF4 crystal was grown using the Czochralski technique [71]. It belongs to the pyroelectric fluoride group BaMF4 (M = Mg, Co, Ni, Zn) and it has space group Cmc21. SrAlF5 crystal belongs to the class of uniaxial ferroelectric [72] and is grown using Czochralski technique [71]. Tl3PbCl5 and Tl3PbBr5 are nonhygroscopic. In Tl3PbBr5, the phase transition is observed at ~237°C, and for Tl3PbCl5, phase transition is noted at 171°C. Tl2HgI4 compound has a melting point temperature of 318°C.

Figure 6.

Crystal of Tl3PbBr5.

HgBr2 crystal showed good phase matchable SHG efficiency, which is 10 times greater than that of KDP and has transparency between 2.5 and 25 mm. It covers the whole mid-IR range. Tl3PbCl5 and Tl3PbBr5 have transparency of 0.5–20 mm and 0.65–24 mm, respectively. The Tl4HgI6 crystal is optically positive and transparent vfrom 1.2 to 40 mm. BaMgF4 is a ferroelectric fluoride due to its wide transparency between 125 nm and 13 mm, and it can be used for UV and mid-IR optical applications [71, 72]. In the UV region, the shortest band is noted at 368 nm, which represents the potential behavior of BaMgF4 as a nonlinear material. It can be used for the production of all solid-state lasers and mid-IR wavelength areas. BaMgF4 and SrAlF5 crystals are promising crystals for solid-state lasers. The LDT value of the HgBr2 crystal is 0.3 GW/cm2.

Advertisement

7. Oxyhalides

To develop high efficiency in mid-IR-NLO crystals, it is important to have an oxide-based system with an expandable IR transparent range. Many NLO oxides have a range from 3 to 5 μm atmospheric windows. When compared with the AgGaS2 (13 μm), the oxide-based materials, such as La3SnGa5O14 and Pb17O8Cl18, have wide IR transparency between 12 and 13.9 μm. In this lead oxyhalide, NLO crystal Pb17O8Cl18 plays an outstanding overall property. To obtain high LDT, halide and oxide-based crystals with high bandgaps are used. Nowadays, the mixture of heavy metal lone pair cation, Pb2+, and mixed oxyhalides are focused on IR applications. Xinglong Chen et al. discovered the lead mixed oxyhalides, such as Pb13O6Cl9Br5, Pb13O6Cl7Br7, and Pb13O6Cl4Br10 [73], which have broad IR transparency up to 14 μm, high SHG behavior (0.6–0.9 × AgGaS2) and wide bandgaps from 3.05 to 3.21 eV. Pb13O6Cl9Br5 single crystal has the size of 2.9 × 1.3 × 0.5 cm3, which was grown using the top-seeded solution growth (TSSG) method. It has a wide transparent range from 0.384 to 14.0 μm and a high LDT value (14.6 × AgGaS2). Many crystals, such as APbCO3F (A = Rb, Cs), Pb2BO3Cl, Cs3VO(O2)2CO3, Bi3TeBO9, and BiFSeO3 [74, 75, 76, 77, 78], have been reported with outstanding properties and it is a very good material for visible/near-IR nonlinear optical applications. Pb13O6Cl4Br10, Pb13O6Cl7Br7, and Pb13O6Cl9Br5 have orthorhombic crystal structures with space group Fmm2 (Table 8). These three crystals are isomorphic.

CrystalSpace groupSHG (AgGaS2)LDT (AgGaS2)
Pb13O6Cl4Br10Fmm20.63.0
Pb13O6Cl7Br7Fmm20.83.2
Pb13O6Cl9Br5Fmm20.94.0

Table 8.

Space group and SHG value of oxyhalides.

By using Czochralski and flux method, oxide-based crystals can be obtained. The Pb13O6Cl4Br10, Pb13O6Cl7Br7, and Pb13O6Cl9Br5 crystals were grown by flux method and the self-flux method was adopted for PbCl2-PbBr2. The crystals obtained by this method were optically transparent and they showed a good growth rate. Pb13O6Cl9Br5 was used to grow large-size crystals using the TSSG technique. After many technical optimizations, two big size crystals (Dimensions up to 2.9 × 1.3 × 0.5 and 3.7 × 0.4 × 0.7 cm3) were grown using the [001] and [100] oriented seeds. They have good transparency and good growth speed. Therefore, to get a better quality crystal the growth parameters (cooling rate, rotation speed, and temperature gradient) are very important in the crystallization process. DSC curves of Pb13O6Cl4Br10, Pb13O6Cl7Br7, and Pb13O6Cl9Br5 show that each of them has one endothermic peak at 501°C, 504°C, and 508°C, respectively, which belongs to the melting point and these crystals have two exothermic peaks, which indicate the decomposing of the compounds. Due to the volatility of the halide materials, there is no weight loss before 490°C in the TGA curves. From the DSC and TGA, it was concluded that these compounds have high thermal stability up to 490°C. Pb13O6Cl9Br5, Pb13O6Cl7Br7, and Pb13O6Cl4Br10 have high reflectance wavelengths in the region between 500 and 2500 nm. When compared with AgGaS2 (2.67 eV, 0.53–13 μm) and ZnGeP2 (1.68 eV, 0.74–12 μm), the crystals of Pb13O6Cl4Br10, Pb13O6Cl7Br7, and Pb13O6Cl9Br5 own greater energy gaps and good transparency in IR region [79, 80].

In the application of high-power laser systems, the NLO crystal with laser-induced damage is one of the biggest problems. The crystals which have wider bandgaps are subjected to higher LDTs. Polycrystalline samples are used for the laser-induced damage threshold evaluation, and the polycrystalline material of AgGaS2 was used as reference material. The Pb13O6Cl4Br10, Pb13O6Cl7Br7, and Pb13O6Cl9Br5 have large LDTs values, which are 3.0, 3.2, and 4.0 times higher than that of AgGaS2. The Pb13O6Cl9Br5 crystal has LDT of 439 MW/cm2, this is 14.6 times higher than that of the AgGaS2 crystal (30 MW/cm2). The second harmonic generation intensity is 0.5 times higher than that of AgGaS2. The SHG value of Pb13O6Cl4Br10, Pb13O6Cl7Br7, and Pb13O6Cl9Br5 are found to be 0.6, 0.8, and 0.9, respectively. From this, we concluded that SHG responses of each material have all phase-matchable when it is under the 2090 nm wavelength. Due to the increase in particle size, it showed a positive movement in SHG response.

Advertisement

8. Conclusion

In summary, significant progress has been attained in the search for new, favorable IR nonlinear crystals, such as chalcogenides, chalcohalides, oxides, halides, and oxyhalides, for producing coherent energy in the MIR. For a good NLO crystal, the crystals must have good physical and chemical properties, such as wide transparency range, LDT, chemical stability, birefringence, and nonlinear susceptibility. Nevertheless, for practical applications, the crystals should have high qualities with promising properties. For promising optical applications, accurate optical properties should be measured. For MIR applications, high bandgap value, LDT, and NLO susceptibility optical transparency are important. Various IR crystals fulfill the basic conditions of IR-NLO applications. The significant behavior of these crystals recommends that this crystal can be used in different optical applications.

References

  1. 1. Yan M, Xue HG, Guo SP. Recent achievements in lone-pair cation-based infrared second-order nonlinear optical materials. Crystal Growth & Design. 2020;21(1):698-720
  2. 2. Chen X, Ok KM. Recent advances in oxide-based nonlinear optical materials with wide infrared transparency beyond 6 μm. Chemistry, an Asian Journal. 2020;15(22):3709-3716
  3. 3. Liang F, Kang L, Lin Z, Wu Y. Mid-infrared nonlinear optical materials based on metal chalcogenides: Structure–property relationship. Crystal Growth & Design. 2017;17(4):2254-2289
  4. 4. Gao L, Huang J, Guo S, Yang Z, Pan S. Structure-property survey and computer-assisted screening of mid-infrared nonlinear optical chalcohalides. Coordination Chemistry Reviews. 2020;421:213379
  5. 5. Jiang XM, Guo SP, Zeng HY, Zhang MJ, Guo GC. Large crystal growth and new crystal exploration of mid-infrared second-order nonlinear optical materials. Structure-Property Relationships in Non-Linear Optical Crystals II. 2012;2012:1-43
  6. 6. Isaenko LI, Yelisseyev AP. Recent studies of nonlinear chalcogenide crystals for the mid-IR. Semiconductor Science and Technology. 2016;31(12):123001
  7. 7. Shi ZH, Chi Y, Sun ZD, Liu W, Guo SP. Sn2Ga2S5: A type of IR nonlinear-optical material. Inorganic Chemistry. 2019;58(18):12002
  8. 8. Nguyen V, Ji B, Wu K, Zhang B, Wang J. Unprecedented mid-infrared nonlinear optical materials achieved by crystal structure engineering, a case study of (KX) P 2 S 6 (X= Sb, Bi, Ba). Chemical Science. 2022;13(9):2640-2648
  9. 9. Wu C, Lin L, Jiang X, Lin Z, Huang Z, Humphrey MG, et al. K5 (W3O9F4)(IO3): An efficient mid-infrared nonlinear optical compound with high laser damage threshold. Chemistry of Materials. 2019;31(24):10100-10108
  10. 10. Yu T, Wang S, Zhang X, Li C, Qiao J, Jia N, et al. MnSiP2: A new Mid-IR ternary phosphide with strong SHG effect and ultrabroad transparency range. Chemistry of Materials. 2019;31(6):2010-2018
  11. 11. Guo SP, Chi Y, Guo GC. Recent achievements on middle and far-infrared second-order nonlinear optical materials. Coordination Chemistry Reviews. 2017;335:44-57
  12. 12. Guo Y, Liang F, Yin W, Li Z, Luo X, Lin ZS, et al. BaHgGeSe4 and SrHgGeSe4: Two new Hg-based infrared nonlinear optical materials. Chemistry of Materials. 2019;31(8):3034-3040
  13. 13. Li MY, Ma Z, Li B, Wu XT, Lin H, Zhu QL. HgCuPS4: An exceptional infrared nonlinear optical material with defect diamond-like structure. Chemistry of Materials. 2020;32(10):4331-4339
  14. 14. Kushwaha AK, Kalita H, Suman S, Bhardwaj A, Ghosh R. Two-dimensional (2D) thermoelectric materials. Thermoelectricity and Advanced Thermoelectric Materials. 2021:233-260
  15. 15. Muslih EY, Munir B, Khan MM. Advances in chalcogenides and chalcogenides-based nanomaterials such as sulfides, selenides, and tellurides. Chalcogenide-Based Nanomaterials as Photocatalysts. 2021:7-31
  16. 16. Shi W, Ding YJ, Fernelius N, Vodopyanov K. Efficient, tunable, and coherent 0.18-5.27-THz source based on GaSe crystal. Optics Letters. 2002;27(16):1454-1456
  17. 17. Abudurusuli A, Li J, Pan S. A review on the recently developed promising infrared nonlinear optical materials. Dalton Transactions. 2021;50(9):3155-3160
  18. 18. Nitsche R, Bölsterli HU, Lichtensteiger M. Crystal growth by chemical transport reactions—I: Binary, ternary, and mixed-crystal chalcogenides. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids. 1961;21:199-205
  19. 19. Bajpai PK, Yadav S, Tiwari A, Virk HS. Recent advances in the synthesis and characterization of chalcogenide nanoparticles. Solid State Phenomena. 2015;222:187-233
  20. 20. Jiang X, Kang L, Luo S, Gong P, Lee MH, Lin Z. Development of nonlinear optical materials promoted by density functional theory simulations. International Journal of Modern Physics B. 2014;28(27):1430018
  21. 21. Ohmer MC, Goldstein JT, Zelmon DE, Saxler AW, Hegde SM, Wolf JD, et al. Infrared properties of AgGaTe 2, a nonlinear optical chalcopyrite semiconductor. Journal of Applied Physics. 1999;86(1):94-99
  22. 22. Schunemann PG, Setzler SD, Pollak TM, Ohmer MC, Goldstein JT, Zelmon DE. Crystal growth and properties of AgGaTe2. Journal of Crystal Growth. 2000;211:242-246
  23. 23. Isaenko L, Yelisseyev A, Lobanov S, Titov A, Petrov V, Zondy JJ, et al. Growth and properties of LiGaX2 (X= S, Se, Te) single crystals for nonlinear optical applications in the mid‐IR. Crystal Research and Technology: Journal of Experimental and Industrial Crystallography. 2003;38:379-387
  24. 24. Yelisseyev A, Isaenko L, Lovanov S, Zondy JJ. Advanced solid state lasers. OSA Trends in Optics and Photonics Series. 2000;34:561-569
  25. 25. Zondy JJ, Bielsa F, Douillet A, Hilico L, Acef O, Petrov V, et al. Frequency doubling of CO 2 laser radiation at 10.6 μm in the highly nonlinear chalcopyrite LiGaTe 2. Optics Letters. 2007;32(12):1722-1724
  26. 26. Yao J, Mei D, Bai L, Lin Z, Yin W, Fu P, et al. BaGa4Se7: A new congruent-melting IR nonlinear optical material. Inorganic Chemistry. 2010;49(20):9212-9216
  27. 27. Yao J, Yin W, Feng K, Li X, Mei D, Lu Q , et al. Growth and characterization of BaGa4Se7 crystal. Journal of Crystal Growth. 2012;346(1):1-4
  28. 28. Isaenko L, Yelisseyev A, Lobanov S, Krinitsin P, Petrov V, Zondy JJ. Ternary chalcogenides LiBC2 (B= In, Ga; C= S, Se, Te) for mid-IR nonlinear optics. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 2006;352:2439-2443
  29. 29. Yelisseyev AP, Drebushchak VA, Titov AS, Isaenko LI, Lobanov SI, Lyapunov KM, et al. Thermal properties of the mid-infrared nonlinear crystal LiInSe 2. Journal of Applied Physics. 2004;96(7):3659-3665
  30. 30. Petrov V, Yelisseyev A, Isaenko L, Lobanov S, Titov A, Zondy JJ. Second-harmonic generation and optical parametric amplification in the mid-IR with orthorhombic biaxial crystals LiGaS2 and LiGaSe2. Applied Physics B. 2004;78(5):543-546
  31. 31. Badikov V, Badikov D, Shevyrdyaeva G, Tyazhev A, Marchev G, Panyutin V, et al. BaGa 4 S 7: Wide-bandgap phase-matchable nonlinear crystal for the mid-infrared. Optical Materials Express. 2011;1(3):316-320
  32. 32. Tyazhev A, Kolker D, Marchev G, Badikov V, Badikov D, Shevyrdyaeva G, et al. Midinfrared optical parametric oscillator based on the wide-bandgap BaGa 4 S 7 nonlinear crystal. Optics Letters. 2012;37(19):4146-4148
  33. 33. Medina-Ramírez I, Hernández-Ramírez A, Maya-Trevino ML. Synthesis methods for photocatalytic materials. In Photocatalytic Semiconductors. 2015:69-102
  34. 34. Isaenko LI, Yelisseyev AP, Lobanov SI, Krinitsin PG, Molokeev MS. Structure and optical properties of Li2Ga2GeS6 nonlinear crystal. Optical Materials. 2015;47:413-419
  35. 35. Yelisseyev AP, Isaenko LI, Krinitsin P, Liang F, Goloshumova AA, Naumov DY, et al. Crystal growth, structure, and optical properties of LiGaGe2Se6. Inorganic Chemistry. 2016;55(17):8672-8680
  36. 36. Yin W, Feng K, Hao W, Yao J, Wu Y. Synthesis, structure, and properties of li2in2mq6 (m= si, ge; q= s, se): A new series of ir nonlinear optical materials. Inorganic Chemistry. 2012;51(10):5839-5843
  37. 37. Lin X, Guo Y, Ye N. BaGa2GeX6 (X= S, Se): New mid-IR nonlinear optical crystals with large band gaps. Journal of Solid State Chemistry. 2012;195:172-177
  38. 38. Liu PF, Li YY, Zheng YJ, Yu JS, Duan RH, Chen H, et al. Tailored synthesis of nonlinear optical quaternary chalcohalides: Ba 4 Ge 3 S 9 Cl 2, Ba 4 Si 3 Se 9 Cl 2 and Ba 4 Ge 3 Se 9 Cl 2. Dalton Transactions. 2017;46(8):2715-2721
  39. 39. Feng K, Kang L, Lin Z, Yao J, Wu Y. Noncentrosymmetric chalcohalide NaBa 4 Ge 3 S 10 Cl with large bandgap and IR NLO response. Journal of Materials Chemistry C. 2014;2(23):4590-4596
  40. 40. Liu BW, Zeng HY, Jiang XM, Wang GE, Li SF, Xu L, et al. [A 3 X][Ga 3 PS 8](A= K, Rb; X= Cl, Br): Promising IR non-linear optical materials exhibiting concurrently strong second-harmonic generation and high laser-induced damage thresholds. Chemical Science. 2016;7(9):6273-6277
  41. 41. Guo SP, Sun ZD, Chi Y, Xue HG. Adduct-type IR nonlinear-optical crystal SbI3·(S8) 3 with a large second-harmonic generation and a high laser-induced damage threshold. Inorganic Chemistry. 2018;57(17):11282-11288
  42. 42. Samoc A, Samoc M, Prasad PN, Krajewska-Cizio A. Second-harmonic generation in the crystalline complex antimony triiodide–sulfur. JOSA B. 1992;9(10):1819-1824
  43. 43. Lu ZT, Sun ZD, Chi Y, Xue HG, Guo SP. Balanced second-order nonlinear optical properties of adducts CHI3·(S8) 3 and AsI3·(S8) 3: A systematic survey. Inorganic Chemistry. 2019;58(7):4619-4625
  44. 44. Guo SP, Chi Y, Xue HG. SnI4·(S8) 2: A novel adduct-type infrared second-order nonlinear optical crystal. Angewandte Chemie. 2018;130(36):11714-11717
  45. 45. Wiegers GT, Vos A. Refinement of the structure of tetrathiazylfluoride (NSF)4. Acta Crystallographica. 1963;16(2):152-153
  46. 46. Weiss J, Ruppert I, Appel R. Die Kristall-und Molekülstruktur von S3N5PF2. Zeitschrift für Anorganische und Allgemeine Chemie. 1974;406:329-336
  47. 47. Beck J, Schlueter S, Zotov N. The cube-shaped main group element clusters (Bi4S4)4+ and (Bi4Se4)4+-synthesis from chloroaluminate melts, crystal structures and vibrational spectra. Zeitschrift für Anorganische und Allgemeine Chemie. 2004;630:2512-2519
  48. 48. Nickel V, Deiseroth HJ, Kienle L, Duppel V, Reiner C. Polymorphism of In5S5Cl–X-ray and HRTEM-Investigations. Allgemeine Chemie. 2010;636:79-84
  49. 49. Deiseroth HJ, Reiner C, Xhaxhiu K, Schlosser M, Kienle L. X-Ray and transmission electron microscopy investigations of the new solids In5S5Cl, In5Se5Cl, In5S5Br, and In5Se5Br. Zeitschrift für Anorganische und Allgemeine Chemie. 2004;630:2319-2328
  50. 50. Wolmershäuser G, Krüger C, Tsay YH. [CS3N2Br]+ Br–ein Produkt der Bromierung von S4N4 in Schwefelkohlenstoff. Chemische Berichte. 1982;115(3):1126-1131
  51. 51. Keller HL, Wimbert L. Über Münzmetall-Quecksilber-Chalkogenidhalogenide. III Zur Kristallstruktur von Ag2HgSI2. Zeitschrift für Anorganische und Allgemeine Chemie. 2003;629(12-13):2337-2340
  52. 52. Biegerl A, Brunner E, Gröger C, Scheer M, Wachter J, Zabel M. The unexpected versatility of P4S3 as a building block in polymeric copper halide networks: 2, 3-P, 1, 2, 3-P and all-P coordination. Chemistry – A European Journal. 2007;13(33):9270-9276
  53. 53. Zhang W, Tao X, Zhang C, Gao Z, Zhang Y, Yu W, et al. Bulk growth and characterization of a novel nonlinear optical crystal BaTeMo2O9. Crystal Growth & Design. 2008;8(1):304-307
  54. 54. Jin CG, Li Z, Huang LX, He MZ. Top-seeded solution growth and characterization of a novel nonlinear optical crystal MnTeMoO6. Journal of Crystal Growth. 2013;369:43-46
  55. 55. Zhang J, Tao X, Sun Y, Zhang Z, Zhang C, Gao Z, et al. Top-seeded solution growth, morphology, and properties of a polar crystal Cs2TeMo3O12. Crystal Growth & Design. 2011;11(5):1863-1868
  56. 56. Zhang W, Wang X, Shen G, Shen D. Top-seeded growth, optical properties and theoretical studies of noncentrosymmetric Te2V2O9. Crystal Research and Technology. 2012;47:163-168
  57. 57. Chen Z, Zhang Z, Dong X, Shi Y, Liu Y, Jing Q. Li3VO4: A promising mid-infrared nonlinear optical material with large laser damage threshold. Crystal Growth & Design. 2017;17:2792-2800
  58. 58. Han G, Wang Y, Su X, Yang Z, Pan S. Growth, properties, and theoretical analysis of M2LiVO4 (M = Rb, Cs) crystals: Two potential mid-infrared nonlinear optical materials. Scientific Reports. 2017;7:1901
  59. 59. Xu J, Wu H, Yu H, Zhang W, Hu Z, Wang J, et al. Li2K4TiOGe4O12: A stable mid-infrared nonlinear optical material. Chemistry of Materials. 2020;32:906-912
  60. 60. Xi M, Tang C, Li R. Rb4Li2TiOGe4O12: A titanyl nonlinear optical material with the widest transparency range. Angewandte Chemie, International Edition. 2019;58:18257-18260
  61. 61. Zhang H, Zhang M, Pan S, Dong X, Yang Z, Hou X, et al. Pb17O8Cl18: A promising IR nonlinear optical material with large laser damage threshold synthesized in an open system. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2015;137:8360-8363
  62. 62. Lu W, Gao Z, Liu X, Tian X, Wu Q , Li C, et al. Rational design of a LiNbO3-like nonlinear optical crystal, Li2ZrTeO6, with high laser-damage threshold and wide Mid-IR transparency window. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2018;140:13089-13096. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b08803
  63. 63. Ok KM, Halasyamani PS, Casanova D, Llunell M, Alemany P, Alvarez S. Distortions in octahedrally coordinated d0 transition metal oxides: A continuous symmetry measures approach. Chemistry of Materials. 2006;18:3176-3183
  64. 64. Lan H, Liang F, Jiang X, Zhang C, Yu H, Lin Z, et al. Pushing nonlinear optical oxides into the mid-infrared spectral region beyond 10 μm: Design, synthesis, and characterization of La3SnGa5O14. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2018;140:4684-4690
  65. 65. Hagemann M, Weber HJ. Are ternary halides useful materials for nonlinear optical applications? Applied Physics A. 1996;63(1):67-74
  66. 66. Zhu T, Chen X, Qin J. Research progress on mid-IR nonlinear optical crystals with high laser damage threshold in China. Frontiers of Chemistry in China. 2011;6(1):1-8
  67. 67. Singh NB, Suhre DR, Green K, Fernelius N, Hopkins FK. Periodically poled materials for long-wavelength infrared (LWIR) NLO applications. Journal of Crystal Growth. 2005;274:132-137
  68. 68. Ferrier A, Velázquez M, Pérez O, Grebille D, Portier X, Moncorgé R. Crystal growth and characterization of the non-centrosymmetric compound Tl3PbCl5. Journal of Crystal Growth. 2006;291(2):375-384
  69. 69. Ferrier A, Velázquez M, Portier X, Doualan JL, Moncorgé R. Tl3PbBr5: A possible crystal candidate for middle infrared nonlinear optics. Journal of Crystal Growth. 2006;289(1):357-365
  70. 70. Badikov DV, Badikov VV, Kuz’micheva GM, Panyutin VL, Rybakov VB, Chizhikov VI, et al. Growth and X-ray diffraction study of Tl4HgI6 crystals. InorganicMaterials. 2004;40:314-320
  71. 71. Shimamura K, Víllora EG, Muramatsu K, Ichinose N. Advantageous growth characteristics and properties of SrAlF5 compared with BaMgF4 for UV/VUV nonlinear optical applications. Journal of Crystal Growth. 2005;275:128-134
  72. 72. Ravez J, Simon A, Chaminade JP. Ferroelectric behavior and phase transition at 715 K in SrAIF5. Journal of Applied Physics. 1981;52:4740-4743
  73. 73. Chen X, Jo H, Ok KM. Lead mixed oxyhalides satisfying all fundamental requirements for high-performance mid-infrared nonlinear optical materials. Angewandte Chemie. 2020;132(19):7584-7590
  74. 74. Zou G, Lin C, Jo H, Nam G, You TS, Ok KM. Pb2BO3Cl: A Tailor-Made polar lead borate chloride with very strong second harmonic generation. Angewandte Chemie. 2016;128(39):12257-12261
  75. 75. Zou G, Lin Z, Zeng H, Jo H, Lim SJ, You TS, et al. Cs 3 VO (O 2) 2 CO 3: An exceptionally thermostable carbonatoperoxovanadate with an extremely large second-harmonic generation response. Chemical Science. 2018;9(48):8957-8961
  76. 76. Xia M, Jiang X, Lin Z, Li R. “All-three-in-one”: A new bismuth–tellurium–borate Bi3TeBO9 exhibiting strong second harmonic generation response. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2016;138(43):14190-14193
  77. 77. Zou G, Ye N, Huang L, Lin X. Alkaline-alkaline earth fluoride carbonate crystals ABCO3F (A= K, Rb, Cs; B= Ca, Sr, Ba) as nonlinear optical materials. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2011;133(49):20001-20007
  78. 78. Liang ML, Hu CL, Kong F, Mao JG. BiFSeO3: An excellent SHG material designed by aliovalent substitution. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2016;138:9433-9436
  79. 79. Kubelka P. Ein Beitrag zur Optik der Farbanstriche (Contribution to the optic of paint). Zeitschrift fur technische Physik. 1931;12:593-601
  80. 80. Tauc J. Absorption edge and internal electric fields in amorphous semiconductors. Materials Research Bulletin. 1970;5(8):721-729

Written By

Senthil Kumar Chandran, Chinnakannu Elavarasi, Srinivasan Manikam and John James Gnanapragasam

Submitted: 25 April 2022 Reviewed: 19 September 2022 Published: 14 December 2022