Abstract
Conventional coarse particle hydraulic conveying is performed under turbulent flow conditions, usually at concentrations of less than 40% v/v. The last three or four decades have seen the development of much higher concentration conveying, with the successful transport of suspensions of 70% v/v or more. These suspensions can be conveyed at very low velocities and generally exhibit very benign characteristics, having the capability of being stopped and restarted at will. There are generally two methods of pumping coarse materials safely at low velocities. The first method, using a Newtonian such as water, can be applied when the particle size distribution is sufficiently broad to minimize percolation and the concentration sufficiently high to prevent particle restructuring during transport. A second method uses a non-Newtonian, visco-plastic carrier fluid, normally fine particle slurry, to convey the coarser particles. This second method removes the constraints of the first method, allowing a greater range of coarse solid distributions and concentrations to be pumped. In both cases, the conveying characteristics appear similar to laminar flow. Both methods are described and analyzed in this chapter.
Keywords
- hydraulic transport
- coarse particle
- high concentration
- no-Newtonian
- hybrid suspension
1. Introduction
Except for the transport of pastes and non-Newtonian slurries, most hydraulic transport applications operate under turbulent conditions at low to moderate volumetric concentrations. This contrasts with pneumatic transport systems which operate in both dilute, or lean, phase conveying and dense phase conveying. Dilute phase is analogous to this form of hydraulic conveying, while dense phase conveys solids at much higher solids’ concentrations and at lower velocities. Over the last three or four decades, advances have been made in the development of higher concentration hydraulic transport systems, which share many characteristics in common with dense phase pneumatic systems.
Conventional hydraulic transport systems are turbulent, relying on the action of turbulent eddies to suspend and convey the solids in the pipe. At high velocities, the solids’ suspension is almost uniform across the pipe, while at lower velocities, a pronounced concentration profile appears, forming sliding and even stationary beds of solids on the bottom of the pipe. Such flows are unstable and solids’ transport will stop when the mean velocity falls below a minimum conveying velocity, and may even block the pipe. To minimize this risk of blockage and assist in restarting, a rule of thumb is used whereby the in-line solids’ concentration,
Despite these unstable characteristics, such conveying has many advantages in the main areas where it is practiced, namely inter-process transfer, dredging, tailings disposal and long distant transport of ore or concentrates. It is simple to operate, requiring only that those solids are mixed with water in a suitably agitated vessel of some form, and pumped, normally using centrifugal pumps, through the pipeline to their destination. The low concentration also affords easy separation of the solids from the conveying fluid.
By contrast, outside of the food and some process industries, high concentration conveying is rarely seen, concrete pumping being the most obvious exception. However, high concentration systems have been developed and are finding increasing use in tailings disposal, hoisting and other niche applications. Their attractiveness lies in their benign operation, as they generally do not require a minimum conveying velocity, so lines can be stopped and restarted at will. Their low velocity, typically of order 1–2 m/s, several meters per second lower than their coarse particle low concentration counterparts, results in low particle attrition and pipe wear. This mode of conveying also allows very coarse particles to be conveyed at low particle pipe diameter ratios, e.g.,
Two forms of high concentration conveying have been developed, one using Newtonian fluids, like water, as the carrier fluid to convey the solids, and a second using non-Newtonian carrier fluids. Although sharing many characteristics, these methods will be described separately starting with the Newtonian system.
2. Newtonian high concentration conveying
2.1 Concentration considerations
While weight concentration,
The typical response to the addition of water (Figure 1b) is to change the solids from a purely granular flow in air, to one where an increasing number of water bridges are formed. Shearing these as well as the solids requires increasingly more energy. Once all the interstices are filled with water, further addition of water simply separates the particles, reducing the mixer energy requirements. Thus, the value of 1-
The calculated value of
2.2 Conveying characteristics
As mentioned in the introduction, both dilute and high concentration conveying is commonplace in pneumatic conveying systems, and the operational or transport characteristics are displayed in what is known as a diagram of state (Figure 2).
At moderate to high velocities, the transport characteristics exhibit the familiar hook curves of conventional hydraulic conveying systems, moving from a fully suspended state at high velocities, to sliding beds as the velocity is decreased. After going through a minimum, the pressure gradient rises due to partial obscuration of the pipe and increased particle wall contact. For hydraulic systems, which normally use centrifugal pumps, this is an unstable region, but for pneumatic systems, which use a variety of different feeding systems, e.g., blow vessels, transport can still be obtained down to very low velocities. At these low velocities, the line is filled with solids that move along as a continuous plug, although this plug is often deliberately broken into smaller plugs to reduce the pressure requirements. At intermediary velocities, however, the flow is unstable, exhibiting dune flow that can block the pipe.
Wilson et al. [4] examined the behavior of dense phase hydraulic hoisting, subsequently publishing an analysis of the frictional component of such plug flow [5], and such techniques were employed in the Hansa underground mine to hoist -60 mm coal, 850 m to the surface [6]. To the author’s knowledge, though, it was not until the invention of a feeding system called a Rotary Ram Slurry Pump (RRSP), described in §2.7, that dense phase horizontal coarse particle hydraulic conveying was considered at an industrial scale.
The RRSP enabled very high concentrations of coarse particles to be loaded into a pipe using a valving system that opened to the full bore of the conveying pipe. These particles could be conveyed at very low velocities with little, if any, inter-particle movement. This feature was ideal for friable materials such as coal. Transport characteristics for ROM coal conveyed in a 300 mm pipe using this technique are shown in Figure 3.
The transport characteristics do not exhibit the typical hooked curves of lower density conveying, although transport below the lowest velocities shown were problematic. Suspensions with concentrations below 65% were also unstable for this particular material. Readings from an isolated electrode probe (see e.g. [7]), inserted into the top of the pipe, registered periodic high activity at these lower concentrations, indicating possible dune formation. A two-layer model, at concentrations close to plug flow, was used to model this flow with satisfactory agreement as shown. However, the adoption of a normal two-layer model is found to substantially overpredict the transport pressure gradients shown, and modification to such a model is needed before the agreement shown here is obtained.
2.3 Two-layer modeling modifications for coarse particles
Only a simple two-layer model (e.g. [8]) will be used in this section for illustrative purposes, and the reader is referred to the chapter on Pipeline Modeling for a more complete description and a more nuanced approach. The early layered models were developed to model the behavior of small sand particle slurries, which become fluidized during transport. This is evident by observing slurry issuing from holes in the upper invert of the conveying pipe, where the slurry behaves as a fluidized jet [9]. Such behavior is not observed in coarse particle flow. This difference has ramifications for the modeling of the resisting force of the bed in a two-layer model. Consider the schematic of the pipe cross section shown in Figure 4a.
If the solids are fine and fluidized, the bed presents a hydrostatic pressure at the pipe wall (Figure 4a, left hand side), which is normal to the pipe wall. If the density of the fluid and solids are
Where
Conversely, for unfluidized coarse particles the normal force is simply
where
The difference between Eqs. (2) and (3) is then a multiplier which accounts for the effect on the resisting force of particle fluidization. Thus, combining Eq. (2), Eq. (3), the bed fractional area and a degree of fluidization 0 <
and used to describe the bed’s normal force for an arbitrarily fluidized bed by
2.4 Comparison with conventional conveying
Data reported by the Saskatchewan Research Council (SRC) for coarse coal in water [10] show typical results in a similarly sized pipe for -50 mm solids,
where the pressure gradient, d
Comparing the SRC data with the higher pressure gradient 75% v/v data, the
2.5 Restart capabilities and practical considerations
2.5.1 Restart
As mentioned above, transport at lower concentrations proved problematic through dune formation partially blocking the pipe, resulting in unsteady flow. Experience gained with the RRSP suggested that an operational concentration range should be limited to 0.75 <
When operating within these constraints, restart of fully loaded pipelines several kilometers long proved to be immediate once the pumps were activated. The explanation for this is not entirely clear but is expected to relate to the low deposition velocities. The deposition locus for the material in Figure 5 expressed as a function of
At the operational limits for this material the corresponding deposition velocities are approximately 0.6 and 0.2 m/s. Such suspensions started with ease, and it is expected that once the pumps were started, increasing the flow to the normal conveying velocity of a 1 m/s was sufficiently rapid so that reorganization of any particles above the bed to form a plugging dune did not occur. This is despite the high velocity fluid flowing over the beds, which occupy 75 to 90% of the pipes CSA.
2.5.2 Practical considerations
Production of such suspensions is comparatively easy as the mobility of these suspensions is very high, requiring only gentle agitation in suitable mixing tanks to ensure homogenization. More difficult is maintaining the high concentrations within the required limits, requiring conveyors etc. to be sheltered from rain, and sufficient surge capacity to be installed for constant operation. This last point is less of a problem, as the ability to reduce the transport velocity to very low values or stopping, provides a very large turn down ratio. Maintaining the correct feed to the pump also requires some care, as fluid can be preferentially drawn from the tank diluting the flow into the pump’s inlet ducting, producing unstable operation, details of which are described in [12].
2.6 Diagram of state for hydraulic conveying systems
A diagram of state, similar to Figure 2, can now be drawn for hydraulic systems, to include high concentration transport, and is shown in Figure 7.
The similarities between Figures 2 and 7 are strong, showing very similar characteristics for dilute or conventional hydraulic conveying, as well as low velocity high concentration flow. In this case, though, rather than the unstable region being simply a function of conveying velocity, it is now a function of solids’ concentration being problematic at the intermediary concentrations.
Before leaving this section on Newtonian systems a brief description of the RRSP will be given, although it is noted that other solids feeders can also be successfully employed, e.g. the Kamyr feeder or similar, and various lock hopper systems (e.g. [13]).
2.7 Rotary ram slurry pump
The RRSP was invented by Bede Boyle [14, 15] and further developed by the ASEA Mineral Slurry Transport group [16], who built a 300 mm pipe diameter unit capable of transporting 300 dtph of coarse coal. A schematic illustrating the basic operating principles of this device is shown in Figure 8.
The RRSP comprises a barrel, like that in a revolver, containing a multiple number of diametrically opposed paired cylinders and pistons, that rotates on hydro-static bearings inside a casing. The configuration of a four-piston cylinder assembly is shown in Figure 8a. Two stationary valve plates each containing a full-bore inlet and full-bore outlet kidney valves are located at either end of the barrel, as shown. Manifolds containing inlet and outlet ducts are attached outboard of these valve plates. The cylinders comprise two bores of different diameters, with the smaller bore at the suspension discharge end of the RRSP. The pistons that run in these cylinders similarly have two diameters to suit the bores in the cylinders. The barrel is rotated by a hydraulic motor, mounted at the water end of the RRSP (right in this Figure), such that the cylinder openings pass the kidney shaped openings in the valve plates, allowing material to periodically enter or exit the cylinders. The upper duct, at the water end, is connected to the output of a multi-stage, high pressure, water pump, and supplies the motive force to drive the suspension. Water is returned via the lower duct to a sump. At the discharge end of the RRSP (left in this figure) the lower duct is connected to a stirred tank containing the suspension to be conveyed, and the upper duct is connected to a matched diameter conveying pipeline. The operation of the RRSP is as follows. While the upper cylinder is exposed through the kidney valve to the high-pressure water supply, the piston is driven forward, discharging the suspension that is in the smaller cylinder into the pipeline. Water contained in the annular volume between the larger upper cylinder and smaller upper piston passes through the transfer port indicated to drive the lower piston backwards. This action induces suspension from the stirred tank through the kidney valve and into the lower smaller cylinder. Since the barrel is continuously rotating, these cylinders move to their horizontal locations, to be replaced by the next pair, indicated in Figure 8b, and ultimately to their near vertical location, where the process is repeated. The valving is designed so that contribution from the total of each cylinder pair produces essentially constant continuous flow.
The RRSP’s design enables very high concentrations of large particles to be transported, by virtue of the use of the high-pressure centrifugal pumps, rather than by driving the pistons through mechanical means. As the cylinders rotate and the upper suspension cylinder starts to be exposed through the kidney valves to the pipeline, large particles in the cylinder will not be able to pass through the initially small valve opening. The suspension will be compressed, and the piston stopped. As the driving force is supplied by a centrifugal pump, this simply means that the pump’s pressure will rise to its shut-off head. The valve opening continues to increase until it is large enough for the trapped particles to pass, and transport continues. This, combined with the full bore opening of the valves, enables very large particles to be conveyed and values of
3. Non-Newtonian high concentration conveying
3.1 A brief history
In the early 70’s, tests examining the effect of hydraulic conveying on high concentration coarse coal suspensions [17] showed that as the coal degraded, the transport characteristics changed from the normal turbulent hook curves, to lines that were characteristic of laminar flow, and that the solids could be conveyed at much lower velocities.
These results instigated work into what became known as Stab Flow, whereby research was conducted into the “laminar” behavior of these suspensions, with various researchers (e.g. [18]) reporting linear relationships of the familiar form
Figure 10a demonstrates how convincing such an approach can be. Here all suspensions are seen to behave like homogeneous fluids. The originally presented curves were calculated using non-Newtonian laminar relationships and semi-empirical predictions of turbulent flow, using a suspension pseudo-rheology, based on the underlying carrier fluid rheology and coarse particle concentrations, i.e.,
Several groups adopted this pseudo-rheological approach to predict full size data and scale up of test data, but this was found to only be successful for relatively minor increases in scale, and, as demonstrated by the dependence on pH, required that the underlying carrier fluid’s rheology would stay constant.
Anecdotal evidence, later confirmed by tomographic studies (described in the chapter on tomography in this text) and flow visualization studies, showed that rather than being homogeneous, such flows were stratified. This allowed mechanistic two-layer models, based on the carrier fluid and particle properties, to be used to predict and scale up the data. Such predictions are shown in Figure 10b. Flows such as these are now generally analyzed using layered models, which produce predictions of transport pressure gradients typically within less than 10%.
During this period, the introduction of high rate and deep cone thickeners allowed a new form of tailings disposal to be developed [21], whereby rather than conveying low concentration solids to settle in conventional walled TSFs, high concentration non-Newtonian suspensions were pumped out onto a flat TSF. The discharged suspensions formed cones of solids that were stabilized by the yield stresses in the underlying carrier fluid. Such TSFs had a smaller footprint than their conventional counterparts, did not incur the expense of large bounding walls, were inherently safe, not being susceptible to catastrophic wall breaches, and could be rehabilitated earlier.
Thus, there was a perceived need to adopt this technology to (i) transport coarse materials at low velocities, and (ii) to dispose of large quantities of waste material in a more economic and environmentally safe manner.
3.2 Stratification process
Stratification when the flow is turbulent is performed through a similar process for non-Newtonian based suspensions as it is for Newtonian suspensions. The higher viscosity and differing viscosity distribution means that moderately sized solids are more readily suspended and adopt a more uniform concentration distribution than their Newtonian based counterparts [22].
In laminar flow, there are no turbulent suspending eddies, but if the carrier fluid is a visco-plastic, with a substantial yield stress, this yield stress will be able to support the particle if it exceeds a critical value
However, in sheared visco-plastic flows, the fluid surrounding the suspended solids is subjected to a shear rate equal to the vector total of all applied shear rates, i.e., the local velocity profile, that due to the particles’ settling motion and that due to any rotation of the particle. This shear rate is finite, and since visco-plastic flows are very shear thinning, this means that the viscosity of the fluid, local to the particle, will have a high, but finite viscosity, and so the particle will be able to settle through it. It has been shown [22, 23, 24] that at particle Reynold’s numbers, typical of settling in non-Newtonian pipeline flows, the settling velocity of the particle can be calculated using Stoke’s relationship, providing this local viscosity is used.
In visco-plastic pipeline flow, there exists a central core that is unsheared, and thus if the carrier fluid’s yield stress exceeds
Consider the coarse suspension pipeline flow, shown in Figure 11, where the carrier fluid has a yield stress greater than that required for static support, i.e.,
Suspensions entering the pipe from a well-mixed tank at volumetric concentration
where
The unsheared plug’s lower boundary thus recedes upwards, as the bed develops, exposing more particles from the original unsheared plug to shear so that they also settle, and this in turn increases the bed thickness. An example of such behavior is given in Figure 11c. Whether a final residual unsheared plug exists or is completely destroyed in the final established flow depends upon the magnitude of
3.3 Concentration considerations with visco-plastic carrier fluids
The higher viscosity and shear thinning nature of the carrier fluid has an impact on the dilated bed concentration described in §2.1. The packing concentration of the visco-plastic carrier fluids themselves are affected by the applied normal stresses [25], as apparently are beds of coarse particles suspended in such fluids.
Studies in Delft have shown that the coarse particle concentration in the bed adapts itself to the exerted shear stresses [26], where coarse particles, settled from a Couette shear flow, created in an annular flume. Upon increasing the fluid shear stress, the bed compacted more. From considerations of mechanical equilibrium, the shear stresses in the bed are higher than within the flow and the imposed fluid shear stresses are larger than the yield stress, outside of any unsheared plug (which has been shown to exist above the bed). Then, since the strength of the bed increases with solids’ concentration, this concentration will increase until bed strength equals the imposed fluid shear stresses [27]. Such analysis has been successfully applied to flow in flumes, tailings deposits, pipelines and computational studies [23, 28, 29, 30].
Experimentally obtained values of
3.4 Two-layer considerations for coarse suspensions in non-Newtonian carrier fluids
As before, only a simple two-layer model will be considered in this section and the reader is referred to the chapter on pipeline modeling for more advanced models. Since the behavior, when the flow is turbulent, is similar to Newtonian based systems, varying only in detail concerned with the calculation of wall stresses and the extent of particle suspension, only laminar flow processes will be considered here (see e.g., [31, 32, 33]).
The increase in viscosity of the carrier fluid increases the various stresses, and modifies the ways the bed is transported, in particular, it is now possible to convey under conditions where the carrier fluid is in laminar flow.
Changing the rheology of the carrier fluid has profound effects on the bed’s behavior as illustrated here.
The example shown in Figure 12a is based loosely on data obtained at a diamond mine, where -6 mm grits were conveyed using thickener underflow to the TSF [34] for thickened central disposal. It demonstrates the effect of changing the viscosity of the carrier fluid. In this case the actual carrier fluid was well described by the Bingham plastic model
3.4.1 Un-blockable systems
The yield stress to ensure that the solids will move as soon as there is flow is obtained by equating the driving and resisting forces on the bed at incipient motion above the bed. At this point on the plane of symmetry, the stress at the pipe wall and the top of the bed will be equal to the yield stress of the fluid, as will the stress under the bed, since it is not moving. Approximating the flow above the bed to that of flow through an equivalent pipe of diameter equal to the hydraulic diameter of the area above the bed [35], it can be shown that the minimum yield stress required to ensure bed motion at all velocities for arbitrary solids’ concentration can be written as
where the area above the bed is
Figure 13 demonstrates that for visco-plastic systems, in common with their Newtonian counterparts, the highest deposition velocity occurs at a relatively low concentration (
3.4.2 Turbulent bed erosion
While this section is primarily concerned with flow that appears to be laminar, there are reports of fine particle beds being resuspended through turbulent action above the bed, before the bed is moved en masse under “laminar” flow and this is now examined.
The velocity displayed in Figure 12 is the bulk velocity, i.e.,
Many workers (e.g. [38, 39]) have found that for visco-plastic fluids, in particular those modeled using a Bingham plastic, the transition velocity,
where 22 <
For small pipes, less than 150 mm, this simple relationship, breaks down. Values for
The conclusion to be drawn from Figure 14 is that, even for only moderately viscous carrier fluids, the flow will not become turbulent before the deposition velocity is exceeded, except for large pipes, and then only for low to moderate coarse concentration flows, not for high concentration flows, where the flow will remain laminar.
3.4.3 Testing requirements
At the time of writing, 2-layer model predictions for non-Newtonian carrier-based systems require pipeline or laboratory tests to determine suitable values for
3.5 Comparison with conventional conveying
The thickened tailings of Figure 12a will be used as an example, noting that in this case all the solids, both the -6 mm grits and particles that are contained within the thickener underflow are to be disposed. The concentration of the grits was only 10% v/v but when combined with the carrier slurry the total concentration of the solids was 40.5% v/v. While this concentration may be within the range of conventional conveying, it must be remembered that the carrier fluid is a highly thickened slurry, a requirement for the central discharge method employed on the TSF. The transport characteristics for this suspension were very flat, requiring a pressure gradient of 0.97 kPa/m to produce velocities ranging from 0.5 to 3 m/s within the pipe. Using Eq. (6) and based on these values the SEC is found to be 0.4 kWhr/(tonne km).
Using conventional conveying, based on a mean particle size of 3 mm, at this total concentration, would require the solids to be conveyed in excess of 6 m/s and require a transport pressure gradient of around 1.55 kPa/m, giving an SEC of 0.64 kWhr/(tonne km).
By using a non-Newtonian carrier, the solids are transported using only 62% of the energy consumption, which would otherwise be required, and the suspension can be used as a thickened discharge. Conversely, using conventional conveying techniques would produce a very erosive environment, and require construction of a, now deprecated, conventional TSF.
3.6 What constitutes a coarse particle?
Earlier, it was suggested that coarse particles may be those larger than 0.5 mm, but tests conducted with some broad size distribution uranium tailings [41] indicated that it was only particles less than 40 μm that contributed to the carrier fluid’s rheology, the rest being coarse and reporting to the sliding bed. Carrier fluid rheology is of course material specific, but it is most likely that similar lower limits exist for other mineral slurries.
4. Discussion and conclusions
Two forms of high concentration conveying have been described, both of which enable very coarse particles to be conveyed at low velocities, and in such a way that stopping and starting the flow is easy. While normally requiring higher transport pressure gradients than those required by fine particle flows, their high solids’ concentrations result in low
The first form, using water, or similar, as the carrier fluid, has the advantage that separation of the solids from the carrier fluid is simple and does not require facilities to manufacture a special non-Newtonian carrier fluid. However, there are considerable restrictions on the solids that can be pumped, requiring both a broad size distribution and a high, but limited, range of solids’ concentrations, 0.75 <
The second form employs a visco-plastic carrier fluid. This ameliorates or removes the PSD and concentration restrictions of the former method and has the advantage that it can be transported using conventional pumps. However, unless the material to be pumped naturally forms a suitable carrier fluid, e.g., contains a high clay content or has a friable component, equipment and techniques are required to produce the necessary carrier and maintain appropriate rheological characteristics during normal lifetime process variabilities. Separation of the coarse material from the carrier, if required, can be costly and involved, although sheared settling, described above, can be exploited to assist in this. Disposal of the used carrier material may also be problematic. Where separation is not required or desirable, e.g., waste disposal, the presence of a yield stress in the carrier fluid means that deposits are stable. Distribution of these suspensions across a TSF can no longer rely on the simple ring main distributions of conventional TSFs, and requires single or multiple central discharge systems to be employed.
Both means of conveying are successfully characterized and predicted using layered models, which provide a mechanistic means to scale up from test data with confidence.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank the CSIRO’s Division of Mineral Engineering and Advanced Fluid Dynamic Laboratory, for support in this work, to Dr. Lachlan Graham, in particular, for his imaging of many of these flows, and assistance in developing a deeper understanding their behavior and to Dr. Arno Talmon for his insights into the bed structure when using non-Newtonian carriers.
References
- 1.
Tanaka T, Ouchiyama N. Coordination numbers and porosity of packing calculated from particle size distribution. 4th International Symposium on agglomeration. Royal York Hotel, Toronto, Ontario, Canada: National Research Council of Canada; 1985:9-16 - 2.
Cross M. Prediction of the Voidage of packed beds. 4th International Symposium on agglomeration. Royal York Hotel, Toronto, Ontario, Canada: National Research Council of Canada; 1985:713-717 - 3.
Imanidis G, Winzap S, Leuenberger H, editors. Agglomeration kinetics and process monitoring in rapid mixers. In: 4th International Conference on Aglomeration. Toronto: Canada; 1985 - 4.
Wilson KC, Brown NP, Streat M. Hydraullic hoisting at high concentration: A new study of friction mechanisms. In: 6th International Conference on Hydrotransport of Solids in Pipes: Hydrotransport 6 BHRA Fluid Engineering. Canterbury, UK: BHRA Fluid Engineering; 1979. pp. 269-282 - 5.
Wilson KC, Brown NP. Analysis of fluid friction in dense-phase pipeline flow. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering. 1982; 60 (1):83-86 - 6.
Jordan D, Dittmann FW. The hydraulic hoisting of coarse coal from a depth of 850 metres. Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. 1980;(May):177-182 - 7.
Ercolani D, Ferrini F, Arrigoni V. Electric and thermic probes for measuring the limit deposit velocity. 6th International Conference on Hydrotransport of Solids in Pipes: Hydrotransport 6. Canterbury, England: BHRA; 1979. pp. 27-42 - 8.
Wilson KC. A unified physically-based analysis of solid-liquid pipeline flow. In: 4th International Conference on Hydrotransport of Solids in Pipes: Hydrotransport 4. Banff, Canada: BHRA; 1976. pp. A1-A16 - 9.
Tan RBH, Davidson JF. Liquid-particle jets from fluidised beds. Chemical Engineering Science. 1989: 44 (12):2899-2907 - 10.
Gillies RG, Haas DB, Small MH, Husband WHW. Coarse coal in water slurries - full scale pipeline tests. In: SRC laboratories. Saskatoon, Canada: Sakatchewan Research Council; 1982 Report No.: E-725-10-C-82 - 11.
Pullum L, McCarthy DJ. In: Round GF, editor. Ultra High Concentration and Hybrid Hydraulic Transport Systems. Freight Pipelines: Elsevier Science Publishers; 1993 - 12.
Pullum L, McCarthy DJ, Longworth NJ. Operating experiences with a rotary ram slurry pump to transport ultra high concentration coarse suspensions. In: Bhr gr Conf Ser Publ. Johannesburg: RSA: BHRA; 1996. pp. 657-671 - 13.
Geisler P. Three-chamber pipe feeder systems n- further technical development and new fields of application. In: 13th International Conference on Slurry Handling and Pipeline Transport. Johannesburg, South Africa: bHr group; 1996. pp. 347-356 - 14.
Boyle BA. Slurry Transport (Australian Patent No. AU1981066639), IP Australia. 1981 - 15.
Stewart DB. High head slurry pump. In: 2nd International Conference on Hydrotransport of Solids in Pipes: Hydrotransport 2. Warwick, England: BHRA; 1972 - 16.
Bhattacharya A, Imrie I. Development of the Asea mineral slurry transport system for coarse coal. In: 10th International Conference on Hydrotransport of Solids in Pipes: Hydrotransport 10; 29–31 October. Innsbruck, Austria: BHRA; 1986. p. C1 - 17.
Elliot DE, Gliddon BJ. Hydraullic transport of coal at high concentrations. In: 1st International Conference on Hydrotransport of Solids in Pipes: Hydrotransport 1. Cranfield, UK: BHRA; 1970. p. Paper G2 - 18.
Lawler HL, Cowper NT, Pertuit P, Tennant JD. Application of stabilised slurry concepts of pipeline transportation of large particle coal. In: 3rd International Technical Conference on Slurry Transportation. Las Vegas: Nevada; 1978 - 19.
Brookes DA, Snoek PE. Stabflow slurry Development. In: 10th International Conference on Hydrotransport of Solids in Pipes: Hydrotransport 10. Innsbruck, Austria: BHRA; 1986. pp. 89-100 - 20.
Duckworth RA, Pullum L, Lockyear CF. Pipeline transport of coarse materials in a non-Newtonian carrier fluid. In: 10th International Conference on Hydrotransport of Solids in Pipes: Hydrotransport 10. Innsbruck, Austria: BHRA; 1986 - 21.
Robinsky EI. Thickened discharge-a new approach to tailings disposal. Canadian Mining and Metallurgical Bulletin. 1975; 68 :47-53 - 22.
Matousek V, Chryss A, Pullum L. Modelling the vertical concentration distributions of solids suspended in a turbulent visco-plastic fluid. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics. 2021; 69 (3):255-262 - 23.
Talmon AM, Huisman M. Fall velocity of particles in shear flow of drilling fluids. TUSP. 2005; 20 (2):193-201 - 24.
Pullum L, Graham L, Wu J. Bed establishment lengths under laminar flow. In: 18th International Conference on Hydrotransport of Solids in Pipes: Hydrotransport 18; 22–24th September. BHRA: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; 2010 - 25.
Wildemuth CR, Williams MC. A new interpretation of viscosity and yield stress in dense slurries: Coal and other irregular particles. Rheologica Acta. 1985; 24 :75-91 - 26.
Talmon A, Mastbergen D. Solids transport by drilling fluids: Concentrated bentonite-sand-slurries. In: 12th Transport and Sedimentation of Solid Particles. Prague, Czech Republic. Wroclaw, Poland: Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences; 2004 - 27.
Talmon AM, van Kesteren W, Sittoni L, Hedblom E. Shear cell tests for quantification of tailings segregation. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2012; 92 (2):362-373 - 28.
Talmon AM, van Kesteren WGM, Mastbergen DR, Pennekamp JGS, Sheets B. Calculation methodology for segregation of solids in non-Newtonian carrier fluids. In: Jewell RJ, Fourie A, Wells PS, Zyl DV, editors. Paste 2014: 17th International Seminar on Paste and Thickened Tailings. Vancouver, Canada: Australian Centre for Geomechanics; 2014. pp. 139-153 - 29.
Van Rhee C, Dobbe P. CFD simulation of shear settling in non-Newtonian flow. In: 19th Conference on Transportation and Sedimentation of Solid Particles. Cape Town: RSA; 2019 - 30.
Van Rhee C, editor Simulation of the settling of solids in non-Newtonian fluid. 18th Conference on Transport and Sedimentation of Solid Particles. Prague, Czech Republic. Wroclaw, Poland: Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences; 2017 - 31.
Pullum L, Graham L, Slatter P. A non-Newtonian two layer model and its application to high density hydrotransport. In: 16th International Conference on Hydrotransport of Solids in Pipes: Hydrotransport 16. Santiago, Chile. PRS1: BHR group; 2004 - 32.
Rojas MR, Saez AE. Two-layer model for horizontal pipe flow of Newtonian and non-Newtonian settling dense slurries. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research. 2012; 51 (20):7095-7103 - 33.
Fraser C, Goosen P. Evaluation of a non-Newtonian two-layer model for high concentration suspensions. In: Paste 2019. Cape Town: RSA; 2019 - 34.
Houman J. Commissioning and operation of the paste thickening farm at Kimberly combined treatment plant. In: 2003 International Seminar on Paste and Thickened Tailings; 14-16th May, 2003. Melbourne: ACG; 2003. p. Section 11 - 35.
Sparrow EM, Haji-sheik hA. Flow and heat transfer in ducts arbitary shape with arbtary Lthermal boundary conditions. Journal of Heat Transfer. 1966;351-358 - 36.
Charru F, Mouilleron-Arnould H. Instability of a bed of particles sheared by a viscous flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 2002; 452 :303-323 - 37.
Schaflinger U, Acrivos A, Stibi H. An experimental study of viscous resuspension in a pressure-driven plane channel flow. International Journal of Multiphase Flow. 1995; 21 (4):693-704 - 38.
Slatter PT, Wasp EJ. Transition velocity estimation for visco-plastic fluids. In: 13th International Conference on Transport and Sedimentation. Tiblisi, Georgia. Wroclaw, Poland: Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences; 2006 - 39.
Darby R, Mun R, Boger DV. Predicting friction loss in slurry pipes. Chemical Engineer. 1992; 99 :116-119 - 40.
Wilson KC, Thomas AD. A new analysis of the turbulent-flow of non-Newtonian fluids. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering. 1985; 63 (4):539-546 - 41.
Coghill M, Jarvie N, Pullum L. Characterisation of thickened tailings suspensions using a 100NB and 150NB pilot test facility. In: 19th International Conference on Transport of the Hydraulic Transport of Solids in Pipes. Denver, USA: bHr; 2014