Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Critical Evaluation of the Relationship between the Need for Achievement and Entrepreneurship Performance: Risk-Taking Propensity, Entrepreneurial Independence and Motivation

Written By

Ayanda Ncokazi and Pretty Thandiswa Mpiti

Submitted: 29 April 2022 Reviewed: 31 May 2022 Published: 24 January 2023

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.105620

From the Edited Volume

Motivation and Success

Edited by Simon George Taukeni

Chapter metrics overview

120 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

To understand and explain entrepreneurial behaviour in businesses, previous studies observed economic factors, but the little emphasis was placed on the value of the entrepreneur as an individual in the business venture itself. However, it was an oversight to disregard the individuality of the entrepreneur’s personality and motivation for being an entrepreneur. Against this background, the study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the need for achievement and entrepreneurial performance thereby looking at some personality traits (risk-taking propensity, independence and motivation) of entrepreneurs in the Chris Hani District Municipality. The need for achievement as a personality characteristic was evaluated with the other characteristics. This literature suggests that the need for achievement could influence entrepreneurial performance. The study employed a descriptive research paradigm, and a stratified sampling technique was used to collect data from the participants. Data were collected using a questionnaire that was administered to 108 small- and medium-sized enterprise owners and managers in the Chris Hani District Municipality. The findings of this study indicated that the need for achievement has the potential to enhance entrepreneurship performance. Moreover, this study found that risk-taking, independence and motivation are the major components of the need for achievement as they serve as predictors of entrepreneurial success.

Keywords

  • need for achievement
  • risk-taking propensity: Entrepreneurial independence
  • entrepreneurship motivation
  • entrepreneurial behaviour
  • entrepreneurial performance
  • entrepreneurial success
  • locus of control

1. Introduction

Entrepreneurs are a dominant factor in an economy. They are creative and innovative, which bring about change, growth and wealth in the economy. They also re-energise economies, thereby creating jobs. Countries with a vibrant small and medium enterprise (SME) sector are said to have a low rate of unemployment with their gross domestic product (GDP) continuing to rise rapidly International Council for Small Business [1]. The Global Entrepreneurship Monitor stated that the Indonesian economy saw a decrease in the unemployment rate between 2011 and 2014. This decline was because of its healthy SME environment, which created more jobs in the same period [2]. In addition, 90% of GDP came from the SME sector. This is the reason why entrepreneurship has been receiving increased attention from both scholars and the public press; this is based on the contribution that entrepreneurship brings to economies. Abor and Quartey [3] state that SMEs contributed to about 91% of the formal business entities in South Africa, which accounts for approximately between 52 and 57% of the GDP and a further 61% of employer contribution.

Similarly, in Kenya, the small, medium and micro enterprises (SMME) sector comprises 98% of all businesses in the country, employing more than 4.6 million people, and accounts for 18.4% of the country’s GDP [4]. These findings on the SMME sector tended to focus on entrepreneurial activities, which are the entrepreneurship opportunities, and not on how the success came about, which is the entrepreneurial behaviour. Zayadin [5] states that there is doubt about the contribution and importance of entrepreneurship in economic development although it has been extensively studied in the recent years. Similarly, entrepreneurship plays a big role in the SME sector and is central to the growth of their business. Therefore, decisions in this sector depend solely on the so-called human factors, the personal characteristics of the entrepreneurs. However, to take advantage of opportunities is neither a self-evident indication nor a matter of chance, but is a result of clear, positively motivated business intentions and actions on the part of the entrepreneur, driven by the belief that they can produce the desired outcomes [6].

Given the importance of entrepreneur success in South Africa, the Chris Hani District Municipality (CHDM) provided funding to small businesses across the CHDM district to assist them in expanding their business footprint and to further enhancing local economic development. These grants were awarded to several selected business owners based on applications that met the set criteria. The main objective of the CHDM grants was to empower entrepreneurs, ensure the creation of sustainable enterprise development, contribute toward job creation and assist in advancing the regional economy. CHDM received more than 300 applications for these grants and 54 enterprises got selected [1]. An important employment trend in CHDM is that household employment, as well as self-employed people, surpasses both the national and provincial averages (57, 37 and 51%, respectively) thus requiring that concerted efforts be put in place with a view to addressing the unemployment challenges besetting the district [1].

In economic theory, growth is viewed as a natural phenomenon that occurs until profit is maximised; nevertheless, not all SME owners want to grow their businesses to maximise profit [7]. Some entrepreneurs are determined to grow their businesses into larger businesses and attain substantial growth because they are motivated and have a drive. Thus, to be motivated is a constant need. Motivation is defined as an internal drive that activates behaviour and gives it direction [8]. Motivation is generally regarded as the drive to achieve targets and the process to maintain the drive. The theory of motivation by McClelland [9] provides a better understanding of the link between the need for achievement (N-Ach) as a personal trait and entrepreneurial activity [10]. It is believed that individuals with an achievement need that is high easily find themselves in entrepreneurship and this leads to a high success rate [11]. These individuals by nature are high achievers; they set goals for themselves, they are opportunity seekers and they find comfort by achieving targets goals that are challenging but not beyond their capabilities. Therefore, it is imperative to understand N-Ach as one of the entrepreneurship traits that motivate entrepreneurs to start a business venture and to strive for survival in their businesses. It is thus important to focus this study on the need for achievement to improve the service performance of entrepreneurs in the Chris Hani District, Eastern Cape.

Advertisement

2. Literature review

Entrepreneurship has become popular and a researched area in the recent years. Thaief and Mudalifah [12] conducted a study on the influence of LOC, N-Ach and entrepreneurial intention. The results of their study showed that the LOC of students makes their entrepreneurial intention stronger, and as a result, it affects their N-Ach to pursue or achieve their goals and targets. A study conducted by Chavez [13] found that entrepreneurs tend to have a high N-Ach compared with non-entrepreneurs. On the other hand, the psychology of individuals as measures of success through satisfaction, feeling of gratitude and preparedness is a major personal characteristic of entrepreneurs. According to Gorgievski and Stephan [14], the power and strengths are embedded deep within the psychology of individual entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurs understand that success is not only in monetary value but is also perceived psychologically. The personal characteristics of entrepreneurs are not limited to the ones discussed above, but due to the scope of this research, the researcher will limit the discussion to the ones discussed; the same characteristics will be further discussed in detail below.

2.1 Entrepreneurial need for achievement

Entrepreneurs are viewed as people who are guided by N-Ach, which is a drive to excel, advance and grow. McClelland [15] stressed that the most important factor for an entrepreneur is achievement orientation. Entrepreneurs are people who believe in success, and it is understood that not everyone who pursues entrepreneurship can succeed, but the motive is to succeed in the business. Success in any business venture comes only to those who are persistent and believe in achieving the goals. In a study that comprised 700 business students in one university in the United Arab Emirates, the personality dimensions of individualism/collectivism as well as introversion/extraversion, alongside N-Ach, were examined to check their relative effects on entrepreneurial potential. The findings indicated that N-Ach (as a measure of motivation) is the most significant determinant of entrepreneurial potential [10]. This supports the idea that people who are high in N-Ach are more likely to have higher levels of entrepreneurial potential as an indication of their capacity and desire to engage in entrepreneurial activities.

According to Adesanya [16], external incentives have the potential to motivate entrepreneurs to be committed and to set goals that will yield good results and see the business grow. Incentives like financial support either from the private sector or from government subsidies can attract individuals to enter the field of entrepreneurship and succeed in business. In addition, the government tax cut for certain categories of small business enterprises (SMEs) is meant to motivate the entrepreneurs to grow their businesses thereby bringing more innovative ideas that will make the entrepreneurs succeed in their entrepreneurial ventures [17]. Incentives can be generally understood as the influential factor and a motivator for entrepreneurship success since they make the entrepreneur commit more energy and time to grow the venture and also set goals that would be achievable to them.

2.2 Risk-taking and service performance

The question of why some entrepreneurs do not succeed with their businesses, while others do survive is one basic concern of entrepreneurial scholars nowadays. When starting entrepreneurial ventures based on discoveries and innovations entail a great deal of risk. In new businesses that pursue unexplored business opportunities with the intent of achieving substantial growth and above-average performance, the risk is an inescapable reality [6]. According to the trait approach, one characteristic an entrepreneur should have is the ability to take risks. Chimucheka et al. [18] suggested that the trait of risk-taking, along with creativity and flexibility, is a better indicator of the likelihood of starting a business than is achievement motivation. Taking risks is an inherent element to entrepreneurship, given the effect, it has on the constraining resources of the individual. Risk-taking involves acting, despite uncertainty or the presence of competitive threats. Risk-taking would take into account all of the resources that the entrepreneur or organisation would be willing to risk while pursuing this opportunity, such as profit, time and other less apparent opportunity costs [19].

A risk is an uncertain event that if it occurs, may either have a substantial positive or negative effect on a person. Therefore, the degree of risk on a person’s work-life may differ, but no one can be identified and specified as a person working in a risk-free environment. Similarly, the work-life of entrepreneurs is also faced with different types of risks. As defined by Erasmus et al. [20], entrepreneurship is “the process of taking a risk and converting it into profit.” This definition simply suggests that risk-taking is the prime and important characteristic of entrepreneurship. Risk and entrepreneurship have a positive and very significant relationship. Without taking risk, there is no business, starting a business or for a business to commence, requires risk-taking from the side of the entrepreneur who is willing to even lose where profits are not made. Rishipal [21] argued that for the successful establishment, conduction and management of the business, an entrepreneur should be adaptive to risk. Risk adaptiveness is a mental state of the effectiveness and capability of an entrepreneur, which is rationally affected by the resulting negative elements of risk-taking, such as fear, excitement, uncertainty, insecurity, danger, threat, pressure and expectations for loss [21].

Risk-taking as a trait of entrepreneurs emphasises that individuals with high needs for achievement would have reasonable tendencies to take the risk [9]. However, the literature on entrepreneurship claims that the entrepreneurial process is usually undertaken under high uncertainty. Thus, entrepreneurs are expected to accept higher risks. Therefore, a lack of agreement on the nature of risk-taking is observed in the scientific literature [22]. Several meta-analyses are related to personality traits in the entrepreneurship domain [23, 24], and several studies aiming to disclose differences between entrepreneurs and managers [25] or employees investigated risk-taking. However, conducted research provided mixed results and in many cases did not differentiate between entrepreneurs and other population groups.

2.3 Psychological capital of entrepreneurs

Linked to service performance is the aspect of a modern entrepreneurial mindset of job satisfaction, which then expresses the positive attitude of the entrepreneur about their business. Mokoena and Dhurup [26] ascertained that job satisfaction has a positive relationship with efficiency, performance and organisational commitment. Similarly, job satisfaction could be generalised as being associated with the positive mood and positive psychology of the entrepreneur. The psychological capital (PsyCap) is a structure that includes positive outcomes, in both personal and organisational levels, and improves human performance [27]. PsyCap relates positively to work performance, desired psychological outcomes and the general well-being of humans and in this case entrepreneurs [28]. The most recent empirical evidence in an entrepreneurship study shows a positive relationship, specifically between PsyCap and satisfaction among entrepreneurs [29].

In theory-based research, PsyCap is described as “a higher-order core construct consisting of four positive psychological resources,” which defines the features of PsyCap such as hope, confidence, optimism, resilience and efficacy. It can be said that PsyCap is a combination of all these four elements and that it can be “measured, developed, and effectively managed” for improving work performance [27]. Hope generally gives the entrepreneur some form of encouragement and motivation that through trust, the goals or objectives will be achieved. At the individual level, many entrepreneurs voluntarily keep faith in their ventures, hoping for success, and despite the facts that they know, few would get through, while the majority march into the Death Valley as observed by Bean [30]. In essence, the need for achieving is desired goals requiring a sense of agency and expectations, which provides people with an internalised determination and willpower to invest the energy.

When one is optimistic, it means the person has a positive expectation for the future, regardless of circumstances. Optimistic individuals accept new ideas and have positive emotions [28]. Furthermore, optimistic people expect that positive situations will happen that serves as positive PsyCap Hmieleski and Carr [29]. demonstrated that optimism and personal well-being have a positive relationship in PsyCap. Cavus and Gokcen [27] stated that optimism can be defined as a psychological intention and expectation to hope for the best possible and positive outcome, which can positively influence peoples’ mental and physical health.

Psychological resiliency is characterised as the ability for bouncing back, focusing on goals and successes [27]. Resilience as a dimension of PsyCap is something that entrepreneurs have accumulated to be successful in the work they do. In the meantime, research by Luthans and Youssef [28] supports that psychological resiliency is the coping skills of people in case of uncertainty, negative situations and obstacles; and according to Çetin and Basim [31], it contains in itself, the other components hope, self-efficacy and optimism.

Self-efficacy originates from Bandura’s [32] study widely used and accepted social cognitive theory. This theory first developed the theory of self-efficacy based on the premise that individuals are proactive agents as opposed to passive reactors to their environment. The instability in the business environment for new business establishments saw many researchers postulate that entrepreneurs succeed in their business because of a strong sense of personal commitment (self-efficacy) to implement their dreams and a keen eye for innovation to identify new products and markets [33]. Self-efficacy represents the general belief of people while they exhibit their performances and make a sense beyond the actual abilities that lead to completing tasks [27]. It can be said that high self-efficacy can influence motivation on both positive and negative sides. Self-confident people know how to improve their motivation. They choose challenging tasks to extend their performance and motivate themselves against the obstacles faced while working for accomplishing goals. Stajkovic and Luthans [34] argued that there is a strong and positive relationship between self-efficacy and performance.

2.4 Entrepreneurial motivation

Motivation is described as a desire to overcome a goal or value feeling activated, goal-driven, incentivised, being inspired or an impulse to be moved to do something and can be explained as someone being motivated [35]. However, a person who feels no inspiration, incentive or drives to be moved to do something is understood to be unmotivated. Motivation is a broad and complex field with various theories. For example, Bruno et al. [36] explained how intrinsic motivations are intertwined with the level of achievement.

Entrepreneurial motivation is important in the discussion of entrepreneurship. Looking at the discussion of entrepreneurial characteristics above, it is not enough to explain what makes an individual decide to pursue entrepreneurship. Bringing the issue of entrepreneurial motivation to the study is fundamental to understanding the reasons why individuals pursue entrepreneurship. Stephan et al. [37] stated that entrepreneurial motivation is a psychological process in which not all the motives may be influenced with the same force; it differs with the awareness levels of the individuals and factors responsible for the motivation. Motivation is classified along some dimensions that are better predictors of growth expectations and business survival and in turn the entrepreneurial success. These dimensions of entrepreneurial motivation are discussed in the following subsections.

Advertisement

3. Method

A descriptive and cross-sectional research design was employed in the study. According to Polit and Beck [38], a descriptive research design is said to have a large representation in which a researcher can obtain the participants’ views. A descriptive survey research design was used in the study to collect data from the participants and for analysis of data, which involved finding the mean and standard deviation of the results, while a cross-sectional research method was used to analyse the relationship that existed between N-Ach and business performance. A cross-sectional research method was also adopted because of time constraints and the costs involved, and that data could be collected at one point in time and to find an answer to the research questions. Sekaran and Bougie [39] argued that a cross-sectional design comprises data that are collected from a population at one specific point in time. The study further employed a stratified sampling technique to collect data from the participants. Data were collected using a questionnaire that was administered to 108 small- and medium-sized enterprise owners and managers in the Chris Hani District Municipality.

Advertisement

4. Results and discussion of findings

The interpretation of results and an analysis of the findings from data will be discussed in this section of the study to conclude the need for N-Ach and entrepreneurial performance.

4.1 Participants’ opinion on risk-taking propensity

The findings from the descriptive analysis show that most participants strongly agreed and agreed with the statement relating to entrepreneurial capability and risk-taking. Figure 1 shows that when participants asked about their wiliness to take a risk on investment, 60% strongly agreed and 17% agreed. This is an indication that one of the characteristics an entrepreneur should have is the ability to take risks. When starting entrepreneurial ventures based on discoveries and innovations, it entails a great deal of risk. For new businesses that pursue unexplored business opportunities with the intent of achieving substantial growth and above-average performance, the risk is an inescapable reality [6].

Figure 1.

Risk-taking propensity (in percentage).

Risk-taking as a trait of entrepreneurs emphasises that individuals with high needs for achievement would have reasonable tendencies to take the risk. However, entrepreneurship literature claims that the entrepreneurial process is usually undertaken under high uncertainty. Thus, entrepreneurs are expected to accept higher risk. The finding further suggested that even though no individual would risk by investing in a business that does not stand good chances of success, the risk is never avoidable in business. Therefore, entrepreneurs should always gamble on the type of risk they are to take before deciding on whether to risk the resources on the venture.

4.2 Entrepreneurial independence

The results in Table 1 indicate that 78% of the participants were open to new ideas and preferred working independently and 78.7% were moderate risk-takers. The table further shows that 85.1% of the participants set the goals they wished to achieve, while 70.2% strongly agreed with the idea that they did not see negative feedbacks and challenges as a source of discouragement. Those who were either neutral or disagreed and strongly disagreed with their responses ranged between 2.1 and 10.6%, respectively. Independence is understood as overseeing your own business and is the dimension of achievement motivation that is directly linked to entrepreneurial performance and results in the success of the entrepreneurial venture. As indicated, most entrepreneurs are in business because they seek independence and that their performance will be judged in terms of the number of years that the business existed and what the entrepreneur has achieved over those years will be counted as the business success.

CharacteristicsStatementsStrongly agree
1
Agree
2
Neutral
3
Disagree
4
Strongly disagree
5
IndependenceI am open to new ideas and prefer to work independently rather than in teams78.0%0%10.6%6.4%4.3%
I set my mind to achieve a goal in relation to a set of standards85.1%8.5%6.4%0%0%
I am a moderate risk-taker and like to anticipate future possibilities78.7%6.4%10.6%2.1%2.1%
I do not see negative feedbacks and challenges as a source of discouragement70.2%2.1%8.5%10.6%8.5%

Table 1.

Entrepreneurial independence (in percentage).

Source: Ncokazi [40].

This finding is supported by a study by Ndlovu [41] who had argued that individuals who venture into entrepreneurship with some personality inventories showed that these entrepreneurs were significantly higher than the general population on measures of independence. Similarly, entrepreneurs with high in achievement motivation are likely to engage in activities that are necessary for success than those who are low in achievement motivation. The performance of entrepreneurship was tested against some dimensions of entrepreneurship traits/characteristics such as independence, risk propensity, commitment and innovations. The findings suggested that independence can be regarded as the predictor of entrepreneurial service performance and that when properly developed, it can impact positively on the business performance/success.

4.3 Motivation for starting a business

The results in Figure 2 indicate the motivational factors of participants to start their initiatives. Figure 2 also indicates that 49% of the participants were motivated to start a business because of the need to be independent and for 21.6% of the participants their motive was to be in charge, which more likely means being independent. Independence facilitates the taking of responsibility to use one’s judgement as opposed to following the statements made by others. In other words, entrepreneurial independence motivation is about being able to control one’s work-life, including control over one’s own time and work, making independent decisions, having the flexibility to combine work with one’s personal life [42, 43, 44, 45]. The results further indicate that 15% of the participants were motivated to start their own business because they had good business ideas and 7.8% was motivated to start a business because they were retrenched from work, while 5.9% of the study population was motivated by other factors not mentioned in the questionnaire, such as political and family reasons.

Figure 2.

Motivation to start a business (in percentage).

Advertisement

5. Conclusion

The analysis of this study revealed that there is a relationship between N-Ach and entrepreneurial performance, but the researcher used a one-time study; therefore, the result may be relevant at the time when the study was conducted; hence, the researcher proposes a further study under the same phenomenon. A new study may conclude a different finding on the understanding of entrepreneurial success and how the interpretation of entrepreneurial success may differ, depending on their underlying understanding of success. The results in this study were presented and analysed using charts. The results indicate that risk-taking propensity and result-driven persons had higher scores where the participants strongly agreed that they are linked to the entrepreneurial N-Ach. The same findings of the study expand the literature on entrepreneurial N-Ach by not only showing the importance of entrepreneurial performance, but also the need to develop the N-Ach motivation of entrepreneurs if they want to succeed in their entrepreneurial endeavours. The study concludes that N-Ach can improve entrepreneurship performance. The researcher understands that it was unlikely to collect data from the owners of failed ventures; therefore, the findings of the study were limited to data collected from the surviving or existing businesses.

Advertisement

6. Recommendation

The study recommends that entrepreneurs should be encouraged to develop N-Ach because of the responsibilities associated with entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurs play a compelling role in the success of their business ventures, they plan, organise resources, lead and execute the work for the realisation of the organisational goals. Independence was found to have been positively associated with entrepreneurial performance. Therefore, researchers recommend entrepreneurs should develop a sense of independence if they want to become independent business owners who can grow their business into a big venture that can compete anywhere in the globe. It is further recommended that government should provide workshops for entrepreneurs to enhance their skills to enable them to be innovative and identify new opportunities, as well as ways that would facilitate them to master their traits, thereby ensuring that the outcomes would be for the benefit of the SME sector.

References

  1. 1. Saputra HE, Abshari HH. knowledge of entrepreuship in cash waqf in international council for small business branch surabaya. jurnal syarikah: jurnal ekonomi islam. 2019;5(2):117-124
  2. 2. Rayawan W, Efrata TC. The effect locus of control and need for achievement towards entrepreneurial performance. Review of Management and Entrepreneurship. 2017;1(1):36-49
  3. 3. Abor J, Quartey P. Issues in SME development in Ghana and South Africa. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics. 2010;39(6):215-228
  4. 4. Kiveu M, Ofafa G. Enhancing market access in Kenyan SMEs using ICT. Global Business and Economics Research Journal. 2013;2(9):29-46
  5. 5. Zayadin R. Understanding the Entrepreneurs Context: A Phenomenographic Approach [Doctoral Dissertation]. United Kingdom: Anglia Ruskin University; 2017
  6. 6. Kozubíková L, Dvorský J, Cepel M, Balcerzak AP. Important characteristics of an entrepreneur in relation to risk taking: Czech Republic case study. Journal of International Studies. 2017;10(3):220-233
  7. 7. Verheul I, Thurik R, Grilo I, Van der Zwan P. Explaining preferences and actual involvement in self-employment: Gender and the entrepreneurial personality. Journal of Economic Psychology. 2012;33(2):325-341
  8. 8. Singh K. Study of achievement motivation in relation to academic achievement of students. International Journal of Educational Planning & Administration. 2011;1(2):161-171
  9. 9. McClelland DC. Human motivation. CUP Archive. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987
  10. 10. Zeffane R. Need for achievement, personality and entrepreneurial potential: A study of young adults in the United Arab Emirates. Journal of Enterprising Culture. 2013;21(01):75-105
  11. 11. Atitsogbe KA, Mama NP, Sovet L, Pari P, Rossier J. Perceived employability and entrepreneurial intentions across university students and job seekers in Togo: The effect of career adaptability and self-efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology. 2019;10:180
  12. 12. Thaief I, Mudalifah. Effect of locus of control and need for achievement results of learning through entrepreneurial intentions: Case study on Student Courses Management, Faculty of Economics University of Makasar. International Business Management. 2015;9(5):798-804. Available from: http://docsdrive.com/pdfs/medwelljournals/ibm/2015/798-804.pdf
  13. 13. Chavez J. The Personality Characteristics of an Entrepreneur and their Effects on the Performance of a New Business Venture. Finland: Helsinki Metropolia University of Applied Sciences. 2016
  14. 14. Gorgievski MJ, Stephan U. Advancing the psychology of entrepreneurship: A review of the psychological literature and an introduction. Applied Psychology. 2016;65(3):437-468
  15. 15. McClelland DC. The Achieving Society. New York: D. van Nostrand; 1961
  16. 16. Adesanya O. effect of entrepreneurship education outcomes on entrepreneurship behavior [Doctoral dissertation]. Ota, Nigeria: Covenant University; 2017
  17. 17. Angel P, Jenkins A, Stephens A. Understanding entrepreneurial success: A phenomenographic approach. International Small Business Journal. 2018;36(6):611-636
  18. 18. Chimucheka T, Muchineripi J, Chinyamurindi W. A narrative analysis of barriers encountered by a sample of immigrant entrepreneurs in the eastern cape province of South Africa. TD: The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa. 2019;15(1):1-9. DOI: 10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n2p403
  19. 19. Durand JR. An Investigation into the Effect of Power on Entrepreneurial Motivations [Doctoral dissertation]. Mankato: Minnesota State University; 2014
  20. 20. Erasmus B, Strydom J, Rudansky-Kloppers S. Introduction to Business Management. 10th ed. Cape Town: Oxford University Press Southern Africa; 2017
  21. 21. Rishipal NJ. Need for achievement an antecedent for risk adaptiveness among entrepreneurs. Global Journal of Management and Business Research. 2012;12(22):56-63
  22. 22. Cromie S. Assessing entrepreneurial inclinations: Some approaches and empirical evidence. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 2000;9(1):7-30
  23. 23. Rauch A, Frese M. Let’s put the person back into entrepreneurship research: A meta-analysis on the relationship between business owners’ personality traits, business creation, and success. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 2007;16(4):353-385
  24. 24. Stewart WH Jr, Roth PL. Risk propensity differences between entrepreneurs and managers: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2001;86(1):145
  25. 25. Tan J. Innovation and risk-taking in a transitional economy: A comparative study of Chinese managers and entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing. 2001;16(4):359-376
  26. 26. Mokoena BA, Dhurup M. Self-efficacy, organisational commitment, job satisfaction and satisfaction with life relationships: A study among amateur sport coaches in South Africa. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies. 2019;11(1):19-34
  27. 27. Cavus MF, Gokcen A. Psychological capital: Definition, components and effects. British Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science. 2015;5:244-255
  28. 28. Luthans F, Youssef CM. Human, Social, and Now Positive Psychological Capital Management: Investing in People for Competitive Advantage. Organizational Dynamics, Digital Commons @ University of Nebraska - Lincoln. 2004
  29. 29. Hmieleski KM, Carr JC. The relationship between entrepreneur psychological capital and well-being. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. 2007;27(1):23-35
  30. 30. Bean J. Boulevard of Broken Dreams: Why Public Efforts to Boost Entrepreneurship and Venture Capital Have Failed–And What to Do about it. Business History, London: Routledge; 2010
  31. 31. Çetin F, Basim HN. Psikolojik Dayanıklılığın İş Tatmini ve Örgütsel Bağlılık Tutumlarındaki Rolü. Is, Guc: The Journal of Industrial Relations & Human Resources. 2011;13(3):79-94
  32. 32. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review. 1977;84(2):191
  33. 33. Kerr SP, Kerr WR, Xu T. Personality Traits of Entrepreneurs: A Review of Recent Literature. US: Publishers Inc.; 2017
  34. 34. Stajkovic AD, Luthans F. Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin. 1998;124(2):240
  35. 35. Dracke F. Entrepreneurial Motivation in Change. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School; 2014
  36. 36. Bruno RL, Bytchkova M, Estrin S. Institutional determinants of new firm entry in Russia: A cross-regional analysis. Review of Economics and Statistics. 2013;95(5):1740-1749
  37. 37. Stephan U, Hart M, Drews CC. Understanding Motivations for Entrepreneurship: A Review of Recent Research Evidence. Birmingham, UK: Enterprise Research Centre; 2015. Available from: http://www.enterpriseresearch.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/
  38. 38. Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing Research: Principles and Methods. USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004
  39. 39. Sekaran U, Bougie R. Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach. West Sussex, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons; 2016
  40. 40. Ncokazi A. The need for achievement to improve the service performance of entrepreneurs in the Chris Hani District, Eastern Cape [master dissertation]. Krugersdorp, South Africa: Southern Business School; 2021
  41. 41. Ndlovu TV. Factors Impacting on Entrepreneurial Success in Durban [Doctoral dissertation]. Durban: University of KwaZulu-Natal
  42. 42. Aziz N, Friedman BA, Bopieva A, Keles I. Entrepreneurial motives and perceived problems: An empirical study of entrepreneurs in Kyrgyzstan. International Journal of Business. 2013;18(2):163
  43. 43. Fernández-Serrano J, Romero I. Entrepreneurial quality and regional development: Characterizing SME sectors in low income areas. Papers in Regional Science. 2013;92(3):495-513
  44. 44. Renko M, Kroeck KG, Bullough A. Expectancy theory and nascent entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics. 2012;39(3):667-684
  45. 45. Uddin R, Kanti T. Motivation, success factors and challenges of entrepreneurs in Khulna City of Bangladesh. European Journal of Business and Management. 2013;5(16):148-157

Written By

Ayanda Ncokazi and Pretty Thandiswa Mpiti

Submitted: 29 April 2022 Reviewed: 31 May 2022 Published: 24 January 2023