Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Ecotoxicity Effects of Lead Bullets in Human and Wildlife: The Consequences of Environmental Pollution, Low Intelligence Quotient, Brain Damage and Brain Overclaim Syndrome

Written By

Saganuwan Alhaji Saganuwan

Submitted: 08 February 2022 Reviewed: 14 June 2022 Published: 30 November 2022

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.105850

From the Edited Volume

The Toxicity of Environmental Pollutants

Edited by Daniel Junqueira Dorta and Danielle Palma de Oliveira

Chapter metrics overview

87 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Bullets from gunshots made of lead are used to kill and arrest criminals, as they are also used by criminals to intimidate or kill innocents for psychosocial gains. So the increased environmental pollution caused by lead from industries, firearms, gasoline, among others is a source of concern for environmental health specialists, clinical toxicologists, experimental toxicologists, industrial toxicologists and ecotoxicologists. Lead can get into body system accidentally via oral, inhalational, epidermal, dermal, intraperitoneal, and intravenous routes. The toxicokinetic data of lead disposition via various routes of administrations are quite inconsistent. Hence the set blood limit concentration has been considered to be incorrect. In view of this, toxicokinetic data analysis of lead was carried out with intent to determine toxic doses of lead in various organs, and its toxicological consequences. Findings have shown that at lower doses, kinetics of lead is linear (first order), and at higher doses the kinetics becomes non-linear (zero-order). Metabolic processes modulated by lead could be either rate limiting or non–rate-limiting causing induction and inhibition of a myriad of metabolizing enzymes in liver, brain, kidney, intestine and lung. The LD50 of lead bullet in human was 450 mg/kg, which caused death in 9.1 days, and penicillamine (18 mg/kg) can be used for treatment. Mean residence time (MRT) and elimination half-life (T12β) were 25.8 and 18 days, respectively.

Keywords

  • plumbism
  • toxicokinetic
  • Michaelis-Menten order
  • brain
  • half-life
  • tissue concentration
  • bullet
  • lead
  • overclaim syndrome
  • neurosis
  • pollution

1. Introduction

Bullets made from lead cause lead intoxication (plumbism), which may be fatal if left unremoved for a period of time [1]. Fragment of lead radiates in target animals [2]. The target doses of lead fragments in Andean condors, Turkey vulture and bald eagle are 45.5–58.2, 20.7–33.8 and 11.5–27.0 mg/kg, respectively [3, 4, 5]. Interference of lead with calcium metabolism can lead to neurological and neuromuscular disorders via signal transduction of protein kinases, neurotransmitter and calcium [6]. Behavioural and learning deficiencies have been linked to interference of lead with signalling of brain cells in human and birds [7, 8]. Bullet fragments can be lodged in body joints and cause anaemia, abdominal colic, nephropathy and neuropathy. The precipitating factors are infection, metabolic stress and alcoholism [2]. Mass spectrometric isotope dilution analysis with chelation therapy was used for the mobilization of lead from bone [1]. Violence can lead to the use of firearms causing lead poisoning characterized in part by changes in behaviour, neurological status and death. Clinical neuronal manifestations are fatigue, malaise, irritability, loss of libido, headache, encephalopathy, delirium, ataxia, convulsions and motor neuropathy [9]. As low as 10 μg/dl interferes with haem synthesis and increases aminolevulinic acid (ALA) that suppresses gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) neurotransmission [10]. Lead concentration less than 4 μm causes acute encephalopathy [11]. Lead exposure (0.25 μg/g) of brain tissues for 50 days, starting on post-natal day 1, caused abnormal expression of glial-related genes [12]. Lead (19–31 μg/dl) caused decrease in the size of cortical column in somatosensory cortex [13]. Placental blood lead (10 μg/dl) caused cognitive impairment [14]. Bullet lodged in various parts of the body can stay in the body for 3 months to 40 years, and associated neurodiseases are alcoholism, delirium tremens, thyrotoxicosis and shock. Gunshot after 4 years caused depression with detected blood lead of 6.7 μg/dl [1]. Intracellular bullets may result in unwanted long-term complications [15]. After 4 years gunshot, caused malaise and weakness with blood level of lead 62 μg/dl, whereas gunshot after 3 years caused paroxysmal abdominal pain and post prandial emesis [16]. Clinical toxic threshold doses for lead fragments in blood (50–100 μg/dl), liver (6 mg/kg), Kidney (4–16 mg/kg) and bone (>20 mg/kg) have been reported for Anseriformes, Falconiformes and Accipitriformes, respectively [17]. Lead concentration of blood (<0.2 ppm), liver and kidney (>2 ppm) and bone (<10 ppm) have been reported for birds not exposed to lead [18], but the cost of antidotes has increased [19]. Therefore, poisoning severity score can be modified to assess the degree of bullet toxicity [20] in human and wildlife with a view to curtailing consequences of lead poisoning.

Advertisement

2. Materials and methods

Literatures were searched for information on acute and chronic effects of lead bullets in wildlife, young and adult humans, especially in relation to brain damage and criminology. Some established formulas for determination of LD50 were modified for determination of acute and chronic toxicity effects of lead in wildlife and human. The developed formulas were used to determine lethal time fifty (LT50), chronicity factor (CF), dose of lead that can kill one man, toxic dose rate, target concentration, clearance, effective dose of antidote, volume of distribution, area under curve, mean residence time and elimination rate constant [21, 22, 23]. Up and down procedure (UPD) was used to estimate LD50 of bullets, as the initial estimate of the LD50 was within a factor of the authentic LD50 [24], and has been validated [25].

2.1 Kinetic energy of lead bullet

The velocity of bullet is proportionally more influential than the weight of the bullet. Therefore, the kinetic energy transferred to the target animal is presented by the equation given below [26]. Kinetic energy of bullet is the mass of bullet times squared velocity of the bullet.

KE=12mv2E1

KE = kinetic energy; m = mass of bullet; v = velocity.

Low velocity = 1200 ft./s; medium = 1200–2500 ft./s; high = >2500 ft./s [27]. Bullets from handguns have velocity of <1000 ft./s, rifles (<2500 ft./s) and bullets of 5.56 mm are small but relatively fast. Outer jacket of the bullet determines margin line of tissue injury which is responsible for bullet moving more than 2000 ft./s [28].

Air rifle pellet that weighed 8.25 grains and of 0.38 calibre received velocity of 101 m/s, but could damage the brain, whereas that of 113 grains of 58 m/s could damage brain matter [29]. An impactor (bullet) of 200–297 mm2 could exert force of 980–1334 N on parietal bone [30]. Therefore Head Injury Criterion (HIC) is used as protective measure for skull. It is a function of the period of acceleration at the head centre of gravity, bearing in mind that head is a one-mass structure:

HIC=t2t11t2t1t2t1atdt2.5maxE2

t1 = initial time (s); t2 = final time (s); a(t) = acceleration at the centre of gravity of the head; t2-t1 = acceleration window (15–36 ms) [31].

2.2 Determination of calcium-lead concentration in erythrocytes

Erythrocyte volume V=43πa2xb, where a = larger axis; b = minor axis; π= 3.1415. Surface area and volume of a single red blood cell are 155 μm2 and 87 μm3 respectively [32]. Calcium concentration (mg/100 ml) to per cent decrease of lead erythrocytes content is equal to;

%decreaseerythrocytes lead contentconcofCa2mixture=401084=1:7.5E3

2.3 Determination of acute toxicity of lead in rodents

The detection limit of lead (0.04 μg/dl) at 5% level of significance, blood level lead (0.2–37 μg/dl) and urine lead (9–930 μg/dl) as well as less than 1% of lead transport from sink to plasma have been considered for calculations [21, 22, 23, 33, 34].

Chronicity factorCF=LD50´90daysLD50E4
Dose rateDR=Target concentrationTC×ClearanceClE5
Also median lethal time fiftyLT50=LD50DPwhereasD=LD;P=Power coefficient1/3E6
Note thatED50=LD503xWax104E7
LD503=ED50Wa×104E8
LD50=3ED50Wa×104E9
LD50=LT50×DP=3ED50Wa×104E10
DP=3ED50Wa×104×1LT50E11

Therefore:

ED50=DP×Wa×104×LT503E12
Also the volume of distributionVd=DoseConcentrationE13
Clearance=DoseAUCE14

2.4 Calculation of pulmonary oxygen toxicity of lead

The cumulative pulmonary toxic dose (CPTD) of lead expressed as OTU (oxygen toxicity units) is calculated thus, partial pressure of oxygen (PO2) remains constant [35].

OTU=txx0.5PO20.556.E15

Where as tx = time of exposure; PO2 = constant; 56= exponent (−0.8333).

Exposure timetx=SegmenttimexMaxPO2lowPO2MaxPO2MinPO2E16

2.5 Calculation of central nervous system oxygen toxicity of lead

CNS oxygen toxicity is calculated thus,PO2 remains constants [36]. Therefore

CNSfraction=TimeatPO2TimelimitforPO2=TimeatPO2mPO2+bE17

where as m = slope of the time; b = intercept for the given range of PO2.

2.6 Calculation of exposure dose of lead from contaminated environment

The equation for calculation of exposure dose of lead from contaminated environment [35, 36] is given as follow:

D=C×IR×AF×EFBW,E18

whereas D = exposure dose; C = contaminated concentration; IR = intake rate of contaminated medium; AF = bioavailability factor; EF = exposure factor; BW = body weight, but the exposure factor is calculated as follow:

EF=F×EDAT,E19

whereas F = frequency of exposure (days/year); ED = Exposure duration (years); AT = averaging time (ED × 365 days/year).

2.7 Calculation of water dermal contact dose of lead

Dose of water concentration of lead that can penetrate dermal layer of skin [35, 36] is calculated as follow:

D=C×P×BSA×ET×CFBW,E20

whereas D = dose (mg/kg); C = contaminant concentration (mg/l); P = permeability coefficient (cm/h); BSA = exposed body surface area (m2); ET = exposure time; CF = conversion factor (1 l/1000 cm3); BW = body weight.

2.8 Calculation of soil ingestion exposure time of lead

Dose of lead ingested via soil can be calculated [35, 36] using the following formula:

D=C×IR×ET×CFBW,E21

where D = exposure dose (mg/kg); C = contaminant concentration (mg/kg); IR = intake rate of contaminated soil (mg/day); EF = exposure factor; CF = conversion factor (kg/mg); BW = body weight.

2.9 Calculation of dose of lead particles present in food

Quantity of lead fragments present in the ingested food can be calculated as follow:

D=n=inC×Cri×EFBW,E22

whereas D = exposure dose (mg/kg/day); C = contaminant concentration (mg/g); Cri = consumption rate of incriminating food (g/day); EF = exposure factor; BW = body weight (kg); n = total number of incriminating food group [30].

2.10 Toxicokinetic scaling of lead fragments

Steady state volume of distribution (Vss) of lead fragments is calculated thus:

Vss=1.22W0.68whereW=body weight of animalE23
Cl=0.91W0.5whereCl=clearanceE24

Vss and Cl are based on plasma concentrations of blood and free lead. However, the Vss and Clu for plasma free concentration of lead are presented below.

Vss=247W0.93E25
Clu=186W0.76E26

Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) = 47.5e0.51, e = 2.718 [37].

Relationship between respiratory minute volume and body weight is given by the equation.

Vm=0.518W0.802E27

A value of 15.6 l/min has been calculated for 70-kg weighed human [38].

Apparent volume of distribution (Vd) related to absolute oral bioavailability is given as follow:

VdF=DoseAUC×Kel,E28

where F = bioavailability; AUC = area under curve; Kel = elimination constant.

Cl/F×MLP=β×WaE29

where Cl = clearance; MLP = maximum lifespan potential; W = body weight; a = exponent.

Dosemg=AnimalAUC×Scaled HumanClFE30

AUC = lowest value among species [39].

Blood/Plasma concentration ratioPp=1+H×fu1E31

whereas fu = fraction unbound in plasma; H = hematocrit (human, 0.44; rat,0.46; mouse, 0.45; rabbit, 0.36; monkey, 0.36).

Cl=33.35ml/minxa0.77RfuE32

Rfu = ratio of unbound fraction in plasma between rats and humans; a = coefficient of surface area.

Conc.H=Conc.AxDoseHDoseAxWAWHcE33
TimeH=TimeAxWAWHbE34

where b and c are exponents of simple allometry of Cl and Vdss, Percent (%) error between observed clinical concentration and predicted concentration of lead is calculated thus [40].

%error=ObservedPredictedObserved×100E35

The experiment for elimination half-life has allometric exponent of 0.25 [41].

Error involved in prediction of clearance is in most cases >30% [42]. Since inhaled lead particles can be distributed immediately the following equation can be used to calculate lead concentration in the blood.

Ct=CoektE36

Ct= lead concentration at time t; Co= theoretical lead concentration obtained if it had been inhaled at time t = 0; k = elimination rate constant [43, 44, 45].

Ratio of urinary clearance to total body clearance=CluClbE37
Ratio of plasma free lead to total body lead=PLBlE38

2.11 Application of the formulas for calculation of toxicokinetic parameters of lead

The reported LD50 of lead in human is 450 mg/kg body weight, but LD1 = 450/50 = 9 mg/kg body weight

  1. LT50(d) LD50DP=450913=4502.06=218.424h 9.1 days

    However, for an adult man weighing 60 kg, the ED50 for lead antidote is calculated as follows:

  2. (ED50) LD503×Wa×104

    (ED50) 4503×60,000×104

    (ED50) 150×6=900

    ED19050=18 mg/kg of antidote

  3. Using dose rate (DR) = TC × Cl

    1080 = 0.037 × Cl

    Cl = 10800.037= 29189.2 kg/h.

    29189.21000×124= 1.24 l/kg/h.

    At concentration of lead = 525 μg/dl.

    If LD1 = 9 mg/kg.

    Dose of lead for 60 kg man = 60×9 = 540 mg

  4. (Vd=)DoseConcentration

    Vd = 540525= 1.028 = 1.03 l/kg

  5. AUC = DoseClearance

    4501.24= 362.9 mg/kg/h

  6. β = ClbVd1.241.03= 1.20 h.

  7. MRT = VdClb = 1.031.24 = 0.83 h.

  8. T½β = 0.693β = 0.6931.20= 0.58 h.

Advertisement

3. Results

LD50, ED50, clearance, LD1, and volume of distribution of lead bullet in adult human, Red grouse, Mallard, Partridge, pheasant, Woodpigeon and Woodcock are presented in Tables 1 and 2. However indices of lead poisoning at various concentrations are presented in Table 3. Concentrations of lead (≤ 5 − > 100 mg/dl) are injurious to haematological, neurological, cardiovascular, reproductive, renal, immunological and respiratory systems (Table 3). The calculated maximum tolerated dose of lead for 70 kg weighed man was 337.1 mg/kg. Bioavailability was 82.3%, whereas 62% of lead was cleared in the urine and 42% sequestrated in various tissues of 70 kg weighed man. Inhaled lead (525 μg/dl) would translate to 622 μg/dl over a period of 5 months with elimination rate of 1.2 h.

Weight (kg)LD50 (mg/kg)ED50 (mg/kg)CL (kg/h)LD (mg/kg)Vd (L/kg)AUC (mg/kg/h)β (h)MRT (h)T½β
60450181.249.01.030.018751.160.860.6

Table 1.

Toxico-therapeutic and pharmacokinetic parameters of lead in adult human.

Keys: LD50 = Median lethal dose; ED50 = Effective dose fifty; Cl = Clearance; LD1 = Lethal dose for 1 human; Vd = Volume of distribution; AUC = Area under curve; β = Elimination rate constant; MRT = Mean residence time; T½β = Elimination half-life.

Name of birdWeight (kg)LD50 (μg/kg)ED50 (μg/kg)Cl (kg/h)LD (μg/kg)Vd (I/kg)
Red grouse0.6003847.65.4980.07
Mallard1.0632749.74.6550.06
Partridge0.4882674.34.855006
Pheasant1.163360143.6870.10
Woodpigeon0.4531201.86.1620.02
Woodcock0.3001261.31.2330.10

Table 2.

Toxicokinetic parameters of lead bullet fragments in birds.

Keys: LD50 = Median lethal dose, ED50 = Effective dose fifty; Cl = Clearance; LD1 = Lethal dose for 1 human; Vd = Volume of distribution.

SystemicRange of toxic doses of plasma blood lead (μg/dl) and their toxicity signs
≤5–1415–2425–3435–4445–5455–100>100
NeurologicalDepression, loss of 4–7 IQ, damage D1 receptors, Reduction of glutamine synthetase, positioning range, bad mood, headache, memory loss, drowsiness, trembling, tingling of limbs, penetration of brain by lead, Kills birds and humans or birds and humans are severely poisoned, 10 μg/dl exceeds EU limitReduction of glutamine synthetaseAbnormal oligodendrocytesIncreased D1 in T = striatum, decreased D1 in nucleus accumbensAcute encephalopathy neurological signs Acute deathEpilepsy death
CardiovascularHypertensionDeath
HaematologicalRatio of blood lead to erythrocytes lead for 6 month- old child (1/2–2/5), infants (7/10–7/11), adult (5/12) irrespectively. Increased delta amino levulinic acid, haemolysis, anaemia, curvilinear relationship between plasma lead and whole blood is within the range (2.13–3.97 μg/dl), chelation is not recommended at >45 μg/dl
ReproductiveLow birth weight, premature birth, anomaly, abortionDecreased libido
RenalRenal insufficiency
ImmunologicalHumoral and cellular immunity is affected
RespiratoryAll the toxic doses can affect respiration

Table 3.

Toxicological indices of lead poisoning in human.

Note: All the reported threshold limits set for blood lead are wrong; − = System is affected by the dose.

3.1 Effects of lead on intelligence quotient

Lead in the brain affects intelligence quotient (IQ) of school age child. IQ measured at 3.8 years is affected by 5 μg/dl of lead concentration in the brain [44]. The established Benchmark limit doses of 1% extra risk are for intelligence quotient (IQ- BMDL01) (12 μg/dl), systolic blood pressure, SBP-BMDL01 (36 μg/dl) and chronic kidney disease, CKD- BMDL01 (15 μg/dl) respectively. Increased blood lead of 1–6.7 μg/dl is associated with mortality from ischaemic heart disease and cardiovascular disease [45] This may likely affect 600,000–900,000 population of Sweden that consume game meat [46].

Advertisement

4. Discussion

4.1 Median lethal effects of lead bullet in human

The reported LD50 (450 mg/kg) of lead in human indicates that lead is very dangerous to life. The concentration, 100 mgpb/m3 is unsafe [33]. However, blood concentration of lead (525 μg/dl) after 5 months caused epilepsy and death, but 10–60 μg/dl for 21 days caused neurological signs [47], as 6.25 μg/dl (0.3 μM) damaged and reduced dopamine uptake [48] and up to 97.2 μg/dl can cause acute death [49]. The concentration of pb (>50 μg/dl) at 60-day increased D1 receptors in the striatum, but decreased D1 receptors in the nucleus accumbens [50]. Lead (5.2–20.8 μg/dl) reduced glutamine synthetase activity [51], as 38.2 μg/dl caused abnormal oligodendrocytes [52]. Where blood lead level is below 45 μg/dl, chelation is not recommended [53]. The calculated 1080 mg of lead poisoning antidote agrees with the report indicating that, 500–1000 mg of penicillamine can be used for treatment of plumbism in man [54]. Accumulation of lead in astrocytes altered neurotransmitter release, receptor density, impaired development and function of oligodendrocytes, caused abnormal myelin function, neurotrophic factor expression, abnormal dendritic branching patterns, disruption of blood brain barrier, thyroid hormone transportation to brain, lowered IQ, impaired neuropsychological function and impaired academic achievement [55]. Interspecies comparison of lead LD50 between rat and mouse using regression analysis, showed high correlation of 0.8 and 0.9, respectively. LD50 variability showed 90% probability; 54% in one category, and 44% in adjacent category suggesting the possibility of an alternative method to conventional in-vivo acute oral toxicity test [56]. Blood lead concentration was significantly higher among Australian consumers of meat contaminated with lead-based ammunition (≤18.1 μg/dl daily), as compared to non-consumers of lead-based ammunition meat (≤7.4 μg/dl rarely) [57].

4.2 Clinical implication of delayed lead bullet elimination

The lead clearance of 1.2 l/kg/h agrees with the reported value of 1.18 l/kg/h [58]. Our findings agree with the report indicating that, other methods can complement the application of LD50 for discovery of potential toxicants. Such methods could aim at encouraging replacement, refinement and reduction [23]. Many scaling factors are determined experimentally, as all scaling factors have uncertainty associated with them. Mathematics of translation from one species to another requires multiple experimentally estimated scaling factors [59]. The developmental effects of lead occur at the age (>2 years). Low level of lead (>10 μg/dl) is associated with adverse effect in the developing child [60] and inversely proportional to neuropsychological development in the first 7 years of life [61]. The reported average blood lead concentration in child aged 1 and 5 years are 0.03 mg/l (3 μg/dl) and 0.11 mg/l (11 μg/dl), respectively. The elimination half-life in adult is 1 and 10 months in children [62]. Circulation of lead after absorption is 30 days. It diffuses into soft tissues including brain, and after 2 min diffuses into bone with blood half-life of 30 days and bone half-life of 20–30 years [63]. Also, half-life of lead in blood is 1–1.5 months and 25–30 years in bone respectively. However, Center for Disease Control (CDC) has defined poisoning level of lead equals or greater than 5 μg/dl [64]. Blood lead concentration of 9.1 μg/dl causes bad mood, headache, memory loss, daylight drowsiness, trembling, tingling of limb among others. Hence there is no known level of lead exposure considered safe [65]. This confirms that lead can enter brain because, it has a molecular weight of 207.2 g [66]. The total elimination half-life of lead is greater than 18 months. The primary route of elimination is urine [67], suggesting that urine is the most important sample in forensic toxicology of lead poisoning. Therefore, governments at various levels and law enforcement agents should curtail the use of lead bullet, so as to avoid damage to physical and intellectual capacity of affected humans [68]. Blood lead concentration (391 μg/dl) requires the use of calcium EDTA, but lead (49 μg/dl) can be neutralized using 600 mg succimer, three times daily for 14 days [69].

4.3 Relationship between brain damage caused by lead, low intelligence quotient and renal dysfunction

Acute encephalopathy occurs in children of blood lead concentration of ≥80 g/dl [70], therefore low threshold of 30–70 g/dl has been suggested [71]. Every increase of 10 g/dl in blood lead caused a loss of 4—7IQ points, hence it is difficult to identify a threshold for decrement in IQ [72, 73]. Renal dysfunction was caused by lead concentration of blood at <40–70 g/dl, and 10 g/dl was associated with 9% reduction in creatinine clearance [74, 75]. Nevertheless, 85 g/dl blood lead caused increased susceptibility to cold and >50 g/dl caused significant immunological changes [76], such as increase in lymphocytes, abnormal T-cell subsets and cellular immune function [77, 78]. Lead concentration of >62 g/dl inhibited conversion of vitamin 2 into 1.25—dihydroxy vitamin 2 which was reduced in children with severe renal insufficiency, at blood lead concentration of 33–55 g/dl [79]. Nevertheless, blood lead concentration of 14 g/dl caused low birth weight, premature birth and increased risk of developmental abnormalities [80]. Threshold level for hypohaemoglobinaemia is 50 g/dl in adult and ≤40 g/dl in children, respectively [38]. Regulatory bodies such as Control of Lead at Work (CLAW) and Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limit (SCOEL) have recommended 30 g/dl for female workers of child-bearing capacity and 60 g/dl for men and others. However, European Lead Association has recommended 30 g/dl for men and 10 g/dl for women with reproductive capacity, respectively [81, 82]. Mean blood lead concentration of pigs that fed on venison was 2.29 g/dl which is 3.6 times higher than that of pig that did not feed on venison (0.63 g/dl). The venison-fed pig eliminated lead within 6 days of last ingestion [45]. Blood concentration of lead >5 g/dl is associated with high risk of spontaneous abortion in woman and the concentration > 40 g/dl is associated with decreased libido, sperm count and abnormal morphology of sperm cells [83, 84].

4.4 Effects of lead bullet on human and wildlife, diagnosis and therapeutic benefit of plumbism

About 0.4 million water birds of 33 species die every year from lead shot in European Union wetlands, and it cost European Union 105 million euros to replace 0.7 million captive-bred birds for killed ones. Restriction of water birds hunting cost greater than 100 million euros [85, 86, 87]. The milk plasma concentration ratio for lead is 50–100:1 after 24 h in mice, indicating a higher efficient concentration of lead milk of lactating mice as compared to that of non-lactating mice [88]. Linear biokinetic model of prehistories/preindustrial children’s blood of 0.06–0.12 g/dl was calculated for two lead intakes, which was lower than CDC threshold limit value of 10 g/dl. Toxicokinetics of bone lead that causes resorption with metabolic stimuli is of great concern for baby growth [89]. However, plumbism in birds cause death in 3 weeks [90]. The metabolizing enzymes that play very great role in the toxicokinetics of lead are d-amino-levulinate dehydratase d–ALA–d and porphobilinogen synthetase [91]. The activity of d-ALA-d, an allosteric enzyme with 28 thiol group is inhibited by lead [92], leading to accumulation of d-amino levulinic acid (d-ALA), whose concentration in urine of human and other animals is used to diagnose lead poisoning [93]. Sublethal dose of lead (0.2–0.5 ppm) has been reported with ≥0.5 ppm showing a significant decreased of d-ALA-d, causing brain damage which can be reversed by zinc. Haemosynthetase, ALA-dehyrotase and ferrochelatase have antidotal effects [94]. The latter enzyme binds iron to protoporphyrin, an indicator of blood lead, 40 ppm of the protoporphyrin is a clear proof of plumbism, over 500 pm affects neuromuscular activity with a consequent change in the motor functions [95, 96, 97]. Dimercaprol, a diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid, D-penicillamine, thiamine and calcium disodium ethylene diamine tetraacetate chelate lead for elimination. Highly hunted birds such as red grouse, mallard partridge, pheasant, woodpigeon, woodcock and deer could have lead fragments that exceeded threshold values of 100–10,000 ppb [98]. Many lead fragments in the carcasses of killed animals weighed >12–25 mg each, concentration of blood lead (5.9–18.1 g/dl) has been reported for consumers of game meats in Greenland and Switzerland and >4.1 millions shots have been reported against macropods, deer, red foxes, feral pigs, European rabbits and feral goats in Australia, annually [74], signifying that Australia may have high incidence of plumbism among wildlife. One million wild fowl estimated to have been killed by lead poisoning and ≥3 million sublethally poisoned [17], including Anseriformes, Falconiformes and Accipitriformes. They were severely poisoned with lead blood concentration of (>100 g/dl) [18]. Lethal lead concentration range (56–120 g/dl) has been reported for bearded vulture, Cape vulture and golden eagle [99, 100, 101, 102, 103] suggesting variation in susceptibility to lead poisoning among wild birds. However, concentration range of 10–47 g/dl was survived, and associated with different isotopes of lead [100, 104, 105]. Clinical threshold limit values for lead toxicosis of blood (>0.5 mg/kg), liver and kidney (>6 mg/kg) have been reported. Fragment sample size of 0.5 to >5 mm radiate from the wound channel [2]. Concentration of lead in the liver (28.9 ppm) for bald eagles and 19.4 ppm for golden eagles are sources for concern [106]. However reduced circulatory erythrocyte volume reduce uptake of lead by blood [107].

4.5 Exposure to environment lead

Exposure to lead arises from air and surfaces, and absorption occurs via ingestion, inhalation, percutaneous and transdermal routes. The first two are relevant to firing ranges, 0.1–5 μm lead can be inhaled, absorbed through the lung and 50% gets distributed to various parts of biological system. Absorption of ingested lead is >8–10% [108]. However, 12.5 g/m3 of airborne lead particles of ≤1 μm is of public health significance and the particles higher than >1 μm are deposited in the upper respiratory tract [109]. About 70% of workers exposed to lead (50 g/m3) had blood lead of 405 g/dl and 6% had >505 g/dl respectively [110]. However, 94% of samples of deer killed with bullets contained fragments of lead, which portend very high risk for scavengers [111]. Blood lead levels increased with time after injury up to 3 months with fragments and increasing age, which is 30% higher in the patient whose torsos are affected. Hence, blood level could be higher (11.8%) at 3 months and 2.6% at 12 months, respectively. Therefore, there is need for continued surveillance after gunshot [112]. The uncertainty in predictive power of algometric scales remains a concern in plumbism caused by lead bullet. Hence, the scales can only apply for exploratory research [113]. The uncertainty and availability, both in terms of inter-subject and application associated can be significant [114]. Natural isotopes of lead; 204 pb, 206 pb, 207 pb, and 208 pb constitute manufactured lead in various percentages, and their measurements in human and wildlife could be compared with their potential sources for environment risk assessment [2].

4.6 Lead causes cognition impairment

Lead causes impairment of neurodevelopment, cognition and behavioural development in the foetus and young child. The source of plumbism from wild birds killed by ammunition is significant among 5 million people in European Union countries [45]. The half-life of lead in blood and bone is 30 days and decades, respectively [115]. Unfortunately, maximum level (ML) for lead in game animals has not been set in the Codex Alimentarius General Standard for contaminants and toxicants [116], and by European Union [117], leading to concentration of 690 μg of lead fragments in wild-shot moose carcasses in Finland, Norway and Sweden [45]. Daily blood lead (12 μg/l) and lead intake (0.5 μg/kg) can affect intelligence quotient (IQ) of a child [118]. Bullet position may preclude surgical removal in order to avoid exacerbation of neurologic damage. The complication of the removal may be due to immediate migration of the fragment [119]. Retention of lead fragments in joint space is associated with increased risk of lead poisoning, and joint disruption leading to synovial metaplasia [120]. Good radiography and clinical findings are highly essential, for identification and complete surgical removal of bullet fragments, that may have high potential of distribution to various parts of biological system [121]. Injuries from bullet are most severe in brain and liver, causing temporary cavitation far from the actual bullet track. Bone and subcutaneous fats are highly resistant to bullet injury [122, 123]. Toxic leads widely used to hunt game animals and varmints are a source of environmental pollution. Lead and bismuth are highly frangible [26] and about 90% of the total burden of lead is found in bone and 5% in plasma, which pass through the cell membrane and cause toxic effect in brain, red blood cells, liver among others. In view of this, the knowledge of lead kinetics is of prime importance to a greater and better understanding of lead toxicity, as the risk of its adverse effects is very high [124]. Substitution of toxic lead bullets for non-toxic bullets such as steel, bismuth and tungsten may be possible alternative of curtailing lead poisoning from firearms, and phasing-out period of lead bullets could reduce cognition impairment [125]. Rationales used to remove lead from paints, gasoline and household items should be applied to lead-base ammunition globally, an issue that regularizes international intervention [126]. About 45% of surveyed states and provinces in the USA and Canada have non-toxic short regulation above federal water fowl regulations [127].

4.7 Forensic implication of lead poisoning

Regulatory toxicology consists of collection, processing and evaluation of epidemiological and experimental toxicological data, that end up in a decision for protection of health against toxic substances [128]. Clinicians treating plumbism from gunshot must be aware of potential incompatibilities between drugs and lead [129]. Mathematical modelling is becoming increasingly relevant for drug development [130]. One in every five injuries caused by firearm is fatal [131]. Ballistic weapon can move with a velocity of 915 m/s, whereas bullet can move up to 610 m/s [132]. Hence there is need for anatomical mapping of the target organs. Neck injuries caused by bullet are described according to the anatomical zones (1–111). Zone I extends from clavicle to cricothyroid membrane, zone II from cricothyroid membrane to the mandibular angle and zone III from mandibular angle to base of the skull [133]. But advanced neurotrauma research can improve the quality of life of patients that suffer from traumatic brain injuries [134].

4.8 Relationship between lead poisoning and brain over claim syndrome

Brain over claim syndrome (BOS) is about the relationship between neuroscience and criminal responsibility, distinguishing between internal and external critiques based on neuroscience [135]. The brain holds the key to mind and behaviour, which is useful to the law [136]. Criminal behaviour and violence are worldwide public health problem, since criminal behaviour has neurobiological basis with judicial implication. The affected brain pathways are genetic (foetal neural development), hormones and neurotransmitters (cortisol and testosterone), psychophysiology (e.g., low resting heart rate, low electroencephalography), brain imaging and neurology (reduced frontal lobe function) with attendant legal context (punishment, prediction and prevention) [137], respectively. Morality is part of human judgment, behaviour and mind. Frontal, temporal and cingulate cortex mediate between emotion and reasoning, amygdala, hippocampus and basal ganglia play vital role in morality. Therefore, genetic polymorphism, endocrine and environmental factors could modify the psychology of morality. Hence, abnormal behaviour can arise from structural brain stimulation [138], especially the anterior cingulate which causes empathy, orbital prefrontal cortex (causes regret), ventromedial prefrontal cortex (PFC) (ethical discussion), ventrolateral PFC (inhibits behaviour) and dorsolateral PFC is for reasoning [139]. Relationship between lower intelligence, crime and custodial outcomes has been established [140]. Also established is a very strong association between preschool lead and subsequent crime rate trends over decades in USA, Britain, Canada, France, Australia, Finland, Italy, West Germany and New Zealand [141]. Nevertheless, removal of lead from petrol since 1975 has led to the decline of crimes in the USA [142], because inhalation of lead content of petrol from 2 g to 0.5 g per gallon between 1975 and 1980 was highly reduced [143]. Atmospheric exposure could cause aggressive crime in children [144].

4.9 Arsenic can mar litigation caused by lead bullet

Since lead decreases arsenic bioavailability [145], it can reduce the chance of arsenic poisoning and vice versa. Hence there is need for knowledge of toxicokinetic changes of lead for better evaluation and interpretation of preclinical safety and clinical hazard [146]. Also the dose of bullets can be used to deduce lead concentration in the body, and the area under curve (AUC) base line should be compared with lead AUC response to eliminate uncertainty and variability [147]. This may be highly beneficial in biopsy [148] and autopsy of living or dead person tissues, affected by lead bullets. Under this condition, statistical moment theory instead of the compartmental model may be used to calculate mean residence time [149]. Elimination and absorption rate constants and volume of distribution may vary with age, gender, weight, clinical status, genetic variability and co-administration of lead with another drug or toxicant. Hence therapeutic monitoring of plumbism is very important [150]. Therefore, Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationship is very important guide for identifying susceptibility and treatment potential of poisoning from lead bullets [151]. Lead distribution and clearance were 2.5 and 4 times higher in lactating and non-lactating animals respectively [152], and 10 μg/dl limit issued by Centre for Disease Control (CDC) is relatively high [89]. Relationship between blood lead concentration and lead intake is non-linear, [153], but at low concentration the kinetic is linear and at 60 μg/dl in erythrocytes which corresponds to blood level of 25 μg/dl, the kinetic becomes non-linear [153], indicating that lead kinetics is Michaelis–Menten. Accessibility pool parameters (Vd, Clb, β, MRT) can be used compartmentally and non-compartmentally [154]. Gunshot residue and shooting distance could be used to determine contact and near contact wound in putrefied or charred bodies [155, 156]. In conventional rifles and gun bullet projection, the projectile requires high altitude and glides with subsonic speed and a good ratio lift/drag. This is applicable with bullets having projectiles of 2–5 times [157]. Threshold level (25 μg/m3) in air is dangerous to health [158]. Velocity of 150–170 fps is required by bullet to penetrate skin [121]. But bones change the speed of bullets greatly, by changing their course and slowing them down [159]. Origin of bullet can be determined using the major/minor axis which determines the impact angle, although modern laser methods provide better results. Semi-automatic gun and bullet system (7.62 mm) is more effective [160]. Toxicosis from lead ammunition in predatory and scavenging birds have been reported in Argentina, Chile, Swiss Alps, Namibia, South Africa, Botswana, Israel, French Pyrenees, Spain, Iberian Peninsula, Sweden, USA, Granada, UK, Japan, Poland, Finland, Ireland, Portugal, Italy and Canada [17]. International suspension limit of blood lead is 10–70 μg/dl in females and 20–70 μg/dl in males, respectively. However, 5–80 μg/dl and above can cause hypertension, kidney dysfunction, neurocognitive deficits, colic, gout, sperm abnormalities, anaemia, peripheral neuropathy and encephalopathy (Table 3). Hence, there is narrow margin of safety between blood lead suspension and subclinical effects [161]. Therefore, the 1899 Hague Declaration is about abstinence from the use of bullets; an effective treaty applied for over 100 years, but may likely face modern challenges [162]. At short range of shooting bullets, the amount of energy absorbed is increased which is proportional to striking velocity [163]. Jauhari experimented on bullet crochet, defined as deflection of a bullet from its course by firing low velocity handgun cartridges on targets [164].

4.10 The importance of ban on the use of lead ammunition

Gun at 0.436o hit the centre of a target 1 m off the ground and 1 km away with an air temperature of 27.2°C. Hence hollow bullet has more drag and hit the centre of the target at a different angle [165]. Bullets from high velocity modern rifles produce lead fragments, and lead shot (6.1 μg/g) could kill birds, when the meats from such birds were consumed, blood concentration (15–128 mg/l) was detected in the blood of human consumers, as well as 24–50 and 9–180 μg/l were detected in mothers and newborns, respectively [166]. Low blood lead concentration (LBLC) is associated with decreased intelligent quotient (IQ) in children [167]. Hence the use of lead ammunition has been banned in the USA, Canada, Mexico, Oceania, Austria, Japan, South Africa, Bennin, Guinea-Bisau, Sudan, Denmark, Norway, Netherland, Finland and Sweden on some categories and species of birds [168]. But 3 mm lead pellet and 3.4 mm steel pellet each weighed 250 mg. Increasing diameter by 0.5 mm compensates for steel’s lower density [169]. Over 90% of ammunitions manufactured in the world contain lead [170]. Pattern density is the primary factor that influences types of ammunition performance [171]. A high lead load (45–52 mg) per 100 g wet weight and the embedded pellet per body mass (1.21/100 g) in woodcock portend high health risk to consumers [172]. Exit wound caused by bullets are very rare at close range [173]. But sabot bullet made from lead alloy and plastic tends to be the most dangerous in soft and medium density materials. However, the effect of lead ammunition in non-quarry species of animals is unknown [174]. All these are very specific in forensic toxicology that can be relied upon in justice delivery, and provision of solution for criminal cases [175]. Hence forensic scientists play critical role in the determination of various risk factors in litigations related to the medical and legal cases [176], which are related to complete penetration of bullet into brain, that may cause death or incomplete penetration that may cause death or survival [177]. Hence, there is need to reduce level of lead exposure in overall population with a view to having healthy and safe environment [161], >0.1 mg/kg concentration has been reported for bovine, sheep, pigs and poultry, a dose that exceeds European Union Maximum level of 100 ppb [178], fulfilling the expectations of the community and justice [179], bearing in mind that wildlife could serve as source of potential lead bullet poisoning [3, 5, 173, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185]. Nevertheless renal damage could be confirmed legally by applying the reported investigation protocol [186]. European Chemical Agency (ECHA) has proposed a restriction on lead use in sports shooting, hunting and fishing. The restriction could reduce lead emissions by 630,000 tonnes over 20 years, representing 72% lead reduction [187].

Advertisement

5. Conclusion

Lethality of lead bullet is dependent on the body weight, median lethal time, doses of lead fragments released per unit time, concentration of lead in the brain, volume of distribution, elimination rate constant, mean residence time and elimination half-life of the lead fragments, which could be detected within 100 days after gunshots. Brain damage caused by lead fragments appears to be associated with low level of intelligence and brain over claim syndrome. Hence, forensic pathologists, police and the concerned judges should take note of prevailing conditions during gunshot attack.

References

  1. 1. Linden MA, Manton WI, Stewagt RM, Thal ER, Feirt H. Lead poisoning from retained bullets: Pathogenesis, diagnosis and management. Annals of Surgery. 1982;195(3):305-313
  2. 2. Golden NH, Warner SE, Coffey MJ. A review and assessment of spent lead ammunition and its exposure and effects to scavenging birds in the United States. Reviews Contamination and Toxicology. 2016;237:123-191
  3. 3. Pattee OH, Carpenter JW, Fritts SH, Rattner BA, Wiemeyer SN, Royle JA, et al. Lead poisoning in captive Andean condors (vulture gryphus). Journal of Wildlife Disease. 2006;42:772-779
  4. 4. Carpenter JW, Pattee OH, Fritts SH, Rattner BA, Wiemeyor SN, Royle JA, et al. Experimental lead poisoning in Turkey vultures (Cathartes aura). Journal of Wildlife Disease. 2003;39:96-104
  5. 5. Pattee OH, Wiemeyer SN, Mulhern BM, Sileo L, Carpenter JW. Experimental lead-shot poisoning in bald eagles. Journal of Wildlife Management. 1981;45:806-810
  6. 6. Peraza MA, Ayala-Fierro F, Barber DS, Caseren E, Rael LT. Effects of micronutrients on metal toxicity. Environmental Health Perspective. 1998;106(1):203-216
  7. 7. Bressler JP, Goldstein GW. Mechanisms of lead neurotoxicity. Biochemical Pharmacology. 1991;41:479-484
  8. 8. Burger J, Gochfeld M. Effects of lead on birds (lavidae): A review of laboratory and field studies. Journal of Toxicology Environmental Health. 2000;3:59-78
  9. 9. Garces G, Bernado J, Artuz M, Ignacio R. Secondary lead poisoning: A projectile housed in the human body. Columbia Medicine. 2012;43(3):230-234
  10. 10. Anderson KE, Sassa S, Bishop DF, Desnick RJ. Disorders of heme biosynthesis: X-linked sideroblastic anemia and the porphyrias. In: Vale MD, editor. The Online Metabolic and Molecular Basis of Inherited Diseases. New York: McGraw Hill; 1996
  11. 11. Silbergold EK, Hruska RE, Bradley D. Neurotoxic aspects of porphyry no parties: Lead and succinyl acetone. Environmental Research. 1982;29:459-471
  12. 12. Zawia NH, Henry GJ. Developmental exposure to lead interferes with glial and neuronal differential gene expression in the rat cerebellum. Toxicology Applied Pharmacology. 1996;138:43-47
  13. 13. Wilson MA, Johnston MV, Goldstein GW, Blue ME. Neonatal lead exposure impairs development of rodent barrel field cortex. Proceeding National Academy Science USA. 2000;97(10):5540-5545
  14. 14. Bellinger DC. Very low lead exposures and children's neurodevelopment. Current Open Pediatrics. 2008;20:172-177
  15. 15. Rehman MA, Umer N, Sepah TJ, Wajid MA. Bullet-induced synovitis as a cause of secondary osteoarthritis of the hip joint: A case report and review of literature. Journal of Medical Case Report. 2007;1:1-4
  16. 16. Knott J, Gilbert J, Green RE, Hoccom DG. Comparison of the lethality of lead and copper bullets in deer control operations to reduce incidental lead poisoning: Field trials in England and Scotland. Conservation Evidence. 2009;6:71-78
  17. 17. Pain DJ, Mateo R, Green RE. Effects of lead from ammunition on birds and other wildlife: A review and update. Ambio. 2019;48:935-953
  18. 18. Franson JC, Pain D. Lead in birds. In: Beyer WN, Meador JP, editors. Environmental Contamination in Biota, Interpreting Tissue Concentrations. 2nd ed. Boca Ralon, FL: Taylor & Francis Group LLC; 2011. pp. 563-593
  19. 19. Mazer-Amirshashi M, Stolbach A, Nelson LS. Correction to ACMT Position Statement: Addressing the Rising Cost of Prescription Anridotes 2018;14:174-176
  20. 20. Cairns R, Buckley NA. The poisoning severity score: If it did not exist, we would have to invent it. Journal Medical Toxicology. 2017;13:131-134
  21. 21. Saganuwan SA. Principles of Pharmacological Calculations. 1st ed. Nigeria: Ahmadu Bello University Press Zaria; 2012. p. 529
  22. 22. Saganuwan SA. The new algorithm for calculation of median lethal dose (LD50) and effective dose fifty (ED50) of Micranus fulvinus venom and antivenom in mice. International Journal of Veterinary Science and Medicine. 2016;4(1):1-4
  23. 23. Saganuwan SA. Toxicity studies of drugs and chemicals in animals: An overview. Bulgarian Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 2017;20(4):291-318
  24. 24. Bruce RD. An up-and-down procedure for acute toxicity testing. Fundal Applied Toxicology. 1985;5(1):151-157
  25. 25. van den Heuivel MJ, Clark DG, Eielder RJ, Koundakjian PP, Oliver GJ, Pelling D, et al. The international validation of a fixed dose procedure as an alternative to the classical LD50 test. Food Chemistry and Toxicology. 1990;28(7):469-482
  26. 26. Stroud RK, Hunt WG, Gunshot wounds: A source of lead in the environment. In: Watson RT, Fuller M, Pokras M, Hunt WG (eds). Ingestion of Lead from Spent Ammunition: Implications for Wildlife and Humans. The Peregrine Fund, Borse, Idaho, USA DOI 10.4080/ilsa.2009.0109
  27. 27. Ragsdale BD. Gunshot wounds: A historical perspective. Military Medicine. 1984;149:301-305
  28. 28. Rhee PM, Moore EE, Joseph B, Tang A, Pandit V, Vercruysse G. Gunshot wounds: A review of bathistics, bullets, weapons and myths. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2016;80(6):853-867
  29. 29. Dimaro VJ, Copeland AR, Besant-Matthews PE, Fletcher LA, Jones A. Minimal velocities necessary for perforation of skull by air gun pellets and bullets. Journal of Forensic Science. 1982;27(4):894-898
  30. 30. Yoganandan N. Frontiers in Head and Neck Trauma: Clinical and Biomechanical. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 1998
  31. 31. Versace J. A review of the seventy index. No 710881 SAE Technical paper 1971
  32. 32. Cy J. Surface area and volume of a single red blood cell. Journal of Membrane Boil. 1971;5:200-214
  33. 33. Bergdahl IA, Schutz A, Gerhardson L, Jensen A, Skerftving S. Lead concentrations in human plasma, urine and whole blood. Scandinavian Journal of Work and Environmental Health. 1997;23(5):359-363
  34. 34. Sanganuwan SA. Comparative therapentic index, lethal time and safety margin of various toxicants and snake antivenoms using newly derived and old formulas. Philadelphia: Biomedical Central Research, Notes. 2020;13(292):1-7
  35. 35. Clark JN. Oxygen toxicity. In: Bennett PB, Elliott DH, editors. The Physiology and Medicine of Diving. 4th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1983. pp. 121-169
  36. 36. Lambertsen CJ. Extension of oxygen tolerance in man. Philosophy and significance. Experimental Lung Research. 1988;14:1035-1058
  37. 37. Paxton JW, Kim SN, Whitfield LR. Pharmacokinetic and toxicity scaling of the antitumor agents amascarine and C1-921, a new analogue in mice, rats, rabbits, dogs and humans. Cancer Research. 1990;50:2692-2697
  38. 38. Bide RW, Armour SJ, Tee E. Estimation of Human Toxicity from Animal Inhalation Toxicity Data: Minute Volume-Body Weight Relationships between Animals and Man. Canada: Defence Research Establishment Suffield (DRESS), National Defence; 1997
  39. 39. Amantana A, Chen T, Tyavanagimatt SR, Jones KF, Jordan R, Chinsangaram J, et al. Pharmacokinetics and interspecies allometric scaling of ST-246, an oral antiviral therapeutic for treatment of orthopoxyvirus infection. PLOS One. 2013;8(4):1-10
  40. 40. Vozmediano V, Ortega I, Lukas JC, Gungalo A, Rodriguez M, Lucero ML. Integration of preclinical and clinical knowledge to predict intravenous pk in humans: Bilastine case study. European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics. 2014;39(1):33-41. DOI: 10.1007/S13318-0131-3
  41. 41. Knibbe CAJ, Zuideveld KP, Aarts LPHJ, Kuks PFM, Danhof M. Allometric relationships between the pharmacokinetics of propofol in rats, children and adults. British journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2005;59(6):705-711
  42. 42. Mahmood I, Bahian JD. The pharmacokinetic principles behind sealing from preclinical results to phase I protocol. Clinical Pharmacokinetics. 1999;36(1):1-11
  43. 43. Quijano-Mateos A, Castillo-Alanis LA, Bravo-Gomeg ME. Mathematical models employed to predict the time frame of intoxications as interpretation tool in forensic cases. Journal of Forensic Toxicology and Pharmacology. 2017;6(1):1-9
  44. 44. Reuben A, Caspi A, Belsky DW, Broadbert J, Harrington H, Sugden K, et al. Association of childhood blood lead levels with cognitive function and socioeconomic status at age 38 years and with IQ change and socioeconomic mobility between childhood and adult. Journal of American Medicine Association. 2017;317:1244-1251
  45. 45. Green RE, Pain DJ. Risks to human health from ammunition derived lead in Europe. Ambio. 2019;48:954-968
  46. 46. Ankarberg EH, Bjerselius R, Kollander B, Sand S, Scherling K, Linne C, et al. Lead in Game in Sweden. Sweden: National Food Agency; 2013. pp. 1-33
  47. 47. Fox DA, Campbell ML, Blocker YS. Functional alterations and apoptotic cell death in the retina following developmental or adult lead exposure. Neurotoxicology. 1997;18:645-664
  48. 48. Hanbauer SM. The effect of lead exposure and serum deprivation on mesencephalic primary cultures. Neurotoxicology. 1997;18:331-339
  49. 49. Struzynska L, Dabrowska-Bouta B, Rafalowska U. Acute lead toxicity and energy metabolism in rat brain synaptosomes. Acta Neurobiology and Experiment. 1997;57:275-281
  50. 50. Widzowski DV, Finkelstein JN, Pokora MJ, Cory-Schlecta DA. Time course of postnatal lead-induced changes in dopamine receptors and their relationship to changes in dopamine sensitivity. Neurotoxicology. 1994;15:853-865
  51. 51. Sierra EM, Tiffany-Castiglioni E. Reduction of glutamine synthetase activity in astroglial exposed in culture to low levels of inorganic lead. Toxicology. 1991;65:295-304
  52. 52. Dabrowska-Bouta B, Sulkowski G, Bartosz G, Walski M, Rafalowska U. Chronic lead intoxication affects the myelin membrane status in the central nervous system of adult rats. Journal of Molecular Neuroscience. 1999;13:127-139
  53. 53. Gracia RC, Snodgrass WR. Lead toxicity and chelation therapy. American Journal of Health System Pharmacy. 2007;64:45-53
  54. 54. Gurer H, Ercal N. Can antioxidants be beneficial in the treatment of lead poisoning? Free Radical Biology and Medicine. 2000;29:927-945
  55. 55. Lidsky TI, Schneider JS. Lead neurotoxicity in children : Basic mechanisms and clinical correlates. Brain. 2003;126(1):5-19
  56. 56. Hoffmann S, Kinsner-Ovaskainen A, Prieto P, Mangelsdorf I, Bieler C, Cole T. Acute oral toxicity: Variability, reliability, relevance and interspecies comparison of rodents LD50 data from literature surveyed for the acutetox project. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 2010;58:395-407
  57. 57. Hampton JO, Laidlaw M, Buenz E, Arnemo JM. Heads in the sand: Public health and ecological risks of lead-based bullets for wildlife shouting in Australia. WildLife Research. 2018;45:287-306
  58. 58. Mcintyre TA, Han C, Xiang H, Bambal R, Davis CB. Difference in the total body clearance of lead compounds in the rat and mouse: Impact of pharmacokinetic screening strategy. Xenobiotica. 2008;38(6):605-619
  59. 59. Rogers JA, Wilbur J, Cole S, Bernhardt PW, Bupp JL, Lennon MJ, et al. Quantifying uncertainty in predictions of hepatic clearance. Statistical Biopharmaceutic Research. 2011;3(4):515-525
  60. 60. Sanders T, Liu T, Buchner V, Tchounnon PB. Neurotoxic effects and biomarkers of lead exposure: A review. Reviews in Environmental Health. 2009;24(1):15-45
  61. 61. Baghurst PA, McMichael AJ, Wigg NR, Vimpani GV, Robertson EF, Roberts RJ, et al. Environmental exposure to lead and children's intelligence at the age of seven years. The Port Pirie Cohort Study. New England Journal of Medicine. 1992;327:1279-1284
  62. 62. Goldstein GW, Asbury AK, Diamond I. Pathogenesis of lead encephalopathy. Uptake of lead and reaction of brain capillaries. Archives of neurology. 1974;31(6):382-389
  63. 63. Rehani B, Wissman R. Lead poisoning from a gunshot wound. South Medical Journal. 2011;104:57-58
  64. 64. Paulson JA, Brown MJ. The CDC blood lead reference value for children: Time for change. Environment Health. 2019;18(16):1-3
  65. 65. De Araujo GCS, Mourao NT, Pinheiro IN, Xavier AR, Gameiro VS. Lead toxicity risks in gunshort victims. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):1-10
  66. 66. Winecker RE, Rofero-Miller JD, Broussard LA, Hammett-Stabler CA. The toxicology of heavy metals: Getting the lead out. Laboratory Medicine. 2018, 2002;33(12):934-947
  67. 67. Ling LJ, Rosen CL. Harwood-Nuss’ Clinical Practice of Emergency Medicine. Philadelphia: Wolters Klower, Lippincott, William and Wilkins; 2009
  68. 68. Jones BL. Reducing Lead Contamination and Exposure on Military Firing Ranges Through the Practical Application of Ballistic Containment System, 4th ed. Fort Belvoir. 1999. p. 24
  69. 69. McNutt TK, Chambers-Emmerson J, Dethlefsen M, Shah ZR. Bite the bullet: Lead poisoning after ingestion of 206 lead bullets. Veterinary and Human Toxicology. 2001;43(5):288-289
  70. 70. National Poisons Information Service (NPIS) US. Lead TOXBASE. Birmingham: Health Protection Agency; 2010
  71. 71. Davis JM, Svendsguard DJ. Nerve conduction velocity and lead: A critical review and meta-analysis. In: Johnson BL, Anger WK, Durao A, Xinteras C, editors. Advances in Neurobehavioural Toxicology: Applications in Environmental and Occupational Health. Chelsea, MI: Michingan Lawis Publishers; 1990. pp. 353-376
  72. 72. Winneke G, Brockhaus A, Ewevs U, Kramer U, Nent M. Results from the European multicemter study on lead neurotoxicity in children: Implications for risk assessment. Neurotoxicology and Teratology. 1990;12:553-559
  73. 73. Committee on Toxicity of Chemicals (COT) in Food Consumer Products and the Environment. COT Statement on the 2006 UK Total Diet Study of Metals and Other Elements. Vol. 2008. London: Food Standards Agency;
  74. 74. Ehrlish R, Robins T, Jordaan E, et al. Lead absorption and renal dysfunction in a South African battery factory. Occupational Environmental Medicine. 1998;55:453-640
  75. 75. Tsaih SW, Kornick S, Schwartz J, et al. Lead, diabetes, hypertension and renal function: The normative ageing study. Environmental Health Perspective. 2004;112:1178-1182
  76. 76. Kimber J, Stonard ND, Gidlow DA, Niewola Z. Influence of chronic low-level exposure to lead on plasma immunoglobulin concentration and cellular immune function in man. International Archive of Occupational and Environmental Health. 1986;57:117-125
  77. 77. Coscia GC, Discalzi G, Ponzetti C. Immunological aspects of occupational lead exposure. Medical Lav. 1987;78:360-364
  78. 78. Wang L, Wang JT, Bailt LXF, Wan F. Impact of excessive blood- lead levels on T cell subsets in lead exposed workers. Zhonzuo shi Tan Xue Xue Za Zhi. 2011;19:150-1511
  79. 79. Koo WW, Succop PA, Bornschem RL, et al. Serum vitamin D metabolites and bone mineralization in young children with chronic low to moderate lead exposure. Pediatrics. 1991;87:680-687
  80. 80. Health Protection Agency. Chemical Hazards and Poisons. Report from the Chemical Hazards and Poisons Division; 2009. p 1-75
  81. 81. Recommendations from the Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits for Lead and Its Inorganic Compounds. SCOEL/SUM. European Commission; 2013. pp. 1-10
  82. 82. The Agency for UK REACH Work Programme 2021/2022. Health and Safety Executives, June 2021. pp 1-37
  83. 83. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). Appendix G: Calculating Exposure Doses, Atlanta. 2005
  84. 84. Borja-Aburto VH, Hertz-Picciotto I, Rojas Copez M, Farias P, Rios C, Blanco J. Blood lead levels measured prospectively and risk of spontaneous abortion. American Journal of Epidemic Lead. 1999;150:590-597
  85. 85. ECHA. Annex XV Restriction Report on Lead in Shot and Appendix. Proposal for Restriction. Helsonki, Finland: ECHA; 2017
  86. 86. True G, Drost W, Stock F. An elevation of the proposal to regulate lead in hunting ammunition through the European Union’s REACH regulation. Environmental Science Turkey;32(68):1-18
  87. 87. Andreoti A, Guberti V, Nardelli R, et al. Economic assessment of wild bird mortality induced by the use of lead gun shot in European coastlands. Science and Total Environment. 2018:610-611;1505–1513
  88. 88. Hallen P, Johnson S, Karlsson MO, Oskarsson A. Toxicokinetics of lead in lactating and non lactating mice. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology. 1996;136(2):342-347
  89. 89. Mushak P. New directions in the toxicokinetics of human lead exposure. Neurotoxicology. 1993;14(2–3):29-42
  90. 90. Friend M. Lead poisoning. In: Friend M, editor. Field Guide to Wildlife Diseases. Vol. 1. Washington DC, USA: Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service; 1987. pp. 175-189
  91. 91. Friend M. Interpretation criteria commonly used to determine lead poisoning problem areas. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington DC. Fish Wildlife Deseases. 1985;2:1-4
  92. 92. Pain DJ. Lead poisoning in waterfowl. Proc an IWRB Workshop Brussels, Belgium 13-15 June 1991. In: IWRB Special Publication No. 16, Gloucester; 1992, pp. 95-97
  93. 93. Humphreys DJ. Toxicolgia Veterinaria, Interamericana. Madrid, Espafia: McGraw Hill; 1990
  94. 94. Pain DJ. Haematological parameters as predictors of blood lead and indicators of lead poisoning in the Black duck, Anas rubripes. Environmental Pollution. 1989;60:67-81
  95. 95. Roscoe DE, Nielsen SW, Eaton HD, Rousseau JE. Chronic plumbism in rabbit: A comparison of three diagnostic tests. American Journal of Veterinary Research. 1975;36:1225-1229
  96. 96. US Fish and Wildlife Service. Lead Poisoning in Water Fowl. Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service; 1990. pp. 1-15
  97. 97. Lumeij JT. Clinicopathologic aspects of lead poisoning in birds: A review. Veterinary Quarterly. 1985;7:133-138
  98. 98. Pain DJ, Cronne RL, Newth J, Brown MJ, Crutcher E, Hardman P, et al. Potential hazard to human health from exposure to fragments of lead bullets and shot in the tissues of game animals. PLoS One. 2010;5(4):1-17
  99. 99. Ganz K, Jenni L, Madry MM, Kraemer T, Jenny H, Jenny D. Acute and chromic lead exposure in four avian scavenger species in Switzerland. Archive of Environmental contaminants and Toxicology. 2018;75:566-575
  100. 100. Naidoo V, Wolter K, Botha CJ. Lead ingestion as a potential contributing factor to the decline in vulture populations in south African. Environmental Research. 2017;152:150-156
  101. 101. Madry MM, Kraemer T, Kupper J, Naegeli H, Jenny H, Jenni L, et al. Excessive lead burden among golden eagles in the Swiss Alps. Environmentals Research Letters. 2015;10:034003
  102. 102. Hovowitz IH, Tanco E, Nadler RV, Anglister N, Landau S, Elia R, et al. Acute lead poisoning in a griffon vulture (Gyps fulvus) in Israel. Israel Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 2014;69:163-168
  103. 103. Langner HW, Domenech R, Slabe VA, Sulivan SP. Lead and mercury in fall migrant golden eagles from Western North America. Archive of Environmental Communication and Toxicology. 2015;69:54-61
  104. 104. Garbett R, Maude G, Hancock P, Kenny D, Reading D, Amar A. Association between hunting and elevated blood lead levels in the critically endangered African white-backed vulture Gyps africanus. Science and Total Environment. 2018;630:1654-1665
  105. 105. Mateo-Tomas P, Olea PP, Jimenez-Moreno M, Camarero PR, Sanchez-Barbudo IS, RCR M-D, et al. Maping the spatio-temporal risk of lead exposure in apex species for more effective mitigation. Proceedings of Royal Society of Biological Science. 2016;283:20160662
  106. 106. Russell RE, Franson JC. Causes of mortality in eagles submitted to the National Wildlife Health Centre 1975-2013. Wildlife Society and Bulletin. 2014;38:697-704
  107. 107. Kochen J, Greener Y. Levels of lead in blood and haematocrit: Implications for the evaluation of the newborn and arsenic patient. Pediatric Research. 1973;7:937-944
  108. 108. O’Flaherty EJ. Physiologically based models for bine seeking elements: Kinetic of lead disposition in humans. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology. 1993;118(1):16-29
  109. 109. Park DU, Paik NW. Effect on blood lead of airborne lead particles characterized by size. Annals of Occupation. 2002;46(2):237-243
  110. 110. Snee RD. Models for the relationship between blood lead and air lead. International Archive of Occupational and Environmental Health. 1982;50(4):303-319
  111. 111. Hunt G, Burnham W, Parish C, Burnharm K, Mutch B, Oaks JL. Bullet fragments in deer remains: Implications for lead exposure in scavengers. In: Watson RT, Fuller M, Pokras M, Hunt WG, editors. Ingestion of Lead from Spent Ammunition: Implications for Wildlife and Humans. Boise Idaho, USA: The Peregrine Fund; 2009
  112. 112. McQuirter JL, Rothenberg SJ, Dinkins GA, Kondrashov V, Mando M, Todd AC. Change in blood lead concentration up to 1 year after a gunshot with a retained bullet. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2004;159(7):683-692
  113. 113. Mahmood J. Prediction of drug clearance in children: A review of different methodologies. Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism and Toxicology. 2015;11(4):573-587
  114. 114. Riley R, Wilson CE. Cytochrome P450 time-dependent inhibition and induction: Advances in assays, risk analysis and modeling. Expert Opinion Drug Metabolism Toxicology. 2015;11(4):557-572
  115. 115. United States Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (USATSAR). Toxialogical Profile for Lead. US. New York: Department of Health and Human Services; 2007. pp. 1-582
  116. 116. Codex Alimentarius. Standard for contaminants and toxicants in food and feed LXb 1993–1995. Adopted in 1995. Raised and Amended 2018. Rome: Food and Agricultural Organization. 2018;364:5-24
  117. 117. EC. European Commission Regulation EC 1881/2006. Setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in food stuffs. Official Journal of European Union. EC 1881/2006;364:5-24
  118. 118. EFSA 2010. Scientific opinion on lead in food. EFSA panel on contaminants in the food chain (CONTAM). European Food and Safety Journal. 2010;8(4):1570
  119. 119. Zaforte RD, Watanabe T, Mann NR. Moving bullet syndrome: A complication of penetrating head injury. Archive of Physics and Medical Rehabilitation. 1998;79:1469-1472
  120. 120. Ragsdale BD, Lehmer LM. Soft tissue pseudocysts associated with retained bullets: A series of 4 cases. Journal of Ortho Trauma Research. 2017;1(1):003
  121. 121. Wilson AJ. Gunshot injuries: What does a radiologist need to know? RadioGraphic. 1999;19:1358-1368
  122. 122. Dimaio VJM. Gunshot Wounds: Practical Aspects of Firearms, Ballistics, and Forensic Techniques. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1985. pp. 163-265
  123. 123. Swan RK, Hunt WG. Gunshot wounds: A source of lead in the environment. In: Watson RT, Fuller M, Pokras M, Hunt WG, editors. Ingestion of Lead from Spent Ammunition: Implications for Wildlife and Humans. Boise, Idaho: The Peregrine Fund, USDA; 10.4080/i/sa.2009.0109
  124. 124. Moreira FR, Moreira JC. Lead kinetics in human body and its significance to health. Cienc Sande Colectiva. 2004;9(1):167-181
  125. 125. Treu G, Drogt W, Slock F. An evaluation of the proposal to regulate lead in hunting ammunition through the European Union’s REACH regulation. Environmental Science European. 2010;32(68):1-18
  126. 126. Arnemo JM, Andersen O, Stokke S, Thomas VG, Krone O, Pain DJ, et al. Health and environmental risks from lead-based ammunition: Science versus socio-politics. EcoHealth. 2016;13:618-622
  127. 127. Tranel MA, Kimmel RO. Impacts of lead ammunition on wildlife, the environment and human health—A literature review and implications for Minnesota. In: Watson RT, Fuller M, Pokras M, Hunt WG, editors. Ingestion of Lead from Spent Ammunition: Implications for Wildlife and Humans. Boise, Idaho, USA.: The Peregrine Fund;
  128. 128. Schwank M, Werner M, Younes M. Regulatory toxicology: Objectives and tasks defined by the working group of the German Society of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and toxicology. Toxicology Letters. 2002;126(31):145-153
  129. 129. Papich MG. Drug compounding for veterinary patients. American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientist Journal. 2005;7(2):281-287
  130. 130. van der Graaf PH, Benson N, Peletier LA. Topics in mathematical pharmacology. Journal of Dynamics, Diffusion Equation. 2016;28:1337-1356
  131. 131. Barlett C. Clinical update: Gunshot wound ballistics. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2003;408:20-57
  132. 132. Fackler N. Civilian gunshot wounds and ballistics: Dispelling the myths. Emerging Clinical North America. 1998;16:1-8
  133. 133. Godhi S, Mittal GS, Kukreja P. Gunshot injury in the neck with an atypical bullet trajectory.Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2011;10(1):80-84
  134. 134. Young L, Rule GT, Bocchieri RT, Waliko TJ, Burns JM, Ling G. When physics meets biology: Low and high-velocity penetration, blunt impact, and blast to the brain. Frontiers in Neurology. 2015;6:89
  135. 135. Morse SJ. Brain over claim syndrome and criminal responsibility: A diagnostic note. In: Conference on the Mind of a Child, Moriz College of Law. Columbus: The Ohio State University; 2005. pp. 397-412
  136. 136. The Royal Society. Brain waves module 4: Neuroscience and the law. RS Policy Document. 2011;05(11):1-135
  137. 137. Glenn L, Raine A. Neurocriminology:Implications for the punishment, prediction and prevention of criminal behaviour. Natural Reviews of Neuroscience. 2014;15:54-63
  138. 138. FumagaIli M, Priori A. Functional and neuroanatomy of morality. Brain. 2012;135:2006-2021
  139. 139. Mobbs D, Lau HC, Jones OD, Frith CD. Law, responsibility and the brain. PLoS Biology. 2007;5(4):0693-0700
  140. 140. Freeman J. The relationship between lower intelligence, crime and custodial outcomes: A brief literary review of a vulnerable group. Working Life Stress, Rehabilitation Counselling and Inclusion. 2012;3(1)S:1-15
  141. 141. Nevin R. Understanding international crime trends: The legacy of preschool lead exposure. Environmental Research. 2007;104:315-336
  142. 142. Hall W. Did elimination of lead from petrol reduce crime in the USA in the 1990s? F1000. Research. 2013;2(156):1-10
  143. 143. Land K. National Child and Youth Well-being Index (CWI). Vol. 2. New York: Foundation for Child Development, F1000 Research; 2013. p. 156
  144. 144. Taylor NP, Forbes MK, Opeskin B, Parr N, Lanphear BP. The relationship between atmospheric lead emissions and aggressive crime: An ecological study. Environmental Health. 2016;15(23):1-10
  145. 145. Diacomanolis V, Noller BN, Ng JC. Interaction effects of lead on bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of arsenic in rat. Environmental Geochemical Health. 2013;35:757-766
  146. 146. Ploemen JPHT, Kramer H, Krajnc EI, Martin I. The use of toxicokinetic data in preclinical safety assessment: A toxicologic pathologist perspective. Toxicological Pathology. 2007;28(5):1081-1089
  147. 147. Scheff JD, Almon RR, DuBois DC, Jusko WJ, Androulakis IA. Assessment of pharmacologic area under curve, the curve when baselines are variable. Pharmaceutical Research. 2011;28(50):1081-1089
  148. 148. Testa B, van de Waterbeemd H. Comprehensive Medicinal III, Vol 5: ADME-Tox Approaches. 1st ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 2006. pp. 1181
  149. 149. Zhang A, Sun H, Jiao G, Wang X. Synergism effects of active ingredients from YCHT. Serum Pharmacochemistry of Traditional Chinese Medicine. 2017:59-71
  150. 150. Loftsson T. Essential Pharmacokinetics: A Primer for Pharmaceutical Scientists. 1st ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2015. pp. 1-175.
  151. 151. Sykes JE, Papich MG. Pharmacodynamics of antimicrobial drugs. In: Canine and Feline Infectious Diseases. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2014. pp. 900
  152. 152. Gulson BL, Jameson CW, Mahaffey KR, Mizon KJ, Patison N, Law AJ, et al. Relationships of lead in breast milk to lead in blood, urine, and diet of the infant and mother. Environment Health Perspect. 1998;106(10):667-674
  153. 153. Leggett RW. An age-specific kinetic model of lead metabolism in humans. Environmental Health Perspectives. 1993;101(7):598-616
  154. 154. Foster DM. Accessible pool parameters. In: Daniel CE, Markey SP (eds) Principles of Clinical Pharmacology, 2nd ed. Washington DC: Academic press; 2007. p. 545
  155. 155. Gradascevic A, Resic E, Saralic N, Franjic B, Sallaic A, Ozuzdanoric-Pasalic A. Is it possible to determine firearm caliber and shooting range from the examination of gunshot residue in close range gunshot wounds? An experimental study. Journal of Health Science. 2013;3(3):b232-b237
  156. 156. Bolonkin A. Long distance bullets and shells. International Journal of Aero Science. 2013;2(2):29-36
  157. 157. Greenberg N, Frimer R, Meyer R, Derazane E, Chodick G. Lead exposure in military outdoor firing ranges. Military Medicine. 2016;181:1121-1126
  158. 158. Ordog GJ, Wasserberger J, Balasubramamiam S. Shortgun wound batistes. Journal of Trauma. 1988;28:624-631
  159. 159. Wei Z, Wang F. Overall parameters design and optimization system for gun and bullet. International Journal of Military Medicine. 2008;6(1):1-7
  160. 160. Coupland R, Loye D. The 1899 Hague declaration concerning expanding bullets. A treaty effective for more than 100years faces complex contemporary issues. IRRC. 2003;85(849):286-287
  161. 161. Gidlow DA. Lead toxicity. Occupational Medicine. 2015;65:348-356
  162. 162. Kent RH. The Theory of the Notion of a Bullet About Its Centre of Gravity. In Dense Media, With Applications to Bullet Design. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland: Ballistic Research Laboratories, Report No. X-65; 1957
  163. 163. Jauhari M. Mathematical model for bullet cachet. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminal Police Science. 1970;61(3):469-473
  164. 164. Wade A. Goth of ballistic: Bullet trajectories. Underground Journal of Mathematic Model: One of Two. 2013;4(1):1-9
  165. 165. Johansen P, Asmund G, Riget F. High human exposure to lead through consumption of birds hunted with lead shot. Environment Pollut. 2004;127:125–129
  166. 166. Coburn HL, Snary EL, Kelly LA, Wooldridge M. Qualitative risk assessment of the hazards and risks from wild game. Veterinary Record. 2005;157:321-322
  167. 167. Mateo R, Kanstrup N. Regulations on lead ammunition adopted in Europe and evidence of compliance. Ambio. 2019;48(9):989-998
  168. 168. Kanstrup N, Thomas VG. Transition to lead-free ammunition use in hunting: Socio-economic and regulatory considerations for the European Union and other jurisdiction. Environmental Sciences Europe. 2020;32(91):1-11
  169. 169. Mammo. Ammunition Handbook. 6th ed. 2021. pp 1-189
  170. 170. Pierce BL, Roster TA, Frisbic MC, Mason CD, Roberson JA. A comparison of lead and steel shot loads for harvesting and mourning doves. Wildlife Society Bulletin; 2015;39(1):103-115
  171. 171. Andreotti A, Borghesi F, Aradis A. Lead ammunition residues in the meat of hunted avodock: A potential health risk to consumers. Italian Journal of Animal Science. 2016;15(1):22-29
  172. 172. Smith WDF. Air rifle ammunition and its influence on wounding potential. Archive Emergency Medicine. 1984;2:25-29
  173. 173. De Francisco N, Troya JDZ, Aguera E1. Lead and lead toxicity in domestic and free living birds. Avian Pathology. 2003;32:3-13
  174. 174. Quy R. Review of Evidence Concerning the Contamination of Wildlife and the Environment Arising from the Use of Lead Ammunition. A Report to DEFRA. Sand Hutton: The Food and Environment Research Research Agency; 2010. pp. 2-56
  175. 175. Yadav M, Tiwari A. Forensic toxicology and its relevance with criminal justice delivery system in India. Forensic Research and Criminology International Journal. 2017;4(4):121-127
  176. 176. Ateriya N, Saraf A, Meshram V, Shekhawat RS, Satia P. Quadruple hanging: a rare scenario in flicide-suicide. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Science. 2019;9(56):1-5
  177. 177. Webster JE, Gurdjian ES. Acute physiological effects of gunshot and other penetrating wounds of the brain. Journal of Neurophysiology. 1943;6(4):255-262
  178. 178. Pain DJ, Cromie RL, Newth J, Broan MJ, Crutcher E, Hardman P, et al. Potential hazard to human health from exposure to fragments of lead bullets and shot in the tissues of game animals. Plors One. 2010;5(4):1-17
  179. 179. Denton JS, Segovia A, Filkins JA, Segovia A, Filkins JA. Practical pathology of gunshot wounds. Archive of Pathology and laboratory Medicine. 2006;130:1283-1289
  180. 180. Carneiro MA, Oliveira PA, Brandao R, Francisco ON, Velavde R, Lavin S, et al. Lead poisoning due to lead pellet injestion in griffon vultures (Gyps fulvus) from the Iberian Peninsula. Journal of Avian Medicine and Surgery. 2016;30:274-279
  181. 181. Carpenter JW, Pattee OH, Fritts SH, Rattner BA, Wiemeyer SN, Royle JA, et al. Experimental lead poisoning in Turkey vultures (Cathartes cura). Journal of Wildlife Diseases. 2003;39:96-104
  182. 182. Wiemeyer GM, Perez MA, Bianchini LT, Sampietro L, Bravo GF, Jacome NL, et al. Repeated conservation threats across the Americas: High level of blood and bone lead in the Andean condor widen the problem to a continental scale. Environmental Pollution. 2017;220:672-679
  183. 183. Degerness LA, Redig PT, Freeman ML. Treatment of lead poisoning in trumpeter swans Cygrums buccinators. Wildlife Rehabilitation. 1990;8:15-20
  184. 184. Zin P, Zheng N, Tu T, Tu S, Sun W, McEachern D, et al. Preclinical pharmacokinetics of MI -219, a novel human double minute 2 (HDM2) inhibitor and prediction of human pharmacokinetics. Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Science. 2012;15(2):265-280
  185. 185. Epps CW. Considering the switch transitional to non-hunting ammunition. The Condor: Ornithology Application. 2014;116:429-434
  186. 186. Sagnuwan SA. The use of body surface area for determination of age, body weight, urine creatinime, serum creatinime , plasma creatinime, urine volume and creatinime clearance: the reliable canomical method of assessing renotoxicity in animals. Comparative Clinical Pathology. 2018;27:1531-1536
  187. 187. European Chemical Agency (ECHA). Lead in Short Bullets and Fishing Weight. Helsinki, Finland; 2020. p. 3021 https://ECHA.Europa.EU

Written By

Saganuwan Alhaji Saganuwan

Submitted: 08 February 2022 Reviewed: 14 June 2022 Published: 30 November 2022