Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidant Activities of Eight Species of Fabaceae That Are Commonly Used in Traditional Medical Practices in the Republic of Suriname

Written By

Dennis R.A. Mans, Priscilla Friperson, Jennifer Pawirodihardjo and Meryll Djotaroeno

Submitted: 25 June 2022 Reviewed: 27 June 2022 Published: 24 July 2022

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.106076

From the Edited Volume

Medicinal Plants

Edited by Sanjeet Kumar

Chapter metrics overview

130 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

The consumption of diets rich in antioxidants may minimize the chances of developing debilitating diseases such as cardiovascular, diabetic, inflammatory, neoplastic, and cognitive disorders. The Fabaceae or pea family is the third most species-rich plant family on Earth and includes more than 19,000 species in over 700 genera. Many species of Fabaceae are ingredients of staple diets and medicinal substances. This may be attributable to the presumably high content of antioxidants in these plants, particularly phenolic compounds. The Republic of Suriname (South America) harbors over 400 species of Fabaceae in more than 100 genera and has a rich ethnopharmacological tradition that also involves a number of Fabaceae species. In this chapter, we evaluated the literature to determine whether the traditional use of eight of the medicinally most commonly employed Surinamese species of Fabaceae may be associated with their phenolic content and antioxidant activity. Our results suggest that this may hold true for Caesalpinia pulcherrima, Cajanus cajan, Clitoria ternatea, Desmodium adscendens, Lablab purpureus, and Tamarindus indica but not for Copaifera guyanensis and Dipteryx odorata, the bioactivities of which mainly seem to be determined by terpenoids and coumarins, respectively, without an apparent involvement of antioxidant effects.

Keywords

  • Suriname
  • Fabaceae
  • traditional medicine
  • pharmacological activity
  • phytochemical composition
  • phenolic content
  • antioxidant activity

1. Introduction

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are chemically unstable oxygen-containing molecules such as superoxide anions and hydroxyl radicals that are able to readily react with and inflict damage to cellular constituents such as nucleic acids, proteins, and lipids [1, 2, 3]. ROS are continuously formed in the body during metabolic reactions involving oxygen such as the mitochondrial electron transport chain, in activated white blood cells in order to eliminate bacteria and other invaders, and as products of various intracellular enzymatic reactions such as those catalyzed by nitric oxide synthase and xanthine oxidase, which yield nitric oxide radicals and superoxide radicals, respectively [1, 2, 3]. ROS are also produced following exposure of the body to various noxious agents ranging from car exhaust and cigarette smoke to γ-radiation and certain medical drugs [1, 2, 3].

ROS play important roles in the cells of the body, for instance, as elements of intracellular signaling pathways for several normal physiological functions including those associated with the regulation of immunity, cell differentiation, and longevity [4, 5, 6]. However, a buildup of these species may cause oxidative stress, cell and tissue injury, and cell death [4, 5, 6] and is probably at the basis of several ailments such as heart conditions, Alzheimer’s disease, and cancer, as well as premature aging and cerebrovascular accidents [7, 8, 9, 10, 11]. For this reason, the body has a variety of innate antioxidant defense mechanisms to its disposal to mitigate potential damage by ROS, including enzymatic antioxidant systems (for instance, superoxide dismutase, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase) and non-enzymatic systems (for instance, bilirubin, glutathione, and certain vitamins) [12]. In addition to these innate defense systems, exogenous antioxidants provided through the diet and/or nutritional supplements may help protect the body from oxidative stress [13]. Thus, the consumption of compounds rich in antioxidants may decrease the risk of developing the abovementioned diseases [14, 15, 16].

An important class of plant-derived antioxidants is represented by phenolic compounds, secondary plant metabolites made up of one or more aromatic ring(s) coupled to one or more hydroxyl group(s) [17]. Phenolic compounds help protect plants from pathogens, animal and insect attack, as well as ultraviolet radiation; provide plants their characteristic colors; and contribute to the organoleptic properties of plants [18]. There are tens of thousands of plant phenolic compounds including the main dietary constituents flavonoids, phenolic acids, and tannins, in addition to coumarins, naphthoquinones, stilbenes, anthraquinones, and lignans [13, 17]. Their mitigating effect on oxidative stress has been attributed to their ability to eliminate potentially harmful oxidizing free radical species by acting as reducing agents, hydrogen donors, quenchers of singlet oxygen, or chelators of metal ions that catalyze oxidation reactions [13, 17].

The pea family Fabaceae is a large family of flowering plants that include various economically important plants such as the soybean Glycine max (L.) Merr., the cowpea Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.), and the peanut Arachis hypogaea L. [19, 20]. The Fabaceae family also includes many species that represent important sources of a wide variety of ethnobotanical medicines against a myriad of diseases (see, for instance, references [20, 21]). This may be attributable to their relatively high contents of various pharmacologically active constituents including phenolic compounds with antioxidant properties [22, 23]. In addition, the Fabaceae is considered a plant family that hyperaccumulates selenium, a key constituent of selenoproteins such as the antioxidant enzyme glutathione peroxidase [24].

The Republic of Suriname (South America) has a land area of roughly 165,000 km2, about 80% of which consists of sparsely inhabited, dense, pristine, and highly biodiverse tropical rain forest [25]. Conversely, about 80% of the country’s population of just over 600,000 lives in the relatively narrow northern coastal zone of the country [26]. Mostly because of the variety of habitats and the humid tropical temperature, the biodiversity in Suriname is high, encompassing roughly 5100 different plant species [27]. As in other parts of the world, the Fabaceae plant family represents a substantial part of Suriname’s plant diversity, with estimations of over 400 different species in more than 100 genera from the northern coast all the way up to the expansive forested mountain ranges [28]. The Fabaceae are also ingredients of a large variety of traditional medicines in Suriname. So far, it is not clear whether this is because of their remarkably high phenolic content and antioxidant activity. In this chapter, we have addressed this topic by assessing whether the traditional uses and pharmacological activities of eight medicinally commonly employed Fabaceae in Surinamese traditional medicine may be associated with their phenolic content and antioxidant activity.

Advertisement

2. ROS and oxidative stress

ROS can be defined as oxygen-containing reactive species and include oxygen-free radicals with unpaired electrons such as superoxide, hydroxyl, peroxyl, and alkoxyl radicals, as well as non-radical species such as hydrogen peroxide, peroxynitrite, hypochlorous acid, and ozone [1, 2, 3]. Reactive nitrogen species (RNS) such as nitric oxide, peroxynitrite, and nitrogen dioxide radical, as well as reactive chlorine species (RCS) such as hypochlorous acid, are also classified as ROS [1, 2, 3]. As mentioned in the preceding section, ROS are able to readily react with and cause damage to biomolecules including proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids, leading to cell and tissue injury [4, 5, 6]. The high reactivity of ROS derives from the presence of a single unpaired electron in their outer orbit formed as a result of incomplete reduction of the oxygen metabolites [4, 5, 6].

ROS can be generated from either endogenous or exogenous sources. Endogenous sources of ROS are cellular organelles where oxygen metabolism is high, such as mitochondria, phagocytic cells, endoplasmic reticulum, and peroxisomes [12]. For instance, during oxidative phosphorylation in the mitochondria, the electron transport chain produces electrons for the reduction of molecular oxygen into superoxides. The superoxides are transformed into the much less reactive hydrogen peroxide by superoxide dismutase. However, when hydrogen peroxide interacts with ions of transition metals such as Fe2+ and Cu2+, the most reactive ROS, hydroxyl radicals are formed through Fenton’s reaction [29]. And phagocytized bacteria, bits of necrotic tissue, other harmful cells, and foreign particles are destroyed by macrophages and neutrophils by the so-called respiratory burst (or oxidative burst), involving the rapid release of superoxides and hydrogen peroxide following the supply of electrons by NADPH [30].

Other important endogenous (enzymatic) sources of ROS are the cytochrome P450 superfamily of enzymes that produce ROS during the detoxification and excretion of xenobiotics [31], cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenase that generate ROS from arachidonic acid [32], and xanthine oxidoreductase that produces superoxide anions during the breakdown of purines to uric acid [33]. And as mentioned before, in the Fenton and Haber-Weiss reactions, molecular oxygen is reduced to form superoxide anions, which dismutates to form hydrogen peroxide that can react with traces of iron or copper to form more highly reactive hydroxyl ions and subsequently hydroxyl radicals [34].

Exogenous sources of ROS are γ-radiation and UV radiation; air pollutants such as car exhaust, cigarette smoke, and industrial contaminants; peroxides, aldehydes, oxidized fatty acids, and transition metals in foods; a large variety of xenobiotics including toxins, pesticides, and herbicides; as well as various medical drugs such as narcotics, anesthetizing gases, and antineoplastic agents [1, 2, 3]. Gamma radiation, for instance, interacts with water molecules to form water radical cations and free electrons, which react with other water molecules to form highly active hydroxyl radicals, superoxides, and organic radicals. These ROS are then converted into organic hydroperoxides and hydrogen peroxide, which subsequently react with Fe2+ and Cu2+ ions, generating even more ROS, eventually resulting in massive damage to cellular biomolecules such as DNA, proteins, and lipids [35].

Iron and copper, along with cadmium, nickel, arsenic, and lead, not only generate ROS by Fenton or Haber-Weiss type reactions, but also by direct reactions with cellular constituents, producing, for example, thiol-type radicals [36]. For instance, arsenic induces the production of peroxides, superoxides, and nitric oxide and inhibits antioxidant enzymes such as glutathione-transferase, glutathione-peroxidase, and glutathione-reductase by binding to the sulfhydryl group [37]. And lead triggers lipid peroxidation and increases glutathione peroxidase concentration in brain tissue [38]. The free radicals generated from these reactions can affect DNA, with substitutions of some DNA bases such as guanine with cytosine, guanine with thymine, and cytosine with thymine [39].

An example of a medical drug that generates ROS is the antitumor antibiotic doxorubicin, both the antineoplastic activity and the cardiomyopathy of which are probably based on its reduction to a semiquinone-derivative that can autoxidize in the presence of oxygen and then produces superoxide anions following electron donation by oxidases such as mitochondrial NADPH and nitric oxide synthases [40].

Advertisement

3. Defenses against oxidative stress

At non-cytotoxic levels, ROS and their secondary electrophilic species perform important functions in the human body, among others, by acting as redox signaling messengers required for the normal physiological functioning of cells [41]. In general, ROS are messengers in the transduction of certain metabolic and environmental cues, which affect diverse signaling pathways, culminating in the activation of transcription factors and other proteins, determining cell fate [5]. A well-described example is redox signaling involving the oxidation of cysteine residues of proteins by hydrogen peroxide, and converting a thiolate anion in cysteine (Cys-S-) into the sulfenic form (Cys-SOH), causing the protein to undergo allosteric changes that alter its function [42]. The sulfenic form can be reduced to thiolate anions by the disulfide reductases thioredoxin and glutaredoxin, to return the protein function to its original state [43]. Comparable reversible ROS-operated mechanisms are involved in the regulation of several key signal transduction pathways such as the PI3K-AKT and RAS-MEK-ERK pathways involved in the promotion of cell proliferation, nutrient uptake, and cell survival [44, 45].

Whether ROS cause oxidative stress and cellular damage is determined by the net result of their production and elimination by antioxidant defenses. Thus, oxidative stress is a consequence of “a disturbance in the prooxidant to antioxidant balance in favor of the former, leading to potential damage” [3]. The antioxidant defenses prevent the formation of ROS or interrupt their propagation, eliminate ROS by scavenging them, slow down redox reactions by removing free-radical intermediates, inhibit oxidation reactions by being oxidized themselves, and repair the oxidized molecules [46]. These mechanisms can be distinguished into innate defense systems and exogenous antioxidants provided through the diet and/or nutritional supplements.

3.1 Innate antioxidant defenses

The innate antioxidant defenses of the body comprise enzymatic and non-enzymatic systems. The main enzymatic antioxidant systems are superoxide dismutase, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase. The metalloprotein superoxide dismutase catalyzes the dismutation of superoxides, that is, the formation of one molecule of oxygen and one molecule of hydrogen peroxide from two superoxides [47, 48]. Hydrogen peroxide can subsequently be converted into highly reactive hydroxyl radicals in the presence of transition metal ions such as Fe2+ or Cu2+ in the Fenton reaction, propagating the damage inflicted to cellular DNA, proteins, and lipids [47, 48]. Superoxide dismutase prevents this process through its three isoforms, cytosolic copper/zinc-superoxide dismutase (Cu/Zn-SOD, SOD1), mitochondrial manganese superoxide dismutase (Mn-SOD, SOD2), and extracellular copper/zinc-superoxide dismutase (Cu/Zn-EC-SOD, SOD3) [47, 48]. The isoforms are located in distinct cellular compartments and/or have different metal components, but all three convert and neutralize superoxides as mentioned above [47, 48].

Catalase acts as a catalyst for the conversion of hydrogen peroxide into oxygen and water. It mitigates the effect of intracellular hydrogen peroxide [49]. Glutathione peroxidases are a family of at least eight oxidoreductases that contain seleno-cysteine in the active site [50, 51]. These enzymes catalyze the reduction of organic hydroperoxides into alcohol and water groups using reduced glutathione as a co-substrate [50, 51]. They can also catalyze the reduction of hydrogen peroxide to water and oxygen by oxidation of reduced glutathione to its disulfide [50, 51]. Oxidized glutathione can be reduced to glutathione by the enzyme glutathione reductase by using NADPH as a reducing substrate [50, 51]. In this way, glutathione peroxidase protects cells from oxidative damage and helps detoxify hydrogen peroxide [50, 51].

Non-enzymatic endogenous antioxidant mechanisms are, among others, bilirubin and albumin. Bilirubin is produced from the enzymatic degradation of hemoglobin and other heme proteins to first yield biliverdin, and then bilirubin following reduction of biliverdin by the enzyme biliverdin reductase [52]. Bilirubin prevents lipid oxidation by removing peroxyl radicals whereby it is oxidized itself to biliverdin, after which it is rapidly reduced by biliverdin reductase to bilirubin [52]. And serum albumin represents an abundant circulating antioxidant defense system [53]. It is able to bind transition metals such as copper and iron, preventing the formation of hydroxyl radicals via the Fenton reaction after their interaction with hydrogen peroxide, directly scavenge hydroxyl radicals, and bind and transport bilirubin, which then acts as an inhibitor of lipid peroxidation [53].

3.2 Exogenous defenses: dietary nutrients

Exogenous antioxidants are mainly derived from dietary sources and include, among others, a variety of phenolic compounds, essential minerals, vitamins, small peptides, and certain fatty acids [13]. Their health-promoting and preventive effects against diseases associated with oxidative stress are now well established [7, 8, 9, 10, 11]. The most common phenolic compounds in the diet are phenolic acids and various subclasses of flavonoids, which together account for on average 60 and 30%, respectively, of the total dietary intake of phenolic compounds [54].

Phenolic compounds are able to act as antioxidants in multiple ways, among others, because of their redox properties, which enable them to adsorb and neutralize free radicals, quench singlet and triplet oxygen, or decompose peroxides [55, 56]. These processes are accomplished by hydrogen atom transfer, transfer of a single electron, sequential proton loss electron transfer, or chelation of transition metals [55, 56]. In addition, phenolic compounds are able to act synergistically with other antioxidants such as ascorbic acid, β-carotene, and α-tocopherol [57] and are presumably also involved in the regulation of intracellular glutathione levels [58].

Other dietary constituents with antioxidant properties are certain essential minerals, vitamins, small peptides, and fatty acids. Copper, iron, manganese, zinc, and selenium are indirectly involved in the body’s antioxidant defenses by enhancing the activities of antioxidant enzyme. For instance, selenium is a cofactor of glutathione transferase and other selenoproteins [59]. It has notable antioxidant activity [60] and may be beneficial in chronic conditions such as cancer [61], heart disease [62], and cognitive disorders [63]. And copper, zinc, and manganese are cofactors of superoxide dismutase [64].

Antioxidant vitamins such as ascorbic acid are able to quench ROS by donating electrons to them; α-tocopherol inhibits ROS generation, preventing lipid peroxidation of cellular membranes; thiamin is a cofactor of NADPH that is required for the production of glutathione reductase and the activity of catalase; and the retinol precursor β-carotene reacts with peroxyl, hydroxyl, and superoxide radicals [65, 66]. The common dietary small peptide glutathione is able to directly scavenge ROS [67]. And polyunsaturated fatty acids in, for instance, fish oil, are able to eliminate ROS and inhibit cellular processes that generate ROS, decreasing the risk of cardiovascular diseases by reducing triacylglycerol production in the plasma [68].

Advertisement

4. Fabaceae

4.1 Taxonomy

The pea family Fabaceae, also known as Leguminosae, is the third largest family of flowering plants after the Orchidaceae (orchid family) and the Asteraceae (aster family), representing about 7% of the global number of flowering plant species [69]. The Fabaceae consists of more than 700 genera and about 20,000 species of annual, biennial, or perennial trees, shrubs, herbaceous plants, vines, and lianas, which are encountered in all ecosystems throughout the world except Antarctica and the high Arctic [69, 70]. Most woody trees are found in tropical regions, while the herbaceous plants and shrubs are predominant outside the tropics [70]. Fabaceae members are readily recognizable by their fruits known as legumes or pods, which split open as they dry, releasing the seeds, and by their compound, stipulated leaves [71].

The leaves of many species (such as those of the common vetch Vicia sativa L.) have glands that produce nectar (extrafloral nectaries) through which they attract ants, which protect them from attacks by herbivores [72]. In other species (such as some in the genus Acacia), the stipules (outgrowths on both sides of the base of the leafstalk) are modified to tiny chambers called domatia, which accommodate “body guard” ants [73]. Many Fabaceae (such as species of groundnut in the genus Apios) also host symbiotic bacteria in their roots—called rhizobia—which convert atmospheric nitrogen into a form that they can use for their metabolism (such as nitrate or ammonia) in a process referred to as nitrogen fixation [74]. The flowers of most species are conspicuous and colorful to attract pollinator insects [71]. The ovary itself matures into a legume or pod that encloses the seeds [71].

The Fabaceae includes six subfamilies [75], namely the Faboideae (or Papilionoideae), Caesalpinioideae, Detarioideae, Cercidoideae, Dialioideae, and Duparquetioideae [75]. The largest subfamily is that of the cosmopolitan Faboideae that harbors 503 genera and about 14,000 species including species of milkvetch in the genus Astragalus, species of lupin in the genus Lupinus, and species of pea in the genus Pisum [75]. The pantropical subfamily Caesalpinioideae includes about 4400 species in 148 genera such as the peacock flower Caesalpinia pulcherrima (L.) Sw., the candle bush Senna alata (L.) Roxb., the shy plant Mimosa pudica L., and the soap pod Senegalia tenuifolia (L.) Britton & Rose [75].

The subfamilies Detarioideae and Cercidoideae are mainly tropical and include 84 genera and about 760 species, and 12 genera and about 335 species, respectively [75]. Well-known examples in the Detarioideae are the ornamental pride of Burma Amherstia nobilis Wall and the tamarind Tamarindus indica L. that bears edible fruit. Renowned species in the Cercidoideae are well-appreciated ornamentals such as the pom pom orchid tree Bauhinia divaricata L. and the Judas tree Cercis siliquastrum L. [75]. The 85 species in 17 genera of the subfamily Dialioideae are widespread throughout the tropics [75]. A well-known example is the western African velvet tamarind Dialium cochinchinense Pierre, the velvety black pods of which contain a vitamin-rich acidic pulp that is chewed to relieve thirst or macerated in water to produce a beverage [75]. The subfamily Duparquetioideae is the smallest, consisting of one genus and one species, the liana Duparquetia orchidacea Baill that is native to western and central Africa [75].

The five largest genera of the Fabaceae family are Astragalus (milkvetches, subfamily Faboideae; over 3000 species), Acacia (acacias, subfamily Caesalpinioideae; over 1000 species), Indigofera (true indigos, subfamily Faboideae; around 700 species), Crotalaria (rattlepods, subfamily Faboideae; around 700 species), and Mimosa (sensitive plants or touch-me-nots, subfamily Caesalpinioideae; around 400 species), which constitute about a quarter of all legume species [75].

4.2 Economic value

Together with cereals, some vegetables and fruits, roots and tubers, oil-bearing crops, and sugar crops, various Fabaceae have been a staple food for humans for millennia, and their use and subsequent domestication and cultivation have been critical to the development of human civilization settlements [76, 77]. There are records dating the use of several species and varieties of beans in Asia, the Americas, and Europe to about 6000 BC, when they were becoming an essential staple as a source of protein (see, for instance, references [78, 79]). Contributing to the importance of the Fabaceae to human civilization were their extraordinary diversity and abundance and the broad variety of other uses they can be put to, ranging from ornamentals to medicines [69, 70]. In fact, species of Fabaceae are still among the economically and culturally most important plants in the world, providing foods, natural fertilizers, and forage; medicines; ornamentals; as well as materials for the pharmaceutical, cosmetic, and textile industries (see, for instance, reference [80]).

Examples of Fabaceae that are food crops of global importance are G. max (soybean), Phaseolus (beans), Pisum sativum (pea), Cicer arietinum (chickpeas), Medicago sativa (alfalfa), A. hypogaea (peanut), Ceratonia siliqua (carob), and Glycyrrhiza glabra (liquorice) [81]. Notably, the Fabaceae plant family is the second most important economic producer of crop plants after the Poaceae, the rice family [80]. Furthermore, the ability of Fabaceae to fix atmospheric nitrogen makes them very suitable as natural fertilizers to replenish soil that has been depleted of nitrogen [82]. A few species used for this purpose are leadtrees (Leucaena spp.) and riverhemps (Sesbania spp.) [82]. The additional nitrogen they receive increases their protein content, making some of them (such as the alfalfa M. sativa L. as well as clovers (Trifolium spp.), vetches (Vicia spp.), and peanut-like species (Arachis spp.) suitable as fodder for livestock [83].

Examples of Fabaceae with therapeutic properties are gum Arabic from the gum acacia Senegalia senegal (L.) Britton that has antitussive and anti-inflammatory properties [84] and tragacanth from Astragalus gummifer Labill that can be used as a demulcent in burn wounds [85]. Other species of Fabaceae are used for the production of vegetable oils for cooking. Well-known examples are the oils extracted from the soya bean G. max [86] and the peanut A. hypogaea [87].

Still other Fabaceae members are industrially farmed to produce dyes. Examples are the logwood Haematoxylon campechianum L., the heartwood of which produces red and purple dyes such as the histological stain hematoxylin [88], and the true indigo Indigofera tinctoria L., the leaves of which give the blue dye indigotin [89]. Furthermore, the roots of species in the genus Derris such as D. elliptica found in Southeast Asia and the southwest Pacific islands are a source of the strong insecticide rotenone [90]. And well-known ornamentals are the cockspur coral tree Erythrina crista-galli L., the national tree of Argentina, and the national flower of Argentina and Uruguay [91], and the Chinese wisteria Wisteria sinensis (Sims) DC that is a much appreciated ornamental vine [92].

4.3 Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity

In addition to the applications mentioned above, many species of Fabaceae are traditionally used for medicinal or invigorating purposes (as mentioned in Section 6 of this chapter). The pharmacological activities have been associated with the abundant presence in the plants of certain bioactive ingredients—particularly phenolic compounds such as phenolic acids, (iso)flavonoids, and anthocyanins—with relatively high antioxidant activity [93, 94, 95, 96]. In fact, the phenolic compounds in many species of Fabaceae—mostly isoflavones such as genistein and daidzein—are involved in a variety of physiological and metabolic processes that are relevant to human health [97]. The seeds are often not only highly nutritious, but also contain the majority of the phenolics [97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102]. Several of the phenolics elicited high antioxidant potential, displaying the ability to scavenge free radicals, and the ability to interact with proteins [97, 98], as well as a diversity of pharmacological activities including, among others, anti-inflammatory, vasodilatory, analgesic, antimicrobial, anti-allergenic, cardioprotective, anti-atherogenic, anticarcinogenic, and immunomodulating activities [97, 98].

However, as mentioned before, the Fabaceae comprise almost 20,000 species, and much of the information on the antioxidant activity and phenolic content extrapolated to the entire plant family is based on investigations with a relative handful of species (see, for instance, references [22, 23, 103, 104, 105, 106]). Nevertheless, despite variable antioxidant activities among species, these studies have suggested a good correlation between total phenolic content and antioxidant activity [22, 23, 103, 104, 105, 106].

The Fabaceae also constitute the greatest number of selenium-hyperaccumulating species, that is, plants that accumulate selenium in their cells at concentrations in excess of 1000 mg per kg dry weight [107]. Many selenium hyperaccumulators in this family belong to the genus Astragalus (milkvetches, subfamily Faboideae), the largest Fabaceae genus with over 3000 species of herbs and small shrubs [108]. The members of the much smaller genus Neptunia (subfamily Caesalpinioideae) also hyperaccumulate selenium [109].

Advertisement

5. The Republic of Suriname

5.1 Generalities

The Republic of Suriname is located on the northeast coast of South America, bordering the Atlantic Ocean and surrounded by French Guiana, Brazil, and Guyana (Figure 1). Roughly 80% of the approximately 600,000 inhabitants live in the capital city of Paramaribo and other urbanized areas in the northern coastal zone of the country (Figure 1). The remaining 20% resides in the rural-coastal areas and the southern-rural interior, which comprises approximately 90% of the country’s land surface and largely consists of sparsely inhabited savanna and undisturbed, dense tropical rainforest with a very high animal and plant biodiversity [25, 26] (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Map of the Republic of Suriname. Circle in top left: suriname’s location in South America.

Suriname’s most important economic means of support are crude oil drilling, gold mining, agriculture, fisheries, forestry, and ecotourism [110]. These activities substantially contributed to the gross domestic product in 2020 of about USD 3 billion [111], positioning Suriname on the World Bank’s list of upper-middle-income economies [112]. Suriname’s population is among the most varied in the world, comprising Amerindians (the original inhabitants of the country) as well as descendants from enslaved Africans, indentured laborers from Asia, and European settlers, as well as immigrants from various Latin American and Caribbean countries [113]. All ethnic groups have preserved much of their original culture and identity, still practicing the religion they were raised with, speaking the language from their country of origin, maintaining their specific perceptions of health and disease, and adhering to their ethnopharmacological traditions [114, 115].

As a result, the use of various forms of traditional medicine is deeply rooted in the country, despite the broad availability of affordable modern health care [114, 115]. This inclination, together with the easy access to raw plant material from Suriname’s rich biodiversity, probably accounts for the frequent use of traditional herbal medications in the country, either alone or in conjunction with prescription medicines [114, 115]. As in many other regions throughout the world, parts from Fabaceae members are often used for preparing the traditional medicines. The botanical knowledge to identify useful and edible plants has probably been obtained from ancient knowledge from the country of origin, by exchanging information with other cultures, by observing other peoples and animals, and by trial and error [114, 115].

5.2 Fabaceae in Suriname

The Fabaceae plant family is the most common family in tropical rainforests and dry forests of the Americas and Africa [116]. This plant family is also abundantly present in Suriname, and all growth forms—from dwarf shrubs and broadleaf evergreen trees to lianas and plants with bulbs or rhizomes—can be encountered between the northern coastal plain and the heavily forested and mountainous interior of the country. The exact number of genera and species in Suriname is not known, but according to the Checklist of the Venezuelan Guiana, there were 1032 species and 146 genera in the Guiana Shield in the year 2007 [28]. These figures are well in accordance with those from the National Herbarium of Suriname, which has 146 Fabaceae genera and 531 species from the Guiana Shield in its repository, 132 genera and 429 species of which have been collected in Suriname [28]. Thus, the Fabaceae species in Suriname can be estimated to constitute roughly 10% of the total number of approximately 5100 vascular plants in the country.

Like in many other parts of the world, several of the Surinamese Fabaceae species are used for a diversity of medicinal purposes. These species of Fabaceae have extensively been dealt with in several comprehensive publications on medicinal plants used in Suriname [117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125], and their total amounted to about 60 of the roughly 800 medicinal plant species. Thirty-nine of the medicinal Fabaceae species (about 65%) belong to the subfamily Faboideae, 16 (about 25%) to the Caesalpinioideae, 4 (about 7%) to the Detarioideae, and only 1 (about 2%) to the Cercidoideae. This distribution is more or less in accordance with that of the Fabaceae subfamilies throughout the world [75].

So far, scientific data to support the health claims of the Surinamese medicinal species of Fabaceae are scant. It is also not certain whether these claims may be based on the relatively high content of phytochemicals with antioxidant activity of these plants that, as mentioned above, seems to be one of the hallmarks of this plant family. For this reason, we consulted the literature for evidence implicating the phenolic antioxidants in the plants in their traditional claims of beneficial health effects as well as their pharmacological activities. Fabaceae members that are mainly used for religious and ritual and spiritual purposes (such as the rosary pea or kokriki Abrus precatorius L., the bushillo shimbillo or yaraní Zygia inaequalis (Humb. & Bonpl. ex Willd.) Pittier, and the shining rattlepod or ogri-aypesi Crotalaria micans Link. [van Andel and Ruysschaert, 2011]) have been left out of our selection. From the remaining plants, eight that have been most frequently mentioned as sources of traditional medicines in the abovementioned publications [117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125] are in detail addressed hereunder (see also Table 1).

Plant speciesTraditional usesPharmacological activitiesAntioxidant phenolic compounds
Caesalpinia pulcherrima (L.) Sw. (peacock flower; krerekrere)Oral complaints; gynecological, obstetric, and genitourinary conditions; colds and fevers; gastrointestinal disordersAntimicrobial, analgesic, anti-inflammatory, cytotoxic, antioxidant activitiesYes; flavonoids
Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. (pigeon pea; loangopesi)Oral complaints; skin problems; inflamed eyes; antiparasitic; analgesic; diabetes mellitus; labor induction; anti-emetic; gastrointestinal disordersAnti-inflammatory, antioxidant activitiesYes; flavonoids
Clitoria ternatea L. (butterfly pea; kembang telang)Aphrodisiac; inflamed eyes; memory-enhancing and improving of cognitive functions; sedative, anxiolytic, and antidepressantAntimicrobial, antipyretic, analgesic, anti-inflammatory, analgesic, antidiabetic, antioxidant activitiesYes; flavonoids
Copaifera guyanensis Desf. (copaiba; hoepelhout)Oral complaints; skin problems; respiratory ailments; wound healing-stimulatory; inflammations; microbial infections; parasitic infections; genitourinary conditions; gastrointestinal disorders; diabetes mellitus, hypertensionAntimicrobial, antiparasitic, anti-inflammatory, wound healing-stimulatory, antioxidant activitiesNo; terpenoids
Desmodium adscendens (Sw.) DC. (glue sticks; konkruman)Respiratory ailments; fever; rheumatism; inflammation; epilepsy; genitourinary conditions; gastrointestinal disorders; diabetes mellitus; hypertensionAnti-asthmatic, anti-anaphylactic, antihypertensive, antioxidant activitiesYes; flavonoids, anthocyanins, tannins
Dipteryx odorata (Aubl.) Willd. (tonka bean; tonkaboon)Hair care; colds, fever, respiratory ailments; analgesic; gastrointestinal disorders; genitourinary conditions; parasitic infections; aphrodisiacAntimicrobial, antiviral, anticoagulant, anticancer, anti-inflammatory activitiesYes; coumarin analogues, but no apparent antioxidant activities
Lablab purpureus (L.) Sweet (hyacinth bean; kulibontyi)Alcohol intoxication; aphrodisiac; fungal skin infections; hypertension; high cholesterol; diabetes mellitusAnti-inflammatory, analgesic, antidiabetic, antimicrobial, antihypertensive, anticancer, antioxidant activitiesYes; flavonoids
Tamarindus indica L. (tamarind; tamarinde)Gastrointestinal disorders; skin problems; wound healing-stimulatory; microbial infections; parasitic infections, inflammations; hypertension; genitourinary conditionsAnti-inflammatory, analgesic, antimicrobial, antiviral, antihypertensive, antidiabetic, anticancer, antioxidant activitiesYes; phenolic compounds like tannins as well as selenium, ascorbic acid, and ß-carotene

Table 1.

Antioxidant compounds of eight Fabaceae members from Suriname and association with pharmacological activity.

Advertisement

6. Health effects of some Surinamese Fabaceae and relationship with phenolic antioxidants

6.1 Caesalpinia pulcherrima (L.) Sw

The peacock flower or krerekrere C. pulcherrima (L.) Sw. (Figure 2) is an evergreen shrub that grows to 3 m tall and likely originates from Mexico and the Caribbean, but can now be encountered in all tropical and subtropical parts of the Americas. Its beautiful inflorescence in yellow, red, and orange has made it a generally valued ornamental plant and the national flower of the Caribbean island of Barbados. The mature seeds contain cyanide and are poisonous, but the immature seeds are edible after roasting [126]. As the taste seems reminiscent of that of peanuts, another Surinamese vernacular for C. pulcherrima is “jodenpinda,” meaning “the peanut of the Jews,” in reference to the colonial masters from Jewish ancestry on whose plantations the enslaved Africans had come to know the plant [127].

Figure 2.

Flower of the peacock flower or krerekrere Caesalpinia pulcherrima (L.) Sw. (from: https://images.app.goo.gl/bqSv1gehtAQT11uk8).

Preparations from various parts of C. pulcherrima are used as a mouthwash for teeth and gums; as an emmenagogue, to accelerate childbirth, and as a strong abortifacient; for treating colds and fevers; against gastrointestinal complaints such as diarrhea, constipation, and gall bladder problems; and to remedy urinary tract problems such as kidney stones [128, 129]. In Suriname, C. pulcherrima is used for the same purposes [118, 120, 125] but also for good fortune and to honor Mama Aisa, an important deity in Afro-Surinamese Winti religion [130].

Figure 3.

Seedpods of the pigeon pea or loangopesi Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. (from: https://images.app.goo.gl/k6pETr1KXfuioSte8).

Figure 4.

Flower of the butterfly pea or kembang telang Clitoria ternatea L. (from: https://images.app.goo.gl/dtytS8JnGZBEzhPg9).

Figure 5.

Seedpods of the copaiba or hoepelhout Copaifera guyanensis Desf. (from: https://images.app.goo.gl/G6iLQWMFEEfyPR8D8).

Figure 6.

Seedpods of the glue sticks or konkruman Desmodium adscendens (Sw.) DC. (from: https://images.app.goo.gl/CoBQwXQrRHUgXq4e9).

Figure 7.

Flowering tonka bean or tonkaboon Dipteryx odorata (Aubl.) Willd. (from: https://images.app.goo.gl/Yy9nodcJhZr5mwvG9).

Figure 8.

Seedpods of the hyacinth bean or kulibontji Lablab purpureus (L.) sweet (from: https://images.app.goo.gl/EpBr6jHWi2s63vEHA).

Figure 9.

Seedpods of the tamarind or tamarinde Tamarindus indica L. (from: https://images.app.goo.gl/FJZ5FyY8UrNma1QUA).

Phytochemical investigations have revealed the presence of various bioactive constituents in C. pulcherrima including a variety of flavonoid compounds along with glycosides, alkaloids, terpenoids, and sterols [131, 132, 133]. Some of these compounds have been associated with pharmacological activities such as antimicrobial, analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and cytotoxic activities, supporting some of the traditional uses of the plant [132, 133, 134].

Preparations from several parts of C. pulcherrima also exhibited substantial antioxidant activity [134, 135, 136]. Studies with this plant and other species of Caesalpinia have suggested that this activity may be associated with, among others, anti-inflammatory activity [135, 136], the inhibition of prostaglandin biosynthesis [135], the inhibition of nitric oxide production [136, 137], and/or the stimulation of superoxide dismutase and catalase activity [137]. These activities might be attributed to the phenolic compounds in the plant [136, 138, 139], supporting a role of these substances and their antioxidant activities in its apparent health-promoting effects.

6.2 Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.

The pigeon pea or loangopesi C. cajan (L.) Millsp. (Figure 3) is an erect, woody shrub that grows to a height of about 4 meters and that is native to the Old World [140]. It is not known in the wild but has been cultivated for centuries in tropical and subtropical regions of the world for its edible, protein-rich seeds, its medicinal properties, as well as its usefulness as fuel, a green manure, and for soil stabilization [140]. This plant is believed to have reached the New World including Suriname by means of the Trans-Atlantic slave trade at the end of the seventeenth century [141]. It grows relatively fast, is rather resilient, easily adapts to different soil and climatic conditions, and is drought-resistant [142], which makes it of utmost importance for food security in areas where rainfall is not reliable and droughts are likely to occur [143]. Not surprisingly, C. cajan has become part of the daily staple meals of millions of people throughout the world [140].

Humans have also used C. cajan since long medicinally, among others, for oral hygiene and treating oral complaints such as gingivitis and stomatitis, and ulcers and inflammations in the oral cavity, skin problems, as well as various chronic diseases such as diabetes mellitus [144, 145, 146]. In Suriname, the fresh leaf is squeezed into inflamed eyes [117] and incorporated into an infusion to facilitate childbirth [117] and to stop severe vomiting [118]. The potential therapeutic efficacy of these traditional remedies is partially supported by the results from pharmacological studies showing remarkable anti-inflammatory activity of preparations from several parts C cajan in both cell culture and animal models [147, 148, 149, 150].

These observations have been attributed to the prevention of lipid peroxidation, the stimulation of endogenous antioxidant enzyme activities, and/or a decrease in the production of inflammatory cytokines [148, 149, 150]. The phytochemicals that have been held responsible for these activities were flavonoids [148, 149, 150], which was in accordance with the high phenolic content of C. cajun that included a diversity of flavonoids, tannins, coumarins, and stilbenes [147, 151]. Notably, flavonoid and phenolic contents of the plant samples correlated well with their individual antioxidant activity [149, 152]. Based on these data, C. cajan has been proposed as a candidate for skin care research and development [151].

6.3 Clitoria ternatea L.

The butterfly pea Clitoria ternatea L. is a perennial herbaceous climber that is native to tropical equatorial Asia, but can now also be found in Africa, Australia, and the Americas including Suriname. The genus name “Clitoria” has been derived from the presumed resemblance of the strikingly blue flowers with light yellow markings to the shape of human female genitals (Figure 4). This is also captured in the Indonesian/Malay vernacular of the plant “kembang telang,” “kembang” meaning “blossoming,” “swollen,” or “extended,” and “telang” meaning “blue-colored flower.” The blue color of the flower is caused by its high content of ternatins, polyacylated derivatives of the anthocyanin delphinidin 3,3′, 5′-triglucoside [153]. It is used in south-eastern Asia as a natural coloring for rice dishes, desserts, hot and cold beverages, and textiles for making clothing. The attractive flower also makes the plant a well-appreciated ornamental in many parts of the world. Other notable chemical components in C. ternatea are cyclotides, exceptionally stable macrocyclic peptides present in all tissues of this plant [154]. These compounds are the bioactive molecules in a commercial eco-friendly insecticide developed from this plant [155].

In traditional Chinese medicine, C. ternatea is used to increase female libido [156]. And in Indian Ayurveda, preparations from the plant are believed to enhance memory, improve cognitive function, control or prevent seizures, relieve stress, prevent or treat anxiety and depression, and exert calming and sedative effects [157]. These effects might be associated with the modulation of serotonin and acetylcholine metabolism in the brain [158]. In Suriname, C. ternatea is mainly used by the Javanese, who pour the diluted sap from the macerated leaf into inflamed eyes [118].

A variety of preclinical studies have shown that extracts from C. ternatea display a wide range of pharmacological activities including antimicrobial, antipyretic, anti-inflammatory, analgesic, diuretic, local anesthetic, antidiabetic, insecticidal, blood platelet aggregation-inhibiting, and vascular smooth muscle-relaxing properties [157, 159]. Many of these activities have been attributed to the presence of flavonols (in the form of flavonol glycosides) and anthocyanins in the plant [159]. These compounds could elicit some of the abovementioned pharmacological activities through their well-documented antioxidant effects [160, 161] or by contributing to the pharmacological activities of other bioactive compounds in the plant [159].

For instance, the anthocyanin delphinidin 3-sambubioside (from the dried calices of the roselle Hibiscus sabdariffa L.; Malvaceae) elicited anti-inflammatory activity in both cell and animal models [162], the synthetic cyclotide [T20K]kalata B1 delayed disease progression and diminished symptoms in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis [163], and the pentacyclic triterpenoid taraxerol isolated and purified from extracts of the transformed root somaclones of C. ternatea displayed encouraging anticancer properties [164]. Interestingly, the antioxidant properties of C. ternatea have commercially been utilized by including extracts from the flower in antiaging cosmetic products [165].

6.4 Copaifera guyanensis Desf.

The copaiba or hoepelhoutboom Copaifera guyanensis Desf. is an evergreen tree with a thick trunk that grows to about 25 m tall and that is indigenous to the swamps and rainforests of northern South America including Suriname (Figure 5). C. guyanensis is much in demand for the oleoresin in the grayish-brown bark of the trunk. The oleoresin is a transparent, yellow to light brown liquid consisting of a nonvolatile fraction and a volatile essential oil with a scent that has been described as woody, sweet, and balsamic [166, 167]. The oleoresin is harvested by drilling a hole in the trunk of the tree and collecting it with the help of a polyvinyl chloride pipe, after which the borehole is plugged in order for the tree to sufficiently recover to retap it a year later. The oleoresin is used in small amounts as a food additive and as a flavoring agent in foods and beverages and has officially been approved in the USA for these purposes (see, for instance, [168]). It is also an ingredient of perfumes, varnishes, and lacquers and used as a substitute for diesel oil [169, 170, 171]. Given the latter application, C. guyanenesis is also called “diesel tree.” The flexible but tough heartwood has been used for preparing hoops to tightly press the staves of barrels against each other, achieving watertight containers to store sugar. Hence, the Surinamese vernacular “hoepelhout,” literally meaning “wood for constructing hoops” [125].

C. guyanansis oleoresin (as well as that of other Copaifera species) has a very long history of medicinal use. In fact, the Amazonian Indigenous peoples have known the healing properties of the oleoresins for centuries from their observation that injured animals rubbed themselves on the tree’s trunk to heal their wounds [169, 172]. This led to the use of the oleoresin against, among others, microbial infections and inflammations and as a disinfectant, styptic, and wound-healing stimulatory substance [166, 173]. Other indications of C. guyanensis oleoresin are a sore throat, tonsillitis, bronchitis, and tuberculosis; cystitis, kidney and bladder infections, vaginal discharge, and gonorrhea; stomach ulcers; as well as a variety of skin problems including insect bites, eczema, blisters, sores, and psoriasis [167, 169, 174]. C. guyanansis oleoresin has essentially the same traditional uses in Suriname, where, in addition, a tea from the bark is drunk against diabetes mellitus, hypertension, malaria, and jaundice [125].

The principle pharmacologically active ingredients in the volatile essential oil of C. guyanensis oleoresin are sesquiterpenes, most notably β-caryophyllene, while the nonvolatile fraction mainly consists of acid diterpenes such as copalic acid and kaurenoic acid [166, 173]. Particularly β-caryophyllene displayed substantial antiseptic, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial effects including activity against Staphylococcus aureus [166, 167, 175], a common cause of skin infections. For these reasons, the cosmetic industry extensively uses Copaifera oleoresins in anti-acne creams, formulations for treating stretch marks and scars, as well as shampoos, capillary lotions, soaps, and bathing foams [176]. β-Caryophyllene also selectively binds to the cannabinoid receptor 2 [177], which makes it an interesting candidate to relieve pain and inflammation [176, 178]. The diterpenes from Copaifera oleoresins reportedly elicited in vitro antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, antileishmanial, antitrypanosomal, and wound-healing stimulatory activities [179]. These findings substantiate some of the traditional uses of C. guyanenesis, but so far there are no convincing data on the usefulness of Copaifera oleoresins in the clinic (see, for instance, reference [178]).

There are also reports on antioxidant activity of Copaifera species. For instance, the oleoresin from C. langsdorffii Desf. elicited notable antilipoperoxidation, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory activity in an experimental model of random skin flaps on rat dorsums [180]. In addition, the essential oil from C. officinalis L. seed reduced lipid oxidation, showing promise as a natural antioxidant to increase the shelf life of meat products [168]. This effect has tentatively been attributed to the phenolic compounds identified in the essential oil [168]. Phenolic compounds—particularly flavonoids—have also been detected in the fruit and leaf of several Copaifera species [181, 182]. However, at this moment, there is no hard evidence to associate phenolic compounds and their potential antioxidant activities with the traditional uses and pharmacological activities of Copaifera species.

6.5 Desmodium adscendens (Sw.) DC

The glue sticks D. adscendens (Sw.) DC is a creeping or ascending herbaceous perennial herb or low shrub that can grow up to 1 meter in height. It probably originates from Africa, but is now widespread in tropical areas of Asia, South and Central America, and the Caribbean. The presence of many small hooked hairs on the seedpods (Figure 6) makes them cling to clothing, body parts, as well as the feathers and coats of pollinating animals, ensuring a wide dispersal of the plant. Hence, the vernacular “glue stick” in English and “konkruman” (“informer”) in Suriname: the sticky pods attaching to clothing betray the unapproved presence of the bearer “in the field,” that is, away from home [183]. The plant is also believed to attract and hold fortune and prosperity while at the same time capturing and removing bad luck and disease [125].

Leaf, stem, and root of D. adscendens (as well as parts of the closely related species Desmodium barbatum (L.) Benth. and Desmodium incanum (Sw.) DC) have probably been used for thousands of years by native peoples of the Americas for a variety of health issues, including asthma and allergies; muscle cramp and back pain, rheumatism; venereal diseases, vaginal infections, and ovarian inflammation; epilepsy; hypertension; and diabetes mellitus [184, 185]. In Suriname, preparations from D. adscendens leaf, stem, and root are taken to relieve abdominal pain, fever, and painful urination associated with venereal diseases and as a remedy against diabetes mellitus and hypertension [124].

D. adscendens is rich in phenolic compounds including flavonoids, anthocyanins, and tannins, as well as reducing sugars, alkaloids, (soya)saponins, triterpenes, and amines [185, 186]. The meaningful pharmacological activities displayed by some of these compounds—such as anti-asthmatic and anti-anaphylactic activity [187, 188] and antihypertensive activity [183]—may support some of the traditional uses of the plant.

There are also reports associating the appreciable content of phenolic compounds with its antioxidant activity and some of its pharmacological effects. For instance, astragalin, the 3-O-glucoside of the flavonoid kaempferol, displayed antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-atopic dermatitis activity and attenuated lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory responses by suppressing the NF-кB signaling pathway [189]. Astragalin also elicited antibacterial activity [190], which may explain the abovementioned traditional uses of the plant for treating infections, venereal diseases, and wounds [124, 184, 185]. Moreover, leaf and whole-plant extracts from D. adscendens displayed ROS scavenging activity and antioxidant properties in vitro [186]. These preparations also protected an LLC-PK1 pig kidney epithelial cell line from glucose-induced oxidative stress [191] and hepatocytes from carbon-tetrachloride-induced injury and hepatitis C virus infection [192]. These observations support the possibility that the antioxidant properties and the phenolic compounds of D. adscendens may be associated with its potential therapeutic value.

6.6 Dipteryx odorata (Aubl.) Willd

The tonka bean or tonkaboon D. odorata (Aubl.) Willd. (Figure 7) is a large semi-deciduous tree with a small, rounded crown that generally grows up to 30 m tall and that is native to Central America and northern South America. The tree is sometimes cultivated but is mostly harvested from the wild for its seed that is rich in coumarin [193]. The tonka beans are black and wrinkled, and have a smooth, brown interior, and their high content of coumarin and several of its derivatives such as umbelliferone (7-hydroxycoumarin) give them a strong sweet and spicy fragrance that is reminiscent of vanilla and almond [193]. For this reason, coumarin is abundantly used in the perfume industry as a fragrance and in desserts and stews as a substitute for vanilla [194]. However, at large infused doses, coumarin may cause liver damage, hemorrhages, and paralysis of the heart [195]. It is therefore controlled as a food additive by many governments [194] and has even been banned in the USA [196]. Anticoagulant prescription drugs such as warfarin are based on 4-hydroxycoumarin that was initially isolated from D. odorata seed, but coumarin itself does not have anticoagulant properties [197]. Other non-medical applications of coumarins are their use as agrochemicals, materials for food processing, optical brighteners, and dispersed fluorescent and laser dyes (see, for instance, references [198, 199]).

Despite the safety concerns, the seed and various other parts of D. odorata are traditionally used, among others, to fortify the scalp and improve hair growth; as a remedy for colds, fever, coughing, asthma, and tuberculosis; for treating stomach pain and diarrhea; against dysentery and schistosomiasis; as an emmenagogue, and as an aphrodisiac [200, 201]. In Suriname, D. odorata seed is mainly used as an ingredient of products to treat hair loss, dandruff, and an itching scalp; against colds; and to command luck [125, 202].

Some of the traditional uses of D. odorata are supported by the results from studies with various coumarin analogues—from the seed as well as other parts of the plant—showing a wide range of pharmacological activities such as antimicrobial, antituberculosis, antiviral, anticoagulant, anticancer, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant activities [194, 203]. In addition to coumarin, D. odorata seed contains various other bioactive flavonoids, particularly isoflavones [204], particularly in the endocarp [205] as well as some of its other parts [206, 207]. These compounds are known to elicit potent antioxidant activity [208] and are, similarly to coumarins, phenylpropanoid-derived natural products. However, so far, their presence in D. odorata has neither been associated with antioxidant activity nor with the traditional and pharmacological activities of preparations from the plant.

6.7 Lablab purpureus (L.) Sweet

The hyacinth bean L. purpureus (L.) Sweet (Figure 8) is an annual or short-lived perennial vine of approximately 6 m high that is presumably native to Africa and has been introduced in south-eastern Asia where it has been cultivated as early as 2500 BC [209]. Since then, it has been carried to many tropical and subtropical parts of the world including Suriname, where it has been brought by Hindustani indentured laborers around the end of the nineteenth century [124]. Hence, its Surinamese vernacular “kulibontyi,” literarily meaning “the bean of the coolies,” the epithet used for Hindustanis in that period. L. purpureus is commercially cultivated as an edible plant, as forage for livestock, and as an ornamental. The seed is poisonous due to its high content of toxic cyanogenic glucosides and trypsine and must thoroughly be cooked to destroy the toxin before consumption [210].

Preparations from various parts of the plant are used for a wide range of medicinal applications, ranging from remedies for alcohol intoxication and insufficient libido to medications for hypertension, high cholesterol, and diabetes mellitus [211, 212]. In Suriname, this plant is mainly used by Hindustanis, who apply the macerated leaves as a poultice against the fungal skin infections pityriasis versicolor and ringworm [124]. Pharmacological studies have shown, among others, anti-inflammatory, analgesic, antidiabetic, antimicrobial, antihypertensive, and anticancer activities [213, 214]. These activities may be associated, at least in part, with the presence in the plant of a variety of pharmacologically active constituents including phenolic compounds such as the flavonoids isoflavone, kievitone, and genistein [212, 215, 216]. In studies with other plants, some of these compounds reportedly decreased the production and the release of arachidonic acid, the expression of cyclooxygenase-1, cyclooxygenase-2, and 15-lipooxygenase, as well as the production of downstream-situated inflammatory mediators such as nitric oxide and prostaglandin E2, eliciting anti-inflammatory activities [217, 218, 219, 220]. Whether the phenolic compounds in L. purpureus also elicit these activities is not certain. But should that be the case, they can account for the traditional uses of the plant as well as the interest of the pharmaceutical industry to develop them to medicinal foods, nutraceuticals, and pharmaceuticals [211, 221].

6.8 Tamarindus indica L.

The tamarind or tamarinde T. indica is a long-living fruiting tree with a dense, spreading crown that can reach a height of 30 m. It is probably indigenous to tropical Africa where it grows in the wild. The tree has been cultivated for centuries in the tropics and subtropics as an ornamental plant, for its edible seedpods (Figure 9), and for its many medicinal uses. It has presumably been introduced in Suriname by enslaved Africans in the seventeenth century in order to fight diseases such as fever, diarrhea, and worm infections on the slave ships [141]. T. indica produces pods with a hard, brown shell that contain about 10 seeds surrounded by a sour pulp that is rich in tartaric acid, acetic acid, and citric acid and is used in cooking, to flavor foods, in refreshing drinks, and as a key ingredient of Worcestershire sauce.

Preparations from T. indica leaf, seed, fruit, stem bark, and root are extensively used in folk medicine, among others, for treating abdominal complaints, to stimulate wound healing, to treat microbial and parasitic infections, against various skin diseases, to fight various inflammatory ailments, and as a remedy for hypertension and diabetes mellitus [222, 223]. In Suriname, T. indica preparations are used for the same conditions but also against menstrual pain and excessive vaginal discharge [117, 121]. Some of the traditional uses are supported by the results from pharmacological studies showing anti-inflammatory, analgesic, antimicrobial, antiviral, antihypertensive, antidiabetic, and anticancer activities in several laboratory models (see, for instance, references [224, 225, 226]).

Some of these activities may be attributable to the presence in the plant of pharmacologically active ingredients with notable antioxidant properties such as phenolic compounds [224, 225, 226, 227] including tannins [227, 228], as well as selenium [229], and ascorbic acid and ß-carotene [228]. The antioxidant activity of T. indica preparations has been associated with, among others, their antidiabetic, hypolipemic, and antihypertensive effects in laboratory animals [230, 231, 232]. Thus, several of the traditional uses and pharmacological activities of T. indica may be partially associated with the presence in the plant of phenolic compounds with antioxidant activity.

Advertisement

7. Concluding remarks

Parts from species in the Fabacaeae plant family are among the most commonly used ingredients in Surinamese traditional medical practices and are employed for a wide diversity of medical indications. In this chapter, we have determined whether the abundant medicinal use of these plants may be associated with their phenolic content and antioxidant activity. This was based on the association of the Fabaceae family with these properties [93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102], even though phenolic antioxidants have been found in a relative handful of the roughly 20,000 plant species in this family that have scientifically been evaluated [93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102]. The plants assessed in the current chapter were C. pulcherrima, C. cajan, C. ternatea, C. guyanensis, D. adscendens, D. odorata, L. purpureus, and T. indica (Table 1). For six of these plants—C pulcherrima, C cajan, C. ternatea, D. adscendens, L. purpureus, and T. indica—the traditional uses and pharmacological activities could be attributed, at least in part, to their phenolic compounds (more specifically, their flavonoids) and the notable antioxidant activities of these substances (Table 1). However, the traditional uses and pharmacological activities of C. guyanensis mainly seemed to be determined by terpenoids which did not elicit antioxidant activity (Table 1). And those of D. odorata mainly seemed to involve coumarins, which, although classified as phenolic compounds, did not seem to act via antioxidant activity (Table 1). This argues against the characterization of the Fabaceae as “a plant family of antioxidant phenolic compounds” [93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102] and underscores the necessity to further explore this group of plants for other classes of phytochemicals and other so far unknown but potentially useful pharmacological activities.

References

  1. 1. Li R, Jia Z, Trush MA. Defining ROS in biology and medicine. Reactive Oxygen Species (Apex, NC). 2016;1:9-21. DOI: 10.20455/ros.2016.803
  2. 2. Kumar V, Abdussalam A. A review on reactive oxygen and nitrogen species. Era’s Journal of Medical Research. 2017;4:1-5
  3. 3. Sies H, Jones DP. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) as pleiotropic physiological signalling agents. Nature Reviews: Molecular Cell Biology. 2020;21:363-383. DOI: 10.1038/s41580-020-0230-3
  4. 4. Pham-Huy LA, He H, Pham-Huy C. Free radicals, antioxidants in disease and health. International Journal of Biomedical Sciences. 2008;4:89-96
  5. 5. Schieber M, Chandel NS. ROS function in redox signaling and oxidative stress. Current Biology. 2014;24:R453-R462. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.03.034
  6. 6. Bardaweel SK, Gul M, Alzweiri M, Ishaqat A, Salamat HA, Bashatwah RM. Reactive oxygen species: The dual role in physiological and pathological conditions of the human body. Eurasian Journal of Medicine. 2018;50:193-201
  7. 7. Klaunig JE, Kamendulis LM. The role of oxidative stress in carcinogenesis. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology. 2004;44:239-267. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.44.101802.121851
  8. 8. Markesbery WR, Lovell MA. DNA oxidation in Alzheimer’s disease. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling. 2006;8:2039-2045. DOI: 10.1089/ars.2006.8.2039
  9. 9. Elahi MM, Kong YX, Matata BM. Oxidative stress as a mediator of cardiovascular disease. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity. 2009;2:259-269. DOI: 10.4161/oxim.2.5.9441
  10. 10. Cui H, Kong Y, Zhang H. Oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and aging. Journal of Signal Transduction. 2012;2012:646354. DOI: 10.1155/2012/646354
  11. 11. Shirley R, Ord EN, Work LM. Oxidative stress and the use of antioxidants in stroke. Antioxidants (Basel). 2014;3:472-501. DOI: 10.3390/antiox3030472
  12. 12. Noori S. An overview of oxidative stress and antioxidant defensive system. Open Access Scientific Reports. 2012;1:413. DOI: 10.4172/scientificreports.413
  13. 13. Balsano C, Alisi A. Antioxidant effects of natural bioactive compounds. Current Pharmaceutical Design. 2009;15:3063-3073. DOI: 10.2174/138161209789058084
  14. 14. Caleja C, Ribeiro A, Barreiro MF, Ferreira ICFR. Phenolic compounds as nutraceuticals or functional food ingredients. Current Pharmaceutical Design. 2017;23:2787-2806. DOI: 10.2174/1381612822666161227153906
  15. 15. Aune D, Keum N, Giovannucci E, Fadnes LT, Boffetta P, Greenwood DC, et al. Dietary intake and blood concentrations of antioxidants and the risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer, and all-cause mortality: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2018;108:1069-1091. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy097
  16. 16. Jayedi A, Rashidy-Pour A, Parohan M, Zargar MS, Shab-Bidar S. Dietary antioxidants, circulating antioxidant concentrations, total antioxidant capacity, and risk of all-cause mortality: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. Advances in Nutrition. 2018;9:701-716. DOI: 10.1093/advances/nmy040
  17. 17. Minatel IO, Borges CV, Ferreira MI, Gomez HAG, Chen CYO, Lima GPP. Phenolic compounds: Functional properties, impact of processing and bioavailability. In: Soto-Hernandez M, Palma-Tenango M, del Rosario Garcia-Mateos M, editors. Phenolic Compounds—Biological Activity. London: IntechOpen; 2017. DOI: 10.5772/66368
  18. 18. Babenko LM, Smirnov OE, Romanenko KO, Trunova OK, Kosakіvskа IV. Phenolic compounds in plants: Biogenesis and functions. Ukrainian Biochemical Journal. 2019;91:5-18. DOI: 10.15407/ubj91.03.005
  19. 19. Isely D. Leguminosae and Homo sapiens. Economic Botany. 1982;36:46-70. DOI: 10.1007/BF02858699
  20. 20. Molares S, Ladio A. The usefulness of edible and medicinal Fabaceae in Argentine and Chilean Patagonia: Environmental availability and other sources of supply. Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2012;2012:901918. DOI: 10.1155/2012/901918
  21. 21. Macêdo MJF, Ribeiro DA, de Oliveira SM, de Macêdo DG, Macedo JGF, de Almeida BV, et al. Fabaceae medicinal flora with therapeutic potential in Savanna areas in the Chapada do Araripe. Northeastern Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia. 2018;28:738-750. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjp.2018.06.010
  22. 22. Tungmunnithum D, Drouet S, Lorenzo JM, Hano C. Characterization of bioactive phenolics and antioxidant capacity of edible bean extracts of 50 Fabaceae populations grown in Thailand. Food. 2021;10:3118. DOI: 10.3390/foods10123118
  23. 23. Jacob MCM, da Silva-Maia JK, Albuquerque UP, Pereira FO. Culture matters: A systematic review of antioxidant potential of tree legumes in the semiarid region of Brazil and local processing techniques as a driver of bioaccessibility. PLoS One. 2022;17:e0264950. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264950
  24. 24. Tinggi U. Selenium: Its role as antioxidant in human health. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine. 2008;13:102-108. DOI: 10.1007/s12199-007-0019-4
  25. 25. Hammond DS. Forest conservation and management in the Guiana Shield. In: Hammond DS, editor. Tropical Rainforests of the Guiana Shield. Wallingford: CABI Publishing; 2005
  26. 26. General Bureau of Statistics/Census Office. Results of the Eight General Census of Suriname. Demographic and Social Characteristics and Migration. Paramaribo: General Bureau of Statistics; 2013
  27. 27. Ministry of Labor, Technological Development and Environment. Suriname. The Fourth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Paramaribo, Suriname: Ministry of Labor, Technological Development and Environment; 2012
  28. 28. Berry PE, Weitzman AL. Checklist of the Plants of the Guiana Shield (Venezuela: Amazonas, Bolivar, Delta Amacuro; Guyana, Surinam, French Guiana). In: Funk VA, Hollowell TH, Berry PE, Kelloff CL, Alexander SN, editors. Checklist of the Plants of the Guiana Shield (Venezuela: Amazonas, Bolivar, Delta Amacuro; Guyana, Surinam, French Guiana). Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution; 2007
  29. 29. Kowaltowski AJ, Castilho RF, Vercesi AE. Mitochondrial permeability transition and oxidative stress. FEBS Letters. 2001;495:12-15. DOI: 10.1016/s0014-5793(01)02316-x
  30. 30. Thomas DC. The phagocyte respiratory burst: Historical perspectives and recent advances. Immunology Letters. 2017;192:88-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.imlet.2017.08.016
  31. 31. McDonnell AM, Dang CH. Basic review of the cytochrome P450 system. Journal of the Advanced Practitioner in Oncology. 2013;4:263-268
  32. 32. Ivanov I, Saam J, Kuhn H, Holzhütter HG. Dual role of oxygen during lipoxygenase reactions. The FEBS Journal. 2005;272:2523-2535. DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04673.x
  33. 33. Battelli MG, Polito L, Bortolotti M, Bolognesi A. Xanthine oxidoreductase in drug metabolism: Beyond a role as a detoxifying enzyme. Current Medicinal Chemistry. 2016;23:4027-4036. DOI: 10.2174/0929867323666160725091915
  34. 34. Thomas C, Mackey MM, Diaz AA, Cox DP. Hydroxyl radical is produced via the Fenton reaction in submitochondrial particles under oxidative stress: Implications for diseases associated with iron accumulation. Redox Report. 2009;14:102-108. DOI: 10.1179/135100009X392566
  35. 35. Spitz DR, Azzam EI, Li JJ, Gius D. Metabolic oxidation/reduction reactions and cellular responses to ionizing radiation: A unifying concept in stress response biology. Cancer Metastasis Reviews. 2004;23:311-322. DOI: 10.1023/B:CANC.0000031769.14728.bc
  36. 36. Sciskalska M, Zalewska M, Grzelak A, Milnerowicz H. The influence of the occupational exposure to heavy metals and tobacco smoke on the selected oxidative stress markers in smelters. Biological Trace Element Research. 2014;159:59-68. DOI: 10.1007/s12011-014-9984-9
  37. 37. Hu Y, Li J, Lou B, Wu R, Wang G, Lu C, et al. The role of reactive oxygen species in arsenic toxicity. Biomolecules. 2020;10:240. DOI: 10.3390/biom10020240
  38. 38. Lopes ACBA, Peixe TS, Mesas AE, Paoliello MMB. Lead exposure and oxidative stress: A systematic review. In: de Voogt P, editor. Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. Cham: Springer; 2016. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20013-2_3
  39. 39. Jan AT, Azam M, Siddiqui K, Ali A, Choi I, Haq QM. Heavy metals and human health: Mechanistic insight into toxicity and counter defense system of antioxidants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2015;16:29592-29630. DOI: 10.3390/ijms161226183
  40. 40. Kong CY, Guo Z, Song P, Zhang X, Yuan YP, Teng T, et al. Underlying the mechanisms of doxorubicin-induced acute cardiotoxicity: Oxidative stress and cell death. International Journal of Biological Sciences. 2022;18:760-770. DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.65258
  41. 41. Finkel T. Signal transduction by reactive oxygen species. The Journal of Cell Biology. 2011;194:7-15. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201102095
  42. 42. Rhee SG. Cell signaling. H2O2, a necessary evil for cell signaling. Science. 2006;312:1882-1883. DOI: 10.1126/science.1130481
  43. 43. Winterbourn CC, Hampton MB. Thiol chemistry and specificity in redox signaling. Free Radical Biology & Medicine. 2008;45:549-561. DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.05.004
  44. 44. Meng TC, Fukada T, Tonks NK. Reversible oxidation and inactivation of protein tyrosine phosphatases in vivo. Molecular Cell. 2002;9:387-399. DOI: 10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00445-8
  45. 45. Lee SR, Yang KS, Kwon J, Lee C, Jeong W, Rhee SG. Reversible inactivation of the tumor suppressor PTEN by H2O2. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2002;277:20336-20342. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M111899200
  46. 46. Gutteridge JMC, Halliwell B. Antioxidants in Nutrition, Health and Disease. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1994
  47. 47. Ighodaro OM, Akinloye OA. First line defence antioxidants-superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) and glutathione peroxidase (GPX): Their fundamental role in the entire antioxidant defence grid. Alexandria Journal of Medicine. 2018;54:287-293. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajme.2017.09.001
  48. 48. Wang Y, Branicky R, Noë A, Hekimi S. Superoxide dismutases: Dual roles in controlling ROS damage and regulating ROS signaling. The Journal of Cell Biology. 2018;217:1915-1928. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201708007
  49. 49. Nandi A, Yan L-J, Jana CK, Das N. Role of catalase in oxidative stress- and age-associated degenerative diseases. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity. 2019;2019:9613090. DOI: 10.1155/2019/9613090
  50. 50. Lubos E, Loscalzo J, Handy DE. Glutathione peroxidase-1 in health and disease: From molecular mechanisms to therapeutic opportunities. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling. 2011;15:1957-1997. DOI: 10.1089/ars.2010.3586
  51. 51. Sarıkaya E, Doğan S. Glutathione peroxidase in health and diseases. In: Bagatini M, editor. Glutathione System and Oxidative Stress in Health and Disease. London: IntechOpen; 2020. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.91009
  52. 52. Moussa Z, Judeh Z, Ahmed S. Nonenzymatic exogenous and endogenous antioxidants. In: Das K, Das S, Biradar MS, Bobbarala V, Tata SS, editors. Free Radical Medicine and Biology. London: IntechOpen; 2019. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.87778
  53. 53. Roche M, Rondeau P, Singh NR, Tarnus E, Bourdon E. The antioxidant properties of serum albumin. FEBS Letters. 2008;582:783-1787. DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2008.04.057
  54. 54. Spencer JP, Abd El Mohsen MM, Minihane AM, Mathers JC. Biomarkers of the intake of dietary polyphenols: Strengths, limitations and application in nutrition research. The British Journal of Nutrition. 2008;99:12-22. DOI: 10.1017/S0007114507798938
  55. 55. Pereira DM, Valentão P, Pereira JA, Andrade PB. Phenolics: From chemistry to biology. Molecules. 2009;14:2202-2211. DOI: 10.3390/molecules14062202
  56. 56. Zeb A. Concept, mechanism, and applications of phenolic antioxidants in foods. Journal of Food Biochemistry. 2020;44:e13394. DOI: 10.1111/jfbc.13394
  57. 57. Croft KD. The chemistry and biological effects of flavonoids and phenolic acids. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1998;854:435-442. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb09922.x
  58. 58. Myhrstad MC, Carlsen H, Nordström O, Blomhoff R, Moskaug JØ. Flavonoids increase the intracellular glutathione level by transactivation of the gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase catalytical subunit promoter. Free Radical Biology & Medicine. 2002;32:386-393. DOI: 10.1016/s0891-5849(01)00812-7
  59. 59. Hariharan S, Dharmaraj S. Selenium and selenoproteins: Its role in regulation of inflammation. Inflammopharmacology. 2020;28:667-695. DOI: 10.1007/s10787-020-00690-x
  60. 60. Schnabel R, Lubos E, Messow CM, Sinning CR, Zeller T, Wild PS, et al. Selenium supplementation improves antioxidant capacity in vitro and in vivo in patients with coronary artery disease. The SElenium Therapy in Coronary Artery disease Patients (SETCAP) Study. American Heart Journal. 2008;156(1201):e1-e11. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.09.004
  61. 61. Cai X, Wang C, Yu W, Fan W, Wang S, Shen N, et al. Selenium exposure and cancer risk: An updated meta-analysis and meta-regression. Scientific Reports. 2016;6:19213. DOI: 10.1038/srep19213
  62. 62. Ju W, Li X, Li Z, Wu GR, Fu XF, Yang XM, et al. The effect of selenium supplementation on coronary heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology. 2017;44:8-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtemb.2017.04.009
  63. 63. Santos JR, Gois AM, Mendonça DM, Freire MA. Nutritional status, oxidative stress and dementia: The role of selenium in Alzheimer’s disease. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 2014;6:206. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00206
  64. 64. Reddi AR, Jensen LT, Naranuntarat A, Rosenfeld L, Leung E, Shah R, et al. The overlapping roles of manganese and Cu/Zn SOD in oxidative stress protection. Free Radical Biology & Medicine. 2009;46:154-162. DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.09.032
  65. 65. Sinbad OO, Folorunsho AA, Olabisi OL, Ayoola OA, Temitope RJ. Vitamins as antioxidants. Journal of Food Science and Nutrition Research. 2019;2:214-235. DOI: 10.26502/jfsnr.2642-11000021
  66. 66. Khadim RM, Al-Fartusie FS. Antioxidant vitamins and their effect on immune system. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 2021;1853:012065. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1853/1/012065
  67. 67. Minich DM, Brown BI. A review of dietary (phyto)nutrients for glutathione support. Nutrients. 2019;11:2073. DOI: 10.3390/nu11092073
  68. 68. Saini RK, Prasad P, Sreedhar RV, Akhilender Naidu K, Shang X, Keum YS. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs): Emerging plant and microbial sources, oxidative stability, bioavailability, and health benefits—A review. Antioxidants (Basel). 2021;10:1627. DOI: 10.3390/antiox10101627
  69. 69. Christenhusz MJM, Byng JW. The number of known plants species in the world and its annual increase. Phytotaxa. 2016;261:201-217. DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.261.3.1
  70. 70. Schrire B, Lavin M, Lewis GP. Global distribution patterns of the Leguminosae: Insights from recent phylogenies. Biologiske Skrifter. 2005;55:375-422
  71. 71. Glimn-Lacy J, Kaufman PB. Pea family (Fabaceae). In: Botany Illustrated. Introduction to Plants, Major Groups, Flowering Families. Boston: Springer; 2006
  72. 72. Katayama N, Suzuki N. Role of extrafloral nectaries of Vicia faba in attraction of ants and herbivore exclusion by ants. Entomological Science. 2004;7:119-124. DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-8298.2004.00057.x
  73. 73. Young TP,·Stubblefield CH, Isbell LA. Ants on swollen-thorn acacias: Species coexistence in a simple system. Oecologia 1997;109:98-107. DOI: 10.1007/s004420050063
  74. 74. Parker MA. Relationships of bradyrhizobia from the legumes Apios americana and Desmodium glutinosum. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1999;65:4914-4920. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.65.11.4914-4920.1999
  75. 75. The Legume Phylogeny Working Group (LPWG). A new subfamily classification of the Leguminosae based on a taxonomically comprehensive phylogeny. Taxon. 2017;66:44-77. DOI: 10.12705/661.3
  76. 76. Purugganan MD. Evolutionary insights into the nature of plant domestication. Current Biology. 2019;29:R705-R714. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.05.053
  77. 77. Schaal B. Plants and people: Our shared history and future. Plants, People, Planet. 2019;1:14-19. DOI: 10.1002/ppp3.12
  78. 78. Zárate S. The archaeological remains of Leucaena (Fabaceae) revised. Economic Botany. 2000;54:477-499. DOI: 10.1007/BF02866547
  79. 79. Rodríguez MF, Rúgolo de Agrasar ZE, Aschero CA. El uso de las plantas en unidades domésticas del sitio arqueológico Punta de la Peña, Puna Meridional argentina (Use of plants in domestic units at the archaeological site of Punta de la Peña 4, Puna in southern Argentina). Chungará. 2006;38:257-271. DOI: 10.4067/S0717-73562006000200009
  80. 80. Gepts P, Beavis WD, Brummer EC, Shoemaker RC, Stalker HT, Weeden NF, et al. Legumes as a model plant family. Genomics for food and feed report of the cross-legume advances through genomics conference. Plant Physiology. 2005;137:1228-1235. DOI: 10.1104/pp.105.060871
  81. 81. Shavanov MV. The role of food crops within the Poaceae and Fabaceae families as nutritional plants. IOP Conferfence Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2021;624:012111. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/624/1/012111
  82. 82. Al-Fredan MAA. Nitrogen fixing legumes in the plant communities. American Journal of Environmental Sciences. 2011;7:166-172
  83. 83. Chimphango SBM, Gallant LH, Poulsen ZC, Samuels MI, Hattas D, Curtis OE, et al. Native legume species as potential fodder crops in the mediterranean renosterveld shrubland, South Africa. Journal of Arid Environments. 2020;173:104015. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2019.104015
  84. 84. Vasishth A, Guleria V. Potential of Senegalia senegal for gum arabic extraction. Indian Journal of Ecology. 2017;44:817-819
  85. 85. Emam-Djomeh Z, Fathi M, Askari G. Gum tragacanth (Astragalus gummifer Labillardiere). In: Razavi SMA, editor. Emerging Natural Hydrocolloids: Rheology and Functions. Hoboken: Wiley; 2019. DOI: 10.1002/9781119418511.ch12
  86. 86. De Almeida Chuffa LG, Vieira FR, da Silva DAF, Franco DM. Soybean seed oil: Nutritional composition, healthy benefits and commercial applications. In: Varnham A, editor. Seed Oil. Hauppauge: Nova Science; 2015
  87. 87. Sharma KK, Bhatnagar-Mathur P. Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). In: Wang K, editor. Agrobacterium Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology. Vol. 343. Totowa: Humana Press; 2006. DOI: 10.1385/1-59745-130-4:347
  88. 88. Ortiz-Hidalgo C, Pina-Oviedo S. Hematoxylin: Mesoamerica’s gift to histopathology. Palo de Campeche (logwood tree), pirates’ most desired treasure, and irreplaceable tissue stain. International Journal of Surgical Pathology. 2018;27:1066
  89. 89. Wahyuningsih S, Ramelan AH, Wardani DK, Aini FN, Sari PL, Tamtama BPN, et al. Indigo dye derived from Indigofera tinctoria as natural food colorant. IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering. 2017;193:012048. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/193/1/012048
  90. 90. Zubairi SI, Sarmidi MR, Aziz RA. A study of rotenone from Derris roots of varies location, plant parts and types of solvent used. Advances in Environmental Biology. 2014;8:445-449
  91. 91. De Mello LM, Lemos R, Marques A, Stefenon VM. Ancient and current distributions of Erythrina crista-galli L. (Fabaceae) in South America. Floresta e Ambiente. 2019;26:e11442017. DOI: 10.1590/2179-8087.114417
  92. 92. Compton JA, Lack HW. The discovery, naming and typification of Wisteria floribunda and W. brachybotrys (Fabaceae) with notes on associated names. Willdenowia. 2012;42:219-240. DOI: 10.3372/wi.42.42207
  93. 93. Meenu M, Kamboj U, Sharma A, Guha P, Mishra S. Green method for determination of phenolic compounds in mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) based on near-infrared spectroscopy and chemometrics. International Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2016;51:2520-2527. DOI: 10.1111/ijfs.13232
  94. 94. Capistrán-Carabarin A, Aquino-Bolaños EN, García-Díaz YD, Chávez-Servia JL, Vera-Guzmán AM, Carrillo-Rodríguez JC. Complementarity in phenolic compounds and the antioxidant activities of Phaseolus coccineus L. and P. vulgaris L. Landraces. Foods. 2019;8:295. DOI: 10.3390/foods8080295
  95. 95. Moloto MR, Phan ADT, Shai JL, Sultanbawa Y, Sivakumar D. Comparison of phenolic compounds, carotenoids, amino acid composition, in vitro antioxidant and anti-diabetic activities in the leaves of seven cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) cultivars. Food. 2020;9:1285. DOI: 10.3390/foods9091285
  96. 96. Zhang Y, Meenu M, Yu H, Xu B. An investigation on phenolic and antioxidant capacity of under-utilized food legumes consumed in China. Food. 2020;9:438. DOI: 10.3390/foods9040438
  97. 97. Singh B, Singh JP, Kaur A, Singh N. Phenolic composition and antioxidant potential of grain legume seeds: A review. Foodservice Research International. 2017;101:1-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.09.026
  98. 98. Mazur WM, Duke JA, Wähälä K, Rasku S, Adlercreutz H. Isoflavonoids and lignans in legumes: Nutritional and health aspects in humans. The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry. 1998;9:193-200. DOI: 10.1016/S0955-2863(97)00184-8
  99. 99. Kim IS. Current perspectives on the beneficial effects of soybean isoflavones and their metabolites for humans. Antioxidants (Basel). 2021;10:1064. DOI: 10.3390/antiox10071064
  100. 100. Alshehri MM, Sharifi-Rad J, Herrera-Bravo J, Jara EL, Salazar LA, Kregiel D, et al. Therapeutic potential of isoflavones with an emphasis on daidzein. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity. 2021;2021:6331630. DOI: 10.1155/2021/6331630
  101. 101. Islam A, Islam MS, Uddin MN, Hasan MMI, Akanda MR. The potential health benefits of the isoflavone glycoside genistin. Archives of Pharmaceutical Research. 2020;43:395-408. DOI: 10.1007/s12272-020-01233-2
  102. 102. Nakamoto M, Otsuka R, Tange C, Nishita Y, Tomida M, Imai T, et al. Intake of isoflavones reduces the risk of all-cause mortality in middle-aged Japanese. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2021;75:1781-1791. DOI: 10.1038/s41430-021-00890-w
  103. 103. Bakasso S, Lamien-Meda A, Lamien CE, Kiendrebeogo M, Millogo J, Ouedraogo AG, et al. Polyphenol contents and antioxidant activities of five Indigofera species (Fabaceae) from Burkina Faso. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences. 2008;11:1429-1435. DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2008.1429.1435
  104. 104. Godevac D, Zdunić G, Savikin K, Vajs V, Menković N. Antioxidant activity of nine Fabaceae species growing in Serbia and Montenegro. Fitoterapia. 2008;79:185-187. DOI: 10.1016/j.fitote.2007.10.001
  105. 105. Khatun S, Kim T. Phenolic compound, antioxidant activity and nutritional components of five legume seed. American Journal of Biomedical Science and Research. 2021;12:328-334. DOI: 10.34297/AJBSR.2021.12.001767
  106. 106. Rodríguez Madrera R, Campa Negrillo A, Suárez Valles B, Ferreira Fernández JJ. Phenolic content and antioxidant activity in seeds of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Food. 2021;10:864. DOI: 10.3390/foods10040864
  107. 107. Gupta M, Gupta S. An overview of selenium uptake, metabolism, and toxicity in plants. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2017;7:2074. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.02074
  108. 108. Alford ÉR, Lindblom SD, Pittarello M, Freeman JL, Fakra SC, Marcus MA, et al. Roles of rhizobial symbionts in selenium hyperaccumulation in Astragalus (Fabaceae). American Journal of Botany. 2014;101:1895-1905. DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1400223
  109. 109. Harvey MA, Erskine PD, Harris HH, Brown GK, Pilon-Smits EAH, Casey LW, et al. Distribution and chemical form of selenium in Neptunia amplexicaulis from Central Queensland, Australia. Metallomics. 2020;12:514-527. DOI: 10.1039/c9mt00244h
  110. 110. General Bureau of Statistics. 9th Environment Statistics Publication 2015-2019. Paramaribo: General Bureau of Statistics; 2020
  111. 111. International Monetary Fund (2020). Suriname: At a Glance. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund; 2022
  112. 112. The World Bank Group. Data—Suriname. Washington, DC: World Bank Group; 2021
  113. 113. International Organization for Migration. Suriname Migration Profile A Study on Emigration from, and Immigration into Suriname. Switzerland: International Organization for Migration; 2015
  114. 114. Mans DRA, Ganga D, Kartopawiro J. Meeting of the minds: Traditional herbal medicine in multiethnic Suriname. In: El-Shemy H, editor. Aromatic and Medicinal Plants—Back to Nature. Rijeka: InTech; 2017. DOI: 10.5772/66509
  115. 115. Mans DRA. The use of medicinal plants in Suriname: The ethnopharmacological legacy of slavery and indentured labour. In: Menke H, Buckingham J, Gounder F, Kumar A, Hassankhan MS, editors. Social Aspects of Health, Medicine and Disease in the Colonial and Post-Colonial Era. New Delhi: Manohar; 2020
  116. 116. Burnham RJ, Johnson KR. South American palaeobotany and the origins of neotropical rainforests. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences. 2004;359:1595-1610. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1531
  117. 117. Stephen HJM. Geneeskruiden Van Suriname: Hun Toepassing in de volksgeneeskunde en in de magie (Herbal Medicines from Suriname: Their Applications in Folk Medicine and Wizardry). Amsterdam: De Driehoek; 1979
  118. 118. May AF, Sranan oso dresi. Surinaams kruidenboek (Surinamese Folk Medicine. A Collection of Surinamese Medicinal Herbs). Paramaribo: De Walburg Pers; 1982
  119. 119. Titjari. Famiri-encyclopedia foe da natoera dresi-fasi. Gezinskruidenboek van de natuurgeneeswijzen. Natuurgeneeswijzen uit het zonnige Suriname (Encyclopedia of Plant-based Forms of Treatment. Folk Medicines from Sunny Suriname). Amsterdam: Sangrafoe; 1985
  120. 120. Heyde H. Surinaamse Medicijnplanten (Surinamese Medicinal Plants). 2nd ed. Paramaribo: Westfort; 1987
  121. 121. Tjong AG. Het gebruik van medicinale planten door de Javanen in Suriname (The Use of Medicinal Plants by the Javanese in Suriname). Paramaribo: Instituut voor de Opleiding van Leraren; 1989
  122. 122. Slagveer JL. Surinaams Groot Kruidenboek: Sranan Oso Dresie (A Surinamese Herbal: Surinamese Traditional Medicines). Paramaribo: De West; 1990
  123. 123. Sedoc NO. Afrosurinaamse natuurgeneeswijzen: Bevattende meer dan tweehonderd meest gebruikelijke geneeskrachtige kruiden (Afro-Surinamese Natural Remedies: Over two hundred Commonly Used Medicinal Herbs). Paramaribo: Vaco Press; 1992
  124. 124. Raghoenandan UPD. Een Ethnobotanisch Onderzoek onder de Hindustanen in Suriname (An Ethnobotanical Survey among Hindustanis in Suriname). Paramaribo: Anton de Kom Universiteit van Suriname; 1994
  125. 125. Van Andel TR, Ruysschaert S. Medicinal and Ritual Plants of Suriname. Amsterdam: KIT Publishers; 2011
  126. 126. Bhat R, Karim AA. Exploring the nutritional potential of wild and underutilized legumes. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. 2009;8:305-331. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-4337.2009.00084.x
  127. 127. Ostendorf FW. Nuttige planten en sierplanten in Suriname (Useful plants and Ornamentals in Suriname). Paramaribo: Landbouwproefstation in Suriname; 1962
  128. 128. Pawar CR, Amol DL, Surana SJ. Phytochemical and pharmacological aspects of Caesalpinia pulcherrima. Journal of Pharmacy Research. 2008;1:131-138
  129. 129. Elfahmi NV, Woerdenbag HJ, Kayser O. Jamu: Indonesian traditional herbal medicine towards rational phytopharmacological use. Journal of Herbal Medicine. 2014;4:51-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.hermed.2014.01.002
  130. 130. Wooding CJ. Winti: een Afro-Amerikaanse godsdienst in Suriname. Een cultuurhistorische analyse van de religieuze verschijnselen in de Para (Winti: An African-American Religion in Suriname. A Cultural-Historical Analysis of Religious Phenomena in Para). Meppel: Krips Repro BV; 1972
  131. 131. Srinivas KV, Rao YK, Mahender I, Das B, Krishna KVR, Kishore KH, et al. Flavanoids from Caesalpinia pulcherrima. Phytochemistry. 2003;63:789-793. DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9422(03)00325-x
  132. 132. Zanin JL, de Carvalho BA, Martineli PS, dos Santos MH, Lago JH, Sartorelli P, et al. The genus Caesalpinia L. (Caesalpiniaceae): Phytochemical and pharmacological characteristics. Molecules. 2012;17:7887-7902. DOI: 10.3390/molecules17077887
  133. 133. Anju V, Zachariah S. Phytochemical and pharmacological activities of Caesalpinia pulcherrima—An overview. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2013;5:6-13
  134. 134. Pankaj N, Deepak N, Ranveer B. A review on phytochemical and pharmacological aspects of Caesalpinia pulcherrima. International Journal of Research in Ayurveda and Pharmacy. 2011;2:416-421
  135. 135. Badami S, Geetha B, Sharma SV, Rajan S, Suresh B. Antioxidant activity of Caesalpinia pulcherrima heartwood. Biological & Pharmaceutical Bulletin. 2003;26:1534-1537
  136. 136. Kumbhare MR, Sivakumar T, Udavant PB, Dhake AS, Surana AR. In vitro antioxidant activity, phytochemical screening, cytotoxicity and total phenolic content in extracts of Caesalpinia pulcherrima (Caesalpiniaceae) pods. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences. 2012;15:325-332. DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2012.325.332
  137. 137. Yodsaoue O, Karalai C, Ponglimanont C, Tewtrakul S, Chantrapromma S. Potential anti-inflammatory diterpenoids from the roots of Caesalpinia mimosoides Lamk. Phytochemistry. 2010;71:1756-1764. DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2010.06.016
  138. 138. Shukla S, Mehta A, John J, Singh S, Mehta P, Vyas SP. Antioxidant activity and total phenolic content of ethanolic extract of Caesalpinia bonducella seeds. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2009;47:1848-1851. DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2009.04.040
  139. 139. Ighodaro A, Ogbeide OK. Antioxidant activity and assessment of total phenolic and flavonoid contents of Caesalpinia pulcherrima leaf extract and fractions. Journal of the Chemical Society of Nigeria. 2020;45:945-950
  140. 140. Fuller DQ , Murphy C, Kingwell-Banham E, Castillo CC, Naik S. Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. origins and domestication: The South and Southeast Asian archaeobotanical evidence. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution. 2019;66:1175-1188. DOI: 10.1007/s10722-019-00774-w
  141. 141. Carney JA, Rosomoff RN. In the Shadow of Slavery. Africa’s Botanical Legacy in the Atlantic World. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2009
  142. 142. Bekele-Tesemma A. Profitable Agroforestry Innovations for Eastern Africa: Experience from 10 Agroclimatic Zones of Ethiopia, India, Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda [Internet]. Nairabi: World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Eastern Africa Region; 2007. Available from: http://apps.worldagroforestry.org/downloads/Publications/PDFS/B15073.pdf. [Accessed: June 10, 2022]
  143. 143. Emefiene ME, Salaudeen AB, Yaroson AY. The use of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) for drought mitigation in Nigeria. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies. 2013;2:29-37. DOI: 10.5901/ajis.2013.v2n12p29
  144. 144. Ganesan S. Traditional oral care medicinal plants survey of Tamil Nadu. Indian Journal of Natural Products and Resources. 2008;7:166-172
  145. 145. Upadhyay B, Parveen DAK, Kumar A. Ethnomedicinal and ethnopharmaco-statistical studies of eastern Rajasthan, India. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2010;129:64-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2010.02.026
  146. 146. Al-Saeedi AH, Hossain MA. Total phenols, total flavonoids contents and free radical scavenging activity of seeds crude extracts of pigeon pea traditionally used in Oman for the treatment of several chronic diseases. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Disease. 2015;5:316-321. DOI: 10.1016/S2222-1808(14)60790-8
  147. 147. Pal D, Mishra P, Sachan N, Ghosh AK. Biological activities and medicinal properties of Cajanus cajan (L) Millsp. Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology & Research. 2011;2:207-214. DOI: 10.4103/2231-4040.90874
  148. 148. Lai YS, Hsu WH, Huang JJ, Wu SC. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.) extracts on hydrogen peroxide- and lipopolysaccharide-treated RAW264.7 macrophages. Food & Function. 2012;3:1294-1301. DOI: 10.1039/c2fo30120b
  149. 149. Hassan EM, Matloub A, Aboutabl ME, Ibrahim NA, Mohamed S. Assessment of anti-inflammatory, antinociceptive, immunomodulatory, and antioxidant activities of Cajanus cajan L. seeds cultivated in Egypt and its phytochemical composition. Pharmaceutical Biology. 2015;54:1380-1391. DOI: 10.3109/13880209.2015.1078383
  150. 150. Vo T-LT, Yang N-C, Yang S-E, Chen C-L, Wu C-H, Song T-Y. Effects of Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. roots extracts on the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities. The Chinese Journal of Physiology. 2020;63:137-148. DOI: 10.4103/CJP.CJP_88_19
  151. 151. Tungmunnithum D, Hano C. Cosmetic potential of Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp: Botanical data, traditional uses, phytochemistry and biological activities. Cosmetics. 2020;7:84. DOI: 10.3390/cosmetics7040084
  152. 152. Sarkar R, Mandal N. Hydroalcoholic extracts of Indian medicinal plants can help in amelioration from oxidative stress through antioxidant properties. Journal of Complementary and Integrative Medicine. 2012;9:1553-1583. DOI: 10.1515/1553-3840.1583
  153. 153. Terahara N, Saito N, Honda T, Toki K, Osajima Y. Acylated anthocyanins of Clitoria ternatea flowers and their acyl moieties. Phytochemistry. 1990;29:949-953. DOI: 10.1016/0031-9422(90)80053-J
  154. 154. Nguyen GK, Zhang S, Nguyen NT, Nguyen PQ , Chiu MS, Hardjojo A, et al. Discovery and characterization of novel cyclotides originated from chimeric precursors consisting of albumin-1 chain a and cyclotide domains in the Fabaceae family. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2011;286:24275-24287. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M111.229922
  155. 155. Mensah R, Leach D, Young A, Watts N, Glennie P. Development of Clitoria ternatea as a biopesticide for cotton pest management: Assessment of product effect on Helicoverpa spp. and their natural enemies. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata. 2015;154:131-145. DOI: 10.1111/eea.12263
  156. 156. Fantz PR. Ethnobotany of Clitoria (Leguminosae). Economic Botany. 1991;45:511-520. DOI: 10.1007/BF02930715
  157. 157. Mukherjee PK, Kumar V, Kumar NS, Heinrich M. The ayurvedic medicine Clitoria ternatea—From traditional use to scientific assessment. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2008;120:291-301. DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2008.09.009
  158. 158. Jain NN, Ohal CC, Shroff SK, Bhutada RH, Somani RS, Kasture VS, et al. Clitoria ternatea and the CNS. Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior. 2003;75:529-536. DOI: 10.1016/s0091-3057(03)00130-8
  159. 159. Oguis GK, Gilding EK, Jackson MA, Craik DJ. Butterfly pea (Clitoria ternatea), a cyclotide-bearing plant with applications in agriculture and medicine. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2019;10:645. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00645
  160. 160. Phrueksanan W, Yibchok-anun S, Adisakwattana S. Protection of Clitoria ternatea flower petal extract against free radical-induced hemolysis and oxidative damage in canine erythrocytes. Research in Veterinary Science. 2014;97:357-363. DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2014.08.010
  161. 161. Sushma NJ, Prathyusha D, Swathi G, Madhavi T, Raju BDP, Mallikarjuna K, et al. Facile approach to synthesize magnesium oxide nanoparticles by using Clitoria ternatea—Characterization and in vitro antioxidant studies. Applied Nanoscience. 2015;6:437-444. DOI: 10.1007/s13204-015-0455-1
  162. 162. Sogo T, Terahara N, Hisanaga A, Kumamoto T, Yamashiro T, Wu S, et al. Anti-inflammatory activity and molecular mechanism of delphinidin 3-sambubioside, a Hibiscus anthocyanin. BioFactors. 2015;41:58-65. DOI: 10.1002/biof.1201
  163. 163. Thell K, Hellinger R, Sahin E, Michenthaler P, Gold-Binder M, Haider T, et al. Oral activity of a nature-derived cyclic peptide for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2016;113:3960-3965. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1519960113
  164. 164. Swain SS, Rout KK, Chand PK. Production of triterpenoid anti-cancer compound taraxerol in Agrobacterium-transformed root cultures of butterfly pea (Clitoria ternatea L.). Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 2012;168:487-503. DOI: 10.1007/s12010-012-9791-8
  165. 165. Kamkaen N, Wilkinson JM. The antioxidant activity of Clitoria ternatea flower petal extracts and eye gel. Phytotherapy Research. 2009;23:1624-1625. DOI: 10.1002/ptr.2832
  166. 166. Veiga Junior VF, Rosas EC, Carvalho MV, Henriques MG, Pinto AC. Chemical composition and anti-inflammatory activity of copaiba oils from Copaifera cearensis Huber ex Ducke, Copaifera reticulata Ducke and Copaifera multijuga Hayne—A comparative study. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2007;112:248-254. DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2007.03.005
  167. 167. Leandro LM, de Sousa VF, Barbosa PCS, Neves JKO, da Silva JA, da Veiga-Junior VF. Chemistry and biological activities of terpenoids from copaiba (Copaifera spp.) oleoresins. Molecules. 2012;17:3866-3889. DOI: 10.3390/molecules17043866
  168. 168. Monteschio JO, de Vargas Junior FM, Alves da Silva AL, das Chagas RA, Fernandes T, Leonardo AP, et al. Effect of copaíba essential oil (Copaifera officinalis L.) as a natural preservative on the oxidation and shelf life of sheep burgers. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0248499. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248499
  169. 169. Veiga VF Jr, Pinto AC. The Copaifera L. genus. Quimica Nova. 2002;25:273-286. DOI: 10.1590/S0100-40422002000200016
  170. 170. Plowden C. The ethnobotany of copaiba (Copaifera) oleoresin in the Amazon. Economic Botany. 2004;58:729-733
  171. 171. Santnna BMP, Fontes SP, Pinto AC, Rezende CM. Characterization of woody odorant contributors in copaiba oil (Copaifera multijuga Hayne). Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society. 2007;18:984-989
  172. 172. Veiga VF, Zunino L, Calixto JB, Patitucci ML, Pinto AC. Phytochemical and antioedematogenic studies of commercial copaiba oils available in Brazil. Phytotherapy Research. 2001;15:476-480. DOI: 10.1002/ptr.976
  173. 173. Lucas FA, Kandrotas AL, Neto EN, de Siqueira CE, André GS, Bromerschenkel I, et al. Copaiba oil in experimental wound healing in horses. Ciencia Rural. 2017;47:e20151292. DOI: 10.1590/0103-8478cr20151292
  174. 174. Pieri FA, Mussi MC, Moreira MAS. Óleo de copaíba (Copaifera sp.): Histórico, extração, aplicações industriais e propriedades medicinais (Copaíba oil (Copaifera sp.): History, extraction, industrial aplications and medicinal properties). Revista Brasileira das Plantas Medicinais. 2009;11:465-472. DOI: 10.1590/S1516-05722009000400016
  175. 175. Santos AO, Ueda-Nakamura T, Dias Filho BP, Veiga Junior VF, Pinto AC, Nakamura CV. Antimicrobial activity of Brazilian copaiba oils obtained from different species of the Copaifera genus. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. 2008;103:277-281. DOI: 10.1590/s0074-02762008005000015
  176. 176. Da Silva AG, Puziol Pde F, Leitao RN, Gomes TR, Scherer R, Martins ML, et al. Application of the essential oil from copaiba (Copaifera langsdorfi Desf.) for acne vulgaris: A double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Alternative Medicine Review. 2012;17:69-75
  177. 177. Ceccarelli I, Fiorenzani P, Pessina F, Pinassi J, Aglianò M, Miragliotta V, et al. The CB2 agonist β-caryophyllene in male and female rats exposed to a model of persistent inflammatory pain. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2020;14:850. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00850
  178. 178. Hebert P, Barice EJ, Park J, Dyess SM, McCaffrey R, Hennekens CH. Treatments for inflammatory arthritis: Potential but unproven role of topical copaiba. Integrative Medicine (Encinitas, Calif.). 2017;16:40-42
  179. 179. Da Trindade R, da Silva JK, Setzer WN. Copaifera of the neotropics: A review of the phytochemistry and pharmacology. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018;19:1511. DOI: 10.3390/ijms19051511
  180. 180. De Lima Silva JJ, Guimarães SB, da Silveira ER, de Vasconcelos PR, Lima GG, Torres SM, et al. Effects of Copaifera langsdorffii Desf. On ischemia-reperfusion of randomized skin flaps in rats. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2009;33:104-109. DOI: 10.1007/s00266-008-9263-2
  181. 181. Adzu B, Balogun SO, Pavan E, Ascêncio SD, Soares IM, Aguiar RWS, et al. Evaluation of the safety, gastroprotective activity and mechanism of action of standardised leaves infusion extract of Copaifera malmei Harms. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2015;175:378-389. DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2015.09.027
  182. 182. Batista ÂG, Ferrari AS, da Cunha DC, da Silva JK, Cazarin CB, Correa LC, et al. Polyphenols, antioxidants, and antimutagenic effects of Copaifera langsdorffii fruit. Food Chemistry. 2016;197:1153-1159. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.11.093
  183. 183. Mans DRA, Grant A, Pinas N. Plant-based ethnopharmacological remedies for hypertension in Suriname. In: Builders P, editor. Herbal Medicine. London: IntechOpen; 2017. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.72106
  184. 184. Rastogi S, Pandey MM, Rawat AKS. An ethnomedicinal, phytochemical and pharmacological profile of Desmodium gangeticum (L.) DC. and Desmodium adscendens (Sw.) DC. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2011;136:283-296. DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2011.04.031
  185. 185. Seriki SA, Odetola AO, Adebayo OF. Analysis of phytoconstituents of Desmodium adscendens in relation to its therapeutic properties. American Journal of Biomedical Science and Research. 2019;2:158-162. DOI: 10.34297/AJBSR.2019.02.000598
  186. 186. Muanda FN, Bouayed J, Djilani A, Yao C, Soulimani R, Dicko A. Chemical composition and, cellular evaluation of the antioxidant activity of Desmodium adscendens leaves. Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2011;2011:620862. DOI: 10.1155/2011/620862
  187. 187. Addy ME, Burka JF. Effects of Desmodium adscendens fractions on antigen-and arachidonic acid-induced contractions of guinea pig airways. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology. 1988;66:820-825
  188. 188. Addy ME, Awumey EM. Effects of the extracts of Desmodium adscendens on anaphylaxis. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 1984;11:283-292. DOI: 10.1016/0378-8741(84)90074-6
  189. 189. Riaz A, Rasul A, Hussain G, Zahoor MK, Jabeen F, Subhani Z, et al. A bioactive phytochemical with potential therapeutic activities. Advances in Pharmacological Sciences. 2018;2018:9794625. DOI: 10.1155/2018/9794625
  190. 190. Adeniyi BA, Izuka KC, Odumosu B, Aiyelaagbe OO. Antibacterial and antifungal activities of methanol extracts of Desmodium adscendens root and Bombax buonopozense leaves. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences. 2013;7:185-194. DOI: 10.4314/ijbcs.v7i1i.15
  191. 191. François C, Fares M, Baiocchi C, Maixent JM. Safety of Desmodium adscendens extract on hepatocytes and renal cells. Protective effect against oxidative stress. Journal of Intercultural Ethnopharmacology. 2015;4:1-5. DOI: 10.5455/jice.20141013041312
  192. 192. Chuisseu PDD, Galani BRT, Younang NCK, Kouam AF, Simo BFN, Tchana AN, et al. Aqueous extracts of Desmodium adscendens (Fabaceae) possess in vitro antioxidant properties and protect hepatocytes from carbone tetrachloride-induced injury and hepatitis C virus infection. Investigational Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacology. 2020;3:36. DOI: 10.31183/imcp.2020.00036
  193. 193. Sarker SD, Nahar L. Progress in the chemistry of naturally occurring coumarins. In: Kinghorn A, Falk H, Gibbons S, Kobayashi J, editors. Progress in the Chemistry of Organic Natural Products. Cham: Springer; 2017. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-59542-9_3
  194. 194. Lončar M, Jakovljević M, Šubarić D, Pavlić M, Buzjak Služek V, Cindrić I, et al. Coumarins in food and methods of their determination. Food. 2020;9:645. DOI: 10.3390/foods9050645
  195. 195. Loprinzi CL, Sloan J, Kugler J. Coumarin-induced hepatotoxicity. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 1997;15:3167-3168. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.9.3167
  196. 196. Abraham K, Wöhrlin F, Lindtner O, Heinemeyer G, Lampen A. Toxicology and risk assessment of coumarin: Focus on human data. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research. 2010;54:228-239. DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.200900281
  197. 197. Matos MJ, Santana L, Uriarte E, Abreu AO, Molina E, Yordi EG. Coumarins—An important class of phytochemicals. In: Rao AV, Rao LG, editors. Phytochemicals—Isolation, Characterisation and Role in Human Health. London: IntechOpen; 2015. DOI: 10.5772/59982
  198. 198. Hussain MI, Qamar Abbas S, Reigosa MJ. Activities and novel applications of secondary metabolite coumarins. Planta Daninha. 2018;36:e018174040. DOI: 10.1590/S0100-8358201836010001
  199. 199. Pereira A, Martins S, Caldeira AT. Coumarins as fluorescent labels of biomolecules. In: Rao V, Mans D, Rao L, editors. Phytochemicals in Human Health. London: IntechOpen; 2019. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.85973
  200. 200. Bourdy G, DeWalt SJ, de Michel LRC, Roca A, Deharo E, Muñoz V, et al. Medicinal plants uses of the Tacana, an Amazonian Bolivian ethnic group. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2000;70:87-109. DOI: 10.1016/s0378-8741(99)00158-0
  201. 201. De Oliveira PC, de Sou Q , BCdO. Traditional knowledge of forest medicinal plants of Munduruku Indigenous people—Ipaupixuna. European. Journal of Medicinal Plants. 2020;31:20-35. DOI: 10.9734/ejmp/2020/v31i1330309
  202. 202. Van Andel T, Behari-Ramdas J, Havinga R, Groenendijk S. The medicinal plant trade in Suriname. Ethnobotany Research and Applications. 2007;5:351-372
  203. 203. Venugopala KN, Rashmi V, Odhav B. Review on natural coumarin lead compounds for their pharmacological activity. BioMed Research International. 2013;2013:963248. DOI: 10.1155/2013/963248
  204. 204. Sullivan G. Occurrence of umbelliferone in the seeds of Dipteryx odorata (Aubl.) Willd. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 1982;30:609-610. DOI: 10.1021/jf00111a051
  205. 205. Da Cunha CP, Godoy RLO, Braz FR. Isolation of flavonoids from Dipteryx odorata by high-performance liquid chromatography. Revista Virtual de Química. 2016;8:43-56. DOI: 10.5935/1984-6835.20160004
  206. 206. Socorro MP, Pinto AC, Kaiser CR. New isoflavonoid from Dipteryx odorata. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung. 2003;58B:1206-1209
  207. 207. Januário AH, Lourenço MV, Domézio LA, Pietro RCLR, Castilho MS, Tomazela DM, et al. Isolation and structure determination of bioactive isoflavones from callus culture of Dipteryx odorata. Chemical & Pharmaceutical Bulletin. 2005;53:740-742. DOI: 10.1248/cpb.53.740
  208. 208. Rüfer CE, Kulling SE. Antioxidant activity of isoflavones and their major metabolites using different in vitro assays. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2006;54:2926-2931. DOI: 10.1021/jf053112o
  209. 209. Maass BL. Origin, domestication and global dispersal of Lablab purpureus (L.) Sweet (Fabaceae): Current understanding. Legume Perspectives. 2016;13:5-8
  210. 210. Rasha MS, Abdel Atti KA. Effect of dietary hyacinth bean (Lablab purpureus) on broiler chicks performance. Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences. 2007;3:494-497
  211. 211. Al-Snafi AE. The pharmacology and medical importance of Dolichos lablab (Lablab purpureus)—A review. IOSR Journal of Pharmacy. 2017;7:22-30
  212. 212. Naeem M, Shabbir A, Ansari AA, Aftab T, Khan MMA, Uddin M. Hyacinth bean (Lablab purpureus L.)—An underutilised crop with future potential. Scientia Horticulturae. 2020;272:109551. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109551
  213. 213. Habib MAM, Hasan R, Nayeem J, Uddin N, Rana S. Anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and cytotoxic potential of methanolic extract of two Bangladeshi bean Lablab purpureus L. sweet white and purple. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. 2012;3:776-781. DOI: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.3(3).776-81
  214. 214. Rai K, Rai N, Pandey-Rai S. Unlocking pharmacological and therapeutic potential of hyacinth bean (Lablab purpureus L.): Role of OMICS based biology, biotic and abiotic elicitors. In: Jimenez-Lopez J, Clemente A, editors. Legumes Research. Vol. 2. London: IntechOpen; 2021. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.99345
  215. 215. Qiaoyu L, Lingsheng D. Chemical study on the flower of Dolichos lablab L. Journal of China Pharmaceutical University. 1996;27:205-207
  216. 216. Kala KB, Tresina Soris P, Mohan VR, Vadivel V. Nutrient and chemical evaluation of raw seeds of five varieties of Lablab purpureus (L.) Sweet. Advances in Bioresearch. 2010;1:44-53
  217. 217. Turco I, Ferretti G, Bacchetti T. Review of the health benefits of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) polyphenols. Journal of Food and Nutrition Research. 2016;55:283-293
  218. 218. Zhang Y, Pechan T, Chang SK. Antioxidant and angiotensin-I converting enzyme inhibitory activities of phenolic extracts and fractions derived from three phenolic-rich legume varieties. Journal of Functional Foods. 2018;42:289-297. DOI: 10.1016/j.jff.2017.12.060
  219. 219. Zhu F, Du B, Xu B. Anti-inflammatory effects of phytochemicals from fruits, vegetables, and food legumes: A review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2018;58:1260-1270. DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2016.1251390
  220. 220. Shi Y, Mandal R, Singh A, Pratap SA. Legume lipoxygenase: Strategies for application in food industry. Legume Science. 2020;2:e44. DOI: 10.1002/leg3.44
  221. 221. Morris JB. Morphological and reproductive characterization in hyacinth bean, Lablab purpureus (L.) sweet germplasm with clinically proven nutraceutical and pharmaceutical traits for use as a medicinal food. Journal of Dietary Supplements. 2009;6:263-279. DOI: 10.1080/19390210903070830
  222. 222. Havinga RM, Hartl A, Putscher J, Prehsler S, Buchmann C, Vogl CR. Tamarindus indica L. (Fabaceae): Patterns of use in traditional African medicine. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2010;127:573-588. DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2009.11.028
  223. 223. Menezes APP, Trevisan SCC, Barbalho SM, Guiguer EL. Tamarindus indica L. A plant with multiple medicinal purposes. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2016;5:50-54
  224. 224. De Caluwé E, Halamov K, van Damme P. Tamarindus indica L.: A review of traditional uses, phytochemistry and pharmacology. Afrika Focus. 2010;23:53-83
  225. 225. Meher B, Dash DK, Roy A. A review on: Phytochemistry, pharmacology and traditional uses of Tamarindus indica L. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2014;3:229-240
  226. 226. Shaikh Z, Mujahid M, Bagga P, Khalid M, Noorul H, Nesar A, et al. Medicinal uses and pharmacological activity of Tamarindus indica. World Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2017;5:121-133
  227. 227. Siddhuraju P, Vijayakumari K, Janardhanan K. Nutritional and antinutritional properties of the underexploited legumes Cassia laevigata Willd. and Tamarindus indica L. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis. 1995;8:351-162
  228. 228. El-Siddig K, Gunasena HPM, Prasa BA, Pushpakumara DKNG, Ramana KVR, Vijayanand P, et al. Tamarind—Tamarindus indica L. Fruits for the Future 1. Southampton: Southampton Centre for Underutilized Crops; 2006
  229. 229. Almeida MMB, de Sousa PHM, Fonseca ML, Magalhães CEC, Lopes MFG, de Lemos TLG. Evaluation of macro and micro-mineral content in tropical fruits cultivated in the northeast of Brazil. Ciência e Technologia de Alimentos. 2009;29:581-586
  230. 230. Martinello F, Soares SM, Franco JJ, Santos AC, Sugohara A, Garcia SB, et al. Hypolipemic and antioxidant activities from Tamarindus indica L. pulp fruit extract in hypercholesterolemic hamsters. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2006;44:810-818. DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2005.10.011
  231. 231. Bhutkar MA, Bhise SB. Anti-oxidative effect of Tamarindus indica in alloxan induced diabetic rats. International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Sciences. 2011;2:1006-1009
  232. 232. Lim CY, Junit SM, Abdulla MA, Aziz AA. In vivo biochemical and gene expression analyses of the antioxidant activities and hypocholesterolaemic properties of Tamarindus indica fruit pulp extract. PLoS One. 2013;8:e70058. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070058

Written By

Dennis R.A. Mans, Priscilla Friperson, Jennifer Pawirodihardjo and Meryll Djotaroeno

Submitted: 25 June 2022 Reviewed: 27 June 2022 Published: 24 July 2022