Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Spinal Cord Injury Prevalence and Treatment Modalities

Written By

Zeenat Ara, Alka Singh, Saloni Raj, Shah Walliullah and Rajeshwar Nath Srivastava

Submitted: 31 March 2022 Reviewed: 09 May 2022 Published: 08 February 2023

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.105214

From the Edited Volume

Spinal Cord Injury - Current Trends in Acute Management, Function Preservation and Rehabilitation Protocols

Edited by Luca Ricciardi, Giorgio Lofrese, Andrea Perna and Sokol Trungu

Chapter metrics overview

135 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devasting neurological condition producing physical dependency, morbidity, psychological stress, and financial burden. During the last 30 years, its global prevalence has increased from 236 to 1298 cases per million populations. Two types of spinal cord injury are primary and secondary injury. Primary injury is mechanical damage to the cord itself whereas secondary injury results from one or more biochemical and cellular processes that are triggered by the primary lesion. In 1700 BC, in an Egyptian surgical papyrus, they describe the frustration of health care professionals in treating a severe spinal cord injury, the Papyrus reported spinal fractures as a “disease that should not be treated”. Most of these studies approach a patient with acute spinal cord injury (ASCI) in one of four manners: corrective surgery or a physical, biological, or pharmacological treatment method. Science is unraveling the mechanisms of cell protection and neuroregeneration, but clinically, we only provide supportive care for patients with spinal cord injuries. By combining these treatments, researchers attempt to enhance the functional recovery of patients with spinal cord injuries. Advances in the last decade have allowed us to encourage the development of experimental studies in the field of spinal cord regeneration. The combination of several therapeutic strategies should, at a minimum, allow for partial functional recoveries for these patients, which could improve their quality of life. More studies were done on spinalized animals that indicate that most of these pharmacological agents may act on receptors present in the spinal cord, thus facilitate to produce coordinated locomotor movement, whereas some other drugs used to improve the neuropathological changes caused because of spinal cord injury (SCI), such as spasticity or demyelination, to improve walking.

Keywords

  • SCI
  • neuroregeneration
  • Papyrus
  • Chondroitinase ABC (ChABC)
  • NMDA
  • ganglioside

1. Introduction

Spinal cord injury (SCI) has a very tremendous impact on the affected individuals and their families, within developed nation annual cases of SCI are 11.5–53.4 cases per million, whereas alone in North America, over 1 million people are affected with direct lifetime costs around $1.1–4.6 million USD each [1, 2, 3]. The incidence rate of SCI has bimodal distribution having a different mechanism of injury from high energy impact in which youngsters are mostly affected i.e., motor vehicle accidents and injuries related to sports, to low energy injuries in which mostly older are affected i.e., fall from standing in the context of pre-existing stenosis. In Tehran, the annual incidence of SCI is 44 cases per 1, 000, 000 [4], whereas in European countries 5.5–195.4 cases per million [5]. Due to sensory and motor impairments, immobility, prolonged hospital stay, and changes in skin composition these subjects are more prone to develop pressure ulcers [6, 7]. Around 30–40% of SCI subjects develop pressure ulcers during the acute phase of injury and rehabilitation [8]. Ludwig Guttmann one of the great pioneers in the field of SCI rehabilitation explains in the year 1976 that SCI is the greatest disaster for affected human beings as along with disability it also leads to dysfunction of many body organs such as respiratory system, GIT, urinary and autonomic system including Joints, bones, and Skin. Due to dysfunction of multiple organs leads to immobility, serious complications &high mortality rate during both chronic & acute phase of injury.

Advertisement

2. Pathophysiology of SCI

After spinal cord injury, cord compression is the most common mechanism of injury and it is continued after injury [9]. Due to mechanical injury, because of rotation dislocation, flexion, extension, or distraction forces give rise to penetrating injuries and strain in vascular structure and in neural tissues [9]. Mechanical damage to bone and ligaments is related to cord compression, which gives rise to hematomas in the channels of the spinal cord [10]. During the early period of injury, bleeding begin to occur after spinal trauma and is later followed by the interruption of blood supply to nearby tissues because of cord compression [11]. Hypoxia and local ischemic infraction are the two main causes that create hindrance in blood flow after SCI [12]. The grey matter of the spinal cord is mostly damaged because of hypoxia and local ischemic infraction, where the metabolic function is high. Physically fractured neurons and reduced thickness of myelin sheath are mostly found in the damaged area [13]. In the damaged tissues deterioration in the neuronal transmission is promoted by edema and macrophage accumulation [14].

Secondary damage can be initiated by primary damage, whereas a number of pathophysiological mechanisms can come into play even hours and days after developing SCIs [15]. At the cellular level most notable mechanism that occurs after a secondary injury is lack of energy because of ischemia and impaired perfusion [16], Mostly after the occurrence of Traumatic SCI ischemia occurs immediately, and if it is left untreated, within after 3 hours additional damages occur which continue for at least 24 h [17, 18]. After secondary injury other crucial changes such as hemorrhage, edema, demyelination, axonal and neuronal necrosis along with the formation of cavity occurs, along with a series of pathological changes in nerve tissue following SCI, which gives rise to infarction [19], excitotoxicity, oxidative damage and ischemia, mostly occurs due to increased level of glutamate, whereas secondary damage in spinal cord occurs due to synthesis of Ca2+-dependent nitric oxide [20, 21]. After secondary injury, oxidative damage and lipid peroxidation occur in the cell membrane and neuronal death occurs because of activation of secondary injury signaling cascades at the areas of injured tissue [12, 22]. N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, throw a direct influence of the excitatory neurotransmitter in the spinal cord [23]. In animal models studies have revealed that the spinal cord affected by trauma and ischemia can be protected by blocking this NMDA receptor [23, 24], antagonists of NMDA receptor thus help in improving neurological outcomes and preventing the incidence of edema [25, 26], magnesium ions acts as antagonists of the NMDA receptor [14]. One of the previous studies has shown the role of antagonists of NMDA receptor i.e., α-amino-3-hydroxy- 5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA), in improving neurological function as well in reducing the injured area when it is administered [27]. One of the important excitatory neurotransmitters is glutamate located in the CNS, if over activation of this glutamate receptor occurs then it causes damage to neurons [28], so in the case of SCI, elevation in the level of excitatory amino acids including glutamate and aspartate occurs [29], within 15 min of SCI these excitatory amino acids reach to their toxic levels and it can last for more than 120 min [30]. After SCI, regeneration of axons in mammals is least, and they cannot regenerate correctly, which leads to permanent paralysis, soon after the injury at the injured site glial reactions occur and they form glial scar [31], microglia, oligodendrocyte precursors, meningeal cells, astrocytes and stem cells, as well as oligodendrocytes and myelin fragments are recruited by glial response [32, 33], but axon regeneration is inhibited by molecules release by these cells that hampers regeneration of neurons [34, 35]. Another important recovery inhibitory known as chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan (CSPG), is also produced by glial scar [36], so administration of natural bacterial enzyme Chondroitinase ABC (ChABC) helps in degrading the inhibitory carbohydrate side chains on CSPG, as well it also promotes regeneration of sensory axons and cortico spinal cord [37]. Growth-promoting effects of Chondroitinase ABC is because of the elimination of perineuronal nets, increased germination of spare axons, and the formation of new synaptic connections under the injured sites [38]. In the severed axon on the bridge side, ChABC promotes axonal regeneration [37]. Its potential therapeutic effect has been shown mostly in an animal model of SCI, nigrostriatal injury, and stroke [39, 40, 41]. PUFA or polyunsaturated are lipids have roles in the central nervous system, especially the major role is played by docosahexanoic acid, one of the major class of omega-3 fatty acids. Over the past decades, studies have proved the major role of omega-3 fatty acids in various CNS disorders including Zellweger syndrome, schizophrenia, depression, and Alzheimer’s disease [42]. Many studies on the animal model had proved its beneficial effect on different animals [43, 44, 45]. These mentioned studies have proven the neuroprotective effect of omega-3 fatty acids in ameliorating inflammatory responses [46, 47], decreasing oxidative stress, and suppressing glutamate-induced cytotoxicity, both in vivo and in vitro [48, 49, 50, 51].

Advertisement

3. Epidemiology

3.1 Indian epidemiological data

According to Chhabra HS [52] his retrospective study showed that (data between 2000 and 2016) during the study period the mortality rate was 10%, while the data from 16 years (758) subjects, quadriplegics, and paraplegics were 39% (294) or 61% (464). 679 subjects were approximately 81% male; the death rate from quadriplegia and paraplegia was 22% and 3%, respectively. Respiratory disease is the leading killer of hospital deaths. Due to the death rate in hospitals, there is a need to focus on respiratory management and the prevention of infections, especially in quadriplegics.

Jha RK, et al. [53], demonstrated in their prospective study observed that the major cause of spinal cord injury is RTA (road traffic accident) along with hills, roofs, trees, electricity pole, and stairs (70%) followed by fall from height, including trees, hills, stairs or roof of home (28%), most common age group is s 20–39 years followed by 50–59 years, cause of injury in age group 50–59 years is because of fall. Male is more prone to SCI, they collected data from march 2019 to march 2020 total of 198 cases (68 cases had thoracic injury. 86 patients had a lumbar spine injury and 22 patients had a cervical spine injury, and rest 22 patients had spine injury at more than one segment), 138 cases fall under the age group 25–50 years, whereas remaining 41 subjects were below 25 years of age and 19 subjects were found in 50 plus age group. Out of 198 cases, 136 cases were of RTA, 52 cases were of fall from height, 8 cases were of assault, 2 cases came after trivial injury who were later found to have atlantoaxial dislocation.

Sengupta D et al. [54] showed in their descriptive retrospective study that in patients with cervical spinal cord injury in low-middle-income countries (LMIC), ventilation exposure, hospitalization, and mortality are high and the main cause of mortality among them is due to poor AIS values, extended VD, intensive care and hospital stays, comprehensive CSCI rehabilitation programs are required to overcome this situation.

Jain M. et al. [55], in its retrospective observational study in the population of East India, collected data on August 15, 2018, and August 14, 2019, by including 103 patients with the injury in their study followed by RTA (37.9%), the ratio of men to Women (M: F) 5.87: 1, the most common age group in their study is 31–40 years, followed by 21–30 years and 41–50 year old.

According to Mittal S., et al RTA is the most common type of injury in men and FFH is the most common type of injury in women. The thoracolumbar junction (D10-L2) (37.5%) followed by the cervical spine (25.3%) is the most common injury site, and variations between the age group was 16–30 years were also observed in their study. Men were mainly affected in May/June (monsoons), while women mainly suffered trauma in March/April (summer).

Mathur and colleagues (2015) demonstrated in their study that occupational hazards like FFH (53%) & RTA (23%), carrying heavy object overhead (3.0%), and fall following electric shock (4.0%), and married couples are at high risk for spinal cord injury in comparison to singles, in their study married subjects were 58.3% which is similar to the studies from the Western countries (57.7%) [56].

Another study by Rai S et al., [57] also reported that the percentage of married couples was more in comparison to singles (70%).

Nirmala BP et al. [58] describe the socio-demographics of the subjects and showed that of 60 subjects, 36 were men (60%), while 23 subjects (38.3%) completed secondary school and 19 (31.7%) completed primary education level, 7 (11.7%) subjects have completed university education, 6 (10.0%) were illiterate. Students, day laborers, and housewives were 17 (28.3%), 16 (26.7%) and 13 (21.7%), respectively. 35 patients (58.3%) were married. 27 (45.0%) came from low-income families and 32 (53.3%) came from middle-income families. Both patients with traumatic SCS and non-traumatic SCS belong to the rural community compared to the urban community.

Krishnamurthy G, et al. [59] in his hospital-based cross-sectional study showed that younger age groups (20–49 years of age) were most often affected compared to older age groups of 50 years and over, while the most common injury site was at the level of the thorax (64.3%) followed by a lower cervical level in 21.4% of the cases. Patients with incomplete SCI (39.2%) were stronger compared those to a complete spinal cord. People with injuries (60.8%).

A study by Yusuf et al. [60] on 133 patients with traumatic paraplegia came to the conclusion that the majority of the patients were younger, in 72.2% of the cases road traffic injuries were the most common type of injury, the most common injury site is the cervical spine (62%) and complete spine injury (52.6%) is the most common type of injury in their study.

While in another study by Aswani Kumar et al. [61] in 152 SCI cases, adolescents were most affected, in which 71.7% of the cases were construction workers, this means in their study that a fall from a great height is a common form of injury (61.2%). Cases of cervical spine injury were 44.1%.

GZ et al. [62] showed in their review that in Asia the incidence rates of traumatic spinal cord injuries ranged from 12.06 to 61.6 per million and the mean age ranged from 26.8 to 56.6 years when male subjects were exposed to high risk are female and common types of injuries are motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) and falls, however, most countries have reported war injuries as the leading cause. The neurological level and extent of injury were mixed and subjects were classified based on AIS/Frankel grade A.

Chacko V, et al. [63] showed that of 218 subjects with spinal cord injuries who were admitted to a general hospital in rural India, 125 subjects were characterized by a neurological deficit. Infections and pressure ulcers were reported, and patients with injuries to the cervical spine were mostly eliminated, so their study emphasizes that general hospitals have no facilities.

Sridharan N, et al. [64] examined the epidemiology of spinal cord injuries in indoor patients (245) of the Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital, Chennai, India, and showed in their study that men are most affected compared to women (216 men). Subjects), the ratio between the male and female population is 8.8: 1.2, and the most common age group is ages 20–40 and the most common type of injury is a fall from a height, such as an injury in men is in Area of the cervical spine (C5 and C6) was high, followed by injuries in the segments at the dorsal level and on the lumbar spine, whereas in women the most common injury site was on the lumbar spine.

According to Pandey V et al. [65], RTA is the second largest mode of injury in SCI it is because of increased number of vehicles in metropolitan cities of a developing country like India so to minimize this traffic-related accidents strict traffic rules must be enforced on the public.

In another retrospective study by Lalwani S et al. [66] a total of 341 such cases were identified between January 2008 and December 2011, of which 288 people were male and 53 people were female, most people were between 25 and 64 years old, followed in young adults between 16 and 24 years of age (19, 35%) the ratio between men and women is 5.4: 1, 55% of the cases had isolated spinal injuries, cases had isolated spine injuries, cervical spine injury was observed in 259 patients (75.95%), thoracic spine injury was observed in 56 patients (16.42%) and thoracic spine injury was observed in 26 patients (7.62%) a thoracic and lumbar spine was observed. A higher drop in energy (44.28%) is the most common type of injury, followed by an RTA (41.93%); the patient’s death mostly occurred in phase IV (secondary to tertiary complications of the trauma, i.e., > 1 week), while in phase I forty patients died (brought dead or survived 3–24 h) and 70 in phase III (> 24 h to 7 days).

3.2 Worldwide epidemiological data

One of the most recent retrospective studies by Chen J, et al. [67] in the Chinese province of Guangdong via TSCI showed that the male to female ratio was 3.4: 1, meaning that of 482 cases, 384 subjects were male and 112 were female. The most affected age group was 45–60 years (41.7%), followed by 31–45 years (23.8%), the most common type of injury was a fall from a height (49.3%), followed by motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) (34.8%), and the most common injury site was the cervical spinal cord, C4–C6, which accounted for 39.8%.

Another descriptive cross-sectional study from Korea by Kim HS et al. [68] has shown that of 221 patients with spinal cord injury (161 traumatic and 60 non-traumatic) the most frequently affected age group was between 40 and 49 years, while in the case of non-traumatic SCI the age group affected by traumatic SCI was between 70 and 79 years. Male subjects were mainly affected by TSCI, compared to non-TSCI, while the most common cause of TSCI was a drop (37.3%), followed by a car accident (35.4%).%) and stumbling (19.3%) and, in non-traumatic SCI, neoplasia (35.0%). Tripping is the main cause, especially in the elderly.

Johansson E, et al. [69] in their prospective cohort study on SCI subjects from Finland over a 4 year period they enrolled 346 subjects and observed that the leading cause of injury were low-level falls (36.2%), high-level falls (25.5%), and transport-related accidents (19.2%), fall from height is the common mode of injury in subjects above 60 years of age, whereas in subjects below 60 years of age 47.4% cases were alcohol-related. Cervical injury is the most common type of injury in subjects above 60 years of age (77.1%), while less common in subjects below 60 years of age (59.6%). In summer and autumn season, the incidence of TSCI is high.

According to Darain H, et al. [70], one of their retrospective study in Pakistan from 2011 to 2016 concluded that male subjects are prone to at least 3 times higher than the female population and 90%) of the subjects were paraplegics. The majority of the illiterate class are more affected and most of the subjects are labors (21.4%) and in the female population majority of affected subjects are housewives (21.3%), and fall from height (30.4%), RTA (25.5%) and firearm injury (21.1%) are major cause of injury. Their retrospective study thus showed that firearm injury in the spinal cord is distinctive in Pakistan, which has not been reported in other countries.

Advertisement

4. Therapeutic possibilities

In the case of SCI repair, surgical techniques are used for more than 40 years [71, 72], most commonly used approach is surgical decompression with or without arthrodesis, but the chances of cervical and thoracic SCI subjects to walk is only 1% to 1.8% after an attempted surgical decompression [73]. Surgery plays a major role in spinal alignment, nerve decompression, and stabilization of the spine, which helps to prevent additional neurological injury. In reconstructive surgeries use of improved implants plays a role in stabilizing unstable fractures. The major role of surgery is to prevent further damage and rehabilitating the subjects [74]. Earlier decompression improves the chances of neurological recovery [75], as proved by many experimental studies. However, these studies did not coincide with the findings of the best clinical studies [76]. One of the studies performed on 2012 corroborated the findings of these experimental studies, this study implies that if decompression is performed within 24 hours after trauma, then the chances of functional recovery improves [77]. The first 24–36 h after injury represents a crucial time window for optimal neurological recovery with decompressive surgery following acute SCI [78]. In one of the studies on decompression surgery, which was performed on 77 subjects with follow-up assessment of 5 years by Anjarwalla et al. [79], to determine the long-term outcome concerning pain and physical function. They reported that back and leg pain was sustained for one year with improved physical function.

4.1 Physical means

To minimize secondary spinal cord damage, physical approaches are accessed as a better treatment method. Hypothermia, hyperbaric oxygen, and exercise, particularly on a treadmill, are the most studied technique under physical means. Most studies have shown the beneficial effect of local cooling by perfusion or irrigation with hypothermic saline. However, this cooling therapy prevents potassium loss, such as in steroid therapy. This technique works on the principle that low temperature protects the central nervous tissues from hypoxia and ischemia. However, this technique is challenging due to its high mortality rate.

Studies have shown that after SCI, Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBO) treatment prevents oxidative damage to the spinal cord [80]. Many studies on an animal model of SCI have demonstrated the neuroprotective effect of HBO, as it downgraded the overproduction of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and SCI-induced interleukin (I.L.)-1β. It also significantly alleviates the number of glial cells line-derived neurotrophic factor- and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-positive cells and spinal cord IL-10 production [81]. In a current metanalysis on R.C.T. by Huang, Liyi et al. 2021, a total of 1746 studies were identified by them in which 11 studies were included involving 875 participants, and they concluded that hyperbaric oxygen therapy might improve sensory, and motor function, as well as psychology after SCI, compared to conventional treatment. In contrast, it needs a large sample size and more R.C.T. to prove it.

4.2 Pharmacological therapy

Pharmacology plays a crucial role in treating SCI; the medication can play an essential role in treating secondary SCI, as many experimental and clinical trials prove. Corticosteroids and gangliosides are already approved for human use.

Michael G. Fehlings et al. 2017 in one of their systematic and meta-analysis, demonstrated that when methylprednisolone sodium succinate was administered within 24 hrs of postinjury has no relevant impact on long-term neurological recovery when all postinjury time points are considered. In contrast, within 8 hrs of injury, its administration showed an additional 3.2 points of motor recovery compared with patients receiving placebo or no treatment. Liu Z et al. 2019 have reported that in the case of acute traumatic SCI, high dose administration of methylprednisolone does not improve neurological outcomes despite increasing the risk of adverse events. Much work has been done with various secondary injury inhibitors, such as estrogen, in the hope of superior protection in secondary injury. Its analogues have been used in the case of the rat model to protect cells in culture and improve outcomes.

Advertisement

5. Effect of secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor

Due to primary injury, there is a dysfunction of blood supply in the cord due to the breakdown of blood spinal cord barrier (BSCB), because of which the spinal cord undergoes ischemia-reperfusion injury and oxidative stress [82, 83]. A recent study by Renzhe Tang et al. [84] demonstrated the protective role of Secretory Leukocyte Protease Inhibitor, which helps improve the S.C.I. by inhibiting the activity of the inflammatory signaling pathway, which releases a large number of inflammatory factors that can affect tissue repair. Hence, SLPI suppresses the Nuclear factor kappa beta (NF-κB) signaling pathway by binding to the tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-8 (IL-8) promoter region. In addition, due to its inflammatory anti-bacterial properties, SLPI promotes reducing secondary injury and other complications during SCI and helps in wound healing.

5.1 Brain-computer interfaces

Brain-computer interfaces play a vital role in restoring both gross and fine locomotion in paralyzed patients. It seeks to decode motor or cognitive intentions from the brain and translate the intentions to an effector: like a robotic arm and a mouse [85]. A BCI apparatus consists of the following parts: Electrodes that are placed directly on the brain tissue or in the epidural, subdural, or subarachnoid spaces, Decoder a device containing neural mapping algorithms, effector that the SCI patient would like to control (Jarosiewicz et al. Pre-made algorithms are used by the decoder to translate specific patterns of cortex excitement into a meaningful signal for the effector. In certain cases, presumably when the use of electrodes is contraindicated then in that case in place of electrodes magnetic resonance imaging is used to map blood-oxygen levels in the brain to transmit a signal to the decoder [86]. A study by Yang et al. [87]observed many multiple clinical studies where BCIs helped to momentarily restore locomotion to limbs. One of the clinical study showed that two quadriplegic subjects were able to control and perform 3D movements like grasping and stretching using a robotic arm that is connected to BCI successfully [87].

5.2 Cethrin

Rho signaling pathway is a significant barrier in axon regulation, and after SCI, this pathway is upregulated, hindering axon regeneration. (Forgoinen et al. 2014). A toxin produced by bacteria clostridium botulinum called c3 transferase has the property to block rho-mediated inhibition of axonal growth by blocking rho an (a type of rho protein) and promoting neuronal development [88]. The result of phase I/IIa clinical trial of a c3 transferase, ba-210 (trademarked as cethrin), was published by, Fehlings et al. 2011 when a single dose of the drug (0.3–9 mg), a permeable material, was applied at the time of decompressive surgery of SCI at dura matter, with acute complete injury of more than seven days on 48 patient then increased motor recovery and ais grade conversion from ASIA scale A to ASIA scale C or D at one year follow up was observed in approximately 6% of the thoracic spine injury patients and 66% of cervical spine injury, in spite that no serious events were reported regarding the drug.

5.3 Magnesium with polyethylene glycol

Magnesium is antagonistic of N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, which help in reducing inflammation and excitotoxicity. After traumatic spinal cord injury, it has been observed clinically and experimentally in human blood and brain of animals that magnesium is continuously depleting. This depletion is the major cause of poor neurological outcomes in humans and animals. The study [89] demonstrated that in the serum of T.B.I. patients significant decline of Mg2+ levels was measured and is linked to the severity of T.B.I. Previous clinical studies showed that it’s a multifactorial pharmacological intervention with proven safety, but it has yet to be investigated. Interestingly, it was proved clinically that Mg2+ in P.E.G. formulation is currently available treatment in the case of SCI and is more effective than methylprednisolone [90].

5.4 Nanoparticle-based therapy

Nanoparticle-based approaches in SCI have also played a significant role; in one of the study Cho et al. [91]. In a guinea pig contusion model, showed that treatment by polyethene glycol coated silica nanoparticles helps in restoring the integrity of neuronal membrane and leads to recovery of conduction through the SCI lesion. Wang YT et al. [92] in one of their study on a rat SCI model, demonstrated that local administration of gold nanoparticles conjugated with human NgR–Fc (hNgR-Fc) fusion protein vaccine promotes and improves the efficacy of repair in this rat model. Besides having their risks nowadays, nanoparticles-based drug formulation is of great choice for treatment in the case of SCI. In their study Wilson S, F et al. 2019 demonstrated the most beneficial effect of Dexamethasone acetate (DA) micelles; it shows promising outcomes in replenishing hindlimb function, in minimizing deformity of glial cells, formation of cyst around the injured point, helps in axonal regeneration and reduce the loss of neurons in case of S.C.I. Rasti Boroojen and his co-workers have shown the effect of co-electrospinning of poly-εcaprolacton (P.C.L.)-containing dexamethasone sodium phosphate-albumin (DEXP-BSA)-loaded chitosan nanoparticles for the repair of SCI. polyethene glycol coupled with single-walled carbon nanotubes plays major role in filling of cavities caused after traumatic SCI and thus help in axonal regeneration& repair and promotes functional recovery of the hindlimbs [93]. Chitosan, a polysaccharide polymer, is non-toxic, biodegradable, biocompatible, and accessible for surface modification due to it being preferred in biomedical sciences for wound healing, drug delivery and surgical adhesion. Chitosan nanoparticles are the best key player for functional recovery of motor and sensory neurons and are named “membrane sealant” after neurotrauma or S.C.I. episodes [94]. Another nanoparticle known as Roilipram has emerged as a promising candidate for targeting C.N.S. regeneration because of its ability to cross the blood-brain barrier. It is a phosphodiesterase (P.D.E.) IV inhibitor, known to uphold an apoptotic cell death, deplete both inflammatory cytokine and immune cell infiltration, increase cAMP via PDE IV inhibitor, reduce neuronal sensitivity, spare white matter space, and improve locomotor revival in SCI [95]. A polymeric micelle nanoparticle PgP [poly (lactide-co-glycolide)-graft-polyethylenimine] acts as a carrier for rolipram in SCI improvement developed by Mack et al. 2018. It has been polymerized for combinational delivery of therapeutic nucleic acids and drugs for SCI. repair; it has a hydrophobic core and hydrophilic shell, which carries rolipram and small-interfering R.N.A. to the site of SCI. Zonisamide, an antiepileptic drug chemically known as 1,2-benzisoxazole-3-methanesulfonamide, is a clinically approved drug used worldwide; this drug has been used in treating psychiatric and other neurological impairments. Zonisamide-loaded MPEG-PLLA-PTMC [monomethyl poly (ethylene glycol)- poly (l-lactide)- poly (trimethylene carbonate)] nanomicelles in the SCI model have targeted and recovered motor dysfunction which was induced in this model. other nanoparticles such as Self-assembled monomethoxy poly (ethylene glycol) – poly (d, l-lactic acid) diblock copolymer micelles have also shown promising results in reducing the inflammatory response in motor function recovery in spinal cord injured rats [96]. In case of primary injury, these particles act as sealing agents. Fang C et al. showed promising results of zonisamide-encapsulated gold nanoparticles in neuronal and axonal regeneration, thus contributing to SCI recovery. In the case of SCI, for cellular survival, intracellular signaling, and axonal transport, microtubule stability is an urgent demand. A clinically accepted nano-drug known as Paclitaxel has a hydrophobic nature. It acts as a regulator for mitosis and microtubule formation. Due to its hydrophobic nature, it’s easy to deliver at the targeted injured site and has shown promising improvement in SCI [97]. April Cox et al. 2020 in one of their latest studies on rodents, showed the beneficial role of low dose estrogen delivery to the injury site to the spinal cord using an agarose gel patch embedded with estrogen-loaded nanoparticles and markedly found decreased post-injury lesion size, reactive gliosis, and glial scar formation. In contrast, with an increase in the levels of glial cell-derived neurotrophic factors and axonal regeneration, vascular endothelial growth factor production also increases.

5.5 Exosomes for spinal cord injury repair

It’s a membrane-bound vesicles having 30–150 nm in diameter released by various cells and can carry intracellular contents including proteins, lipids, mRNA, and microRNA [98].

In case of SCI many studies have reported the importance of micro RNAs (miRNA) as it regulates RNA silencing and post-transcriptional modification of gene expression. miRNA-126 has shown promising results after SCI as it promotes angiogenesis and suppresses inflammation. One of the recent studies by Huang et al. [76] used MSC derived exosomes to deliver miRNA-126, to cure SCI in rat model, its administration promoted angiogenesis and neurogenesis at the injury site of SCI, in addition, miRNA-126 treated SCI rats had elevated Bax, caspase-3 and Bcl2 expression these findings suggest that miRNA-126 loaded exosomes inhibited apoptosis. Similarly, another study by Zhong et al. 2020 reported the role of neural stem cell-derived exosomes in SCI mouse model that at the injured site it of the spinal cord it starts promoting angiogenesis by upregulating vascular endothelial growth factor-A.

A study by Li et al. 2020 transplantation of MSC-derived exosomes immobilized in a peptide-modified adhesive hydrogel in SCI mouse model promoted neural and bladder function recovery after 28 days of transplantation.

U-83836E (2-[[4-(2,6-dipyrrolidin-1-ylpyrimidin-4-yl) piperazin-1-yl] methyl] -2,5,7,8-tetramethyl-3,4- dihydrochromen-6-ol dihydrochloride) is a second-generation of lazaroid (a class of lipophilic steroids that inhibits LPO), containing a non-steroidal structure and an α-tocopherol ring are some of the new antioxidants that plays role in neuroprotection as shown by many studies [99], U-83836E acts as neuroprotective played a major role in inhibiting the production of LPO, ROS, and RNS, in addition inhibiting calpain-dependent neurodegeneration and cascading events associated with secondary injury pathways [99]. melatonin (N-acetyl-5-methoxytryptophan), one of the drug plays a major role in scavenging away free radicals (ROS and RNS), suppressing lipid peroxidation and endogenous antioxidant enzyme expressions are also regulated by melatonin drug [100], It acts as a neuroprotectant by preserving the neuronal structure and increasing neuroprotection post-injury. In combination with dexamethasone (Melatonin + dexamethasone), it exerts a good neuroprotective effect by acting as an anti-inflammatory agent and improving locomotor function [100]. In case of the Traumatic Brain Injury model, this melatonin drug enhances the brain anti-oxidant level, suppress NF-kappa B activation, and enhances cognitive function [99]. Drug Resveratrol a natural phytoalexin exerts neuroprotective activity to suppress oxidative stress, post-SCI·oedema, Na+, K+-ATPase activity, glutamate excitotoxicity, neuro-regeneration and thus improves neurological activity during SCI [101].

5.6 Non-pharmacological approaches

Vitamins, growth factors, and cultured cells are categorized under non-pharmacological approaches as these help in reducing SCI complications such as pain, swelling, and improve locomotor activity through non-medication approaches. As these approaches are beneficial for a short duration so for long-term clinical efficacy they should be combined with pharmacological agents [102], That’s the reason in case of prevention and treatment of ischemic brain injury require multiple interventions.

But, this approach needs more research, particularly those with few side effects [103]. Natural vitamins like vitamins A, E, and C are antioxidants that mostly attack the generation of ROS and RNS that further retard LPO and cellular damage. By retarding the formation of lipid hydroperoxides vitamin C contributes in protecting the membrane from destruction. It also enhances following neuroprotective pathways by diminishing the necrotic tissues and promotes functional recovery, suppressing the generation & expression of ROS, LPO, and proteins such as NF-kB, iNOS, and COX-2, downregulating the levels of TNFα and IL-1β, and controlling the antioxidant status and MPO activity[104]. Vitamin E also promotes functional recovery by suppressing the production of ROS, RNS, LPO, glutathione activity, and reducing peroxidases [105].

Gangliosides, a glycolipid molecule derived from sialic acid, in vitro studies have observed that gangliosides, help in increasing the formation and growth of neurites, protoplasmic expansions of axons that originate new functional connections, induce neuronal regeneration, and promote neuroplasticity [106]. In case of SCI most studied ganglioside is GM1, studies have observed that SCI subjects who are receiving GM1, ganglioside has much more improvement in sensory and motor functions along with sphincter function in comparison to subjects who are on placebos [107]. In incomplete SCI subjects who received GM1in combination with physical therapy have improved motor scores and walking velocity and distance in comparison to subjects who were either on placebo or physical therapy alone [108]. In traumatic SCI subjects with neurological damage, have recommended ganglioside loading dose is 300 mg for 30 days, i.e., 100 mg once daily via intravenous or intramuscular injection. Ganglioside should not be administered simultaneously with methylprednisolone [107].

5.7 Nimodipine

Nimodipine, an L type calcium channel blocker, showed a moderate result in the case of spasticity, one of the significant comorbidities of the spinal cord that hampers the quality of life and motor recovery. One of the studies performed by Maite Marcanton et al. [109] in a mouse model of chronic SCI showed that nimodipine ultimately hampers the development of spasticity measured as increased muscle tone and spontaneous spasms. Nimodipine improves blood flow to the injured spinal cord in the laboratory setting. The abnormal muscle activities associated with spasticity remain inhibited even after the stoppage of the treatment. Constitutive and conditional silencing of the L-type calcium channel CaV1.3 in neuronal subtypes demonstrated that this channel-mediated the preventive effect of nimodipine on spasticity after SCI This study identifies a treatment protocol and suggests targeting CaV1.3 could prevent spasticity after SCI [110].

5.8 Anti-nogo antibodies

Inhibitory molecules present in the myelin obstruct the regeneration of axon in the injured CNS myelin-associated protein nogo a is the most potent inhibitor, so after nervous system injury, neutralization of nogo-a exhibits axonal regeneration in the injured tract and compensatory sprouting of uninjured tracts in animal studies. Anti-nogo, an IgG antibody, has undergone a phase I safety trial in human subjects with acute sci as it also promotes axonal regeneration in C.N.S. injury. Zorner et al. [111] in his study showed the potent role of human anti-human-nogo-a antibody in 52 patients with ASIA A to C cervical or thoracic injuries by administrating it within 4–14 days of injury for periods ranging from 24 h to 4 weeks, intrathecally into the lumbar spine, no adverse event of this antibody was reported, but efficacy trials are still ongoing (www.clinicaltrials.gov, nct00406016). Loss of bladder control is a common problem after spinal cord injury. In ASCI subjects, a human phase-i safety and tolerability trial with the intrathecal application of anti-nogo-a antibodies has been successfully concluded [112]. In patients with acute tetraplegia for upper-limb motor recovery, a phase-two randomized European multicenter trial is still going on (https://nisci-2020.eu).Bladder parameters will be monitored as part of the panel of secondary readouts in this trial. Data addressing potential beneficial effects of nogo-suppression after SCI in humans should become available soon. Klaus Kutcher et al. [112] demonstrated the role of an anti-nogo antibody in humans. It assessed this antibody’s pharmacokinetics, tolerability, and feasibility ati35 by administrating it intrathecally in 52 patients with acute, complete traumatic paraplegia and tetraplegia. Treatment started 4 to 60 days post-injury in SCI subjects. There was no adverse event reported regarding ati355. In the case of paraplegic subjects, motor scores improved by 8 points, while in tetraplegic patients, mean total motor scores increased, with 3/19 gaining >10 points, and 19/27 points at week 48. In their review, Raihan Mohammed et al. 2020 describe the beneficial use of anti-nogo antibodies in rats and primates in upregulating C.N.S. regeneration and improving sensory and motor function. In treatment with anti-nogo antibodies in the case of sci subjects, no adverse event has been reported, although genetic evidence for its efficacy is mixed. Rong-Rong Zhao et al. 2013 in his study showed the effective response of combined treatment of anti-nogo-A and chondroitinase abc in the treatment of SCI subjects, anti-nogo a therapy promotes the growth of the more significant number of axons having a diameter of > 3 μm and growth of finer axons with varicosities is promoted by treatment of ch abc, these results point to different functions of nogo-a and chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans in axonal regeneration. In contrast, the combination of both shows enhanced functional recovery. According to their protocol, the first administered anti-nogo-a or the control antibody anti-cyclosporin a by intrathecal infusion from the osmotic pump for two weeks in rats. After that, the pump was removed two weeks after the lesion. After one week of removing the pump, rats were given ch abc or the control enzyme penicillinase above and below the lesion through intraspinal injection. Subsequently, the rats received five intrathecal infusions of enzyme on alternate days for ten days; the rats in all groups started rehabilitation training one month after the lesion, seven days after the first enzyme injection.

5.9 Cell transplantation therapies

It is the most promising therapeutic therapy for SCI treatment. Nowadays, various stem cells and mature somatic cells (neural stem cell, embryonic/pluripotent stem cells, mesenchymal/hematopoietic neural cells, oligodendrocytes, astrocytes, Schwann cells, and olfactory ensheathing cells) stem cells are used as transplantation therapy to treat various stages of SCI [113].

5.10 Autologous mesenchymal stem cells (MSC)

Ling Ling Liau et al. 2020, in their recent review, concluded the beneficial role of mesenchymal stem cell therapy in the case of sci, including novel biological therapies that can be applied along with MSC to enhance its efficacy. MSC’s application in the injured spinal cord helps reduce secondary injury and protects the neural elements that survived the initial mechanical insult by suppressing the inflammation. M.S.C.s are also shown to differentiate into neuron-like cells and help rebuild damaged nerve tissues by stimulating neural stem cell proliferation. As M.S.C.s secretes paracrine factors that help protect the remaining axon and promote the regeneration of axons, it helps replace damaged cells by differentiating them into nerve cells [114]. The secretion of VEGF, H.G.F., IGF-I, stanniocalcin-1, TGF-β, and GM-CSF promotes the survival of damaged neurons and oligodendrocytes M.S.C.s. [115]. Hur et al. [116] in one of their studies demonstrated the role of an autologous adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cell by intrathecal transplantation of it in 14 subjects with SCI; there was improvement shown in sensory function in 10 subjects, motor function improvement was shown in 5 subjects, whereas improved voluntary anal contraction was reported in 2 subjects with SCI. But in the M.R.I. examination, the lesion size remained unchanged. Bydon et al. 2020 demonstrated the beneficial role of 100 million autologous ADSCs in treating SCI subjects. ADSCs were delivered intrathecally in the subjects. There was improvement shown in ASIA sensory and motor score and quality of life, as indicated by the higher Global Health Score. Jarocha et al. 2015 reported that after SCI injury in a 15 years old patient with complete injury AIS (A) transplantation of BMNCs at ten weeks and then subsequent transplantation of autologous BMSCs at every 3–4 months for five times, and in 2 years follow up, AIS grade improved from C to D (score increased from 112 to 231), and patient also received bladder filling sensation, control over the bladder, the anal sensation was restored, control over the body trunk, improvement in muscle strength of lower extremities from plegia to deep paresis and subject began to stand and walk with support. Sharma et al. 2013 in his study of 56 subjects with chronic SCI (mean duration of injury 64 months), transplanted BMNCs in them and found improvement in A.I.S. grade of 4 patients while improvement in Functional Independence Measure (F.I.M.) score was observed in 24 patients. Marcus Vinícius Pinheiro Mendonça et al. 2014 conducted a non-control study in 14 subjects of both genders of traumatic injury of fewer than six months of thoracic or lumbar level. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell was directly injected into the lesion following laminectomy and durotomy after culturing and characterizing it by flow cytometry, cell differentiation assays, and G-band karyotyping. In all the subjects, improvement in tactile sensitivity was observed, gain in motor function in the lower limb, especially in the hip flexor, was observed in 8 subjects, sacral sparing was presented in 7 subjects, and improved (A.I.S.) grades to B or C – incomplete injury. In contrast, improvement in urologic function was observed in 9 subjects, while in 1 subject, improvement in somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) was observed. Zhilai Zhou et al. 2020, in their study on a mouse model, demonstrated the role of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell (ADSC) transplantation on the inflammatory reaction after SCI and the potential mechanism mediated by Jagged1/Notch signaling pathway suppression. Zengjie Fan et al. 2020. Design fabricated pre vascularized nerve conduits (P.N.C.) based on the pre vascularized stem cell sheet. They demonstrated its repair effect in transected SCI rats; they found that for promoting better healing of SCI, improving the condition of ischemia and hypoxia, and inhibiting glial scar formation P.N.C. is potential alternative material biomaterials and the best effective solution for SCI rehabilitation. Many studies have shown that stem cells revealed their therapeutic role by secreting factors into their surroundings via a paracrine mechanism, like extracellular vesicles, one of the emerging extracellular vesicles has diameter 40–150 nm. They have attracted increasing attention in regenerative medicine called exosomes [98]. They act as the communication medium between cells by carrying different proteins, lipids, R.N.A. (mRNA, noncoding R.N.A., etc.), and other biological macromolecules and regulating the gene expression or protein synthesis of target cells; they influence the physiological function of the targeted cell [117]. Studies also showed that when human adipose mesenchymal stem cells (hADSCs)-derived exosomes were injected in and around the wounds in rodents’ skin, they significantly promoted angiogenesis at the lesion site and accelerated wound healing [116]. Besides that, exogenous stem cell exosomes also facilitate tissue regeneration and repair at the injured site when directly administered [118]. Rong Y et al. 2019 demonstrated that neural stem cell-derived exosomes (NSCs-Exos) after traumatic spinal cord injury reduce neuroinflammation and cell apoptosis by mediating the activation of autophagy. Dong Zhong et al. 2020 demonstrated in their study that after traumatic spinal cord injury, the weakly physical strength of spinal cord microvascular endothelial cells (SCMECs) is one of the leading causes of augmentation of the spinal cord. Therefore, to promote recovery after spinal cord injury, it is crucial to improve the plasticity and regeneration of SCMECs, So they focused on the influence of exosomes derived from neural stem cells. So, they extracted primary SCMECs from the spinal cord tissue of C57 mice and neural stem cells from 14 days pregnant C57 mouse after that, exosomes were isolated from N.S.C.s conditioned medium. After that co-incubated with the SCMECs in vitro, the result showed that NSCs-Exos could enhance the angiogenic activities of SCMECs and were highly enriched in VEGF-A; they accelerated the microvascular regeneration, reduced the spinal cord cavity and improved Basso mouse scale scores in spinal cord injury mice (Table 1).

CompoundClassMode of action
IndomethacinNon-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) is a nonselective cyclooxygenase inhibitor (COX)Prostaglandin production is inhibited and tissue necrosis is prevented. This drug also blocks RhoA synthesis that involves in preventing axonal regeneration, loss of oligodendrocytes & axonal myelination is prevented by Indomethacin [119, 120].
MeloxicamCOX2 inhibitorProstaglandin production is inhibited, reduction in oxidative stress and exerts neuroprotective effect by suppressing the production of ROS, LPO, GSH, an DNA fragmentation [121].
Cyclosporine AImmunosuppressantIt inhibits helper T lymphocytes, cytotoxic and inflammatory responses in macrophages, suppress the expression of nitric oxide synthase suppresses the production of tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α) and expression of IL-1, IL-2, and IL-6 [122].
Tacrolimus (FK506)Immunosuppressant (isolated from Streptomyces tsukubanensis)It exerts a neuroprotective effect on T cells and modulates inflammation, in addition, suppress caspase-3, NF-kB and promotes survival of oligodendrocytes [119].
A91 (87–99 immunogenic sequence)Neural peptide INDPIt promotes neuroprotection by activating T-lymphocytes, Th2 anti-inflammatory activity, and promote brain-derived neurotropic factor (BDNF). iNOS expression production of ON, LPO generation is inhibited by INDP after SCI thus prevents apoptosis [119, 123].
MetforminHypoglycemic drug, AMP-protein kinase (AMPK), an agonist.Apoptosis is prevented by this drug by suppressing the activity of two pathways i.e., mTOR and p70S6K promoting autophagy and inhibiting NF-kB inflammation, also regulate TNFα and IL-1β inflammatory cytokines [119].

Table 1.

Immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory drugs are commonly reported to use during SCI.

5.11 Nutritional supplementation

Mostafa Hosseini et al. 2020 in one of their meta-analyses on the role of nutritional supplementation of Vit C &E on spinal cord injury animal model and concluded that daily supplementation of both nutraceuticals either alone or in combination significantly helps in improving motor function in animals suffering from SCI, in addition, studies proved that supplementation of vitamin C is only effective when administered intraperitoneally, whereas concomitant supplementation of both vitamins does not show better efficacy than treatment of both vitamins alone. Due to its antioxidative properties, Vitamin C or ascorbic acid protects other organs, including the spinal cord, in an animal model. Wang et al. 2015 in their study demonstrated that supplementation of vitamin C is effective against renal damage induced due to SCI by inhibiting proinflammatory cytokines and nuclear factor-kappa. In another study conducted by Chao Chen et al. 2020 on nutritional supplementation of combined effects of taurine and Ascorbic acid in SCI induced rats. They divided the rats into four groups: sham, control, 100 mg/kg of taurine, 100 mg/kg of ascorbic acid, and 100 mg/kg of taurine + 100 mg/kg of ascorbic acid, and continued his treatment daily for 45 consecutive days and reported that the combined treatment of taurine and ascorbic acid decreased the activity of caspase-3 by 33.7% and p53 by 44% respectively, as well as activity of pro-NGF, mRNA expression of interleukin-6 (IL-6), cyclooxygenase-2, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS as compared to the individual treatment of both taurines as well as vitamin C. Whereas changed antioxidant markers were recovered and induced lipid peroxidation comes to its normal level after the combined treatment of both. In his study on adult Sprague-Dawley rats, Kathia Cordero et al. 2018 demonstrated when fed with a normal diet. In another group, when fed with a dietary regiment supplemented with vitamin E (51 IU/g) for eight weeks after that, the rats were exposed to contusive SCI or sham operation; they reported that rats that were administered with vitamin E enriched diet showed accelerated bladder recovery, as well as improved locomotory function compared to rats that were fed with normal diets, as well as several oligodendrocytes in the ventral horns, were also increased. In one of the latest studies, K Pritchett et al. 2019 demonstrated the beneficial role of Vit D supplementation in athletes with spinal cord injury because athletes with SCI have insufficient status of 25(O.H.) vitamin D (25(O.H.)D) that is associated with decreased muscle strength. In their study, Thirty-four members (age: 33  ±  15 years, weight: 69.6  ±  28.2 kg, and height: 170.2  ±  25.4 cm) of the U.S. and Canadian Paralympic program participated in the study. After pre and post supplementation of Vitamin D(50,000 IU/week) for eight weeks to subjects deficient in 25(OH) D, and to subjects showing the insufficient status of 25(O.H.), D received 35,000 IU/week for four weeks, after that, both groups received a maintenance dose of 15,000 IU/week. They received supplementation of Vitamin D totally for 12- to 16-week. It was observed that 26% of athletes had sufficient 25(O.H.)D concentrations pre supplementation. In contrast, about 91% had sufficient concentrations post supplementation, whereas handgrip strength is improved post supplementation in about 62% of participants, whereas no change in 20-m wheelchair sprint performance was observed. Bi J, et al. [105] demonstrated the antioxidant & anti-inflammatory role of omega-3 fatty acid in spinal cord injury in the rat model, their study showed that as the concentration of omega-3 fatty was increased more effective result was obtained such as reduced oxidative stress markers, inflammatory markers, and apoptosis. As omega-3 fatty acid usually modify multiple pathways that are responsible for secondary damage following SCI. Studies have confirmed that subjects who are administrating long-chain omega-3 fatty acid before injury they restore cord lipid homeostasis, exerts neuroprotection, dysfunction of sensorimotor, and neuropathic pain is prevented by omega-3 fatty acid as well it promotes locomotor recovery both in acute & sensory phase of SCI [73]. One of the studies on SCI-induced rats has proved the neuroprotective effect of omega-3 fatty acid, it mainly suppresses the activation of inflammasomes following SCI. Their study showed that PUFA mainly suppresses activation of microgliosis, whereas oligodendrocytes number got increased with its consumption, and demyelination got suppressed [74].

Advertisement

6. Conclusion

Mammalian nervous system was unable to regenerate or repair itself as axons have least capacity to regenerate after devasting injury. Science is continuously searching the mechanism of protecting cell and axonal regeneration, but clinically still we are only providing support to SCI Subjects. Therapeutic approaches made in the last decades have only open field in the experimental work in the field of spinal cord regeneration. The combination of several strategies, either pharmacological or non-pharmacological should make minimum or partial functional recovery in SCI subjects, which might facilitate in improving their quality of life. Research has proved that above mentioned therapeutic approaches have proved very beneficial in these subjects.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi, (F.N.5/9/1311/2020-Nut) for the financial assistance.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The authors have no potential conflict of interest. The disclosure of potential conflict of interest in the prescribed format has been obtained from all the authors.

References

  1. 1. Center NSCIS. Spinal cord injury facts and figures at a glance. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine. 2014;37:117-118
  2. 2. Foundation CaDR. One Degree of Separation: Paralysis and Spinal Cord Injury in the United States. 2010. Available at: http://www.christopherreeve.org/site/c.ddJFKRNoFiG/b.5091685/k.58BD/One_Degree_of_Separation.htm
  3. 3. Sekhon LH, Fehlings MG. Epidemiology, demographics, and pathophysiology of acute spinal cord injury. Spine. 2001;26:S2-S12
  4. 4. Rahimi-Movaghar V, Moradi-Lakeh M, Rasouli MR, Vaccaro AR. Burden of spinal cord injury in Tehran, Iran. Spinal Cord. 2010;48(6):492
  5. 5. Jazayeri SB, Beygi S, Shokraneh F, Hagen EM, Rahimi-Movaghar V. Incidence of traumatic spinal cord injury worldwide: A systematic review. European Spine Journal. 2015;24(5):905-918
  6. 6. Li C, DiPiro N, Cao Y, Szlachcic Y, Krause J. The association between metabolic syndrome and pressure ulcers among individuals living with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2016;54(11):967
  7. 7. Iyun AO, Malomo AO, Oluwatosin OM, Ademola SA, Shokunbi MT. Pattern of presentation of pressure ulcers in traumatic spinal cord injured patients in university college hospital, Ibadan. International Wound Journal. 2012;9(2):206-213
  8. 8. Mathew A, Samuelkamaleshkumar S, Radhika S, Elango A. Engagement in occupational activities and pressure ulcer development in rehabilitated south Indian persons with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2013;51(2):150
  9. 9. Wasner G, Naleschinski D, Baron R. A role for peripheral afferents in the pathophysiology and treatment of at-level neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury? A case report. Pain. 2007;131:219-225
  10. 10. Vaidyanathan S, Soni BM, Sett P, Watt JW, Oo T, Bingley J. Pathophysiology of autonomic dysreflexia: Long-term treatment with terazosin in adult and paediatric spinal cord injury patients manifesting recurrent dysreflexic episodes. Spinal Cord. 1998;36:761-770
  11. 11. Austin JW, Afshar M, Fehlings MG. The relationship between localized subarachnoid inflammation and parenchymal pathophysiology after spinal cord injury. Journal of Neurotrauma. 2012;29:1838-1849
  12. 12. Yezierski RP. Pain following spinal cord injury: Pathophysiology and central mechanisms. Progress in Brain Research. 2000;129:429-449
  13. 13. Nickel M, Gu C. Regulation of central nervous system myelina- tion in higher brain functions. Neural Plasticity. 2018;2018:6436453
  14. 14. Fehlings MG, Agrawal S. Role of sodium in the pathophysi- ology of secondary spinal cord injury. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995;20:2187-2191
  15. 15. Schwartz G, Fehlings MG. Secondary injury mechanisms of spinal cord trauma: A novel therapeutic approach for the management of secondary pathophysiology with the sodium channel blocker riluzole. Progress in Brain Research. 2002;137:177-190
  16. 16. Sharma HS, Patnaik R, Sharma A, Sjoquist PO, Lafuente JV. Silicon dioxide nanoparticles (SiO2, 40-50 nm) exacerbate pathophysiology of traumatic spinal cord injury and deteriorate functional outcome in the rat. An experimental study using pharmacological and morphological approaches. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. 2009;9:4970-4980
  17. 17. Valles M, Mearin F. Pathophysiology of bowel dysfunction in patients with motor incomplete spinal cord injury: Comparison with patients with motor complete spinal cord injury. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 2009;52:1589-1597
  18. 18. Xiong Y, Hall ED. Pharmacological evidence for a role of peroxynitrite in the pathophysiology of spinal cord injury. Experimental Neurology. 2009;216:105-114
  19. 19. Agrawal SK, Nashmi R, Fehlings MG. Role of L- and N-type calcium channels in the pathophysiology of traumatic spinal cord white matter injury. Neuroscience. 2000;99:179-188
  20. 20. Furlan JC, Fehlings MG. Cardiovascular complications after acute spinal cord injury: Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. Neurosurgical Focus. 2008;25:E13
  21. 21. Hayta E, Elden H. Acute spinal cord injury: A review of patho- physiology and potential of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for pharmacological intervention. Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy. 2018;87:25-31
  22. 22. Hall ED. Pathophysiology of spinal cord injury. Current and future therapies. Minerva Anestesiology. 1989;55:63-66
  23. 23. Aarabi B, Olexa J, Chryssikos T, Galvagno SM, Hersh DS, Wessell A, et al. Extent of Spinal Cord Decompression in Motor Complete (American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale Grades A and B) Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury Patients: Post-Operative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis of Standard Operative Approaches. Journal of Neurotrauma. 2019;36:862-876
  24. 24. Akhmetzyanova ER, Mukhamedshina YO, Zhuravleva MN, Galieva LR, Kostennikov AA, Garanina EE, et al. Transplantation of microglia in the area of spinal cord injury in an acute period increases tissue sparing, but not functional recovery. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience. 2018;12:507
  25. 25. Aguiar SA, Baker SN, Gant K, Bohorquez J, Thomas CK. Intermuscular coherence. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2018;120:1765-1771
  26. 26. Tang Y, Liu HL, Min LX, Yuan HS, Guo L, Han PB, et al. Serum and cerebrospinal fluid tau protein level as biomarkers for evaluating acute spinal cord injury severity and motor function outcome. Neural Regeneration Research. 2019;14:896-902
  27. 27. Sharma HS. Neurotrophic factors in combination: A possible new therapeutic strategy to influence pathophysiology of spinal cord injury and repair mechanisms. Current Pharmaceutical Design. 2007;13:1841-1874
  28. 28. Alizadeh A, Santhosh K, Kataria H, Karimi-Abdolrezaee S. Neuregulin-1 positively modulates neuroinflammation and improves functional recovery following traumatic spinal cord injury. Journal of Neurotrauma. 2018;35:A32-A32
  29. 29. Baklaushev VP, Durov OV, Kim SV, Gulaev EV, Gubskiy IL, Konoplyannikov MA, et al. Development of a motor and somatosensory evoked potentials-guided spinal cord Injury model in non-human primates. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 2019;311:200-214
  30. 30. Bonizzato M, Pidpruzhnykova G, DiGiovanna J, Shkorbatova P, Pavlova N, Micera S, et al. Brain-controlled modula- tion of spinal circuits improves recovery from spinal cord injury. Nature Communications. 2018;9:3015
  31. 31. Huebner EA, Strittmatter SM. Axon regeneration in the peripheral and central nervous systems. Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation. 2009;48:339-351
  32. 32. Barritt AW, Davies M, Marchand F, Hartley R, Grist J, Yip P, et al. Chondroitinase ABC promotes sprouting of intact and injured spinal systems after spinal cord injury. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2006;26:10856-10867
  33. 33. Caggiano AO, Zimber MP, Ganguly A, Blight AR, Gruskin EA. Chondroitinase ABCI improves locomotion and bladder function following contusion injury of the rat spinal cord. Journal of Neurotrauma. 2005;22:226-239
  34. 34. Gold BG, Densmore V, Shou W, Matzuk MM, Gordon HS. Immunophilin FK506-binding protein 52 (not FK506-binding protein 12) mediates the neurotrophic action of FK506. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 1999;289:1202-1210
  35. 35. Kang CB, Hong Y, Dhe-Paganon S, Yoon HS. FKBP family proteins: Immunophilins with versatile biological functions. Neurosignals. 2008;16:318-325
  36. 36. Iaci JF, Vecchione AM, Zimber MP, Caggiano AO. Chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans in spinal cord contusion injury and the effects of chondroitinase treatment. Journal of Neurotrauma. 2007;24:1743-1759
  37. 37. Iseda T, Okuda T, Kane-Goldsmith N, Mathew M, Ahmed S, Chang YW, et al. Single, high-dose intra- spinal injection of chondroitinase reduces glycosaminoglycans in injured spinal cord and promotes corticospinal axonal regrowth after hemisection but not contusion. Journal of Neurotrauma. 2008;25:334-349
  38. 38. Weissmiller AM, Wu C. Current advances in using neuro- trophic factors to treat neurodegenerative disorders. Translational Neurodegeneration. 2012;1:14
  39. 39. Kwok JC, Afshari F, Garcia-Alias G, Fawcett JW. Proteoglycans in the central nervous system: Plasticity, regen- eration and their stimulation with chondroitinase ABC. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience. 2008;26:131-145
  40. 40. Grimpe B, Silver J. A novel DNA enzyme reduces glycosami- noglycan chains in the glial scar and allows microtransplanted dorsal root ganglia axons to regenerate beyond lesions in the spinal cord. Journal of Neuroscience. 2004;24:1393-1397
  41. 41. McRae PA, Porter BE. The perineuronal net component of the extracellular matrix in plasticity and epilepsy. Neurochemical International. 2012;61:963-972
  42. 42. Calon F, Cole G. Neuroprotective action of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids against neurodegenerative diseases: Evidence from animal studies. Prostaglandins Leukotic Essential Fatty Acids. 2007;77:287-293
  43. 43. Liu ZH, Yip PK, Adams L, Davies M, Lee JW, Michael GJ, et al. A single bolus of docosahexaenoic acid promotes neuroplastic changes in the innervation of spinal cord interneurons and motor neurons and improves functional recovery after spinal cord injury. Journal of Neuroscience. 2015;35:12733-12752
  44. 44. Pallier PN, Poddighe L, Zbarsky V, Kostusiak M, Choudhury R, Hart T, et al. A nutrient combination designed to enhance synapse formation and function improves outcome in experimental spinal cord injury. Neurobilogy Diseases. 2015;82:504-515
  45. 45. Yip PK, Bowes AL, Hall JC, Burguillos MA, Ip TR, Baskerville T, et al. Docosahexaenoic acid reduces microglia phagocytic activity via miR-124 and induces neuroprotection in rodent models of spinal cord contusion injury. Human Molecular Genetics. 2019;28:2427-2448
  46. 46. Kwon BK, Tetzlaff W, Grauer JN, Beiner J, Vaccaro AR. Pathophysiology and pharmacologic treatment of acute spinal cord injury. Spine Journal. 2004;4:451-464
  47. 47. Popovich PG, Wei P, Stokes BT. Cellular inflammatory response after spinal cord injury in Sprague-Dawley and Lewis rats. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 1997;377:443-464
  48. 48. King VR, Huang WL, Dyall SC, Curran OE, Priestley JV, Michael-Titus AT. Omega-3 fatty acids improve recovery, whereas omega-6 fatty acids worsen outcome, after spinal cord injury in the adult rat. Journal of Neuroscience. 2006;26:4672-4680
  49. 49. Huang WL, King VR, Curran OE, Dyall SC, Ward RE, Lal N, et al. A combination of intravenous and dietary docosahexaenoic acid significantly improves outcome after spinal cord injury. Brain Journal of Neurology. 2007;130:3004-3019
  50. 50. Hogyes E, Nyakas C, Kiliaan A, Farkas T, Penke B, Luiten PG. Neuroprotective effect of developmental docosahexaenoic acid supplement against excitotoxic brain damage in infant rats. Neuroscience. 2003;119:999-1012
  51. 51. Wang X, Zhao X, Mao ZY, Wang XM, Liu ZL. Neuroprotective effect of docosahexaenoic acid on glutamate-induced cytotoxicity in rat hippocampal cultures. Neuroreport. 2003;14:2457-2461
  52. 52. Chhabra HS, Sharawat R, Vishwakarma G. In-hospital mortality in people with complete acute traumatic spinal cord injury at a tertiary care center in India—a retrospective analysis. Spinal Cord. 2021;25:1-6. DOI: 10.1038/s41393-021-00657-x
  53. 53. Jha RK, Gupta R. Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury, an Overview of Epidemiology and Management in Vindhya Region. Executive Editor. 2021;12:304
  54. 54. Sengupta D, Bindra A, Kumar N. Respiratory morbidity and mortality of traumatic cervical spinal cord injury at a level I trauma center in India. Spinal Cord Series and Cases. 2021;13:1-8. DOI: 10.1038/s41394-020-00371-5
  55. 55. Jain M, Mohanty CR, Doki SK. Traumatic spine injuries in Eastern India: A retrospective observational study. International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science. 2021;11:79. DOI: 10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_95_20
  56. 56. Migliorini CE, New PW, Tonge BJ. Quality of life in adults with spinal cord injury living in the community. Spinal Cord. 2011;49(3):365-370
  57. 57. Rai S, Ganvir S. A retrospective study of demographic profile of patients with spinal cord injury admitted in a tertiary care hospital in Ahmadnagar, India. International Journal of Physiotheraphy Research. 2019;7:1034-1039
  58. 58. Nirmala BP, Srikanth P, Janardhana MN. Clinical and sociodemographic profiles of persons with spinal cord injury. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care. 2020;9:4890
  59. 59. Krishnamurthy G, Kumar G. A hospital based cross-sectional study on clinical profile of patients with spinal cord injuries. MRIMS Journal of Health Sciences. 2020;8:61. DOI: 10.4103/mjhs.mjhs_19_20
  60. 60. Yusuf AS, Mahmud MR, Alfin DJ. Clinical characteristics and challenges of management of traumatic spinal cord injury in a trauma center of a developing country. Journal of Neuroscience Rural Practise. 2019;10:393-399. DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1695696
  61. 61. Aswani Kumar K, Subrahmanyam BV, Phanindra SV. Demographic pattern, clinical profile and outcome of traumatic spinal cord injuries at a tertiary care hospital. Romanian Neurosurgery. 2015;3:312-317
  62. 62. Ning GZ, Wu Q, Li YL. Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury in Asia: A systematic review. Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine. 2012;1:229-239. DOI: 10.1179/2045772312Y.0000000021
  63. 63. Chacko V, Joseph B, Mohanty SP, Jacob T. Management of spinal cord injury in a general hospital in rural India. Spinal Cord. 1986;24:330-335. DOI: 10.1038/sc.1986.48
  64. 64. Sridharan N, Uvaraj N, Dhanagopal M. Epidemiologic evidence of spinal cord injury in Tamil Nadu, India. International Journal of Research and Medical Science. 2015;3:220-223. DOI: 10.5455/2320-6012.ijrms20150139
  65. 65. Pandey V, Nigam V, Goyal T. Care of posttraumatic spinal cord injury patients in India: an analysis. Indian Journal of Orthopology. 2007;41:295-299. DOI: 10.4103/0019-5413.36990
  66. 66. Lalwani S, Singh V, Trikha V. Mortality profile of patients with traumatic spinal injuries at a level I trauma care centre in India. Indian Journal of Medical Research. 2014;140:40
  67. 67. Chen J, Chen Z, Zhang K. Epidemiological features of traumatic spinal cord injury in Guangdong Province, China. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine. 2021;4:276-281. DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2019.1654190
  68. 68. Kim HS, Lim KB, Kim J, Kang J, Lee H, Lee SW, et al. Epidemiology of spinal cord injury: changes to its cause amid aging population, a single center study. Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2021;45:7. DOI: 10.5535/arm.20148
  69. 69. Johansson E, Luoto TM, Vainionpää A. Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury in Finland. Spinal Cord. 2021;59:761-768. DOI: 10.1038/s41393-020-00575-4
  70. 70. Darain H, Ilyas SM, Zeb A, Ullah I, Muhammad D. Epidemiology of spinal cord injury in Pakistan: A retrospective study. Physikalische Medizin, Rehabilitationsmedizin, Kurortmedizin. 2017;27(02):106-109
  71. 71. van Middendorp JJ, Barbagallo G, Schuetz M, Hosman AJ. Design and rationale of a Prospective, Observational European Multicenter study on the efficacy of acute surgical decompression after traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: the SCI-POEM study. Spinal Cord. 2012;50:686-694. DOI: 10.1038/sc.2012.34
  72. 72. Janssen L, Hansebout RR. Pathogenesis of spinal cord injury and newer treatments. A review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1989;14(1):23-32. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198901000-00005
  73. 73. Damasceno ML, Letaif OB, Cristante AF, Marcon RM, Iutaka AS, Oliveira RP, et al. Estudo retrospectivo dos resultados da utilização do halo craniano nas fraturas-luxações subaxiais [Retrospective results analysis of the use of cranial fractures halo subaxial dislocations]. Coluna/Columna. 2010;9(4):376-380. DOI: 10.1590/S1808-18512010000400006
  74. 74. Vaccaro AR, Daugherty RJ, Sheehan TP, Dante SJ, Cotler JM, Balderston RA, et al. Neurologic outcome of early versus late surgery for cervical spinal cord injury. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997;22(22):2609-2613. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199711150-00006
  75. 75. Fehlings MG, Vaccaro A, Wilson JR, Singh A, Cadotte DW, Harrop JS, et al. Early versus delayed decompression for traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: results of the Surgical Timing in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (STASCIS). PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e32037. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032037
  76. 76. Huang JH, Xu Y, Yin XM, Lin FY. Exosomes derived from miR-126-modified MSCs promote angiogenesis and neurogenesis and attenuate apoptosis after spinal cord injury in rats. Neuroscience. 2020;424:133-145
  77. 77. Zhong D, Cao Y, Li CJ, Li M, Rong ZJ, Jiang L, et al. Highlight article: Neural stem cell-derived exosomes facilitate spinal cord functional recovery after injury by promoting angiogenesis. Experimental Biological Medicine. 2020a;245:54-65
  78. 78. Letaif OB, Damasceno ML, Cristante AF, Marcon RM, Iutaka AS, Oliveira RP, et al. Escolha da via ciru´rgica para tratamento das fraturas cervicais [The choice of surgical approach for treatment of cervical fractures]. Coluna/Columna. 2010;9(4):358-362. DOI: 10.1590/S1808-18512010000400003
  79. 79. Anjarwalla NK, Brown LC, McGregor AH. The outcome of spinal decompression surgery 5 years on. European Spine Journal. 2007;16(11):1842-1847
  80. 80. Kahraman S, Düz B, Kayali H, Korkmaz A, Öter S, Aydin A, et al. Effects of methylprednisolone and hyperbaric oxygen on oxidative status after experimental spinal cord injury: A comparative study in rats. Neurochemical Research. 2007;32(9):1547-1551
  81. 81. Tai PA, Chang CK, Niu KC, Lin MT, Chiu WT, Lin CM. Attenuating experimental spinal cord injury by hyperbaric oxygen: Stimulating production of vasculoendothelial and glial cell line-derived neurotrophic growth factors and interleukin-10. Journal of Neurotrauma. 2010;27(6):1121-1127
  82. 82. Lv R, Du L, Zhang L, et al. Polydatin attenuates spinal cord injury in rats by inhibiting oxidative stress and microglia apoptosis via Nrf2/HO-1 pathway. Life Sciences. 2019;217:119-127
  83. 83. Li Q, Gao S, Kang Z, Zhang M, et al. Rapamycin enhances mitophagy and attenuates apoptosis after spinal ischemia-reperfusion injury. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2018;12:865
  84. 84. Tang R, Botchway BO, Meng Y, Zhang Y, Zhou C, Jiang J, et al. The inhibition of inflammatory signaling pathway by secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor can improve spinal cord injury. Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology. 2020;40(7):1067-1073
  85. 85. Jarosiewicz B, Sarma AA, Saab J, Franco B, Cash SS, Eskandar EN, et al. Retrospectively supervised click decoder calibration for self-calibrating point-and-click brain-computer interfaces. Journal of Physiology - Paris. 2016;110:382-391
  86. 86. Zheng Y, Mao YR, Yuan TF, Xu DS, Cheng LM. Multimodal treatment for spinal cord injury: A sword of neuroregeneration upon neuromodulation. Neural Regeneration Research. 2020;15(8):1437
  87. 87. Yang B, Zhang F, Cheng F, Ying L, Wang C, Shi K, et al. Strategies and prospects of effective neural circuits reconstruction after spinal cord injury. Cell Death & Disease. 2020;11(6):1-4
  88. 88. Dubreuil CI, Winton MJ, McKerracher L. Rho activation patterns after spinal cord injury and the role of activated Rho in apoptosis in the central nervous system. The Journal of Cell Biology. 2003;162(2):233-243
  89. 89. Kahraman S, Ozgurtas T, Kayalı H, Atabey C, Kutluay T, Timurkaynak E. Monitoring of serum ionized magnesium in neurosurgical intensive care unit: Preliminary results. Clinica Chimica Acta. 2003;334(1-2):211-215
  90. 90. Bracken MB, Holford TR. Neurological and functional status 1 year after acute spinal cord injury: Estimates of functional recovery in National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study II from results modeled in National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study III. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2002;96:259-266
  91. 91. Cho Y, Shi R, Borgens RB. Chitosan produces potent neuroprotection and physiological recovery following traumatic spinal cord injury. Journal of Experimental Biology. 2010;213:1513-1520
  92. 92. Wang YT, Lu XM, Zhu F, Huang P, Yu Y, Zeng L, et al. The use of a gold nanoparticle-based adjuvant to improve the therapeutic efficacy of hNgR-Fc protein immunization in spinal cord-injured rats. Biomaterials. 2011;32(31):7988-7998
  93. 93. Roman JA, Niedzielko TL, Haddon RC, Parpura V, Floyd CL. Single-walled carbon nanotubes chemically functionalized with polyethylene glycol promote tissue repair in a rat model of spinal cord injury. Journal of Neurotrauma. 2011;28:2349-2362
  94. 94. Chen L, Zheng Y, Feng L, Liu Z, Guo R, Zhang Y. Novel hyaluronic acid coated hydrophobically modified chitosan polyelectrolyte complex for the delivery of doxorubicin. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2019;126:254-261
  95. 95. Costa LM, Pereira JE, Filipe VM, Magalhães LG, Couto PA, Gonzalo-Orden JM, et al. Roilipram promotes functional recovery after contusive thoracic spinal cord injury in rats. Behavioural Brain Research. 2013;243:66-73
  96. 96. Zang C, Ma Z, Chen L, Li H, Jiang C, Zhang W. Biosynthesis of gold nanoparticles, characterization and their loading with Zonisamide as a novel drug delivery system for the treatment of acute spinal cord injury. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology. 2019;190:72-75
  97. 97. Li Z, Tan S, Li S, Shen Q, Wang K. Cancer drug delivery in the nano era: An overview and perspectives. Oncology Reports. 2017;38:611-624
  98. 98. Tkach M, Thery C. Communication by extracellular vesicles: Where we are and where we need to go. Cell. 2016;164:1226-1232. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.043
  99. 99. Li L, Li L, Zhang Y, Mu J, Chen J, Zhang C, et al. Transplantation of human mesenchymal stem-cell-derived exosomes immobilized in an adhesive hydrogel for effective treatment of spinal cord injury. Nano Letters. 2020c;20:4298-4305
  100. 100. Samantaray S, Das A, Thakore NP, Matzelle DD, Reiter RJ, Ray SK, et al. Therapeutic potential of melatonin in traumatic central nervous system injury. Journal of Pineal Research. 2009;47:134-142
  101. 101. Mustafa AG, Singh IN, Wang J, Carrico KM, Hall ED. Mitochondrial protection after traumatic brain injury by scavenging lipid peroxyl radicals. Journal of Neurochemistry. 2010;114:271-280
  102. 102. Xiong Y, Singh IN, Hall ED. Tempol protection of spinal cord mitochondria from peroxynitrite-induced oxidative damage. Free Radical Research. Jun 2009;43:604-612
  103. 103. Lalkovičová M, Danielisová V. Neuroprotection and antioxidants. Neural Regeneration Research. 2016;11(6):865
  104. 104. Shimmyo Y, Kihara T, Akaike A, Niidome T, Sugimoto H. Three distinct neuroprotective functions of myricetin against glutamate-induced neuronal cell death: Involvement of direct inhibition of caspase-3. Journal of Neuroscience Research. 2008;86:1836-1845
  105. 105. Ahuja CS, Fehlings M. Concise review: Bridging the gap: Novel neuroregenerative and neuroprotective strategies in spinal cord injury. Stem Cells Translational Medicine. 2016;5:914-924
  106. 106. Gebrin AS, Cristante AF, Marcon RM, Da-Silva CF. Intervenções farmacológicas no trauma raquimedular: uma nova visão terapêutica [Pharmacological interventions in spinal cord trauma: A therapeutic approach]. Acta Ortop Bras. 1997;5(3):123-136
  107. 107. Marcon RM, Barros Filho TEP, Oliveira RP, Cristante AF, Taricco MA, Colares G, et al. Estudo experimental da ação da metilprednisolona utilizada antes do traumatismo raquimedular em ratos Wistar [Experimental study on the action of methylprednisolone on Wistar rats before spinal cord injury]. Acta Ortop Bras. 2010;18(1):26-30. DOI: 10.1590/S1413-78522010000100005
  108. 108. Domingo A, Al-Yahya AA, Asiri Y, Eng JJ, Lam T. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence Research Team. A systematic review of the effects of pharmacological agents on walking function in people with spinal cord injury. Journal of Neurotrauma. 2012;29(5):865-879. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2011.2052
  109. 109. Marcantoni M, Fuchs A, Löw P, Bartsch D, Kiehn O, Bellardita C. Early delivery and prolonged treatment with nimodipine prevents the development of spasticity after spinal cord injury in mice. Science Translational Medicine. 2020;12(539):eaay0167.
  110. 110. Ross IB, Tator CH. Further studies of nimodipine in experimental spinal cord injury in the rat. Journal of Neurotrauma. 1991;8(4):229-238
  111. 111. Zörner B, Schwab ME. Anti-Nogo on the go: From animal models to a clinical trial. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2010;1198:E22-E34.
  112. 112. Kucher K, Johns D, Maier D, Abel R, Badke A, Baron H, et al. First-in-man intrathecal application of neurite growth-promoting anti-Nogo-A antibodies in acute spinal cord injury. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 2018;32(6-7):578-589
  113. 113. Tetzlaff W, Okon EB, Karimi-Abdolrezaee S, Hill CE, Sparling JS, Plemel JR, et al. A systematic review of cellular transplantation therapies for spinal cord injury. Journal of Neurotrauma. 2011;28(8):1611-1682
  114. 114. Ruzicka J, Machova-Urdzikova L, Gillick J, Amemori T, Romanyuk N, Karova K, et al. A comparative study of three different types of stem cells for treatment of rat spinal cord injury. Cell Transplantation. 2017;26(4):585-603
  115. 115. Uccelli A, Moretta L, Pistoia V. Mesenchymal stem cells in health and disease. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2008;8(9):726
  116. 116. Hu LI, Wang J, Zhou X, Xiong Z, Zhao J, Yu R, et al. Exosomes derived from human adipose mensenchymal stem cells accelerates cutaneous wound healing via optimizing the characteristics of fibroblasts. Scientific Reports. 2016;6(1):1-1
  117. 117. Au Yeung CL, Co NN, Tsuruga T, Yeung TL, Kwan SY, Leung CS, et al. Exosomal transfer of stroma-derived miR21 confers paclitaxel resistance in ovarian cancer cells through targeting APAF1. Nature Communications. 2016;7(1):1-4
  118. 118. Zhang B, Wu X, Zhang X, Sun Y, Yan Y, Shi H, et al. Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell exosomes enhance angiogenesis through the Wnt4/β-catenin pathway. Stem Cells Translational Medicine. 2015;4(5):513-522
  119. 119. Saganová K, Gálik J, Blaško J, Korimová A, Račeková E, Vanický I. Immunosuppressant FK506: Focusing on neuroprotective effects following brain and spinal cord injury. Life Sciences. 2012;91:77-82
  120. 120. Afshari K, Dehdashtian A, Haddadi NS, Haj-Mirzaian A, Iranmehr A, Ebrahimi MA, et al. Anti-inflammatory effects of Metformin improve the neuropathic pain and locomotor activity in spinal cord injured rats: Introduction of an alternative therapy. Spinal Cord. 2018;56:1032-1041
  121. 121. Nourbakhsh B, Waubant E. Neurodegeneration and remyelination in multiple sclerosis. In: Multiple Sclerosis: A Mechanistic View. Cambridge, MA, USA: Academic Press; 2016. pp. 311-337
  122. 122. Chen ZR, Ma Y, Guo HH, Lu ZD, Jin QH. Therapeutic efficacy of cyclosporin A against spinal cord injury in rats with hyperglycemia. Molecular Medicine Reports. 2018;17:4369-4375
  123. 123. Martiñón S, García E, Gutierrez-Ospina G, Mestre H, Ibarra A. Development of protective autoimmunity by immunization with a neural-derived peptide is ineffective in severe spinal cord injury. PLoS One. 2012;7:e32027

Written By

Zeenat Ara, Alka Singh, Saloni Raj, Shah Walliullah and Rajeshwar Nath Srivastava

Submitted: 31 March 2022 Reviewed: 09 May 2022 Published: 08 February 2023