Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Metal Nanoparticles and Abiotic Stress Tolerance

Written By

Maryam Dahajipour Heidarabadi

Submitted: 10 March 2022 Reviewed: 09 May 2022 Published: 22 June 2022

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.105211

From the Edited Volume

Advances in Plant Defense Mechanisms

Edited by Josphert Ngui Kimatu

Chapter metrics overview

171 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Nanotechnology opens a large scope of novel applications in the fields of biotechnology and agricultural industries. Nanoparticles (NPs) are described as particles with at least one dimension in the 1–100 nm size range. They have unique physicochemical properties, i.e., high surface area, high reactivity, tunable pore size, and particle morphology. Abiotic stresses like drought, salinity, flooding, heat, heavy metals, etc. are major constraints that affect the growth and productivity of plants. To overcome the impact of these abiotic stresses, many strategies could be considered to support plant growth including the use of metal nanoparticles. Several metal nanoparticles (such as Zn, Fe, Ti, Ag, Mn, Cu, and Mo NPs) are being studied to assess their potential in protecting plants from abiotic stresses, improving plants, and modulating various plant processes. The present review has investigated the beneficial role of metal nanoparticles in alleviation of various abiotic stresses in some plants.

Keywords

  • abiotic stress tolerance
  • antioxidant activity
  • metal nanoparticles
  • secondary metabolites

1. Introduction

Nanotechnology, the fourth wave of the industrial revolution, is one of the new technologies that is developing rapidly [1]. In the last decade, nanotechnology has been considered as an important tool to increase agricultural production. Nanotechnology has the potential to transform the agricultural industry through the development of new formulations for pesticides and fertilizers, the identification and diagnosis of plant diseases, water supply for agriculture, and soil management [2]. The agricultural industry is considered as one of the important economic pillars of developed countries. As the world’s population grows, the need for food and agricultural products is increasing. Factors such as climate change, limited soil and water resources, increased environmental pollution, and plant diseases create problems in agriculture and the production of sufficient and healthy food [3]. In general, nanotechnology can make a significant contribution to the growing prosperity of the industry by optimizing the consumption of agricultural inputs such as water, fertilizers, and pesticides and reducing effluents and pollution [4]. Nanotechnology can improve the overall use efficiency of agricultural inputs such as water, light, and chemicals. Health and functions of both soil and plant improve through microbiome enhancement and decreasing losses by managing crop disease better, which leads to less collateral damage to the environment. Therefore, nanotechnology has a promising potential to develop sustainable agriculture [5].

The environmental factors that restrict plant growth, vitality, and fertility are known as abiotic stresses. Plants are naturally exposed to a variety of abiotic stresses such as drought, salinity, heavy metals, chilling, and heat [6]. Plants as sessile organisms have numerous mechanisms to cope with changes in their growth conditions to show the necessary flexibility in responding to environmental stresses, without affecting cellular, physiological and developmental processes [7]. One of the main concerns in sustainable agriculture is increasing tolerance to abiotic stresses. Based on this, researchers have been able to take a big step in global sustainable agriculture by reducing the harmful effects of abiotic stresses [8]. When plants are exposed to abiotic stresses, reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulate at the toxicity level in the cell. Overproduction of ROS causes the degradation of membrane lipids and proteins, cell toxicity, and reduction of plant growth. The antioxidant defense system scavenges ROS to alleviate oxidative stress [9]. In the last years, the use of nanoparticles in technology has been considered due to their properties such as small size, high surface area, higher solubility, and reactivity compared to bulk materials [10]. Metallic nanoparticles (MNPs) including Zn, Fe, Ti, Ag, Mn, Cu, and Mo NPs have earned significant attention due to their environmentally friendly implementations in the agricultural sector [11]. They have recently been used for seed germination, plant growth, and stress tolerance of a number of plants [12, 13]. The goal of this review was to better understand the stress resistance mechanisms and MNP-mediated plant tolerance increase via antioxidant activity regulation.

Advertisement

2. Types of nanoparticles

Nanoparticles (NPs) have dimensions between 1 and 100 nm. They have unique physical and chemical properties such as high surface vitality, large surface-to-volume ratio, and high reactivity [14]. NPs are generally classified into different groups: metal-based NPs, metalloid NPs, metal magnetic NPs, metal oxide NPs, dendrimers, and carbon-based NPs (Table 1). In the last decade, metal and metal oxide-based NPs are comprehensively studied in agriculture fields for the improvement of crop productivity and increasing the plant flexibility and tolerance under abiotic stress conditions [16]. Metal-based NPs and their oxides including nanomaterials of gold, silver, copper, aluminum, iron, titanium dioxide (TiO2), cerium oxide (CeO2), iron oxide (FeO), aluminum oxide (Al2O3), and zinc oxide (ZnO) are gaining so much attention of scientists to modulate abiotic stress [12, 13, 17].

Types of NanoparticlesExample
Metal-based NPsGold, copper, aluminum, iron, silver, platinum, palladium
Metalloid NPsSelenium, silicon, boron, arsenic, tellurium
Metal magnetic NPsCobalt, manganese, nickel, iron
Metal oxide NPsTitanium dioxide, cerium oxide, iron oxide, aluminum oxide, zinc oxide, copper oxide
DendrimersHybrid, tecto, micellar, chiral, liquid crystalline, triazine
Carbon-based NPsCarbon nanotubes, carbon nanohorn, nanodiamond, fullerene, graphite, graphene, graphene oxide, carbon dot

Table 1.

Types of nanoparticles [15].

Advertisement

3. Effect of metal nanoparticles on antioxidant defense system improving of plants during abiotic stress exposure

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are generated in various plant cell compartments such as plasma membranes, endoplasmic reticulum, peroxisomes, chloroplasts, mitochondria, and cell wall in natural and stress conditions [18]. ROS such as singlet oxygen (1O2), superoxide (O2−), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and hydroxyl radicals (OH.) are accumulated in all the abiotic stresses that result in oxidative stress. Increased ROS act as a signal, and ROS scavengers are one of the defense mechanisms in plants [8]. As the level of ROS is elevated in plants in response to abiotic stress exposure, an antioxidant defense system that is capable of scavenging ROS is activated [19]. Antioxidant defense system of plants includes a number of antioxidant enzymes such as catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR), guaiacol peroxidase (GPX), glutathione reductase (GR), monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDHAR), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) and non-enzyme antioxidant compounds such as proline, glycine betaein, anthocyanins, flavonoids, carotenoids, glutathione, and ascorbate [20, 21, 22]. As shown in Figure 1, MNPs enter the plant cell through penetration or transportation via specific channels in the plasma membrane. Then, as stress signaling molecules, by inducing the expression of regulatory factors in the activation of the defense system, they result in stress tolerance.

Figure 1.

Antioxidative mechanism of action of MNPs in plants under abiotic stress (NPs: Nanoparticles; MDHAR: Monodehydroascorbate reductase; SOD: Superoxide dismutase; APOX: Ascorbate peroxidase; DHAR: Dehydroascorbate reductase; GR: Glutathione reductase; ROS: Reactive oxygen species) [17].

In addition, MNPs can activate the plant defense system under stress by maintaining ROS levels to induce the ROS signaling network. MNPs treatment alters biological pathways involved in defense mechanisms by upregulation of genes that encode proteins that play a key role in ROS balance such as peroxidases (POX), NADPH oxidase, glutathione S-transferase (GST), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) [23]. MNPs upregulate the genes responsible for the activation of antioxidant enzymes. For instance, Laware and Raskar experiments on onion seedlings showed that TiO2 NPs enhanced SOD enzyme’s activity in NP-supplemented plants [24]. Also, results from transcriptomic studies showed that the expression of Cu/Zn SOD, Fe/Mn SOD, catalase, and ascorbate peroxidase in plants that were treated with ZnO NPs under drought was notably enhanced [25]. Concrete evidence provided by Thakur et al. showed that an increase in GPX and SOD activities in wheat plants treated with ZnO NPs under heat stress improved heat tolerance by further reducing H2O2 levels and establishing membrane stability [26]. Studies have also reported that MNPs participate in the induction of Ca2+-binding protein expression, resulted in stress tolerance by launching a cascade of intracellular signaling and upregulation of associated genes [27].

Advertisement

4. Secondary metabolites role induced by MNPs in abiotic stress tolerance

Metabolites are essential molecules for growth, adaptation to stress, and defense of a living organism. Metabolic pathways leading to the synthesis of molecules including carbohydrates, proteins, amino acids, fatty acids, and nucleotides are considered as the primary metabolism, and the compounds produced in these pathways, which are necessary for plant survival, are called primary metabolites [28]. Primary metabolites are involved in various life functions in plants, such as cell division, growth and development, photosynthesis, respiration, and reproduction [29]. Plants produce a diverse group of organic compounds called secondary metabolites that do not have a role in processes such as photosynthesis, respiration, metabolism, protein synthesis, and nutrient accumulation directly [30]. A significant number of secondary metabolites, such as terpenoids, steroids, phenolics, flavonoids, and alkaloids, by the removal of ROS in cellular stress and defense response, function as an adaptation mechanism to stress conditions [31]. Evidence has shown that secondary metabolites are involved in the non-enzymatic defense of plants against stress [32]. The MNPs are commonly found in agrochemicals such as pesticides, fungicides, herbicides, and fertilizers [33]. A few studies have demonstrated that treatment of plants with MNPs resulted in increased production of secondary metabolites, which might act as antioxidants to scavenge the ROS [34, 35]. Several studies have shown that MNPs have the potential to induce plant secondary metabolites’ production (Table 2).

MNPsSpeciesConcentrationSecondary metaboliteRefs
CuNPsCucumis sativus10 and 20 mg L−1Acetyl glucosamine, Phenyl lactate, 4-aminobutyrate[36]
AgNPsArtemisia annua900 mg L−1Artemisinin[37]
Arabidopsis thaliana0.2–25 μg mL−1Anthocyanin and Flavonoid[38]
Corylus avellana0–10 mg L−1Taxol and Baccatin II[39]
CeNPsSolanum lycopersicum0–500 mg kg−1lycopene[40]
ZnNPsThymus vulgaris100 and 150 mg L−1Thymol and Carvacrol[41]
TiNPsSalvia officinalis0–1000 mg L−1Monoterpenes and Camphene[42]
FeNPsHypericum perforatum0–150 mg L−1Hypericin and Hyperforin[43]

Table 2.

MNPs as an elicitor for secondary metabolites.

Advertisement

5. Alleviation of abiotic stress by metal-based and metal-oxide NPs application

Abiotic stresses including drought, salinity, heat, chilling, heavy metal toxicities, etc. are major obstacles to plant growth and productivity [7]. Plants adapt to and alleviate abiotic stresses by alterations in morphological, physiological, biochemical, and molecular levels. Researchers have shown that MNPs help plants to overcome abiotic stresses by their concentration-dependent impact on plant growth and development [15]. MNPs can be supplied to plants in form of seed coating, soil, or foliar application according to their mode of action. Extensive researches have elucidated the positive effects of some MNPs on some plant species under different abiotic stress conditions (Table 3). For instance, MNPs were effective in ameliorating the detrimental effects of abiotic stresses by increasing flavonoid, anthocyanin, phenolic, and photosynthetic pigment contents, upregulating the antioxidant enzymes, reducing the stress markers (MDA and H2O2), water balance, ion accumulation, improvement of the nutrient absorption, and the Na+/K+ ratio [17, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60].

MNPsCharacters and Size (nm)SpeciesAbiotic stressMode of applicationMorphophysiological responsesRefs
Silver NPsHexagonal and spherical (17–34)Solanum melongenaDroughtFoliar sprayUpregulating the antioxidant enzymes[17]
Spherical (27–33)Triticum aestivumSalinityFoliar sprayUpregulating the antioxidant enzymes, proline metabolism, and ion accumulation[44]
Cubic to rectangular (8–28)T. aestivumHeatSoil applicationBalanced relative water content, and improved chlorophyll content[45]
Spherical (~10 nm)Phaseolus vulgarisChillingSeed treatmentIncreased seedling height, fresh and dry weight, and net photosynthesis[46]
Mono nanopowder (15)Glycine maxFloodingSilica sandImprove the growth by accumulation of calnexin/calreticulin and glycoproteins[47]
Zinc NPsNRCucumis sativusDroughtFoliar applicationReduction in ROS accumulation and lipid peroxidation, improve antioxidant defense system, nutrient absorption, and osmolytes accumulation[48]
Spherical and hexagonal (~20 nm)Brassica napusSalinitySeed treatmentSeedling development through the biosynthesis of pigments, osmotic protection, reduction of ROS accumulation, adjustment of antioxidant enzymes, and improvement of the nutrient absorption[49]
Spherical (80)wheat cultivarsHeatFoliar sprayIncreasing antioxidant enzymes activities[50]
Spherical (30)Oryza SativaChillingFoliar applicationUpregulation of the chilling-induced gene expression of the antioxidant system and chilling response transcription factors[51]
Hexagonal, square and spherical (2–64)Leucaena leucocephalaHeavy metalsHydroponic applicationReduced MDA content and the elevated level of antioxidant enzyme activities[52]
Copper NPsCrystalline powder (30–40)Zea maysDroughtSeed treatmentWater balance, photosynthesis pigment, ROS-scavenging enzyme activities and anthocyanin biosynthesis[53]
Spherical (20–50)Lycopersicon esculentumSalinityFoliar applicationImproving the Na+/K+ ratio and stimulates the plant’s antioxidant mechanism[54]
Iron NPsSpherical (20–40)Dracocephalum moldavicaSalinityFoliar applicationIncreasing non-enzymatic system as phenolic compounds and flavonoid content[55]
NRT. aestivumDroughtSeed treatmentincreases photosynthetic pigments, proline, reduced lipid peroxidation, electrolyte leakage, and improved antioxidative defense system[56]
Spherical (50)wheat cultivarsHeatFoliar sprayIncreasing antioxiodant enzymes activities, appearance of new bands in some isozymes and decreasing of lipid peroxidation product malondialdehyde[50]
Spherical (16)L. esculentumHeatFoliar sprayenhanced photosynthesis by regulating energy dissipation, caused cooling of leaves through inducing stomatal opening[57]
Titanium NPsCrystalline and nearly spherical (15–25)T. aestivumDroughtFoliar applicationIncreased growth, yield, gluten, and starch content[58]
Spherical (16)L. esculentumHeatFoliar sprayEnhanced photosynthesis by regulating energy dissipation, caused cooling of leaves through inducing stomatal opening[57]
Spherical-like shapes (70–90)D. moldavicaSalinityHydroponic applicationPositive impact on agronomically important attributes by increased antioxidant enzyme activity[59]
Aluminum NPsCrystalline powder (30–60)G. maxFloodingUpregulated the AsA/GSH pathway (ROS scavenger) and increased ribosomal proteins[60]

Table 3.

Application of some metal NPs induce abiotic stress tolerance in different plant species.

NR: not reported.

Advertisement

6. Conclusion

Plant production globally is subjected to various environmental stress challenges. Today, the application of nanotechnology in various scientific fields is expanding. Recent studies have highlighted the potential applications of nanotechnology in improving plant growth and performance. MNPs due to their small size and having large surface area, as compared to their bulk chemical forms penetrate and absorb in relatively shorter period of time into plant cells. It has been found that MNPs have a multitude of beneficial effects on morphological, physiological, and biochemical characteristics of plants and enhance their tolerance under a variety of abiotic stresses. Accordingly, the application of MNPs in abiotic stress improvement has been noticed by agricultural researchers. MNPs enhance ROS level in plants that is associated with the amplification of a stress signal that can efficiently activate defense systems of them. It may be concluded that MNPs alleviate the abiotic stress-caused damage by activating the defense system in plants. In addition to, MNPs can regulate photosynthetic efficiency, water balance, nutrient absorption, and osmolytes accumulation, thereby enhancing growth and productivity of plants. However, to investigate the exact action of MNPs in improve plant stress, further research is needed at molecular and subcellular levels. Although MNPs have many advantages that deserve to be explored for alleviation of abiotic stress in plants; it must be noticed that its application without care can lead to a series of issues to the plants, animals, and finally to humankind. The toxicity level of MNPs is related to their concentration, size, number, surface activity, modification, and aggregation. Thus, ambiguities about the risk of use and fate of MNPs in plants and soil, as well as their interaction with the environment, should not be overlooked. In addition, green synthesized MNPs in comparison with chemically synthesized MNPs can be efficiently used due to the lack of limitation of use and toxicity in modulating various abiotic stresses in plants. Finally, developing a comprehensive database, an alert system, as well as international cooperation in regulation and legislation is essential for the use of this technology.

References

  1. 1. Handford CE, Dean M, Henchion M, Spence M, Elliott CT, Campbell K. Implications of nanotechnology for the Agri-food industry: Opportunities, benefits and risks. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 2014;40(2):226-241
  2. 2. Acharya A, Pal PK. Agriculture nanotechnology: Translating research outcome to field applications by influencing environmental sustainability. NanoImpact. 2020;19:100232
  3. 3. Foley JA, Ramankutty N, Brauman KA, Cassidy ES, Gerber JS, Johnston M, et al. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature. 2011;478(7369):337-342
  4. 4. Sekhon BS. Nanotechnology in Agri-food production: An overview. Nanotechnology, Science and Applications. 2014;7:31-53
  5. 5. Tipu MMH, Baroi A, Rana J, Islam S, Jahan R, Miah MS, et al. Potential applications of nanotechnology in agriculture: A smart tool for sustainable agriculture. In: Agricultural Development in Asia: Potential Use of Nano-Materials and Nano-Technology. IntechOpen; 2021
  6. 6. Kumar AA, Mishra P, Kumari K, Panigrahi K. Environmental stress influencing plant development and flowering. Frontiers in Bioscience. 2012;4:1315-1324
  7. 7. Yang L, Wen K-S, Ruan X, Zhao Y-X, Wei F, Wang Q. Response of plant secondary metabolites to environmental factors. Molecules. 2018;23(4):762
  8. 8. Khan N, Ali S, Shahid MA, Mustafa A, Sayyed R, Curá JA. Insights into the interactions among roots, rhizosphere, and rhizobacteria for improving plant growth and tolerance to abiotic stresses: A review. Cell. 2021;10(6):1551
  9. 9. Das K, Roychoudhury A. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and response of antioxidants as ROS-scavengers during environmental stress in plants. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2014;2:53
  10. 10. Baig N, Kammakakam I, Falath W. Nanomaterials: A review of synthesis methods, properties, recent progress, and challenges. Materials Advances. 2021;2(6):1821-1871
  11. 11. Rai PK, Kumar V, Lee S, Raza N, Kim K-H, Ok YS, et al. Nanoparticle-plant interaction: Implications in energy, environment, and agriculture. Environment International. 2018;119:1-19
  12. 12. Abdel Latef AAH, Abu Alhmad MF, Abdelfattah KE. The possible roles of priming with ZnO nanoparticles in mitigation of salinity stress in lupine (Lupinus termis) plants. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 2017;36(1):60-70
  13. 13. Taran N, Storozhenko V, Svietlova N, Batsmanova L, Shvartau V, Kovalenko M. Effect of zinc and copper nanoparticles on drought resistance of wheat seedlings. Nanoscale Research Letters. 2017;12(1):1-6
  14. 14. Sukhanova A, Bozrova S, Sokolov P, Berestovoy M, Karaulov A, Nabiev I. Dependence of nanoparticle toxicity on their physical and chemical properties. Nanoscale Research Letters. 2018;13(1):1-21
  15. 15. Sarraf M, Vishwakarma K, Kumar V, Arif N, Das S, Johnson R, et al. Metal/metalloid-based nanomaterials for plant abiotic stress tolerance: An overview of the mechanisms. Plants. 2022;11(3):316
  16. 16. Paramo LA, Feregrino-Pérez AA, Guevara R, Mendoza S, Esquivel K. Nanoparticles in agroindustry: Applications, toxicity, challenges, and trends. Nanomaterials. 2020;10(9):1654
  17. 17. Alabdallah NM, Hasan MM, Salih AM, Roushdy S, Al-Shammari AS, Alsanie SI, et al. Silver nanoparticles improve growth and protect against oxidative damage in eggplant seedlings under drought stress. Plant, Soil and Environment. 2021;67(11):617-624
  18. 18. Mansoor S, Ali Wani O, Lone JK, Manhas S, Kour N, Alam P, et al. Reactive oxygen species in plants: From source to sink. Antioxidants. 2022;11(2):225
  19. 19. Bowler C, Mv M, Inze D. Superoxide dismutase and stress tolerance. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 1992;43(1):83-116
  20. 20. Liu Y, Xiao Z, Chen F, Yue L, Zou H, Lyu J, et al. Metallic oxide nanomaterials act as antioxidant nanozymes in higher plants: Trends, meta-analysis, and prospect. Science of The Total Environment. 2021;780:146578
  21. 21. Rico CM, Peralta-Videa JR, Gardea-Torresdey JL. Chemistry, biochemistry of nanoparticles, and their role in antioxidant defense system in plants. In: Nanotechnology and Plant Sciences. Springer, Champions; 2015
  22. 22. Hasan MM, Gong L, Nie Z-F, Li F-P, Ahammed GJ, Fang X-W. ABA-induced stomatal movements in vascular plants during dehydration and rehydration. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2021;186:104436
  23. 23. Ruotolo R, Maestri E, Pagano L, Marmiroli M, White JC, Marmiroli N. Plant response to metal-containing engineered nanomaterials: An omics-based perspective. Environmental Science & Technology. 2018;52(5):2451-2467
  24. 24. Laware S, Raskar S. Effect of titanium dioxide nanoparticles on hydrolytic and antioxidant enzymes during seed germination in onion. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2014;3(7):749-760
  25. 25. Sun L, Song F, Guo J, Zhu X, Liu S, Liu F, et al. Nano-ZnO-induced drought tolerance is associated with melatonin synthesis and metabolism in maize. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020;21(3):782
  26. 26. Thakur S, Asthir B, Kaur G, Kalia A, Sharma A. Zinc oxide and titanium dioxide nanoparticles influence heat stress tolerance mediated by antioxidant defense system in wheat. Cereal Research Communications. 2021:1-12
  27. 27. Linh TM, Mai NC, Hoe PT, Lien LQ , Ban NK, Hien LTT, et al. Metal-based nanoparticles enhance drought tolerance in soybean. Journal of Nanomaterials. 2020;2020:4056563
  28. 28. Piechulla B, Heldt H-W. Plant Biochemistry. Academic Press; 2010
  29. 29. Bourgaud F, Gravot A, Milesi S, Gontier E. Production of plant secondary metabolites: A historical perspective. Plant Science. 2001;161(5):839-851
  30. 30. Irchhaiya R, Kumar A, Yadav A, Gupta N, Kumar S, Gupta N, et al. Metabolites in plants and its classification. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2015;4(1):287-305
  31. 31. Isah T. Stress and defense responses in plant secondary metabolites production. Biological Research. 2019;52:39
  32. 32. Edreva A, Velikova V, Tsonev T, Dagnon S, Gürel A, Aktaş L, et al. Stress-protective role of secondary metabolites: Diversity of functions and mechanisms. General and Applied Plant Physiology. 2008;34(1-2):67-78
  33. 33. DeRosa MC, Monreal C, Schnitzer M, Walsh R, Sultan Y. Nanotechnology in fertilizers. Nature Nanotechnology. 2010;5(2):91-91
  34. 34. Dixon RA, Paiva NL. Stress-induced phenylpropanoid metabolism. The Plant Cell. 1995;7(7):1085
  35. 35. Franklin G, Conceição LF, Kombrink E, Dias AC. Xanthone biosynthesis in Hypericum perforatum cells provides antioxidant and antimicrobial protection upon biotic stress. Phytochemistry. 2009;70(1):60-68
  36. 36. Zhao L, Huang Y, Hu J, Zhou H, Adeleye AS, Keller AA. 1H NMR and GC-MS based metabolomics reveal defense and detoxification mechanism of cucumber plant under nano-Cu stress. Environmental Science and Technology. 2016;50(4):2000-2010
  37. 37. Zhang B, Zheng LP, Yi Li W, Wen WJ. Stimulation of artemisinin production in Artemisia annua hairy roots by Ag-SiO2 core-shell nanoparticles. Current Nanoscience. 2013;9(3):363-370
  38. 38. García-Sánchez S, Bernales I, Cristobal S. Early response to nanoparticles in the Arabidopsis transcriptome compromises plant defence and root-hair development through salicylic acid signalling. BMC Genomics. 2015;16(1):1-17
  39. 39. Jamshidi M, Ghanati F. Taxanes content and cytotoxicity of hazel cells extract after elicitation with silver nanoparticles. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2017;110:178-184
  40. 40. Barrios AC, Medina-Velo IA, Zuverza-Mena N, Dominguez OE, Peralta-Videa JR, Gardea-Torresdey JL. Nutritional quality assessment of tomato fruits after exposure to uncoated and citric acid coated cerium oxide nanoparticles, bulk cerium oxide, cerium acetate and citric acid. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2017;110:100-107
  41. 41. Mosavat N, Golkar P, Yousefifard M, Javed R. Modulation of callus growth and secondary metabolites in different thymus species and Zataria multiflora micropropagated under ZnO nanoparticles stress. Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry. 2019;66(3):316-322
  42. 42. Ghorbanpour M. Major essential oil constituents, total phenolics and flavonoids content and antioxidant activity of Salvia officinalis plant in response to nano-titanium dioxide. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology. 2015;20(3):249-256
  43. 43. Sharafi E, Fotokian MH, Loo H. Improvement of hypericin and hyperforin production using zinc and iron nano-oxides as elicitors in cell suspension culture of John’swort (Hypericum perforatum L.). Journal of Medicinal Plants and By-products. 2013;2(2):177-184
  44. 44. Wahid I, Kumari S, Ahmad R, Hussain SJ, Alamri S, Siddiqui MH, et al. Silver nanoparticle regulates salt tolerance in wheat through changes in ABA concentration, ion homeostasis, and defense systems. Biomolecules. 2020;10(11):1506
  45. 45. Iqbal M, Raja NI, Wattoo FH, Hussain M, Ejaz M, Saira H. Assessment of AgNPs exposure on physiological and biochemical changes and antioxidative defence system in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under heat stress. IET Nanobiotechnology. 2019;13(2):230-236
  46. 46. Prażak R, Święciło A, Krzepiłko A, Michałek S, Arczewska M. Impact of Ag nanoparticles on seed germination and seedling growth of green beans in normal and chill temperatures. Agriculture. 2020;10(8):312
  47. 47. Hashimoto T, Mustafa G, Nishiuchi T, Komatsu S. Comparative analysis of the effect of inorganic and organic chemicals with silver nanoparticles on soybean under flooding stress. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020;21(4):1300
  48. 48. Ghani MI, Saleem S, Rather SA, Rehmani MS, Alamri S, Rajput VD, et al. Foliar application of zinc oxide nanoparticles: An effective strategy to mitigate drought stress in cucumber seedling by modulating antioxidant defense system and osmolytes accumulation. Chemosphere. 2022;289:133202
  49. 49. El-Badri AM, Batool M, Mohamed IA, Khatab A, Sherif A, Wang Z, et al. Modulation of salinity impact on early seedling stage via nano-priming application of zinc oxide on rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2021;166:376-392
  50. 50. Hassan NS, Salah El Din TA, Hendawey MH, Borai IH, Mahdi AA. Magnetite and zinc oxide nanoparticles alleviated heat stress in wheat plants. Current Nanomaterials. 2018;3(1):32-43
  51. 51. Song Y, Jiang M, Zhang H, Li R. Zinc oxide nanoparticles alleviate chilling stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.) by regulating antioxidative system and chilling response transcription factors. Molecules. 2021;26(8):2196
  52. 52. Venkatachalam P, Jayaraj M, Manikandan R, Geetha N, Rene ER, Sharma N, et al. Zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnONPs) alleviate heavy metal-induced toxicity in Leucaena leucocephala seedlings: A physiochemical analysis. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2017;110:59-69
  53. 53. Van Nguyen D, Nguyen HM, Le NT, Nguyen KH, Nguyen HT, Le HM, et al. Copper nanoparticle application enhances plant growth and grain yield in maize under drought stress conditions. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 2022;41(1):364-375
  54. 54. Pérez-Labrada F, López-Vargas ER, Ortega-Ortiz H, Cadenas-Pliego G, Benavides-Mendoza A, Juárez-Maldonado A. Responses of tomato plants under saline stress to foliar application of copper nanoparticles. Plants. 2019;8(6):151
  55. 55. Moradbeygi H, Jamei R, Heidari R, Darvishzadeh R. Investigating the enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant defense by applying iron oxide nanoparticles in Dracocephalum moldavica L. plant under salinity stress. Scientia Horticulturae. 2020;272:109537
  56. 56. Noor R, Yasmin H, Ilyas N, Nosheen A, Hassan MN, Mumtaz S, et al. Comparative analysis of iron oxide nanoparticles synthesized from ginger (Zingiber officinale) and cumin seeds (Cuminum cyminum) to induce resistance in wheat against drought stress. Chemosphere. 2022;292:133201
  57. 57. Qi M, Liu Y, Li T. Nano-TiO2 improve the photosynthesis of tomato leaves under mild heat stress. Biological Trace Element Research. 2013;156(1):323-328
  58. 58. Jaberzadeh A, Moaveni P, Moghadam HRT, Zahedi H. Influence of bulk and nanoparticles titanium foliar application on some agronomic traits, seed gluten and starch contents of wheat subjected to water deficit stress. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca. 2013;41(1):201-207
  59. 59. Gohari G, Mohammadi A, Akbari A, Panahirad S, Dadpour MR, Fotopoulos V, et al. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2 NPs) promote growth and ameliorate salinity stress effects on essential oil profile and biochemical attributes of Dracocephalum moldavica. Scientific Reports. 2020;10(1):1-14
  60. 60. Mustafa G, Komatsu S. Insights into the response of soybean mitochondrial proteins to various sizes of aluminum oxide nanoparticles under flooding stress. Journal of Proteome Research. 2016;15(12):4464-4475

Written By

Maryam Dahajipour Heidarabadi

Submitted: 10 March 2022 Reviewed: 09 May 2022 Published: 22 June 2022