Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Studies on Endophytic Actinobacteria as Plant Growth Promoters and Biocontrol Agents

Written By

Sumi Paul and Arka Pratim Chakraborty

Submitted: 13 September 2021 Reviewed: 05 May 2022 Published: 15 June 2022

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.105169

From the Edited Volume

Actinobacteria - Diversity, Applications and Medical Aspects

Edited by Wael N. Hozzein

Chapter metrics overview

230 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

The exploration of microbial resources is necessary for plant growth promotion, biological control, and reducing the agrochemicals and fertilizers for sustainable agriculture. Bacteria and fungi are distributed in the biosphere including the rhizosphere and help the host plants by alleviating biotic and abiotic stress through different mechanisms and can be used as bioinoculants for biocontrol and plant growth promotion. Actinobacteria are among the most abundant groups of soil microorganisms. They have been studied for their function in the biological control of plant pathogens, interactions with plants, and plant growth promotion. Streptomyces is the largest genus of actinobacteria. Streptomyces acts as both plant growth promoter and also as plant disease suppressor by various mechanisms like an increase in the supply of nutrients such as phosphorus, iron, production of IAA, and siderophore production. Endophytic actinobacteria help in plant growth-promoting through multiple ways by producing plant hormones; controlling fungal disease through antibiosis and competition. This review briefly summarizes the effects of actinobacteria on biocontrol, plant growth promotion, and association with plants as endophytes.

Keywords

  • actinobacteria
  • endophytic in nature
  • growth promoters
  • biocontrol agents
  • disease suppression

1. Introduction

Agricultural activity is hampered by various plant diseases and non-living factors i.e., temperature, drought, salinity, etc. [1]. To prevent plant diseases several pesticides are used in the present day. The reason behind environmental pollution and the loss of soil fertility in crop fields is due to excessive use of chemical products in agriculture [2]. In recent years, due to environmental pollution, the use of chemical pesticides and fertilizers has been canceled in several countries. But nowadays many workers have given attention on the utilization of microbial antagonists to reduce the unrestricted use of chemical products which are applied to prevent plant disease. According to Vurukonda et al. [3] in place of chemical pesticides plant growth-promoting microbes are approved as a safe substitute in the agricultural field. Several microorganisms are known to act as a plant growth promoter and they have the capability to suppress plant disease [4, 5, 6, 7]. Among microbes, actinobacteria are known to produce secondary metabolites, antimicrobial compounds, and plant growth-promoting regulators to improve agricultural developments [8, 9, 10]. Actinobacteria are gram-positive bacteria. Various plant pathogens are controlled by different types of antibiotics which are generally obtained from actinomycetes. Extensive use of chemical products in agriculture imparts deleterious effect on the environment and on the health of human too. Microbial pesticides act as a better and safer alternative way of chemical pesticides. For the growth of plants, the production of biological pesticides from actinobacteria is considered to be a more economical and safe method. The formation of biological pesticides is more useful in function compared to chemical pesticides. These harmful chemicals can be replaced by biological products of actinomycetes. The workers have found another way to obtain large vigor in vegetables with safety by applying the group of actinobacteria to avoid chemical fertilizers [11]. These biopesticides maintain the quality of crops as well as productivity of crops without any harmful effect on plants. In nature, actinobacteria are mostly distributed group of microorganisms. Almost 80% of drugs in the world are known to come from species of actinobacteria like Streptomycetes and Micromonospora [12]. According to Qin et al. [13] the rate of discovery of naturally antibiotics derived from the actinobacteria is increasing continuously. Actinobacteria have been reported to be an important producer of secondary metabolites [14] and these metabolites are utilized for different biological activities, such as antibacterial, antifungal, and insecticidal activities. According to Jog et al. [15], Actinobacteria also produce phytohormones. Various secondary metabolites, cell wall degrading enzymes, and antibiotics are produced from different species of actinobacteria like Streptomyces.

The antagonistic activity of Streptomyces is due to the production of the antifungal compound, antibacterial compound, and extra cellular enzymes facilitate [16]. These genera have been found to show a great potential to improve the future of agriculture [17]. The actinobacteria taxa are diverse as composed of streptomycetes and non-streptomycetes, the latter being uncommon, and classified as rare taxa.

An endophyte is a bacterial (including actinomycetes) or fungal microorganism, which spends the whole or part of its life cycle inside the healthy tissues of the host plant by colonizing inter- or intracellularly, typically without causing any harm to the host plant [18, 19]. Thus, an endophyte is an organism, which lives inside a plant [20]. Host plant becomes benefited from entophytic actinobacteria, which can inhibit the other harmful microbes and helps the host plants by increasing nutrient uptake like iron, phosphorus, etc. [21]. Endophytes make a colony in the internal tissue of the plants and are able to accelerate physiological plant responses [22, 23]. Endophytic actinobacteria in plants can produce different types of metabolites which are used for different applications, such as plant growth promoters [24, 25], biocontrol agents [26, 27], antimicrobials [28, 29, 30].

Endophytic actinobacteria help the host plants by means of growth promotion, stress tolerance, and reduction in disease symptoms [31]. From the tissues of the medicinal plants, actinobacteria are being consistently discovered [32, 33, 34, 35]. For pharmaceutical industries and agricultural applications, endophytic actinobacteria could be a potential source of novel antimicrobial compounds [36]. In developing sustainable systems of crop production, endophytic bacteria–plant interactions have an important role [37].

Advertisement

2. Distribution of actinobacteria

According to Oskay et al. [38], actinobacteria are globally distributed soil-inhabiting microorganisms. Basilio et al. [39] reported that lots of actinobacteria including Micromonospora, Streptomyces were obtained from soil, and also many workers have identified Nocardia, Actinoplanes, Streptosporangium, Streptomyces as members of actinobacteria [40]. Pandey et al. [12] reported about the isolation of strains of actinobacteria from Lucknow. Actinobacteria were isolated from the soil samples of various regions around Jaipur, Sikar of Rajasthan [41]. According to Ababutain et al. [42], in Saudi Arabia, the existence of actinobacteria was observed from soil samples of different places and from sea sediment of Caspian [43]. Srinivasan et al. [44] reported that actinobacteria are a heterogeneous and widely distributed group of bacteria in nature. They grow as hyphae like fungi accountable for the characteristically “earthy odor of freshly turned healthy soil” [45].

In several habitats the actinobacteria are found to survive in nature [46]. They are originally soil inhabitants [47]. But they have been reported in various range of an ecosystem, like from deep-sea [48], in terrestrial soil as well as in extreme environments. Takami et al. [49] reported actinomycetrs from greatest depth Mariana Trench. According to Williams et al. [50], actinobacteria can be found in a wide range of soils. Microbispora, Nocardia, Microtetraspora, Amycolaptosis, Actinomadura, and Saccharothrix are thermo-tolerant (up to 50°C) actinobacteria, reported by Takahashi et al. [51].

2.1 Endophytic actinobacteria

The word endophyte means “in the plant” (endon Gr. = within, phyton = plant). In 1866, de Bary had given the term endophyte. According to his definition, “Endophytes are the microorganisms, which reside inside the plant tissues and are significantly different from those found on the plant surface”. Microorganisms that live within the host place either intra or intercellularly, known as endophytes [52] without causing any harmful effect on their host, and have proven to be the richest source of bioactive natural products. By secreting phytohormones entophytes help the plants in nutrition improvement and enhancement the growth of plants by protecting them against phytopathogens [53]. According to Petrini et al. [54], all organisms inhabiting plant organs can colonize internal plant tissues without causing harm to the host at some time in their life. According to Singh and Dubey [55], several microorganisms like bacteria, fungi, as well as actinobacteria form symbiotic associations within the host plant cell.

Normally the endophytes without subjecting the plant to any disadvantage complete their life cycle within the host plants. When groups of actinobacteria reside within living plant cells cooperatively that is called endophytic actinobacteria, such as nitrogen-fixing endophytes Frankia. It is reported that endophytic actinobacteria help to promote the growth of host plants and can reduce disease symptoms. Endophytes are ubiquitous in nature and they produce phytohormones and other growth-promoting factors to enhance the growth of the host plants. In return, the host plant helps the endophytes with nutrients and shelter. The endophytic actinobacteria form one of the interesting groups of microorganisms that is associated with a wide range of plant species. Recently the scientific community have shown interest in research on endophytic actinobacteria due to produce novel and host-origin natural compounds, and various other benefits like growth enhancement and herbivore resistance.

Endophytic actinobacteria may be of two types “obligate” and “facultative”.The growth of obligate endophytes depend on the host plant. Facultative endophytes can exist outside the host plant [22]. Endophytic actinobacteria have been isolated from different plant parts, such as roots [35, 56], stem [57], leaves [58], and fruits [59] . Endophytic actinobacteria in plants are found to produce different types of metabolites that can be used for different applications, such as antimicrobials [28], plant growth promoters [25], and biocontrol agents [27]. According to Passari et al. [60], the presence of PKS/NRPS gene clusters in endophytic actinobacteria is responsible for secondary metabolite biosynthesis. Endophytic actinobacteria are reported to produce several plant growth promotion compounds such as auxins, cytokinins, and gibberellins or producing siderophore to improve nutrient uptake [61, 62]. Coombs and Franco [63] reported that different strains of actinobacteria including Microbispora, Nocardia, Streptomyces were recognized from the tissues of vigorous wheat plants. Streptomyces aureofaciens is one of the endophytic actinobacteria which were obtained from the root of Zingiber Officinale and that endophyte was found to inhibit the growth of Candida albicans [64]. Endophytic actinobacteria form a symbiotic relationship by the formation of the colony within plant cells to get nutrition, shelter from host plants and in return, they produce several secondary compounds which is used by the plant for its growth and productivity [65]. These metabolites prevent the growth of other harmful pathogens in host plants. According to Loria et al. [66], Streptomyces species can produce active secondary metabolites like antibiotics. According to Nalini and Prakash [67], Masand et al. [41], endophytic actinobacteria are diversely distributed in the ecosystem. In China, Qin et al. [68] studied different strains of endophytic actinobacteria that were recognized from several medicinal and crop plants. Streptomyces spp. and non-Streptomyces spp. are the two types of endophytic actinobacteria. Yandigeri et al. [69] reported in the plants of arid regions drought tolerant endophytic actinobacteria like Streptomyces olivaceus DE10, Streptomyces geysiriensis DE27 and Streptomyces coelicolor DE07. Information on the diversity of endophytic actinobacteria and their organ-specificity is significant for helping in the screening of beneficial strains and also for understanding their ecological roles. It is reported that most of the endophytic actinobacteria are generally available in roots than in other plant parts [70, 71]. The density of endophytic actinobacteria in wheat roots was demonstrated by Conn and Franco [72].

Endophytes are reported in plants that are growing in tropical and temperate forests with the hosts ranging from herbaceous plants in various habitats such as extreme arctic, alpine, and xeric environments. Many studies have reported that endophytic actinobacteria are found in different types of plant tissue such as seeds and ovules, fruits, stems, roots, root nodes, leaves, flowers, tubers, buds, xylem, rachis, and bark [60, 73].

Advertisement

3. Plant growth promoting (PGP) activities byendophytic actinobacteria

Roots are the most favorite part of the plants to be colonized by the microbes. Such interaction between the plants and the microbes may result in an endosymbiotic relationship between them. In many cases, the endophytic microbes play a significant role in the protection of plants against pathogenic agents [74, 75]. Studies have been performed with endophytes by inoculating the host plant with endophytes [76] for evaluation of the colonization pattern of vegetative tissues and the effect of endophytes on the host plant. This technique comprehends plant biology and microbial ecology [74].

Actinobacteria are found as symbionts or parasites within plants. According to Hallmann et al. [77], endophytic actinobacteria usually originated from epiphytic actinobacteria colonizing soil, and through any wound or opening on the plant surface, they might have got the opportunities to enter the plant tissues and become endophytes. Individual bacterial cells are not able to penetrate intact epidermal cells as they do not posses mycelium like fungi while actinobacteria colonize on the external part and grow on plant surface by forming branching hyphae and penetrate through natural or by mechanical openings injury [78]. Petrini et al. [54] suggested that the endophytes produce enzymes that are able to degrade most substrates present on the surfaces or in the cell wall of the host. According to Gohain et al. [79], colonization of endophytic actinobacteria is influenced by different climatic conditions and the rate of colonization is high in summer than in winter. The genera Microbispora, Micromonospora, Saccharopolyspora, Micrococcus, Amycolatopsis, Microbacterium, and Nocardia were isolated only in summer; however, the genus Streptomyces was often isolated in both the seasons. By producing plant hormones, fixing nitrogen and by preventing the growth of phytopathogens, endophytes help to increase plant growth. Antibiotics are produced by endophytes with the help of an induced resistance system [80, 81]. Endophytic actinobacteria can offer the opportunity for further research aimed at understanding the correlation between the metabolism of plants and their endophytes.

Stimulation of plant growth by endophytic actinobacteria are of two types, direct and indirect. In the first mechanism, phytohormones such as IAA, cytokinins are produced along with solubilization of minerals like iron, and phosphorus by the production of siderophores for enhancing plant nutrition and 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase [82]. Indirectly endophytic actinobacteria help the plants as a biocontrol agent. They can destroy the harmful phytopathogen by stimulating the resistance system of the plant. Besides it, they can also produce extracellular enzymes which can lysis the cell wall of dangerous fungus [83]. Different unique secondary metabolites have been produced from endophytes that are associated with medicinal plants and these secondary metabolites can be applied in pharmaceutical, agricultural and other industries. According to Cattelan et al. [84], endophytic actinobacteria can increase plant growth promotion by several way. They are able to form phytohormones, they can fix nitrogen also and they can prevent the growth of phytopathogen by their antagonism activity and they help in the solubilization of phosphate also.

Numerous actinobacterial species such as endophytes with plants have been reported to have various plant growth-promoting (PGP) properties [85] s. They have also been found to show antagonistic properties against many root-borne and disease-causing plant pathogens [86]. Plant growth-promoting actinobacteria (PGPA) have been reported to be mostly endophytic (Table 1). Plant growth-promoting attributes have been presented in Figure 1.

Plant growth-promoting attributesEndophytic ActinobacteriaIsolated fromReferences
IAA, siderophoreStreptomyces sp. CMU PA 101Carcuma manggaKhamna et al. [10]
IAA, hydrxymate and catechol type siderophore, proteaseStreptomyces sp. S4202, Nonomuraea sp. S3304, Actinomadura sp.S4215Aquilaria crassnaNimnoi et al. [62]
Solubilization of phosphateStreptomyces sp. Nhcr0816Triticum aestivumEl-Tarabily et al. [87]
Production of IAA and ACC deaminaseActinoplanes campanulatus, Streptomyces spirilisCucumis sativusEl-Tarabily et al. [87]
Production of chitinase, phosphatase activity, and siderophoreStreptpmyces sp. AB131–1,LBRO2Isolates of microbiology laboratory, Bogal Agricultural UniversityHastuti et al. [88]
Siderophore productionStreptomyces sp. GMKU3100Oriza sativa L.cv.KDML 105Rungin et al. [89]
Production of IAAStreptomyces sp. PT2Plants of Algerian SaharaGoudjal et al. [90]
IAA productionStreptomyces sp. Nocardia sp.Citrus reticulataShutsrirung et al. [25]
Solubilization of phosphate, production of siderophoresStreptomyces sp. BPSAC34Medicinal plantsPassari et al. [60]
Phosphate solubilization, siderophore productionStreptomyces sp. UKCW/B, Nocardia sp. TP1BA1BPseudowintera colorataPurushotham et al. [91]

Table 1.

Plant growth promotion by endophytic actinobacteria.

Figure 1.

Plant-endophytic actinomycetes interactions favoring plant growth and biocontrol of phytopathogens [92].

3.1 Production of plant growth hormone - indole acetic acid (IAA) by endophytic actinobacteria

In leguminous plants and in cereals, endophytic actinobacteria function as a plant growth promoter; as a result, they have the capacity to influence plant growth and can increase the ability of nutrition absorption by plants [85].

According to Khamna et al. [93], Palaniyandi et al. [94], indole acetic acid (IAA) is a highly reported growth regulator which is produced by endophytic actinobacteria. The naturally-occurring auxin, indole-3- acetic acid (IAA) is produced by plants through different tryptophan-dependent IAA production pathways and also by bacteria and fungi [95]. The type of pathway that bacterium uses to produce IAA within plants can determine the nature of the resulting plant-microbe interactions [22]. The primary form of auxin is indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) which have an important contribution to control the different cellular process of plants. IAA helps in elongation, cell division. To form the root hair and to make short root length IAA performs very important functions. IAA helps to increase the nutrient absorption ability of the plant. Some strains of endophytic actinobacteria were reported to produce IAA to enhance the growth of cucumber plants [4, 5]. Passari et al. [96] reported various strains of actinobacteria including Micromonospora, Streptomyces, Microbacterium, Pseudonocardia which can produce plant growth phytohormone IAA. According to Madhurama et al. [97], actinobacteria Streptomyces sp. has the capability to produce IAA in the high range. In another study by Khamna et al. [93], it is reported that in many medicinal plants IAA was produced by Streptomyces sp.

It is reported that to improve plant growth, genus Streptomyces, such as Streptomyces olivaceoviridis, S. rimosus, S. rochei, and Streptomyces spp. have the ability to produce IAA from tomato rhizosphere [98, 99]. According to Verma et al. [100], Streptomyces strains of endophytic actinobacteria were obtained from Azadirachta indica and in tomato plants, they were found to increase the plants’ growth. Streptomyces strain En-1 had been studied to produce IAA and to stimulate the growth of Arabidopsis plantlets [101]. Many endophytic, as well as rhizospheric actinobacteria, possess the ability to produce IAA, cytokinins, and GA3 [102]. Nimnoi et al. [62] reported that endophytic actinobacteria from eaglewood (Aquilaria crassna) had shown a trait of plant growth promotion by the production of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and ammonia. IAA and siderophore-producing actinobacteria that colonize the root in the rhizosphere are studied to promote root elongation and plant growth [103]. Several endophytic actinobacteria including Streptomyces viridis, S. rimosus, S.olivaceoviridis, S. atrovirens, and S. rochei have been exhibited to improve germination as well as root and shoot elongation [104].

3.2 Phosphate solubilization

Phosphorus is an important component’s that is involved in a wide range of cellular processes by developing plant organs and increasing cell enlargement in plants [105].

Phosphorus (P) content is generally very low in soil and it is available in the form of insoluble metallic complexes. For that reason, plants can absorb from soil, a little amount of phosphorus for their growth [106]. Endophytic actinobacteria support the plants to get phosphorus in soluble form through acidification and mineralization of insoluble soil phosphorus to increase the growth of plants [107, 108]. According to Jog et al. [109], endophytic actinobacteria Streptomyces sp. obtained from Triticum aestivum was found to soluble the phosphate to promote the plant growth.

Various genera of actinobacteria such as Streptomyces, Rhodococcus, Arthrobacter, Micromonospora were reported to have P-solubilization potential under in vivo as well as in vitro [109]. Under P-deficient soils, Streptomyces griseus, Micromonospora aurantiaceae has been reported to help in the P-solubilization of wheat crop [109]. According to Hamdali et al. [110], actinobacteria such as S. griseus, Micromonospora aurantiaca were found to soluble rock phosphate to stimulate the plant growth of wheat. In a recent study, it is reported that endophytic actinobacteria Nocardia sp. TP1BA1B and Streptomyces sp. UKCW/B isolated from the native medicinal plant Pseudowintera colorata (Horopito) were found to solubilize phosphate in New Zealand [91].

3.3 Production of siderophore and enhanced iron availability by endophytic actinobacteria

Siderophores are iron-chelating secondary metabolites produced by various microorganisms in order to scavenge iron from their surrounding environment to make this essential element available to the cell. Due to the high affinity for ferric iron, siderophores are secreted out to form soluble ferric complexes that can be taken up by the organisms. According to Bothwell [111], iron plays an important role in the physiological processes of plants. It is available in the soil as insoluble Fe3+ form and plants need soluble Fe2+ form to uptake from soil [112]. Actinobacteria can converts iron from Fe3+ to Fe2+ form and it can increase the bioavailability of iron in the plant rhizosphere by the production of siderophores and help the plant uptake of iron.

The mechanism of siderophore was reported by endophytic actinobacteria to stimulate plant growth [100]. Streptomyces acidiscabies E13 is an excellent example of siderophore producer that promotes the growth of Vigna unguiculata under abiotic stress conditions [113]. Several recent studies demonstrated the production of plant growth-promoting compounds such as siderophores in vitro by endophytic actinobacteria [114, 115]. Khamna et al. [93] studied to produce a high amount of siderophore by Streptomyces CMU-SK 126 that was isolated from Curcuma mangga in rhizospheric soil.

3.4 ACC deaminase producing strains of endophytic actinobacteria

The enzyme ACC deaminase can cleave the plant ethylene precursor ACC, and thereby lower the level of ethylene in a developing or stressed plant [116]. Under unfavorable conditions, plant growth becomes reduced and, in that condition, bacterial ACC deaminase performs an important function to increase the plant growth [117]. Nascimento et al. [118] reported that actinobacteria including Mycobacterium, Streptomyces, Rhodococcus were found to contain ACC deaminase producing genes [118].

By the study, it was proved that when ACC deaminase producing endophytic Streptomyces sp. GMKU 336 was inoculated into Thai jasmine rice Khao Dok Mali 105 cultivar (Oryza sativa L. cv. KDML105), Streptomyces sp. GMKU 336 significantly increased plant growth and decreased ethylene under salt stress (150 mM NaCl) conditions. This work demonstrates that ACC deaminase produces Streptomyces sp. GMKU 336 enhances the growth of rice and increases salt tolerance by reduction of ethylene by the action of ACC deaminase [119].

Advertisement

4. Endophytic actinobacteria as biocontrol agents

According to Lee et al. [120], endophytic actinobacteria such as Microbispora rosea, Streptomyces olivochromogenes prevented the growth of phytopathogen of clubroot of Chinese cabbage effectively. Coombs et al. [121] examined the endophytic actinobacteria as a biocontrol agent against Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici of wheat. The endophytic actinobacteria can control Pythium aphanidermatum in cucumber which was described by El-Tarabily et al. [4, 5]. Cao et al. [122] reported that endophytic actinobacteria such as Streptomyces spiralis, Micromonospora chalcea were isolated from cucumber root. They were found to promote plant growth by decreasing plant disease like damping off and crown rot. They were identified as biocontrol agents due to the formation of enzymes that can destroy the cell wall of fungal phytopathogen. These endophytic actinobacteria significantly reduced the incidence of damping-off, crown, and root-rot of cucumber roots. Phytopathogenic fungus Sclerotinia sclerotiorum causes stem rot which is a very harmful disease for economically important crops like soybean and sunflower worldwide [123]. Streptomyces sp. NEAU-S7GS2 was obtained from the root cells of Glycine max. In a study, it was observed that the mycelial growth and germination of S. sclerotiorum (99.1%) were inhibited by Streptomyces sp. NEAU-S7GS2 [124]. Shimizu et al. [81] first reported the powerful activity of endophytic actinobacteria biocontrol agent to decrease the foliar disease. The strain MBR-5 identified as Streptomyces galbus, among ten actinobacterial strains, isolated from field-grown Rhododendron plants showed significant antagonistic activities against Phytophthora cinnamomi and Pestalotiopsis sydowiana. According to Cao et al. [122], the growth of plant pathogens was prevented by endophytic actinobacteria to save the host plant from the attack of harmful microbes. Strain CEN26, an endophyte was isolated from Centella asiaticato and the strain was found to inhibit the germination of conidia and morphological development of the fungal pathogen Alternaria brassicicola [73]. It was studied that most of the endophytic actinobacteria were seen to protect the hosts from diseases by inhibiting plant pathogens [94]. In pot experiments, it was observed that the extract of Streptomyces sp. MR14 cells significantly suppressed Fusarium moniliforme [125].

Maggini et al. [126] also discussed the relationship between actinobacteria and their host plants to protect the host from the disease that is caused by the phytopathogen.

According to Wan et al. [127], leaf blight disease of rice was suppressed by Streptomyces platensis. In a study, the inhibition activities against various phytopathogens such as Neonectria ditissima ICMP 14417, Ilyonectria liriodendri WPA1C, Neofusicoccum luteum ICMP 16678 were shown by Streptomyces sp. PRY2RB2 [91]. Endophytic actinobacteria as biocontrol agents have been enlisted in Table 2. Prominent antagonistic potential against Rhizoctonia solani was found by Streptomyces avidinii vh32, S. toxybicini vh22, and S. tricolor vh85 which also induced the accumulation of phenolic compounds in tomato [140]. From neem (A. indica), endophytic actinobacteria were isolated by Verma et al. [70]. The most common genera were Streptomyces, Streptosporangium, Microbispora, Streptoverticillium, Sacchromonospora, and Nocardia, which showed antagonistic activities against root pathogens Pythium and Phytophthora sp.

Endophytic actinobacteriaHost plantPathogenReferences
Streptomyces sp. S30Solanum lycopersicumRhizoctonia solaniCao et al. [122]
Streptomyces halstediiCapsicumPhytophthora capsicaLiang et al. [128]
Microbispora sp. A004 and A011Brasica rapaPlasmophora brassicaeLee et al. [120]
Streptomyces sp. KH-614Oryza sativaPyricularia oryzaeNingthoujam et al. [129]
Streptomyces sp. S30
Streptomyces sp. R18(6)
Lycopersicon esculentumRhizoctonia solaniDe Olivera et al. [114]
Streptomyces spiralis
Microsmonopora chalcea
Cucumis sp.Pythium aphanidermatumEI-Tarabily et al. [87]
Streptomyces sp.Cicer arietinumFusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceriGopalakrishnan et al. [130]
Streptomyces sp. AzR-051, AzR – 049Azadirachta indica A. JussAlternaria alternataVerma et al. [100]
Streptomyces sp.Capsicum frutescensAlternaria brassicae, Colletotrichum gloeosporioidesSrividya et al. [16]
Streptomyces sp.SoybeanXanthomonas campestris pv. glycinesMingma et al. [131]
Streptomyces indiaensisKJ872546CapsiumFusarium oxysporumJalaluldeen et al. [132]
Actinobacteriastrains OUA3, OUA5, OUA18, and OUA40Capsicum annuumColletotrichum capsici and Fusarium oxysporumAshokvardhan et al. [133]
Streptomyces felleus YJ1Brrasica napusSclerotinia sclerotiorumCheng et al. [134]
Streptomyces cyaneus ZEA17ILactuca sativaSclerotinia sclerotiorum FW361Kunova et al. [135]
Streptomyces diastaticus, Streptomyces fradiae,
Streptomyces collinus
Medicinal plantsSclerotium rolfsii, Rhizoctonia solani,
Fusarium oxysporum
Singh and Gaur [136]
Streptomyces sp. DBT204S. lycopersicumFusarium proliferatumPassari et al. [137]
Streptomyces humidusBrassica oleraceaAlternaria brassicicolaHassan et al. [138]
Saccharothrix algeriensis NRRL B-24137S. lycopersicumFusarium oxysporumMerrouche et al. [139]
Streptomyces sp.PRY2RB2Pseudowintera colorataNeofusicoccum luteum ICMP 16678Purushotham et al. [91]

Table 2.

Endophytic actinobacteria as biocontrol agents.

The growth of the fungal pathogen Alternaria alternata was inhibited by endophytic actinobacteria isolated from the medicinal plant Ferula sinkiangensis [141]. 72 strains endophytic actinobacteria isolated from the medicinal plant Rhynchotoechum ellipticum, were found to inhibit the growth of Fusarium proliferatum, F. oxysporum. Different strains of streptomyces sp. such as S. olivaceus, Streptomyces sp. BPSAC121, Streptomyces sp. BPSAC101 showed antifungal activities. Antifungal antibiotics, fluconazole, ketoconazol and miconazole are produced from S. olivaceus and Streptomyces sp. BPSA 121 [96]. Endophytic Streptomyces sp. showed antifungal activity against Geotrichum candidum, F. oxysporum, Alternaria sp. [142]. According to Passari et al. [137], the growth of various phytopathogens including Fusarium Oxysporum, Fusarium graminearum, Rhizoctonia solani, Colletotrichum capsici were inhibited by endophytic actinobacteria such as Nocardiopsis sp., Streptomyces sp. DBT204, Streptomyces sp. DBT 207 by the formation of cell wall degrading enzymes and HCN. Some species of Streptomyces exhibit biological control activity by stimulating the plant resistance system or by the formation of secondary metabolites like antibiotics, particularly against phytopathogenic fungi such as Fusarium oxysporum, Pythium ultimum, Phytophthora sp. [82]. Biocontrol potentials of endophytic actinobacteria against different phytopathogens have been presented schematically in Figure 1.

4.1 Induction of resistance in the host by endophytic actinobacteria

Conn et al. [143] reported that by inducing system acquired resistance (SAR) and jasmonic acid (JA) or ethylene (ET) pathways, the endophytic actinobacteria were able to induce resistance against Erwinia carotovora and Fusarium oxysporum respectively. Conn et al. [143] reviewed that the growth of the pathogen Botrytis cinerea was inhibited by endophytic actinobacteria Streptomyces sp. GB4–2 by stimulating the SAR pathway. Streptomyces has been found to induce host plant resistance on various crops such as vegetables, forages, and eucalyptus [144]; oak [145]. Actinobacteria can act as an antagonist against pathogens due to the production of lytic enzymes that are capable of destroying fungal cell wall. Many researchers have reported the enzyme activity of actinobacteria which can prevent the growth of fungus by destroying the cell wall with their extracellular enzymes like cellulase, chitinase, amylase, etc. [146]. Taechowisan et al. [147] reported the production of chitinase from endophytic Streptomyces aureofaciens CMUAC130. Srividya et al. [16] discussed the enzyme activity (chitinase, glucanase) of Streptomyces sp. to suppress the growth of fungal phytopathogen.

Endophytic actinobacterium- Streptomyces sp. showed hyperparasitic activity. Compant et al. [61] reported the antimicrobial activity of strain NRRL 30562 to prevent the growth of fungal pathogens such as Fusarium oxysporum, Pythium ultimum by producing an antibiotic munumbicins. The strain was obtained from Kennedia nigriscansin in vitro.

The extracellular enzymes- β-1,3-glucosidase, cellulase, and protease; produced by endophytic actinobacteria cause the lysis of hyphae to inhibit the growth of phytopathogens [148]. Hydrolytic enzymes degrade fungal cell wall, cell membrane, and extracellular virulence factors to control plant diseases [149]. According to Yandigeri et al. [69], actinobacteria produced chitinases to inhibit the growth of fungal pathogens. The extracellular antifungal metabolites especially chitinase and β-1,3 glucanase; produced by actinobacteria inhibited the growth of fungi through hyphal swelling, lysis of cell walls in Fusarium oxysporum, and Sclerotium rolfsii [150].

Endophytes are found to produce secondary metabolites, which are active at low concentrations against other microorganisms [151]. A large number of antimicrobial compounds belonging to the classes like alkaloids, peptides, steroids, terpenoids, phenols, quinines, and flavonoids were found to produce from endophytic actinobacteria [152]. Endophytic actinobacteria were found to show antimicrobial activity against phytopathogenic fungi [153]. Another Streptomyces NRRL 30562, isolated from the snake vine possessed activity against many pathogenic fungi [154].

Advertisement

5. Conclusion and future prospects

Actinobacteria can enhance plant growth by producing growth regulators and other compounds and it is well known as a biocontrol agent for the production of antibiotics. Other properties like the production of cell wall degrading enzymes and induced systemic resistance can inhibit the growth of new plant pathogens. This review has been focused on the importance of endophytic actinobacteria as they are widely regarded as an excellent source for plant growth promotion and biocontrol agents by various mechanisms like increasing the supply of nutrients, and production of IAA, cytokinin, controlling fungal diseases through antibiosis and competition. The excessive use of agrochemical is harmful for the environment. The use of biocontrol agents for the management of plant disease is very important. It is very important to review and highlight the previous achievements in endophytic research in order to draw the attention of the research community towards this emerging field. As endophytic actinobacteria help to increase plant growth, so the utilization of actinobacteria can be developed as another way for suitable organic and environmentally helpful agricultural crop production.

References

  1. 1. Atkinson NJ, Urwin PE. The interaction of plant biotic and abiotic stresses: From genes to the field. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2012;63(10):3523-3543
  2. 2. Djebaili R, Pellegrini M, Smati M, Del Gallo M, Kitouni M. Actinomycete strains isolated from saline soils: Plant-growth-promoting traits and inoculation effects on Solanum lycopersicum. Sustainability. 2020;12(11):4617
  3. 3. Vurukonda SSKP, Giovanardi D, Stefani E. Plant growth promoting and biocontrol activity of Streptomyces spp. as endophytes. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018;19(4):952
  4. 4. El-Tarabily KA, Nassar AH, Hardy G, Sivasithamparam K. Plant growth promotion and biological control of Pythium aphanidermatum, a pathogen of cucumber, by endophytic actinomycetes. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2009b;107:672-681
  5. 5. El-Tarabily KA, Nassar AH, Hardy GES, J. and Sivasithamparam, K. Plant growth promotion and biological control of Pythium aphanidermatum, a pathogen of cucumber, by endophytic actinomycetes. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2009a;106(1):13-26
  6. 6. Nimaichand S, Tamrihao K, Yang LL, Zhu WY, Zhang YG, Li L, et al. Streptomyces hundungensis sp. nov., a novel actinomycete with antifungal activity and plant growth promoting traits. The Journal of Antibiotics. 2013;66(4):205-209
  7. 7. Sadeghi A, Karimi E, Dahaji PA, Javid MG, Dalvand Y, Askari H. Plant growth promoting activity of an auxin and siderophore producing isolate of Streptomyces under saline soil conditions. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2012;28(4):1503-1509
  8. 8. Barea JM, Pozo MJ, Azcon R, Azcon-Aguilar C. Microbial co-operation in the rhizosphere. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2005;56(417):1761-1778
  9. 9. Franco-Correa M, Quintana A, Duque C, Suarez C, Rodríguez MX, Barea JM. Evaluation of actinomycete strains for key traits related with plant growth promotion and mycorrhiza helping activities. Applied Soil Ecology. 2010;45(3):209-217
  10. 10. Khamna S, Yokota A, Lumyong S. Actinobacteriaisolated from medicinal plant rhizosphere soils: Diversity and screening of antifungal compounds, indole-3-acetic acid and siderophore production. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2009;25(4):649-655
  11. 11. Chaurasia A, Meena BR, Tripathi AN, Pandey KK, Rai AB, Singh B. Actinomycetes: An unexplored microorganisms for plant growth promotion and biocontrol in vegetable crops. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2018;34(9):1-16
  12. 12. Pandey A, Ali I, Butola KS, Chatterji T, Singh V. Isolation and characterization of actinobacteria from soil and evaluation of antibacterial activities of actinobacteria against pathogens. International Journal of Applied Biology and Pharmaceutical Technology. 2011;2(4):384-392
  13. 13. Qin S, Li J, Chen H, Guozhen Z, Zhu WY, Jiang CL, et al. Isolation, diversity and antimicrobial activity of rare actinobacteria from medicinal plants of tropical rain forests in Xishuangbanna, China. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2009;75:6176-6186
  14. 14. Tyc O, Song C, Dickschat JS, Vos M, Garbeva P. The ecological role of volatile and soluble secondary metabolites produced by soil bacteria. Trends in Microbiology. 2017;25(4):280-292
  15. 15. Jog R, Nareshkumar G, Rajkumar S. Enhancing soil health and plant growth promotion by actinomycetes. In: Plant Growth Promoting Actinobacteria book. Springer; 2016. pp. 33-45
  16. 16. Srividya S, Thapa A, Bhat D, Golmei K, Dey N. Streptomyces sp. 9p as effective biocontrol against chilli soil borne fungal phytopathogens. European Journal of Experimental Biology. 2012;2(1):163-173
  17. 17. Olanrewaju OS, Babalola OO. Streptomyces: Implications and interactions in plant growth promotion. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2019;103(3):1179-1188
  18. 18. Sturz AV, Christie BR, Nowak J. Bacterial endophytes: Potential role in developing sustainable systems of crop production. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. 2000;19:1-30
  19. 19. Wilson D. Endophyte: The evolution of a term, and clarification of its use and definition. Oikos. 1995;73(2):274
  20. 20. Wilson D. Fungal endophytes: Out of sight but should not Be out of mind. Oikos. 1993;68(2):379
  21. 21. Singh MJ, Sedhuraman P. Biosurfactant, polythene, plastic, and diesel biodegradation activity of endophytic Nocardiopsis sp. mrinalini9 isolated from Hibiscus rosasinensis leaves. Bioresources and Bioprocessing. 2015;2:1-7
  22. 22. Hardoim PR, van Overbeek LS, van Elsas JD. Properties of bacterial endophytes and their proposed role in plant growth. Trends in Microbiology. 2008;16:463-471
  23. 23. Van Wees SC, Van der Ent S, Pieterse CM. Plant immune responses triggered by beneficial microbes. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2008;11:443-448
  24. 24. Borah A, Thakur D. Phylogenetic and functional characterization of culturable endophytic actinobacteria associated with camellia spp. for growth promotion in commercial tea cultivars. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2020;11(318):318. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00318
  25. 25. Shutsrirung A, Chromkaew Y, Pathom-Aree W, Choonluchanon S, Boonkerd N. Diversity of endophytic actinobacteria in mandarin grown in northern Thailand, their phytohormone production potential and plant growth promoting activity. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 2013;59(3):322-330
  26. 26. Alblooshi AA, Purayil GP, Saeed EE, Ramadan GA, Tariq S, Altaee AS, et al. Biocontrol potential of endophytic actinobacteria against fusarium solani, the causal agent of sudden decline syndrome on date palm in the UAE. Journal of Fungi. 2022;8:8. DOI: 10.3390/jof8010008
  27. 27. Li X, Huang P, Wang Q, Xiao L, Liu M, Bolla K, et al. Staurosporine from the endophytic Streptomyces sp. strain CNS-42 acts as a potential biocontrol agent and growth elicitor in cucumber. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2014;106(3):515-525
  28. 28. Ding WJ, Zhang SQ, Wang JH, Lin YX, Liang QX, Zhao WJ, et al. A new di-O-prenylated flavone from an actinomycete Streptomyces sp. MA-12. Journal of Asian Natural Product Research. 2013;15:209-214
  29. 29. Igarashi Y, Ogura H, Furihata K, Oku N, Indananda C, Thamchaipenet A. Maklamicin, an antibacterial polyketide from an endophytic Micromonospora sp. Journal of Natural Products. 2011;74(4):670-674
  30. 30. Yan LL, Han NN, Zhang YQ, Yu LY, Chen J, Wei YZ, et al. Antimycin A18 produced by an endophytic Streptomyces albidoflavus isolated from a mangrove plant. Journal of Antibiotics. 2010;63:259-261
  31. 31. Dudeja SS, Giri R, Saini R, Suneja-Madan P, Kothe E. Interaction of endophytic microbes with legumes. Journal of Basic Microbiology. 2012;52(3):248-260
  32. 32. Chen HH, Zhao GZ, Park DJ, Zhang YQ, Xu LH, Lee JC, et al. Micrococcus endophyticus sp. nov., isolated from surface-sterilized Aquilaria sinensis roots. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2009;59(5):1070-1075
  33. 33. Qin S, Zhu WY, Jiang JH, Klenk HP, Li J, Zhao GZ, et al. Pseudonocardia tropica sp. nov., an endophytic actinomycete isolated from the stem of Maytenus austroyunnanensis. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2010;60(11):2524-2528
  34. 34. Rachniyom H, Matsumoto A, Indananda C, Duangmal K, Takahashi Y, Thamchaipenet A. Actinomadurasyzygii sp. nov., an endophytic actinomycete isolated from roots of a jambolan plum tree (Syzygiumcumini L. Skeels). International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2015;65:1946-1949
  35. 35. Shen Y, Zhang Y, Liu C, Wang X, Zhao J, Jia F, et al. Micromonosporazeae sp. nov., a novel endophytic actinomycete isolated from corn root (Zea mays L.). The Journal of Antibiotics. 2014;67(11):739-743
  36. 36. Castillo UF, Browne L, Strobel G, Hess WM, Ezra S, Pacheco G, et al. Biologically active endophytic Streptomycetes from Nothofagus spp. and other plants in Patagonia. Microbial Ecology. 2007;53(1):12-19
  37. 37. Rosenblueth M, Martínez-Romero E. Bacterial endophytes and their interactions with hosts. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions. 2006;19:827-837
  38. 38. Oskay M, Usame T, A. and Azeri, C. Antibacterial activity of some actinobacteriaisolated from farming soils of Turkey. African Journal Biotechnology. 2004;3(9):441-446
  39. 39. Basilio A, Gonzalez I, Vicente MF, Gorrochategui J, Cabello A, Gonzalez A, et al. Patterns of antimicrobial activities from soil actinobacteriaisolated under different conditions of pH and salinity. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2003;95(4):814-823
  40. 40. Wang Y, Zhang ZS, Ruan JS, Wang YM, Ali SM. Investigation of actinomycete diversity in the tropical rainforests of Singapore. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology. 1999;23(3):178-187
  41. 41. Masand M, Jose PA, Menghani E, Jebakumar SRD. Continuing hunt for endophytic actinobacteriaas a source of novel biologically active metabolites. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2015;31(12):1863-1875
  42. 42. Ababutain IM, Aziz ZKA, Al-Meshhen NA. Lincomycin antibiotic biosysthesis produced by Streptomyces sp. isolated from Saudi Arabia soil: Taxonomical, antimicrobial and insecticidal studies on the producing organism. Canadian. Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences. 2012;6(1):1739
  43. 43. Mohseni M, Norouzi H, Hamedi J, Roohi A. Screening of antibacterial producing Actinobacteria from sediments of the Caspian Sea. International Journal of Molecular and Cellular Medicine. 2013;2(2):64-71
  44. 44. Srinivasan MC, Laxman RS, Deshpande MV. Physiology and nutritional aspects of actinomycetes: An overview. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 1991;7:171-184
  45. 45. Sprusansky O, Stirrett K, Skinner D, Denoya C, Westpheling J. The bkd R gene of Streptomyces coelicolor is required for morphogenesis and antibiotic production and encodes a transcriptional regulator of a branched-chain amino acid dehydrogenase complex. Journal of Bacteriology. 2005;187(2):664-671
  46. 46. George M, Anjumol A, George G, Mohamed Hatha AA. Distribution and bioactive potential of soil actinobacteria from different ecological habitats. African Journal of Microbiology Research. 2012;6:2265-2271
  47. 47. Kuster E. The actinomycetes. In: Burges A, Raw F, editors. Soil Biology. London: Academic Press. pp. 111-124
  48. 48. Walker JD, Colwell RR. Factors affecting enumeration and isolation of actinobacteriafrom Chesapeake Bay and southeastern Atlantic Ocean sediments. Marine Biology. 1975;30(3):193-201
  49. 49. Takami H, Inoue A, Fuji F, Horikoshi K. Microbial flora in the deepest sea mud of the Mariana trench. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 1997;152(2):279-285
  50. 50. Williams ST, Goodfellow M, Alderson G. Genus Streptomyces. Waksman and Henrici 1943, 399AL. Vol. 2. New York: Springer Verlag; 1989. pp. 2028-2090
  51. 51. Takahashi Y, Matsumoto A, Seino A, Iwai Y, Omura S. Rare ActinobacteriaIsolated from desert soils. Actinomycetologica. 1996;10(2):91-97
  52. 52. Leuchtmann A. Systematics, distribution, and host specificity of grass endophytes. Natural Toxins. 1993;1(3):150-162
  53. 53. Shen FT, Yen JH, Liao CS, Chen WC, Chao YT. Screening of rice endophytic biofertilizers with fungicide tolerance and plant growth-promoting characteristics. Sustainability. 2019;11:1133
  54. 54. Petrini O, Sieber TN, Toti L, Viret O. Ecology, metabolite production, and substrate utilization in endophytic fungi. Natural Toxins. 1992;1(3):185-196
  55. 55. Singh R, Dubey AK. Endophytic actinobacteria as emerging source for therapeutic compounds. Indo Global Journal of Pharmaceutical Science. 2015;5:106-116
  56. 56. Indananda C, Thamchaipenet A, Matsumoto A, Inahashi Y, Duangmal K, Takahashi Y. Actinoallomurus oryzae sp. nov., an endophytic actinomycete isolated from roots of a Thai jasmine rice plant. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2011;61(4):737-741
  57. 57. Gu Q, Zheng W, Huang Y. Glycomyces sambucus sp. nov., an endophytic actinomycete isolated from the stem of Sambucus adnata wall. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2007;57(9):1995-1998
  58. 58. Kafur A, Khan AB. Influence of cultural parameters on antimicrobial activity of endophytic Streptomyces sp. Cr 12 from Catharanthus roseus leaves. International Journal of Drug Delivery. 2011;3:425-431
  59. 59. Du H, Su J, Yu L, Zhang Y. Isolation and physiological characteristics of endophytic actinobacteria from medicinal plants. Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao. 2013;53:15-23
  60. 60. Passari AK, Mishra VK, Saikia R, Gupta VK, Singh BP. Isolation, abundance and phylogenetic affiliation of endophytic actinobacteria associated with medicinal plants and screening for their in vitro antimicrobial biosynthetic potential. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2015;6:273
  61. 61. Compant S, Duffy B, Nowak J, Clement C, Barka EA. Use of plant growth promoting bacteria for biocontrol of plant diseases: Principles, mechanisms of action and future prospects. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2005;71(89):4951-4959
  62. 62. Nimnoi P, Pongsilp N, Lumyong S. Endophytic actinobacteriaisolated from Aquilaria crassna Pierre ex Lec and screening of plant growth promoters production. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2010;26(2):193-203
  63. 63. Coombs JT, Franco CMM. Isolation and identification of Actinobacteria from surface-sterilized wheat roots. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2003;69(9):5603-5608
  64. 64. Taechowisan T, Lu C, Shen Y, Lumyong S. Secondary metabolites from endophytic Streptomyces aureofaciens CMUAc130 and their antifungal activity. Microbiology. 2005;151:691-1695
  65. 65. Tan RX, Zou WX. Endophytes: A rich source of functional metabolites (1987 to 2000). Natural Product Reports. 2001;18(4):448-459
  66. 66. Loria R, Bukhalid RA, Fry BA, King RR. Plant pathogenicity in the genus streptomyces. Plant Disease. 1997;81(8):836-846
  67. 67. Nalini MS, Prakash HS. Diversity and bioprospecting of actinomycete endophytes from the medicinal plants. Annals of Microbiology Letters in Applied Microbiology. 2017;64(4):261-270
  68. 68. Qin S, Xing K, Jiang JH, Xu LH, Li WJ. Biodiversity, bioactive natural products and biotechnological potential of plant-associated endophytic actinobacteria. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2011;89(3):457-473
  69. 69. Yandigeri MS, Malviya N, Solanki MK, Shrivastava P, Sivakumar G. Chitinolytic Streptomyces vinaceusdrappus S5MW2 isolated from Chilika lake, India enhances plant growth and bio-control efficacy through chitin supplementation against Rhizoctonia solani. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2015;31:1217-1225
  70. 70. Verma VC, Gond SK, Kumar A, Mishra A, Kharwar RN, Gange AC. Endophytic Actinobacteria from Azadirachta indica A. Juss.: Isolation, diversity, and anti-microbial activity. Microbial Ecology. 2009;57(4):749-756
  71. 71. Zin NM, Loi CS, Sarmin NM, Rosli AN. Cultivation-dependent characterization of endophytic Actinomycetes. Research Journal of Microbiology. 2010;5(8):717-724
  72. 72. Conn VM, Franco CMM. Analysis of the endophytic Actinobacterial population in the roots of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) by terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism and sequencing of 16S rRNA clones. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2004;70(3):1787-1794
  73. 73. Phuakjaiphaeo C, Kunasakdakul K. Isolation and screening for inhibitory activity of Alternaria brassicicola endophytic actinobacteria from Centella asiatica (L.) urban. Journal of Agricultural Technology. 2015;11:903-912
  74. 74. Bacilio-Jimenez M, Aguilar-Flores S, del Valle MV, Perez A, Zepeda A, Zenteno E. Endophytic bacteria in rice seeds inhibit early colonization of roots by Azospirillum brasilense. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2001;33(2):167-172
  75. 75. Khush, G.S. (1992). Bennett, J. Nodulation and Nitrogen Fixation in Rice. Potential and Prospects IRRI Press, Manila.
  76. 76. Poon ES, Huang TC, Kuo TT. Possible mechanisms of symptom inhibition of bacterial blight of rice by an endophytic bacterium isolated from rice. Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica. 1977;18:61-70
  77. 77. Hallmann J, Quadt-Hallmann A, Mahaffee WF, Kloepper JW. Bacterial endophytes in agricultural crops. Canadian Journal of Microbiology. 1997;43(10):895-914
  78. 78. Huang J. Ultrastructure of bacterial penetration in plants. Annual Review of Phytopathology. 1986;24(1):141-157
  79. 79. Gohain A, Gogoi A, Debnath R, Yadav A, Singh BP, Gupta VK, et al. Antimicrobial biosynthetic potential and genetic diversity of endophytic actinobacteriaassociated with medicinal plants. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2015;362(19):158
  80. 80. Hasegawa S, Meguro A, Shimizu M, Nishimura T, Kunoh H. Endophytic Actinobacteria and their interactions with host plants. Actinomycetologica. 2006;20(2):72-81
  81. 81. Shimizu M, Furumai T, Igarashi Y, Onaka H, Nishimura T, Yoshida R, et al. Association of induced disease resistance of rhododendron seedlings with inoculation of Streptomyces sp. R-5 and treatment with actinomycin D and amphotericin B to the tissue-culture medium. The Journal of Antibiotics. 2001;54(6):501-505
  82. 82. Tamreihao K, Ningthoujam DS, Nimaichand S, Singh ES, Reena P, Singh SH, et al. Biocontrol and plant growth promoting activities of Streptomyces corchorusii strain UCR3-16 and preparation of powder formulation for application as biofertilizer agents for rice plant. Microbiological Research. 2016;192:260-270
  83. 83. Podile AR, Kishore GK. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. In: Gnanamanickam SS, editor. Plant-Associated Bacteria. Netherlands: Springer; 2006. pp. 195-230
  84. 84. Cattelan AJ, Hartel PG, Fuhrmann JJ. Screening for plant growth–promoting Rhizobacteria to promote early soybean growth. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 1999;63(6):1670-1680
  85. 85. Nimaichand S, Devi AM, Li and W.J. Direct plant growth-promoting ability of actinobacteria in grain legumes. In: Subramaniam G, Arumugam S, Rajendran V, editors. Plant Growth Promoting Actinobacteria: A New Avenue for Enhancing the Productivity and Soil Fertility of Grain Legumes. Singapore: Springer Nature; 2016. pp. 1-16
  86. 86. Jacob S, Sudini HK. Indirect plant growth promotion in grain legumes: Role of Actinobacteria. In: Subramaniam G, Arumugam S, Rajendran V, editors. Plant Growth Promoting Actinobacteria: A New Avenue for Enhancing the Productivity and Soil Fertility of Grain Legumes. Singapore: Springer Nature; 2016. pp. 17-32
  87. 87. El-Tarabily K, Hardy GEJ, Sivasithamparam K. Performance of three endophytic actinobacteriain relation to plant growth promotion and biological control of Pythium aphanidermatum, a pathogen of cucumber under commercial field production conditions in the United Arab Emirates. European Journal of Plant Pathology. 2010;128:527-539
  88. 88. Hastuti RD, Lestari Y, Suwanto A, Saraswati R. Endophytic Streptomyces spp. as biocontrol agents of Rice bacterial leaf blight pathogen (Xanthomonas oryzae pv. Oryzae). Hayati Journal of Biosciences. 2012;19(4):155-162
  89. 89. Rungin S, Indananda C, Suttiviriya P, Kruasuwan W, Jaemsaeng R, Thamchaipenet A. Plant growth enhancing effects by a siderophore-producing endophytic streptomycetes isolated from a Thai jasmine rice plant (Oryza sativa L. cv. KDML105). Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2012;102(3):463-472
  90. 90. Goudjal Y, Toumatia O, Sabaou N, Barakate M, Mathieu F, Zitouni A. Endophytic actinobacteriafrom spontaneous plants of Algerian Sahara: Indole-3-acetic acid production and tomato plants growth promoting activity. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2013;29(10):1821-1829
  91. 91. Purushotham N, Jones E, Monk J, Ridgway H. Community structure of endophytic Actinobacteria in a New Zealand native medicinal plant Pseudowintera colorata (horopito) and their influence on plant growth. Microbial Ecology. 2018;76(3):729-740
  92. 92. Vardharajula S, Skz A, Vurukonda SSKP. Plant growth promoting endophytes and their interaction with plants to alleviate abiotic stress. Current Biotechnology. 2017;6:252-263
  93. 93. Khamna S, Yokota A, Peberdy J, Lumyong S. Indole-3-acetic acid production by Streptomyces sp. isolated from Thai medicinal rhizosphere soils. Eur Asian Journal of Biosciences. 2010;4:23-32
  94. 94. Palaniyandi S, Yang SH, Damodharan K, Suh JW. Genetic and functional characterization of culturable plant-beneficial actinobacteria associated with yam rhizosphere. Journal of Basic Microbiology. 2013;53(12):985-995
  95. 95. Duca D, Lorv J, Patten CL, Rose D, Glick BR. Indole-3-acetic acid in plant–microbe interactions. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2014;106(1):85-125
  96. 96. Passari AK, Mishra VK, Singh G, Singh P, Kumar B, Gupta VK, et al. Insights into the functionality of endophytic actinobacteria with a focus on their biosynthetic potential and secondary metabolites production. Scientific Reports. 2017;7(1):11809
  97. 97. Madhurama G, Sonam D, Urmil PG, Ravindra NK. Diversity and biopotential of endophytic actinobacteriafrom three medicinal plants in India. African Journal of Microbiology Research. 2014;8(2):184-191
  98. 98. Aldesuquy HS, Mansour FA, Abo-Hamed SA. Effect of the culture filtrates of Streptomyces on growth and productivity of wheat plants. Folia Microbiologica. 1998;43(5):465-470
  99. 99. Tokala RK, Strap JL, Jung CM, Crawford DL, Salove MH, Deobald LA, et al. Novel plant-microbe rhizosphere interaction involving Streptomyces lydicus WYEC108 and the pea plant (Pisum sativum). Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2002;68(5):2161-2171
  100. 100. Verma VC, Singh SK, Prakash S. Bio-control and plant growth promotion potential of siderophore producing endophytic Streptomyces from Azadirachta indica A. Juss. Journal of Basic Microbiology. 2011;51(5):550-556
  101. 101. Lin L, Xu X. Indole-3-acetic acid production by endophytic Streptomyces sp. En-1 isolated from medicinal plants. Current Microbiology. 2013;67(2):209-217
  102. 102. Vijayabharathi R, Sathya A, Gopalakrishnan S. A Renaissance in Plant Growth Promoting and Biocontrol Agents by Endophytes. India: Springer; 2016. pp. 37-61
  103. 103. Sreevidya M, Gopalakrishnan S, Kudapa H, Varshney RK. Exploring plant growth-promotion actinobacteria from vermicompost and rhizosphere soil for yield enhancement in chickpea. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. 2016;47(1):85-95
  104. 104. Abdallah ME, Haroun SA, Gomah AA, El-Naggar NE, Badr HH. Application of actinobacteria as biocontrol agents in the management of onion bacterial rot diseases. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection. 2013;46(15):1797-1808
  105. 105. Ahemad M, Kibret M. Mechanisms and applications of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: Current perspective. Journal of King Saud University Science. 2014;26(1):1-20
  106. 106. Hamdali H, Bouizgarne B, Hafidi M, Lebrihi A, Virolle MJ, Ouhdouch Y. Screening for rock phosphate solubilizing Actinobacteria from Moroccan phosphate mines. Applied Soil Ecology. 2008;38(1):12-19
  107. 107. Ezawa TS, Smith SE, Smith FA. P metabolism and transport in AM fungi. Plant and Soil. 2002;244:221-230
  108. 108. van der Heijden MGA, Bardgett RD, van Straalen NM. The unseen majority: Soil microbes as drivers of plant diversity and productivity in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecology Letters. 2008;11(3):296-310
  109. 109. Jog R, Pandya M, Nareshkumar G, Rajkumar S. Mechanism of phosphate solubilization and antifungal activity of Streptomyces spp. isolated from wheat roots and rhizosphere and their application in improving plant growth. Microbiology. 2014;160(4):778-788
  110. 110. Hamdali H, Hafidi M, Virolle MJ, Ouhdouch Y. Rock phosphate solubilizing actinomycetes: Screening for plant growth promoting activities. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2008;24:2565-2575
  111. 111. Bothwell TH. Overview and mechanisms of iron regulation. Nutrition Reviews. 1995;53:237-245
  112. 112. Francis I, Holsters M, Vereecke D. The gram-positive side of plantmicrobe interactions. Environmental Microbiology. 2010;12(1):1-12
  113. 113. Sessitsch A, Kuffner M, Kidd P, Vangronsveld J, Wenzel WW, Fallmann K, et al. The role of plant-associated bacteria in the mobilization and phytoextraction of trace elements in contaminated soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2013;60:182-194
  114. 114. De Oliveira MF, da Silva GM, Sand STVD. Anti-phytopathogen potential of endophytic actinobacteria isolated from tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum) in southern Brazil, and characterization of Streptomyces sp. R18(6), a potential biocontrol agent. Research in Microbiology. 2010;161(7):565-572
  115. 115. Ghodhbane-Gtari F, Essoussi I, Chattaoui M, Chouaia B, Jaouani A, Daffonchio D, et al. Isolation and characterization of non-Frankia actinobacteria from root nodules of Alnus glutinosa, Casuarina glauca and Elaeagnus angustifolia. Symbiosis. 2010;50(1-2):51-57
  116. 116. Glick BR, Penrose DM, Li J. A model for lowering of plant ethylene concentrations by plant growth promoting bacteria. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 1998;190:62-68
  117. 117. Nascimento FX, Rossi MJ, Glick BR. Role of ACC deaminase in stress control of leguminous plants. In: Plant Growth Promoting Actinobacteria. Singapore: Springer; 2016. pp. 179-192
  118. 118. Nascimento FX, Rossi MJ, Soares CRFS, McConkey BJ, Glick BR. New insights into 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase phylogeny evolution and ecological significance. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e99168
  119. 119. Jaemsaeng R, Jantasuriyarat C, Thamchaipenet A. Molecular interaction of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase (ACCD)- producing endophytic Streptomyces sp. GMKU 336 towards salt-stress resistance of Oryza sativa L. cv KDML105. Scientific Reports. 2018;8:1950
  120. 120. Lee SO, Choi GJ, Choi YH, Jang KS, Park DJ, Kim CJ. Isolation and characterization of endophytic Actinobacteria from Chinese cabbage roots as antagonists to Plasmodiophora brassicae. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2008;18:1741-1746
  121. 121. Coombs JT, Michelsen PP, Franco CMM. Evaluation of endophytic actinobacteria as antagonists of Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici in wheat. Biological Control. 2004;29(3):359-366
  122. 122. Cao L, Qiu Z, You J, Tan H, Zhou S. Isolation and characterization of endophytic Streptomyces strains from surface-sterilized tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) roots. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 2004;39(5):425-430
  123. 123. Arfaoui A, El Hadrami A, Daayf F. Pre-treatment of soybean plants with calcium stimulates ROS responses and mitigates infection by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2018;122:121-128
  124. 124. Liu D, Yan R, Fu Y, Wang X, Zhang J, Xiang W. Antifungal, plant growth-promoting, and genomic properties of an endophytic Actinobacterium Streptomyces sp. NEAU-S7GS2. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2019;10:2077
  125. 125. Kaur T, Rani R, Manhas RK. Biocontrol and plant growth promoting potential of phylogenetically new Streptomyces sp. MR14 of rhizospheric origin. AMB Express. 2019;9(1):125
  126. 126. Maggini V, De Leo M, Mengoni A, Gallo ER, Miceli E, Reidel RVB, et al. Plant-endophytes interaction influences the secondary metabolism in Echinacea purpurea (L.) Moench: An in vitro model. Scientific Reports. 2017;7(1):16924
  127. 127. Wan M, Li G, Zhang J, Jiang D, Huang HC. Effect of volatile substances of Streptomyces platensis F-1 on control of plant fungal diseases. Biological Control. 2008;46(3):552-559
  128. 128. Liang J, Xue Q, Niu X, Li Z. Root colonization and effects of seven strains of actinobacteriaon leaf PAL and PPO activities of capsicum. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica. 2005;25(10):2118-2123
  129. 129. Ningthoujam DS, Sanasam S, Nimaichand S. Studies on bioactive actinobacteriain a niche biotope, Nambul River in Manipur, India. International Journal of Molecular and Cellular Medicine. 2011;S6:1-6
  130. 130. Gopalakrishnan S, Humayun P, Vadlamudi S, Vijayabharathi R, Bhimineni RK, Rupela O. Plant growth-promoting traits of Streptomyces with biocontrol potential isolated from herbal vermicompost. Biocontrol Science and Technology. 2011;22(10):1199-1210
  131. 131. Mingma R, Pathom-aree W, Trakulnaleamsai S, Thamchaipenet A, Duangmal K. Isolation of rhizospheric and roots endophytic actinobacteriafrom Leguminosae plant and their activities to inhibit soybean pathogen, Xanthomonas campestris pv. Glycine. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2014;30:271-280
  132. 132. Jalaludeen SAM, Othman K, Ahmad RM, Abidin Z. Isolation and characterization of actinomycets with in vitro antagonistic acvity against fusarium oxysporum from rhizosphere of chilli. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2014;3:54-61
  133. 133. Ashokvardhan T, Rajithasri AB, Prathyusha P, Satyaprasad K. Actinobacteriafrom Capsicum annuum L. rhizosphere soil have the biocontrol potential against pathogenic fungi. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2014;3(4):894-903
  134. 134. Cheng G, Huang Y, Yang H, Liu F. Streptomyces felleus YJ1: Potential biocontrol agents against the Sclerotinia stem rot (Sclerotinia sclerotiorum) of oilseed rape. Journal of Agricultural Science. 2014;6(4):91-98
  135. 135. Kunova A, Bondaldi M, Saracchi M, Pizzatti C, Chen X. Selection of Streptomyces against soil borne fungal pathogens standardized dual culture assay and evaluation of their effects on seed germination and plant growth. BMC Microbiology. 2016;16(1):272
  136. 136. Singh SP, Gaur R. Evaluation of antagonistic and plant growth promoting activities of chitinolytic endophytic actinobacteria associated with medicinal plants against Sclerotium rolfsii in chickpea. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2016;121(2):506-518
  137. 137. Passari AK, Chandra P, Zothanpuia M, V.K., Leo, V.V., Gupta, V.K., Kumar, B. and Singh, B.P. Detection of biosynthetic gene and phytohormone production by endophytic actinobacteria associated with Solanum lycopersicum and their plant-growth-promoting effect. Research in Microbiology. 2016;167(8):692-705
  138. 138. Hassan N, Nakasuji SE, Naznin HA, Kubota M, Ketta H, Shimizu M. Biocontrol potential of an endophytic Streptomyces sp. strain MBCN152-1against Alternaria brassicicola on cabbage plug seedlings. Microbes and Environments. 2017;32(2):133-141
  139. 139. Merrouche R, Yekkou RA, Lamari L, Zitouni A, Mathieu F, Sabaou N. Efciency of Saccharothrix algeriensis NRRL B-24137 and its produced antifungal dithiolopyrrolones compounds to suppress fusarium oxysporum-induced wilt disease occurring in some cultivated crops. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering. 2017;42:2321-2327
  140. 140. Patil HJ, Srivastava AK, Singh DP, Chaudhari BL, Arora DK. Actinobacteriamediated biochemical responses in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) enhances bioprotection against Rhizoctonia solani. Crop Protection. 2011;30(10):1269-1273
  141. 141. Liu Y, Guo J, Li L, Asem MD, Zhang Y, Mohamad OA, et al. Endophytic bacteria associated with endangered plant Ferula sinkiangensis K. M. Shen in an arid land: Diversity and plant growth-promoting traits. Journal of Arid Land. 2017;9(3):432-445
  142. 142. Perez-Rosales E, Alcaraz-Melendez L, Puente ME, Vazquez-Juarez R, Quiroz-Guzmán E, Zenteno-Savín T. Isolation and characterization of endophytic bacteria associated with roots of jojoba (Simmondsia chinensis (link) Schneid). Current Science. 2017;112(2):396
  143. 143. Conn VM, Walker AR, Franco CMM. Endophytic Actinobacteria induce defense pathways in Arabidopsis thaliana. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions. 2008;21(2):208-218
  144. 144. Salla TD, Astarita LV, Santarém ER. Defense responses in plants of eucalyptus elicited by Streptomyces and challenged with Botrytis cinerea. Planta. 2016;243(4):1055-1070
  145. 145. Kurth F, Mailander S, Bonn M, Feldhahn L, Herrmann S, Grobe I, et al. Streptomyces induced resistance against oak powdery mildew involves host plant responses in defense, photosynthesis, and secondary metabolism pathways. Molecular Plant Microbe Interaction. 2014;27:891-900
  146. 146. Beyer M, Diekmann H. The chitinase system of Streptomyces sp. ATCC 11238 and its significance for fungal cell wall degradation. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 1985;23(2):140-146
  147. 147. Taechowisan T, Peberdy JF, Lumyong S. Chitinase production by endophytic Streptomyces aureofaciens CMUAc130 and its antagonism against phytopathogenic fungi. Annals of Microbiology. 2003;53:447-461
  148. 148. Xue L, Xue Q, Chen Q, Lin C, Shen G, Zhao J. Isolation and evaluation of rhizosphere actinobacteria with potential application for biocontrol of Verticillium wilt of cotton. Crop Protection. 2013;43:231-240
  149. 149. Pal KK, McSpadden Gardener B. Biological control of plant pathogens. The Plant Health Instructor. 2006;2:1-15
  150. 150. Prapagdee B, Kuekulvong C, Mongkolsuk S. Antifungal potential of extracellular metabolites produced by Streptomyces hygroscopicus against phytopathogenic fungi. International Journal of Biological Sciences. 2008;4(5):330
  151. 151. Guo B, Wang Y, Sun X, Tang K. Bioactive natural products from endophytes: A review. Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology. 2008;44(2):136-142
  152. 152. Zhang HW, Song YC, Tan RX. Biology and chemistry of endophytes. Natural Product Reports. 2006;23(5):753
  153. 153. Priya MR. Endophytic actinobacteriafrom Indian medicinal plants as antagonists to some phytopathogenic fungi. Scientific Reports. 2012;4(1):259
  154. 154. Castillo UF, Strobel GA, Ford EJ, Hess WM, Porter H, Jensen JB, et al. Munumbicins, wide-spectrum antibiotics produced by Streptomyces NRRL 30562, endophytic on Kennedianigriscansaa the GenBank accession number for the sequence determined in this work is AY127079. Microbiology. 2002;148(9):2675-2685

Written By

Sumi Paul and Arka Pratim Chakraborty

Submitted: 13 September 2021 Reviewed: 05 May 2022 Published: 15 June 2022