Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Green Preparation of Fe2O3 Doped Gum Acacia Derived Porous Carbon/Graphene Ternary Nanocomposite as a Supercapacitor Electrode

Written By

Vijayasree Haridas, Zahira Yaakob and Binitha N. Narayanan

Submitted: 08 January 2022 Reviewed: 07 February 2022 Published: 14 December 2022

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.103080

From the Edited Volume

Green Chemistry - New Perspectives

Edited by Brajesh Kumar and Alexis Debut

Chapter metrics overview

71 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

The extended applications of the supercapacitor are possible with the attainment of a wide potential window since then it can exhibit high energy density too. Thus, organic electrolytes are more feasible in supercapacitors due to the accessibility of wide potential windows and the resultant higher storage/release of energy. A high-performance supercapacitor electrode material is prepared here via an eco-friendly procedure using a combination of Fe2O3, gum acacia derived porous carbon, and a ball-mill synthesized graphene for the first time. The synergistic action of the metal oxide and the carbon materials provided excellent specific capacitance values to the ternary nanocomposite. An appreciable specific capacitance of 433 F/g has been displayed by the composite coated glassy carbon electrode at a current density of 6 A/g in tetraethylammonium tetrafluoroborate—acetonitrile electrolyte at a wide potential window of 2.5 V. The material showed outstanding cyclic stability of 109% of the initial specific capacitance after 5000 repeated cycles.

Keywords

  • ternary nanocomposite
  • graphene
  • Fe2O3
  • acacia
  • green synthesis
  • supercapacitor

1. Introduction

Supercapacitors are potential energy storage systems that revolutionize conventional energy storage devices by their exceptional energy density, power density, promising cyclic stability as well as rate capability [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. Based on the charge storage mechanism, supercapacitors are broadly classified into electrochemical double-layer capacitors (EDLC), pseudocapacitors, and hybrid capacitors. The faradaic reaction is present in the pseudocapacitors, while electrostatic interaction acts in the working of EDLCs, and hybrid capacitors are a combination of both of the above [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]. The power density and shelf life shown by the supercapacitors are higher compared to the batteries; while the energy density is found to be lower [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. To enhance the performance, the development of modified electrodes having high specific capacitance and energy density is required without sacrificing the power density and cyclic stability of EDLC, which is a challenge for the scientific community.

The planar covalently bonded hexagonal 2D materials like graphene act as EDLC due to its surprising electrical conductivity, high surface area, etc. [8, 9]. Graphene is a perfect candidate that provides a good conducting network with a theoretical specific capacitance value of 550 F/g [10]. Similarly, porous carbon with a graphitic structure also functions as a good electrode material due to its outstanding electrical conductivity as well as high surface area [11]. The porous nature of the material additionally provides fast movement of the electrolyte ions. The preparations of such porous networks are found to be difficult as they require costly methods like chemical vapor deposition and electro-spinning methods [12, 13, 14]. Without disturbing the quality and supercapacitor performance, the development of a porous carbon network in a cost-effective manner is an interesting aspect.

Among the different methods of preparation of graphene, ball-mill-assisted exfoliation of graphite has the advantage of the easiness of preparation under mild conditions [15]. In addition, edge functionalization of graphene with milling agent provides synergistic properties advantageous in various applications. The use of naturally occurring biopolymers as milling agents is highly recommendable due to their low cost, eco-friendly nature, and easy availability [16, 17]. Here we use gum acacia for the ball-mill exfoliation of graphite and in addition, it takes the role of the precursor for porous carbon. Gum acacia, also called gum Arabic, is found in different species of Acacia, for example, Acacia arabica, Acacia babul, etc. [18]. It is a highly branched biopolymer composed mainly of high molecular weight glycosidal acid (Arabic acid) [19]. It has medicinal applications as well as it is used in food as an additive, thickening agent, emulsifier, etc. It is also used as a binder in paints, photography, printmaking, ceramics, etc. [18].

The operating voltage of a supercapacitor increases the energy density since it is related to the square of the operating voltage as evident from the equation, E = ½CV2, where, E is the energy density, C is the specific capacitance, and V is the operating voltage [20]. Electrolytes are one of the vital parts, deciding the performance of supercapacitors. Organic electrolytes like tetraethylammonium tetrafluoroborate (TEABF4), acetonitrile (AN), propylene carbonate, etc. enhance the operating voltage and provide greater specific capacitance as well as specific energy by avoiding the complications caused by the splitting of water in the aqueous electrolytes [21]. Kesavan and co-workers developed nitrogen-doped graphene for high energy density supercapacitors in 1 M TEABF4/AN, and obtained a specific capacitance value of 103 F g−1 at a current density of 0.5 mA cm−2 [22]. Kovalska et al., performed supercapacitor studies using a gel electrolyte lithium bis(oxalate)borate in propylene carbonate displaying a capacitance of 78 μF/cm2 using graphene-based supercapacitor [23]. Mostly for commercial purposes, supercapacitors are developed using organic electrolytes. But compared to the aqueous electrolyte, organic electrolytes reduce the electrolyte conductivity proceeding slower diffusion of the electrolyte to the electrode [21]. Therefore, developing a better electrode material with suitable functionalization reform the demerit caused by the organic electrolytes.

Hou et al., synthesized nitrogen-doped porous carbon nanosheets from natural silk and obtained a specific capacitance value of 242 F/g at a current density of 0.1 A/g [24]. Wang and co-workers prepared nitrogen-doped porous carbon from silkworm excrement and utilized it for high-energy-density symmetrical supercapacitor having an energy density of 138.4 Wh kg−1 and lithium-ion hybrid electrochemical capacitors of energy density 242.2 Wh kg−1 [12]. Liu et al., synthesized graphene-like porous carbon nanosheets from salvia splendens and displayed good capacity retention from 1 to 100 A/g [25].

The introduction of metal oxides in the carbon matrix improves the supercapacitor performance due to pseudocapacitance behavior in addition to the EDLC nature of carbon species [26]. The transition metal oxides like Fe2O3, MnO2, RuO2, NiCo2O4, etc. improve the supercapacitor performance of graphene-like materials by adapting pseudocapacitive behavior [27, 28, 29, 30]. The non-toxic nature and low cost together with high theoretical capacitance promote the use of Fe2O3 as a supercapacitor electrode material [31]. The conducting carbon network on Fe2O3 can provide excellent supercapacitor properties to the combination [31, 32].

Herein, we have developed a Fe2O3 decorated biomass-derived porous carbon/graphene ternary nanocomposite in an eco-friendly and cost-effective manner. Environmentally benign gum acacia is used here for the exfoliation purpose. The composite was characterized and supercapacitor performance studies were done via cyclic voltammetric (CV), galvanostatic charge-discharge (CD), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopic (EIS) studies in 1 M tetraethylammonium tetrafluoroborate-acetonitrile (TEABF4/AN). The ternary composite showed excellent supercapacitor performance with a specific capacitance value of 433 F/g at a current density of 6 A/g and outstanding cyclic stability of 109% of the initial specific capacitance after 5000 repeated cycles.

Advertisement

2. Experimental

2.1 Materials

Graphite flake (Sigma Aldrich Chemicals India Pvt. Ltd.), FeCl3.6H2O (Loba Chemie), gum acacia (Loba Chemie), ammonia (Nice Chemicals Pvt. Ltd.) ethanol (98.5%), and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA, Loba Chemie) of reagent grade were used as such without purification. Electrolytic water (using electrolytic water purifier-double stage water purification system—type II water, W3T324491, EVOQUA Water Technologies) was used throughout the electrochemical experiments. Deionized water was used for the material preparation.

2.2 Preparation of Fe2O3/porous carbon graphene ternary composite

For the exfoliation of graphite, the planetary ball-mill procedure was used with 9 balls of 1 cm diameter and 5 balls of 2 cm diameter. The ball to powder weight ratio is fixed to be 4:1. Forty-nine gram of gum acacia and 1 g of graphite were mixed well and the resulting mixture is then dry milled for 30 hours. To the ball-milled mixture, 75 ml of water was added and then wet-milled for 3 hours. The mixture was then recovered from the ball mill and 425 ml of water was added which was further sonicated (Bath Sonicator, 6.5 L, PCI Analytics Ltd.) for 1 hour. Centrifugation is carried out to remove unexfoliated graphite. 6.77 g of FeCl3.6H2O dissolved in 50 ml water was then added to the graphene dispersion under sonication. Ammonia solution was then added until basic pH and the obtained solution was kept overnight. Hydrothermal treatment was given to the dispersion in a tightly closed Teflon container at 120°C for 18 hours. The treated solution was transferred to a dialysis membrane (Himedia Dialysis Membrane-50, 14.3 mm diameter, 1.61 ml/cm approximate capacity) and dialyzed using water by stirring for a day until chloride ions were completely removed. It was dried and calcined for 3 hours in a tubular furnace at 350°C in a crucible closed with aluminum foil. The ternary system is further designated as Fe2O3-PC/graphene. Binary systems without Fe2O3 and without graphene are represented as PC/graphene and Fe2O3-PC, respectively, where PC indicates porous carbon.

2.3 Material characterization

X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements of the materials were conducted by an advanced X-ray powder diffractometer (Bruker AXS D8 with CuKα radiation 0.15406 nm) in a 2θ range of 10–90°. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra were measured using a Perkin Elmer Spectrum TwoL1600300 FTIR Spectrometer. Raman analysis was conducted to analyze the defective nature of the prepared composite using JASCO NRS-4100 Spectrometer of 532 nm wavelength laser light. To study morphology, transmission electro microscopic images were taken using a high-resolution transmission electron microscope (TEM/JEM 2100). To investigate the elemental composition and nature of bonding, X-ray photoelectron microscopic analysis was performed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy with Auger electron spectroscopy module (PHI 5000 Versa Prob II, FEI Inc.) with C1s as internal standard.

2.4 Electrochemical measurements

The electrochemical studies were recorded using CHI-760E Electrochemical Analyzer (CH Instruments, USA) with the techniques cyclic voltammetry (CV), galvanostatic charge-discharge (GCD), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). All of the measurements were done in 1 M TEABF4/AN electrolyte using a modified glassy carbon electrode (GCE) as the working electrode, Pt wire as the counter electrode, and Ag/AgCl as the reference electrode. The studies were conducted by drop coating the dispersion on GCE as prepared by sonicating 70 wt% composite, 15 wt% carbon black (Phillips Carbon Black Limited), and 15 wt% PVA in 60 vol% ethanol-water mixture. The specific capacitance values were calculated from the following equation based on CD studies [33].

Specificcapacitance=IΔt/AΔVE1

Where I is the current (mA), t is the discharge time (s), ΔV represents the potential window (V), and A is the area of the electrode of the CD measurement. EIS measurements were conducted with an amplitude of 5 mV in a frequency range of 0.01–10,000 Hz.

Advertisement

3. Results and discussion

A ternary composite of Fe2O3 with carbon nanostructures is prepared here for its use as a supercapacitor electrode material. The composite preparation was attained via ball-mill-assisted exfoliation of graphite with gum acacia and further hydrothermal treatment of the obtained graphene dispersion with the iron oxide precursor. The as-prepared colloidal mixture is dried and heat-treated for the formation of Fe2O3embedded porous carbon on the highly conducting graphene sheets. The porous nature of the carbon derived from gum acacia can be a result of the release of gaseous materials such as H2O, CO2, etc. during the heat treatment at 350°C. The different stages in the preparation are schematically illustrated in Figure 1 and detailed in the experimental section, from where it is clear that the preparation procedure follows a green strategy throughout.

Figure 1.

Schematic representation showing the formation of Fe2O3—PC/graphene.

The formation of iron species can be explained as follows. During preparation, to the graphene-gum acacia dispersion FeCl3 is added followed by ammonia. Initially, FeCl3 interacts with basic ammoniacal medium to form Fe(OH)3 precipitate as observed during preparation. In hydrothermal treatment, Fe3+ interacts with polysaccharides in the medium. The alcoholic moieties of polysaccharides exist as deprotonated in basic medium and these negative species coordinate with Fe3+ via electrostatic interaction forming complexes. Since, after hydrothermal treatment, a colloidal solution is obtained, the iron can exist as FeOOH covered by the polysaccharide as in agreement with reports [34]. Dialysis and further heat treatment convert the colloidal iron species to Fe2O3 as evident from various characterization techniques. In addition, during calcination, the polysaccharides from gum acacia got transferred to a porous carbon network embedding the Fe2O3 nanoparticles. These materials lay on the conductive graphene sheets to work as an efficient ternary composite electrode material.

3.1 Material characterization

X-ray diffraction patterns of the ternary composite and Fe embedded carbon shown in Figure 2 displayed broad peaks centered around 2θ values of 24° and 43° indicating the presence of amorphous carbon [35]. Graphitic (002) diffraction is observed as a sharp band at 26.5° [36]. This band is found to be absent on the sample prepared without graphene. Weak bands around 33°, 35.7°, 54°, 62.5°, and 72° in the ternary composite as well as on iron embedded amorphous carbon indicate diffraction from the (104), (110), (116), (214), and (119) planes of α-Fe2O3 in the composites [37, 38]. The results suggest the coexistence of amorphous carbon, graphene, and α-Fe2O3 in the ternary composite.

Figure 2.

XRD patterns of (a) Fe2O3/-PC graphene nanocomposite. And (b) Fe2O3-PC.

FTIR spectra of the samples Fe2O3-PC and Fe2O3-PC/graphene (Figure 3(a)) show peaks corresponding to C-OH (~3400 and 1150 cm−1), C-H (2916 cm−1), C=O (1708 cm−1), CH2 (1380 cm−1), C-O-C (1056 cm−1), and Fe-O (~580 cm−1) suggesting the presence of oxygen-containing functionalities on the carbon that can bind with Fe2O3 [39, 40, 41, 42, 43]. The presence of aromatic carbon stretching of graphene (C=C, 1629 cm−1) is also indicated in the ternary composite [44].

Figure 3.

(a) FTIR spectra of Fe2O3/-PC graphene nanocomposite and Fe2O3-PC, and (b) Raman spectrum of Fe2O3/-PC graphene nanocomposite.

Raman spectrum of the ternary composite (Figure 3(b)) displayed two major peaks corresponding to the D and G bands of carbon matrix at 1350 and 1580 cm−1 [45, 46]. The ID/IG value of 0.71 indicates the presence of disordered graphitic structure in the composite [47]. The broad bands around 700 and 2850 cm−1 are indicative of the hematite and graphitic 2D bands, respectively [45, 48].

The morphology of the ternary composite is investigated from the TEM images (Figure 4). The Fe2O3 nanoparticle embedded porous carbon structure on graphene sheets is well evident in the images. HRTEM image of the Fe2O3 nanoparticle embedded carbon displayed the lattice fringe at 0.26 nm corresponding to the (110) plane of α-Fe2O3 [49]. Graphene prepared with the assistance of gum acacia displayed a sheet-like graphene structure; in addition, torn carbon sheets are also visible with a porous texture (Figure 5).

Figure 4.

(a)–(c) TEM images of Fe2O3/-PC graphene nanocomposite.

Figure 5.

(a)–(c) HRTEM of Fe2O3/-PC and (d) of PC/graphene.

XPS wide scan spectra indicate the presence of C (74.72 at %), O (22.68 at %), and Fe (2.59 at %) in the ternary composite (Figure 6(a)). Deconvoluted C1s (Figure 6(b)) show the interaction between Fe2O3 and carbon as evident from the peak at 283.69 eV. The peak at 284.8 eV indicates the sp3 C-C bond, and the aromatic C=C is confirmed by the peak at 283.99 eV [50]. The slight shift in the reported values of sp3 C-C bond may be a result of the interaction of some of the sp3 C with Fe. The presence of oxygen moieties is validated from the peak at 286.89 eV indicating the presence of C-O-C/C-OH functionalities [50]. In the XPS profile of O1s (Figure 6(c)), the peaks at 532.57 eV, and 531.95 eV indicate the C-O-C and C-OH groups in the ternary composite [51]. A well-specified band noticed at 530.09 eV corresponds to Fe-O-C indicating binding of Fe with carbon via oxygen [52]. The band at 530.73 eV is indicative of Fe-O in Fe2O3 [53]. The Fe-O binding in Fe2O3 and its Fe-C interaction is additionally evident from the band at 531.88 eV [54]. The peak at 532.66 eV further confirms the C-OH functionalities in the composite [55].

Figure 6.

XPS spectra of Fe2O3-PC/graphene nanocomposite (a) wide scan spectra, (b) C 1 s, and (c) O1s.

3.2 Supercapacitor performance evaluation

The supercapacitor performance of the materials is evaluated using CV and CD measurements. CV curves are shown in Figure 7(a), which illustrate both electrochemical double-layer capacitance (EDLC) as well as the pseudocapacitive nature of the materials. The ternary composite displayed a very high current in comparison with GCE, Fe2O3-PC, as well as PC/graphene systems. This indicates a synergistic effect of the ternary system enhancing the electrochemical performance of each of the components. Both the EDLC and redox behavior are displayed in the CV curves [56, 57]. A wide potential window has been attained by the electrodes as a result of the use of organic electrolyte, which can provide high energy density to the system [58].

Figure 7.

(a) Cyclic voltammograms of Fe2O3-PC/graphene, Fe2O3-PC, PC/graphene and GCE in 1 M TEABF4/AN, (b) GCD curves of Fe2O3-PC, PC/graphene and GCE, and (c) GCD curves of Fe2O3-PC/graphene at different current densities.

The charge-discharge curves of GCE, Fe2O3-PC, and PC/graphene are shown in Figure 7(b). The specific capacitance value of Fe2O3-PC (77.4 F/g) was found to be lower than that of PC/graphene (83 F/g) that can be due to the lower conductivity of Fe2O3, whereas the high diffusion of electrolyte on the porous carbon and high conductivity of graphene are the reasons of the enhanced specific capacitance of PC/graphene [59]. The specific capacitance of Fe2O3-PC/graphene (433 F/g) measured at a current density of 6 A/g is found to be excellent as a result of the synergy between the individual components in the hybrid structure. All the systems showed an initial IR drop, but the discharge time for the ternary nanocomposite is found to be slower thereafter. The ternary composite shows good specific capacitance values of 433, 97, 88, 84, 23, 14, and 12 F/g at current densities of 6, 7, 9, 10, 25, 50, and 100 A/g, respectively. The synergistic behavior attained by the ternary composite is composed of high pseudocapacitance of Fe2O3, fast electrolyte diffusion on porous carbon, and the highly conducting high surface area graphene sheets with good EDLC [60]. The galvanostatic CD curves of Fe2O3-PC/graphene-modified electrodes at different current densities are shown in Figure 7(c). As expected, the discharge time and thus the specific capacitance values decrease with an increase in the current density [61].

The stability of the electrode in repeated CD cycles was evaluated at a current density of 10 A/g to check the suitability of present ternary systems in electronic devices (Figure 8(a) and (b)). The performance of the Fe2O3-PC/graphene was slightly improved to 109% of its initial performance after 5000 repeated runs, which is highly promising and potential quality of a supercapacitor electrode material.

Figure 8.

(a) Capacitance retention versus the number of charge-discharge cycles, (b) comparison charge-discharge cycles of first and 5001th cycle and EIS spectrum (c), and (d) of Fe2O3-PC/graphene nanocomposite.

EIS of the ternary composite (Figure 8(c)) indicates Warburg impedance and absence of a semicircle at high-frequency region (Figure 8(d) is indicative of the absence of charge transfer limitations in the composite electrode as well as its high conductivity [62, 63]. The inclination of the EIS plot towards the Y-axis suggested enhanced diffusion of electrolyte ions, which can be resultant of the porous nature of carbon in the composite [64].

Table 1 indicates a comparative supercapacitor performance evaluation of the present ternary composite with other carbon-based electrodes using organic electrolytes (details of the electrode materials are given in the appendix Table A1). The better specific capacitance of the Fe2O3-PC/graphene is well evident from the data.

Sl. No.SystemCurrent density/Scan rateSpecific capacitanceElectrolyte% Retention @ no. of cyclesRef
1NAC@Gr1 A/g228 F/g1 M TEABF4/AN93.64 @ 10,000[65]
2ResFaGO-A10 A/g105 F/g1.5 M Et4NBF472 @ 10,000[66]
3NPCFs50 mA/g306 F/g1 M TEABF4/AN[67]
4GMS1 mV/s125 F/g1 M Et4NBF4/PC100 @ 600[68]
5RGO/V2O50.1 A/g384 F/gLiClO4/PC82.2 @ 10,000[69]
6Graphene-CNT composites1 A/g110 F/g1 M TEABF4/PC[70]
7Co3O4-graphene1 A/g424.2 F/g1 M LiPF6[71]
8PCNS1 mV/s120–150 F/g1 M TEABF4/AN90 @ 10,000[72]
9PNSC2 A/g210 F/g1 M TEABF4/PC95 @ 2000[73]
10Fe2O3-PC/graphene6 A/g433 F/g1 M TEABF4/AN109 @ 5000 cyclesThis work

Table 1.

The specific capacitance of carbon-based graphene nanocomposites using organic electrolytes.

Advertisement

4. Conclusions

A perfectly green procedure is reported here for the preparation of a ternary system having Fe2O3, porous carbon, and graphene as constituents. Gum acacia takes the dual role of exfoliating agent to graphite and the precursor of porous carbon. The material characterization revealed the porous nature of Fe2O3 embedded carbon and the strong interaction between the components. Electrochemical studies revealed the electrochemical double-layer capacitance, pseudocapacitance, and the conducting nature of the composite leading to high specific capacitance values. Excellent cyclic stability of 109% is offered by the nanocomposite even at a high current density of 10 A/g after 5000 continuous charge-discharge measurements.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

Vijayasree Haridas acknowledges UGC, New Delhi, India for UGC-SRF. The authors thank Sree Neelakanta Govt. Sanskrit College Pattambi and the University of Calicut for providing the facilities to carry out the research work. SAIF KOCHI, India is acknowledged for XRD and TEM analyses. The authors express gratitude to ACMS, IIT, Kanpur, for XPS analysis, and PSG Institute of Advanced Studies, Coimbatore for Raman analysis. Technical support for instrument purchase resulting from FIST-2016 grant of Department of Science & Technology, New Delhi, India is greatly acknowledged.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

All authors declare, there are no financial/commercial conflicts of interest associated with this manuscript.

Advertisement

Sl. No.System designationElectrode material
1NAC@GrNitrogen- and oxygen-enriched porous carbon/graphene
2ResFaGO-ACarbon-graphene composite under Ar atmosphere
3NPCFsSandwich-like nitrogen-doped porous carbon/graphene nanoflakes
4GMSCarbon graphene mesosponge
5RGO/V2O5Reduced graphene oxide/V2O5
6Graphene-CNT compositesGraphene-carbon nanotube composites
7Co3O4-grapheneNanoporous Co3O4-graphene composite
8PCNSPorous carbon nanosheets
9PNSCPorous network structured carbon

Table A1.

Details of various graphene-porous carbon-based modified electrodes (mentioned in Table 1 of the manuscript) used in the supercapacitor performance evaluation studies.

References

  1. 1. Conway BE. Electrochemical Supercapacitors: Scientific Fundamentals and Technological Applications. New York: Kluwer-Plenum; 1999
  2. 2. Arico AS, Pruce P, Scrosati P, Tarascon JM, Schalkwijk WV. Nanostructured materials for advanced energy conversion and storage devices. Nature Materials. 2005;4:366-377
  3. 3. Chu A, Braatz P. Comparison of commercial supercapacitors and high power lithium-ion batteries for power-assist applications in hybrid electric vehicles initial characterization. Journal of Power Sources. 2002;112:236-246
  4. 4. Burke A. Ultracapacitors: Why, how, and where is the technology. Journal of Power Sources. 2000;91:37-50
  5. 5. Chen SM, Ramachandran R, Mani V, Saraswathi R. Recent advancements in electrode materials for the Highperformance electrochemical supercapacitors: A review. International Journal of Electrochemical Science. 2014;9:4072-4085
  6. 6. Wang G, Zhang L, Zhang J. A review of electrode materials for electrochemical supercapacitors. Chemical Society Reviews. 2012;2012(41):797-828
  7. 7. Conway BE, Birss VJ. Wojtowicz the role and utilization of pseudocapacitance for energy storageby supercapacitors. Journal of Power Sources. 1997;66:1-14
  8. 8. Geim AK, Novoselov KS. The rise of graphene. Nature Materials. 2007;6:183-191
  9. 9. Shan CS, Yang HF, Song JF, Han DX, Ivaska A, Niu L. Graphene: Synthesis and applications. Analytical Chemistry. 2009;81:2378-2382
  10. 10. Ke Q, Wang J. Graphene-based materials for supercapacitor electrodes – A review. Journal of Materiomics. 2016;2:37-54
  11. 11. Ma C, Xu J, Fan Q, Shi J, Song Y. Synthesis and electrochemical performance of high surface area hierarchical porous carbon with ultrahigh mesoporosity for high-performance supercapacitors. Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry. 2019;23:2153-2163
  12. 12. Wang P, Zhang G, Li MY, Yin YX, Li JY, Li G, et al. Porous carbon for high-energy density symmetrical supercapacitor and lithium-ion hybrid electrochemical capacitors. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2019;375:122020
  13. 13. Zhong Y, Xia XH, Deng SJ, Zhan JY, Fang RY, Xia Y, et al. Popcorn inspired porous microcellular carbon: Rapid puffing fabrication from rice and its applications in lithium-sulfur batteries. Advanced Energy Materials. 2018;8:1701110
  14. 14. Yang XY, Chen LH, Li Y, Rooke JC, Sanchez C, Su BL. Hierarchically porous materials: Synthesis strategies and structure design. Chemical Society Reviews. 2017;46:481-558
  15. 15. Balasubramanyan S, Sasidharan S, Poovathinthodiyil R, Ramakrishnan RM, Narayanan BN. Sucrose-mediated mechanical exfoliation of graphite: A green method for the large scale production of graphene and its application in catalytic reduction of 4-nitrophenol. New Journal of Chemistry. 2017;41:11969-11978
  16. 16. Mallick H, Sarkar A. An experimental investigation of electrical conductivities in biopolymers. Bulletin of Materials Science. 2000;23:319-324
  17. 17. Chabot V, Kim B, Sloper B, Tzoganakis C, Yu A. High yield production and purification of few layer graphene by gum Arabic assisted physical sonication. Scientific Reports. 2013;3(1378):1-7
  18. 18. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gum_arabic
  19. 19. Bahadur S, Sahu UK, Sahu D, Sahu G, Roy A. Review on natural gums and mucilage and their application as excipient, journal of applied. Pharmaceutical Research. 2017;5:13-21
  20. 20. Choi C, Ashby DS, Butts DM, DeBlock RH, Wei Q, Lau J, et al. Achieving high energy density and high power density with pseudocapacitive materials. Nature Reviews Materials. 2020;5:5-19
  21. 21. Li SM, Yang SY, Wang YS, Tsai HP, Tien HW, Hsiao ST, et al. N-doped structures and surface functional groups of reduced graphene oxide and their effect on the electrochemical performance of supercapacitor with organic electrolyte. Journal of Power Sources. 2015;278:218-229
  22. 22. Kesavan T, Aswathy R, Arul Raj I, Prem Kumar T, Ragupathy P. Nitrogen-doped graphene as electrode material with enhanced energy density for next-generation supercapacitor application. ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology. 2015;4:88-92
  23. 23. Kovalska EC. Kocabas organic electrolytes for graphene-based supercapacitor: Liquid, gel or solid. Materials Today Communications. 2016;7:155-160
  24. 24. Hou J, Cao C, Idrees F, Ma X. Hierarchical porous nitrogen-doped carbon Nanosheets derived from silk for ultrahigh-capacity battery anodes and supercapacitors. ACS Nano. 2015;9:2556-2564
  25. 25. Liu B, Yang M, Chen H, Liu Y, Yang D, Li H. Graphene-like porous carbon nanosheets derived from salvia splendens for high-rate performance supercapacitors. Journal of Power Sources. 2018;397:1-10
  26. 26. Davies A, Yu A. Material advancements in supercapacitors: From activated carbon to carbon nanotube and graphene. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2011;89:1342-1357
  27. 27. Wang H, Xu Z, Yi H, Wei H, Guo Z, Wang X. One-step preparation of single-crystalline Fe2O3 particles/graphene composite hydrogels as high performance anode materials for supercapacitors. Nano Energy. 2014;7:86-96
  28. 28. Lei Z, Zhang J, Zhao X. Ultrathin MnO2 nanofibers grown on graphitic carbonspheres as high-performance asymmetric supercapacitor electrodes. Journal of Materials Chemistry. 2012;22:153-160
  29. 29. Majumdar D, Maiyalagan T, Jiang Z. Recent Progress in ruthenium oxide-based composites for supercapacitor applications. ChemElectroChem. 2019;6:4343-4372
  30. 30. Wu Z, Zhu Y, Ji X. NiCo2O4-based materials for electrochemical supercapacitors. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 2014;2:14759-14772
  31. 31. Zeng Y, Yu M, Meng Y, Fang P, Lu X, Tong Y. Iron-based supercapacitor electrodes: Advances and challenges. Advanced Energy Materials. 2016;6:1601053
  32. 32. Tian Y, Hu X, Wang Y, Li C, Wu X. Fe2O3 nanoparticles decorated on graphene-carbon nanotubes conductive networks for boosting the energy density of all-solid-state asymmetric supercapacitor. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. 2019;7:9211-9219
  33. 33. Jeong KH, Lee HJ, Simpson MF, Jeong SM. Electrochemical synthesis of graphene/MnO2 Nano-composite for application to supercapacitor electrode. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. 2016;16:4620-4625
  34. 34. Somsook E, Hinsin D, Buakhrong P, Teanchai R, Mophan N, Pohmakotr M, et al. Interactions between iron(III) and sucrose, dextran, or starch in complexes. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2005;61:281-287
  35. 35. Shang H, Lu Y, Zhao F, Chao C, Zhang B, Zhang H. Preparing high surface area porous carbon from biomass by carbonization in molten salt medium. RSC Advances. 2015;5:75728-75734
  36. 36. Wang G, Yang J, Park J, Gou X, Wang B, Liu H, et al. Facile synthesis and characterization of graphene nanosheets. Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2008;112:8192-8195
  37. 37. Manikandan A, Vijaya JJ, Kennedy LJ. Structural, optical and magnetic properties of porous α-Fe2O3 nanostructures prepared by rapid combustion method. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. 2013;13:2986-2992
  38. 38. Kumar B, Smita K, Galeas S, Sharma V, Guerrero VH, Debut A, et al. Characterization and application of biosynthesized iron oxide nanoparticles using Citrus paradisi peel: A sustainable approach. Inorganic Chemistry Communications. 2020;119:108116
  39. 39. Samargandi D, Zhang X, Liu F, Tian S. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy for discrimination of fenugreek seeds from different producing areas. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research. 2014;6:19-24
  40. 40. Emiru TF, Ayele DW. Controlled synthesis, characterization and reduction of graphene oxide: A convenient method for large scale production. Egyptian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. 2017;4:74-79
  41. 41. Duygu DY, Udoh AU, Ozer TB, Akbulut A, Erkaya IA, Yildiz K, et al. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy for identification of Chlorella vulgaris Beijerinck 1890 and Scenedesmus obliquus (Turpin) Kützing 1833. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2012;16:3817-3824
  42. 42. Shopska M, Zara P, Zheleva C, Paneva DG, Lliev M, Kadinov GB, et al. Biogenic iron compounds: XRD, Mossbauer and FTIR study. Central European Journal of Chemistry. 2013;11:215-227
  43. 43. Kumar B, Smita K, Galeas S, Guerrero VH, Debut A, Cumbal L. One-pot biosynthesis of Maghemite (γ-Fe2O3) nanoparticles in aqueous extract of Ficus carica fruit and their application for antioxidant and 4-Nitrophenol reduction. Waste and Biomass Valorization. 2021;12:3575-3587
  44. 44. Yang W, Chen Y, Wang J, Peng T, Xu J, Yang B, et al. Reduced graphene oxide/carbon nanotube composites as electrochemical energy storage electrode applications. Nanoscale Research Letters. 2018;13:181
  45. 45. Ferrari AC, Meyer JC, Scardaci V, Casiraghi C, Lazzeri M, Mauri F, et al. Physical Review Letters. 2006;97:187401-1-187401-4
  46. 46. Dresselhaus BS, Jorio A, Souzafilho AG, Saito R. Defect characterization in graphene and carbon nanotubes using Raman spectroscopy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A. 2010;368:5355-5377
  47. 47. Geng X, Guo Y, Li D, Li W, Zhu C, Wei X, et al. Interlayer catalytic exfoliation realizing scalable production of large-size pristine few-layer graphene. Scientific Reports. 2013;3:1-6
  48. 48. Song K, Lee Y, Jo MR, Nam KM, Kang YM. Comprehensive design of carbonencapsulated Fe3O4 nanocrystals and their lithium storage properties. Nanotechnology. 2012;23:505401
  49. 49. He L, Wu H, Zhang W, Bai X, Chen J, Ikram M, et al. High-dispersed Fe2O3/Fe nanoparticles residing in 3D honeycomb-like N-doped graphitic carbon as high-performance room-temperature NO2 sensor. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2021;405:124252
  50. 50. Wang G, Yang J, Park J, Gou X, Wang B, Liu H, et al. Facile synthesis and characterization of graphenenanosheets. Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2008;112:8192-8195
  51. 51. Pedrosa M, Silva ESD, Martínez LMP, Drazic G, Falaras P, Faria JL, et al. Hummers’ and Brodie’s graphene oxides as photocatalysts for phenol degradation. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2020;567:243-255
  52. 52. Zubir NA, Yacou C, Motuzas J, Zhang X, Costa JCD. Scientific Reports. 2015;4:4594-4602
  53. 53. Plecenik T, Gregor M, Sobota R, Truchly M, Satrapinskyy L, Kurth F, et al. Physics Letters. 2013;103:052601-1-052601-4
  54. 54. Muruganandham M, Amutha R, Ahmmad B, Repo E, Sillanpaa M. Self-assembled fabrication of superparamagnetic highly stable mesoporous amorphous iron oxides. Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2010;114:22493-22501
  55. 55. Hashemi SA, Mousavi SM, Faghihi R, Arjmand M, Rahsepar M, Bahrani S, et al. Superior X-ray radiation shielding effectiveness of biocompatible polyaniline reinforced with hybrid graphene oxide-iron tungsten nitride flakes. Polymers. 2020;12:1407
  56. 56. Charoen-amornkitt P, Suzuki T, Tsushima S. Ohmic resistance and constant phase element effects on cyclic voltammograms using a combined model of mass transport and equivalent circuits. Electrochimica Acta. 2017;258:433-441
  57. 57. Kim BK, Sy S, Yu A, Zhang J. Electrochemical Supercapacitors for Energy Storage and Conversion, Handbook of Clean Energy Systems. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2015
  58. 58. Khomenko V, Raymundo-Piñero E, Béguin F. High-energy density graphite/AC capacitor in organic electrolyte. Journal of Power Sources. 2008;177:643-651
  59. 59. Tian H, Wang T, Zhang F, Zhao S, Wan S, He F, et al. Tunable porous carbon spheres for high-performance rechargeable batteries. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 2018;6:12816-12841
  60. 60. Yu P, Duan W, Jiang Y. Porous Fe2O3 Nanorods on hierarchical porous biomass carbon as advanced anode for high-energy-density asymmetric supercapacitors. Frontiers in Chemistry. 2020;8:611852
  61. 61. Kumar YA, Sambasivam S, Ahmed S, Hira K, Zeb W, Uddin TNV, et al. Boosting the energy density of highly efficient flexible hybrid supercapacitors via selective integration of hierarchical nanostructured energy materials. Electrochimica Acta. 2020;364:137318
  62. 62. Nagamuthu S, Vijayakumar S, Muralidharan G. Ag incorporated Mn3O4/AC nanocomposite based supercapacitor devices with high energy density and power density. Dalton Transactions. 2014;43:17528-17538
  63. 63. Liu W, Li X, Zhu M, He X. High-performance all-solid state asymmetric supercapacitor based on Co3O4 nanowires and carbon aerogel. Journal of Power Sources. 2015;282:179-186
  64. 64. Jeon B, Ha T, Lee DY, Choi MS, Lee SW, Jung KH. Preparation and electrochemical properties of porous carbon nanofiber electrodes derived from new precursor polymer: 6FDA-TFMB. Polymers. 2020;12:1851
  65. 65. Zhou S, Xie Q, Wu S, Huang X, Zhao P. Influence of graphene coating on supercapacitive behavior of sandwich-like N- and O-enriched porous carbon/graphene composites in aqueous and organic electrolytes. Ionics. 2017;23:1499-1507
  66. 66. Fernandez GM, Urbano JLG, Enterrıa M, Rojo T, Carriazo D. Flat-shaped carbon–graphene microcomposites as electrodes for high energy supercapacitors. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 2019;7:14646-14655
  67. 67. Zhang Y, Taob B, Xing W, Zhang L, Xue Q, Yan Z. Sandwich-like nitrogen-doped porous carbon/graphene Nanoflakes with high-rate capacitive performance. Nanoscale. 2016;8:7889-7898
  68. 68. Xiong C, Lia B, Lin X, Liu H, Xu Y, Mao J, et al. The recent progress on three-dimensional porous graphene-based hybrid structure for supercapacitor. Composites Part B Engineering. 2019;165:10-46
  69. 69. Liu Z, Zhang H, Yang Q, Chen Y. Graphene/V2O5 hybrid electrode for an asymmetric supercapacitor with high energy density in an organic electrolyte. Electrochimica Acta. 2018;287:149-157
  70. 70. Jung N, Kwon S, Lee D, Yoon DM, Park YM, Benayad A, et al. Synthesis of chemically bonded graphene/carbon nanotube composites and their application in large volumetric capacitance supercapacitors. Advanced Materials. 2013;25:6854-6858
  71. 71. Huang X, Sun B, Chen S, Wang G. Self-assembling synthesis of free-standing Nanoporous graphene–transition-metal oxide flexible electrodes for high-performance lithium-ion batteries and supercapacitors. Chemistry, an Asian Journal. 2014;9:206-211
  72. 72. Sevilla M, Fuertes AB. Direct synthesis of highly porous interconnected carbon Nanosheets and their application as high-performance supercapacitors. ACS Nano. 2014;8:5069-5078
  73. 73. Liang Y, Liang F, Zhong H, Li Z, Fu R, Wu D. An advanced carbonaceous porous network for high-performance organic electrolyte supercapacitors. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 2013;1:7000-7005

Written By

Vijayasree Haridas, Zahira Yaakob and Binitha N. Narayanan

Submitted: 08 January 2022 Reviewed: 07 February 2022 Published: 14 December 2022