IntechOpen

Home > Books > Recent Advances in Gas Chromatography

Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Temperature-Dependent Linear Solvation Energy Relationship for the Determination of Gas-Liquid Partition Coefficients of Organic Compounds in Ionic Liquids

Written By

Amel Ayad, Fabrice Mutelet and Amina Negadi

Submitted: 29 September 2021 Reviewed: 18 January 2022 Published: 03 March 2022

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.102733

Recent Advances in Gas Chromatography IntechOpen
Recent Advances in Gas Chromatography Edited by Fabrice Mutelet

From the Edited Volume

Recent Advances in Gas Chromatography

Edited by Fabrice Mutelet

Book Details Order Print

Chapter metrics overview

137 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics
Advertisement

Abstract

In this work, a new group contribution method was used for calculating gas-to-ionic liquid partition coefficients (log KL) of molecular solutes in ILs with a temperature-dependent linear solvation energy relationship. About 36 group parameters are used to correlate 14,762 log KL data points of organic compounds in ionic liquids. The experimental log KL data have been collected from the published literature for different solutes in ionic liquids at different temperatures within the range of 293.15–396.35 K. The calculated log KL data showed a satisfactory agreement with experimental data with an average absolute relative deviation (AARD) of 6.39%.

Keywords

  • inverse gas chromatography
  • solvation model
  • thermodynamic properties
  • ionic liquids
  • polarity

1. Introduction

Gas chromatography is a widely used technique for the characterization of complex systems in chemical industries but also for the determination of physicochemical properties of solute in the stationary phase. This approach is also known as inverse gas chromatography (IGC) is used to quantify the solute-stationary interactions or the polarity of the last one. At the end of the twentieth century, numerous solvation models were proposed to represent retention data from chromatography. The most well-known models are called Linear Free Energy Relationship (LFER) or Linear Solvation Energy Relationship (LSER). The most recent representation of the LSER model proposed by Abraham [1, 2, 3, 4] is given by Eq. (1).

logSP=c+eE+sS+aA+bB+lLE1

Where SP is a solvation parameter related with the free energy change such as gas–liquid partition coefficient, specific retention volume, or adjusted retention time at a given temperature. The capital letters represent the solutes properties and the lowercase letters the complementary properties of the ionic liquids. The solute descriptors are the excess molar refraction E, dipolarity/polarizability S, hydrogen bond acidity basicity, A and B, respectively, and the gas–liquid partition coefficient on n-hexadecane at 298 K, L. The solute descriptors may be determined using inverse gas chromatography or estimated using a group contribution method. A databank of descriptors for about 4000 compounds may be found in the literature [5, 6, 7]. The coefficients c, e, s, a, b, and l are not simply fitting coefficients, but they reflect complementary properties of the solvent phase. These coefficients are determined by multiple linear regression of Eq. (1). This model was strongly applied to characterize complex fluids.

A large databank of experimental LSER parameters for organic compounds can be found in the literature. Platts et al. proposed to determine these parameters using group contribution methods [5, 6].

In order to improve the predictive applicability of the Abraham model for ionic liquids, Sprunger et al. [8, 9, 10, 11] have proposed a method for predicting log KL for solute dissolved in ILs by splitting each of the six equation coefficients as a cation plus anion sum contribution. In their paper, the gas–liquid partition of solutes in ILs is represented by:

logKL=cKL,cation+cKL,anion+eKL,cation+eKL,anion.E+sKL,cation+sKL,anion.S+aKL,cation+aKL,anion.A+bKL,cation+bKL,anion.B+lKL,cation+lKL,anion.LE2

Other approaches reported in the literature to calculate log KL are based on group contribution methods (GC). This method is useful because we need only to know the structure of the material (IL). Revelli et al. [12] proposed to splits the cation with its alkyl chains into 21 different contributions to estimate log KL for other IL whose cation does not define in the correlation but their groups appear in this method. A new approach was developed by Mutelet et al. [13] who proposed temperature-dependent GC-LSER (TDGC-LSER) for correlating log KL data measured of various solutes in ILs at different temperatures. A reliable prediction was obtained with a standard deviation of 0.13 log units and a coefficient of determination R2 of 0.995. To evaluate the predictive capacity of this model, Mutelet et al. have been used data from five ILs not included in the regression. The deviations vary from 0.09 log units and 0.27 log units depending on the number of data for the groups defined by the IL. The TDGC-LSER model is given by the following equation:

logKL=−2.84418+∑i21nici+∑i21nieiE+∑i21nisiS+∑i21niaiA+∑i21nibiB+∑i21niliL/TE3

In this chapter, we propose to extend the model temperature-dependent GC-LSER (TDGC-LSER) based on the group contribution method to correlate and analysis of log KL values for different solutes in ILs as a function of the temperature from 293.15 to 396.35 K. A new decomposition but also new groups are proposed in this approach. The database includes the alkyl-based ILs as well as functionalized ILs (task-specific ILs) such as alcohols and ethers. The largest number of ILs used in this database was composed of imidazolium cation-based ILs (73 ILs). Three new cations were included, choline, quinolinium, and octanium, each cation occurs only once in the database as well as Sulphonium-Based ILs.

Advertisement

2. Calculation of gas-liquid partition coefficients from inverse gas chromatography data

Partition coefficients KL maybe then calculated from the activity coefficients at infinite dilution, γ1,2∞, using Eq. (4):

KL=RTγ1,2∞P10VsolventE4
Advertisement

3. Data sets and methodology

The objective of this study is to extend the potential applicability of the TDGC-LSER model for the prediction of log KL to different ILs include new functional groups. The ILs used in this study and their abbreviations are listed in Table 1. The families of ILs represent 11 cation types are imidazolium, pyridinium, pyrrolidinium, piperidinium, phosphonium, morpholium, sulphonium, ammonium, choline, quinolinium, octanium. From Figure 1, we can see ILs with respect to their cations used for the correlation of log KL. The largest number of ILs used in this database was composed of imidazolium cation-based ILs. Three new cations were included, choline, quinolinium, and octanium. For the anions, 20 different structures are used, for example tris(pentafluoroethyl)trifluorophosphate, nitrate, bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide, hexafluorophosphate, tetrafluoroborate, and sulfates.

No.AbbreviationIonic liquid NameReference
Imidazolium-Based ILs
1[MMIM]+ [MeSO4]−1-metyl-3-methylimidazolium methylsulfate[14]
2[BMIM]+ [MeSO4]−1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium methylsulfate[15]
3[EMIM]+ [F3AC]−1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium trifluoroacetate[16]
4[HMIM]+ [F3AC]−1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium trifluoroacetate[17]
5[EMIM]+ [Tf2N]−1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imidate[18]
6[EMIM]+ [Tf2N]−1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)Amide[18]
7[EMIM]+ [Tf2N]−1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide[19]
8[EMIM]+ [Tf2N]−1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imidate[18]
9[EMIM]+ [Tf2N]−1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)Amide[18]
10[MMIM]+ [Tf2N]−1-methyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide[19]
11[BMIM]+ [Tf2N]−1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide[20]
12[BMIM]+ [Tf2N]−1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide[19]
13[BMIM]+ [Tf2N]−1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide[21]
14[BMIM]+ [Tf2N]−1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide[22]
15[MEIM]+ [Tf2N]−1-methyl-3-ethylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl) amide[23]
16[M2EIM]+ [Tf2N]−1,2-dimethyl-3-ethylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl) amide[23]
17[HMIM]+ [Tf2N]−1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide[20]
18[HMIM]+ [Tf2N]−1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide[24]
19[HMIM]+ [Tf2N]−1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide[25]
20[OMIM]+ [Tf2N]−1-octyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide[25]
21[OMIM]+ [Tf2N]−1-octyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide[22]
22[(CH2)4SO3HMIM]+ [Tf2N]−1-(4-sulfobutyl)-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide[26]
23[EtOHMIM]+ [Tf2N]−1-ethanol-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide[27]
24[MeoeMIM]+ [Tf2N]−1-(methylethylether)-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide[27]
25[(MeO)2IM]+ [Tf2N]−1,3-dimethoxyimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide[27]
26[(CH2)4SO3HMIm]+ [TFO]−1-(4-sulfobutyl)-3-methylimidazolium trifluoromethanesulfonate[26]
27[(CH2)4SO3HMIm]+ [HSO4]−1-(4-sulfobutyl)-3-methylimidazolium hydrogen sulfate[26]
28[BMIM]+ [TDI]−1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium 4,5-dicyano-2 (trifluoromethyl)imidazolide[28]
29[C2OHMIM]+ [FAP]−1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-3-methylimidazolium tris(pentafluoroethyl)trifluorophosphate[29]
30[C2OHMIM]+ [FAP]−1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-3-methylimidazolium tris(pentafluoroethyl)trifluorophosphate[30]
31[EMIM]+ [FAP]−1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tris(pentafluoroethyl)trifluorophosphate[31]
32[BMIM]+ [N(CN)3]−1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium tricyanomethanide[32]
33[EMIM]+ [BF4]−1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate[33]
34[EMIM]+ [BF4]−1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate[34]
35[BMIM]+ [BF4]−1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate[20]
36[BMIM]+ [BF4]−1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate[33]
37[BMIM]+ [BF4]−1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate[35]
38[BMIM]+ [BF4]−1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate[21]
39[HMIM]+ [BF4]−1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate[33]
40[HMIM]+ [BF4]−1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate[36]
41[OMIM][BF4]−1-octyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate[33]
42[OMIM][BF4]−1-octyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate[21]
43[C2OHMIM]+ [BF4]−1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate[37]
44[PM2IM]+ [BF4]−1-propyl-2,3-dimethylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate[38]
45[PM2IM]+ [BF4]−1-propyl-2,3-dimethylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate[39]
46[EMIM]+ [(MeO)(H)PO2]−1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium methylphosphonate[40]
47[M2MIM]+ [(MeO)(H)PO2]−1.3-dimethylimidazolium methylphosphonate[40]
48[EMIM]+ [EtSO4]−1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium ethylsulfate[41]
49[EMIM]+ [EtSO4]−1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium ethylsulfate[19]
50[BMIM]+ [OcSO4]−1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium octylsulfate[20]
51[BMIM]+ [OcSO4]−1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium octylsulfate[42]
52[EMIM]+ [SCN]−1-ethyl-3-methyl-imidazolium thiocyanate[43]
53[EMIM]+ [SCN]−1-ethyl-3-methyl-imidazolium thiocyanate[22]
54[BMIM]+ [SCN]−1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium thiocyanate[44]
55[BMIM]+ [SCN]−1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium thiocyanate[22]
56[HMIM]+ [SCN]−1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium thiocyanate[45]
57[MMIM]+ [CH3OC2H4SO4]−1-methyl-3-methylimidazolium methoxyethylsulfate[14]
58[MMIM]+ [(CH3)2PO4]−1-methyl-3-methylimidazolium dimethylphosphate[14]
59[BMIM]+ [PF6]−1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate[46]
60[HMIM]+ [PF6]−1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate[47]
61[HMIM]+ [PF6]−1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate[47]
62[MOIM]+ [PF6]−1-methyl-3-octylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate[48]
63[EMIM]+ [CF3SO3]−1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium trifluoromethanesulfonate[49]
64[BMIM]+ [CF3SO3]−1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium trifluoromethanesulfonate[22]
65[HMIM]+ [CF3SO3]−1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium trifluoromethanesulfonate[50]
66[HMIM]+ [CF3SO3]−1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium trifluoromethanesulfonate[22]
67[BMIM]+ [NO3]−1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium nitrate[51]
68[OMIM]+ [NO3]−1-octyl-3-methylimidazolium nitrate[52]
Pyridinium-Based ILs
69[B4MPY]+ [N(CN)2]−1-butyl-4-methylpyridinium dicyanamide[53]
70[BMPY]+ [TDI]−1-Butyl-3-methylpyridinium 4,5-dicyano-2-(trifluoromethyl)imidazolide[28]
71[BMPY]+ [N(CN)3]−1-butyl-4-methylpyridinium tricyanomethanide[32]
72[NEPY]+ [Tf2N]−N-ethylpyridinium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide[14]
73[4MBPY]+ [BF4]−4-methyl-N-butylpyridinium tetrafluoroborate[54]
74[4MBPY]+ [BF4]−4-methyl-N-butylpyridinium tetrafluoroborate[55]
75[4MBPY]+ [BF4]−4-methyl-N-butylpyridinium tetrafluoroborate[46]
76[BMPY]+ [Tf2N]−1-butyl-3-methylpyridinium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide[56]
77[1,3BMPY]+ [CF3SO3]−1-butyl-3-methylpyridinium trifluoromethanesulfonate[57]
78[C2PY]+ [Tf2N]−2-alkylpyridinium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide[22]
79[C4PY]+ [Tf2N]−4-alkylpyridinium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide[22]
80[C5PY]+ [Tf2N]−5-alkylpyridinium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide[22]
Pyrrolidinium-Based ILs
81[BMPYR]+ [N(CN)3]−1-butyl-1-methylpyrrolidinium tricyanomethanide[58]
82[MeoeMPYR]+ [FAP]−1-(2-methoxyethyl)-1-methylpyrrolidinium tris(pentafluoroethyl)trifluorophosphate[59]
83[MeoeMPYR]+ [FAP]−1-(2-methoxyethyl)-1-methylpyrrolidinium tris(pentafluoroethyl)trifluorophosphate[29]
84[PrMPYR]+ [Tf2N]−1-propyl-1-methylpyrrolidinium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide[60]
85[BMPYR]+ [Tf2N]−1-butyl-1-methylpyrrolidinium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide[25]
86[BMPYR]+ [Tf2N]−1-butyl-1-methylpyrrolidinium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide[60]
87[PeMPYR]+ [Tf2N]−1-pentyl-1-methylpyrrolidinium Bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide[60]
88[HMPYR]+ [Tf2N]−1-hexyl-1-methylpyrrolidinium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide[61]
89[OMPYR]+ [Tf2N]−1-octyl-1-methylpyrrolidinium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide[61]
90[BMPYR]+ [CF3SO3]−1-butyl-1-methylpyrrolidinium trifluoromethanesulfonate[62]
Piperidinium-Based ILs
91[C5C1PIP]+ [Tf2N]−1-5-alkyl-1-methylpiperidinium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide[63]
92[C6C1PIP]+ [Tf2N]−1-6-alkyl-1-methylpiperidinium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide[63]
93[MeoeMPIP]+ [FAP]−1-(2-methoxyethyl)-1-methylpiperidinium trifluorotris(perfluoroethyl)phosphate[64]
94[PMPIP]+ [Tf2N]−1-propyl-1-methylpiperidiniumbis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide[65]
Phosphonium-Based ILs
95[H3TdP]+ [L-Lact]−trihexyl(tetradecyl)phosphonium L-lactate[66]
96[H3TdP]+ [+CS]−trihexyl(tetradecyl)phosphonium (1S)-(+)-10-camphorsulfonate[66]
97[H3TdP]+ [Tf2N]−Trihexyl(tetradecyl)phosphonium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide[67]
98[H3TdP]+ [Tf2N]−Trihexyl(tetradecyl)phosphonium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide[25]
Morpholinium-Based ILs
99[BMMOR]+ [N(CN)3]−1-butyl-1-methylmorpholinium tricyanomethanide[68]
100[N-C3OHMMOR]+ [Tf2N]−4-(3-hydroxypropyl)-4-methylmorpholinium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)amide[69]
Sulphonium-Based Ils
101[Et3S]+ [Tf2N]−triethylsulphonium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide[70]
Ammonium-Based Ils
102[O3MAM]+ [Tf2N]−trioctylmethylammonium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide[71]
103[O3MAM]+ [Tf2N]−trioctylmethylammonium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide[71]
104[M3BAM] + [NTf2]−trimethyl-butylammonium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide[72]
Choline-Based Ils
105[Cho]+ [Tf2N]−choline bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide[73]
Quinolinium-Based Ils
106[HiQuin]+ [SCN]−N-hexylisoquinolinium thiocyanate[74]
Octanium-Based Ils
107[HDABCO]+ [Tf2N]−1-hexyl-1,4-diaza[2.2.2]bicyclooctanium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide[75]

Table 1.

Names and abbreviations of ionic liquids.

Figure 1.

Number of cation-based ILs used for the prediction of log KL.

The collection of organic solutes includes alkanes, cycloalkanes, alkenes, alkynes, aromatics, alcohols, ethers, aldehydes, ketones, chloroalkanes cyanoalkanes, thiophene, pyridine, water, and other solutes. The values of the five solute descriptors for different organic compounds considered in this work can be found in the literature [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. The solute descriptors used in the calculations were taken from earlier studies on ILs and cover the range from: E = −0.020 to E = 0.851, S = 0.000 to S = 0.950, A = 0.000 to A = 0.82, B = 0.000 to B = 0.79, L = 0.26 to L = 6.705. A databank containing 107 ILs corresponding to 14,762 experimental logKL were used for the development of the model. The 36 groups used for the representation of ILs are given in Table 2.

DefinitionGroupDefinitionGroup
CH3 from alkyl chainCH3Trifluorotris(perfluoroethyl)phosphate[FAP]─
CH2 from alkyl chainCH2Bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide[Tf2N]─
-O- in alkyl chainOHexafluorophosphate[PF6]─
Hydroxyl in alkylOHTetrafluoroborate[BF4]─
Sulfonyl hydroxideSO3HMethylsulfate[MeSO4]─
N ammonium’s cation[N]+Ethylsulfate[EtSO4]─
S sulfonium’s cation[S]+Octylsulfate[OcSO4]─
1,4-diaza [2] bicyclooctanium[DABCO]+Thiocyanate[SCN]─
Imidazolium cation[IM]+Trifluoromethylsulfonate[CF3SO3]─
Pyridinium cation[PY]+Trifluoroacetate[F3AC]─
Pyrrolidinium cation[PYR]+Methoxyethylsulfate[CH3OC2H4SO4]─
Piperidinium cation[PIP]+4,5-Dicyano-2-(trifluoromethyl)imidazolium[TDI]─
Phosphonium cation[P]+Methylphosphonate[(MeO)(H)PO2]─
Morpholium cation[MOR]+Hydrogen sulfate[HSO4]─
Quinolinium cation[Quin]+Dimethylphosphate[(CH3)2PO4]─
Choline cation[Cho]+L-lactate[L-Lact]─
Dicyanamide[N(CN)2]─(1S)-(+)-10-Camphorsulfonate[+CS]─
Tricyanomethanide[N(CN)3]─Nitrate[NO3]─

Table 2.

Description of the 36 groups used for the estimation of log KL.

Advertisement

4. Results and discussion

In the present study, the database contains 14,762 experimental data for about 107 ILs at the temperature range of 293.15–396.35 K, the main objective of this study is to extend the predictive applicability of the TDGC-LSER model to a new cation and anion based ILs, that have not been reported previously, as the ILs having cyano-based anions (thiocyanate [SCN]─; dicyanamide, [N(CN)2]─; tricyanomethanide, [C(CN)3]─ and perfluorinated anions (e.g. trifluorotris(perfluoroethyl)phosphate, [FAP]). The model adopted in this work is capable of representing log KL over a wide range of temperatures. The quality of regression analysis was determined by calculating the average absolute relative deviation (AARD) defined as follows:

AARDlogKL=1N∑i=1NlogKLcal−logKLexplogKLexp×100E5

The TDGC-LSER model may represent the partition coefficient of solutes in ILs using the Eq. 6:

logKL=−3.1729+∑i36nici+∑i36nieiE+∑i36nisiS+∑i36niaiA+∑i36nibiB+∑i36niliL/TE6

Where ni is the number of group i present in the ionic liquid. Values of ci, ei, si, ai, bi, and li and their standard errors in parentheses are given in Table 3.

Groupcieisiaibili
CH3−82.195 (8.697)67.71 (13.14)1.38 (15.33)133.26 (16.50)5.69 (14.63)4.18 (2.594)
CH211.093 (1.523)−25.428 (2.319)−15.933 (2.836)−14.017 (2.827)−3.663 (3.065)8.57 (0.4577)
O−18.818 (6.703)−9.581 (8.681)21.984 (8.577)−30.93 (11.21)21.494 (9.081)−13.017 (1.732)
OH−193 (12.76)98.11 (17.90)39.42 (20.01)168.51 (22.02)293.86 (19.65)−17.394 (3.687)
[N]+2316.75 (64.96)353.55 (90.42)−297.80 (112.6)−387.6 (120.5)98.1 (123.9)−263.57 (17.99)
[S]+1892.89 (47.02)−69.03 (61.36)71.74 (73.65)−358.17 (80.73)190.98 (67.59)−59.51 (11.93)
SO3H−401.01 (27.18)211.14 (25.90)29.56 (29.25)963.61 (46.37)646.47 (35.68)−0.109 (5.620)
DABCO1804.97 (41.71)116.87 (41.93)−89.01 (46.46)−141.72 (70.03)232.09 (53.11)−60.643 (9.825)
[IM]+1929.34 (39.51)−29.8 (39.59)−8.73 (44.00)−267.56 (65.70)180.46 (47.66)−63.12 (9.213)
[PY]+1899.81 (39.00)8.09 (39.56)−20.39 (44.43)−254.68 (65.27)189.68 (47.58)−59.425 (9.001)
[PYR]+1891.63 (40.38)−5.33 (40.98)16.51 (45.52)−222.69 (67.02)117.9 (49.23)−50.992 (9.509)
[PIP]+1896.55 (40.90)6.56 (42.01)30.75 (46.89)−231.35 (67.60)65.98 (50.61)−46.801 (9.668)
[P]+1942.67 (72.12)410.56 (98.99)48.1 (116.4)−402.1 (128.0)191.7 (122.5)−243.72 (20.34)
[MOR]+1834.41 (41.57)44.92 (42.28)107.86 (46.83)−119.24 (68.33)88.14 (50.55)−72.741 (9.943)
[Quin]+1849.71 (40.76)25.7 (42.69)33.16 (48.08)−145.85 (66.40)33.22 (49.85)−46.729 (9.584)
[Cho]+−183.29 (35.99)−522.76 (58.38)333.14 (78.77)−30.32 (75.04)−49.82 (93.81)185.55 (10.51)
[N(CN)2]─−970.82 (36.63)150.74 (33.05)810.89 (35.05)1249.76 (61.39)−81.18 (40.34)197.042 (8.294)
[N(CN)3] ─−896.18 (34.95)82.95 (28.43)725.96 (29.59)894.88 (56.33)13.96 (36.19)199.506 (7.598)
[FAP] ─−830.7 (34.70)−74.84 (29.00)736.99 (30.24)372.32 (56.58)52.4 (36.71)214.343 (7.509)
[Tf2N] ─−899.66 (33.67)−29.2 (27.04)734.55 (28.17)640.99 (55.10)−10.5 (34.81)207.618 (7.095)
[PF6]─−977.77 (36.33)85.23 (38.82)758.26 (47.71)528.15 (64.97)125.04 (49.75)208.42 (8.180)
[BF4]─−958.9 (34.01)144.71 (27.81)733.41 (29.17)979.13 (56.03)−40.58 (35.85)187.379 (7.214)
[MeSO4]─−912.02 (38.32)179.36 (34.98)439.56 (38.88)1866.13 (72.09)112.7 (49.26)147.143 (9.112)
[EtSO4]─−959.72 (36.50)−12.58 (35.09)792.73 (39.00)1467.31 (65.24)−194.98 (48.93)198.684 (7.880)
[OcSO4] ─−883.39 (45.40)−65.96 (41.05)575.78 (42.09)1395.39 (73.88)−231.21 (50.54)249.11 (11.64)
[SCN]─−1120.06 (34.61)239.28 (32.03)720.87 (36.59)1388.16 (56.41)64.13 (38.49)210.298 (7.459)
[CF3SO3] ─−971.54 (34.72)84.5 (30.51)708.98 (34.13)1048.13 (57.45)35.85 (39.56)205.302 (7.504)
[F3AC]─−948.31 (36.54)192.18 (32.62)516.67 (34.42)1654.6 (60.42)−41.21 (40.15)201.913 (8.340)
[CH3OC2H4SO4]─−864.62 (60.40)−117.89 (90.33)1150.9 (142.0)−190.7 (776.4)−563.9 (186.0)128.97 (19.99)
[TDI]─−900.02 (34.69)8.82 (28.82)719.91 (29.78)868.4 (56.35)−50.29 (36.22)228.757 (7.537)
[(MeO)(H)PO2]─−837.19 (39.44)−110.29 (34.18)772.28 (36.82)1843.42 (68.33)−103.52 (42.76)175.47 (8.406)
[HSO4]─−718.34 (91.93)−438.37 (52.51)991.64 (66.58)−457.3 (283.4)−1113.4 (101.0)171.09 (16.10)
[(CH3)2PO4]─−1189.85 (64.54)327.11 (52.20)379.11 (68.71)1887.4 (79.33)445.78 (81.67)242.14 (17.61)
[L-Lact] ─−935.34 (46.66)−35.01 (45.39)869.85 (46.65)2176.62 (89.53)−254.38 (59.97)227.99 (11.50)
[+CS]─−1008.33 (44.06)−29.46 (43.56)822.58 (43.45)1674.07 (74.84)−160.92 (51.68)228.68 (10.48)
[NO3]─−937.17 (33.75)215.29 (26.72)565.62 (29.28)1483.74 (45.69)125.91 (29.89)188.276 (7.003)

Table 3.

TDGC-LSER coefficients for the calculation of log KL.

The experimental log KL data for all ILs were reproduced using Eq. (6) with average absolute deviation (AARD) at the level of 6.39%. The model developed is statistically good, and describes the experimental log KL to within a standard deviation of 0.134 log units, squared correlation coefficient R2 = 96.9%, and a Fisher’s F statistic F = 2106.87.

The average absolute deviation AARD (γ∞) on the prediction of activity coefficients at infinite dilution γ∞ for each IL considered in this study are determined by the following equation:

AARDγ∞=1N∑i=1Nγcal∞−γexp∞γexp∞×100E7

The AARD values on the prediction of log KL and γ∞ for each IL considered in this work are reported in Table 4.

Ionic liquidsLog KL (%)γ1,2∞ (%)Ionic liquidsLog KL (%)γ1,2∞ (%)
Imidazolium-Based ILs
[MMIM]+ [MeSO4]−22.8256.93[EMIM]+ [EtSO4]−6.7121.63
[BMIM]+ [MeSO4]−13.1727.0310.2019.59
[EMIM]+ [F3AC]−5.9115.16[BMIM]+ [OcSO4]−6.7033.60
[HMIM]+ [F3AC]−4.5432.122.7814.49
[MMIM]+ [Tf2N]−6.5626.59[MMIM]+ [CH3OC2H4SO4]−13.8211.28
[EMIM]+ [Tf2N]−13.5598.45[MMIM]+ [(CH3)2PO4]−10.7329.15
9.3654.05[EMIM]+ [CF3SO3]−3.2411.55
5.3829.87[BMIM]+ [CF3SO3]−3.3811.03
13.69101.29[HMIM]+ [CF3SO3]−10.1123.18
10.6464.236.9321.79
[MEIM]+ [Tf2N]−6.1017.00[BMIM]+ [NO3]−6.3129.82
[M2EIM]+ [Tf2N]−6.7324.15[OMIM]+ [NO3]−6.1232.88
[BMIM]+ [Tf2N]−3.9022.78Pyridinium-Based ILs
5.1124.57[B4MPY]+ [N(CN)2]−4.5412.64
6.9939.58[BMPY]+ [TDI]−3.3514.75
3.5427.55[BMPY]+ [C(CN)3]−3.7719.51
[HMIM]+ [Tf2N]−3.1521.65[BMPY]+ [Tf2N]−5.1816.77
3.1716.04[4MBPY]+ [BF4]−3.8821.36
2.9015.234.8215.22
2.8620.702.6716.47
0.875.15[1,3BMPY]+ [CF3SO3]−9.9842.38
[OMIM]+ [Tf2N]−3.1211.35[NEPY]+ [Tf2N]−9.5429.23
2.6211.09[C2PY]+ [Tf2N]−5.3721.46
[(CH2)4SO3HMIm]+ [Tf2N]−7.4034.57[C4PY]+ [Tf2N]−9.6332.88
[EtOHmim]+ [Tf2N]−7.1226.81[C5PY]+ [Tf2N]−9.6332.88
[(MeO)2IM]+ [Tf2N]−8.0521.27Pyrrolidinium-Based ILs
[MeoeMIM]+ [Tf2N]−4.7020.21[BMPYR]+ [C(CN)3]−3.0911.06
[EMIM]+ [BF4]−9.6460.61[MeoeMPyrr]+ [FAP]−4.7018.65
11.7138.355.6129.68
[PM2IM]+ [BF4]−6.1823.63[PrMPYR]+ [Tf2N]−4.2316.02
35.4135.51[BMPYR]+ [Tf2N]−4,1015.54
[BMIM]+ [BF4]−5.1511.76[PeMPYR]+ [Tf2N]−3.7914.22
12.1022.42[HMPYR]+ [Tf2N]−1.957.89
4.2521.49[OMPYR]+ [Tf2N]−3.2712.20
5.3229.16[BMPYR]+ [CF3SO3]−7.9714.51
5.5528.39[BMPYR]+ [Tf2N]−4.6022.93
[HMIM]+ [BF4]−6,0219.93Piperidinium-Based ILs
9.6351.73[PMPIP]+ [Tf2N]−3,1913.44
[OMIM]+ [BF4]−3.5714.14[C5C1PiP]+ [Tf2N]−2.4210.89
3.7122.32[C6C1PIP]+ [Tf2N]−2.4710.12
5.6929.40[MeoeMPIP]+ [FAP]−3.7415.66
11.3790.97Phosphonium-Based ILs
[C2OHMIM]+ [BF4]−10.6538,39[H3TdP]+ [L-Lact]−3.0616.80
[BMIM]+ [PF6]−2.7018.20[H3TdP]+ [+CS]−5.9033.28
[HMIM]+ [PF6]−3.3614.79[H3TdP]+ [Tf2N]−3.5816.19
3.3214.514.5523.55
[MOIM]+ [PF6]−2.9112.12Morpholinium-Based ILs
[(CH2)4SO3HMIm]+ [TFO]−12.5231.50[BMMOR]+ [C(CN)3]−5.9413.17
[(CH2)4SO3HMIm]+ [HSO4]−8.5636.71[N-C3OHMMOR]+ [Tf2N]−12.4215.87
[BMIM]+ [TDI]−3.4213.01Sulphonium-Based ILs
[EMIM]+ [FAP]−8.4123.43[Et3S]+ [Tf2N]−3.638.95
[C2OHMIM]+ [FAP]−8.2554.98Ammonium-Based ILs
4.7121.68[M3BA]+ [Tf2N]−11.0891.05
[EMIM]+ [SCN]−14.5014.31[O3MA]+ [Tf2N]−8.6152.55
9.1719.02[O3MA]+ [Tf2N]−8.7250.13
[BMIM]+ [SCN]−10.2018.10Choline-Based ILs
14.2129.36[Cho]+ [Tf2N]−4.8213.95
[HMIM]+ [SCN]−5.4418.68Quinolinium-Based ILs
[BMIM]+ [C(CN)3]−3.1410.86[HiQuin]+ [SCN]−7.9316.65
[EMIM]+ [(MeO)(H)PO2]−15.8950.54Octanium-Based ILs
[DIMIM]+ [(MeO)(H)PO2]−9.7047.47[HDABCO]+ [Tf2N]−4.2818.48

Table 4.

Average absolute deviation for the ionic liquids that are used in this study.

The values obtained for each ILs vary from 0.87 to 35.41%. Figure 2 shows a plot of calculated log KL from TDGC-LSER versus experimental log KL for 107 ILs. The derived equation provides a good description of solute transfer into cyano-based anion such as [BMIM]+ [C(CN)3]−, [BMPY]+ [C(CN)3]−, [BMPYR]+ [C(CN)3]− for which the values of AARD are at the level of about 3% except for [BMMOR]+ [C(CN)3]− with AARD of 5.94%. For the IL [HMIM]+ [Tf2N]− the AARD was less than 1%. The same all piperidinium cation-based ILs studied in this work have a small AARD lower than 4%.

Figure 2.

Comparison of calculated log KL values based on Eq. (6) versus experimental data.

The ILs with the highest AARD are [MMIM]+ [MeSO4]−, [PM2IM]+ [BF4]−, [BMIM]+ [NO3]−, [OMIM]+ [NO3]−, This may be related to the quality of the experimental data or the number of experimental data.

Advertisement

5. Prediction of partition coefficients of organic compounds in ILs not included in the database using the TDGC-LSER model

The predictive power of TDGC-LSER was evaluated calculating log KL of organic compounds in four ILs not included in the database: 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride [BMIM]+ [Cl]─ [76], 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium dimethyl phosphate [BMIM]+ [(CH3)2PO4]─ [76], 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium dicyanamide [BMIM]+ [N(CN)2]─ [77], 1-Dodecyl-3-methylimidzolium Bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)-imide [DoMIM]+ [Tf2N]─ [78]. In the case of [BMIM]+ [Cl]─, 224 experimental log KL values were predicted using the TDGC-LSER model. The difference between the calculated values and the experimental data is significant since it reaches 44.8%. In the case of alkanes, this difference is greater than 100% (for cyclopentane (173.24) and ethyl tert-butyl ether (120.38) at T = 358.15 K). The poor performance of the model can be explained by the limited number of experimental data containing the group [Cl]─. In addition, this ionic liquid is particularly hydrophilic and can therefore contain significant amounts of water. This presence of water can have a significant impact on the physicochemical properties of this ionic liquid. For [BMIM]+ [(CH3)2PO4]─, the AARD of log KL is 17.84%. The results indicate that the model correctly predicts the partition coefficients of aromatics, methanol, and ethanol. The log KL values of alkanes and ethers are underestimated. This can be explained by the low solubility of alkanes in the ILs and also the limited number of ethers in the database. The AARD observed with [BMIM]+ [N(CN)2]─ for the log KL prediction of 378 solutes is 19.78%. The TDGC-LSER model provides a good description for alkenes, alkynes, aromatic hydrocarbons (o-xylene about 4.72% at T = 318.15), alcohols, and ketones (acetone about 5.13% at 348.15 K). For most alkanes, the log KL values are underestimated, in particular for pentane (109.32% at 338.15 K), 2.2-dimethylbutane, 2.2.4-triethylpentane and cyclopentane. [DoMIM]+ [Tf2N]─ contains a long alkyl chain grafted onto the imidazolium cation. 284 experimental log KL values were estimated using the TDGC-LSER model. The correlation provides a good description of the experimental log KL data (AARD = 15.77%). This result is important as it shows that the model can be used to predict solute partition coefficients in ILs not taken into account in the database. The model provides a good description for polar solutes such as aromatics (benzene 4.46% at T = 318.15 K) and alcohols. The most significant differences are observed for the ethers (tert-butyl methyl ether, Diethyl ether, Di-n-propyl ether, Di-iso-propyl ether).

Advertisement

6. Conclusions

The TDGC-LSER model was used for the prediction of log KL for 107 ILs over a wide range of temperatures. A new set of cation and anion functional groups have been used to define the structures of the ionic liquids. The obtained correlation allows reproduce the experimental gas-to-ionic liquid partition coefficients derived from γ∞ with satisfactory accuracy to within 0.134 log units and AARD of 6.39%. The deviation between calculated and experimental log KL depends strongly on the cation and anion type.

The list of groups used for the estimation of calculated log KL in this work can be increased to improve the predictive applicability of this model to other functional groups by the additional γ∞ data for families of a new generation of ionic liquids.

References

  1. 1. Abraham MH. Scales of solute hydrogen-bonding: Their construction and application to physicochemical and biochemical processes. Chemical Society Reviews. 1993;22(2):73-83. DOI: 10.1039/CS9932200073
  2. 2. Abraham MH, Grellier PL, McGill RA. Determination of olive oil–gas and hexadecane–gas partition coefficients, and calculation of the corresponding olive oil–water and hexadecane–water partition coefficients. Journal of the Chemical Society, Perkin Transactions. 1987;2(6):797-803. DOI: 10.1039/P29870000797
  3. 3. Abraham MH, Whiting GS, Doherty RM, Shuely WJ. Hydrogen bonding. XVI. A new solute salvation parameter, π2H, from gas chromatographic data. Journal of Chromatography A. 1991;587(2):213-228. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9673(91)85158-C
  4. 4. Abraham MH, Whiting GS, Doherty RM, Shuely WJ. Hydrogen bonding. Part 13. A new method for the characterisation of GLC stationary phases—The Laffort data set. Journal of the Chemical Society, Perkin Transactions. 1990;2(8):1451-1460
  5. 5. Abraham MH, Platts JA. Hydrogen bond structural group constants. Journal of Organic Chemistry. 2001;66(10):3484-3491. DOI: 10.1021/jo001765s
  6. 6. Platts JA, Butina D, Abraham MH, Hersey A. Estimation of molecular linear free energy relation descriptors using a group contribution approach. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences. 1999;39(5):835-845. DOI: 10.1021/ci980339t
  7. 7. Mutelet F, Rogalski M. Experimental determination and prediction of the gas-liquid n-hexadecane partition coefficients. Journal of Chromatography A. 2001;923(1–2):153-163. DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9673(01)00995-5
  8. 8. Sprunger LM, Proctor A, Acree WE Jr, Abraham MH. LFER correlations for room temperature ionic liquids: Separation of equation coefficients into individual cation-specific and anion-specific contributions. Fluid Phase Equilibria. 2008;265(1–2):104-111. DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2008.01.006
  9. 9. Sprunger L, Clark M, Acree WE Jr, Abraham MH. Characterization of room-temperature ionic liquids by the abraham model with cation-specific and anion-specific equation coefficients. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. 2007;47(3):1123-1129. DOI: 10.1021/Ci7000428
  10. 10. Sprunger LM, Gibbs J, Proctor A, Acree WE Jr, Abraham MH, Meng Y, et al. Linear free energy relationship correlations for room temperature ionic liquids: Revised cation-specific and anion-specific equation coefficients for predictive applications covering a much larger area of chemical space. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research. 2009;48(8):4145-4154. DOI: 10.1021/ie801898j
  11. 11. Proctor A, Sprunger L, Acree WE Jr, Abraham MH. LFER correlations for the solubilising characterisation of room temperature ionic liquids containing trifluoromethanesulfonate and trifluoroacetate anions. Physics and Chemistry of Liquids. 2008;46(6):631-642. DOI: 10.1080/00319100802087191
  12. 12. Revelli A-L, Mutelet F, Jaubert J-N. Prediction of partition coefficients of organic compounds in ionic liquids: Use of a linear solvation energy relationship with parameters calculated through a group contribution method. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research. 2010;49(8):3883-3892. DOI: 10.1021/ie901776z
  13. 13. Mutelet F, Ortega-Villa V, Moïse J-C, Jaubert J-N, Acree WE. Prediction of partition coefficients of organic compounds in ionic liquids using a temperature-dependent linear solvation energy relationship with parameters calculated through a group contribution method. Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data. 2011;56(9):3598-3606. DOI: 10.1021/je200454d
  14. 14. Kato R, Gmehling J. Activity coefficients at infinite dilution of various solutes in the ionic liquids [MMIM]+ [CH3SO4]−, [MMIM]+ [CH3OC2H4SO4]−, [MMIM]+ [(CH3)2PO4]−, [C5H5NC2H5]+ [(CF3SO2)2N]− and [C5H5NH]+ [C2H5OC2H4OSO3]−. Fluid Phase Equilibria. 2004;226:37-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2004.08.039
  15. 15. Ge M-L, Deng X-M, Zhang L-H, Chen J-Y, Xiong J-M, Li W-H. Activity coefficients at infinite dilution of organic solutes in the ionic liquid 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium methyl sulfate. The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics. 2014;77:7-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2014.04.020
  16. 16. Domańska U, Marciniak A. Activity coefficients at infinite dilution measurements for organic solutes and water in the ionic liquid 1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium trifluoroacetate. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. B. 2007;111(41):11984-11988. DOI: 10.1021/jp075079+
  17. 17. Jiang L-K, Wang L-S, Du C-J, Wang X-Y. Activity coefficients at infinite dilution of organic solutes in 1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium trifluoroacetate and influence of interfacial adsorption using gas–liquid chromatography. The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics. 2014;70:138-146. DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2013.10.038
  18. 18. Deenadayalu N, Letcher TM, Reddy P. Determination of activity coefficients at infinite dilution of polar and nonpolar solutes in the ionic liquid 1-Ethyl-3-methyl- imidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl) Imidate using gas−liquid chromatography at the temperature 303.15 K or 318.15 K. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. 2005;50(1):105-108. DOI: 10.1021/je0498107
  19. 19. Krummen M, Wasserscheid P, Gmehling J. Measurement of activity coefficients at infinite dilution in ionic liquids using the dilutor technique. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. 2002;47(6):1411-1417. DOI: 10.1021/je0200517
  20. 20. Zhou Q, Wang L-S. Activity coefficients at infinite dilution of alkanes, alkenes, and alkyl benzenes in 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate using gas−liquid chromatography. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. 2006;51(5):1698-1701. DOI: 10.1021/je060142u
  21. 21. Zhang J, Zhang Q, Qiao B, Deng Y. Solubilities of the gaseous and liquid solutes and their thermodynamics of solubilization in the novel room-temperature ionic liquids at infinite dilution by gas chromatography. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. 2007;52(6):2277-2283. DOI: 10.1021/je700297c
  22. 22. Yan P-F, Liu Q-S, Yang M, Liu X-M, Tan Z-C, Welz-Biermann U. Activity coefficients at infinite dilution of organic solutes in N-alkylpyridinium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide ([CnPY][NTf2], n=2,4,5) using gas–liquid chromatography. The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics. 2010;42(12):1415-1422. DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2010.06.009
  23. 23. Heintz A, Kulikov DV, Verevkin SP. Thermodynamic properties of mixtures containing ionic liquids. 2. Activity coefficients at infinite dilution of hydrocarbons and polar solutes in 1-Methyl-3-ethyl-imidazolium bis(trifluoromethyl-sulfonyl) amide and in 1,2-Dimethyl-3-ethyl-imidazolium bis(trifluoromethyl-sulfonyl) amide using gas−liquid chromatography. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. 2002;47(4):894-899. DOI: 10.1021/je0103115
  24. 24. Letcher TM, Marciniak A, Marciniak M, Domańska U. Activity coefficients at infinite dilution measurements for organic solutes in the ionic liquid 1-hexyl-3-methyl-imidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)-imide using g.l.c. at T=(298.15, 313.15, and 333.15) K. The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics. 2005;37(12):1327-1331. DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2005.03.014
  25. 25. Kato R, Gmehling J. Systems with ionic liquids: Measurement of VLE and γ∞ data and prediction of their thermodynamic behavior using original UNIFAC, mod. UNIFAC(do) and COSMO-RS(Ol). The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics. 2005;37(6):603-619. DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2005.04.010
  26. 26. Bensaid Z, Mutelet F, Bouroukba M, Negadi A. Experimental and theoretical study of interaction between organic compounds and 1-(4-sulfobutyl)-3-methylimidazolium based ionic liquids. Fluid Phase Equilibria. 2014;378:34-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2014.06.021
  27. 27. Revelli A-L, Mutelet F, Jaubert J-N, Garcia-Martinez M, Sprunger LM, Acree WE, et al. Study of ether-, alcohol-, or Cyano-functionalized ionic liquids using inverse gas chromatography. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. 2010;55(7):2434-2443. DOI: 10.1021/je900838a
  28. 28. Zawadzki M, Niedzicki L, Wieczorek W, Domańska U. Estimation of extraction properties of new imidazolide anion based ionic liquids on the basis of activity coefficient at infinite dilution measurements. Separation and Purification Technology. 2013;118:242-254. DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2013.07.006
  29. 29. Órfão EF, Dohnal V, Blahut A. Infinite dilution activity coefficients of volatile organic compounds in two ionic liquids composed of the tris(pentafluoroethyl)trifluorophosphate ([FAP]) anion and a functionalized cation. The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics. 2013;65:53-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2013.05.035
  30. 30. Marciniak A, Wlazło M. Activity coefficients at infinite dilution and physicochemical properties for organic solutes and water in the ionic liquid 1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-3-methylimidazolium trifluorotris(perfluoroethyl)phosphate. The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics. 2013;64:114-119. DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2013.05.008
  31. 31. Wlazło M, Marciniak A, Letcher TM. Activity coefficients at infinite dilution and physicochemical properties for organic solutes and water in the ionic liquid 1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium trifluorotris(perfluoroethyl)phosphate. Journal of Solution Chemistry. 2015;44(3):413-430. DOI: 10.1007/s10953-014-0274-0
  32. 32. Lukoshko E, Mutelet F, Domanska U. Experimental and theoretically study of interaction between organic compounds and tricyanomethanide based ionic liquids. The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics. 2015;85:49-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2014.12.027
  33. 33. Foco GM, Bottini SB, Quezada N, de la Fuente JC, Peters CJ. Activity coefficients at infinite dilution in 1-Alkyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate ionic liquids. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. 2006;51(3):1088-1091. DOI: 10.1021/je050544m
  34. 34. Ge M-L, Wang L-S, Wu J-S, Zhou Q. Activity coefficients at infinite dilution of organic solutes in 1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate using gas−liquid chromatography. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. 2008;53(8):1970-1974. DOI: 10.1021/je800218g
  35. 35. Zhou Q, Wang L-S, Wu J-S, Li M-Y. Activity coefficients at infinite dilution of polar solutes in 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate using gas−liquid chromatography. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. 2007;52(1):131-134. DOI: 10.1021/je060305e
  36. 36. Letcher TM, Soko B, Reddy P, Deenadayalu N. Determination of activity coefficients at infinite dilution of solutes in the ionic liquid 1-Hexyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate using gas−liquid chromatography at the temperatures 298.15 K and 323.15 K. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. 2003;48(6):1587-1590. DOI: 10.1021/je030187k
  37. 37. Li Y, Wang L-S, Zhang Y. Activity coefficients at infinite dilution of polar solutes in 1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate using gas−liquid chromatography. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. 2010;55(4):1732-1734. DOI: 10.1021/je900704b
  38. 38. Ge M-L, Wu J-S, Wang M-H, Wang L-S. Activity coefficients at infinite dilution of polar solutes in 1-Propyl-2,3-dimethylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate using gas–liquid chromatography. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. 2008;53(3):871-873. DOI: 10.1021/je700640r
  39. 39. Wang M-H, Wu J-S, Wang L-S, Li M-Y. Activity coefficients at infinite dilution of alkanes, alkenes, and alkyl benzenes in 1-Propyl-2,3-dimethylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate using gas−liquid chromatography. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. 2007;52(4):1488-1491. DOI: 10.1021/je6005696
  40. 40. Ayad A, Mutelet F, Abumandour E-S, Negadi A. Activity coefficients at infinite dilution of organic solutes in methylphosphonate based ionic liquids using gas-liquid chromatography. The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics. 2015;86:116-122. DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2015.02.023
  41. 41. Sumartschenkowa IA, Verevkin SP, Vasiltsova TV, Bich E, Heintz A, Shevelyova MP, et al. Experimental study of thermodynamic properties of mixtures containing ionic liquid 1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium ethyl sulfate using gas-liquid chromatography and transpiration method. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. 2006;51(6):2138-2144
  42. 42. Mutelet F, Jaubert J-N. Accurate measurements of thermodynamic properties of solutes in ionic liquids using inverse gas chromatography. Journal of Chromatography A. 2006;1102(1):256-267. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2005.10.046
  43. 43. Domańska U, Marciniak A. Measurements of activity coefficients at infinite dilution of aromatic and aliphatic hydrocarbons, alcohols, and water in the new ionic liquid [EMIM][SCN] using GLC. The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics. 2008;40(5):860-866. DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2008.01.004
  44. 44. Domańska U, Laskowska M. Measurements of activity coefficients at infinite dilution of aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons, alcohols, thiophene, tetrahydrofuran, MTBE, and water in ionic liquid [BMIM][SCN] using GLC. The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics. 2009;41(5):645-650. DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2008.12.018
  45. 45. Domańska U, Marciniak A, Królikowska M, Arasimowicz M. Activity coefficients at infinite dilution measurements for organic solutes and water in the ionic liquid 1-Hexyl-3-methylimidazolium thiocyanate. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. 2010;55(7):2532-2536. DOI: 10.1021/je900890u
  46. 46. Shimoyama Y, Hirayama T, Iwai Y. Measurement of infinite dilution activity coefficients of alcohols, ketones, and aromatic hydrocarbons in 4-methyl-N-butylpyridinium tetrafluoroborate and 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate by gas−liquid chromatography. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. 2008;53(9):2106-2111. DOI: 10.1021/je800246v
  47. 47. Letcher TM, Soko B, Ramjugernath D, Deenadayalu N, Nevines A, Naicker PK. Activity coefficients at infinite dilution of organic solutes in 1-Hexyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate from gas−liquid chromatography. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. 2003;48(3):708-711. DOI: 10.1021/je0256481
  48. 48. Olivier E, Letcher TM, Naidoo P, Ramjugernath D. Activity coefficients at infinite dilution of organic solutes in the ionic liquid 1-octyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate using gas–liquid chromatography at T=(313.15, 323.15, and 333.15) K. The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics. 2010;42(5):646-650. DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2009.12.004
  49. 49. Olivier E, Letcher TM, Naidoo P, Ramjugernath D. Activity coefficients at infinite dilution of organic solutes in the ionic liquid 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium trifluoromethanesulfonate using gas–liquid chromatography at T=(313.15, 323.15, and 333.15) K. The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics. 2010;42(1):78-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2009.07.010
  50. 50. Yang X-J, Wu J-S, Ge M-L, Wang L-S, Li M-Y. Activity coefficients at infinite dilution of alkanes, alkenes, and alkyl benzenes in 1-Hexyl-3-methylimidazolium Trifluoromethanesulfonate using gas−liquid chromatography. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. 2008;53(5):1220-1222. DOI: 10.1021/je800043a
  51. 51. Feng Y-X, Wang L-S, Li Y. Activity coefficients at infinite dilution of organic solutes in 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium nitrate using gas−liquid chromatography. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. 2011;56(5):2730-2736. DOI: 10.1021/je200050q
  52. 52. Duan J-D, Wang L-S, Jiang K, Wang X-X. Activity coefficients at infinite dilution of organic solutes in 1-octyl-3-methylimidazolium nitrate using gas–liquid chromatography. Fluid Phase Equilibria. 2012;328:1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2012.05.006
  53. 53. The study of activity coefficients at infinite dilution for organic solutes and water in 1-butyl-4-methylpyridinium dicyanamide, [B4MPy][DCA] using GLC. The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics. 2014;68:138-144. DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2013.09.007
  54. 54. Heintz A, Kulikov DV, Verevkin SP. Thermodynamic properties of mixtures containing ionic liquids. Activity coefficients at infinite dilution of polar solutes in 4-methyl- N-butyl-pyridinium tetrafluoroborate using gas–liquid chromatography. The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics. 2002;34(8):1341-1347. DOI: 10.1006/jcht.2002.0961
  55. 55. Heintz A, Kulikov DV, Verevkin SP. Thermodynamic properties of mixtures containing ionic liquids. 1. Activity coefficients at infinite dilution of alkanes, alkenes, and alkylbenzenes in 4-methyl-n-butylpyridinium tetrafluoroborate using gas−liquid chromatography. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. 2001;46(6):1526-1529. DOI: 10.1021/je0101348
  56. 56. Domańska U, Marciniak A. Activity coefficients at infinite dilution measurements for organic solutes and water in the ionic liquid 4-methyl-N-butyl-pyridinium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)-imide. The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics. 2009;41(12):1350-1355. DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2009.06.011
  57. 57. Marciniak A, Wlazlo M. Activity coefficients at infinite dilution measurements for organic solutes and water in the ionic liquid 1-Butyl-3-methyl-pyridinium Trifluoromethanesulfonate. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. 2010;55(9):3208-3211. DOI: 10.1021/je1000582
  58. 58. Domańska U, Lukoshko EV. Measurements of activity coefficients at infinite dilution for organic solutes and water in the ionic liquid 1-butyl-1-methylpyrrolidinium tricyanomethanide. The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics. 2013;66:144-150. DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2013.07.004
  59. 59. Marciniak A, Wlazło M. Activity coefficients at infinite dilution and physicochemical properties for organic solutes and water in the ionic liquid 1-(2-methoxyethyl)-1-methylpyrrolidinium trifluorotris(perfluoroethyl)phosphate. The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics. 2013;60:57-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2013.01.007
  60. 60. Mutelet F, Hassan E-SRE, Stephens TW, Acree WE, Baker GA. Activity coefficients at infinite dilution for organic solutes dissolved in three 1-Alkyl-1-methylpyrrolidinium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide ionic liquids bearing short linear alkyl side chains of three to five carbons. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. 2013;58(8):2210-2218. DOI: 10.1021/je4001894
  61. 61. Nebig S, Liebert V, Gmehling J. Measurement and prediction of activity coefficients at infinite dilution (γ∞), vapor–liquid equilibria (VLE) and excess enthalpies (HE) of binary systems with 1,1-dialkyl-pyrrolidinium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide using mod. UNIFAC (Dortmund). Fluid Phase Equilibria. 2009;277(1):61-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2008.11.013
  62. 62. Domańska U, Redhi GG, Marciniak A. Activity coefficients at infinite dilution measurements for organic solutes and water in the ionic liquid 1-butyl-1-methylpyrrolidinium trifluoromethanesulfonate using GLC. Fluid Phase Equilibria. 2009;278(1):97-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2009.01.011
  63. 63. Paduszyński K, Domańska U. Experimental and theoretical study on infinite dilution activity coefficients of various solutes in piperidinium ionic liquids. The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics. 2013;60:169-178. DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2013.01.005
  64. 64. Marciniak A, Wlazło M. Activity coefficients at infinite dilution and physicochemical properties for organic solutes and water in the ionic liquid 1-(2-methoxyethyl)-1-methylpiperidinium trifluorotris(perfluoroethyl)phosphate. The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics. 2013;57:197-202. DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2012.08.016
  65. 65. Domańska U, Paduszyński K. Measurements of activity coefficients at infinite dilution of organic solutes and water in 1-propyl-1-methylpiperidinium bis{(trifluoromethyl)sulfonyl}imide ionic liquid using g.l.c. The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics. 2010;42(11):1361-1366. DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2010.05.017
  66. 66. Mutelet F, Alonso D, Stephens TW, Acree WE, Baker GA. Infinite dilution activity coefficients of solutes dissolved in two Trihexyl(tetradecyl)phosphonium ionic liquids. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. 2014;59(6):1877-1885. DOI: 10.1021/je500050p
  67. 67. Tumba K, Letcher TM, Naidoo P, Ramjugernath D. Activity coefficients at infinite dilution of organic solutes in the ionic liquid trihexyltetradecylphosphonium bis (trifluoromethylsulfonyl) imide using gas–liquid chromatography at T=(313.15, 333.15, 353.15 and 373.15) K. The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics. 2013;65:159-167. DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2013.05.030
  68. 68. Domańska U, Lukoshko EV. Thermodynamics and activity coefficients at infinite dilution for organic solutes and water in the ionic liquid 1-butyl-1-methylmorpholinium tricyanomethanide. The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics. 2014;68:53-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2013.08.030
  69. 69. Wlazło M, Marciniak A, Zawadzki M, Dudkiewicz B. Activity coefficients at infinite dilution and physicochemical properties for organic solutes and water in the ionic liquid 4-(3-hydroxypropyl)-4-methylmorpholinium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)-amide. The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics. 2015;86:154-161. DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2015.02.024
  70. 70. Domańska U, Marciniak A. Activity coefficients at infinite dilution measurements for organic solutes and water in the ionic liquid triethylsulphonium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide. The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics. 2009;41(6):754-758. DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2008.12.005
  71. 71. Gwala NV, Deenadayalu N, Tumba K, Ramjugernath D. Activity coefficients at infinite dilution for solutes in the trioctylmethylammonium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide ionic liquid using gas–liquid chromatography. The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics. 2010;42(2):256-261. DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2009.08.012
  72. 72. Heintz A, Vasiltsova TV, Safarov J, Bich E, Verevkin SP. Thermodynamic properties of mixtures containing ionic liquids. 9. Activity coefficients at infinite dilution of hydrocarbons, alcohols, esters, and aldehydes in trimethyl-butylammonium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl) imide using gas−liquid chromatography and static method. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. 2006;51(2):648-655. DOI: 10.1021/je050440b
  73. 73. Domańska U, Papis P, Szydłowski J. Thermodynamics and activity coefficients at infinite dilution for organic solutes, water and diols in the ionic liquid choline bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide. The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics. 2014;77:63-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2014.04.024
  74. 74. Królikowska M, Karpińska M, Królikowski M. Measurements of activity coefficients at infinite dilution for organic solutes and water in N-hexylisoquinolinium thiocyanate, [HiQuin][SCN] using GLC. The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics. 2013;62:1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2013.02.004
  75. 75. Marcinkowski Ł, Kloskowski A, Namieśnik J. Measurement of activity coefficients at infinite dilution of organic solutes in the ionic liquid 1-hexyl-1,4-diaza[2.2.2]bicyclooctanium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide using gas–liquid chromatography. The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics. 2014;71:84-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2013.10.026
  76. 76. Martins MAR, Coutinho JAP, Pinho SP, Domańska U. Measurements of activity coefficients at infinite dilution of organic solutes and water on polar imidazolium-based ionic liquids. The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics. 2015;91:194-203. DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2015.07.042
  77. 77. Domańska U, Wlazło M, Karpińska M. Activity coefficients at infinite dilution of organic solvents and water in 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium dicyanamide. A literature review of hexane/hex-1-ene separation. Fluid Phase Equilibria. 2016;417:50-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2016.02.004
  78. 78. Domańska U, Wlazło M. Thermodynamics and limiting activity coefficients measurements for organic solutes and water in the ionic liquid 1-dodecyl-3-methylimidzolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl) imide. The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics. 2016;103:76-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2016.08.008

Written By

Amel Ayad, Fabrice Mutelet and Amina Negadi

Submitted: 29 September 2021 Reviewed: 18 January 2022 Published: 03 March 2022

© 2022 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Continue reading from the same book

View All
Chapter 1 Introductory Chapter: Recent Advances in Gas Chrom...

By Fabrice Mutelet

205 downloads

Chapter 2 Reactive Transport and Its Implications on Heavy O...

By Diana Margarita Hernandez-Baez, Alastair Reid, Ant...

214 downloads

Chapter 3 Features and New Examples of Gas Chromatographic S...

By Igor G. Zenkevich

473 downloads