Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Neurotoxic Effects of Insecticides Chlorpyrifos, Carbaryl, Imidacloprid, in Different Animal Species

Written By

Alejandra Mora-Gutiérrez, Carmen Rubio, Ángel Alonso Romero-López and Moisés Rubio-Osornio

Submitted: September 3rd, 2021Reviewed: September 19th, 2021Published: December 2nd, 2021

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.100527

Chapter metrics overview

62 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Insecticides are pesticides used to control insects in agriculture, ornamental gardens, homes, and veterinary medicine. Although the toxic effects on the environment and the health of living beings are not fully understood, these pesticides have become the first options for crop protection in agriculture. After herbicides, insecticides are the most extensively used pesticides in agriculture, with large quantities consumed on every continent, primarily in America. Chlorpyrifos, carbaryl, and imidacloprid are among the top ten most used insecticides. Amidst organophosphates, chlorpyrifos has been reported to be used in over fifty food crops. Carbaryl is a carbamate employed as an insecticide, fungicide, herbicide, and nematicide. Similarly, neonicotinoids are the most used insecticide on a global scale. Neonicotinoids include imidacloprid, the second most frequently used pesticide, surpassed only by glyphosate. It is used because it is less toxic to humans. However, insects appear to be less resistant to its compounds. Evidence suggests that these insecticides persist in soils for a long time and have neurotoxic effects in animal species not intended to receive its consequences. Thus, this chapter’s aim is to describe these three pesticides effects and contrast them with the most recent findings regarding their neurotoxic effects in various animal species.

Keywords

  • insecticides
  • chlorpyrifos
  • carbaryl
  • imidacloprid
  • neurotoxicity

1. Introduction

Pesticides are substances that exist in our daily lives. Their most widespread use is in agriculture, where they are used to protect crops from pests caused by plants and animals. They are also used to prevent diseases caused by ectoparasites in farm animals and pets. These substances are used in gardening and brought into our homes to protect us from mosquitoes and other insects. Pesticides come into intimate touch with all forms of life through drinking water and eating food. However, the use of these substances is so widespread and poorly controlled that environmental contamination is inevitable.

Pesticide exposure occurs in a variety of ways. Not all living organisms are exposed to the same periods or the same dose, or not even to a single type of pesticide or to the same mixtures. The above may have yet unknown, synergistic, or potentiating effects on organisms.

Insecticides are a class of pesticides used to kill or control insects. It is not only used in agriculture, but also in ornamental gardens, homes, and veterinary medicine. Although the hazardous effects on the environment and the health of living beings are not yet fully understood, they have become one of the primary solutions for crop protection in agriculture. Regardless of the fact that pesticides come in a wide variety of families, the major goal of this chapter is to highlight the effects of imidacloprid (neonicotinoid), chlorpyrifos (organophosphate), and carbaryl (carbamate), insecticides widely used in agriculture, despite recent findings of their neurotoxic effects on several animal species.

Advertisement

2. Worldwide use of insecticides

After herbicides, insecticides are the most extensively used pesticides in agriculture [1]. The principal insecticide consumers by continent were America (44.9%), Asia (29%), Europe (16%), Africa (6.4), and Oceania (3.7%), with the United States being the country with the highest insecticide consumption worldwide (Figure 1) [2]. Recently collected data, dating from 1998 to 2014, indicates that chlorpyrifos was the third most used organophosphate pesticide in the United States, only for corn cultivation, with a total of 1,122kg/ha. In the same country, the most widely used carbamate was carbaryl with a total of 1,024 kg/ha; while imidacloprid was the most used neonicotinoid, with 0.057 kg/ha. During the same time period, chlorpyrifos, carbaryl, and imidacloprid were among the top 10 most widely used insecticides in the United States [3]. Currently, these same pesticides are used in agriculture and are included among the principal insecticides for each insecticide family aforementioned [4, 5, 6].

Figure 1.

Highest to lowest insecticide use by continent.

Furthermore, organophosphate insecticides account for roughly half of all insecticides used worldwide, and chlorpyrifos is one of the most widely used. This insecticide is approved for use on more than 50 food crops in both developed and developing countries [7]. About 50 chemicals belong to the carbamate family, which are utilized as fungicides, herbicides, and nematicides in addition to having insecticidal properties. Carbaryl was the first carbamate to be commercialized, and it is now more widely used than all other carbamates combined [8]. Neonicotinoids, on the other hand, appear to be the most widely employed insecticides worldwide, according to the literature. In fact, imidacloprid is the world’s second most widely used pesticide, after only the controversial herbicide glyphosate [9, 10]. Neonicotinoids have largely replaced carbamates and organophosphates because they are considered less toxic to humans and insects, and they appear to be less resistant to neonicotinoids compared to other conventional insecticide classes [11].

Advertisement

3. Of the molecule, its structure, and mechanism of action

3.1 Chlorpyrifos

Organophosphates are compounds of organic nature that contain phosphorus. Chlorpyrifos (O, O-diethyl-O-3,5,6-trichloropyridin-2-yl phosphorothioate) is an organic thiophosphate of the chloropyridine class [12]. The latter is one of the most widely used organophosphate insecticides in agriculture, primarily used on corn, soy, fruit trees, walnut trees, brussels sprouts, blueberries, broccoli, and cauliflower, among others. This pesticide is also used on golf courses, on ornamental plants, for treating wood, and in homes to combat mosquitoes, cockroaches, and ants [13]. Chlorpyrifos act by irreversibly inhibiting the acetylcholinesterase enzyme activity, which causes acetylcholine accumulation in the synaptic cleft, causing overstimulation of postsynaptic receptors and the consequent signs of intoxication [14].

3.2 Imidacloprid

Imidacloprid [1-[(6-chloropyridin-3-yl) methyl] imidazolidin-2-ylidene] nitramide is a neonicotinoid of the chloropyridinyl class [15], which like the insecticides of the same family, acts as an agonist of nicotinic cholinergic receptors (nAChRs) of insects and mammals [16, 17]. IImidacloprid is used in agriculture for corn, cotton, soybean, potato, wheat, and some vegetable seeds, as well as for soil treatment and foliar application on crops like orange, potato, and cotton. It is also utilized in the treatment of decorative plants and residential areas, industrial vegetation and forestry management [18]. Additionally, it is used as veterinary medicine in presentations such as pipettes or collars for direct application on dogs and cats to prevent infestations by internal and external parasites [19].

3.3 Carbaryl

Carbaryl (1-naphthyl methylcarbamate) is a carbamate-based pesticide. It’s a carbamate ester made up of 1-naphthol and methylcarbamic acid. On plants, this pesticide is insecticidal, acaricidal, and even growth retardant when used in plants. It is currently used to treat corn, soybean, cotton, nuts, fruit, and vegetable crops in agriculture [20]. It is mostly used on apple, nut, and soybean crops in the United States. However, it is found in more than 40 crops around the world, including asparagus, squash, and potatoes. Its non-agricultural uses include ornamental plants, lawns, grass, roads, and buildings [21]. Carbaryl acts by inhibiting acetylcholinesterase. Nevertheless, unlike organophosphates, carbamates do it reversibly [22].

Advertisement

4. Persistence in soil and water

When pesticides are manually or aerially sprayed on seeds, soil, or even directly on plants, they can last for days, months, or even years. They might also filter through the soil into surface and deep waterways, polluting food and water sources for living beings by coming into contact with animal and plant life. Table 1 illustrates the soil-water partition coefficients (Koc) and octanol–water partition coefficients (Kow), which are used to characterize the mobility and bioaccumulation properties of pesticides, respectively. While these coefficients are not the only indicators used to determine pesticide behavior in the environment and in organisms, they do serve as referents for pesticide toxicity.

Table 1.

Crucial physicochemical characteristics for insecticides are chlorpyrifos, carbaryl, and imidacloprid.

The Koc is a coefficient that is used to determine the pesticide concentration “attached” to soil particles as well as the phase present in the solution, i.e., dissolved in the same soil’s water. As a result, the lower the temperature, the higher the Koc of the pesticide in solution, and the greater the likelihood of it leaching into groundwater. The Kow is a coefficient that is used to calculate pesticide concentrations in octanol and water. Pesticides having a high Kow, which are more soluble in octanol and less soluble in water, have been found to accumulate in organisms [23]. Chlorpyrifos accumulates greater in organisms than carbaryl and imidacloprid, as shown in Table 1. It does, however, have a lesser tendency to leak into the soil as compared to them. In this sense, imidacloprid would pose a greater risk as a groundwater pollutant.

To estimate a substance’s environmental fate in diverse environments, scientists must first determine its degradation half-life, or DT50, which is the time it takes for 50% of a chemical to degrade or disappear from water or soil [7]. For the purposes of this review, the three pesticides DT50 examined will be provided below, depending on their average persistence in soil and water,

Chlorpyrifos can have a long persistence even in arctic regions, where its presence has been assessed in samples of ice, snow, a microcosm of water, sediments, air, and flora. The persistence of this pesticide (due to its high resistance to hydrolysis) has been reported to be greater in aquatic habitats than in soil. However, the LD50 in soil, has a wide range of values as reported in the literature, ranging from a few days to four years. It is also suggested to be more stable in low-pH soils, dark settings, and cold environments [7]. Chlorpyrifos DT50 has been found to last from 1 to 120days in the field and up to 180 days in the soil in the absence of light. It is worth noting that in organic soils, the half-life is longer than in mineral soils. A DT50 of 150 to 200 days has been documented in anaerobic pond sediments, while 106 + 54 days has been reported in experimental circumstances of wetland and anaerobic sediments. Chlorpyrifos has a DT50 of 18.7 days in freshwater and 49.4 days in seawater at 10°C, which decreases with increasing temperature [24].

In the case of carbaryl, its DT50 in the soil ranges from 17 to 28 days. It is considered to have low persistence, where it is degraded mainly by the action of light and bacteria. In sandy soil conditions, its half-life is 7 to 14 days, while in clay soil it ranges from 14 to 28 days, hydrolyzing itself rapidly in alkaline soils. The DT50 in water is highly variable, increased in acidic conditions; for example, in acidic water with a pH of 5, degradation is slow and can persist for up to 1500 days [23]. The DT50 of carbaryl in soil has recently been reported to be 16 days, while it can reach 12 and 5.8 days in water and sediments, respectively [25].

Neonicotinoids have a high DT50, which means they can last a long time in the soil, with values in the range from 6.7 to 1230 days, while imidacloprid has the highest DT50, with a value of 35.9 to 1230 days. Though it should be noted that the degradation of neonicotinoids and other pesticides in soil is dependent on pH, temperature, humidity, chemical concentration, and even the presence of microorganisms [26]. As evidence, imidacloprid has been found to remain for 42 to 129 days in vegetated soils and more than 180 days in soils free of vegetation [27]. The data on this insecticide’s water persistence is varied, with half-lives ranging from 1 to 3 hours, 48 hours, and even 31 to 43 days [28].

Advertisement

5. Neurotoxic effects in different animal species

The lethal dose 50 or LD50, is a measure that in toxicology is used to estimate the dose of a test substance that produces 50% of death in a certain animal species. It is used as a reference to determine how toxic it is to humans [29]. The LC50 or lethal concentration 50, corresponds to the concentration of a chemical substance in the air or in the water that causes half of the exposed animals to die [30]. According to the WHO toxicological classification for pesticides (Table 2) [31], both imidacloprid and carbaryl are in class II, which includes those pesticides with moderate toxic effects, while chlorpyrifos is located in class 1b since its LD50 is below 200 mg. Therefore, it is considered highly dangerous. In Table 3, the LD50 or LC50 for chlorpyrifos, carbaryl, and imidacloprid in different animal species are illustrated.

ClassLD50 for rat (mg / kg body weigth)
OralDermal
IaExtremely dangerous<5<50
IbHighly dangerous5–505–200
IIModerately dangerous50–2000200–2000
IIISlightly dangerous>2000>2000
UAcute hazard unlikely5000 or more

Table 2.

Toxicological classification for pesticides with moderate toxic effects.

InsecticideClassNerve targetLD50 or LC50 in different speciesToxicological classification (WHO)
RatHoney beeFishBird
Acute oral LD50 (mg/kg)Acute contact LD50 (mg/bee)Acute exposure LC50 (mg/L)Acute oral LD50 (mg/kg)
ChlorpyrifosOrganophosphateAChE1820.07210827.36Ia
CarbarylCarbamateAChE2300.8434701870.5II
ImidaclopridNeonicotinoidnAChR439.80.061229,10035.36II

Table 3.

Effect of LD50 or LC50: chlorpyrifos, carbaryl, and imidacloprid in different animal species.

Advertisement

6. Neurotoxic effects of chlorpyrifos, carbaryl, and imidacloprid

Although insecticides are substances designed to kill some kinds of insects that cause pests, for decades it has been documented that they can also kill insects that should not be the target of their toxic effects and that overall, are essential for life on planet Earth. The most documented case is the decrease in pollinator populations and its possible association with insecticides utilization. In recent reviews, information supporting that insecticides can interfere with localization capacity, alteration of foraging and motor behavior, olfactory learning, and flight ability has been gathered. Additionally, they negatively impact the immune system and increase the death rate, among other toxic effects in bees [32, 33, 34, 35], bumblebees [36, 37, 38], butterflies and moths [39, 40, 41, 42], ants [43, 44], earthworms [39, 45] and various aquatic invertebrates [46, 47, 48]. They have also been associated with neuronal and colony performance alterations in bumblebees [32]. Insecticides such as dichlorvos, imidacloprid, and malathion, among others, can harm butterfly populations, resulting in decreased survival and changes in feeding and oviposition patterns [49].

Therefore, the effects on non-target insects have received special attention. According to studies on these species, an environmental emergency has been declared due to the decline in their populations. It is worth noting that insecticides have effects not confined to insects, which exacerbates the existing problem because all living beings are exposed to varying degrees of insecticides, making humans vulnerable to their toxic effects. Following, there is a brief overview of the effects identified in the last five years for each of the insecticides that have been the subject of this chapter, grouped into three different types of effects: behavioral, neurochemical, and cellular (Tables 46). However, for more detailed information, consider the present bibliography.

Behavioral effects
ChlorpyrifosCarbarylImidacloprid
InsectsAlters caste differentiation in Plebeia droryanabees [50].
Alters the formation and recovery of olfactory memories in bees [51].
It alters the locomotor activity of the cockroach Nauphoeta cinerea[52].
Alteration of olfactory learning and memory retention in Apis melliferaand Apis ceranabees [53].
Impaired locomotor performance manifested with altered swimming activity in Diamesa zernyi larvae [54].
It causes alterations in the percentage of copulations in adults of Rhynchophorus palmarum(Coleoptera: Curculionidae) [55].
No more recent studies for the review period in the literature.
Paralysis, tremors, prostration, and death in Scaptotrigona posticaLatreille bees [56].
Decreased food consumption, digging, and foraging behavior in the red ant Solenopsis Invicta[57].
Alterations in sexual behavior and search for hosts in parasitic wasps Nasonia vitripennis [58].
It affects the queen selection behavior of the stingless bee Plebeia droryana[59].
Reduced visual movement and deterioration in-flight behavior in the migratory locust Locusta [60].
Disruption of copulation in adults of Rhynchophorus palmarum(Coleoptera: Curculionidae) [55].
Aquatic organismsAlterations in the straightening of the gastropod Gibbula umbilicalis[61].
Irregular hatching patterns in shrimp Artemia salina[62].
Alteration of swimming activity, such as hypoactivity and spasms in the Physalaemus gracilistadpole [63]
Alterations in the swimming pattern in the catfish Heteropneustes fossilis[64].
General hypoactivity, decrease in escape swim, and feeding behavior in tadpoles of the terrestrial Anaxyrus toad [65].
Decrease in hatching speed of shrimp Artemia salina[62].
Delay in the ocular peduncle retraction speed in the blue crab Callinectes sapidus[66].
Hypoactivity, alterations in exploratory, social and feeding behavior in zebrafish exposed during embryonic life [67].
Decreased shell closing time and increased mucus secretion from the gills in the Unio pictorummussel [68].
Decreased startle behavior and habituation in zebrafish larvae [69].
It decreases exploratory behavior, swimming activity and increases the sensorimotor response to startling stimuli in zebrafish [70].
It alters the swimming behavior and avoidance behavior of the predators of the tadpole Limnodynastes tasmaniensisy [71].
Decreased response to predators in the Lithobates sylvaticusfrog [72].
Alterations in swimming and feeding behavior in the Farfantepenaeus aztecusshrimp [73].
Locomotor alterations and decreased aggressive behavior in the Procambarus clarkiies crab [74].
Hypoactivity in the zebrafish Danio rerio[75].
Lethargy is followed by hyperactivity and spasms in the tadpole Leptodactylus latrans[76].
BirdsSalivation, tearing, panting, frequent defecation, tremors, and seizures in broilers [77].
Alteration in migratory orientation in the white-crowned sparrow Zonotrichia leucophrys[78].
Difficulty walking, weak legs, dizziness, frequent defecation, less food consumption, decrease in aggressive behavior [79].Alteration in migratory orientation in the white-crowned sparrow Zonotrichia leucophrys[78].
Hypoactivity, decreased flight behavior, spasms, drooping wings, ataxia, prostration in the pigeon Zenaida auriculata[80].
Decrease in food consumption and delay in migration in the white-crowned sparrow Zonotrichia leucophrys[81].
Muscle tremors, ataxia, and depression in domestic chickens Gallus gallusdomesticus [82].
Non-human vertebratesAnxiety affects exposure in fetal life in male Wistar rats [83].
Alterations in social behavior and recognition memory in C57Bl6 / J mice [84].
Decreased locomotor activity and muscle strength in Sprague–Dawley rats [85]
Alteration of the reference memory; Anxious behavior in male Wistar rats [86].
Catalytic behavior decreased motor coordination and gait disturbances in Swiss mice [87].
Piloerection, tremors, seizures, hypoactivity, among other neurological signs after administration in mice [88].
Impairment of social behavior and sensorimotor reflexes in PON 1/1 mice [89].
Memory and learning deficits. As well as habituation behavior alterations in NMRI mice [90].
Hypoactivity in Norwegian gray rats [91].
Hypersalivation, miotic pupils, lethargy, coma in bats Eidolon helvum[92].
Hypoactivity increased grooming behavior and behaviors associated with anxiety and depression in male Sprague–Dawley rats [93].
Decreased exploratory behavior, a deficit in sensorimotor functions, and depression in male Sprague–Dawley rats [94].
It alters the vocal, auditory, orientation, and memory systems in bats Hipposideros armiger terasensis[95].
HumansArm tremors in prenatally exposed children [96].
Alterations in the social and motor function of 3-year-old children are exposed postnatally [97].
Neurobehavioral deficits in exposed Egyptian workers [98].
Semi-conscious state due to acute intoxication [99].Coma, dyspnea, and sweating in acute poisonings [100].
Drowsiness, confusion, incoherence, lack of orientation, and unconsciousness after acute poisoning [101].
Somnolence, Glasgow Coma Scale with a score of 10/15 and
Miotic pupils after acute poisoning [102].

Table 4.

Behavioral effects of chlorpyrifos, carbaryl and imidacloprid on five animal species.

Neurochemical effects
ChlorpyrifosCarbarylImidacloprid
InsectsDecreased acetylcholinesterase activity and oxidative stress in Nauphoeta cinereacockroaches’ heads [52].
Lipid peroxidation and protein carbonylation in Diamesa zernyi larvae [54].
Increased levels of acetylcholinesterase in Apis melliferabees’ heads [103].
Inhibition of carbonic anhydrase in the bee Apis mellifera[104].
Decreased levels of acetylcholinesterase in the head of the bee Apis mellifera[103].
Increased levels of acetylcholinesterase in the heads of the bee Apis mellifera[103].
It decreases the activity of acetylcholinesterase and 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine, increases the levels of antioxidant enzymes in the brain tissue of the rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss[105].
Aquatics organismsCholinesterase inhibition in the protobrain of shrimp Artemia salina[62].
Inhibition of acetylcholinesterase in the gastropod Gibbula umbilicalis[83].
Oxidative stress and acetylcholinesterase inhibition in common carp Cyprinus carpiobrain tissue [106].
Decreased acetylcholinesterase activity and oxidative stress in Physalaemus gracilistadpoles [63].
Cholinesterase inhibition in Chilina gibbosa [107].
Decreased levels of acetylcholine, GABA, choline, tryptophan, and phenylalanine in Danio reriozebrafish larvae [108].
Cholinesterase inhibition in the protobrain of shrimp Artemia salina[62].
Inhibits acetylcholinesterase activity in the brain of tropical fish Phalloceros harpagos, Pterygoplichthys pardalis, and Astyanax altiparanae[109].
Inhibition of cholinesterase and carboxylesterase in Chilina gibbosa [107].
It increases acetylcholinesterase activity and causes oxidative stress in Gobiocypris rarusfish brain tissue [110].
Inhibition of brachial acetylcholinesterase in Sydney rock oyster [111].
Oxidative stress and acetylcholinesterase inhibition in zebrafish Danio rerio[75].
Inhibition of acetylcholinesterase in the muscle of Astyanax altiparanaefish [112].
BirdsDecreased acetylcholinesterase activity in blood, serum, and plasma of broilers [77].
Inhibition of acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase; oxidative stress in the brain of the Coturnix japanica quail [113].
Inhibition of plasma acetylcholinesterase in the vulture Gyps fulvus[114].It increases the levels of monoamines in the cerebral cortex of the Coturnix coturnixquail [115].
Alteration of acetylcholinesterase and glutathione-S-transferase activity in the muscle and brain of the gray bay-wing bird Agelaioides baduis [116].
Non-human vertebratesDecreased activity of acetylcholinesterase; down-regulation of genes related to Parkinson’s disease, synaptic transmission, plasticity, and dopaminergic and GABAergic signaling [117].
Acetylcholinesterase increased activity; increased levels of nitric oxide and reactive oxygen species in the amygdala and hippocampus of male Wistar rats [86].
Decreased acetylcholinesterase activity in the brain and cerebellum of Sprague Dawley rats [85].
Decreased dopamine levels and acetylcholinesterase activity in the striatum of Swiss mice [87].
Decreased brain levels of dopamine, serotonin and the activity of monoamine oxidase, acetylcholinesterase, and sodium-potassium ATPase in rats [118].
Acetylcholinesterase inhibition in Norwegian gray rats [91].Increased acetylcholinesterase activity and calcium levels in the hypothalamus and pituitary of the Wistar rat [119].
Increased levels of epinephrine, norepinephrine, and cortisone in the serum of male Sprague–Dawley rats [93].
Reduction of serotonin, GABA, and dopamine levels, as well as oxidative stress in the brain of male Sprague–Dawley rats [94].
Reduction of GABA and glutathione levels, as well as a decrease in SDH in the albino rat brain [120].
HumansHumans Decreased intracellular ATP levels and mitochondrial dysfunction in induced pluripotent stem cells [121].Binding to human melatonin receptors [122].
Inhibition of plasma acetylcholinesterase after acute poisoning [99].
Increases intracellular calcium levels in LUHMES and SH-SY5Y neurons [123].

Table 5.

Neurochemical effects of chlorpyrifos, carbaryl and imidacloprid on five animal species.

Effects on the cellular level
ChlorpyrifosCarbarylImidacloprid
InsectsNo recent studies for the review period in the literature.No recent studies for the review period in the literature.Induction of apoptosis by increased levels of caspase-3 and caspase-1 mRNA in the bee Apis mellifera[124].
Apoptosis and autophagy in neurons of the brain of the bee Apis mellifera[124].
Decreased density of synaptic units in the fungal bodies of the bee Apis mellifera[125].
Decreased driving speed in locusta migratoria [60].
Aquatics organismsIncreased expression of BNDF and c-fos in brain tissues of the zebrafish Danio rerio[126].
Degeneration and vacuolization in neurons of the dorsal pars medialis in the catfish Heteropneustes fossilis[64].
No recent studies for the review period in the literature.Increased expression of BDNF and c-fos in brain tissues of the zebrafish Danio rerio[126].
BirdsNecrosis and degeneration in the brain of broilers [77].
Neurodegeneration, infiltration of mononuclear cells in the brain, and congestion of blood vessels of the meninges of broilers [127].
Neurodegeneration, liquefactive necrosis, vacuolar degeneration, glia cell enlargement, and satellitosis in the broiler brain [128].
No recent studies for the review period in the literature.Pyknosis, karyolysis, perineuronal edema, reactive astrocytosis, among other histopathological findings in the white Leghorn hen embryos cerebellum [129].
Neurodegeneration, axonal degeneration with demyelination, congestion, perivascular edema, neuronal vacuolization in the Columba liviadomestica pigeon [130].
No humans vertebratesHistological alterations in the brain and cerebellum of Sprague Dawley rats [85].
Lewy body formation and neurodegeneration in the substantia nigra of Swiss albino mice [131].
Gliosis and Purkinje cell degeneration in male Wistar rats [132].
Alterations in normal brain development due to changes in important protein levels during neonatal exposure in NMRI mice [90].
Alterations in the electroencephalogram of the visual and frontal cortex of the male Long Evans rat [133].
Neuroinflammation in the hippocampus of male Wistar rats exposed during pregnancy and lactation [134].
Neurodegeneration and increased GFAP expression in the brain of male Sprague–Dawley rats [94].
Absence of the cellular band of the hippocampal formation in mice [135].
Decreased proteins related to echolocation in different brain regions of the bat Hipposideros armiger terasensis[95].
DNA damage of male Wistar rat brain cells [136].
HumansInhibition of voltage-gated calcium channels in human PC12 cells [137].
Inhibition of neurite length, number of neurites, and branch points per neuron in human neural progenitor cells [138].
Apoptotic cell death in human neural stem cells [139].
Alterations in the morphology of different brain regions in exposed children [140].
Associated with meningiomas in people involved in agriculture [141].Brain edema after acute poisoning [101].
Cell death in neurons of
SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma [142].

Table 6.

Effects on the cellular level of chlorpyrifos, carbaryl and imidacloprid on five animal species.

6.1 Chlorpyrifos

The recent literature regarding chlorpyrifos toxic effects in different species is extensive. However, this chapter has focused on those that are associated with effects on the nervous system. For example, in non-target insects, such as bees, it has been observed that it can have adverse effects on caste differentiation [50], as well as on olfactory learning and memory retention [51, 53]; in cockroaches [52] and mosquito larvae [54] has been associated with locomotor alterations (Table 4) [143]. It has also been documented that chlorpyrifos can cause alterations in acetylcholinesterase activity and induce oxidative stress in different insects [52, 54, 103] and annelids (Table 5). On the other hand, in aquatic organisms such as mollusks, crustaceans, amphibians, and fish, it has been reported that it can cause alterations in locomotor activity [61, 63, 64, 144], inhibit acolinesterase in shrimp [62, 144], copepods [145], common carp [106], tadpoles [63] and snails [61, 107], as well as causing neuronal degeneration in catfish [64]. In toxicity studies carried out in broilers, it has been described that it can cause nervous signs such as salivation, tearing, panting, frequent defecation, tremors, and seizures [77], in sparrows, it can alter the migratory orientation [78] and inhibit acetylcholinesterase activity in broilers [77] and quail (Tables 4 and 5) [113]. Regarding its cellular effects, in repeated studies, chlorpyrifos has been reported to be associated with neurodegeneration in broilers [127, 128]. The neurotoxic effects of chlorpyrifos scale to small mammal species. In fact, in rodents under experimental conditions, it has been seen that it can have anxiogenic effects [83, 86] and cause alterations in the memory of recognition [84] and reference [86] in locomotor activity [85, 87], in social behavior (Table 4) [84, 89].

While, acute poisonings are associated with signs of piloerection, tremors, seizures, and hypoactivity, among other neurological manifestations [88]. Regarding brain neurochemistry in experimental rodents, it has been reported that chlorpyrifos can alter the activity of acetylcholinesterase. It participates in the downregulation of genes related to Parkinson’s disease, causes oxidative stress and decreases dopamine and serotonin levels [86, 87, 117, 118]. Overall, it has also been associated with neurodegeneration in rodents for experimentation [85, 131, 132]. In humans, it has been reported that chlorpyrifos can alter social and motor function in children (Table 5) [96, 97]. As well as having fallout related to neurobehavioral deficits in workers exposed to the insecticide [98]. At the neurochemical level, in an in vitro study with human cells, it was shown that it can decrease intracellular levels of ATP and cause mitochondrial dysfunction [121]. Finally, at the cellular level, it has been reported to cause inhibition of activated calcium channels by voltage [137], alter morphology [138], and induce apoptosis in vitro [139]. In human cells exposed to chlorpyrifos, a recently published study reported that it may be associated with alterations in the morphology of different brain regions in children exposed to the substance (Table 6) [140].

6.2 Carbaryl

Recent studies on the neurotoxic effects associated with carbaryl are scarce. However, it has been reported that in bees, it can inhibit carbonic anhydrase [104] and decrease acetylcholinesterase levels [103], as well as its negative effect on isopod growth and survival (Table 5) [146]. In aquatic organisms, it has been discovered that carbaryl can cause embryonic deformities and growth inhibition in crustaceans [147], affect hatching speed in shrimp [62], locomotives alterations in blue crabs [66], mussels [68], and zebrafish [69]. Besides, in this same species, it has been associated with alterations in exploratory, social, and feeding behavior [67]. Likewise, in tadpoles, it causes hypoactivity, reduction in escape swimming, and feeding behavior (Table 4) [65]. Regarding the effects on brain chemistry, it has been reported that carbaryl may be related to the decrease in the levels of acetylcholine, GABA, choline, tryptophan, and phenylalanine in zebrafish [108]. Additionally, it inhibits acetylcholinesterase in shrimp [62], in some species of tropical fish [109], and also in mollusks (Table 5) [107]. On the other hand, it has been documented that in broilers, acute poisoning can cause walking difficulty, weakness in the legs, dizziness, frequent defecation, less food consumption, and a decrease in aggressive behavior (Table 4) [79]. Overall, acetylcholinesterase inhibition has been reported, particularly in the vulture [114]. Simultaneously, in experimental rodents, it has been associated with deficits in memory and learning. As well as alterations in habitual behavior [90] and hypoactivity [91]. Furthermore, in a supposed carbaryl poisoning in bats, signs such as hypersalivation, miotic pupils, lethargy, and coma were reported [92]. This substance can also inhibit acetylcholinesterase in Norwegian gray rats [91] and in experimental rodents. The above has been related to neurodevelopmental alterations [90], as depicted in the visual and frontal cortex electroencephalogram [133] and hippocampal neuroinflammation [134]. In humans, it has been linked to a semi-conscious state and acetylcholinesterase inhibition after acute poisoning in a 3-year-old child, without further details on other associated neurological signs (Table 4) [99]. Moreover, in an in vitro study, it was observed that carbaryl could bind to human melatonin receptors [122]. Carbaryl was recently associated with meningiomas in people agriculturally involved in an epidemiological investigation [141].

While, acute poisonings are associated with signs of piloerection, tremors, seizures, and hypoactivity, among other neurological manifestations [88]. Regarding brain neurochemistry in experimental rodents, it has been reported that chlorpyrifos can alter the activity of acetylcholinesterase [86, 87, 117, 118]. It participates in the downregulation of genes related to Parkinson’s disease [117], causes oxidative stress [86] and decreases dopamine and serotonin levels [87, 118]. Overall, it has also been associated with neurodegeneration in rodents for experimentation [131, 132]. In humans, it has been reported that chlorpyrifos can alter social and motor function in children [96, 97]. As well as having fallout related to neurobehavioral deficits in workers exposed to the insecticide [98]. At the neurochemical level, in an in vitro study with human cells, it was shown that it can decrease intracellular levels of ATP and cause mitochondrial dysfunction [121]. Finally, at the cellular level, it has been reported to cause inhibition of activated calcium channels by voltage [137], alter morphology [138], and induce apoptosis in vitro [139]. In human cells exposed to chlorpyrifos, a recently published study reported that it may be associated with alterations in the morphology of different brain regions in children exposed to the substance (Table 6) [140].

6.3 Imidacloprid

Despite being considered harmless for most living organisms, neonicotinoid insecticide have been the focus of extensive investigation, as their toxicity has been proven to extend beyond insects [148], to humans. Imidacloprid poisoning in bees has been associated to neurological symptoms such as paralysis and tremors [56], and fire ant exposure has been linked to decreased consumption, foraging, and digging behavior, as well as parasitic wasps with alterations in host-seeking behavior (Table 4) [57, 58]. Reduced visual mobility and degradation in in-flight behavior in lobsters, in addition to influencing queen selection behavior in stingless bees have been other reported consequences of the exposure to this insecticide [59, 60]. Imidacloprid has been linked to a decrease in the density of synaptic units in fungiform bodies [125] and a decrease in driving speed in lobsters [103]. It can also increase acetylcholinesterase levels [103] and induce apoptosis and neuronal autophagy [60, 124]. In edaphic invertebrates, imidacloprid causes diverse effects on the survival, growth, and reproduction of earthworms, springtails, mites, and isopods based on LC50, EC50, and EC20 toxicity tests [149]. In aquatic organisms, a decrease in acetylcholinesterase levels in mollusks has been reported [150], as well as varied effects on exploratory behavior, swimming activity, and sensorimotor response to startling stimuli in zebrafish (Tables 4 and 5) [70].

Moreover, exposure to imidacloprid has been associated with alterations in swimming behavior in tadpoles [71] and shrimp [73], decreased response to predators in frogs [72], and locomotor alterations in crabs [74], zebrafish [75] and tadpoles (Table 4) [76]. At the neurochemical level, it has been proposed that imidacloprid can alter acetylcholinesterase activity and cause oxidative stress in fish [75, 105, 110]. It also inhibits brachial acetylcholinesterase in oysters [111] and in fish muscles (Table 5) [112]. At the cellular level, it has been documented that the above may be associated with increased expression of BNDF and c-fos in the brain tissues of zebrafish (Table 6) [126]. In birds, it has been reported that exposure to imidacloprid can cause hypoactivity, decreased flight behavior, spasms, drooping wings, ataxia, and prostration in pigeons [80]. It has also been stated that it can alter the migratory orientation and delay the time of starting migration in the white-crowned sparrow [151]. In one of the most recently published studies, it was reported that in chickens, it can generate neurological signs such as muscle tremors, ataxia and depression (Table 4) [82]; in quail, it can increase monoamine levels in the cerebral cortex [115] and alter the activity of acetylcholinesterase in the muscles and brain of the gray laurel wing bird (Table 5) [116]. At the cellular level, it has been associated with neurodegeneration in chicken embryos’ cerebellum [129] and pigeons [130]. In experimentation rodents, it has been associated with hypoactivity, increased grooming behavior, and conduct associated with anxiety and depression [93, 94]. While in bats, it may be associated with alterations in the vocal, auditory, orientation, and memory systems (Table 4) [95]. Also, in rodents, it can increase acetylcholinesterase activity [119], adrenaline, norepinephrine, and cortisone levels [93], and reduce serotonin, GABA, dopamine, and glutathione (Table 5) [120, 152]. Regarding the cellular effects, exposure to imidacloprid can also cause neurodegeneration, an increase in the expression of GFAP [152], and DNA damage in neurons [136]. In bats, it has been related to a decrease in proteins related to echolocation in different brain regions [95]. Moreover, in humans, acute imidacloprid poisonings have been associated with neurological signs such as dyspnea, coma, sweating, drowsiness, confusion, incoherence, lack of orientation, and miotic pupils, among others [100, 101, 102]. In an in vitro study with LUHMES and SH-SY5Y cells, an increase in intracellular calcium levels was found [123] (Table 5) On the other hand, after acute poisoning, cerebral edema has been reported as a necropsy finding [101], while in an in vitro study it was revealed that it can cause the death of SH-SY5Y cells [135].

On the other hand, acute poisonings are linked to piloerection, tremors, seizures, and hypoactivity, among other neurological manifestations. Regarding brain neurochemistry in experimental rodents, it has been reported that chlorpyrifos can alter the activity of acetylcholinesterase [86, 87, 117, 118]. It participates in the downregulation of genes related to Parkinson’s disease [117], causes oxidative stress [86] and decreases dopamine and serotonin levels [87, 118]. Overall, it has also been associated with neurodegeneration in rodents for experimentation [85, 132]. In humans, it has been reported that chlorpyrifos can alter social and motor function in children [96, 97]. As well as having fallout related to neurobehavioral deficits in workers exposed to the insecticide [98]. At the neurochemical level, in an in vitro study with human cells, it was shown that it can decrease intracellular levels of ATP and cause mitochondrial dysfunction [121]. Finally, at the cellular level, it has been reported to cause inhibition of activated calcium channels by voltage [137], alter morphology [138], and induce apoptosis in vitro [139]. In human cells exposed to chlorpyrifos, a recently published study reported that it may be associated with alterations in the morphology of different brain regions in children exposed to the substance [140].

Advertisement

7. Conclusions and perspectives

Insecticides are pesticides commonly associated with neurotoxic effects [153] and although the general population is exposed on a daily basis to low doses through water and food [154, 155, 156] the highest risk is presented by agricultural workers, their families and people who live in the areas surrounding the fields, unfortunately, these people are the most exposed and also the least informed about the toxic effects, which leads to bad practices of use, handling and disposal of these substances, which put wildlife and the environment at risk. Since the effects that cause the greatest impact are usually those that directly affect human health, in conclusion some neurotoxic effects associated with the use of insecticides are revealed. In epidemiological studies in humans, organophosphates have been linked to effects such as cholinergic syndrome, polyneuropathy and neuropsychiatric disorders such as cognitive deficits, anxiety, depression, peripheral neuropathy, extrapyramidal symptoms such as dystonia, tremor at rest, bradykinesia, postural instability and rigidity of facial muscles, among others, and have even been associated with neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s disease [157, 158]; neonicotinoids have been linked to developmental diseases such as autism and anencephaly and in acute poisonings with neurological signs such as memory loss, finger tremors, muscle spasms, coma and dilated pupils [159, 160, 161]; On the other hand, with regard to epidemiological studies on neurotoxicity of carbamates in humans, the literature is limited, however, in the most recently published article, it has been reported that after acute poisoning, these pesticides can cause signs such as coma, drowsiness, seizures, disorientation, tremors and fasciculations, among others [157]. However, although there are epidemiological studies in which the possible relationship between exposure to pesticides and neurological disorders has been determined, to date they remain limited and in fact most of the toxic effects of many pesticides used in the field are unknown. agriculture and therefore it is difficult to determine how we can protect ourselves from them, although there are studies in which the neuroprotective effect of various substances has been experimentally demonstrated, which could counteract the neurotoxic effects of pesticides, for example in the case of pesticides. Organophosphates it has been documented that the flavonoid kaempferol may have protective effects on chlorpyrifos-induced neurotoxicity [162] and that crocin and citric acid may also have the same effect on malathion-induced toxicity [163, 164]; in the case of neonicotinoids, reduced glutathione, curcumin, resveratrol, ascorbic acid, and aqueous ginger extract have been shown to act as neuroprotectors against imidacloprid-induced toxicity [165, 166, 167, 168], as well as curcumin and N-acetylcysteine can protect against acetamiprid-induced neurotoxicity [169, 170]; In the case of carbamates, it has been described that naringenin can combat oxidative stress induced by exposure to carbaryl [171]. Previous studies offer alternatives as possible neuroprotectors, therefore, it is necessary to continue investigating the mechanisms of toxicity and target species of pesticides that exist on the market, before thinking of creating new, more powerful and, of course, more toxic pesticides ; In addition to banning those that pose a high risk to living beings and the environment and making strict policies to control their distribution and sale, since it is clear that it is difficult to live without pesticides, however, it is our duty to use them responsibly.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

The present work has been possible thanks to Grant from Consejo Nacional de Ciencias y Tecnología (CONACYT) México, registry number 287959.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.Sharma A, Kumar V, Shahzad B. Worldwide pesticide usage and its impacts on ecosystem. SN Appl. Sci. 2019;1:1446. DOI: 10.1007/s42452-019-1485-1
  2. 2.FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). FAOSTAT. Pesticides Use, 2021. Available from:http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/RP
  3. 3.Perry ED, Moschini G. Neonicotinoids in US maize: insecticide substitution effects and environmental risk. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 2020;102:102320. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2020.102320
  4. 4.Borsuah JF, Messer TL, Snow DD, Comfort SD, Mittelstet AR. Literature review: global neonicotinoid insecticide occurrence in aquatic environments. Water. 2020;12(12):3388. DOI: 10.3390/w12123388
  5. 5.Adeyinka A, Muco E, Pierre L. Organophosphates. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021. Jan-. Available from:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK499860/
  6. 6.Silberman J, Taylor A. Carbamate ToxicityIn: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021. Jan-. Available from:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482183/
  7. 7.ur Rahman HU, Asghar W, Nazir W, Sandhu MA, Ahmed A, Khalid N. A comprehensive review on chlorpyrifos toxicity with special reference to endocrine disruption: Evidence of mechanisms, exposures and mitigation strategies. Science of the Total Environment. 142649. DOI. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142649
  8. 8.Struger J, Grabuski J, Cagampan S, Sverko E, Marvin C. Occurrence and distribution of carbamate pesticides and metalaxyl in southern Ontario surface waters 2007-2010. Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology. 2016;96(4):423-431. DOI: 10.1007/s00128-015-1719-x
  9. 9.Simon-Celso N, Amaral-Rogers V, Belzunces LP, Nonmatin JM, Chagnon M, Downs C, et al. Systemic insecticides (neonicotinoids and fipronil): trends, uses, mode of action and metabolites. Environmental Science snd Pollution Research. 2015;22(1):5-34https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3470-y
  10. 10.Kundoo AA, Dar S, Mushtaq M, Bashir Z, Dar M, Gul S, et al. Role of neonicotinoids in insect pest management: A review. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies. 2018;6(1):333-9. Available online:https://www.entomoljournal.com/archives/2018/vol6issue1/PartE/5-5-303-183.pdf
  11. 11.Craddock HA, Huang D, Turner PC, Quirós-Alcalá L, Payne-Sturges DC. Trends in neonicotinoid pesticide residues in food and water in the United States, 1999-2015. Environmental Health. 2019;18(1):1-16. DOI: 10.1186/s12940-018-0441-7
  12. 12.National Center for Biotechnology Information PubChem Compound Summary for CID 2730, Chlorpyrifos. 2021. Retrieved July 11. Available from:https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Chlorpyrifos.
  13. 13.US EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). Chlorpyrifos. 2020. Available from:https://www.epa.gov/ingredients-used-pesticide-products/chlorpyrifos#:~:text=
  14. 14.Hinojosa MG, Prieto AI, Gutiérrez-Praena D, Moreno FJ, Caméan AM, Jos A. In vitro assessment of the combination of cylindrospermopsin and the organophosphate chlorpyrifos on the human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cell line. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety. 2020;191:110222. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110222
  15. 15.Pang S, Lin Z, Zhang W, Mishra S, Bhatt P, Chen S. Insights into the microbial degradation and biochemical mechanisms of neonicotinoids. Frontiers in microbiology. 2020;11:868. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00868
  16. 16.Tomizawa M, Casida JE. Neonicotinoid insecticide toxicology: mechanisms of selective action. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2005;45:247-268. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.45.120403.095930
  17. 17.Matsuda K, Ihara M, Sattelle DB. Neonicotinoid insecticides: molecular targets, resistance, and toxicity. Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology. 2020;60:241-255. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010818-021747
  18. 18.US Environmental Protection Agency. Imidacloprid Proposed Interim Registration Review Decision Case Number 7605. Washington, DC. 2020. Available online:https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=EPAHQ-OPP-2008-0844-1619.
  19. 19.Anthe M, Valles-Ebeling B, Achtenhagen J, Arenz-Leufen M, Atkinson J, Starp M, et al. Development of an aquatic exposure assessment model for Imidacloprid in sewage treatment plant discharges arising from use of veterinary medicinal products. Environmental Sciences Europe. 2020;32(1):1-21. DOI: 10.1186/s12302-020-00424-4
  20. 20.National Center for Biotechnology Information. PubChem Compound Summary for CID 6129, Carbaryl. Retrieved July 11, 2021. Fromhttps://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Carbaryl.
  21. 21.US EPA (United States Environmental Protection). APPENDIX 1-4. Usage Data for Carbaryl–SUUM. 2020. Available from: Agencyhttps://www3.epa.gov/pesticides/nas/carbaryl/appendix-1-4.pdf.
  22. 22.Ahn S, Lee JY, Kim B. Accurate Determination of Carbaryl, Carbofuran and Carbendazim in Vegetables by Isotope Dilution Liquid Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Chromatographia. 2021;84(1):27-35. DOI: 10.1007/s10337-020-03976-y
  23. 23.Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAO pesticide disposal series 8. Assessing soil contamination. A reference manual. 2002. Available online:http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/agphome/documents/Pests.
  24. 24.Watts M. Chlorpyrifos as a possible global POP. Pesticide Action Network North America, Oakland, CA. 2012.https://www.pan-europe.info/old/News/PR/121009 Chlorpyrifos_as_POP_final.pdf.
  25. 25.Guarda PM, Pontes AM, Domiciano R, Gualberto LB, Mendes DA, Guarda E, da Silva JE. Determination of carbamates and thiocarbamates in water, soil and sediment of the Formoso River, TO, Brazil. Chemistry & biodiversity. 2020;17(4):e1900717. DOI: 10.1002/cbdv.201900717.
  26. 26.Pietrzak D, Kania J, Kmiecik E, Malina G, Wątor K. Fate of selected neonicotinoid insecticides in soil–water systems: Current state of the art and knowledge gaps. Chemosphere. 2020;255:126981. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126981
  27. 27.Romeh AA. Synergistic use ofPlantago majorand effective microorganisms, EM1 to clean up the soil polluted with imidacloprid under laboratory and field condition. International Journal of Phytoremediation. 2020;22(14):1515-1523. DOI: 10.1080/15226514.2020.1785388
  28. 28.Tišler T, Jemec A, Mozetič B, Trebše P. Hazard identification of imidacloprid to aquatic environment. Chemosphere. 2009;76(7):907-914. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.05.002
  29. 29.Erhirhie EO, Ihekwereme CP, Ilodigwe EE. Advances in acute toxicity testing: strengths, weaknesses and regulatory acceptance. Interdisciplinary Toxicology. 2018;11(1):5-12. DOI: 10.2478/intox-2018-0001
  30. 30.Canadian Centre for Occupational Health & Safety. What is a LD50 and LC50? 2021. Available online:https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/chemicals/ld50.html.
  31. 31.World Health Organization. The WHO recommended classification of pesticides by hazard and guidelines to classification 2019. World Health Organization. 2020. Available online:https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/332193/9789240005662-eng.pdf.
  32. 32.Godfray HCJ, Blacquiere T, Field LM, Hails RS, Potts SG, Raine NE, et al. A restatement of recent advances in the natural science evidence base concerning neonicotinoid insecticides and insect pollinators. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2015;282:20151821. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.1821
  33. 33.Kumar S, Joshi PC, Nath P, Singh VK. Impacts of insecticides on pollinators of different food plants. Entomol Ornithol Herpetol. 2018;7(2):7. DOI: 10.4172/2161-0983.1000211
  34. 34.Siviter H, Muth F. Do novel insecticides pose a threat to beneficial insects? Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 2020;287(1935):20201265. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1265
  35. 35.Gomes IN, Vieira KIC, Gontijo LM, Resende HC. Honeybee survival and flight capacity are compromised by insecticides used for controlling melon pests in Brazil. Ecotoxicology. 2020;29(1):97-107. DOI: 10.1007/s10646-019-02145-8
  36. 36.Spurgeon D, Hesketh H, Lahive E, Svendsen C, Baas J, Robinson A, et al. Chronic oral lethal and sublethal toxicities of different binary mixtures of pesticides and contaminants in bees (Apis mellifera,Osmia bicornisandBombus terrestris). EFSA supporting publication. 2016. DOI: 10.2903/sp.efsa.2016.EN-1076
  37. 37.Sterk G, Peters B, Gao Z, Zumkier U. Large-scale monitoring of effects of clothianidin-dressed OSR seeds on pollinating insects in northern Germany: effects on large earth bumble bees (Bombus terrestris). Ecotoxicology. 2016;25:1666-1678. DOI: 10.1007/s10646-016-1730-y
  38. 38.Switzer CM, Combes SA. The neonicotinoid pesticide, imidacloprid, affectsBombus impatiens(bumblebee) sonication behavior when consumed at doses below the LD50. Ecotoxicology. 2016;25:1150-1159. DOI: 10.1007/s10646-016-1669-z
  39. 39.Pisa LW, Amaral-Rogers V, Belzunces LP. Effects of neonicotinoids and fipronil on non-target invertebrates. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015;22:68-102. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-014-3471-x
  40. 40.Pecenka JR, Lundgren JG. Non-target effects of clothianidin on monarch butterflies. Sc. Nat. 2015;102:19. DOI: 10.1007/s00114-015-1270-y
  41. 41.Yu RX, Wang YH, Hu XQ, Wu SG, Cai LM, Zhao XP. Individual and joint acute toxicities of selected insecticides againstBombyx mori(Lepidoptera: Bombycidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2015;109:327-333. DOI: 10.1093/jee/tov316
  42. 42.Botías C, David A, Hill E, Goulson D. Contamination of wild plants near neonicotinoid seed-treated crops, and implications for non-target insects. Sci. Total. Environ. 2016;566:269-278. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.065
  43. 43.Wang L, Zeng L, Chen J. Sublethal effect of imidacloprid onSolenopsis invicta(Hymenoptera: Formicidae) feeding, digging, and foraging behaviour. Environ. Entomol. 2015a;44:1544-1552. DOI: 10.1093/ee/nvv127
  44. 44.Wang L, Zeng L, Chen J. Impact of imidacloprid on new Queens of imported fire ants,Solenopsis invicta(Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sci. Rep. 2015b;5:17938. DOI: 10.1038/srep17938
  45. 45.Douglas MR, Rohr JR, Tooker JF. Neonicotinoid insecticide travels through a soil food chain, disrupting biological control of non-target pests and decreasing soya bean yield. J. Appl. Ecol. 2015;52:250-260. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12372
  46. 46.Morrissey CA, Mineau P, Devries JH, Sánchex-Bayo F, Liess M, Cavallaro MC, et al. Neonicotinoid contamination of global surfacewaters and associated risk to aquatic invertebrates: a review. Environ. Int. 2015;74:291-303. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.10.024
  47. 47.de Perre C, Murphy TM, Lydy MJ. Fate and effects of clothianidin in fields using conservation practices. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2015;34:258-265. DOI: 10.1002/etc.2800
  48. 48.Kunce W, Josefsson S, Örberg J, Johansson F. Combination effects of pyrethroids and neonicotinoids on development and survival ofChironomus riparius. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2015;122:426-431. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.09.008
  49. 49.Mulé R, Sabella G, Robba L, Manachini B. Systematic review of the effects of chemical insecticides on four common butterfly families. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2017;5:32. DOI.https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2017.00032
  50. 50.Dos Santos CF, Acosta AL, Dorneles AL, Dos Santos PD, Blochtein B. Queens become workers: pesticides alter caste differentiation in bees. Scientific Reports. 2016;6(1):1-9. DOI.https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31605
  51. 51.Urlacher E, Monchanin C, Rivière C, Richard FJ, Lombardi C, Michelsen-Heath S, et al. Measurements of chlorpyrifos levels in forager bees and comparison with levels that disrupt honey bee odor-mediated learning under laboratory conditions. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 2016;42(2):127-138. DOI.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-016-0672-4
  52. 52.Adedara IA, Rosemberg DB, de Souza D, Farombi EO, Aschner M, Souza DO, et al. Neurobehavioral and biochemical changes inNauphoeta cinereafollowing dietary exposure to chlorpyrifos. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology. 2016;130:22-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2015.12.004
  53. 53.Li Z, Li M, Huang J, Ma C, Xiao L, Huang Q, Su S. Effects of sublethal concentrations of chlorpyrifos on olfactory learning and memory performances in two bee species,Apis melliferaandApis cerana. Sociobiology. 2017;64:174-181. DOI: 10.13102/sociobiology.v64i2.1385
  54. 54.Di Nica V, González ABM, Lencioni V, Villa S. Behavioural and biochemical alterations by chlorpyrifos in aquatic insects: an emerging environmental concern for pristine Alpine habitats. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2020;27(25):30918-30926. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-06467-2
  55. 55.Martínez LC, Plata-Rueda A, Rodríguez-Dimaté FA. Exposure to insecticides reduces populations ofRhynchophorus palmarumin oil palm plantations with bud rot disease. Insects. 2019;10:111. DOI: 10.3390/insects10040111
  56. 56.Soares HM, Jacob CRO, Carvalho SM, Nocelli RCF, Malaspina O. Toxicity of imidacloprid to the stingless beeScaptotrigona posticaLatreille, 1807 (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 2015;94(6):675-680. DOI: 10.1007/s00128-015-1488-6
  57. 57.Wang L, Zeng L, Chen J. Sublethal effect of imidacloprid onSolenopsis invicta(Hymenoptera: Formicidae) feeding, digging, and foraging behavior. Environmental Entomology. 2015;44(6):1544-1552. DOI: 10.1093/ee/nvv127
  58. 58.Tappert L, Pokorny T, Hofferberth J, Ruther J. Sublethal doses of imidacloprid disrupt sexual communication and host finding in a parasitoid wasp. Scientific Reports. 2017;7(1):1-9. DOI: 10.1038/srep42756
  59. 59.Otesbelgue A, Dos Santos CF, Blochtein B. Queen bee acceptance under threat: Neurotoxic insecticides provoke deep damage in queen-worker relationships. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2018;166:42-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.09.048
  60. 60.Parkinson RH, Gray JR. Neural conduction, visual motion detection, and insect flight behaviour are disrupted by low doses of imidacloprid and its metabolites. Neurotoxicology. 2019;72:107-113. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuro.2019.02.012
  61. 61.Silva CO, Novais SC, Alves LM, Soares AM, Barata C, Lemos MF. Linking cholinesterase inhibition with behavioural changes in the sea snailGibbula umbilicalis: Effects of the organophosphate pesticide chlorpyrifos. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Toxicology & Pharmacology. 2019;225:108570. DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpc.2019.108570
  62. 62.Gambardella C, Nichino D, Iacometti C, Ferrando S, Falugi C, Faimali M. Long term exposure to low dose neurotoxic pesticides affects hatching, viability and cholinesterase activity of Artemia sp. Aquatic Toxicology. 2018;196:79-89. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2018.01.006
  63. 63.Rutkoski CF, Macagnan N, Folador A, Skovronski VJ, do Amaral AM, Leitemperger J, Hartmann MT. Morphological and biochemical traits and mortality inPhysalaemus gracilis(Anura: Leptodactylidae) tadpoles exposed to the insecticide chlorpyrifos. Chemosphere. 2020;250:126162. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126162.
  64. 64.Mishra AK, Gopesh A, Singh KP. Acute toxic effects of chlorpyrifos and indoxacarb on dorsal pars medialis of telencephalon and swimming behavior of a catfish,Heteropneustes fossilis. Journal of Applied Biology & Biotechnology. 2021;9(03):137-143. DOI.https://doi.org/10.7324/JABB.2021.9317
  65. 65.Wood L, Welch AM. Assessment of interactive effects of elevated salinity and three pesticides on life history and behavior of southern toad (Anaxyrus terrestris) tadpoles. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 2015;34(3):667-676. DOI: 10.1002/etc.2861
  66. 66.Schroeder-Spain K, Fisher LL, Smee DL. Uncoordinated: effects of sublethal malathion and carbaryl exposures on juvenile and adult blue crabs (Callinectes sapidus). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 2018;504:1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2018.03.005
  67. 67.Correia D, Almeida AR, Santos J, Machado AL, Ucun OK, Žlábek V, et al. Behavioral effects in adult zebrafish after developmental exposure to carbaryl. Chemosphere. 2019;235:1022-1029. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.07.029
  68. 68.Khudhur SM, Shekha YA. Histopathological and Biochemical Biomarker Response of Mussel,Unio Pictorum, to Carbamate Pesticide Carbaryl: A Laboratory Study. Indian J Ani Res. 2019;1157:1-5. DOI: 10.18805/ijar.B1157.
  69. 69.Faria M, Wu X, Luja-Mondragón M, Prats E, Gómez-Oliván LM, Piña B, et al. Screening anti-predator behaviour in fish larvae exposed to environmental pollutants. Science of The Total Environment. 2020;714:136759. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136759
  70. 70.Crosby EB, Bailey JM, Oliveri AN, Levin ED. Neurobehavioral impairments caused by developmental imidacloprid exposure in zebrafish. Neurotoxicology and Teratology. 2015;49:81-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.ntt.2015.04.006
  71. 71.Sievers M, Hale R, Swearer SE, Parris KM. Contaminant mixtures interact to impair predator-avoidance behaviours and survival in a larval amphibian. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2018;161:482-488. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.06.028
  72. 72.Lee-Jenkins SS, Robinson SA. Effects of neonicotinoids on putative escape behavior of juvenile wood frogs (Lithobates sylvaticus) chronically exposed as tadpoles. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 2018;37(12):3115-3123. DOI: 10.1002/etc.4284
  73. 73.Al-Badran AA, Fujiwara M, Mora MA. Effects of insecticides, fipronil and imidacloprid, on the growth, survival, and behavior of brown shrimpFarfantepenaeus aztecus. PloS One. 2019;14(10):e0223641. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223641.
  74. 74.Huang Y, Hong Y, Yin H, Yan G, Huang Q, Li Z, et al. Imidacloprid induces locomotion impairment of the freshwater crayfish.Procambarus clarkiivia neurotoxicity and oxidative stress in digestive system. Aquatic Toxicology. 2021;16:238105913. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2021.105913
  75. 75.Guerra LJ. do Amaral AMB, de Quadros VA, da Luz Fiuza T, Rosemberg DB, Prestes OD, Loro VL. Biochemical and Behavioral Responses in Zebrafish Exposed to Imidacloprid Oxidative Damage and Antioxidant Responses. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 2021;81(2):255-264. DOI: 10.1007/s00244-021-00865-9
  76. 76.Samojeden CG, Pavan FA, Rutkoski CF, Folador A, Da Fré SP, Müller, C, Hartmann MT. Toxicity and Genotoxicity of Imidacloprid in Tadpoles ofLeptodactylus LatransandPhysalaemus Cuvieri(Anura: Leptodactylidae). Ecotoxicology. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-448465/v1.
  77. 77.Ahmad MZ, Khan A, Javed MT, Hussain I. Impact of chlorpyrifos on health biomarkers of broiler chicks. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology. 2015;122:50-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2014.12.024
  78. 78.Eng ML, Stutchbury BJ, Morrissey CA. Imidacloprid and chlorpyrifos insecticides impair migratory ability in a seed-eating songbird. Scientific Reports. 2017;7(1):1-9. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-15446-x
  79. 79.Khanam S. Behavioral Changes in Broiler Chicks Exposed to Carbaryl. Am. J. Biomed. Sci. Res. 2019;3:209-212. DOI: 10.34297/AJBSR.2019.03.000664.
  80. 80.Addy-Orduna LM, Brodeur JC, Mateo R. Oral acute toxicity of imidacloprid, thiamethoxam and clothianidin in eared doves: a contribution for the risk assessment of neonicotinoids in birds. Science of the Total Environment. 2019;650:1216-1223. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.112
  81. 81.Eng ML, Stutchbury BJM, Morrissey CA. A neonicotinoid insecticide reduces fueling and delays migration in songbirds. Science. 2019;365(6458):1177-1180. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaw9419
  82. 82.Franzen-Klein D, Jankowski M, Roy CL, Nguyen-Phuc H, Chen D, Neuman-Lee L, et al. Evaluation of neurobehavioral abnormalities and immunotoxicity in response to oral imidacloprid exposure in domestic chickens (Gallus gallusdomesticus). Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A. 2020;83(2):45-65. DOI: 10.1080/15287394.2020.1723154
  83. 83.Silva JG, Boareto AC, Schreiber AK, Redivo DD, Gambeta E, Vergara F, et al. Chlorpyrifos induces anxiety-like behavior in offspring rats exposed during pregnancy. Neuroscience Letters. 2017;641:94-100. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.01.053
  84. 84.Lan A, Kalimian M, Amram B, Kofman O. Prenatal chlorpyrifos leads to autism-like deficits in C57Bl6/J mice. Environmental Health. 2017;16(1):1-10. DOI: 10.1186/s12940-017-0251-3
  85. 85.Fereidounni S, Kumar D. Understanding the role of quercetin during neurotoxicity induced by Chlorpyrifos. The Journal of Phytopharmacology. 2018;7(1):33-39. Available online.http://www.phytopharmajournal.com/Vol7_Issue1_08.pdf
  86. 86.Imam A, Sulaiman NA, Oyewole AL, Chengetanai S, Williams V, Ajibola MI, et al. Chlorpyrifos-and dichlorvos-induced oxidative and neurogenic damage elicits neuro-cognitive deficits and increases anxiety-like behavior in wild-type rats. Toxics. 2018;6(4):71. DOI: 10.3390/toxics6040071
  87. 87.Ali SJ, Ellur G, Patel K, Sharan K. Chlorpyrifos exposure induces parkinsonian symptoms and associated bone loss in adult swiss albino mice. Neurotoxicity Research. 2019;36(4):700-711. DOI: 10.1007/s12640-019-00092-0
  88. 88.Mustafa KA, Al-Baggou BK. Toxicological and neurobehavioral effects of chlorpyrifos and deltamethrin insecticides in mice. Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences. 2020;34(1):189-196. DOI: 10.33899/ijvs.2019.125738.1144.
  89. 89.Kofman O, Lan A, Raykin E, Zega K, Brodski C. Developmental and social deficits and enhanced sensitivity to prenatal chlorpyrifos in PON1−/−mouse pups and adults. Plos One. 2020;15(9):e0239738. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239738.
  90. 90.Lee I, Eriksson P, Fredriksson A, Buratovic S, Viberg H. Developmental neurotoxic effects of two pesticides: Behavior and biomolecular studies on chlorpyrifos and carbaryl. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology. 2015;288(3):429-438. DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2015.08.014
  91. 91.Moser VC, Phillips PM, McDaniel KL. Assessment of biochemical and behavioral effects of carbaryl and methomyl in Brown-Norway rats from preweaning to senescence. Toxicology. 2015;331:1-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2015.02.006
  92. 92.Selig M, Lewandowski A. Suspected carbaryl toxicity in a captive colony of straw-colored fruit bats (eidolon helvum). Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine. 2017;48(4):1247-1249. DOI: 10.1638/2017-0029R.1
  93. 93.Khalil SR, Awad A, Mohammed HH, Nassan MA. Imidacloprid insecticide exposure induces stress and disrupts glucose homeostasis in male rats. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology. 2017;55:165-174. DOI: 10.1016/j.etap.2017.08.017
  94. 94.Abd-Elhakim YM, Mohammed HH, Mohamed WA. Imidacloprid impacts on neurobehavioral performance, oxidative stress, and apoptotic events in the brain of adolescent and adult rats. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2018;66(51):13513-13524. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b05793
  95. 95.Wu CH, Lin CL, Wang SE, Lu CW. Effects of imidacloprid, a neonicotinoid insecticide, on the echolocation system of insectivorous bats. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology. 2020;163:94-101. DOI: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2019.10.010
  96. 96.Rauh VA, Garcia WE, Whyatt RM, Horton MK, Barr DB, Louis ED. Prenatal exposure to the organophosphate pesticide chlorpyrifos and childhood tremor. Neurotoxicology. 2015;51:80-86. DOI.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2015.09.004
  97. 97.Guo J, Zhang J, Wu C, Lv S, Lu D, Qi X, et al. Associations of prenatal and childhood chlorpyrifos exposure with Neurodevelopment of 3-year-old children. Environmental Pollution. 2019;251:538-546. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.05.040
  98. 98.Anger WK, Farahat FM, Lein PJ, Lasarev MR, Olson JR, Farahat TM, et al. Magnitude of behavioral deficits varies with job-related chlorpyrifos exposure levels among Egyptian pesticide workers. Neurotoxicology. 2020;77:216-230. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuro.2020.01.012
  99. 99.El-Nahhal Y. Successful Management of Carbamate Poisoning among Children: Case Report from Gaza Strip. Occupational Diseases and Environmental Medicine. 2018;6(3):95-106. DOI: 10.4236/odem.2018.63008
  100. 100.Sriapha C, Trakulsrichai S, Tongpoo A, Pradoo A, Rittilert P, Wananukul W. Acute Imidacloprid Poisoning in Thailand. Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management. 2020;16:1081. DOI: 10.2147/TCRM.S269161
  101. 101.Perananthan V, Mohamed F, Shahmy S, Gawarammana I, Dawson A, Buckley N. The clinical toxicity of imidacloprid self-poisoning following the introduction of newer formulations. Clinical Toxicology. 2021;59(4):347-350. DOI: 10.1080/15563650.2020.1815760
  102. 102.Shiri-Ghaleh V, Khani S, Moradi M, Soltaninejad K. Clinical and Medicolegal Aspects of Fatal Imidacloprid Deliberate Self-Poisoning: A Case Report. International Journal of Medical Toxicology and Forensic Medicine. 2021;11:32228. DOI: 10.32598/ijmtfm.v11i.32228.
  103. 103.Pervez M, Manzoor F. A study on lethal doses of various pesticides on honeybees (Apis melliferaL.) a laboratory trial. Physiological Entomology. 2021;46(1):34-44. DOI.https://doi.org/10.1111/phen.12338A
  104. 104.Soydan E, Güler A, Bıyık S, Şentürk M, Supuran CT, Ekinci D. Carbonic anhydrase fromApis mellifera: purification and inhibition by pesticides. Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry. 2017;32(1):47-50. DOI: 10.1080/14756366.2016.1232255
  105. 105.Topal A, Alak G, Ozkaraca M, Yeltekin AC, Comaklı S, Acıl G, et al. Neurotoxic responses in brain tissues of rainbow trout exposed to imidacloprid pesticide: Assessment of 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine activity, oxidative stress and acetylcholinesterase activity. Chemosphere. 2017;175:186-191. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.02.047
  106. 106.Berkoz M, Ozkan-Yilmaz F, Ozluer-Hunt A, Gunduz SG, Yildirim M, Yalin S. Influence of sublethal chlorpyrifos exposure on oxidative stress and acetylcholinesterase activity in common carp (Cyprinus carpio). Feb-Fresenius Environmental Bulletin. 2019;219:981-988. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.12.077
  107. 107.Herbert LT, Cossi PF, Painefilú JC, Goñalons CM, Luquet CM, Kristoff G. Acute neurotoxicity evaluation of two anticholinesterasic insecticides, independently and in mixtures, and a neonicotinoid on a freshwater gastropod. Chemosphere. 2021;265:129107. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129107
  108. 108.Tufi S, Leonards P, Lamoree M, de Boer J, Legler J, Legradi J. Changes in neurotransmitter profiles during early zebrafish (Danio rerio) development and after pesticide exposure. Environmental Science & Technology. 2016;50(6):3222-3230. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b05665
  109. 109.Pereira BV, Silva-Zacarin EC, Costa MJ. Dos Santos ACA, do Carmo JB, Nunes B. Cholinesterases characterization of three tropical fish species, and their sensitivity towards specific contaminants. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2019;173:482-493. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.01.105
  110. 110.Tian X, Yang W, Wang D, Zhao Y, Yao R, Ma L, et al. Chronic brain toxicity response of juvenile Chinese rare minnows (Gobiocypris rarus) to the neonicotinoid insecticides imidacloprid and nitenpyram. Chemosphere. 2018;210:1006-1012. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.06.083
  111. 111.Ewere EE, Powell D, Rudd D, Reichelt-Brushett A, Mouatt P, Voelcker NH, et al. Uptake, depuration and sublethal effects of the neonicotinoid, imidacloprid, exposure in Sydney rock oysters. Chemosphere. 2019;230:1-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.05.045
  112. 112.Almeida ÉC, Passos LS, Vieira CED, Acayaba RD, Montagner CC, Pinto E, et al. Can the insecticide Imidacloprid affect the health of the Neotropical freshwater fishAstyanax altiparanae(Teleostei: Characidae)? Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology. 2021;85:103634. DOI: 10.1016/j.etap.2021.103634
  113. 113.Miladinović DĆ, Borozan S, Ivanović S. Involvement of cholinesterases in oxidative stress induced by chlorpyrifos in the brain of Japanese quail. Poultry Science. 2018;97(5):1564-1571. DOI: 10.3382/ps/pey018
  114. 114.Oropesa AL, Sánchez S, Soler F. Characterization of plasma cholinesterase activity in the Eurasian Griffon VultureGyps fulvusand its in vitro inhibition by carbamate pesticides. Ibis. 2017;159(3):510-518. DOI: 10.1111/ibi.12476
  115. 115.Rawi SM, Al-Logmani AS, Hamza RZ. Neurological alterations induced by formulated imidacloprid toxicity in Japanese quails. Metabolic Brain Disease. 2019;34(2):443-450. DOI: 10.1007/s11011-018-0377-1
  116. 116.Poliserpi MB, Cristos D, Iglesias JMP, Brodeur JC. Tissue distribution and sublethal effects of imidacloprid in the South American grayish baywing (Agelaioides badius). Chemosphere. 2021;284:131327. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131327
  117. 117.Pallotta MM, Ronca R, Carotenuto R, Porreca I, Turano M, Ambrosino C, et al. Specific effects of chronic dietary exposure to chlorpyrifos on brain gene expression—a mouse study. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2017;18(11):2467. DOI: 10.3390/ijms18112467
  118. 118.Ibrahim EM, Abdelrahman SM, Elhakim HK, Ragab EA. Single or combined exposure to chlorpyrifos and cypermethrin provoke oxidative stress and downregulation in monoamine oxidase and acetylcholinesterase gene expression of the rat’s brain. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2020;27(11):12692-12703. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-07864-8
  119. 119.Annabi A, Dhouib IB, Lamine AJ, Golli NE, Gharbi N, Fazâa SE, et al. Recovery by N-acetylcysteine from subchronic exposure to Imidacloprid-induced hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis tissues injury in male rats. Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods. 2015;25(7):524-531. DOI: 10.3109/15376516.2015.1045663
  120. 120.Farag MR, Abou-EL Fotoh MF, EL-Sayed GG, EL-Sayed EW. Modulatory Effect of Ginger Aqueous Extract against Imidacloprid-Induced Neurotoxicity in Rats. Zagazig Veterinary Journal. 2019;47(4):432-446. DOI: 10.21608/zvjz.2019.14914.1061.
  121. 121.Yamada S, Kubo Y, Yamazaki D, Sekino Y, Kanda Y. Chlorpyrifos inhibits neural induction via Mfn1-mediated mitochondrial dysfunction in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Scientific Reports. 2017;7(1):1-12. DOI: 10.1038/srep40925
  122. 122.Popovska-Gorevski M, Dubocovich ML, Rajnarayanan RV. Carbamate insecticides target human melatonin receptors. Chemical Research in Toxicology. 2017;30(2):574-582. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.6b00301
  123. 123.Loser D, Hinojosa MG, Blum J, Schaefer J, Brüll M, Johansson Y, et al. Functional alterations by a subgroup of neonicotinoid pesticides in human dopaminergic neurons. Archives of Toxicology. 2021;95(6):2081-2107. DOI: 10.1007/s00204-021-03031-1
  124. 124.Wu YY, Zhou T, Wang Q, Dai PL, Xu SF, Jia HR, et al. Programmed cell death in the honey bee (Apis mellifera) (Hymenoptera: Apidae) worker brain induced by imidacloprid. Journal of Economic Entomology. 2015;108(4):1486-1494. DOI: 10.1093/jee/tov146
  125. 125.Peng YC, Yang EC. Sublethal dosage of imidacloprid reduces the microglomerular density of honey bee mushroom bodies. Scientific Reports. 2016;6(1):1-13. DOI: 10.1038/srep19298
  126. 126.Özdemir S, Altun S, Özkaraca M, Ghosi A, Toraman E, Arslan H. Cypermethrin, chlorpyrifos, deltamethrin, and imidacloprid exposure up-regulates the mRNA and protein levels of bdnf and c-fos in the brain of adult zebrafish (Danio rerio). Chemosphere. 2018;203:318-326. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.03.190
  127. 127.Wani H, Rehman S, Shoukat S, Kour N, Ayoub B. Patho-Morphological Changes in Liver, Kidney and Brain of Broiler Birds Due to Chlorpyrifos Intoxication. International Journal of Livestock Research. 2018;8(02):266-274. DOI: 10.5455/ijlr.20170718095718
  128. 128.Rathod AS, Ingole RS, Rathod PR, Hajare SW, Ingawale M. Individual and combined toxicopathology of chlorpyrifos and cypermethrin in broiler chickens. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences. 2020;90(5):688-692. Available online.https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Maheshkumar
  129. 129.Singh V, Hussein M, Singh AK, Hassan MA, Gupta P. Histological and immunohistochemical changes in cerebellum of chick embryos after exposure to neonicotinoid insecticide imidacloprid. Journal of the Anatomical Society of India. 2015;64(2):122-127. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasi.2015.10.014
  130. 130.Zeid EHA, Alam RT, Ali SA, Hendawi MY. Dose-related impacts of imidacloprid oral intoxication on brain and liver of rock pigeon (Columba liviadomestica), residues analysis in different organs. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2019;167:60-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.09.121
  131. 131.Ravikumar HA, Karapehlivan M. Chlorpyrifos-induced parkinsonian model in mice: Behavior, histopathology and biochemistry. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology. 2018;144:36-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2017.11.002
  132. 132.Ravikumar Y, Madhuri D, Lakshman M, Reddy AG, Kalakumar B. Antioxidative Profile and Histopathological Alterations of Brain Induced by Cadmium (Cd) and Chlorpyrifos (CPF) in Wistar Rats. 2020. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/ijlr.20200512065339.
  133. 133.Freeborn DL, McDaniel KL, Moser VC, Herr DW. Use of electroencephalography (EEG) to assess CNS changes produced by pesticides with different modes of action: effects of permethrin, deltamethrin, fipronil, imidacloprid, carbaryl, and triadimefon. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology. 2015;282(2):184-194. DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2014.11.011
  134. 134.Gómez-Giménez B, Llansola M, Hernández-Rabaza V, Cabrera-Pastor A, Malaguarnera M, Agusti A, et al. Sex-dependent effects of developmental exposure to different pesticides on spatial learning. The role of induced neuroinflammation in the hippocampus. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2017;99:135-148. DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2016.11.028
  135. 135.Zheng M, Qin Q, Zhou W, Liu Q, Zeng S, Xiao H, et al. Metabolic disturbance in hippocampus and liver of mice: A primary response to imidacloprid exposure. Scientific Reports. 2020;10(1):1-12. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-62739-9
  136. 136.Katić A, Kašuba V, Kopjar N, Lovaković BT, Čermak AM, Mendaš G, et al. Effects of low-level imidacloprid oral exposure on cholinesterase activity, oxidative stress responses, and primary DNA damage in the blood and brain of male Wistar rats. Chemico-Biological Interactions. 2021;338:109287. DOI: 10.1016/j.cbi.2020.109287
  137. 137.Meijer M, Brandsema JA, Nieuwenhuis D, Wijnolts FM, Dingemans MM, Westerink RH. Inhibition of voltage-gated calcium channels after subchronic and repeated exposure of PC12 cells to different classes of insecticides. Toxicological Sciences. 2015;147(2):607-617. DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfv154
  138. 138.Wu X, Yang X, Majumder A, Swetenburg R, Goodfellow FT, Bartlett MG, et al. From the cover: AstrocytesAre protective against chlorpyrifos developmental neurotoxicity in human pluripotent stem cell-derived astrocyte-neuron cocultures. Toxicological Sciences. 2017;157(2):410-420. DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfx056
  139. 139.Sandoval L, Rosca A, Oniga A, Zambrano A, Ramos JJ, González MC, et al. Effects of chlorpyrifos on cell death and cellular phenotypic specification of human neural stem cells. Science of The Total Environment. 2019;683:445-454. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.270
  140. 140.Todd SW, Lumsden EW, Aracava Y, Mamczarz J, Albuquerque EX, Pereira EF. Gestational exposures to organophosphorus insecticides: From acute poisoning to developmental neurotoxicity. Neuropharmacology. 2020;1:108271. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2020.108271
  141. 141.Piel C, Pouchieu C, Migault L, Béziat B, Boulanger M, Bureau M, et al. Increased risk of central nervous system tumours with carbamate insecticide use in the prospective cohort agrican. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2019;48(2):512-526. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyy246
  142. 142.Paredes-Espinosa MB. Neonicotinoid neurotoxicity evaluation on human retinoic acid differentiated cholinergic neuroblastoma 5H-SY5Y cells (Bachelor’s thesis, Universidad de Investigación de Tecnología Experimental Yachay). 2021. Available online:http://repositorio.yachaytech.edu.ec/handle/123456789/300.
  143. 143.Muangphra P, Tharapoom K, Euawong N, Namchote S, Gooneratne R. Chronic toxicity of commercial chlorpyrifos to earthworm Pheretima peguana. Environ Toxicol. 2016;31(11):1450-1459. DOI: 10.1002/tox.22150
  144. 144.Duarte-Restrepo E, Jaramillo-Colorado BE, Duarte-Jaramillo L. Effects of chlorpyrifos on the crustaceanLitopenaeus vannamei. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0231310. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231310.
  145. 145.Lee JW, Kim BM, Jeong CB, Won EJ, Rhee JS, Lee JS. Inhibitory effects of biocides on transcription and protein activity of acetylcholinesterase in the intertidal copepodTigriopus japonicus. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015;167:147-156. DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpc.2014.10.005
  146. 146.Morgado RG, Gomes PD, Ferreira NGC, Cardoso DN, Santos MJG, Soares AM. Toxicity interaction between chlorpyrifos, mancozeb and soil moisture to the terrestrial isopodPorcellionides pruinosus. Chemosphere. 2016;144:1845-1853. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.10.034
  147. 147.Toumi H, Burga-Perez KF, Ferard JF. Acute and chronic ecotoxicity of carbaryl with a battery of aquatic bioassays. Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B. 2015;51:57-62. DOI: 10.1080/03601234.2015.1080500
  148. 148.Tunnissen NW, Lautz LS, van Schaik TWG, Hendriks AJ. Ecological risks of imidacloprid to aquatic species in the Netherlands: Measured and estimated concentrations compared to species sensitivity distributions. Chemosphere. 2020;126604. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126604
  149. 149.de Lima e Silva C, Brennan N, Brouwe, JM, Commandeur D, Verweij RA, van Gestel CAM. Comparative toxicity of imidacloprid and thiacloprid to differentspecies of soil invertebrates. Ecotoxicology. 2017;26:555-564. 10.1007/s10646-017-1790-7.
  150. 150.Prosser RS, de Solla SR, Holman EAM, Osborne R, Robinson SA, Bartlett AJ, et al. Sensitivity of the early-life stages of freshwater mollusks to neonicotinoid and butenolide insecticides. Environ Pollut. 2016;218:428-435. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.07.022
  151. 151.Eng ML, Stutchbury BJ, Morrissey CA. A neonicotinoid insecticide reduces fueling and delays migration in songbirds. Science. 2019;365(6458):1177-1180. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaw9419
  152. 152.Abd-Elhakim YM, Mohammed HH, Mohamed WAM. (2018). Imidacloprid Impacts on Neurobehavioral Performance, Oxidative Stress, and Apoptotic Events in the Brain of Adolescent and Adult Rats. J Agric Food Chem. 2018;66(51):13513-13524. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b05793
  153. 153.Abreu-Villaca Y, Levin ED. Developmental neurotoxicity of succeeding generations of insecticides. Environment international. 2017;99, 55-77. DOI.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.11.019
  154. 154.Kim KH, Kabir E, Jahan SA. Exposure to pesticides and the associated human health effects. Science of the Total Environment. 2017;575, 525-535. DOI.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.009
  155. 155.Carvalho FP. Pesticides, environment, and food safety. Food and Energy Security. 2017;6(2), 48-60. DOI.https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.108
  156. 156.Richardson JR, Fitsanakis V, Westerink RH, Kanthasamy AG. Neurotoxicity of pesticides. Acta Neuropathologica. 2019;138(3), 343-362. DOI.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-019-02033-9
  157. 157.Jokanović M. Neurotoxic disorders and medical management of patients poisoned with organophosphorus and carbamate pesticides. The Impact of Pesticides. Academic Publishers. 2012:39-62https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Milan-Jokanovic/publication/235974937_
  158. 158.Jokanović M. Neurotoxic effects of organophosphorus pesticides and possible association with neurodegenerative diseases in man: a review. Toxicology. 2018;410, 125-131. DOI.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2018.09.009
  159. 159.Keil AP, Daniels JL, Hertz-Picciotto I. Autism spectrum disorder, flea and tick medication, and adjustments for exposure misclassification: the CHARGE (CHildhood Autism Risks from Genetics and Environment) case–control study. Environmental Health. 2014;13(1), 1-10. DOI.https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-13-3
  160. 160.Am C, Boyles AL, Thayer KA, Perry MJ. Effects of neonicotinoid pesticide exposure on human health: a systematic review. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2017;125(2), 155-162. DOI.https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP515
  161. 161.Thompson DA, Lehmler HJ, Kolpin DW, Hladik ML, Vargo JD, Schilling KE, et al. A critical review on the potential impacts of neonicotinoid insecticide use: current knowledge of environmental fate, toxicity, and implications for human health. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts. 2020;22(6), 1315-1346. DOI.https://doi.org/10.1039/C9EM00586B
  162. 162.Hussein RM, Mohamed WR, Omar HA. A neuroprotective role of kaempferol against chlorpyrifos-induced oxidative stress and memory deficits in rats via GSK3β-Nrf2 signaling pathway. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology. 2018;152, 29-37. DOI.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2018.08.008
  163. 163.Abdel-Salam OM, Youness ER, Mohammed NA, Yassen NN, Khadrawy YA, El-Toukhy SE, et al. Novel neuroprotective and hepatoprotective effects of citric acid in acute malathion intoxication. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine. 2016;9(12), 1181-1194. DOI.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apjtm.2016.11.005
  164. 164.Mohammadzadeh L, Hosseinzadeh H, Abnous K, Razavi BM. Neuroprotective potential of crocin against malathion-induced motor deficit and neurochemical alterations in rats. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2018;25(5), 4904-4914. DOI.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0842-0
  165. 165.Sauer E, Moro AM, Brucker N, Nascimento S, Gauer B, Fracasso R, et al. Liver δ-aminolevulinate dehydratase activity is inhibited by neonicotinoids and restored by antioxidant agents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2014;11(11), 11676-11690. DOI.https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph111111676
  166. 166.Lonare M, Kumar M, Raut S, Badgujar P, Doltade S, Telang A. Evaluation of imidacloprid-induced neurotoxicity in male rats: a protective effect of curcumin. Neurochemistry International. 2014;78, 122-129. DOI.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2014.09.004
  167. 167.Waseem M, Jain S, Parvez S, Akram M. Ascorbic acid modulates non enzymatic antioxidants in swiss albino mice targeted to imidacloprid: Brain v/s Liver. (2016).https://www.thepharmajournal.com/archives/2016/vol5issue8/PartB/9-10-89-996.pdf.
  168. 168.Farag MR, Abou-EL Fotoh MF, EL-Sayed GG, EL-Sayed EW. Modulatory Effect of Ginger Aqueous Extract against Imidacloprid-Induced Neurotoxicity in Rats. Zagazig Veterinary Journal. 2019;47(4), 432-446. DOI.http://doi.org/10.21608/zvjz.2019.14914.1061
  169. 169.Dhouib IB, Annabi A, Doghri R, Rejeb I, Dallagi Y, Bdiri Y, et al. Neuroprotective effects of curcumin against acetamiprid-induced neurotoxicity and oxidative stress in the developing male rat cerebellum: biochemical, histological, and behavioral changes. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2017;24(35), 27515-27524. DOI.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0331-5
  170. 170.Khovarnagh N, Seyedalipour B. Antioxidant, histopathological and biochemical outcomes of short-term exposure to acetamiprid in liver and brain of rat: The protective role of N-acetylcysteine and S-methylcysteine. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal. 2021;29(3), 280-289. DOI.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2021.02.004
  171. 171.Muthaiah VK, Venkitasamy L, Michael FM, Chandrasekar K, Venkatachalam S. Neuroprotective role of naringenin on carbaryl induced neurotoxicity in mouse neuroblastoma cells. Journal of Pharmacology & Pharmacotherapeutics. 2013;4(3), 192. doi:https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-500X.114599.

Written By

Alejandra Mora-Gutiérrez, Carmen Rubio, Ángel Alonso Romero-López and Moisés Rubio-Osornio

Submitted: September 3rd, 2021Reviewed: September 19th, 2021Published: December 2nd, 2021