Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Effect of Various Feed Additives on the Methane Emissions from Beef Cattle Based on an Ammoniated Palm Frond Feeds

Written By

Mardiati Zain, Rusmana Wijaya Setia Ningrat, Heni Suryani and Novirman Jamarun

Submitted: 18 July 2021 Reviewed: 26 August 2021 Published: 18 October 2021

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.100142

From the Edited Volume

Animal Feed Science and Nutrition - Production, Health and Environment

Edited by Amlan Kumar Patra

Chapter metrics overview

450 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Methane gas has a very significant contribution to the increase in greenhouse gases (GHG) globally. The livestock sector, especially ruminants, causes the issue of increasing GHG concentrations. The chapter presents the issue of reducing methane gas production from cattle. Various experiments to reduce methane gas production from ruminants have been carried out and have shown varying results. This series of results of the author\'s research on reducing methane gas production in livestock in beef cattle based on agriculture by-product to animal feed is addressed with this background. Agriculture by-products such as oil palm fronds and rice straw can be used to feed beef cattle in Indonesia. However, agriculture by-product as animal feed can reduce feed efficiency and increase methane gas production due to the high lignin content. Therefore, various alternatives are carried out to optimize the utilization of this plantation waste. One of them is the use of feed additives and methanogenesis inhibitors. The author\'s series of research using feed additives (direct-fed microbial) and various methanogenesis inhibitors (plant bioactive compounds and dietary lipids) were tested to determine their effect on nutrient digestibility and methane gas production in feed based on plantation waste. Experiments were carried out in vitro and in vivo on various types of ruminants. Plant bioactive compounds such as tannins are proven to reduce methane production through their ability to defaunate in the rumen. Tannins may also have direct effect on methanogens and indirectly by reducing fiber digestion. In addition, direct-fed microbial (DFM) feed additives such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Bacillus amyloliquifaciens, and Aspergillus oryzae can be used in ruminants to increase livestock productivity. Furthermore, virgin coconut oil as a dietary lipid contains medium-chain fatty acids, mainly lauric acid, which can inhibit the development of ciliates of protozoa and methanogenic bacteria that produce methane in the rumen.


  • feed additive
  • direct fed microbials
  • virgin coconut oils
  • tannins and saponin
  • methane emissions
  • beef cattle
  • ammoniated palm frond

1. Introduction

The main problem in the development of ruminant livestock production in Indonesia, such as beef cattle, is the difficulty of meeting the availability of forage sustainably, both in quality and quantity. Therefore, the use of plantation waste such as palm fronds, rice straw as animal feed is an alternative that can be done to overcome the problem of feed availability. The utilization of plantation waste as ruminant feed is still minimal due to the high content of lignin [1] which causes low digestibility [1, 2, 3]. To optimize plantation waste as animal feed, it is necessary to combine processing techniques and optimize bioprocesses in the rumen [3], which aims to increase the microbial population and streamline the fermentation process in the rumen.

Supplementation of direct-fed microbial (DFM) and methanogenesis inhibitors is a way that can be done to increase the efficiency of rumen fermentation [3, 4, 5]. DFM is a feed additive product that contains a source of live microorganisms [6], can modify the rumen ecosystem [7], synthesize nutrients so that their availability can increase livestock growth [8]. S. cerevisiae is one of the DFM microbes that can be added together with other bacteria and fungi such as Aspergillus sp. and Bacillus sp. [3]. The administration of S. cerevisiae as an additive to live microbes into the body will affect the host by improving the balance of rumen microorganisms [9]. S. cerevisiae can compete with starch bacteria [10].

High-fiber feeds such as plantation waste reduce not only the efficiency of feed use [11] but also increase the production of methane gas (CH4) [12]. In the livestock sector, methane is one of the gaseous products of fermented feed ingredients by rumen microbes. Ruminants account for more than 75% of methane emissions from total greenhouse emissions [13]. The release of methane causes an increase in the concentration of CH4 in the air and causes energy loss of 6–13% from the feed [14]. Many livestock nutritionists try to reduce methane production because they feel responsible for the contribution of the livestock sector to atmospheric pollution by methane, as one of the pollutants that is always associated with global warming [15]. Decreased methane production in the rumen is closely related to the metabolic activity of protozoa [16]. Ciliated protozoa in the rumen are in symbiosis with methane bacteria, so that by reducing the population of ciliated protozoa, it will reduce the availability of hydrogen for the formation of methane [17].

Tannins are plant bioactive compounds that can reduce methane production because they act as protozoal defaunation agents [18]. The results of the meta-analysis of in vivo experiments with tannins reported by Jayanegara et al., [19] revealed that the concentration of tannins is closely related to the production of CH4 produced. Different sources of tannins have been shown to have different impacts on CH4 production. This is probably because the composition and types of tannins [12] are different from different sources. In addition to tannins, Virgin coconut oil (VCO) contains many medium-chain fatty acids (MCFA). Medium-chain fatty acids (MCFA) are known to have a high potential to suppress rumen methanogenic bacteria [20]. The most abundant MCFA in VCO was lauric acid (C12: 0) 51.95% [21]. Soliva et al., [22] stated that lauric acid (C12: 0) is more effective in suppressing methanogenesis than myristic acid (C14: 0). The ability of VCO to modify the rumen ecosystem depends on the level of its addition in the feed [23]. The high lauric acid content in VCO will allow VCO to have the ability as a defaunation agent against ciliated protozoa and inhibit archaea methanogens in the rumen.

Based on the description above, this chapter book presents several reviews of the results of the author’s research, which combines a combination of processing techniques and optimization of bioprocesses in the rumen to increase the value of benefits from plantation waste that can be packaged into complete quality rations, able to increase livestock productivity and reduce beef cattle methane production.


2. Direct fed microbial and virgin coconut oils on methane gas production

2.1 Effect direct-fed microbes on rumen microbial population

Direct-fed microbes (DFM) have comparable results to probiotics. DFM is a feed product that contains a source of live microorganisms [6]. DFM is commonly used as a supplement to increase livestock production. DFM commonly used in ruminants is yeast. DFM works to modify the rumen ecosystem to create an optimal environment for the development of rumen microbes. The provision of DFM as an additive to live microbes in the feed will affect the host by improving the balance of rumen microorganisms [9].

The three-stage series of research has been conducted by Suryani et al., [3]. Phase I is a research aimed at optimizing the bioprocess in the rumen through DFM to increase the rumen microbial population. Three types of DFM were used, namely Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Aspergillus oryzae, and Bacillus amyloliquefacien. The substrate used was based on palm frond, which had previously been ammoniated using 6% urea. The evaluation was carried out in vitro [24] to determine nutrient degradation and rumen fermentability. The effect of DFM supplementation on rumen fermentability [3] is shown in Table 1.

VFA (mM)NH3 (mM)Bacteria population (cell mL−1)
P0108.35e12.28d1.61 x 109e
P1130.69ab14.97ab2.49 x 109ab
P2125.10cd14.47ab2.37 x 109bc
P3123.24cd13.73bc2.40 x 109bc
P4126.97bc15.25a2.41 x 109bc
P5132.55a15.75a2.55 x 109a
P6121.38d13.06cd2.35 x 109c
P7121.38d12.78cd1.93 x 109c

Table 1.

Supplementation of DFM in ammoniated palm fronds on fermentability and bacteria population in vitro.

Source: Suryani et al., 2016, DOI: 10.3923/pjn.2017.599.604

Numbers followed by different lowercase letters in the same column (a, b, c, d, and e) were significantly different (P < 0.05), SC: Saccharomyces cerevisiae, AO: Aspergillus oryzae, BA: Bacillus amilolyquifaciens, P0: Ammoniated palm fronds, P1: P0 + SC (1%), P2: P0 + AO (1%), P3: P0 + BA (1%), P4: P0 + SC (0.5%) + AO (0.5%), P5: P0 + SC (0.5%) + BA (0.5%), P6: P0 + AO (0.5%) + BA (0.5%), P7: P0 + SC (0.3%) + AO (0.3%) + BA (0.3%), supplementation of DFM % on dry matter basis;

The results showed that DFM supplementation in feed based on plantation waste in the form of ammoniated palm frond could increase rumen fermentability. The bacterial population increased from 1.61 x 109 to 2.35 x 109 cell mL-1. These results are following the results of research [1, 9] where the addition of probiotics in the ration can stimulate the development of microbes in the rumen and increase the digestibility of food in livestock. The way yeast works in the rumen can utilize oxygen to ensure anaerobic conditions for rumen bacteria and stimulate specific rumen bacterial populations [25] (Figure 1). However, there was a tendency for the bacterial population to decrease in the combination supplementation of three types of DFM (P7). It was suspected that there was an accumulation of rumen microbial growth so that bacteria in the rumen competed in digesting feed. The total NH3 and VFA concentrations increased from 12.28 mM to 14.28 mM and 108.35 mM to 125.90 mM. Desnoyers et al., [26] stated that yeast supplementation could increase the concentration of VFA (2.1 mmol L-1) and decrease the concentration of lactate.

Figure 1.

Mode of action DFM in the rumen.

Furthermore, DFM fungal A. oryzae can reduce oxygen in the rumen [27]. This situation was followed by increased ammonia and lactic acid utilization so that the rumen pH was stable. Anaerobic conditions and stable rumen pH allow more optimal microbial protein synthesis so that the total population of rumen bacteria increases and the digestibility of crude fiber increases. Increased digestibility of crude fiber will increase the consumption and supply of nutrients to the intestines, so that it is expected to increase the overall response of livestock production. Meanwhile, B. amylolyquifaciens DFM can produce cellulase enzymes [28], so when yeast is combined with fungal or bacterial DFM, it can increase rumen fermentation with high VFA results. The increase in rumen fermentability was also followed by dry matter and organic matter digestibility which increased from 47.5% (without DFM) to 51.55% (with DFM) and 48.89% to 52.41% [3]. DFM S. cerevisiae can be used individually or in combination with A. oryzae or B. amylolyquifaciens. However, when viewed from the average value produced, the S. cerevisiae + B. amylolyquifaciens combination gave the best rumen digestibility and fermentability results. This is because S. cerevisiae can produce growth factors for microbial growth from organic acids, B vitamins, and amino acids to stimulate rumen microbial activity and development [29]. A brief diagram illustrating the working principle of DFM in the rumen. It can be seen in Figure 1 [25] modified.

Yeast culture uses oxygen to metabolize feed particles into sugars and oligosaccharides to produce peptides and amino acids as end products used by bacteria. Most rumen microorganisms are anaerobic, so the utilization of oxygen by yeast culture will increase the optimum conditions in the rumen. These conditions will protect the anaerobic rumen bacteria from damage by O2. They created better conditions for the growth of cellulolytic bacteria so that the number of cellulolytic bacteria increases and improves digestion in the rumen [30].

Yeast activity as DFM can regulate rumen biological activity by stimulating lactic acid utilization and reducing ammonia production, so that rumen pH is stable and increases nutrient absorption and VFA profile [31]. Supplementation can support livestock productivity by increasing intestinal development, mucosal immunity, nutrient absorption, and inhibiting pathogenic bacteria. This will have an impact on improving livestock health and performance [32].

2.2 Effect virgin coconut oils on methane gas concentration

In another study, to streamline the digestive process in the rumen, Suryani et al., [3] continued the best DFM results from the 1st stage of the experiment to be combined with methane emission reducers. Virgin coconut oil (VCO), rich in MCFA, is used to reduce methane emissions. VCO is oil produced from fresh coconuts. VCO contains lauric acid (C12:0), which effectively suppresses methanogenic bacteria and rumen protozoa [5]. The VCO used in this study contained lauric acid (C12: 0) 51.95% [21] (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Fatty acid composition of VCO.

The purpose of this experiment is to get the best VCO level combined with the best type of DFM stage 1 on ammoniated palm fronds. The three VCO levels tested were 2, 3, and 4% DM. The two best types of DFM from stage 1 used as controls were S. cerevisiae and S. cerevisiae + B. amyloliquifaciens 1% DM. Experiments were carried out in vitro according to the method [24].

The effect of combined VCO and DFM supplementation on methane gas concentration and rumen protozoa population in vitro on ammoniated palm frond-based feed can be seen in Table 2, Figures 3 and 4.

TreatmentsCH4 (ml/g DM)Protozoa (cell/mL-1)
P1: SC 1% + 0% VCO21.74 ± 1.167.08 x 104 ± 0.23
P2: SC 0.5% + BA 0.5% + 0% VCO22.94 ± 0.847.23 x 104 ± 0.36
P3: SC 1% + 2% VCO11.78 ± 0.621.92 x 104 ± 0.09
P4: SC 0.5% + BA 0.5% + 2% VCO12.92 ± 0.222.23 x 104 ± 0.09
P5: SC 1% + 3% VCO11.87 ± 0.791.97 x 104 ± 0.09
P6: SC 0.5% + BA 0.5% + 3% VCO12.58 ± 0.152.65 x 104 ± 0.15
P7: SC 1% + 4% VCO12.75 ± 0.933.38 x 104 ± 0.09
P8: SC 0.5% + BA 0.5% + 4% VCO13.49 ± 0.093.28 x 104 ± 0.15

Table 2.

Production of methane (CH4) and protozoa population from the fermentation of ammoniated palm fronds in vitro in the rumen for each DFM type level and VCO levels.

Note. Substrate based on Ammoniated palm frond treated with 6% urea, DFM supplementation and VCO level on dry matter basis, SC: Saccharomyces cerevisiae, AO: Aspergillus oryzae BA: Bacillus amilolyquifaciens, VCO: Virgin coconut oils;

Figure 3.

The relationship between DFM + VCO levels and methane production from rumen fermentation of ammoniated palm frond during 48 hours incubation.

Figure 4.

The relationship between DFM + VCO levels and the population of protozoa produced by fermenting the rumen of ammoniated palm frond during 48 hours of incubation.

The results of the orthogonal polynomial test show a quadratic relationship (P < 0.05) between the level of VCO (X, %) and the concentration of methane gas in the rumen (Y, mM) with the equation y = 1.2682x2–7.3169 + 22.281 and the coefficient of determination R2 = 0.98137 (Figure 3).

Based on the orthogonal polynomial test, methane gas concentration at the level of 2% VCO addition with DFM S. cerevisiae and S. cerevisiae + B. amyloliquifaciens decreased by 48.11% and 43.67%, respectively. The addition of a 3% VCO level also decreased methane gas concentration compared to without supplementation and resulted in an average of 11.87 mM and 12.58 mM. The decrease in methane gas concentration occurs because VCO is rich in MCFA, mainly lauric acid (C12:0) (Figure 2), which is effective in suppressing methanogenic bacteria and rumen protozoa [5]. Lauric acid is the most toxic to protozoa [33] and is the most potent antiprotozoal that inhibits ciliated protozoa’s growth and activity (mainly Entodinium spp.) [22]. The decrease in ciliate protozoa population due to defaunation causes a decrease in the symbiosis between ciliate protozoa and methanogens, thereby reducing the availability of hydrogen for methane formation [17].

Furthermore, Dohmet et al., [33] reported that lauric acid (C12:0) and myristic acid (C14:0) could reduce methanogenesis in the rumen and significantly reduce total methanogenic bacteria. This result is also supported by Machmuller et al., [20]. The effect of coconut oil supplementation is to reduce methane by inhibiting the metabolic activity of archaea methanogens directly in the rumen.

Supplementation of S. cerevisiae and VCO DFM at all levels (P3, P5, and P7) can reduce methane cocntentration better than the combination of DFM S. cerevisiae + B. amyloliquifaciens and VCO at all levels (P4, P6, and P8). This indicates that when S. cerevisiae type DFM combined with VCO can support a decrease in methane concentration in rumen fermentation activity, this is also suspected because S. cerevisiae as DFM also can reduce methane. Yeast supplementation can also stimulate acetogenins to compete for hydrogen with methanogens, thereby reducing methane emissions [34].

The results of the orthogonal polynomial test give a quadratic relationship between the VCO level (X, %) and the protozoa population (Y, cell/mL-1), the Eq. Y = 0.7546x2–3.9464x + 7.1323 and the coefficient of determination (R2) = 0.98564 is shown on Figure 4. The average population of protozoa with the addition of VCO in the rumen can be seen in Table 3.

DM Intake (kg day−1)3.16a3.01b2.99b2.57c0.143
DM/BW0.75 (g kg −1 b.wt.0.75 d−1)79.94a75.68ab74.24ab67.36b1.790
OM Intake (kg/h/d)3.93a3.74b3.72b3.19c0.017
OM /BW0.75 (g kg −1 b.wt.0.75 d−1)99.28a97.14a93.98a83.65b1.504
ADG (kg day−1)0.53c0.63b0.63b0.71a0.007
Feed Efficiency (%)16.96c20.84b21.34b27.77a0.311
Methane production (L day−1)109.01c103.27b102.61b86.52a0.501
Nitrogen intake (g day−1)59.20a56.34b55.96b47.84c0.815
Nitrogen retention (g day−1)50.51a47.99a47.16a37.23b0.797

Table 3.

Effect of DFM and VCO supplementation on consumption, ADG, efficiency, and methane production of Bali cattle.

Source: Suryani et al., 2017, pjn.2017.599.604.

Numbers followed by different lowercase letters (a, b, c) in the same row are significantly different (P < 0.05), A: 100% Complete feed, B: A + 1% SC, C: A + 0.5% SC + 0.5% BA, D: A + 2% VCO + 1% SC. DM: Dry matter, OM: Organic matter, BW: Body weight, ADG: Average daily gain, SC: Saccharomyces cerevisiae, BA: Bacillus amilolyquifaciens, VCO: Virgin coconut oils;

Based on the orthogonal polynomial test, the protozoa population decreased with VCO supplementation. Supplementation of 2% and 3% VCO (P3,P4,P5,P6) on palm fronds with the addition of DFM S. cerevisiae and S. cerevisiae + B. amyloliquifaciens reduced the protozoa population by 72.88%, 69.15%, 72, 17 and 63.32%, respectively. This result was also followed by a decrease in methane gas concentartion in this treatment. Protozoa populations are closely related to rumen methane production [35]. 7 to 37% of methanogens live in symbiosis with protozoa in the rumen [5]. The results of this combination of DFM and VCO supplementation resulted in a decrease in the percentage of protozoa population, which was the same as that obtained by Kongmun et al. [36] that the protozoa decreased 68–75% by supplementing with 7% coconut oil. Furthermore, this result is greater than that obtained [37] that coconut oil and lauric acid supplementation reduced the protozoan population by up to 40%.

Meanwhile, total protozoa (especially Entodinium spp) decreased by 96% due to lauric acid supplementation compared to myrystic acid on a concentrate rich substrate [38]. This indicates that DFM supplementation in high-fiber feeds such as palm oil plantation waste plays an important role in modifying the rumen ecosystem so that the addition of VCO at the right level can reduce the concentration of methane and protozoa without reducing nutrient degradation. From the results of this study, it is recommended that 2% VCO be used for cattle in vivo because levels 3 and 4% give almost the same average results.

In other studies, Suryani et al [24] continued the experimental in vitro studies of stages I and II into a complete ration formulation based on ammoniated palm fronds prepared with a TDN content of 63.28%. In vivo tests were carried out using 16 Bali cattle to determine the effect of adding DFM S. cerevisiae, S. cerevisiae + B. amyloliquifaciens, and S. cerevisiae + 2% VCO on livestock productivity. Blood samples were collected to determine the effect of DFM and VCO supplementation on the blood profile. Blood samples were taken once before the cattle were fed in the morning (fasting). Blood samples were taken through the jugular vein using a 10 ml capacity syringe and placed in a vacutainer. Blood serum was separated using centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 10 minutes. Analysis of glucose levels, total protein, urea, BUN, albumin, triglycerides, total cholesterol, HDL, and LDL was carried out using the HumaStar 80® Auto Analyzer. A statistical test was carried out to determine the effect of treatment on the observed parameters, using a variance according to the design used. If there was a significant effect, it was continued with Duncan’s test [39].

The effect of DFM and VCO supplementation on Bali cattle on performance and methane gas production [21] is shown in Table 3.

DFM and VCO supplementation decreased methane production by 5.26, 5.87, and 20.63% respectively. The highest ration efficiency was in DFM S. cerevisiae + 2% VCO supplementation, followed by ADG at 0.70 (kg/h/d) and decreased methane production by 20.63% [21]. DFM yeast was reported to have the ability to reduce methane production by 28% [40]. Yeast supplementation could also stimulate acetogens to compete for hydrogen with methanogens, thereby reducing methane emissions [41]. With reduced methane production in the rumen, it can increase feed energy, which positively affects livestock performance. This can be seen from the decrease in DM and OM consumption but can increase Efficiency and ADG. The digestibility of DM, OM, NDF, ADF, Cellulose, and TDN also increased with DFM supplementation and the combination of DFM S. cerevisiae + VCO [21]. The mechanism of DFM can reduce methane production, presumably because DFM microorganisms can stimulate the development of rumen microbes in digesting feed so that fermentation of carbohydrates in the rumen results in high production of propionate. In the rumen, propionate production requires H2 bound to glucose which is described in the following equation.


Therefore, to reduce hydrogen production to methane, hydrogen must be switched to propionate production via lactate or fumarate [42]. H2 and CO2 are substrates used to form methane. According to Wilkie [43] the role of hydrogen in the methane production process is as a source of electrons, so the low level of H2 in the rumen is an indication of activity using H2 to reduce CO2 to CH. In addition, to form one mole of CH4 requires four moles of H2. The rate of H2 utilization is four times the rate of methane production so that H2 in the rumen never accumulates. The following is the stoichiometry of the carbohydrate fermentation reaction in producing methane gas in the rumen:


The effect of DFM and VCO supplementation on Bali cattle on blood profile can be seen in Table 4.

Cholesterol (mg/dl)137.18a124.25b122.00b108.69c1.508
Triglycerides (mg/dl)87.2989.0895.70108.493.305
LDL (mg/dl)76.14a72.49b70.43b67.18c0.501
HDL (mg/dl)184.00a170.07b168.05b147.00c1.814
Urea (mg/dl)29.4224.5324.0619.530.954
Protein (g/dl)6.176.997.187.660.226
Albumin (g/dl3.133.313.453.560.046
Glucose (mg/dl)70.0973.7576.6980.080.679

Table 4.

Blood profile of complete diet based on ammoniated palm fronds supplemented with DFM and VCO.

Numbers followed by different lowercase letters (a, b, c) in the same row are significantly different (P < 0.05), A: 100% Complete feed, B: A + 1% SC, C: A + 0.5% SC + 0.5% BA, D: A + 2% VCO + 1% SC. DFM: Direct fed microbials, SC: Saccharomyces cerevisiae, BA: Bacillus amilolyquifaciens, VCO: Virgin coconut oils, LDL: low density lipoprotein, HDL: high density lipoprotein.

The results showed that DFM and VCO supplementation had a very significant effect (p < 0.05) in reducing cholesterol, LDL and increasing HDL blood levels of Bali cattle. DFM and VCO supplementation had no significant effect (P > 0.05) on triglycerides, urea, protein, albumin, and glucose. VCO contains MCFA, which is a saturated fatty acid (Figure 1), its addition in the ration if consumed by livestock can help lower cholesterol because of the nature of this fatty acid, which can be absorbed directly by the animal’s body so that it does not cause fat accumulation that causes cholesterol. This is supported by Fernando et al. [44], which states that MCFA is directly converted into energy in the liver and increases metabolic rate, and reduces fat deposits in the body. MCFA has a very high solubility in water and requires fewer digestive enzymes, making it burnt into energy. MCFA is burned to produce energy and encourages the combustion of LCFA [45]. So there is a significant decrease in the amount of LDL and is followed by an increase in HDL in the blood. The calories contained are also lower than long-chain fatty acids [46]. Reducing fat deposits in the body can lower LDL cholesterol and increase HDL cholesterol [47].

This study can conclude that individual S. cerevisiae DFM supplementation and S. cerevisiae + B. amyloliquifaciens combination can optimize bioprocesses in the rumen. VCO supplementation level of 2% can be used to suppress methane production. Supplementation of S. cerevisiae type DFM and 2% VCO level can be considered to optimize bioprocesses in the rumen, increasing performance and reducing methane production in Bali cattle fed complete rations based on ammoniated palm fronds.


3. Effect of different source tannins on methane gas production

Bioactive compounds, including polyphenols, carotenoids, omega-3 fatty acids, vitamins, organic acids, nucleotides, and nucleosides, have attracted significant attention for their role in preventing several chronic diseases in humans. In animal husbandry, especially ruminant nutrition, bioactive plant polyphenolic compounds such as tannins and saponins have been studied extensively for optimizing bioprocesses in the rumen through feed manipulation. Manipulation of feed using tannins as an agent of rumen defaunation is one way to overcome global climate change due to the effects of greenhouse gases, one of which is caused by methane gas from ruminants [18]. Feeds containing tannins will be anti-nutrients that limit livestock production when the crude protein concentration in the feed is high because it can reduce the absorption of amino acids [48]. Tannins can also cause poisoning if consumed by livestock in excess, and there are many in vitro and in vivo studies that describe the methane inhibitory effect of tannins [19]. The study results Staerfl et al. [49] proved that the use of tannins could reduce CH4 emissions by up to 36% in bulls fed grass, corn silage, and concentrate rations. Not many studies have explored the use of tannins in feed based on plantation waste. Therefore, the authors are interested in conducting a series of experiments using tannins from different sources. Plant bioactive compounds used are tannins derived from gambir leaves waste (GLW) and obtained from two different sources or areas, namely GLW Payahkumbuh and Painan. GLW was added at different levels (10, 15, 20%) to the ammonium palm midrib substrate with the addition of 4% urea [50]. Experiments were carried out in vitro and in vivo.

In another in vitro study in the same group, the authors also tried to compare Gliricidia sepium in animal feed based on rice straw plantation waste [51]. Gliricidia sepium is a bioactive plant compound containing thick tannins and saponins capable of modifying the number of rumen microbes such as archaea, protozoa, and fibriolytic bacteria that affect the fermentative process and production of methane gas [52]. The study was conducted in vitro. Complete feed is prepared based on ammoniated rice straw. Three levels of Gliricidia sepium tested were 10, 20, and 30% DM basis. The study results, the effect of different sources and levels of tannins on dry matter digestibility (DM), organic matter (OM), methane gas concentration, protozoa, and bacteria can be seen in Table 5.

TreatmentsDM (%)OM (%)Protozoa population (cell mL-1)CH4 (ml/g DM)VFA Total (mM)A: P Ratio
T048.45b51.34b11.43 x 104a27.22a71.00b3.98a
B151.59ab54.17ab2.3 x 104c23.64ab83.70ab2.70c
B252.09a57.30a1.4 x 104c12.67c95.78a3.52ab
B350.93ab53.15ab4.8 x 104b13.14c65.94b3.38ab
C151.08ab54.16ab4.7 x 104a15.13c75.49ab2.58b
C250.69ab52.83ab9.3 x 104b17.12c79.40ab3.65a
C348.65b51.04b8.8 x 104a21.90b62.44b3.40b
A58,83c59.50c6.3 x 105a22.72a72.002.14b
B62.5b63.72b5.8 x 105b21.46b74.251.50a
C66.33a68.66a4.9 x 105c16.27c75.451.70a
D68.54a69.50a4.7 x 105c14.14c76.81.33a

Table 5.

Effect different sources and doses of tannin on dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), protozoa population, methane (CH4) production, VFA total, and acetate: Propionate ratio based on agriculture by-product as feed in the rumen.

Sources: Ningrat et al., 2017; DOI: 10.3923/ajas.2017.47.53; Zain et al., 2020; DOI:10.18517/ijaseit.10.2.11242.

Different superscripts in the same column highly significant effect (p < 0.05), T0: Oil palm frond ammoniated previously treated by 4% urea as control, B1: A + 10% GLW Payakumbuh, B2: A + 15% GLW Payakumbuh, B3: A + 20% GLW Payakumbuh, C1: A + 10% GLW Painan, C2: A + 15% GLW Painan, C3: A + 20% GLW Painan. A: 40% ammoniated rice straw +60% concentrate, B: 40% ammoniated rice straw +50% concentrate + 10% Gliricidia sepium, C: 40% ammoniated rice straw +40% concentrate +20% Gliricidia sepium, D: 40% ammoniated rice straw +30%, DM: Dry matter, OM: Organic matter, VFA: Volatile fatty acid, GLW: gambir leaves waste;

The results showed that different sources and doses of tannins proved to have different effects on decreasing methane production [50]. The in vitro study results showed that supplementation of 15% GLW and 10% GLW, which had a total tannin concentration of 12.5 and 15.6% dry matter, respectively, could reduce methane gas concentration by 53% and 45% compared to control. The decrease in methane gas was followed by a decrease in the protozoa population by 53.89% compared to control. Different levels and sources of GLW had no significant effect (P > 0.05) on the total bacterial population. However, there is a tendency for the bacterial population to increase as the population of protozoa and methane decreases. Tannins decrease methane production by reducing methanogenic bacteria and protozoa [53]. Furthermore, it was reported that condensed tannins extracted from different plants had different effects on rumen fermentation characteristics. This is because it is associated with different chemical structures and molecular weights [54, 55]. Condensed tannins extracted from different plants have varied activities in binding carbohydrates and proteins [56].

Furthermore, the in vitro results of the addition of GLW as a source of tannins were tested in vivo on three Simmental cattle [12] with a weight ranging between 179 and 190 kg using the BSL design. The results showed that two sources of tannin levels could increase nutrient digestibility but had no effect on protein digestibility, urinary allantoin, and nutrient consumption. The addition of 15% GLW tannins and 10% GLW Painan in the ration significantly increased ADG and decreased methane production compared to controls, namely 0.65, 0.90, 0.92 kg/day, and 2.48, 1.28, 1.26 MJ/day [12]. Saponins contained in GLW can increase the efficiency of rumen fermentation through the mechanism of reducing the population of protozoa [57]. The decrease in the protozoa population will cause the availability of H2 for methanogens to decrease [58]. The reduction in protozoa population supports stabilization of rumen pH and an increase in the population of cellulolytic microorganisms. Thus, decreased methanogenesis will increase the efficiency of digestibility in high fiber rations and livestock performance.

The addition of G. sepium in the diet resulted in a decrease in methane production and the highest protozoa population at the levels of 20 and 30%, namely 12.67, 13.16 mM, and 4.9 x 105, 4.7 x 105 cell/ml in vitro. However, there was no significant difference (P > 0.05) between the two levels. The treatment had no significant effect (p > 0.05) on total VFA, acetate, butyrate, valerate + isovalerate + isobutyrate. Acetate propionate ratio decreased respectively to 2.14, 1.50, 1.70, 1.33. The propionate concentration increased by 43.87% compared to the control, and there was no significant difference (P > 0.05) between levels of gliricidia addition [51]. Plant bioactive compound Gliricidia sepium contains tannins and saponins, which effectively reduce the population of protozoa and methane production. The feed used in this study was based on agricultural waste with high fiber content. In addition to saponin’s structure, which can affect protozoa’s activity, the type of feed given can also affect the fermentation process in the rumen [59]. In the study Zain et al., [51] the types of protozoa that survived the addition of Gliricidia sepium were not identified. However, the results obtained showed that the saponins and tannins in Gliricidia sepium could inhibit certain types of protozoa that cause a decrease in protozoa population in the rumen. The decrease in methane production and the protozoa population with 20 and 30% Gliricidia sepium can increase the digestibility of dry matter and organic matter produced [51].

The potential of plant bioactive compounds such as tannins and saponins as defaunation agents and reducing methane emissions can be combined with direct-fed microbes. There is not much literature on decreasing methane production that combines the two in vivo studies. In vitro studies Arowolo et al. [60] stated that there is a synergistic effect between probiotics and plant bioactive compounds simultaneously to stabilize the rumen fermentation process and reduce methane production. However, it still requires further studies at the in vivo level. Based on these results, Ningrat et al. [61] conducted a test of Gliricidia sepium and DFM S. cerevisiae supplementation to improve the performance of Simmental cattle while reducing methane gas production. It was found that the combined supplementation of 1% SC and 15% Gliricidia sepium significantly increased the digestibility of DM, and OM, ADG, and methane gas production compared to S. cerevisiae and Gliricidia sepium supplementation individually. The decrease in methane production with the addition of SC, GLW, and the combination of S. cerevisiae + Gliricidia sepium respectively 1.42, 1.35, and 1.02 [61]. These results prove that yeast culture can work synergistically when combined with reducing agents. Emissions of methane plant bioactive compounds such as tannins and saponins. Tannin compounds inhibit the activity of methanogens [62] and can defaunate [63]. Pineiro-Vazquez et al. [64] reported the results of an in vivo evaluation showing the effect of 80% Leucaena sp. (21% condensed tannins) in the diet composition was able to reduce methane emissions by 61.3% without affecting nutrient intake and VFA production in the Bos taurus × Bos indicus cross.


4. Conclusion

In conclusion, the overall reduction in methane production in agriculture by-products as feed-based beef cattle can be made by improving feed quality through a combination of processing techniques and efforts to optimize bioprocesses in the rumen, which include supplementation of feed additives such as direct-fed microbials, methanogenesis inhibitors and plant bioactive compounds. Supplementation of DFM type S. cerevisiae 1% combined with 2% VCO can reduce methane production by 20.36% and increase ADG by 0.70 kg/day in Bali cattle. Plant bioactive compounds, especially tannins from Gliricidia sepium, can be used up to 15% in amniotic palm frond-based rations. Gliricidia sepium, which contains tannins and saponins at levels of 20 and 30% dry matter in complete rations, can also reduce methane, protozoa population and increase livestock performance. The combination of DFM S. cerevisiae and Gliricidia sepium can also be used to reduce methane gas production in Simmental cattle fed complete feed based on 46.61% amniotic palm fronds compared to controls.



Thank to the Ministry of Research and Technology, and Andalas University that providing grants to support the research.


  1. 1. Zain M, Jamarun N, Arnim A, Ningrat RWS, Herawaty R. Effect of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on fermentability, microbial population, and digestibility of low-quality roughage in vitro. Arch. Zootech. 2011: 14: 51-58
  2. 2. Herawaty R, Jamarun N, Zain M, Arnim and Ningrat RWS. Effect of supplementation Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Leucaena leucocephala on low quality roughage feed in beef cattle diet. Pak. J. Nutr. 2013: 12: 182-184. Doi: 10.3923/pjn.2013.182.184
  3. 3. Suryani H, Zain M, Ningrat RWS, Jamarun N. Supplementation of Direct Fed Microbials (DFM) on in vitro fermentability and degradability of ammoniated palm frond. Pak. J. Nutr. 2016: 15: 90-95. abstract/?doi=pjn.2016.89.94
  4. 4. Mustangwa T, Edward IE, Topps JH and Peterson GFM. The effect of dierty inclusion yeast culture (Yea-Saac) on pattern of rumen fermentation, food intake and growth of intensively fed bulls. Anim. Prod. 1992: 55: 35-40. DOI:
  5. 5. Machmuller A, Soliva CR, and Kreuzer M. Effect of Coconut Oil and Defaunation Treatment on Methanogenesis in sheeep. J. Reprod. Nuter. Dev. 2003: 43: 41-55.
  6. 6. Brashears MM, Amezquita A and Jaroni D. Lactic acid bacteria and their uses in animal feeding to improve food safety. Adv. Food Nut. Res. 2005: 50:1- 31. DOI: 10.1016/S1043-4526(05)50001-9
  7. 7. Musa HH, We SL, Zhu CH, Seri HI and Zhu GQ. The Potential Benefits of Probiotics in Animal Production And Health. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 2009: 8: 313-321
  8. 8. Oyetayo VO, and Oyetayo FL. Potential of Probiotics as Biotherapeutic Agents Targeting the Innate Immune System. Afr. J. Biotech. 2005: 4: 123-127.
  9. 9. Zain M, Jurnida R, Khasrad and Erpomen. In vitro Fermentation Characteristics of Palm Oil By products Which is Supplemented with Growth Factor Rumen Microbes. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition. 2015: 14 (9): 625-628.: 10.3923/pjn.2015.625.628
  10. 10. Lynch HA and Martin SA. Effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture and Saccharomyces cerevisiae live cells on in vitro mixed ruminal mircoorganism fermentation. J. Dairy. Sci. 2002: 85: 2603-2608.
  11. 11. Zain, M. N. Jamarun, and Nurhaita. Effect of Sulfur Supplementation on in vitro Fermentability and Degradability of Ammoniated Rice Straw. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition. 2010: 9 (5): 413-415. DOI: 10.3923/pjn.2010.413.415
  12. 12. Ningrat RWS, Zain M, Erpomen and Suryani H. Effects of supplementation of different sources of tannins on nutrient digestibility, methane production and daily weight gain of beef cattle fed on ammoniated oil palm frond based diet. Inter. J. of Zoological Research. 2018. 14 (1): 8 – 13. DOI: 10.3923/ijzr.2018.8.13
  13. 13. Steinfeld H, Gerber P, Wassenaar T, Castel V, rosales M, de Haan C. Livestock's long shadow,. FAO, Rome 2006.
  14. 14. Miller TL, Wolin MJ, Hongxue Z, and Bryant MP. Characteristics of Methanogens Isolated from Bovine Rumen. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. American Sociey for Microbiology. 2002: 51: 201-202.
  15. 15. Moss AR, Jouany JP, and Newbold J. Methane production by ruminants: its contribution to global warming. Ann. Zootech. 2000: 49: 231-253.
  16. 16. Dohme F, Machmuller A, Esterman BL, Pfister P, Wasserfallen A, and Kreuzer M. The role of the rumen protozoa fo methane suppression caused by coconut oil. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 1999. 29: 187-192.
  17. 17. Jordan E, Kenny D, Hawkins M, Malone R, Lovett DK, and O’Mara FP. Effect oy refined soy oil or whole soybeans on intake, methane output, and performance of young bulls. J.Anim.Sci. 2006: 84: 2418-2425. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2005-354
  18. 18. Makkar HPS. Effect and fate of tannins in ruminant animals, adaptation to tannins, andstrategies to overcome detrimental e ects o eeding tannin-rich feeds. Small Ruminant Res. 2003: 49: 241-256. S0921-4488(03)00142-1
  19. 19. Jayanegara A, Leiber F and Kreuzer M. Meta-analysis of the relationship between dietary tannin level and methane formation in ruminants from in vivo and in vitro experiments. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. 2012: 96:365-375.
  20. 20. Machmuller, A. Medium chain fatty acids and their potential to reduce methanogenesis in dosmetic ruminants. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2006: 112: 107-114.
  21. 21. Suryani H, Zain M, Ningrat RWS, Jamarun N. Effect of dietary supplementation based on an ammoniated palm frond with direct fed microbials and virgin coconut oil on the growth performance and methane production of Bali cattle. Pak. J. Nutr. 2017: 16: 599-604. pjn.2017.599.604
  22. 22. Soliva CR, Meile L, Hindrichsen IK, Kreuzer M, and Machmuller. Myristic acid supports the immediate inhibitory effect of lauric acid on ruminal methanogens and methane release. Anaerobe. 2004: 10: 269-276.
  23. 23. Beauchemin KA, McGinn SM, Martinez TF, and McAlliste TA. Use of condensed tannin extract from quebracho trees to reduce methane emission from cattle. J Anim Sci. 2007: 85:1990-1996. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2006-686
  24. 24. Tilley JMA and Terry RA. A two stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of British Grassland Society. 1963: 18: 104 – 111.
  25. 25. Yoon IK and Stern MD. Influence of directed fed microbials on ruminal microbial fermentation and performance of ruminants. A Review. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 1995: 8: 535 – 555
  26. 26. Desnoyers M, Giger-Reverdin S, Bertin G, Duvaux-Ponter C and Sauvant D. Meta-Analysis of The Influence Of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Supple- mentation on Ruminal Parameters And Milk Production of Ruminant. J. Dairy. Sci. 2009: 92: 1620-1632. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2008-1414
  27. 27. Seo JK, Kim JS, Kim MH, Upadhaya SD, Kam DK, Ha JK. Direct-fed microbials for ruminant animals. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 2010: 23: 1657-1667. Doi: 10.5713/AJAS.2010.R.08
  28. 28. Wizna., H. Abbas, Y. Rizal, A. Dharma dan I. P. Kompiang. Selection and identification of cellulase-producing bacteria isolated from the litter of mountain and swampy forest. Microbiology Indonesia Journal, December. 2007: 1(3): 135-139. Doi:
  29. 29. Wiedmeier, R.D., M.J. Arambel, and J.L. Walters. Effect of yeast culture and aspergillus oryzae fermentation extract on ruminal characteristics and nutrient digestibility. J. Dairy Sci. 1987: 70:2063-2068.
  30. 30. Jouany JP. Twenty years of research and now more relevant than ever the coming of age of yeast cultures in ruminant diets. In: Responding to a Changing Agricultural Landscape. Alltech’s European, Middle Eastern and African Lecture Tour. 2001. 44-69 p
  31. 31. Wang Y, Wu X, Chen J, Amin R, Lu M, Bayana B, Zhao J, Murray CK, Hamblin MR, Hooper DC, and Dai T. Antimicrobial blue light in-activation of gram-negative pathogens in biofilms: in vitro and in vivo studies. The J. of Infectious Dieasis. 2016. 213 (9): 1380-1387. Doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiw070
  32. 32. Suryani H, Zain M, Jamarun N, Ningrat RWS. The role of Direct Fed Microbials (DFM) Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Aspergillus oryzae on ruminant productivity: a Review. Jurnal Peternakan Indonesia. 2015: 17: 27-37. jpi.17.1.27-37.2015
  33. 33. Dohme F, Machmuller A, Wasserfallen A and Kreuzer M. Ruminal methanogenesis as influence y individual fatty acids supplemented to complete ruminant diets. Lett. Applied Microbiol. 2001: 32: 47-51. DOI: 10.1046/j.1472-765x.2001.00863.x
  34. 34. Chaucheyras F, Fonty G, Bertin G, Salmon JM and Gouet P. Effects of a strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Levucell SC), a microbial additive for ruminants, on lactate metabolism in vitro. Can. J. Microbiol. 1995: 42:927-933. DOI: 10.1139/m96-119
  35. 35. Guyader J, Eugene M, Noziere P, Morgavi DP, Doreau SE, and McSweeney CS. Effect of tea saponin on methanogenesis, microbial community structure and expression of mcrA gene, in cultures of rumen microorganism. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2008: 47: 421-426. DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2008.02459.x
  36. 36. Kongmun P, Wanapat M, Pakdee P, Navanukraw C, and Yu Z. Manipulation of Rumen Fermentation and Ecology of Swamp Buffalo by Coconut Oil and Garlic Powder Supplementation. J. Liv. Sci. 2010: 01315.
  37. 37. Faciola AP and Broderick GA. Effect of feeding lauric acid or coconut oil on ruminal protozoa numbers, fermentation pattern, digestion, omasal nutrient flow, and milk production in dairy cow. J. Dairy Sci. 2014: 97: 5088-5100.doi.10.3168/jds.2013-7653.
  38. 38. Hristov AN, Callaway TR, C. Lee, SE and Dowd SE. Rumen Bacterial, Archaeal, and Fungal Diversity of Dairy Cows in Response to Ingestion of Lauric or Myristic Acid. J. Anim. Sci. 2012: 90: 4449-4457. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2011-4624
  39. 39. Wiliam P E V. Understanding the biochemical mode of action of yeast culture. In. Biotechnology in the Feed Industry. LYONS, T.P. (Ed.). Alltech Techinical Publication, Nicholasville. Kentucky. 1988. 79- 100 p
  40. 40. Steel RGD, Torrie JH. Principles and procedures of statistics. McGraw-Hill Inc. 1993. New York, USA
  41. 41. Mwenya B, Santoso B, Sar C, Gamo Y, Kobayashi T, Arai I and Takahashi J. Effects of including β1-4 galacto-oligosaccharides, lactic acid bacteria or yeast culture on methanogenesis as well as energy and nitrogen metabolism in sheep. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2004: 115: 313-326.
  42. 42. Mitsumori M and Sun W. Control of rumen microbial fermentation for mitigating methane emissions from the rumen. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 2008: 21:144-154.
  43. 43. Wilkie, A. C. Anaerob Digestion: Holistic vioprocessing of animal manures. in proceeding of the animal residuals management coference. Virginia. 2002. 1-12
  44. 44. Fernando WMADB, Ian JM, Goozee KG, Charles SB, Jayasena V and Martins RN. The role of dietary coconut for the prevention and treatment of Alzaimer’s disease: potential mecanishm of action. Cambridge university press. 2015: 114 (1): 1 – 14. Doi:[Opens in a new window]
  45. 45. Odle Jack. New Insights into the utlilization of medium chain triglycherides by the neonate: observation from a piglet model. The Journal of nutrition. 1997: 127:1061-1067.
  46. 46. Fife, Bruce. The Healing Miracles of Coconut Oil, 3rd Edition. Piccadilly Books Ltd. 2003.
  47. 47. Andrea A, Papamandjaris, Diane, MacDougal E and Petter, JHJ. Medium chain fatty acid metabolism and energy expenditure: obesity treatment implications. Life science. 1998: 62 (14): 1203 - 1215.32.
  48. 48. Waghorn G. Beneficial and detrimental effects of diertary condenses tannins for suitable sheep and goat production-progress and challenges. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2008: 147: 116 – 139.
  49. 49. Staerfl SM, Zeitz JO, Kreuzer M and Soliva CR. Methane conversion rate of bulls fattened on grass or maize silage as compared with the IPCC default values, and the long-term methane mitigation efficiency of adding acacia tannin, garlic, maca and lupine. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 2012: 148: 111-120. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2011.11.003
  50. 50. Ningrat RWS, Zain M, Erpomen and Suryani, H. Effect of doses and different sources of tannis on in vitro ruminal methane, volatile fatty acid production and on bacteria and protozoa population. Asian J. of Anim. and Vet. Adv. 2017: 11 (5): 314-318. DOI: 10.3923/ajas.2017.47.53
  51. 51. Zain M, Putri EM, Ningrat RWS, Erpomen, Makmur M. Effects of Supplementing Gliricidia Sepium on ration based ammoniated rice straw in ruminant feed to decrease methane gas production and to improve nutrient digestibility (in-vitro). Int. J. on Adv.Sci. Eng.In.Tech. 2020: 10:2. DOI:10.18517/ijaseit.10.2.11242
  52. 52. Molina-Botero IC, Arroyave-Jaramilloa J, Valencia-Salazarb S, Barahona-Rosalesc R, Aguilar-Péreza CF, Burgosa AA, Arangod J, Ku-Veraa JC. Effects of tannins and saponins contained in foliage of Gliricidia sepium and pods of Enterolobium cyclocarpum on fermentation, methane emissions and rumen microbial population in crossbred heifers. Animal Feed and Science Technology. 2019: 251.
  53. 53. Yang K, Wei C, Zhao GY, et al. Effects of dietary supplementing tannic acid in the ration of beef cattle on rumen fermentation, methane emission, microbial flora and nutrient digestibility. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2017: 101: 302-10. DOI: 10.1111/jpn.12531
  54. 54. Tan HY, Sieo CC, Abdullah N, Liang JB, Huang XD, et al. Effects of condensed tannins from Leucaena on methane production, rumen fermentation and populations of methanogens and protozoa in vitro. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2011. 169: 185-193.
  55. 55. Patra AK, and Saxena J. Dietary phytochemicals as rumen modi ers: a review of the e ects on microbial populations. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2009: 96: 363-375
  56. 56. Wina E, Muetzel S and Becker K. The dynamics of major brolytic microbes and enzyme activity in the rumen in response to short- and long-term feeding of Sapindus rarak saponins. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2006b: 100 (1), 114-122.
  57. 57. Miah MY, Rahman MS, Islam MK and Monir MM. Effects of saponin and L-carnitine on the performance and reproductive fitness of male broiler. Int J Poult Sci. 2004: 3: 530 – 533
  58. 58. Anantasook N, Wanapat M, Gunun P, and Cherdthong A. Reducing methane production by supplementation of Terminalia chebula RETZ. containing tannins and saponins. Animal Science Journal. 2016: 87: 783-790.
  59. 59. Gerlach K, Pries M, Tholen E, Schmithausen AJ, Buscher W, Sudekum KH. Effect of condensed tannins in rations of lactating dairy cows on production variables and nitrogen use efficiency. J. Anim. 2018: 14 (9): 1847 -1855.
  60. 60. Arowolo MA and He J. Use of probiotics and botanical extracts to improve ruminant production in the tropics: A review. Animal Nutrition. 2018: 4: 241-249. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.aninu.2018.04.010
  61. 61. Ningrat RWS, Zain M, Elihasridas, Makmur M, Putri M, Sari YC. Effect of dietary supplementation based on ammoniated palm frond with saccharomyces cerevisiae and gambir leaves waste on nutrient intake and digestibility, daily gain and methane production of simental cattle. Adv. In Anim.and Vet. Sci. 2020: 8(12): 1325-1332.
  62. 62. Carrula JE, Kreuzer M, Machmiller A, Hess HD. Supplementation of Acacia mearnsii tannins decreases methanogenesis and urinary nitrogen in forage-fed sheep. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 2005: 56:961-970. AR05022
  63. 63. Goel G, Makkar HPS, Becker K. Effects of Sesbania sesban and Carduus pycnocephalus leaves and Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) seeds and their extracts on partitioning of nutrients from roughage- and concentrate- based feeds to methane. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2008: 147: 72- 89.
  64. 64. Piñeiro-Vázquez A, Canul-Solis J, Jiménez-Ferrer G, Alayón- Gamboa J, Chay-Canul A, Ayala-Burgos A, Aguilar-Pérez C, Ku-Vera J. Effect of condensed tannins from Leucaena leucocephala on rumen fermentation, methane production and population of rumen protozoa in heifers fed low-quality forage. Asian-Australas J. Anim. Sci. 2018: 31:1738- 1746.

Written By

Mardiati Zain, Rusmana Wijaya Setia Ningrat, Heni Suryani and Novirman Jamarun

Submitted: 18 July 2021 Reviewed: 26 August 2021 Published: 18 October 2021