Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Metformin: Pros and Cons

Written By

Shalini Sivadasan, Muthukumar Subramanian and Rajasekaran Aiyalu

Submitted: 12 July 2021 Reviewed: 05 August 2021 Published: 30 August 2021

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.99815

From the Edited Volume

Metformin - Pharmacology and Drug Interactions

Edited by Juber Akhtar, Usama Ahmad, Badruddeen and Mohammad Irfan Khan

Chapter metrics overview

1,068 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Metformin was approved for the treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in 1958 for UK, in 1972 for Canada and in 1995 by FDA in USA. Metformin is the drug of choice for patients who are obese and have type 2 diabetes mellitus. Though metformin was at first proven to treat hyperglycemia, many other uses of metformin are proven to be effective. It is also used for gestational diabetes mellitus, obesity, hyper secretion of ovarian androgen, poly-cystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), anti-psychotic therapy induced weight gain, cancer treatment and anti-aging. Metformin causes a decrease in appetite thus known to act on obesity. The other action of metformin is reduction of circulating levels of insulin and insulin like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) which is associated with anticancer action. There are ongoing researches about the effect of metformin on anti-aging properties and proved that metformin is linked with anti-aging factors. Three main factors that are related with aging are oxidation, glaciation and methylation. Metformin as all drugs, have unwanted effects as well. Many side effects of metformin are considered mild where lactic acidosis and vitamin B12 deficiency happens to be the major.


  • metformin uses
  • diabetes mellitus
  • obesity
  • poly-cystic ovary syndrome
  • cancer

1. Introduction

1.1 Pros (uses) of metformin

Metformin, the most common drug used to treat type 2 diabetes, approved by U.S. Food Drug Administration (US-FDA) (1), belongs to a class of drugs called biguanides with a guanidine and galegine connection. Metformin was approved for treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in 1958 for UK [1], 1972 for Canada [2] and 1995 by FDA in USA [1, 3].

Metformin (1,1-dimethyl biguanide hydrochloride) was synthesized in 1920’s. Since then, the drug became the first choice to treat type 2 diabetes due to its remarkable ability to decrease plasma glucose levels [4, 5, 6]. It acts by reducing the glucose made by liver, decreasing the amount glucose that body absorbs and increasing the effect of insulin in the body [7].

In recent years, studies have shown many unexpected effective roles of metformin that exerts strong effect on cardiovascular disease (CVD) [8], cancers [9, 10], neurodegenerative diseases [11], liver diseases [12], obesity [13, 14], and renal diseases [15], hypersecretion of ovarian androgens, poly-cystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), anti-psychotic therapy induced weight gain, and anti-aging [16]. The agent also offers neuro protection that may reduce the risk of dementia and stroke [17].

1.1.1 Metformin in diabetes

Several studies and clinical trials have confirmed that metformin mono therapy or combination therapy with other glucose-lowering drugs is successful in treating type 2 diabetes. Metformin is the drug of choice for diabetic patients who are obese and have type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Type 2 diabetes coexists with insulin resistance and leads to extremely high blood sugar levels. Metformin lowers blood sugar, preventing permanent organ damage, which in due course could lead to dysfunction and failure [18, 19]. Metformin exerts its anti-hyperglycemic effects through AMP which initiates the uptake of sugar from the blood into muscles.

Metformin exerts its anti-hyperglycemic effects by suppressing hepatic glucose production through AMPK dependent [20, 21] or -independent pathways [22, 23].

Metformin increases AMPK that leads to more sugar being taken from the blood into tissues, thus lowering the blood sugar level [24].

It is used in case of insulin resistance as it works by decreasing hepatic glucose production, decreasing peripheral insulin resistance and improving insulin sensitivity thereby increasing peripheral glucose uptake and utilization. Metformin does not produce hypoglycaemia and does not cause hyperinsulinemia in normal patients or in patients with type 2 diabetes. Insulin secretion remains unchanged whereas fasting insulin levels and daylong plasma insulin response may decrease with metformin therapy [25].

On the other hand, metformin may reduce blood sugar by inhibiting the production of new glucose (gluconeogenesis) from non-carbohydrates such as lactate, glycerol, and some amino acids [23]. Metformin inhibits gluconeogenesis through AMPK-dependent activation of small hetero dimer partner (SHP) and inhibition of phosphorylation of CREB binding protein (CBP) [26], thereby suppressing the expression of gluconeogenic genes, such as G6Pase (glucose 6 phosphatase), PEPCK (phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase), and PC (pyruvate carboxylase) [27].

Studies also suggest that metformin could enhance GLUT1 (glucose transporter 1) mediated glucose transport into hepatocytes by activating IRS2 (insulin receptor substrate two), decreasing plasma glucose levels [28].

Besides decreasing liver glucose production, metformin also decreases glucose levels through increasing (i) GLUT4 (glucose transporter 4) mediated glucose uptake in skeletal muscles [29] and (ii) absorption of glucose in the intestines [30]. Metformin also stimulates glucagon-like-peptide-1 (GLP-1) release, thereby improving insulin secretion and reducing plasma glucose levels [31]. The molecular mechanism of metformin in hepatic gluconeogenesis and glucose production is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Metformin in hepatic gluconeogenesis and glucose production. Metformin acts primarily to suppress glucose production in the liver. While metformin’s mechanism(s) of action remain controversial, current evidence indicates that metformin’s most important effect in treating diabetes is to lower the hepatic production of glucose [32, 33].

A clinical trial conducted on over 3,000 people who were at risk of developing type 2 diabetes showed that those people treated with metformin had a 31% lower occurrence of type 2 diabetes compared to the placebo group [34].

1.1.2 Metformin in gestational diabetes

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is the most common medical complication of pregnancy which is associated with insulin resistance (IR) and hyperinsulinemia that may predispose some women to develop diabetes. Gestational diabetes has been defined as any degree of glucose intolerance with an onset, or first recognition during pregnancy [35]. In 2013, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended that hyperglycemia first detected during pregnancy be classified as either ‘diabetes mellitus (DM) in pregnancy’ or ‘GDM’ [36]. GDM is associated with short- and long-term sequelae on both, mother and offspring [37, 38].

During normal pregnancy, around the mid-pregnancy, a progressive insulin resistance develops that progresses during the third trimester. In early pregnancy, insulin secretion increases, while insulin sensitivity remain unchanged, decreased or increased whereas in mid pregnancy, insulin sensitivity declines progressively and worsens during the rest of the pregnancy, being worst in the late third trimester, which rebounds with the delivery of the placenta. Therefore, GDM usually develops in the late second trimester and disappears, instantly, post-delivery [39].

For GDM, lifestyle interventions such as daily exercise, medical nutrition therapy is the initial treatment while, metformin, the oral hypoglycemic agent is being considered as a substitute to insulin. The rationale behind using metformin in gestational and pre-existing diabetes during pregnancy is as metformin increases insulin sensitivity, reduces hepatic glucogeneogenesis and enhances peripheral glucose uptake, resulting in lowering of blood glucose with minimal risk of maternal hypoglycemia and weight gain [40].

Although, metformin has been shown to pass freely across the placenta [41], there are no reported adverse side effects to the fetus when it is used to treat women with infertility caused by poly-cystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) [42, 43]. Metformin is classified as a category B drug, which implies that there is no confirmation of animal or fetal toxicity or teratogenicity. The study of metformin in pregnancy revealed that the use of metformin in women with GDM was not associated with increased risk of congenital anomalies, or maternal and neonatal complications compared to insulin, except for higher rates of preterm labour [44].

Results of systematic review and meta-analysis had shown that metformin is better than insulin in reducing, maternal weight gain during pregnancy and the frequency of pregnancy induced hypertension, with no changes in the frequency of hypoglycemia and pre-eclampsia [45]. In addition, randomized controlled trials (RCT) suggest that metformin could be used to treat or prevent pre-eclampsia [46]. Metformin is considered as the first-line drug in the management of type 2 diabetes due to its efficacy, tolerability and safety in non-pregnant individuals.

1.1.3 Metformin in polycystic ovary syndrome

Poly-cystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is a hormonal disorder often aggravated by obesity and insulin resistance. PCOS is an endocrine-metabolic dysfunction among 5–10% of women in reproductive age which is associated with metabolic disturbances that have a high impact in cardio metabolic diseases, such as insulin resistance [47, 48, 49].

PCOS is characterized by menstrual irregularities, low fertility, obesity and high blood levels of male hormones in reproductive aged women [50]. PCOS confirms insulin resistance which leads to the hypothesis of a pre-diabetic state with glucose intolerance, gestational diabetes mellitus and evident diabetes. Several studies show that insulin resistance stimulates the ovaries to produce male hormones, i.e., androgens. This causes stigmata of androgen excess such as hirsutism and acne. Metformin increases insulin sensitivity and decreases the production of ovarian androgen thereby normalizing the hormone levels, stabilizes menstrual irregularities and improves fertility and ovulation. It also directly inhibits the androgen production [51].

Metformin treats PCOS symptoms, such as irregular ovulation or menstrual cycles, and the excess of insulin in the body. It has also been made known to treat PCOS symptoms by reducing body mass index (BMI) and testosterone levels. Furthermore, metformin assists fertility and increases the chance of successful pregnancy and reduces the risk of early miscarriage, gestational diabetes, and inflammation associated with PCOS. Metformin is thus used as the drug of choice for the treatment of PCOS. More to that, metformin helps mothers carry their baby to full term [51, 52]. Metformin is strongly recommended in patients with metabolic syndrome and obesity [51].

1.1.4 Metformin in obesity

Obesity is a chronic disease accompanied with metabolic syndromes, such as diabetes, fatty liver diseases, and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Obesity is caused by an imbalance between energy intake and expenditure [53].

Metformin happens to be one of the drugs available for the treatment of obesity. Metformin acts on obesity by decreasing the appetite and reduced BMI levels. Metformin contains a primary anorectic factor which reduces the appetite. Leptin levels were found to be decreased on taking metformin. Moreover, glucagon like peptide-1 levels rise significantly on taking metformin. This promotes weight loss. It was observed that adults with severe obesity lost weight more significantly than mildly obese patients [54]. Metformin exerts its anti-obesity effects through increasing mitochondrial biogenesis, decreasing fatty acid uptake, and stimulating thermogenesis [55].

It acts by promoting sugar dysplasia restrains and reducing inhibition caused by insulin-induced expression of the glucose transporter protein, thus increasing glucose utilization [56]. Metformin is effective in reducing body weight and improving insulin sensitivity in adults, and is used to treat adolescents who are overweight or obese and unresponsive to changes in lifestyle or who present with insulin resistance [57]. Many studies support that metformin can promote weight loss in overweight or obesity patients [58, 59]. Based on the reports it is understood that clinical trials supports the efficacy and safety profiles of metformin in diabetes and weight gain prevention [60].

1.1.5 Metformin in medication induced weight gain

Studies have shown that use of antipsychotics increase the risk of weight gain, dyslipidemia and diabetes. Weight gain and abdominal adiposity which is directly associated with insulin resistance, dyslipidemia and risk of diabetes may be induced by second generation antipsychotics [61, 62]. Stimulation of appetite, reducing physical activity and impairing metabolic regulation is the mechanism of antipsychotics induced weight gain [63].

Metformin aids in weight loss. Drug induced weight gain can be reduced by metformin. It assists in reduction of weight for those who gain 10% of body weight than pre-treatment [63]. Metformin contains an anorectic factor and facilitates less hunger. This also aids in decreased appetite. Metformin causes decreased leptin levels, thus suppresses appetite. Metformin also increases the GLP-1 levels which enhances weight loss. Thus, metformin with lifestyle changes is effective in the treatment of weight gain induced by antipsychotics.

1.1.6 Metformin in cancer

New studies have shown that metformin is effective in killing cancer cells. In trials, people undergoing chemotherapy alone saw their cancer return, while for those on chemo and metformin, their tumors disappeared. Research has shown that those taking metformin are less likely to develop certain cancers. Metformin has been found to improve cancer prognosis as it inhibits cancer cell growth and proliferation. Evidence points that metformin inhibits growth, survival, and metastasis of different types of tumor cells, including those from breast, liver, bone, pancreas, endometrial, colorectal, kidney, and lung cancers [64].

Metformin prevented the growth and spreading of certain cancers in patients with type 2 diabetes. This proposed mechanism is through a known tumor-suppressant gene (LKB1), which activates AMPK. Metformin shows anticancer properties by direct and indirect regulation of cells’ metabolism. The direct effects are mediated by AMPK dependent and -independent pathways. (i) Metformin activates AMPK, which leads to the inhibition of mTOR signaling, and thereby disturbs the protein synthesis, and suppresses the cell growth and proliferation [65]. As an anti-diabetic drug, metformin decreases plasma glucose levels, thereby inhibiting cancer cell proliferation and survival [66].

Other studies reported that metformin could activate the immune response against cancer cells [67] or decrease NF-kB (nuclear factor-kB) activity, which results in a reduction in the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines [68].

Metformin activates AMPK and then induces p53 phosphorylation to prevent cell invasion and metastasis [69].

The different mechanisms antitumor action has been proposed which involves the following: (a) the activation of adenosine monophosphate kinase, (b) modulation of adenosine A1 receptor (ADORA), (c) reduction in insulin/insulin growth factors, and (d) inhibition of endogenous reactive oxygen species (ROS); and its resultant damage to deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) molecule is another paramount antitumor mechanism [70].

Metformin reduces the proliferation of cancer cells and the possibility of malignancies in different types of cancer, including gastric carcinoma, pancreatic cancer, uterine cancer, medullary thyroid cancer [71]. Figure 2 shows the mechanism of metformin in Cancer and Figure 3 shows the direct and indirect effects of metformin in Cancer.

Figure 2.

Mechanism of metformin in Cancer. The anticancer activity of metformin is associated with direct and indirect effects of the drug. The direct insulin-independent effects of metformin are mediated by activation of AMPK and a reduction in mTOR signaling and protein synthesis in cancer cells [72].

Figure 3.

Direct and indirect effects of metformin on cancer. Metformin activates AMPK leading to stabilization of TSC2 and inhibition of mTORC1 signaling and protein synthesis. Metformin can also directly target mTOR independently of AMPK and TSC2 [73]. Breast cancer

Breast cancer (BC) is one of the most common malignancies occurring in females. Cellular glucose metabolism is linked tightly with the proliferation and development of breast cancer. Several studies suggested that metformin reduces the incidence of breast cancer in type 2 diabetes patients [74]. Cancer cells show enhanced glucose uptake and metabolism and prefer glycolysis. The noted specialty of metformin is to decrease glucose levels, thereby limiting the availability of energy for cancer cells. Metformin decreases FAS expression which is an essential component of the fatty acid synthesis pathway, therefore affecting the survival of cancer cells. Blood cancer

Leukemia comprises 2.8% of all cancers and 3.4% of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The aberrant activation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is one of the most common biochemical features of leukemia [75]. Metformin inhibits AKT/mTOR signaling, which is an effective approach to treat leukemia. Metformin plays a beneficial role in human lymphoma by inhibiting mTOR signaling without the involvement of AKT, and the suppression of mTOR subsequently leads to the suppression of growth of B cells and T cells [76]. Colorectal cancer (CRC)

CRC is also one of the most common cancers in the world. In 2004, relationship between metformin and CRC was demonstrated [77]. Metformin may exert its pharmacodynamic effects through the gut-brain-liver axis, but these mechanisms require further exploration. In the intestine, metformin increases glucose uptake and lactate concentrations. Administration of metformin increases the bile acid pool in the intestine that may affect GLP-1 secretion and cholesterol levels. In addition, metformin changes the microbiome, affecting the regulation of metabolism, such as glucose homeostasis, lipid metabolism, and energy metabolism [78]. These changes inhibits the development and progress of CRC. Bone cancers

Compared with cancers initiating in bone tissue itself, invasion of metastatic cancers, especially breast, lung, and prostate cancers, into bones is more common [79]. All types of bone cancers influence the osteolytic process, and osteoblastic metastases occur through osteoclast activation or stimulant factors which are responsible for osteoblastic proliferation, differentiation, and formation [80]. Endometrial cancer

Metabolic syndrome like obesity and hyperglycemia is related to the development of endometrial cancer. Metformin is an effective anti-diabetic drug, studies have demonstrated the beneficial effect of metformin on endometrial cancer development by the mechanisms involving the mitochondrial OXPHOS suppression and AMPK activation which subsequently inhibit a variety of metabolic pathways, including STAT3, ZEB-1, ACC, mTOR, and IGF-1 [81]. Melanoma

Melanoma is the most aggressive skin cancer and is responsible for almost 80% of the skin cancer-related deaths. Due to its strong invasive ability, melanoma often metastasizes to the lymph nodes, liver, lungs, and even the central nervous system [82]. Metformin can induce cell cycle arrest in the G0–G1 phase in melanoma cells. Another study indicated that metformin can attenuate melanoma growth and metastasis through inhibiting the expression of TRB3 (tribbles pseudokinase 3) in non-diabetic and diabetic mouse models [83]. Because of the activation effect of AMPK, metformin could influence melanoma cell death and proliferation and the tumor microenvironment. It will be interesting to investigate the effects of combination treatment of metformin with current therapies or other drugs to treat melanoma.

1.1.7 Metformin in aging

Aging is considered unavoidable and is modulated by genetic and dietary factors. The declining ability to regenerate damaged tissue and the deterioration in homeostatic processes are considered as biological features of aging [84]. Usually, the primary causes foraging are DNA damage and autophagy. Aging is a result of DNA damage, which can be induced by ROS, alkylation, hydrolysis, chemicals, and ultraviolet and other radiation [85]. Trials have shown metformin’s efficacy in reducing the effects of aging, such as decreasing age-related illnesses, problems with cognitive function, and morbidity [86].

Metformin slows down aging and reduces the incidence of aging-related diseases such as neurodegenerative disease and cancer in humans. In spite of its widespread use, the mechanisms by which metformin exerts favorable effects on aging remain largely unknown [87]. The mechanisms by which metformin affects the aging process are partly dependent on the regulation of glucose metabolism. By inhibiting mitochondrial complex I, metformin reduces endogenous production of ROS and subsequently decreases DNA damage [88].

By activating AMPK, metformin is able to inhibit NF-kB signaling and attenuate cell inflammation [89]. Metformin also leads to decreased insulin levels, and suppresses IGF-1 signaling and mTOR signaling, resulting in suppression of inflammation and autophagy, which is beneficial to the aging process [90]. Besides, metformin was shown to have a function in the regulation of the microbiome, which may be another way to affect aging [91]. There are three main factors that are related with aging. They are oxidation, glycation and methylation. There is evidence that metformin acts as an anti-aging agent. It helps slow the rate of aging and retain youth characteristics for a longer period of time than compared to non-metformin users. There are ongoing research about the effect of metformin on anti-aging properties. Researches have proved that metformin is linked with anti-aging factors [92].

There are two mechanisms to describe aging. First one is ROS theory, i.e., reactive oxygen species [93]. The ROS theory explains that by products of oxidative phosphorylation are reactive oxygen species, i.e., free radicals. The free radicals increase significantly and damage other cells and organs. The ROS leads to DNA damage [64].

The second mechanism is TOR theory. Cellular pathway like IGF-1 axis, MAPK, AKT, PI3K stimulated by mitogens, growth factors, sugars and amino acids are said to inhibit aging. Caloric restriction suppresses the mTOR pathway. The activity of mTOR may be inhibited by rapamycin. Rapamycin has gero-suppressive effects. These include extending the lifespan, prevent age related disorders and reduce cost of patient care. AMPK activation led to an indirect inhibition of mTOR. Metformin acts as an AMPK activator [64, 94]. Metformin, Being an AMPK activator, metformin has been proved to have gero-suppressive effects. Extended longevity and lifespan were seen in those taking metformin. Autophagy plays a significant role in gero-suppressive mechanisms. Autophagy protects cell organelles and nutrient supply. Induction of autophagy extends the lifespan. Polyamines cause autophagy. Activation of autophagy induces processes associated with suppression of IGF and mTOR pathways. Therefore metformin acts as an activator of autophagy [95].

1.1.8 Metformin in liver diseases

Liver dysfunction may lead to many diseases, such as diabetes, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, cirrhosis, non-alcoholic hepatitis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Studies showed that metformin is safe in patients with cirrhosis. In diabetic patients, metformin caused a 50% reduction in hepatocellular carcinoma incidence and improved survival mainly by influencing cell growth and angiogenesis through the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway [96]. In humans, metformin was also found to reduce the incidence of fatty liver diseases and to cause a histological response [97]. However, other studies showed that metformin failed to improve liver histology, hepatic steatosis, and inflammation [98].

1.1.9 Metformin and cardiovascular diseases

Hyperglycemia induces oxidative stress, resulting in lipoprotein dysfunction and endothelial dysfunction, increasing the risk of CVD. Metformin was shown to decrease the incidence of CVD in diabetes patients. Metformin was also shown to decrease irregular heartbeats and lower oxidative stress [86]. Through activating AMPK, metformin inhibits alpha-dicarbonyl-mediated modification of apolipoprotein residues, consequently ameliorating high density lipoprotein (HDL) dysfunction and reducing low density lipoprotein (LDL) modifications. Reductions in HDL dysfunction improve cholesterol transport and diminish the cardiovascular risk. Moreover, metformin improves endothelial oxidative stress levels and attenuates hyperglycemia-induced inflammation, decreasing the occurrence of CVD [99]. It has been shown that metformin improves the myocardial energy status through ameliorating cellular lipid and glucose metabolism via AMPK [100].

1.1.10 Metformin and renal diseases

Diabetes is considered as an important cause of renal diseases, and metformin is an interesting candidate to treat renal diseases, although its use was restricted previously [101]. Daily oral administration of metformin could improve kidney fibrosis and normalize kidney structure and function. These effects may be mediated by the AMPK signaling pathway, which can regulate cell growth and energy utilization. Another study found that in a CKD mouse model, metformin could suppress kidney injury and improve kidney function, through AMPK-mediated ACC signaling [102].

It is worth to note that appropriate dosage of metformin is very important in the treatment for renal diseases. The mechanisms underlying these kidney protective roles of metformin may be related to the regulation of glucose utilization, the decrease in cell inflammation, and oxidative stress [103]. The summary of metformin in different diseases and the underlying major mechanism is shown in the Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Summary of metformin in different diseases and the underlying major mechanism [103].

1.2 Cons (side effects) of metformin

Metformin as all drugs, have unwanted effects which can be mild or serious side effects. The most common side effects are related to gut complications and include upset stomach, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, light headedness, or a metallic taste in the mouth [104]. In general, older patients may be at an increased risk for some of its side effects, such as lactic acidosis or low blood sugar, due to other factors [104]. The minor side effects include gastrointestinal disturbances. The most common are anorexia, nausea, abdominal discomfort and diarrhea. Dose reduction or discontinuation of the drug may reduce or alleviate these symptoms. Out of the side effects, lactic acidosis and vitamin B12 deficiency happens to be the major. Although rare, if lactic acidosis occurs, may be fatal, which may occur in presence of hypoxia and renal insufficiency [105].

1.2.1 Lactic acidosis

Lactic acidosis is a condition in which lactic acid builds up in the body, altering pH balance and potentially leading to complications [106]. Because metformin reduces the breakdown of lactate to glucose, the drug may induce lactic acidosis if it accumulates significantly. Metformin’s exact mechanism of action in doing so is unknown. More frequently, the combination of this drug and an underlying health condition may trigger lactic acidosis [107].

The rate of developing lactic acidosis increases in patients with predisposing factors, such as renal impairment, hepatic disease, congestive heart failure or sepsis. Metformin is renally cleared. In cases of renal failure or decreased creatinine clearance, metformin accumulates. When this happens, it inhibits mitochondrial electron transport. Therefore, it increases anerobic metabolism and lactic production [108]. The levels of lactate increase in metformin taking patients. The pyruvate dehydrogenase inhibits conversion of lactate to glucose, thereby causes lactic acidosis [109].

Because metformin decreases liver uptake of lactate, any condition that may precipitate lactic acidosis is a contraindication. Patients with infections, recent surgery, kidney or liver damage, history of heart disease, respiratory failure, excessive alcohol consumption (due to depletion of NAD+ stores), or dehydration have an increased risk of lactic acidosis induced by metformin [110]. The FDA recommends avoiding the use of metformin in more severe chronic kidney disease, below the eGFR cutoff of 30 ml/minute/1.73 m2.

Lactate uptake by the liver is diminished with metformin use because lactate is a substrate for hepatic gluconeogenesis, a process that metformin inhibits. Metformin-associated lactate production may also take place in the large intestine, which could potentially contribute to lactic acidosis in those with risk factors. Elderly patients are also at risk for developing lactic acidosis [104, 111].

1.2.2 Vitamin B12 deficiency

A common report with long term metformin use is vitamin B12 malabsorption which leads to vitamin B12 deficiency [112, 113]. With increased metformin dosage, the incidence of vitamin B12 deficiency also increased [114]. In a study, it was proven that being treated with metformin had a 7% greater risk of vitamin B12 deficiency than with placebo [115].

The mechanisms leading to vitamin B12 deficiency may be explained by changes in small intestine motility. This cause increased bacterial growth and hence, consumption of vitamin B12. Metformin also inhibits the calcium dependent absorption of vitamin B12 [116]. Vitamin B12 is an essential nutrient for cognitive and cardiovascular function [117, 118]. Clinical manifestations of vitamin B12 deficiency include alteration in mental status, megaloblastic anemia and neurological damage [118].

1.2.3 Hypoglycemia

Metformin, itself, does not lead to a state of critically low blood sugar. In combination with other risk factors such as heavy alcohol drinking (or dehydration), the use of other drugs for diabetes, insufficient calorie intake, or bouts of heavy exercise, it may increase the chances of developing hypoglycemia [100]. Since metformin does not directly stimulate insulin secretion, hypoglycemia risk may be lower than for that of other oral anti-diabetes drugs. However, hypoglycemia in patients using metformin may occur in association with strenuous physical activity or fasting [119].

1.2.4 Anemia

Metformin can decrease the levels of vitamin B12 in our body. In rare cases, this can cause anemia or low levels of red blood cells. Metformin use is associated with early risk of anemia in individuals with type 2 diabetes. The mechanism for this early fall in hemoglobin is uncertain, but given the time course, is unlikely to be due to vitamin B12 deficiency alone [120].

Vitamin B12 (cobalamin) deficiency is a frequent cause of megaloblastic anemia that is evident through various symptoms [121]. However, the mechanism for these findings is unclear. Because development of anemia was not obviously associated with a rising mean cell volume (MCV) or macrocytosis, vitamin B12 deficiency is an unlikely explanation in most cases. We should evaluate anemia in metformin users as we would for any patient; if a thorough evaluation is unrevealing, we might cautiously attribute the anemia to metformin [120].

1.2.5 Cognitive impairments

A case–control study of over 7,000 patients with Alzheimer’s disease showed that, compared to insulin treatments, sulfonylureas, and thiazolidinediones, metformin was associated with an increased incidence of Alzheimer’s [122]. However, another study on approximately 1,500 people showed that the cognitive impairment associated with metformin may be alleviated with vitamin B12 and calcium supplements [123]. Controversies are seen as studies have reported that metformin was found to significantly reduce the occurrence of cognitive dysfunction in patients with T2D [124]. Several studies found that metformin improved cognitive abilities [125, 126]. The relationship between metformin and cognitive dysfunction in patients with T2D is controversial.

1.2.6 Gastrointestinal

Gastrointestinal upset is most common when metformin is first administered, or when the dose is increased. This can cause severe discomfort which can often be avoided by starting the drug at a low dose and increasing the dose gradually, but even with low doses, 5% of people may be unable to tolerate metformin. Long-term use of metformin has been associated with increased homocysteine levels and malabsorption of vitamin B12. Higher doses and prolonged use are associated with increased incidence of vitamin B12 deficiency.


2. Conclusion

Metformin, the drug initially approved and used for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes mellitus is proven to be effective in many other conditions such as gestational diabetes mellitus, obesity, hypersecretion of ovarian androgens, poly-cystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), anti-psychotic therapy induced weight gain, cancer treatment etc. There are ongoing research about the effect of metformin on anti-aging properties and proved that metformin is linked with anti-aging factors.


  1. 1. Bailey CJ. Metformin: historical overview. Diabetologia 2017; 60: 1566-1576. doi: 10.1007/s00125-017-4318-z
  2. 2. Lucis OJ. The status of metformin in Canada. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 1983; 128(1):24-26
  3. 3. DeFronzo RA, Goodman AM, Multicenter Metformin Study Group. Efficacy of metformin in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1995; 333:541-549
  4. 4. Witters LA. The blooming of the French lilac. J Clin Invest. 2001; 108:1105– 7. doi: 10.1172/JCI14178
  5. 5. Papanagnou P, Stivarou T, Tsironi M. Unexploited antineo plastic effects of commercially available anti-diabetic drugs. Pharmaceuticals. 2016: 9:24. doi: 10.3390/ph9020024
  6. 6. Blonde L, Dipp S, Cadena D. Combination glucose-lowering therapy plans in T2DM: case-based considerations. Adv Ther. 2018; 35:939-965. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0694-0
  7. 7. Metformin, oral tablet. 2018; Available at
  8. 8. Lamanna C, Monami M, Marchionni N, Mannucci E. Effect of metformin on cardiovascular events and mortality: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2011; 13:221-228. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2010.01349.x
  9. 9. Gandini S, Puntoni M, Heckman-Stoddard BM, Dunn BK, Ford L, Decensi A, et al. Metformin and cancer risk and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis taking into account biases and confounders. Cancer Prev Res. 2014; 7:867-885. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-13-0424
  10. 10. Morales DR, Morris AD. Metformin in cancer treatment and prevention. Annu Rev Med. 2015; 66:17-29. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-062613-093128
  11. 11. Patrone C, Eriksson O, Lindholm D. Diabetes drugs and neurological disorders: new views and therapeutic possibilities. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014; 2:256-262. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(13)70125-6
  12. 12. Bhat A, Sebastiani G, Bhat M. Systematic review: preventive and therapeutic applications of metformin in liver disease. World J Hepatol. 2015; 7:1652-1659. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i12.1652
  13. 13. Breining P, Jensen JB, Sundelin EI, Gormsen LC, Jakobsen S, Busk M, et al. Metformin targets brown adipose tissue in vivo and reduces oxygen consumption in vitro. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018; 20:2264-2273. doi: 10.1111/dom.13362
  14. 14. Bannister CA , Holden SE, Jenkins-Jones S, Morgan CL, Halcox JP, Schernthaner G, Mukherjee J, Currie CJ. Can people with type 2 diabetes live longer than those without? A comparison of mortality in people initiated with metformin or sulphonylurea monotherapy and matched, non-diabetic controls. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014; 16(11):1165-1173. doi: 10.1111/dom.12354
  15. 15. Neven E, Vervaet B, Brand K, Gottwald-Hostalek U, Opdebeeck B, De Mare A, et al. Metformin prevents the development of severe chronic kidney disease and its associated mineral and bone disorder. Kidney Int. 2018; 94:102-113. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2018.01.027
  16. 16. Non-Diabetic Uses of Metformin. Available at Accessed on May 23, 2017
  17. 17. Ng TP, Feng L, Yap KB, Lee TS, Tan CH, Winblad B. Long-term metformin usage and cognitive function among older adults with diabetes. J Alzheimers Dis. 2014; 41(1):61-68. doi: 10.3233/JAD-131901
  18. 18. Alam U, Asghar O, Azmi S , Malik RA. General aspects of diabetes mellitus. Handb Clin Neurol. 2014; 126:211-222. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53480-4.00015-1
  19. 19. Bailey CJ, Turner RC. Metformin. N Engl J Med. 1996; 334(9):574-579. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199602293340906
  20. 20. Shaw RJ, Lamia KA, Vasquez D, Koo SH, Bardeesy N, Depinho RA, et al. The kinase LKB1 mediates glucose homeostasis in liver and therapeutic effects of metformin. Science. 2005; 310:1642-1646. doi: 10.1126/science.1120781
  21. 21. Fullerton MD, Galic S, Marcinko K, Sikkema S, Pulinilkunnil T, Chen ZP, et al. Single phosphorylation sites in Acc1 and Acc2 regulate lipid homeostasis and the insulin-sensitizing effects of metformin. Nat Med. 2013; 19:1649-1654. doi: 10.1038/nm.3372
  22. 22. Foretz M, Hebrard S, Leclerc J, Zarrinpashneh E, Soty M, Mithieux G, et al. Metformin inhibits hepatic gluconeogenesis in mice independently of the LKB1/AMPK pathway via a decrease in hepatic energy state. J Clin Invest. 2010; 120:2355-2369. doi: 10.1172/JCI40671
  23. 23. Madiraju AK, Erion DM, Rahimi Y, Zhang XM, Braddock DT, Albright RA, Prigaro BJ, Wood JL, Bhanot S, MacDonald MJ, Jurczak MJ, Camporez JP, Lee HY, Cline GW, Samuel VT, Kibbey RG, Shulman GI. Metformin suppresses gluconeogenesis by inhibiting mitochondrial glycerophosphate dehydrogenase. Nature. 2014; 510(7506):542-546. doi: 10.1038/nature13270
  24. 24. Gaochao Zhou, Robert Myers, Ying Li, Yuli Chen, Xiaolan Shen, Judy Fenyk-Melody, Margaret Wu, John Ventre, Thomas Doebber, Nobuharu Fujii, Nicolas Musi, Michael F. Hirshman, Laurie J. Goodyear, and David E. Moller. Role of AMP-activated protein kinase in mechanism of metformin action. J Clin Invest. 2001; 108(8):1167-1174.
  25. 25. Dumitrescu R, Mehedintu C, Briceag I, Purcarea VL, and Hudita D. Metformin-Clinical Pharmacology in PCOs. J Med Life. 2015; 8(2):187-192
  26. 26. He L, Sabet A, Djedjos S, Miller R, Sun X, Hussain MA, et al. Metformin and insulin suppress hepatic gluconeogenesis through phosphorylation of CREB binding protein. Cell. 2009; 137:635-646. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.03.016
  27. 27. Herzig S, Long F, Jhala US, Hedrick S, Quinn R, Bauer A, et al. CREB regulates hepatic gluconeogenesis through the coactivator PGC-1. Nature. 2001; 413:179-183. doi: 10.1038/35093131
  28. 28. Gunton JE, Delhanty PJ, Takahashi S, Baxter RC. Metformin rapidly increases insulin receptor activation in human liver and signals preferentially through insulin-receptor substrate-2. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003; 88:1323-1332. doi: 10.1210/jc.2002-021394
  29. 29. Kristensen JM, Treebak JT, Schjerling P, Goodyear L, Wojtaszewski JF. Two weeks of metformin treatment induces AMPK-dependent enhancement of insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in mouse soleus muscle. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2014; 306:E1099–E1109. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.004 17.2013
  30. 30. Gu S, Shi J, Tang Z, Sawhney M, Hu H, Shi L, et al. Comparison of glucose lowering effect of metformin and acarbose in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a metaanalysis. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10:e0126704. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126704
  31. 31. Emilie Bahne, Emily W. L. Sun, Richard L. Young, Morten Hansen, David P. Sonne, Jakob S. Hansen, Ulrich Rohde, Alice P. Liou, Margaret L. Jackson, Dayan de Fontgalland, Philippa Rabbitt, Paul Hollington, Luigi Sposato, Steven Due, David A. Wattchow, Jens F. Rehfeld, Jens J. Holst, Damien J. Keating, Tina Vilsbøll, and Filip K. Knop. Metformin-induced glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion contributes to the actions of metformin in type 2 diabetes. JCI Insight. 2018; 3(23): e93936
  32. 32. He L, Wondisford FE. Metformin action: concentration matters. Cell Metab. 2015; 21(2):159-162. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.01.003
  33. 33. Nolte Kennedy MS, Masharani U: Pancreatic Hormones & Antidiabetic Drugs (Chapter 41). In: Basic & Clinical Pharmacology. 15th Ed. Katzung BG, Trevor AJ (Editors). McGraw-Hill / Lange.2015
  34. 34. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Reduction In The Incidence Of Type 2 Diabetes With Lifestyle Intervention Or Metformin. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346(6):393-403. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012512
  35. 35. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and other categories of glucose intolerance. National Diabetes Data Group. Diabetes. 1979; (12):1039-1057
  36. 36. World Health Organization. Diagnostic criteria and classification of hyperglycaemia first detected in pregnancy. Geneva (CH): World Health Organization; 2013. Available from:
  37. 37. Dall, T. M., Yang, W., Halder, P., Pang, B., Massoudi, M., Wintfeld, N., et al. The economic burden of elevated blood glucose levels in 2012: diagnosed and undiagnosed diabetes, gestational diabetes mellitus, and prediabetes. Diabetes Care. 2014; 37(12):3172-3179. doi: 10.2337/dc14-1036
  38. 38. Farrar, D., Simmonds, M., Bryant, M., Sheldon, T. A., Tuffnell, D., Golder, S., et al. Treatments for gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2017; 7(6):e015557. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015557
  39. 39. Catalano PM, Tyzbir ED, Roman NM, Amini SB, Sims EA. Longitudinal changes in insulin release and insulin resistance in nonobese pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 165:1667-1672
  40. 40. Rena G, Hardie DG, Pearson ER. The mechanisms of action of metformin.Diabetologia. 2017; 60(9):1577-1585
  41. 41. Eyal S, Easterling TR, Carr D, Umans JG, Miodovnik M, Hankins GD, Clark SM, Risler L, Wang J, Kelly EJ, Shen DD, Hebert MF. Pharmacokinetics of metformin during pregnancy. Drug Metab Dispos. 2010; 38(5):833-840
  42. 42. Nawaz FH, Khalid R, Naru T, Rizvi J. Does continuous use of metformin throughout pregnancy improve pregnancy outcomes in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome? J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2008; 34(5):832-837
  43. 43. Bolton S, Cleary B, Walsh J, Dempsey E, Turner MJ. Continuation of metformin in the first trimester of women with polycystic ovarian syndrome is not associated with increased perinatal morbidity. Eur J Pediatr. 2009; 168(2):203-206
  44. 44. Rowan JA, Hague WM, Gao W, Battin MR, Moore MP, MiG Trial Investigators. Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358(19):2003-2015
  45. 45. Gui, J, Liu Q, Feng L. Metformin vs insulin in the management of gestational diabetes: a meta-analysis. PloS One. 2013; 8(5), e64585. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064585
  46. 46. Romero R., Erez O, Huttemann M, Maymon E, Panaitescu B, Conde-Agudelo A, et al. Metformin, the aspirin of the 21st century: its role in gestational diabetes mellitus, prevention of preeclampsia and cancer, and the promotion of longevity. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017; 217 (3): 282-302. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.06.003
  47. 47. Dunaif A, Segal KR., Futterweit W, Dobrjansky A. Profound peripheral insulin resistance, independent of obesity, in polycystic ovary syndrome. Diabetes. 1989; 38 (9), 1165-1174. doi: 10.2337/diab.38.9.1165
  48. 48. Franks S. Polycystic ovary syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 1995; 333(13): 853-861. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199509283331307
  49. 49. Holte, J. Disturbances in insulin secretion and sensitivity in women with the polycystic ovary syndrome. Baillieres Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1996; 10(2): 221-247. doi: 10.1016/S0950-351X(96)80085-1
  50. 50. Lathief S and Pal L. Advances in Treatment options for Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome. Female Endocrinology. US Endocrinology. 2012; 8(1):57-64
  51. 51. Hsin-Shih W. The Role of Metformin in the Treatment of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS). Forum. Chang Gung Med J. 2006; 29(5):445-447
  52. 52. Spritzer PM. PCOS: Reviewing Diagnosis and Management of Metabolic Disturbances. Arq Bras Endocrinal Metab. 2014; 58 (2): 182-187
  53. 53. Despres JP, Lemieux I. Abdominal obesity and metabolic syndrome. Nature. 2006; 444:881-887. doi: 10.1038/nature05488
  54. 54. Aa MP, Hoving V, Garde EMW, Boer A, Knibbe CAT, Vorst MMJ. The Effect of Eighteen- Month Metformin Treatment in Obese Adolscents: Comparison of Results Obtained in Daily Practice with Results from a Clinical Trial. Journal of Obesity. 2016; 2016: 1-7
  55. 55. Karise I, Bargut TC, Del Sol M, Aguila MB, Mandarim-De-Lacerda CA. Metformin enhances mitochondrial biogenesis and thermogenesis in brown adipocytes of mice. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019; 111:1156-1165. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.01.021
  56. 56. Kirpichnikov D, McFarlane SI, Sowers JR. Metformin: an update. Ann Intern Med. 2002; 137:25-33
  57. 57. Caprio S. Treatment of impaired glucose tolerance in childhood. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab 2008; 4:320-332
  58. 58. McDonagh MS, Selph S, Ozpinar A, Foley C. Systematic review of the benefits and risks of metformin in treating obesity in children aged 18 years and younger. JAMA Pediatr. 2014; 168(2):178-184
  59. 59. Graff SK, Mario FM, Ziegelmann P, Spritzer PM. Effects of orlistat vs. metformin on weight loss-related clinical variables in women with PCOS: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Clin Pract. 2016; 70(6):450-461
  60. 60. Hostalek U, Gwilt M, Hildemann S. Therapeutic Use of Metformin in Prediabetes and Diabetes Prevention. Drugs. 2015; 75(10):1071-1094
  61. 61. Fenton WS and Chavez MR. Medication Induced Weight Gain and Dyslipidemia in Patients with Schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2016; 163(10): 1697-1704
  62. 62. Generali JA and Cada DJ. Off- Label Drug Uses, Metformin: Prevention and Treatment of Antipsychotic-Induced Weight Gain. Hosp Pharm. 2013; 48(9): 734-735
  63. 63. Fenton WS and Chavez MR. Medication Induced Weight Gain and Dyslipidemia in Patients with Schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2016; 163(10): 1697-1704
  64. 64. Podhorecka M, Ibanez B, Dmoszynska A. Metformin – its potential anticancer and anti-aging effects. Postepy Hig, Medycyny Doswiadczalnej. 2017; 71: 170-175. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0010.3801
  65. 65. Gwinn DM, Shackelford DB, Egan DF, MihaylovaMM, Mery A, Vasquez DS, et al. AMPK phosphorylation of raptor mediates a metabolic checkpoint.Mol Cell. 2008; 30:214-226. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.03.003
  66. 66. Sui X, Xu Y, Wang X, Han W, Pan H, Xiao M. Metformin: a novel but controversial drug in cancer prevention and treatment. Mol Pharm. (2015) 12:3783-3791. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5b00577
  67. 67. Pryor R, Cabreiro F. Repurposing metformin: an old drug with new tricks in its binding pockets. Biochem J. 2015; 471:307-322. doi: 10.1042/BJ20150497
  68. 68. MoiseevaO, Deschenes-Simard X, St-Germain E, Igelmann S, HuotG, Cadar AE, et al. Metformin inhibits the senescence-associated secretory phenotype by interfering with IKK/NF-kappaB activation. Aging Cell. (2013) 12:489-98, doi: 10.1111/acel.12075
  69. 69. Cerezo M, Tichet M, Abbe P, Ohanna M, Lehraiki A, Rouaud F, et al. Metformin blocks melanoma invasion and metastasis development in AMPK/p53-dependent manner. Mol Cancer Ther. 2013; 12:1605-1615. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-12-1226-T
  70. 70. Ugwueze CV, Ogamba OJ, Young EE, Onyenekwe BM and Ezeokpo BC. Metformin: A Possible Option in Cancer Chemotherapy. Analytical Cellular Pathology. 2020;
  71. 71. Rego DF, Pavan LM, Elias ST, De Luca Canto G, Guerra EN. Effects of metformin on head and neck cancer: a systematic review. Oral Oncol. 2015; 51(5):416-422
  72. 72. Kasznicki J, Sliwinska A, Drzewoski J. Metformin in cancer prevention and therapy. Ann Transl Med. 2014; 2:57. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2014.06.01
  73. 73. Dowling R, Niraula S, Stambolic V, Goodwin P. Metformin in cancer: translational challenges. Journal of molecular endocrinology 2012; DOI:10.1530/JME-12-007
  74. 74. Dowling RJ, Goodwin PJ, Stambolic V. Understanding the benefit of metformin use in cancer treatment. BMC Med 9: 33. Available at
  75. 75. Polak R, Buitenhuis M. The PI3K/PKB signaling module as key regulator of hematopoiesis: implications for therapeutic strategies in leukemia. Blood. 2012; 119:911-923. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-07-366203
  76. 76. Shi WY, Xiao D, Wang L, Dong LH, Yan ZX, Shen ZX, et al. Therapeutic metformin/AMPK activation blocked lymphoma cell growth via inhibition of mTOR pathway and induction of autophagy. Cell Death Dis. 2012; 3:e275.doi: 10.1038/cddis.2012.13
  77. 77. Yang YX, Hennessy S, Lewis JD. Insulin therapy and colorectal cancer risk among type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Gastroenterology. 2004; 127:1044-1050. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.07.011
  78. 78. Mccreight LJ, Bailey CJ, Pearson ER. Metformin and the gastrointestinal tract. Diabetologia. 2016; 59:426-435. doi: 10.1007/s00125-015-3844-9
  79. 79. Linnard-Palmer L. The use of simulation for pediatric oncology nursing safety principles: ensuring competent practice through the use of a mnemonic, chemotherapy road maps and case-based learning. J Pediatr Nurs. 2012; 27:283-286. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2012.02.001
  80. 80. Mundy GR. Metastasis to bone: causes, consequences and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002; 2:584-593. doi: 10.1038/nrc867
  81. 81. Ko EM, Walter P, Jackson A, Clark L, Franasiak J, Bolac C, et al. Metformin is associated with improved survival in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2014; 132:438-442. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.11.021
  82. 82. Demierre MF. Epidemiology and prevention of cutaneous melanoma. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2006; 7:181-186. doi: 10.1007/s11864-006-0011-z
  83. 83. Li K, Zhang TT, Wang F, Cui B, Zhao CX, Yu JJ, et al. Metformin suppresses melanoma progression by inhibiting KAT5-mediated SMAD3 acetylation, transcriptional activity and TRIB3 expression. Oncogene. 2018; 37:2967-2981. doi: 10.1038/s41388-018-0172-9
  84. 84. Losordo DW, Henry TD. New definition of aging? Measuring regenerative capacity in patients. Circ Res. 2016; 119:774-775. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.309622
  85. 85. Hoeijmakers JH. DNA damage, aging, and cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361:1475-1485. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0804615
  86. 86.
  87. 87. Soukas AA, Hao H, Wu L. Metformin as Anti-Aging Therapy: Is It for Everyone? Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2019; 30(10):745-755. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2019.07.015
  88. 88. Algire C, Moiseeva O, Deschenes-Simard X, Amrein L, Petruccelli L, Birman E, et al. Metformin reduces endogenous reactive oxygen species and associated DNA damage. Cancer Prev Res. 2012; 5:536-543.doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-11-0536
  89. 89. Valencia WM, Palacio A, Tamariz L, Florez H. Metformin and ageing: improving ageing outcomes beyond glycaemic control. Diabetologia. 2017; 60:1630-1638. doi: 10.1007/s00125-017-4349-5
  90. 90. Song YM, Lee YH, Kim JW, Ham DS, Kang ES, Cha BS, et al. Metformin alleviates hepatosteatosis by restoring SIRT1-mediated autophagy induction via an AMP-activated protein kinase-independent pathway. Autophagy. 2015; 11:46-59. doi: 10.4161/15548627.2014.984271
  91. 91. Barzilai N, Crandall JP, Kritchevsky SB, EspelandMA. Metformin as a tool to target aging. Cell Metab. 2016; 23:1060-1065. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.05.011
  92. 92. Arora BP. Anti-aging Medicine. Indian J. Plastic Surgery Supplement. 2008; 41: S130-S133
  93. 93. Foretz M, Guigas B, Bertrand L, Pollak M, Viollet B. Metformin: From Mechanism of Action to Therapies. Cell Metabolism 20. 2014; 20(6):953-966
  94. 94. Hawley SA, Gadalla AE, Olsen GS, Hardie DG. The Antidiabetic Drug Metformin Activates the AMP-Activated Protein Kinase Cascade via an Adenine Nucleotide- Independent Mechanism. Diabetes. 2002; 51: 2420-2425
  95. 95. Menendez JA, Cufi S, Oliveras-Ferraros C, Vellon L, Joven J, Vazquez-Martin A. Gerosuppressant Metformin: less is more. Aging. 2011; 3(4): 348- 362
  96. 96. Singh S, Singh PP, Singh AG, Murad MH, Sanchez W. Anti-diabetic medications and the risk of hepatocellular cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013; 108:881-891. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.5
  97. 97. Lavine JE, Schwimmer JB, Van Natta ML, Molleston JP, Murray KF, Rosenthal P, et al. Effect of vitamin E or metformin for treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in children and adolescents: the TONIC randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2011; 305:1659-1668. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.520
  98. 98. Tiikkainen M, Hakkinen AM, Korsheninnikova E, Nyman T, Makimattila S, Yki-Jarvinen H. Effects of rosiglitazone and metformin on liver fat content, hepatic insulin resistance, insulin clearance, and gene expression in adipose tissue in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2004; 53:2169-2176. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.53.8.2169
  99. 99. Kheniser KG, Kashyap SR, Kasumov T. A systematic review: the appraisal of the effects of metformin on lipoprotein modification and function. Obes Sci Pract. 2019; 5:36-45. doi: 10.1002/osp4.309
  100. 100. Dziubak A, Wojcicka G, Wojtak A, Beltowski J. Metabolic effects of metformin in the failing heart. Int J Mol Sci. 2018; 19:2869. doi: 10.3390/ijms19102869
  101. 101. Misbin RI, Green L, Stadel BV, Gueriguian JL, Gubbi A, Fleming GA. Lactic acidosis in patients with diabetes treated with metformin. N Engl J Med. 1998; 338:265-266. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199801223380415
  102. 102. Lee M, Katerelos M, Gleich K, Galic S, Kemp BE, Mount PF, et al. Phosphorylation of Acetyl-CoA Carboxylase by AMPK Reduces Renal Fibrosis and Is Essential for the Anti-Fibrotic Effect of Metformin. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018; 29:2326-36. doi: 0.1681/ASN.2018010050
  103. 103. Lv Z and Guo Y (2020) Metformin and Its Benefits for Various Diseases. Front. Endocrinol. 2020; 11:191. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00191
  104. 104. Hamid Nasri and Mahmoud Rafieian-Kopaei. Metformin: Current knowledge. J Res Med Sci. 2014; 19(7):658-664
  105. 105. Suh S. Metformin- Associated Lactic Acidosis. Endocrinology Metabolism. 2015; 30:45-46
  106. 106. Jeffrey KA and Nicolaos EM. Lactic acidosis. The New England journal of medicine, 371(24): 2309-2319. Doi.10.1056/nejmra1309483
  107. 107. Lalau JD, Kajbaf F, Protti A, Christensen MM, De Broe ME, Wiernsperger N. Metformin-associated lactic acidosis (MALA): Moving towards a new paradigm. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017; 19(11):1502-1512. doi: 10.1111/dom.12974
  108. 108. Misbin RI. The Phantom of Lactic Acidosis due to Metformin in Patients with Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004; 27(7):1791-1793
  109. 109. Renda F, Mura P, Finco G, Ferrazin F, Pani L, Landoni G. Metformin- Associated Lactic Acidosis Requiring Hospitalization. A National 10 year Survey and a Systematic Literature Review. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences. 2013; 17(Supplement 1):45-49
  110. 110. Yazdi P. 9 Proven Metformin Uses + Side Effects. 2020; Available at Accessed on 20 June 2021
  111. 111. Scheen AJ, Paquot N. Metformin revisited: a critical review of the benefit-risk balance in at-risk patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 2013; 39(3):179-190. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2013.02.006
  112. 112. Kumthekar AA, Gidwani HV, Kumthekar AB. Metformin Associated B12 deficiency. JAPI. 2012; 60: 58-59
  113. 113. Kang D, Yun JS, Ko SH, Lim TS, Ahn YB, Park YM, Ko HS. Higher Prevalence of Metformin-Induced Vitamin B12 Deficiency in Sulfonylurea Compared with Insulin Combination in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross- Sectional Study. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9(10):1-9
  114. 114. Liu Q, Li S, Quan H, Li J. Vitamin B12 status in metformin treated patients: systematic review. PLoS One. 2014; 9(6):e100379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100379
  115. 115. Jager J, Kooy A, Lehert P, Wulffele MG, Kolk J, Bets D, Verburg J, Donker AJM, Stehouwer CDA. Long Term Treatment with Metformin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Risk of Vitamin B12 Deficiency: Randomised Placebo Controlled Trial. BMJ. 2010; 340:1-7
  116. 116. Jeetendra S and Tushar B. Metformin Use and Vitamin B12 Deficiency in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. MVP Journal of Medical Sciences. 2016; 3(1):67-70
  117. 117. Kibirige D and Mwebaze R. Vitamin B12 Deficiency among Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: Is Routine Supplementation Justified? Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders. 2013; 12(17):1-6
  118. 118. Fatima S and Noor S. A Review on Effects of Metformin on Vitamin B12 Status. American Journal of Phytomedicine and Clinical Therapeutics. 2013; 1(8):652-660
  119. 119. Bodmer M, Meier C, Krahenbuhl S, Jick SS, Meier CR. Metformin, Sulfonylureas, or Other Antidiabetes Drugs and the Risk of Lactic Acidosis or Hypoglycemia. A nested case-control analysis. Diabetes Care. 2008; 31(11):2086-2091.
  120. 120. Donnelly LA, Dennis JM, Coleman RL, Sattar N, Hattersley AT, Holman RR, Pearson ER. Risk of Anemia with Metformin Use in Type 2 Diabetes: A MASTERMIND Study. Diabetes Care. 2020; dc201104.
  121. 121. Fujita H, Narita T, Yoshioka N, et al. A case of megaloblastic anemia due to vitamin B12 deficiency precipitated in a totally gastrectomized type II diabetic patient following the introduction of metformin therapy. Endocr J. 2003; 50(4):483-484. doi:10.1507/endocrj.50.483
  122. 122. Patrick Imfeld, Michael Bodmer, Susan S Jick, Christoph R Meier. Metformin, other antidiabetic drugs, and risk of Alzheimer's disease: a population-based case-control study J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012; 60(5):916-921. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.03916.x
  123. 123. Moore EM , Mander AG, Ames D, Kotowicz MA, Carne RP, Brodaty H, Woodward M, Boundy K, Ellis KA, Bush AI, Faux NG, Martins R, Szoeke C, Rowe C, Watters DA, AIBL Investigators. Increased risk of cognitive impairment in patients with diabetes is associated with metformin. Diabetes Care. 2013; 36(10):2981-2987. doi: 10.2337/dc13-0229
  124. 124. Qing ZQ, Shan LW, Zhou L; Zhang, Li HZ, Gui BY, Xia ZR. Metformin therapy and cognitive dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes. A meta-analysis and systematic review. Medicine: 2020; 99(10):p e19378. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019378
  125. 125. Yokoyama H, Ogawa M, Honjo J, et al. Risk factors associated with abnormal cognition in Japanese outpatients with diabetes, hypertension or dyslipidemia. Diabetol Int 2015; 6:268-274
  126. 126. Zhou Y, Fang R, Liu LH, et al. Clinical characteristics for the relationship between type-2 diabetes mellitus and cognitive impairment: a cross-sectional study. Aging Dis 2015; 6:236-244

Written By

Shalini Sivadasan, Muthukumar Subramanian and Rajasekaran Aiyalu

Submitted: 12 July 2021 Reviewed: 05 August 2021 Published: 30 August 2021