Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Radium-223 and Actinium-225 α-Emitter Radiopharmaceuticals in Treatment of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Written By

Akbar Abbasi, Hesham M.H. Zakaly and Fatemeh Mirekhtiary

Submitted: 15 July 2021 Reviewed: 01 August 2021 Published: 15 June 2022

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.99756

From the Edited Volume

Radiopharmaceuticals - Current Research for Better Diagnosis and Therapy

Edited by Farid A. Badria

Chapter metrics overview

195 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

In recent decades, multiple radiopharmaceutical conjugates have been tested and shown to be efficacious in treating metastasized castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Several types of research have been published on the therapeutic use of α-emitter radiopharmaceuticals, and several authors suggested their treatment superiority. One of the suggested methods is targeted alpha therapy. In this method, alpha radiation delivers energy to cancer cells and the tumor microenvironment while minimizing toxicity to surrounding tissues. In this chapter, the alpha emitter radiopharmaceutical applications in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients were investigated. Hence, we studied the 223Ra and 225Ac α-emitter radiopharmaceuticals application method and distribution of dose throughout human body organs.

Keywords

  • radiopharmaceutical
  • treatment
  • alpha emitter
  • 223Ra
  • 225Ac
  • metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

1. Introduction

The prostate gland weighs around 20 g and is located at the base of the bladder, near the prostatic urethra. It is split into four zones: peripheral, central, transitional, and peri-urethral. The most frequent location of prostate cancer in the peripheral zone, and adenocarcinoma accounts for the majority of cases, generally arising from acinar cells in the prostate gland and accompanied by a rise in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA). PSA is unaffected by some tumor forms, including neuroendocrine tumors, small-cell carcinoma, and transitional cell carcinoma [1].

According to a study conducted in the United States, 241,740 men were diagnosed with prostate cancer in 2012, resulting in 28,170 fatalities. In the United States, about 160,000 men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer in 2017. Prostate cancer is the third largest cause of cancer mortality in males, despite its generally indolent course. Since 2011, there has been significant progress in finding treatment alternatives and defining illness risk [2].

Prostate cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide among males and the fourth in terms of incidence worldwide [3]. Patients with PCa may be treated with radical prostatectomy or radiation as initial therapies, although disease recurrence is possible. A prostatic-specific antigen (PSA) in the clinical setting of PCa screening has resulted in earlier detection. The first symptom of disease recurrence is an increase in PSA levels, referred to as biochemical recurrence (BR). Early recurrence can be treated with potentially curative salvage treatments such as additional lymphadenectomy or targeted radiation, although both need the disease to be localized [4].

Several radiopharmaceutical conjugates have been tried and proved to be effective in treating bone metastases [5, 6, 7] and metastasized castration-resistant prostate cancer in recent decades (mCRPC). In addition, various research on the therapeutic use of α-emitter radiopharmaceuticals have been published, and several writers have indicated that they are preferable in terms of therapy [8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16]. Targeted alpha treatment targets cancer cells and the tumor microenvironment while limiting damage to adjacent organs. Radiopharmaceuticals are specific radioisotope formulations used for diagnosis and treatment in important clinical domains. 223Ra and 225Ac radionuclides are the major radiopharmaceuticals utilized in treating prostate cancer [17].

The linear energy transfer (LET) causes damage to the cell DNA owing to the movement of the α-particle into the tissue, but the shortened range of the α-particle restricts tumor damage to the adjacent healthy cells, decreasing the damage. However, α particles may cause serious harm at both cellular and genetic levels, if breathed or eaten. External body exposure to an α-particle is insignificant. The possible harmful kind of radiation is α-particles [2].

Routines throughout the world include systemic chemotherapy, hormone therapies, and targeted bone drugs such as radium-223 dichloride (223Ra) and actinium-225 (225Ac) for skeleton metastases [18].

Advertisement

2. Radium-223

223Ra (T1/2 = 11.43 day) is α-emitter radiopharmaceutical with an average energy of 5.78 MeV (accounting for 93.5 percent of emitted energy), 4% as particles, and 2% as radiation utilized in prostate cancer bone metastases. The dichloride-223Ra is a targeted emitter that binds to accelerated bone turnover in bone metastases and releases high-energy alpha particles with a short-range (100 m) [19, 20]. 223Ra treatment with a targeted-emitter provides radiation energy to cancer cells and tumor tissue while limiting damage to healthy tissues. Table 1 shows 223Ra radiopharmaceutical characteristics. Also, the decay chain of 223Ra radiopharmaceuticals is presented in Figure 1.

RadionuclideHalf-life (day)Emission particles (parent and daughters)Emean (MeV) (%)Tissue penetration average (mm)
Ac-22510.0α5.8 (54%), 6.4 (82%), 7.1 (>99%), 5.7 (2%), 8.8 (100%)0.051
β1.8 (98%), 1.4 (98%), 0.64 (100%)11.21
Ra-22311.4α5.7 (100%), 6.9 (100%), 7.5 (99%), 6.6 (99%), 7.4 (100%)0.062
β0.47 (0.3%), 0.47 (100%), 0.35 (100%)8.56

Table 1.

The properties of 223Ra and 225Ac radiopharmaceuticals in the treatment of bone metastases prostate cancer.

Figure 1.

The decay chain of 223Ra radiopharmaceuticals.

Radium-223 dichloride is a targeted alpha emitter that preferentially binds to regions where the bone turnover is enhanced in bones and produces short-range (<100 μm) high-energy alpha particulates. As osteoblastic calcium mimesis, 223Ra is linked into newly developed osteoblast or sclerotic metastasis, especially in the microenvironment. The high-energy radiation of alpha-particles leads largely to dual-stranded DNA breaks with a powerful and highly localized cytotoxic impact on the target areas. The alpha particles’ short distance also minimizes the harmful effects on nearby healthy tissue, especially bone marrow [21].

In phase I and phase II trials involving bone metastasis patients, radium-223 has been shown to have a good safety profile with little myelotoxicity [22]. Studies of Phase two showed the reduction of pain and improvement of biomarkers associated with diseases (e.g., bone-alkaline phosphatase and prostate-specific antigen [PSA]) and suggest a survival advantage among patients who have castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases [23]. In order to investigate radium-223’s survival impact, we conducted a Phase 3 randomized, two-blind multi-national research that compared 223Ra effectiveness and safety to placebo in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases in Symptomatic Prostate Cancer Painters (ALSYMPCA).

Advertisement

3. Actinium-225

225Ac (T1/2 = 10 days), like 223Ra, is α-emitter radiopharmaceutical that decays to stable 209Bi through six radionuclides [24]. The 225Ac radioelement is a targeted alpha treatment that improves survival in individuals with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. 225Ac emits a particle with Eα = 6 MeV energy when it decays, yielding net four particles and three-particle disintegrations, the majority of which are high energy and useful gamma emissions, including 213Bi (T1/2 = 45.6 m; Eα = 6 MeV Emax(β) = 444 keV and Eγ=440 keV), where this line has been used in imaging drug distribution [18]. Other daughters include 221Fr (T1/2 = 4.8 min; Eα = 5 Mev and 218 keV γ energy line emission), 217At (T1/2 = 32.3 ms; Eα = 7 MeV), 213Po (T1/2 = 4.2 μs; Eα = 8 MeV), 209Tl (T1/2 = 2.2 m; Emax(β) = 659 keV) (stable). Given 225Ac with a 10 d half-life, the high emission of alpha particles, and the favorable, fast 209Bi stable decay chain, this radionuclide is recognized to have a promising potential for cancer usage [2]. Figure 2 illustrates the decay pattern for 225Ac. Also, Table 1 shows 225Ac characteristics of radiopharmaceuticals. 225Ac is a potential candidate among the α particle-producing ions with characteristics suited for usage in targeted α therapy (TAT) (Figure 3).

Figure 2.

The 225Ac radiopharmaceuticals position in radioactive 233U decay series.

Figure 3.

Schematic diagram depicting the concept of targeted radionuclide therapy employing alpha (α) particles in a tumor-targeting construct. The high linear energy transfer (LET) and short-range of particles make them highly desirable for use in cancer therapy.

The radiological half-life of 225Ac is 9.92 days, allowing it to be sent to clinics distant from the location of manufacture. Furthermore, this lengthy half-life is compatible with the use of macromolecular targeting vectors, such as antibodies or nanoparticles, which have long in-vivo circulation durations. As it decays to stable 209Bi, 225Ac produces eight short-lived progenies, producing a total of four high-energy a particle that kill cancer cells (Figure 2). Notably, in both in vitro and in vivo settings, 225Ac is far more potent than its daughter nuclide, 213Bi.

Advertisement

4. Dose calculations

The estimations of the doses were carried out with the application “Internal Computer Dose Assessment” (IDAC-Dose2.1). The dose coefficients of patients having radiopharmaceutical exams in nuclear medicine were calculated using this program by ICRP. In addition, dose estimates using the same ICRP computer architecture for the internal dose evaluation are the basis of the IDAC-Dose2.1 program.

For a time-independent system, the mean absorbed dose (D) to a target region (rT) is calculated using the equation below [25]:

rTTD=rSArSTD.SrTrSE1

where ArSTD is the cumulated activity (Bq) in source region rS over the integration period TD, and SrTrS is the mean absorbed dose (Gy/Bq) in the target tissue per nuclear transformation in the source region and defined by this Equation [26]:

SrTrS=ii.φrTrSEiE2

where φrTrSEi is the specific absorbed fractions (SAFs) value, and; i=EiYi (where Ei is the yield and Yi is the mean energy or part of the energy distribution for β-decay) of the iththe nuclear transition of the radionuclide in joules [27].

The absorbed dose of radiopharmaceuticals 223Ra and 225Ac was estimated with IDAC-Dose2.1 and given in Table 2. The findings were computed after one hour of intravenous doses. In the prostate organ, the absorbed doses of 223Ra and 225Ac radiopharmaceuticals were determined to be 9.47 × 10−9 Gy/Bq and 1.91E-9Gy/Bq, respectively. This number represents 1% of the total body dosage. The greatest and least absorbed doses of 223Ra were observed in the Thymus (9.53 × 10−8 Gy/Bq) and Eye lenses (1.30 × 10−10 Gy/Bq) organs, respectively, according to biokinetics distribution. In addition, the 225Ac distribution in bodily organs reveals that the Spleen (1.47 × 10−8 Gy/Bq) has the greatest concentration absorbed dosage and the Eye lenses have the lowest.

OrganDose coefficientsAbsorbed dose (Gy/Bq)
Gy/Bq*Sv/Bq**223Ra (×10−9)225Ac (×10−9)
223Ra (×10−8)225Ac (×10−9)223Ra (×10−9)225Ac (×10−9)
Adrenals2.064.148.241.6541.28.27
Brain0.4710.9451.880.3789.411.89
Breast0.4770.9551.910.3829.541.91
Colon wall2.655.3510.62.1452.910.7
Endosteum (bone surface)0.6601.312.640.52413.22.62
Extra thoracic region0.4740.9551.890.3829.471.91
Eye lenses0.00650.0030.0020.0010.1300.007
Gallbladder wall0.4789.551.910.3829.551.91
Heart wall1.573.116.281.2431.46.21
Kidneys2.810.05611.22.2656.211.3
Liver2.525.0510.12.0250.410.1
Lung3.406.8513.62.7467.913.7
Lymphatic nodes0.6351.272.540.50612.72.53
Muscle0.2820.0561.130.2265.641.13
Esophagus2.424.869.681.9448.49.72
Oral mucosa0.4780.0951.910.3829.561.91
Pancreas2.064.148.241.6541.28.27
Prostate0.4750.0951.890.3829.471.91
Red (active) bone marrow1.723.446.881.3734.46.87
Salivary glands0.4740.9551.890.3829.471.91
Skin0.5151.042.060.41410.32.07
Small intestine wall2.615.2510.42.1052.210.5
Spleen3.647.3514.62.9472.814.7
Stomach wall2.424.869.681.9448.49.72
Testes0.631.292.540.51412.72.57
Thymus4.770.95519.10.38295.31.91
Thyroid1.533.076.101.2330.56.14
Urinary bladder wall0.2370.4690.9460.1874.730.937
Total body849153

Table 2.

Intravenous 223Ra and 225Ac radiopharmaceutical doses and the doses absorbed (Gy/Bq) determined by computer-assessing computer-dose 2.1 in human body organs.

Radiation weighting factor for α-radiation is 5, unit Gy/Bq as proposed by the ICRP [26].


Radiation weighting factor of 20 for α-radiation with unit Sv/Bq.


ICRP = International Commission on Radiological Protection.

Figures 4 and 5 indicates doses taken in some human body organs by 223Ra and 225Ac radiopharmaceuticals, respectively. The histogram shows that 50 percent of the absorbed dosage is accumulated in six organs in both radiopharmaceuticals. These six organs are thymus, Spleen, lunge, kidney, colon wall, small intestine wall, Spleen, lung, kidney, colon wall, small intestine wall, and liver.

Figure 4.

The absorbed dose distribution of 223Ra radiopharmaceutical in somebody organs.

Figure 5.

The absorbed dose distribution of 225Ac radiopharmaceutical in some body organs.

Advertisement

5. Conclusions

The alpha-emitting radionuclides of 223Ra and 225Ra are a targeted alpha emitter radiopharmaceutical used to treat prostate cancer. The properties and absorbed dose value of those radiopharmaceuticals in body organs are reviewed in this chapter. Total body absorbed dose value (Gy/Bq) per intravenous injections of 223Ra was higher than 225Ac radiopharmaceuticals. This difference is related to the energy of alpha particles and the half-life of the radiopharmaceuticals. The results of this study will assist in evaluating and analyzing human body organ doses from the application of 223Ra and 225Ac that are used in mCRPC patients. The main obstacles using of 223Ra and 225Ac radiopharmaceuticals are that the daughter nuclides will always dissociate from the targeting construct upon their formation. Therefore, they can make unwanted doses in other organs.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1. Pawson A, Ghumman Z, Kuo PH, Jadvar H, Bartel T, Shayegan B, et al. A review of prostate cancer imaging, positron emission tomography, and radiopharmaceutical-based therapy. Can Urol Assoc J. 2020;14(4):130.
  2. 2. Abbasi A, Dadashpour M, Alipourfard I. Calculation of radium-223 and actinium-225 α-emitter radiopharmaceuticals dose rates in treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. 2020.
  3. 3. Abbasi A, Sadikoglu F, Hassanzadeh M. Effect of Au-197 nanoparticles along with Sm-153 radiopharmaceutical in prostate cancer from simulation method. J Cancer Res Ther. 2019;15(8).
  4. 4. Heidenreich A, Moul JW, Shariat S, Karnes RJ. Role of salvage lymph node dissection in prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol. 2016;26(6):581–589.
  5. 5. Zakaly HMH, Mostafa MYA, Deryabina D, Zhukovsky M. Comparative studies on the potential use of 177Lu-based radiopharmaceuticals for the palliative therapy of bone metastases. Int J Radiat Biol. 2020;96(6):779–789.
  6. 6. Zakaly HMH, Mostafa MYA, Zhukovsky M. Biokinetic modelling of 89Zr-labelled monoclonal antibodies for dosimetry assessment in humans. Int J Radiat Res. 2020;18(4):825–833.
  7. 7. Zakaly HMH, Mostafa MYA, Dzholumbetov S, Issa SAM, Tekin HO, Erdemir RU, et al. Comparative study on application of 177Lu-labeled rituximab, tetulomab, cetuximab and huA33 monoclonal antibodies to targeted radionuclide therapy. Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2020 Nov;7(1):15015.
  8. 8. Banerjee SR, Minn IL, Kumar V, Josefsson A, Lisok A, Brummet M, et al. Preclinical evaluation of 203/212Pb-labeled low-molecular-weight compounds for targeted radiopharmaceutical therapy of prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2020;61(1):80–88.
  9. 9. Patel CM, Wadas TJ, Shiozawa Y. Progress in targeted alpha-particle-emitting radiopharmaceuticals as treatments for prostate cancer patients with bone metastases. Molecules. 2021;26(8):2162.
  10. 10. Lin M, Ta RT, Kairemo K, Le DB, Ravizzini GC. Prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted radiopharmaceuticals in diagnosis and therapy of prostate cancer: Current status and future perspectives. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2021;36(3):237–251.
  11. 11. Okarvi SM. Recent developments of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-specific radiopharmaceuticals for precise imaging and therapy of prostate cancer: An overview. Clin Transl Imaging. 2019;7(3):189–208.
  12. 12. Nonnekens J, Chatalic KLS, Molkenboer-Kuenen JDM, Beerens CEMT, Bruchertseifer F, Morgenstern A, et al. 213Bi-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeting agents induce DNA double-strand breaks in prostate cancer xenografts. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2017;32(2):67–73.
  13. 13. Kesavan M, Turner JH, Meyrick D, Yeo S, Cardaci G, Lenzo NP. Salvage radiopeptide therapy of advanced castrate-resistant prostate cancer with Lutetium-177-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen: Efficacy and safety in routine practice. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2018;33(7):274–281.
  14. 14. Sartor O, Sharma D. Radium and other alpha emitters in prostate cancer. Transl Androl Urol. 2018;7(3):436.
  15. 15. Mostafa MYA, Zakaly HMH, Zhukovsky M. Assessment of exposure after injection of 99m Tc-labeled intact monoclonal antibodies and their fragments into humans. Radiol Phys Technol. 2019 Mar;12(1):96–104.
  16. 16. Zakaly HMH, Mostafa MYA, Zhukovsky M. Dosimetry assessment of injected 89Zr-labeled monoclonal antibodies in humans. Radiat Res. 2019 May;191(5):466–474.
  17. 17. Du Y, Carrio I, De Vincentis G, Fanti S, Ilhan H, Mommsen C, et al. Practical recommendations for radium-223 treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:1671–1678.
  18. 18. Mangano AM, Pacilio M, Ialongo P, Semprebene A, Ventroni G, Mango L. Dosimetry-based consideration on remission and relapse after therapy with 223Ra-dichloride in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) with bone metastases. A case report. Diagnostics. 2018;8:18.
  19. 19. Tagawa ST, Vallabhajosula S, Jhanwar Y, Ballman K V, Hackett A, Emmerich L, et al. Phase I dose-escalation study of 225Ac-J591 for progressive metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). American Society of Clinical Oncology; 2018.
  20. 20. Osvaldo G-PF, Salvador M-OS, Zael S-R, Nora S-M. Radium-223 in metastatic hormone-sensitive high-grade prostate cancer: Initial experience. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;7(5):236.
  21. 21. Parker C, Nilsson S, Heinrich D, Helle SI, O’sullivan JM, Fosså SD, et al. Alpha emitter radium-223 and survival in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:213–223.
  22. 22. Nilsson S, Larsen RH, Fosså SD, Balteskard L, Borch KW, Westlin J-E, et al. First clinical experience with α-emitting radium-223 in the treatment of skeletal metastases. Clin cancer Res. 2005;11(12):4451–4459.
  23. 23. Nilsson S, Franzén L, Parker C, Tyrrell C, Blom R, Tennvall J, et al. Bone-targeted radium-223 in symptomatic, hormone-refractory prostate cancer: A randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled phase II study. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8(7):587–594.
  24. 24. Jurcic JG. Targeted alpha-particle therapy for hematologic malignancies. J Med imaging Radiat Sci. 2019;50(4):S53–S57.
  25. 25. Andersson M, Johansson L, Eckerman K, Mattsson S. IDAC-dose 2.1, an internal dosimetry program for diagnostic nuclear medicine based on the ICRP adult reference voxel phantoms. EJNMMI Res. 2017;7:88.
  26. 26. Bolch WE, Jokisch D, Zankl M, Eckerman KF, Fell T, Manger R, et al. ICRP publication 133: The ICRP computational framework for internal dose assessment for reference adults: Specific absorbed fractions. Ann ICRP. 2016;45:5–73.
  27. 27. Protection IC On R. nuclear decay data for dosimetric calculations. ICRP Publ 107, Ann ICRP. 2008;38.

Written By

Akbar Abbasi, Hesham M.H. Zakaly and Fatemeh Mirekhtiary

Submitted: 15 July 2021 Reviewed: 01 August 2021 Published: 15 June 2022